Halloysite Clay Nanotubes For Loading and Sustained Release of Functional Compounds
Halloysite Clay Nanotubes For Loading and Sustained Release of Functional Compounds
de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Release of Functional Compounds
Yuri Lvov,* Wencai Wang, Liqun Zhang, and Rawil Fakhrullin
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1227
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
1228 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 1. SEM, AFM, and TEM images of halloysite. Halloysite supplied by Applied Minerals Inc. USA (images c,e,f), and Henan province, China
(images a,b,d). Panel (c) was provided by and is used with permission from A. Zeitoun, Applied Minerals Inc.
have shown that the process is reversible. For example, urea (Figure 2).[21] This could triple the tube lumen volume from
intercalated between the walls increased the distance between 10 to 30 vol% making this container comparable with poly-
the walls from 0.72 nm to 1.1 nm, but after drying the modi- meric micro-/nanocapsule loading capacities. The etching pro-
fied sample and X-ray measurement, it was found that the layer cess starts at the tube openings, so that the lumen diameter is
spacing had collapsed back to 0.72 nm, an indication of the slightly smaller in the center. The authors explained the selec-
removal of the urea from the interlayer space. tive etching by dissolution of aluminum oxide in the acidic
environment.
This explanation is not completely clear, because acid
2.2. Selective Lumen Etching sequentially decomposes the inner alumina layer followed by
the silica layer. Probably, crystalline defects in the tube multi-
Two-component chemistry of halloysite tubes allows for a sepa- layer wall play a role in the further penetration of acid. During
rate and controlled acid etching of alumina or base decomposi- longer 15–20 h acid processing one can see the accumulation
tion of silica (Scheme 2).[21–24] Processing halloysite with 0.1 M of 3–4 nm diameter silica nanoparticles in the tubes’ lumen,
H2SO4 or HCl at a temperature 60 °C over 8 h allowed the accomplished by increasing perforation of the tube wall, and
lumens’ diameter to be increased from 12 ± 2 nm to 21 ± 4 nm finally converting the tubes into nanorods decorated with
while preserving the outermost tubes’ diameter at 50 ± 5 nm silica nanoparticles. During this process, the porosity of the
Scheme 1. a) Halloysite nanotubes are formed by rolling alumosilicate sheets so that alumina forms on the inside surface (green) and silica on the
outside surface (red). b-d) TEM and AFM images of the tube end.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1229
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
1230 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 2. a–f) TEM images of pristine halloysite before acid treatment (a,b), after the removal of 20% (c,d), and 75% (e,f) of alumina by treatment
with H2SO4 at 50 °C. The external diameters of the tubes are ca. 60 nm. The lumen diameters are 10, 21, and 35 ± 2 nm for the original, 20% alumina-
etched, and 75% alumina-etched halloysite Reproduced with permission.[21] Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Al
O
O P
O O
O P O O P O
O O
a b
Scheme 3. a) Selective lumen modification for more-efficient loading of hydrophobic compounds; in the second stage, an external hydrophobization
is also possible through silanization. Reproduced with permission.[25] Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. b) Flame-retardant loading into
hydrophobized halloysite.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1231
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Scheme 5. a) Orientation of nanotubes in the meniscus of drying halloysite droplet. b) SEM images of PSS/l-HNTs films oriented in 5 µm channel,
concentration 10 mg mL−1. Reproduced with permission.[12] Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
Figure 3. a) Images of pristine and PSS-modified halloysite dispersion after 0 and 24 h, s-HNT- short 500 nm length halloysite tubes and l-HNT- long
800 nm length halloysite. b) SEM images of PSS/l-HNTs coating after water evaporation at the edge of the droplet on a silicon substrate. PSS: sodium
polystyrene sulfonate. Reproduced with permission.[12] Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
1232 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Halloysite nanotube (HNT)
Surfactant-loaded HNT
Oil Droplet
Aqueous
Phase
Scheme 7. a) Loading clay nanotubes with drug from saturation solu-
tion. b,c) Mixing with drug solution, pumping out air, and pulling in drug
Surfactant molecules released from HNTs molecules, washing, and loaded tubes.
Scheme 6. Halloysite nanotube stabilization of an emulsion droplet and
the release of surfactant cargo (above). Cryo-SEM showing an oil droplet 12 h (40% release in 5 h). In all three release curves, an
stabilized with halloysite on the left, and a magnified view on the right initial burst within 20 min was followed by 8–10 h release.
showing the tube network on the oil–water interface (below). Reproduced
The initial burst may be due to release from externally
with permission.[34] Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.
bound drugs. The release profile from the halloysite fits the
Peppas model[40] (Mt/M∞ = ktn, where Mt is the amount of
3. Clay-Nanotube Loading with Chemicals drug released at time t, M∞ is the amount of drug released at
and Controlled Release infinite time, n is the exponent characteristic of the release
mechanism, and k is a constant). The value of n is 0.5 for all
3.1. Drug Loading and Sustained Release three drugs, indicating that the release mechanism is Fickian
diffusion. In the case of loading using 50% ethanol and
One of the attractive features of halloysite clay is an inner release in water, the value of n is around 0.75, indicating that
lumen with a diameter capable of encasing macromolecules, the release mechanism is approaching zero-order kinetics.
including drugs, DNA, and proteins. In their pioneering This linear release might be due to heavier loading of the
work, Price, Gaber, and Lvov suggested using halloysite for drugs inside the halloysite tubules, giving a nanopore con-
sustained drug delivery.[38] They loaded halloysite nanotubes trolled release. No drug was inserted between the halloysite
from saturated drug solutions (e.g., antibiotics – tetracy- clay layers in the roll, as confirmed by the preserved 0.72 nm
cline, gentamicin) or from a melt for low-water-soluble drugs packing X-ray reflection.
(e.g., khellin). Loading from drug solutions accompanied by
cyclic vacuum pumping in/out enhanced the replacement of
air in the internal cavities with liquid. After the first appli- 3.2. Proteins and DNA Loading
cation of a vacuum, one can see bubbles at the surface of
the dispersion, similar to bubbles at the interface of boiling Loading DNA into clay nanotubes is very interesting and prom-
water, which indicates replacement of the inner air with the ising.[49,50] During this loading performed by the described
aqueous drug. The wettable lumen diameter of 15 nm pro- above method, the electonegativity of the composite tubes
vides a very high capillary force of ca. 200 atm, pushing solu- became –56 mV (our data). Based on the increased negative
tion into the tubes; however, cyclic air pumping was still potential on the tube surface, the authors assumed an external
necessary for the highest loading efficiency. For drug loading, adsorption of DNA on the nanotubes. We, however, think that
water, alcohol, or acetone were often used as solvents. After adsorption of anionic DNA more probably occurs into the cati-
loading, clay tubes were quickly washed with water to remove onic tube lumen, which will also result in an increase of the
the outermost adsorbed drug and dried at 70 °C. Such drug magnitude of the tube’s negative ξ-potential. Such nanotube
nanoformulation may be kept in a dry form for a long time DNA formulations may be used for intracellular delivery. We
(Scheme 7).[39–49] have to mention here discussing clay nanotube drug formula-
Typically, a successful drug loading reached 5–10 wt% of the tion, that we do not expect their intravenous injection because
tube weight. Taking the density of the organic drug as close these alumosilicate tubes are not biodegradable, but are rather
to 1.2 and halloysite 2.53 g cm–3 one could see that this value thinking about external medical applications (creams, wound
almost coincides with the complete filling of the lumen with healing tissue, implants) or work on modification of cell cul-
condensed drug. We assume that drug condensation could tures and bacteria.
occur from saturated solution in the nanoconfined lumen The 10–20 nm inner diameters of halloysite tubes make
volume, though this is not proven yet. them a good container for loading proteins that have globule
If loaded halloysite nanotubes are exposed to water, they diameters of 3–8 nm. Besides, it is possible to utilize electro-
release drug within 4–12 h. In Figure 4, one can see that static interactions to enhance internal loading in the tubes
dissolution of dexamethasone, furosemide, and nifedipine and prevent external protein adsorption. Taking proteins at a
microcrystalline powder in water happens within 0.2 h, while pH above their isoelectric point, one can have them predomi-
their time-extended release from clay nanotubes takes ca. nantly negative and efficiently load inside the tubes. There are
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1233
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 4. a) Release profile of dexamethasone, furosemide and nifedipine; water, pH 6.5, sink conditions (a), and TEM image of aqueous dispersion
of the loaded nanotubes (b).
surprisingly few publications on halloysite tubes loaded with In the opposite experiment (positive proteins), we saw faster
proteins,[51,52,55] and other published work deals with non-spe- desorption kinetics of 4–6 h. When processed at low pH (below
cific protein adsorption on halloysite–polymer or halloysite– the isoelectric point), the loading efficiency was significantly
lipid composites, where the location of proteins is not confined higher than the lumen volume, of ca. 25 wt%. Obviously a lot
within the tube lumens.[53,54] of positive proteins are adsorbed on the tube’s negative outer-
With thermogravimetric analysis, one can determine a total surface. This external adsorption is more common for different
mass of loaded proteins and with UV techniques to measure clays (e.g., montmorillonite and bentonite) and less interesting
the kinetics and the amount of the proteins capable of being for tubule halloysite composites.
released. For many negatively charged proteins, halloysite We have immobilized laccase from Trametes veriscolor and
loading consisted of 7–8 wt%, but only about half, 3–4%, of lipase from Candida rugosa into clay nanotubes. The enzymes
these proteins were released within 8–20 h, while another were loaded using incubation in solution and vacuum treat-
ca. 3% remained bound in the tube and were functional for ment. Lipase, when adsorbed in halloysite, can be described with
a longer time as compared with free enzymes in solution a Langmuir adsorption isotherm, whereas laccase is described
(Figure 5).[51,52] with a linear adsorption. Both enzymes displayed enhanced
Figure 5. a) TGA results after loading lipase (solid line) and after releasing the loaded protein (dashed line). The line representing the protein before
release was offset one unit to account for the extra water that was in the sample (this is the weight percent lost in the first 100–150 °C). b) Release
kinetics of laccase from halloysite, pH 6.5. Results by J. Tully, Y. Lvov and R. Yendluri, Louisiana Tech University.
1234 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 6. a) A TEM image of halloysite nanotubes loaded with laccase. b) Extended biocatalytic stability of laccase samples at 25 °C; round dots:
halloysite-loaded enzymes; squares: free enzyme in solution.
pH stability at acidic pH when immobilized into the tubes. Lac- longer release is needed; thus drug release has to be efficient for
case shows greater biocatalytic stability at acidic pH and no dif- 1–3 days, antimicrobial formulations for weeks, anticorrosion,
ference at basic pH. From this, one can conclude that halloysite flame-retardant. and antioxidant composites for many months
can be used as an immobilization tubule substrate providing and even years. We have to indicate that if clay nanotubes loaded
long-term enzymatic stability, especially in acidic pH. Glucose oxi- with dry functional compounds (antimicrobial, anticorrosion,
dase temperature stability was essentially increased (up to 70 °C). etc.) are doped into melted polymers, then the tube ends are
We assume that an extension of storage time for halloysite-immo- clogged and release is stopped. Only after such polymeric mate-
bilized enzymes may be a general feature (see Figure 6). rials are decomposed or have cracks and defects, this enhances
Another interesting application of tubular nanoreactors chemical release, exposing healing and protective properties.
is when one could load enzymes into a clay tube and then In many cases, one need to design additional nanotube coating
“feed” them with a substrate through the tube opening, real- with thin polymeric layers or forming tube-end stoppers to
izing confined biocatalysis. The fact that enzymatic catalysis slow down release.[5–7,58–60] A straight-forward (though difficult)
occurs only inside the hollow tubular lumen was shown by the approach is the sequential adsorption of polycations and poly-
urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of urea, which, in turn, resulted anions on charged clay nanotubes through so-called layer-by-
in a higher pH inside the tubes and enhanced the internal layer (LbL) encapsulation (Scheme 8 and Figure 7).
precipitation of Ca2+ and CO32− ions.[51] Synthesized CaCO3 Polycation/polyanion multilayers form a shell on the hal-
completely fills inner halloysite lumens and exhibits the meta- loysite providing a diffusion barrier slowing the release. Hal-
stable vaterite phase. This CaCO3 formation was not observed loysite readily adsorbs polycations, such as chitosan, polyeth-
to occur on the outer surface of the halloysite nanotube nor yleneimine (PEI), polylysine, or polyallylamine hydrochloride
in solution. Recently, in a similar approach, urease-loaded hal- forming a molecularly thin positively charged layer. Then, nega-
loysite sustained a higher pH in the halloysite lumen, which tively charged polyelectrolytes, sodium polystyrene sulfonate
induced magnetite synthesis inside the tube.[57] The “enzy- (PSS), and poly(acrylic acid) or heparin may be deposited,
matic” approach may be utilized either for loading the interior forming strong polycation/polyanion complexation. In Figure 7a,
of the halloysite with different compounds or with bioactive halloysite nanotubes LbL-coated with PEI/7 nm silica are
material. The suggested technique may find application as a shown. The halloysite surface was first covered with PEI/PSS/
means of fabricating complex inorganic core–shell type nano- PEI with a 5 nm thickness. Such precursor treatment signifi-
materials composed of two completely different substances cantly enhanced next silica nanoparticle adsorption. Coating
ensuing from the biomineralization reaction demonstrated halloysite nanotubes with large-molecular-weight polyelectro-
above. The idea of using halloysite nanovolume lumens lyte shells allowed for an extension of the release time of the
as nanoreactors offers promising possibilities for studying drug dexamethasone from 8 to 16 h.[56]
crystal engineering and fundamental aspects of the biominer- Another approach is based on the formation of a urea–for-
alization process. maldehyde (UF) coating on the halloysite surface. Halloysite
was exposed to urea–formaldehyde prepolymer solution (par-
tially polymerized oligomer as described in ref. [59]. Due to
3.3. Time-Extended Release from Nanotubes with Encapsulation its abundant N–H functional groups, prepolymer adsorbs on
and the End-Stoppers the halloysite external surface via hydrogen bonding and with
enhanced adsorption at the lumen ends. Rapid crosslinking of
A typical release time of water-soluble chemical agents from the the prepolymer causes formation of a thin polymer shell that
clay nanotubes is 5–10 hours. However, for many applications also plugs tube endings.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1235
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 7. a,b) TEM image of halloysite nanotubes encapsulated in polyethyleneimine – silica shell (a) and with tube opening clogged with glycogen
stoppers (b). c) Comparison of benzotriazole release curves from pristine halloysite, halloysite encapsulated with urea-formaldehyde encapsulation,
and with copper end-tube stoppers.
1236 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 8. a) TEM image of brilliant-green-loaded halloysite. b) SEM image of a dextrin cap on the end of the functionalized nanotube. c) TEM images
of A549 cell incubated with dextran-coated clay nanotubes. d) Resazurin assay results demonstrating the LD50 value of BG-loaded halloysite for A549
cells. The insets show AFM images of the distribution of DX-halloysite in the A549 cells. Reproduced with permission.[61] Copyright 2015, Nature
Publishing Group.
effective destruction of human lung carcinoma cells (A549) on the relative sizes of the cells (i.e., smaller bacteria are
(Figure 8d), whereas the hepatoma cells (Hep3b) were more coated with chaotically organized bundles of nanotubes,
resistant, indicating selective drug delivery. Exploiting tubule while yeast and microalgae are covered by tile-resembling
clay instead of mesoporous silica nanoparticles typically used layers of halloysite). The electrostatic interactions secure the
in the fabrication of enzyme-activated drug-delivery carriers[64] nanotubes within the LbL-formed layers, preventing the dis-
might be more efficient because it offers more room for drugs assembly of the shells. Importantly, no penetration of nano-
in the lumens, unlike silica having a small pore size of 2–3 nm tubes into the cell interior has been detected. The approach is
and potential in vivo toxicity. universal and can be applied to most microbial cells (bacteria,
microalgae, microfungi). Nanotube-decorated micro-organ-
isms may find applications as versatile templates for the fab-
4.2. Cell Surface Deposition via LbL Polymer Assembly rication of core–shell inorganic microcapsules obtained after
the calcination of cells. Other applications are found with live
Cell-surface engineering is one of the vibrantly developing cells carrying a cargo of halloysite loaded with biomacromol-
multidisciplinary research areas.[65–68] Cell-surface engineering ecules, such as nutrients, antibiotics, biocides, nucleic acids
aims at tailoring nanomaterials to cell surfaces (cell walls or and enzymes.
membranes) to provide the coated cells with novel functionali-
ties. Also known as “cyborg cells”, these biocomposite micro-
particles have become an important tool and a promising 4.3. Low Toxicity of Halloysite
biomaterial.[42] Living cells may be coated with magnetic nano-
particles, which allows for effective spatial manipulation using Halloysite clay nanotubes unquestionably are a promising
an external magnetic field.[62] Among the many other types of natural nanomaterial. Recently, halloysite nanotubes have
nanomaterial, halloysite nanotubes have also been employed been found applicable for the fabrication of novel biomedical
to decorate cell walls of yeast,[64] microalgae,[40] and bacte- materials. The rapidly expanding use of halloysite nanotubes in
rial cells[65] via layer-by-layer (LbL) deposition with oppositely the porcelain and polymer composite industry suggests a high
charged polymers (Figure 9a–d). probability of undesired release of these clay nanotubes into the
After deposition on cells, the nanotubes form randomly environment, bringing them into the direct contact with organ-
positioned monolayers on the microbial cell walls, depending isms in their natural habitats, which may potentially cause
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1237
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 9. Above: polyelectrolyte LbL-mediated deposition of halloysite nanotubes onto yeast and fabrication of hollow microparticles (a). Below: TEM
(b) and SEM (c) images of single yeast cells coated with AH/PSS/PAH/halloysite/PAH; (c) SEM image (false-colored) demonstrating halloysite-free
daughter-cell budding from halloysite-coated mother cell. All adapted with permission.[67] Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
unwanted damage to cells, tissues, and organs. Therefore, the within the last four decades, including for nanotoxicity assays.
elucidation of the toxicity of halloysite nanotubes toward living Our study demonstrated that these nanotubes were found
organisms is crucially important. Halloysite has a good bio- exclusively in the intestines of the worms (Figure 10a–d).
compatibility, which was assessed for both cell cultures[66] and Halloysite was detected along the whole intestine, starting
invertebrate models.[68–70] from the buccal cavity to the anus, and the aggregated areas
The uptake and toxic effects of halloysite have been inves- were located in interior bulb and terminal bulb (Figure 10a).
tigated using human cell lines (breast cancer cells and epi- Importantly, we did not detect nanotubes outside the intes-
thelial adenocarcinoma cells).[66] This study suggests that the tines of the nematodes. As a result, no significant effect on
viability of the human cells was preserved at relatively low con- the fertility of the microworms, or the reduction of the egg
centrations (up to 0.075 mg mL–1), (70% of viable cells); with number in pregnant animals was detected (Figure 10e–g).
increasing concentrations (>1 mg mL–1), the viability was con- Apparently, halloysite within a wide range of concentrations
siderably decreased. As well as free clay nanotubes, chitosan does not damage the organism of the nematodes, inflicting
scaffolds for tissue engineering doped with halloysite were only mechanical stress onto the alimentary system. The
found to induce no significant adverse effects on attachment microworms intentionally avoid taking up the nanotubes,
and development of fibroblasts. Composite halloysite-doped therefore the only effective way of delivery is based on clay-
dental scaffolds stimulated the growth of fibroblast cells.[35,36] nanotube-modified cells. Based on these findings, halloysite
To supplement the observation of morphology and moni- clay nanotubes appear unlikely to have toxic effects at mod-
toring of cell growth, proteomic analysis has been applied,[71] erate levels of exposure.
detecting exposure-specific changes in protein expression In conclusion, first, halloysite has very low cell toxicity and
associated with the pro-inflammatory effects induced by the is safe up to very high concentration of 0.5 mg mL–1 of culture.
halloysite (ca. 1 mg mL–1), suggesting that halloysite induces It is also safe for soil worms, which are the first organisms
cell growth and proliferation, stimulates subtle responses to encountering possible halloysite pollution. Second, it is biocom-
infection, irritation, and injury, and demonstrates enhanced patible, which means that tissue contact with halloysite is not
antioxidant capability. However, a study with a mouse primary harmful; moreover, being included in polymeric composite hal-
peritoneal macrophage model demonstrated anti-inflammatory loysite improves biological cell proliferation and coating micro-
activity of the nanotubes, which increased with lumen volume organisms with halloysite does not harm their functionality.
and space, and decreased with average pore size.[69] The overall However, halloysite is not biodegradable, there are no biological
toxicity of halloysite on yeast and bacteria has been found to be mechanisms to degrade this alumosilicate clay in the body, and
negligible.[66,68] it cannot be injected in the blood intravenously, but rather may
We have evaluated the in vivo toxicity of halloysite on free- be used for external medical treatment with slow release of
living nematodes (worms) Caenorhabditis elegance.[68] These encapsulated drugs (e.g., in creams, implants, or wound treat-
nematodes have been extensively used in biomedical research ment of tissues).
1238 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 10. Above) Dark-field microscopy imaging of distribution of halloysite in C. elegance worms: a) inside the foregut; b,c) in the midgut (no nano-
tubes in embryos, uterus, and vulva were detected); d) inside the hindgut. Below) in vivo effects on C. elegance growth and fertility: a) the cumulative
curves of body length of nematodes treated with increasing concentrations of halloysite (mg mL−1); b) the influence of tube concentration on fertility in
adult hermaphrodites; c) cumulative survival curve for increasing concentrations of halloysites (mg mL−1). Reproduced with permission.[68] Copyright
2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1239
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 11. a–d) Dye filtration from 2nd-generation kaolinite and halloysite filters: chrome azurol S (a) and rhodamine 6G (b) solution passed through
halloysite filters; chrome azurol S (c) and rhodamine 6G (d) solution passed through kaolinite filters. The concentrations of the dyes were 300 mg L−1
in all the cases. e) Adsorption of rhodamine 6G and chrome azurol S onto halloysite and kaolinite.
6. Halloysite Mesoporous Templates for Catalytic i) first, to carry out nanoparticle synthesis in the presence of
Nanoparticles halloysite nanotubes, which results in seeding the surface of
the tubes with 3–5 nm diameter catalytic particles. The for-
Nanotubes of different natures, coated or intercalated with metal mation of the nanoparticles on the halloysite surface may be
and metal oxides, are efficient mesoporous media for advanced initiated at external defects in the crystalline wall structure.
catalysis. To deposit metal nanoparticles onto the clay-tube sur- Vacancies in the halloysite crystal lattice create enhanced
face, standard metal-particle-formation reactions were carried charges that attract metal ions, followed by their growth to
out in the tube dispersion. There are two approaches elaborated: nanoparticles.[7,79–81]
Figure 12. a,b) SEM of silver nanoparticles synthesized onto clay nanotubes (a) and silver nanorod synthesized inside the tube (b). c,d) Fe2O3 particles
synthesized onto halloysite (c) and within its lumen (d). e) Scheme of internal silver synthesis in halloysite lumen. Reproduced with permission.[82]
Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
1240 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
ii) Second, to load reactor components into
the nanotube lumen, wash these tubes’
outermost and to carry out particle syn-
thesis exclusively inside the tube interior,
producing round or rod-like nanoparticles
(Figure 12).[7,82]
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1241
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
Figure 14. SEM images of polyethylene doped with 5 wt% and low-density polyethylene doped with 15 wt% halloysite (images (a–c) provided by and
used with permission from A. Zeitoun, Applied Minerals Inc.). d,e) Pectin doped with 30 and 50% halloysite. Reproduced with permission.[100] Copyright
2011, American Chemical Society. f) Cross-section of (halloysite-PEI-silica-PEI)4 superlattice-film on a silver electrode. The film is bound together via
the electrostatic interactions of anionic and cationic species Reproduced with permission.[7] Copyright 2002, Elsevier.
1242 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
3
10 wt% Halloysite
2.5 5 wt% halloysite
2 wt% Halloysite
Stress (MPa) 2 Without halloysite
1.5
0.5
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Strain
a b
Figure 15. a,b) Stress–strain characterization of polymers doped with halloysite, poly(methyl methacrylate) (a) and epoxy resin (b).
setting time and higher flexibility. More-detailed analysis of the remix and redistribute the enhancements after every thermal
mechanical properties of halloysite with polymers can be found loading. The thermal properties of the composite were con-
in the reviews in refs.,[6–8] and we will further concentrate on sistent for at least 100 thermal cycles. This indicates the
the composite functionality based on combinations with carbon potential for real-world applications of these materials, as no
nanotubes and loading chemical inhibitors inside the clay external containment is required and long-term property sta-
nanotubes. bility is achieved. To study the real-world application of this
phase-change material, double-layer structures with different
doping have been tested. This multilayer organization allows
8. Functional Composites preferable vectorial heat transfer in the chosen direction over
a 24-hour heating/cooling cycle (day/night). A composite
8.1. Phase-Change Materials (PCMs) for Thermal-Energy for a smart building roof is suggested, which can maintain
Storage the interior temperature of the building by the appropriate
arrangement of the layers. Due to the good thermal stability,
Other interesting composites were obtained by halloysite the high thermal conductivity, the ability to preserve shape
mixing with paraffin and wax. These wax compounds melt at during wax melting, and the abundant availability of this nat-
72 °C and transform to liquid. However, composites containing ural tubule clay, phase-change insulation composites based
40–50 wt% of halloysite allow for a material to preserve its on halloysite could be used to conserve energy in large-scale
shape during wax melting (Figure 16).[110,111] The capability of applications.[111]
the new wax–nanoclay composites of maintaining their form Unfortunately, to counter the exciting prospects of polymer–
even above the wax melting temperature with the binding of halloysite nanocomposites, there is one dark feature: the
melted tiny droplets of wax with the halloysite ceramic car- possibility of catalytic decomposition of the polymers with hal-
cass was demonstrated. Such capability of phase-change heat- loysite alumina. We have observed a high-temperature decom-
transfer materials could lead them to become a potential choice position (140–170 °C, 10–20 hours) of poly(dimethylsiloxane)
for application in buildings or other systems as part of an doped with halloysite, and have attempted to modify the tubes
overall energy-efficiency improvement. Phase-change insula- with hexamethyldisiloxane to prevent this.
tion materials include the mixed blend of naturally occurring
halloysite nanotubes with low-cost paraffin of unique charac-
teristics. In addition to the inclusion of halloysite, conductivity- 8.2. Antimicrobial Composites (Bone Implants
enhancement materials such as graphite nanoparticles and and Tissue Scaffolds)
multiwall carbon nanotubes have also been added to make
such phase-change materials thermally conductive while main- Halloysite loaded with simple antiseptics such as brilliant green,
taining their shape. providone iodine, or chlorhexidine allows for extending the time
The thermal-conductivity test presented values from 0.5 that these antibacterial agents will function from minutes to
to 1.4 W m–1 K–1 as conductivity enhancement ranged from 5–10 hours. Halloysite encapsulation of antibiotics (tetracycline,
3 to 10% . Maximum thermal conductivity was demonstrated gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin) are even more efficient, their
for a mixture of 45:45:10 (wax:halloysite:graphite). Inclusion sustained release for 100–200 h allows them to fight even multi-
of the halloysite provided a structural support for the mate- drug resistant (MDR) bacteria such as gangrene. In Figure 17
rial to maintain its shape after undergoing phase change. we present results on the release of ciprofloxacin from clay
Such a unique characteristic would allow phase-change com- nanotubes and the use of such nanoformulation to destroy a
posites to maintain the distribution of thermal conductivity gangrene colony in a Petri dish. An equal amount of the anti-
enhancement within themselves, eliminating the need to biotic was applied to white tablets and the dark rings around
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1243
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 16. Photographs of the wax composites maintaining their shape at 60 and 80 °C (left to right in each group): a) for wax; b) 90 wt% wax + 10 wt%
carbon nanotubes; c) 60 wt% wax + 40 wt% halloysite; d) 50 wt% wax + 40 wt% halloysite + 10 wt% carbon nanotubes.
them demonstrate the area of inoculation. One can see that non- composite adhesiveness to bone and titanium implants over
encapsulated ciprofloxacin has a very low antibacterial efficiency, pure poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or calcium phosphate
while halloysite–ciprofloxacin efficiently kills gangrene bacteria. (CP) has been demonstrated. Decrease of the PMMA poly-
In the next step, drug loaded halloysite was embedded into merization temperature from 72 to 50 °C minimized tissue
polymers to make stronger and functional bone implants, damage. Antibiotics encased in clay nanotubes were isolated by
dental filler formulations, tissue scaffolds, and for structural a free-radical polymerization process during cement solidifica-
reinforcement of microvascular networks.[112–118] We pro- tion to allow a wider drug selection (e.g., ciprofloxacin). Prepa-
duced halloysite composites for bone implants with extended ration of combinations of clay nanotubes loaded with different
2–3 week antibacterial protection needed for surgery spot antibiotics (halloysite cocktail) with long-time release will syn-
healing[114] ergistically increase the efficiency of fighting of drug-resistant
Clay tubule containers allow for bone-cement composites infections.[114]
with sustained 200–300 h antibiotics release without compro- With a halloysite powder formulation, 95 wt% of loaded
mising the material strength; 2–3 times enhancement of the gentamicin was released within 48 h; however, the gentamicin
Figure 17. Release of ciprofloxin (vertical axis in%) from halloysite, and efficent suppression of gangrene with this nanoformulation (dark circles of
dead bacterial around white antibiotic tablet). Collaborative results by Y. Lvov and K. Lews, Northeastern University, Boston.
1244 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 18. a,b) Sustained release of ciprofloxacin (a) and gentamicin (b) from 7–10 wt% halloysite doped into PMMA bone cement.
release time was dramatically extended when the halloysite infection.[119] This nanoarchitecture of electrospun micro-
was incorporated in PMMA cement. Release from PMMA fibers with tubular nanocontainers may include a variety of
composites reached 60% in 250 h (Figure 18b), with enhanced drugs, allowing for drug cocktails for fighting multidrug-
gentamicin release in implant defects such as cracks. We have resistant infections.
also elaborated a “cocktail” of nanotubes loaded with 2–3 dif- The physico-chemical and mechanical properties of
ferent antibiotics and tested its efficiency on drug-resistant such microfibers with aligned clay nanotubes may have
bacteria. interesting features, and one of them is inducing the ori-
An interesting application of halloysites is their inclusion entation of poly(glycolic acid) polymeric chains along hal-
into electrospun microfibers.[119–121] Often, such polymeric loysite nanotubes.[122] The molecular chain and crystallite
fibers have a diameter of ca. 400 nm, which forces 800-nm- ordering achieved the highest orientation degree at 5 wt%
long halloysite tubes to orient along the fibers, making them halloysite loading. Clay nanotubes act as nucleating agent
stronger.[119] Such inclusion of halloysite loaded with drugs for poly(glycolic acid) and increase the crystallinity of the
into the fibers allows drug release to be extended from the 10 fibers.
to 20 h, typical for polymeric electrospun fibers, to hundreds
of hours. The guided tissue regeneration (GTR) technique
has become standard in therapy; however, infections in many 8.3. Corrosion Coating
cases cause failure of clinical applications. A nano–micro-
composite electrospun membrane with sustained 3-week Doping these clay nanotubes into paint (polyurethane, epoxy,
drug delivery was developed using metronidazole-loaded and polystyrene latex) coatings at 5 wt% provides sustained
halloysite clay nanotubes doped into poly(caprolactone)/ release of anticorrosion agents, resulting in longer-term
gelatin fibers (Figure 19). A hierarchical nano–micro system metal protection, as well as in 50–100% increase in the
was constructed as follows:[117] Clay tubes with a diameter coating strength and adhesivity. Such enhanced coating is
of 50 nm and a length of 800 nm were incorporated at especially important for operation in extreme conditions.
8 vol% into the polymeric fibers with a diameter of 400 nm, Comparative tests have shown an advantage of this coating
which resulted in the alignment of the tubes and provided technology for sea-water operations as compared with
enhanced anisotropic mechanical properties of the tissue existing coatings.[58,59,123–125] Cracks developed in polymer
membrane. coating materials doped with tubule nanocapsules will also
The metronidazole-loaded halloysite incorporated be self-healed. Doping loaded clay nanotubes into a poly-
in the microfiber membranes allowed for an extended meric matrix will provide sustained inhibitor release and
release time of 20 days as compared with 4 days for direct a ceramic “skeleton”, enhancing the composite material
admixing of the drug into the microfibers. In Figure 19, strength.
one can see two different increment areas: the first 4 days – Polymer composites used for coating, containing 5 wt% of
mostly drug release from the bulk polymer, and the second clay nanotubes were loaded with standard anticorrosion agents
region, 5–20 days – a slower release from the nanotubes. specific for copper, aluminum, and steel (benzotriazole, hydrox-
A longer sustained release of metronidazole from the com- yquinoline, and dodecylamine). An encapsulation of these
posite membranes prevented colonization of anaerobic agents in a clay tube will allow a longer anticorrosion protective
bacteria, while cells could adhere to and proliferate on the function with enhanced action at the coating defects. Figure 20
drug-loaded composite membranes without toxic effects. demonstrates scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of
The biocompatibility of the nanotubes was demonstrated bulk clay nanotubes, their location in the polyurethane paint
with mouse cells, while the halloysite–drug formula- layer, and the efficiency of anticorrosion protection for steel and
tion has been shown to efficiently suppress Fusebacterium aluminum.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1245
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 19. Scheme of the composite fiber formation and drug release. TEM images of poly(caprolactone)/gelatin fibers with embedded halloysite tubes
and metronidazole release curves from such composite (blue dots) as compared with usual fibers (red). Reproduced with permission.[119] Copyright
2015, American Chemical Society.
1246 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
Figure 20. a) Clay nanotube location in paint. b–e) Corrosion development on scratched polyurethane painted metal samples after 9 months in simu-
lated sea water: steel, usual paint coating, and paint/halloysite composite loaded with dodecylamine (b,c); aluminum-2024 alloy coated with usual
paint, and paint/halloysite loaded with benzotriazole (d,e).
Figure 21. a) Antioxidant 4010NA release from halloysite rubber composite at 25 °C. The inset images arethe EDS spectra of the sample after
2 months and the schematic of the release of antioxidant in rubber matrix. b,c) SEM image of the section surface of SBR-halloysite composite (b) and
TEM image of SBR-halloysite composites (c).
rubber is important; however, antioxidants often diffuse toward antioxidant blooming. From this research, we concluded that
the surface of rubber products in an event called “blooming”. this functionalized halloysite can improve the SBR composite
Blooming results in microdefects, loss of antioxidant protec- mechanical properties and aging resistance without blooming.
tion, and contaminates the environment. Because of this, only This approach for fabricating functional rubber–halloysite
about 1 wt% antioxidant can be added to an elastomer formula- nanocomposites may be extended to other “smart” elastomers,
tion, which provides only limited aging resistance, and is not for example, for sustainable antimicrobial rubber protection
high enough to illicit blooming.[129] using halloysite fillers loaded with antiseptics.
An aging-resistant SBR composite was prepared by the addi-
tion of 27 wt% halloysite clay nanotubes loaded with the anti-
oxidant 4010NA.[125] Silanized halloysites were well dispersed 9. Conclusions
in the SBR matrix, which provided the synergistic effect of
improved mechanical properties and sustained release of the Halloysite clay tubes with a diameter of ca. 50 nm and a
antioxidant. Encapsulating the antioxidant in the nanotubes length of 1 µm have been used as natural nanocontainers
allowed for an antioxidant concentration of 3.2 wt% (which for loading and sustained release of chemical agents. The
tripled the amount compared with the traditional process), halloysite inner lumen can store and release molecules in a
without any indication of surface blooming. The release of controllable manner, making these tiny containers attractive
4010NA from the halloysite nanotubes in water and nonpolar for applications in drug delivery, antimicrobial materials, self-
cyclohexane varies from four hours to days, but, after burying healing polymeric composites, and regenerative medicine.
the tube-encapsulated antioxidant into bulk rubber, it was The halloysite lumen capacity may be adjusted between 10
extended to more than nine months (66 wt% was released in and 40 vol% with selective etching, and its porosity may be
the first five months (see Figure 21)). After incubation at 90 °C varied from 60 to 400 m2 g–1. Halloysite has no in vitro or
for seven days, the SBR and antioxidant-loaded halloysite com- in vivo toxicity, which allows it to be used for drug-delivery
posite showed stable tensile strength and little decrease in systems capable of releasing bioactive agents in a sustained
elongation at break when compared with a control sample. The manner from hours to months. It may be useful for oral drug
test occurred at 90 °C and incubation for 15 days showed no formulations, skin care, medical implants, and dentistry,
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1247
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
though halloysite cannot be used for intravenous injection [8] M. Liu , Z. Jia , D. Jia , C. Zhou , Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 39 ,
because it is not biodegradable. 1498 .
Halloysite tubes can encase enzymes for longer storage, [9] G. Cavallaro, G. Lazzara, S. Milioto, J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116,
higher temperature, and extended functionality, while the tube’s 21932.
[10] G. Cavallaro, G. Lazzara, S. Milioto, F. Parisi, V. Sanzillo, ACS
opening allows for delivery of small substrate molecules into
Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 606.
the tube interior for biocatalysis. Loading DNA into halloysite [11] G. Cavallaro, G. Lazzara, S. Milioto, G. Palmisano, F. Parisi, J. Col-
is another prospective research direction. As functional nano- loid Interface Sci. 2014, 417, 66.
blocks, halloysite tubes may be used for building on biological [12] Y. Zhao, G. Cavallaro, Y. Lvov, J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 440, 68.
cells, like the formation of spore-like microbial shells providing [13] B. Singh, Clays Clay Miner. 1996, 44, 191.
microorganisms with additional functions. [14] B. Singh, I. Mackinnon, Clays Clay Miner. 1996, 44, 825.
These clay nanotubes have good mixability with biopolymers [15] K. Tazaki, Clays Clay Miner. 2005, 53, 224.
(e.g., polysaccharides, polyacrylates), with high-, medium- or [16] J. Kirkman, Clays Clay Miner. 1981, 29, 1.
low-polarity polymers (e.g., polyamides, epoxy, poly(vinyl chlo- [17] Y. Kuroda, K. Ito, K. Itabashi, K. Kuroda, Langmuir 2011, 27, 2028.
ride), polyethylene), and can be doped into plastics providing [18] K. Wada, Chem. Geol. 1987, 60, 17.
[19] P. Quantin, J. Gautheyrou, P. Lorenzoni, Clay Miner. 1988, 23,
good dispersions. These ceramic nanotubes form a “skeleton”
423.
in the bulk polymers, enhancing the composite strength and [20] K. Nicolini, C. Fukamachi, F. Wypych, A. Mangrich, J. Colloid Inter-
adhesivity. These “skeleton bones” may be loaded with active face Sci. 2009, 338, 474.
compounds, like real bones are loaded with marrow, providing [21] E. Abdullayev, A. Joshi, W. Wei, Y. Zhao, Y. Lvov, ACS Nano 2012,
additional functionality for polymers (antimicrobial, anti-aging, 6, 6887.
anticorrosion, and flame-retardancy). Halloysite–rubber nano- [22] R. White, D. Bavykin, F. Walsh, Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 1.
composites have improved strength and elongation limits, as [23] A. Zhang, L. Pan, H. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Ye, M. Xia, X. Chen, Colloids
well as enhanced anti-aging and flame-retardant properties due Surfaces, A 2012, 396, 182.
to the nanotube loading/sustained release of corresponding [24] C. Li, J. Wang, X. Lu, S. Ding, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 420, 1.
chemical inhibitors. Halloysite is nontoxic, abundantly avail- [25] W-O. Yah, A. Takahara, Y. Lvov, J. Am Chem Soc 2012, 134,
1853.
able from natural deposits: a “green” nanomaterial that does
[26] W-O. Yah, H. Xu, H. Soejima, W. Ma, A. Takahara, Y. Lvov, J Am
not require exfoliation or other complicated energy-consuming Chem Soc 2012, 134, 12134.
processing. [27] H. Jing, W-O. Yah, Y. Higaki, H. Otsuka, Y. Lvov, A. Takahara,
Chem. Lett. 2013, 42, 121.
[28] Y. Fu, D. Zhao, W. Wang, Y. Lvov, IOP Mater. Sci. Eng. J. 2014, 64,
Acknowledgements #012047.
[29] P. Yuan, P. Southon, Z. Liu, C. Kepert, Nanotechnology 2012, 23,
Y.L. acknowledges support by the U.S. Department of Energy under
275705.
EPSCoR Grant DE-SC0012432 with additional support from the
[30] G. Cavallaro, G. Lazzara, S. Milioto, Langmuir 2011, 27,
Louisiana Board of Regents and an Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Prize. W.W. and L.Z. acknowledge support from the National Natural 1158.
Science Foundation of China (51320105012 and 81330043) and the [31] Z. Luo, H. Song, X. Feng, M. Run, H. Cui, L. Wu, J. Gao, Z. Wang,
Beijing Nova Program (Z131102000413015). R.F. acknowledges support Langmuir 2013, 29, 12358.
from the Russian Science Foundation grant No 14–14–00924. The [32] Z. Luo, A. Wang, C. Wang, W. Qin, N. Zhao, H. Song, J. Gao,
authors thank A.S. Dubkova for technical help with pictures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7327 .
Note: Figure 4b in the originally published manuscript did not show the [33] L. Onsager, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1949, 51, 627.
tube loading as described in the caption. On February 8, 2016, the image [34] J. Adams, J. He, G. McPherson, A. Bose, R. Gupta, V. John, Lang-
was replaced with a higher resolution image wherein the tube loading is muir 2014, 30, 13533.
demonstrated. [35] A. Hughes, M. King, Langmuir 2010, 26, 12155.
[36] D. Kommireddy, S. Sriram, Y. Lvov, D. Mills, Biomaterials 2006, 27,
4296.
Received: May 16, 2015 [37] H. Wu, H. Watanabe, W. Ma, A. Fujimoto, T. Higuchi, K. Uesugi,
Revised: June 22, 2015 A. Takeuchi, Y. Suzuki, H. Jinnai, A. Takahara, Langmuir 2013, 29,
Published online: October 6, 2015 14971.
[38] R. Price, B. Gaber, Y. Lvov, J. Microencapsulation 2001, 18, 713.
[39] Y. Suh, D. Kil, K. Chung, E. Abdullayev, Y. Lvov, D. Mongayt,
J. Nanosci. Nanotechol. 2011, 11, 661.
[1] P. Podsiadlo, A. Kaushik, E. Arruda, A. Waas, B. Shim, J. Xu, [40] N. Veerabadran, R. Price, Y. Lvov, Nano 2007, 2, 215.
H. Nandivadu, B. Pumplin, J. Lahann, A. Ramamoorthy, N. Kotov, [41] Y. Lvov, R. Price, B. Gaber, I. Ichinose, Col Surf Eng. 2002, 198, 375.
Science 2007, 318, 80. [42] Y. Lvov, A. Aerov, R. Fakhrullin, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 207,
[2] Y-C. Li, J. Schulz, S. Mannen, C. Delhom, B. Condon, S-C. Chang, 189.
M. Zammaran, J. Grunlan, ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3325. [43] S. Levis, P. Deasy, Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 243, 125.
[3] E. Ruiz-Hitzky, M. Dardera, F. Fernandes, B. Wicklein, A. Alcântar, [44] S. Levis, P. Deasy, Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 253, 145.
P. Aranda, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1392. [45] H. Kelly, P. Deasy, E. Ziaka, N. Claffey, Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 274, 167.
[4] E. Joussein, S. Petit, J. Churchman, B. Theng, D. Righi, B. Delvaux, [46] C. Ward, S. Song, E. Davis, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 6641.
Clay Miner. 2005, 40, 383. [47] J. Forsgren, E. Jämstorp, S. Bredenberg, H. Engqvist, M. Strømme,
[5] Y. Lvov, D. Shchukin, H. Möhwald, R. Price, ACS Nano 2008, 2, 814. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 219.
[6] M. Du, B. Guo, D. Jia, Polym. Int. 2010, 59, 574. [48] V. Vergaro, Y. Lvov, S. Leporatti, Macromol. Biosci. 2012, 12, 1265.
[7] Y. Lvov, E. Abdullayev, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1690. [49] M. Shami, K. Geckeler, Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 075604.
1248 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
[50] Y. Lee, G-E. Jung, S. Cho, K. Geckeler, H. Fuchs, Nanoscale 2013, 5, [84] H. Robson, (Exxon Research & Development Co.), US Patent
8577. 4,098.676, 1978.
[51] D. Shchukin, R. Price, Y. Lvov, Small 2005, 1, 510. [85] E. Abdullayev, V. Abbasov, Y. Lvov, J. Petrochem. Oil Ref. 2010, 23,
[52] J. Tully, R. Fakhrullin, Y. Lvov, in NATO Science Series – C: Envi- 234.
ronmental Security. Nanomaterials and Nanoarchitectures (Eds: [86] E. Abdullayev, Y. Lvov, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11,
T. Wagner, M. Bardošová), Springer 2015, Ch. 6. 10007.
[53] R. Zhai, B. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Xie, H. Zhang, J. Liu, Cat. Commun. [87] D. Lu, H. Chen, J. Wu, C. Chan, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11,
2010, 12, 259. 7789.
[54] C. Chao, J. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Xiang, [88] M. Liu, B. Guo, M. Du, X. Cai, D. Jia, Nanotechology 2007, 18,
R. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10559. 455703.
[55] C. Chao, B. Zhang, R. Zhai, X. Xiang, J. Liu, R. Chen, ACS Applied [89] S. Deng, J. Zhang, L. Ye, Comp. Sci. Tech. 2009, 69, 2497.
Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10559. [90] Y. Ye, H. Chen, J. Wu, L. Ye, Polymer 2007, 48, 6426.
[56] N. Veerabadran, Y. Lvov, R. Price, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, [91] B. Guo, Q. Zou, Y. Lei, M. Du, M. Liu, D. Jia, Thermochim. Acta
24, 99. 2009, 484, 48.
[57] P. Zheng, Y. Du, X. Ma, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 151, 14. [92] M. Liu, B. Guo, M. Du, D. Jia, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Proc. 2007,
[58] E. Abdullayev, Y. Lvov, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 6681. 88, 391.
[59] A. Joshi, E. Abdullayev, A. Vasiliev, O. Volkova, Y. Lvov, Langmuir [93] M. Du, B. Guo, M. Liu, D. Jia, Polym. J. 2007, 39, 208.
2013, 29, 7439 [94] B. Lecouvet, J. Gutierrez, M. Sclavons, C. Bailly, Polym. Degrad.
[60] W. Wei, R. Minullina, R. Fakhrullin, E. Abdullayev, D. Mills, Y. Lvov, Stabil. 2011, 96, 226.
RCS Adv. 2014, 4, 488. [95] W. Wei, E. Abdullayev, A. Hollister, Y. Lvov, D. Mills, Macromol.
[61] M. Dzamukova, E. Naumenko, A. Badrutdinov, Y. Lvov, Mater. Eng. 2012, 297, 645.
R. Fakhrullin, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10560. [96] Y. Xiea, P. Chang, S. Wang, J. Yua, X. Maa, Carbohydr. Polym. 2011,
[62] M. Guo, A. Wang, F. Muhammad, W. Qi, H. Ren, Y. Guo, G. Zhu, 83, 186.
Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 2115. [97] H. Voon, R. Bhat, A. Easa, M. Liong, A. Karim, Food Bioproc. Tech.
[63] X. Zhang, Y. Zheng, L. Fried, Y. Du, S. Montano, A. Sohn, Free Rad- 2012, 5, 1766.
ical Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 811. [98] M. Liu, B. Guo, Q. Zou, M. Du, D. Jia, Nanotechnology 2008, 19,
[64] A. Bernardos, L. Mondragón, E. Aznar, M. Marcos, R. Martínez- 205709.
Máñez, F. Sancenón, J. Soto, J. Barat, E. Pérez-Payá, C. Guillem, [99] Y. Lvov, S. Eadula, Z. Zheng, Z. Lu, G. Grozdits, Nor. Pulp Paper
P. Amorós, ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6353. Res. J. 2006, 21, 552.
[65] E. Naumenko, M. Dzamukova, G. Fakhrullina, F. Akhatova, [100] G. Cavallaro, G. Lazzara, S. Milioto, Langmuir 2011, 27, 1158.
R. Fakhrullin, Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2014, 18, 84. [101] G. Lazzara, G. Cavallaro, R. Fakhrullin, Y. Lvov, ICE Green Mater.
[66] V. Vergaro, E. Abdullayev, R. Cingolani, Y. Lvov, S. Leporatti, Bio- 2014, 2, 232.
macromolecules. 2010, 11, 820. [102] M. Liu, B. Guo, M. Du, D. Jia, Polym. J. 2008, 40, 1087.
[67] S. Konnova, I. Sharipova, T. Demina, Y. Osin, D. Yarullina, [103] M. Du, B. Guo, M. Liu, D. Jia, Polym. J. 2006, 38, 1198.
O. Ilinskaya, Y. Lvov, R. Fakhrullin, Chem. Commun. 2013, 476. [104] M. Du, B. Guo, M. Liu, D. Jia, Polym. Polym. Compos. 2007, 15,
[68] G. Fakhrullina, F. Akhatova, Y. Lvov, R. Fakhrullin, Environ. Sci.: 321.
Nano 2015, 2, 54. [105] H. Ismail, P. Pasbakhsh, A. M. N. Fauzi, A. A. Bakar, Polym. Test.
[69] J. Cervini-Silva, A. Nieto-Camacho, E. Palacios, J. A. Montoya, 2008, 27, 841.
V. Gómez-Vidales, M. T. Ramírez-Apán, Colloids Surfaces, B 2013, [106] A. Notta-Cuvier, M. Murariu, J. Odent, R. Delille, A. Bouzouita,
111, 651. J.-M. Raquez, F. Lauro, P. Dubois, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2015, 6,
[70] M. Bottino, G. Yassen, J. Platt, N. Labban, L. Windsor, K. Spolnik, 254.
A. Bressiani, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2013, 1712. [107] M. Du, B. Gao, D. Jia, Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 1362.
[71] X. Lai, M. Agarwal, Y. Lvov, C. Pachpande, K. Varahramyan, [108] J. Zhao, C.-L. Deng, S.-L. Du, L. Chen, C. Deng, Y.-Z. Wang, J. Appl.
F. Witzmann, J. Appl. Toxicity 2013, 33, 1316. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40065.
[72] A. Kilislioglu, B. Bilgin, Radiochim. Acta 2002, 90, 155. [109] A. Joshi, C. Montes, E. Allouche, Y. Lvov, J. Inorg. Organomet.
[73] Y. Zhao, E. Abdullayev, A. Vasiliev, Y. Lvov, J. Colloid Interface Sci. Polym. Mater. 2015, 25, 282.
2013, 406, 121. [110] J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Wan, D. Mei, B. Zhang, Sol. Energy 2012, 86,
[74] J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. Du, B. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Liu, 1142.
K. Wang, I&ES Res. 2012, 51, 1082, [111] Y. Zhao, S. Thapa, L. Weiss, Y. Lvov, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2014, 16,
[75] Y. Zheng, A. Wang, J. Macromol. Sci. A: Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 47, 33. 1391.
[76] S. Jana, S. Das, C. Ghosh, A. Maity, M. Pradhan, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, [112] E. Abdullayev, Y. Lvov, J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2894.
8711. [113] Y. Lvov, A. Aerov, R. Fakhrullin, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 207,
[77] Y. Zhang, R. Gao, M. Liu, C. Yan, A. Shan, Archives Animal Nutri- 189.
tion 2014, 68, 320. [114] W. Wei, E. Abdullayev, A. Hollister, D. Mills, Y. Lvov, Macromol.
[78] Y. Zhang, R. Gao, M. Liu, B. Shi, A. Shan, B. Cheng, Theriogenology Mater. Eng. 2012, 297, 645.
2014, 12, 1. [115] W. Zhou, B. Guo, M. Liu, R. Liao, A. Bakr, M. Rabie, D. Jia,
[79] Y. Fu, L. Zhang, J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 3595. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 1574.
[80] Y. Zhang, X. He, J. Ouyang, H. Yang, Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2948. [116] Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, W. Wu, T. Xu, H. Fong, Dental Mater. 2012, 28,
[81] R. Wang, G. Jiang, Y. Ding, Y. Wang, X. Sun, X. Wang, W. Chen, 1071.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4154. [117] M. Liu, C Wu, Y. Jiao, S. Xiong, C. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. B 2013,
[82] E. Abdullayev, K. Sakakibara, K. Okamoto, W. Wei, K. Ariga, Y. Lvov, 1, 2078.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4040. [118] S. Olugebefola, A. Hamilton, D. Fairfield, N. Sottos, S. White, Soft
[83] N. Sanchez-Ballester, G. Ramesh, T. Tanabe, L. Shrestha, Matter 2014, 10, 544.
E. Koudelkova, Y. Lvov, K. Ariga, H. Abe, J. Mater. Chem. 2015, 3, [119] J. Xue, Y. Niu, M. Gong, R. Shi, D. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Lvov, ACS
6614. Nano 2015, 9, 1900.
Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250 © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com 1249
www.advmat.de
www.MaterialsViews.com
REVIEW
[120] K. El-Refaie, G. Bowlin, K. Mansfield, J. Layman, D. Simpson, [125] D. Fix, D. Andreeva, H. Möhwald, Y. Lvov, D. Shchukin, Adv. Funct.
E. Sanders, G. Wnek, J. Controlled Release 2002, 81, 57. Mater. 2009, 19, 1720.
[121] M. Makaremi, R. De Silva, P. Pasbakhsh, J. Phys. Chem. 2015, 119, [126] B. Guo, Y. Lei, F. Chen, X. Liu, M. Du, D. Jia, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008,
7949. 255, 7329.
[122] D. Tao, Y. Higaki, W. Ma, H. Wu, T. Shinohara, T. Yano, [127] V. Raman, S. Rooj, A. Das, K. Stockelhuber, F. Simon, G. Nando,
A. Takahara, Polymer 2015, 60, 1894. G. Heinrich, J. Macromol. Sci. A 2013, 50, 1091.
[123] D. Shchukin, H. Moehwald, Small 2007, 3, 926. [128] Y. Fu, D. Zhao, P. Yao, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Lvov, ACS Appl.
[124] E. Abdullayev, R. Price, D. Shchukin, Y. Lvov, ACS Appl. Mater. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8156.
Interfaces 2009, 2, 1437. [129] G. Li, J. Koenig, Rubber Chem. Technol. 2005, 78, 3.
1250 wileyonlinelibrary.com © 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1227–1250