Church in Politics Study Guide
Church in Politics Study Guide
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Foreword 4
Endorsements 5
Acknowledgements 6
Study #1: Introduction to the Study 7
A. Perspective 7
B. Bible Study - Psalm 96 9
C. Application Challenge 10
Study #2: The Kenyan Scenario 11
A. Perspective 11
B. Bible Study- Matthew 5:13-16; Romans 2:17-23 13
C. Application Challenge 14
Study #3: The Global Scenario 15
A. Perspective 15
B. Bible Study – Joshua 22:10-34; Philippians 1:27-28 17
C. Application Challenge 18
Study #4: The Rock on Which We Stand 19
A. Perspective 19
B. Bible Study - Romans 13:1-7; Acts 4:13-20; Esther 4:9-14 21
C. Application Challenge 22
Study #5: The Church as Citizen 23
A. Perspective 23
B. Bible Study – Genesis 1:26-28; Exodus 20:1-17 25
C. Application Challenge 26
Study #6: The Church as a Peacemaker 27
A. Perspective 27
B. Bible Study 29
C. Application Challenge 30
Study #7: The Church as a Participant 31
A. Perspective 31
B. Bible Study - Jeremiah 29: 1-14 34
C. Application challenge 34
Study #8: The Church as an Advocate 35
A. Perspective 35
B. Bible Study – Luke 4:16-21; Micah 6:8 37
C. Application Challenge 38
Study #9: The Church as a Mediator 39
A. Perspective 39
B. Bible Study - Philemon 1:8-20 and Philippians 2:1-9 41
C. Application Challenge 42
Study #10: The Church as a Custodian 43
A. Perspective 43
B. Bible Study - 2 Samuel 12:1-15 45
C. Application Challenge 46
Study #11: The Responsibility We Carry 47
A. Perspective 47
B. Bible Study – Exodus 3: 1-10 (cf. Exodus 1) , Mark 10:35-45 49
C. Application Challenge 50
Study #12: Way Forward 51
A. Perspective 53
B. Bible Study – 1 Peter 2:9-12 53
C. Application Challenge 54
Contributors 55
Foreword
Throughout the history of the church, there has existed among some Christians the belief that there
is a need to separate ourselves from all affairs of the world. In an obvious misinterpretation of Paul’s
advice to Timothy, they have advocated for believers to dissociate themselves from all civilian affairs
of this world. Politicians have equally used this line to urge the church to stay out of public affairs and
restrict themselves to faith issues within the confines of the places of worship.
This concept of separation stems from the sharp dichotomy that some have placed between the
secular and the sacred. It is a belief that there is a secular space where the sacred cannot and should
enter, and a sacred realm from which the secular is outlawed. To buttress this belief, many have
argued that Jesus never involved Himself in politics, so why should we?
It is indeed true that in the narrow understanding of politics, Jesus never formed a political party,
adopted a political program, or organised a political protest. Yet in the broader sense, Jesus whole
ministry was political. His birth stirred a serious political storm in Herod’s leadership that resulted
in the massacre of many children. His ministry inaugurated a new social order whose values and
standards challenged the very systems and structures of the time.
This often landed Him on the collision path with the ruling class. In proclaiming the onset of a new
Kingdom, Jesus’ teaching offered a strong alternative to the Roman and Jewish status quo. His was
a Kingdom whose principles and practice were set to alter the politics and governance of nations. To
this end He commissioned His followers to be the transformative agents in nations as salt and light.
For this reason, if the church is committed to the cause of Christ, we cannot afford to ignore political
involvement.
To this end we deeply appreciate the effort that has gone into preparing this unique Study Guide on
Church and Politics. The studies are developed from talks and panel discussions by 33 speakers at
the Church and Politics Summit, which was held in mid- 2021 with participants from more than 52
countries and six continents. With robust biblical exposition, this Study Guide is a worthy companion
for all who are desirous of bringing Kingdom impact into the political and governance arena. It sets out
a clear agenda and practical lessons on how to engage politics, with the eternal hope that ultimately
the kingdoms of this world will become the Kingdom of our God and His Christ. While we await that
manifestation, may the lessons of this study stir our hearts to arise and stand for our God and our
country.
Endorsements
The engagement of the church with politics is a spectrum that swings all the way from the position that some traditional churches
took that politics is worldly in nature to the other extreme where church leaders like Dietrich Bonhoeffer even planned the overthrow
of a government. Sometimes we have confused the politics of man with the politics of God and in the process offered theological or
prophetic mandate to politicians of our preference only to swallow the bitter pills later on when it turns out God had a different idea.
This is why a Study like this is so useful so that we can engage both with the contextual political realities which are facing us and
examine how the Bible speaks to those situations at the same time. As the Lausanne Congress on world evangelization put it,
“Although reconciliation with other people is not reconciliation with God, nor is social action evangelism, nor is political liberation
salvation, nevertheless, we affirm that evangelism and social–political involvement are both part of our Christian duty.”
Indeed, by discussing and engaging, we are doing our duty. It is part of the mission of the church. We highly recommend this Study
Guide that will help us to fulfil this mandate knowledgeably.
This Study Guide material on, “Church and Politics,” has come at a very opportune moment. As the Body of Christ, corporately or
individually, the issues covered in this Guide are such a great reminder of our missional role, as salt and light, in the society and
particularly on matters of governance. Like any other mission field, God is interested and concerned about the affairs of His people
and as such, He is calling believers to actively participate in the political life of their society as a missional responsibility. When we do
this, then we will be able to impact the society for God’s glory. This is the concern of this Study Guide and it is creatively put together
to trigger discussion and reflections on the same. Because of this, it is fit for Small Group Bible study at individual and group (Church,
family or workplace) level and I highly recommend it to all who desire to make a difference as faithful ambassadors of Christ and agents
of transformation.
Simon Kande,
National Director
Fellowship of Christian Unions (FOCUS) Kenya
Church and Politics Study Guide is catalytic, overwhelmingly convincing about the inseparableness of Church and Politics, compelling
on the urgency to act now leaving no room for procrastination. It employs historical records, comparative analysis and biblical narratives
for its argument and affirms the church as both individual believers and the Institution, consequently asks the reader, where are you
in today’s politics? It unapologetically reminds us when, how and why the church in Kenya failed, commends its positive roles and
clarifies its irreplaceable roles which if not played will be catastrophic. It states that the church is the moral conscience, compass and
advocate for justice; hence cannot “sit out” of politics.
This masterpiece pushes the global church to rethink on its participatory roles in politics, redirects it to intentionally, strategically,
prayerfully and actively engage in politics citing great men and women who stepped into politics with one common agenda- to respond
to the why question. It suggests practical ways in which Kenyan politics can be reshaped towards building the Kenya God wants. The
Kenyan politics requires an urgent reengineering through the church vehicle.
I highly recommend this timely, well researched, informative, practical and inspiring study guide to all those who genuinely and urgently
desire to see the new Kenya after God’s heart and ultimately God’s rule here on the earth.
The debate as to whether the Church should make its voice heard in the political arena has abounded for long. Over time, however,
Church history and the evolving theological discourses have almost resolved that. By calling believers the salt and light of the world,
Christ was no doubt calling upon believers to play an active role in aligning the world. Politics cannot be an exemption to this call. How
then should the Church go about in executing this role?
For the Church to occupy its place well in the political space, it must first do an introspection. It must be salt with taste and light that
is not dim. The Church must therefore do proper house keeping in an effort to be like Caesar’s wife, lacking in suspicion. In order for
the Church to look the politicians straight in the eye and correct wrongs in their stable, it must ensure it is also seen to be clean in its
dealings. That is why the Church must sanitize from within. In the same way it is said that justice must not only be done but seen to
be done, the transparency and accountability in the Church must not only be done but be seen to be done. The doctrine in law that he
who comes into equity must come with clean hands may also apply in this case. If the Church intends to align politics, it must be seen
to be walking the straight and narrow path it dictates for others.
Acknowledgements
After the successful Church and Politics Summit 2021, the production of this Study Guide provides
an important bridge for accessing the rich content shared by the resourceful speakers at the event.
We deeply appreciate all the voices represented here. We especially wish to appreciate our partners,
Tearfund Kenya, who have generously supported the production of this Study Guide, in pursuit of
their commitment to encourage the church in fulfilling its mission of transforming society as “salt of
the earth” and “light of the world.”
This Study Guide would not have been possible in the first place, without the plenary speakers and
panel discussants at Church and Politics Summit 2021, whose wealth of wisdom and reflections
provided the rich content from which this tool draws, particularly in the Perspective articles of the
twelve (12) studies.
Thirdly, we acknowledge the dedicated work of the technical team of writers, led by Rev. Lucas
Owako and Wilson Kiuna, all who worked tirelessly within very tight timelines to convert the content
of the Church and Politics Summit 2021 into the Study Guide. The team of contributors, who adapted
the Summit talks into the twelve (12) corresponding Perspective articles and Bible Studies, included,
Dr. Mary Thamari, Daniel Karanu, Florah Kidula, Fredrick Abuya, and Kepha Nyandega.
Last, and by no means least, we appreciate the invaluable input of the Church and Politics Steering
Committee, who provided the vision and oversight for the Church and Politics Summit 2021, and in
the production of the Church and Politics Study Guide, through its various task committees. We
acknowledge the following members:
With our prayers that God would ignite a renewal in our nation as the church rediscovers its role in
politics, we commend this Study Guide to you.
STUDY #1
Introduction to the Study
A. Perspective
The term “church”, as used in the Church and Politics Summit 2021 and in this study guide,
has a comprehensive meaning. It begins with the individual Christians who collectively
make up the church; it also encompasses specific local congregations, circles of believers in
particular localities or regions such as the church in Nairobi or Kenya, and even the universal
church, the body of believers in all places throughout history. 1
Politics has always played a key role in shaping the destiny of nations. On one hand, great
nations have been built through constructive politics that promotes justice and the common
good of the citizenry. On the other hand, negative politics characterised by vices such as
injustice, corruption and conflicts has often resulted into the breakdown of society socially,
1.
Stanley Grenz. Theology for the Community of God. (Grand Rapids, Mich. : W.B. Eerdmans, 2000).
economically, politically, morally, religiously and spiritually. If believers are to shape society
positively as God’s stewards, it follows that influencing its politics is an integral part of the
process. It is our God given missional mandate, and failing at it would mean we have failed
our Master.
Abraham was called and blessed by God to be a blessing to the nations (Genesis 12:1-3).
The people of Israel, however, continually struggled to appreciate that the privileges of
being God’s covenant people came hand in hand with the mandate of propagating God’s
rule and extending the blessings of his kingdom to all nations. An inward-looking practice of
faith that overlooked God’s plans for the nations proved to be a hindrance to this God given
missional mandate.2
At certain key moments, the church in Kenya has a history of exerting positive influence
on the politics of the land. More often than not, however, she has struggled to properly
discern and fulfil her calling in this area of mission. The Church and Politics Summit 2021
was inspired by the concern about this struggle and this informs the development of this
study guide. It seeks to answer two key questions:
This Study Guide, following the outline of discussions at the Summit, makes the following
arguments in the subsequent chapters:
1. Kenyan Scenario: How are We Faring? Although the church in Kenya has a history of
some positive influence on the politics of the land, reality points to major weaknesses
in her engagement with and influence on politics. This calls for renewed reflection and
commitment to a life of witness and influence in the political arena.
2. Global Scenario: Lessons from the American Church- while the USA church has its
fair share of shortcomings, the ‘good, the bad and the ugly’ of its experience teaches
the global church that effective Christian political witness requires a framework of
engagement built on biblical norms and values, and a political philosophy expressed in a
balanced agenda and program of action.
3. The Rock on Which We Stand: Rethinking Our Theology About Politics – for the church
to bring godly influence on politics, we need a well-defined political theology which is
firmly rooted in scripture. How can we sharpen our theological edge, and what are the
answers to some few specific theological questions from our present context?
4. Church as Citizen: Balancing Our Twin Identities - the Christian is called to engage with
the society in all its spheres, dimensions, and life, for such is the responsibility of a
citizen, of whom all Christians are, whether as individuals or a community of faith.
5. The Church as a Peacemaker: Promoting Peace and Cohesion in the Nation – the church
has a central and privileged responsibility for modelling and promoting a holistic view
and understanding of peace, which they model as a people who have been reconciled
to God.
2
Christopher Wright. The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative. (Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP
Academic, 2006), 462-465.
6. Church as Participant: Entering the Political Arena- despite the challenges in the
elective politics of the land, the church has a duty to participate and influence the
prevailing political culture, driven by the higher calling of serving and meeting the needs
of the people.
7. Church as Advocate: Speaking and Acting for the Powerless – whether as an institution
or individual believers, the church has a biblical advocacy mandate rooted in the very
character of God, to ensure that society upholds God-honouring practices and policies
that respect justice, human dignity for all, and especially the vulnerable.
8. Church as Mediator: Building Bridges to Common Good – acknowledging that conflicts
and divisions are a reality in all communities, Christians are called to be builders of
bridges to a common good, for people who live in estrangement and hostility. In doing
this, believers obey and follow in the footsteps of their Saviour Jesus Christ, the perfect
mediator.
9. Church as Custodian: Safeguarding Society’s Moral Fabric – in a context of persistent
concerns about moral decadence in Kenyan society, the church must first acknowledge
this as a sad consequence of the failed responsibility as the moral compass of the
nation, and then renew its commitment to modelling and safeguarding godly values and
morality in all spheres of life.
10. The Responsibility We Carry: A Call to Service and Sacrifice– cognizant of the
temptations of the perks and power of political office, the church should be careful not
to be merely driven by self-interest, as is the prevailing norm, but rather by an affirmed
and distinct call by God, driven by a genuine motivation to serve people.
11. Way Forward: Translating Concern Into Action – having understood our mandate, and
realized our shortcomings, we must move beyond contemplation to action. Beginning
with repentance of the sin of neglect of its God-given mandate, the church needs to
recover its lost identity as God’s holy people, reclaim its neglected spaces of influencing
the political narrative in Kenya, and lastly, renew its prophetic and transformative
mandate as salt of the earth and light of the world.
Reflection:
Share some specific ways in which you have been part of or have witnessed failure by
the church in the area of political engagement. What were the causes and what are the
consequences of this failure?
1. Read through the Psalm. Take note of the Psalmist’s calls for the worship of God by His
people, and his proclamation of God’s rule over all.
C. Application Challenge
The rest of this study is meant to help you learn how to practically influence politics within
your circles of influence, whether nationally, regionally or locally.
a. Name the specific circle of influence in which you will be seeking to apply what you
learn through this study.
c. Identify at least one social media platform where you can share what God will be
teaching you in this study series, and start with a reflection or insight from today’s
study.
STUDY #2
The Kenyan Scenario: How Are We Faring?
A. Perspective
There is a widespread view that politics is dirty, dangerous and has its owners. Many
believers have stayed out of it because of either indifference or fear of the sharp criticism
that follows those who dare to venture into it. This is the spirit of a presentation on the
Kenyan scenario, made by Bishop Dr. David Oginde at the Church and Politics Summit
2021. Whereas there may be some truths in the fears expressed, believers have no excuse
whatsoever to disengage from political and national activities in their communities. Our faith
must be lived out in every aspect of our daily lives if we are to remain obedient stewards
of God’s creation. John Stott, in his book, Issues Facing Christians Today, argues that “No
single word captures more accurately, or expresses more eloquently, the modern sense
of impotence than the word ‘alienation’.”3 He says that when the affairs of the nation are
left unguided by the principles of the kingdom of God, then ordinary men and women shall
inevitably suffer alienation, whereby the powerful oppress the weak, the rich exploit the poor,
and the majority overrun the minority. Suffering people are waiting for a man or woman of
God to speak and act on their behalf so that they are relieved from their suffering. Therefore,
Christians cannot afford to give in to the spirit of alienation. They are God’s instruments that
must engage politics and influence it for the good of all.
It is encouraging that throughout history, men and women of God have been at the
forefront of spearheading significant change. The likes of Moses, Jeremiah, Elijah, John the
Baptist, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr were at the forefront of influencing their nations in their
days. We have seen the Church and individual believers in our time speaking and acting
on national issues in a manner that amplified the church’s prophetic voice in the nation.
For instance, past church leaders like Bishop Alexander Muge, Bishop Henry Okullu, Bishop
David Gitari, Bishop Ndingi Mwana-a-Nzeki, among others, played an inspiring role in calling
the government leaders toward justice and good governance. Others, like Rev. Timothy
Njoya, were part of that generation, and still continue to raise that prophetic voice. Today’s
Christians, both church leaders as well as ordinary members, are also doing their bit to exert
positive influence on the politics of the land at various levels.
We must, however, be honest that today, the influence of the Church in politics and
governance is a far cry from what is expected of it. It is a paradox that Kenya which is said
to be 85%4 Christian can also experience the levels of corruption that have become so
prevalent in our national discourse. The faith we possess seems not to be impacting our
politics as it ought to.
Why is this so? Many factors have contributed to this status, four of which will be mentioned
here. Firstly, the Church has spoken with a discordant voice, and a divided house cannot
stand. During heightened political seasons, the nation has often been confronted with
the spectre of diverse prophecies, all of which purport to speak on behalf of God, yet their
messages contradict each other. Similarly, different tribes seem to hear God differently: all
hear God favouring candidates from their own tribes. This inconsistency only tells the world
that the Church is confused, and the confusion further breeds distrust even against the
authentic voice of God.
Secondly, the impact of the church has been stunted by a tribal bondage. Allegiance to
one’s tribe has superseded allegiance to the Cross and to the heavenly citizenship. It is
saddening that some in favour of tribal preferences throw biblical values out of the window.
Although our heavenly citizenship should be superior to our earthly citizenship, the tribal
bondages have reversed the expected norm for believers.
Thirdly, the love of money has interfered with the church’s witness. The Bible says that the
love of money is the root of all evil (1 Timothy 6:10). When believers accept favours from
those in power, they become incapacitated to call out evils committed by the same people.
Money has the power to silence the voice of reason and, unfortunately, it has silenced the
Church’s voice.
Fourthly, the Church has not explored the wisdom of influencing the politics of the nation.
Jesus called his disciples to be shrewd as well as gentle in their witness (Matthew 10:16). For
instance, influencing society is not all about calling for press conferences to express what
the church feels. Effective change may come through establishing the right relationships
with the players and engaging them from the point of love. Aggressive efforts of change
that lack wisdom may only lead to hostility and alienation. Sadly, influence from the Church
oftentimes comes as a reaction to offence. The Church has not considered a wider view of
effecting change in the political arena.
These are just but a few highlights of what is stunting our influence in politics and governance.
But all is not lost. It is said that the first step in solving a problem is recognizing that there is
one. Despite the current weaknesses of the Church in impacting its political environment,
it is possible for believers to pray, reflect and act on the problem areas, with God’s help, and
seek to deal with our weak links so that our witness and political influence is renewed.
3
John R. W. Stott and John Wyatt, Issues Facing Christians Today: 4th Edition, ed. Roy McCloughry, Fourth
edition. (Zondervan, 2011).
4
2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census, (Vol. IV): Distribution of Population by Socio-Economic
Characteristics, pg.12, 422
Reflection
Share a practical example where you have witnessed any of the four failures mentioned in
the article above play out. In what way did it impact the rest of society?
1. Jesus implies in Matthew 5:13-16 that the world needs believers. How are believers a
solution to the world?
2. Share one significant event where the Church institution or individual believers have
had a significant positive impact in the politics of our nation, and one event where the
Church has failed.
3. Reflecting on the state of politics and governance in Kenya, share some of the ways
that the Church, as individuals and institutionally, can be a positive influence.
4. Read Matthew 5:13b and Romans 2:17-23. These Scriptures give the consequences
of believers not living up to their task.
a. What are these consequences mentioned?
b. What are some of the results and outcomes of the Church’s silence or negative
involvement in politics?
C. Application Challenge
Identify one specific challenge or weakness that hinders you as an individual, and one that
hinders you as a church, from positively impacting the politics around you? What action will
you take in order to change the situation in each case?
STUDY #3
The Global Scenario: Lessons from the
American Church
A. Perspective
As a case in the global scenario, the American church with its good and bad experiences
in the political arena has many valuable insights and lessons for the church in Kenya, and
Africa at large. In light of a presentation and follow-up discussions at the Church and
Politics Summit 2021, Ron Sider, Adam Taylor and Bob Inglis point out that the global church
can be inspired both by the successes and failures of the American church in its political
engagement.5 On the one hand, the church in the USA has made significant contributions
to democracy and universal human equality, promotion of global health and flourishing, and
faith-driven advocacy for justice in the world. On the other hand, its political witness has
been undermined by failure to listen across the spectrum of political differences, reluctance
to confront racism, and lack of a biblically balanced agenda. In this regard, the ‘good, the bad
and the ugly’ of American experience teaches the global church that effective Christian
political witness requires a framework of engagement built on biblical norms, and a political
philosophy that is expressed in a balanced agenda and program of action.
As Sider asserts, the foundations of American democracy provide a crucial insight into
the role of Christian faith in shaping the nation’s political culture and public policy. At the
heart of this is the Christian heritage of the Declaration of Independence, a crucial founding
document that affirms the “inalienable rights” of all human beings, created in the image of
God. This has been a key motivation for Christian influence in the pursuit of public good,
through historical initiatives of civic engagement that changed American history. Such
include the “great abolitionist movement to end slavery,” the “civil rights movement” and the
support given by the Catholics in establishing unions that “brought much greater economic
justice to millions of people.”6 Besides contributions in expanding the democratic space,
5
Dr. Ron Sider is the former president of Christians for Social Action, while Rev. Adam Taylor is the president
of Sojourners, a Christian non-profit that works with Christians across the spectrum to engage with a
variety of issues in the public square in the USA. Bob Inglis, a former congressman of South Carolina, is
Executive Director of Republc-EN.org, notable for their advocacy for environmental justice, climate change
work in ways that also engage with values for free market enterprise.
6
Sider, “Global Scenario” in Church and Politics Summit 2021, 16-18 June, 2021, Nairobi.
the American church has also made generous investments in global health and promoting
human flourishing, through medical aid to save “millions of people in Africa, and elsewhere.”7
This is in addition to faith-driven advocacy for justice in the world.
Notwithstanding the positives, Sider notes on the other hand that the American church,
and particularly the evangelicals, have over the last five years had the following challenges:
1. Failure to listen to black, Latino, and Asian American Evangelicals, and to create
necessary platforms to “talk about their political differences on the basis of what the
Bible tells us.”
2. Failure to confront racism and “idolatrous nationalism by politicians,”8 a thorny problem
especially during Donald Trump’s regime and in the transition to the Biden administration.
3. Adoption by the Evangelicals and catholics of “one-issue politics,” rather than a more
encompassing, “biblically-balanced agenda,”9 which goes beyond the traditional issues
of personal morality, to include a range of pressing social problems and global concerns.10
4. Lack of a well-thought out biblical framework for “sustained, theologically grounded
reflection on social and political issues that shapes some other Christian traditions.” 11
Unlike Catholics, who have a rich heritage of papal communication and reflections that
guide political discourse and action, evangelicals have resorted to a knee-jerk approach
to issues, which one commentator has derided as a “ready, fire, aim” approach!12
Despite the inherent challenges revealed by the American experience, Sider maintains
that the Church cannot afford to abandon politics as a “dirty game,” for two reasons.
a) Pragmatic reason - practically speaking, since politics shapes billions of lives of people
in the world, for better or for worse, Christians need to leverage politics for common
good. 13
b) Theological reason - the church has a compelling discipleship duty to bring every sphere
of life, including politics, under the Lordship of Jesus Christ, for His honour. Failure to do
so then amounts to disobedience to the Master!
In this regard, what can the Kenyan Church learn from the American experience? There are
four lessons that can be drawn from the successes and struggles of the American church
in politics.
7
Ibid
8
Sider, Ronald J. and Knippers, eds., Toward An Evangelical Public Policy: Political Strategies for the Health of
the Nation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2005), 11.
9
Ibid
10
Sider & Knippers, pp. 25, 26.
11
Ibid, p.9.
12
Ibid
13
Sider, “Global Scenario”
• A careful study of the contemporary world – in order to understand the issues facing
society and realities of human experience that the church should address.
• A holistic, balanced political agenda that espouses, among others, the dignity and
sanctity of human beings, freedom of belief and practice, concern for the poor etc.
• Application through concrete political decisions, proposals and programs of action.
2. Maintaining integrity of the church by avoiding partisan endorsement of a particular
party, politicians or political affiliations.
3. Creating platforms for honest dialogue - to ensure we listen to one another more closely
and to understand our differences, so that we can rally together as the church.
4. Courageously confronting the issues that bring divisions in our context - that is,
negative ethnicity, which in the past has been manipulated for political advantage during
elections.
Reflection
After reading through the Perspective article, what stands out for you about the ‘good, the
bad and the ugly’ of the American church’s experience? To what extent would you say the
struggles of the Kenyan church in its political involvement mirror those of the American
experience discussed?
1. Read Joshua 22:10-34, and make your observations about the unfolding events of the
passage, the conflict that arises and how the parties involved resolve it:
What insights or lessons can you draw from the misunderstandings of the people
involved?
2. Consider the central issues of the struggle of the American church in its political
engagement as highlighted in the article, and from personal knowledge. In what ways
would you say Israel’s conflict in Joshua 22: 10-34 (and its potential consequences)
illuminates the political differences that have divided American Christians?
3. Read Philippians 1:27-30. What is the gist of Paul’s exhortation in this passage? In
light of his exhortation, how can the Church/ individual Christians “stand firm in one
spirit” in their political witness in our current context?
C. Application Challenge
In light of the summary of lessons from American experience shared in the article, and
insights from the Bible Study, come up with an action plan to address an identified issue
of concern/ passion. Share what you intend to do with your small group for prayer support
and accountability.
STUDY #4
The Rock on Which We Stand: Rethinking Our
Theology About Politics
A. Perspective
Discussions during preparations for the Church and Politics Summit 2021, and even during
the Summit itself, revealed one disturbing fact: the average church member and church
leader in Kenya today would, at best, struggle to give a clear and comprehensive answer
to the question of what exactly God wants the church in Kenya to do about the politics of
the land. To put it more technically, the church is in dire need of a clear theology of political
engagement.
In Matthew 7:24-27, Jesus spoke about the two builders who put up houses – one on the
rock and the other on the sand. When the rains came, each house was tested, and one stood
firm while the other was swept by the floods. Jesus likened the one building his house on
the rock to the person who “hears these words of mine and puts them into practice.” Thus
if the church is to engage politically, then such engagement must have a solid theological
and biblical foundation, for it to have positive and lasting impact.
The Summit session on “The Rock on Which We Stand” explored the reality that a faulty
or unclear theology of political engagement has been a major hindrance to the efforts of
believers to positively influence politics. To overcome this, we should be careful to avoid
borrowing and adopting theologies that do not emerge from faithful interpretation of the
whole bible, and are borrowed from contexts whose issues do not relate to our present
context. Our political engagement ought to be informed by an exhaustive interaction with
scripture, and relating closely to our unique context.
1. The Temptation Towards Apathy: The creation narrative calls us to a pursuit of Biblical
justice, that is giving people their God-given rights, both economic and political. The two
are intertwined, and should not be viewed as being exclusive of one another. Both are
central in respecting and upholding the dignity of human beings created in the image
of God. Mankind’s stewardship responsibility over creation, therefore, inevitably has
political implications. Apathy, an attempt to ignore or run away from politics altogether,
therefore, amounts to stewardship failure, and is not an option for believers.
2. Relationship Between the Government and the Church: We need to appreciate the fact
that having different responsibilities and expectations for different institutions, also
known as ‘separation of powers,’ is rooted in scripture. God specified roles for judges,
kings, priests and prophets (Deuteronomy 16:18 – 18:22). The state is just one institution
among many others e.g. family, church etc. Each individual and each institution is called
by God to play distinct roles in the public life of the nation. While the government plays
the kingly role of dispensing justice and protecting the vulnerable, the church plays the
prophetic role of being the conscience of the nation, proclaiming God’s expectations
and calling people back when they fall short of the same. While this should not be
misunderstood to mean the church cannot seek to influence politics directly, it implies
that breakdown in the society does not only reflect failure by the government. It also
reflects a failure in the other institutions, and in the moral formation of the citizenry.
Each individual or institution must, therefore, ensure that they play their part effectively.
3. Clergy and Laity in Politics: The role of the clergy (church leaders) is to equip God’s
people for works of public service in the various institutions in which God places them.
The church’s engagement in politics is, therefore, not about clergy getting into elective
politics. It is, rather, about ordinary Christians bringing the kingdom of God; his rule, by
doing his will wherever they are. This is the gospel, that Jesus is Lord, and is bringing
people under his rule, creating a new community of people with a new primary identity.
Believers should thus view themselves first as Christians before their ethnic and national
identities or political affiliations. The result of this is that they would pursue and work for
the interests of the Kingdom of God before any other interests.
4. Politics and the Concept of Divinely Ordained Authority: A lot of error in political
theology has been occasioned by a misinterpretation and misapplication of Paul’s
teaching in Romans 13:1-7. It has been used to manipulate the church into an uncritical
support of governments and leadership regimes. In this passage, the apostle Paul does
not claim that all those in authority have been individually placed there by God, and so
ought to be obeyed at all times. He, rather, teaches that authority has been instituted
by God, who delegates divine authority to human governing authorities. The purpose is
to restrain wrongdoing and protect the weak and vulnerable. Paul’s call to submission
to rulers is premised on the fact that they “hold no terror for those who do right, but for
those who do wrong”, and are in fact “God’s servant to do you good” (vs.3-4). The basic
duty of government is to render justice. If they don’t, then there is no government. It
should thus be called to account and resisted when it fails to fulfill this mandate.
Reflection
a. How have you seen any of the four theological issues discussed above manifested in
your context?
a. Are there any of them in which you have a different perspective? If so, why?
b. Are there any other theological issues in which you see gaps the church needs to fill in
order to engage more productively?
1. In what ways do the governing/political authorities around you reflect or distort God’s
design for leadership as presented in Romans 13:1-7?
2. Read Acts 4:13-20. Is there any specific area in which, like the apostles, it may be
necessary for you to disagree with, and even resist, those in authority in your context?
3. Read Esther 4:9-14. Are there ways in which you have been tempted towards apathy
and inaction in light of the political challenges around you? What specific actions
would God have you do instead?
C. Application Challenge
Which of the following steps will you take in order to grow your theological grounding for
political engagement? Share with your study group and keep one another accountable
through the coming weeks and months.
Tick the one you pick (you can pick more than one):
I commit to read/study the bible more consistently this year (Specify your target)
Title:
I commit to study about a particular theological issue and find biblical and
contextual answers.
STUDY #5
The Church as Citizen: Balancing our Twin
Identities
A. Perspective
Questions abound why a country that has 85.5%14 of its population as Christians struggles
with political balkanisation, ethnic animosity and cleansing, corruption, greed, economic
disempowerment, amongst others. The heart of this question is the concern about the
participation of God’s people in the affairs of the nation. How has the church guided its
members to undertake their civic responsibilities as citizens? How can the church participate
fully in the affairs of the state as a corporate citizen? By citizen, we mean two things: an
individual in a country or state and the church as an institution.
In sharing on ‘The Church as Citizen’ during the Church and Politics Summit 2021, Dr. Oliver
Kisaka identified three dynamics that affect a Christian’s participation as a citizen in the
affairs of the society. The first one is the call to separate. “Come out of the world” (2 Cor.6:17),
for the world and its systems are passing away (1 John 2:17). The second is the invitation
to integrate. “As the Father sent me, so I am sending you.” (John 20:21) The mission field
here is the same world from which the Christian had been called. The mandate is to return
to the world and engage it, influence it and transform it (Matt.5:13-16). These two augment
the dual-citizenship of the Christian (and by extension the Church). The Christian is “in this
world but not of this world.” (John 17:11,14-15) The third factor is biblical interpretation and
application, especially on how well we relate the meaning of Scriptures to our contextual
issues.
This ‘separate-integrate’ portrait of a citizen-Christian feeds into the third factor, that is, how
we interpret and apply Scriptures in day to day living. Biblical interpretation can inspire or
undermine a theology of engagement with the society and the world at large. Engagement in
a society’s life is natural for its citizens, regardless of their faith or creed. It follows then, that,
the natural spheres that a community engages in, are the spaces that spell out the natural
responsibilities of a citizen, where a citizen is understood to be “a member of a political
community or state, has rights and responsibilities and participates in determining how it is
14
2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census, (Vol. IV): Distribution of Population by Socio-Economic
Characteristics, pg.12, 422
15
Dr. Kisaka remarks that the church as an institution would of necessity require that it is legally registered by
the government, operates within certain legal parameters and systems in a context of society, and is called
upon to give an account of its activities from time to time.
16
The people are citizens of particular nations or states and exercise their civic responsibilities voluntarily and
responsibly.
SETTING THE AGENDA FOR ENGAGEMENT | 23
CHURCH & POLITICS STUDY GUIDE
governed.” In this sense, the church then, is a citizen, both as a corporate institution15 but
also as an Assembly of God’s people16.
The Israelites were asked to engage actively in society while in exile in Babylon (Jeremiah
29:4-19). They were to participate fully in the affairs of the Babylonian empire until the
appointed time. We can easily spot aspects of family and kinship (v.5-6), civic responsibility
(v.7), religion and worship (8-15), leadership and governance (v.16), war, peace and security
(v.17,18), health wellness and diseases (v.17,18), among others. Similar language is recognisable
in Deuteronomy 8:6-13 underscoring the fact that God’s people were and still are to engage
in the life of the society as active participants. It is the duty and responsibility of the citizen
to render support to the state by paying taxes (Matthew 17:24-27; 22:15-22; Romans 13:6-
7), obeying the laws and leaders of the land (Romans 13:1-5), praying for the leaders and
rulers (1 Timothy 2:1-4), among other responsibilities. This is citizenship!
Engaging in the life of a society is (and ought to be) the natural outflow of belonging to
a particular political community. But citizenship goes beyond participation. Therefore, in
playing its citizenship role, both corporately and as individuals, the church is seen as one
that:
1. Champions and encourages population growth in line with Genesis 1:26-28. It is the will
of God that mankind is fruitful, increases in number, fills the earth and subdues it. More
and more citizens are required on earth. This is how human capital is guaranteed. It is
part of the dual-citizenship responsibility. The question of where each citizen should
stay or be located is addressed by Acts 17:25-27. God determines the boundaries and
exact location of people.
2. Models and propagates responsible citizenship across generations (2 Tim.2:2; Psalm
78:1-7) By responsible citizenship, we mean being actively involved and engaged in the
life of a society in all its dimensions. We have already noted that marriage and procreation,
production and labour, paying taxes, involvement in leadership and governance matters
(politics included) are all civic responsibilities of a citizen. Citizenship then becomes a
heritage of God’s people. It is neither to be seen as an intruder or foreign concept, nor a
contradiction to the Christian identity.
3. Pursues the heavenly citizenship without being held back by the inadequacies of the
earthly citizenship (Heb.11:13-16).
It follows, then, that a Christian in Kenya, as would be in any other nation or state, is expected
to be engaged in all affairs of the country as a citizen. This engagement includes but is not
limited to marrying and getting married, production and labour, commerce and industry,
paying taxes, demanding accountability of how taxes are used by government, pursuing
justice, participation in elective leadership, voting in leaders of their choice, offering oneself
to be a leader, among others. Involvement in the political arrangements of a country is an
intrinsic right and responsibility of a citizen, of which a Christian is. A prevalent fallacy is
that politics is a dirty game, which implies that Christians should not get involved in terms
of offering themselves for elective politics. Their duty ends by casting a ballot (and actually,
some do not even see the need to cast their ballots). But to argue this way is to abdicate
the citizenship responsibility and to fail in one’s Christian duty. Christ sends us as salt of the
earth and light of the world. This saltiness is to be experienced in the context of staleness
that characterises Kenya today. Similarly, light is to be seen and experienced in the context
of darkness that has engulfed Kenya in particular, and the world in general. If politics is dirty,
it is because it has been left to people who have no salt and bear no light. Yet, it is this space
that the Christian, as a citizen, is called to step into and bring a change.
Let the church engage society in all its dimensions; for Christ’s light is required in all the
spheres of the society, for which the carrier is the Christian.
Reflection:
Which key issues about citizenship has the author brought out in this article? How does
this challenge your current perspective on citizenship or what is prevailing in the church in
your context?
1. Read Genesis 1:26-28 and Exodus 20:1-17. Which aspects of citizenship can be derived
from the passages? Fill in other aspects that have not been captured by the passages
you have read.
2. The article alludes to the dual-citizenship of a Christian (2 Cor.6:17, 1 John 2:17, John
20:21 and John 17:11, 14-15). How can this inform our theology of engagement (how
we think and approach our social involvement) with the world today by the citizens?
3. What are some of the practical challenges that you or other believers has faced in
balancing our “twin-identity” as citizens of heaven and citizens of our country (the
present world)? What can you as a member of the Church do to be remain more faithful
in striking this balance?
C. Application Challenge
In light of the points raised in this study, how should the church equip its members to
consciously engage in their citizenship responsibility? What specific role will you play to
actualise this?
STUDY #6:
The Church as a Peacemaker:
Promoting Peace and Cohesion in the Nation
A. Perspective
In his sharing at the Church and Politics Summit 2021, the Rev. Dr. Samuel Kobia highlighted
the fact that peace and cohesion is central to the call and ministry of the church. The truth
that the Church of Jesus Christ is the church of the Prince of Peace implies it is the church
of peace, mandated by God to bear his offer of reconciliation to a world alienated from him
(2 Corinthians 5:19-20). The entire gospel narrative is characterised by God’s offer and
proclamation of peace. Indeed, the birth of Christ was announced with the angelic choir’s
proclamation of “Glory to God in the highest and on earth peace to men on whom his
favour rests” (Luke 2:14). In sending his disciples out, he instructed that “When you enter
a house, first say, ‘Peace to this house’” (Luke 10:5). His post resurrection appearances to
his disciples are distinctly characterised with the proclamation that “Peace be with you”
(Luke 24:36; John 20:19, 21). In our day and age, we must continually defeat the enemies of
peace so that we can deliver peace to all Kenyans. 17
An ideal picture of peace and cohesion is seen in the creation order before the fall of mankind
(Genesis 1-3). As seen in the story of Cain and Abel, a breakdown of relationship with God
results in various evils which ultimately undermine peace and cohesion in human society.
The church’s mandate as peacemaker, therefore, leads it to first address the restoration
of people’s relationship with God and secondly, the restoration of relationships with one
another in multilingual, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and multi-faith contexts.
Historically, state and non-state actors have pursued peace through various initiatives, but
which hardly ever address people’s relationship with God. The church has a unique space in
providing a holistic view and understanding of peace. For when peace initiatives are devoid
of the component that addresses how people relate with God – as an integral and intentional
part – such efforts become humanistic in their approach, and they achieve little and the
little that is achieved is not sustainable. One does not need to look far. The history of Kenya
is replete with land ownership conflicts, electoral injustices, historical injustices, cattle
rustling, dwindling pasture land and water resources, negative ethnic identities, zoning of
natural resources and minerals for self-interest, all which undermine inter-ethnic and inter-
clan coexistence in Kenya. These are perennial issues that the state actors try to deal with
year in year out, but have never been able to eradicate them. The contrary is true. When
people who are reconciled to God, reflecting and pursuing his kingdom undertake the affairs
of a nation, then there is peace and prosperity (see Prov.28:28 and 29:2).
In many instances, the church, especially through some of its leaders, has called out
individuals and institutions that promote injustice, undermine peace and champion
conflicts18. In many instances, the church has by its own initiative, provided economic
opportunities within communities that it serves19, 20, 21, 22. There are many instances where
the church has been involved in peace building, reconciliation and healing among conflict-
laden communities and instances. For example, during the 2007 post-election violence
(PEV), a consortium of churches formed the ‘wheels/caravan of hope’ (msafara), a peace
initiative that coordinated prayers for the nation and food distribution to internally displaced
persons (IDPs). The Amani Mashinani Initiative 23 championed by (the late) Bishop Cornelius
Korir made great strides in bringing together warring communities in the North Rift Region.
The National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK) has, over the years, mobilised grassroots
community forums to engage the youth towards reducing acts of violence. There has also
been intentional capacity building for church leaders to engage in mediation and peace
building across the country.
However, there are instances in which the church has been complicit in undermining peace.
The 2007 General Elections was one instance when a cross-section of church leaders
publicly apologised to the nation for complicity24. Although some church leaders had
cautioned against heightened political polarisation in the period leading to the elections,
these divisions found their way into the church and compromised the effectiveness of its
reconciliation and peacebuilding initiatives. In this regard, Dr. Kobia pointed out at least four
strategies through which the church can effectively engage in building peace and cohesion:
1. Act as a Whistle-blower Against Oppression and Injustice: There are three key lessons
we can learn from reading the stories of the prophets in the bible. First is that the church
cannot keep quiet when the political class is mistreating the masses. Secondly, the
church cannot keep quiet when the masses are misbehaving. Thirdly is the reality
that the best leadership results when leaders follow the biblical instructions on how to
administer and provide just rule. It follows, then, that the church should be the loudest
whistle blower when the leaders and the people are wrong.
18
Religious leaders like Bishops Henry Okullu, Alexander Muge, David Gitari Ndingi Mwan’a Nzeki (all late), Rev.
Timothy Njoya and institutions such as NCCK and KCCB cannot go unmentioned.
19
http://www.christianimpactmission.org/omo-counter.html
20
https://www.icfem-mission.org/
21
https://adskenya.org/
22
http://strategicjournals.com/index.php/journal/article/view/856
23
https://www.mreza-mira.net/wp-content/uploads/Amani-Mashinani-Experience-of-Community-
Peacebuidling-in-the-North-Rift-Region-of-Kenya.pdf
24
https://www.ncck.org/executive-committee-tribute-to-canon-karanja/
28 | SETTING THE AGENDA FOR ENGAGEMENT
CHURCH & POLITICS STUDY GUIDE
2. Set and Model the Standards of Right and Wrong: The church has a God given mandate
to provide the moral compass from which the nation is led. While telling the state and
individual citizens what they can’t do is part of the job of the church, it is not the whole
job. Like the apostle Paul, the church has a job to show the nation “the most excellent
way,” the way of love (1 Corinthians 12:31). The law of love enables believers to be
guided by the higher values, exhibiting the fruit of the Spirit in love, joy, peace, patience,
temperance even forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, self-control, restraint.
Although chapter six of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution attempted to capture some of these
values, our politics continues to largely operate in the opposite direction, characterised
by rough talk and actions. As believers, we need to model and propagate a standard
where people will not be restrained from violence, conflict and harming others only by
the law, but where “it is the inner voice that tells us to love one another even as we
ourselves have been loved, to forgive as we have been forgiven, and do unto others as
we would have done to us.”
3. Promote Equality and Access to Opportunities: Peace and cohesion is only possible
when there is equal access to opportunities and services all over the republic. This
builds a sense of common identity, and inspires people to trust one another and
treat one another fairly. Fears, mistrust, perceived inequalities and anxieties prevent
us from achieving cohesion in our diverse communities. A lot of the unrest that has
been experienced in Kenya has been because the people have been deprived, whether
materially, socially or even spiritually. The church should, therefore, wage war against
these threats to peace, and proactively advocate for a better society that nurtures and
guarantees peace and cohesion.
4. Build Human Capacity for Peaceful Coexistence: The capacity to relate better can
be strengthened when our knowledge of the other is deepened through our personal
interactions. The church of Christ, as the salt of the earth, ought to oppose hate speech,
promote healing of those who are aggrieved and wounded, and disciple its members to
relate with others cohesively.
Reflection:
What are the two dimensions of peace-building brought out in this article? Identify at least
one real life example from your context which illustrates this reality.
B. Study:
1. Read Genesis 3:8-17. Which relationships are broken and destroyed in this passage?
In your view, how is such brokenness evident today in Kenya?
2. Where conflicts and hostilities exist, people erect barriers that undermine peace and
reconciliation initiatives. What factors contribute to such barriers? What can we learn
about this from Eph.2:12-14?
3. From the article and from your own experience, what are some of the successes and
failures by the church on matters of peace building? What can you, as an individual or
congregation, do to build on the successes and remedy the failures?
C. Application Challenge
Reflect on the centrality of the church in promoting a holistic understanding of peace. How
should this inform and shape pastoral training, pulpit ministry and Christian discipleship
across the churches? Come up with specific recommendations that you can share with
another person in your group.
STUDY #7:
The Church as a Participant:
Entering the Political Arena
A. Perspective
In discussing church and involvement in the political processes, the focus should be in
helping the communities of believers understand that participation in politics, in any form, is
part of fulfilling God’s missional purpose25. This is because of the fact that God’s missional
purpose is all encompassing as far as the affairs of human beings is concerned. It is on this
basis that Jesus, in Matthew 5: 13-16, referrers to his followers as salt of the earth and light
of the world. From this text, it is clear that our salt must be felt and our light be seen for the
realization of social transformation through political participation. As we do this, either as
the body corporate or individuals, our participation must be in such a manner that promotes
Christian witness.
From an experiential perspective, Prof. Hellen Sambili, a Christian, a former university lecturer
and a two-term member of parliament for Mogotio Constituency in Baringo County (Kenya),
notes that the Church cannot be a spectator on the periphery of the field in the game of
politics. This is because of the centrality of politics in nation state’s ideological positioning,
laws and policies formulation, and resource allocation.26 On this basis, she notes that it is
irresponsible for the Church, either as a body corporate or individuals, to ‘sit out’ of politics.
But, in seeking an elective office at any level, one must respond to the why question. To
this end, Prof. Sambili said, “In my case, getting into politics, I did not have any conscience
problems as to whether or not it was right to join politics…, I observed how communities were
being adversely affected by the poor management of resources by leaders characterized by
low levels of accountability and transparency in the use of public funds; I also noted biases
and unfairness in allocation of resources, such as where a school should be built, or which
child gets bursary besides corrupt practices in governance, abuse of power and entrenched
political divides that push people into different camps.” And as such, she continued, “Like
Nehemiah of old, I was moved by the plight of the people and decided to do something about
it.” 27
Reflection
After reading through the perspective article, share the key insights about Christian
political participation that you draw from it. In what way(s) does it challenge your current
perspectives?
1. Read Jeremiah 29: 1-14 and outline the instructions that the LORD gave to the people
of Israel.
2. In the context of Jeremiah 29, what is your understanding of Jeremiah 29:7, “Also,
seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to
the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper.”
3. Considering the church’s history of political involvement, how does God’s message
to the exiles in Babylon challenge the Kenyan church in the current context of our
politics?
4. From this study passage, in what practical way(s) can you as an individual and at your
level participate in the in seeking “the peace and prosperity” of our society?
C. Application Challenge
Drawing from the instructions given to the people of Israel in their Babylonian exile, come up
with specific commitments or initiatives you will undertake to more intentionally participate
in making a positive contribution to the country’s political situation.
STUDY #8:
The Church as an Advocate:
Speaking and Acting for the Powerless
A. Perspective
The role of the church as the moral compass and advocate for justice has been highlighted
in previous chapters in various ways. This was the central theme of a presentation made by
Rev. Dr. Sammy Wainaina,28 at the Church and Politics Summit 2021. Yet, controversies on
church’s or individual Christian’s participation, nature of the participation and the mandate
of the church in regard to its advocacy role is still rife. This article explores the church’s
mandate as an advocate in politics and other social worlds around and within the community
where church is situated and where individual Christians interact. It aims to answer the
question: What is the basis of church as an advocate and how can it effectively advocate
to ensure the entrenchment of practices and policies that respect values of justice, human
dignity and honour God?
To understand the role of the church in advocacy, it is important to review the scope of
our definition of ‘church.’ Who/what is the church? Church has often been equated with
the clergy partly because the voice of the church has often been that of the clergy. This
misconception has led to an apathetic stance by individual Christians who think their voices
and their influence does not matter in public spaces. During the Church and Politics Summit
2021 there was a resounding correction to this attitude. Rev. Wainaina stated that “Church is
not clergy but first it is the believer, the individual Christian. The Church is also the institution,
the body corporate composed of believers with a unified purpose of propagating the good
news of Jesus Christ.” Church as advocate in the society therefore refers to the church as
the institution and the individual Christians taking on the role of advocacy. Emphasising
the individual Christian’s responsibility, Rev. Wainaina draws attention to individual rights as
taxpayers and as voters:
When you ask yourself, should I be involved in politics? It is yes, you have a
godly mandate. You are a taxpayer. We have a right to participate in politics, and
politicians are not our bosses. They are actually our servants. We elect them.
And so, if you are an individual Christian who doesn’t question how the country
is managed, then you are failing this country. (Rev. Wainaina)
To advocate is to represent the interests, the voice, or the point of view of another. An
advocate speaks in support of some cause or supports others to make their voice heard.
For there to be advocacy, there is always an issue worth representing or speaking up
about. Historically, both in biblical examples and in the contemporary world, we see that
individual characters who instigated change and transformation always had a burning
issue at stake. Joseph in Genesis was concerned with impending drought and famine in
Egypt; Moses in Exodus was concerned with the slavery that rendered his people socially,
politically, economically and spiritually oppressed; Nehemiah saw the broken walls and the
down-trodden position of his people who had returned from exile; Esther couldn’t stand the
thought of a planned genocide of her people; Nathan called out King David for his deviation
from moral standards of a king. In our context, individuals such as the late Prof. Wangari
Mathai advocated for climate action and environmental restoration; Governor Kivutha
Kibwana saw the potential of a functional and transformative devolution and demonstrated
it in Makueni county; Caren Wakoli, the CEO of Emerging Leaders Foundation (ELF) has seen
the gap in well-informed and bold political engagement and is influencing that gap through
transformative mentorship; Martin Luther King Jr was alarmed by racial injustice in America,
and so was Nelson Mandela’s unrelenting passion to end apartheid in South Africa among
others. In all these examples, these individuals acted with others by mobilising ideas, then
organising communities or existing institutions to succeed.
As illustrated by these examples, the call for advocacy comes from a compelling issue and
for Christians, it is based on God’s mission to restore beauty, justice and shalom (holistic
peace). As a representative of God’s interests on earth, we can therefore suggest that the
church’s role in advocacy is to argue for, to support, to voice up, and to represent the interests
of God using various strategies. So, advocacy presumes that there are people who need to
be spoken for, because there is a need and there is someone who has that capacity and
opportunity. In Kenya today, there are many such issues: injustices of poverty, corruption
and misuse of public resources; slow attention to climate action; and poor service delivery
in health and education. All indicate that there are many opportunities for the church’s
advocacy. Advocacy is a means of bringing good news.
Rev. Wainaina offers a reflection on God’s character that lays the basis for effective
advocacy, in three aspects, namely the justice of God, his initiative in self-revelation, and
his sovereignty as King.
Firstly, God is just. Justice finds its definition for the Christian in the very being of the divine
and most fully known in the person of Jesus Christ. God demonstrates a perfect balance
of mercy and wrath, justice and forgiveness. And Jesus demonstrated this action within
the given socio-historical reality in which he lived. In response to the evil and issues of that
context, Jesus articulated a message of God’s boundless love. Jesus’ mission statement in
Luke 4:18 reveals issues of advocacy that he came to bolster and to empower his followers
to advance. As Rev. Wainaina points out, Jesus is the best model of political engagement
through advocacy as he creates a standard by which humanity connects with the redeemed
nature. So, the church has a mandate while still immersed in a fallen, broken and persecuted
28
Rev. Canon Dr. Sammy Wainaina is the Provost of All Saints Cathedral Church, Nairobi
world to advance the ultimate justice which is the restoration of the world to the state God
intended. This restoration is needed in political, social, economic, environmental and spiritual
realms. Advocacy is a tool to achieve that aim. Micah shows that we are expected to: Act
justly, to be right, to love mercy and to walk humbly with God (Micah 6:8).
Secondly, God is a communicating God. God speaks throughout the entire biblical
narrative - revealing himself, instructing, teaching, and encouraging. He shows affection in
conversation and interaction with people. Thus, the act of translating this love remains the
Christian strategy of advocacy - to present the wisdom of God in a language that the world
and especially those with power can understand. So, if God is a communicating God, the
church is a communicating body who speaks out not only with words but by way of life.
Thirdly, God is the sovereign King. This is n indisputable political image and portrait that
consistently arises throughout the redemptive history. God’s sovereign rule holds the
universe in place and has dominion over all the powers in the world. The reign of God
therefore then extends over all the areas of life, seen and unseen, including people’s hearts,
relationships, social systems, political process and power structures. When Christians say
Jesus is Lord, this carries heavy moral and ethical implications which includes political
values. In other words, He does not only change hearts, but also He changes the minds,
and He changes how we view the problems around us and how we respond to them. He also
directs on issues we should be concerned about and acting on. The world around us is all
under the reign of God and therefore a space of influence for the church.
So then how can the church best engage as advocates to influence politics and power
structures?
Reflection
What do you think are the main barriers that slow or prevent fulfilment of our advocacy
responsibility as Christians? How can we move towards a more effective role as advocates?
1. Read Luke 4:16-21 and observe the issues Jesus highlights about his earthly mission.
In light of this, what would you say was Jesus’ understanding of the essence of
mission? Why do you think Jesus pointed out these issues highlighted in the passage
as key to his ministry?
2. Read Nehemiah 5:1-13 and observe the prevailing situation and Nehemiah’s response
a) What was the problem that Nehemiah had to deal with in this passage?
b) What strategies of advocacy does Nehemiah apply in dealing with the problem facing
the disadvantaged people of Jerusalem in this story? (cf. 1:2; 1:4; 2:5; 2:17).
3. In light of Nehemiah’s example above, Micah’s emphasis of ‘acting justly, being right,
loving mercy and walking humbly with God’ (Micah 6:8), and the wisdom of King
Lemuel in Proverbs 31:1-9, what would you highlight as the characteristics of a good
advocate?
C. Application Challenge
Going by the reflection of the article and the passages of scripture, identify an issue of
social concern in your context and consider what you can do about it. What initiative(s)
will you take as an individual, family or church community to obey the call to be a biblical
advocate?
STUDY #9:
The Church as a Mediator:
Building Bridges to a Common Good
A. Perspective
Conflict is part of life. But unhealthy and unresolved conflict can lead to adverse
consequences including loss of life. Christians are not exempt from conflict. We witness
it and are part of it at all times. For example, we see it when people at the workplace fight
over positions, siblings disagree over inheritance. We see it in couple fights, in inter-ethnic
clashes, with political parties over seats in parliament, and even with nations fighting over
disputed borders. Unfortunately, sometimes, believers have preferred to run away from
conflict and to keep their own peace. But what should our rightful response be?
Matthew 5:9 says, ‘Blessed are the peace-makers, for they will be called sons of God.’
Believers are to be the mediators of peace in times of conflict, and the Bible accords a
blessedness to those who pursue peace. Mediation means building a bridge between two
conflicting parties so that there can be a peaceful exchange between them. When two land
areas are inaccessible to each other for some reason such as the presence of a water body
or a ditch in between them, a bridge is built so that there can be a common path where
the inhabitants of the two areas can meet or cross over to each other’s lands. A mediator
facilitates the building of a metaphorical bridge between people who are conflicted, by
bringing them together and facilitating the charting of a common course that will result in
peace and a common good.
The Mediator par excellence, Jesus Christ, accomplished the greatest mediation event in
history. The Bible tells of the wrath of God that flared against a sinful world, and a people,
on the other hand, who were sinful and hostile to God their Creator. There was no peace
between man and God. Jesus Christ came on earth to provide a common path, a bridge,
that is the Cross, where the two parties could mingle. There is no Mediator between God
and man except Jesus Christ (1 Timothy 2:5). Any man who accepts the mediating work of
Christ now has access to God and, similarly, God now admits any man who comes to him in
the name of his son Jesus Christ. This was the most significant mediation event, and it is
our model and inspiration.
We have a role as believers to prevent our ‘neighbour’ and our communities from getting to
moments where mediation is necessary. We do this by being at the cradle to nurture values
that enhance cohesiveness. However, when conflict arises, we also have the mandate to
follow the example of Christ and stand in the gap, building bridges to reunite people.
What is the goal of our mediation? Ultimately, we mediate as co-workers of the Chief-
Mediator, Jesus Christ, to show people the Cross and the holiness that God desires. We
plead that people be reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:20). Guided by this greater goal, we also
mediate between individuals or people groups in our communities so that there may be
peaceful coexistence and so that they may embrace paths that lead to the greater good.
One of the key areas that calls for mediation is the political arenas of our nations. In times
of heated political activity, for instance during election campaigns and elections, there
are always rivalries and unhealthy competitions between political parties, tribes, political
aspirants and between individuals who have conflicting opinions. We, believers, have the
responsibility to position ourselves strategically as peace-makers in our homes, among our
friends, tribes and in every political conversation and affair that we are part of.
One example of a celebrated mediator in the Kenyan church is the late Bishop Cornelius
Korir who took part in risky peace missions to neutralise tribal clashes. It is said that “He was
always available when called to mediate, and for meetings that would ensure that there is a
peaceful co-existence in the communities and in the country. He bravely went to war zones
to quell violence perpetuated by tribal clashes.”29 Bishop Korir was eulogised as a peace-
loving person, and the Bible calls such ‘the blessed ones.’ The faith values of believers have
the capacity to recover the lost ethics of politics and to bring sobriety and peace to our
nations. 30
The mandate of mediation places a huge responsibility upon believers. Not anyone can rise
up and claim to be a mediator. The character, conduct and skill of a mediator play a big role
in ensuring effectiveness of the role. A mediator needs to be trusted! Think of the character
of Jesus Christ! Or even of the values of courage accorded to the Bishop mentioned above.
Respect and credibility are necessary, because the rival parties have to be confident in him
or her. The position demands humility, patience to listen, negotiating skills to sell greater
goals, and good relationships with the people. It also requires that one must never be part
of the problem. For example, if we are involved in negative ethnicity, then we can never be
effective mediators in tribal differences.
Do you see how important believers are in times of conflict? We must acknowledge the
need, explore the capacity of our faith, position ourselves strategically and be well prepared
for mediation. We must not run away in times of conflict, but seek to always have people at
heart, enunciate to them the values of peace, and maintain a broad view of mediation that
seeks not just agreement but a realignment of community values.
29
Diocese of Kitui, “The Late Bishop Cornelius Korir Eulogized as a Peace Loving Person – Catholic Diocese
of Kitui,” n.d., accessed January 26, 2022, https://dioceseofkitui.org/the-late-bishop-cornelius-korir-
eulogized-as-a-peace-loving-person/.
30
Church and Politics Summit 2021, The Church as a Mediator by Archbishop Anthony Muheria |
The Responsibility We Carry, 2021, accessed January 26, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lev-
IX8PDuA.
Reflection
What conflicts have you recently experienced or witnessed within your circles? What was
your reaction to them?
4. In which of the qualities and attributes discussed in 2 & 3 above do you need to grow
in, if you are to be a good mediator? What can you do to facilitate this growth?
C. Application Challenge
Think of a scenario in your personal circles that may require you as an individual to be a
mediator. Plan and take action and steps to mediate for peace and the common good in the
situation.
STUDY #10:
The Church as a Custodian:
Safeguarding Society’s Moral Fabric
A. Perspective
The persistent concerns about the moral decadence in Kenyan society is a consequence of
the failure of the Church in her responsibilities. This was the overarching argument of Rev.
Thegu Mutahi’s presentation made at the Church and Politics Summit 2021, from which
this article is adapted.31 Jesus’s sermon on the mountain shows that the Church is the salt
and light of the world (Matthew 5:13-16). A truly committed and engaging Church is thus the
antidote of the rottenness in the society. Indeed, the Church ought to be at the forefront
of ensuring that ‘the moral, the ethical, the societal values that are expected in a nation are
observed’, as argued by Rev. Thegu Mutahi.
In addition to the conventional definitions, lawyer Charles Kanjama says that the Church
can be understood in at least three perspectives: (1) Church as Individual: individual believer
who has embraced Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour and is committed to following Him; (2)
Church as ideas, where ‘ideas’ here include the Christian message, values and teachings;
and (3) Church as an Institution, that is, the organized and formal structures such as
denomination, structure or other Church organisations.
Therefore, by its very nature as followers of Christ’s teachings and ideals, the Church is a
custodian of the values and moral fabric of a society. As a custodian, the Church has the
responsibility of taking care of or protecting and propagating Christ’s teachings and ethics
in the society. In politics, therefore, the Church has the mandate of ‘sanitizing’ all institutions
including politics of the country.
Drawing examples from the Bible and Church history, Rev. Mutahi explains that, ‘Throughout
history, God has been involved in politics and actively so, no wonder He is called the King
of Kings. That’s politics, the King of kings. Therefore, when the Church gets involved in
commenting, making statements on the morality of the nation and the leaders, on the ethics
and values of our leaders, it is not trespassing, it’s doing what its calling is’. Various people
of God got actively involved in the politics of their day, not ‘necessarily to take positions of
power, but to give guidance on the values that the leaders should have’. Moses sought for
emancipation of Israelites from the tyrannical rule of Pharaohs of Egypt. Samuel served
so well both as the prophet and the judge/leader and handed over power peacefully to the
extent that in his ‘exit interview’, the people unanimously declared, “You have not cheated or
oppressed us…. You have not taken anything from anyone’s hand.” 1 Samuel 12:4. Prophets
Nathan and Elijah confronted King David and Ahab respectively, whenever these leaders of
their day went wrong. While King David repented, King Ahab did not.
It is not a wonder, then, that the Psalmist commended David for having ‘shepherded them
with integrity of heart; with skillful hands he led them’ Psalm 78:72. John the Baptist
challenged Herod over his adulterous conduct; Peter and John defied the authorities of
their day and sought to obey God instead (Acts 4:19). Peter later advised the Church to ‘Live
such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may
see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.’ 1Peter 2:12.
The Church in Kenya must also play its role as the custodian of godly values and morals if
they are to remain faithful to Christ’s expectation. How can the church remain on the cutting
edge in this mandate? As Rev Mutahi argues, the competence of the Church in the public
arena and as a custodian of godly values and morality is dependent on her credibility in living
out those same values in life, deeds and words. In order to competently and effectively hold
the country’s leadership to account and faithfully discharge her role as custodian of the
morals and the values of the society, it is imperative that the Church makes among other
thingsthe following commitments:
• Cleanse herself from sin – this was what Joshua did with the Israelites in the case
of Achan (Joshua 7:10-26). The Apostles did the same in the case of Ananias and
Saphira (Acts 5:1-11).
• Speak with one voice: if the church will be a custodian of society, Christians have to
endeavour to speak in one voice rather than take unnecessarily divergent positions.
• Be courageous as Prophet Nathan was when he rebuked King David for his adultery
with Bathsheba and murder of Uriah (2 Sam. 12:1-15).
• Avoid being unnecessarily partisan- the church cannot belong to one political
formation.
• Remain in prayer always - as this is crucial for keeping vigilant as society’s moral
compass
31
The thoughts of this article also integrate reflections from a corresponding panel discussion on the topic,
comprising Edward Buri with Charles Kanjama, Rev. Fr. Joseph Mutie and Dr Ezekiel Mutua at the Church
and Politics Summit 2021.
Reflection
In your view, what are some of the areas or issues of social concern where the church in
Kenya has struggled to safeguard the moral fabric of society? What would it take for the
church in Kenya to transform the values and morality of this nation?
1. Read 2 Samuel 12:1-15. What leadership qualities does Samuel exhibit according to
this text? Is there one that stands out for you?
2. Why do you think Samuel was able to live and lead in such an exemplary manner?
3. How important was Samuel’s admonition to the assembly of Israelites in verses 12-15,
in light of the history he reminded them of in verses. 6-11?
4. Take a moment and consider the political process and products in Kenya.
a. What qualities or values should Kenyans look for in leaders in view of this study?
b. Share at least 2 specific actions you will play to ‘sanitize’ politics in your context.
Application Challenge
2. Analyse their character and manifestos or political ‘promises’ in light of the values or
qualities in this study. In a scale of 1-10 (1 being the ‘Poorest” and 10 being the “Best”),
rank the leaders you have identified in Q.1 above.
3. Mobilize a friend or a member of your church group, discuss the candidates and agree
on what you can do to have ‘Samuel-like’ leaders in your area. Share ideas on how you
can hold to account your leaders after elections. (You can do the same with the sitting
leaders).
STUDY #11:
The Responsibility We Carry:
A Call to Service and Sacrifice
A. Perspective
From a political perspective, God’s call for his people to serve him as a missionary in the
field of government exists because he hears the cries of people who are oppressed by bad
and oppressive governments and sends his servants to rescue them.32 The event in the
book of Exodus 3: 1-10 is a shining light on this matter. In calling Moses to lead the people
of Israel out of slavery in Egypt, God said (Exodus 3: 7), “I have indeed seen the misery of
my people in Egypt. I have heard them crying out because of their slave drivers, and I am
concerned about their suffering.” The misery that the people of Israel were subjected to was
a real physical suffering (see Exodus 1). They were enslaved by being put in forced labour as
painted in Exodus 1: 14, “They made their lives bitter with harsh labour in brick and mortar
and with all kinds of work in the fields; in all their harsh labour the Egyptians worked them
ruthlessly.” As such, the LORD noticed their suffering, heard their cry and showed concern
for their suffering. How is this story a mirror image of your society?
Giving his reflections on this subject during the Church and Politics Summit 2021, H.E
President Lazarus Chakwera, President of The Republic of Malawi, notes, “I had been leading
the Malawi Assemblies of God for over two decades, preaching the gospel of Jesus, planting
churches, supporting missions, training leaders and pastors for Kingdom impact.” In his
mind, he says, “The mission of work of the church was going to be the sole function of my
life.” But, “One day,” he says, “A group of young people approached me, and informed me
that they had done a survey amongst Malawians of the kind of leadership they aspired for
their country… and my name, I was informed, was on that list.” As such, his call to participate
in elective politics came through an invitation. However, for him to take up the call, he had
to wrestle with God on the question of whether politics was a mission field enough where
he was calling his people to venture into. Because of this, he observes, “I could not shake
off the sense that the Lord was speaking to my spirit to regard the whole country of Malawi
as a flock and I as a servant to shepherd the whole nation… I also sensed that the Lord was
saying that there was one mission field that was devoid of missionaries, a mission field that
I had wrongly assumed was one place, God would not want his servants to go. A mission
field that was too dirty for God to enter and too evil for God to redeem. That mission field
was politics.” The result of this was God’s confirmation that politics is equally a mission field
that requires active engagement by his people, and a motivation to serve the people. In this
regard, he notes that:
1. The church should view government and politics as a mission field that God uses to
release his people from oppressive governance.
2. The church’s call and mandate should not merely be driven by self-interest, but rather
an affirmed and distinct call by God
3. The church’s posture should be that of service as a mission which ultimately reveals
God’s faithfulness through his servants.
4. The church must be a live to the enormous costs and temptations that comes with this
responsibility and that part of church’s responsibility is to support, encourage, love and
counsel those called into politics to keep them spiritually strong.33
The import of this study is therefore clear; an examination of our contextual realities with an
aim of applying ourselves to bring God’s shalom to his people. What are you doing about the
poor service delivery at your local clinic? What role can you play to mitigate the challenge
of hate speech during electioneering period and election related violence? In what way can
you employ the power of the vote to bring about change in your society? How can we
change our contextual realities which is characterized by apathy, partisanship, corruption
and negative ethnicity? As God’s servants, how then, can we reveal his character and glory
in the darkness of our political situation?
32
“The Responsibility We Carry [H.E. Dr. Lazarus Chakwera] – Church and Politics.” Accessed January 13,
2022. https://churchandpolitics.co.ke/the-responsibility-we-carry/the-responsibility-we-carry/.
33
Ibid
Reflection
From the perspective article, what would you say is the responsibility that we carry as a
church, corporately and individually? How well do you think the contemporary Kenyan
church has understood this responsibility?
B. Bible Study – Exodus 3: 1-10 (cf. Exodus 1); Mark 10: 35-45
c) What was the request by James and John and how did Jesus respond?
2. a) What do you think Exodus 3: 7-8 communicates about God and how does it inform
your understanding on what God expects of you as a Christian?
b) From Mark 10: 35-45, what attitude does James and John portray and in what
ways does the same express itself in the Kenyan political context?
C. Application Challenge
1. From the lessons learnt in this study, indicate specific convictions that you have
developed about Christian social responsibility with regard to politics.
2. Based on the convictions, highlight the action points that you are committing to
undertake to serve and influence your community. Take some minutes to pray about
them.
STUDY #12:
Way Forward:
Translating Concern Into Action
A. Perspective
Having gone through the last eleven studies, you have, hopefully, had an opportunity for
candid conversations about the strengths and weaknesses as a church, on its successes
and failures, and on its aspirations and disappointments. When we reflect on the wealth of
wisdom shared through the study so far, and key lessons learned, we can affirm with Bishop
David Oginde that the church is tasked with the role of a midwife, who must ensure the
‘baby’ is not left in the ‘womb’!34
In this regard, despite its past shortcomings, the church is called upon to deliver the ‘baby’
of its vision of political engagement, as we have conceived through the foregoing studies,
and initially at the Church and Politics Summit 2021 that inspired it. But how can the church
proceed in this endeavour? This article proposes that the church can translate its concern
into practical action by responding to a four-fold clarion call, that is to: repent of the sin of
neglect of its God-given mandate; recover its lost identity as God’s holy people; reclaim
its neglected spaces of influencing the political narrative in Kenya, and lastly, renew its
prophetic and transformative mandate as salt of the earth and light of the world.
1. Firstly, a call to repentance- acknowledging its failure to fulfil its calling as God’s holy
people, with a transformative presence and influence in the society, the church needs
to confess its shortcomings and guilt of failure to get out of the salt-shaker into the
world, and covering its lamp of truth under a basket (Matt. 5:13-16). Part of repentance
should be seen in a renewed commitment for the church to embrace integral mission,
and engage the political arena.
2. Secondly, a call to remember and recover its lost identity as God’s covenant community
- If the church remains ignorant about its true nature and potential, it will invariably
continue to live in obscurity and alienation from its purpose. As John Stott argues,
Christians are “God’s new society,”35 called to glorify God through a distinctive life of
holiness, and good works that win the world. Standing in continuity with the Old and
New Testament communities, the church is thus “a chosen people, a royal priesthood,
a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who
called you out of darkness into his wonderful light” (1 Pet 2:9; cf. Exo 19:3-6). Thus,
revitalization of the church’s political witness demands a recovery of its identity, with
steadfast commitment to ethical living and God-honouring social engagement (1 Pet.
2:11, 12).
3. Thirdly, a call to reclaim its space in shaping the nation’s political narrative and culture
- As Bishop Oginde laments, it appears “clearly that the church has ceded space to
the political class,”36 and relegated to politicians the crucial role of setting “the agenda
and narrative for national discourse in almost every sphere of life.”37 As a result, this
abdication of responsibility has brought about “a society that is ever at war with itself,”
characterised, as it often is, by petty politically-motivated hostilities vented out on the
social media and other platforms. If the church is going to reshape the negative narratives
of our politics, and “speak the blessing of God into this nation,” it needs to mobilise its
members to enter all spaces of society, including politics. Building on this idea, Stearns
argues that being Christian “requires much more than just having a personal and
transforming relationship with God. It also entails a public and transforming relationship
with the world.” 38 In this regard, the vision of the gospel is that God’s transformed people
would be proactively engaged in “challenging and transforming the prevailing practices
of our world,” and bring a new order.39 Such a perspective not only helps to deal with the
obvious and the not-so-obvious ‘holes’ in our discipleship, but also liberates the Church
to take strategic initiatives to reclaim its neglected spaces of influence in Kenya’s
politics.
4. Lastly, the church is called upon to renew its prophetic and transformative mandate
as salt of the earth and light of the world. In a context where Christians have withdrawn
from engagement in the politics of the country, we need to reaffirm that “politics is too
dirty to be left to the politicians!”40 But on what basis can we make such an audacious
claim of the church’s unique transformative presence and influence in society? As Stott
helpfully points out, the church as a community of Christ’s disciples can exert a “double
influence on a secular community” by both “arresting its decay” and by “bringing light
into its darkness.”41 In pursuit of this mandate, the salt of kingdom values espoused
by the Church must take effect by “deeds as well as words,” through strategic socio-
political action motivated by the love of God.
Some of the broad commitments the church can make to translate its concern into action
include:
1) Review its theology of politics and governance to align with biblical teaching and
framework.
2) Come up with initiatives to foster unity within the church in order to engage politics as a
united force.
3) Carry out civic education in order to create awareness to church members on the place
of politics and the importance of values-driven leaders in government.
36
“Oginde, “Proposed Strategic Direction of the Church” in Church and Politics Summit 2021.
37
Ibid
38
Stearns, Richard, The Hole in Our Gospel (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010), 2.
39
Ibid
40
Ibid
41
Stott, John R.W., Essential Living: The Sermon on the Mount (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1978), 64.
Reflection
Consider each of the three key tasks of the church in translating concern into action,
highlighted in the preceding article. What do you think are the manifestations of the church’s
neglect of its “midwifery” role in influencing the positive change needed in Kenyan politics?
1. Read 1 Peter 2:9-11. What are your observations on how the author describes:
a) The identity of followers of Christ?
2. As the preceding article illustrated, the church has been accused of abdicating its
responsibility of setting the agenda in Kenya’s politics and influencing its narrative. In
what ways do you think the teaching of Peter in this passage challenges the church
today?
3. In 1 Peter 2:12, believers are urged to put on display “your good deeds before people” so
that they may “glorify God.” In what ways can the church as a community or individual
believers glorify God by influencing politics for the common good of our country?
C. Application Challenge
Over the next one week, consider the list of “broad commitments” proposed at the end of
the Perspective Article and identify 1 or 2 key areas of shared interest with your prayer
partner (or any other person, or as a small group in your church). In light of what you have
learned, and after prayerful reflection, come up with one practical initiative to translate
your concerns into action.
Contributors
The Church and Politics Study Guide was put together as a follow-up initiative of
the Church and Politics Summit 2021. In order to develop the twelve (12) studies,
the writing team developed the Perspective articles and Bible Studies, adapting from
over nineteen documents transcribed by Judi Wahinya-Glover, from the recordings of
the Summit talks and panel discussions. The following is the team of writers and the
studies they contributed in this Study Guide:
All the recordings of the talks which informed the content of this Study Guide, including
the profiles of the various speakers, may be accessed on https://churchandpolitics.
co.ke/
CHURCH
& POLITICS
S T U DY G U I D E
Church and Politics Study Guide is catalytic, overwhelmingly convincing about the
inseparableness of Church and Politics, compelling on the urgency to act now leaving no room
for procrastination. It unapologetically reminds us when, how and why the church in Kenya
failed, commends its positive roles and clarifies its irreplaceable roles which if not played will be
catastrophic. It states that the church is the moral conscience, compass, and advocate for justice;
hence cannot “sit out” of politics.
For the Church to occupy its place well in the political space, it must first do an introspection.
It must be salt with taste and light that is not dim. In order for the Church to look the politicians
straight in the eye and correct wrongs in their stable, it must ensure it is also seen to be clean
in its dealings. That is why the Church must sanitize from within. If the Church intends to align
politics, it must not be seen as not walking the straight and narrow path it dictates for others.
Sometimes we have confused the politics of man with the politics of God and in the process
offered theological or prophetic mandate to politicians of our preference only to swallow the bitter
pills later on when it turns out God had a different idea. This is why a Study like this is so useful
so that we can engage both with the contextual political realities which are facing us and examine
how the Bible speaks to those situations at the same time.
Like any other mission field, God is interested and concerned about the affairs of His people
and as such, He is calling believers to actively participate in the political life of their society as
a missional responsibility. This is the concern of this Study Guide… and it is fit for Small Group
Bible study at individual and group (Christian Union, Church, family or workplace) level and I highly
recommend it to all who desire to make a difference as faithful ambassadors of Christ and agents
of transformation.
Simon Kande
National Director: Fellowship of Christian Unions (FOCUS) Kenya
With robust biblical exposition, this Study Guide is a worthy companion for all who are desirous of
bringing Kingdom impact into the political and governance arena. It sets out a clear agenda and
practical lessons on how to engage politics, with the eternal hope that ultimately the kingdoms of
this world will become the Kingdom of our God and His Christ.
Email: [email protected],
Cell: +254 768139267 Website: www.churchandpolitics.co.ke