Custody Notes
Custody Notes
Procedure under section 7 of the C(G&C) Act Marriage with father of child ended because of the adultery of
the mother. Child remained with mother and was happy with her
By fixed date claim form in the Supreme court and summons in and doing well in school. There was medical evidence that the
the RM Court. child’s health would suffer if she was separated from the mother.
WHO IS TO HAVE CUSTODY? Held- the welfare of the child, both moral and physical was the
paramount considerations. Custody should remain with the
C(G&C) Act 7.-(1) The Court may make such order as it may mother.
think fit regarding the custody of such child and the right of
access thereto of either parent, having regard to the welfare of Conduct may be weighed against a party, not because of
the child, and to the conduct of the parents, and to the wishes as punishment to the party but the effects it would have on the
well of the mother as of the father. child’s disposition.
Section 18 of the Act makes the welfare of the child the Dennis Forsythe v Idealin Jones
paramount consideration.
Child(Brian) was living with his mother, her fiance and his two
Clarke v Carey sisters in a modest two bedroom home and he was happy and in
good health. His father a lawyer who willfully smokes ganja in
The admitted father of two illegitimate children was granted breach of the law albeit for religious purposes and with more
custody on appeal. The Children were living with their father money and a larger house applied for custody. Custody was not
and his wife in a good house with their own room and were granted to the father as the best interest of the child was satisfied
happy and doing well in school. The mother after returning from by the child remaining with the mother. Lindley, LJ said:
the US applied for custody. She had no job and no stable place
to accommodate the children. ‘The dominant matter for the consideration of the Court
is the welfare of the child. But the welfare of a child is
Held- The future of the children if allowed to live with their
not to be measured by money only nor by physical
mother would be uncertain. The best interest of the children
comfort only. The word welfare must be taken in its
required that they remain in the custody of their father.
widest sense. The moral and religious welfare of the
Re S (A Minor) (Custody) - [1991] FCR 155 child must be considered as well as its physical
wellbeing. Nor can the ties of affection be disregarded.’
JOINT CUSTODY considered the agreement between the parties but refused to be
bound by its terms in determining the welfare of the child.
Joint custody orders are not made unless parents are able to
communicate and cooperate with each other, if not, it can be
very difficult. Generally, the court awards custody to the person
who is going to have the day to day care of the child.
Caffell v Caffell
Joint custody of the child was granted with care and control to
the mother. It was noted that this form of order should only have
been made where it was clear that the parties were likely to co-
operate. However, it was also correct in this case because it
recognised the husband’s concern for his children.
ACCESS
Where the Court gives custody to one party it will usually allow
the other party reasonable access to the child. This is the basic
right of every parent and should not be refused, except in
unusual circumstances where for example, access will lead to
emotional and psychological disturbance. Generally, the welfare
of the child demands that access should be continued.
AGREEMENTS