Emerging Risks in Construction
Emerging Risks in Construction
EMERGING RISKS
IN CONSTRUCTION
EXPERT PERSPECTIVES ON THE
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
CONTENTS
ff PERSPECTIVES ON INNOVATION #2
Internal Threats: Five Ways Employees and Business Partners Put Intellectual 21
Property (IP) and Data at Risk
ff ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 24
ff ECONOMIC IMPACTS 38
The articles contained in this publication examine some of these crucial issues and aim to
provide critical insight into the risks and opportunities facing construction companies as they
navigate through the profound transformation that is under way.
These articles first appeared on BRINK – the digital news service of Marsh & McLennan
Companies’ Global Risk Center, managed by Atlantic Media Strategies. BRINK gathers timely
perspectives from experts on risk and resilience around the world to inform business and
policy decisions on critical challenges.
I hope you find Emerging Risks In Construction: Expert Perspectives on the Construction
Industry informative and valuable.
Yours sincerely,
JON MARSH
International Chairman
Global Construction Practice
Marsh • 1
PERSPECTIVES
ON INNOVATIO
ON
Perspectives on Innovation
DISRUPTIVE
TECHNOLOGY
BRINGS RISK AND
OPPORTUNITY TO
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
AUTHOR: ADRIAN PELLEN, INFRASTRUCTURE SEGMENT LEADER,
US AND CANADA, CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE AT MARSH
Marsh • 5
Perspectives on Innovation
Social disruption: If innovation does Cybersecurity: Because infrastructure Thankfully, there is a bustling market
eventually displace large numbers of now needs to be able to integrate with emerging in the risk management
construction crews, drivers, or other and connect to technology, such as and insurance industry to address
workers, it’s possible there could be smart buildings, autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity. In addition to consulting
considerable social unrest in some parts and transit systems, cybersecurity risks services developed to assess and
of the world. According to executives become more of a threat than in the manage cybersecurity exposures,
participating in a recent World Economic past. The interconnectedness of our insurers have developed products to
Forum event,4 it will be critical for infrastructure through the Internet of transfer the risks that infrastructure
industry to plan ahead by investing in Things (IoT) will face cybersecurity risks. stakeholders face, as well as support
education and training for workers whose Infrastructure may increasingly become a risk mitigation by establishing incident
jobs could be made redundant due to target for sophisticated organized crime response plans. These products, which
technological advancement. looking to extract sensitive information. are triggered by cybersecurity breaches
Firms with proprietary software, systems, whether motivated by financial crime
Financial viability: As technology and infrastructure may become targets of or terrorism, can cover expenses
advances, will the infrastructure we corporate and political espionage. related to extortion, property damage,
design and build today be useful in 20 or financial loss related to a data and
to 30 years? How quickly will it become Hackers have long probed for privacy breach or network outage.
obsolete? What if we have flying cars? weaknesses in critical infrastructure.
That may sound harebrained at face value, The ability for cyber events to affect One recent estimate from the
but compare the world we live in today infrastructure has grown, as seen in Global Infrastructure Hub, a G20
to what people thought was possible just two recent global attacks involving initiative, says there is a need for
20 or 30 years ago. Once we integrate malware—WannaCry and Petya/ US$94 trillion in infrastructure
technology into physical infrastructure, GoldenEye. Infrastructure from hospitals investments by the year 2040.6
it can quickly become outdated. to marine ports suffered financial losses
and damage due to those events. At the same time, it’s clear that rapid
This is particularly important in technological advancement is changing
the context of privately financed Perhaps the most frightening risk the way we design, build, operate,
infrastructure, where the private sector from an infrastructure perspective and use infrastructure. Innovation in
takes on the life-cycle management is that of cyberterrorists seeking to infrastructure will enable growth and
of infrastructure. Obsolescence is of invoke fear. In the age of digitization promote economic, environmental, and
particularly heightened risk to private and IoT, there are legitimate concerns social vitality.
concession companies who have that cyberterrorists could gain access
assumed revenue risk (for example, to flood control gates, traffic lighting But advancement comes with risks—
tolling) based on financial models that systems, public transit systems, or even including social disruption, obsolescence,
were unable to incorporate disruption the doomsday scenario of shutting and cybersecurity threats. These risks
in infrastructure utilization. The firms the electric grid down completely. can be mitigated by forward-thinking city
exposed to the financial risk related to Cybersecurity continues to be one of planning, investment, and integration of
infrastructure obsolescence could be the global risks of highest concern.5 education into our workplace, as well as
builders, engineering firms, and/or equity an increase in cyber-oriented defenses.
firms and financiers developing and Today’s new technologies almost always
maintaining infrastructure. increase connectivity, including in the THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED
ways we build, operate, and maintain ON BRINK.
infrastructure. Companies involved in
infrastructure can no longer afford to
think of cyber risk as an afterthought,
but need to adopt strong cyber-risk
management practices from day one.
Marsh • 7
Perspectives on Innovation
What will cities look like by the year DATA AND THE MEGACITIES
2050? Will they be like those in OF THE FUTURE
South Korea, centered on a digitally Neighboring cities are coalescing in their shared
connected retrofit of existing infrastructure and mutual impact of their economies.
Power lines, roads, transit, water systems, and safety
society?1 Will they parallel the shiny
don’t stop at city limits,7 and municipalities are facing
new cities of Dubai or Singapore? transformation at unprecedented rates. As a result,
Or could they possibly move there’s a lot of debate about who decides the way
forward and what that looks like.
underground or under the oceans?2
Today, innovative cities, such as Curitiba, Brazil,3 are The challenge for cities around
rethinking entire mass-transportation strategies while
debating visions of autonomous cars and drones.4 The the world is: How do they grow?
most basic infrastructure needs have always been about
how people want to live and move around. How do they perform and
It’s also about how things move around. FedEx sees transform simultaneously?
e-commerce increasing by 26% from 2016 to US$2.4
trillion worldwide by 2018,5 which adds pressure
to upgrade roads, highways, and port/airport When it comes to designing infrastructure, one
infrastructure for vehicle use—autonomous thing is for sure: Big data collected through the
or otherwise. IoT will play a key role in growing the megacities of
2050. “Big Data is all the information around us that
Add to this mix myriad technology disruptions, such as is being collected in various streams,” says Steph
sensors, big data, and the Internet of Things (IoT), which Stoppenhagen, smart cities business development
can help adjacent cities work together like cogs in a director for Black & Veatch. “If you use a metrocard
bigger machine. to get on a subway, then the system knows when you
entered, where you went, and the route you took. How
is this helpful? By recognizing if the subway service
But why is that important? Planners have been
worked. Was it successful? If so, you will do it again
considering urbanization pressures, often in areas
and again. That is one example of using data to watch
with little room to increase building or infrastructure
people’s movements—creating smarter mobility.”
capacity.6 One alternative is analyzing collected data
to determine how to densify corridors of population
between neighboring cities, with mass transit creating Not all data easily translates into useful or actionable
megaregions that could easily become home to information, though. To address the changing urban
millions more. landscape, information itself should be seen as a form of
infrastructure—one that can be used for better planning
to connect cities within a bigger system.8
The challenge for cities around the world is:
How do they grow? How do they perform and
transform simultaneously?
Marsh • 9
Perspectives on Innovation
But smart investment and policy decisions are crucial Technology lets people see with both eyes open—
to planning, and moving to long-term investment gaining perspective and depth—rather than with
(versus grant funding) is key. To achieve that, cities one eye closed, which gives perspective but no
must connect: depth. The depth comes from information streaming
through technology: Information-rich models
•• Projects: Developments that build toward the can help stretch infrastructure investment dollars
unified city vision12 and meet broader economic throughout the design and construction phases.
objectives, such as accessibility, jobs, affordable
housing, and healthy environments.
Going forward, using 2D designs in an ever-changing
•• Teams: Collaborative efforts functioning across all 3D world won’t work. Using 3D BIM processes will be
levels of government to unlock public and private a critical skill set to build the right infrastructure for a
infrastructure investment, leveraging big data to megacities-of-the-future vision.
track the performance of infrastructure.
Marsh • 11
Perspectives on Innovation
CONSTRUCTION
MACHINES IN THE
DIGITAL AGE
AUTHOR: ROMED KELP
PARTNER AT OLIVER WYMAN, AND DAVID KAUFMANN, PARTNER AT OLIVER WYMAN
Marsh • 13
Perspectives on Innovation
COORDINATION
• Fleet performance
optimization.
• Construction scheduling.
• Real-time coordination.
Marsh • 15
Disruptive Technology
THE RISING
IMPORTANCE OF THE
“SECONDARY CITY”
AUTHOR: DARRYLE ULAMA,
RESEARCH ANALYST FOR HYPERLOOP ONE
Marsh • 17
Perspectives on Innovation
Marsh • 19
Disruptive Technology
But it is also true that the guy whose office is just down
the hall past the soda machine may be as great a threat
Many companies lack appropriate
as a remote criminal. Insiders—company employees as
well as contractors and business partners—can present a
limits on employees’ access to
significant risk for misappropriation of sensitive information
and intellectual property. Whether they are operating out
confidential, sensitive information.
of malice or ignorance, their actions can be disastrous for
company profits, reputation, and future business plans.
Mobility: In today’s globalized economy, professionals in
many industries have unprecedented opportunities to move
KEY FACTORS FUELING between companies and work in different countries. In an
INSIDER RISK increasingly common narrative, employees with access to
trade secrets walk out the door with reams of downloaded
Access: Many companies lack appropriate limits on documents that they aim to provide to competing
employees’ access to confidential, sensitive information— companies or foreign governments. The greatest risk comes
items including customer lists and contact information, from employees who are disgruntled, leaving amid layoffs
intellectual property, and private information about or similar upheaval, or returning to their native country.
customers, employees, and business partners. In a recent Typical of these cases is one recently reported by South
report by the independent Ponemon Institute,1 71% of “end Korea’s Yonhap News Agency.2 A court in Seoul indicted
users” (employees on the system) said they have access to a man identified only as Kim, a high-level automotive
company data they should not be able to see, and 54% of engineer, for passing classified documents from his former
them said that the access was frequent or very frequent. employer to competing carmakers in China. The documents
The vast majority of IT professionals surveyed said that he transferred contained details of safety and performance
their organizations don’t have a “need-to-know” policy of testing technology that the South Korean company had
managing access, or don’t strictly enforce it. developed. There are many similar cases in a wide array
of industries.
Marsh • 21
Perspectives on Innovation
Risky digital behavior: In the Ponemon survey, only Accountability gap: Many companies do a
47% of information technology practitioners surveyed poor job of conveying their expectations around
believed that employees in their companies take confidentiality and security to employees and
data protection seriously. That belief is supported by supply chain partners. Monitoring to see whether
the response to another question by the non-IT set: appropriate procedures are being followed is even
76% of those surveyed said they saw no problem weaker. In some sense, it’s no wonder employees
with loading confidential documents onto their are not vigilant about protecting intellectual
unsecured personal computers, smart phones, and property and preventing cyber breaches.
the public cloud. By doing so, they may unwittingly
open the door to cyber theft. Another common way Insider advantage: A combination of the
that internal and supply chain employees may create above factors and first-hand knowledge of a
holes in security is by loading their own software company’s information system, and a failure
onto work computers. If that software is pirated, it to monitor insider behavior lead to some
may contain malicious code designed to search their of the most damaging data breaches.
systems for valuable data.
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
VERY HIGH HIGH MODERATE LOW NONE
Marsh • 23
ENVIRONMENT
IMPACTS
TAL
New Demands
SPENDING MORE
TO MAKE
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUSTAINABLE
AUTHOR: AMAL-LEE AMIN, CHIEF OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY DIVISION AT THE INTER-
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK, AND JANE AMBACHTSHEER, PARTNER, MERCER INVESTMENTS AND
MEMBER OF THE FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
“We’ll always have Paris.” On The Global Commission on the Economy and
Climate estimates that the world is expected to
the same day that the Paris invest roughly US$90 trillion in infrastructure over
Agreement went into force, the next 15 years,2 a major boost from current
delegates attending a warm-up levels. Most countries have chronic infrastructure
deficits. In the case of Latin America and the
event in Casablanca, Morocco, Caribbean, the Inter-American Development Bank
before last year’s UN climate estimates that up to 5% of the region’s GDP, or
talks in Marrakesh, might roughly US$250 billion per year, will be required
to meet future demand for infrastructure.3
have uttered that iconic line
from the film Casablanca.
The world is expected to invest
Yet, despite the location and timing being a perfect US$90 trillion in infrastructure
match, the Casablanca reference is off-key. As the
film depicts, the protagonists may have found love over the next 15 years, far above
in Paris, but their predicament dictated they must
separate. In the case of the Paris Agreement—and its current levels.
alignment with the finance necessary to implement
it—this is not the end, but the start of what could be a
In part, this deficit reflects existing barriers facing
beautiful friendship.
private sector financing of sustainable infrastructure.
These include a failure on the part of governments
The Paris Agreement has the objective of making to develop transparent pipelines, which has led to
finance flows consistent with a pathway toward a poor estimation of infrastructure needs. Investors
low emission and climate-resilient development. may also be deterred by high development and
As countries look to boost growth while transactions costs.
implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
and their Paris commitments, shifting finance
Fortunately, a large number of initiatives focused on
flows to sustainable infrastructure is critical.1
closing the infrastructure funding gap are emerging.
Marsh • 27
Environmental Impacts
The initiatives generally fall into three categories. The Paris Agreement is lauded as helping to
One set are “influencers,” which focus on thought provide a long-term signal to investors to allocate
leadership and attempts to affect policy change. capital that is consistent with low-carbon and
There are also “mobilizers,” which work to develop resilient development. This signal can only
“bankable” projects or convene investors to facilitate illuminate the path forward; these initiatives must
capital flows. Lastly, “tool providers” attempt to achieve far greater coherence and coordination
enable integrated environmental or social analysis between them to ensure that they and the
of infrastructure projects into the investment and Paris Agreement are mutually reinforcing.
monitoring process.
FOUR STEPS
To achieve this, we propose the following steps.
First, industry initiatives need to clarify the principles
Industry initiatives need to clarify
and develop shared definitions for sustainable
infrastructure investment. This can provide greater
the principles and develop shared
certainty and urgency across the industry and
create a more compelling alternative to traditional
definitions for sustainable
infrastructure such as coal-fired power stations,
while also enabling comparability for investors.
infrastructure investment.
Second, those infrastructure initiatives that
do not consider sustainable infrastructure
should change tack and commit to sustainable
infrastructure principles through a review
of their mission and objectives.
Marsh • 29
30 • Emerging Risks In Shipping
Environmental Impacts
DRAMATIC DROP IN
GLOBAL COAL PLANT
CONSTRUCTION
AUTHOR: BRINK EDITORIAL STAFF
Trump’s efforts might be too little, too late, as the On the global coal front, from January 2016 to January
fate of the coal industry has been in steady decline 2017, there was a 48% drop in planned coal plants and a
for decades. Even Robert Murray, head of the largest 62% drop in construction starts, the report said.
private US coal operation, Murray Energy, told Trump
earlier this year he should “temper his expectations” The global slowdown in coal plant construction
on the promise to bring back coal jobs.3 Coal’s fate in is highlighted in the report as keeping global
the US was seemingly sealed last year when natural gas warming under the two-degree Celsius target
exceeded coal-fired power for the first time on an annual set at the Paris Climate Summit. The slowdown
basis, owing to “mainly a market-driven response to appears “to have brought global climate goals
lower natural gas prices,” according to the US Energy within feasible reach, raising the prospect that the
Information Administration.4 Overall, the US energy worst levels of climate change might be avoided”
profile is in transition and the impact of the recent policy the report said. “More progress is needed and
decision on the country’s energy performance and the margin for error is tight, but the results of the
energy security will play out over time. Currently, the past year provide good reason for optimism.”
US ranks fourth overall in terms of energy security in the
global rankings on the Energy Trilemma Index.5
Note: Includes coal-fired generating units 30 megawatt (MW) and larger. According to Platts WEPP database there are
about 27,060 MW of units smaller than 30 MW.
The global coal slowdown began in 2013. "[T]he dramatic shrinkage in the coal power pipeline … shows that power
capacity trends are moving into alignment with declining power generation and that climate goals are indeed within
reach without massive asset stranding,” the report said.
Marsh • 31
Environmental Impacts
CHINA AND INDIA LEAD THE WAY An end to the coal plant
Policy action in China was the main contributor
to the shrinking coal plant pipeline, owing to construction boom brings the
“the imposition of unprecedented and far-
reaching restrictive measures by China’s central possibility of a global phase-out of
government,” the report said. Coal consumption
in China declined by 4.7% last year, according coal over the coming decades.
to the National Bureau of Statistics.6
China’s move away from coal has been replaced From 2006 through 2016, China and India
with a push for renewable energy sources, accounted for 86% of all coal power built. “An
including solar and wind, as much as a way to end to the coal plant construction boom brings
combat debilitating air pollution in its urban areas the possibility of a global phase-out of coal
as to combat the effects of climate change. over the coming decades, a prerequisite to
reining in climate change,” the report said.
In tandem with the moves by China, India is
also experiencing a slowdown in coal plant Retirement of older coal plants also factors into
development, the report noted, “driven the climate goals equation. Coal plant retirements
primarily by the reluctance of banks and have steadily grown over the past 10 years, the
other financiers to provide further funds.” report said. For any phase-out plan for coal plants
to be effective, the report said it’s crucial that
India is in the midst of its own campaign on construction currently on hold in China and India
renewables; the Government plans to install remain that way, coal power implementation rates
215 gigawatts of renewable power by 2027. worldwide continue to decline, and Organisation
“The combination of excessive coal power for Economic Co-operation and Development
capacity and declining cost of renewables has (OECD) countries “move aggressively” to install
caused many financial backers of coal projects clean energy sources in place of aging coal plants.
to withdraw support,” the report said.
THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED ON BRINK.
India could phase out coal power completely by
2050 if the cost of renewables continues to fall at
its current rate,7 which would put it significantly
ahead of its Paris Agreement climate commitments.
Marsh • 33
34 • Emerging Risks In Shipping
Environmental Impacts
Record electric generation from Renewables lead over nuclear in the energy generation
race will likely be short-lived, as official EIA projections
wind, solar, and hydroelectric estimate that “monthly nuclear electricity generation
power in March and April combined will surpass renewables again during the summer
to exceed that provided by nuclear months of 2017 and that nuclear will generate more
electricity than renewables for all of 2017.” 2
sources in the US for the first time
in 32 years, according to the Energy In addition, nuclear power is a critical component of
Information Administration (EIA).1 a low-carbon infrastructure in the fight against rising
temperatures and climate change. “[N]uclear power
is a low-carbon technology, with overall emissions
The record was the result of a rain-soaked of the same magnitude as wind or hydro electricity,”
winter environment across much of the West the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Coast that has wiped out the region’s prolonged Development (OECD) said in a report on nuclear’s
drought and “contributed to the overall rise in global place in the low-carbon equation to fight
renewable energy generation this spring, while climate change.3 While acknowledging there are a
nuclear generation in April was at its lowest host of hurdles in front of nuclear power—from societal
monthly level since April 2014,” the EIA said. acceptance to financing to public policy—“in most
cases, constraining the evolution of an energy system
However, this may not signal a long-term decrease in by limiting carbon levels in the most cost-effective
nuclear power generation. The results, the EIA said, way leads to a high share of nuclear energy,” the OECD
reflect “both seasonal and trend growth in renewable report said.
generation, as well as maintenance and refueling
schedules for nuclear plants, which tend to undergo
maintenance during spring and fall months, when Renewables lead over nuclear in
overall electricity demand is lower than in summer
or winter.” the energy generation race will
likely be short-lived.
Marsh • 35
Environmental Impacts
FIGURE 1: Monthly Electricity Generation from Selected Fuels (Jan 2012-Apr 2017)
Source: EIA
80
70
NUCLEAR
SOLAR
60
50
WIND
% 40
BIOMASS
30 GEOTHERMAL
20
HYDRO
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Marsh • 37
Economic Impacts
ECONOMIC
IMPACTS
Marsh • 39
Insurance Impacts
PREPARING BANKABLE
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
AUTHOR: FIDA RANA, SENIOR CONSULTANT, WORLD BANK AND PRINCIPAL POLICY ADVISOR AT
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
The issue of bankability of infrastructure projects has long been the topic
of discussion by the development and investor community, and is one of
the key problems of the global infrastructure gap.
Under German presidency, the B20 has submitted 20 Infrastructure projects entail risks, in various forms
recommendations to G20 leaders under the theme and shapes: preparation, bidding, construction,
“Building Resilience—Improving Sustainability— and development phases. Commercial lenders,
Assuming Responsibility.”1 Recommendation 14 is like other risk capital providers, are concerned
on boosting infrastructure finance and reads, “G20 about the risk profiles of the project and as such
members should boost infrastructure finance by the riskiness of their investment decisions. Unless
developing and promoting bankable and investment- this group of investors, who typically provide up
ready infrastructure project pipelines and by to 80% of a project’s financing needs, is satisfied
enhancing the role of Multilateral Development Banks with the risk profile of the project, they will not
as catalysts for private sector investment.” invest. Alternatively, they would ask for various
risk mitigations or credit enhancements that
The B20 task force on infrastructure confirms that would only raise the total cost of the projects.
“the investment gap in infrastructure is not the result
of a shortage of capital. Real long-term interest rates
are low, there is ample supply of long-term finance,
The investment gap in
interest by the private sector is high, and the benefits
are obvious.” However, a number of factors hold back
infrastructure is not the result
investment in terms of financing and funding. “The
main challenge is to find bankable and investment-
of a shortage of capital.
ready projects.”2
The fate of the bankability of an infrastructure project
Unfortunately, there seems to be a lack of is set at a much earlier phase of project life—at the
understanding of what factors constitute—and more project development stage.
importantly, which parties contribute the most to—
making infrastructure projects bankable. Somewhat When the concerned ministry (or responsible agency)
misleading, perhaps by the semantics of the term starts preparing a project to roll out into the market
“bank,” the issue of bankability tends to be associated with an aim to attract private capital, it has to, among
with bankers. The argument, “Just let the bankers many other aspects, decide on the key risk-sharing
discuss and deal with the bankability aspect of the protocol of the project. Which risks will be shared by
project,” is a misconception at best. whom during different phases of the project, such as
pre-construction, construction, and operation?
It is important to note that commercial bankers and
other commercial infrastructure debt providers do
not make a project bankable. Rather, their task is to
assess the bankability of an infrastructure project
and, if found acceptable, provide the risk capital in
the form of debt financing. If not, they will move on in
search of other projects.
Marsh • 41
Economic Impacts
Designing an optimal
risk-sharing protocol at •• Project Preparation Facility (PPF): PPFs are used
•• Market Sounding: Through market sounding •• What are the other key credit considerations such
exercises, important feedback from the lender as collateral, off-taker credit quality, supplier credit
community can feed into the project preparation quality, etc.?
phase and shape the risk allocation matrix in a
market-acceptable manner. The lending market •• What could be the approximate maximum facility
and the appetite of lenders can vary over time, and tenor for a project of this nature?
due to a host of factors. These include legal and
•• What kinds of risks should the Government cover
regulatory matters, global interest rate regime,
for this project?
capital market conditions, etc. As such, taking
lenders’ feedback on board can be very useful to •• What kind of minimum government support or
make the project bankable. other credit enhancements are needed for the
There are specialized organizations that can conduct bank to fund this project?
market sounding through their network of banks that
are active in funding infrastructure public-private An infrastructure project that has risk-
partnership (PPP) projects. A typical market-sounding sharing protocol based on broad-level early
questionnaire would ask a bank questions such as: feedback from the lending community will
likely be able to raise the required funding
•• Does the bank have an appetite to lend to
with less complication than without it.
the particular country? Can the bank lend on
an uncovered basis or does it need an
insurance cover? THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED ON BRINK.
Marsh • 43
Insurance Impacts
SOUTHEAST 5.7
ASIA 2,753 388 1,347
CENTRAL 492
555 7.8
ASIA 73
THE 42
46 9.1
PACIFIC 4
The new estimates from the ADB are more than double the US$750 billion it estimated in 2009.* The inclusion of
climate-related factors has contributed majorly toward the increase. The forecast for continued rapid economic
growth, however, is a more important reason.
* The inclusion of all 45 ADB member countries in developing Asia, compared to 32 in the 2009 report, and the use of 2015
prices versus 2008 prices, also explain the increase.
Marsh • 45
Economic Impacts
VARYING REQUIREMENTS
Of the various subregions, East Asia is expected to
account for 61% of all climate-related investments
between now and 2030. As a percentage of GDP,
however, investments need to be highest in the
Pacific region (9.1%), followed by South Asia (8.8%).
3.1%
8.7% (802)
(2,279)
31.9% 56.3%
(8,353) (14,731)
account for 61% of all climate- with adequate data, comprising 96% of the region’s
population), but the infrastructure investment gap
related investments between stands at 2.4% of projected GDP for 2016-2020 when
climate-related adjustments are accounted for.
now and 2030. In fact, when China is excluded, the gap rises to
5% of GDP. According to ADB, strong fiscal reforms
could lead to the generation of additional revenues
equivalent to 2% of GDP, bridging about 40% of the
funding gap. Even if that happens, the private sector
will still need to cover the remaining 60% shortfall,
and to do so, it will need to increase its annual
investments in infrastructure from US$63 billion
today to US$250 billion over 2016-2020.
Figure 3: Meeting the Investment Gaps: Selected ADB Developing Member Countries, *2016-2020
(annual averages, US$bn 2015 prices)
Source: ADB(2016a); Country sources; Investment and Capital Stock Dataset, 1960-2015, IMF; Private Participation in Infrastructure
Database, World Bank; World Bank (2015a and 2015b); World Development Indicators, World Bank; ADB estimates
INVESTMENTS
400 $141 400
(2.3%) (3.0%)
Marsh • 47
Insurance Impacts
ROAD TO ECONOMIC
GROWTH PAVED
WITH EFFICIENT
INFRASTRUCTURE
INVESTMENT
AUTHOR: TREVOR D’OLIER-LEES, SENIOR DIRECTOR, INFRASTRUCTURE PRACTICE
AT S&P GLOBAL RATINGS SERVICES, AND MAR BELTRAN, SENIOR DIRECTOR,
INFRASTRUCTURE PRACTICE AT S&P GLOBAL RATINGS SERVICES
Marsh • 49
Economic Impacts
56,007 DEFICIENT US$90 BILLION US$62 BILLION BACKLOG US$160 BILLION LOST
structurally deficient bridges needed for public transit construction projects by US sitting in traffic each year
Army Corps of Engineers
240,000 BROKEN 900 BILLION DISCHARGED US$25 MILLION WASTED US$232 OVERPAID
water main breaks gallons of untreated sewage by antiquated power per household annually for
transmission and delayed goods
distribution per year
$ $ $
US$7 TRILLION US$3.9 TRILLION US$3,400 PER YEAR 2.5 MILLION
lost in business sales lost in gross domestic lost by households fewer jobs in US
product
81% FUNDED 73% FUNDED 59% FUNDED 46% FUNDED 30% FUNDED
US$757 billion funded US$155 billion funded US$22 billion funded US$941 billion funded US$45 billion funded
US$177 billion US$42 billion US$15 billion US$1.1 trillion US$105 billion
unfunded unfunded unfunded unfunded unfunded
infrastructure projects using their with more countries posting stronger growth
numbers, the spread between the fast- and slow-
own balance sheets without growing economies in the eurozone is set to narrow
in the coming months. Governments’ ability to fund
compromising long-term fiscal infrastructure projects using their own balance sheets
without compromising long-term fiscal sustainability
sustainability is set to increase. is set to increase. To help, in late 2014 the European
Union launched the European Fund for Strategic
Investment. This is the main execution vehicle of
the Investment Plan for Europe.3 The European
Parliament is in final negotiations to increase its
capacity from an initial €21 billion to €33.5 billion.
Marsh • 51
Economic Impacts
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RAIL AND MASS TRANSIT AIRPORTS/PORTS ROADS AND BRIDGES
RATED EXAMPLES
Ancora (RCH) Pty Ltd. Line Transit Partners LLC Arctic Infrastructure Limited Elizabeth River Crossings
(Hospital Australia). (Light rail transit, US). Partnership (Airport, Opco LLC (Bridge and
Canada). tunnel, US).
InspirED Education (South High Speed 1 PLC Lima Airport Partners SRL ITR Concession Company
Lanarkshire) PLC (School, (Rail, UK) (Airport, Peru). LLC (Toll Road, US).
UK)
Properties LTAP LP (Civic Reliance Rail Finance Pty. ACI Airport Sudamerica 95 Express Lanes LLC
building, Canada). (Rail, Australia). S.A./Cerealsur S.A. (Aiport, (Managed lance, US).
Uruguay).
Terminales Portuarios
Euroandinos Paita SA (Port,
Peru).
Investors, of course, need economies of scale A second risk to factor in is poor project preparation.
for cost-efficient financing of construction and We have observed that, ideally, it is best practice for
operations to attract capital to smaller assets. We’ve potential projects to be carefully evaluated, planned,
seen separate ventures “bundled” into one larger and designed. Before committing capital, investors
infrastructure entity—whether through acquisitions rely on favorable conditions and transparent insights
of smaller utility systems by larger companies, the into creditworthiness. Continued growth of the
securitization of municipal assets, or the bundling offshore wind sector, for example, relies on projects
of loans in state revolving funds. In North America, being able to overcome engineering, technological,
courthouse, highway, school, and bridge assets have geographical, and regulatory limitations.
been bundled in this way. In Spain last year, we saw
the Vela Energy project company issue €404.4 million
worth of bonds to refinance the construction debt for Efficient infrastructure markets
a bundle of 42 solar parks nationwide.6
generally depend on
A sector that could especially benefit from bundling
is North America’s water system.7 The American governments outlining both clear
Water Works Association estimates the cost of
modernizing the continent’s pipe and sewer facilities infrastructure needs and a long-
at US$1 trillion over the next 20 years. Of the 52,000
community water systems in the US, more than half term pipeline of projects.
are characterized as “small” by the Environmental
Protection Agency and may struggle to find the funds
on their own. Projects can face a multitude of risks: unproven
technology or design, operational underperformance,
exposure to adverse demand or commodity
RISKS AND CHALLENGES price movements in the markets, financially
insecure counterparties, or unfavorable regulatory
Infrastructure development is not without its risks. environments. In the absence of appropriate
First, infrastructure investment cannot risk being mitigants, all these risks could invite the chance of
fiscally unsustainable. Governments must develop default. At S&P Global Ratings, we’ve noted that in
assets at the lowest possible costs of capital (not over two decades of rating project finance debt about
just in the short term, but also across the long 6.5% of projects default, with market risk having been
term, throughout the useful life of the asset), with the most common reason, followed by technical risk.
funds allocated to those projects with the highest At the same time, the median recovery rate has been
ratio of benefits to costs. Otherwise, higher levels around 89%.9
of spending may simply lead to larger budget
deficits. This is a particular concern for developing
On a broader scale, meanwhile, efficient
economies where, if the tax base is limited or tax
infrastructure markets generally depend on
enforcement is weak, even those public investments
governments outlining both clear infrastructure
that could significantly boost economic growth
needs and a long-term pipeline of projects. Just look
may not reduce budgetary pressures. Yet the most
at Spain, where the fragmentation of responsibilities
advanced economies may still have little fiscal room
for infrastructure planning across different levels of
for maneuver if—like the UK, for instance—they are
government has, in some cases, resulted in resources
already constrained by high debt-to-GDP ratios.
being invested in unfinished or unused projects, such
as the construction or upgrade of barely used airports
We have observed that a way that governments at Castellón, Ciudad Real, Huesca, and Lleida before
generally transfer the payment obligation is to the financial crisis.10
follow the principle that users pay for infrastructure
services whenever feasible. Colombia, for example—
Developing the world’s infrastructure presents as
where inadequate transportation infrastructure
many challenges as opportunities. With the risks
has impeded economic performance—is currently
identified, managed, and appropriately mitigated, the
relying on concessionaires to develop and operate
public and private sectors could collaborate to reap
7,000 kilometers of new toll roads.8 Regional and
the benefits of efficient investment.
international institutional investors have provided
financing based on their view that projected traffic
volumes will underpin revenues. THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED ON BRINK.
Marsh • 53
Insurance Impacts
COMMERCIAL
INSURANCE RATES
CONTINUE DECLINE IN
LIGHT OF GLOBAL
MARKET FORCES
AUTHOR: CLAUDE D. YODER, HEAD OF GLOBAL ANALYTICS AT MARSH
Q2 12
Q3 12
Q4 12
Q1 13
Q2 13
Q3 13
Q4 13
Q1 14
Q2 14
Q3 14
Q4 14
Q1 15
Q2 15
Q3 15
Q4 15
Q1 16
Q2 16
Q3 16
Q4 16
Q1 17
Q2 17
The Marsh Global Insurance Market Index captures a rolling four-quarter view of rate movement, providing a
quarter-to-quarter look at changes in the marketplace. The rate change captures year-over-year rate movement,
measured quarterly.
Marsh • 55
Economic Impacts
1.4% 1.4%
1.2% 1.2%
0.3%
-0.4%
-0.7%
-1.0%
-1.6%
-2.3% -2.2%
-2.7% -2.8%
-3.2% -3.1%
-3.6%
-3.8%
-4.2% -4.2%
-4.4%
-4.8%
-5.0%
Q1 12
Q2 12
Q3 12
Q4 12
Q1 13
Q2 13
Q3 13
Q4 13
Q1 14
Q2 14
Q3 14
Q4 14
Q1 15
Q2 15
Q3 15
Q4 15
Q1 16
Q2 16
Q3 16
Q4 16
Q1 17
Q2 17
AVERAGE CASUALTY INSURANCE RATES DECLINE
Insurance rates in the second quarter declined globally, on In the UK, composite insurance rate decreases in the second
average, across all major product lines— property, casualty, quarter of 2017 remained, on average, greater than the global
and financial and professional coverages. The global casualty rate of decline. The average rate of decline for the UK was 4.2%
composite index was the one area in which the rate of pricing in the second quarter, compared to 4.8% in the prior quarter.
decline was higher in the second quarter compared to the first, Renewal rates declined in the UK across all major product lines,
driven by the US market. although the average rate of decline moderated in casualty from
4.2% to 1.7%.
The change in US casualty lines was largely due to an increase in
the average rate of decline in workers’ compensation pricing and Also in the second quarter:
a smaller, continuing increase in average auto liability pricing.
General liability renewal rates also declined in the second quarter, •• In Latin America, average casualty insurance rates
after posting slight increases in the previous quarter. increased for the fourth consecutive quarter.
-0.6%
-1.7%
-1.9%
-2.6%
-2.8% -2.8%
-3.0%
-3.6%
-4.2%
Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17
At the same time, rate improvement continues in the sectors that were most affected by cyber events in recent
years. As cybersecurity investments from these firms take effect and the claims environment improves, the
general unwinding of historic cyber insurance rate increases is reducing overall market rate change, on average.
We will watch closely in the coming months to see what, if any, impact recent high-profile events—including the
WannaCry and Petya/GoldenEye malware attacks—have on the cyber insurance markets.
20.0%
19.1% 18.7%
16.9%
12.8%
US CYBER LIABILITY
12.0%
6.8% 6.9%
5.4% 4.8% 5.2%
4.1%
3.3%
1.4%
0.1% 0.4% 0.2%
-0.3% -0.8%
-1.7% -1.5%
-2.4%
Q1 12
Q2 12
Q3 12
Q4 12
Q1 13
Q2 13
Q3 13
Q4 13
Q1 14
Q2 14
Q3 14
Q4 14
Q1 15
Q2 15
Q3 15
Q4 15
Q1 16
Q2 16
Q3 16
Q4 16
Q1 17
Q2 17
Marsh • 57
Insurance Impacts
DECONSTRUCTING A
DIFFERENT KIND OF
“NUCLEAR SPILL”
AUTHOR: MARK POLLARD, GLOBAL PRACTICE LEADER NUCLEAR AND RENEWABLE ENERGY AT MARSH
where regulators and civil society The job is simple to define, but devilish to execute:
opinion allow no slack, can find Model the expected decommissioning costs
application in many energy and annualized over the decades necessary to complete
the process, understand the volatilities in the model,
industrial contexts. and then match a funding plan to optimize the
investment returns while retaining enough flexibility
Planners of new nuclear projects are obsessed in the cash-out period to allow for the volatilities.
with detail. Investors, equipment manufacturers,
plant operators, and regulators alike leave nothing The world is full of infrastructure where the future
to chance. Nuclear safety and ensuring returns decommissioning is unfunded or underfunded.
on investment drive the rigor; every aspect of the Power stations, oil rigs, mines, and even solar farms
planning, construction, operation, and ultimately will need to be removed sooner or later, and future
dismantling is defined, configured, integrated, and costs on balance sheets will embarrass managers
stress tested beyond doubt. and disgruntle shareholders. In some cases, the costs
won’t be met, and the infrastructure will rot and rust
Construction period and cost overruns, for which until the taxpayer steps in.
new nuclear projects are well-known, have usually
been due to inadequate definition of design and
construction methodologies or the application of yet Construction period and cost
more layers of regulatory attention.
overruns, for which new nuclear
projects are well-known, have
usually been due to inadequate
definition of design and
construction methodologies or the
application of yet more layers of
regulatory attention.
Marsh • 59
Economic Impacts
WASHINGTON MAINE
NORTH MINNESOTA
MONTANA DAKOTA VERMIONT
NEW
HAMPSHIRE
NEW MASS.
OREGON WISCONSIN YORK
SOUTH MICHIGAN CT RI
IDAHO DAKOTA
WYOMING NJ
PENNSYLVANIA
IOWA MARY-
NEBRASKA OHIO LAND DE
NEVADA INDIANA WEST
ILLINOIS VIRGINIA
UTAH VIRGINIA
COLORADO
KANSAS MISSOURI
KENTUCKY
CALIFORNIA NORTH
CAROLINA
TENNESEE
SOUTH
OKLAHOMA ARKANSAS CAROLINA
ARIZONA NEW
MEXICO ALABAMA GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
TEXAS LOUISIANA
FLORIDA
Gulf of Mexico
Marsh • 61
Marsh’s Construction and Real Estate Practice
ABOUT MARSH’S
PRACTICE
S CONSTRUCTION
Marsh • 63
Marsh’s Construction and Real Estate Practice
ABOUT MARSH’S
CONSTRUCTION
PRACTICE
This report has been produced by Marsh’s Global Construction Practice,
which is at the forefront of brokering insurance and advising the
construction industry on risk and insurance issues.
Our team helps you assess risks and opportunities and •• Our ability to manage contractual risk allocation.
uncover ways to use working capital more efficiently.
We measure your firm’s appetite for risk, recommend •• A targeted placement strategy which uses
solutions that meet your needs, and take your program to the strength of Marsh’s global account and,
market knowing the best insurers for the best structure for international projects, considers the most
and pricing. competitive underwriters, irrespective of their
geographical location.
Our strengths include:
THE RESULT
•• The depth of our resources, experience,
and expertize. Marsh’s Global Construction Practice is an
international team operating across geographical
•• Our network of offices working closely with boundaries, which offers you opportunities
regional specialists. and solutions to meet your needs.
TORONTO
LONDON
NEW YORK
HONG KONG
DUBAI
Marsh • 65
Marsh’s Construction Practice
INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACTORS
AND CIVIL Some construction companies procure contract
works insurance policies on a case-by-case ad-hoc
ENGINEERING basis when required to do so as a contractual
obligation or requirement.
Experience has shown that the negative time
and cost impact of major risks, such as varying
While this may be an appropriate and necessary
geological conditions and exposure to natural
approach for very large projects, for heavy civil
hazards, can be particularly severe in the
works (such as tunneling and wet works), and
infrastructure sector.
projects in specific natural catastrophe zones, there
is an effective and advantageous alternative to
These risks create a wide range of exposures
insure a contractor’s portfolio.
linked to areas of design, construction, interfacing,
and sequencing which must be continually
Marsh works with many national and multinational
evaluated and managed by the project team. Risk
contractors to design and arrange annual or multi-
management strategy must be tailored to minimize
year insurance facilities that automatically include
the impact of specific risks on the project works,
all projects within pre-agreed parameters and limits,
existing infrastructure, construction equipment,
without the need to arrange single project policies
and third parties, in particular.
on a case-by-case basis.
Marsh • 67
Marsh’s Global Marine Practice
CONTACTS
For more information on any of the topics discussed, please
contact a colleague below or your local Marsh office.
IAN W BROWN
+852 2301 7322 US NATIONAL
[email protected] CONSTRUCTION LEADERS
DAVID MARINO
UK REGIONAL LEADER +1 212 345 6639
[email protected]
PHIL LAZELL
+44 (0)207 178 4230 ADRIAN PELLEN
[email protected] +1 312 627 6146
[email protected]
CONTINENTAL EUROPE
REGIONAL LEADER TECHNICAL SPECIALIST
NICK HOLMES MICHAEL SPENCER
+44 (0)7711 083261 +44 (0)207 357 5219
[email protected] [email protected]
Marsh • 69
FOOTNOTES
PERSPECTIVES ON INNOVATION 4. Enderle, Rob. “Airbus Enters Human Carrying Drone
Race: But Where Are Ford and GM?”, available at
http://www.techzone360.com/topics/techzone/
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY BRINGS RISK articles/2017/01/16/428813-airbus-enters-human-carrying-
AND OPPORTUNITY TO INFRASTRUCTURE drone-race-but-where.htm, accessed 1 November 2017.
PROJECTS
5. Niquette, Mark. “FedEx Pushes for Infrastructure Fix as Trump
1. World Economic Forum. Shaping the Future of Construction: Eyes Investment,” Bloomberg, available at https://www.
A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology, available at http:// bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/fedex-pushes-for-
www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_ infrastructure-fix-as-trump-weighs-investment, accessed
Construction_full_report__.pdf, accessed 1 November 2017. 1 November 2017.
2. Redpoint Positioning. “Redpoint Positioning Showcases 6. Moore, James A. “What the Future of Cities Can Learn From
Wearable Safety Alert System for Industrial Construction Sites,” Ancient Cities,” available at https://www.autodesk.com/
available at https://www.redpointpositioning.com/redpoint- redshift/the-future-of-cities/, accessed 1 November 2017.
positioning-news-wearable-safety-alert-system-for-industrial-
construction-sites/, accessed 1 November 2017. 7. Meko, Tim. “Six maps that show the anatomy of America’s vast
infrastructure,” Washington Post, available at https://www.
3. Balfour Beatty. Innovation 2050 - A Digital Future for the washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/maps-of-american-
Infrastructure Industry, available at https://www.balfourbeatty. infrastrucure/?tid=ss_tw, accessed 1 November 2017.
com/2050, accessed 1 November 2017.
8. National Geographic. “Four Million Commutes Reveal New U.S.
4. Gilchrist, Karen. “Technological development will cause tension ‘Megaregions’,” available at http://news.nationalgeographic.
- and it’s a good thing, say ‘Summer Davos’ execs,” CNBC, com/2016/11/us-commutes-reveal-new-economic-
available at https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/29/technology- megaregions-map/#/01megaregions.jpg, accessed
tension-summer-davos-exec.html, accessed 1 November 2017. 1 November 2017.
5. World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Interconnections 9. Pianin, Eric. “How Big Cities Mine Big Data to Solve Big
Map 2017, available at http://reports.weforum.org/global- Problems,” The Fiscal Times, available at http://www.
risks-2017/global-risks-landscape-2017/#risks, accessed thefiscaltimes.com/2015/02/05/How-Big-Cities-Mine-Big-
1 November 2017. Data-Solve-Big-Problems, accessed 1 November 2017.
6. GI Hub. “Forecasting infrastructure investment needs and 10. Trieu, Rosa. “What Is the Future of Smart Cities?”, available at
gaps,” available at https://outlook.gihub.org/, accessed https://www.autodesk.com/redshift/smart-cities/, accessed
1 November 2017. 1 November 2017.
Marsh • 71
DRAMATIC DROP IN GLOBAL COAL PLANT IN US, RENEWABLE ENERGY SURPASSES
CONSTRUCTION NUCLEAR GENERATION…FOR NOW
1. The White House Office of the Press Secretary. “Presidential 1. U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Monthly renewable
Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and electricity generation surpasses nuclear for the first time since
Economic Growth,” available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ 1984,” available at https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
the-press-office/2017/03/28/presidential-executive-order- detail.php?id=31932, accessed 1 November 2017.
promoting-energy-independence-and-economi-1, accessed
1 November 2017. 2. U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Short-term Energy
Outlook,” available at https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/
2. Shearer, Christine; Ghio, Nicole; Myllyvirta, Lauri; Yu, Aiqun; report/electricity.cfm, accessed 1 November 2017.
Nace, Ted. Boom and Bust 2017: Tracking the Global Coal
Plant Pipeline, available at http://endcoal.org/wp-content/ 3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
uploads/2017/03/BoomBust2017-English-Final.pdf, accessed The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future,
1 November 2017. available at https://www.oecd-nea.org/nsd/reports/2012/
nea6887-role-nuclear-low-carbon.pdf, accessed
3. Rushe, Dominic. “Top US coal boss Robert Murray: Trump 1 November 2017.
‘can’t bring mining jobs back’,” The Guardian, available at
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/27/ 4. U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Record precipitation,
us-coal-industry-clean-power-plan-donald-trump, accessed snowpack in California expected to increase hydro generation
1 November 2017. in 2017,” available at https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
detail.php?id=30452, accessed 1 November 2017.
4. BRINK Editorial Staff. “NatGas Trumps Coal in U.S. Power
Usage,” available at http://www.brinknews.com/natgas- 5. U.S. Energy Information Administration. “U.S. electric
trumps-coal-in-u-s-power-usage/, accessed 1 November 2017. generating capacity increase in 2016 was largest net change
since 2011,” available at https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
5. World Energy Council. Energy Trilemma Index, available at detail.php?id=30112, accessed 1 November 2017.
https://trilemma.worldenergy.org/, accessed
1 November 2017. 6. U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Three Mile Island is
the latest nuclear power plant to announce retirement plans,”
6. Watt, Louise. “China’s coal consumption falls for 3rd available at https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.
year in a row,” available at https://apnews.com/ php?id=31612, accessed 1 November 2017.
a55827924d944698ae0cbb28af5aeb4e/chinas-coal-
consumption-falls-3rd-year-row, accessed 1 November 2017.
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
7. UN Climate Action. “India could eliminate the use of coal by
2050,” available at http://www.climateactionprogramme.org/
PREPARING BANKABLE INFRASTRUCTURE
news/india_could_eliminate_the_use_of_coal_by_2050,
accessed 1 November 2017. PROJECTS
1. Global Business Coalition. “B20 Germany hands over its policy
recommendations to the G20 Presidency,” available at http://
www.globalbusinesscoalition.org/global-governance-news/
b20-germany-hands-key-policy-recommendations-g20-
presidency/, accessed 1 November 2017.
Marsh • 73
ABOUT MARSH
Marsh is a global leader in insurance broking and innovative risk management solutions.
In more than 130 countries, our experts help clients to anticipate, quantify, and more
fully understand the range of risks they face. In today’s increasingly uncertain global
business environment, Marsh helps clients to thrive and survive.
We work with clients of all sizes to define, design, and deliver innovative solutions
to better quantify and manage risk. To every client interaction we bring a powerful
combination of deep intellectual capital, industry-specific expertise, global experience,
and collaboration. We offer risk management, risk consulting, insurance broking,
alternative risk financing, and insurance programme management services.
Since 1871 clients have relied on Marsh for trusted advice, to represent their interests
in the marketplace, make sense of an increasingly complex world, and help turn risks
into new opportunities for growth. Our more than 30,000 colleagues work on behalf
of our clients, who are enterprises of all sizes in every industry, and include businesses,
government entities, multinational organizations, and individuals around the world.
We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE: MMC),
the leading global professional services firm in the areas of risk, strategy
and people. With 60,000 colleagues worldwide and annual revenue
exceeding $13 billion, Marsh & McLennan Companies also include
global leaders Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.
WE SERVE CLIENTS
IN MORE THAN
130
COUNTRIES
500 MARSH
OFFICES
WORLDWIDE GLOBALLY
30,000
EMPLOYEES
ABOUT BRINK
All of these articles appeared on BRINK – the digital news service of Marsh & McLennan
Companies’ Global Risk Center, managed by Atlantic Media Strategies. BRINK gathers
timely perspectives from experts on risk and resilience around the world to inform
business and policy decisions on critical challenges.
Marsh • 75
The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable
and should be understood to be general risk management and insurance
information only. The information is not intended to be taken as advice with
respect to any individual situation and cannot be relied upon as such.
In the United Kingdom, Marsh Ltd is authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority.
Copyright © 2017 Marsh Ltd All rights reserved
GRAPHICS NO. 17-0617