24-Enabling The Multiple Use of Condition Monitoring Devices For Real-Time Monitoring Real-Time Data Logging and Remote Condition Monitoring
24-Enabling The Multiple Use of Condition Monitoring Devices For Real-Time Monitoring Real-Time Data Logging and Remote Condition Monitoring
1
and battery technology removes the need to procure and 2.3 RTDL mode requirement
install potentially long distances of cabling. In addition to
reducing install time and cost, lack of cabling removes the RTM mode can be employed for visualising live data when
risk of cable theft, which would induce costs of replacement the sampling rate of the signal is not high. For the scenario
cables and reinstallation, as well as service outages. that the sampling rate is so fast that the data cannot be
streamed reliably over the bandwidth-limited communication
The features for an RCM system were defined as follows: protocol, RTDL mode is required. Below are the requirements
¾ Low power consumption for the sensor nodes, to for the RTDL mode:
minimise maintenance requirements ¾ Fast sampling rate. Fast sampling rate is required in
¾ Low and configurable sampling/reporting rate; several order to represent the waveform of the signal.
seconds to several hours ¾ Large memory with fast access. The acquired data
¾ Sensor nodes should have a compact form factor and be should be temporarily stored to a large memory for later
resilient to the environment transmission to avoid data loss.
¾ Ability to transmit data to a remote location over ¾ Triggers for starting sampling. For a low power
existing network/Internet consumption sensor node, the RTDL mode cannot run
¾ System redundancy – unavailability of a single continuously, and a trigger signal (such as switch or
component shouldn’t impede the rest of the system periodic interrupt clock) is required to start this mode.
¾ Ability to retry transmissions in the case of a network ¾ Convenient to retrieve the data. The acquired data in
outage RTDL mode should be able to be retrieved by a remote
user as the sensor node is usually deployed in outdoor
2.2 RTM mode requirement areas.
2
3.1 Default mode Internet. The AP then attempts to transmit this packet over its
integrated network connection – either via an existing
In the default, RCM, mode the sensor nodes spend the network, or a cellular 3G link – to a remote cloud-based
majority of time in an extremely low power state (requiring system. Upon connection failure, due to a network or system
less than 100 μA of current), meaning that a small battery can outage, a retry is scheduled after a delay.
be used (ensuring small form factor) with battery life of up to
two years (minimising maintenance). A real-time clock Finally, the cloud system holds the responsibility for
(RTC) is present in the circuitry, which activates the node processing and storing the information and presenting it to the
into a fully operational state at pre-defined intervals. user.
After the RTC activates the node, a measurement is taken 3.2 RTM mode
from the on-board sensor(s), and this data, along with status
information, is required to be transmitted to access points. In RTM mode, the low power 2.4 GHz wireless
communication is still employed to transmit live clamping
To meet the RCM mode requirement of extremely low power force information. This has avoided extra investments on
consumption, the wireless radio device had to be carefully additional communication modules and kept the sensor node
selected to have the following characteristics: compact in physical size. Although the sampling rate in RTM
¾ Ability to switch off radio and/or place in extremely low mode is higher than that in RCM mode, the data can still be
power state. transmitted via the low power radio in real-time. The diagram
¾ Minimal time required to start up, negotiate with for the sensor node working in RTM mode is presented in
receiver and send data. Figure 3.
BLE
Communication between
Practically all common wireless technologies fell short of reader and tablet
Reader Tablet
these requirements. For instance, Bluetooth Low Energy
(BLE) is designed as an always-on, low power wireless Near field communication
x charge battery 2.4 GHz low power wireless WiFi/3G
technology. Although a BLE module can enter a low power x wake up sensor x live data updating
x sensor configuration
Upload data and
configurations to cloud
x authenticate connection
sleep state, waking from the sleep state, negotiating a
connection to another device and transmitting the data takes Sensor node Cloud
several seconds, which ultimately increases the required
battery power. Figure 3 Diagram for sensor node working in RTM mode
As such, a custom wireless technology was developed using The sensor is typically deployed in an environment where an
the 2.4 GHz ISM band. The protocol designed minimised the exposed charging connector could wear out in conditions such
radio on-time, whilst allowing a reliable data transmission as rain fall, vibrations and mud. Therefore, a wireless
even in the case of poor signal strength. charging solution is employed for charging the battery.
Wireless charging is a convenient, safe and reliable way for
charging and hence has gained wide applications in portable
Cloud electronic products, such as smart phones and tablets. [4]
3
In addition to data visualisation, the tablet can also be used
for data logging, sensor calibration and configuration. For
communication between the reader and the tablet, Bluetooth
Low Energy (BLE) technology is employed for the following
reasons:
¾ BLE is integrated into many off-the-shelf tablets.
¾ BLE has a lower power requirement than other
technologies such as classic Bluetooth and WiFi,
reducing power consumption of the reader and tablet.
Figure 4 Diagram for data buffering in RTDL mode Figure 6 Smart Washer installation
In RTDL mode, the sensor consumes much more current than Figure 6 shows the installation of two prototype Smart
that in RCM mode due to higher sampling rates and increased Washers – examples of sensor nodes – on a railway switch
wireless activity. [5] This indicates that RTDL mode cannot stretcher bar. The Smart Washers have embedded circuitry,
run frequently; otherwise, battery on the sensor node will run battery and wireless capability.
out quickly. Typically, this mode can be triggered by an
external event or a periodic clock with much longer interval
than that for the RCM mode. For instance, when an
accelerometer is employed for monitoring the movement of
railway points, this mode is only triggered when the points
start moving.
4 Implementation
SCT has developed an implementation of the described
system – the Smart Ecosystem, which has seen a number of
rail-based demonstrator installations.
4
Figure 10 Viewing data on the Smart Cloud interface
The RCM data is received into the Smart Cloud system, and
Figure 7 Smart Reader in use the user can view the data, an example of which is shown in
Figure 10.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we have explored the differences between a
number of forms of condition based monitoring typically used
in the railway industry. Current monitoring systems typically
focus on a single mode, but an opportunity was identified in
which multiple modes could be supported.
References
Figure 8 Smart Reader tablet app data capture
[1] Network Rail, “Asset Management Strategy.” Oct-2014.
Figure 7 demonstrates a reader set-up. The Smart Reader box [2] London Underground, “LU Asset Management Strategy
is connected to one of the Smart Washers using the near-field Summary.” 2013.
charging/communication clip. The tablet is visible, which is [3] V. J. Hodge, S. O’Keefe, M. Weeks, and A. Moulds,
connected via BLE to the Smart Reader and displaying status “Wireless Sensor Networks for Condition Monitoring in
information. The screen displaying the real-time monitoring the Railway Industry: A Survey,” IEEE Trans. Intell.
data can be seen in Figure 8. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1088–1106, Jun. 2015.
[4] X. Lu, P. Wang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, and Z. Han,
“Wireless charging technologies: Fundamentals,
standards, and network applications,” IEEE Commun.
Surv. Tutor., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1413–1452, 2015.
[5] A. Tobola, F. J. Streit, C. Espig, O. Korpok, C. Sauter,
N. Lang, B. Schmitz, C. Hofmann, M. Struck, C.
Weigand, and others, “Sampling rate impact on energy
consumption of biomedical signal processing systems,”
in 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on
Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN),
2015, pp. 1–6.
Figure 9 Smart Access Point and network installation