Concepts Modelling IJISET
Concepts Modelling IJISET
net/publication/292643307
CITATIONS READS
14 2,935
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
OBSERVATION AND MODELLING OF VARIOUS HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A SMALL WATERSHED IN UPPER GANGA BASIN View project
All content following this page was uploaded by C. P. Kumar on 02 February 2016.
262
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
Subsidence occurs when too much water is pumped out 2.5 Pollution
from underground, deflating the space below the surface,
and thus causing the ground to collapse. The result can Water pollution of groundwater, from pollutants released
look like craters on plots of land. This occurs because, in to the ground that can work their way down into
its natural equilibrium state, the hydraulic pressure of groundwater, can create a contaminant plume within an
groundwater in the pore spaces of the aquifer and the aquifer. Movement of water and dispersion within the
aquitard supports some of the weight of the overlying aquifer spreads the pollutant over a wider area, its
sediments. When groundwater is removed from aquifers advancing boundary often called a plume edge, which can
by excessive pumping, pore pressures in the aquifer drop then intersect with groundwater wells and springs, making
and compression of the aquifer may occur. This the water supplies unsafe for humans and wildlife.
compression may be partially recoverable if pressures Different mechanism have influence on the transport of
rebound, but much of it is not. When the aquifer gets pollutants, e.g. diffusion, adsorption, decay in the
compressed, it may cause land subsidence, a drop in the groundwater. The interaction of groundwater
ground surface. contamination with surface waters is analyzed by use of
hydrology transport models.
2.3 Waterlogging
The stratigraphy of the area plays an important role in the
Waterlogging refers to the saturation of soil with water. transport of these pollutants. An area can have layers of
Soil may be regarded as waterlogged when the water table sandy soil, fractured bedrock, clay, or hard pan. Areas of
of the groundwater is too high to conveniently permit an karst topography on limestone bedrock are sometimes
vulnerable to surface pollution from groundwater.
263
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
Earthquake faults can also be entry routes for downward The modelling studies in India have so far been confined
contaminant entry. Water table conditions are of great to academic and research organisations. The practising
importance for drinking water supplies, agricultural professionals mostly still prefer to employ lumped models
irrigation, waste disposal (including nuclear waste), for planning of groundwater development and recharge.
wildlife habitat, and other ecological issues. Such models completely ignore the distributed character of
the groundwater regime. Thus, they are based upon rather
3. Applications of Groundwater Models conservative concepts like safe yields and are incapable of
accounting for the stream-aquifer interaction and the
The use of groundwater models is prevalent in the field of dependence of lateral recharge on the water table pattern.
environmental science. Models have been applied to Consequently, permissible mining (i.e. withdrawals in
investigate a wide variety of hydrogeologic conditions. excess of vertical recharge) and perennial yield can not be
More recently, groundwater models are being applied to arrived at. The objectives of modelling studies in India
predict the transport of contaminants for risk evaluation. have been mainly (i) groundwater recharge, (ii) dynamic
behaviour of the water table, (iii) stream-aquifer
In general, models are conceptual descriptions or interaction, and (iv) sea-water intrusion etc. It is important
approximations that describe physical systems using to understand general aspects of both groundwater flow
mathematical equations; they are not exact descriptions of and transport models so that application or evaluation of
physical systems or processes. By mathematically these models may be performed correctly.
representing a simplified version of a hydrogeological
system, reasonable alternative scenarios can be predicted, 4. Model Development
tested, and compared. The applicability or usefulness of a
model depends on how closely the mathematical equations A groundwater model application can be considered to be
approximate the physical system being modeled. In order two distinct processes (Figure 1). The first process is
to evaluate the applicability or usefulness of a model, it is model development resulting in a software product, and
necessary to have a thorough understanding of the the second process is application of that product for a
physical system and the assumptions embedded in the specific purpose. Groundwater models are most efficiently
derivation of the mathematical equations. developed in a logical sequence.
264
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
within some acceptable criteria. Model calibration requires
4.1 Model Objectives that field conditions at a site be properly characterized.
Lack of proper site characterization may result in a model
Model objectives should be defined which explain the calibrated to a set of conditions that are not representative
purpose of using a groundwater model. The modelling of actual field conditions.
objectives will profoundly impact the modelling effort
required. 4.7 Sensitivity Analysis
Model design includes all parameters that are used to 4.10 Performance Monitoring Plan
develop a calibrated model. The input parameters include
model grid size and spacing, layer elevations, boundary Groundwater models are used to predict the migration
conditions, hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity, pathway and concentrations of contaminants in
recharge, any additional model input, transient or steady groundwater. Errors in the predictive model, even though
state modelling, dispersion coefficients, degradation rate small, can result in gross errors in solutions projected
coefficients etc. forwarded in time. Performance monitoring is required to
compare future field conditions with model predictions.
4.6 Model Calibration
5. Groundwater Flow Equation
Model calibration consists of changing values of model
input parameters in an attempt to match field conditions
265
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
Groundwater modelling begins with a conceptual models, a discrete solution is obtained in both the space
understanding of the physical problem. The next step in and time domains by using numerical approximations of
modelling is translating the physical system into the governing partial differential equation. Various
mathematical terms. In general, the results are the familiar numerical solution techniques are used in groundwater
groundwater flow equation and transport equations. The models. Among the most used approaches in groundwater
governing flow equation for three-dimensional saturated modelling, three techniques can be distinguished: Finite
flow in saturated porous media is: Difference Method, Finite Element Method, and
Analytical Element Method. All techniques have their own
h h h h (1) advantages and disadvantages with respect to availability,
( K xx ) + ( K yy ) + ( K zz ) - Q = S s
x x y y z z t costs, user friendliness, applicability, and required
knowledge of the user.
where,
The input data for a groundwater model include natural
Kxx, Kyy, Kzz = hydraulic conductivity along the x,y,z axes and artificial stress, and parameters, dimensions, and
which are assumed to be parallel to the major axes of physico-chemical properties of all aquifers considered in
the model. A finer level of detail of the numerical
hydraulic conductivity;
approximation (solution) greatly increases the data
H = piezometric head;
requirements. Input data for aquifers are common values
Q = volumetric flux per unit volume representing
such as transmissivities, aquitard resistances, abstraction
source/sink terms;
rates, groundwater recharges, surface water levels etc. The
Ss = specific storage coefficient defined as the volume of
most common output data are groundwater levels, fluxes,
water released from storage per unit change in head per
velocities and changes in these parameters due to stress
unit volume of porous material. put into the model.
The transport of solutes in the saturated zone is governed
by the advection-dispersion equation which for a porous
6. Groundwater Modelling Software
medium with uniform porosity distribution is formulated
Salient features of the frequently used groundwater
as follows:
models and supporting software have been presented
below. The most widely used numerical groundwater flow
c
=- cvi + Dij c + Rc i, j = 1,2,3 (2) model is MODFLOW which is a three-dimensional model,
t xi xi x j originally developed by the U.S. Geological Survey
(McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988).
where,
6.1 MODFLOW
c = concentration of the solute;
Rc = sources or sinks; MODFLOW is the USGS's three-dimensional (3D) finite-
Dij = dispersion coefficient tensor; difference groundwater model. MODFLOW is considered
vi = velocity tensor. an international standard for simulating and predicting
groundwater conditions and groundwater/surface-water
An understanding of these equations and their associated interactions. Originally developed and released solely as a
boundary and initial conditions is necessary before a groundwater-flow simulation code when first published in
modelling problem can be formulated. Basic processes, 1984, MODFLOW's modular structure has provided a
that are considered, include groundwater flow, solute robust framework for integration of additional simulation
transport and heat transport. Most groundwater modelling capabilities that build on and enhance its original scope.
studies are conducted using either deterministic models, The family of MODFLOW-related programs now includes
based on precise description of cause-and-effect or input- capabilities to simulate coupled groundwater/surface-
response relationships or stochastic models reflecting the water systems, solute transport, variable-density flow
probabilistic nature of a groundwater system. (including saltwater), aquifer-system compaction and land
subsidence, parameter estimation, and groundwater
The governing equations for groundwater systems are management.
usually solved either analytically or numerically.
Analytical models contain analytical solution of the field The current core version of MODFLOW is MODFLOW-
equations, continuously in space and time. In numerical 2005 v.1.11.00. MODFLOW-2005 is the standard version
266
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
of MODFLOW supported by the USGS Office of a two-dimensional or three-dimensional hybrid finite-
Groundwater and is the most stable and well-tested element and integrated finite-difference method to
version of the code. There are few other USGS software approximate the governing equations that describe the two
most commonly used as USGS MODFLOW utitilities. interdependent processes that are simulated: (1) fluid
GW_Chart is a graphing application for MODFLOW, density-dependent saturated or unsaturated ground water
ZONEBUDGET, and other codes. GW_Chart also flow and either (2a) transport of a solute in the ground
converts binary cell-by-cell flow files to text files. water, in which the solute may be subject to equilibrium
ModelMuse is a GUI for MODFLOW-2005, MODFLOW- adsorption on the porous matrix, and both first-order and
LGR, MODFLOW-NWT, MT3DMS, PHAST, zero-order production or decay, or (2b) transport of
MODPATH, and ZONEBUDGET. Model Viewer is a thermal energy in the ground water and solid matrix of the
program for 3D visualization of groundwater-model aquifer.
results. ZONEBUDGET is a program for computing
subregional water budgets for MODFLOW. 6.4 MT3DMS
267
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
since 1977 onwards by a consortium of three European Recharge/ET memory compression for large transient
organizations: the Institute of Hydrology (United models, support for the HUF Package in
Kingdom), SOGREAH (France) and DHI Water- MODFLOW2000/2005 and PEST SVD Assist
Environment-Health (Denmark). Since then, DHI has capabilities. The Professional version of Groundwater
continuously invested resources into research and Vistas 6 includes everything in the Advanced version plus
development of MIKE SHE. GW3D for 3D Visualization. The Premium version of
Groundwater Vistas 6 is everything included in the
MIKE SHE delivers truly integrated modelling of Professional version plus the sophisticated SAMG Solver.
groundwater, surface water, recharge and
evapotranspiration. MIKE SHE includes all important 6.9 GMS
aspects of hydrology when a project requires a fully
integrated model. MIKE SHE can be used for the analysis, GMS (Groundwater Modelling System) is a complete
planning and management of a wide range of water program for building and simulating groundwater models.
resources and environmental problems related to surface It features 2D and 3D geostatistics, stratigraphic modelling
water and groundwater, especially surface-water impact and a unique conceptual model approach. GMS provides
from groundwater withdrawal, conjunctive use of tools for every phase of a groundwater simulation
groundwater and surface water, wetland management and including site characterization, model development,
restoration, river basin management and planning, impact calibration, post-processing, and visualization. GMS
studies for changes in land use and climate. The program supports both finite-difference and finite-element models
is offered in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions for Microsoft in 2D and 3D including MODFLOW 2000, MODPATH,
Windows operating systems. MT3DMS/RT3D, SEAM3D, FEMWATER, PEST,
UTEXAS, MODAEM and SEEP2D. The program's
6.7 Visual MODFLOW modular design enables the user to select modules in
custom combinations, allowing the user to choose only
Visual MODFLOW Flex (VMOD Flex) is a graphical those groundwater modelling capabilities that are required.
interface for MODFLOW. The program also combines
proprietary extensions, such as MODFLOW-SURFACT, 6.10 PMWIN
MT3DMS (mass-transport 3D multi-species) and a 3D
model explorer. Visual MODFLOW supports Processing ModflowTM (PMWIN) is a comprehensive
MODFLOW-2000, MODFLOW-2005, MODFLOW- integrated groundwater modelling system. It includes the
NWT, MODFLOW-LGR, MODFLOW-SURFACT, and following components.
SEAWAT. The software is used primarily by
hydrogeologists to simulate groundwater flow and Intuitive graphical user interface to greatly simplify
contaminant transport. The program, developed by and clarify data input and result visualization processes
Schlumberger Water Services, is one of the first that work with result files of practically unlimited file
commercial graphical interfaces for MODFLOW. size (way greater than 2 GB).
268
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
269
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
models. Users can add groundwater and surface water Mathematical models are tools, which are frequently used
components to the framework as necessary, or develop in studying groundwater systems. In general, mathematical
their own components. This new componentized approach models are used to simulate (or to predict) the
enables tailoring the geodatabase design to meet specific groundwater flow and in some cases the solute and/or heat
project needs. transport. In order to avoid model misuse, it is important
to know and understand the limitations and possible
The Arc Hydro Groundwater tools enable to take sources of error in numerical models. To avoid applying
advantage of the ArcGIS platform to archive, manage, and an otherwise valid model to an inappropriate field
visualize groundwater information. Use Arc Hydro situation, it is not only important to understand the field
Groundwater to create water level, water quality and flow behavior but also to understand all of the assumptions that
direction maps, create, archive and visualize MODFLOW form the basis of the model.
models, and create and visualize both 2D and 3D geologic
models. Additionally, one can georeference subsurface Predictive simulations must be viewed as estimates,
data including boreholes, sketch cross sections, and dependent upon the quality and uncertainty of the input
geovolumes, and store, georeference, and create GIS maps data. Models may be used as predictive tools, however
of MODFLOW model input and solution data. field monitoring must be incorporated to verify model
predictions. The best method of eliminating or reducing
6.16 PEST modelling errors is to apply good hydrogeological
judgement and to question the model simulation results. If
PEST is a nonlinear parameter estimation package. It can the results do not make physical sense, find out why.
be used to estimate parameters for just about any existing
computer model, whether or not a user has access to the References
model's source code. PEST is able to "take control" of a
model, running it as many times as it needs to while [1] Anderson, M.P. and W.W. Woessner, 1992, Applied
adjusting its parameters until the discrepancies between Groundwater Modelling. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego,
selected model outputs and a complementary set of field or CA., 381 p.
laboratory measurements is reduced to a minimum in the
[2] American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993, Standard
weighted least squares sense.
Guide for Application of a Ground-Water Flow Model to a
Site-Specific Problem. ASTM Standard D 5447-93, West
PEST communicates with a model through the model's Conshohocken, PA, 6 p.
own input and output files. Thus PEST adapts to the
model, the model does not need to be adapted to PEST. It [3] American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995, Standard
implements a particularly robust variant of the Gauss- Guide for Subsurface Flow and Transport Modelling. ASTM
Marquardt-Levenberg method of nonlinear parameter Standard D 5880-95, West Conshohocken, PA, 6 p.
estimation. Furthermore, through adjustment of a number
of control variables, a user is able to "tune" PEST's [4] Bear, J., and A. Verruijt, 1987, Modelling Groundwater Flow
and Pollution. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 414 p.
implementation of the method to suit the model for which
parameters are sought. [5] Franke, O.L., Bennett, G.D., Reilly, T.E., Laney, R.L.,
Buxton, H.T., and Sun, R.J., 1991, Concepts and Modelling
Considering the large variability and the quick in Ground-Water Hydrology -- A Self-Paced Training
development of groundwater models, a new, more Course. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 90-707.
sophisticated model can often replace a previously applied
model. Additionally, the reconsideration of the conceptual [6] Kashyap, Deepak, 1989, Mathematical Modelling for
model and the regeneration of the mesh may need a new Groundwater Management – Status in India. Indo-French
allocation of the parameters. Therefore, it is important that Seminar on Management of Water Resources, 22-24
model data (information) are stored independently from a September, 1989, Festival of France-1989, Jaipur, pp. IV-59
given model, with a preference for GIS-based databases. to IV-75.
Considerable development in the field of user-friendly
[7] Kinzelbach, W., 1986, Groundwater Modelling: An
GIS and data base servers makes the set-up and the Introduction with Sample Programs in BASIC. Elsevier, New
modification of models easier and more time-effective. York, 333 p.
270
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 2, February 2015.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
Contribution to Hydrological Sciences, National Institute of
Hydrology, Roorkee, pp. 235-261.
271