1

UPTODATE: DIAGNOSIS OF DELIRIUM AND CONFUSIONAL STATES, EMERGENCY AND

OTHERS.
Authors
Joseph Francis, Jr, MD, MPH
G Bryan Young, MD, FRCPC
Section Editors
Michael J Aminoff, MD, DSc
Kenneth E Schmader, MD
Deputy Editor
Janet L Wilterdink, MD
Disclosures: Joseph Francis, Jr, MD, MPH Nothing to disclose. G Bryan Young, MD, FRCPC Nothing to disclose. Michael J Aminoff, MD,
DSc Equity Ownership/Stock Options: Trust, which is independently managed by a financial company. The portfolio may include medical or
drug companies. Kenneth E Schmader, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Merck [Herpes zoster (Zoster vaccine)]. Janet L
Wilterdink, MD Nothing to disclose.

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-
level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is
required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jul 2015. | This topic last updated: Aug 22, 2014.
INTRODUCTION — Delirium and confusional states are among the most common mental disorders encountered in
patients with medical illness, particularly among those who are older. They are associated with many complex underlying
medical conditions and can be hard to recognize. Systematic studies and clinical trials are difficult to perform in patients
with cognitive impairment. Recommendations for evaluating and treating delirium are based primarily upon clinical
observation and expert opinion [1].
Knowledge of the clinical epidemiology of delirium and confusional states in various settings has substantially increased
as a result of applying standardized diagnostic methods. These prospective observational studies provide a basis for
understanding and managing the disorder.
The epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis of delirium and confusional states will be reviewed here.
The prevention and treatment of these disorders are discussed separately. (See "Delirium and acute confusional states:
Prevention, treatment, and prognosis".)
DEFINITION AND TERMINOLOGY — The American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th
edition (DSM-V) lists five key features that characterize delirium [2]:
●Disturbance in attention (reduced ability to direct, focus, sustain, and shift attention) and awareness.
●The disturbance develops over a short period of time (usually hours to days), represents a change from baseline,
and tends to fluctuate during the course of the day.
●An additional disturbance in cognition (memory deficit, disorientation, language, visuospatial ability, or perception)
●The disturbances are not better explained by another preexisting, evolving or established neurocognitive disorder,
and do not occur in the context of a severely reduced level of arousal, such as coma
●There is evidence from the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings that the disturbance is caused by a
medical condition, substance intoxication or withdrawal, or medication side effect.
Additional features that may accompany delirium and confusion include the following:
 2

●Psychomotor behavioral disturbances such as hypoactivity, hyperactivity with increased sympathetic activity, and
impairment in sleep duration and architecture.
●Variable emotional disturbances, including fear, depression, euphoria, or perplexity.
There is no generally accepted consensus regarding the distinction between delirium and confusional states. The terms
"acute confusional state" and "encephalopathy" are often used synonymously with delirium. The more general term
"confusion" is used to indicate a problem with coherent thinking. Confused patients are unable to think with normal speed,
clarity, or coherence [3]. Confusion is typically associated with a depressed sensorium and a reduced attention span, and
it is an essential component of delirium.
The term "acute confusional state" refers to an acute state of altered consciousness characterized by disordered attention
along with diminished speed, clarity, and coherence of thought [3]. Although this definition encompasses delirium as well,
some experts use "confusional state" to convey the additional meaning of reduced alertness and altered psychomotor
activity [3]. In this paradigm, delirium is a special type of confusional state characterized by increased vigilance, with
psychomotor and autonomic overactivity; the delirious patient displays agitation, excitement, tremulousness,
hallucinations, fantasies, and delusions.
In this discussion, the term delirium will be used in the sense of the DSM-V definition. The additional components of
agitation, tremor, and hallucinations are allowed for but are not essential diagnostic features of delirium in the DSM-V
usage. Confusion and other states of altered consciousness are encompassed by the DSM-V definition of delirium.
EPIDEMIOLOGY — Delirium and confusion have primarily been studied in hospital settings. Nearly 30 percent of older
medical patients experience delirium at some time during hospitalization [4,5]. Among older surgical patients, the risk for
delirium varies from 10 to greater than 50 percent; the higher figures are associated either with frail patients (eg, those
who have fallen and sustained a hip fracture) or complex procedures such as cardiac surgery [6].
In general, delirium can be found wherever there are sick patients. When standardized screening and diagnostic tools
(see 'Evaluation' below) have been applied prospectively to consecutive patients, high rates of delirium have been
demonstrated in intensive care units (70 percent) [7], emergency departments (10 percent) [8], hospice units (42 percent)
[9], and postacute care settings (16 percent) [10]. Now that the care of sicker patients has become fragmented across a
variety of venues, clinicians are challenged to identify and manage delirium efficiently across a wide variety of settings.
PATHOGENESIS — The pathophysiology of delirium and confusion is poorly understood. Most theories are overly
simplified. With so many disparate etiologies (table 1), it is highly unlikely that a single mechanism is universally operative.
The biologic basis of delirium and confusion is poorly understood in part because it is difficult to study severely ill patients
with conventional electrophysiologic tests, brain imaging, or neurotransmitter assays. Rarely can the observed
phenomena attributed to delirium be separated reliably from that of underlying illness and drug treatment. Animal models
for delirium have been proposed but are in their infancy and still not validated.
Despite these limitations, some important data regarding the pathophysiology of delirium have been reported. Risk factors
for the development of delirium have also been identified.
Neurobiology of attention — Since a disorder of attention is a universal feature of confusional states, it helps to
understand the neurobiology of attention.
●Arousal and attention may be disrupted by brain lesions involving the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS)
from the mid-pontine tegmentum rostrally to the anterior cingulate regions.
●Attention in both right and left aspects of extrapersonal space is governed by the "nondominant" parietal and frontal
lobes. Thus with inattention, there is typically some disruption of the integrated function of these regions.
●Insight and judgment are dependent on intact higher order integrated cortical function. Since insight into
perceptions is often reduced with delirium and confusional states, it seems likely that higher order cortical function is
therefore impaired, especially regarding frontal lobe involvement in scrutinizing incoming sensory information.
Cortical versus subcortical mechanisms — Seminal work in the 1940s using electroencephalography (EEG) in acutely
ill patients established that delirium was a disturbance of global cortical function, characterized by slowing of the dominant
posterior alpha rhythm and the appearance of abnormal slow-wave activity [11]. These findings correlated with the level of
consciousness and other observed behaviors regardless of the underlying etiology, suggesting a final common neural
pathway. The major exception appeared to be that of delirium accompanying alcohol and sedative drug withdrawal, in
which low voltage, fast-wave activity predominated. These findings are so consistent that EEG can be used to resolve
uncertainty in patients in whom the diagnosis of delirium is in doubt.
The results of brainstem auditory evoked potential, somatosensory evoked potentials, and neuroimaging studies have
supported an important role for subcortical (eg, thalamus, basal ganglia, and pontine reticular formation) as well as
 3

cortical structures in the pathogenesis of delirium [12]. These findings correlate with clinical reports that patients with
subcortical strokes and basal ganglia abnormalities (including Parkinson disease) have a higher susceptibility to delirium.
Neurotransmitter and humoral mechanisms — Acetylcholine plays a key role in the pathogenesis of delirium [13,14].
Anticholinergic drugs cause delirium when given to healthy volunteers and are even more likely to lead to acute confusion
in frail elderly persons. This effect can be reversed with cholinesterase inhibitors such asphysostigmine.
(See "Anticholinergic poisoning".)
Further support for the role of acetylcholine is derived from observations that medical conditions precipitating delirium,
such as hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and thiamine deficiency, decrease acetylcholine synthesis in the central nervous system
(CNS). In addition, serum anticholinergic activity, measured with binding assays employing purified preparations of brain
muscarinic receptors, correlates with the severity of delirium in postoperative and medical patients [13,15]. Finally,
Alzheimer disease, which is characterized by a loss of cholinergic neurons, increases the risk of delirium due to
anticholinergic medications.
The anticholinergic mechanism is important for clinicians to keep in mind, since many drugs used by older adults
(including several not traditionally viewed to have "anticholinergic effects") can lead to detectable serum anticholinergic
activity measured by competitive radioreceptor binding [16,17]. Psychotropic drugs, in particular, are likely to cause
detectable serum anticholinergic activity at doses typically administered to older patients. Some elderly patients with
delirium also have elevated serum anticholinergic activity in the absence of anticholinergic drug use, raising the possibility
that endogenous anticholinergic substances may play a role in delirium [13].
Drugs that are agonists or antagonists of a number of other neurotransmitters can produce delirium-like effects, although
the precise role of these neurotransmitter systems is difficult to determine. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies of patients
with delirium reveal alterations in neuropeptides (eg, somatostatin), endorphins, serotonin, norepinephrine, and GABA,
among others [12]. However, it is difficult to exclude the confounding effects of underlying illness or dementia.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor alpha also may have a role in the pathogenesis
of delirium. These agents have strong CNS effects when injected into experimental animals or when administered for
therapeutic purposes (eg, interferons in chronic hepatitis). Cytokine activation may account for delirium (particularly
hyperactive forms of the disturbance) in situations such as sepsis (where mental changes may actually precede fever),
cardiopulmonary bypass [18], and acute hip fracture [19].
Risk factors — Delirium is a multifactorial disorder. Factors that increase the risk for delirium and confusional states can
be classified into those that increase baseline vulnerability and those that precipitate the disturbance [20].
The most commonly identified risk factors are underlying brain diseases such as dementia, stroke, or Parkinson disease;
these are present in nearly one-half of older patients with delirium. In a meta-analysis of published prospective studies of
delirium, the prevalence of delirium superimposed upon dementia ranged from 22 to 89 percent [21]. Often, the dementia
went unrecognized prior to the onset of delirium. Similarly, in a study of 78 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures
who were followed for five years, dementia developed in 69 percent of the 29 patients with postoperative delirium versus
only 20 percent of the 49 patients without postoperative delirium [22].
Other factors that increase the vulnerability to delirium include advanced age and sensory impairment.
Precipitating factors — Factors that may precipitate delirium are numerous and varied (table 1). Some common
examples include polypharmacy (particularly psychoactive drugs), infection, dehydration, immobility (including restraint
use), malnutrition, and the use of bladder catheters. Drugs that may precipitate delirium and confusion are noted in the
Table (table 2).
CLINICAL PRESENTATION — As previously noted, several key features characterize delirium and confusional states
(see 'Definition and terminology' above) [2]. A disturbance of consciousness and altered cognition are essential
components. The condition typically develops over a short period of time and tends to fluctuate during the course of the
day. The disturbance is typically caused by a medical condition, substance intoxication, or medication side effect. These
criteria form a useful framework for understanding the clinical presentation of the disorder.
Disturbance of consciousness — One of the earliest manifestations of delirium is a change in the level of awareness
and the ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention. This loss of mental clarity is often subtle and may precede more flagrant
signs of delirium by one day or more. Thus, family members or caregivers who report that a patient "isn't acting quite right"
should be taken seriously, even if delirium is not obvious to the examining clinician.
Distractibility, one of the hallmarks of delirium, is often evident in conversation. It is important that the examiner be
sensitive to the patient's flow of thought and not attribute tangential or disorganized speech to age, dementia, or fatigue.
 4

Patients will appear obviously drowsy, lethargic, or even semi-comatose in more advanced cases of delirium. The
opposite extreme, hypervigilance, may also occur in cases of alcohol or sedative drug withdrawal, but such a presentation
is less common in older persons. (See "Management of moderate and severe alcohol withdrawal syndromes".)
Change in cognition — Delirious individuals have cognitive and perceptual problems, including memory loss,
disorientation, and difficulty with language and speech. Formal mental status testing can be used to document the degree
of impairment, but more important than the test score are the patient's overall accessibility and attentiveness while
attempting to answer the questions. It is important to ascertain the patient's level of functioning prior to the onset of
delirium from family members, caregivers, or other reliable informants, since dementia can impair cognitive ability and
frequently underlies delirium.
Perceptual disturbances typically accompany delirium. Patients may misidentify the clinician or believe that objects or
shadows in the room represent a person. Vague delusions of harm often accompany these misperceptions. Hallucinations
can be visual, auditory or somatosensory, usually with lack of insight - the patients believe they are real. Hallucinations
can be simple, e.g., shadows or shapes, or complex, as people and faces. Sounds can also consist of simple sounds or
hearing voices with clear speech.
A variety of language difficulties can occur. Patients may lose the ability to write or to speak a second language. One
personal experience involved a patient who immigrated to North America as an adolescent; she spoke only Italian during
her delirium, recovering her grasp of English after her pneumonia was treated.
Temporal course — Delirium develops over hours to days and typically persists for days to months. The acuteness of the
presentation is the most helpful feature in differentiating delirium from dementia. In addition, the features of delirium are
unstable, typically becoming most severe in the evening and at night. It is not unusual for a patient with delirium to appear
relatively lucid during morning rounds. Clinicians, particularly physicians, are apt to miss the diagnosis if they rely upon
only a single point assessment; evidence of the behavior change should be actively solicited from all staff, especially
those working evening and night shifts.
There is often a prodromal phase, especially in elderly patients, that later blends into quiet/hypoactive delirium or erupts
into an agitated confusional state. Prodromal features include complaints of fatigue, sleep disturbance (excessive daytime
somnolence or insomnia), depression, anxiety, restlessness, irritability and hypersensitivity to light or sound. With
progression there are perceptual disturbances and cognitive impairment. These symptoms may fluctuate. Hypoactive
delirium can, however, begin without a prodromal phase and agitated behavior may appear as the first manifestation of
delirium without a prodromal or hypoactive phase.
Elderly patients — Patients with delirium are sick by definition. However, older patients with delirium often do not look
sick apart from their behavioral change. Thus, delirium may be the only finding suggesting acute illness in older demented
patients. Caregivers must be educated that sudden changes in mental functioning are not expected with most progressive
dementias and require prompt medical attention.
Other features — Delirium may present with a variety of clinical manifestations that are not essential diagnostic features,
including psychomotor agitation, sleep-wake reversals, irritability, anxiety, emotional lability, and hypersensitivity to lights
and sounds. These features are not seen in all patients with delirium and can be evident in patients with dementia; their
presence neither rules in nor rules out the diagnosis. The most common presentation in older patients is a relatively quiet,
withdrawn state that frequently is mistaken for depression.
The relationship between clinical manifestations and outcome has not been well studied, although a report of outcomes of
delirium following hip fracture repair suggested that patients with more severe delirium, including psychomotor agitation,
had higher rates of mortality and nursing home placement [23]. Delirium that does not resolve before discharge is also a
risk factor for nursing home placement [24].
EVALUATION — There are two important aspects to the diagnostic evaluation of delirium: recognizing that the disorder is
present and uncovering the underlying medical illness that has caused delirium.
Recognizing the disorder — As previously mentioned, clinicians often fail to recognize delirium; in some reports, this
happens in more than 70 percent of cases. Behavioral problems or cognitive impairment may be readily apparent but
wrongly attributed to the patient's age, to dementia, or to other mental disorders. In one study, over 40 percent of patients
referred to a consulting liaison psychiatrist for the evaluation or treatment of depression ultimately were found to have
delirium [23].
Clinical confirmation — The DSM-V criteria (See 'Definition and terminology' above.) form a practical framework for
assessing delirium [25]:
 5

●A change in the level of consciousness is often the first observable clue. Clinicians must not "normalize" lethargy or
somnolence by assuming that illness, sleep loss, fatigue, or anxiety are causing the changes.
●In cases where the patient appears awake, the ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention can be assessed during
attempts to obtain a history; a global assessment of the patient's "accessibility" during conversation or the
performance of a mental status examination is a sensitive indicator of delirium.
●Conversation with the patient may elicit memory difficulties, disorientation, or speech that is tangential,
disorganized, or incoherent. The clinician should be aware of superficially appropriate conversation that follows
social norms but is poor in content.
●When in doubt, formal mental status testing should be performed, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination or
brief bedside tests of attention (table 3). Serial-sevens and spelling a word such as “farm” or “world” backward are
other simple tests of attention. (See "Evaluation of cognitive impairment and dementia", section on 'Mini-Mental
State Examination'.)
Determining that cognitive impairment or perceptual problems are not due to a prior or progressing dementia can be
challenging and requires knowledge of the patient's baseline level of functioning. The diagnosis is made more easily if
there has been a prior assessment of cognitive abilities. In other instances, informants must be immediately sought to
establish chronology. These should include formal caregivers (eg, nursing staff familiar with the patient), family members,
and informal caregivers, particularly those who may have observed fluctuations in the patient's mental functions.
History — Some historical clues to the underlying etiology of delirium and confusion can be obtained from relatives, eg,
recent febrile illness, history of organ failure, a medication list, history of alcoholism or drug abuse, or recent depression. It
is otherwise often difficult to impossible to obtain a history in the confused or uncooperative patient. As an example,
myocardial infarction may cause sufficient confusion that the patient cannot relate a history of chest pain.
General examination — A comprehensive physical examination is often difficult or impossible in the confused or
uncooperative patient. Clinicians should instead perform a focused assessment, concentrating upon vital signs, the state
of hydration, skin condition, and potential infectious foci.
The patient's general appearance may be suggestive, eg, the dusky appearance seen with chronic pulmonary disease,
the jaundiced appearance of hepatic failure, or the stigmata of renal failure. Needle tracks strongly suggest drug abuse.
Cherry-red lips indicate possible carbon monoxide poisoning. The breath may smell of alcohol, fetor hepaticus, uremic
fetor or ketones. Hyperventilation offers a limited number of possible etiologies. (See 'Diagnostic tests' below.)
A bitten tongue or posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder suggests a convulsive seizure (over 40 percent of such
patients remain in nonconvulsive status epilepticus). There may also be signs of head injury. Subhyaloid or retinal
hemorrhages raise the possibility of an intracranial hemorrhage, usually from a ruptured berry aneurysm.
Alcohol or sedative-drug withdrawal may cause a delirium characterized by autonomic nervous system activation
(tachycardia, sweating, flushing, dilated pupils) in younger persons, but these responses are blunted or absent in the
geriatric population. Anticholinergic toxicity in elders can cause delirium without peripheral signs of atropine poisoning (eg,
fever, mydriasis, tachycardia). Sepsis may present as delirium without obvious fever (sometimes even with hypothermia)
or localizing signs (eg, rebound tenderness from a perforated viscus). (See "Evaluation of infection in the older adult".)
Pitfalls in the examination must be kept in mind: temperature may be under 38.3ºC (101ºF) even in the presence of
serious infections; auscultatory and radiographic findings of pneumonia may be subtle or absent; and abdominal
catastrophes may present without peritoneal signs in frail older patients. False-positive findings occur as well (eg, nuchal
rigidity may not signify meningitis).
Neurologic examination — The neurologic examination is often confounded by inattention and altered consciousness in
patients with delirium. Certain aspects of the examination may be difficult or unreliable in uncooperative patients (eg,
sensory testing), or reflect chronic rather than acute CNS conditions. However, an assessment emphasizing the level of
consciousness, degree of attention or inattention, visual fields, and unambiguous cranial nerve and motor deficits, is
important to identify individuals with a higher likelihood of focal neurologic disease. Posterior cortical strokes, for example,
can present as delirium with few findings other than hemianopia, and in some cases may present with no focal symptoms
or signs.
The absence of focal examination findings does not exclude the possibility of focal or multifocal neurologic lesions as the
cause of the delirium. In the absence of an obvious cause for delirium, further testing including neuroimaging, lumbar
puncture, and EEG is indicated.
The physical signs of metabolic/toxic delirium can include nonrhythmic, asynchronous muscle jerking (multifocal
myoclonus), flapping motions of an outstretched, dorsiflexed hand (asterixis), and postural action tremor. These are
nonspecific findings and do not help establish any particular medical etiology within themetabolic/toxic category. Selective
 6

loss of the vestibular-ocular reflex, or nystagmus with unexplained ocular palsies that spare pupillary reactivity to light,
raise the possibility of Wernicke's encephalopathy.
Clinical instruments — The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a simple tool that can be used by clinicians to
integrate their observations and identify when delirium is the most probable diagnosis (table 4). In medical and surgical
settings, the CAM has a sensitivity of 94 to 100 percent and a specificity of 90 to 95 percent [26]. The CAM has become a
standard screening device in clinical studies of delirium, conducted across multiple settings including emergency rooms
and long-term care [27]. It takes five minutes to administer and may be particularly helpful when incorporated into the
routine bedside assessment. A review of 11 bedside instruments used to identify the presence of delirium in adults
concluded that the best evidence supported the use of the CAM as the best, and the Mini Mental State Exam as the least
accurate test [28].
The CAM-ICU instrument has been developed and validated for identification of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU)
[29-31]. In mechanically ventilated patients who are unable to communicate verbally, the instrument considers observed
behaviors and nonverbal responses to simple questions, as well as visual and auditory recognition tasks (table 4).
Another instrument, the Intensive Care Delirium Checklist for Screening (ICDSC), has also been validated in the diagnosis
of delirium in the ICU setting and had high agreement rates with the CAM-ICU in one study [32,33].
Investigating medical etiologies — Virtually any medical condition can precipitate delirium in a susceptible person;
multiple underlying conditions are often found [34]. The history and physical examination will guide most of the
investigations. The conditions noted most commonly in prospective studies of the disorder include:
●Fluid and electrolyte disturbances (dehydration, hyponatremia and hypernatremia)
●Infections (urinary tract, respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue)
●Drug or alcohol toxicity
●Withdrawal from alcohol
●Withdrawal from barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
●Metabolic disorders (hypoglycemia, hypercalcemia, uremia, liver failure, thyrotoxicosis)
●Low perfusion states (shock, heart failure)
●Postoperative states, especially in the elderly
Less common causes that should be considered include hypoxemia, hypercarbia, Wernicke encephalopathy, adrenal
failure, primary central nervous system infection, seizures, trauma, and paraneoplastic syndromes.
A cost-effective work-up for delirium focuses upon these most likely possibilities. (See "Delirium and acute confusional
states: Prevention, treatment, and prognosis".)
Medication review — Drug toxicity accounts for approximately 30 percent of all cases of delirium [16]. Thus, the most
important initial step is a medication review. The most common offenders are listed in the Table (table 2) [16]. Clinicians
should be careful not to neglect over-the-counter agents, drugs prescribed by other physicians, or drugs belonging to
other household members. A simple but high-yield diagnostic procedure is to ask a family member to clean out the
medicine cabinet and bring the contents for review.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — Careful attention to the key features of acute onset, fluctuating course, altered
consciousness, and cognitive decline should readily distinguish delirium from depression, psychotic illness, and dementia.
When in doubt, the most useful rule-of-thumb is to assume delirium and attempt to rule out common medical etiologies.
This is true even for patients with known psychiatric illness (including dementia), since they also are susceptible to
delirium when acutely ill.
Sundowning — Delirium should be distinguished from "sundowning," a frequently seen but poorly understood
phenomenon of behavioral deterioration seen in the evening hours, typically in demented, institutionalized patients [35].
Sundowning should be presumed to be delirium when it is a new pattern. Patients with established sundowning and no
obvious medical illness may be suffering the effects of impaired circadian regulation or nocturnal factors in the institutional
environment (eg, shift changes, noise, reduced staffing).
Focal syndromes — A number of lobar or focal neurologic syndromes may mimic delirium.
●Temporal-parietal — Patients with Wernicke's aphasia may appear delirious in that they do not comprehend or
obey and seem confused. However, the problem is restricted to language, while other aspects of mental function are
intact. Furthermore, fluent paraphasias are typically present with Wernicke's and offer a major clue to the correct
diagnosis.
 7

Bitemporal dysfunction, if transient, may produce a transient global amnesia (TGA), in which the deficit is restricted
to memory. With more extensive bitemporal dysfunction, visual agnosia and cortical deafness (either bitemporal or
left temporal) or the Kluver-Bucy syndrome (apathy, visual agnosia, increased sexual activity, and increased oral
behavior) may be seen.
●Occipital — Anton's syndrome of cortical blindness and confabulation might be confused with delirium. Careful
examination, however, will reveal a lack of vision.
●Frontal — Patients with bifrontal lesions (eg, from tumor or trauma) often show akinetic mutism, lack of spontaneity,
lack of judgment, problems with recent or working memory, blunted or labile emotional responses, and incontinence.
These features may closely resemble delirium. Neuroimaging may be required to differentiate frontal lesions from
delirium and confusional states in difficult cases.
Confusion or delirium due to acute or subacute brain lesions, such as stroke or multifocal white matter inflammation, may
occur without focal deficits on examination [36-39]. One retrospective study of 127 consecutive neurology consultations
for isolated acute mental status change found stroke as the cause in nine patients (7 percent) [37]. Of these, three
patients (2.7 percent) with stroke had no focal neurologic findings, and one of these was a subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Risk factors for delirium in the setting of stroke include pre-existing cognitive impairment, infection, right hemispheric
stroke, anterior circulation large vessel stroke, and greater stroke severity [39].
Confusion or delirium may follow head injury even in the absence of focal neurologic deficits.
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus — Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is under-recognized, particularly in older
patients. NCSE requires an EEG for detection and continuous EEG for management. Often patients show no classic ictal
features, but the following features should suggest the possibility of seizures: prominent bilateral facial twitching,
unexplained nystagmoid eye movements during obtunded periods, spontaneous hippus, prolonged "post-ictal state,"
automatisms (lip smacking, chewing, or swallowing movements), and acute aphasia or neglect without a structural lesion
[40]. NCSE should also be considered in the absence of these findings when the etiology of a confusional state remains
obscure [41].
Dementia — Dementia may sometimes be confused with delirium or confusion and vice-versa. However, characteristic
differences in progression and cognitive features usually distinguish these disorders.
●In contrast to delirium, cognitive change in Alzheimer disease is typically insidious, progressive, without much
fluctuation, and occurs over a much longer time (months to years). Attention is relatively intact, as are remote
memories in the earlier stages. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of Alzheimer disease", section on 'Clinical
features'.)
●Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is similar to Alzheimer disease but can be more easily confused with delirium,
because fluctuations and visual hallucinations are common and prominent. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of
dementia with Lewy bodies".)
Primary psychiatric illnesses — Delirium is commonly misdiagnosed as depression. Both are associated with poor
sleep and difficulty with attention or concentration. Agitated depression may be especially problematic. However,
depression is associated with dysphoria, and there is less fluctuation than in delirium.
Mania can be confused with hyperactive delirium with agitation, delusions, and psychotic behavior. However, mania is
usually associated with a history of previous episodes of mania or depression. In schizophrenia, the delusions are usually
highly systematized, the history is longer, and the sensorium is otherwise clear.
DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Laboratory tests — A number of laboratory tests may be considered in the patient with delirium. However, the desire for
diagnostic completeness can increase costs and possibly delay the prompt treatment of more obvious disorders. Targeted
testing is appropriate in most instances.
●Serum electrolytes, creatinine, glucose, calcium, complete blood count, and urinalysis and urine culture are
reasonable for most patients when a cause is not immediately obvious.
●Drug levels should be ordered where appropriate. However, clinicians must be aware that delirium can occur even
with "therapeutic" levels of such agents as digoxin, lithium, or quinidine.
●Toxic screen of blood and urine should be obtained from patients with acute delirium or confusion when a cause is
not immediately obvious. Again, clinicians must be aware that some common drugs (eg,risperidone) are not
assessed in routine laboratory screens. Therefore, overdose of these drugs cannot be excluded by negative results
from a toxic screen.
●Blood gas determination is often helpful. In hyperventilating patients, respiratory alkalosis is most commonly due to
early sepsis, hepatic failure, early salicylate intoxication, or cardiopulmonary causes. A metabolic acidosis usually
 8

reflects uremia, diabetic ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, late phases of sepsis or salicylate intoxication, or toxins
including methanol and ethylene glycol. A chest x-ray is usually performed.
●Further testing, such as liver function tests, should be based upon the history and clinical examination. A report of
slow cognitive decline over several months, for example, will increase the importance of evaluating thyroid function
and vitamin B12 levels.
Neuroimaging — Neuroimaging with head CT may be used selectively rather than routinely for most patients with
delirium. However, neuroimaging is necessary, if no obvious cause of delirium is apparent on first evaluation.
The need for imaging should be guided by patient history and findings on neurologic examination. Neuroimaging may not
be necessary if a patient with acute delirium meets the following conditions: the initial clinical evaluation discloses an
obvious treatable medical illness or problem, there is no evidence of trauma, no new focal neurologic signs are present,
and the patient is arousable and able to follow simple commands. However, neuroimaging should be reconsidered if the
patient doesn't improve as expected.
Neuroimaging may still be required if the delirium does not improve despite appropriate treatment of the underlying
medical problem. In addition, imaging should be considered if the neurologic examination is confounded by diminished
patient responsiveness or cooperation.
There have been no well-designed prospective studies to assess the yield of neuroimaging in patients with delirium.
Abnormalities on head CT are commonly seen, but they usually represent chronic conditions that predispose to delirium
rather than acute, treatable causes [42]. Examples of retrospective studies include:
●A retrospective study of 294 patients with acute confusion found revealed abnormal CTs in 14 percent overall [43].
However, only 4 percent of patients without focal signs had abnormal CT; the lowest yield of CT (2 percent) was in
patients with premorbid dementia and no focal neurologic signs.
●In a review of CT scans performed in 123 medical intensive care unit patients, new CT findings were present in 26,
leading to a change in diagnosis in 11 and a new treatment plan in 6 [36]. Most studies were performed for an
indication of "altered mental status" and findings included cerebral infarction in 13, intracranial hemorrhage in 2, and
tumor in 3.
●In another review of 279 head CT scans performed in the emergency department in patients older than 70 years,
42 (15 percent) revealed an acute condition [38]. Of these, 40 were found in patients with either significantly
impaired consciousness (eg, unable to open eyes, speak, or follow simple commands) and/ornew focal neurologic
findings.
Fewer data exist for MRI evaluation of patients with delirium. However, MRI is more sensitive than head CT for acute
stroke, posterior fossa lesions, and white matter lesions, however, such findings may not influence immediate treatment
course in critically ill patients [44]. In patients with delirium of unknown cause and negative head CT, MRI may be useful
to exclude acute or subacute stroke and multifocal inflammatory lesions (eg, as seen in reversible posterior
leukoencephalopathy and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis).
Lumbar puncture — Older patients with bacterial meningitis are more likely to present with delirium rather than the
classic triad of fever, headache, and meningismus. Bacterial meningitis is an uncommon disorder, and routine
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluation may not be necessary in all febrile or septic appearing older patients with delirium as
long as other infectious foci are obvious. However, CSF analysis may be the only diagnostic tool that will identify bacterial
or aseptic meningitis and encephalitis.
In a retrospective study of 81 elderly patients who were admitted to the hospital for the evaluation of fever and mental
status changes, CSF cultures were negative for bacterial growth in 80 of 81 patients [45]. However, one case of bacterial
meningitis and one case of aseptic meningitis were diagnosed by CSF findings. In a retrospective review of 232 lumbar
punctures performed in hospitalized patients for the indication of altered mental status, 11 percent were abnormal; the
yield was highest in those suspected of community-acquired meningitis [46].
Lumbar puncture is mandatory when the cause of delirium is not obvious. Clinicians should also have a low threshold for
obtaining CSF in febrile patients with delirium, even when alternate explanatory conditions for delirium are present or
suspected.
Neuroimaging should be obtained prior to lumbar puncture in patients with coma, focal signs, papilledema, or suspicion of
increased intracranial pressure because of the very low but real risk of precipitating transtentorial herniation. If lumbar
puncture is delayed and the suspicion of bacterial meningitis is high, empiric antibiotic treatment should be considered.
(See "Lumbar puncture: Technique, indications, contraindications, and complications in adults", section on
'Complications' and "Clinical features and diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis in adults".)
 9

EEG testing — Electroencephalography (EEG) is useful in patients with altered consciousness in order to [47,48]:
●Exclude seizures, especially nonconvulsive or subclinical seizures
●Confirm the diagnosis of certain metabolic encephalopathies or infectious encephalitides that have characteristic
EEG patterns
Nonconvulsive seizures lack motor manifestations or convulsions, but they may impair consciousness. Nonconvulsive
status epilepticus may cause continuous or fluctuating impairment of consciousness, and EEG is the only method that can
make the diagnosis. One report evaluated 198 EEGs performed for the indication of altered consciousness without
convulsions and found definite or probable nonconvulsive status epilepticus in 74 (37 percent) [49]. In another study,
continuous EEG monitoring was performed for unexplained decrease in consciousness or detection of subclinical seizures
in 570 critically ill patients [50]. Seizures were detected in 110 patients (19 percent), and the seizures were exclusively
nonconvulsive in 92 percent of these individuals. Coma patients frequently required greater than 24 hours of monitoring to
detect the first electrographic seizure.
Metabolic encephalopathies may show diffuse bilateral slowing of background rhythm and moderate or high wave
amplitude. Triphasic waves are associated with hepatic encephalopathy but can be seen in other severe metabolic
disturbances including uremic and septic encephalopathy [51,52]. Viral encephalitis is typically associated with diffuse
background slowing and occasional epileptiform activity or electrographic seizures. Herpes simplex encephalitis may be
associated with high amplitude periodic complexes in the temporal lobe leads.
EEG evaluation should be obtained for any patient with altered consciousness of unknown etiology [40]. Patients with a
remote or recent history of head trauma, stroke, seizures, or focal brain lesions may be at higher risk of convulsive and
nonconvulsive seizures. However, neither clinical signs nor prior history predicted which of the 198 EEGs showed
nonconvulsive status in the study cited above [49].
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, “The Basics” and “Beyond
the Basics.” The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6thgrade reading level, and
they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for
patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education
pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level
and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to
your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on “patient info” and the
keyword(s) of interest.)
●Basics topic (see "Patient information: Delirium (confusion) (The Basics)")
●Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient information: Delirium (Beyond the Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●Delirium is a clinical syndrome caused by a medical condition, substance intoxication or withdrawal, or medication
side effect that is characterized by a disturbance of consciousness with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift
attention (See 'Definition and terminology' above.)
●Nearly 30 percent of older medical patients experience delirium at some time during hospitalization. The incidence
is higher in those with advanced age and pre-existing brain disease (See 'Epidemiology' above.)
●A disturbance of consciousness and altered cognition are essential components of delirium. Some patients are
drowsy and lethargic, others are agitated and confused. Visual hallucinations, tremulousness,
and myoclonus/asterixis are variably present (See 'Clinical presentation' above and 'Neurologic
examination' above.).
•Focal or lateralized neurologic findings are not characteristic of delirium. A careful neurologic examination can
also distinguish between focal syndromes that can mimic delirium (See 'Focal syndromes' above.)
●The past medical history, a review of medications, and a physical examination may provide clues as to the
underlying etiology (See 'History' above and 'General examination' above.)
●Laboratory evaluation in patients with delirium should include serum electrolytes, creatinine, glucose, calcium,
complete blood count, and urinalysis and urine culture. Drug levels, toxicology screen, liver function testing, and
arterial blood gas should follow if the cause remains obscure (See 'Laboratory tests'above.).
●Neuroimaging, lumbar puncture, and electroencephalogram are not required in most patients with delirium, but are
recommended in specific clinical scenarios, including in those whose cause remains obscure after routine testing
(See 'Diagnostic tests' above.)
Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.
 10

REFERENCES

1. Inouye SK. The dilemma of delirium: clinical and research controversies regarding diagnosis and evaluation of delirium in
hospitalized elderly medical patients. Am J Med 1994; 97:278.
2. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th ed, APA Press, Washington, DC 2013.
3. Adams RD, Victor M, Ropper AH. Delirium and other acute confusional states. In: Principles of Neurology, 6th, McGraw-
Hill, New York 1997. p.405.
4. Francis J. Delirium in older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40:829.
5. Inouye SK, Rushing JT, Foreman MD, et al. Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site
epidemiologic study. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13:234.
6. Dyer CB, Ashton CM, Teasdale TA. Postoperative delirium. A review of 80 primary data-collection studies. Arch Intern
Med 1995; 155:461.
7. McNicoll L, Pisani MA, Zhang Y, et al. Delirium in the intensive care unit: occurrence and clinical course in older patients.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51:591.
8. Elie M, Rousseau F, Cole M, et al. Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ
2000; 163:977.
9. Lawlor PG, Gagnon B, Mancini IL, et al. Occurrence, causes, and outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer: a
prospective study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:786.
10. Kiely DK, Bergmann MA, Murphy KM, et al. Delirium among newly admitted postacute facility patients: prevalence,
symptoms, and severity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58:M441.
11. Romano J, Engel GL. Delirium: I. Electroencephalographic data. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1944; 51:356.
12. Trzepacz PT. The neuropathogenesis of delirium. A need to focus our research. Psychosomatics 1994; 35:374.
13. Mach JR Jr, Dysken MW, Kuskowski M, et al. Serum anticholinergic activity in hospitalized older persons with delirium: a
preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43:491.
14. Campbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging 2009;
4:225.
15. Golinger RC, Peet T, Tune LE. Association of elevated plasma anticholinergic activity with delirium in surgical patients.
Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144:1218.
16. Francis J. Drug-induced delirium: Diagnosis and treatment. CNS Drugs 1996; 5:103.
17. Chew ML, Mulsant BH, Pollock BG, et al. Anticholinergic activity of 107 medications commonly used by older adults. J Am
Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:1333.
18. Stefano GB, Bilfinger TV, Fricchione GL. The immune-neuro-link and the macrophage: postcardiotomy delirium, HIV-
associated dementia and psychiatry. Prog Neurobiol 1994; 42:475.
19. van Munster BC, Korevaar JC, Zwinderman AH, et al. Time-course of cytokines during delirium in elderly patients with hip
fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:1704.
20. Elie M, Cole MG, Primeau FJ, Bellavance F. Delirium risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 1998;
13:204.
21. Fick DM, Agostini JV, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;
50:1723.
22. Lundström M, Edlund A, Bucht G, et al. Dementia after delirium in patients with femoral neck fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc
2003; 51:1002.
23. Marcantonio E, Ta T, Duthie E, Resnick NM. Delirium severity and psychomotor types: their relationship with outcomes
after hip fracture repair. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50:850.
24. McAvay GJ, Van Ness PH, Bogardus ST Jr, et al. Older adults discharged from the hospital with delirium: 1-year
outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54:1245.
25. Pompei P, Foreman M, Cassel CK, et al. Detecting delirium among hospitalized older patients. Arch Intern Med 1995;
155:301.
26. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for
detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:941.
27. Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:823.
28. Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, Straus SE. Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments. JAMA
2010; 304:779.
29. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion
assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 2001; 286:2703.
30. Luetz A, Heymann A, Radtke FM, et al. Different assessment tools for intensive care unit delirium: which score to use?
Crit Care Med 2010; 38:409.
31. Mitasova A, Kostalova M, Bednarik J, et al. Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: validation of the Confusion
Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2012; 40:484.
 11

32. Plaschke K, von Haken R, Scholz M, et al. Comparison of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit
(CAM-ICU) with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for delirium in critical care patients gives high
agreement rate(s). Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:431.
33. Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, et al. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening
tool. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:859.
34. Francis J, Martin D, Kapoor WN. A prospective study of delirium in hospitalized elderly. JAMA 1990; 263:1097.
35. Bliwise DL. What is sundowning? J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42:1009.
36. Salerno D, Marik PE, Daskalakis C, et al. The role of head computer tomographic scans on the management of MICU
patients with neurological dysfunction. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24:372.
37. Benbadis SR, Sila CA, Cristea RL. Mental status changes and stroke. J Gen Intern Med 1994; 9:485.
38. Naughton BJ, Moran M, Ghaly Y, Michalakes C. Computed tomography scanning and delirium in elder patients. Acad
Emerg Med 1997; 4:1107.
39. Oldenbeuving AW, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, et al. Delirium in the acute phase after stroke: incidence, risk factors, and
outcome. Neurology 2011; 76:993.
40. Sheth RD, Drazkowski JF, Sirven JI, et al. Protracted ictal confusion in elderly patients. Arch Neurol 2006; 63:529.
41. Veran O, Kahane P, Thomas P, et al. De novo epileptic confusion in the elderly: a 1-year prospective study. Epilepsia
2010; 51:1030.
42. Koponen H, Hurri L, Stenbäck U, et al. Computed tomography findings in delirium. J Nerv Ment Dis 1989; 177:226.
43. Hufschmidt A, Shabarin V. Diagnostic yield of cerebral imaging in patients with acute confusion. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;
118:245.
44. Morandi A, Gunther ML, Vasilevskis EE, et al. Neuroimaging in delirious intensive care unit patients: a preliminary case
series report. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2010; 7:28.
45. Warshaw G, Tanzer F. The effectiveness of lumbar puncture in the evaluation of delirium and fever in the hospitalized
elderly. Arch Fam Med 1993; 2:293.
46. Metersky ML, Williams A, Rafanan AL. Retrospective analysis: are fever and altered mental status indications for lumbar
puncture in a hospitalized patient who has not undergone neurosurgery? Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25:285.
47. Jacobson SA, Leuchter AF, Walter DO, Weiner H. Serial quantitative EEG among elderly subjects with delirium. Biol
Psychiatry 1993; 34:135.
48. Hemphill JC. Disorders of consciousness in systemic diseases. In: Neurology and general medicine, Aminoff, MJ (Ed),
Churchill Livingstone, 2001. p.1053.
49. Privitera M, Hoffman M, Moore JL, Jester D. EEG detection of nontonic-clonic status epilepticus in patients with altered
consciousness. Epilepsy Res 1994; 18:155.
50. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, et al. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in
critically ill patients. Neurology 2004; 62:1743.
51. Fisch BJ, Klass DW. The diagnostic specificity of triphasic wave patterns. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;
70:1.
52. Young GB. Metabolic and inflammatory cerebral diseases: electrophysiological aspects. Can J Neurol Sci 1998; 25:S16.
12
13
14
15