Scribd
Upload
40 views2 pages

Demo 12 Angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

Uploaded by

Marianne Emil-1051
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views2 pages

Demo 12 Angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

Uploaded by

Marianne Emil-1051
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

TWELVE ANGRY MEN NAME:________________________

DATE :___________ HOUR:______

EVIDENCE LOG
ANSWER GUIDE
DIRECTIONS:
1: Summarize the details of the evidence as present during the trial.
2: Summarize the details after the jurors reviewed the evidence critically.

ORIGINAL EVIDENCE RE-EXAMINED EVIDENCE

Was first claimed to be the only Juror #8 produced an identical


one to exist known to the store switchknife.
owner.
Juror #2 questions how a person
KNIFE

The angle of the knife was 5’8” tall could stab a person 6’ 2”
proven to have entered from a tall downward into the chest since
downward angle. the victim was a half a foot taller.

Juror #5 demonstrated that an


experienced knife fighter would use
the knife in a underhanded manner.

The woman claimed that at It was determined that the woman


TESTIMONY
WOMAN’S

12:10 A.M she witnessed the wore bifocals and that it was highly
murder that occurred across the unlikely for her to have worn them
street from her bed next to the as she casually looked out the
window, which allowed her to window from her bed. It was also
see directly across the street. determined by Juror #11 that they
appeared to be very strong, casting
doubt to the credibility of what she
saw.

The old man testified that he It was agreed that the old man
TESTIMONY

heard the boy state that he was probably heard the boy make the
OLD MAN’S

going to kill his father and a statement before, and that the old
second later he heard the body man could not have reached the
fall. He also stated that he door and open it from his bedroom
reached the door in 15 seconds in less than 31 seconds.
to observe the son leaving the Juror #9 believed the old man to be
apartment. lying to gain attention thus, casting
doubt on the credibility of the
witness.

You might also like