Aspect and Impact Analysis
Aspect and Impact Analysis
Environmental Analysis
Environmental aspects and impacts identification process
ECO-EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY - G3 - ISSUE 1
Environmental Analysis
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 3
XI. Glossary 15
Annexe 1 - Environmental Analysis Crib Sheet 16
Annexe 2 - List of Processes 17
The environmental analysis or environmental aspects and impacts identification process is one of the most
important parts of any Environmental Management System (EMS), as it lays the foundation for how the management
system will run in the future and the environmental improvements it should address. In basic terms, it will assess
environmental risk.
It also has the ability to give information on the level and amount of environmental impact, and to give valuable
information on other requirements of the system that might be required, including training needs, operational control
requirements and the setting of objectives and targets within the system.
This guide will focus on the requirements of the ISO 14001 Standard and will aim to give an overview of what might
be required to identify aspects and impacts within an organization's site-based operations.
There are some very key decisions to be made when planning to implement the organization's EMS. These are
discussed in this section, and will save the organization time over the implementation period of the EMS and set
the basis for the environmental analysis process.
Scope
The environmental analysis should reflect the scope of the organization's EMS, so that what is covered within the
system can be measured; the scope needs to be determined at the outset.
So, will the scope cover the whole organization, or just part of it? For example, if you have a manufacturing unit
and/or a design department, will the organization's EMS cover just the manufacturing element or include all other
support functions within the business?
This scope will not only be needed at the outset, but also for as long as it may be audited, as the auditors will want
to know what the organization's EMS covers and what they are going to audit.
Once the scope is defined and set for the system, this will then determine how the analysis is completed.
Process-Based
The process-based analysis gives the assessor an overview of what is going on and avoids repetition within the
analysis, as mentioned before. For example, all office-based activities can be analysed once, instead of individually
analysing each office that has similar activities with therefore the same overall outcome.
When the method of carrying out the analysis has been chosen, it is also very important for sub-contractors to be
included in the analysis. This will help identifying any environmental risk that the sub-contracted operations pose
to the organization, and is now a requirement of the ISO 14001 standard.
Indeed, it is the organization's decision entirely as to the level at which the environmental analysis should be
carried out, but again, this decision should be made early on in the implementation of the EMS organization
process.
As part of the planning section, the ISO 14001 Standard states that:
The organization shall establish, implement and maintain a procedure(s):
a) To identify the environmental aspects of its activities, products and services within the defined scope of the
environmental management system that it can control and those that it can influence, taking into account
planned or new developments, or new or modified activities, products and services,
b) To determine aspects that have or can have significant impact(s) on the environment
(i.e. significant environmental aspects).
The organization shall document this information and keep it up to date, so all the results have to be recorded and
periodically checked to ensure any changes or new processes are accounted for.
The organization shall ensure that the significant environmental aspects are taken into account in establishing,
implementing and maintaining its environmental management system (Source ISO 14001:2004E).
The main areas of consideration for the analysis should be:
- Emissions to air
- Releases to water
- Releases to land
- Use of energy
- Energy emitted, for example: heat, radiation, vibration
- Noise (that can be heard off site)
- Waste in all forms, and by-products
- Physical attributes of the organization, for example: size, shape, colours, appearance, etc.
NB: There is further guidance from the Standard on what should be included within the environmental analysis
and what areas of environmental impact should be considered and measured within the organization. However,
this should only be considered where the organization has control and influence over environmental aspects
and impacts.
Before investigating the environmental analysis process, it is important to understand the difference between an
environmental aspect and an environmental impact and therefore what can ultimately be improved in time.
An Environmental Aspect is an element of an organization's activities, products or services that can interact with
the environment.
An Environmental Impact refers to any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially
resulting from an organization's activities, products or services.
For example:
A list of the environmentally sensitive areas that need to be measured, their potential aspects and impacts are
shown in Annexe 1.
In addition to this, Annexe 2 lists some potential processes that may be found in a manufacturing environment.
Neither of these lists is exhaustive, however they do help guide the assessor as to the potential aspects, impacts
and processes that may be found.
The first thing to do in terms of fulfilling the analysis process is to map the site that the organization occupies. Does
it share any buildings with another organization? If this is the case, these will also need to be considered. Once this
has been established, a complete identification of the processes should be carried out.
Example:
P2
P4
P7
P6
P1 P5
P3
P4
P4 - design office
) Production Process
Now that the site has been mapped, the processes identified can be broken up into categories as shown above.
Once a full list of processes has been identified and categorised, each process should be scrutinised to see what
the inputs and outputs are, and this starts the analysis process. This is dealt with in the next section.
Now all the processes have been identified, the process should be viewed in terms of its inputs and outputs, or in
other words what goes in, what happens and what comes out as a result or consequence of the process.
In terms of the machining example used earlier, the inputs and outputs for example could be as follows:
The inputs are an inventory or a consequence of the process requirement and the environmental aspects. The
outputs are the result of completing those requirements and potential environmental impacts, so here again we
have a cause and effect process. The above observations are not exhaustive and other items may be added or taken
away as identified.
Using this method to identify inputs and outputs helps to ensure that nothing is missed and that a logical sequence
is followed. Make sure that any periphery activity related to the process is also included. For example, delivery of
metallic blanks to the machining area. What will happen to any waste packaging?
The same input will apply to different parts of the process. For example, energy will be used for all parts of the
process, whereas detergents will only be used for the cleaning element. However, whatever part the input plays in
the process, it will have a relative effect on the outputs.
The inputs and outputs will have to be completed for all the processes identified, to help determine how any aspects
need to be identified in terms of their potential impact.
NB: When investigating the inputs and outputs, make sure that only aspects that can be managed locally at process
level are included. With waste, for example, the segregation of waste is the responsibility of the local process and
its contributors, whereas the organization's waste management process as a whole is the responsibility of the site
services department, and can therefore be analysed as part of this process when it is analysed.
Now as the list of processes and their environmental aspects have been identified, the next stage is to evaluate
these aspects and determine whether or not they have an impact or pose a risk to the environment. The most
appropriate way to do this is through a scoring mechanism, which helps ensure a consistent approach.
The ISO 14001 Standard requires this process to be carried out in “normal”, “abnormal” and “emergency”
situations. The reason for this is that the environmental impact will differ for each one. An example of these three
situations can be illustrated using the example of a car. For example:
Normal condition: normal everyday use of the car
Abnormal condition: maintenance activities such as servicing
Emergency condition: involvement of the car in an incident
Consider the environmental consequence of each situation and how they differ. Some examples below show the
difference:
Normal condition - operation:
- Inputs: petrol/diesel, small amounts of oil and hydraulic fluid to top up
- Outputs: C02 emissions, small leaks
Abnormal condition - servicing:
- Inputs: replacement oil, hydraulic fluid, coolant, replacement parts
- Outputs: waste oils and hydraulic fluid, used parts
Emergency condition - accident:
- Inputs: from normal and abnormal conditions
- Outputs: spillage of petrol/diesel, leaking hydraulic and cooling systems
Given these different situations for each process, the environmental consequence or impact now has to be
measured using an appropriate scoring system. There is no defined process for this within the ISO 14001 Standard,
so it will be necessary to develop one for the organization. Any scoring system developed will have to be both
meaningful and give consistent results as to what is being measured.
For normal and abnormal conditions, the scoring system should follow the same logic and should investigate:
quantity of aspect, likelihood/frequency of occurrence and environmental consequences.
For emergency situations, basic risk management evaluation logic should be applied and should investigate the
likelihood of occurrence versus the consequence for the environment.
What is measured and the outcome of that scoring process is up to the organization, but will also need to include
a threshold that determines where an aspect becomes an impact after the scoring process has been completed.
The next section deals with this issue.
This is where the process becomes a bit more complex, as the processes that have been identified on the site now
have to be measured to establish whether or not the identified aspects have an environmental impact or not via an
“aspect rating (AR)”.
A point that should be considered here, if a number of people are to carry out the analysis, is that regular co-
ordination of the results should be reviewed to ensure consistency, particularly if you have similar processes in
different parts of your business.
That leaves the scoring of “Normal” and “Abnormal” situations. When setting up the system, there are several
environmental conditions to be considered. These could include:
- Consequence of the process aspect on the environment
- Likelihood that it will affect the environment
- Quantity of the aspect
Consequence, will the aspect be: Score
- Major and have a serious effect on the environment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
- Significant and have a noticeable effect on the environment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
- Moderate with a known effect on the environment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
- Limited effect on the environment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Minimal with very little effect on the environment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Likelihood of occurrence, the aspect:
- Is certain to happen / always happens?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
- Is very likely to happen / often happens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
- Is likely to happen / could happen?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
- Is unlikely to happen / may not happen / never happens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Is very unlikely to happen / never happens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Quantity of aspect, does the aspect produce:
- A major source of emissions or use major levels of resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
- A high source of emissions or use high levels of resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
- A moderate source of emissions or moderate levels of resources? . . . . . . . 3
- A minimal source of emissions or minimal levels of resources? . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Or have no source of emissions or use of resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
All these environmental conditions can be scored from 5 (high risk) to 1 (low risk) and multiplied by each other as
each condition is given a score.
C x L x Q = AR e.g. 3 x 3 x 3 = 27
Significant impact
C x L x Q = AR e.g. 2 x 2 x 3 = 12
Non-significant impact
C x L x Q = AR e.g. 4 x 4 x 3 = 58
Significant impact
Where there are processes with similar inputs and outputs, it may be possible to use an analysis that has
been carried out elsewhere in the organization. However, it is very important to check that the inputs and
outputs do not vary.
Emergency Conditions
As mentioned before, the “Emergency” conditions should be treated in the same terms as a typical “Risk
Management” assessment. This means that the measurement is taken from the notion of:
“Occurrence” versus “Gravity”
The following table shows how this principle works. For example, if a small amount of hazardous material were to
be spilled into the local drainage system, what would be the outcome? The suggestion would be that this event
would not happen very often, if at all, but if it does the consequence would be very high, so would probably score
7, making it a critical occurrence, even if it only happen once.
Gravity
Very serious Serious Major Minor
4 3 2 1
VERY LIKELY Very critical Critical Lightly critical Lightly critical
4 10 7 5 3
There are other considerations that may need to be factored in when completing the analysis.
For example:
- Does the process have any licence or legal requirements attached to it?
- Does the process use any hazardous materials?
- Etc.
In these cases, it may be appropriate to make the aspects automatically significant, giving them the highest possible
scores. This will ensure the right level of focus is given to the reduction and subsequent management of any
impacts, and will help ensure conformance with the licence agreement or the regulation involved.
Another consideration is Operational Control. Whilst carrying out the analysis, the levels of operational control
can / could also be investigated. This will help to investigate whether or not existing controls are robust enough
to lower or contain the environmental impact, or whether they should be introduced at a later date.
The sort of issues that can be questioned include:
- Is the level of employee awareness sufficient to enable them to control the environmental aspect?
- Are there technical solutions available that can reduce / control the environmental aspect?
- Are raw materials used in the most efficient way (within the process requirements and quality issues)?
- Are the work instructions being followed, can they be improved?
- Etc.
When considering land contamination, there are a few additional questions that should be asked:
- Has the organization been the only tenant on the land?
- Have processes used in the past and no longer implemented contaminated the land being used?
- Is the land used as part of a leasing agreement?
- Is a history available on the previous users of the land?
- Etc.
In the majority of cases, the organization will not produce its own energy, although it would be true to say that energy
will be used! If the organization is not part of any emissions trading scheme (ETS), then it has no taxation or
regulatory implication through energy use. However, there will be a cost implication and C02 output related to
operations, so energy efficiency is the key measurement within the analysis.
Now that all of the processes have been measured, the consistency checked and the results recorded, there is a
considerable amount of information available that can be used to move forward environmentally, and it is up to the
organization as to how this information can best be used.
All the identified aspects that have a significant environmental impact fall into the category for potential “continuous
improvement”. These can now be turned into environmental “Objectives and Targets” and become part of the
organization's Environmental Management Programme (EMP) for the organization to lead, monitor, target and
manage improvements in the future.
If the organization has additionally measured the operational control of each process (recommended), any
improvements to this element can be part of the continuous improvement plan and be turned into objectives and
targets towards the goal of reducing environmental impact.
The aspects and impacts may also highlight any training needs within the organization that will also lead to
improvement and increase the awareness of all employees.
The results can help set indicators for reporting, for example: a 10% reduction in energy use will mean a 10%
reduction in C02 output and reduce the organization's energy bill and increase energy efficiency.
Improvements can be made at both the input stage and the output stage depending on what is feasible.
For example:
- Are the raw materials consumed used in the most efficient way?
- Is it possible to re-use packaging?
- Can waste sent to landfill be reduced?
The environmental analysis should be continually updated and revisited to ensure that it is kept up to date. This
could be done periodically for existing processes (recommended every 3 years, dependent on impact level), or for
each new process as it is installed or even at the planning stage to remove or reduce potential environmental
impacts at the earliest possible opportunity.
Environmental aspect - an element of an organization's activities, products or services that can interact with
the environment.
Environmental impact - any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially
resulting from an organization's activities, products or services.
ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme. An EU trading scheme allowing companies to emit C02 to an agreed level.
VOCs (Solvents e.g. from paint, sealant, Formation of ground level ozone
degreasing, cleaning, etc.)
Reference: UG0700142
Version: V1
GWLNSD 20080678