0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

09-2 Controlling Suspect Counterfeit Items Procedure Rev001

This document outlines Fermilab's procedure for controlling suspect/counterfeit items (S/CI). It defines S/CI and outlines responsibilities and procedures. If an individual identifies a potential S/CI, they are to stop work, notify their supervisor, and the supervisor will segregate the item if possible and notify the Division/Section/Center S/CI Coordinator. The Coordinator will log the S/CI, apply an S/CI tag, and work with relevant experts like engineering and safety officers to investigate and disposition the item. The goal is to manage S/CIs safely and ensure proper controls are in place until a final determination can be made.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

09-2 Controlling Suspect Counterfeit Items Procedure Rev001

This document outlines Fermilab's procedure for controlling suspect/counterfeit items (S/CI). It defines S/CI and outlines responsibilities and procedures. If an individual identifies a potential S/CI, they are to stop work, notify their supervisor, and the supervisor will segregate the item if possible and notify the Division/Section/Center S/CI Coordinator. The Coordinator will log the S/CI, apply an S/CI tag, and work with relevant experts like engineering and safety officers to investigate and disposition the item. The goal is to manage S/CIs safely and ensure proper controls are in place until a final determination can be made.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.

1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

QA

1006

Administrative Procedure

1001

Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items


Procedure

Page 1 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

1.0 Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the actions necessary to manage Suspect Counterfeit Items (S/CI)
upon discovery.

2.0 Scope
All new and existing items, equipment, products or parts at Fermilab are within the scope of this document.

3.0 Applicability
This procedure applies to Fermilab line management, division/section/center (D/S/C) S/CI Coordinators,
employees, subcontractors, and users, Senior Safety Officers (SSO’s), Laboratory ES&H Committee Chair,
Procurement Department, and the Office of Quality and Best Practices (OQBP).

4.0 Responsibilities

4.1 The Fermilab Director


Approves the S/CI policy as part of Director’s Policy #10, Quality Assurance
Holds management accountable for implementation of, and compliance with, this program and its
implementing procedures
Appoints OQBP as the Fermilab site S/CI Coordinator

4.2 Heads of Divisions/Sections/Centers


Ensure compliance with this procedure for their areas of responsibility including flow down of
requirements and awareness
Provide the necessary resources as appropriate to implement this procedure
Ensure individuals within their D/S/C are trained in S/CI where required
Appoint S/CI Coordinators for each D/S/C

4.3 The Office of Quality and Best Practices


Oversees the Fermilab S/CI Program and serves as the site S/CI Coordinator
Provides support to line management and S/CI Coordinators in resolving open S/CI issues
Recommends what notification to the DOE Office of the Inspector General and the DOE Site Office is
required
Forwards requests for subject matter expert (SME) guidance to the relevant laboratory ES&H
subcommittee chairs when S/CI discoveries or reports require a laboratory response.
Provides periodic status reports to the Fermilab Assurance Council, the Laboratory Director, line
managers, and others as appropriate
Maintains training materials and works with ES&H and D/S/C training to provide training

4.4 Employees, Subcontractors and Users


Receive training in S/CI awareness as it pertains to their work
Notify their immediate supervisor when a potential S/CI is discovered
Follow applicable FESHM policies and procedures

4.5 Supervisors, Construction Coordinators, and Task Managers


Notify appropriate line management and S/CI Coordinator of potential S/CI
Refer to this procedure when a potential S/CI is discovered
Page 2 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Determine training requirements


Ensure that S/CI-related information is flowed down to all affected employees, subcontractors and
users working under their direction either through formal training or transfer of information (with
records maintained) by an S/CI-trained Fermilab employee

4.6 Division/Section/Center S/CI Coordinators


Work with the supervisor, engineering, OQBP, Procurement or other subject matter expert, to
document and resolve reported S/CI
Maintain an S/CI log

4.7 Senior Safety Officer for Division/Section/Center


Respond to requests for safety related evaluation of S/CI
Inform local S/CI Coordinator and OQBP when the result of a safety related evaluation of S/CI
identifies a safety risk
4.8 Laboratory ES&H Committee (FESHCOM) Chair
Bring requests from OQBP for SME guidance on S/CI to the relevant subcommittee for review and
response
Provide the laboratory’s response to requested S/CI reviews
Elevate to other ES&H subcommittees or the laboratory ES&H committee if necessary

4.9 Procurement
Incorporate technical requirements that are a part of or attached to the relevant requisition into the
subcontract
Contact subcontractor and ensure that Fermilab’s S/CI concerns are documented in Fermilab’s
subcontract file

5.0 Procedure for Controlling Identified S/CI


This section describes the step by step procedure for managing S/CI upon identification (See the flowchart in
Appendix I). For a discussion of items which are prone to be counterfeited see Appendix II.

Note: Fermilab personnel SHALL NOT contact the supplier of a potential S/CI without
concurrence from OQBP.

Note: A nonconforming item is not automatically suspect and should be managed using
existing nonconforming / discrepant items procedures unless there is evidence suggesting
that it meets the definition of a suspect item or counterfeit item in section 7. Appendix II
provides guidance on identification of S/CI.

5.1 An individual identifies a potential S/CI, stops work associated with the S/CI and notifies their
immediate supervisor or other line manager.

5.2 The supervisor/line manager notifies the local Senior Safety Officer (SSO) if there is a risk to ES&H,
segregates S/CI where practicable, and notifies the local D/S/C S/CI Coordinator. The SSO will begin
an investigation to determine the immediate ES&H-related risks the potential S/CI poses.

IF it is not practicable to segregate S/CI (due to the nature of the item or because it is
installed), THEN line management will make provision to ensure that others in the area are

Page 3 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

made aware of the presence of S/CI. The supervisor/line manager ensures that work
associated with the S/CI is not resumed until an investigation has been conducted and the
S/CI has been dispositioned by engineering or other subject matter expert.

IF the S/CI is installed, THEN notify appropriate management to request assistance with
the investigation from engineering or other subject matter expert. The engineer or other
subject matter expert will determine S/CI disposition, including notifying the SSO of a risk
to ES&H not already reported.

IF notified by a supervisor/line manager, THEN the local SSO follows applicable FESHM
policies and procedures and notifies the local S/CI Coordinator and OQBP if his/her
investigation concludes that there is a safety risk associated with the S/CI.

IF the D/S/C S/CI Coordinator receives a “response required” notice from OQBP of S/CI
discovered elsewhere, THEN he/she will contact the appropriate line management to
ensure an inspection is conducted. IF S/CI is discovered during the inspection THEN the
S/CI Coordinator and line management, ensure that it is managed in accordance with these
procedures.

IF the S/CI notice from OQBP does not indicate “response required”, THEN it is for
awareness only and local management will determine if any action is required.

5.3 The D/S/C S/CI Coordinator ensures that S/CI is segregated or other provisions applied as noted in
step 2, and indicates the S/CI status with an S/CI Tag to prevent further use. Where tagging is not
practicable, application of a “safety purple” paint appropriate for the materials and conditions is
acceptable. The S/CI Coordinator updates and maintains an S/CI log which includes the unique S/CI
log number, pertinent information about the item, including status.

5.3.1 The S/CI Tag has two sides. The S/CI Coordinator completes the side labeled HOLD,
indicates the S/CI log number and reason the item is suspect and contact information. The
other side of the S/CI Tag is reserved for disposition by the responsible engineer or subject
matter expert.

IF the application of an S/CI Tag or paint is not practicable, THEN the D/S/C S/CI
Coordinator will contact OQBP to determine the appropriate action to prevent further use.
An S/CI log number is still assigned and logged even in the event alternative markings are
used as directed by OQBP.

5.4 The D/S/C S/CI Coordinator coordinates the investigation with line management and other staff,
updates and ensures the S/CI log and supporting materials contain adequate information.

Line management determines if the potential S/CI is nonconforming or if the specification is in


question.

IF the item is confirmed to be nonconforming THEN follow existing nonconforming /


discrepancy procedures and continue to the next step.

Page 4 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

IF the item is not nonconforming relative to the requestor’s requirements, but still
considered to be a potential risk or issue THEN the D/S/C S/CI Coordinator notifies
OQBP. OQBP will determine if further notifications are necessary. Examples include high
strength shackles or high strength bolts with no manufacturer’s code and no clear
purchasing requirement for a manufacturer’s code.

Note: Nonconforming procedures should require identification and quarantine of all like
items.

5.5 The D/S/C S/CI Coordinator and line management (with SME participation, as appropriate) complete
an investigation and reach a conclusion indicating whether the S/CI status is confirmed. Two
conditions must be met to conclude that the S/CI status of an item is confirmed; 1) It must be
nonconforming to requirements specified in procurement documents, and 2) its documentation,
appearance, performance, material, or other characteristics may have been knowingly misrepresented.
See the Definitions section.

IF the status is no longer considered S/CI, THEN continue with existing nonconforming
procedures including disposition by engineering or other subject matter expert.

IF the item is still considered to be a potential risk or issue, although no longer considered
S/CI, THEN the D/S/C S/CI Coordinator notifies OQBP. OQBP will determine if further
notifications are necessary.
IF the status is confirmed S/CI or still in doubt, THEN locate, tag and quarantine all items
with the same item identification from the same procurement. The D/S/C S/CI
Coordinator notifies OQBP and provides copies of supporting materials upon request. In
this case S/CI remains in quarantine pending further instruction from OQBP.

5.6 Disposition of S/CI is recommended by engineering or other subject matter experts based on evaluation
of the likelihood of injury to personnel, damage to the environment, damage to other equipment, and
other technical and operational considerations. The S/CI Coordinator will ensure that OQBP, line
management, and SSO’s are advised of the recommended disposition. The recommended disposition
requires OQBP approval before implementation.

One or more of the dispositions below may be selected:


Replace immediately
Replace at next scheduled maintenance
Replace at next planned maintenance outage
Implement additional controls
Continue to use in place
Retain sample S/CI for training

IF the disposition of installed items is other than replace immediately THEN the
responsible engineer or subject matter expert completes the side of the S/CI Tag labeled
DISPOSITION. This side includes a section for “Review date” which must be completed
to indicate when the S/CI issue or the material itself should be re-examined.

Page 5 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Note: It is expected that when S/CI are replaced the S/CI Tag is removed, they are
destroyed, and the S/CI log entry closed out. The exception to S/CI destruction is whether
the OQBP wishes to retain the item for training purposes. In the event where S/CI are
destroyed, disposal must be completed in a manner to prevent reuse and records of
destruction shall be retained. Records are retained by BSS, Property & Inventory Control
in accordance with “Department of Energy Administrative Records schedule 4, Item 1
which established a two-year retention schedule for property disposal records. For offsite
destruction, contact the Business Services Section, Property and Inventory Control
Manager. Destruction of S/CI materials considered hazardous is handled in accordance
with applicable laws, regulations DOE directives and FESHM 8021.

5.7 Results of dispositions shall be recorded in the log.

6.0 Records
S/CI Log
Records of disposition
Records of destruction

7.0 Review Cycle


This procedure shall be reviewed for accuracy and relevance on at least a three year cycle

7.1 Document Owner


OQBP QA Manager

7.2 Reviewers
OQBP Head
Division/section/center S/CI Coordinators
Procurement Manager

7.3 Approver
OQBP

8.0 Policy and Program Documents


Directors Policy #10, Quality Assurance
1001 Fermilab Integrated Quality Assurance (IQA) Chapter 10, Suspect/Counterfeit Items
1006 Suspect/Counterfeit Items Program
1006.1002 Suspect/Counterfeit Items OQBP Procedure
Fermilab Environment Safety & Health Manual (FESHM) Chapter 3010, Significant and Reportable
Occurrences

9.0 Definitions
Counterfeit items are nonconforming items whose documentation, appearance, performance, material, or
other characteristics are knowingly misrepresented by the vendor, supplier, distributor, or manufacturer.

Nonconforming items are items that do not meet specified requirements.

Page 6 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Suspect items are nonconforming items whose documentation, appearance, performance, material, or other
characteristics may have been knowingly misrepresented by the vendor, supplier, distributor, or
manufacturer.

Note: By definition, for an item to be considered S/CI officially it must first be nonconforming to
specified requirements. Therefore all confirmed S/CI are nonconforming items but all
nonconforming items are not necessarily S/CI.

10.0 References
DOE O 414.1C Quality Assurance – Contractor Requirements Document, Attachment 2 Section 4 – DOE-
Wide Suspect/Counterfeit Item Prevention Process
DOE G 414.1-3- Suspect Counterfeit Items Guide

Page 7 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Appendix 1 – Controlling S/CI Flowchart


Potential S/CI identified
Suspend work activity Notify line manager Controlling S/CI Procedure
(5.1) (5.1) Flowchart (Rev 000B8)

Risk
Notify local SSO (5.2) Yes
to ES&H? (5.2)

No

Request SME
Prior to use or
SSO review (5.2) assistance in risk No
installation? (5.2)
assessment (5.2)

Yes Yes

SME investigation Isolate item and DO “Response Required”


(Operation and NOT USE Notice from OQBP
Technical Review) (5.2) until approved. (5.2) (5.3.1)

Immediate Notify Div/Sec/Center Initiate S/CI Log (5.3)


risk to ES&H? (5.2) S/CI Coordinator (5.2)

S/CI Coordinator
ensures isolation
controls are adequate &
No items are tagged (5.3)

S/CI Coordinator
coordinates
investigation (5.4)

Is
Is item potentially
material
No a risk or an
nonconforming?
issue? (5.4) No
(5.4)

Yes Yes

Start nonconforming / Notify OQBP (also


discrepant material notifies all D/S/C S/CI
process (5.4) Coordinators) (5.4)

Conduct local
Is
nonconforming / Record findings and
material confirmed No
discrepant material disposition items.
suspect? (5.5)
process (5.5)

Yes

Find and quarantine


File per record retention
or tag like items (5.5)

Notify OQBP, copy QA


OQBP S/CI Disposition S/CI items
Manager & request
Response as directed by OQBP
instructions on how to
Process (5.6)
proceed (5.5)

Page 8 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Appendix II- Identifying S/CI

Items prone to be counterfeited:


Moderate - or low-cost, high-demand / high turnover use items
Items easily copied by secondary market suppliers
Items that often bypass the vendor (seller or manufacturer) and are drop shipped to the
requestor
Items that are not typically inspected
Items that are sold by un-authorized distributors

Typical S/CI are:


Used, rebuilt, or reconditioned items sold as new
Fraudulently marked or labeled as being manufactured by a recognized reputable company, or
certified by a regulatory or certifying agency
Manufactured with misrepresented inferior materials, or processes that create a potential for
failure and exposure to hazards.

Industrial types of items, materials, parts, and components that have been counterfeited include, but are not
limited to:
Hoists, as well as other hoisting, lifting, and rigging equipment
Valves, pipe, pipe fittings, plates, couplings, plugs, spacers, nozzles, supports, hangars, and
flanges
Preformed metal, elastomers (O-rings, seals), spare replacement kits from suppliers other than
the original equipment manufacturer, weld-filler material, diesel generator speed governors,
pumps
Fasteners: Metallic screw, nut, bolt, or stud having internal or external threads with a nominal
diameter of 1/4 inch (6 mm) or greater. Washer that is through-hardened or represented as
meeting a consensus standard that calls for through-hardening, and that is grade identification
marked or represented as meeting a consensus standard that requires grade identification
marking. e.g., J429 standard for automotive and related industries - below grade 5 (plus grade
8.1 studs) no grade-mark required. However, all bolts and screws shall bear the manufacturer
identification symbol.
Electrical equipment and devices, including circuit breakers, transformers, fuses, relays,
resistors, capacitors, semiconductors, connectors, switch gear, power supplies, inverters,
transmitters, and motors
Metal plates, bars, shapes, channel members, and other structural items
Welding rods and electrodes

Page 9 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

The listing of commercial grade items that have been counterfeited is extensive. Following is a partial listing:
Batteries: household, camera, and cell-phone
Extension cords
Surge suppressors
Fire extinguishers
Automotive components, including oil filters and brake pads
Computer components, semiconductors, software
Pharmaceuticals

Disclaimer
This appendix provides information on individual components identified as suspect or suspect/counterfeit. Without
additional information, the manufacturers or suppliers identified should not be considered as to have engaged in any
wrongdoing. It is not necessarily a negative reflection on a supplier or manufacturer if their products are reported as
suspect/counterfeit items (S/CI). Reputable manufacturers and suppliers have a vital interest in preventing the
manufacture and distribution of S/CI associated with their names. The supplier or manufacturer may have been
victimized and is pursuing S/CI associated with its products in an aggressive, prudent, and professional manner to
get these items off the market. Therefore, each particular case must be examined on its own merit without making
premature conclusions about the fault or culpability of the manufacturer or supplier whose name is associated with
the S/CI.

The following is an update to the Suspect Item Indicator list found in DOE G 414.1-3 and the DOE
Suspect/Counterfeit Item Awareness Training manual.

SUSPECT ITEM INDICATOR LIST


Note: This information alone does not constitute an item or material as being S/CI. Further research, such as a
review of purchase orders, specifications, and certification / documentation is required before an item can be
categorized as S/CI.

I. GENERAL INDICATORS
Visual Inspection
Nameplates, labels, or tags have been altered, photocopied, or painted over; are not secured
well; are unusual in location and method of attaching; have incomplete data; or are missing.
Preprinted labels that show typed entries.
Item has wear marks or scratches on external surfaces.
Obvious attempts at repair or beautification have been made, such as excess painting or wire
brushing; evidence of hand-painting (touch-up), painted stainless steel; non-ferrous metals
(e.g., copper, brass, bronze) are clean and bright indicating recent polishing.
Handmade parts are evident; gaskets are rough-cut; shims and thin metal part edges show
evidence of cutting or dressing by hand tools (filing, hacksaw marks, tin snips, or nippers).
Assembled items fit poorly.
Metallic items are pitted or corroded.
Heat discoloration marks.
Casting markings have been ground off and the item has been re-stamped with other markings.
Configuration is not consistent with other items from the same supplier or varies from that
indicated in supplier literature or drawings.
Inconsistency between vendor (seller or manufacturer) name on the item, and the shipping
container.
Page 10 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Visual Inspection continued


Nameplates attached with inconsistent fasteners, such as screws instead of rivets, or a
combination of rivets and screws.
Nameplates attached in a different location than normal.
Warning labels with grammatical errors and conflicts with information found elsewhere on the
packaging.
Nameplates missing manufacturer’s standard markings, stamps, or logos, and with irregular
stamping or inconsistent type (font).
Inconsistent appearances of items in the same shipment.
Shipping boxes / totes containing mixed batch numbers, expiration dates, and uniform product
codes (UPC).
The item or component matches the description of one that is listed on a suspect item list (e.g.,
DOE Suspect/Counterfeit Fastener Headmark List).
Unusual packaging and boxing of items. Packaging is inconsistent with the manufacturer’s
normal packaging or documentation requirements.
Questionable or meaningless numbers on the item(s) or packaging.
Signs of weld repairs
Country of origin is China1, Taiwan, India, Korea, or Mexico.
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) marks missing one or more of the four elements (UL
trademark, the word LISTED in capital letters, product identity, and a control number)2; a UL
mark on the package – but not on the product.

Procurement
Quoted price for the item is unusually discounted or low. 3
Unusual disclaimers, or denials, of responsibility for the accuracy of the test results, etc.
The supplier is not a manufacturer’s authorized distributor.
Dimensions of the item are inconsistent with the specification requested on the purchase order,
and those provided by the manufacturer at the time of the shipment.

1 In 2003, more than 66% of goods seized at ports of entry into this country were traced to China. What are
Counterfeiting and Piracy Costing the American Economy. National Chamber Foundation, 2005.
2 Refer to http://www.ul.com/ace/fake.html
3 There have been reports of counterfeiters raising prices to just below OEM levels in order to prevent such
concerns. http://fleetowner.com/mag/fleet_counterfeit_parts_buyer/index.html

Page 11 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

II. DOCUMENTATION
Documentation may be suspect or fraudulent when:
The use of correction fluid or correction tape is evident.
Type style, size, or pitch change is evident.
Documentation is not signed or initialed when required.
It is excessively faded or unclear (indicating multiple, sequential copying), or data is missing.
The name of the document approver, or title, cannot be determined; the document has missing
or illegible signature, initials; the approvers name and signature does not match.
Technical data is inconsistent with code or standard requirements.
Certification or test results are identical between items when normal variations should be
expected.
Document is not traceable to the items procured.
Corrections are not properly lined-out, initialed and dated.
Documentation is not delivered as required on the purchase order, or is in an
unusual format.
Lines on forms are bent, broken, or interrupted indicating data has been deleted or exchanged
by “cut and paste”.
Handwritten entries are on the same document where there is typed or preprinted data.
Text on page ends abruptly and the number of pages conflicts with the transmittal.
Data on a single line is located at different heights.

Page 12 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

The above list was prepared by the U.S. Customs Service after extensive testing of many samples of fasteners from
around the United States. If found, consider any of these headmarks as S/CI.

In many cases, a new counterfeit fastener has roughly the same physical strength as the graded fastener it mimics,
but does not meet the chemical composition or heat treatment requirements specified in consensus standards. As a
result, it will stretch, exhibit metal fatigue, or corrode under less harsh service than the genuine fastener.

Page 13 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Fasteners - Bolts.
Suspect/Counterfeit SAE Grade 5 (ASTM A 449) bolts. (Photo on left) From the left -the first three are missing the
required manufacturer’s symbol, and the fourth bolt has the “KS”, Kosaka Kogyo insignia. All four are on the
DOE S/C bolt headmark list (Enclosure 1). (Photo on right) failed fork lift bolt.

Circuit Breakers.
Suspect indicators – missing information
Left – Used 600 volt, 100 amp breaker sold as “new”. Right – Original breaker

Page 14 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Fuses.
S/CI - Used internal components within 600 volt, 100 amp breaker sold as “new and unused”.

Hook, lifting.
S/CI - Altered working load limit (WLL) marking.
Page 15 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Shackle.
Counterfeit on right. Authentic Crosby on left. a) Crosby name embossed per Crosby logo, b) should see CE mark,
c) 45-degree angle markings, d) pin stamped on head with traceable ID number (www.imca-int.com/safetyflashes)

Shackle.
S/CI – Trademark violation. 6-1/2 Ton rated screw pin shackle, minus any manufacturer’s name or logo, and
country of origin. The red colored screw pin is a Crosby Group trademark.

Page 16 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Flange.
Suspect indicator - Hand stamping

Flange.
Suspect Indicator – Meaningless information; ASA is a reference to an obsolete
consensus standards organization.

Page 17 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Label.
Suspect indicator - Worn label with missing information on a “new” air-dryer valve.

Valve, internal.
S/CI - Internal corrosion of an air-dryer valve sold as “new”.

Page 18 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Extension cords. S/CI - Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Inc. issued an alert regarding 25 and 50 ft. cords. The cords
are marked as UL listed and having 14 gauge wire. These have not been approved by UL and the wire size is
actually significantly undersized, leading to potential fire hazards. http://www.ul.com/newsroom/notices.html

Sprinkler heads, fire protection. S/CI - UL issued two alerts in 2006 regarding Chinese manufactured sprinkler
heads having counterfeit UL marks. http://www.ul.com/newsroom/notices.html

Page 19 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Batteries.
S/CI – “Copper Top” trademark violation and confusingly similar name of the manufacturer “Duracell”.
Counterfeit batteries present a higher risk of malfunction; constructed without adequate vent holes (safety
feature), and often contain mercury - a heavy metal that damages the central nervous system when ingested and
can harm the environment when the batteries are discarded

Page 20 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Table of Revisions
Author Description Revision Date
Jed Heyes Draft with most formatting changes accepted. A1 000 A3 07/18/08
to A2 Updated draft – eliminated intermediate
form, replaced with S/CI log only – changed
initiation of log to S/CI Coordinator. Updated
name and number scheme. Other changes noted
with change tracking on. A2 to A3 reconcile
OQBP comments.
Jed Heyes Final reconciliation and promotion 000 B 07/23/08
Jed Heyes Updated for lab safety subcommittee role. 000 B1 08/19/08
Clarified when response to OQBP notices are
required
Jed Heyes, Kurt Mohr Updated based on formatting comments from 000 B2 11/07/08
Business Services Section & Jeff Cotton &
consistency with revisions to the S/CI Program.
Kurt Mohr Changed Sect. 8 (Policy and Program) reference 000 B3 11/13/08
to “FIQMP” to “IQA”
Kurt Mohr Revised for consistency with SCI Program based 000 B4 12/9/08
on S/CI team review
Kurt Mohr Revised for consistency with S/CI Program, 000 B5 12/10/08
changes based on input from Joe Collins & Greg
Mitchell
Kurt Mohr Revised Appendix 1 flowchart for consistency 000 B6 12/15/09
with rev B4 & B5 changes. Added allowance for
painting as S/CI identification method and OQBP
approval of disposition recommendation
Kurt Mohr Minor revisions based on S/CI Coordinator 000 B7 1/26/10
reviews 12/09
Kurt Mohr, Jed Heyes Minor revisions based on S/CI Coordinator 000 C 3/16/10
Meeting 1/27/10 and:
Revised list of those with program responsibilities
in 3.0 Applicability. Clarified supervisory role for
program flowdown and expanded application to
Construction Coordinators & Task Managers in
4.5. Relocated paragraphs regarding OQBP
“response required” notification from 5.3.1 to 5.2.
Clarified example in 5.4. Changed initial
notification path to insert OQBP before full
Coordinator notification in 5.4 & 5.5. Added
SME’s to investigating team in 5.5. In 5.6 -
Specified completion of “review date” section of
tag, records retention responsibilities & disposal
of hazardous S/CI material.
7.2 Updated following input from Bruce
Chrisman

Page 21 of 22
SUBJECT: Controlling Suspect/Counterfeit Items Procedure NUMBER: 1006.1001
RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Assurance Manager REVISION: 001
APPROVED BY: Head, Office of Quality and Best Practices EFFECTIVE: 03/19/2010

Author Description Revision Date


Jed Heyes Removed watermark. Minor changes to match the 001 03/18/2010
program document.

Page 22 of 22

You might also like