Scribd
Upload
83 views

Process Observation Tool PDF Free

This document provides a process observation tool to monitor and evaluate learning sessions. The tool collects general information about the session and asks observers to rate the session content, process, and atmosphere on a scale. It also prompts observers to note specific interactions, verbatim quotes, and their interpretations to inform debriefing sessions for program improvement. The tool aims to objectively capture session details to validate facilitator evaluations and guide management teams in taking appropriate actions.

Uploaded by

Christopher E. Zerna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
83 views

Process Observation Tool PDF Free

This document provides a process observation tool to monitor and evaluate learning sessions. The tool collects general information about the session and asks observers to rate the session content, process, and atmosphere on a scale. It also prompts observers to note specific interactions, verbatim quotes, and their interpretations to inform debriefing sessions for program improvement. The tool aims to objectively capture session details to validate facilitator evaluations and guide management teams in taking appropriate actions.

Uploaded by

Christopher E. Zerna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Document Code: SDO-QF-SGOD-M&E

Revision: 00
Quality Form Ref. No.:
Effectivity date:
Process Observation Tool Name of Office:
School Governance and
Operations Division-Monitoring &
Evaluation

(To be accomplished by Learning Delivery class monitors for every session; observations are to be validated
with the session – facilitator evaluation of participants. The observations will be the basis for debriefing
sessions for action by the management team.)

GENERAL INFORMATION
PROGRAM/ACTIVITY CLUSTER/DISTRICT
MONITORED

REGION MODULE No.


DIVISION BATCH No.
LEARNING SERVICE LEARNING AREA
PROVIDER
VENUE CLASS SECTION
INCLUSIVE DATES NUMBER OF
PARTICIPANTS
DATE OBSERVED NUMBER OF
TRAINERS

SESSION: Facilitator/RP:

1. Session CONTENT Strongly Disagree Agree Strongly Agree


Disagree
 Objectives were presented
 Activities were congruent to objectives
 Substantial input was given
 Key messages were clear
 Objectives were achieved
2. Session PROCESS How was the session conducted?
 Methodology was appropriate for adult
learners
 Participants were engaged
 Stimulating questions were asked
 Workshop output was processed (if any)
3. Session ATMOSPHERE What was the general environment in the group?
Informal << >> Formal

(This refers to participants) Low energy << >> High Energy

Hostile << >> Supportive

Inhibited/Tens << >> Open/Relaxed


e

4. PARTICIPATION OF TRAINEES How engaged were participants in the session?


Only the Few people talked Most people
facilitator/spea talked

QM - Page 1 of 2
Document Code: SDO-QF-SGOD-M&E
Revision: 00
Quality Form Ref. No.:
Effectivity date:
Process Observation Tool Name of Office:
School Governance and
Operations Division-Monitoring &
Evaluation

ker talked

Group was << >> Group was


apathetic involved

Group was << >> Group was


divided united

TIME I See… (specific person I Hear… (verbatim) I Think… (informed


interaction) interpretation/analysis)

Session Remarks/Observation

Name of Monitor (LN, FN):


Region:

Division/Office:

Reference: NEAP Training


Standards

QM - Page 2 of 2

You might also like