Counterpoint Global Insights

Good Losses, Bad Losses

All Losses Are Not Created Equal

CONSILIENT OBSERVER | July 20, 2022

Introduction AUTHORS

Aphasia is a condition that breaks the link between thought and Michael J. Mauboussin
language. It is the result of damage to specific regions in the brain [email protected]
and is usually caused by a stroke. Patients who suffer from aphasia Dan Callahan, CFA
understand images, ideas, or concepts but cannot convey them in [email protected]
words. The term comes from the Greek aphatos, or “speechless.”1
Accounting is commonly called the language of business.2 It is how
a company communicates its economic results and financial
position to current and prospective stakeholders, including
shareholders, creditors, suppliers, and employees. These
stakeholders want to know whether the company has a good
business. Core considerations include the company’s growth,
profitability, return on investment, and financial strength.
Accounting can be aphasic. In many cases, the bottom-line figures
that are consistent with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) fail to communicate the essence of a company’s
economics. For example, there has been a steady rise in the use
and utility of non-GAAP figures, calculations that deviate from the
accounting rules and regulations.3 More than 95 percent of
companies in the S&P 500 report non-GAAP numbers, and there
is evidence that investors find them useful.4 Overall, understanding
whether a company’s business is fundamentally sound requires
going deeper than superficial sums or ratios.5
Investors often demarcate between profitable and unprofitable
companies, as measured by net income. Net income is the profit
after subtracting all costs, expenses, and taxes from sales. Exhibit
1 shows that one-third of the companies in the Russell 3000, which
tracks the largest stocks by market capitalization in the United
States, reported negative net income in 2021. This ratio has been
climbing in recent decades. Non-GAAP results swing about a fifth
of them into positive territory. Some adjustments make sense,
including adding back truly one-time or non-economic expenses,
whereas others, such as adding back the expense for stock-based
compensation, do not.6 What we want to investigate is how much
information is contained in simple profits or losses.

.
Exhibit 1: Percent of Russell 3000 Companies with Negative Net Income, 1980-2021
40

35
Percent of Companies with

30
Negative Net Income

25

20

15

10

0
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Source: FactSet and Counterpoint Global.
Note: Constituents of the Russell 3000® Index as of year-end; Data reflects calendar years.

Would You Rather?

Exhibit 2 shows the financial forecasts for three companies. Assume that the results in the subsequent years
are consistent with the numbers you see here. Your task is to rank the three businesses in terms of value, from
highest to lowest. There are enough data for those with sharp eyes and pencils to have an informed view, even
though the statements are not complete. Take a moment to examine the figures.

Exhibit 2: The Financials for Three Companies

Company A Company B Company C
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Sales 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9
Cost of goods sold 690.0 793.5 912.5 287.5 330.6 380.2 690.0 793.5 912.5
Gross profit 460.0 529.0 608.4 862.5 991.9 1,140.7 460.0 529.0 608.4
Gross margin 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0%

Maintenance SG&A 230.0 264.5 304.2 632.5 727.4 836.5 230.0 264.5 304.2
Investment SG&A 248.4 269.8 182.5
Operating income 230.0 264.5 304.2 (18.4) (5.3) 121.7 230.0 264.5 304.2
Operating margin 20% 20% 20% -1.6% -0.4% 8.0% 20% 20% 20%

Taxes 46.0 52.9 60.8 46.0 52.9 60.8 46.0 52.9 60.8

NOPAT 184.0 211.6 243.3 (64.4) (58.2) 60.8 184.0 211.6 243.3

Invested capital 1,276.0 1,593.4 1,836.7 527.6 575.2 636.0 1,276.0 1,672.8 2,129.0

ROIC 16.2% 14.7% 14.2% -12.5% -10.6% 10.0% 16.2% 14.4% 12.8%
Source: Counterpoint Global.
Note: SG&A=selling, general, and administrative expense; NOPAT=net operating profit after taxes; ROIC=return on
invested capital (invested capital=average of current and prior year).

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 2

The answer is that Company A and Company B have the exact same value, and Company C is worth
considerably less. Take a look at the appendix if you want more complete numbers. The key is to calculate free
cash flow, defined as net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) minus the investment in future growth. Free cash
flow is the lifeblood of corporate value as it measures the cash that a firm can distribute to its creditors and
shareholders. Note that negative free cash flow is not only fine, but desirable, in cases when the return on
investment comfortably exceeds the cost of capital and the company has access to capital.

Company A and Company B have identical free cash flows. What is different is where the investments show up
in the financial statements according to the rules of accounting. For Company A, investments are captured on
the balance sheet, which is revealed by examining the change in invested capital from one year to the next.

For Company B, most of the investments are expensed on the income statement. The figures for Company A
are typical of a firm that invests primarily in tangible assets, including capital expenditures for machines and
factories. Those for Company B are common for a company that invests mostly in intangible assets, non-physical
items such as software code and marketing to build a brand.

Let’s do the calculations to show the equivalence. We’ll focus on year two. Company A has NOPAT of $211.6
and an investment of $317.4 for total free cash flow of -$105.8. You can compute the investment by looking at
the change in invested capital ($317.4 = $1,593.4 - $1,276.0).

Company B has NOPAT of -$58.2, investment of $47.6, and free cash flow of -$105.8. But note that Company
B reflects $269.8 of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expense on the income statement even though
it is really an investment. Were the company to record that investment on the balance sheet instead of the
income statement, NOPAT would go from -$58.2 to $211.6, investment would rise from $47.6 to $317.4, and
free cash flow would stay the same.

Company B would in fact be more valuable in the real world because the investments it expenses create a
valuable tax shield. That means that Company B would pay less in taxes than Company A.

We can also do a back of the envelope calculation of the return on investment, which we define here as the
change in this year’s NOPAT divided by last year’s investment. In other words, how much did earnings grow this
year as a result of last year’s investment? Again, we’ll start with Company A and look at years 2 and 3. In this
case, the return on investment is 10 percent, or a change in NOPAT of $31.7 ($243.3 - $211.6) divided by the
investment of $317.4.

The unadjusted figures for Company B appear nonsensical. But if you make the adjustments, the figures for
Company B align exactly with those of Company A. Here again, you have to think about investment and return
on investment clearly to see these businesses are indeed the same.

Company C has the same NOPAT as Company A but its investment of $396.8 is much higher. As a result, its
free cash flow is -$185.1 and its return is 8 percent ($31.7 ÷ $396.8). Company C’s investments yield a lower
return than that of companies A and B.

We designed this example so that the level of investment, return on investment, and growth are identical for
companies A and B. But the accounting differs because one invests in tangible assets and the other in intangible
assets. The concepts are the same, but the communication is different. This is accounting aphasia.

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 3

Real versus GAAP-Driven Losses

The central point of this report is to distinguish between “GAAP-losers” and “real losers.” These categories were
introduced by the accounting professors Feng Gu, Baruch Lev, and Chenqi Zhu. 7 GAAP losers are companies
that have expenses that exceed sales, but the essential insight is that some percentage of those expenses are
intangible investments. Real losers also have expenses that exceed sales. Gu, Lev, and Zhu focus on how the
valuation and stock price performance of these categories differ.

Exhibit 1 shows that the percentage of companies reporting losses has increased in recent decades. We want
to understand whether that rise reflects GAAP-driven or real losses. There are spikes in losses that coincide
with periods of economic decline, but the underlying driver of the trend is the rise of intangible investment.

Exhibit 3 illustrates the point. In 2001, intangible investments were on par with capital expenditures for
companies in the Russell 3000. Twenty years later, intangible investments were roughly double capital
expenditures.

To cast all companies in a similar light, the professors adjusted the GAAP accounting by recording the intangible
investment on the balance sheet and replacing the expense on the income statement with the amortization of
the capitalized intangibles.8 This treats capital expenditures and intangible investments in the same way. 9 The
researchers found that this modification flipped about 40 percent of the reported losses to profits and improved
the relevance of earnings.10

Exhibit 3: Intangible Investments Are on the Rise

Intangible Investments $635 billion

2001

Capital Expenditures $640 billion

Intangible Investments $2,100 billion

2021

Capital Expenditures $1,040 billion

Source: Based on Luminita Enache and Anup Srivastava, “Should Intangible Investments Be Reported Separately or
Commingled with Operating Expenses? New Evidence,” Management Science, Vol. 64, No. 7, July 2018, 3446-3468;
Includes estimates by Counterpoint Global.

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 4

The main message is that an investor should focus on understanding a business’s investments, return on
investments, and opportunities for investment. Taken together, these are the value drivers that determine long-
term free cash flow.

Accountants have to adhere to generally accepted accounting principles that are well established and
conservative. The problem is that these principles can obscure the value drivers that investors and other
stakeholders seek to comprehend and forecast.

Stock prices reflect a company’s current financial position plus a set of expectations about its future financial
results.11 We want to know if investors sort good and bad losses effectively when they value businesses.

Why Investors Should Care

Gu, Lev, and Zhu not only make adjustments to more accurately reflect profit, but they also examine the total
shareholder returns for the stocks of the GAAP losers relative to profitable firms as well as the real losers. Exhibit
4 shows the results for the period from 1980 to 2017. The companies in each category are matched for size,
valuation, industry, and year so as to isolate the profit effect. They found that $1 grew to $20.82 when invested
in the GAAP losers, $7.65 in the profitable firms, and just $1.90 in the real losers. The respective compound
annual growth rates in total shareholder returns are 11.5, 7.5, and 2.3 percent.

These long-term results obscure an important shift. From 1980 to 1996, just under one-half of the full period, the
GAAP losers outperformed real losers but underperformed profitable firms. It was only in the last two decades
of the measured period that the GAAP losers delivered higher returns than both the real losers and profitable
firms.12 The message is that the market ultimately recognizes and pays for intangible investments that create
value, even if they create losses in the short term.

Exhibit 4: Growth of One Dollar Invested in Matched Companies: GAAP Losers, Profitable
Firms, and Real Losers, 1980-2017

GAAP Losers $20.82

Profitable Firms $7.65

Real Losers $1.90

0 5 10 15 20 25
Growth of One Dollar Invested, 1980-2017

Source: Based on Feng Gu, Baruch Lev, and Chenqi Zhu, “All Losses Are Not Alike: Real versus Accounting-Driven
Reported Losses,” SSRN Working Paper, May 2022.
Note: Firms matched by size, price/book, industry, and year; GAAP=Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; The growth
of one dollar is hypothetical and based on actual historical information and should not be construed as an indication of
future results.
© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 5
Conclusion

Accounting is the language of business that allows a company to share its financial results with interested
stakeholders. Certain principles guide how accountants reflect the range of business activities on financial
statements.

One principle of accounting is conservatism, which says that companies should be prudent when recognizing
items that have uncertain future benefits.13 For example, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 in October 1974 that stipulated that research and
development costs, a classic form of intangible investment, should be expensed immediately because of “a high
degree of uncertainty about the future benefits of individual research and development projects.” 14 Today, most
intangible investments are subject to this principle.

The rise of intangibles in recent decades means that more investments than ever are expensed immediately
versus capitalized on the balance sheet and amortized on the income statement consistent with the principle
that sales and expenses should be matched over time. This makes the income statements and balance sheets
of today appear distorted relative to those of the past. In particular, some businesses with high return on
investment have losses. Academics call these companies GAAP losers to distinguish them from real losers,
businesses that have expenses unrelated to investment that exceed sales.

Capitalizing intangible investments and amortizing them makes the economic picture clearer. It allows investors
to sort companies losing money for the right reasons and improves the relevance of earnings. Core concepts
are communicated more clearly.

Evidence from recent decades shows that GAAP losers produced attractive total shareholder returns relative to
the real losers and profitable companies. Investors must look past simple measures of profits to understand a
business’s true ability to create value.

Please see important disclosures on pages 11-13

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 6

Appendix: Financial Statements for Companies A, B, and C

Company A
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sales 1,000.0 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9 1,749.0 2,011.4 2,313.1 2,660.0 3,059.0 3,517.9 4,045.6 4,652.4 5,350.3
Cost of goods sold 600.0 690.0 793.5 912.5 1,049.4 1,206.8 1,387.8 1,596.0 1,835.4 2,110.7 2,427.3 2,791.4 3,210.2
Gross profit 400.0 460.0 529.0 608.4 699.6 804.5 925.2 1,064.0 1,223.6 1,407.2 1,618.2 1,861.0 2,140.1
Gross margin 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0%

Maintenance SG&A 200.0 230.0 264.5 304.2 349.8 402.3 462.6 532.0 611.8 703.6 809.1 930.5 1,070.1
Investment SG&A
Operating income 200.0 230.0 264.5 304.2 349.8 402.3 462.6 532.0 611.8 703.6 809.1 930.5 1,070.1
Operating margin 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%

Taxes 40.0 46.0 52.9 60.8 70.0 80.5 92.5 106.4 122.4 140.7 161.8 186.1 214.0

NOPAT 160.0 184.0 211.6 243.3 279.8 321.8 370.1 425.6 489.4 562.9 647.3 744.4 856.0

Investment 240.0 276.0 317.4 243.3 279.8 321.8 277.6 319.2 367.1 422.1 388.4 446.6 535.0

Free cash flow (80.0) (92.0) (105.8) (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 92.5 106.4 122.4 140.7 258.9 297.8 321.0

PV of FCF (85.2) (90.7) (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 58.3 62.1 66.1 70.4 119.9 127.7 127.5
Sum of PV of FCF 456.1

Continuing value 10,700.5

PV of CV 4,249.3

Corporate value 4,705.4

Invested capital 1,000.0 1,276.0 1,593.4 1,836.7 2,116.6 2,438.4 2,716.0 3,035.2 3,402.3 3,824.4 4,212.8 4,659.4 5,194.4
ROIC 16.2% 14.7% 14.2% 14.2% 14.1% 14.4% 14.8% 15.2% 15.6% 16.1% 16.8% 17.4%

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 7

 Company B
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sales 1,000.0 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9 1,749.0 2,011.4 2,313.1 2,660.0 3,059.0 3,517.9 4,045.6 4,652.4 5,350.3
Cost of goods sold 250.0 287.5 330.6 380.2 437.3 502.8 578.3 665.0 764.8 879.5 1,011.4 1,163.1 1,337.6
Gross profit 750.0 862.5 991.9 1,140.7 1,311.8 1,508.5 1,734.8 1,995.0 2,294.3 2,638.4 3,034.2 3,489.3 4,012.7
Gross margin 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0%

Maintenance SG&A 550.0 632.5 727.4 836.5 962.0 1,106.2 1,272.2 1,463.0 1,682.5 1,934.8 2,225.1 2,558.8 2,942.6
Investment SG&A 228.0 248.4 269.8 182.5 181.9 209.2 166.5 175.6 183.5 211.1 194.2 223.3 267.5
Operating income (28.0) (18.4) (5.3) 121.7 167.9 193.1 296.1 356.4 428.3 492.5 614.9 707.2 802.5
Operating margin -2.8% -1.6% -0.4% 8.0% 9.6% 9.6% 12.8% 13.4% 14.0% 14.0% 15.2% 15.2% 15.0%

Taxes 40.0 46.0 52.9 60.8 70.0 80.5 92.5 106.4 122.4 140.7 161.8 186.1 214.0

NOPAT (68.0) (64.4) (58.2) 60.8 97.9 112.6 203.5 250.0 305.9 351.8 453.1 521.1 588.5

Investment 12.0 27.6 47.6 60.8 97.9 112.6 111.0 143.6 183.5 211.1 194.2 223.3 267.5

Free cash flow (80.0) (92.0) (105.8) (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 92.5 106.4 122.4 140.7 258.9 297.8 321.0

PV of FCF (85.2) (90.7) (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 58.3 62.1 66.1 70.4 119.9 127.7 127.5
Sum of PV of FCF 456.1

Continuing value 10,700.5

PV of CV 4,249.3

Corporate value 4,705.4

Invested capital 500.0 527.6 575.2 636.0 734.0 846.6 957.7 1,101.3 1,284.8 1,495.9 1,690.1 1,913.4 2,180.9
ROIC -12.5% -10.6% 10.0% 14.3% 14.3% 22.6% 24.3% 25.6% 25.3% 28.4% 28.9% 28.7%

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 8

 Company C
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sales 1,000.0 1,150.0 1,322.5 1,520.9 1,749.0 2,011.4 2,313.1 2,660.0 3,059.0 3,517.9 4,045.6 4,652.4 5,350.3
Cost of goods sold 600.0 690.0 793.5 912.5 1,049.4 1,206.8 1,387.8 1,596.0 1,835.4 2,110.7 2,427.3 2,791.4 3,210.2
Gross profit 400.0 460.0 529.0 608.4 699.6 804.5 925.2 1,064.0 1,223.6 1,407.2 1,618.2 1,861.0 2,140.1
Gross margin 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0%

Maintenance SG&A 200.0 230.0 264.5 304.2 349.8 402.3 462.6 532.0 611.8 703.6 809.1 930.5 1,070.1
Investment SG&A
Operating income 200.0 230.0 264.5 304.2 349.8 402.3 462.6 532.0 611.8 703.6 809.1 930.5 1,070.1
Operating margin 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%

Taxes 40.0 46.0 52.9 60.8 70.0 80.5 92.5 106.4 122.4 140.7 161.8 186.1 214.0

NOPAT 160.0 184.0 211.6 243.3 279.8 321.8 370.1 425.6 489.4 562.9 647.3 744.4 856.0

Investment 240.0 276.0 396.7 456.3 524.7 804.5 925.2 1,064.0 1,223.6 1,407.2 1,618.2 1,861.0 535.0

Free cash flow (80.0) (92.0) (185.1) (212.9) (244.9) (482.7) (555.1) (638.4) (734.2) (844.3) (970.9) (1,116.6) 321.0

PV of FCF (85.2) (158.7) (169.0) (180.0) (328.5) (349.8) (372.5) (396.6) (422.4) (449.7) (478.9) 127.5
Sum of PV of FCF (3,263.9)

Continuing value 10,700.5

PV of CV 4,249.3

Corporate value 985.4

Invested capital 1,000.0 1,276.0 1,672.8 2,129.0 2,653.7 3,458.3 4,383.5 5,447.5 6,671.1 8,078.2 9,696.5 11,557.4 12,092.5
ROIC 16.2% 14.4% 12.8% 11.7% 10.5% 9.4% 8.7% 8.1% 7.6% 7.3% 7.0% 7.2%
Source: Counterpoint Global.
Note: SG&A=selling, general, and administrative expense; NOPAT=net operating profit after taxes; PV=present value; FCF=free cash flow; CV=continuing value; ROIC=return
on invested capital (invested capital=average of current and prior year).

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 9

Endnotes
1 Antonio R. Damasio, M.D., “Aphasia,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 326, No. 8, February 20, 1992,
531-539.
2 For example, Warren Buffett, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Berkshire Hathaway and a renowned

investor, has said, “Accounting is the language of business, and you have to be as comfortable with that as you
are with your own native language to really evaluate businesses.” See “CNBC Excerpts: Billionaire Investor
Warren Buffett on CNBC’s ‘Squawk Box’ Today,” CNBC.com, March 2, 2015.
3 Nilabhra Bhattacharya, Ervin L. Black, Theodore E. Christensen, and Chad R. Larson, “Assessing the Relative

Informativeness and Permanence of Pro Forma Earnings and GAAP Operating Earnings, Journal of Accounting
and Economics, Vol. 36, Nos. 1-3, December 2003, 285-319 and Dirk E. Black, Theodore E. Christensen, Jack
T. Ciesielski, and Benjamin C. Whipple, “Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Academia and Current Practice,”
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 45, No. 3-4, March/April 2018, 259-294.
4 Vijay Govindarajan, Anup Srivastava, and Rong Zhao, “Mind the GAAP,” Harvard Business Review, May 4,

2021; Asher B. Curtis, Sarah E. McVay and Benjamin C. Whipple, “The Disclosure of Non-GAAP Earnings
Information in the Presence of Transitory Gains,” Accounting Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, May 2014, 933-958; Patricia
M. Dechow, Richard G. Sloan, and Jenny Zha, “Stock Prices and Earnings: A History of Research,” Annual
Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 6, 2014, 343-363; and Ethan Rouen, Eric C. So, Charles C.Y. Wang, “Core
Earnings: New Data and Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 142, No. 3, December 2021, 1068-
1091. The S&P 500® Index measures the performance of the large cap segment of the U.S. equities market,
covering approximately 80% of the U.S. equities market. The Index includes 500 leading companies in leading
industries of the U.S. economy.
5 Richard G. Sloan, “Fundamental Analysis Redux,” Accounting Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, March 2019, 363-377.
6 Michael J. Mauboussin and Dan Callahan, “Categorizing for Clarity: Cash Flow Statement Adjustments to

Improve Insights,” Consilient Observer: Counterpoint Global Insights, October 6, 2021.

7 Feng Gu, Baruch Lev, and Chenqi Zhu, “All Losses Are Not Alike: Real versus Accounting-Driven Reported

Losses,” SSRN Working Paper, May 2022.

8 The researchers capitalize research and development (R&D) “using industry-specific R&D capitalization and

amortization rates” and “capitalize one-third of the current year’s SG&A expenses.” See Gu, Lev, and Zhu, “All
Losses Are Not Alike.” For a recent paper that estimates the percentage of SG&A and R&D that are investment,
along with asset lives, by industry see Aneel Iqbal, Shivaram Rajgopal, Anup Srivastava, and Rong Zhao, “Value
of Internally Generated Intangible Capital,” Working Paper, February 2022.
9 Tangible assets are depreciated, and intangible assets are amortized.
10 The 40 percent figure is from Gu, Lev, and Zhu. For a discussion on the impact of capitalizing intangible

investments, see Michael J. Mauboussin and Dan Callahan, “Intangibles and Earnings: Improving the
Usefulness of Financial Statements,” Consilient Observer: Counterpoint Global Insights, April 12, 2022.
11 Michael J. Mauboussin and Alfred Rappaport, Expectations Investing: Reading Stock Prices for Better

Returns—Revised and Updated (New York: Columbia Business School Publishing, 2021).
12 Gu, Lev, and Zhu, “All Losses Are Not Alike,” Figure 4A.
13 Feng Gu and Weimin Wang, “The Effect of R&D Investment on Future Earnings Uncertainty: New Evidence,”

SSRN Working Paper, January 12, 2012.

14 “Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2: Accounting for Research and Development Costs,”

Financial Accounting Standards Board, October 1974. For a more detailed history of accounting for R&D, see
Paul E. Nix and David E. Nix, “A Historical Review of the Accounting Treatment of Research and Development
Costs,“ Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, June 1992, 51-78.

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 10

IMPORTANT INFORMATION
The views and opinions and/or analysis expressed are those of the author as of the date of preparation of this
material and are subject to change at any time due to market or economic conditions and may not necessarily
come to pass. Furthermore, the views will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that
subsequently becomes available or circumstances existing, or changes occurring, after the date of publication.
The views expressed do not reflect the opinions of all investment personnel at Morgan Stanley Investment
Management (MSIM) and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively “the Firm”), and may not be reflected in all
the strategies and products that the Firm offers.
Forecasts and/or estimates provided herein are subject to change and may not actually come to pass.
Information regarding expected market returns and market outlooks is based on the research, analysis and
opinions of the authors or the investment team. These conclusions are speculative in nature, may not come to
pass and are not intended to predict the future performance of any specific strategy or product the Firm offers.
Future results may differ significantly depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or
general economic conditions.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This material has been prepared on the basis of publicly
available information, internally developed data and other third-party sources believed to be reliable. However,
no assurances are provided regarding the reliability of such information and the Firm has not sought to
independently verify information taken from public and third-party sources. The views expressed in the books
and articles referenced in this whitepaper are not necessarily endorsed by the Firm.
This material is a general communications which is not impartial and has been prepared solely for information
and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular
security or to adopt any specific investment strategy. The material contained herein has not been based on a
consideration of any individual client circumstances and is not investment advice, nor should it be construed in
any way as tax, accounting, legal or regulatory advice. To that end, investors should seek independent legal
and financial advice, including advice as to tax consequences, before making any investment decision.
Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. Any securities referenced herein are solely
for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation for investment.
The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the largest 3,000 U.S. companies representing
approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. The Russell 3000 Index is constructed to provide a
comprehensive, unbiased, and stable barometer of the broad market and is completely reconstituted annually
to ensure new and growing equities are reflected. The index is unmanaged and does not include any expenses,
fees or sales charges. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The index referred to herein is the intellectual
property (including registered trademarks) of the applicable licensor. Any product based on an index is in no
way sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by the applicable licensor and it shall not have any liability with
respect thereto.
This material is not a product of Morgan Stanley’s Research Department and should not be regarded as a
research material or a recommendation.
The Firm has not authorised financial intermediaries to use and to distribute this material, unless such use and
distribution is made in accordance with applicable law and regulation. Additionally, financial intermediaries are
required to satisfy themselves that the information in this material is appropriate for any person to whom they
provide this material in view of that person’s circumstances and purpose. The Firm shall not be liable for, and
accepts no liability for, the use or misuse of this material by any such financial intermediary.
The whole or any part of this work may not be directly or indirectly reproduced, copied, modified, used to create
a derivative work, performed, displayed, published, posted, licensed, framed, distributed or transmitted or any
of its contents disclosed to third parties without MSIM’s express written consent. This work may not be linked to
unless such hyperlink is for personal and non-commercial use. All information contained herein is proprietary
and is protected under copyright and other applicable law.
Eaton Vance is part of Morgan Stanley Investment Management. Morgan Stanley Investment Management is
the asset management division of Morgan Stanley.
This material may be translated into other languages. Where such a translation is made this English version
remains definitive. If there are any discrepancies between the English version and any version of this material
in another language, the English version shall prevail.

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 11

DISTRIBUTION

This communication is only intended for and will only be distributed to persons resident in jurisdictions
where such distribution or availability would not be contrary to local laws or regulations.

MSIM, the asset management division of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), and its affiliates have
arrangements in place to market each other’s products and services. Each MSIM affiliate is regulated
as appropriate in the jurisdiction it operates. MSIM’s affiliates are: Eaton Vance Management
(International) Limited, Eaton Vance Advisers International Ltd, Calvert Research and Management,
Eaton Vance Management, Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, and Atlanta Capital Management LLC.

This material has been issued by any one or more of the following entities:

EMEA
This material is for Professional Clients/Accredited Investors only.
In the EU, MSIM and Eaton Vance materials are issued by MSIM Fund Management (Ireland) Limited
(“FMIL”). FMIL is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and is incorporated in Ireland as a private company
limited by shares with company registration number 616661 and has its registered address at 24-26 City
Quay, Dublin 2, DO2 NY19, Ireland.

Outside the EU, MSIM materials are issued by Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited (MSIM Ltd) is
authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1981121.
Registered Office: 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 4QA.

In Switzerland, MSIM materials are issued by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, London (Zurich Branch)
Authorised and regulated by the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht ("FINMA"). Registered Office:
Beethovenstrasse 33, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland.

Outside the US and EU, Eaton Vance materials are issued by Eaton Vance Management (International)
Limited (“EVMI”) 125 Old Broad Street, London, EC2N 1AR, UK, which is authorised and regulated in the
United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Italy: MSIM FMIL (Milan Branch), (Sede Secondaria di Milano) Palazzo Serbelloni Corso Venezia, 16 20121
Milano, Italy. The Netherlands: MSIM FMIL (Amsterdam Branch), Rembrandt Tower, 11th Floor Amstelplein 1
1096HA, Netherlands. France: MSIM FMIL (Paris Branch), 61 rue de Monceau 75008 Paris, France. Spain:
MSIM FMIL (Madrid Branch), Calle Serrano 55, 28006, Madrid, Spain. Germany: MSIM FMIL Frankfurt Branch,
Große Gallusstraße 18, 60312 Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Gattung: Zweigniederlassung (FDI) gem. § 53b
KWG). Denmark: MSIM FMIL (Copenhagen Branch), Gorrissen Federspiel, Axel Towers, Axeltorv2, 1609
Copenhagen V, Denmark.

MIDDLE EAST
Dubai: MSIM Ltd (Representative Office, Unit Precinct 3-7th Floor-Unit 701 and 702, Level 7, Gate Precinct
Building 3, Dubai International Financial Centre, Dubai, 506501, United Arab Emirates. Telephone: +97 (0)14
709 7158).

This document is distributed in the Dubai International Financial Centre by Morgan Stanley Investment
Management Limited (Representative Office), an entity regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority
(“DFSA”). It is intended for use by professional clients and market counterparties only. This document is not
intended for distribution to retail clients, and retail clients should not act upon the information contained in this
document.

U.S.
NOT FDIC INSURED | OFFER NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE | NOT INSURED BY ANY
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY | NOT A DEPOSIT

ASIA PACIFIC
Hong Kong: This material is disseminated by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited for use in Hong Kong and shall
only be made available to “professional investors” as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of
Hong Kong (Cap 571). The contents of this material have not been reviewed nor approved by any regulatory
© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 12
authority including the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Accordingly, save where an
exemption is available under the relevant law, this material shall not be issued, circulated, distributed, directed
at, or made available to, the public in Hong Kong. Singapore: This material is disseminated by Morgan
Stanley Investment Management Company and should not be considered to be the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or any member of the public in Singapore
other than (i) to an institutional investor under section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of
Singapore (“SFA”); (ii) to a “relevant person” (which includes an accredited investor) pursuant to section 305 of
the SFA, and such distribution is in accordance with the conditions specified in section 305 of the SFA; or (iii)
otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
This publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Australia: This material is
provided by Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 22122040037, AFSL No.
314182 and its affiliates and does not constitute an offer of interests. Morgan Stanley Investment Management
(Australia) Pty Limited arranges for MSIM affiliates to provide financial services to Australian wholesale clients.
Interests will only be offered in circumstances under which no disclosure is required under the Corporations
Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Corporations Act”). Any offer of interests will not purport to be an offer of interests in
circumstances under which disclosure is required under the Corporations Act and will only be made to persons
who qualify as a “wholesale client” (as defined in the Corporations Act). This material will not be lodged with
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Japan
This material may not be circulated or distributed, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Japan other than
to (i) a professional investor as defined in Article 2 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (“FIEA”) or
(ii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other allocable provision of the FIEA.
This material is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Japan) Co., Ltd.,
Registered No. 410 (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firms)), Membership: the
Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment
Advisers Association and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association.

© 2023 Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved. 5845839 Exp. 7/31/2024 13