Paper 37
Paper 37
267
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015: Social and Economic Models for Development Track
equitable wages and salaries, good physical working indiscipline are dimensions of human behavior.
environment and longevity of employment relationship, Disciplined behavior is the sine qua non for individuals,
anchored on ethical standards and human resource best organizations and national survival and development.
practices, [4] . Discipline and indiscipline, just and unjust, right and
Any behaviour contrary to the expectations of these wrong, can be directly associated with ethics.
actors would rather hinder the trajectory of production However, work ethics as noted by Cascio, is the
processes and the development of the organizations. accepted standards in terms of personal and social
Since national development is dependent on what the welfare of employee, their work attitudes, self-discipline
labour can generate by way of Gross Domestic Products and commitment to their assignments [ 16] . Velasquaez
(GDP), a substantial attention must be paid to the observes that work ethics is the principle of conduct
agreement legally, socially and economically entered into governing an individual or a group in the work place,
by all the stakeholders for the parties to enjoy the which makes them conform to the ethical standards thus
expected efficiency, equity and development, which are influencing organizational output level and the resultant
the main objectives of employment relationship and the profitability level [38] .
overall impact on the organizational productivity. The work attitudes, integrity, self-discipline,
teamwork, emphasis on quality, commitment and
Statement of Problem productivity of the Nigerian workers have painted a
The desperation of the productive enterprise to rather negative picture of an apathetic, uncommitted men
achieve corporate goals and workers ' desire for equity and women, who are unresponsive to motivational
have naturally affected etiquette, integrity, self discipline techniques. The Nigerian workers have been described as
and by extension the level of performance and indolent, apathetic and unresponsive to motivation and
productivity within the framework of employment generally, not willing to put forth maximum productive
relationship [5] . efforts [35] . Whichever way we look at it, the Nigerian
Hitherto, Nigerian workers were ranked among the workers are what we have, hence we must encourage
best in world, given a conducive work situation. Today, them to make meaningful contribution to the
the rating has developed far below average as Nigerian development of the nation by becoming more productive.
workers only care about what he can benefit from
employment relationship. Ultimately, this study is to see III. TEAMWORK AND ORGANISATIONAL
standards and favourable situations in the work system PRODUCTIVITY
acting as a catalyst to increasing performance of Every organization, large or small, private or public
employees, in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and real enterprise, struggle to acquire productivity so as to
output. achieve success and maintain a valuable image in this
Admittedly, globalization and its concomitants pose a present days of stiff organizational competitions. Though
potent challenge to organized labour, hence necessitates the population of workers in an organization may be
the adoption of a proactive strategy in the continuous large and organizational productivity also low with no
interface with employers, management and government improvement in their products, yet this could be as a
and onerous pursuit of the development agenda in result of absence of teamwork in the organization.
Nigeria. Gone were the days of irresponsible trade Absence of teamwork in the organization is the failure of
unionism. This is another cogent reason for the research. an organization to coordinate works into work groups so
as to tap from the respective human resources the
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE organization possesses [19] . Teamwork is the
The Oxford Advanced Leamer' s Dictionary defines cooperative and coordinated efforts on the part of a group
ethics as "the science which deals with morals" Ethics is of persons who work together as a team. It is the
the systematic study of the fundamental principle of the willingness of people to work together to achieve a
moral law; or as normative science ofhuman conduct [7] . common goal. A team exists when individual strengths
This implies that ethics is basically a normative science, and skills are combined with teamwork in the pursuit of a
as distinct from the descriptive or empirical sciences. common cause in order to produce meaningful results for
Moral principles that form the subject matter of ethics are the team members and the organization [4] . Thus, a team
about the way people ought to behave in terms of the combines individual strength with a shared commitment
commitment to their work and their team, integrity and to performance.
being self-disciplined. It follows that ethics, primarily is There is a saying that many hands make light work.
the critical investigation of the norms of conduct to The reason not far-fetched , in that more can be achieved
which human actions ought to conform. According to as a collective than individual. For instance, with
[27], the term ethics refers to the fundamental principles teamwork, creativity is achieved. Because we have
of right and wrong; it is the behavior that is consistent different skills, knowledge and personal attributes, by
with those principles. Conceptually, discipline and utilizing these different aspects in a team, more ideas can
268
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015: Social and Economic Models for Development Track
be generated and more creative solutions brought on productivity if the employee morale is enhanced. A
board thereby leading to better results and thus improve committed employee is perceived to be loyal and stays
on the organizational results/ productivity. with the organization even in turbulent times, attends to
Not only that, even the best qualified individual work regularly, protects organisation's assets and as well
cannot have all of the skills to do everything. While some shares its goals [14]; [18] . Therefore employee
persons excel at coming up with the ideas, some others commitment is an important factor for sustained
have to be counted on when it comes to implementing productivity. Hence the following proposition in null
and follow through of a plan [3] . The bottom line is that form that; H3 : Employee commitment is not likely to have
when a team works together, it has a wide range of skills a significant relationship with organizational
available to deliver extra-ordinary results. Thus, in the productivity.
light of this, we come up with the proposition in null
form that; H 1 : Teamwork is not likely to influence VI. WORK ATTITUDE AND
organizational productivity. PRODUCTIVITY
Each individual worker has a different level of
IV. INTEGRITY AND PRODUCTIVITY attitude to work and this attitude is assessed by the
The goal of any organization is to have employees involvement of employees in performing the assigned
behave in a manner consistent with the company' s responsibilities. According to [21], attitude as an
mission and goals i.e aligning absolutely with the core acceptable and unacceptable evaluation of particular
values, adhering to a code of ethics and matching actions person, people, objects, events happenings or ideas.
with beliefs across a variety of situations [31]. Attitude paves way for behavioral action which
Meanwhile, integrity play a fundamental role in ultimately influences productivity. The relationship
employee pattern of alignment, sound moral, ethical between work attitude and productivity has been largely
principles and organization productivity [15]; [36]. studied and various factors are responsible for this
Moreover, absenteeism, unwarranted breaks, stealing of relationship. Some studies [6], [21], [35] argued that
organization property, converting office equipment for employees work attitude tends to be favourable when
personal use, gossiping etc. are characteristics of organizations facilitate industrial harmony, affection,
unethical conducts and are liable to affect organization recognition, friendliness, freedom that are crucial for
productivity [26]; [32]; [34] . However, the organization enhancing organizational productivity [29]. However,
level of productivity is directly proportional to employee where these are ignored, intention leave, sabotage,
level of commitment and satisfaction, thus, the absenteeism, labour turnover, low morale and
commitment and satisfaction becomes immaterial if it productivity becomes a common phenomenon. Also
does not infused with integrity [10]; [11]. Integrating argued that unfavourable work attitude could come as a
values of integrity into the day-to-day operation of an result of poor relationship with a leaders/manager, lack
organisation will promote employees ethical behaviour, of recognition and flextime, inequality, inconsistent
prevent damaging lapses while tapping into human promotion and payment of salary, lack of training,
instincts for moral though/action and as well enhanced development and career opportunities [1 ]; [28] increased
sustained productivity [11]. industrial hazard, inadequate employment protection can
Therefore, we propose the null hypothesis that; H2 : be the push factor behind an individual's attitudes
Integrity will not in any way contribute to organizational towards organizational productivity [35]. It becomes
productivity. imperative to note that an individual that is not satisfied
with the pay, working environment, ethical values,
culture, company policy and processes may exhibit some
V. EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT AND attitudes that could be detrimental to organizational
PRODUCTIVITY productivity. When productivity is adversely affected,
Most organizations have realized that the employees' then achievement of corporate objective suffers which
commitment is fundamental in determining organisation will eventually make profit maximization unattainable. It
productivity [39]; [13] . Meanwhile, employee is pertinent to note that the notion of an employee
commitment is an extent to which employee feels towards his/her job will certainly influence his/her
attached, loyal and dedicated to the organisation goals attitude. However, favourable and unfavourable cultural
and objectives [9]; [39]; [30]. However, employee and ethical values should be a formal and informal laid
commitment can benefit organization in a number of down policies, procedures and standards which are
ways which include but not limited to reducing established to guide the conduct, attitude and behaviour
absenteeism, promoting employee active engagement, of employees in the workplace [20] . Therefore, the
reducing intention to quite thereby resulting in sustained success of every organization is a dependent factor on
productivity [12] . Besides, Rajendran and Raduan (2005) employees ' attitude towards increasing productivity of
opined that employee commitment tends to aid higher the organization. Therefore, we have the following
269
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015 : Social and Economic Models for Development Track
270
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015 : Social and Economic Models for Development Track
Middle Staff 67 60.4 60.4 93.7 work attitude, commitment, team work and discipline.
Junior Staff 7 6.3 6.3 100.0
Below 5 years
Strong relationships that exist between these variables is
Service 43 38.7 38.7 38.7
Years: 5- 10 years 54 48.6 48.6 87.4 a vital predictor of organisational productivity. The
I Oyears & above 14 12.6 12.6 100.0 regression coefficient value between commitment and
Source: Survey,2014 productivity is 0.16, being the highest. While the
As obtained in Table 1, the valid sample for the study coefficient value between both work attitude and
shows that sixty five (65) males and forty six (46) productivity; team work and productivity is .13.
females representing 58.6% and 41.4% respectively. The
sample indicates that one hundred and one (101)
respondents are above twenty one (21) years but not
more than fifty (50) years, while below twenty one (21)
years and above fifty (50) years are four (4) and six (6)
respondents respectively. Evidently, a significant
percentage (61.3%) of the respondents were married with
29.7% unmarried. About 48.6% have worked for five
years and above with 38.7% below five (5) years.
There are different measures of model fit measure of
how well a model accurately represents reality. There are
many different measures among which include; the
significance level of the study chi-square value, Normed
Fit Index (NFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Root
Mean Square Error of Approximation). The rule of Fig. 2. Standardized Parameter Estimates of the Model
Source: Survey, 2014
thumb for these parameters varies; for NFI and CFI, the
benchmark value should either equal or greater than .90
[41]. In structural equation modeling, chi -square value is X. DISCUSSION AND MANAGERIAL
expected not to be significant and different standards are IMPLICATIONS
considered to be appropriate model fit using this Results obtained from the study showed that integrity
measure, the value ranges between 2 and 5. However, as and discipline have negative impact on the improved
for the chi-square value (CMIN/DF = 4.234) obtained productivity level of organization, which could be
from the study it could be considered to have good model attributed to the nature of these virtues being abstract and
fit. The NFI and CFI values obtained are depicted in could only be seen or observed over time. In other words,
Table 2, these values are .872 and .873 , respectively,
both hypothesized statements regarding these variables
while .9 and above are considered to have acceptable or
should be accepted - (a) integrity will not contribute to
good fit.
organisational productivity; this is contrary to the
TABLE 2· MODEL FIT SUMMARY
existing literature that was argued by Bergman (2006)
Model
N c D p CMI
that infusion of integrity into daily operations of
PAR MIN F N/DF
Default 2 8.
organisations tend to enhance employees ethical behavior
2 4.234 which may enhance productivity; (b) there is no
model 5 468 014
Saturate 2 .0 significant positive correlation between self-discipline
0
d model 7 00 and organisational productivity. Similarly, this
Indepen I 6 I
4.396
hypothesized statement is also contrary to the view of
dencemodel 2 5.942 5 000 [ 17] who argued that for organisations to flourish and
N I T survive, stimulation of self-discipline at work is essential.
R
FI FI LI
Model
Delta
FI
Delta rho
CFI Further, others hypotheses should be rejected having
rhol obtained that these variables (work attitude, commitment,
1 2 2
Default .8 .0 .8 and team work) are strong predictors of organisational
.873
model 72 37 99 048 productivity, which are supported by literature. [39]; and
Saturate I. I.
1.000
[13] argued that employees' commitment is a
d model 000 000 determining factor of organization productivity. [ 19]
Indepen .0 .0 .0 argued that lack of teamwork could lead to failure in
.000
dencemodel 00 00 00 000
organisations. Work attitude has also been found to be
Source: Survey,2014 vital in organisation productivity.
Depicted in Figure 2 are the standardized parameter
estimates of the model. Generally, close relationship
exists amongst the observed variables viz-a-viz integrity,
271
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015: Social and Economic Models for Development Track
XI. CONCLUSION AND [5] Adeyeye, J.O. Aina, S. & Ige, A. (2012). Globalisation and
RECOMMENDATIONS the Transitional Economy: Impacts and Effect on Africa
Regional Growth. European. Journal of Globalisation and
The urge to attain and maintain high level of Development Research, Vol. 9(1), pgs176-185.
productivity is a "sine qua non" for the establishment of
commercial and business ventures. Ethical consideration [6] Aluko, M.A. 0. (2007). Factors that motivate the Nigerian
workers.Jfe Social Review, (10)5 , 55.
in labour management relationship is a concomitant for
organizational development. For high productivity, it is [7] Aniele, D. (2004). Business Ethics and Corruption. Lagos.
important that all stakeholders observe ethical conducts Tope Ogun Priners.
in their dealings with one another. This must be openly [8] Arvey, R. D., & Jones, A. P. (2005). The use of discipline
displayed through positive attitudes, committed in organizational settings: A framework for future
teamwork, high integrity and self-discipline. research. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.),
Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 7, pp. 367-408.
Although a few scholars in labour relations feel Greenwich, CT: JAI.
differently, many including these researchers, observed [9] Akintayo D. I. (2010). Work-Family Role Conflict and
that, when pursued sincerely, the aforementioned Organizational Commitment among Industrial Workers in
variables could serve as indicators of organizational Nigeria. Journal of Psychology and Counselling, Vol.
development. This implies that concerted efforts must be 2(1 ), 1-8.
made to ensure and observe etiquette and ethical [10] Arnold, D. N. (2009) Integrity Under Attack: The State of
conducts within work centres for the expected goals of Scholarly Publishing. News Journal of the Society for
the complex organization to be attained. Absence of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 42(1 0), 1-3
etiquette in work places has created in the Nigerian [11] Bergman, M., (2006) "The Relationship between Affective
worker the attitude, which may hinder productivity. The and Normative Commitment: Review and Research
exploitative nature of the productive enterprise, Agenda," Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 645-
particularly those of local and foreign origins, is a major 663.
concern to this study. [12] Bhatti, K. K , Nawab, S. & Akbar, A. (2011) Effect of
Direct Participation on Organizational Commitment.
It is a known fact that the surplus labour is extremely International Journal of Business and Social Science , Vol.
appropriated by the capitalists leaving labour with very 2(9), 15-23
little, even after having been made to work with their [13] Biljana, D. , (2004) Employee Commitment in Times of
"blood". On the part of the Nigerian worker, for ethical Radical Organisational Changes. Economics and
conducts to have been properly observed, there is the Organisation , Vol. 2(2), 111-117.
need to align wage demands and increase in productivity [14] Camilleri E. (2002) Some Antecedents of Organizational
and performance. A stable pattern of rising productivity Commitment: Results from an Information Systems Public
will naturally improve and sustain wages and favourable Sector Organization. Bank of Valletta Review, No. 25 , 1-
conditions of employment relationship in Nigeria, [22]. 29.
[15] Cleary, M, Walter, G, Horsfall, J & Jackson, D. (2013)
Promoting integrity in the workplace: A priority for all
REFERENCES academic health professionals. Contemporary Nurse , Vol.
[1] Abiodun, A.J; Osibanjo, A.O; Adeniji, A.A. & Iyere- 45(2)264-291.
okojie, E. (2014). Modelling the Relationship between Job
[16] Cascio, W. F. (2013). Managing Human Resource,
Demands, Work Attitudes and Performance Among
Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits. New York. Me
Nurses in a Transition Economy. International Journal of
Grand-Hill International Edition Inc.
Healthcare Management, Vol. 7(4), Pps 257-264.
[17] Fowers, B. J. (2008). From Continence to Virtue:
[2] Adeniji, A.A. (2012). The Role of Human Resource
Recovering Goodness, Character Unity, and Character
Development Practitioners in Solving Ethical Concerns in Types for Positive Psychology. Theory &
Mentoring. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. Psychology, 18, (5). pp. 629-653.
6(3), pps.721-726. ISSN: 1993-8233.
[18] Habib A. , Khursheed A. & Idrees A. S. (2010).
[3] Adeniji, A. A. & Osibanjo, A. 0. (2012). Human Resource Relationship between Job Satisfaction, Job Performance
Management: Theory and Practice. Lagos. Pumark Attitude towards Work and Organizational Commitment.
Nigeria Limited. European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 18(2), 257-267.
[4] Adeyeye, J. 0. (2010). Human Resource Practices: [19] Ige, K, Adeyeye, J. 0. & Aina, S. (2011). The Impacts of
Panacea for Tackeing. The Multiplicity of Challenges Policy and Strategic Management on Microeconomic
posed by Economic Meltdown in the Globalised Economy. Indicators in Corporate Governance. European Journal of
African Journal of Information Technology and Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 6(1), pgs. 207- 215.
Educational Media, Vol. 2(2), pgs. 92-97.
272
International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI) 2015 : Social and Economic Models for Development Track
[20] Kate, W. & Masako, T. (2002) "Reframing organizational [32] Qiu, T. & Peschek, B. S. (2013). The Effect of
commitment within a contemporary careers framework" , Interpersonal Counterproductive Workplace Behaviors on
New York, Comell University. the Performance of New Product Development Teams.
American Journal of Management, Vol. Vol. 12(1 ).
[21] Kenrick D. T., Neuberg S. L. & Ciadini, R. B. (2005).
Social Psychology: Unraveling the Mystery (3rd Ed .). [33] Rajendran, M. & Raduan, C. R. (2005). Typology of
USA, Pearson Education inc. Organizational Commitment. American Journal ofApplied
Science, Vol.26 (17), 1078-1081.
[22] Matanmi, S. (2007). Employment Relationships that
Endure: Lessons for Nigeria. 31st Inaugural Lecture, [34] Robbins S.P. & Judge. T.A (2007). Organizational
Lagos State University. Lagos, Nigeria. Behavior, Twelfth Edition, Pearson Education, Inc ., Upper
Saddle, River, New Jersey.
[23] Maxwell T. R., Chonko L. B., & Loe T. W. (2001). The
Impact of Ethics code familiarity on Managers' [35] Salau, 0. P., Faiola, H. 0. & Akinbode, J. 0 . (2014).
behaviour' , Journal ofBusiness Ethics , 33 (1 ), 59-69 Induction and staff attitude towards retention and
organizational effectiveness. IOSR Journal of Business
[24] Mestre, M., Stainer, A. , & Stainer, L. (1997). Employee
and Management (IOSR-JBM).16(4), 47-52,
orientation - the Japanese approach. Journal of Employee
www.iosrjournals.org
Relations, 19, 443-456.
[36] Simons, T. (2002). 'Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived
[25] Meyer J, Becker, T., and Van D. R. (2006), "Social
Alignment between Managers' Words and deeds as a
Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an
Research Focus', Organization Science, Vol. 13(1), 18-35 .
Integrative Model", Journal of Organizational Behavior,
Vol. 27(11), 665-683 . [37] Sokefun, E. A. (2004). Nigerian Workers and Work Ethic:
The Need for Increase in Productivity. Lagos. Tope Oguns
[26] Muafi, J. (2011). Causes and Consequences of deviant
Printers.
workplace behavior. International Journal of Innovation,
Management and Technology , Vol. 2(2), 123-126. [38] Velasquaez, M. G. (2002). Business, Ethics Concepts and
Cases. New Delhi. Prentice-Hall. 5th edition.
[27] Noe, R. A. , Hollenbeck, J. R. , Gerhart, B. & Wright, P.A.
(2004). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, [39] Zheng W., Sharan K. & Wei, J. (2010). New Development
New York. Me Grand-Hill International Edition Inc. of Organizational Commitment: A Critical Review (1960-
2009). African Journal of Business Management. Vol.
[28] Obasi, C. A. (2003). Organisational Behaviour: Concepts
4(1 ), 12-20.
and Applications. Lagos, Malthouse Press Ltd
[40] Kremelberg, D. (2011). Practical Statistics: a quick and
[29] Ogunbameru, 0 . A. (2004). Organizational Dynamics.
easy guide to IBM SPSS statistics, Stata, and other
Ibadan, Spectrum Books Ltd .
statistical software, SAGE Publications, Inc.
[30] Ongori, H. (2007). A Review of the Literature on
[41] Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D. C. (1980). Significance tests
Employee Turnover. African Journal of Business
and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures,
Management, Vol.4 (1) 49-54 .
Psychological Bulletin, 88(3): 588-606.
[31] Pattison, S. & Edgar, A. (2011). Integrity and the Moral
Complexity of Proffessional Practise. Nursing Philosophy,
Vol. 12 (2), 94-106 .
273