Triple Junctions
Triple Junctions
Triple junctions
Second
X triple
junction
Cascadia
trench
Mendocino triple
X junction
Mendocino
transform
San Andreas
fault
Topography
Central
Indian ridge
Indian
X Ocean triple
junction
Southeast Indian
Southwest ridge
Indian ridge
Satellite derived Carlsberg ridge
gravity
Slow
spreading
Indian
X Ocean triple
junction
Very slow
spreading Intermediate
spreading rate
X
Bouvet Triple
Junction
RFF
Gravity
South Atlantic
ridge Southwest
Indian ridge
Japan
trench
Philippine
plate
Velocity line and bisects
the velocity
is || to ridge vector
Velocity line
passes
through AB
:_r
Note: The velocity line ab
oI is parallel to the ridge and
is not necessarily
/
/17 orthogonal to AB
A o-----'+--'-"---4 ts
I
Reykjanes
North ridge
American Eurasian
plate plate
Mid-Atlantic ridge
Gravity
Iceland
hotspot
Reykjanes
ridge
Mid-Atlantic ridge
Gravity
South Atlantic
ridge Southwest
Indian ridge
F
F
USGS
J = Juan de
Fuca plate
J
C = Cocos plate
C
<i--
_(E
i.9 o
:, c d": ,..:-:7
J
(g
oo o = !.E.9
z E o-
- o
L!
()
{.
o
c)
o :9=- P
c) o co
^o$'z
r-,PL,'/ c
q) c ;A:L!
G e
(E a io' 6+;
(g o
E d a
o l9 .9
o o.
l.
:= < >E -- e
o
(g ^ 9.q E !
(L
. { * E3
i5 -.+
F ! !P
Blanco
transform
fault
Gorda North
rise American
platre
Gorda
plate
X
Mendocino
transform
Pacific plate fault
San
Andreas
fault
Rivera T.J.:
R\!ev"* r,T,l
Flips
FI',js between TRF-f and
b etr,r.c.l.1 l< F TFF
-u-r-
Ar"ot
n -T
-F-
t- F
r 11 F
n-i)
I
I
13
bc, a-u
'f' r 14
t l- l-
^\
lt\- l)
bL a.C
)
I
fr}Yln 65 Mq (65-71) 56 Mo ( 56-61)
-"-artlilllt
-^.'':_.....- fll+1,
t{a
t.\
aa KuLA I
|,Q
xUor
FA?
i\ .tr \
\}..4
,f/
\Yr-r
\*5
,o"oraff\
PAClFlc\
\
(O- 5)
PRESENT
Blghl
GMB=GreatMagnetic 37Mo (37- 43)
c
\ *'-.,{
60.
" plctrtc I
-
Atwater 1989
Digital isochrons of the ocean floor
Nazca plate
South America is
gradually South
overriding the American
Chile ridge plate
X
Chile triple
junction
Antarctic plate
Gravity
X
trench collision
during and after a ridge-
Study what happens before
tq
r
Far-NoAm
Compare Pac-
I 6-0 o
d ,D(o + !C= o
: +
=
5 97 5
-.<- tr
qiir >ci:
:
f ,its o ^vz
g-ii
-{ :91
6r " . : - >r n
;
dif * 6
j J'" z --i
a !!sn
a <;6
9;
n
' 60- 31.
>s
:d
d5
o- dla
!
Maksymowicz et al. (2012)
/h
J| |
">P' U1Y\A^
South Chile
*_.dr..".r.--."-
^t
A2 4V*tu".
configurations
Nrg rA
\9 ffr''.
I\
?
t-
I
t>
t>
f r(.
t-
"tf
K
N- fY
fti
i:
I
sc pt T.J.
-l-..1- migrates
w-ty.t'{a slowly
T.J. migrates rapidly K. southwards gr,"AwrL
r.J. *'YJ't "^"4 slr,"'{
northwards *
*a,lin*L
both
r .4 lt configurations
(a116ft'lvt a"aare
| | r,(
ffi>44stable
bYw vl
X
New ocean
crust
forming at
axis
Subducted
half-seamount?
X
TJ
Axis is
buried by
sediments
Ridge subduction: The shape of the Central
Spreading at the Chile anomaly indicates when
triple junction layer 2A stops being
formed;
Between line 8 and 9 the
axial magnetic high
dissapears
Slab
window
Similarities between
Southern Chile trench
and Cascadia:
Is subduction of young
crust a predictor of large
earthquakes?
(But, 120 Ma crust
involved in Japan 2011)