Texto Solange
Texto Solange
188
170 Dynamics
Maju
Ewelina Mierzwa
Department of Applied Linguistics,Opole University,
pl. Kopernika 11, 45-040 Opole, Poland
E-mail address: [email protected]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-7768
Abstract
Aim. The primary objective of the present study was to investigate the level of For-
eign Language (FL) learning Enjoyment and Foreign Language (FL) teaching Enjoyment expe-
rienced by FL teachers in Poland. The secondary aim was to investigate the sources of
enjoyment.
Methods. The informants of the study were Polish educators teaching foreign lan-
guages at different educational levels. Standard descriptive and inferential statistics
were used to report means, median and standard deviation for sociodemographic and
baseline characteristics of the sample. The t-Test and one-way ANOVA were used to
show mean differences in the score data.
Results. The results of the study revealed that teachers experienced a relatively high
level of both FL learning Enjoyment and FL teaching Enjoyment, regardless of independent
variables (e.g. place of residence, level of education, language being taught). The result
revealed a signiÀcant gender difference in FL learning Enjoyment in favour of females,
while there was no gender difference in FL teaching Enjoyment. A qualitative analysis of
participants’ emotional experiences in the FL classroom conÀrmed previous research
on FLE to a certain degree. That is, FLE is more related to learner-internal and teacher-
speciÀc variables than to the behaviour of peers and the atmosphere in the classroom.
Conclusion. The originality of the present study lies in the choice of a mixed-meth-
ods approach (qualitative and quantitative data) using a relatively large sample in a
Àeld characterised by case studies. To the best of my knowledge, this is the Àrst study
on foreign language enjoyment among teachers within the Polish educational context.
Key Words: foreign language enjoyment, foreign language teachers, enjoyment,
SLA, gender differences, positive psychology
Introduction
Empirical research
The primary objective of the present study was to investigate the level
of foreign language enjoyment experienced by foreign language teachers in
Poland while learning and teaching a FL. The secondary aim was to investigate
the sources of foreign language enjoyment experienced by FL students, yet
from the perspective of their educators.
The present study aims to address the following research questions:
RQ1: What is the level of foreign language enjoyment among foreign language
teachers in Poland (while learning/ while teaching)?
RQ2: What is the effect of independent variables (gender, place of residence,
years of experience, school type, a language being taught) on the level of
Foreign Language teaching Enjoyment?
RQ3: What sources of FLE are indicated by FL teachers?
RQ4: What did FL teachers derive joy from while learning a FL?
RQ5: What (in teachers’ opinions) do FL students derive joy from while learn-
ing a FL?
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 175
The instrument
The main instrument of the study was a web-questionnaire. The partici-
pants of the study were asked to Àll in an online questionnaire, which was
preceded by a brief explanation of the general aim of the research. The partici-
pants Àlled the questionnaire voluntarily. All questions were formulated in the
participants’ mother tongue, that is to say in Polish.
The questionnaire comprised questions of both quantitative and qualita-
tive nature. In the Àrst part, the teachers were asked to answer the questions
regarding their sociodemographic information (e.g. gender, place of residence,
type of school they teach in, work experience, etc.). The subsequent part of the
questionnaire included two scales.
The Àrst one was a 10-item scale created for the purpose of the study. It
was based on Pekrun’s (2002) Learning Enjoyment Scale, however, adopted to
the foreign language learning environment. All items in the scale were formu-
lated in the past tense (e.g. “I looked forward FL classes,” “ReÁecting on the
progress of my students made me happy,” “I got physically excited when my
learning was going well,” “I studied more than required because I enjoyed FL
much”). For the needs of the article, it was named Foreign Language Learning
Enjoyment Scale.
The second was a Foreign Language Enjoyment Scale (developed by
Dewaele, & McIntyre, 2014) adapted to the foreign language teaching environ-
ment, which, for the needs of the present article received a working name of
Foreign Language Teaching Enjoyment Scale.
The following part of the questionnaire aimed to assess the sources of
foreign language enjoyment. The participants were provided with a list of 8
sources of enjoyment (e.g. teachers’ attitude, positive atmosphere in the class-
room, challenging material, learning real-life language) and they were asked
to point to at least 1 and at most 3 aspects, which in their opinion have the
greatest impact on their enjoyment experience. The participants had also an
opportunity to suggest their own source of enjoyment which was not listed in
the questionnaire. The reliability of the scale was equal to ǂ= .85.
The Ànal part of the questionnaire included two questions of a qualitative
nature. First, the teachers were asked to describe one speciÀc moment in their
own foreign language learning experience which they derived joy from. In the
subsequent part, they were asked to answer a similar question, yet, in reference
to their foreign language students.
Participants
The vast majority of all the participants constituted female teachers. A total
of 89 participants (63 females, 26 males) completed the web-questionnaire. All
of them were foreign language (FL) teachers and their experience in the profes-
sion ranged from one year to more than 20 years. 38 participants (42.7 %) have
been teaching a FL for less than 5 years, 17 participants (19.1%) 5-10 years, 20
176 Dynamics
participants (22.5%) 11-20 years and 14 respondents (15.7%) have been teaching
for more than 20 years. All of the participants were of Polish nationality and
completed the questionnaire in their mother tongue.
Regarding the participants’ place of residence: more than a half (49 people,
55.1 %) of all the participants teach FL in the school located in a city (over
50,000 citizens); 27 participants (30.3%) teach in a town (from 2,500-50,000 citi-
zens), and 13 teachers (14.6 %) teach in a village (with less than 2,500 citizens).
There was a quite even distribution of the types of school the participants
were teaching a foreign language in: only 3 out of all 89 participants teach a
FL in the kindergarten (3.4%); 29 teachers teach in primary school (32.6%); 25
in secondary grammar high school (28.1%); 8 in technical school (9%). There
was one participant who declared teaching a FL at the tertiary education level.
Eventually, over a quarter of all the participants (25.9%, 23 teachers) of the study
declared themselves as teaching in the private sector of education, teaching FL
to students at different educational levels in private language schools.
As to the languages being taught, the vast majority of the participants
taught English as an FL (38 respondents, 42.7%); the second largest group
constituted teachers of Spanish as an FL (14 teachers, 15.7%), the remaining
groups comprised of FL teachers of German (12 teachers, 13.5%), Russian (12,
13.5 %), French (8 participants, 9%) and Italian as a FL (1, 1.1%). The remaining
4 teachers (4.5%) declared that they were teaching more than two FLs.
Regarding the level of education, the vast majority of the participants had a
higher education. There were 11 FL teachers (12.4%) holding BA Degree, and
70 teachers (78.6) holding MA; 1 participant declared being at the PhD level.
There were 7 participants (7.9%) who have not completed their higher educa-
tion yet. Those were the philological students who were teaching a FL in the
private sector of education.
Variables
The independent variables in the present study were as follows: partici-
pants’ gender, type of foreign language being taught, place of residence, level
of education, years of teaching experience, and type of school the participants
taught in.
There were two main dependent variables measured in the present study:
teachers’ foreign language learning enjoyment and foreign language teaching
enjoyment. The operational deÀnition of teachers’ foreign language learning
enjoyment was reÁected by the number of points achieved on the Learning
Enjoyment Scale adapted to the FL environment (5-point Likert scale ranging
from “I absolutely do not agree” to “I fully agree”). All items on the scale were
phrased positively and were formed in the past tense in order to reÁect the
retrospective nature of the questions. The Cronbach alpha was .83.
The operational deÀnition of foreign language teaching enjoyment, in turn,
was reÁected by the number of points achieved on the FLE Scale adapted to the
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 177
needs of the study. Those were the Likert scale responses to a shortened ver-
sion of Foreign Language Enjoyment Scale adapted to the context of teaching,
not learning. In total, the scale included 17 questions, all phrased positively.
Foreign Language Teaching Enjoyment was measured through such items as
“I enjoy teaching a FL,” “I have fun while teaching a FL,” “I feel proud of my
students’ accomplishments in the FL.” The Cronbach alpha was .88.
Analyses
Data collection lasted one week. The data were computed by means of
the statistical program STATISTICA, with the main operations being descrip-
tive statistics (means and SD) and an inferential statistics operation: a t-test
for independent samples (between between-group comparison) and one-way
ANOVAs. T-test was used to compare the performance of two groups (males/
females) on a scale measuring their FL learning Enjoyment and FL teaching
Enjoyment. One-way ANOVA was be used to compare the performance of
more than two groups (years of experience, language being taught, etc.).
Table 1.
Mean, SD for FL learning Enjoyment and FL teaching Enjoyment for all the
participants and for males and females separately.
Variable All (N=89) Females (N=63) Males (N=26) T
M SD M SD M SD
FL learning Enjoyment 4.42 0.49 4.50 0.42 4.23 0.58 2.42*
FL teaching Enjoyment 4.19 0.34 4.21 0.27 4.14 0.47 0.89**
*p=0.016, p**= 0.379
What emerges from the table above is that there is a signiÀcant gender
difference in the Mean Scores for enjoyment. More speciÀcally, the results of
the study revealed a signiÀcant gender difference in the FL learning Enjoy-
ment with female teachers experiencing higher level of enjoyment (M=4.50,
SD=0.42) than male teachers (M=4.23, SD=0.58). There was also a slight gender
difference in terms of FL teaching Enjoyment, however not statistically signiÀ-
cant. Figure 1 below shows a visual representation of the data.
178 Dynamics
Figure 1.
FL learning Enjoyment and FL teaching Enjoyment form males and females.
For the needs of the present study, from now on the analysis of results
will be focused on Foreign Language teaching Enjoyment primarily. Among the
group of teachers participating in the present study, the highest level of Fore-
ign Language teaching Enjoyment was experienced by teachers of Russian as a
FL (M=4.34; SD= 0.28) and Spanish (M=4.29; SD=0.24), and the lowest by the
teachers of English (M=4.15; SD=0.37). Nevertheless, due to unequal sample
sizes, caution must be applied as the Àndings might not be generalisable. One-
-way ANOVA did not display any statistically signiÀcant differences between
the groups (F(6, 82)= .40923, p= .87). Figure 2 below shows a visual represen-
tation of the data.
Figure 2.
FL teaching Enjoyment according to the FL.
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 179
It is now time to analyse these results from the perspective of all the rema-
ining independent variables. The results are presented and summarized in
Table 2 below.
Table 2.
FL teaching Enjoyment according to independent variables
Variables FL teaching Enjoyment
M SD
Gender female 4.21 0.27
male 4.14 0.47
Place of residence village 4.13 0.41
town 4.29 0.25
city 4.17 0.33
Education student 4.38 0.23
BA 4.22 0.31
MA 4.19 0.33
PhD student* 4.01
Years of experience less than 5 year 4.12 0.37
5-10 years 4.33 0.30
11-20 years 4.22 0.26
more than 20 years 4.24 0.24
School type kindergarten 4.00 0.41
primary school 4.21 0.33
secondary grammar HS 4.20 0.22
vocational school 4.08 0.25
university* 4.68
private language schools 4.24 0.40
*only one participant
Table 3.
Sources of FLE and the frequency of responses
Source Number of responses
Teacher’s attitude 68 (89)
Interesting topic of the lesson 52 (89)
Learning real-life language 48 (89)
Teacher’s sense of humour 46 (89)
Positive atmosphere in the classroom 46 (89)
Possibility of self-development 43 (89)
Demanding/challenging activities 30 (89)
Games, play-roles, funny activities 27 (89)
Table 4.
Sources of teachers’ personal learning enjoyment, examples and frequency of
mentions by the participants (N=42)
Coding category Examples Frequency
FLE-Teacher - teacher’s sense of humour and jokes; positive 12/42
attitude to students; recognition and appreciation.
- teaching strategies, methods and techniques;
speciÀc classroom activities: games, role plays,
singing songs, storytelling
FLE-Atmosphere positive relationship with peers, mutual help, nice 6/42
atmosphere, smiling, laughing
FLE-Private pride in one’s accomplishment, sense of self- 24/42
development, real-life use of language, getting good
marks, teacher praise in front of a class or work;
preparing to, taking part in and Ànally winning the
competition, learning more than required
Table 5.
Learners’ sources of FLE according to teachers, examples and frequency of
mentions by the participants (N=45)
Coding category Examples Frequency
The participants of the study most frequently mentioned the teacher’s dimen-
sion of FLE. Among this category, the participants enumerated a variety of teaching
methods and techniques which they incorporate while teaching and which, in
their opinion, constitute the source of positive emotions among their students.
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 183
The second in frequency was the private dimension of FLE. Similar to the
previous question, the participants pointed most often to pride, joy and exci-
tement of their students at the moment of accomplishment and excellent FL
performance. Dealing with challenging tasks, taking part in FL competition
were other main sources of FLE.
The participants of the present study pointed least frequently to the social
dimension of FLE, that is FLE-Atmosphere. It is worth to allude to the words of
one participant commenting on a game competition:
The students really enjoyed the game aimed at practising conditional clauses. Although
the game was difÀcult, the students were really absorbed while playing. They were sho-
uting with joy once they did something correctly. If not, they were slightly disappointed.
In the end, everyone was satisÀed and achieved a small success. They left the class with
smiles on their faces and they wanted to play again. Nevertheless, such a situation did
not take place in each and every class. In those classes where the atmosphere is not good
and the relationships between peers are stormy, the game was not successful (English
teacher, primary school, less than Àve years of experience).
In a similar vein, FLE was depicted by another participant of the study
(teacher of English at the tertiary educational level). The participant claimed as
follows: “when they [the students] faced a grammatical problem which at the
beginning appeared to be intractable for them. After some time of dealing with
it, they found the answer and had a sense of enlightenment. They felt excited
and proud of themselves, which motivated them for further work”.
These two examples highlight some core truths about foreign language
enjoyment. First, taking into account its private dimension, FLE is an emo-
tion that is not trivial and frivolous, it is not experienced at the moment of
dealing with easy tasks, but with those that pose a moderate challenge, requ-
ire mental effort. In this sense, enjoyment is a reÁection of learners’ drive for
success in the face of difÀcult foreign language tasks (Deweale, & MacIntyre,
2016).
It is the joy at the moment of taking the challenge, of dealing with a deman-
ding task and eventually, it is the sense of satisfaction and pride in one’s
accomplishment which motivates for further work. Taking into considera-
tion its social dimension, in turn, enjoyment appears to be strongly modera-
ted by the relationship among peers students, the atmosphere created in the
classroom, positive rivalry and the social bonds established in the FL. Finally,
it might be determined by the relationship with teachers, their dynamism, a
variety of teaching techniques, positive attitude and enthusiasm, their support
and appreciation. A concluding comment for what has been suggested might
be vividly represented by the quotation of one of the participants of the study:
“Even the most difÀcult grammatical concept can be presented in an intere-
sting way. What is absolutely crucial? Positive emotions, teacher’s dynamism
and a variety of teaching techniques” (French teacher in the primary school,
female).
184 Dynamics
Discussion
The present study aimed to answer Àve research questions. The results will
be now analysed and discussed in line with these questions.
The Àrst research question aimed to investigate the level of FLE among fore-
ign language teachers in Poland. At the beginning, the results will be discus-
sed for the Foreign Language learning Enjoyment (retrospective accounts of the
teachers when they were FL learners themselves).
Not unexpectedly, the results of the study reveal that Polish foreign langu-
age teachers experienced a relatively high level of foreign language learning
enjoyment. Due to the fact that, to the best of my knowledge, this is the Àrst
study aimed at investigating the level of enjoyment experienced by teachers,
these results cannot be compared to any other studies. Nonetheless, these
results are not surprising for two reasons. First, foreign language teachers can
boast high expertise in a FL and it has been found that high proÀciency and
mastery in a FL results in high FLE (Dewaele, & MacIntyre, 2014; 2016; 2018).
Second, it appears to be a matter of course that those students who enjoy lan-
guage learning more signiÀcantly than others, decide to continue their fore-
ign language learning to the level of tertiary education and, more often than
not, use the FL as a tool to work in their future, e.g. by becoming FL teachers.
The results reveal a signiÀcant gender difference in Foreign Language Learning
Enjoyment in favour of the female participants. These results dovetail those
observed in the previous studies on FLE with female learners experiencing a
signiÀcantly higher level of FLE than their male peers (Dewaele, & MacIntyre,
2014; Radwan, 2014; Dewaele, Witney, Saito, & Dewaele, 2018).
As the Foreign Language teaching Enjoyment, the level of enjoyment is on
a lower level than Foreign Language learning Enjoyment. Nevertheless, due
to two slightly different tools (scales) adopted for the measurement of these
variables, caution must be applied while making any comparison. In the case
of this type of enjoyment, there are no signiÀcant gender differences.
The second research question examined the effects of independent varia-
bles on the level of FL teaching Enjoyment. The results reveal that none of the
investigated variables have a signiÀcant effect on the level of Foreign Langu-
age Teaching Enjoyment. Optimistically, it might be stated that foreign langu-
age teachers experience a high level of teaching enjoyment, regardless of their
gender, place of residence, years of experience, school type, and the type of the
language they teach.
The following research question aimed to investigate the sources of FLE
which, in the teachers’ opinions, have the most signiÀcant effect on their stu-
dents’ enjoyable experiences in the classroom. The results reveal that the vast
majority of the teachers perceive themselves and their positive attitude to stu-
dents to be the strongest predictors for their learners’ enjoyment. It seems that
foreign language teachers are aware of the fact that they play a vital role in the
foreign language learning process, not only because of their expertise but also
because of emotions that they may evoke in students, the atmosphere they
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 185
create in the classroom, and useful and interesting lesson content they provide
their learners with. In very general terms, they are in charge, or more adequ-
ately, they have the privilege of inÁuencing their students’ emotions in the
FL classroom. Thus, the effective foreign language teacher is not only the one
who may boast great command of a foreign language, methodology—system
of practices and procedures that a teacher uses to teach—but, Àrst and fore-
most, the atmosphere and the relationship created in the FL classroom as it
may impact the learners’ attitude to life-long learning.
The two Ànal research questions were of a strictly qualitative nature and
aimed to investigate FLE according to three main categories: FLE-Private, FLE-
-Atmosphere, FLE-social. The distribution of these categories was signiÀcantly
different when the teachers’ described their own experiences and those of their
learners. Describing their own experiences, the private dimension of enjoy-
ment was mentioned the most frequently. The vast majority of the participants
emphasised the joy they derived while overcoming FL difÀculties, giving an
excellent FL performance, taking part in extra-curricular activities and FL com-
petitions, all of which made them proud, satisÀed and fulÀlled.
Asked about their students’ experiences, in turn, it was the teacher who was
indicated as the main source of FLE the most frequently. Teachers’ dynamism,
positive attitude (teacher’s praise) and a variety of teaching techniques are just
a few examples of the teacher’s dimension of FLE indicated by the participants
of the study. Regardless of the question being posed, the atmosphere in the FL
classroom (peer interaction, integration, positive climate in the classroom) was
indicated the least frequently.
Limitations
The generalisability of these results might be subject to certain limitations.
The reader should bear in mind that the study is based on the teacher’s response
who Àlled out the questionnaire voluntarily. This, in turn, for some researchers,
may have led to biased results. Second, the participants Àlled out the question-
naire online which gave the researcher a lack of control over the procedure of the
data collection. Further, qualitative data were analysed only by the author of the
present study. To avoid biased results, an independent researcher with the same
coding categories is recommended. For a more complete understanding of the
nature of enjoyment in the FL environment, data triangulation is strongly recom-
mended, i.e. the investigation of this particular emotion from the perspective of
students and teachers simultaneously, ideally, incorporating both quantitative
and qualitative approach (mixed-method approach).
Journal of Education Culture and Society No. 2_2019 187
References
1. Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2013). Interest and enjoyment. In: R. Pekrun, & Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
(Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205-220). New York: Routledge.
2. Carson, R. L. (2006). Exploring the episodic nature of teachers’ emotions as it relates to teacher burnout
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Purdue University, IN, USA.
3. Daubney, M., Dewaele, J. M., & Gkonou, C. (2017). Introduction. In: J. M. Dewaele, C. Gkonou,
& M. Daubney (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implica-
tions (pp. 1-10). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
4. Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the
foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237-274.
5. Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language
classroom anxiety. The right and left feet of FL learning? In: P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S.
Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 147–167). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
6. Dewaele, J. M., MacIntyre, P., Boudreau, C., & Dewaele, L. (2016). Do girls have all the fun?
Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Lan-
guage Acquisition, 2(1), 41–64.
7. Dewaele, J. M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele, L. (2017). Foreign Language Enjoyment and
Anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research. Retrieved from
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1362168817692161.
8. Dewaele, J. M., Franco M. A., & Saito, K. (2019). The effect of perception of teacher character-
istics on Spanish EFL Learners’ Anxiety and Enjoyment. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2),
412-427.
9. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The American
Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
10. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1378.
11. Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In: R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Interna-
tional handbook of emotions in education (pp. 495–496). New York: Routledge.
12. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission
in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716.
13. Hagenauer, G., & Hascher, T. (2014). Early adolescents’ enjoyment experienced in learning
situations at school and its relation to student achievement. Journal of Education and Training
Studies, 2(2), 20–30.
14. Khajavy, G. H., & Mahmoodzadeh, M. (2018). Towards Conceptualizing Language Learning
Curiosity in SLA: An Empirical Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328003204_Towards_Conceptualizing_Langu-
age_Learning_Curiosity_in_SLA_An_Empirical_Study.
15. Li, Ch., Jiang, G., & Dewaele, J. M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students’ for-
eign language enjoyment: Validation of the Chinese version of the foreign language enjoyment
scale. System, 76, 183-196.
16. MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). So far so good: An overview of positive psychology and its contribu-
tions to SLA. In: D. GabryĤ-Barker, & D. Gaãajda (Eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign
language learning and teaching (pp. 3–20). Berlin/Heidelberg, NY: Springer.
17. MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2016). Positive psychology in SLA. Bristol,
UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. MacIntyre, P. D., & Mercer, S. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second
Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 153–172.
19. Oades-Sese, G. V., Matthews, T. A., & Lewis, M. (2014). Shame and pride and their effects on
student achievement. In: R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of
Emotions in Education (pp. 246–264). New York: Routledge.
20. Oxford, R. L. (2015). Emotion as the ampliÀer and the primary motive: Some theories of emotion
with relevance to language learning. Studies in second language learning and Teaching, 5(3), 371.
21. Pavelescu, L., & Petric, B. (2018). Love and enjoyment in context: Four case studies of adoles-
cent EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 8, 73-101.
188 Dynamics
22. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control–value theory of achievement emotions. In:
J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143–163). Oxford,
England: Elsevier.
23. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Titz, W. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated
Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational
Psychologist 37(2), 91-106.
24. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corol-
laries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review,
18(4), 315-341.
25. Pekrun, R., & Perry, P. (2014). Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions. In: R. Pekrun,
& L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 120-141).
New York: Routledge.
26. Pekrun, R., Frenzel A. C., & Goetz, T. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emo-
tions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In: P. Schultz, & R. Pekrun (Eds.),
Emotion in Education (pp. 13-36). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
27. Piasecka, L. (2016). Teaching Matters: Enjoyment and Job Satisfaction. In: D. Gaãajda,
P. Zakrajewski, & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Researching Second Language Learning and Teaching from a
Psycholinguistic Perspective (pp. 167-182). Cham: Springer.
28. Piechurska- Kuciel, E. (2017). L2 or L3? Foreign Language Enjoyment and ProÀciency. In: D.
GabryĤ-Barker, D. Gaãajda, A. Wojtaszek, & P. Zakrajewski (Eds.), Multiculturalism, Multilin-
gualism and the Self. Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning (pp. 97-111). Cham: Springer.