CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering Module1 S2024
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering Module1 S2024
Transportation Engineering
Wael M. ElDessouki, Ph.D.
5
6 Introduction
Primary Objective:
SAFETY
Secondary Objectives:
Speed
Comfort
Convenience
Economy
Environmental compatibility
60 Deg.
Line of Sight
5 Deg. (Diameter)
10 Deg.
60 Deg.
90-100 Deg.
Monocular Monocular
Vision 60 Deg. Vision
~ 35 Deg. ~ 35 Deg.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 18
Field of Vision: Impact of Speed (35 km/hr)
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 19
Field of Vision: Impact of Speed (40 km/hr)
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 20
Field of Vision: Impact of Speed (48 km/hr)
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 21
22
Field of Vision: “Importance”
Reaction Time:
Can be defined as the time it takes a driver to make a
response decision based on the nature of the existing stimulus
and his own state, and to execute that decision.
2.5 seconds for most computations involving braking reactions. (90th %) (AASHTO)
NOTE: Higher values of PRT for more complex situations might be used (AASHTO)
Boat Trailer
Camper Trailer
Motor Homes
JetSki Trailer
Low Speed Turning Characteristics
35
0.01 + =
Where ,
C.G.
V – Vehicle Speed (m/s), R
- Superelevationon ,
– Gravitational Acceleration(m/s2)
43
= +
−
= ∗ +
2 ( ± 0.01 )
Where,
ds : Total Stopping Distance (m)
Vi : Initial Vehicle Speed (m/s)
Vf : Final Vehicle Speed (m/s)
g : Gravitational Acceleration (m/s2)
f : Pavement Longitudinal Friction Coefficient (0.348)
G : Vertical Grade %
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Vehicle Characteristics:
Traffic Light Application (General)
Yellow Time (Y):
Stopping Sight Distance
Y
Approach Speed Passing Speed
2
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 46
Vehicle Characteristics:
Traffic Light Application
V V
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 47
Vehicle Characteristics:
Traffic Light Application R L
V LArc
q 45
R
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 49
Example : Chapter 2
50
2.2
A driver traveling at 100 km/h rounds a curve on a
level grade to see a truck overturned across the
roadway at a distance of 120 m. If the driver is able to
decelerate at a rate of 0.31g, at what speed will the
vehicle hit the truck? Plot the result for reaction times
ranging from 0.50 to 5.00 s in increments of 0.5 s.
Comment on the results.
2.7
What minimum radius of curvature may be designed
for the safe operation of vehicles at 110 km/h if the
maximum rate of superelevation (e) is 6% and the
maximum coefficient of side friction (f) is 0.10?
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
51
Uninterrupted:
Uninterrupted flow facilities have no external
interruptions to the traffic stream. Pure uninterrupted
flow exists primarily on freeways, where there are no
intersections at grade, traffic signals, STOP or YIELD
signs, or other interruptions external to the traffic
stream itself.
Interrupted:
Interrupted flow facilities are those that incorporate
fixed external interruptions into their design and
operation. The most frequent and operationally
significant external interruption is the traffic signal.
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Traffic Stream Parameters
54
Macroscopic Parameters:
1. Volume or Flow Rate
2. Speed
3. Density
Microscopic Parameters:
1. Headway
2. Spacing
3. Speed of individual vehicles
Remember:
AADT is not directional, i.e. traffic flow on both direction of the road is counted
Question:
Why we don’t just count hourly volume and do our design?
Answer:
We usually
CONEN do our design
442 Transportation for future
Engineering S2024 forecast volume. Most future demand forecasting is ElDessouki
600
500
Average Daily Volume
400
300
200
100
0
12:00 AM 6:00 AM 12:00 PM 6:00 PM 12:00 AM
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 Time of Day (hrs) ElDessouki
63
Macroscopic Parameters: Peak Hour
Factor
Peak Hour:
Is defined as the single hour of the day that has the highest traffic flow
rate.
Estimating Peak Hour Factor (PHF):
1- Traffic volume is counted during the peak hour time frame in 15
minutes increments for a period of 2 hrs.
2- Identify the maximum consecutive 15 min intervals where the traffic
volume is the highest, this would be the Peak Hour
3- Add the traffic volume for the four intervals to get the hourly rate,
then ( )
=
4∗
Where,
V – Hourly volume observed during peak hour
Vmax15 – The maximum volume counted during the 15 minutes intervals
of the peak hour
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
64
Macroscopic Parameters: Peak Hour
Factor
Example for Calculating PHF:
Time Interval Traffic Volume
6:30 – 6:45 423
6:45 – 7:00 563
7:00 – 7:15 635
7:15 – 7:30 745
7:30 – 7:45 865
7:45– 8:00 825
8:00 – 8:15 725
8:15 – 8:30 710
Headway (ha):
Is defined as the time interval between successive vehicles as
they pass a point along the lane, also measured between
common reference points on the vehicles.
3600
Then , flow rate (q) would be: q ( veh / hr )
ha
q
v ( km / hr ) 3 .6 * ( d a / h a )
D
Average Speed (v ) would be:
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
70
Relationship Between:
Flow Rate, Speed &Density
Flow Rate Q (veh/lane/hr)
Q vS * D
Where ,
Free Flow
Speed
Q FlowRate
Stable Congested v s Speed
Flow Flow
D Density
0 Density
D (veh/lane/km)
0
Critical Jam
Density Density
ElDessouki
vs Q / D
Stable
Flow Where ,
Q FlowRate
Congested v s Speed
Flow
D Density
0 Flow Rate
Q (veh/lane/hr)
0
Saturation Flow Rate
ElDessouki
Greenshield’s Model(1934):
D
v v f * 1
D
jam
Greenberg’s Model(1959):
D 0 Density
v C * ln
D 0 D (veh/lane/km)
jam Jam
C Model Constant vs Q / D Density
Where ,
Underwood’s Model(1961): Q FlowRate
D
v vf *e
D jam
v s Speed
v f FreeFlowSpeed D Density
ElDessouki
90%
30
Cumulative Frequency%
80%
25 70%
Frequency
60%
20
50%
15
40%
10 30%
20%
5
10%
0 0%
55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135
Observations Observations
S2 i 1
S S2 i 1
( N 1) ( N 1)
where :
where :
2
S sample Variance
S S tan dard Deviation
x sample mean
S 2 sample Variance
xi observation (i )
N number of Observations
117
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
Advantages: Simple
Disadvantages:
40 m
High error due to stopwatch
depressing time variations.
Class Example
ElDessouki
ref ElDessouki
Reflected wave
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024
122
Speed Studies: Spot Speed Studies
Doppler Radar (Speed Gun):
Advantages:
High Accuracy, but the readings must be corrected for aiming
angle.
Disadvantages:
Difficult to conceal, drivers associate Radar
with police which may cause them to
slow their speeds down and yielding
inaccurate results.
ElDessouki
Speed
TrueSpeed
cos
ElDessouki
20
15
10
0
50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 100-110 110-120 120-130 130-140 140-150 150-160
Speed (km/hr)
MODE = 105 km/hr ElDessouki
90%
85
% 80%
70%
Accumulative %
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
15 Median
10%
%
0%
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 ElDessouki
15th% Speed Speed (km/hr) 85th% Speed
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024
Spot Speed Studies:
126
Data Reduction & Analysis
The speed data is analyzed and reported as following:
B- Quantitative:
1- Mode
2- Median
3- Mean
4- Standard Deviation (SD)
5-85th% & 15th% Speeds
6- Pace(15 km/hr band)
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
Zd
X 1 X 2 d o
S
Z d Normalized Diffirence between before & after
X 1 & X 2 Mean speed before & after resp.
S pooled Standard Deviation
d o hypothesiz ed population mean difference ElDessouki
ElDessouki
Example (cont.):
Now, the question did we reach the target?
6
X 1.96 E 63.0 1.96 * 63.0 1.52mph
60
ElDessouki
Volume Studies
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
135
Traffic Volume Studies:
Volume studies:
Traffic counts are the most basic of traffic studies
and are the primary measure of demand; virtually
all aspects of traffic engineering require volume as
an input, including highway planning and design,
decisions on traffic control and operations, detailed
signal timing, and others.
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
Tally Sheets:
Recording data onto tally sheets is the simplest means of
conducting manual counts. The data can be recorded with a
tick mark on a pre-prepared field form. A watch or stopwatch is
necessary to measure the desired count interval. A blank traffic
volume count intersection tally sheet is provided in Appendix B.
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 151
The Capacity Concept:
The Highway Capcity Manual (HCM 2000) defines
Capacity as following:
“The capacity of a facility is the maximum hourly
rate at which persons or vehicles reasonably can be
expected to traverse a point or a uniform section of
a lane or roadway during a given time period under
prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions.”
HCM2000 , pp. 2-2
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 152
Concept #1 in HCM Capacity Definition
Capacity is defined as a maximum hourly rate.
For most cases, the rate used is for the peak 15
minutes of the peak hour, although HCM 2000 allows
for some discretion in selecting the length of the
analysis period. In any analysis, care must be taken to
express both the demand and the capacity in terms
of the same analysis period.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 153
Concept #2 in HCM Capacity Definition
Capacity may be expressed in terms of
persons or vehicles:
This is critical when transit and pedestrian issues are
considered, as well as in the consideration of high-
occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes and facilities, where the
person-capacity is clearly more important than the vehicle-
capacity.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 154
Concept #3 in HCM Capacity Definition
Capacity is defined for prevailing roadway, traffic, and control
conditions.
Roadway conditions refer to the geometric characteristics of the
facility, such as the number of lanes, lane widths, shoulder widths,
and free-flow speeds.
Traffic conditions refer primarily to the composition of the traffic
stream, particularly the presence of trucks and other heavy
vehicles.
Control conditions refer primarily to interrupted flow facilities, where
such controls as STOP and YIELD signs and traffic signals have a
significant impact on capacity.
The important concept is that a change in any of the prevailing
conditions causes a change in the capacity of the facility.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 155
Concept #4 in HCM Capacity Definition
Capacity is defined for a point or uniform section of a
facility:
This correlates to the “prevailing conditions” discussed
above. A “uniform section” must have consistent
prevailing conditions. At any point where these
conditions change, the capacity also changes.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 156
Concept #5 in HCM Capacity Definition
Capacity refers to maximum flows that can “reasonably” be
expected to traverse a section:
This recognizes that capacity is subject to variation in both time
and space. Thus, capacity is not defined as the single highest
flow level ever expected to occur on a facility. Rather it is a value
that represents a flow level that can be reasonably achieved
repeatedly at a given location and at similar locations
throughout the United States. Thus, isolated observations of
actual flows in excess of stated capacities is not a contradiction
and is, in fact, an expected condition.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 157
Level of Service (LOS) Concept:
The level-of-service concept was introduced in the 1965 HCM as a
convenient way to describe the general quality of operations on a
facility with defined traffic, roadway, and control conditions.
Using a letter scale from A to F, a terminology for operational quality
was created that has become an important tool in communicating
complex issues to decision-makers and the general public.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 158
Level of Service (LOS) Concept:
The Highway Capcity Manual (HCM 2000) defines Level Of Service
(LOS) as following:
“Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational
conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service
measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic
interruptions, and comfort and convenience.”
(HCM 2000, pg. 2-2).
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 159
Critical Issues with LOS Concept:
When originally defined, models did not exist for the prediction of
precise quality measures for many types of facilities. This is no longer
true. Every facility type now has levels of service defined in terms of
a specific measure of effectiveness.
Levels of service are basically step-functions, each representing a
range of operating conditions. Levels of service B and C, for
example, may represent very similar conditions if they are both
close to the defined boundary between the two levels.
Example:
Site S1 LOS=B
A B C D E F
Site S2 LOS=B
Site S3 LOS=C
But S2 &S3 almost S1 S2 S3
the same
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 160
Critical Issues with LOS Concept (Cont.):
Another critical concept is that level of service is to be defined in
terms of parameters that can be perceived by drivers and
passengers and that the definitions should reflect that perception.
Thus, volume or flow is never used as a measure of
effectiveness, as it is a point measure that cannot be perceived
by drivers or passengers from within the traffic stream.
On the other hand, it is very difficult to measure driver or
passenger perceptions regarding specific threshold values.
Thus, most level-of-service criteria are based on the collective
judgment of professionals, exercised through the Highway
Capacity and Quality of Service Committee and its
subcommittees.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 161
Measures for Level of Service (LOS):
Common Service Measures used in LOS:
1. Speed,
2. Travel Time /delay
3. Freedom to maneuver / traffic density
4. Traffic interruptions
5. Comfort & Convince
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 162
Measures of Effectiveness for (LOS):
LOS is usually defined in terms of parameters that can be
perceived by drivers and passengers:
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 163
LOS & Service Flow Rate Concept:
Service Flow Rate:
A service flow rate is similar to capacity, except that it represents
the maximum flow rate that can be accommodated while
maintaining a designated level of service.
Service flow rates may be defined for levels of service A-E, but are
never defined for level of service F, which represents unstable flow
or unacceptably poor service quality.
Due to the complexity of some capacity and level-of-service
models, service flow rates are difficult to determine for some types
of facilities.
Like capacity, service flow rates are defined for prevailing
conditions on uniform sections of a facility, and they relate to flow
levels that can be reasonably expected to occur at the various
levels of service.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 164
Problems of Level of Service(LOS)
The MOST significant problem with LOS, is the ability to misinterpret changes in level
of service due to the step-function nature of the concept, has already been
noted.
Some state and local governments have incorporated level-of-service criteria into
development legislation. Thus, when revisions to the HCM are made, legal
standards are being altered. This is clearly not the intent of the HCQSC, and it is
not generally recognized by the legislators enacting these laws.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 166
Level of Service
for Multilane Highway
167
Source: CONEN
Maryland DOT
442 Transportation http://www.mdta.maryland.gov/
Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Highway Capacity
169
Traveled Way: The portion of the roadway for the movement of vehicles,
exclusive of shoulders.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024
172
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024
173
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024
Highway Capacity
174
HCM Standard Conditions (Multilane Rural Highway):
3.6-m minimum lane widths;
Only passenger cars in the traffic stream;
No direct access points along the roadway;
A divided highway; and
Free-flow speed (FFS) higher than 100 km/h.
3.6-m minimum total lateral clearance in the direction of travel --
( this represents the total lateral clearances from the edge of the
traveled lanes to obstructions along the edge of the road and in
the median (in computations, lateral clearances greater than 1.8
m are considered in computations to be equal to 1.8 m);
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Highway Capacity Analysis
175
HCM Methodology:
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 177
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS)
(Cont.)
fLW -Adjustment for Lane Width
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 178
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS) (Cont.)
fLC – Total Lateral Clearance Adjustment
Fixed obstructions with lateral clearance effects include light standards, signs, trees,
abutments, bridge rails, traffic barriers, and retaining walls.
Standard raised curbs are not considered obstructions.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 179
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS) (Cont.)
fLC – Adjustment for Lateral Clearance
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 180
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS) (Cont.)
fLC – Adjustment for Lateral Clearance
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 181
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS) (Cont.)
fM – Adjustment for Median Type
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 182
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Estimating Free Flow Speed (FFS) (Cont.)
fA – Adjustment for Access-Points Density
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 183
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology : Volume Adjustment
Converting traffic volume into passenger cars
equivalent
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 184
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology : Volume Adjustment
fHV – Heavy Vehicles Adjustment factor
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 185
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Heavy Vehicle Passenger-Car
Equivalents (ET & ER)
For general segment with no specific Grade%, use Exhibit 21-8
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 186
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology: Heavy Vehicle Passenger-Car Equivalents (ET & ER)
For specific & composite segment Grade%, use Exhibits 21-9, 10 & 11
See Handout for design forms & charts
To Determine the Equivalent Grade % use the truck performance
curves. (Exhibit A23-2)
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 187
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
(LOS)
HCM Methodology : Volume Adjustment
fP – Drivers Population Adjustment factor:
The adjustment factor fp reflects the effect weekend
recreational and perhaps even midday drivers have on the
facility. The values for fp range from 0.85 to 1.00.
Typically, the analyst should select 1.00, which reflects
weekday commuter traffic i.e., users familiar with the
highway), unless there is sufficient evidence that a lesser value,
reflecting more recreational or weekend traffic characteristics,
should be applied. When greater accuracy is needed,
comparative field studies of weekday and weekend traffic
flow and speeds are recommended.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 188
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service
HCM
(LOS)
Methodology : DETERMINING LOS (Calculation)
(Only for Vp< 1400 pc/hr/ln)
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 189
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service (LOS)
HCM Methodology (cont.): DETERMINING LOS (Graphical)
Example: FFS= 75km/hr & Vp= 1300pc/hr/ln
LOS = D
FFS
Vp
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 190
Highway Capacity Analysis &Level of Service (LOS)
HCM Methodology: Limitations
The methodology in this chapter does not take into account the following
conditions:
Transitory blockages caused by construction, accidents, or railroad crossings;
Interference caused by parking on the shoulders (such as in the vicinity of a
country store, flea market, or tourist attraction);
Three-lane cross sections;
The effect of lane drops and additions at beginning or end of segments;
Possible queuing delays when transitions from a multilane segment into a two-
lane segment are neglected;
Differences between median barriers and two-way left-turn lanes; and FFS
below 70 km/h or above 100 km/h.
ElDessouki
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 191
Highway Capacity Analysis Cases
192
Operational Case: Existing Facility
Design Input:
Number of Lanes
Lane Width
Median
Shoulders
Traffic Volume
Topography (i.e. Terrain: Level /Rolling/ Mountainous)
HV%, PHF ,
Design Objective:
Current Level Of Service (LOS)
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Highway Capacity Analysis Cases
193 Design Case 1: New Construction
Design Input:
Design Volume
Target LOS
Topography (i.e. Terrain: Level /Rolling/ Mountainous)
Right of Way (ROW)
Design Objective:
Number of Lanes (N)
Lane Width
Median
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
Shoulders
Highway Capacity Analysis Cases
194
Design Case 2: New Construction
Design Input:
Number of Lanes
Lane Width
Median
Shoulders
Design LOS
Topography (i.e. Terrain: Level /Rolling/ Mountainous)
Projected HV%, PHF ,
Design Objective:
Maximum Service Volume for the given design LOS (Vp)
CONEN 442 Transportation Engineering S2024 ElDessouki
195
End of Module 1