Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R *
Contract No. :

REQUEST FOR INSPECTION / APPROVAL CHIT CHIT NO. :

(EARTH WORKS / PAVEMENT WORKS / DRAINAGE WORKS / STRUCTURAL WORKS / OTHER WORKS)*

PART A : (To be filled by Contractor)

From : CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE

To : RESIDENT ENGINEER

We request for inspection and permission to proceed with the following work;

Submitted by :- Signature : Checked by :- Signature :

( ) Contractor's Representative

Time : Date : / /

PART B : (To be filled by Consulting Engineer/Engineer's Staff)*

Received by:- Signature : Time : Date : / /

Name :

Comments :-

Survey & Setting Out : Inspection of Prior Work : Testing of Prior Work :

Signature : Signature : Signature :

(Survey Technician) (Inspector of Works) (Laboratory Technician)

PART C : (To be filled by Engineer / Quality Assurance Engineer)*

From : RESIDENT ENGINEER

To : CONTRACTOR's REPRESENTATIVE

Your request to proceed with the above mentioned work IS APPROVED

*
IS NOT APPROVED

Remarks :

Received for Contractor ; Signature :

Resident Engineer

Time : Date : / /
Signature :
Contractor's Representative

Neither the endorsement of this Form nor anything written on it is intended to convey final
Time : Date : / / approval for any part of the Works, nor does it relieves the Contractor of his responsibility to
comply with the quality requirements of the Works.

* select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R *
Contract No. :

INSPECTION REPORT Report No :

(Earth Works/Pavement Works / Drainage Works)*

CHECKS DONE
WORK / OPERATION DATE & COMMENTS
INSPECTED TIME (Deficiencies, Degree of Completion,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Weather, others)
Ref : Approval Chit No

Ref : Approval Chit No

Ref : Approval Chit No

Ref : Approval Chit No

CHECK-LIST CHECK MARKS Checked by;

1. SETTING OUT 6. MATERIALS ALL AS REQUIRED O. K. Signature :

Inspector of Works

2. PRIOR WORK 7. TESTING DEFICIENT X Name :

3. DIMENSIONS 8. COMPACTION NOT APPLICABLE - Date :

4. EQUIPMENT 9. WORKMANSHIP NOT CHECKED O

5. LABOUR 10.

Date :

* Select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

1)
Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R *
Contract No. :

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY & FIELD TESTS

(Earth Works & Pavement Works)
For the period from : / to / / 20

No. of Tests Carried Out No. of Tests

Works Item & Type of Test During the Passed Failed Remarks
reporting Previously Total (During the Reporting
period Period)
EMBANKMENT FILL BELOW TOP 300mm :
Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis
* Atterberg Limit (Casagrande Method)
* C. B. R. (4-Days Soaked Test)
(for the top 0.7m of fill)
* Std. Compaction Test (BS 1377:1990)
Field Tests : * Field Density Test (Sand Replacement Method)
TOP 300mm SUBGRADE (for Cut & Fill) :
Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis
* Atterberg Limit (Casagrande Method)
* C. B. R. (4-Days Soaked Test)
* Std. Compaction Test (BS 1377:1990)
Field Test : * Field Density Test (Sand Replacement Method)
SUB-BASE :
Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis
* Atterberg Limit (Casagrande Method)
* C. B. R. (4-Days Soaked Test)
* Aggregate Crushing Value
* Std. Compaction Test (BS 1377:1990)
Field Test : * Field Density Test (Sand Replacement Method)
ROAD BASE :
Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis
* Atterberg Limit (Casagrande Method)
* C. B. R. (4-Days Soaked Test)
* Sodium Sulphate Soundness Test
* Aggregate Crushing Value
* Flakiness Index
* Std. Compaction Test (BS 1377:1990)
Field Test : * Field Density Test (Sand Replacement Method)
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FOR PAVEMENT COURSES : ACBC ACWC ACBC ACWC ACBC ACWC ACBC ACWC ACBC ACWC

Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis & Bitumen Extraction

* Aggregate Crushing Value
* Flakiness Index
* Bitumen Stripping Test
* Sodium Sulphate Soundness Test
* % Water Absorption
* Polished Stone Value (for wearing course)
* Marshall Method Tests (Prod. Stage)
Field Test : * Thickness Test (coring)
* Compacted Density Test (coring)
SHOULDERS :
Lab Tests : * Gradation Analysis
* Atterberg Limit (Casagrande Method)
* C. B. R. (4-Days Soaked Test)
* Std. Compaction Test (BS 1377:1990)
Field Test : * Field Density Test (Sand Replacement Method)
* select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor * : Project

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R * Contract No. :

NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT

Sample Location (Chainage / Borrow Pit No.)* :

Date of Test

Sample No.

Specimen No.

Container No.

Mass of Wet Soil + Container W2 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil + Container W3 (g)

Mass of Moisture W2 - W3 (g)

Mass of Container W1 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil W3 - W1 (g)

MOISTURE CONTENT Wc = W2 - W3 x 100 (%)

W3 - W1

Avg. MOISTURE CONTENT w (%)

Sample Location (Chainage / Borrow Pit No.)* :

Date of Test

Sample No.

Specimen No.

Container No.

Mass of Wet Soil + Container W2 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil + Container W3 (g)

Mass of Moisture W2 - W3 (g)

Mass of Container W1 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil W3 - W1 (g)

MOISTURE CONTENT Wc = W2 - W3 x 100 (%)

W3 - W1

Avg. MOISTURE CONTENT w (%)

Sample Location (Chainage / Borrow Pit No.)* :

Date of Test

Sample No.

Specimen No.

Container No.

Mass of Wet Soil + Container W2 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil + Container W3 (g)

Mass of Moisture W2 - W3 (g)

Mass of Container W1 (g)

Mass of Dry Soil W3 - W1 (g)

MOISTURE CONTENT Wc = W2 - W3 x 100 (%)

W3 - W1

Avg. MOISTURE CONTENT w (%)

Tested by : Witnessed by :

( ) ( )
Date : / / Date : / /

* Select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R *
Contract No. :

ATTERBERG LIMIT (CASAGRANDE METHOD ) Date of Test : / /

BS 1377 : Part 2 : 1990 (Cl. 4.5)

Material Tested For : Road Section : Test No. : LL/PI/ /(sample ref. no.)

Sample Location (Chainage / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) * :

Soil Description : Sample Ref. No :

Specimen No. 1 2 3
Container No. SPECIFICATION LIMITS :-
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Plastic Limit

Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g L. L. - %

Mass of Container (w1) g
Mass of Dry Soil (w3 - w1) g P. I. -
Mass of Moisture (w2 - w3) g
Moisture Content (w2 - w3) x 100 %
(w3 - w1)
Average MOISTURE CONTENT %

Specimen No. 4 5 6 7 8
Number of Bumps
Liquid Limit

Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (m2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (m3) g
Mass of Container (m1) g
Mass of Dry Soil (m3 - m1) g
Mass of Moisture (m2 - m3) g
MOISTURE CONTENT (m2 - m3) x 100 %
(m3 - m1)

Sample Preparation
(Delete / Identify as appropriate)
l
As received:
MOISTURE CONTENT %

l Air Dried at: °C

l Oven Dried at : °C

l Washed on 425 µm sieve :

l Proportion retained on 425 µm sieve:

%
l

Test Results
LL %

%
PL
10 15 20 25 30 # 50
PI
NUMBER OF BUMPS

Remarks :

Tested by : Signature :
( )
Name :
Witnessed by : Laboratory Technician
( )
Date : / /
* Select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R * Contract No. :

LIQUID LIMIT & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (CONE PENETROMETER TEST)

B. S 1377 : Part 2 : 1990

Material Tested For : Date of Test : / /

Road Section : Test No. : LL/PI/ /(sample ref. no.)

Sample Location (Chainage / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No) * :

Soil Description : Sample Ref. No :

PLASTIC LIMIT -
Specimen No. 1 2 3 4
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Container (w1) g
Mass of Moisture (w3 - w1) g
Mass of Dry Soil [(w2 - w3) / (w3 - w1)] x 100 g
Moisture Content %
AVERAGE MOISTURE CONTENT %

LIQUID LIMIT -
Specimen No. 5 6 7 8
Initial dial gauge reading mm
Final dial gauge reading mm
Cone Penetration mm
Average Penetration mm
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (m2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (m3) g
Mass of Container (m1) g
Mass of Moisture (m2 - m3) g
Mass of Dry Soil (m3 - m1) g
Moisture Content [(m2 - m3) / (m3 - m1)] x 100 %

LIQUID LIMIT : % Specification Limits :- Sample Preparation

PLASTIC LIMIT : % L. L. : (Delete / Identify as appropriate)
PLASTICITY INDEX : P. I. :
l As received:

28.00 l Air Dried at: °C

26.00 # # # # # # # # # l Oven Dried at : °C

24.00 l Washed on 425 µm sieve :

l Proportion retained on 425 µm sieve:

22.00
%
Penetration of Cone (mm)

20.00
Tested & Witnessed by :

1.
18.00 ( )

2..

16.00 ( )

14.00
Signature :

Name :
12.00
Laboratory Technician
Moisture Content (%)
Date : / /

* Select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R * Contract No.

Date of Test : / /
C. B. R. TEST (4-Days Soaked Test)
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 {Cl. 7.2 (method-3 ) 7.3, 7.4, 7.5 & 7.6}

Test No. : CBR/ /(sample ref. no.)

Material Tested For : Road Section :

Sample Location (Chainage / Offset / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) :*

Soil Description : Sample Ref. No :

SPECIMEN PREPARATION : 4.5 kg Rammer Method (Manual / Mechanical) / Vibrating Hammer Method* Result of BS Compaction Test :
* Target moisture content: % (as identified previously in Test No. ) (Using CBR mould with 62 nos. of blows/layer)
* Compaction effort : No. of blows / layer= (as identified previously in Test No. ) M.D.D. : Mg/m³
No. of layers = O.M.C. : %

BEFORE SOAKING
DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT Top face Bottom face
Mould No. Container No.
Mass of Mould + Base + Compacted Soil (m2) g Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Mould + Base (m1) g Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Compacted Soil (m2 - m1) g Mass of Container (w1) g
Volume of (CBR) Mould (v) cm³ Mass of Moisture (w2 - w3) g
Bulk Density of Soil [P = (m2 - m1) / v] Mg/m³ Mass of Dry Soil (w3 - w1) g
Av. Moisture Content (w) % Moisture Content [(w2 - w3) / (w3 - w1)] x 100 %
Dry Density of Soil [Pd = 100 P/(100 + w)] Mg/m³ Av. Moisture Content w %
4- DAYS SOAKED CBR TEST : Proving Ring Constant : kN/Div
Penetration of Gauge Reading Gauge Reading Force on Plunger
Force on Plunger (kN)
plunger (Div) Penetration of plunger (mm) (Div) (kN) l
Dry Density of the specimen
(mm) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Mg/m³

0 4.00

0.25 4.25 l
Specimen compacted to :
0.50 4.50 % of
0.75 4.75
MDD of sample
1.00 5.00
1.25 5.25
1.50 5.50
1.75 5.75
2.00 6.00 From the graph
2.25 6.25 (after corrections if appropriate)
2.50 6.50 CBR Values at penetrations of :
2.75 6.75 2.5 mm 5.0 mm
3.00 7.00 Top face (%)
3.25 7.25 Bottom face (%)

3.50 7.50
Accepted CBR Value : %
3.75

EXPANSION & ABSORPTION DETERMINATION :

Surcharge (if applied) : kg Remarks:

Gauge reading before soaking : mm
Gauge reading after soaking : mm
Final swell : mm
Mass of Mould + Base + Specimen (before soaking)m2 : g
Mass of Mould + Base + Specimen (after soaking) m3 : g
Mass of Water Absorption (m3 - m2) : g
( %)

Tested & Witnessed by : Signature :

Name :
Laboratory Technician
1. ; 2.
( ) ( ) Date : / /
* Select as appropriate

Format Rev. No. : 0

Computer ref.: C:/A-c-2/ISO/QC Forms/QC-07(a) CBR Test Minsar/QC/07(a)
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R * Contract No.:

Date of Test : / /
C. B. R. TEST (4-Days Soaked Test) - Graph
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 {Cl. 7.2 (method-3 ) 7.3, 7.4, 7.5 & 7.6}

Test No. : CBR/ /(sample ref. no.)

Material Tested For: / Road Section :

Sample Location (Chainage / Offset / Depth / Borrow Pit No. / Stock Pile No.) *:

Soil Description : Sample Ref. No :

Dry Density of the Specimen: Mg/m³( % of M.D.D. of sample) Moisture Content of the Specimen : %

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
TEST RESULT CURVES OF TOP & BOTTOM FACES OF SPECIMEN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Force on Plunger (kN)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Penetration of Plunger (mm)

Top Face Bottom Face

Calculations : Penetration of
(after corrections if plunger Force Std. Force (kN) Force Std. Force (kN)
CBR Value CBR Value
appropriate) (kN) (100% CBR) (kN) (100% CBR)
2.5 mm 13.2 ( /13.2) x 100 = % 13.2 ( /13.2) x 100 = %

5.0 mm 20 ( /20.0) x 100 = % 20 ( /20.0) x 100 = %

Remarks :

Tested By : Signature :
( )
Name :
Witnessed By : Laboratory Technician
( ) Date : / /

* Select as appropriate
Contractor / Turnkey Contractor *: Project :

Consulting Engineer/Engineer/S.O.R * Contract No.:

STANDARD COMPACTION TEST Date of Test : / /

BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990 (Cl. 3.5 & 3.6 - 4.5kg Rammer Method/Cl. 3.7 - Vibrating Hammer Method)*

Material Tested For : / Road Section : Test No.: MDD/ /(sample ref. no.)

Sample Location (Chainage / Borrow Pit No. / Depth / Stock Pile No.) * :

Soil Description : Sample Ref. No :

Specimen No. 1 2 3 4 5

DENSITY :
Amount of Water Added ml
Mass of Mould + Base + Compacted Soil (m2) g
Mass of Mould + Base (m1) g
Mass of Compacted Soil (m2 - m1) g
Volume of Mould (1.0 litre / CBR)* (v) cm³
BULK DENSITY OF SOIL [P = (m2 - m1) / v) Mg/m³

MOISTURE CONTENT :
Container No.
Mass of Wet Soil + Container (w2) g
Mass of Dry Soil + Container (w3) g
Mass of Moisture (w2 - w3) g
Mass of Container (w1) g
Mass of Dry Soil (w3 - w1) g
(w2 - w3) x 100
Moisture Content %
(w3 - w1)
Average MOISTURE CONTENT (w) %
DRY DENSITY OF SOIL [Pd = 100 P/(100 + w)] Mg/m³

0 5 # 1. # # # 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 5 # # # # #
DRY DENSITY Mg/m3

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

MOISTURE CONTENT (%)

SPECIMEN PREPARATION :
No. of blows / layer = ; No. of layers = MAX. DRY DENSITY (MDD) = Mg/m³
Initial sample mass = OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (OMC) = %
Mass retained on (20mm / 37.5mm) * sieve= g ( %)

Remarks :

Signature :

Name :
Tested by : ( ) Laboratory Technician

Witnessed by : ( ) Date : / /

* Select as appropriate