Lakshan - Lesson 4 Study Guide
Lakshan - Lesson 4 Study Guide
b. What is the example provided in the lecture which demonstrates the lack of
knowledge about the sky during this time period?
• The sky is seen as a dome, night and day were created by god (light created by god
as sun to rule day and moon to rule night) and that’s all god wants us to know
about astronomy.
• Church maintained that knowledge of Ancient Greek were worthless (Latin is
official language of scholarship), fewer people know how to read Greek. Basic
knowledge of astronomy is lost during dark ages (lost of old knowledge and lack of
progress).
3. Early Renaissance Astronomy: (Black plague killed many and science was encouraged, as
well Europe traded with Asia/Africa). 14-16 period, rise in intellectual pursuit.
c. How did Buridan's thought experiments about moving objects on Earth pave the way
for heliocentrics like Copernicus?
• Theorized that thrown/projected objects have IMPETUS (in addition to their
natural motion towards earth) = there is an addition source of motion called
Impetus.
• Therefore, if earth moves, projected objects inherit Earth’s impetus
o Object’s impetus + earth’s impetus = constant curving path towards the
ground. (same as Newton’s first law of modern theory of motion).
• Thought experiment = this showed: a fixed earth and moving earth appear
equivalent from our perspective on earth.
b. According to Copernicus, what do the planets orbit around, what is the shape of their
orbits, and do they move at constant or non-constant speeds through space?
• Planets move around circular orbits and move at constant speed
c. In the Copernican model, what are the 3 components of Earth's motion?
1. Earth spins once a day around an axis that pokes through North and South Poles,
around that axis the earth spins around once a day. Sky changes because of the
earth’s motion.
2. All planets orbits around the sun including the earth. Earth has annual circular
orbit around the sun (explains sun’s annual cycles)
Sun is the center of the universe.
3. Axis of North / South poles wobbles, spins axis has a ~26,000 year circular wobble
(explains the precession of the equinoxes) = it’s call “precesses” (shifting of the sky
by 1/100 degree per year).
e. In the Copernican model, when do planets appear to slow down and increase their
brightness, and why? Does this match what we observe in the sky?
• When they are in retrograde, because the planets are closer in proximity to
earth and therefore reflect more sun’s light on it to earth. This doesn’t match
what we observe in the sky because our position is relative to where we are on
earth not in reality of the path of earth’s and the planets’. This is because our
viewing angle of the object is changing as well.
• Brightness changes due to planets varying distance from earth
g. In the Copernican model, what is the explanation for the different motion of Mercury
and Venus compared to Mars, Jupiter and Saturn?
• In Copernican heliocentric model, Venus & Mercury are INNER planets (explains
their apparent proximity to Sun).
5. Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus:
a. When Copernicus compared the orbital periods of the planets with their orbital radii
in his heliocentric model, what did he find?
• Mercury and venus are inner planets, that’s why they are always seen near the sun
o R = Orbital radius (distance/size of orbit around sun)
o P = Orbital period (time to complete 1 orbit)
o Venus R = .7 R earth , P = 225 days
o Mercury = R= .4 R earth, P = 88 days
o Earth R = 1 R earth, P =1 year
o Mars R 1.5 R earth, P= 2 years
• The larger the planet’s orbit, the longer its orbital period (an appealing, orderly results)
b. What is the (shortened) name of Copernicus' famous book in which he presented his
heliocentric cosmology?
• De Revolutionibus (1543)
c. What did Copernicus' colleague add to the book in order to make it appear less
controversial?
• That Copernicus’ theories were hypothesis need not be true nor even probable
(added as preface) which made it appear that Copernicus wasn’t claiming that the
universe is not heliocentric.
What important purpose did this preface serve in the decades following the book’s
publication?
• The preface prevented the book from being rejected by the church for
hundreds of years after, but the church did eventually ended up burning it.
b. What discovery did Tycho make about the supernova of 1572 ("Tycho's Star"), and
how did it contradict Aristotelian beliefs about celestial bodies?
• Observed that supernovae remain fixed relative to the stars (therefore, star
realm is NOT eternally unchanging, challenging past beliefs that star isn’t born
or dies but eternal).
• Naked eye supernova is relatively rare.
How can we tell today that a supernova really did occur in the Cassiopeia
constellation?
• Because we can see remnants of it with a telescope
c. What sort of observations did Tycho make from his observatories on the island of
Hven, and why were these observations so valuable?
• Tycho made the most accurate pre-telescopic records of planetary co-ordinates
because they were highly accurate.
• These measurements were used to unravel the prior theories/beliefs of planetary
systems.
Describe how parallax would affect a photograph of a stop sign if you took the
photograph from two different locations.
• The stop sign would appear closer or further away (moved) at another location
relative to its background, but it was you that moved.
b. Describe how parallax affects our view of the stars. Can we see stellar parallax with the
naked eye? Why/why not?
• Stellar parallax is proof of Earth’s motion. Star seemed to shift back and forth
(but not with naked eye) but only if we recorded night to night to notice it is
shifting.
• The further the earth is from the star, the shifting is reduced. Therefore the
nearest star is so distant; we can’t see it with the naked eye.
• Even with his highest-precision instruments, Tycho couldn’t detect stellar
parallax.
c. Explain (very generally – no calculations necessary) why Tycho’s search for stellar
parallax led him to believe that the Earth is motionless.
• The detection of stellar parallax needed a telescope in order to detect it.
Tycho died before invention of telescope.
• Tycho reasoning that the earth can’t be moving,
Tycho’s best precision d > (1AU) / tan (1degree/120) > 6800 AU or minimum unit
to stars for its parallax to be detectable, that’s a huge distance. This is
inconceivable when everyone believed at that time that there isn’t that much empty space.
Tycho failure to detect parallax had him concluded: Earth is fixed. He was a firm believer of
Geocentrism.
b. Does the Tychonic system explain the 3 features of apparent planetary motion?
Why/why not?
• Mercury and venus have larger orbits which wraps around earth, that’s why
the appear to speed up/slow down, brighter/dimmer and changing directions
at times.
c. Explain how Tycho’s observations of the Great Comet of 1577 led him to conclude
that the crystal orbs do not exist.
• Because there are no orbs shattered if it intersect with planet’s orbit (in Tycho’s
system)
• Initial objections: “Crystal orbs” shouldn’t intersect
o Tycho resolved this by parallax distance of 1577 great comet. If comet
were atmospheric phenomenon, how could its tail be affected by the
sun?
Why did this conclusion make the Tychonic system more believable?
• Galileo couldn’t convince the church his model but was able to prove that Ptolemic
model was wrong, which made Tycho’s model to make more sense.
c. When Kepler compared his model to the Copernican model, why did Kepler become
convinced that his own model was correct
• Kepler’s heliocentric model was strengthened by the consistency between Perfect
Solids model & Copernican distances to planets (Kepler didn’t know we have 8
planets and this consistency of perfect solids matching distances of planets was by
pure coincidence).
b. In Gilbert's book On The Magnet, what was his correct explanation for why compass
needles always point to the Earth's North geographic pole?
• The earth has a magnetic field like a Bar Magnet: a compass needle changes relative to
location of where the needle is at on earth.
• He demonstrated the earth has a magnetic field, it must be a magnet. The poles with
earth magnetic field lined perfectly with geographic poles (north pole of magnet is
attracted to south pole of magnet, so North Pole has S magnetic force) Opposite poles
attract. Force is magnetism is what is driving the motion of the planets (sun is most
powerful magnet, and driving planets around it).
c. After reading On the Magnet, what did Kepler conclude about the cause of planetary
motion?
• Tycho proved there is no orbs, so Kepler see magnetic attraction as reason why
planets move.
• Kepler proposed: if all celestial bodies are magnets, then the Sun’s magnetic
force may be the cause of planetary motion. (but the truth is not due to
magnetic force but gravitational force found by Newton).
b. What is it about the planet Mars that led Kepler to the true shape of planetary
orbits?
• Mars orbit is noticeably elongated (Kepler concluded that planetary orbit is not in a
perfect circle).
o Kepler rejected the notion of CCM (constant speed and circular)
b. Describe the connection that Kepler made between the spacing of the planetary
orbits and musical intervals.
c. What does Kepler's 3rd Law tell us about the relationship between the orbital
periods of planets and their distance to the Sun?
d. What are the Rudolphine Tables, who wrote them, and whose planetary model are
they based on? How does their accuracy compare to the tables made using the other
available models?