DBMS Chap 3
DBMS Chap 3
Anomalies in DBMS
There are three types of anomalies that occur when the database is not
normalized. These are – Insertion, update and deletion anomaly.
Update anomaly: In the above table we have two rows for employee Rick as he
belongs to two departments of the company. If we want to update the address of
Rick then we have to update the same in two rows or the data will become
inconsistent. If somehow, the correct address gets updated in one department
but not in other then as per the database, Rick would be having two different
addresses, which is not correct and would lead to inconsistent data.
Insert anomaly: Suppose a new employee joins the company, who is under
training and currently not assigned to any department then we would not be able
to insert the data into the table if emp_dept field doesn’t allow nulls.
Normalization
Here are the most commonly used normal forms:
Example: Suppose a company wants to store the names and contact details of
its employees. It creates a table that looks like this:
emp_id emp_name emp_address emp_mobile
8812121212
102 Jon Kanpur
9900012222
9990000123
104 Lester Bangalore 8123450987
Two employees (Jon & Lester) are having two mobile numbers so the company
stored them in the same field as you can see in the table above.
This table is not in 1NF as the rule says “each attribute of a table must have
atomic (single) values”, the emp_mobile values for employees Jon & Lester
violates that rule.
To make the table complies with 1NF we should have the data like this:
An attribute that is not part of any candidate key is known as non-prime attribute.
Example: Suppose a school wants to store the data of teachers and the subjects
they teach. They create a table that looks like this: Since a teacher can teach
more than one subjects, the table can have multiple rows for a same teacher.
111 Maths 38
111 Physics 38
222 Biology 38
333 Physics 40
333 Chemistry 40
The table is in 1 NF because each attribute has atomic values. However, it is not
in 2NF because non prime attribute teacher_age is dependent on teacher_id
alone which is a proper subset of candidate key. This violates the rule for 2NF as
the rule says “no non-prime attribute is dependent on the proper subset of any
candidate key of the table”.
To make the table complies with 2NF we can break it in two tables like this:
teacher_details table:
teacher_id teacher_age
111 38
222 38
333 40
teacher_subject table:
teacher_id Subject
111 Maths
111 Physics
222 Biology
333 Physics
333 Chemistry
An attribute that is not part of any candidate key is known as non-prime attribute.
In other words 3NF can be explained like this: A table is in 3NF if it is in 2NF and
for each functional dependency X-> Y at least one of the following conditions
hold:
employee table:
employee_zip table:
The table is not in BCNF as neither emp_id nor emp_dept alone are keys.
To make the table comply with BCNF we can break the table in three tables like
this:
emp_nationality table:
emp_id emp_nationality
1001 Austrian
1002 American
emp_dept table:
emp_dept dept_type dept_no_of_emp
Production and planning D001 200
stores D001 250
design and technical support D134 100
Purchasing department D134 600
emp_dept_mapping table:
emp_id emp_dept
1001 Production and planning
1001 Stores
Functional dependencies:
emp_id -> emp_nationality
emp_dept -> {dept_type, dept_no_of_emp}
Candidate keys:
For first table: emp_id
For second table: emp_dept
For third table: {emp_id, emp_dept}
This is now in BCNF as in both the functional dependencies left side part is a
key.