Chapter - Non Resident Taxation
Chapter - Non Resident Taxation
21.1 INTRODUCTION
Taxation of cross-border transactions are generally based on the two concepts:
1. Residence based taxation
2. Source based taxation
Residence based taxation: The concept of residence-based taxation asserts that natural persons
or individuals are taxable in the country or tax jurisdiction in which they establish their residence or
domicile, regardless of the source of income. In case of companies, the place of incorporation or
the place of effective management is generally considered as its place of residence.
Source based taxation: According to this concept, a country considers certain income as taxable
income, if such income arises within its jurisdiction. Such income is taxed in the country of source
regardless of the residence of the taxpayer.
Under section 6(1), an individual is said to be resident in India in any previous year, if he satisfies
any one of the following conditions:
(i) He has been in India during the relevant previous year for a total period of 182 days or
more, or
(ii) He has been in India during the 4 years immediately preceding the relevant previous year
for a total period of 365 days or more and has been in India for at least 60 days in the
relevant previous year.
If both the above conditions are not satisfied, the individual is a non-resident.
Notes:
(a) The term “stay in India” includes stay in the territorial waters of India (i.e., 12 nautical
miles into the sea from the Indian coastline). Even the stay in a ship or boat moored in
the territorial waters of India would be sufficient to make the individual resident in India.
(b) It is not necessary that the period of stay must be continuous or active nor is it essential
that the stay should be at the usual place of residence, business or employment of the
individual.
(c) For the purpose of counting the number of days stayed in India, both the date of
departure as well as the date of arrival are considered to be in India.
(d) The residence of an individual for income-tax purpose has nothing to do with citizenship,
place of birth or domicile. An individual can, therefore, be resident in more countries than
one even though he can have only one domicile.
Exceptions:
The following categories of individuals will be treated as resident in India only if the period of their
stay during the relevant previous year amounts to 182 days or more. The condition of presence in
India for 60 days or more in the relevant previous year is not applicable for such individuals.
(i) Indian citizen, who leaves India during the relevant previous year as a member of the
crew of an Indian ship or for purposes of employment outside India, or
(ii) Indian citizen or person of Indian origin 1 who, being outside India comes on a visit to
India during the relevant previous year.
However, such person having total income, other than the income from foreign sources
[i.e., income which accrues or arises outside India (except income from a business
controlled from or profession set up in India) and which is not deemed to accrue or arise
in India], exceeding ` 15 lakhs during the previous year will be treated as resident in
India if -
- the period of his stay during the relevant previous year amounts to 182 days or
more, or
- he has been in India during the 4 years immediately preceding the previous year
for a total period of 365 days or more and has been in India for at least 120 days
in the previous year.
Note - Stay in India for 120 days in the relevant P.Y. is not a standalone condition. This
condition requires stay in India for 120 days in the relevant P.Y. + 365 days in the 4 years
immediately preceding the P.Y.
How to determine period of stay in India for an Indian citizen, being a crew member?
In case of foreign bound ships where the destination of the voyage is outside India, there is
uncertainty regarding the manner and the basis of determining the period of stay in India for an
Indian citizen, being a crew member.
To remove this uncertainty, Explanation 2 to section 6(1) provides that in the case of an individual,
being a citizen of India and a member of the crew of a foreign bound ship leaving India, the period
or periods of stay in India shall, in respect of such voyage, be determined in the prescribed
manner and subject to the prescribed conditions.
Accordingly, the CBDT has vide, Notification No. 70/2015 dated 17.8.2015, inserted Rule 126 in
the Income-tax Rules, 1962 to compute the period of stay in such cases.
According to Rule 126, for the purposes of section 6(1), in case of an individual, being a citizen of
India and a member of the crew of a ship, the period or periods of stay in India shall, in respect of
an eligible voyage, not include the following period:
1A person is said to be of Indian origin if he or either of his parents or either of his grandparents were born in undivided
India.
Period to be excluded
Period commencing from Period ending on
the date entered into the Continuous And the date entered into the Continuous Discharge
Discharge Certificate in respect of joining Certificate in respect of signing off by that
the ship by the said individual for the eligible individual from the ship in respect of such voyage.
voyage
Terms Meaning
(a) Continuous This term has the meaning assigned to it in the Merchant Shipping (Continuous
Discharge Discharge Certificate-cum Seafarer’s Identity Document) Rules, 2001 made under the
Certificate Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
(b) Eligible A voyage undertaken by a ship engaged in the carriage of passengers or freight in
voyage international traffic where –
(i) for the voyage having originated from any port in India, has as its destination any
port outside India; and
(ii) for the voyage having originated from any port outside India, has as its destination
any port in India.
ILLUSTRATION 1
Mr. Ajay is an Indian citizen and a member of the crew of a Mauritius bound Indian ship engaged
in carriage of passengers in international traffic departing from Mumbai port on 16 th July, 2023.
From the following details for the P.Y.2023-24, determine the residential status of Mr. Ajay for
A.Y.2024-25, assuming that his stay in India in the last 4 previous years (preceding P.Y.2023-24)
is 415 days and last seven previous years (preceding P.Y.2023-24) is 745 days:
Particulars Date
Date entered into the Continuous Discharge Certificate in respect of joining the 16th July, 2023
ship by Mr. Ajay
Date entered into the Continuous Discharge Certificate in respect of signing off 19th January, 2024
the ship by Mr. Ajay
SOLUTION
In this case, since Mr. Ajay is an Indian citizen and leaving India during P.Y. 2023-24 as a member
of the crew of an Indian ship, he would be resident in India, only if he stayed in India for 182 days
or more.
The voyage is undertaken by an Indian ship engaged in the carriage of passengers in international
traffic, originating from a port in India (i.e., the Mumbai port) and having its destination at a port
outside India (i.e., the Mauritius port). Hence, the voyage is an eligible voyage for the purposes of
section 6(1).
Therefore, the period beginning from 16th July, 2023 and ending on 19th January, 2024, being the
dates entered into the Continuous Discharge Certificate in respect of joining the ship and signing
off from the ship by Mr. Ajay, an Indian citizen who is a member of the crew of the ship, has to be
excluded for computing the period of his stay in India. Accordingly, 188 days
[16+31+30+31+30+31+19] have to be excluded from the period of his stay in India. Consequently,
Mr. Ajay’s period of stay in India during the P.Y.2023-24 would be 178 days [i.e., 366 days – 188
days]. Since his period of stay in India during the P.Y.2023-24 is less than 182 days, he is a non-
resident for A.Y.2024-25.
Note - Since the residential status of Mr. Ajay is “non-resident” for A.Y.2024-25 consequent to his
number of days of stay in P.Y.2023-24 being less than 182 days, his period of stay in the earlier
previous years become irrelevant.
Deemed resident [Section 6(1A)]
An individual, being an Indian citizen, having total income, other than the income from foreign
sources [i.e., income which accrues or arises outside India (except income from a business
controlled from or profession set up in India) and which is not deemed to accrue or arise in India],
exceeding ` 15 lakhs during the previous year would be deemed to be resident in India in that
previous year, if he is not liable to pay tax in any other country or territory by reason of his domicile or
residence or any other criteria of similar nature.
However, this provision will not apply in case of an individual who is a resident of India in the
previous year as per section 6(1).
Meaning of “liable to tax” – Liable to tax, in relation to a person and with reference to a country,
means that there is an income-tax liability on such person under the law of that country for the time
being in force. It also includes a person who has subsequently been exempted from such liability
under the law of that country [Section 2(29A)].
Notes – (1) Only Indian citizen can be deemed resident. An individual who is not an Indian citizen
but a person of Indian Origin cannot be deemed resident u/s 6(1A).
(2) Stay in India is not necessary for being a deemed resident u/s 6(1A).
Resident and ordinarily resident/ Resident but not ordinarily resident
Only individuals and HUF can be resident but not ordinarily resident in India. All other classes of
assessees can be either a resident or non-resident. An individual and HUF would be not-ordinarily
resident if they satisfy any one of the conditions specified under section 6(6).
(i) If such individual has been non-resident in India in any 9 out of the 10 previous years
preceding the relevant previous year, or
(ii) If such individual has during the 7 previous years preceding the relevant previous year
been in India for a period of 729 days or less, or
(iii) If such individual is an Indian citizen or person of Indian origin (who, being outside India,
comes on a visit to India in any previous year) having total income, other than the income
from foreign sources [i.e., income which accrues or arises outside India (other than
income derived from a business controlled in or profession set up in India) and which is
not deemed to accrue or arise in India], exceeding ` 15 lakhs during the previous year,
who has been in India for 120 days or more but less than 182 days during that previous
year, or
(iv) If such individual is an Indian citizen who is deemed to be resident in India under section
6(1A) [It may be noted that a deemed resident will always be a resident but not ordinarily
resident].
ILLUSTRATION 2
Chris Gayle, a West Indies cricket player visits India for 102 days in every financial year. This has
been his practice for the past 10 financial years.
(a) Find out his residential status for the A.Y. 2024-25.
(b) Would your answer change if the above facts relate to Srinath, an Indian citizen who
resides in West Indies and represents the West Indies cricket team?
(c) What would be your answer if Srinath had visited India for 120 days instead of 102 days
every year, including P.Y.2023-24?
SOLUTION
(a) Determination of Residential Status of Mr. Chris Gayle for the A.Y. 2024-25:
Period of stay during the P.Y. 2023-24 = 102 days
Calculation of period of stay during 4 preceding previous years (102 days x 4=408 days)
P.Y. 2022-23 102 days
P.Y. 2021-22 102 days
P.Y. 2020-21 102 days
P.Y.2019-20 102 days
Total 408 days
Mr. Chris Gayle has been in India for a period of more than 60 days during P.Y. 2023-24
and for a period of more than 365 days during the 4 immediately preceding previous years.
Therefore, since he satisfies one of the basic conditions under section 6(1), he is a resident
for the A.Y. 2024-25.
Computation of period of stay during 7 preceding previous years = 102 days x 7=714 days
2022-23 102 days
2021-22 102 days
2020-21 102 days
2019-20 102 days
2018-19 102 days
2017-18 102 days
2016-17 102 days
Total 714 days
Since his period of stay in India during the past 7 previous years is less than 730 days, he is
a not-ordinarily resident during the A.Y. 2024-25. (See Note below)
Therefore, Mr. Chris Gayle is a resident but not ordinarily resident during the previous year
2023-24 relevant to the A.Y. 2024-25.
Note: An individual, not being an Indian citizen, would be not-ordinarily resident person if
he satisfies any one of the conditions specified under section 6(6), i.e.,
(i) If such individual has been non-resident in India in any 9 out of the 10 previous
years preceding the relevant previous year, or
(ii) If such individual has during the 7 previous years preceding the relevant previous
year been in India for a period of 729 days or less.
In this case, since Mr. Chris Gayle satisfies condition (ii), he is a not-ordinary resident for
the A.Y. 2024-25.
(b) If the above facts relate to Mr. Srinath, an Indian citizen, who residing in West Indies,
comes on a visit to India, he would be treated as non-resident in India for previous year
2023-24, irrespective of his total income (excluding income from foreign sources), since
his stay in India in the current financial year is, in any case, less than 120 days.
(c) In this case, if Mr. Srinath’s total income (excluding income from foreign sources)
exceeds ` 15 lakh, he would be treated as resident but not ordinarily resident in India for
P.Y.2023-24, since his stay in India is 120 days in the P.Y.2023-24 and 480 days (i.e.,
120 days x 4 years) in the immediately four preceding previous years.
If his total income (excluding income from foreign sources) does not exceed ` 15 lakh, he
would be treated as non-resident in India for the P.Y.2023-24, since his stay in India is
less than 182 days in the P.Y.2023-24.
(2) Residential status of HUF
Resident: A HUF would be resident in India if the control and management of its affairs is situated
wholly or partly in India.
Non-resident: If the control and management of the affairs is situated wholly outside India it would
become a non-resident.
YES NO
YES NO
Non-resident: Where the control and management of the affairs is situated wholly outside India,
the firm, AoP and BoI would become a non-resident.
Note - The residential status of the partners/ members is immaterial while determining the
residential status of a Firm/AOP/BOI.
The term “Non-resident” is defined under section 2(30) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as a person
who is not a "resident". However, for the purposes of sections 92B, 93 and 168, non-resident
would include a person who is not ordinarily resident within the meaning of section 6(6).
“Place of effective management “means a place where key management and commercial
decisions that are necessary for the conduct of the business of an entity as a whole are, in
substance made [Explanation to section 6(3)].
Yes Yes
Term Meaning
Income (a) As computed for tax purpose in accordance with the laws of the country
of incorporation; or
(b) As per books of account, where the laws of the country of incorporation
does not require such a computation.
Value of (a) In case of an individually The average of its value for tax
depreciable asset purposes in the country of incorporation
assets
of the company at the beginning and at
end of the previous year; and
(b) In case of pool of fixed The average of its value for tax
asset, being treated as a purposes in the country of incorporation
block for depreciation of the company at the beginning and at
end of the year;
(c) In case of any other asset Value as per books of account
Number of The average of the number of employees as at the beginning and at the end
of the year and shall include persons, who though not employed directly by
employees
the company, perform tasks similar to those performed by the employees.
Payroll This term includes the cost of salaries, wages, bonus, and all other
employee compensation including related pension and social costs borne by
the employer.
Passive It is the aggregate of, -
income (i) income from the transactions where both the purchase and sale of
goods is from/to its associated enterprises; and
(ii) income by way of royalty, dividend, capital gains, interest, or rental
income;
However, any income by way of interest shall not be considered to be
passive income in case of a company which is engaged in the business of
banking or is a public financial institution, and its activities are regulated as
such under the applicable laws of the country of incorporation
For this purpose, merely because the Board of Directors (BOD) follows general and objective
principles of global policy of the group laid down by the parent entity which may be in the field of
Payroll functions, Accounting, Human resource (HR) functions, IT infrastructure and network
platforms, Supply chain functions, Routine banking operational procedures, and not being specific
to any entity or group of entities per se; would not constitute a case of BoD of companies standing
aside.
CBDT Circular No. 25/2017, dated 23.10.2017 clarifies that so long as the Regional Headquarter
operates for subsidiaries/ group companies in a region within the general and objective principles
of global policy of the group laid down by the parent entity in the field of Payroll functions,
Accounting, HR functions, IT infrastructure and network platforms, Supply chain functions, Routine
banking operational procedures, and not being specific to any entity or group of entities per se; it
would, in itself, not constitute a case of BoD of companies standing aside and such activities of
Regional Headquarter in India alone will not be a basis for establishment of POEM for such
subsidiaries/ group companies.
It is further mentioned in the said Circular that the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rule
contained in Chapter X-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 may get triggered in such cases where the
above clarification is found to be used for abusive/ aggressive tax planning.
For the purpose of determining whether the company is engaged in active business outside India,
the average of the data of the previous year and two years prior to that shall be considered. In
case the company has been in existence for a shorter period, then data of such period shall be
considered. Where the accounting year for tax purposes, in accordance with laws of country of
incorporation of the company, is different from the previous year, then, data of the accounting year
that ends during the relevant previous year and two accounting years preceding it shall be
considered.
It has been clarified that mere following of global policies laid down by the Indian holding company
would not constitute that Board is standing aside.
(ii) In case of Companies not engaged in active business outside India
The guidelines provide a two-stage process for determination of POEM in case of companies not
engaged in active business.
(a) First stage: Identifying the person(s) who actually make the key management and
commercial decisions for the conduct of the company as a whole.
(b) Second stage: Determine the place where these decisions are, in fact, being made.
The place where these management decisions are taken would be more important than the place
where such decisions are implemented. For the purpose of determination of POEM, it is the
substance which would be conclusive rather than the form.
The conditions specified in the circular are depicted in the flow charts below:
A company is said
to be engaged in Less than 50% of its total assets situated in India
ABOI, if it fulfills
the cumulative
conditions of:
Less than 50% of the total number of employees are
situated in India or are residents in India
Some of the guiding principles which may be taken into account for determining the POEM
are as follows:
(a) Location where the Board of Directors meet and makes decisions: This location may
be the place of effective management of a company provided, the Board –
(i) retains and exercises its authority to govern the company; and
(ii) does, in substance, make the key management and commercial decisions necessary
for the conduct of the company’s ‘business as a whole’.
It may be mentioned that mere formal holding of board meetings at a place would by itself
not be conclusive for determination of POEM being located at that place. If the key
decisions by the directors are in fact being taken in a place other than the place where
the formal meetings are held then such other place would be relevant for POEM.
As an example this may be the case where the board meetings are held in a location
distinct from the place where head office of the company is located or such location is
unconnected with the place where the predominant activity of the company is being
carried out.
If a Board has de facto delegated the authority to make the key management and
commercial decisions for the company to the senior management or any other person
including a shareholder, promoter, strategic or legal or financial advisor etc. and does
nothing more than routinely ratifying the decisions that have been made, the company’s
place of effective management will ordinarily be the place where these senior managers
or the other person make those decisions.
“Senior Management” in respect of a company means the person or persons who are
generally responsible for developing and formulating key strategies and policies for the
company and for ensuring or overseeing the execution and implementation of those
strategies on a regular and on-going basis. While designation may vary, these persons may
include:
(i) Managing Director or Chief Executive Officer;
(ii) Financial Director or Chief Financial Officer;
(iii) Chief Operating Officer; and
(iv) The heads of various divisions or departments (for example, Chief Information or
Technology Officer, Director for Sales or Marketing).
(b) Location of Executive Committee in case powers are delegated by the Board: A
company’s board may delegate some or all of its authority to one or more committees such
as an executive committee consisting of key members of senior management. In these
situations, the location where the members of the executive committee are based and
where that committee develops and formulates the key strategies and policies for mere
formal approval by the full board will often be considered to be the company’s place of
effective management.
The delegation of authority may be either de jure (by means of a formal resolution or
Shareholder Agreement) or de facto (based upon the actual conduct of the board and the
executive committee).
(c) Location of Head Office: The location of a company’s head office will be a very important
factor in the determination of the company’s place of effective management because it often
represents the place where key company decisions are made. The following points need to
be considered for determining the location of the head office of the company: -
If the company’s senior management and their support staff are based in a single location
and that location is held out to the public as the company’s principal place of business or
headquarters then that location is the place where head office is located.
If the company is more decentralized (for example where various members of senior
management may operate, from time to time, at offices located in the various countries)
then the company’s head office would be the location where these senior managers,-
(i) are primarily or predominantly based; or
(ii) normally return to following travel to other locations; or
(iii) meet when formulating or deciding key strategies and policies for the company as a
whole.
Members of the senior management may operate from different locations on a more or less
permanent basis and the members may participate in various meetings via telephone or
video conferencing rather than by being physically present at meetings in a particular
location. In such situation the head office would normally be the location, if any, where the
highest level of management (for example, the Managing Director and Financial Director)
and their direct support staff are located.
In situations where the senior management is so decentralized that it is not possible to
determine the company’s head office with a reasonable degree of certainty, the location of a
company’s head office would not be of much relevance in determining that company’s place
of effective management.
“Head Office” of a company would be the place where the company's senior management
and their direct support staff are located or, if they are located at more than one location,
the place where they are primarily or predominantly located. A company’s head office is not
necessarily the same as the place where the majority of its employees work or where its
board typically meets.
(d) Use of modern technology: The use of modern technology impacts the place of effective
management in many ways. It is no longer necessary for the persons taking decision to be
physically present at a particular location. Therefore, physical location of board meeting or
executive committee meeting or meeting of senior management may not be where the key
decisions are in substance being made. In such cases the place where the directors or the
persons taking the decisions or majority of them usually reside may also be a relevant
factor.
(e) Decision via circular resolution or round robin voting: In case of circular resolution or
round robin voting the factors like, the frequency with which it is used, the type of decisions
made in that manner and where the parties involved in those decisions are located etc. are
to be considered. It cannot be said that proposer of decision alone would be relevant but
based on past practices and general conduct; it would be required to determine the person
who has the authority and who exercises the authority to take decisions. The place of
location of such person would be more important.
(f) Decisions made by shareholders are not relevant factor in determination of POEM:
The decisions made by shareholder on matters which are reserved for shareholder decision
under the company laws are not relevant for determination of a company’s place of effective
management. Such decisions may include sale of all or substantially all of the company’s
assets, the dissolution, liquidation or deregistration of the company, the modification of the
rights attaching to various classes of shares or the issue of a new class of shares etc.
These decisions typically affect the existence of the company itself or the rights of the
shareholders as such, rather than the conduct of the company’s business from a
management or commercial perspective and are therefore, generally not relevant for the
determination of a company’s place of effective management.
However, the shareholder’s involvement can, in certain situations, turn into that of effective
management. This may happen through a formal arrangement by way of shareholder
agreement etc. or may also happen by way of actual conduct. As an example if the
shareholders limit the authority of board and senior managers of a company and thereby
remove the company’s real authority to make decision then the shareholder guidance
transforms into usurpation and such undue influence may result in effective management
being exercised by the shareholder.
Therefore, whether the shareholder involvement is crossing the line into that of effective
management is one of fact and has to be determined on case-to-case basis only.
(g) Day to day routine operational decisions are not relevant for determination of POEM:
It may be clarified that day to day routine operational decisions undertaken by junior and
middle management shall not be relevant for the purpose of determination of POEM. The
operational decisions relate to the oversight of the day-to-day business operations and
activities of a company whereas the key management and commercial decision are
concerned with broader strategic and policy decision. For example, a decision to open a
major new manufacturing facility or to discontinue a major product line would be examples
of key commercial decisions affecting the company’s business as a whole. By contrast,
decisions by the plant manager appointed by senior management to run that facility,
concerning repairs and maintenance, the implementation of company-wide quality controls
and human resources policies, would be examples of routine operational decisions. In
certain situations, it may happen that person responsible for operational decision is the
same person who is responsible for the key management and commercial decision. In such
cases it will be necessary to distinguish the two type of decisions and thereafter assess the
location where the key management and commercial decisions are taken.
If the above factors do not lead to clear identification of POEM, then the final guidelines
provide that following secondary factors may be considered:
• Place where main and substantial activity of the company is carried out; or
(i) The fact that a foreign company is completely owned by an Indian company will not
be conclusive evidence that the conditions for establishing POEM in India have been
satisfied.
(ii) The fact that there exists a Permanent Establishment of a foreign entity in India
would itself not be conclusive evidence that the conditions for establishing POEM in
India have been satisfied.
(iii) The fact that one or some of the Directors of a foreign company reside in India will
not be conclusive evidence that the conditions for establishing POEM in India have
been satisfied.
(iv) The fact of, local management being situated in India in respect of activities carried
out by a foreign company in India will not, by itself, be conclusive evidence that the
conditions for establishing POEM have been satisfied.
(v) The existence in India of support functions that are preparatory and auxiliary in
character will not be conclusive evidence that the conditions for establishing POEM
in India have been satisfied.
It is reiterated that the above principles for determining the POEM are for guidance only. No single
principle will be decisive in itself. The above principles are not to be seen with reference to any
particular moment in time rather activities performed over a period of time, during the previous
year, need to be considered.
In other words, a “snapshot” approach is not to be adopted. Further, based on the facts and
circumstances if it is determined that during the previous year the POEM is in India and also
outside India then POEM shall be presumed to be in India if it has been mainly /predominantly in
India
The CBDT also clarified that the Assessing Officer (AO) shall, before initiating any proceedings for
holding a company incorporated outside India, on the basis of its POEM, as being resident in India,
seek prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner, as the case may be.
Further, in case the AO proposes to hold a company incorporated outside India, on the basis of its
POEM, as being resident in India then any such finding shall be given by the AO after seeking
prior approval of the collegium of three members consisting of the Principal Commissioners or the
Commissioners, as the case may be, to be constituted by the Principal Chief Commissioner of the
region concerned, in this regard. The collegium so constituted shall provide an opportunity of being
heard to the company before issuing any directions in the matter.
Example 1: Company A Co. is a sourcing entity, for an Indian multinational group, incorporated in
country X and is 100% subsidiary of Indian company (B Co.). The warehouses and stock in them
are the only assets of the company and are located in country X. All the employees of the
company are also in country X. The average income wise breakup of the company’s total income
for three years is, -
(i) 30% of income is from transaction where purchases are made from parties which are non-
associated enterprises and sold to associated enterprises.
(ii) 30% of income is from transaction where purchases are made from associated enterprises
and sold to associated enterprises.
(iii) 30% of income is from transaction where purchases are made from associated enterprises
and sold to non-associated enterprises. and
(iv) 10% of the income is by way of interest.
Interpretation: In this case, passive income is 40% of the total income of the company. The
passive income consists of, -
(i) 30% income from the transaction where both purchase and sale is from/to associated
enterprises; and
(ii) 10% income from interest.
The A Co. satisfies the first requirement of the test of active business outside India. Since no
assets or employees of A Co. are in India the other requirements of the test is also satisfied.
Therefore, company is engaged in active business outside India.
Example 2: The other facts remain same as that in Example 1 with the variation that A Co. has a
total of 50 employees. 47 employees, managing the warehouse, storekeeping, and accounts of the
company, are located in country X. The Managing Director (MD), Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
and sales head are resident in India. The total annual payroll expenditure on these 50 employees
is of ` 5 crore. The annual payroll expenditure in respect of MD, CEO and sales head is of ` 3
crore.
Interpretation: Although the first limb of active business test is satisfied by A Co. as only 40% of
its total income is passive in nature. Further, more than 50% of the employees are also situated
outside India. All the assets are situated outside India. However, the payroll expenditure in respect
of the MD, the CEO and the sales head being employee’s resident in India exceeds 50% of the
total payroll expenditure. Therefore, A Co. is not engaged in active business outside India.
Example 3: The basic facts are same as in Example 1. Further facts are that all the directors of
the A Co. are Indian residents. During the relevant previous year 5 meetings of the Board of
Directors is held of which two were held in India and 3 outside India with two in country X and one
in country Y.
Interpretation: The A Co. is engaged in active business outside India as the facts indicated in
Example 1 establish. The majority of board meetings have been held outside India. Therefore, the
POEM of A Co. shall be presumed to be outside India.
Example 4:The facts are same as in Example 3 but it is established by the Assessing Officer that
although A Co.’s senior management team signs all the contracts, for all the contracts above ` 10
lakh the A Co. must submit its recommendation to B Co. and B Co. makes the decision whether or
not the contract may be accepted. It is also seen that during the previous year more than 99% of
the contracts are above ` 10 lakh and over past years also the same trend in respect of value
contribution of contracts above ` 10 lakh is seen.
Interpretation: These facts suggest that the effective management of the A Co. may have been
usurped by the parent company B Co. Therefore, POEM of A Co. may in such cases be not
presumed to be outside India even though A Co. is engaged in active business outside India and
majority of board meeting are held outside India.
Example 5: An Indian multinational group has a local holding company A Co. in country X. The A
Co. also has 100% downstream subsidiaries B Co. and C Co. in country X and D Co. in country Y.
The A Co. has income only by way of dividend and interest from investments made in its
subsidiaries. The Place of Effective Management of A Co. is in India and is exercised by ultimate
parent company of the group. The subsidiaries B, C and D are engaged in active business outside
India. The meetings of Board of Director of B Co., C Co. and D Co. are held in country X and Y
respectively.
Interpretation: Merely because the POEM of an intermediate holding company is in India, the
POEM of its subsidiaries shall not be taken to be in India. Each subsidiary has to be examined
separately. As indicated in the facts since B Co., C Co., and D Co. are independently engaged in
active business outside India and majority of Board meetings of these companies are also held
outside India. The POEM of B Co., C Co., and D Co. shall be presumed to be outside India.
Further, the CBDT vide Circular no. 8/2017 dated 23.02.2017 also clarified that POEM
guidelines shall not apply to a company having turnover or gross receipts of ` 50 crores or
less in a financial year.
ILLUSTRATION 3
ABC Inc., a Swedish company headquartered at Stockholm, not having a permanent establishment
in India, has set up a liaison office in Mumbai in April, 2023 in compliance with RBI guidelines to
look after its day to day business operations in India, spread awareness about the company’s
products and explore further opportunities. The liaison office takes decisions relating to day to day
routine operations and performs support functions that are preparatory and auxiliary in nature. The
significant management and commercial decisions are, however, in substance made by the Board
of Directors at Sweden. Determine the residential status of ABC Inc. for A.Y. 2024-25.
SOLUTION
Section 6(3) provides that a company would be resident in India in any previous year, if-
ABC Inc. has only a liaison office in India through which it looks after its routine day to day
business operations in India. The place where decisions relating to day to day routine operations
are taken and support functions that are preparatory or auxiliary in nature are performed are not
relevant in determining the place of effective management.
Hence, ABC Inc., being a foreign company is a non-resident for A.Y.2024-25, since its place of
effective management is outside India in the P.Y.2023-24.
Transition Mechanism for a company incorporated outside India and has not been assessed
to tax earlier [Chapter XII-BC – Section 115JH]
A transition mechanism has been provided in Chapter XII-BC comprising of section 115JH for a
company which is incorporated outside India, which has not been assessed to tax in India earlier
and has become resident in India for the first time due to application of POEM,.
(a) Section 115JH empowers the Central Government to notify exception, modification and
adaptation subject to which, the provisions of the Act relating to computation of income,
treatment of unabsorbed depreciation, set-off or carry forward and set off of losses, special
provision relating to avoidance of tax and the collection and recovery of taxes shall apply in
a case where a foreign company is said to be resident in India due to its POEM being in
India for the first time and the said company has never been resident in India before.
(b) In a case where the determination regarding foreign company to be resident in India has
been made in the assessment proceedings relevant to any previous year, then, these
transition provisions would also cover any subsequent previous year, if the foreign company
is resident in India in that previous year and the previous year ends on or before the date
on which such assessment proceeding is completed. In effect, the transition provisions
would also cover any subsequent previous year upto the date of determination of POEM in
an assessment proceeding. However, once the transition is complete, then, normal
provisions of the Act would apply.
(c) In the notification issued by the Central Government, certain conditions including procedural
conditions subject to which these adaptations shall apply can be provided for and in case of
failure to comply with the conditions, the benefit of such notification would not be available
to the foreign company.
Accordingly, where in a previous year, any benefit, exemption or relief has been claimed
and granted to the foreign company in accordance with the notification, and subsequently,
there is failure to comply with any of the conditions specified therein, then –
(i) the benefit, exemption or relief shall be deemed to have been wrongly allowed.
(ii) the Assessing Officer may re-compute the total income of the assessee for the said
previous year and make the necessary amendment as if the exceptions,
modifications, and adaptations as per the notification does not apply; and
(iii) the provisions of section 154 shall, so far as may be, apply thereto and the period of
four years for rectification of mistake apparent from the record has to be reckoned
from the end of the previous year in which the failure to comply with the condition
stipulated in the notification takes place.
(d) Every notification issued in exercise of this power by the Central Government shall be laid
before each house of the Parliament.
(e) Accordingly, in exercise of the power under section 115JH(1) of the Income-tax Act,
1961,the Central Government has, vide notification No. 29/2018, dated 22 nd June, 2018,
specified the exceptions, modifications and adaptions subject to which, the provisions of the
Act relating to computation of income, treatment of unabsorbed depreciation, set-off or carry
forward and set off of losses, special provision relating to avoidance of tax and the
collection and recovery of taxes shall apply in a case where a foreign company is said to be
resident in India in any previous year on account of its POEM being in India and the such
foreign company has not been resident in India before the said previous year.
Particulars Provisions
Determination of If the foreign company is assessed to tax in the foreign
opening WDV jurisdiction
Where depreciation is required to be taken into account for the
purpose of computation of its taxable income, the WDV of the
depreciable asset as per the tax record in the foreign country on the
1st day of the previous year shall be adopted as the opening WDV for
the said previous year.
Where WDV is not available as per tax records, the WDV shall be
calculated assuming that the asset was installed, utilised and the
depreciation was actually allowed as per the provisions of the laws of
that foreign jurisdiction. The WDV so arrived at as on the 1st day of the
previous year shall be adopted to be the opening WDV for the said
previous year.
If the foreign company is not assessed to tax in the foreign
jurisdiction
WDV of the depreciable asset as appearing in the books of account as
on the 1st day of the previous year maintained in accordance with the
laws of that foreign jurisdiction shall be adopted as the opening WDV
for the said previous year.
Brought forward If the foreign company is assessed to tax in the foreign
loss and jurisdiction
unabsorbed Brought forward loss and unabsorbed depreciation as per the tax
depreciation record shall be determined year wise on the 1st day of the said
previous year.
If the foreign company is not assessed to tax in the foreign
jurisdiction
Brought forward loss and unabsorbed depreciation as per the books of
account prepared in accordance with the laws of that country shall be
determined year wise on the 1st day of the said previous year.
Other provisions
Such brought forward loss and unabsorbed depreciation shall be
deemed as loss and unabsorbed depreciation brought forward as on
the 1st day of the said previous year and shall be allowed to be set off
and carried forward in accordance with the provisions of the Act for
the remaining period calculated from the year in which they occurred
for the first time taking that year as the first year.
However, the losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the foreign
company shall be allowed to be set off only against such income of
the foreign company which has become chargeable to tax in India on
account of it becoming resident in India due to application of POEM.
In cases where the brought forward loss and unabsorbed depreciation
originally adopted in India are revised or modified in the foreign
jurisdiction due to any action of the tax or legal authority, the amount
of the loss and unabsorbed depreciation shall be revised or modified
for the purposes of set off and carry forward in India.
Period of profit The foreign company is required to prepare profit and loss account and
and loss balance sheet for the period starting from the date on which the
account and accounting year immediately following said accounting year begins, upto
balance sheet in 31st March of the year immediately preceding the period beginning with
cases where 1st April and ending on 31st March during which the foreign company has
accounting year become resident.
of foreign The foreign company is also required to prepare profit and loss
company does account and balance sheet for succeeding periods of twelve months,
not end on beginning from 1st April and ending on 31st March, till the year the
31st March foreign company remains resident in India on account of its POEM.
Examples:
Example 1: If the accounting year of the foreign company is a
calendar year and the company becomes resident in India during P.Y.
2023-24 for the first time due to its POEM being in India, then, the
company is required to prepare profit and loss account and balance
sheet for the period 1st January, 2023 to 31st March, 2023. It is also
required to prepare profit and loss account and balance sheet for the
period 1st April, 2023 to 31st March, 2024.
For the purpose of carry forward of loss and unabsorbed depreciation
in this case, since the period 1st January, 2023 to 31st March, 2023 is
less than 6 months, it is to be included in the accounting year
immediately preceding the accounting year in which the foreign
company is held to be resident in India for the first time. Accordingly,
the profit and loss and balance sheet of the Fifteen (15) month period
from 1st January, 2022 to 31st March, 2023 is to be prepared.
previous year day of the preceding previous year in accordance with the provisions
also of this notification.
No effect on Any transaction of the foreign company with any other person or entity
other under the Act shall not be altered only on the ground that the foreign
transactions company has become Indian resident.
Applicability of Subject to the above exceptions, modifications and adaptions
other provisions specifically provided vide this notification, the foreign company shall
relating to continue to be treated as a foreign company even if it is said to be
foreign company resident in India and all the provisions of the Act shall apply accordingly.
Consequently, the provisions specifically applicable to—
(i) a foreign company, shall continue to apply to it;
(ii) non-resident persons, shall not apply to it; and
(iii) the provisions specifically applicable to resident, shall apply to it.
Applicability of In case of conflict between the provision applicable to the foreign
tax rate on company as resident and the provision applicable to it as foreign
foreign company company, the later shall generally prevail.
Therefore, the rate of tax in case of foreign company i.e., 40% shall
remain the same, i.e., rate of income-tax applicable to the foreign
company even though residency status of the foreign company
changes from non-resident to resident on the basis of POEM.
Applicability of This notification shall be deemed to have come into force from 1st
notification April 2017.
Meaning of The place of incorporation of the foreign company.
foreign
jurisdiction
Applicability of The rate of exchange for conversion into rupees of value expressed in
rule 115 of the foreign currency, wherever applicable, shall be in accordance with
Income-tax provision of Rule 115 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. [Rule 115 is
Rules, 1962. given as Annexure 1 at the end of this module]
Individual
No
Yes
Resident Has he stayed ≥ 182
days in the RPY?
No
HUF/Firm/AOP/BOI/Local Authority/
Artificial Juridical Person Company
No
Is it wholly or NR
partly in India?
No
Yes
Yes Is the Place of
R Effective Management
in India?
Resident HUF No
NR
Is the Karta NR Yes
in any 9 PPY HUF is
out of 10 PPY? RNOR
No
No
HUF is ROR
(ii) the place of accrual or receipt of income, whether actual or deemed; and
(iii) the point of time at which the income had accrued to or was received by or on behalf of the
assessee.
The ambit of total income of the three classes of assessees would be as follows:
(1) Resident and ordinarily resident (ROR)
The total income of an ROR would, under section 5(1), consist of:
(i) income received or deemed to be received in India during the previous year;
(ii) income which accrues or arises or is deemed to accrue or arise in India during the previous
year; and
(iii) income which accrues or arises outside India even if it is not received or brought into India
during the previous year.
In simpler words, the global income of a ROR is chargeable to tax in India.
(2) Resident but not ordinarily resident (RNOR)
Under section 5(1), the total income of an RNOR would consist of –
(i) income received or deemed to be received in India during the previous year;
(ii) income which accrues or arises or is deemed to accrue or arise in India during the previous
year; and
(iii) income derived from a business controlled in or profession set up in India, even though it
accrues or arises outside India.
Note – All other income accruing or arising outside India which is not received or deemed to be
received or deemed to accrue or arise in India would not be included in his total income.
(3) Non-resident
A non-resident’s total income under section 5(2) includes:
(i) income received or deemed to be received in India in the previous year; and
(ii) income which accrues or arises or is deemed to accrue or arise in India during the previous
year.
Note: All assessees, whether resident or not, are chargeable to tax in respect of their income
accrued, arisen, received or deemed to accrue, arise or to be received in India whereas a resident
alone (resident and ordinarily resident in the case of individuals and HUF) is chargeable to tax in
respect of income which accrues or arises outside India.
Accrue refers to the right to receive income, whereas due refers to the right to enforce payment of
the same. For e.g. salary for work done in December will accrue throughout the month, day to day,
but will become due on the salary bill being passed on 31st December or 1st January.
Similarly, on Government securities, interest payable on specified dates arise during the period of
holding, day to day, but will become due for payment on the specified dates.
Example:
Interest on Government securities is usually payable on specified dates, say on 1 st January and
1 st July. In all such cases, the interest would be said to accrue from 1 st July to 31 st December
and on 1st January, it will fall due for payment.
It must be noted that income which has been taxed on accrual basis cannot be assessed again on
receipt basis, as it will amount to double taxation.
Explanation 1 to section 5 specifically provides that an item of income accruing or arising outside
India shall not be deemed to be received in India merely because it is taken into account in a
balance sheet prepared in India.
Further, Explanation 2 to section 5 makes it clear that once an item of income is included in the
assessee’s total income and subjected to tax on the ground of its accrual/ deemed accrual, it
cannot again be included in the person’s total income and subjected to tax either in the same or in
a subsequent year on the ground of its receipt - whether actual or deemed.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India [Section 9]
Under section 9, certain types of income are deemed to accrue or arise in India even though they
may actually accrue or arise outside India.
The categories of income which are deemed to accrue or arise in India are:
(1) Any income accruing or arising to an assessee in any place outside India whether
directly or indirectly
(i) through or from any business connection in India,
(ii) through or from any property in India,
(iii) through or from any asset or source of income in India or
Note - This amendment in the definition of “business connection” is for the purpose of
alignment with the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) as
modified by Multilateral Instrument (MLI) so as to make the provisions in the treaty effective.
(b) in a case, where he has no such authority, but habitually maintains in India a stock of
goods or merchandise from which he regularly delivers goods or merchandise on behalf
of the non-resident, or
(c) habitually secures orders in India, mainly or wholly for the non-resident.
Further, there may be situations when the person acting on behalf of the non-resident
secure order for other non-residents. In such situation, business connection for other non-
residents is established if,
i. such other non-resident controls the non-resident or
Agents having independent status are not included in Business Connection: Business
connection, however, shall not be established, where the non-resident carries on business through
a broker, general commission agent or any other agent having an independent status, if such a
person is acting in the ordinary course of his business.
A broker, general commission agent or any other agent shall be deemed to have an independent
status where he does not work mainly or wholly for the non-resident.
Where a business is carried on in India through a person referred to in (a), (b) or (c) of (i) above,
only so much of income as is attributable to the operations carried out in India shall be deemed to
accrue or arise in India [Explanation 3 to Section 9(1)(i)].
Significant economic presence [Explanation 2A to section 9(1)(i)]
Significant economic presence of a non-resident in India shall also constitute business connection
in India.
Significant economic presence means-
Nature of transaction Condition
(a) in respect of any goods, services or property Aggregate of payments arising from such
carried out by a non-resident with any person transaction or transactions during the
in India including provision of download of previous year should exceed ` 2 crores.
data or software in India
(b) systematic and continuous soliciting of The number of users should be atleast 3
business activities or engaging in interaction lakhs.
with users in India
Further, the above transactions or activities shall constitute significant economic presence in India,
whether or not,—
(i) the agreement for such transactions or activities is entered in India;
(ii) the non-resident has a residence or place of business in India; or
(a) In the case of a business, in respect of which all the operations are not carried out in
India [Explanation 1(a) to section 9(1)(i)]: In the case of a business, other than the
business having business connection in India on account of significant economic
presence, of which all the operations are not carried out in India, the income of the
business deemed to accrue or arise in India shall be only such part of income as is
reasonably attributable to the operations carried out in India. Therefore, it follows that
such part of income which cannot be reasonably attributed to the operations in India, is
not deemed to accrue or arise in India.
(b) Purchase of goods in India for export [Explanation 1(b) to section 9(1)(i)]: In the
case of a non-resident, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to him
through or from operations which are confined to the purchase of goods in India for the
purpose of export.
(c) Collection of news and views in India for transmission out of India [Explanation 1(c)
to section 9(1)(i)]: In the case of a non-resident, being a person engaged in the business
of running a news agency or of publishing newspapers, magazines or journals, no income
shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to him through or from activities which are
confined to the collection of news and views in India for transmission out of India.
(d) Shooting of cinematograph films in India [Explanation 1(d) to section 9(1)(i)]: In the
case of a non-resident, no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India through or
from operations which are confined to the shooting of any cinematograph film in India, if
such non-resident is :
• an individual, who is not a citizen of India or
• a firm which does not have any partner who is a citizen of India or who is resident in
India; or
• a company which does not have any shareholder who is a citizen of India or who is
resident in India.
(e) Activities confined to display of rough diamonds in SNZs [Explanation 1(e) to section
9(1)(i)]: In case of a foreign company engaged in the business of mining of diamonds, no
income shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India to it through or from the activities
which are confined to display of uncut and unassorted diamonds in any special zone
notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette in this behalf.
(ii) & (iii) Income from property, asset or source of income in India
Any income which arises from any property in India (movable, immovable, tangible and intangible
property) would be deemed to accrue or arise in India.
Examples:
• Hire charges or rent paid outside India for the use of the machinery or buildings situated in
India
• deposits with an Indian company for which interest is received outside India etc.
arises from or in consequence of transfer of shares or securities held in India by the specified
funds and such income is chargeable to tax in India.
However, the above benefit shall be applicable only in those cases where the proceeds of
redemption or buyback arising to the non-resident do not exceed the pro-rata share of the non-
resident in the total consideration realized by the specified funds from the said transfer of shares
or securities in India. It is further clarified that a non-resident investing directly in the specified
funds shall continue to be taxed as per the extant provisions of the Act.
Declaration of dividend by a foreign company outside India does not have the effect of transfer
of any underlying assets located in India. Circular No. 4/2015, dated 26-03-2015, therefore,
clarifies that, the dividends declared and paid by a foreign company outside India in respect of
shares which derive their value substantially from assets situated in India would NOT be deemed
to be income accruing or arising in India by virtue of the provisions of section 9(1)(i).
Explanation 6 to section 9(1)(i) provides that the share or interest in a company or entity
registered or incorporated outside India, shall be deemed to derive its value substantially from the
assets (whether tangible or intangible) located in India, if on the specified date, the value of Indian
assets, -
• exceeds the amount of ` 10 crore; and
• represents at least 50% of the value of all the assets owned by the company or entity, as
the case may be;
Meaning of certain terms:
Term Meaning
Value of an asset The fair market value as on the specified date, of such asset
without reduction of liabilities, if any, in respect of the asset,
determined in prescribed manner.
Specified date The date on which the accounting period of the company or, as the
case may be, the entity ends preceding the date of transfer of a share
or an interest.
However, the date of transfer shall be the specified date of valuation,
in a case where the book value of the assets of the company or entity
on the date of transfer exceeds by at least 15%, the book value of the
assets as on the last balance sheet date preceding the date of
transfer.
Accounting Each period of 12 months ending with 31st March.
period However, where a company or an entity, referred to in Explanation 5,
Note - The manner of determination of fair market value of the assets of the foreign company is
given in Rule 11UB. Determination of income attributable to assets in India is given in Rule 11UC 2.
Explanation 7 to section 9(1)(i) provides that no income shall be deemed to accrue or arise to
a non-resident from transfer, outside India, of any share of, or interest in, a company or an entity,
registered or incorporated outside India, in the following cases;
(1) Foreign AND the transferor (whether individually or along with its
company or associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months
entity directly preceding the date of transfer, does not hold
owns the • the right of management or control in relation to foreign
assets situated company or entity; or
in India
• the voting power or share capital or interest exceeding
5% of the total voting power or total share capital or
total interest, as the case may be, of the foreign
company or entity; or
(2) Foreign AND the transferor (whether individually or along with its
company or associated enterprises), at any time in the twelve months
entity preceding the date of transfer, does not hold
indirectly • the right of management or control in relation to foreign
owns the company or entity; or
2 For detailed reading of Rule 11UB and 11UC of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, students may visit
https://incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/rules/income-tax-rules-1962.aspx
assets situated • any right in, or in relation to, such foreign company or
in India entity which would entitle him to the right of
management or control in the company or entity that
directly owns the assets situated in India; or
• such percentage of voting power or share capital or
interest in foreign company or entity which results in
holding of (either individually or along with associated
enterprises) a voting power or share capital or interest
exceeding 5% of the total voting power or total share
capital or total interest, as the case may be, of the
company or entity that directly owns the assets
situated in India;
In effect, the exemption shall be available to the transferor of a share of, or interest in, a foreign
entity if he along with its associated enterprises, -
• neither holds the right of control or management,
• nor holds voting power or share capital or interest exceeding 5% of the total voting power or
total share capital or total interest,
in the foreign company or entity directly holding the Indian assets (direct holding company).
In case the transfer is of shares or interest in a foreign entity which does not hold the Indian assets
directly then the exemption shall be available to the transferor if he along with its associated
enterprises,-
• neither holds the right of management or control in relation to such company or the entity,
• nor holds any rights in such company which would entitle it to either exercise control or
management of the direct holding company or entity or entitle it to voting power or share
capital or total interest exceeding 5% in the direct holding company or entity.
Further, where all the assets owned, directly or indirectly, by a company or, as the case may be,
an entity registered or incorporated outside India, are not located in India, the income of the non-
resident transferor, from transfer outside India of a share of, or interest in the foreign company or
entity, deemed to accrue or arise in India under this clause, shall be only such part of the income
as is reasonably attributable to assets located in India and determined in the prescribed manner.
“Associated enterprise”, in relation to another enterprise, means an enterprise—
• which participates, directly or indirectly, or through one or more intermediaries, in the
management or control or capital of the other enterprise; or
• in respect of which one or more persons who participate, directly or indirectly, or through
one or more intermediaries, in its management or control or capital, are the same persons
who participate, directly or indirectly, or through one or more intermediaries, in the
management or control or capital of the other enterprise.
(2) Income from salaries earned in India [Section 9(1)(ii)]
Income, which falls under the head “Salaries”, deemed to accrue or arise in India, if it is earned in
India. Salary payable for service rendered in India would be treated as earned in India.
Further, any income under the head “Salaries” payable for rest period or leave period which is
preceded and succeeded by services rendered in India, and forms part of the service contract of
employment, shall be regarded as income earned in India.
(3) Income from salaries payable by the Government for services rendered outside India
[Section 9(1)(iii)]
Income from ‘Salaries’ which is payable by the Government to a citizen of India for services
rendered outside India would be deemed to accrue or arise in India.
However, allowances and perquisites paid or allowed outside India by the Government to an Indian
citizen for services rendered outside India is exempt, by virtue of section 10(7).
ILLUSTRATION 4
J, a citizen of India, employed in the Indian Embassy at Tokyo, Japan. He received salary and
allowances at Tokyo from the Government of India for the year ended 31.3.2024 for services
rendered by him in Tokyo. Besides, he was allowed perquisites by the Government. He is a non-
resident for the assessment year 2024-25. Examine the taxability of salary, allowances and
perquisites in the hands of J for the assessment year 2024-25.
SOLUTION
As per section 9(1)(iii), salaries payable by the Government to a citizen of India for services
rendered outside India shall be deemed to accrue or arise in India. As such, salary received by J is
chargeable to tax, even though he was a non-resident for A.Y. 2024-25.
As per section 10(7), all allowances or perquisites paid or allowed as such outside India by the
Government to a citizen of India for rendering services outside India is exempt from tax. Therefore,
the allowances and perquisites received by J are exempt as per section 10(7).
(iii) a non-resident, when it is payable in respect of any debt incurred or moneys borrowed
and used, for the purpose of a business or profession carried on in India by him.
Exception: Interest on money borrowed by the non-resident for any purpose other than a
business or profession, will not be deemed to accrue or arise in India.
Example: If a non-resident ‘A’ borrows money from a non-resident ‘B’ and invests the
same in shares of an Indian company, interest payable by ‘A’ to ‘B’ will not be deemed to
accrue or arise in India.
Meaning of interest: Interest means interest payable in any manner in respect of any
moneys borrowed or debt incurred (including a deposit, claim or other similar right or
obligation) and includes any service fee or other charge in respect of the moneys
borrowed or debt incurred or in respect of any credit facility which has not been utilized.
Such interest shall be chargeable to tax in addition to any income attributable to the PE in
India.
Further, the PE in India shall be deemed to be a person separate and independent of the
non-resident person of which it is a PE and the provisions of the Act relating to computation
of total income, determination of tax and collection and recovery would apply accordingly.
Also, the PE in India has to deduct tax at source on any interest payable to either the head
office or any other branch or PE, etc. of the non-resident outside India. Non-deduction
would result in disallowance of interest claimed as expenditure by the PE and may also
attract levy of interest and penalty in accordance with relevant provisions of the Act.
Permanent establishment includes a fixed place of business through which the business
of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on.
(B) Meaning of Computer software: “Computer software” means any computer programme
recorded on any disc, tape, perforated media or other information storage device and
includes any such programme or any customised electronic data.
(C) Meaning of Royalty: The term ‘royalty’ means consideration (including any lumpsum con-
sideration but excluding any consideration which would be the income of the recipient
chargeable under the head ‘capital gains’) for:
(i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of license) in respect of a
patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar
property;
(ii) the imparting of any information concerning the working of, or the use of, a patent,
invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property;
(iii) the use of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade
mark or similar property;
(iv) the imparting of any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or
scientific knowledge, experience or skill;
(v) the use or right to use any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment but not
including the amounts referred to in section 44BB;
(vi) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of license) in respect of any
copyright, literary, artistic or scientific work including films or video tapes for use in
connection with television or tapes for use in connection with radio broadcasting.
Note - Consideration for sale, distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films is
covered within the scope of royalty.
(vii) the rendering of any service in connection with the activities listed above.
The definition of ‘royalty’ for this purpose is wide enough to cover both industrial royalties
as well as copyright royalties. The definition specially excludes income which should be
chargeable to tax under the head ‘capital gains’.
(D) Consideration for use or right to use of computer software is royalty within the
meaning of section 9(1)(vi)
The consideration for use or right to use of computer software is royalty by clarifying that,
transfer of all or any rights in respect of any right, property or information includes and
has always included transfer of all or any right for use or right to use a computer software
(including granting of a license) irrespective of the medium through which such right is
transferred [Explanation 4].
Consequently, the provisions of tax deduction at source under section 194J and
section 195 would be attracted in respect of consideration for use or right to use
computer software since the same falls within the definition of royalty as per the
provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Central Government has, vide Notification No. 21/2012 dated 13.6.2012 to be effective
from 1st July, 2012, exempted certain software payments from the applicability of tax
deduction under section 194J. Accordingly, where payment is made by the transferee for
acquisition of software from a resident-transferor, the provisions of section 194J would not
be attracted if –
(1) the software is acquired in a subsequent transfer without any modification by the
transferor;
(2) tax has been deducted either under section 194J or under section 195 on payment
for any previous transfer of such software; and
(3) the transferee obtains a declaration from the transferor that tax has been so
deducted along with the PAN of the transferor.
The issue of whether the amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/ distributors to non-
resident computer software manufacturers/ suppliers, as consideration for the use/resale of
the computer software through End-User Licence Agreement (EULAs) /distribution
agreements, be considered as payment of royalty for the use of copyright in the computer
software came up before the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence
P. Ltd v. CIT and Another (2021) ITR 471.
The Apex Court observed that as per the definition given in Explanation 2(v) to section
9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, “royalty” means consideration for, inter alia, the
transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence), in respect of any copyright,
literary, artistic or scientific work. As per Explanation 4 thereto, such transfer of all or any
rights includes transfer of all or any right for use or right to use a computer software
(including the granting of a licence). As per the meaning of royalties as assigned in the
DTAA with Singapore, “royalty” means payment of any kind received as consideration for
“the use of, or the right to use, any copyright” of a literary, artistic or scientific work. The
meaning of royalty in India’s DTAA with other countries like Australia, Canada, France,
Italy, USA, Netherlands, Sweden, Taiwan, Japan, China etc. is also similar if not identical.
The definition of the royalties under the DTAA does not include transfer of right for use or
right to use a computer software.
The scope of definition of royalties under the Act is wider as compared to the definition of
royalties under India’s DTAA with these countries.
The Apex Court observed the following four categories of cases, in which the distribution
agreements and end-user licence agreements did not create any interest or right to such
distributors or end-users, which could amount to the use of or right to use any copyright:
(c) the location of such right, property or information is in India [Explanation 5].
(F) Meaning of Process
The term “process” includes and shall be deemed to have always included transmission by
satellite (including up-linking, amplification, conversion for down-linking of any signal),
cable, optic fibre or by any other similar technology, whether or not such process is secret
[Explanation 6].
(7) Fees for technical services [Section 9(1)(vii)]
Any fees for technical services will be deemed to accrue or arise in India if they are payable by -
(i) the Government.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India to a non-resident by way of interest, royalty and fee
for technical services to be taxed irrespective of territorial nexus [Explanation to section 9]
Income by way of interest, royalty or fee for technical services which is deemed to accrue or arise
in India by virtue of clauses (v), (vi) and (vii) of section 9(1), shall be included in the total income of
the non-resident, whether or not –
(i) the non-resident has a residence or place of business or business connection in India; or
(ii) the non-resident has rendered services in India.
In effect, the income by way of fee for technical services, interest or royalty, from services utilized
in India would be deemed to accrue or arise in India in case of a non-resident and be included in
his total income, whether or not such services were rendered in India.
ILLUSTRATION 5
Miss Vivitha paid a sum of 5000 USD to Mr. Kulasekhara, a management consultant practising in
Colombo, specializing in project financing. The payment was made in Colombo. Mr. Kulasekhara is
a non-resident. The consultancy is related to a project in India with possible Ceylonese
collaboration. Is this payment chargeable to tax in India in the hands of Mr. Kulasekhara?
SOLUTION
A non-resident is chargeable to tax in respect of income received outside India only if such income
accrues or arises or is deemed to accrue or arise to him in India.
The income deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 9 comprises, inter alia, income by
way of fees for technical services, which includes any consideration for rendering of any
managerial, technical or consultancy services. Therefore, payment to a management consultant
relating to project financing is covered within the scope of “fees for technical services”.
The Explanation below section 9(2) clarifies that income by way of, inter alia, fees for technical
services, from services utilized in India would be deemed to accrue or arise in India in case of a
non-resident and be included in his total income, whether or not such services were rendered in
India or whether or not the non-resident has a residence or place of business or business
connection in India.
In the instant case, since the services were utilized in India, the payment received by
Mr. Kulasekhara, a non-resident, in Colombo is chargeable to tax in his hands in India, as it is
deemed to accrue or arise in India.
(8) Any sum of money paid by a resident Indian to a non-corporate non-resident or
foreign company or to a resident but not ordinarily resident in India [Section 9(1)(viii)]
Income arising outside India, being any sum of money paid without consideration, by a Indian
resident person to a non-corporate non-resident or foreign company or to a RNOR would be
deemed to accrue or arise in India if the same is chargeable to tax under section 56(2)(x) i.e., if
the aggregate of such sum received by a non-corporate non-resident or foreign company exceeds
` 50,000.
It may be noted that this deeming provision applies to only sum of money paid outside India to a
non-corporate non-resident or foreign company or to a RNOR, and not in respect of property,
SOLUTION
Computation of total income for the A.Y. 2024-25
(iii) Conditions to be fulfilled by an Eligible Investment Fund [Section 9A(3)]: The eligible
investment fund means a fund established or incorporated or registered outside India,
which collects funds from its members for investing it for their benefit. Further, it should
fulfill the following conditions:
(a) the fund should not be a person resident in India;
(b) the fund should be a resident of a country or a specified territory with which an
agreement referred to in section 90(1) or section 90A(1) has been entered into or
should be established or incorporated or registered, outside India in a country or a
specified territory notified by the Central Government in this behalf;
(c) the aggregate participation or investment in the fund, directly or indirectly, by
0persons being resident in India should not exceed 5% of the corpus of the fund;
(e) the fund should have a minimum of 25 members who are, directly or indirectly, not
connected persons;
(f) any member of the fund along with connected persons shall not have any
participation interest, directly or indirectly, in the fund exceeding 10%;
(g) the aggregate participation interest, directly or indirectly, of ten or less members
along with their connected persons in the fund, shall be less than 50%;
(h) the investment by the fund in any entity shall not exceed 20% of the corpus of the
fund;
(i) no investment shall be made by the fund in its associate entity;
(j) the monthly average of the corpus of the fund shall not be less than ` 100 crore. If
the fund has been established or incorporated in the previous year, the corpus of
fund should not be less than ` 100 crore at the end of a period of twelve months
from the last day of the month of its establishment or incorporation;
However, this condition shall not be applicable to a fund which has been wound up in
the previous year.
(k) the fund shall not carry on or control and manage, directly or indirectly, any business
in India;
(l) the fund should neither be engaged in any activity which constitutes a business
connection in India nor should have any person acting on its behalf whose activities
constitute a business connection in India other than the activities undertaken by the
eligible fund manager on its behalf.
(m) the remuneration paid by the fund to an eligible fund manager in respect of fund
management activity undertaken on its behalf should not be less than the amount
calculated in the prescribed manner.
(iv) Certain conditions not to apply to investment fund set up by the Government or the
Central Bank of a foreign State or a Sovereign Fund or other notified fund [Proviso to
Section 9A(3)]: The following conditions would, however, not be applicable in case of an
investment fund set up by the Government or the Central Bank of a foreign State or a
sovereign fund or such other fund notified by the Central Government [i.e., an investment
fund set up by a Category-I or Category-II Foreign Portfolio Investor registered under the
SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014, made under the SEBI Act, 1992 and
an investment fund set up by a Category-I foreign portfolio investor registered under the
SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019, made under the SEBI Act, 1992]:
(e) the fund should have a minimum of 25 members who are, directly or indirectly, not
connected persons;
(f) any member of the fund along with connected persons shall not have any
participation interest, directly or indirectly, in the fund exceeding 10%;
(g) the aggregate participation interest, directly or indirectly, of ten or less members
along with their connected persons in the fund, shall be less than 50%.
(v) Eligible Fund Manager [Section 9A(4)]: The eligible fund manager, in respect of an
eligible investment fund, means any person who is engaged in the activity of fund
management and fulfills the following conditions:
(a) the person should not be an employee of the eligible investment fund or a connected
person of the fund;
The CBDT has, vide Circular No.8/2019 dated 10.5.2019, clarified that a fund
manager includes an Asset Management Company (AMC) approved by SEBI under
the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996. This is because AMCs are engaged in
the activity of fund management of Mutual Funds and hence are, in substance, Fund
Managers.
(c) the person should be acting in the ordinary course of his business as a fund
manager;
(d) the person along with his connected persons shall not be entitled, directly or
indirectly, to more than 20% of the profits accruing or arising to the eligible
investment fund from the transactions carried out by the fund through such fund
manager.
(vi) Furnishing of Statement in prescribed form [Section 9A(5)]: Every eligible investment
fund shall, in respect of its activities in a financial year, furnish within 90 days from the
end of the financial year, a statement in the prescribed form to the prescribed income-tax
authority. The statement should contain information relating to –
(a) the fulfillment of the above conditions; and
(b) such other relevant information or document which may be prescribed.
If any eligible investment fund fails to furnish such statement or information or document
within 90 days from the end of the financial year, the income-tax authority prescribed
under the said sub-section may direct that such fund shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum
of ` 5,00,000 [Section 271FAB].
(vii) Non-applicability of special taxation regime under section 9A [Section 9A(6)/(7)]:
This special taxation regime would not have any impact on taxability of any income of the
eligible investment fund which would have been chargeable to tax irrespective of whether
the activity of the eligible fund manager constituted business connection in India of such
fund or not.
Further, the said regime shall not have any effect on the scope of total income or
determination of total income in the case of the eligible fund manager.
(viii) CBDT to prescribe guidelines for the manner of application of the provisions of this
section.
(ix) Certain conditions not to apply or apply with modification to investment fund and its fund
manager, if such fund manager is located in an IFSC and has commenced its operation
on or before 31.3.2024 [Section 9A(8A)]: The Central Government may, by notification,
specify that any one or more of the conditions specified in point (iii) and (v) above would not
be applicable or applicable with such modifications, as may be specified in such notification
in case of an eligible investment fund and its eligible fund manager, if such fund manager is
located in an IFSC as defined in section 80LA and has commenced its operation on or
before 31.3.2024:
Accordingly, the Central Government has, vide Notification No. 59/2022 dated 6.6.2022,
specified that in case of –
I. An eligible investment fund -
(i) the following conditions mentioned under section 9A(3) would not be
applicable
(e) the fund should have a minimum of 25 members who are, directly or
indirectly, not connected persons;
(f) any member of the fund along with connected persons shall not have
any participation interest, directly or indirectly, in the fund exceeding
10%;
(g) the aggregate participation interest, directly or indirectly, of ten or
less members along with their connected persons in the fund, shall
be less than 50%.
(ii) the condition mentioned above in clause (k) of section 9A(3) would apply
after the following modification -
“the fund shall not carry on, or participate in, the day to day operations of
any person in India and for this purpose the monitoring mechanism to
protect the investment in such person including the right to appoint directors
or executive director shall not be considered as participation in day to day
operations of such person in India”
As per section 10(4)(ii), in the case of an individual, any income by way of interest on moneys
standing to his credit in a Non-resident (External) Account (NRE A/c) in any bank in India in
accordance with the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA, 1999), and the rules made
thereunder, would be exempt, provided such individual;
is a person resident outside India, as defined in FEMA, 1999, or
is a person who has been permitted by the Reserve Bank of India to maintain such account.
The benefit of exemption under section 10(4)(ii) will be available to joint account holders, subject
to fulfilment of other conditions contained in that section by each of the individual joint account
holders.
Example: Mrs. Neena Kansal, is resident of Singapore since year 2000. She holds an NRE
account with Bank of Baroda, New Delhi Branch. Interest of ` 10,000 was credited to such account
during financial year 2023-24. Such interest income earned by her shall be exempt from income-
tax while she files her tax return for A.Y 2024-25.
(2) Interest income of a non-corporate non-resident or foreign company on specified off-
shore Rupee Denominated Bonds issued by an Indian company or business trust
[Section 10(4C)]
Condition for exemption - The income attributable to units held by non-resident (not being the
permanent establishment of a non-resident in India) in a specified fund would not be exempt under
section 10(4D) unless the specified fund furnish the annual statement of exempt income on or
before the due date u/s 139(1).
The income of a specified fund attributable to an eligible investment division would not be exempt
under section 10(4D) unless it furnishes the annual statement of exempt income and the report of
audit on or before the said due date. [Notification no. 64/2022 dated 16.6.2022]
Meaning of certain terms:
entered into with an offshore banking unit of an IFSC as referred to in section 80LA(1A), which
fulfils prescribed conditions would be exempt.
Accordingly, Rule 21AK specifies the following conditions to be fulfilled for claiming such
exemption -
• the non-deliverable forward contract or offshore derivative instruments or over-the-
counter derivatives is entered into by the non-resident with an offshore banking unit of an
IFSC which holds a valid certificate of registration granted under IFSC Authority
(Banking) Regulations, 2020 by the IFSC Authority; and
• such contract or instrument or derivative is not entered into by the non-resident through
or on behalf of its permanent establishment in India [The offshore banking unit (i.e., a
banking branch unit located in an IFSC) has to ensure that this condition is complied
with].
Meaning of Certain terms:
Term Meaning
Non-deliverable A contract for the difference between an exchange rate agreed before and
forward contract the actual spot rate at maturity, with the spot rate being taken as the
domestic rate or a market determined rate and such contract being settled
with a single payment in a foreign currency.
Offshore banking A banking branch Unit located in an IFSC, as referred to in section
unit 80LA(1A).
Offshore Any instrument, by whatever name called, which is issued overseas by a
derivative foreign portfolio investor against securities held by it in India, as its
instrument underlying [Regulation 2(1)(o) of the SEBI Foreign Portfolio Investor
Regulations, 2019];
Over-the-counter A derivative contract that is not traded on an exchange but instead is
derivatives privately negotiated between a purchaser and a seller.
(i) from A.Y. relevant to the P.Y. in which the domestic company has commenced its
operations or
(ii) from A.Y. 2024-25, where the period of 10 A.Ys. under (i) above ends before 1.4.2034.
"Aircraft" means an aircraft or a helicopter, or an engine of an aircraft or a helicopter, or any part
thereof.
(8) Remuneration received by individuals, who are not citizens of India [Section 10(6)]
(b) The above-mentioned member of the staff of such officials should be the subjects
of the respective countries and should not be engaged in any other business or
profession or employment in India.
Examples:
• Mr. A, a citizen of India but resident of USA since year 2012, was appointed as a
senior official of the US embassy in India. He earned a remuneration of ` 10 lakhs
during F.Y. 2023-24. Being an Individual who is a citizen of India, though
fulfilling other conditions of the section, such remuneration shall not be
exempt in his hands for A.Y. 2024-25.
• Mr. Vikram Kohli, an Indian born person but currently a resident and Citizen of USA,
was appointed as a senior official of the US embassy in India. He earned a
remuneration of ` 10 lakhs during F.Y. 2023-24. Being an Individual who is not a
citizen of India and also fulfilling other conditions of the section, such
remuneration shall be exempt in his hands for A.Y. 2024-25, subject to
fulfilment of conditions.
• Mr. Frank D’Souza, an Irish Citizen but currently the resident of USA, was appointed
as a senior official of the US embassy in India. He earned a remuneration of ` 10
lakhs during F.Y. 2023-24. Being an Individual who is not a citizen of India, such
remuneration shall be exempt in his hands for A.Y. 2024-25, subject to
fulfilment of the conditions.
(ii) Remuneration received for services rendered in India by a Foreign National employed
by foreign enterprise [Section 10(6)(vi)]: The remuneration received by a foreign national
as an employee of a foreign enterprises, for services rendered by him during his stay in
India is exempt from tax.
Conditions
(a) The foreign enterprise is not engaged in any business or trade in India:
(b) The employee’s stay in India does not exceed in the aggregate a period of 90 days in
such previous year, and
(c) The remuneration is not liable to be deducted from the income of the employer
chargeable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Examples:
• Mr. A, citizen of India but resident of USA since year 2012, was appointed in India in
October, 2022 as an employee of a US enterprise. Such US enterprise is not
engaged in any business in India. A’s job requires him to visit his US office every
twenty five (25) days for reporting purposes.
During F.Y. 2023-24, Mr. A earned a remuneration of ` 10 lakhs for his India related
assignment and his stay in India in aggregate was 85 days. Further, such US enterprise
has not claimed any deduction of such remuneration under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Being an Individual who is a citizen of India, such remuneration shall not be exempt
in his hands for A.Y. 2024-25 under this section i.e., section 10(6)(vi), though he may
get exemption under any other provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961, subject to
fulfilment of conditions stipulated thereunder.
• In the above case, let’s consider that Mr. A is a citizen of USA. All other facts
remaining same, his remuneration shall be exempt from tax in his hands for A.Y.
2024-25 under this section.
• Let’s take another variation, Mr. A is a citizen of USA but the remuneration paid to
him is borne by the permanent establishment of such US enterprise in India. ` 10
lakhs paid to A is cross charged by the US enterprise to its Indian permanent
establishment (PE).
In this case, the remuneration shall not be exempt from taxation in the hands
of Mr. A as the same is getting deducted from the income of the Indian PE of
such foreign enterprise.
(10) Certain incomes of wholly owned subsidiary of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority,
Sovereign Wealth Fund and specified pension fund [Section 10(23FE)]
(i) Nature of income exempted: Any income of a specified person in the nature of
- dividend,
- interest
- any sum referred to in section 56(2)(xii) i.e. any specified sum received by a
unit holder from a business trust during the previous year, with respect to a
unit held by him at any time during the previous year or
- long-term capital gains
arising from an investment made by it in India, whether in the form of debt or share capital
or unit would be exempt, if such investment –
(a) is made on or after 1st April, 2020 but on or before 31st March, 2024; and
inclusion, such income shall be chargeable to income-tax as the income of the specified
person of that previous year.
(v) Proportionate exemption of income attributable to investment in Category-I or
Category-II AIF, domestic companies or NBFC referred to in (c), (d) or (e) of (ii)
above if they are not having 100% investment in specified companies or entities:
(a) In case a Category-I or Category-II AIF referred to in (c) of (ii) above has
investment of less than 100% in one or more of the companies or enterprises or
entities referred to in (b) or (d) or (e) of (ii) above or in an Infrastructure Investment
Trust referred to in (c) of (ii) above, income accrued or arisen or received or
attributable to such investment, directly or indirectly, which is exempt under this
section shall be calculated proportionately to that investment made in one or more
of the companies or enterprises or entities referred to in (b) or (d) or (e) of (ii)
above or in the Infrastructure Investment Trust referred to in (c) of (ii) above, in
such manner as may be prescribed.
(b) In case a domestic company referred to in (d) of (ii) above has investment of less
than 100% in one or more of the companies or enterprises or entities referred to in
(b) of (ii) above, income accrued or arisen or received or attributable to such
investment, directly or indirectly, which is exempt under this section shall be
calculated proportionately to that investment made in one or more of the
companies or enterprises or entities referred to in (b) of (ii) above, in such manner
as may be prescribed.
(c) In case a non-banking finance company registered as an Infrastructure Finance
Company or Infrastructure Debt Fund referred to in (e) of (ii) above has lending of
less than 100% in one or more of the companies or enterprises or entities referred
to in (b) of (ii) above, income accrued or arisen or received or attributable to such
lending, directly or indirectly, which is exempt under this section shall be
calculated proportionately to the lending made in one or more of the companies or
enterprises or entities referred to in (b) of (ii) above, in such manner as may be
prescribed.
(vi) Non applicability of exemption under section: In case a sovereign wealth fund or
pension fund has loans or borrowings, directly or indirectly, for the purposes of making
investment in India, such fund shall be deemed to be not eligible for exemption under this
section.
In order to address the concern with regard to the term “indirect borrowings” which have
not been defined in the section and the consequent eligibility or otherwise of the
exemption to the specified fund, where the loan and borrowings have been taken by the
specified fund or its holding or any other entity in the chain of holding or any associate
thereof, the CBDT has, vide Circular No. 19/2021 dated 26.10.2021, issued the guidelines
and clarified the following:
- if the loans and borrowings have been taken by the specified fund or any of its group
concern, specifically for the purposes of making investment by the specified fund in
India, such fund shall not be eligible for exemption under section 10(23FE); and
- if the loans and borrowings have been taken by the specified fund or any of its
group concern, not specifically for the purposes of making investment in India, it
shall not be presumed that the investment in India has been made out of such
loans and borrowings and such specified fund shall be eligible for exemption under
section 10(23FE), subject to the fulfilment of all other stipulated conditions,
provided that the source of the investment in India is not from such loans and
borrowings.
(vii) Meaning of certain terms:
Specified Person
The earnings of the fund are credited It should not be liable to tax in
either to the account of the such foreign country or if liable
Government of that foreign country or to tax, exemption from taxation
to any other account designated by for all its income has been
that Government so that no portion of provided by such foreign
the earnings inures any benefit to any country
private person
10(6BB) Tax paid by Indian company, engaged in the Government of foreign State or
business of operation of aircraft, which has foreign enterprise (i.e., a person
acquired an aircraft or an aircraft engine on who is a non-resident)
lease, under an approved (by Central
Government) agreement entered into
between 1-4-1997 and 31-3-1999, or after
31-3-2007, on lease rental/income derived
(other than payment for providing spares or
services in connection with the operation of
leased aircraft) by the Government of a
Foreign State or foreign enterprise.
10(6C) Royalty income or fees for technical services Foreign company (notified by the
under an agreement with the Central Central Government)
Government for providing services in or
outside India in projects connected with
security of India
10(6D) Royalty income from or fees from technical Non-corporate non-resident or
services rendered in or outside India to, the foreign company
National Technical Research Organisation
(NTRO)
10(15)(iiia) Interest on deposits made by a foreign bank Bank incorporated outside India
with a scheduled bank with approval of RBI. and authorised to perform Central
Banking functions in that country.
10(15)(iv)(fa) Interest payable by scheduled bank on a) Non-resident
deposits in foreign currency where b) Individual or HUF being a
acceptance of such deposits is duly resident but not ordinary
approved by RBI. resident
[Scheduled bank does not include co-operative
bank]
10(15)(viii) Interest on deposit on or after 01.04.2005 in
an Offshore Banking Unit
10(15)(ix) Interest payable by a unit located in an IFSC Non-resident
in respect of monies borrowed by it on or
after 1.9.2019
10(15A) Lease rental paid by Indian company, engaged Government of foreign State or
in the business of operation of aircraft, to foreign enterprise (i.e., a person
acquire an aircraft or an aircraft engine on who is a non-resident)
lease (other than payment for providing spares
or services in connection with the operation of
leased aircraft) under an approved (by Central
The amounts referred above would include demurrage charges or handling charges or any other
amount of similar nature.
The amounts paid or payable or the amounts received or deemed to be received will also include the
amount paid or payable or received or deemed to be received by way of demurrage charges or
handling charges or any other amount of similar nature [CIT v. Japan Lines Ltd. 260 ITR 656(Mad)].
Thus 7.5% of the gross amounts mentioned above would be liable to tax and no deduction would be
allowed for any expenditure, (i.e. the provisions of section 28 to 43A are not to be taken into account)
however carried forward losses would be allowed to be set off from such income.
Analysis of section 44B and section 172:
(iii) Time limit for passing the assessment order [Section 172(4A)/(5)]: It is incumbent on
the Assessing Officer to pass the order of assessment within 9 months from the end of
the financial year in which the return of income under section 172(3) is filed.
For the purpose of determining the tax payable, Assessing Officer is empowered to call
for such accounts and documents as he may require.
(iv) Grant of port of clearance to the ship [Section 172(6)]: A port clearance shall not be
granted to the ship until the Collector of customs or other authorized officer, is satisfied
that the tax assessable under section 172 has been duly paid or that satisfactory
arrangements have been made for the payment thereof.
(v) Option to pay tax as per normal provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the
income chargeable to tax under section 172 [Section 172(7)]: The owner or charterer
has the option to claim before the expiry of the assessment year relevant to the previous
year in which the date of departure of the ship from the Indian port falls, that an
assessment in respect of his total income for the previous year and the tax payable on
the basis thereof be determined in accordance with the other provisions of this Act. In
such a case, any payment made under section 172 is to be treated as a payment in
advance of the tax leviable for that assessment year and the difference between the sum
so paid and the amount of tax found payable by him on such assessment is to be paid by
him or refunded to him, as the case may be.
The sum chargeable to tax under this section shall include amounts payable by way of demurrage
charge or handling charge or any other amount of similar nature [Section 172(8)].
Section 172 vis-à-vis section 44B
In case the assessee is covered under section 172, 7.5% of the amount paid or payable on
account of the carriage of the passengers, livestock, mail or goods to the owner or the chartered or
to any person on his behalf is deemed as his income and tax is levied on such income at a rate
applicable to a foreign company i.e., 40% plus surcharge, if any, and plus health and education
cess @4%.
Under the provisions of section 172(7), the non-resident owner or charterer is allowed an option to
be assessed on his total income of the previous year in accordance with other provisions of the Act
i.e., as per section 44B.
When such option is exercised, a regular assessment is made. In such a case, the tax already
paid under the provisions of section 172(4) by the non-resident owner or charterer would be
treated as tax paid in advance for that assessment year before determining the amount of tax
finally due. The difference between the sum so paid and the amount of tax payable by him on such
assessment shall be paid by the assessee or refunded to him (See Note below).
In that case, the non-resident assessee is liable to pay interest under sections 234B and 234C and
also entitled to receive interest under section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the case may
be. [Circular No. 9/2001, dated 9-7-2001]
Note –Refund may arise in case of non-corporate non-residents, since they are liable to pay tax at
a rate lower than the rate of 40% (plus surcharge, if any, and cess@4%) applicable to a foreign
company.
The Supreme Court, in A.S. Glittre v CIT (1997) 225 ITR 739 (SC), held that the assessment made
under section 172(4) shall be an ‘adhoc’ assessment and it will be superseded if a regular
assessment is opted as per the provisions of the Act.
ILLUSTRATION 7
Sea Port Shipping Line, a non-resident foreign company, is engaged in the business of carriage of
goods shipped at Mumbai port. During the previous year ended on 31.3.2024, it had collected
freight of ` 100 lakhs, demurrages of ` 20 lakhs and handling charges of ` 10 lakhs. The
expenses of operating its fleet during the year for the Indian Ports were ` 110 lakhs. Compute its
income applying the presumptive provisions under section 44B.
SOLUTION
Section 44B provides that in the case of an assessee, being a non-resident, engaged in the
business of operation of ships, a sum equal to 7.5% of the aggregate of the following amounts
would be deemed to be the profits and gains of such business chargeable to tax under the head
“Profits and gains of business or profession”.
(i) The amount paid or payable, whether within India or outside, to the assessee or to any
person on his behalf on account of the carriage of passengers, livestock, mail or goods
shipped at any port in India; and
(ii) The amount received or deemed to be received in India by the assessee himself or by
any other person on behalf of or on account of the carriage of passengers, livestock, mail
or goods shipped at any port outside India.
The above amounts will include demurrage charges and handling charges.
These provisions for computation of income from the shipping business in case of non-residents
would apply notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the provisions of sections 28 to
43A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Therefore, in this case, M/s. Sea Port Shipping Line is required to pay tax in India on the basis of
presumptive scheme as per the provisions of section 44B. The assessee shall not be entitled to
set off any of the expenses incurred for earning of such income. Therefore, the Shipping Line is
required to pay tax on deemed profit of ` 9.75 lacs (7.50% on the total receipts of ` 130 lacs). The
tax payable would be reduced by the amount of tax paid under section 172(4).
(2) Special provision for computing profits and gains in connection with the business of
exploration etc. of mineral oils [Section 44BB]
Section 44BB is a non-obstante clause. Accordingly, sections 28 to 41 and section 43 and 43A are
not applicable in the case of a non-resident engaged in the business of providing services of
facilities in connection with, or supplying plant and machinery on hire used, or to be used in the
prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils.
(i) Eligible assessee: Section 44BB provides for determination of income of taxpayer being
a non-resident engaged in the business of providing services and facilities in connection
with, or supplying plant and machinery on hire used or to be used in the prospecting for,
or extraction or production of mineral oils.
(ii) Presumptive rate: In such case, the profits and gains shall be deemed to be equal to
10% of the following amounts:
• paid or payable to the taxpayer or to any person on his behalf whether in or out of
India, on account of the provision of such services or facilities or supply of plant &
machinery for the aforesaid purposes in India; and
• received or deemed to be received in India by or on behalf of the assesse on
account of such service or facilities or supply of plant and machinery used or to be
used in prospecting for, or extraction or production of mineral oils outside India.
(iii) Non-applicability of presumptive taxation under section 44BB: The provisions of
section 44BB shall not apply to any income to which the provisions of section 42 or
section 44DA, 115A or 293A apply for the purpose of computing profit or gains or any
other income referred to in these sections.
Section Provision
42 Special provision for deductions in the case of business for prospecting,
etc., for mineral oil
44DA Special provisions for computing income by way of royalties, etc., in case of
non-residents.
115A Tax on royalty and fees for technical services in the case of foreign
companies
(iv) Option to claim lower profits: An assessee may claim lower income than the
presumptive rate of 10%, if he keeps and maintains books of account under section
44AA(2) and get them audited and furnish a report of such audit under section 44AB. The
assessment in all such cases shall be done by the Assessing Officer under section
143(3).
(v) No set-off of unabsorbed depreciation and brought forward loss: Where an assessee
declares profits and gains of business @10% for any previous year in accordance with
the presumptive provisions under this section, no set off of unabsorbed depreciation and
brought forward loss would be allowed to the assessee for such previous year.
(vi) Meaning of certain terms: For the purposes of this section,-
(a) “Plant” includes ships, aircraft, vehicles, drilling units, scientific apparatus and
equipment, used for the purposes of the said business;
(b) “Mineral oil” includes petroleum and natural gas.
Note - If the income of a non-resident is in the nature of fees for technical services, it shall be
taxable under the provisions of either section 44DA or section 115A irrespective of the business to
which it relates. Section 44BB would apply only in a case where consideration is for services and
other facilities relating to exploration activity which are not in the nature of technical services..
(3) Special provision for computing profits and gains of the business of operation of
aircraft in the case of non-residents [Section 44BBA]
Particulars `
Amount received in India on account of carriage of passengers from Chennai 2,00,00,000
(5) Deduction in respect of head office expenses in case of non-residents [Section 44C]
In case of a non-resident, head office expenditure is allowed in accordance with the provisions of
section 44C. This section is a non-obstante provision and anything contrary contained in sections
28 to 43A is not applicable.
Deduction in respect of head office expenditure is restricted to the least of the following:
(a) an amount equal to 5% of “adjusted total income” or in the case of loss, 5% of the
“average adjusted total income”; or
(b) the amount of so much of the expenditure in the nature of head office expenditure incurred
by the assessee as is attributable to the business or profession of the assessee in India.
Meaning of certain terms:
Term Meaning
Adjusted Total income computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act without
total giving effect to the following :-
income Allowance under this section
Unabsorbed depreciation allowance under section 32(2).
Expenditure incurred by a company for the purpose of promoting family
planning amongst its employees under first proviso to section 36(1)(ix).
Business loss brought forward under section 72(1).
Speculation loss brought forward under section 73(2).
Loss under the head Capital Gain under section 74(1).
Loss from certain specified source brought forward under Section 74A(3).
Deduction under Chapter VI-A.
Average (a) The total income of the assessee, assessable for each of the three
adjusted assessment years immediately preceding the relevant assessment year,
total one third of the aggregate amount of the adjusted total income in respect of
income previous years relevant to the aforesaid three assessment years is average
adjusted total income.
(b) When the total income of the assessee is assessable only for two of the
aforesaid three assessment years, one half of the aggregate amount of
the adjusted total income in respect of the previous year’s relevant to the
aforesaid two assessment years is taken on average adjusted total income.
(c) Where the total income of the assessee is assessable only for one of the
aforesaid three assessment years, the amount of the adjusted total
income in respect of the previous year relevant to that assessment year is
average adjusted total income.
Head office Executive and general administration expenditure incurred by the assessee
expenditure outside India, including expenditure incurred in respect of:
a. rent, rates, taxes, repairs or insurance of any premises outside India used
Lower of
ILLUSTRATION 9
The net result of the business carried on by a branch of foreign company in India for the year
ended 31.03.2024 was a loss of ` 100 lakhs after charge of head office expenses of ` 200 lakhs
allocated to the branch. Explain with reasons the income to be declared by the branch in its return
for the assessment year 2024-25.
SOLUTION
Section 44C restricts the allowability of the head office expenses to the extent of lower of an
amount equal to 5% of the adjusted total income or the amount actually incurred as is attributable
to the business of the assessee in India.
For the purpose of computing the adjusted total income, the head office expenses of ` 200 Lakhs
charged to the profit and loss account have to be added back.
The amount of income to be declared by the assessee for A.Y. 2024-25 will be as under:
Particulars `
Net loss for the year ended on 31.03.2024 (100 lakhs)
Add: Amount of head office expenses to be considered separately as per 200 lakhs
section 44C
Adjusted total income 100 lakhs
Less: Head Office expenses allowable under section 44C is the lower of -
(i) ` 5 lakhs, being 5% of ` 100 lakhs, or
(ii) ` 200 lakhs. 5 lakhs
Income to be declared in return 95 lakhs
(6) Special provision for computing income by way of royalties etc. in case of non-
residents [Section 44DA]
(i) Eligible assessee: Section 44DA provides the method of computation of income by way
of royalty or fees for technical services arising from the agreement made by the non-
resident with the Indian company or Government of India after 31.03.2003 where:
(a) such non-resident carries business/profession in India through permanent
establishment or fixed place of profession; and
(b) the right, property, or contract in respect of which the royalty or fees for technical
services are paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or
fixed place of service.
(ii) Expenses not allowed as deduction: While computing the income chargeable to tax
under this section, the following expenses are not allowed as deduction:
- expenditure or allowance incurred which is not wholly and exclusively for such
permanent establishment or fixed place of service in India
- amount paid (otherwise than reimbursement of actual expenses) by the permanent
establishment to head office or to any of its other offices.
(iii) Non-applicability of section 44BB: The provisions of section 44BB do not apply in
respect of income covered by this section.
(iv) Mandatory requirement to maintain books of account and get them audited: Under
this section, the non-resident is mandatorily required to keep and maintain the books of
account under section 44AA and get them audited before the date one month prior to the
due date for furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) and furnish by that date
a report of such audit.
Assessee Due date of filing return Specified date of tax audit
of income u/s 139(1) u/s 44AB
(i) In case of an assessee 30th November of the A.Y. 31st October of the A.Y.
who is required to
furnish report referred
to in section 92E
(ii) In case of other 31st October of the A.Y. 30th September of the A.Y.
assessees computing
income u/s 44DA
The aforesaid manner of computation of capital gains shall be applied for every purchase and sale
of shares or debentures in an Indian company.
Benefit of indexation will not be applied in this case.
Rule 115A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 provides that the average of the telegraphic transfer
buying rate and telegraphic transfer selling rate of the foreign currency initially utilized in purchase
of the capital asset as on the date specified in column (3) in the table below, shall be considered to
convert rupees into foreign currency for the purpose of computation of capital gains.
(1) (2) (3)
S. No. Item Date
(a) Cost of acquisition of capital asset Date of acquisition of capital asset
(b) Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in Date of transfer of capital asset
connection with transfer of capital asset
(c) Full value of consideration received or accruing Date of transfer of capital asset
as a result of transfer of a capital asset
For reconverting capital gains computed in the foreign currency initially utilized in the purchase
of the capital asset into rupees, the telegraphic transfer buying rate of such currency, as on the
date of transfer of the capital asset, is to be considered.
Meaning of certain terms
Term Meaning
Telegraphic transfer The rate or rates of exchange adopted by the State Bank of India for
buying rate buying foreign currency having regard to the guidelines specified from
time to time by the RBI for buying foreign currency where such
currency, made available to that bank through a telegraphic transfer.
Telegraphic transfer The rate of exchange adopted by the State Bank of India for selling
selling rate foreign currency where such currency is made available by that bank
through telegraphic transfer.
However, the benefit of indexation and currency fluctuation would not be available in respect of
capital gains arising from the transfer of the following long term capital assets referred to in section
112A –
(i) equity share in a company on which STT is paid both at the time of acquisition and transfer
(ii) unit of equity oriented fund or unit of business trust on which STT is paid at the time of transfer.
This provision would, however, not be applicable to any consideration received or accruing
as a result of transfer by such class of persons and subject to such conditions as may be
prescribed.
e. Section 50D provides that, in case where the consideration received or accruing as a result
of the transfer of a capital asset by an assessee is not ascertainable or cannot be
determined, then, for the purpose of computing income chargeable to tax as capital gains,
the fair market value of the said asset on the date of transfer shall be deemed to be the full
value of consideration received or accruing as a result of such transfer.
f. The shares and debentures (whether listed or non-listed) of Indian companies only are
covered under this proviso. Indian company shall include Government company. However,
bonds of Central Government/State Government and RBI are not covered for this purpose.
ILLUSTRATION 10
Mr. A, a non-resident Indian, remits US $ 40,000 to India on 16.09.2006. The amount is partly
utilised on 3.10.2006 for purchasing 10,000 equity shares in A Ltd, an Indian Company, at the rate
of ` 12 per share. These shares are sold for ` 48 per share on 30.03.2024. Fair market value of
these shares on 31.01.2018 was ` 35 per share.
The telegraphic transfer buying and selling rate of US dollars adopted by the State Bank of India is
as follows:-
Date Buying Rate (1 US$) Selling Rate (1 US $)
16.09.2006 18 20
3.10.2006 19 21
30.3.2024 59 61
Compute the capital gain chargeable to tax for the A.Y. 2024-25 on the assumption that –
(a) These shares have not been sold through a recognised stock exchange
(b) These shares have been purchased and sold through a recognised stock exchange.
SOLUTION
(a) Where the shares are not sold through recognised stock exchange
Particulars US $
Sale consideration (` 4,80,000/60) 8000
Less: Cost of Acquisition (1,20,000/20) 6000
Long term capital gain 2000
Long term capital gains upto ` 1,00,000 would be exempt. Long term capital gains
exceeding ` 1,00,000, i.e., ` 30,000 is taxable @10% under section 112A.
Rupee Denominated Bonds of an Indian company
As a measure to enable Indian companies to raise funds from outside India, the RBI has permitted
them to issue rupee denominated bonds outside India. Accordingly, in case of non-resident
assesses, any gains arising on account of appreciation of rupee between the date of purchase and
the date of redemption of rupee denominated bond of an Indian company held by him against
foreign currency in which investment is made shall not be included in computation of full value of
consideration. This would provide relief to the non-resident investor who bears the risk of currency
fluctuation [Fifth Proviso to Section 48].
Terms Meaning
(a) Convertible Foreign exchange which is for the time being treated by the Reserve Bank
foreign exchange of India as convertible foreign exchange for the purposes of the Foreign
Exchange Management Act, 1999, and any rules made thereunder.
(b) Foreign exchange Any specified asset which the assessee has acquired or purchased
asset with, or subscribed to in, convertible foreign exchange.
(c) Investment income Any income derived from a foreign exchange asset.
(d) Long-term capital Income chargeable under the head “Capital gains” relating to a capital
gains asset, being a foreign exchange asset which is not a short-term capital
asset.
(e) Non-resident An individual, being a citizen of India or a person of Indian origin who is
Indian not a “resident.
A person shall be deemed to be of Indian origin if he, or either of his
parents or any of his grandparents, was born in undivided India
(f) Specified asset Any of the following assets, namely:
(i) Shares in an Indian company;
(ii) Debentures issued by an Indian company which is not a private
company
(iii) Deposits in an Indian Company which is not a private company
(iv) Any security of the Central Government
(v) Any other asset which the Central Government may notify
(2) Special provisions relating to taxation of investment income and long term capital
gains of a non-resident [Sections 115D to 115F]
(i) Taxation on gross basis [Section 115D(1)]: Section 115D deals with the computation of
total income of non-residents. In computing the investment income of non-resident Indian,
no deduction is to be allowed under any provision of the Act in respect of any expenditure
or allowance thereabout.
(ii) No deduction allowed [Section 115D(2)]: No deduction under Chapter VI-A shall be
allowed and indexation benefit will not be available, where the gross total income of a non-
resident Indian consists only of investment income or/and long term capital gain.
However, where the gross total income includes investment incomes or/and long term
capital gain, the deduction under Chapter VI-A shall be allowed only on that portion of gross
total income which does not include the investment income and long term capital gain.
(iii) Tax rate on investment income and long term capital gains [Section 115E]: Under
section 115E, tax payable by shall be aggregate of –
(b) income-tax on long term capital gains from transfer of specified assets (i.e.,
purchased in foreign currency) at 10%; and
Investment Income
2. Where the new asset is transferred or converted into money within a period of 3
years from the date of its acquisition, the amount of capital gains arising from the
transfer of original asset not charged to tax earlier shall be deemed to be the income
under the head “Capital Gains ‘’ relating to long term capital assets. The same shall be
charged to tax in the previous year in which new asset is transferred or converted into
money.
ILLUSTRATION 11
A non-resident Indian acquired shares in an Indian company, A Ltd., on 1.1.2009 for ` 1,00,000 in
foreign currency. These shares are sold by him on 1.1.2024 for ` 3,00,000. He invests ` 3,00,000
in shares on 31.03.2024 and these shares are sold by him on 30.06.2024 for ` 3,50,000. Discuss
the tax implications. Ignore the effect of first proviso to section 48.
SOLUTION
Computation of Long term Capital Gain for Assessment Year 2024-25
Particulars Amount (`)
Sale consideration 3,00,000
Less: Cost of Acquisition 1,00,000
Long term capital gain 2,00,000
Less: Exemption under section 115F 2,00,000
Exempt long-term capital gain NIL
A non-resident Indian need not furnish a return of income under section 139(1) if he
satisfies the following two conditions:-
(a) His total income consists only of investment income or income by way of long-term
capital gains or both; and
(b) Tax deductible at source has been deducted from such income.
(vi) Continuance of benefits after the non-resident becomes a resident [Section 115H]
(a) Where a person who is NRI in any previous year becomes assessable as a resident in
any subsequent year, then he may furnish a declaration in writing along with the return
of income under section 139 for the year in which he is so assessable.
(b) The declaration shall be to the effect that the provisions of this chapter shall
continue to apply to him in respect of the investment income derived from foreign
exchange assets being debentures, deposits, securities of Central Government
and such other notified assets as specified under section 115C.
(c) If he does so, the provisions of this chapter shall continue to apply to him in
relation to such income for that assessment year and every subsequent year until
the transfer or conversion into money of such assets.
(vii) Option to opt out of Chapter XII-A [Section 115-I]
This section gives an option to a non-resident Indian to elect that he should not be
governed by the special provisions of Chapter XII-A for any particular assessment year by
furnishing his return of income for that assessment year under section 139 declaring
therein that the provisions of Chapter XII-A shall not apply to him for that assessment
year. In case where such an option is exercised by a non-resident Indian, his total income
for that assessment year would be charged to tax under the general provisions of the Act.
A Quick Recap
Meaning of Foreign Exchange Asset (FEA)
Deduction Allowable.
for Not However, Allowable. Benefit Allowable
expenses or allowable benefit of of indexation of
allowance indexation of COA is available.
COA is not
available.
Deduction Not
under allowable Not allowable Not allowable Allowable
Chapter
VI-A
Exemption Allowable
u/s 115F
If entire net If part of net
consideration is consideration is
invested in specified invested in specified
asset (new asset) asset (new asset)
Important Points:
1. Special rate of tax is applicable on the above mentioned incomes. The remaining income of
the assessee will be chargeable to tax at normal rates applicable to assessee.
2. No deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance shall be allowed to the assessee
under sections 28 to 44C and section 57 in computing the above income.
3. Deduction under Chapter VI-A is not available in respect of dividend and interest referred to in (i)
above. However, this condition would not be applicable to deduction allowed to a unit of an
International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) under section 80LA i.e. a unit of an IFSC can
claim deduction under section 80LA against dividend and interest referred to in (i) above.
4. It shall not be necessary for the assessee to furnish a return of income if the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) The total income consists of only the interest or dividend income referred to in (i)
above or royalty or fees for technical services referred to in (ii) above; and
(b) Tax deductible at source has been deducted from such income and the rate of such
deduction is not less than the rate specified in (i) or the rate of 20% specified in (ii).
A Quick Recap
Tax treatment of Royalty & Fees for technical service received from
Government/Indian concern in pursuance of approved agreement
Royalty & FTS would be computed as per sec 44DA under Rate of tax@20% u/s
the head “PGBP” as per the provisions of the Income-tax 115A on gross
Act, 1961; and normal rates of tax would apply royalty/FTS would apply
No deduction of any
expenditure or
allowance is allowable
u/s 28 to 44C or u/s 57
Accounts & Audit Deduction of
expenditure
Deduction under Chap
VI-A permissible
(2) Special provision for computing tax on income from units purchased in foreign
currency or capital gains arising from their transfer in case of offshore fund [Section
115AB]
Where the total income of an overseas financial organisation (Offshore Fund) includes the
following incomes namely-
(i) Income received in respect of units purchased in foreign currency or
(ii) by way of long-term capital gains arising from the transfer of units of a mutual fund
specified under section 10(23D) or units of UTI purchased in foreign currency,
Then, the income tax payable shall be the aggregate of the following:
(a) 10% on income referred to above
(b) the amount of income-tax with which the Offshore Fund would have been chargeable had
its total income been reduced by the amount of long term capital gains and income received
referred to above.
Important Points:
(i) The benefit of indexation shall not be available in the computation of long- term capital
gains.
(ii) No deduction shall be allowed to the assessee under sections 28 to 44C or section 57(i)/(iii)
or under Chapter VI-A in computing the above income.
(iii) Where the gross total income of the Overseas Financial Organisation consists of other
incomes, then, the deduction under Chapter VI- A will be available in respect of other
incomes. The normal provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 will apply for computation of
other income.
(iv) “Overseas Financial Organisation’’ means any fund, institution, association or body,
whether incorporated or not, established under the laws of a country outside India, which
has entered into an arrangement for investment in India with any public sector bank or
public financial institution or a mutual fund specified under section 10(23D). Such
arrangement should be approved by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.
(v) It may be noted that long term capital gains upto ` 1,00,000 on units of equity oriented fund
would be exempt and long term capital gains exceeding ` 1,00,000 shall be taxable @10%
under section 112A provided securities transaction tax has been paid on the sale of such
units.
(vi) It may be noted that short term capital gains on units of equity oriented fund are taxable
@15% under section 111A provided securities transaction tax has been paid on the sale of
such units.
(vii) It may be noted that capital gain on transfer of unit of specified mutual fund (mutual fund
where not more than 35% of its total proceeds is invested in the equity shares of domestic
companies) is a short term capital gain [Section 50AA].
(3) Special provision for computing tax on income from bonds or Global Depository
Receipts purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising from their transfer
[Section 115AC]
(i) Eligible assessee and special rate of tax: According to section 115AC(1), where the total
income of an assessee, being a non-resident includes:
(a) income by way of interest on bonds of an Indian company issued in accordance
with such scheme as the Central Government may notify or on bonds of a public
sector company sold by the Government, and purchased by him in foreign
currency; or
(b) income by way of dividends on Global Depository Receipts –
(1) issued in accordance with such scheme as the Central Government may
specify against the initial issue of shares of an Indian company and
purchased by him in foreign currency through an approved intermediary; or
(2) issued against the shares of a public sector company sold by the
Government and purchased by him in foreign currency through an approved
intermediary; or
(3) issue or re-issued in accordance with such scheme as the Central
Government may specify against the existing shares of an Indian company
purchased by him in foreign currency through an approved intermediary; or
(c) income by way of long-term capital gains arising from the transfer of above bonds
or GDRs,
then, income-tax will be charged at the rate of 10% on the above income.
(ii) Deductions not allowable [Section 115AC(2)]: Where the gross total income of the
non-resident consists only the aforesaid interest or dividend income referred to in (a) and
(b) of (i) above, no deduction shall be allowed to him under section 28 to 44C or section
57(i) or 57(iii) or under Chapter VIA.
Deduction under Chapter VI-A is also not allowable against long term capital gains
arising from transfer of bonds or GDRs.
Where the gross total income of the non-resident consists of incomes other than interest,
dividend and long term capital gains referred to in (a), (b) and (c) of (i) above, then, the
deduction under Chapter VI-A will be available in respect of other incomes.
(iii) Non-availability of indexation benefit and computation of capital gains in foreign
currency [Section 115AC(3)]: The indexation benefit and benefit of computation of
capital gains in foreign currency, shall not be available for the computation of long-term
capital gains arising out of the transfer of long term asset, being bonds or GDRs.
(iv) Filing of Return of Income not required [Section 115AC(4)]: It shall not be necessary
for a non-resident to furnish under section 139(1), a return of income if his total income in
respect of which he is assessable under the Act during the previous year consisted only
of aforesaid interest or dividend income, and the tax deductible at source under the
provisions of Chapter XVII-B has been deducted from such income.
(v) Concessional tax treatment for GDR/Bonds acquired in course of Amalgamation
[Section 115AC(5)]: Where the assessee acquired GDR or bonds in an amalgamated or
resulting company by virtue of his holding GDR or bonds in the amalgamating or
demerged company, in accordance with the provisions of 115AC(1), the concessional tax
treatment would apply to such GDR or bonds.
(vi) Meaning of Global Depository Receipts: "Global Depository Receipts" means any
instrument in the form of a depository receipt or certificate (by whatever name called)
created by the Overseas Depository Bank outside India or in an IFSC and issued to
investors against the issue of —
(a) ordinary shares of issuing company, being a company listed on a recognized stock
exchange in India;
(b) foreign currency convertible bonds of issuing company; or
(c) ordinary shares of issuing company, being a company incorporated outside India, if
such depository receipt or certificate is listed and traded on any IFSC.
(4) Special provisions for computing tax on income of Specified Fund or Foreign
Institutional Investors from securities or capital gains arising from their transfer
[Section 115AD]
(i) Special rate of tax: Where the total income of a Specified Fund or Foreign Institutional
Investor includes the income referred to in column (2), the same would be subject to tax at
the rate mentioned in column (3):
(1) (2) (3)
S. No. Income Rate of Tax
(a) Income received in respect of securities other than 20% in case of
• income on units referred to in section 115AB i.e., units FII,
of Mutual Fund specified u/s 10(23D) or UTI 10% in case of
• Interest referred u/s 194LD specified fund
(b) Interest referred u/s 194LD 5%
(c) Income by way of Short term capital gains arising from the transfer 30%
of securities (other than Short term capital gains u/s 111A)
(d) Income by way of Short term capital gains u/s 111A 15%
(e) Income by way of Long term capital gains arising from the 10%
transfer of securities (other than Long term capital gains u/s
112A)
(f) Income by way of long term capital gains u/s 112A exceeding 10%
` 1 lakh
(g) Other income of Specified Fund or FII At normal rates
of tax
In case of specified fund, the provision of this section would apply only to the extent of
income that is attributable to units held by non-resident (not being a permanent
establishment of a non-resident in India) calculated in the prescribed manner.
The specified fund has to furnish an annual statement of income eligible for concessional
taxation electronically under digital signature on or before the due date u/s 139(1), which
is duly verified in the manner indicated therein.
The income of a specified fund attributable to the units held by a non-resident (not being
the permanent establishment of a non-resident in India), would not be eligible for tax
rates specified under section 115AD unless it furnishes the annual statement of income
eligible for concessional taxation on or before the said due date. [Notification no. 64/2022
dated 16.6.2022]
Where the specified fund is investment division of an offshore banking unit, the provisions of
this section would apply to the extent of income that is attributable to the investment division
of offshore banking units [granted certificate of registration as a Category-I foreign portfolio
investor under the SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019 made under the SEBI
Act, 1992, and fulfills the prescribed conditions, including maintenance of separate accounts
for its investment division] calculated in the prescribed manner.
The eligible investment division has to furnish an annual statement of income, eligible for
taxation under section 115AD(1B) in the prescribed form electronically under digital
signature on or before the due date specified u/s 139(1).
The income of an eligible investment division would not be eligible for tax rates specified
under section 115AD unless the eligible investment division furnishes an annual
statement of income eligible for taxation under section 115AD(1B) on or before the said
due date [Notification no. 64/2022 dated 16.6.2022].
(ii) Surcharge:
Under normal provisions of the Act
Surcharge applicable on tax on total income of individuals/AoPs 3/BoIs/ Artificial Juridical
Persons (having any income under section 115AD and such person has shifted out of the
default tax regime and opted to pay tax under the normal provisions of the Act) for payment
of advance tax for A.Y.2024-25 –
Rate of Example
Particulars surcharge on Components of total Applicable rate
income-tax income of surcharge
(i) Where the total 10% Example:
income > ` 50 • Capital gains on Surcharge would
lakhs but ≤ ` 1 securities referred to in be levied@10%
crore section 115AD(1)(b) on income-tax
` 60 lakhs; and computed on
• Other income ` 35 total income of
lakhs; ` 95 lakhs.
(ii) Where total 15% Example:
income > ` 1 • Capital gains on Surcharge would
crore but ≤ securities referred to in be levied@15%
` 2 crore section 115AD(1)(b) on income-tax
Surcharge and health and education cess would not be applicable to specified fund in
respect of income received from securities referred to in section 115AD(1)(a).
Note – In case of default tax regime, the maximum rate of surcharge would be 25%
(instead of 37%).
In case of an AoP consisting of only companies as its members, the rate of surcharge
would be 10%, where the total income > ` 50 lakhs but ≤ ` 1 crore and 15%, where the
total income > ` 1 crore.
(iii) No deduction is allowed [Section 115AD(2)]: Where the gross total income of the
specified fund or Foreign Institutional Investor comprises only of the aforesaid interest or
dividend income from securities, no deduction shall be allowed to it under sections 28 to
44C or section 57(i) or 57(iii) or under Chapter VI-A.
Deduction under Chapter VI-A is also not allowable in case of short term capital gain or long
term capital gain arising from transfer of securities.
Where the gross total income of the specified fund or Foreign Institutional Investor consists
of incomes other than income referred to in (a) to (f) of table in (i) above, then, the
deduction under Chapter VI-A will be available in respect of other incomes. However, the
provisions of AMT under section 115JEE would not apply to specified fund.
(iv) First and second provisos to section 48 shall not apply [Section 115AD(3)]:The benefit
of computation of capital gains in foreign currency and the benefit of indexation would not
be available for the computation of capital gains arising on transfer of securities.
(v) Meaning of certain terms
S. Term Meaning
No.
1 Investment An investment division of a banking unit of a non-resident
division of offshore located in an IFSC, as referred to in section 80LA(1A) and
banking unit which has commenced its operations on or before 31.3.2024
(i) Eligible assessee and special rate of tax: Where the total income of an assessee,
referred to in column (2) includes income referred to in column (3) of the table below, such
income would be chargeable to tax@20%.
Assessee Income
(1) (2) (3)
(a) A sportsman Any income received or receivable by way of—
(including an
athlete), who is (i) participation in India in any game (other than a game the
not a citizen of winnings wherefrom are taxable under section 115BB,
India and is a being winning from crossword puzzles, races including
non-resident horse races, card games and other games of any sort of
gambling or betting) or sport; or
(ii) advertisement; or
(iii) contribution of articles relating to any game or sport in
India in newspapers, magazines or journals;
(b) A non-resident Any amount guaranteed to be paid or payable to such
sports association or institution in relation to any game (other than a
association or game the winnings wherefrom are taxable under section
institution 115BB) or sport played in India
(c) An entertainer Any income received or receivable from his performance in
who is not a India
citizen of India
and is a non-
resident
What would be his tax liability in India for A.Y. 2024-25? Is he required to file his return of income?
SOLUTION
Under section 115BBA, all the three items of receipts in India viz. prize money of ` 15 lakhs,
amount received from newspaper of ` 1 lakh and amount received towards TV advertisement of
` 5 lakhs - are chargeable to tax. No expenditure is allowable as deduction against such receipts.
The rate of tax chargeable under section 115BBA is 20%, plus health and education cess @4%.
The total tax liability works out to ` 4,36,800 being 20.8% of ` 21 lakhs. Thus, Nadal will be liable
to tax on the income earned in India
He is not required to file his return of income if -
(a) his total income during the previous year consists only of income arising under section
115BBA; and
(b) the tax deductible at source under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B have been deducted
from such incomes.
(i) The provisions of this section apply to a foreign company engaged in banking business in
India through its branch situated in India, which is converted into an Indian subsidiary
company in accordance with the scheme framed by RBI.
(ii) If the conditions notified by the Central Government in this behalf are satisfied, then
capital gains arising from such conversion would not be chargeable to tax in the
assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such conversion takes place.
(iii) Also, the provisions of the Act relating to computation of income of foreign company and
Indian subsidiary company would apply with such exceptions, modifications and
adaptations as specified in the notification.
(iv) Further, the benefit of set-off of unabsorbed depreciation, set-off or carry forward and set-
off of losses, tax credit in respect of tax paid on deemed income relating to certain
companies available under the Act shall apply with such exceptions, modifications and
adaptations as specified in the notification.
Accordingly, the Central Government has, vide Notification no. 85/2018, specified the conditions to
be fulfilled –
Note - Any change in the value of assets consequent to their revaluation would not be
considered while determining the value of the assets.
(d) the foreign bank or its nominee shall hold the whole of the share capital of the Indian
subsidiary company during the period beginning from the date of conversion and ending
on the last day of the previous year in which the conversion took place and continue to
hold the shares of Indian subsidiary company carrying not less than 51% of the voting
power for a period of five years immediately succeeding the said previous year;
(e) the foreign company does not receive any consideration or benefit, directly or indirectly,
in any form or manner, other than by way of allotment of shares in the Indian subsidiary
company.
(2) Application of the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 with modifications/
exceptions
The provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 relating to unabsorbed depreciation, set off or carry
forward and set off of losses, tax credit in respect of tax paid on deemed income relating to certain
4under paragraph 20(h) of the Framework for setting up of wholly owned subsidiaries by foreign banks in India
issued by the Reserve Bank of India vide Press release number 2013-2014/936 dated 6th November, 2013
companies and the computation of income in case of foreign company and Indian subsidiary
company shall apply with following modifications, exceptions and adaptation –
Purpose Modification/exception/adaptation
(a) Allowance of The aggregate deduction, in respect of depreciation on buildings,
depreciation machinery, plant or furniture, being tangible assets, or know-how, patents,
under section copyrights, trademarks, licenses, franchises or any other business or
32 commercial rights of similar nature, being intangible assets, allowable to
the Indian branch and the Indian subsidiary company shall not exceed in
any previous year the deduction calculated at the prescribed rates as if
the conversion had not taken place.
Such deduction would be apportioned between the Indian branch and
the Indian subsidiary company in the ratio of the number of days for
which the assets were used by them;
(b) Set-off and c/f The accumulated loss and the unabsorbed depreciation of the Indian
of loss and branch would be deemed to be the loss or allowance for depreciation
depreciation of the Indian subsidiary company for the previous year in which
conversion was effected; and provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961,
relating to set off and carry forward of loss and allowance for
depreciation shall apply accordingly.
(c) Determination The actual cost of the block of assets in the case of the Indian
of actual cost subsidiary company shall be the written down value of the block of
u/s 43(1) assets as in the case of the Indian branch on the date of its conversion
into the Indian subsidiary company
The actual cost of any capital asset on which deduction has been
allowed or is allowable under section 35AD, shall be treated as 'nil' in
the case of the Indian subsidiary company if the capital asset became
the property of the Indian subsidiary company as a result of
conversion of the Indian branch
(d) Cost of Where the capital asset other than those referred to in (c) above
acquisition of became the property of the Indian subsidiary company as a result of
other capital conversion of the Indian branch, the cost of acquisition of the asset for
assets the purposes of computation of capital gains shall be deemed to be
the cost for which the Indian branch acquired it or, as the case may
be, the cost for which previous owner has acquired it.
(e) Tax credit The tax credit of the Indian branch shall be deemed to be the tax
credit of the Indian subsidiary company for the purpose of the previous
year in which conversion was effected; and the provisions of section
115JAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shall apply accordingly.
(f) Amortisation of The provisions of 35DDA of the Act shall be, as far as may be, apply
VRS to the Indian subsidiary company, as they would have applied to the
Expenditure Indian branch, if the conversion had not taken place
(g) Deemed credit The credit balance in the provision for bad and doubtful debts account
balance in made under section 36(1)(viia) of the Indian branch on the date of
provision for conversion shall be deemed to be the credit balance of the Indian
bad and subsidiary company and the provisions of section 36 of the Income-tax
doubtful debts Act, 1961, shall apply accordingly
(h) Non- The provisions of section 56(2)(x) shall not apply to the transaction of
applicability of receipt of shares in the Indian subsidiary company by the foreign
section 56(2)(x) company or its nominee in consequence of the conversion of the
Indian branch into the Indian subsidiary company.
(2) Consequences of failure to comply with the specified conditions [Section 115JG(2)]
If the conditions specified in the scheme of RBI or notification issued by the Central Government
are not complied with, then, all the provisions of the Act would apply to the foreign company and
Indian subsidiary company without any benefit, exemption or relief under this section.
5under paragraph 20(i) of the Framework for setting up of wholly owned subsidiaries by foreign banks in India
issued by the Reserve Bank of India vide press release number 2013-2014/936 dated 6th day of November, 2013.
(i) If the benefit, exemption or relief has been granted to the foreign company or Indian
subsidiary company in any previous year and thereafter, there is a failure to comply with
any of the conditions specified in the scheme or notification, then, such benefit,
exemption or relief shall be deemed to have been wrongly allowed.
(ii) In such a case, the Assessing Officer is empowered to re-compute the total income of the
assessee for the said previous year and make the necessary amendment. This power is
notwithstanding anything contained in the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(iii) The provisions of rectification under section 154, would, accordingly, apply and the four year
period within which such rectification should be made has to be reckoned from the end of the
previous year in which the failure to comply with such conditions has taken place.
(iv) Every notification under issued under this section shall be laid before each House of
Parliament.
By virtue of section 9(1)(ii), salary is deemed to accrue or arise in India, if services are rendered in
India. Therefore, if a non-resident renders services in India, the salary income would be
chargeable to tax in India and the person responsible for paying the salary income i.e., the
employer, has to deduct withholding tax in accordance with the provisions of section 192, at the
rates in force for the financial year in which the payment is made where the employee exercises
option to opt out of new tax regime under section 115BAC.
(i) Tax on non-monetary perquisites paid by employer [Section 192(1A)] – In case of
non-monetary perquisite, employer can opt to pay tax on whole or part of such income
without making any deduction therefrom at the time tax was otherwise deductible.
Such tax will have to be calculated at the average rate applicable to aggregate salary
income of the employee and payment of tax will have to be made every month along with
tax deducted at source on monetary payment of salary, allowances etc [Section 192(1)].
(ii) Meaning of Average rate of income-tax – Average rate of income-tax means the rate
arrived at by dividing the amount of income-tax calculated on the total income, by such
total income.
(iii) Deferment of TDS on perquisite of specified security or sweat equity shares
provided by an eligible start-up [Section 192(1C)] - An employer, being an eligible
start up referred to in section 80-IAC, responsible for paying any income to the assessee
by way of perquisite being any specified security or sweat equity shares allotted or
transferred free of cost or at concessional rate to the assessee, has to deduct or pay, as
the case may be, tax on the value of such perquisite provided to its employee within 14
days from the earliest of the following dates –
- after the expiry of 48 months from the end of the relevant assessment year; or
- from the date of the sale of such specified security or sweat equity share by the
assessee; or
- from the date of the assessee ceasing to be the employee of the employer who
allotted such shares
Such tax has to deducted or paid for the financial year in which said specified security or
sweat equity share is allotted or transferred.
(iv) Calculation of TDS where salary is payable in foreign currency [Section 192(6)] -
Section 192(6) deals with the provisions of withholding tax in case of salary payable in
foreign currency. In case, where salary is payable in foreign currency, the amount of tax
deducted is to be calculated after converting the salary payable into Indian currency at
the telegraphic transfer buying rate as adopted by State Bank of India on the last day of
the month immediately preceding the month in which the salary is due, or is paid in
advance or in arrears [Rule 26 read with Rule 115].
Students may note that the Rule 26 and Rule 115 have been given as Annexure – 1 at the
end of this module.
(i) Applicability
This section provides for deduction of tax at source in respect of any income referred to in
section 115BBA payable to a non-resident sportsman (including an athlete) or an
entertainer who is not a citizen of India or a non-resident sports association or institution.
Note: The issue as to whether the non-resident match referees and umpires in the games played
in India fall within the meaning of “sportsmen” to attract taxability under the provisions of section
115BBA, and consequently attract the TDS provisions under section 194E in the hands of the
payer was taken up by the Calcutta High Court in Indcomv. CIT (TDS) (2011) 335 ITR 485.
In order to attract the provisions of the section 194E, the person should be a non-resident
sportsperson or non-resident sports association or institution whose income is taxable as per the
provisions of section 115BBA.
Umpires and match referees can be described as professionals or technical persons who render
professional or technical services, but they cannot be said to be either non-resident sportsmen
(including an athlete) or non-resident sports association or institution so as to attract the provisions
of section 115BBA and consequently, the provisions of tax deduction at source under section 194E
are can not be attracted.
The Calcutta High Court held that although the payments made to non-resident umpires and the
match referees are “income” which has accrued and arisen in India, the same are not taxable
under the provisions of section 115BBA and thus, the assessee is not liable to deduct tax under
section 194E.
It may be noted that since income has accrued and arisen in India to the non-resident umpires and
match referees, the TDS provisions under section 195 would be attracted and tax would be
deductible at the rates in force.
Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka v. DIT (International Taxation) & Pilcom v. CIT
(2020) 425 ITR 312 (SC)
The International Cricket Council (ICC), having its headquarters in London, is the organisation
which makes and alters the rules of the game of cricket, sets the different levels and minimum
standards at which the game is to be played in each country to get its recognition, the different
formats of the game, e. g. test cricket, first class cricket, limited overs competition and so on. It
has affiliates from similar organisations in countries, all over the world. It controls, supervises and
regulates the game of cricket in every respect.
At a special meeting of the ICC held in London in the year 1993, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka
were chosen to co-host the world cup. A joint management committee of these three countries,
[(Pak-Indo-Lanka) joint management committee (PILCOM)] was formed to conduct this world cup
cricket tournament. Bank accounts were opened by PILCOM in London to be operated jointly by
the India and Pakistan Cricket Boards. In this account were deposited moneys from sponsorships,
TV rights, etc. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) appointed its own committee,
INDCOM, for discharge of its functions. INDCOM had its bank account at Calcutta. From the bank
account of PILCOM at London certain amounts were transferred to the bank accounts of the host
countries for the purpose of payment of fees to umpires and referees, defraying administrative
expenses and payment of prize money. PILCOM paid £ 43,50,000 which included £ 19,55,000 as
guarantee money to eleven cricket associations.
The payments of £ 8,85,000 representing guarantee money paid to the Boards of Australia,
England, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and Kenya with whom Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements
exist, and of £ 7,10,000 representing guarantee money paid to the Boards of Pakistan, West
Indies, Zimbabwe and Holland were in the nature of guarantee money paid to non-resident sports
associations. The payments were not made by the assessee in India but through its bank accounts
at London or elsewhere. The non-resident sports associations had participated in the event, where
cricket teams of these associations had played various matches in the country. Though the
payments were described as guarantee money, they were intricately connected with the event
where various cricket teams were scheduled to play and did participate in the event. The source of
income was in the playing of the matches in India.
The mandate under section 115BBA(1)(b) is that if the total income of a non-resident sports
association includes the amount guaranteed to be paid or payable to it in relation to any game or
sports played in India, the amount of Income-tax calculated in terms of the section shall become
payable. The expression “in relation to” emphasises the connection between the game or sport
played in India on the one hand and the guarantee money paid or payable to the non-resident
sports association on the other. Once the connection is established, the liability under the
provision must arise. To the extent the payments represented amounts which could not be subject
matter of charge under the provisions of the Act, appropriate benefit had already been extended to
the assessee.
The payments made to the non-resident sports associations represented their income which
accrued or arose or was deemed to have accrued or arisen in India. Consequently, the assessee
was liable to deduct tax at source in terms of section 194E.
ILLUSTRATION 14
Smith, a foreign national and a cricketer came to India as a member of Australian cricket team in
the year ended 31st March, 2023. He received ` 5 lakhs for participation in matches in India. He
also received ` 1 lakh for an advertisement of a product on TV. He contributed articles in a
newspaper for which he received ` 10,000. When he stayed in India, he also won a prize of
` 20,000 from horse racing in Mumbai. He has no other income in India during the year.
(i) Compute tax liability of Smith for Assessment Year 2024-25.
(ii) Are the income specified above subject to deduction of tax at source?
(iii) Is he liable to file his return of income for Assessment Year 2024-25?
(iv) What would have been his tax liability, had he been a match referee instead of a cricketer
and pays tax under the default tax regime under section 115BAC?
SOLUTION
(i) Computation of tax liability of Smith for the A.Y.2024-25
Particulars ` `
Income taxable under section 115BBA
Income from participation in matches in India 5,00,000
Advertisement of product on TV 1,00,000
Contribution of articles in newspaper 10,000
Income taxable under section 115BB
Income from horse races 20,000
Total income 6,30,000
Tax@ 20% under section 115BBA on ` 6,10,000 1,22,000
Tax@ 30% under section 115BB on income of ` 20,000
from horse races 6,000
1,28,000
Add: Health and Education cess@4% 5,120
Total tax liability of Smith for the A.Y.2024-25 1,33,120
(iv) The Calcutta High Court in Indcom v. CIT (TDS)(2011) 335 ITR 485 has held that ‘match
referee’ would not fall within the meaning of “sportsmen” to attract the provisions of section
115BBA.Therefore, although the payments made to non-resident ‘match referee’ are
“income” which has accrued and arisen in India, the same are not taxable under the
provisions of section 115BBA. They are subject to the normal rates of tax under section
115BAC.
Particulars `
Tax@30% under section 115BB on winnings of ` 20,000 from horse races 6,000
Tax on ` 6,10,000 at normal rate of tax
Upto ` 3,00,000 Nil
3,00,000 – 6,00,000 @5% 15,000
6,00,000 – 6,10,000 @ 10% 1,000 16,000
22,000
Add: Health and Education cess@4% 880
Total tax liability 22,880
(3) Income by way of interest from Infrastructure Debt Fund [Section 194LB]
(i) Special rate of tax on interest received by non-residents from notified infrastructure
debt funds
Interest income received by a non-corporate non-resident or a foreign company from
notified infrastructure debt funds set up in accordance with the prescribed guidelines would
be subject to tax at a concessional rate of 5% under section 115A on the gross amount of
such interest income as compared to tax @20% on other interest income of non-resident.
The concessional rate of tax is expected to give a fillip to infrastructure and encourage
inflow of long-term foreign funds to the infrastructure sector.
(ii) Rate of TDS
Accordingly, tax would be deductible @5% plus surcharge, if applicable, plus health and
education cess @4% on interest paid/credited by such fund to a non-resident/foreign
company.
(a) in respect of borrowing made in foreign currency from sources outside India
- under a loan agreement at any time between 1.7.2012 and 30.6.2023 or
- by way of issue of long-term infrastructure bonds during the period between
1.7.2012 and 30.9.2014 or
- by way of issue of any long-term bond, including long-term infrastructure bond
during the period between 1.10.2014 and 30.6.2023
as approved by the Central Government in this behalf.
(b) in respect of monies borrowed by it from a source outside India by way of issue of
rupee denominated bond on or before 30.6.2023.
Tax is deductible at concessional rate of 4% in respect of monies borrowed by an Indian
company or business trust from a source outside India by way of issue of any long-term
bond or rupee denominated bond between 1.4.2020 and 30.6.2023, which is listed only on
a recognised stock exchange located in any IFSC.
Tax is deductible at concessional rate of 9% in respect of monies borrowed by an
Indian company or business trust from a source outside India by way of issuance of
any long-term bond or rupee denominated bond on or after 1.7.2023, which is listed
only on a recognised stock exchange located in any IFSC.
The interest to the extent the same does not exceed the interest calculated at the rate
approved by the Central Government, taking into consideration the terms of the loan or the
bond and its repayment, will be subject to tax at a concessional rate of 5%, 4% or 9%, as
the case may be, plus surcharge, wherever applicable, plus health and education cess
@4%.
(ii) Non-applicability of higher rate of TDS under section 206AA for non-furnishing of
PAN
Section 206AA provides that any person whose receipts are subject to deduction of tax at
source i.e., the deductee, shall mandatorily furnish his PAN to the deductor failing which
the deductor has to deduct tax at source at higher of the following rates –
(i) the rate prescribed in the Act;
(ii) at the rate in force i.e., the rate mentioned in the Finance Act; or
(iii) at the rate of 20
Levy of higher rate of TDS under section 206AA in the absence of PAN would not be
attracted in respect of payment of interest on long-term bonds, as referred to in section
194LC, to a non-corporate non-resident or to a foreign company and other payment
subject to prescribed conditions.
For the purpose of reducing the compliance burden, Rule 37BC provides for relaxation to
a non-corporate non-resident or a foreign company not having PAN in respect of payment
in the nature of interest, royalty, fees for technical services, dividends and payments on
transfer of any capital asset, subject to the deductee furnishing the following details and
documents to the deductor, namely:-
a. name, e-mail id, contact number;
b. address in the country or specified territory outside India of which the deductee is
a resident;
c. a certificate of his being resident in any country or specified territory outside India
from the Government of that country or specified territory if the law of that country
or specified territory provides for issuance of such certificate;
d. Tax Identification Number of the deductee in the country or specified territory of his
residence and in case no such number is available, then a unique number on the
basis of which the deductee is identified by the Government of that country or the
specified territory of which he claims to be a resident.
Any person who is responsible for paying to a person being a FII or a QFI, any such
interest shall, at the time of credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the
time of payment of such income in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any
other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct income-tax thereon @5% plus surcharge,
wherever applicable, plus health and education cess @4%.
(i) Applicability
Any person responsible for paying interest (other than interest referred to in section
194LB or section 194LC or section 194LD) or any other sum chargeable to tax (other than
salaries) to a non-corporate non-resident or to a foreign company is liable to deduct tax at
source at the rates prescribed by the relevant Finance Act. Such persons are also
required to furnish the information relating to payment of any sum in such form and
manner as may be prescribed by the CBDT.
Payee to be a non-resident - In order to subject an item of income to deduction of tax
under this section the payee must be a non-corporate non-resident or a foreign company.
before making payment to another non-resident, if the payment represents income of the
payee non-resident, chargeable to tax in India. Therefore, if the income of the payee non-
resident is chargeable to tax, then tax has to be deducted at source, whether the payment
is made by a resident or a non-resident.
Explanation 2 clarifies that the obligation to comply with section 195(1) and to make
deduction thereunder applies and shall be deemed to have always applied and extends
and shall be deemed to have always extended to all persons, resident or non-resident,
whether or not the non-resident has:-
The tax is to be deducted at source at the time of credit of such income to the account of
the payee or at the time of payment thereof in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or
by any other mode, whichever is earlier.
Where any interest or other sum as aforesaid is credited to any account, whether called
“Interest payable account” or “Suspense account” or by any other name, in the books of
account of the person liable to pay such income, such crediting shall be deemed to be
credit of such income to the account of the payee.
However, in the case of interest payable by the Government or a public sector bank
within the meaning of section 10(23D) or a public financial institution within the meaning
of section 10(23D), deduction of tax shall be made only at the time of payment thereof in
cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode.
(iii) Payments subject to tax deduction
The statutory obligation imposed under this section would apply for the purpose of
deduction of tax at source from any sum being income assessable to tax (other than
salary income) in the hands of the non-resident non-corporate/foreign company.
Payment to a non-resident by way of royalties and payments for technical services
rendered in India are common examples of sums chargeable under the said provisions of
the Act to which the liability for deduction of tax at source would apply.
(b) Under section 195(2), where the person responsible for paying any such sum
chargeable to tax under the Act (other than salary) to a non-resident, considers that
the whole of such sum would not be income chargeable in the hands of the recipient,
he may make an application in such form and manner to the Assessing Officer, to
determine in such manner, as may be prescribed, the appropriate proportion of such
sum so chargeable. When the Assessing Officer so determines, the appropriate
proportion, tax shall be deducted under section 195(1) only on that proportion of the
sum which is so chargeable.
(c) Section 195(7) provides that, notwithstanding anything contained in sections 195(1)
and 195(2), the CBDT may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify a class of
persons or cases, where the person responsible for paying to a non-corporate non-
resident or to a foreign company, any sum, whether or not chargeable under the
provisions of this Act, shall make an application in the prescribed form and manner
to the Assessing Officer, to determine in the prescribed manner, the appropriate
proportion of sum chargeable to tax. Where the Assessing Officer determines the
appropriate proportion of the sum chargeable, tax shall be deducted under sub-
section (1) on that proportion of the sum which is so chargeable.
(d) Consequently, where the CBDT specifies a class of persons or cases, the person
responsible for making payment to a non-corporate non-resident or a foreign
company in such cases has to mandatorily make an application in the prescribed
form and manner to the Assessing Officer, whether or not such payment is
chargeable under the provisions of the Act.
Accordingly, the CBDT has inserted Rule 29BA to specify the following form and manner
of making application to the Assessing Officer and manner for determining the
appropriate fraction on which tax is deductible at source:
Sub-rule Provision
(1) Form and manner of making application:
An application by a person for determination of appropriate proportion of
sum chargeable in the case of non-resident recipient under section
195(2)/(7) has to be made in Form 15E electronically –
(i) under digital signature; or
(ii) through electronic verification code.
(2) Determination of appropriate proportion of sum chargeable to tax
after examining the taxability of the amount as per the Act and the
relevant DTAA:
The Assessing Officer has to examine whether the sum being paid or
credited is chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act read with the
relevant DTAA, if any. If the sum is chargeable to tax, he has to
determine the appropriate proportion of such sum chargeable to tax.
(3) Issuance of certificate determining appropriate proportion of sum
chargeable to tax:
The Assessing Officer has to examine the application and on being
satisfied that the whole of such sum would not be the income chargeable
in case of the recipient, he may issue a certificate determining
appropriate proportion of such sum chargeable under the provision of the
Act, for the purposes of tax deduction under section 195(1).
(4) Information to be considered while examining the application:
While examining the application, the Assessing Officer has to take into
consideration, following information in relation to the recipient:-
(i) tax payable on estimated income of the previous year relevant to
the assessment year
(ii) tax payable on the assessed or returned or estimated income, as
the case may be, of preceding four previous years
(iii) existing liability under the Income-tax Act, 1961
(iv) advance tax payment, tax deducted at source and tax collected at
source for the assessment year relevant to the previous year till the date
of making application in Form 15E.
(5) Validity of the certificate:
The certificate would be valid only for the payment to non-resident
named therein and for such period of the previous year as may be
specified in the certificate, unless it is cancelled by the Assessing Officer
at any time before the expiry of the specified period.
(6) Application for fresh certificate:
An application for a fresh certificate may be made, if the assessee so
desires, -
- after the expiry of the period of validity of the earlier certificate or
- within three months before the expiry thereof.
(7) Procedures, formats and standards to be laid down for ensuring
secure capture and transmission of data and uploading of
documents:
The PDGIT (Systems) or the DGIT (Systems), as the case may be, has
to lay down procedures, formats and standards for ensuring secure
capture and transmission of data and uploading of documents. They
would also be responsible for evolving and implementing appropriate
security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to the furnishing of
Form No 15E and issuance of Certificate.
(vii) Refund for denying liability to deduct tax under section 195 [Section 239A]:
(a) Application for refund of tax - This section provides that where under an
agreement or other arrangement, in writing, the tax deductible on any income,
other than interest, under section 195 is to be borne by the person by whom the
income is payable, and such person having paid such tax to the credit of the
Central Government, claims that no tax was required to be deducted on such
income, he may file an application before the Assessing Officer for refund of such
tax in prescribed form and manner.
(b) Time limit for filing application - Such application may be filed within 30 days from
the date of payment of such tax.
(c) Passing of order by Assessing Officer - The Assessing Officer has to, by an order
in writing, allow or reject the application. However, no application would be rejected
unless an opportunity of being heard has been given to the applicant. The Assessing
Officer, may, before passing an order make such inquiry as he considers necessary.
(d) Time limit for passing order - The order has to be passed within 6 months from
the end of the month in which application for refund is received.
(viii) Procedure for refund of TDS under section 195 to the person deducting tax in cases
where tax is deducted at a higher rate prescribed in the DTAA
(I) The CBDT has, through Circular No.7/2011 dated 27.9.2011, modified Circular
No.07/2007, dated 23.10.2007 which laid down the procedure for refund of tax
deducted at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to the person
deducting tax at source from the payment to a non-resident. The said Circular
allowed refund to the person making payment under section 195 in the
circumstances indicated below where, after the deposit into Government account
of the tax deducted at source under section 195,
(a) the contract is cancelled, and no remittance is made to the non-resident;
(b) the remittance is duly made to the non-resident, but the contract is cancelled.
In such cases, the remitted amount has been returned to the person
responsible for deducting tax at source;
(c) the contract is cancelled after partial execution and no remittance is made to
the non-resident for the non-executed part;
(d) the contract is cancelled after partial execution and remittance related to non-
executed part is made to the non-resident. In such cases, the remitted amount
has been returned to the person responsible for deducting the tax at source or
no remittance is made but tax was deducted and deposited when the amount
was credited to the account of the non-resident;
(e) there occurs exemption of the remitted amount from tax either by amendment
in law or by notification under the provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961;
(f) an order is passed under section 154 or 248 or 264 of the Income-tax Act,
1961 reducing the tax deduction liability of a deductor under section 195;
(g) there occurs deduction of tax twice from the same income by mistake;
(h) there occurs payment of tax on account of grossing up which was not required
under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961;
(i) there occurs payment of tax at a higher rate under the domestic law while a
lower rate is prescribed in the relevant double taxation avoidance treaty
entered into by India.
In the cases mentioned above, income does not either accrue to the non-resident
or it accrues but the excess amount in respect of which refund is claimed, is borne
by the deductor. The amount deducted as tax under section 195 and paid to the
credit of the Government therefore belongs to the deductor.
In the type of cases referred to in (a), the non-resident not having received any
payment would not apply for a refund. For cases covered in (b) to (i), no claim may
be made by the non-resident where he has no further dealings with the resident
deductor of tax or the tax is to be borne by the resident deductor. The resident
deductor was therefore put to genuine hardship as he would not be able to recover
the amount deducted and deposited as tax.
In the type of cases referred to above, where no income has accrued to the non-
resident due to cancellation of contract or where income has accrued but no tax is
due on that income or tax is due at a lesser rate, the amount deposited to the
credit of Government to that extent under section 195, cannot be said to be "tax".
Therefore, the CBDT decided that this amount can be refunded to the person who
deducted it from the payment to the non-resident, under section 195.
Refund to the person making payment under section 195 is being allowed as
income does not accrue to the non-resident or if the income is accruing no tax is
due or tax is due at a lesser rate. The amount paid into the Government account in
such cases to that extent, is no longer "tax".
If a resident deductor is entitled for the refund of tax deposited under section 195,
then, it has to be refunded with interest under section 244A from the date of
payment of such tax [Circular No. 11/2016 dated 26.4.2016].
In case of refund being made to the person who made the payment under section
195, the Assessing Officer may, after giving intimation to the deductor, adjust it
against any existing tax liability of the deductor under the Income-tax Act, 1961, or
any other direct tax law. The balance amount, if any, should be refunded to the
person who made such payment under section 195.
A refund in terms of this circular should be granted only after obtaining an
undertaking that no certificate under section 203 of the Income-tax Act has been
issued to the non-resident. In cases where such a certificate has been issued, the
person making the refund claim under this circular should either obtain it or should
indemnify the Income-tax Department from any possible loss on account of any
separate claim of refund for the same amount by the non-resident. A refund in
terms of this circular should be granted only if the deductee has not filed return of
income and the time for filing of return of income has expired.
The refund as per this circular is, inter alia, permitted in respect of transactions
with non-residents, which have either not materialized or have been cancelled
subsequently. It, therefore, needs to be ensured by the Assessing Officer that they
disallow corresponding transaction amount, if claimed, as an expense in the case
of the person, being the deductor making refund claim. Besides, in all cases, the
Assessing Officer should also ensure that in the case of a deductor making the
claim of refund, the corresponding disallowance of expense amount representing
TDS refunded is made.
(II) The said Circular, however, did not cover a situation where tax is deducted at a
rate prescribed in the relevant DTAA which is higher than the rate prescribed in the
Income-tax Act, 1961. Since the law requires deduction of tax at a rate prescribed
in the relevant DTAA or under the Income-tax Act, 1961, whichever is lower, there
is a possibility that in such cases excess tax is deducted relying on the provisions
of relevant DTAA.
(III) Accordingly, in order to remove the genuine hardship faced by the resident
deductor, the CBDT has modified Circular No. 07/2007, dated 23-10-2007 to the
effect that the beneficial provisions under the said Circular allowing refund of tax
deducted at source under section 195 to the person deducting tax at source shall
also apply to those cases where deduction of tax at a higher rate under the
relevant DTAA has been made while a lower rate is prescribed under the domestic
law.
(7) Income from units of mutual fund or specified company [Section 196A]
(i) Applicability and rate of TDS: The person responsible for paying to non-corporate non-
resident or a foreign company any income in respect of units of a mutual fund specified
under section 10(23D) or from the specified company referred to in section 10(35) shall
deduct tax @20% plus surcharge, wherever applicable, plus health and education
cess@4%.
However, where an agreement referred to in section 90(1) or section 90A(1) applies
to the payee and if the payee has furnished a tax residency certificate referred to in
section 90(4) or section 90A(4), as the case may be, then, tax thereon shall be
deducted @20% or at the rate or rates of income-tax provided in such agreement
for such income, whichever is lower.
(ii) Time of deduction: Tax shall be deducted at the time of credit of such income to the
account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof by any mode, whichever is earlier.
Where any such income is credited to any account, whether called “Suspense account” or
by any other name, in the books of account of the person liable to pay such income, such
crediting shall be deemed to be credit of such income to the account of the payee and the
provisions of this section will apply accordingly.
(iii) Meaning of non-resident: An individual, being a citizen of India or a person of Indian
origin who is not a “resident. A person would be deemed to be of Indian origin if he, or
either of his parents or any of his grandparents, was born in undivided India.
(8) Income from units [Section 196B]
The person responsible for making the following payment to an Offshore Fund shall deduct tax
@10% plus surcharge, wherever applicable, plus health and education cess@4% at the time of
credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof by any mode,
whichever is earlier.
The person responsible for making the following payments to a non-resident has to deduct tax
@10% plus surcharge, wherever applicable, plus health and education cess@4% at the time of
credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof by any mode,
whichever is earlier.
- income by way of interest or dividend in respect of bonds or Global Depository Receipts
referred to in section 115AC or
- income by way of long-term capital gains arising from the transfer of such bonds or
Global Depository Receipts.
(10) Income of foreign institutional investors and specified funds from securities [Section
196D]
(i) Applicability and rate of TDS: The person responsible for making the payment in
respect of securities referred to in section 115AD(1)(a)
- to a Foreign Institutional Investor has to deduct tax @20% or
- to a specified fund referred to in section 10(4D) has to be deduct tax @10%
plus surcharge, wherever applicable, plus health and education cess@4% at the time of
credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof by
any mode, whichever is earlier.
However, where an agreement referred to in section 90(1) or section 90A(1) applies to
the Foreign Institutional Investor and if the FII has furnished a tax residency certificate
referred to in section 90(4) or section 90A(4), as the case may be, then, tax thereon shall
be deducted @20% or at the rate or rates of income-tax provided in such agreement for
such income, whichever is lower.
Note – The enhanced rate of surcharge@25% and 37% of tax payable are not applicable
in case of tax deductible u/s 196D on dividend income.
Surcharge and health and education cess would not be applicable to specified fund in
respect of income received from securities referred to in section 115AD(1)(a)
time limit u/s 139(1) has expired, the sum shall cash withdrawal
be the amt or agg. of amts, in cash > ` 20 lakh > ` 20 lakhs ≤
during the P.Y. ` 1 crore (` 3
crores, where the
recipient is a co-
operative society)
- @5% of
the sum, where
cash withdrawal
exceeds ` 1
crore (` 3 crores,
where the
recipient is a co-
operative society)
195 Any other sum payable to a non-resident At the rates in
force
196A Income on units of a mutual fund specified 20%
under section 10(23D) or from the specified
company referred to in section 10(35) payable
to non-corporate non-resident or foreign
company.
Where a DTAA applies to the payee and if
the payee has furnished a TRC then, tax
thereon shall be deducted @20% or at the
rate or rates of income-tax provided in
such agreement for such income,
whichever is lower.
196B Income from units of a mutual fund or UTI 10%
purchased in foreign currency (including long
term capital gain on transfer of such units)
payable to an Offshore Fund
196C Income by way of interest or dividend on bonds 10%
of an Indian company or public sector company
sold by the Government and purchased by a
non-resident in foreign currency or GDRs
referred to in section 115AC (including long term
capital gain on transfer of such bonds or GDRs)
payable to a non-resident
196D Income of foreign Institutional Investors from 20%
securities (not being income by way of interest
referred to in section 194LD or capital gain
arising from such securities).
Note: In all the above cases, the rate of tax would be increased by surcharge, wherever
applicable, and health and education cess @4% except in case of deduction u/s 196D on income
of a specified fund.
(2) Recovery against the assessee’s property in foreign countries [Section 228A]
Where an assessee is in default or is deemed to be in default in making a payment of tax, the Tax
Recovery Officer may, if the assessee is a resident of a country (being a country with which the
Central Government has entered into an agreement for the recovery of income tax under this Act
and the corresponding law in force in that country) or has any property in that country, forward to
the CBDT a certificate drawn up by him under section 222. Thereafter, the CBDT may take such
action thereon as it may deem appropriate having regard to the terms of the agreement with such
country.
Similarly, the Government of the other country or any authority under that Government may send
to the CBDT a certificate of recovery of any tax due under such corresponding law from a person
having property in India and the CBDT may forward such certificate to Tax Recovery Officer
having jurisdiction over the resident or within whose jurisdiction such property is situated, for
recovery of such tax. Tax Recovery Officer can proceed to recover the amount specified in the
Certificate by –
(a) attachment and sale of assesses movable or immovable property
(b) arrest of the assessee and his detention in prison.
(c) appointing a receiver for the management of assesses movable and immovable property.
He shall thereafter remit the sum so recovered to the CBDT.
- any share of, or interest in, a company or an entity registered or incorporated outside
India derives, directly or indirectly, its value substantially from the assets located in
India, as referred to in Explanation 5 to section 9(1)(i), and
- such company or, entity, holds, directly or indirectly, such assets in India through, or
in, the Indian concern.
(iii) The information has to be furnished in Form No.49D electronically within a period of 90
days from the end of the financial year in which the transfer of such share or interest
referred to above takes place. However, if the share or the interest has the effect of
directly or indirectly transferring the rights of management or control in relation to the
Indian concern, the information has to be furnished in Form No.49D within a period of 90
days of the transaction.
(iv) If any Indian concern fails to furnish the information or documents, the income-tax
authority, as may be prescribed under the said section, may direct that such Indian
concern shall pay, by way of penalty under section 271GA,—
(a) @2% of the value of the transaction in respect of which such failure has taken
place, if such transaction had the effect of directly or indirectly transferring the
right of management or control in relation to the Indian concern;
(b) ` 5,00,000 in any other case.
Note – Rule 114DB prescribes the time limit and information or documents to be furnished under
section 285A 6.
6 For detailed reading of Rule 114DB of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, students may visit
https://incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/rules/income-tax-rules-1962.aspx
In the first four cases stated above, the person sought to be assessed as the agent of a non-
resident must necessarily be in India whereas it need not be so in the fifth case. Thus, a non-
resident may be treated as the agent of another non-resident. The appointment of the agent may
be made any time before or after the expiry of the relevant previous year. An agent of a non-
resident may be appointed under this section even if at the date of such appointment, the non-
resident is not alive.
According to the proviso to this section, where transactions are carried on in the ordinary course of
business through a broker in India and the broker does not deal directly with or on behalf of a non-
resident principal but deals with or through a non-resident broker and such non-resident broker
also carries on such transactions in the ordinary course of his business and not as a principal, the
broker in India cannot be treated as statutory agent in respect of the income arising to the non-
resident from such transactions. Thus, where bona fide hedging transactions take place through a
broker in India and a foreign broker acting for an undisclosed principal, the Indian broker cannot be
deemed to be agent of the foreign principal.
For the purposes of section 163(1), the expression “business connection” shall have the meaning
assigned to it in Explanation 2 to clause (i) of section 9(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
[Explanation to section 163(1)]
Before a person can be treated as an agent of a non-resident he must be given a reasonable
opportunity of being heard by the Assessing Officer as to his liability to be so treated.
In certain cases, the income received by one person can be assessed in the hands of another.
Persons who are liable to be assessed on behalf of other because of their association with the real
recipient of the income are known as representative assessees.
In respect of Income of a non-resident which is deemed to accrue or arise to him in India under
section 9(1), agent of a non-resident including a person who is treated as an agent under
section 163 would be considered a representative assessee under section 160. As per the
provisions of section 161, every representative assessee, shall be subject to the same duties,
responsibilities and liabilities as the assessee and the taxes shall be levied upon and recovered
from him in like manner and to the same extent as it would be leviable upon and recoverable
from the person represented by him.
Questions
1. Peeyush, who returned to India on 12th June, 2023 for permanently residing in India after a
stay of about 20 years in U.K., provides the sources of his various incomes and seeks your
opinion to know about his liability to income tax thereon in India in assessment year 2024-
25 assuming that he has exercised the option to shift out of the default tax regime under
section 115BAC:
(i) Income of rent of the flat in London which was deposited in a bank there. The flat
was given on rent by him after his return to India since July, 2023.
(ii) Dividends on the shares of three German Companies which are being collected in
a bank account in London. He proposes to keep the dividend on shares in London
with the permission of the Reserve Bank of India.
(iii) He has got two sons, one of whom is of 12 years and other 19 years. Both his sons
are staying in London and not returning to India with him. Each of his sons is
having income of ` 75,000 in U.K. in foreign currency (not received in India) and of
` 20,000 in India.
(iv) During the preceding accounting year when he was a non-resident, he had sold
1000 shares which were acquired by him in British Pound Sterling and the sale
proceeds were repatriated. The profit in terms of British Pound Sterling on sale of
these 1000 shares was 175% of the cost at ` 37,500 while in terms of Indian
Rupee it was ` 50,000.
2. Mr. David, a citizen of India, serving in the Ministry of External Affairs in India, was
transferred to Indian Embassy in Canada on 31.03.2023. He did not visit India any time
during the previous year 2023-24. He has received the following income for the Financial
Year 2023-24:
S.No. Particulars `
(i) Salary (Computed) 5,00,000
(ii) Foreign Allowance 4,00,000
(iii) Interest on fixed deposit from bank in India 1,00,000
(iv) Income from agriculture in Country X 2,00,000
(v) Income from house property in Country X 2,50,000
Compute his gross total income for Assessment Year 2024-25.
3. Mr. A, a citizen of India, left for USA for the purposes of employment on 1.5.2023. He has
not visited India thereafter. Mr. A borrows money from his friend Mr. B, who also left India
for employment purpose one week before Mr. A's departure, to the extent of ` 10 lakhs and
buys shares in X Ltd., an Indian company. Discuss the taxability of the interest charged
@10% in B's hands, if the said interest has been received in New York.
4. JJ Limited, a company incorporated in Australia has entered into an agreement with KK
Limited, an Indian company for rendering technical services to the latter for setting up a
fertilizer plant in Orissa. As per the agreement, JJ Limited rendered both off-shore services
and on-shore services to KK Limited at fee of ` 1 crore and ` 1.5 crore, respectively. JJ
Limited is of the view that it is not liable to tax in India in respect of fee of ` 1 crore as it is
for rendering services outside India. Discuss the correctness of the view of JJ Limited.
5. Examine with reasons whether the following transactions attract income-tax in India, in the
hands of recipients under section 9 of Income-tax Act, 1961:
(i) A non-resident German company, which did not have a permanent establishment in
India, entered into an agreement for execution of electrical work in India. Separate
payments were made towards drawings & designs, which were described as
"Engineering Fee". The assessee contended that such business profits should be
taxable in Germany as there is no business connection within the meaning of section
9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(ii) A firm of solicitors in Mumbai engaged a barrister in UK for arguing a case before
Supreme Court of India. A payment of 5000 pounds was made as per terms of
professional engagement.
(iii) Amount paid by Government of India for use of a patent developed by Mr. A, who is
a non-resident.
(iv) Sai Engineering, a non-resident foreign company entered into a collaboration
agreement on 25/6/2023, with an Indian Company and was in receipt of interest on
8% debentures for ` 20 lakhs, issued by Indian Company, in consideration of
providing technical know-how utilised in its business in Mumbai during previous year
2023-24.
6. Z, an American tourist, comes to India for the first time on June 17, 2023. He leaves India on
September 29, 2023. Determine his residential status for the assessment year 2024-25.
Would your answer change if he is a person of Indian origin and his total income from Indian
sources for A.Y.2024-25 is ` 16 lakhs?
7. M/s. Global Airlines incorporated as a company in USA operated its flights to India and vice
versa during the year 2023-24 (April, 2023 to March, 2024) and collected charges of ` 125
lakhs for carriage of passengers and cargo out of which ` 65 lakhs were received in New
York in U.S Dollars for the passenger fare booked from New York to Mumbai. The total
expenses for the year on operation of such flights were ` 95 lakhs. Compute the income
chargeable to tax of the foreign airlines.
8. Atlant Italy, a company incorporated in France, was engaged in manufacture, trade and
supply equipment and services for GSM Cellular Radio Telephones Systems. It supplied
hardware and software to various entities in India. Software licensed by assessee embodied
the process which is required to control and manage the specific set of activities involved in
the business use of its customers, and also made available to its customers, who used it to
carry out their business activities. The Assessing Officer contended that the consideration for
supply of software embedded in hardware is 'royalty' under section 9(1)(vi).
Examine the correctness of the action of the Assessing Officer assuming that the software
that was loaded on the hardware and embedded in the system does not have any
independent existence.
9. Singtel Ltd. is a company incorporated in Singapore and 55% of its shares are held by
Godavari (P) Ltd., an Indian company. Singtel Ltd. has its presence in India also. The details
relating to Singtel Ltd. for the P.Y.2023-24, are as under:
Particulars India Singapore
Fixed assets at depreciated values for tax purposes 120 80
(` in crores)
Intangible assets (` in crores) 50 200
Other assets (value as per books of account) (` in crores) 40 120
Income from trading operations (` in crores) 25 50
The above figure includes:
(i) Income from transactions where purchases are from 2 4
associated enterprises and sales are to unrelated parties
(ii) Income from transactions where sales are to associated 3 5
enterprises and purchases are from unrelated parties
Answers
1. Peeyush returned to India on 12 th June 2023 for permanently residing in India after
staying in UK for 20 years. During the P.Y.2023-24, he stays in India for 294 days. Since
he has stayed in India for a period of 182 days or more during the previous year 2023-24,
he would be a resident in India for the A.Y.2024-25. However, he would be a resident but
not ordinarily resident, assuming that he was a non-resident in nine out of ten previous
years preceding P.Y.2023-24/his stay in India during the seven previous years is less
than 730 days. The residential status of Peeyush for A.Y.2024-25 is, therefore, Resident
but Not Ordinarily Resident.
As per section 5(1), only income which is received/ deemed to be received/ accrued or
arisen/ deemed to accrue or arise in India is taxable in case of a Resident but not
Ordinarily Resident. Income which accrues or arises outside India shall not be included
in his total income, unless it is derived from a business controlled in, or a profession set
up in, India.
(i) Rental income from a flat in London which was deposited in a bank there shall not
be taxable in the case of a resident but not ordinarily resident, since both the
accrual and receipt of income are outside India.
(ii) Dividends from shares of three German Companies, collected in a bank account in
London, would also not be taxable in the case of a resident but not ordinarily
resident since both the accrual and receipt of income are outside India.
(iii) As per section 64(1A), all income accruing or arising to a minor child is includible
in the hands of the parent, after providing for deduction of ` 1,500 per child under
section 10(32).
Accordingly, income of ` 20,000 accruing to his minor son, aged 12 years, in India
is includible in the income of Peeyush, after providing deduction of ` 1,500.
Therefore, `18,500 is includible in the income of Peeyush. Income accruing to the
minor child outside India (which is also received outside India) is not includible in
the income of Peeyush.
Since the other son is major, his income is not includible in the income of Peeyush.
(iv) Repatriation of sale proceeds of 1000 shares sold in the preceding accounting
year, when Peeyush was a non-resident, is not taxable in the A.Y.2024-25 since it
is not the income of the P.Y.2023-24.
Consequently, only the income includible under section 64(1A) would form part of
the total income of Mr. Peeyush for A.Y.2024-25. Since his total income (i.e.,
` 18,500) is less than the basic exemption limit, there would be no liability to
income-tax for A.Y.2024-25.
2. As per section 6(1), Mr. David is a non-resident for the A.Y. 2024-25, since he was not
present in India at any time during the previous year 2023-24.
As per section 5(2), a non-resident is chargeable to tax in India only in respect of
following incomes:
(i) Income received or deemed to be received in India; and
(ii) Income accruing or arising or deemed to accrue or arise in India.
In view of the above provisions, income from agriculture in Country X and income from
house property in Country X would not be chargeable to tax in the hands of David,
assuming that the same were received in Country X.
Income from ‘Salaries’ payable by the Government to a citizen of India for services
rendered outside India is deemed to accrue or arise in India as per section 9(1)(iii).
Hence, such income is taxable in the hands of Mr. David, even though he is a non-
resident. However, allowances or perquisites paid or allowed as such outside India by the
Government to a citizen of India for rendering service outside India is exempt under
section 10(7). Hence, foreign allowance of ` 4,00,000 is exempt under section 10(7).
Gross Total Income of Mr. David for A.Y. 2024-25
Particulars `
Salaries 5,00,000
Income from other sources (Interest on fixed deposit in India) 1,00,000
Gross Total Income 6,00,000
3. An individual is said to be resident in India in any previous year, if he -
(i) has been in India during that year for a total period of 182 days or more, or
(ii) has been in India during the four years immediately preceding that year for a total
period of 365 days or more and has been in India for at least 60 days in that year.
In the case of an Indian citizen leaving India for the purposes of employment outside
India during the previous year, the period of stay during the previous year in condition (ii)
above, to qualify as a resident, would be 182 days instead of 60 days.
In this case, Mr. A is an Indian citizen who left India for employment outside India on
01.05.2023. Mr. A has been in India only from 1.4.2023 to 01.05.2023 i.e. for 31 days.
Since his stay in India during the previous year 2023-24 is only 31 days, he does not
satisfy the minimum criterion of 182 days stay in India for being a resident. Hence, his
residential status for A.Y. 2024-25 is non-resident. Mr. B, who left India one week before
A’s departure, is also a non-resident for the same reasons.
Section 9(1)(v) provides that income by way of interest payable by a non-resident in
respect of any debt incurred, or moneys borrowed and used, for the purposes of a
business or profession carried on by such person in India shall be deemed to accrue or
arise in India.
Therefore, interest payable by a non-resident in respect of any debt incurred, or moneys
borrowed and used, for the purpose of making or earning any income from any source
other than a business or profession carried on by him in India, shall not be deemed to
accrue or arise in India. Therefore, interest payable by Mr. A on money borrowed from
Mr. B to invest in shares of an Indian company shall not be deemed to accrue or arise in
India and hence, is not taxable in India in the hands of Mr. B.
4. The Explanation below section 9(2) clarifies that income by way of, inter alia, fees for
technical services from services utilized in India would be deemed to accrue or arise in
India under section 9(1)(vii) in case of a non-resident and be included in his total income,
whether or not such services were rendered in India.
In this case, the technical services rendered by the foreign company, JJ Ltd., were for
setting up a fertilizer plant in Orissa. Therefore, the services were utilized in India.
Consequently, as per the Explanation below section 9(2), the fee of ` 2.5 crore for
technical services rendered by JJ Ltd. (both off-shore and on-shore services) to KK Ltd. is
deemed to accrue or arise in India and includible in the total income of JJ Ltd.
Therefore, the view of JJ Ltd. that it is not liable to tax in India in respect of fee of ` 1
crore (as it is for rendering services outside India) is not correct.
5. (i) Fees for technical services is taxable under section 9(1)(vii). In this case, the
separate payments made towards drawings and designs (described as
“engineering fee”) are in the nature of fee for technical services and, therefore, it is
taxable in India by virtue of section 9(1)(vii), since the services are utilized for
execution of electrical work in India [Aeg Aktiengesllschaft v. CIT (2004) 267 ITR
209 (Kar.)].
As per Explanation below section 9(2), where income is deemed to accrue or arise
in India under section 9(1)(vii), such income shall be included in the total income of
the non-resident German company, regardless of whether it has a residence or
place of business or business connection in India.
(ii) As per section 9(1)(i), all income accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly,
through or from any business connection in India is deemed to accrue or arise in
India.
In this case, there was a professional connection between the firm of solicitors in
Mumbai and the barrister in UK. The expression “business” includes not only trade
and manufacture; it includes, within its scope, “profession” as well. Therefore, the
existence of professional connection amounts to existence of “business
connection” under section 9(1)(i). It was so held by the Supreme Court in Barendra
Prasad Roy v. ITO (1981) 129 ITR 295.
Hence, the amount of 5,000 pounds paid to the barrister in UK as per the terms of
the professional engagement constitutes income which is deemed to accrue or
arise in India under section 9(1)(i). Hence, it is taxable in India.
(iii) As per section 9(1)(vi), income by way of royalty payable by the Government of
India is deemed to accrue or arise in India. “Royalty” means consideration for,
inter alia, use of patent. Therefore, the amount paid by Government of India for
use of patent developed by Mr. A, a non-resident, is deemed to accrue or arise in
India. Hence, it is taxable in India in the hands of Mr. A.
(iv) ` 20 lakhs, being the value of debentures issued by an Indian company in
consideration of providing technical know-how for use in its business in India, is in
the nature of fee for technical services, deemed to accrue or arise in India to Sai
Engineering, a non-resident foreign company, under section 9(1)(vii). Hence, it is
taxable in India.
Further, as per section 9(1)(v), income by way of interest payable by a person who
is a resident of India is deemed to accrue or arise in India. Therefore, interest
income from debentures of an Indian company is deemed to accrue or arise in
Note – Since the question specifically requires the candidates to examine the taxability of
the above transactions under section 9, the provisions of double taxation avoidance
agreement, if any, applicable in the above cases, have not been taken into consideration.
8. The issue under consideration in this case is whether consideration for supply of software
embedded in hardware would tantamount to ‘royalty’ for attracting deemed accrual of income
under section 9(1)(vi).
As per section 9(1)(vi), income by way of royalty payable by a person who is a resident in
India would be deemed to accrue or arise in India. However, where it is payable for the
transfer of any right or the use of any property or information or for the utilization of services
for the purposes of a business or profession carried on by such person outside India or for the
purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India, the amount payable
by way royalty would not be deemed to accrue or arise in India, in the hands of non-resident.
For this purpose, ‘royalty’ includes transfer of all or any right for use or right to use a computer
software irrespective of the medium through which such right is transferred.
The facts of the case are similar to the facts in CIT v. Alcatel Lucent Canada (2015) 372 ITR 476,
wherein the above issue came up before the Delhi High Court. The Court observed that the
software supply is an integral part of GSM mobile telephone system and is used by the cellular
operators for providing cellular services to its customers. Where payment is made for hardware in
which the software is embedded and the software does not have independent functional existence,
no amount could be attributed as ‘royalty’ for software in terms of section 9(1)(vi).
In this case, since the software that was loaded on the hardware and embedded in the system
does not have any independent existence, there could not be any independent use of such
software. Therefore, the rationale of the Delhi High Court ruling can be applied to the case on
hand. Accordingly, the action of the Assessing Officer in treating the consideration for supply
of software embedded in hardware as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) is not correct.
9. The residential status of a foreign company is determined on the basis of place of
effective management (POEM) of the company.
For determining the POEM of a foreign company, the important criteria is whether the
company is engaged in active business outside India or not.
A company shall be said to be engaged in “Active Business Outside India” (ABOI) for
POEM, if
- the passive income is not more than 50% of its total income; and
- less than 50% of its total assets are situated in India; and
- less than 50% of total number of employees are situated in India or are resident in
India; and
- the payroll expenses incurred on such employees is less than 50% of its total payroll
expenditure.
Singtel Ltd. shall be regarded as a company engaged in active business outside India for
P.Y.2023-24 for POEM purpose only if it satisfies all the four conditions cumulatively.
Condition 1: The passive income of Singtel Ltd. should not be more than 50% of its
total income
Total income of Singtel Ltd. during the P.Y. 2023-24 is ` 110 crores [(` 25 crores + ` 50
crores) + (` 20 crores + ` 15 crores)]
Passive income is the aggregate of, -
(i) income from the transactions where both the purchase and sale of goods is from/to
its associated enterprises; and
(ii) income by way of royalty, dividend, capital gains, interest or rental income;
Passive Income of Singtel Ltd. is ` 50 crores, being sum total of :
(i) ` 15 crores, income from transactions where both purchases and sales are from/to
associated enterprises (` 5 crores in India and ` 10 crores in Singapore)
(ii) ` 35 crores, being interest and dividend from investment (` 20 crores in India and
` 15 crores in Singapore)
Percentage of passive income to total income = ` 50 crore/ ` 110 crore x 100 = 45.45%
Since passive income of Singtel Ltd. is 45.45%, which is not more than 50% of
its total income, the first condition is satisfied.
Condition 2: Singtel Ltd. should have less than 50% of its total assets
situated in India
Value of total assets of Singtel Ltd. during the P.Y. 2023-24 is ` 610 crores [` 210
crores, in India + ` 400 crores, in Singapore]
Value of total assets of Singtel Ltd. in India during the P.Y. 2023-24 is ` 210 crores
Percentage of assets situated in India to total assets = ` 210 crores/` 610
crores x 100 = 34.43%
Since the value of assets of Singtel Ltd. situated in India is less than 50% of its
total assets, the second condition for ABOI test is satisfied.
Condition 3: Less than 50% of the total number of employees of Singtel Ltd.
should be situated in India or should be resident in India
Number of employees situated in India or are resident in India is 70
Total number of employees of Singtel Ltd. is 160 [70 + 90]
Percentage of employees situated in India or are resident in India to total
number of employees is 70/160 x 100 = 43.75%
Since employees situated in India or are residents in India of Singtel Ltd. are less
than 50% of its total employees, the third condition for ABOI test is satisfied.
Condition 4: The payroll expenses incurred on employees situated in India or
resident in India should be less than 50% of its total payroll expenditure
Payroll expenses on employees employed in and resident of India = ` 8 crores.
Total payroll expenses = ` 20 crores (` 8 crores + ` 12 crores)
Percentage of payroll expenses of employees situated in India or are resident
in India to the total payroll expenses = 8 x 100/20 = 40%
Since the payroll expenses incurred on employees situated in India or resident in
India is less than 50% of its total payroll expenditure, the fourth condition for
ABOI test is also satisfied.
Thus, since Singtel Ltd. has satisfied all the four conditions, the company would be
said to be engaged in “active business outside India” during the P.Y. 2023-24.
POEM of a company engaged in active business outside India shall be presumed
to be outside India, if the majority of the board meetings are held outside India.
Since Singtel Ltd. is engaged in active business outside India in the P.Y. 2023-24
and majority of its board meetings i.e., 5 out of 8, were held outside India, POEM
of Singtel Ltd. would be outside India.
Therefore, Singtel Ltd. would be non-resident in India for the P.Y. 2023-24.
10. Computation of total income of STYLE Inc., a notified FII, for A.Y.2024-25
Particulars ` `
Interest on Rupee Denominated Bonds 8,50,000
Dividend income 6,20,000
Interest on securities [No deduction is allowable in respect of
expenses incurred in respect thereof] 17,32,000 32,02,000
Long-term capital gains on sale of bonds of J Ltd.
Sale consideration 47,00,000
Less: Cost of acquisition 32,00,000 15,00,000
[Benefit of indexation is not allowable]
Short-term capital gains on sale of STT paid equity
shares of E Ltd.
Sale consideration 12,40,000
Less: Cost of acquisition 7,80,000 4,60,000
Short-term capital gains on sale on unlisted equity
shares of M Ltd.
Sale consideration 8,40,000
Less: Cost of acquisition 3,72,000 4,68,000
Total Income 56,30,000
Particulars `
Tax@5% on interest of ` 8,50,000 received from an Indian company on 42,500
investment in rupee denominated bonds = 5% x ` 8,50,000
Tax@20% on interest on securities and dividend =20% x ` 23,52,000 4,70,400