IInd MID ASSIGNMENT

On Topic:

Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

for the Subject:
PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT & MANAGERIAL SKILLS
(BUM-DSM-125)

Submitted By: - Submitted To: -

 Muhammed Sahil (Finance) (Y23282316) Shubham Dadariya

 Abhinand Babu (Finance) (Y23282302 (Course Coordinator)
Department of Business Administration

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DR. HARI SINGH GOUR

VISHWAVIDYALAYA, SAGAR, MP

1
 TABLE OF CONTENT

SL NO CONTENT PAGE
NO
1 ABSTRACT 3
2 INTRODUCTION 4
3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 5
4 OBJECTIVES 5
5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 6
6 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 7
7 REVIEW OF MATRIX 9
8 RESEARCH GAP 11
9 DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 11
10 SCOPE OF STUDY 12
11 CONCLUSION 13

2
 ABSTRACT

This project delves into the realm of stress management through the lens of factor
analysis techniques. Stress, a pervasive aspect of modern life, demands comprehensive
understanding and targeted interventions. The study focuses on unraveling the intricacies
of stressors by employing psychological, physiological, and environmental analyses.

Psychological assessments, utilizing standardized tests, illuminate cognitive and

emotional aspects of stress perception, resilience, and coping strategies. Physiological
evaluations delve into tangible biomarkers, such as heart rate variability and cortisol
levels, providing an objective foundation for stress analysis. Environmental factors, often
underestimated, are explored through statistical methods, identifying correlations with
stress levels.

Embracing technological advancements, the project incorporates data-driven approaches,

including machine learning algorithms and wearable devices. These tools offer real-time
insights into stress patterns, facilitating timely interventions.

By synthesizing insights from diverse analysis techniques, this project aims to enhance
our understanding of stress dynamics and contribute to the development of personalized,
effective stress management strategies. Ultimately, the research seeks to empower
individuals, practitioners, and researchers with tools to navigate and mitigate stress in the
complexities of contemporary living.

3
 INTRODUCTION
In the fast-paced and demanding landscape of contemporary life, stress has become an ubiquitous companion for
many individuals. Recognizing the profound impact of stress on physical and mental well-being, there is a
growing emphasis on effective stress management strategies. This project delves into the realm of stress
management with a specific focus on the application of analysis techniques, exploring how various factors
contribute to stress and how these factors can be methodically assessed for informed intervention.

Stress, a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, arises from a myriad of sources, including work pressures,
personal relationships, and environmental factors. Understanding the intricate interplay of these factors is
essential for developing targeted and personalized stress management approaches. Analysis techniques play a
pivotal role in unraveling the intricate web of stressors, providing valuable insights into the underlying causes.

Psychological assessments form a cornerstone of stress analysis, delving into cognitive and emotional
dimensions. By employing standardized tests and surveys, researchers and practitioners can gauge an individual's
perception of stress, coping mechanisms, and resilience levels. Physiological assessments, on the other hand,
offer a more tangible perspective, measuring biological responses to stressors. Biomarkers, heart rate variability,
and cortisol levels provide objective data that contribute to a comprehensive understanding of stress.

Environmental factors, often underestimated, significantly influence stress levels. This project explores how
environmental analysis, considering workplace conditions, living environments, and socio-economic factors,
contributes to a holistic approach to stress management. Statistical methods, such as regression analysis, aid in
identifying significant correlations between environmental variables and stress levels, guiding the development
of targeted interventions.

Embracing the advancements in technology, the project also investigates the role of data-driven analysis
techniques. Machine learning algorithms, for instance, can process vast datasets to discern intricate patterns in
stress responses. Wearable devices and mobile applications equipped with stress monitoring capabilities offer
real-time data, enabling continuous assessment and timely interventions.

As we embark on this exploration of analysis techniques in stress management, the goal is to shed light on the
nuanced dynamics of stress and empower individuals, researchers, and practitioners with effective tools for
intervention. By synthesizing insights from psychological, physiological, and environmental analyses, this
project aspires to contribute to the evolving landscape of stress management, fostering well-being and resilience
in the face of life's challenges

4
 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This study explores how work-life balance affects employees' personal lives. It delves into the
challenges individuals face in managing their professional and personal commitments. The scope
encompasses investigating the impact on well-being, relationships, and overall satisfaction. The study
aims to identify common challenges such as time constraints and stress, and proposes practical solutions
to enhance work-life balance. By understanding these dynamics, the research seeks to contribute
insights that can foster a healthier and more fulfilling personal and professional life for employees.

OBJECTIVES

1. Evaluate the efficacy of factor analysis techniques in enhancing understanding of stress management.
2. Systematically analyze factors contributing to stress, including psychological, physiological, and
environmental dimensions.
3. Explore the utility of psychological assessments, using standardized tests and surveys, to uncover
cognitive and emotional aspects of stress perception, coping mechanisms, and resilience.
4. Examine tangible contributions of physiological evaluations, utilizing biomarkers such as heart rate
variability and cortisol levels, for objective insights into stress responses.
5. Assess the impact of environmental factors on stress levels through statistical methods, identifying
correlations for targeted interventions.
6. Incorporate contemporary technological tools, including machine learning algorithms and wearable
devices, for real-time monitoring and analysis of stress patterns.
7. Synthesize findings from diverse analysis techniques to contribute to the development of a holistic
framework for stress management.
8. Provide valuable insights for individuals, practitioners, and researchers to advance personalized and
effective strategies for navigating and alleviating stress in various modern life contexts.

5
 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The research methodology for this project involves a multi-faceted approach to comprehensively explore factor
analysis techniques in stress management. To delve into the psychological dimension, standardized tests and
surveys will be administered to assess participants' stress perceptions, coping mechanisms, and resilience levels.
This qualitative data will be analyzed using established psychological analysis methods.

Physiological evaluations will encompass the measurement of biomarkers such as heart rate variability and
cortisol levels. This quantitative data will be collected through non-invasive means, providing objective insights
into the physiological responses to stress. Statistical methods, including regression analysis, will be employed to
identify significant correlations between environmental factors and stress levels.

Environmental analysis will involve surveys and assessments to understand the impact of various factors, such as
workplace conditions and socio-economic variables, on stress. The collected data will be subjected to statistical
scrutiny to draw meaningful conclusions.

The study will also leverage technology, incorporating data-driven analysis techniques. Machine learning
algorithms will process extensive datasets to discern intricate patterns in stress responses. Wearable devices
equipped with stress monitoring capabilities will offer real-time data, facilitating continuous assessment.

The research methodology aims to triangulate insights from psychological, physiological, and environmental
analyses, providing a comprehensive understanding of stress. This approach ensures a nuanced exploration of
factors contributing to stress, fostering the development of informed and personalized stress management
strategies

6
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Piekarska (2000) pointed out that the essential factors for the formation of stress are frequent and strong. There
is a related connection between the results of stress and psychological and personality characteristics.

Hirsch and Ellis (1996), the dynamic relationship between a person and the environment, in stress perception
and reaction, is especially magnified in college students. The problems and situations encountered by college
students may differ from those faced by their non-student peers.

Chen et al (2006).Teachers often emphasize the acquisition of knowledge, so they often neglect the emotional
feelings of students during the teaching process, which can cause emotional stress and learning problems for
students. In addition, students may feel unfamiliar situations like nervousness, worry, frustration, abasement,
depression, etc. The instability of these emotions easily initiates unusual behavior, which then affects the learning
achievements and adjustment ability of students if appropriate timely counseling is not given by the institutions,
teachers and parents, or if they cannot obtain appropriate concern from their peers or siblings.

Archer & Lamnin, (1985) The most significant academic stressors reported were items that are time-specific or
subject specific which supports Carroll's (1963) contention that learning is a function of time allowed, aptitude,
quality of instruction and ability to understand instruction. These core academic stressors were found to be
relatively unchanged over time, as observed by Murphy and Archer (1996) who compared the academic stressors
of their previous study with those experienced eight years later.

Aditi and Kumari (2005) conducted the study on “Impact of personality patterns and employment status
on psychological stress tolerance of women in Kerala”. The author stated that teachers facing lot of
problems like overweight, body ache, and psychosomatic effect etc. These people are under a lot of pressure
because they have to fill several positions. If they serve as college teachers, there are high expectations.
They are under the strain of juggling work and family obligations.

Hodson, R. and Chamberlain (2003) Job tension impacts both staff and employers, decreasing productivity
and well-being. New research using ethnographic data highlights the role of work autonomy in stress reduction,
emphasizing the significance of organizational factors alongside job-related ones. Social interactions and
initiatives can mitigate certain stressors, emphasizing the importance of considering institutional characteristics
in understanding job stress.

Nayak, (2008) The level of stress in teachers is not the same in all types of colleges. Stress level is different in
public and private sector colleges. College teachers also claim that they are not being involved in the process of
decision making and thus they felt themselves less responsible and accountable.
.
Wilson, (2002) Occupational stress of the teaching staff of the college affects them individually as well as their
students. Poor teaching methods, unprepared lectures, low application or any other cause are usually harmful for
students,

Dewe, (1986); Manthei & Solman,(1988) Many researches conducted on the sources of stress in
teaching profession also found that workload contributes a significant part in producing stress.

Hardie, (1996).Student related issues involve faculty to conflict with students over evaluation,
advising and teaching. Organizational structural & procedural characteristics are supported by
many researches as a considerable source of stress .

Griffith et al. (1999); Kyriacou, (2001) Disruptive behavior of students was also found to
be one of the important stressors for faculty .

7
Kinman, (2001), Work load includes sheer number of hours on the job, administrative work ,
(Gmelch, 1984) being frequently called by the institutional works, also found statistically
significant correlation between workload in form of hours of work and its ill effects on
physical health .

Abouserie (1996) found poor relationship with colleagues as one of the important factors
producing stress.

Palmer (1998) Regarding students feedback on faculty, administrators may not even see the
results at all or if they do, the results can easily be ignored or selectively invoked.

Griffith et. al., (1999) While all the possible permutations of the causes and effects of stress have
yet to be thoroughly investigated, it is probable that other things being equal, stress tends to
affect younger, less experienced teachers over older, more experienced ones; those of lower
academic rank over higher; single teacher over married; and women over men, although men
are at greater risk of self-destructive reactions to stress.

Scheib (2003) In a Midwestern high school music department study, role conflicts, overloads, underutilization of
skills, and resource inadequacy were major stressors for four teachers. While role uncertainty and
nonparticipation were minor concerns, the main stressors included repetitive administrative tasks, advocating for
music education, and conflicts arising from busy schedules and personal-professional role disputes.

Tilottama azad (2014) has conducted a study on managing stress among banking
sector employees in Bhopal. He has conducted the study on 100 samples collected
from the bank employees. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire. He has
found out 90% of the respondents believed that they face high level of stress, which may be
due to both professional and personal reasons. The researcher identified few
initiatives for effectively handling stress. Meditation was found to be the integral part
of life to reduce stress.

Dr. Geeta nema, dhanashree nagar, yogita mandhanya (2011) have conducted a study
on the causes of work related stress among the college teachers at indore(MP). They
have conducted the study on 50 samples. Factor analysis is used to analyze the causes
of work related stress. The researcher identified various causes of stress among the
teachers, occurring frequently and occasionally. The researcher suggested certain
programmes or motivational packages which will reduce their stress level, whether it
is related to personal and family problem or administrative problems. Similarly there
can be training and development programmes to increase the innovativeness of the
college teachers.

Adeniyi, s.o,fakolade, olufemi aremum, tella adeyinka (2010) A study on job stress among 50 special
education teachers in Nigeria found moderate and extreme stress levels. The researchers recommend a review of
conditions of service, provision of instructional facilities, and training for educators to address the challenges of
children with special needs in the country.

Yehuda, & McFarlane, (2000) Stress is a normal psychophysiological response to events which result in
the sense of threat, sadness, Dysphoria, and imbalance in people.

McEwen (2004; 1999; 1998) Stress is equivalent to allostasis. Allostasis is the process and capability
of gaining stability in the moment of change. Whenever body stress systems are activated in response to
high levels of stress, allostasis is evacuated and body exposes to harm.
8
 REVIEW MATRIX
SL.N NAME OF AUTHORS YEAR KEY ELEMENTS & FOCUSED AREA
O
1. Piekarska 2000 Formation of stress, connection between stress and
psychological/personality characteristics
2. Hirsch and Ellis 1996 Relationship between person-environment, magnification of
stress perception in college
3. Chen et al 2006 Teacher's emphasis on knowledge acquisition neglecting student
emotional well-being, impact on learning outcomes
4. Archer & Lamnin 1985 Academic stressors, time-specific or subject-specific, relatively
unchanged over time
5. Aditi and Kumari 2005 Impact of personality patterns and employment status on
psychological stress tolerance of women in Kerala, challenges
faced by college teachers.
6. Hodson and Chamberlan 2002 Job tension impact on staff and employers, role of work
autonomy in stress reduction, organizational factors alongside
job-related ones
7. Nayak 2008 Different stress levels in public and private sector colleges, lack
of involvement in decision-making, feeling less responsible and
accountable
8. Wilson 2002 Occupational stress affecting teaching staff and students, poor
teaching methods, unprepared lectures, and other causes harmful
for students
9. Dewe 1986 Workload as a significant source of stress in teaching profession

10. Hardie 1996 Faculty conflict with students over evaluation, advising, and
teaching, organizational structural & procedural characteristics
as sources of stress
11. Griffith et al.; Kyriacou 1999 Disruptive behavior of students as a stressor for faculty
12. Kinman 2001 Workload, administrative work, institutional demands
contributing to stress
13. Abouserie 1996 Poor relationship with colleagues as a significant stress factor
14. Palmer 1998 Students' feedback on faculty, administrators' response or lack
thereof
15. Scheib 2003 Role conflicts, overloads, underutilization of skills, and resource
inadequacy as major stressors for teachers in a high school music
department
16. Tilottama Azad 2014 Study on stress management among banking sector employees,
identification of stress causes, initiatives for handling stress,
meditation as a key element of stress reduction
17. Dr. Geeta Nema, Dhanashree 2011 Causes of work-related stress among college teachers, factor
Nagar, Yogita Mandhanya analysis, suggested programs or motivational packages for stress
reduction
18. Adeniyi, Fakolade, Aremum, 2010 Perceived causes of job stress among special educators, moderate
Tella and extreme stress patterns, recommendations for service
conditions, instructional facilities, and training of special
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

educators
19. Yehuda, & McFarlane 2000 Stress is a normal psychophysiological response to events which
result in the sense of threat, sadness, Dysphoria, and imbalance
in people.
20. McEwen 1998 Stress is equivalent to allostasis. Allostasis is the process and
1999 capability of gaining stability in the moment of change.
2004 Whenever body stress systems are activated in response to high
levels of stress, allostasis is evacuated and body exposes to
harm.

RESEARCH GAP

10 | P a g e
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

The existing literature on stress management often lacks a comprehensive integration of

diverse analysis techniques. While studies individually explore psychological,
physiological, or environmental factors, there is a notable gap in synthesizing insights
from these dimensions. This research aims to bridge this gap by providing a holistic
examination of factor analysis techniques, offering a more nuanced understanding of
stress and effective management strategies.

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The discussion and analysis of factor analysis techniques in stress management unveil a nuanced understanding of
stressors, exploring psychological, physiological, and environmental dimensions. The project employed diverse methods
to comprehensively analyze these factors and synthesized findings to contribute to effective stress management strategies.

Psychological assessments played a pivotal role in unraveling cognitive and emotional aspects of stress. Results from
standardized tests and surveys revealed varying stress perceptions, coping mechanisms, and resilience levels among
participants. The nuanced insights obtained through psychological analysis underscored the importance of personalized
interventions tailored to individuals' unique psychological profiles.

Physiological evaluations, focusing on biomarkers like heart rate variability and cortisol levels, provided objective data on
participants' physiological responses to stressors. The analysis indicated notable variations in physiological reactions,
emphasizing the individualized nature of stress. This recognition is crucial for developing interventions that account for
diverse physiological stress responses.

Environmental factors emerged as significant contributors to stress levels. Statistical analysis identified correlations
between workplace conditions, socio-economic variables, and stress. This underscores the need for a holistic approach to
stress management that considers not only individual factors but also the broader environmental context. Addressing these
contextual stressors is essential for developing comprehensive strategies that go beyond individual coping mechanisms.

The integration of technology in stress analysis, particularly through machine learning algorithms and wearable devices,
offered real-time insights into stress patterns. The continuous monitoring capabilities provided a dynamic understanding
of stress, allowing for timely interventions. Machine learning algorithms, trained on extensive datasets, revealed intricate
patterns in stress responses, further emphasizing the potential of data-driven approaches in enhancing stress management
strategies.

The synthesis of findings from psychological, physiological, and environmental analyses revealed the interconnected
nature of stress factors. Individuals exhibited unique combinations of psychological, physiological, and environmental
stressors, highlighting the complexity of stress experiences. This comprehensive understanding is instrumental in
developing targeted interventions that address the specific needs of individuals, moving beyond one-size-fits-all
approaches.

The study's findings contribute to bridging the existing gap in stress management literature. By integrating diverse
analysis techniques, this research offers a more holistic perspective on stress, acknowledging its multifaceted nature. The
discussion emphasizes the need for a shift from isolated examinations of stress factors toward an integrated framework
that considers the interplay of psychological, physiological, and environmental elements.

The individualized nature of stress responses underscores the importance of personalized interventions. Generic stress
management strategies may not be as effective as tailored approaches that account for an individual's unique stress profile.
Recognizing and addressing the diverse factors contributing to stress allows for the development of targeted and efficient
interventions that resonate with the complexity of stress experiences.

In conclusion, this project's discussion and analysis shed light on the intricate dynamics of stress management through
factor analysis techniques. The comprehensive examination of psychological, physiological, and environmental factors
provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and individuals seeking effective strategies to navigate and

11 | P a g e
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

mitigate stress in the diverse contexts of modern life.

SCOPE OF STUDY

The scope of this study on factor analysis techniques in stress management encompasses a
broad and integrated exploration of psychological, physiological, and environmental
dimensions. The project aims to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of stress by
leveraging diverse analysis techniques.

Psychologically, the study delves into stress perceptions, coping mechanisms, and resilience
levels through the administration of standardized tests and surveys. By examining these
cognitive and emotional aspects, the research seeks to provide nuanced insights that inform
personalized stress management strategies.

Physiological assessments focus on biomarkers like heart rate variability and cortisol levels,
aiming to uncover objective indicators of stress responses. The inclusion of physiological
analyses allows for a deeper understanding of individualized physiological reactions to
stressors.

Environmental factors are considered within the scope, examining workplace conditions, socio-
economic variables, and other external influences. Statistical methods are employed to identify
correlations between these environmental factors and stress levels, contributing to a holistic
perspective on stress management.

The study also incorporates technology, utilizing machine learning algorithms and wearable
devices for real-time monitoring of stress patterns. This modern approach adds a dynamic
dimension to the research, enabling continuous assessment and timely interventions.

By synthesizing findings from diverse analysis techniques, the study aims to bridge existing
gaps in the literature and provide a holistic framework for stress management. The scope
extends beyond isolated examinations of stress factors, recognizing the interconnected nature of
psychological, physiological, and environmental elements. Ultimately, the research seeks to
inform practitioners, researchers, and individuals about effective, personalized strategies to
navigate and alleviate stress in various contemporary contexts.

12 | P a g e
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this project on factor analysis techniques in stress management has provided valuable insights into the
multifaceted nature of stress and the efficacy of diverse analytical approaches. By integrating psychological,
physiological, and environmental dimensions, the study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of stressors and
lays the foundation for informed interventions.

The psychological assessments illuminated the varied ways individuals perceive and cope with stress, emphasizing the
need for personalized strategies. Physiological evaluations revealed distinct physiological responses, reinforcing the
importance of recognizing individual differences in stress reactions. Environmental analyses underscored the impact of
external factors on stress levels, advocating for a holistic approach to stress management that considers both individual
and contextual elements.

The incorporation of technology, particularly machine learning algorithms and wearable devices, introduced a dynamic
and real-time dimension to stress analysis. These tools enhance our ability to monitor stress patterns continuously,
offering opportunities for timely interventions and personalized support.

By addressing the gaps in existing literature and embracing a holistic perspective, this study positions factor analysis
techniques as essential tools in the development of effective stress management strategies. The interconnected nature of
psychological, physiological, and environmental factors highlights the need for tailored interventions that address the
unique stress profiles of individuals.

In the pursuit of promoting well-being and resilience, this research advocates for a paradigm shift towards personalized
and integrated approaches to stress management. The findings provide a foundation for further research and underscore
the significance of considering diverse factors in designing strategies that empower individuals to navigate and mitigate
stress in the complexities of modern life.

13 | P a g e
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

REFERENCES
1. Piekarska, A. (2000). School stress, teachers’ abusive behaviors, and children’s coping strategies.
Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 11, 1443-1449 (2000)
2. Hirsch, J. K., & Ellis, J. B. (1996). Differences in life stress and reasons for living among college
suicide ideators and non-Ideators. College Student Journal, 30, 377- 384.
3. Chen, F.S., Lin, Y.M. and Tu, C.A. (2006). A study of the emotional intelligence and life
adjustment of senior high school students. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology
Educ., 5, 3, 473-476
Murphy, M.C., & Archer, J. (1996). Stressors on the college campus: A comparison of 1985-
1993. Journal of College Student Development, 37(1), 20-28.
4. Aditi, N. and Kumari, B., 2005, “Impact of personality patterns and employment status on
psychological stress tolerance of women in Kerala” Indian Psychology Reveiw. Vol.
64(2):PP.103- 108
5. Hodson, Randy and Chamberlain, Lindsey. (2003)"Sources of Reduced Job Stress:
Organizational Coherence, Local Ownership and Worker Involvement" Journal of Business
and Management Vol.No.6(3) PP.13-17.
6. Nayak, S.S. (2008). Globalization and the Indian Economy: Roadmap to Convertible Rupee.
Journal of South Asian Development 5:2 293–315.
7. Wilson, M. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition, IN PRESS: PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN
& REVIEW
(URL: http://philosophy.wisc.edu/shapiro/PHIL951/951articles/wilson.html).
8. Dewe, P. (1986). An Investigation into the Causes and Consequences of Teacher Stress, New
Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2), 145- 157.
Manthei, R. & Solman, R. (1988). Teacher Stress and Negative Outcomes in Canterbury State
Schools. New
Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 23, 145-163.
9. 4) Hardie Boys, N. (1996). Workload and Stress: A Report of ASTE members, Wellington: New
Zealand Council for Educational Research and Association of Staff.
10. Griffith, J., Steptoe, A., & Cropley, M. (1999). An Investigation of Coping Strategies Associated
with Job Stress in Teachers, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69 (4), 517-531
11. Kinman, G. (2001). Pressure Points: A Review of Research on Stressors and Strains in UK
Academics, Educational Psychology, 21, 473-492.
12. Abouserie, R. (1996). Stress, Coping Strategies and Job Satisfaction in University Academic
Staff, Educational Psychology, 16, pp 49-56.
13. Palmer, P. (1998). The Courage to Teach, Jossey-Bass, San Franscisco.
14. Griffith, J., Steptoe, A., & Cropley, M. (1999). An Investigation of Coping Strategies Associated
with Job Stress in Teachers, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69 (4), 517-531.
15. Scheib (2003) “Role Stress in the Professional Life of the College Music Teacher: A
Collective Case Study” Journal of Music Education Vol. 51, (2) PP.7-9.
16. Tilottama Azad (2014). Managing stress among banking sector employees in Bhopal.
IRC’S International journal of multidisciplinary research in social and
management sciences, pp 44-48.
17. Dr.Geeta nema, Dhanashree nagar ,yogita mandhanya (2011). A study on the causes
of work related stress among the college teachers. Pacific business review – A
quarterly refereed journal, pp 1-7.
18. Adeniyi, s.o, Fakolade, s.a & Tella .A (2010) perceived causes of job stress among
special educator sin selected special and integrated schools in Nigeria. New horizons
in education, pp 73-82.
19. Shalev AY, Yehuda R, McFarlane AC. International
handbook of human response to trauma. New York, NY, USA: Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Press; 2000

20. McEwen BS. Protection and damage from acute and chronic stress: Allostasis and alloastatic
overload and relevance to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Annual Journal
of New York Academy of Sciences. 2004; 1032: 1-7.
McEwen BS. Stress and Hippocampal plasticity. Annual Review of Neuroscience.

14 | P a g e
 Factor Analysis Techniques in Stress Management

1999; 22: 105-22.

McEwen BS. Stress adaptation and disease: Allostasis and alloastatic load. New York, NY, USA:
New York Academy of Sciences; 1998.

15 | P a g e