0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views4 pages

Asses

This document contains a grid for assessing bids below the EU threshold for a private sector development project in Ethiopia. It lists 5 criteria for evaluating bids: technical-methodological design; proposed staff; experience of similar projects; price; and additional criteria. For each criterion, it provides weighting and allows scores to be entered for up to 5 bidders. The scores will then be calculated based on the weightings to determine the overall assessment.

Uploaded by

Estiphanos Get
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views4 pages

Asses

This document contains a grid for assessing bids below the EU threshold for a private sector development project in Ethiopia. It lists 5 criteria for evaluating bids: technical-methodological design; proposed staff; experience of similar projects; price; and additional criteria. For each criterion, it provides weighting and allows scores to be entered for up to 5 bidders. The scores will then be calculated based on the weightings to determine the overall assessment.

Uploaded by

Estiphanos Get
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold

Org. unit 1700 Project title Date Date


Officer responsible for the commission Aregash Asfaw Private Sector Development in Ethiopia PN 19.2310.1-001.00
Assessor Contract no. Contract no.
Version Individual assessment/overall assessment Bidder 1 to 5 of 5

Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5

(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
1 Assessment of technical-methodological design
1.1 Strategy
Interpretation of the objectives in the ToRs, critical examination of
1.1.1 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
tasks
Description and justification of the contractor's strategy for delivering
1.1.2 15% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
the services put out to tender.
Interim total 1.1 25% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.2 Cooperation
Presentation and interaction between the relevant actors in the
1.2.1 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
contractor's area of responsibility
Strategy for establishing cooperation and then cooperating with the
1.2.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
relevant actors
Interim total 1.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.3 Steering structure
Approach and procedure for steering the measures with the project
1.3.1 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
partners
Description of contractor's contribution to results monitoring and the
1.3.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
associated challenges
Interim total 1.3 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.4 Processes
Presentation and explanation of the implementation plan: work steps,
1.4.1 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
milestones, schedule
1.4.2 Presentation and explanation of the integration of the partner 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 1.4 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 Learning and innovation
Contractor's contribution to knowledge management at the partner
1.5.1 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
and at GIZ
Presentation and explanation of the measures undertaken by the
1.5.2 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
contractor to promote scaling-up effects
Interim total 1.5 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6 Project management of the contractor
1.6.1 Approach and procedure for coordination with/in GIZ project 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Personnel assignment plan (who, when, what work steps) incl.
1.6.2 6% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
explanation and specification of expert months

Form 31-10-3-en Page 1 of 4


Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold

Org. unit 1700 Project title Date Date


Officer responsible for the commission Aregash Asfaw Private Sector Development in Ethiopia PN 19.2310.1-001.00
Assessor Contract no. Contract no.
Version Individual assessment/overall assessment Bidder 1 to 5 of 5

Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5

(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
Contractor's backstopping strategy (incl. CVs of the technical and
1.6.3 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
administrative backstopper)
Interim total 1.6 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.7 Further requirements 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 1 50% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Assessment of proposed staff
2.1 Team leader (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.1.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.5 - Leadership/management experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.6 - Regional experience 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.1 16% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2 Expert 1 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.2.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.2 12% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 Expert 2 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.3.1 - Qualifications 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.4 - Specific professional experience 4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3.8 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.3 12% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Page 2 of 4
Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold

Org. unit 1700 Project title Date Date


Officer responsible for the commission Aregash Asfaw Private Sector Development in Ethiopia PN 19.2310.1-001.00
Assessor Contract no. Contract no.
Version Individual assessment/overall assessment Bidder 1 to 5 of 5

Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5

(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
2.4 Expert 3 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.4.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4.8 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.4 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5 Expert 4 (in accordance with ToR provisions/criteria)
2.5.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.5 - Leadership/management experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.6 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.7 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.5.8 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.5 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6 Short-term expert pool 1 (in accordance with ToR
2.6.1 - Qualifications 2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.2 - Language 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.3 - General professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.4 - Specific professional experience 3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.5 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.6 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6.7 - Other 1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.6 10% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7 Short-term expert pool 2 (in accordance with ToR
2.7.1 - Qualifications 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.2 - Language 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.3 - General professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.4 - Specific professional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.5 - Regional experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7.6 - Development cooperation experience 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Page 3 of 4
Grid for the technical assessment of bids below the EU threshold

Org. unit 1700 Project title Date Date


Officer responsible for the commission Aregash Asfaw Private Sector Development in Ethiopia PN 19.2310.1-001.00
Assessor Contract no. Contract no.
Version Individual assessment/overall assessment Bidder 1 to 5 of 5

Enter bidder 1 Enter bidder 2 Enter bidder 3 Enter bidder 4 Enter bidder 5

(1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4)
Criterion Weighting Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment Points Assessment
in % (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3) (max.10) (2)x(3)
2.7.7 - Other 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interim total 2.7 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assessment of proposed personnel for non-specified positions
2.8
(provided permissible under ToRs)
Composition and sufficient assignment duration of the team in order
2.8.1 to perform the tasks specified in the schedule and personnel 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
assignment plan
Qualifications and sufficient assignment duration of the team
2.8.2 (professional experience and other specific experience) in order to 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
process theme 1
Qualifications and sufficient assignment duration of the team
2.8.3 (professional experience and other specific experience) in order to 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
process theme 2
Interim total 2.8 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 2 50% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overall total 1 + 2 100% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Assessment in % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ranking 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

I hereby declare that I completed this assessment independently, to the best of my knowledge and in good faith. I will treat the information confidentially and will not pass on any details of the ongoing assessment
procedure.

Date, full first and last name, function, OU

Page 4 of 4

You might also like