CHAPTER? CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND LEVERAGE LEARNING OBJECTIVES AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER, READERS WILL BE ABLE TO: & Understand the meaning, sources of capital and concept of capital structure. Understand the meaning of capital structure and financial structure Differentiate between capital structure and financial structure. Understand the meaning and features of target capital structure Understand the concept of business risk and financial risk, Understand the breakeven point and its significance Understand leverage and its significance in capital structure Calculate and interpret degree of operating, financial and total leverage. + Explain different capital structure theories. sees eee2 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya CONCEPT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ‘The term CAPITAL is used in different ways by different scholars and professionals of different field, In the context of business, it denotes to the long-term fund raised from long-term sources of financing that can be used for several years or forever. These long-term sources of financing include: (7) Long-term debt, (ji) preferred stock, and (iti) common equity (common stock plus retained earnings). Therefore, the total capital used in business can be divided into two components: Debt capital and equity or ownership capital. Debt capital is the borrowed capital and encompasses all long-term borrowings of the firm. Debentures, long-term loan from bank and other financial institutions are the major sources of debt capital. Primarily this capital is used with the objective of increasing earnings per share of common stock holders and getting benefit of tax advantage offered by the use of financial leverage. However, excess use of exposes the firm towards greater risk of financial distress. Another component of capital is the equity or ownership capital. It consists of long-term fund provided by the owners of the firm. It includes common stock, additional paid in capital (or share premium), and retained earnings (undistributed profil). It can be used as permanent capital until the firm is an existence and represents the ownership capital in business. The sources of capital discussed in above involve curtained costs. Therefore, appropriate mix of these capitals isthe most 10 minimize the cost of capital and value of firm. Upon getting the concept of capital and components of capital, we turn towards explaining the concept of capital structure and its features. CAPITAL STRUCTURE is the combination of two ‘words: capital and structure. The term capital refers to the funds raised from long-term sources of financing that covers long -term debt, preferred stock and common equity. Primarily, total capital employed in the firm is divided into two components as debt capital and equity capital. On the other hand, structure refers to the composition or mix. Thus, structure represents the parts or proportion of each component in total. ‘After defining the two words capital and structure separately, we can define the capital structure as the combination of long-term sources of fund used in the business. It represents proportionate mix of various long-term sources of financing. The long-term sources of financing include long- term debt, preferred stock and common equity including retained earnings. In equation form, capital structure can be shown as follows. Capital structure = Long-term debt + Preferred stock + Common equity Capital structure decision falls under the financing decision of the firm. The financing decision of the firm involves determination of financing need of the firm, identifying the sources of fund and deciding upon the proportionate mix of fund from different sources. Under financing decision, the financial manager should assess what amount of capital is needed and which sources could be relied upon, The decision related to the determination of proportionate mix of long-term fund is the capital structure decision,FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 3 Based on above explanation, following conclusions can be drawn about the capital structure. ‘Capital structure includes only the long-term sources of financing and + Capital structure shows the proportionate mix of different sources of long-term capital used in business. FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE The two terms financial structure and capital structure are frequently used in the context of Corporate financial management. In above, we have defined only the capital structure. This section will define both term financial structure and capital structure. In addition, we will explore the relationship between financial structure and capital structure. Financial structure refers to the way the firm’s assets are financed with. It refers to entire capital and liabilities side of the balance sheet. Thus, it encompasses all sources of financing that covers current liabilities, long-term debt, preferred stock and common equity. The financial structure of a firm in equation form can be written as follows. Financial structure = Current liabilities + Long-term debt + Preferred stock + Common equity However, capital structure includes only the long-term sources of financing. Thus capital structure is only a part of financial structure. The relationship between financial structure and capital structure can be expressed as follows. Financial structure = Current liabilities + Capital structure or Capital structure = Financial structure ~ Current liabilities, Besides above, the relationship between financial structure and capital structure has been discussed with the help of following table: Example 2.1. Let us considering the balance sheet of Mahalaxmi Corporation, ‘TABLE 1.1: Mahalaxmi Corporation, Balance Sheet as of December 31°, 2019 {in million) Assets ‘Amount | Liabilities and Equity | Amount ‘Cash& marketable securities 330| Account payable 5 ‘Account receivable 45| Accruals 39) Inventories 195 Note payable 66 Total current assets 240) Total current fabil 150 Net fixed assets $540] Long-term debt 240 (Common stock 270) Retained eamings 90) Total assets 750| Total liabilities and equity 750 Table 1.1 shows that Nepal Corporation has Rs.750 million in total assets which is financed by three components of capital: Current liabilities, long-term debt, and common equity. Current4) CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya liabilities represents 20 percent of total capital (i.e. 150 million + 750 million), the long-debt represent 32 percent (j.e. 240 million + 750 million), and common equity (common stock plus retain earnings) represents 48 percent (ie. 360 million = 750 million). These entire items in liabilities side of balance sheet of the corporation are called financial structures. The liability section in table 1.1 of the corporation shows a total of Rs.600 million as long-term. debt, common stock and retained earings. The mix of these long-term financing is known as capital structure, As shown in table, the long-term debt consist of 40 percent of total capital (i.e. 240 million + 600 million) and common equity constitutes 60 percent of total capital (ie. 360 million + 600 million). Therefore, the capital structure is the mix or proportion of a firm's permanent or long-term financing represented by long-term debt, preferred stock and common equity. TARGET CAPITAL STRUCTURE In previous sections, we defined capital, components of capital and capital structure. We also defined financial structure and examined the relationship between financial structure and capital structure, Based on this background, this section is focused to defined optimal or target capital structure, its features and significance to the firm's, As discussed earlier, capital structure refers to the composition or mix of long- terms sources of capital that includes long-term debt, preferred stock and common equity. Every firm has its own capital structure. However, all capital structure cannot be considered as an optimal capital structure. Target capital structure refers to the combination of mix of debt, preferred stock and common equity that maximizes the total value of the firm or minimizes the weighted average cost of capital Itis also known as target capital structure. ‘There are significant variations in the capital structure of different industries and different Companies. The capital structure varies not only among the industries but it also varies greatly across the different companies within the same industry. Designing the optimal capital structure is, formidable task. Therefore, financial manager should be very much careful while designing capital structure ofthe firm. In this connection, financial manager should try to minimize the cost of capital and maximize the shareholders” wealth, ‘The optimal capital structure should balance between risk and return to equity shareholders. The capital structure which helps to accomplish these objectives is called optimal capital structure. BUSINESS RISK AND FINANCIAL RISK Can you imagine any organizations without risk?? Of course not. Organizations should face various kinds of risk due to which variability in return occurs. In fact, people who decide to go into business ‘must reconcile with the fact that risks come part and parcel of the whole endeavor. Risk does not refer loss; it refers the variability in returnFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 8 BUSINESS RISK ‘Along with the establishment, every organization should have to face business risk. Some organizations have lower risk whereas some have higher level of business risk. Organization ‘without business risk is beyond the imagination. This is a clear indication that business risks will always be there, hanging over and around business organizations. Business risk is the variability of the firm's operating income, that is, the income before interest Business risk is the chance that a business’ cash flows are insufficient to cover fixed operating expenses, Operating expenses are those a business incurs by performing its normal operations. They include wages, rent, repairs, taxes, transportation, and other selling, administrative and general expenses Business risk varies from industry to industry and also among firms in a given industry. Further, business risk can change over time. Business risk is determined by general business and economic Conditions. The variability in operating return is caused purely by business-related factors, such as variability in demand, sales price, input cost. Similarly the firm’ ability to adjust output p changes in input costs and the ability to develop new products in a timely, cost-effective manner also affects the level of business risk. This risk will be influenced by factors such as the variability of sales volumes or prices over the business cycle, the variability of input costs, the degree of market power and the level of growth for FINANCIAL RISK Once the firm uses debt and preferred stock financing in its capital structure, it has to bear additional risk called financial risk. Financial risk is the result of using debt and preferred stock financing in capital structure of organization. Increase in financial risk gives more uncertainty on the shareholders’ return means the probability of higher or lower profit available tothe shareholder. If company uses some debt to finance the business, it will have to spend additional money to pay the debt down. This can make its returns more volatile and less certain over the long term. If the company can't pay off the debt then it could face bankruptcy or other legal troubles, which ‘would put it at very high risk. Financial risk has both advantages and disadvantages in organization. Financial risk management is an essential element of any successful business. The factors that affect financial risk include a company's accounting practices, its financial management, the management's tolerance for risk; whether the company's cash flow is adequate, whether its assets are protected and its short-term liquidity, In order to maximize the shareholders’ wealth position, financial manager should balance both business risk and financial risk. Both types of risk has great significance in maximizing shareholders wealth position. in further section, we are going to discuss tools and techniques than. can be used to analyze these two types of risk.8 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS 1s your business in Break-even? Our firm has make target to be in Break-even in first year of operation...... Even we are not in break-even till date......How much sales how we have to generate to be at least in Break-even? These are the common questions and issues arises in any level of business, Break-even level is more concern issues in any business organization. Most commonly, we define the BREAK-EVEN POINT as the sales required for profit of firms to be equal to zero, This this the level of sales in which firm’s profit is equal with zero i.e. neither profit nor loss. It is useful for any firm to know the least favorable scenarios in which the project still breaks even, Managers typically do a break-even analysis to determine the minimum level of ‘output or sales that the firm must achieve in order to avoid losing money—that is, to break even, Along with this, break-even analysis also helps to analyze the level of risk associated with organizations. Break-even point can be categorized as: ACCOUNTING BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS Accounting BEP is that level of sales in which firm’s operating profit (EBIT) equals with zero, that is, what level of sales we need in order to cover our total fixed and variable costs, resulting in operating profitviEBIT equaling zero. Accounting BEP is also known as Operating BEP. It involves determining the level of sales necessary to cover total fixed costs—that is, both cash fixed costs (or fixed operating costs before depreciation) and depreciation. At this point, the firm’s sales, revenue is equal with its total cost. It can be expressed as: ‘As we know, EBIT = Sales revenue ~ Total cost Or, = Sales revenue - Total cost Or, Sales revenue = Total Cost Or, Sales revenue = Variable cost + Total Fixed operating cost Or, (Q* SPPU) = Total Fixed operating cost + (Q* VCPU) Or, (Q* SPPU) - (Q x VCPU) = Total Fixed operating cost Or, Q(SPPU~VCPU) = Total Fixed operating cost or __ Total fixed operating cost " = SPPU = VCPU. FORMULA = Lotal Fixed Operating Cost "1 Break-even point (BEP) in units / Quantity =" a EMet Operating Cost 0 or, Total fixed operating cost "* Conribution Margin Per UnitFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 1 Example 2.2 \Vatika Enterprises, is evaluating the accounting break-even level of sales units for its novelty-brake-light, investment opportunity. The firm is using its worst-case scenario estimates of selling price and variable cost of Rs.190 and Rs.160 per unit respectively. The firm has total operating fixed cost of Rs 3,75,000. Variable costs include all the costs incurred in the manufacturing process that vary with the number of else eae evan Rie SOLUTION ier Senge peru (SPU) = R00 pera Variable cost per unit (VCPU) Rs.160 per unit Tealepening adem =faa7sen0 Wen Total fixed operating cost ereakeven pth nts or Quant sep = 2a Bed neat cost 375000 SO 160 = 12,500 units ‘The above calculation shows that if the firm should be able to produce and sell 12,500 units @ Rs.190 per it to be BEP. Similarly, accounting BEP in rupee can be calculated Accounting BEP in rupee = Accounting BEP in units x SPPU or = Total Fixed Operating Cost 3. MERU ~'SPPU )perating Cos or = Total Fixed Operating Cost ontribution Margin Ratio Where, Varaible Cost | VCPU Contribution margin ratio= Stes Revenus °Y SPPU Now, BEP in rupee for Vatika enterprises is8 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya Graphically we can locate accounting BEP in units and rupee as follows: Break-even point s.23,75,000 EQUAL, Total Cost = Fixed costs + Variable costs Revenues and Costs 3g 3 10,0,009 378000 + (12500 » 160) s.2875,000, $00,000 OF 6 Son0 Tat) Lon 1255018000 1750) 20000 Units produced and sold Fig. 2.1: Accounting Break-even Analysis ‘Apart from above analysis accounting BEP can also be used to analyze the level of business risk of firms. The firm having higher level of operating fixed cost has higher level of accounting BEP. This indicates the firm with higher level of accounting BEP also has higher level of business risk and vice versa. CASH BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS If company cannot achieve BEP, the company suffers from loss. Suppose, Vatika’s actual sales is only 11000 units. This shows that that firm is in loss. Now the question arises, if the company suffers from loss, does it mean that company faces with the difficulties in paying its bills for rent, salary, suppliers and labors? Not necessarily, the issue can be resolved by computing Cash Break- even point. The accounting break-even point tells us the level of sales necessary to cover our variable and total fixed costs, where total fixed costs include both cash fixed costs and depreciation expense (which is not a cash expense for the period), The cash breakeven point tells us the level of sales where we have covered our cash fixed costs (ignoring depreciation) and, as a result, our cash flow is zero. To calculate the cash break-even point, we consider only those fixed costs that entail a cash payment by the firm (specifically, we exclude depreciation expense): ‘Total Fixed Operating Cost excluding depreciation Cash breakeven point nants Quay = Tet Fae Operating Cnexutng epreaton Total ined Oprtng a Depritin on ‘SPPU- VCPUFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 9 Example 23 Going back othe Vatka Enterprises example 2.2, recall thatthe company had ttl operating fxed costs ‘of R5.3,75,000 which includes depreciation expense of Rs 90,000. In calculating the cash break-even Point, we are interested only inthe cash fixed expenses or fixed costs other than deprecation) Vatika’s price per unit is $190, and its variable cost pet unit i $160, SOLUTION Given, Selling price per unit (SPPU) = Rs.190 per unit Variable cost per unit (VCPU) = Rs.160 per unit Totclopeaing redcot = R3.75000 Depesiaton xpences =Rs80,000 Werave = Gash fixed operating cost excluding depreciation i Cash eae evenpntin unis or Quay ep = Sie erating cst exlading dereition og Tol ned pun cot = pein exes ne SPPU - VCPU o 2.500 units i Cash BEP in rupee = 950 190 Rs 186,000 The above calculation shows that Vatika’s cash BEP is 9,500 units, This calculation clarifies that though the firm's actual sales is 11,000 units ic. less than accounting BEP 12,500 units, the firm is able to meet its regular cash expenses. This notifies that there is not the possibility of firm being cash insolvency. FINANCIAL BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS Financial break-even point is the level of earnings before interest and taxes that will result in zero net income or zero earings per share. It represents the level of EBIT in which fitm’s net income or EPS equals to zero, The relationship between EBIT and net income can be expressed as follows: Net income = (EBIT ~ 1) (1-t) ~ Pd Financial BEP attempts to find EBIT that results in zero net income 2:0=(EBIT-1) (1-t)—Pa Rearranging the above equation, we get the following formula to find the financial BEP (i.e. EBIT level that results in zero net income): Finacial breakevan pit in rupee = eres epeses «Bee end Similarly, Financial BEP in units refers the quantity sales that will result zero net income or EPS. The relationship between Sales and net income can be expressed as follows: Net income = [Q (SPPU-VCPU) — Fixed cost - I] (1-t) Pd Financial break-even point in units attempts to find sales quantity that results in zero net income. (0 = [Q (SPPU-VCPU) — Fixed cost - 1] (1-1) -Pd10 GAPITALSTRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya Rearranging the above equation, we get the following formula to find the financial break-even in Units (ie. sales quantity level that results in zero net income): otal Fixed Operating Cost + 1+ 5 Financial break-even point in unit ‘SPPU-VCPU or, = Total Fixed Operating Cost + Financial BEP in Rs 7 ‘SPPU - VCPU Example 2.4 \Valika Enterprises is evaluating the accounting break-even level of sales units for its novelty-brake-light westment opportunity. The frm is using its worst-case scenario estimates of selling price and variable cost of R590 and Rs.260 per unit respectively. The firm has total operating fixed cost of Rs.3,75.000. ‘Variable costs include all the costs incurred in the manufacturing process that vary with the number of units produced. Fed costs donot vary with the number of units produced, Vatika has raised Rs.500000 debenture consisting 10 percent interest and Rs.200000 prefered stock paying 12 percent dividend per annum. Assume 4096 tax rate, Calculate financial BEP both in ree and SOLUTION Given, Selling price per unit (SPPU) = Rs.190 per unit Variable cost per unit (VCPU) = RS.160 per unit Total fixed operating cost = Rs-3,75,000 “Amount of debenture Inert rate (1) Amount of preferred stock Preferred dividend rate (0) Calculation of financial BEP in rupee and units ete Fnac Pn = rst xp» EC ee 24000 50000 + 9g) = Rs.90,000 Total Fixed Operating Cost + 1 ji, Financial BEP in units SPU -veRU 24000 (10.4) -375000t + 50000 + 190-160 5,500 units {In the given example 2.4, the calculation shows that, Vatika enterprises should earn Rs.90,000 operating profit tobe in financial break-even. In other words, if the firm generates Rs.90,000 operating, its net income ‘ill be zero. Likewise financial BEP in units 15,500 units indicates that ifthe firm generates sales of 15,500 Units its net income of EPS results zero.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 11 Financial BEP also helps to analyze the financial risk of firms. As the firm uses more debt and preferred. stock in its capital structure, interest expenses and preferred dividend also increases, This results the increase in financial BEP. Therefore, we can conclude thet the firm having higher level of financial BEP has higher level of financial risk. LEVERAGE The word “leverage” gain more outcomes by using less energy and power. Leverage can be used in various sectors. A politician can influence their mass by their small speech. A doctor can treat their patient by small tablet or one can end their life by poisonous tablet. Same meaning can be employed for the leverage in financial world too. In finance, a firm can maximize their earnings by increasing little sales but firm needs to bear certain level of fixed cost for it. Leverage measures the sensitivity of earings per share or net income towards the sensitivity of sales, derived from the “lever” that is used in physics on which it meant one can Sales Fixed Cost Fig.2.2: Leverage Analysis Leverage is an effort or attempt by which a firm tries to show high result or more benefit by using fixed costs assets and fixed return sources of capital. In finance leverage refers to the use of fixed cost in an attempt to increase the profitability. Leverage affects the level and variability of the firms after tax earnings and hence, the firm's overall risk and return. The variability of return with the small change in revenue depends upon the level of fixed cost the firm uses. Higher the level of fixed cost creates higher leverage. More speaking, leverage and return or risk both are positively related with each other. Risk exists because of uncertainty. As mentioned in above section, risk attached to a firm can be divided into two more categories like business risk and financial risk. Leverage helps to measure these two kinds of risk. Leverage is divided, into following parts to measure the different types of risk, as follows: + Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL) * Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL) * Degree of Combine Leverage (DCL) Besides above, the relationship between operating leverage, financial leverage and combined leverage have been discussed with the help of following table:12 CAPITALSTRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya Example 25 Sales revenue R5.10/00,000 (20000 units @ Rs.100 per unit) Less: Variable cost Pate (20000 units @ Rs.40 per unit) ee Contribution Margin 700000 Less: Fixed Operating expenses 200000 canoes Sains before ret and tee EBT) 00000 Less: Interest (10% on Rs 600000) 60000 Earnings before taxes (EBT) 340000 Less: taxes @ 40% 1136000 Earnings after taxes (EAT) zoa000 + eee Less: Preferred dividend (12 % on Rs.200000 24000 preferred stock) Net Income f- Eamings available to common | 180000 stockholders OPERATING LEVERAGE Operating leverage is associated with investment activities of the firm. It is caused due to fixed ing expenses in the company. In other words, operating leverage studies the relations between the firm’s sales and earnings before interest and taxes (operating profit). It is defined as the firm’s ability to use fixed operating cost to magnify the effect of change in sales in EBIT. In simple words, it measures the sensitivity of EBIT that occurs due to the change in sales. Operating leverage arises from the existence of fixed operating expenses. When a firm has fixed operating expenses, 1 percent change in sales leads to more than 1 per cent change in EBIT. The purpose of operating leverage is to analyze the level business risk associated with any business organization, Degree of operating leverage (DOL) measures the percentage change in EBIT due to 1 percent change is sales revenue. It measures the sensitivity of EBIT that occurs due to the change in Sales revenue, This can be written as follows: = ochange is sales. Degree of operating leverage (OOL) = ap chan ae ._ Contribution margin Or, DOL= EBIT Sales revenue Varaible cost Sale revenue - Varaible cost - Fixed cost . (SPPU - VCPU) = Q(SPPU - VCPU) - Fixed cost or, Where, Q = units of output ‘SPPU = selling price per unitFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 13 VCPU = variable cost per unit Degree of operating leverage (DOL) for Mehalaxmi Corporation is: DOL = S00000 = 15 imes Operating leverage is measured in terms of times in general. DOL for Mahalaxmi Corporation is 1.5 times, This indicates that 1 percent change in sales will lead 1.5 percent change in EBIT. For e.. If sales of Mahalexmi Corporation changes by 30 percent (ether decrease or increase) in coming future, EBIT will change by 45 percent. This can be expressed as follows: Percent change in EBIT = DOL x Percentage change in sales revenue 15%30 = 45% Inabove income statement, the fixed operating expenses is Rs.200000. Suppose, ifthe evel of ths fixed ‘operating expenses is Rs.300000 instead of Rs.200000, DOL of Mahalaxmi Corporation will be 2 times. instead of 1.5 times. in this situation, 1 percent change wil sale wll bring 2 percent variability in EBIT. ‘This implies that higher the level of fixed operating fixed cost results higher DOL, which ultimately indicates higher level of business risk. In other words, the firm having higher value of DOL is in higher business risk Fined operating expences, DOL. Varin operating profit wth smallchanginsaks.y Busines Risk A Significance of Operating Leverage ‘The value of Degree of Operating leverage can be used to measure the percentage change in operating profit of firm with the change in sales revenue, * DOL reflects the level business risk associated with any business organization. A firm having higher level of DOL carries higher level of business risk. It implies that small change in sales revenue have greater variability in EBIT of the firm. Therefore, high operating leverage is good when sales are rising but itis bad when they are falling. FINANCIAL LEVERAGE Financial leverage is a measure of financial risk that refers to the extent to which a firm relies on. debt. Financial leverage exists if there is the use of funds that bears fixed financial payment like debt and preferred stock. Interest and dividend payment on debt and preferred stock is termed as, financial/financing cost. Financial leverage is a direct result of managerial decisions about how the firm should be financed. This leverage arises ifthe firm uses debt and preferred stock financing in its capital structure. Thus, financial leverage results from the existence of financial fixed cost such as interest payment and preferred dividend. Financial leverage affects the financial risk either by increasing the variability in shareholder’s earnings or by increasing the probability of insolvency. Degree of financial leverage (DFL) measures the percentage change in EPS due to 1 percent change is operating profit (EBIT). It measures the sensitivity of EPS that occurs due to the change in EBIT. This can be written as follows:14 CAPITALSTRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya 9% change is EPS ‘% change in EBIT Degree of financial leverage, DFL FORMULA Degree of Financial leverage = EST Financial BEP Th ape Where, interest amount y= Preference dividenaiPreferred dividend = exrate cial leverage (DFL) for Mahalaxmi Corporation is: 400000 24000 0.4) Degree of financial leverage is measured in times in general. DFL. for Mahalaxmi Corporation is 1.33 times. “This indicates that 1 percent change in EBT will lead to 1.33 percent change in EPS/Net income. For e.g If EBIT of Mahalaxmi Corporation changes by 20 percent (either decrease or increase) in coming future, EPS: ‘will change by 26.5 percent. This can be expressed as follows: Percent change in EPS = DFL x Percentage change in EBIT 33 «20 6.6% In above income statement, Mahalaxmi Corporation has Rs.600000 and Rs 200000 of debt and preferred stock in its capital structure. If the firm increases the amount of debt and preferred stack financing, its financing cost (Je. interest payment and preferred dividend) also increases. This increases the degree of financial leverage which ultimately increases the financial risk as well as possibility of insolvency ofthe firm. Degree of DFL = = 1,33 times 340000 - Debt & Preferred stock * Interest & Preferred dividend’ —yDFL*__» Financial Risk*t Alternatively, pri = Sale revenue - Variable cost- Fixed cost Sale revenue - Variable cost - Fixed cost — zron- (SPPU - VCPI Q (SPPU-VCPU) - Fixed cost — If preferred stock is not given EIT OFL= EBT Significance of Operating Leverage ed cost FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 18 Ps ‘© The value of Degree of Financial leverage can be used to measure the percentage change in EPS of firm with the change in EBIT. * DFL reflects the level financial risk associated with any business organization. A firm having higher value of DFL carries higher level of financial risk. It implies that small change in EBIT have greater variabil in EPS of the m. Therefore, high financial leverage is good when operating profit are rising but it is bad when they are falling. Difference between operé ing leverage and finan« I leverage Operating Leverage Financial Leverage 1. Itmeasures the business risk. 2. It measures the relationship between sales and EBIT 3. Itis the result of fixed operation cost. 4. It is associated with capital budgeting decision 1, Imeasures the financial risk. 2, It-measures the relationship between EBIT and EPS, 3, It is the result of fixed financial cost. 4, It is associated with the capital structure decision. COMBINED LEVERAGE Combined leverage is the combined effect of operating leverage and financial leverage. It is a measure of total risk, Iti the result of incurring both operating and financial fixed cost, Ifa firm Uses high degree of operating leverage and financial leverage, EPS will have significant change even small changes occurs in EPS. Degree of combined leverage (DCL) measures the percentage change in EPS due to 1 percent change is sales revenue. It measures the sensitivity of EPS that occurs due to the change in sales revenue. This can be written as follows: pet, ©r, ——-DOL= DOL « DFL or, = poL=—S™ est-7 t) on, vei =... 8 ‘% change in EPS ‘% change in sales (lf there is preferred stock) .. (If there is no preferred stock)16 CAPITALSTRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya Degree of combined leverage (DCL) for Mahalaxmi Corporation is: DCL= 1.5 « 1.33 = 1.995 times Similar to DOL and DFL, Degree of combined leverage is also measured in times. DCL for Mahalaxmi Corporation is 1,995 times. This indicates that 1 percent change in sales will lead to 1.995 percent change in EPS/Net income, For e.g. If sales revenue of Mahalaxmi Corporation changes by 20 percent (cither decrease or increase) in coming future, EPS will change by 39.9 percent. This can be expressed a follows: Percent change in EPS = DCL x Percentage change in Sales revenue = 1,995 x 20 = 39.9% Significance of Combined Leverage The value of Degree of Combined Leverage can be used to measure the percentage change in EPS of firm with the change in sales revenue. = DCL reflects the level total risk (i.e. combined of business risk and financial risk) associated with any business organization. A firm having higher value of DCL carries higher level of total risk. It implies that small change in Sales revenue have greater impact in EPS or shareholders” return. = IMPACT OF FINANCIAL LEVERAGE Company employs financial leverage with an expectation to increase the shareholders” return in terms of EPS. But itis to be noted that financial leverage, in other hand, increases the chances of probability of insolvency too, Financial risk is introduced by the financial leverage. So financial leverage and financial risk has positive relation. Business organizations having debt capital in its capital structure is called levered company and it has financial risk. On the other hand, organization having no dent is called unlevered company. In such organization, there is no financial risk. Now, it is necessary to know that different form of capital structure affects the degree of risk to the company and to its shareholders. Let's take an example: Debt ratio O% 2% 0% ae wm Debt Capital (in Fs} 0 200 00 600 300 Equity Capital (in Rs) 1000 800 600 400 200 Income Statement at Different leverage ratio (debt ratio) Debiratio o 20% 0% om wm EBIT(in Rs) 200 200 200 200 200 Less: Inerest@10¥6 o 2 40 oo 80 EBT 200 180 160 140 720 Less: taxe@40%6 Ey 2 6 56 48 EAT 120 106 96 a iz ROE = EAT/Equity Capital 12% 135% 16% 2% 30%FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 17 Shareholders’ return has increased as leverage ratio increase as shown above. It happens because more tax saving occurs as interest amount increases. Excess use of debt capital lowers the equity capital in capital structure. Fewer amounts used in denominator give high percentage value which is ROE here. But it is to be noted that high leverage ratio increases the risk to the company simultaneously with ROE. Again, let's ake an example of two companies on which one is levered and another is unlevered Levered Company Unlevered company (debt used) (No debt is used) EBIT Rs.50,000 Rs.50,000 Less: Interest 20,000 . EBT: 30,000 50,000 In this example, operating profit, EBIT is sufficient to cover interest obligation. If EBIT turns down 10 Rs.10,000, company could not meet its obligation from their profits and bankruptcy may occurs but unlevered firm still have Rs.10,000 before tax profit. Thus, financial leverage provides not only the potentiality to increases the shareholder's return in terms of ROE but also it increases the risk of losses. Debt can be defined as two edge swords which meant that it is harmful for company itself to use either more debt or less debt capital. Financial leverage ratio must be optimal for the company which can be measured by different ratio like debt ratio, debt-equity ratio or equity multiplier. = CAPITAL STRUCTURE THEORIES ‘As discussed in above section, the financial structure of an organization consists of short-term financing, intermediate financing and long term financing. The financing composition of long-term sources of capital such as debt, preferred stock and equity is defined as capital structure. ‘We know the two primary sources of long-term finance are debt and equity. Normally we say the application of higher leverage (debt) produces the higher level of profitability and thus it can increase the value of firm, but it has adverse impact on financial risk, which may reduce the total value of firm. In other words, a sort of controversy has been existed whether the capital structure affects the value of firm or not. Some financial analysts argue that capital structure can increase ‘the value of firm if more and more leverage is added, where traditionalists believe the value of firm can be maximized by adopting an optimal capital structure (not maximum leverage). Modigliani and Miler, on the other hand argue that capital structure does not matter in the value of firm provided the capital market is perfect. The main objective of this chapter is to analyze whether the change in leverage ratio (holding all other variables constant) affects firm’s overall cost of capital and its market value or not.18 CAPITALSTRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya BASIC ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS Does the change in leverage ratio affects weighted average cost of capital and value of firm of not? To study the views expressed by different financial analysts on this issue, following assumptions are made: i, There are no corporate and personal taxes. (Later on it will be discussed the effect of taxes). ji, There are no bankruptcy and transaction costs. (Later on it will be discussed the effect of ital structure consist only debt and equity. iv, Total assets would be same but only the leverage is changed. That means, issue of additional debt is used to repurchase the stock and issue of additional stock is used to retire the bond. ‘The firm maintains 100 percent dividend payout ratio and thus there is no existence of growth rate. (i.; NI = Dividend) vi, Net operating income (NOI) or earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) remains unchanged regardless in the change in leverage ratio, vii._Debt is assumed to be perpetual Based on above assumptions, following calculations can be done: 1. Income Statement ‘Net operating income (NOI) / EBIT woe Less: interest e000 Earnings before tax (EBT)/ Net income (ND. a 2. For Debt Financing 1 @ Debt capitalization rate or cost of debt (Ke)= yp According to the assumptions, there is no existence of flotation cost. So, cost of debt can be caleulated as L Cost of debt (Ki) = Since there is no flotation cost and debt is issued at par, cost of debt is equal with coupon. rate ie Kd=C 1 Or, BG Or, 1s Bx Kd Where, I= Interest expenses Net proceed B = Value of debt FV = face value 3. For equity financing (Equity capitalization rate or cost of equity (K,)FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 19 ‘On the basis of above assumptions no ii, Equity capitalization rate or cost of equity (Ke)= ~p- Net Income (NI Market Value of Stock (S) ESTE (8) Market value of stock (s)= Nettncome (ND Net income = Value of stock ($) « Ks Where, Ds = Expected dividend in year 1 Po = Price of stock EPS = Earnings per share growth rate of dividend NI = Net income; EBIT-Interest 4. Overall cost of capital (Ks) or Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WAC Itis the weighted average cost or overall cost of capital paid by the company to the supplier of the capita. It can be obtained as follows; ()WACC “Wax Ki + WoxKs (Equation n0.1) BS - bred BK; SxKs vv, 1 NI viv a Tov No1 - Nol (Equation no.2) 5. Total value of firm (V) = Value of debt (B) + Value of stock (5) NO oe hve equation) THEORIES OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE The combination of debt and equity is very essential for the company. Finding the appropriate mix of debt and equity is crucial. Under favorable economic condition, the earnings per share increase with financial leverage but it also increase the financial risk. Sometimes using higher level of debt is beneficial and sometimes-higher equity is beneficial. Now, crucial question is here; what should the optimal combination of the debt and equity ie. optimal capital structure be? There is direct effect of the leverage on risk and profitability of the firm. The objectives of a firm should be directed towards the maximization ofthe firm’s value.20 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya ‘The capital structure of financial leverage decision should be examined from the point of its impact on the value of the firm, However, there are two conflicting theories to show the relationship, between the capital structure and the value of firm. Traditionalists believe that capital structure is, relevant that means it effects on value of firm. Inversely, Modigliani and Miller (MM) say under certain assumptions it is irrelevant. In a broad sense, there are two theories one is; relevancy theory and is irrelevancy theory. There are two approaches under relevancy theory (i) traditional approach and (ji) net income approach, Similarly, there are two approaches under irrelevancy theories (i) net operating income approach (ii) Modigliani and Miller approach. The Various approaches have been developed under the significance of capital structure on value of firm and cost of capital. These four approaches are discussed in coming sections. RELEVANCY THEORIES Relevancy theory states that the combination of debt and equity that means capital structure or leverage is the relevant matters. Since itis the relevant matters, at different combination of debt and equity value of firm will differ. In other words, value of firm differs as per the change in Combination of debt and equity. There are two approaches under the relevancy theories to explain the impact of leverage on value of firm. They are traditional approach and NI approach. IRRELEVANCY THEORIES Imrelevaney theory states that the combination of debt and equity that means capital structure or leverage is the irrelevant matters. Since it is the irelevant matters, at different combination of debt and equity value of firm remains same. In other words, value of firm remains constant as per the change in combination of debt and equity. There are two approaches under the irrelevancy theories 10 explain there is no impact of leverage on value of firm, They are NOI and M-M approach. Each approaches are explained in the coming section, ‘Theories of Capital Structure —__, Relevancy Theories Inele ig. 2.3: Types of Capital Structure Theories ny Theo NET INCOME (NI) APPROACH According to this approach, as suggested by David Durand, the capital structure decision is relevant to the valuation of the firm. This theory suggests that the change in leverage ratio affects,FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 21 the overall cost of capital and market value of firm. Therefore, if debt ratio (leverage) is increased, the weighted average cost of capital will dectine as well as the value of firm and the market price of share will increase. Under, NI approach, the value of firm will be highest at the point where ‘weighted average cost of capital is lowest Basically, NI approach has following two assumptions. * Cost of debt is less than cost of equity capitalization rate (Ko < Ke), ‘= There is no change in cost of debt (Ka) and cost of equity (Ke). This implies that the use of debt does not change the risk perception of investors By considering the above assumption, since the cost of debt and cost of equity remain constant, the increased use of debt (leverage) by repurchasing the equity will reduce the overall cost and magnify the level of earings so that value of firm will be higher. Thus, this theory suggests total debt or maximum possible debt financing for minimizing the cost of capital. In other words, the implication of these two assumptions underlying in NI approach is that as the degree of leverage increases, the proportion of a cheaper sources of funds, (i.e. debt) in capital structure increases. As a result, the overall cost of capital gradually decreases, leading to an increase in the total value of the firm. Thus, with the cost of debt and cost of equity being constant, the increased use of debt (increase in leverage), will increase the market value of firm. The above fact can be explained by the following figure: Ke = a Leverage ratio Leverage ratio Fig, 2.4: Cost of capital and Value of firm under NIApproach Basic Calculation "The value ofthe firm based on Net Income approach can be ascertained as follows: (Value of firm (Vv) = Market value of debt (8) + Market value of equity (S) = _Metincome (Nt)_ i) Market value of equity (S) = Zasropenuit 3) ) Overall costo capital (Ko) = jqariet Seat im or, ‘Wd x Kd + Ws x Ks22 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya ‘The following examples highlights about the effect of change in leverage on value of firm and overall cost of cepital under NI approach. Example 2.6 ‘ABC, Lid. is expecting annual net operating profit Rs.2,00,000. The company in its capital structure has all {debt of Rs.5,00,000 at annual interest rate of 1096. The cost of equity or capitalization rate is 12.596. You are required to calculate the value of firm and overall cost of capital according to NI approach, SOLUTION Given, Net Operating Income (NOVEBIT) s.2,00,000 ‘Amount of debt (8) R55 ,00,000 Cost of debt (Kd) 10% Cost of equity or capitalization rate (Ks) 12.5%, Under NI Approach; calculation of value of firm and overall cost of capital i. Value of firm (V) = Market value of debt + Market value of equity 5,00,000 + 12,00,000 s.17,00,000 ‘Working Notes Net operating income (EIT) = Rs.200,000 Less: Interest (10% of debt of Rs.500,000) =__50000. Net income (NI) 150000 aan Cost of equity(Ks) _ss00 ~ 0.125" i ove tot eptal ko) sere 200 fea 0, overleaf cpl (Ko) = Weer + WK Su) soon = BOD 19 22 ost 76 case company nee te el af tts R700 06, ha il bein cs fata and va rm peut ett) 500m + 20n00= Ra7en00 salam (0) Mata of © Mate tu of aly ~ranooo" 1040000 Re 70000 Market value of equity(S) 1,200,000 1176 or 11.76% Working Notes Net operating income (EBIT) Rs, 200,000 Less: Interest (L096 of debt of Rs, 700,000) 70000 Net Income (NI) 130000FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 23 pons ua of eu « ERE “som s.10,40,000 amo ea Or, Overall cost of capital (Ko) = Wd x Kd + Ws * Ks TOI S00, 1 - come Spent onsite hla fet 200, ht souuTion en Amount of debt (B) = 5,00,000 - 2,00.000 = Rs.3,00,000 1149 0r11.49% Working Notes Net operating income (EBIT) Less: Interest (10% of debt of Rs.300,000): Nat Income (NI) Again Market value of equity(S) Net Income (NI Tost of equity (Ks) 170000. D425 = R5.13.60,000 i Overl cost of capital (Ko) = age EO a 200000 _ Taao000 = 0.1205 oF 12.05% (Or, Overall cost of capital (Ko) = Wal x Kd + Ws * Ks 300000. 4 , 1260000 1660000 * 19 * 1660000 On the basis of above example, it can be clarify that according to NI approach the with the increase in leverage, overall cost (Ka) decreases in result total value of firm gradually increases and vice versa NET OPERATING INCOME (NOI) APPROACH, ‘According to NOI approach, capital structure decision is irrelevant to the valuation of the firm. Any change in leverage ratio will not lead to any change in overall cost of capital as well as value of firm. % 12.5 = 12.05%24 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya ‘The critical assumptions with this approach is that Ko is constant, regardless of the degree of leverage. The market capitalizes the value of the firm as a whole; as a result, the breakdown between debt and equity is unimportant. An increase in the use of supposedly “cheaper” the debt funds is offsets exactly by the increase in the required equity return (KKe). So, weighted average Cost of capital (WACC or Ko) would be same for all degree of leverage. As the firm increase its degree of leverage, it becomes increasingly more risky. Investors penalizes the stock by raising the required return on equity directly in keeping with the increase in the debt equity ratio. Because the cost of capital of firm (Ko), cannot be altered through leverage, the net operating income approach implies that there is no one optimal capital structure, From the above discussion, NOI approach has the following assumptions; # Cost of debt is assumed to be constant. ‘= The change in the proportion of leverage affects the required rate of return as financial risk changes. Required rate or return on equity / Cost of equity changes linearly with the change in leverage. + Anincrease in the use of supposedly “cheaper” the debt funds i offets exactly by the increase inthe required return on equity (Ke). So WACC would be same for all degree of leverage. Based on above assumptions, this theory suggests that as the leverage ratio increases’ the risk. perception of investors (shareholders) changes, so in this case their required rate of return also increases. Because of increased Ks, it offsets overall cost of capital to remain constant though the debt having cheaper cost is added more. Therefore, this approach argues that firms having same business risk, total assets and operating income but only the way of financing is different should have same market value. Graphically a *s _— — Ko Kg Value frm Leverage ratio Leverage ratio ‘Fig. 2.5: Cost of capital and Value of firm under NOI Approach The assumption of required rate of return of shareholders made by this approach has made more appreciable than NI approach.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 25 KEY CONCEPTS "The value of the firm based on Net Operating Income (NOI) approach can be ascertained as follows: (Market value ofthe firm (V) i) Market value of equity (S) (ii). Cost of equity (Ks) a The following examples highlights about the effect of change in leverage on value of firm and overall cost of capital under NOM approach. Example 27 ‘Assume that a firm has debt of Rs.100000 at 10% interest, that the expected value of annual net operating income of Rs.100000, and the overall capitalization rate is 12.5 96. You are required to calculate the value of firm and cost of equity according to NOI approach, chen, Amount of Debt (B) = Rs.1,00,000 Cost of debt (Kd) 10% Net operating income (NOI!) Rs.1,00,000 ‘Overall capitalization rate (Ko) = 125% i Under NO ep va o tim (y= EB = 20.00 i costor eau ce) = 1285 01260 erking tes Wate va of ey () = Va of fi Wake of ‘200000 - 10000 Net income (NI) = EBIT—1 = 100000 - (1036 of 100000) = Rs.90,000 Case 1: Suppose the firm raised additional debt Rs. 100000 and use the proceeds to repurchase stock. Assume cost of debt remain constant, Recalculate value of firm and cost of equity according to NOI approach. SOULTION Given, Value of debt (B) = 100000 + 100000 = R's 200000 i. According to NOI approach, the change in leverage does not affect overall cost of capital and market value of firm, Value of firm (V) =Rs.8,00,000 Ni _ 80000 $= Go0000 = 0.1833 oF 13.33% 700000,26 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya Working notes Market value of equity (S) = Value of firm —Value of debt ‘800000 ~ 200000 = Fs.600000 Net income (NI) = EBIT —1 = 100000 ~ (10% of 200000) = Rs.80, 000 ‘The above example explicit that required return equity (Ke) increases with the increase in leverage, As mentioned in above section, due to increase in cost of equity firm's overall cost of capital remains constant though the firm uses additional debt (sources of financing having cheaper cost). Due to this value of firm remains unchanged regardless of change in leverage. ‘TRADITIONAL APPROACH Traditional approach also known as intermediate approach has mix features of NI and NOI approach. This approach suggests that there is an optimal capital structure and the firm can increase the total market value of firm through judicious use of leverage but not maximum leverage as suggested by NI approach. This approach is based on fol assumptions: «This approach assumes that cost of equity increases as leverage ratio increases but not linearly as in NOI approach. Starting slightly upto reasonable limit of leverage ratio, after that it increases rapidly as financing risk increases. On the other hand, it assumes that cost of debt remains constant but only up to certain extent or leverage ratio, after that cost of debt also increases because of increase in the risk of firm. Based on these above assumptions, at starting overall cost of capital decreases due to constant cost of debt and slightly increased in cost of equity to which this approach has define as decline stage. At certain point Ko Cost of capital andits components Optimal Capital Structure Leverage ratio. Value of firms Value offerFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 27 will be least which is Known as optimum point. The point of leverage where KO is minimum is known as optimum capital structure. In this point the value of firm is maximum. Once the firm crosses this optimum point and use additional debt in its capital structure, cost of debt starts to increase slightly as well as cost of equity increases rapidly due to rapid increase in financing risk of shareholders. This ultimately increases the overall cost of capital and decreases the value of the firm, ‘Therefore, the traditional approach to capital structure advocates that there is a right combination of equity and debt in the capital structure, at which the market value of a firm is. maximum. Debt should exist in the capital structure only up to a specific point, beyond which, any increase in leverage would result in the reduction in value of the firm. MODIGLIANI AND MILLER (MM) APPROACH, ‘The Modigliani and Merton Miller theorem is perhaps the most widely accepted capital structure theory. Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller (M & M) revolutionized the financial world in 1958 and set the cornerstone for thinking about a company’s capital structure. In 1958, Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller established two propositions for the relation between a firm's capital structure, its market value and cost of capital. They both won the Nobel Prize for their contribution to corporate finance. APPROACH I: M-M HYPOTHESIS WITHOUT TAXES: Proposition I: This approach supports Net Operating Approach and suggests that the value of firm, is independent of capital structure. In spite of supporting to NOI approach, M-M approach provides operational justification for the irrelevance of the firm’s total market value and overall cost of capital at any degree of leverage ratio. Modigliani and Miller derived the theorem and wrote their groundbreaking article when they were both professors at the Graduate School of Industrial Administration (GSLA) of Carnegie Mellon University. The story goes that Miller and Modigliani were set to teach corporate finance for business students despite the fact that they had no prior experience in corporate finance. When they ‘ead the material that existed they found it inconsistent so they sat down together to try to igure it ‘out, The result ofthis was the article in the Americen Economic Review and what has later been known as the M&M theorem. This approach is based on following assumptions: (i) Perfect capital market: means & Investors are free to buy and sell securities. ‘& Investors behave rationally, No transactions cost. Investors are well informed about the risk-return on all types of securities (symmetric information). Lending and borrowing rate is equal with risk free rate. +26 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE (ii) Homogenous risk: Firms operate in similar business conditions and have sit risk, (iii) No taxes: There do not exist any corporate taxes. (iv) Same expectations: All investors have the same expectations from a firm’s EBIT. (v) 100% payout ratio: All earnings are distributed as dividend. On the basis of above assumptions, M-M argues that in a perfect capital market, without taxes and bankruptey cost, a firm’s total market value and overall cost of capital remain in-Variant to capital structure decision. The value of a firm is dictated first by the earning power and riskiness of its assets, not by how those assets are financed, + According to M-M approach, Vale of tevre thm = Va of neem = ‘where, NOI = Net operating inoome Key) = Cost of equity of unlevered firm Proposition 11: As suggested by NOI approach, M-M approach also assumes thatthe cost of equity of levered firm is greater than unlevered firm. The cost of equity linearly changes with the debt ratio, According to M-M approach, cost of equity for levered firm is be calculated by using following formula. SOLUTION Given, [Unlevered] [Levered} Pepsi Coke Debt - s5,00,000 Cost of debt (K.) ~ 6%FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 29 Cost of equity (Ks) 10% - soit 32 las Fs2 las a, Calculation of value of each firm carr ‘Value of unlevered and levered = KU) = BEZINES _20 as b.Caleltion of fr ach im 1 forunlvered (eps) Keqy = 10% (hem Gi) efor lvered (040) Koos = Kean ny Ka ® Debt equity aso Rs, 5 lakiis Rs. 15 lakhs 103% + [10-6] x 11.33% «, Calculation of WACC or Overall cost of capital for each firm overalleototcptal (ky = ERIE Rs. lakhs = Rs 20 lakis 0.10 oF 1936 APPROACH II: TAXES AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE Modigliani and Miller knew, of course, that taxes exist in the real world, In a follow-up article (second version), they relaxed the assumption about taxes and asked the question, “So what happens when we introduce taxes into the analysis?” M-M HYPOTHESIS WITH CORPORATE TAXES The irrelevance of capital structure rests on an absence of market imperfections. No matter how tone slices the corporate pie between debt and equity, there is a conservation of value, so that the sum of the parts is always the same. In other words, nothing is lost or gained in the slicing. To the extent that there are capital market imperfections, however, changes in the capital structure of a company may affect the total size of the pie. That is to say, the firm's valuation and cost of capital may change with changes in its capital structure, One of the most important imperfections is the presence of taxes. In this regard, we examine the valuation impact of corporate taxes in the absence of personal taxes and then the combined effect of corporate and personal taxes, The advantage of debt in a world of corporate taxes is that interest payments are deductible as an expense. They elude taxation at the corporate level, whereas dividends or retained earings associated with stock are not deductible by the corporation for tax purposes. Consequently, the total amount of payments available for both debt holders and stockholders is greater if debt employed. Proposition M-M argues that if there exists corporate taxes, the levered firm can get tax advantage from interest expenses, Meaning that, interest paid to debt holders is treated as tax-deductible expenses, thus90. CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya interest payable by firm saves taxes. This makes debt financing advantageous. In this case, values of levered firm will greater than unlevered firm be, Value of levered firm (Vi) = Value of unlevered firm (Vu) + PV of tax shield sant Vel weve fim = SBMA Te] vie, PV tnd = rs valu of tc hf an net ng The firm can get tax advantage from annual interest payment in future for forever, so it is converted (0 present value for valuation. Present value of annual interest tax saving is computed as follows: Calculation of PV or tax shield, = Annual tax saving PV oftwxshield = Anualtax savin Ke _ BxKuxTe on = Ke or, BxTe Where, B face value of debt Te Comporate tax rate Value of levered firm \ PV of tacshield Value of unlevered frm Leverage ratio Eig..27: Value of Firms under Corporate tax only Conclusion: From the above explanation of M-M hypothesis, we can conclude that, if there is the existence of corporate taxes, the market value of firm can be maximized using maximum debt.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 31 soLuTion chen Firm A Firm B Debentures ~ Rs. 2,00,000 Cost of debt ~ 5% Sent om oo ro re soco moa Csi) rt . (aioe ote rt Mag tae ) Vikectiiomec tina = ESE) as ints Rs.2,40,000 wi) ‘Value of levered firm (Vi) Vu + PV of tax shield oom ns s000 mean worn ros vetersed = 8x tesco x04 mano (b) Calculation of Ks for firm A & B Ge unmestin key = 1 abe © (i) Ke for levered firm B [Kay Kay Kay ~ Ka x (2-1) Debt equity ratio is. 2,00,000 = 10% + [10% 584] L-0.4) x PEESEE = 15% ‘Working notes: Value of equity (S) = Value of firm (V) — Value of debt (D) = Rs.3,20,000 - Rs,2,00,000 5.120,000 Calcul of WACC for each firm ()— WACC for unlevered firm A Ks 10% (ii), WACC for levered firm B = = We+ Kat We Kaus92 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya 90,000 , 4 , 2: 320,000 “$*3,20,000 075 or 7.5% = EFFECTS OF BANKRUPTCY COSTS, ‘As we came to know that, the firm can get tax advantage from the interest expenses, but it cannot Use maximum debt to maximize market value of firm. Another important imperfection affecting capital structure decisions is the presence of bankruptcy costs. We know, bankruptcy costs are ‘more than legal and administrative expenses of bankruptcy: they involve inefficiencies in operating a company when itis about to go bankrupt as well as liquidation of assets at distress prices below their economic values. If there is a possibility of bankruptcy, and if administrative and other costs associated with bankruptey are significant, the levered firm may be less attractive to investors than the unlevered one. With perfect capital markets, zero bankruptcy costs are assumed. Ifthe firm goes bankrupt, assets presumably can be sold at their economic values with no liquidating or legal costs involved. If capital markets are less than perfect, however, there are administrative costs to bankruptcy, and assets may have to be liquidated at less than their economic values."° These costs and the shortfall. in liquidating value from economic value represent a drain in the system from the standpoint of debt holders and equity holders. IM-M suggests that, though the firm can get more tax advantage from the use of high volume of debt, it has also adverse effect impact in the value of firm. As the firm increases the volume of debt increases, interest expenses (this is fix obligations of an organization) also increases. The excess amount of fixed obligation may create the situation of financial distress, When the firm will be on extreme financial distress, this me lead to bankruptcy, a formal legal proceeding where an overextended firm is placed under the protection of the bankruptcy court, allowing it to keep operating while developing a new plan to pay off creditors. When the firm will declares bankruptcy, itwill bear various legal, accounting and administrative expenses and could be forced to sell assets at fre sale price to meet creditors’ claim, Lenders anticipate the risks of attend cost of bankruptcy and required higher rate of return as compensation, Due to the existence of various direct and indirect cost of bankruptcy or financial distress, the market value firm starts to decrease from the certain extent of leverage ratio, Therefore, it can be conclude that, if the adverse effect of debt is considered with the effect of taxes, the firm can maximize its market value by using optimal debt rather than maximum debt. The effect of the bankruptcy cost on the equity capital can be explained by the following graph. ‘Value of lever firm with tax and bankruptcy costs can be ascertained as follows, Vi = Vu + PV of tax shield — PV of bankruptcy cost (cost of financial distress) ‘The effect of the bankruptcy cost on the value of the firm can be explained by the following graph.FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 33 Vale of levered firm with ex only AY ‘Value of levered fim with tax ‘and bankruptey cost ‘Value of unlevere fim Leverage ratio Conclusion: Therefore, from above explanation it can be concluding that considering the effect of bankruptcy cost, the form can maximizes its market value using optimum debt rather than maximum, = SUMMARY. Financial structure studies the left hand side of the balance sheet which consists of short term capital and long term capital. Short term capital refers to the current liabilities and fong term capital refers tothe long term debt and equity capital Capital structure is @ part of financial structure which is consists of long term capital like long term debt, preferred stock and common stock. Capital structure decision is significant financial decision since it affects the shareholder's return, risk and market price of shares. Leverage means use of sources of funds in capital structure that bears fixed payment as interest and preferred stock dividend, Operating leverage measures business risk of the company which explains the relation between the Yechange in sales and % change in EBIT. Financial leverage measures financial risk which explains the relation between Yochange in EBIT and 96 change in EPS. ‘Combined leverage is the combined effect of operating leverage and financial leverage which ‘measures the relation between Sechange in sales and % change in EPS. Company employs financial leverage with an expectation to inerease the shareholders” return in terms of EPS. But itis to be noted that financial leverage, in other hand, increases the chances of probability of insolvency too, ‘According to Net Income (NI) approach, the firm can increase its value and reduce cost of capital by increasing leverage,94 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya > Net operating income (NOI) approach suggests the cost of capital does not decline with the increase in leverage the value of firm will also remain constant at different levels of leverage. » The traditional approach assumes thet the firm can increase the total value ofthe firm through the judicious use of leverage. This approach strikes the balance between net income approach and net ‘operating approach. It is also known as intermediate anproach, > MLM approach support net operating income approach and suggest that there is nothing like optimal capital structure in a world of perfect capital market. » According to M-M, if two firms are identical in each and every respect, then value of the two firms must be same. > As per M-M, if values of two forms are not same, the arbitrage will occur and this arbitrage will drive the value ofthe two firms together '§ MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS (MCQs) i, Accounting BEP helps to analyze the of the firm. a. Business risk b. Financing risk ©. Total Risk . None of them ii, The value of Sales at which EBIT is equal to zero is known as, a. Cash break-even point b. Financial break-even point . Accounting break-even point d. None of them il, Financial BEP is the amount of inwhich EPS is zero a Sales revenue b. Contribution margin oEsIT eT iv. Degree of operating leverage can be applied in measuring change a. EBIT toa percentage change in sales b. EPS to a percentage change in EBIT EPS to a percentage change in sales d. None of above v. The value of EBIT at which EPS is equal to zero is known as a. Cash breek-even point b. Financial break-even point «. Accounting break-even point d. None of them vi. The DTL of a firm whose contribution margin is Rs 60,000, fixed cost is Rs.30000 and pays an interest of Rs.10000 is: a. .times . 1.5 times c. 3times d, 3.25 times vil, DFL becomes zero when: a the firm does not have to pay any tax b. the firm does not earn any operating profit ©. the interest component equals the preferred dividend d, DFL will never become zero viii, If DOL and DFL for a firm are 3.5 and 1.20 respectively, it means that 1 percent change in sales will lead to___ change in EPs:FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 38 4.20 b. 3.50 0.2.92 1.20 ix. Under net income approach, the requited rate of retumn on equity a. changes linearly with the change leverage _b. remains constant C. increases as leverage decreases d. None of them x. In NOI Approach which of the following is constant? a. Cost of equity b. Cost of debt ©. Overall cost of capital and Kd. Cost of equity and cost of debt THEORITICAL QUESTIONS Brief Answer Questions 1, Define financial structure. How does it differ from capital structure? Illustrate with example, 1 target capital structure, a firm has minimized its cost of capital” Explain, 3 What is business risk? Mention the factors affecting business risk of a firm. 4, Differentiate between business risk and financial risk. 5. What do you understand by break-even analysis? What would be the effect of an increase in selling price and increased sales on the firm's operating break-even point? 6. What do you mean by cash break-even point? How it is calculated? 7. Define the financial break-even point. How it differs with accounting break-even-point? 8. Define operating leverage. How degree of operating leverage is calculated? 8. What does the value of DOL 3 times indicates? 10. Define operating leverage. How does it differ from financial leverage? 111, Firm A and Firm B have Financial BEP of Rs.50000 and Rs.125000 respectively. How do you ‘analyze the financing risk of these two firms? 12. Firm A and Firm B have DCL of 4 times and 6 times respectively. How do you analyze the ri these two firms? Descriptive Answer Questions 1. Define the term leverage with its types and significance. 2, Discuss Net Income and Net Operating Income Approaches to valuation of earnings of the company. 3. Compare and contrast NI approach with the NOI approach and explain in what respect these approaches differ from traditional view. 4, Capital structure changes are nothing of value in the perfect capital market world that MM assume Discuss, NUMERICAL PROBLEMS BRIEF ANSWER QUESTIONS 1. Sunrise corporate has fixed cost of Rs.2,00,000, SPPU and VCPU of 3.100 and Rs.50 respectively. Calculate accounting BEP both in units and rupee. of96 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya 2, Sulav Inc. has sales revenue of R5.10,00,000 and variable cost Rs.4,00,000. If the firm’s total ‘operating fixed cost is Rs.3,00,000, calculate break-even point 3. Neelgiri Corporation has its operating fixed cost of Rs.2,00,000 and variable cost ratio 0.40. Calculate its BEP. 4, Suytodaya Inc. has operating fixed cost Rs.200000, financial BEP in rupee Rs.50000. Its average product sell for Rs.100 per unit. The variable cost per unit ofthe firm is Rs.40. Calculate its financial BEP in units 5. Find the DOL if a firm sells 10,000 units @ Rs. per unit; variable cost is Rs.3 per unit and fixed operating cost is Rs.10,000. 6. Anmol enterprise has EBIT R5.100,000, and the firm has 10%, debenture R's.200,000 and 15% preferred stock Rs.1,00,000. The firm isin 40% tax rate, Calculate its DEL. 7. Kimbo Restro has EBIT of Rs.2,00,000 and financial BEP Rs.40,000. Calculate it DFL. 8. A firm has DOL of 2 times and DFL of 25 times. Its EBIT is currently Rs.20,000 and net income is. Rs.9,000, What is its degree of total leverage? If sales increases by 10 percent, what will be its new EBIT and net income? 9. Sunrise Enterprises has DOL, DFL and DCL are 1.5 times, 2 times and 3 times respectively. By how ‘much EPS of Sunrise will change if EBIT changes by 25%? 10, ABC firm has DOL and DCL of 1.5 times and 4 times respectively. By how much net income will change if EBIT will Change by 50%? DESCRIPTIVE ANSWER QUESTIONS PROBLEM 21 ‘The following information is available for Himalayan Inc. Selling price per unit = Rs.20 Variable cost per unit = Rs.12 Total fixed cots = Rs.560000 a, Calculate accounting break-even point both in quantity and rupee. bb. What should be the profit earned when the output és 100000 units? What should be the level of sales in units to achieve target profit of Rs.4,00,000? 70 ets Re TB Ri 2A 120000 we PROBLEM 22 ‘The following price and cost data are given for firms A, B, and C: FirmA | FirmB | Firm Selling price per unit (S) R825 Rs.i2 R515 Variable cost per unit (V) Rs.10 Rs RS Fixed operating cost (FC) Rs.30,000 | _Rs.24,000 | Rs.1,00,000 Calculate: ‘a, Accounting bresk-even point b. Cash break-even point for each firm, assuming Rs.5,000 of each firm’s fixed costs are depreciation. ‘c._Rank these firms in terms of their risk. 200 ts & REI 00 nts & ROO TOON ws & RE 000 b IGROT nls SET ws OO =e GBEAFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 7 PROBLEM 23 ‘The following relationship exists for Kumari Enterprises. Each unit of output is sold for R45; the fixed costs are Rs.175,000 of which R.110,000 is annual depreciation; variable costs are Rs.20 per unit. ‘a. What isthe firm’s gain or loss at sales of $,000 units? Of 12,000 units? . What isthe operating income break-even point? . What isthe cash break-even point? d. Assume the company is operating ata level of 4,000 units. Are creditors likely to seek the liquidation of the company if itis slow in paying its bills? is 50,000 125.00 7000 ts & RSIS 00 2 60 rts & RE AT7.00 6. No PROBLEM 24 Himalayan Beverages expects to earn R5.50,000 next year after taxes, Sales will be Rs.3,75,000, The firm is located near the shopging district surrounding a college. Its average product sel for RS.27 a unit ‘The variable cost per unit is R.14.85. Tax rate applicable to the store is 40 percent. ‘a, What are the fixed costs expected to be next year? b. Calculate the break-even point in both units and rupees. . If the company requires an after-tax profit of Rs,80,000, what sales volume in units the firm ‘must achieve? 1 R85 41S 016s, 705028 wns & RGIS S17 56 6 18008226 vols PROBLEM 25, LPC Trading Company's 2018 income statement is shown below: Particulars ‘Amount Sales revenue Rs.36,000 Less: variable cost 25200 Contribution margin (CM) 10,800 Less: Fixed operating cost 6.480 Earnings before interest taxes (EBIT) [4,320 Less: Interest 2880 Earnings before tax. 1.440 Less: Taxes @40% 576 Earnings after taxes (EAT) 864 Less: Preferred dividend 432 Earnings available to shareholders 432 a. Calculate Accounting BEP and Financial BEP. b. Compute the degree of operating leverage (DOL), degree of financial leverage (DOL). Degree of combined leverage (DCL). . Interpret the meaning of each of the numerical values you computed in part b Calculate the percentage change in EPS if sales changes by 30%. Briefly discuss some ways the company can reduce its degree of combined leverage. 1) Rs21,600 & Rs3,600b) 25 times, 6 mes & 15 times 450%98 CAPITAL STRUCUTURE AND LEVERAGE Pratap Shakya PROBLEM 26 Neco Airline’s fixed operating costs are Rs.5.8 milion, and its variable cost ratio is 0.20. The firm has, s.2 million in bonds outstanding with a coupon interest rate of 8 percent. Neco has 30000 shares of preferred stock outstanding, which pays Rs.2 annual dividend. There are 1,00,000 shares of common stock outstanding, Revenues forthe firm are Rs.8 million, and the firm is in the 40 percent tax rate. a. Compnte Neco's degree of operating leverage b. Compute its financial leverage. ¢. d. Compute its degree of combined leverage and interpret this value. By how much EPS will increase if Sales will increase by 40%? 0) 167 times b) 1.76 times 6) 18.83 times d) 733.2% PROBLEM 2.7 Hari and Associates has EBIT of Rs.67.500. Interest costs are Rs.22,500 and the firm has 15,000 share of common stock outstanding, Assume a 40 percent tax rate, a, Whatis the DFL of the firm? b. Ifthe firm also has 1,000 shares of preferred stock paying Rs.6 annual is the DFL? c._Why DFL in part b is higher? idend per share, what 1) ES Fines WLS fies PROBLEM 2.8 A firm has break-even sale of 45,000 units. Its selling price less variable cost per unit is Rs.9. Annual depreciation of the firm is RS.1,30,000. a Wha b. If the firm's cash fixed cost increases by 20 percent, what is its operating and cash break- even point? ©. What is the firm's degree of operating leverage if sales were 50,000 units? d.__ By what percentage the firm's EBIT increases if sales inereases by 10 percent? {)Rs2,75 000 b) SLL. nits & 36666.67 units ©) 10 times d) 100% he firm’s cash fixed cost PROBLEM 29 Given the following information of Firm A and B, Firm A: Break-point in units = 25000 units Total fixed cost = Rs.80000 Total revenue at BEP = Rs,200000 Firm B: Break-point in units Total fixed cost Total revenue at BEP ‘a. Whici firm has the higher operating leverage at given level of sales? Explain b. At what level of sales in units, do both firms earn the same operating profit? . Ifboth firms require an after tax profit of Rs.36,000, what isthe target unit of sales required in each firm? Assume corporate tax rate is 40% “DB 50000 ws) 43750 wets & 45000 vsFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 39 PROBLEM 2.10 Selected financial data for three firms are as follows: Firm A Firm B c ‘Average selling price per unit (S) R532 RSB75«RS.97 ‘Average variable cost per unit (¥) R817 S400, R87 Units sold (Q) 18,770 2500 11000 Fixed cost (FC) Rs.120,350 | Rs.850,000 _Rs.89,500 ‘What isthe profit (EBIT) for each company at the indicated sales volume? ‘What i the BEP in units for each company? ‘What isthe degree of operating leverage for each company at indicated sales volume? If sales were to decline, which firm suffer the largest relative decline in profitability? Rs 16120, Rs 33730, & Rs 203006) P35 wits, 173947 wns, $960 wns 1.75 times, 3.2 vimes, 537 times Fim C PROBLEM 2.11 A project has the following estimated data Selling price = Rs.57 per unit, variable costs = Rs.32 per unit; cash fixed cost = Rs.9000; interest rate = 12 percent; debt = Rs.18,000; initial investment = Rs 18000; life = 4 years. ‘a, Whats the accounting break-even point? b. What is the cash break-even quantity? ‘c. Whatis the financial break-even quantity?

You might also like

• Capital Structure and Financial Offering

  

  72% (25)

  Capital Structure and Financial Offering

  2 pages
• Capital Structure Theories

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure Theories

  26 pages
• Capital Structure - Set 1

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure - Set 1

  20 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  10 pages
• Unit - 3 Capital Structure & Leverage

  

  No ratings yet

  Unit - 3 Capital Structure & Leverage

  32 pages
• PPFM Unit-3 Capital Struture Decision and Firm Valuation

  

  No ratings yet

  PPFM Unit-3 Capital Struture Decision and Firm Valuation

  15 pages
• 202 FM Unit 4-Capital Structure Theories

  

  No ratings yet

  202 FM Unit 4-Capital Structure Theories

  49 pages
• Importance of Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Importance of Capital Structure

  9 pages
• Unit 04

  

  No ratings yet

  Unit 04

  68 pages
• 3. Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  3. Capital Structure

  11 pages
• Capital Structure Definition, Importance Factors Affecting

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure Definition, Importance Factors Affecting

  6 pages
• Capital Structure Analysis at Bharathi Cement

  

  100% (1)

  Capital Structure Analysis at Bharathi Cement

  21 pages
• Jai Narayan Vyas University Jodhpur Faculty of Law

  

  No ratings yet

  Jai Narayan Vyas University Jodhpur Faculty of Law

  9 pages
• Capital Structure Definiation

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure Definiation

  6 pages
• FM Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  FM Capital Structure

  5 pages
• Lecture 4 Notes

  

  No ratings yet

  Lecture 4 Notes

  8 pages
• capital sructure 2222

  

  No ratings yet

  capital sructure 2222

  63 pages
• Capitasl Expenditure (Final Project)

  

  100% (1)

  Capitasl Expenditure (Final Project)

  42 pages
• Module 2

  

  No ratings yet

  Module 2

  57 pages
• A Study On Capital Structure Best 2016 2020 Jemi Cluster

  

  No ratings yet

  A Study On Capital Structure Best 2016 2020 Jemi Cluster

  78 pages
• Capital S UltraTech Cement

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital S UltraTech Cement

  57 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  13 pages
• Amity University Kolkata: Fundamentals of Financial Management

  

  No ratings yet

  Amity University Kolkata: Fundamentals of Financial Management

  16 pages
• Chapter 1 Capital Structure Policy and Leverage FM-II 2015

  

  No ratings yet

  Chapter 1 Capital Structure Policy and Leverage FM-II 2015

  109 pages
• Finance Project Harsh Cap Management

  

  No ratings yet

  Finance Project Harsh Cap Management

  94 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  15 pages
• MS-109-Unit VIII

  

  No ratings yet

  MS-109-Unit VIII

  14 pages
• unit 6 capital structure

  

  No ratings yet

  unit 6 capital structure

  5 pages
• Capital Structure - Ambuja

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure - Ambuja

  14 pages
• Capital Structure - Bharati Cement

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure - Bharati Cement

  14 pages
• Unit Iv: Financing Decisions

  

  No ratings yet

  Unit Iv: Financing Decisions

  11 pages
• Concept of Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Concept of Capital Structure

  22 pages
• BTMC 138 UNIT 14

  

  No ratings yet

  BTMC 138 UNIT 14

  11 pages
• FM Unit 6

  

  No ratings yet

  FM Unit 6

  18 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  8 pages
• Capital Structure 1

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure 1

  12 pages
• CF UNIT 3

  

  No ratings yet

  CF UNIT 3

  21 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  7 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  100% (2)

  Capital Structure

  4 pages
• UNIT-IV Topic - Capital Structure and Its Theories Meaning and Concept of Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  UNIT-IV Topic - Capital Structure and Its Theories Meaning and Concept of Capital Structure

  15 pages
• Nawaz

  

  No ratings yet

  Nawaz

  67 pages
• FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SD PROJECT

  

  No ratings yet

  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SD PROJECT

  5 pages
• MBA Project On Working Capital

  

  No ratings yet

  MBA Project On Working Capital

  57 pages
• A Study on Capital Structure Its Impact on Profitability

  

  No ratings yet

  A Study on Capital Structure Its Impact on Profitability

  11 pages
• Capital Structure Final

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure Final

  27 pages
• FM Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  FM Capital Structure

  78 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  44 pages
• New Document 2

  

  No ratings yet

  New Document 2

  27 pages
• Bezu Aster Kema HW - 3

  

  No ratings yet

  Bezu Aster Kema HW - 3

  8 pages
• Chaitanya Chemicals - Capital Structure - 2018

  

  No ratings yet

  Chaitanya Chemicals - Capital Structure - 2018

  82 pages
• CTP - Chapter 3

  

  No ratings yet

  CTP - Chapter 3

  28 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  9 pages
• Lecture 9 Unit 2

  

  No ratings yet

  Lecture 9 Unit 2

  9 pages
• Capital Structure

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure

  6 pages
• CH 5

  

  No ratings yet

  CH 5

  10 pages
• Capital Structure in A Company: A Detailed Study: Hidayatullah National Law University Raipur, Chhattisgarh

  

  No ratings yet

  Capital Structure in A Company: A Detailed Study: Hidayatullah National Law University Raipur, Chhattisgarh

  16 pages
• Finance

  

  No ratings yet

  Finance

  6 pages
• UNIT - 4 CAPITALs - Tre

  

  No ratings yet

  UNIT - 4 CAPITALs - Tre

  20 pages