CPC 4
CPC 4
(2) What is the effect of non-filing written statement :- The conduct of the
defendant in not filing the written statement has to seen in the facts of each case,
and no straight-jacket formula can be applied that where the written statement
not filed within a particular time, no further opportunity should be granted. If the
defendants were negligent in not filing the written statement, some reasonable
opportunity should be allowed to them so that the case could be decided on
merits.
However, due to uncontrolled circumstances, if the defendant can not file his
written statement within the before-mentioned time, he may submit a written
statement along with delay application and pray for the condonation of delay for
late filing written statement. If the defendant failed to explain the reason for the
delay satisfactorily, the Court could reject said application.
Case laws
Mohammed Yusuf v. Faij Mohammad and ors (AIR 2009 SC (Supp) 1741), the
supreme CourtCourt observed that Written Statement filed after three years
beyond the time limit, the application filed by the respondents herein praying for
condoning the delay in filing the written statement was rejected. And the plaintiff
ordered to examine his witnesses – Sufficient reasons recorded in support of
Order held, Interference with the Order by writ Court in the absence of finding
that there had been a failure of justice or Order contained an error on the face of
the record is improper.[1].
M/s. Aditya Hotels (P) Ltd v. Bombay Swadeshi Stores Ltd. and Ors(Air 2007
sc 1574), the supreme CourtCourt held that Condonation of Delay in filing Written
Statement since neither the trial Court nor the High Court has indicated any
reason to justify the acceptance of the written statement after the expiry of the
time fixed, Order allowing filing of the written statement is liable to be set aside.
[2].
Om Prakash Gupta vs. Union of India and another (Air 2000 sc 3585) the
supreme CourtCourt observed that Written statement not filed for more than two
years held Order granting further time to party not justified – Application under O.
8, R. 10 to pronounce judgment against defendant allowed. The CourtCourt may
proceed and dispose of the suit by the law.[4].
3.Conclusion :Indeed, the defendant’s conduct in not filing the written statement
has to be understood in the facts of the specific case, and no straight-jacket
formula can be used where the written statement is not filed within a particular
time to be given only for extraordinary situations. The Court can allow the
plaintiff’s application under Order 8, rule 10, and pronounce the judgment against
the defendant as per the provisions of the civil procedure code.