LAB - Empirical Formula of MgO - 2018 - NM
LAB - Empirical Formula of MgO - 2018 - NM
Date Per
Pre-lab Questions:
2) Explain how an empirical formula can be calculated from mass data. Describe the steps that need to
be followed. (HINT: there are 2 steps!)
3) What is the “law of conservation of mass”? If 4.10 g of copper react with oxygen gas to form 5.03 g of
COPPER OXIDE, what was the mass of oxygen that combined with the copper? SHOW your
calculations and EXPLAIN your answer!
4) Calculate the empirical formula from the following experimental data examples. When finished
correctly NAME the compound (both of the compounds are IONIC so the name can be found from the
empirical formula)
A) 4.10 g of copper reacts with 0.93 g of oxygen. B) 5.21 g of iron reacts with 2.19 g of oxygen.
5) Using the values from the previous question, what is the ratio of moles of copper to moles of oxygen?
(We want to express this value as a decimal instead of a fraction. Do not round your answer to a whole
number. For example: 0.0889 / 0.0865 = 1.028)
6) What type of compound would magnesium oxide be? What should its empirical formula be? Explain
how you know this.
7) The reaction between magnesium and oxygen that forms magnesium oxide can be written as the
following word equation. In the space below the word equation, write the chemical equation for this
reaction and then BALANCE it! (note: the formula for oxygen is O2). Also, indicate the TYPE of reaction.
Balanced equation:
Type of reaction:
8) This reaction will occur by placing a long narrow strip of magnesium (you will measure / know its
mass) into a crucible and heating it to start the reaction. Where will the oxygen come from for the
reaction?
9) When the reaction is complete, only magnesium oxide should be present inside of the crucible.
Briefly explain how the mass of the magnesium oxide can be found.
10) Explain how the mass of the oxygen that reacted can be found.
STAMP
WLHS / Chem Name
Date Per
Materials:
crucible and lid crucible tongs ring stand and clay triangle
Bunsen burner magnesium ribbon safety goggles
0.01 g precision electronic balance
WEAR SAFETY GOGGLES! BEWARE OF HOT CRUCIBLES!
Procedure:
1) Set up: Place a crucible and lid on a clay triangle clamped to a ring stand. Light the gas burner and
adjust it to give a clear blue inner flame. Place the burner under the crucible. Adjust the height of the
ring support so that the bottom of the crucible is in the hottest part of the flame. Place the crucible lid
slightly ajar on the crucible.
2) Perform the lab and collect all the data necessary. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO HANDLE A HOT
CRUCIBLE! Place the hot crucible on the metal base and let it cool for a few minutes before
moving it at all.
3) Clean up: Clean the crucible by scraping the magnesium oxide into the garbage with a metal spatula.
DO NOT CLEAN THE CRUCIBLE BY USING WATER.
Mass of magnesium
ribbon
Observations
Analysis:
Perform each of the following calculations. Show mathematical work including units for each
calculation.
1) Calculate the mass of magnesium oxide in the crucible at the end of the reaction.
2) Calculate the mass of oxygen that reacted in the lab using the law of conservation of mass.
3) Calculate the number of moles of magnesium that reacted in the lab using dimensional analysis.
4) Calculate the number of moles of oxygen that reacted in the lab using dimensional analysis.
5) Calculate the mole ratio of magnesium to oxygen by dividing the moles of magnesium by the moles of
oxygen. Round the answer to 3 decimal places.
6) The theoretical mole ratio of magnesium to oxygen should be 1.000. Calculate the experimental error.
1) According to your results, what is the mole ratio of magnesium to oxygen, to the nearest 0.001?
2) Was your mole ratio of magnesium to oxygen higher or lower than the theoretical value?
3) Scenario #1: Someone did this same lab and collected the following results: Magnesium mass =
0.520 g and Oxygen mass = 0.25 g.
A) Calculate the experimental mole ratio of Magnesium:Oxygen (do not round to whole numbers – keep
the decimals)?
B) Which element’s mass was smaller than it theoretically should have been?
4) Scenario #2: Someone did this same lab and collected the following results: Magnesium mass =
1.505 g and Oxygen mass = 1.10 g.
A) Calculate the experimental mole ratio of Magnesium:Oxygen (do not round to whole numbers – keep
the decimals).
B) Which element’s mass was smaller than it theoretically should have been?
**For each experimental scenario below, predict and EXPLAIN the effect on the mole ratio of
Mg/O. (Hint: would the ratio be greater than or lower than 1?)
7) Noticeable residue was in the crucible and not removed prior to performing the reaction.
8) Based on the mole ratio of Mg/O that you calculated using your data, brainstorm 2-3 procedural
reasons that would explain why the experimental ratio was NOT 1.000.
9) Using the questions above and your results and observations from the lab, what best explains the
observed experimental % error? Be specific and use your results (evidence) to support a claim with
sound reasoning. In the space below, write a thorough explanation (CLAIM, EVIDENCE, REASONING).
Proposed procedure modification(s) or emphasis to the procedure that address the claim:
stamp
Instructions:
1) Repeat the data collection and record your data in the original data table. *use “future trial” column(s)
2) Show all your work for the calculations to find the Magnesium:Oxygen mole ratio in the space below.
Clearly show the work (including the experimental error for the new trial(s)).