Asses
Asses
Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
1 Assessment of technical-methodological design
1.1 Strategy
Interpretation of the objectives in the ToRs, critical examination of
1.1.1 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
tasks
Description and justification of the contractor's strategy for delivering
1.1.2 15% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
the services put out to tender.
Interim total 1.1 25% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.2 Cooperation
Presentation and interaction between the relevant actors in the
1.2.1 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
contractor's area of responsibility
Strategy for establishing cooperation and then cooperating with the
1.2.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
relevant actors
Interim total 1.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.3 Steering structure
Approach and procedure for steering the measures with the project
1.3.1 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
partners
Description of contractor's contribution to results monitoring and the
1.3.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
associated challenges
Interim total 1.3 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.4 Processes
Presentation and explanation of the implementation plan: work steps,
1.4.1 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
milestones, schedule
1.4.2 Presentation and explanation of the integration of the partner 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 1.4 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 Learning and innovation
Contractor's contribution to knowledge management at the partner
1.5.1 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
and at GIZ
Presentation and explanation of the measures undertaken by the
1.5.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
contractor to promote scaling-up effects
Interim total 1.5 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6 Project management of the contractor
1.6.1 Approach and procedure for coordination with/in GIZ project 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Personnel assignment plan (who, when, what work steps) incl.
1.6.2 6% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
explanation and specification of expert months
Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
Contractor's backstopping strategy (incl. CVs of the technical and
1.6.3 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
administrative backstopper)
Interim total 1.6 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.7 Further requirements 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 1 50% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Assessment of proposed staff
2.1 Team leader (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.1.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.5 - Leadership/management experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.6 - Regional experience 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.1 16% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2 Expert 1 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.2.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.2 12% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 Expert 2 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.3.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.3 12% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Page 2 of 4
Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold
Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
2.4 Expert 3 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.4.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.8 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.4 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5 Expert 4 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.5.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.8 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.5 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6 Short-term expert pool 1 (in accordance with ToR
2.6.1 - Qualifications 2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.4 - Specific professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.5 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.6 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.7 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.6 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7 Short-term expert pool 2 (in accordance with ToR
2.7.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.5 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.6 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Page 3 of 4
Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold
Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
2.7.7 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.7 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assessment of proposed personnel for non-specified positions
2.8
(provided permissible under ToRs)
Composition and sufficient assignment duration of the team in order
2.8.1 to perform the tasks specified in the schedule and personnel 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
assignment plan
Qualifications and sufficient assignment duration of the team
2.8.2 (professional experience and other specific experience) in order to 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
process theme 1
Qualifications and sufficient assignment duration of the team
2.8.3 (professional experience and other specific experience) in order to 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
process theme 2
Interim total 2.8 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 2 50% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overall total 1 + 2 100% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assessment in % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ranking 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
I hereby declare that I completed this assessment independently, to the best of my knowledge and in good faith. I will treat the information confidentially and will not pass on any details of the ongoing assessment
procedure.
Page 4 of 4