See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/345062499

A Smart Fire Detection System using IoT Technology With Automatic Water
Sprinkler.

Article in International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · October 2020
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v11i4.pp2994-3002

CITATIONS READS

52 35,518

3 authors, including:

Amgad Muneer
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
76 PUBLICATIONS 902 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Amgad Muneer on 31 October 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2020, pp. xx~xx
ISSN: 2088-8708, DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v9i4.ppxx-xx  101

A Smart Fire Detection System using IoT Technology

With Automatic Water Sprinkler
Hamood Alqourabah1, Amgad Muneer2, Suliman Mohamed Fati3
1,2
School of Mechatronics Engineering, Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation, Malaysia
3
College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Saudi Arabia

Article Info ABSTRACT

Article history: House combustion is one of the main concerns for builders, designers, and
property residents. Singular sensors were used for a long time in the event of
Received Sep 4, 2020 detection of a fire, but these sensors can not measure the amount of fire to alert
Revised Sep 21, 2020 the emergency response units. To address this problem, this study aims to
Accepted Oct 7, 2020 implement a smart fire detection system that would not only detect the fire
using integrated sensors but also alert property owners, emergency services,
and local police stations to protect lives and valuable assets simultaneously.
Keywords: The proposed model in this paper employs different integrated detectors, such
as heat, smoke, and flame. The signals from those detectors go through the
Fire Detection System system algorithm to check the fire's potentiality and then broadcast the
Internet of Things predicted result to various parties using GSM modem associated with the
Smart Water System system. To get real-life data without putting human lives in danger, an IoT
Ubidots Platform technology has been implemented to provide the fire department with the
GSM Network necessary data. Finally, the main feature of the proposed system is to minimize
Flame Sensor false alarms, which, in turn, makes this system more reliable. The experimental
results showed the superiority of our model in terms of affordability,
effectiveness, and responsiveness as the system uses the Ubidots platform,
which makes the data exchange faster and reliable.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.

Corresponding Author:
Amgad Muneer,
School of Engineering,
Asia Pacific University,
Technology Park, 57000 Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Email: [email protected]

1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, fire incidents have become a critical issue [1-3], which must be dealt with on time without
any unnecessary delay to avoid the loss in lives and belongings [4-10]. It is considered a fire situation when
the monitored temperature exceeds 50o C. In critical places such as hospitals, schools, and banks, personnel's
arrival time to come for help in fire hazards is around 15 minutes [11]. The statistics show that there are 475,500
structural fires annually in the United States, causing 2,950 civilian deaths, 12,775 civilian injuries, and $7.9
billion in property damage [12]. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), two-third of
U.S. household fires occur in premises with no working smoke alarms, alarms with no proper maintenance, or
misplaced alarms [13]. The appropriate allocation of fire alarms with a proactive warning could save lives and
reduce property losses [14], [15]. Particularly, there are many types of fire alarms as heat detectors and smoke
detectors [16]; studying these types helps to decide which type is more suitable for home or store. For instance,
heat detectors are classic options [17] when the temperature reaches a certain level. Thus, it is more suitable
for applications that rapid response is not required or in an environment where smoke detectors cannot be
placed like frozen areas. Heat detectors have a lower false alarm rate but still slower in response because the
temperature rises slowly [19]. With all these lacks, smoke detectors remain better than heat detectors [18].

Journal homepage: http:// /ijece.iaescore.com

102  ISSN: 2088-8708

Smoke alarms will more likely detect fires before it really starts. Smoke comes when the energy of an object
is consumed due to the loss of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) from heat [20]. Smoke detectors are classified into three
types: ionization, photoelectric, and combination. All these types can be studied further in instruments and
measurement books. In this study, we will highlight a brief description of ionization. In brief, ionization is a
radioactive material that receives radiation from the fire. It enters the ionization chamber, which is an air-filled
space between two electrodes and permits a small, constant current between the electrodes. This type is the
best for fast fires or fires caused by bombs or accidents [21].
The concept of Internet of things (IoT) nowadays is applied in many applications ranging from the
smart industry [33], smart agriculture [34] to smart healthcare [31], and smart home application [32]. Home
automation is an area where IoT has several advantages [35-37]. In the case of remote plant locations, for
example, technology enabling remote operation and maintenance will benefit; autonomous inter-appliance
such that devices are mutually aware of the information exchange, thereby minimizing engineering costs in
handling all devices involved. Nowadays, fires can get out of control because people intend to save money
rather than installing proper fire alarm systems. Some problems are still on, such as affordability, effectiveness,
and responsiveness [22-24]. Previous related works such as Network-Based Real-time Integrated Fire
Detection and Alarm (FDA) System with Building Automation [25] have been done to overcome these
problems.
Considering the aforementioned challenges, this study focuses on building an advanced fire alarm
using heat and smoke alarms. The system reads the flame, heat, and smoke data using IoT, analyzes these data,
and then quickly triggers the automatic water sprinkler. Thus, this study's importance is to provide a low-cost
fire alarm system considering the affordability, effectiveness, and responsiveness.
Many studies have been conducted to address these issues like [26-28]; however, fire detection issues
are not addressed properly since these systems rely on machine vision, where the algorithms need more images
to train, and the detection rate is not satisfactory. Other approaches like [29,30] suffer from some limitations,
mainly slow time responses and low accuracy. Thus, this paper aims to minimize false alarms, provide faster
response, and a new IoT approach than previous studies that used mostly Node-Red. The contribution is as
follows: (1) To determine which combinations and algorithms of sensors can accurately and quickly detect
fires, (2) We have designed and then developed a system that detects fire and activates the fire alarm, (3) the
proposed system evaluates the situation and initiates an automatic water sprinkler where the water unit was
designed separately, and (4) the system analyses the collected data using Ubidots platform which results in a
faster response. Thus, the highlighted four points make the proposed system superior in terms of affordability,
effectiveness, and responsiveness.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives an overview of the methodology
adopted for the proposed research and described the experimental model. Results are discussed in Section 3
while; the conclusion and the future work are given in Section 4.

2. RESEARCH METHOD
Smart Fire Detection System with Automatic Water sprinkler has been developed to solve the slow
response issue of fire accidents. The inputs provide readings for the system to analyze, such as sensors and Wi-
Fi module that works as a transmitter for the sensor readings. Temperature, gas, and flame sensors are inputs.
The readings from the inputs are displayed on the web page. Outputs like LED and Buzzer indicate a fire. The
water system is lunched with a 12V water pump powered by Arduino and Controlled by a 5V relay. The
sprinkler head is the outer of the water output. An ultrasonic sensor is used to measure the tank level and inform
the need for refilling. Moreover, batteries are suppling the circuitry and the pump. The pump is 12V that cannot
get powered by an Arduino. Relay is used as a switch to control the 12v motor that pumps water required from
the tank. In addition to the microcontroller used, a Multiplexer is also used to deal with Analog and Digital
lack of pins.

2.1 Block Diagram

According to Figure 1, in case of fire, flame, temperature, and gas sensors send continuous readings to
the Arduino. Updated readings are sent into a Wifi module that translates the data into a graphical and statistical
manner. A web page created to analyze the data and a response extracted conditionally to launch a water
sprinkler as shown. Batteries feed the system as a back-up source while the primary Alternating Current (AC)
source function.

Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2020 : xx - xx

Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708  103

Figure 1. Block Diagram of Smart Fire Detection System with Automatic Water Sprinkler

2.2 Flowchart
Figure 2 depicts the proposed fire detection system with an automatic water sprinkler. As described in
the figure, the Arduino Mega controls the sensors to extract reading from the surroundings. Each indicator for
these readings has a threshold to check the potentiality and criticality of fire. For example, the temperature
exceeds 80C, CO2 exceeds 30%, and/or flames detection. Smoke and flame, indicators of fire criticality,
represent the extra needed readings to see fire plus, if one sensor does not work, then back up reading is
required. If the above thresholds are met, the water system would be activated to stop the danger. The 12V
pump sucks water from the tank to pass into the sprinkler head through the pipe. An ultrasonic sensor reads the
water level on the tank. The feedback is linked to IoT updates that control the water pump with other sensors
that detected fire. Besides, LED and Buzzer are used in the system as visual evidence to show danger.
NodeMCU stores data and display continuous reading on a smartphone.

Figure 2. Flowchart of the Proposed System

2.3 Placements of the sensors (Real life application)
Figure 3 depicts the proposed prototype of a fire detector system in which a room is equipped with
Gas, Temperature, and flame sensors propagated to ensure fast readings, water sprinklers are equally
distributed, a router of the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) module is added, and accessories
such as LED and Buzzer. The prototype is a testing stand for fire with an emergency backup of the water
system.

A Smart Fire Detection System using IoT with Automatic Water Sprinkler (Alqourabah)
104  ISSN: 2088-8708

Figure 3. Components Placements in Real-Life with the additional GSM router

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this section, several tests have been conducted to carry out the objectives of the study and get more
accurate values with precision. Therefore, efficiency becomes higher with accurate readings; thus, the testing
is conducting on seven elements because a smart fire detection system is a life linked matter, so accuracy
matters.

3.1. Flame Sensor

A flame sensor is programmed to detect light that falls into a specific range of wavelengths. The
sensor follows the visible spectrum. Specifications indicated that the range of detection is acceptable up to
33cm. The changes are between distance and wavelength values; the more the distance, the more the nm
increase. The accuracy is higher when the distance is closer. Accuracy is higher when the distance is lower. In
5cm, the reading is 26, which is far from 100; less than 100 fire is detected. In 30cm, the reading is 97, which
is critically close to 100, and sensors vary within close range, so it can go more than 100 in thunder moment
and not detecting fire due to sensitivity. Figure 4 illustrates the flame sensor detection result.

Flame Sensor Detection

120 97
88
100
Wavelength

66
80
44 48
60
26
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40
Distance

Figure 4. Flame Sensor Detection results. Figure 5. Result of temperature sensor accuracy

Furthermore, the experimental result indicates that the distance is proportionally linked with
wavelength. Ideally, the flame sensor would be more accurate if it is placed within a range of 10cm to 15cm
from the targeted point.

3.2. Temperature Sensor

Table 1 demonstrates the accuracy of the temperature sensor; the results are compared with infrared
thermometer readings. By using a lighter near the sensor to raise the temperature, the reading was conducted.
The readings accuracy does not follow a pattern because the sensor is linked to formula and voltage varying
from the microcontroller.

Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2020 : xx - xx

Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708  105

Table 1. Accuracy of temperature sensor

Measured Infrared Error%= Accuracy%(100-

𝑨𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍−𝑴𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅
Temperature Thermometer 𝒙𝟏𝟎𝟎 Error)
𝑨𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍
Reading
°
23 𝑪 25𝐶 ° 8% 92%
° ° 9.89% 90.1%
41𝑪 45.5𝐶
° ° 0.96% 99.04%
62𝑪 62.6𝐶

80𝑪° 85𝐶 ° 5.9% 94.1%

87𝑪° 88.2𝐶 ° 1.36% 98.6%

Figure 5 indicates that results are accurate and can be used practically. Due to the voltage varying and
formula used to convert the voltage into temperature, the results can be affected by the delay, so the water
pump is not linked to a temperature reading.

3.3. Gas Sensor

Table 2 shows that any increment in voltage means rising in gas concentration. MQ-5 can detect Co,
methane, and alcohol. The sensor function according to its sensitivity by using a formula to convert the voltage
into estimated numbers of gas concentration. The sensor's accuracy is hard to tell because the reading is based
on converting voltage into a percentage by using a mathematical approach. Accuracy can be justified to be
acceptable, taking self-observing even though no referencing point is taken.
Table 2. Expermintal result Gas Sensor
Voltage Gas Concentration
(Co) %
0.45 7%
0.9 10%
1.6 19%
2.2 29%
2.8 33%

3.4. Automatic Water System

The delay time is tested according to the response time of the flame sensor. The water pump is connected
into a relay switch; if a flame is detected, a delay is counted to switch on the relay that activates the water
pump. The flame sensor detects lights wavelengths that are less than 100nm. Once fire detected, the relay
switch on. The water pump activated and suck water from the tank and release it into the water sprinkler. The
tested part is how many seconds it took the relay to switch on after fire is detected. Figure 6 illustrates the
automatic water sprinkler unit design. Therefore, the experimental response time results obtained over the
distance is demonstrated in Figure 7.

Figure 6. Automatic Water System Working Diagram Figure 7. Response time Vs Distance

Therefore, Hsu et al. [38] have developed a kitchen fire detection system with the same sensors employed
in this study. However, the system was mainly functioning to warn the residents with loud sounds if a flame
was detected and let them monitor the kitchen stove using the Line app to reduce the loss. In Hsu et al. [38]
work, no automatic water sprinkler unit was involved, making the system not sufficient and reliable to minimize
the fire or turn it off. A different system was proposed by [40], where the authors used temperature, flame,
Carbon Monoxide (CO), and humidity sensors. The system is designed to notify the owner using SMS;

A Smart Fire Detection System using IoT with Automatic Water Sprinkler (Alqourabah)
106  ISSN: 2088-8708

however, their system has an average delay of less than 30 seconds to achieve its desired functionality. While
the proposed approach in this study obtained an average response of 5 seconds

3.4. Integrated System

Table 3 demonstrates that six types of testing were conducted in a continuous attempt to observe the
sensors' changes. Six continuous readings have been carried out to establish firefighting. In the beginning, the
flame sensor was exposed to flame. However, no fire was detected due to response time. All the testing is
continuous and studied every 5 seconds. In testing 2, 3, and 4, the fire was detected and dealt with a water
sprinkler that stops when the flame sensor is 1024. Moreover, the water level is monitored with the response
time.
Table 3. Expermental results of the system
NO Flame Temperature Gas Status Water Water Response
Reading Reading Concentration Sprinkler Tank Time
Level

1 1024 30.4 C° 3% No Fire OFF 100% None

2 34 56.2 C° 12% Fire ON 88% 2 Seconds
3 22 64.5 C° 22% Fire ON 53% 3 Seconds
4 10 68 C° 66% Fire ON 33% 2 Seconds
5 1024 39 C° 35% No Fire OFF 20% 4 Seconds
6 1024 31.2 C° 21% No Fire OFF 20% None

3.5. Results and Prototyping

The software results are shown on the Arduino window and the Ubidots platform. Figure 8 displays
the readings on the Ubidots dashboard that linked to Arduino coding from the sensors. The readings came from
temperature, gas, flame, ultrasonic, and battery. There are three indicators for temperature, gas, and flame
sensors; the temperature goes from 0 Celsius to 100 Celsius. The gas sensor takes two displays; one is an
indicator for the voltage, one for gas percentage. Ultrasonic gives water level percentage by measuring the
distance of water from the container cap. The battery percentage is measured with the voltage divider rule, and
it is displayed on the dashboard.

Figure 8. Expermintal result of IoT with Ubidots

When a flame sensor detects light that ranges from 760nm to 1100nm, fire is detected, and data are
collected into the IoT platform of Ubidots. Ubidots sends SMS messages into a signed phone number to alert
the user that there is a fire threat, as shown in Figure 9 (a). Therefore, the authors in [39] have proposed a fire
detection system based IoT using a gateway protocol and flame sensor with Arduino. However, the system was
designed to warn the property owner via email if a fire was detected, unlike our system, which alerts the
property owner by sending direct SMS messages. Also, there is no automatic water sprinkler unit implemented.
This approach is time-consuming and not sufficient compared to the proposed approach in this study.
Figure 9 (b) illustrates the developed experimental model front view, which shows three units
integrated with a solid metallic prototype. The joints are eight to support the corners and edges. The water tank
is placed on top to make use of gravity when water flows to the bucket. The testing chamber will carry the

Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2020 : xx - xx

Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708  107

flame, gas, and temperature sensors. The water unit will carry two containers for water and a water pump
attached to the water sprinkler. The electronics will form the brain of the operation with IoT included.

Figure 9. (a) Sending SMS message into a signed phone number to alert the owner of properties; (b)
The developed expermintal model.
4. CONCLUSION
The fire detection systems proposed in the literature served fire stopping with no care of the
responsiveness. Thus, this study considers the existing issues and build an efficient and effective fire detection
system based on IoT technology, gas, temperature, and smoke sensors to collect the data accurately and rapidly.
The continuous readings sent over WIFI modules to the central unit to analyze the data and trigger the water
sprinkle. This system structure enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of fire detection. Moreover, using the
Ubidots platform in this system made the data exchange faster and reliable. However, this study's proposed
approach obtained an average response of 5 seconds to detect the fire and alert the property owner. Meanwhile,
the water pump activated to suck water from the tank and release it into the water sprinkler to minimize the
fire until the property owners and emergency services reached. Hence, the proposed system overcame the
challenges of the issues of affordability, effectiveness, and responsiveness. The proposed system still needs
further enhancements. Thus, one of the enhancement directions is integrating machine learning with the system
to predict the potentiality of fire based on the collected data from different sources. Machine learning may help
the operators find and overcome the vulnerabilities in their building to prevent fire instead of detection only.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

REFERENCES
[1] Bu, F. and Gharajeh, M.S., 2019. Intelligent and vision-based fire detection systems: A survey. Image and Vision
Computing, 91, p.103803.
[2] Saeed, F., Paul, A., Rehman, A., Hong, W.H. and Seo, H., 2018. IoT-based intelligent modeling of smart home
environment for fire prevention and safety. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 7(1), p.11.
[3] Saeed, F., Paul, A., Karthigaikumar, P. and Nayyar, A., 2019. Convolutional neural network based early fire
detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp.1-17.
[4] Shokouhi, M., Nasiriani, K., Khankeh, H., Fallahzadeh, H. and Khorasani-Zavareh, D., 2019. Exploring barriers and
challenges in protecting residential fire-related injuries: a qualitative study. Journal of injury and violence
research, 11(1), p.81.
[5] Kodur, V., Kumar, P. and Rafi, M.M., 2019. Fire hazard in buildings: review, assessment and strategies for improving
fire safety. PSU Research Review.
[6] Salhi, L., Silverston, T., Yamazaki, T. and Miyoshi, T., 2019, January. Early Detection System for Gas Leakage and
Fire in Smart Home Using Machine Learning. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics
(ICCE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[7] Gong, F., Li, C., Gong, W., Li, X., Yuan, X., Ma, Y. and Song, T., 2019. A real-time fire detection method from
video with multifeature fusion. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019.
[8] Mahzan, N.N., Enzai, N.M., Zin, N.M. and Noh, K.S.S.K.M., 2018, June. Design of an Arduino-based home fire
alarm system with GSM module. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1019, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP
Publishing.
[9] Suresh, S., Yuthika, S. and Vardhini, G.A., 2016, November. Home based fire monitoring and warning system.
In 2016 International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[10] Kanwal, K., Liaquat, A., Mughal, M., Abbasi, A.R. and Aamir, M., 2017. Towards development of a low cost early
fire detection system using wireless sensor network and machine vision. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(2),
pp.475-489.

A Smart Fire Detection System using IoT with Automatic Water Sprinkler (Alqourabah)
 108  ISSN: 2088-8708

[11] Khalaf, O.I., Abdulsahib, G.M. and Zghair, N.A.K., 2019. IOT fire detection system using sensor with Arduino.
[12] Desima, M.A., Ramli, P., Ramdani, D.F. and Rahman, S., 2017, November. Alarm system to detect the location of
IOT-based public vehicle accidents. In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design
(ICCED) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[13] Ahrens, M., 2019. Smoke alarms in US home fires. National Fire Protection Association.
[14] Shah, R., Satam, P., Sayyed, M.A. and Salvi, P., 2019. Wireless Smoke Detector and Fire Alarm System.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET).
[15] Nfpa.org. NFPA - Data, Research, And Tools. [online] Available: https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Data-
research-and-tools 2018
[16] Lee, D. and Kim, B., 2019. Study on Detecting Fires and Finding Rescuers. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard
Mitigation, 19(1), pp.225-230.
[17] Liu, Z. “Review of Recent Developments in Fire Detection Technologies”. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering,
13(2), pp.129-151, 2003.
[18] Mowrer, F.” Lag times associated with fire detection and suppression”. Fire Technology, 26(3), pp.244-265, 2010.
[19] Gong, F., Li, C., Gong, W., Li, X., Yuan, X., Ma, Y. and Song, T., 2019. A real-time fire detection method from
video with multifeature fusion. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019.
[20] Fonollosa, J.; Solórzano, A.; Marco, S. Chemical Sensor Systems and Associated Algorithms for Fire Detection: A
Review. Sensors 2018, 18, 553.
[21] Moinuddin, K., Bruck, D. and Shi, L. “An experimental study on timely activation of smoke alarms and their effective
notification in typical residential buildings”. Fire Safety Journal, 93, pp.1-11, 2017.
[22] Taha, I.A. and Marhoon, H.M., 2018. Implementation of controlled robot for fire detection and extinguish to closed
areas based on Arduino. Telkomnika, 16(2), pp.654-664.
[23] Willstrand, O., Karlsson, P. and Brandt, J., 2015. Fire detection & fire alarm systems in heavy duty vehicles: WP1–
Survey of fire detection in vehicles.
[24] Desima, M.A., Ramli, P., Ramdani, D.F. and Rahman, S., 2017, November. Alarm system to detect the location of
IOT-based public vehicle accidents. In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design
(ICCED) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[25] Anwar, F., Boby, R., Rashid, M., Alam, M. and Shaikh, Z, “ Network-Based Real-time Integrated Fire Detection and
Alarm (FDA) System with Building Automation”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 260,
p.012025, 2017.
[26] Asif, O., Hossain, M.B., Hasan, M., Rahman, M.T. and Chowdhury, M.E., 2014. Fire-detectors review and design of
an automated, quick responsive fire-alarm system based on SMS. Int'l J. of Communications, Network and System
Sciences, 7(09), p.386.
[27] Bayoumi, S., AlSobky, E., Almohsin, M., Altwaim, M., Alkaldi, M. and Alkahtani, M., 2013, December. A real-time
fire detection and notification system based on computer vision. In 2013 International Conference on IT Convergence
and Security (ICITCS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[28] Sowah, R.A., Apeadu, K., Gatsi, F., Ampadu, K.O. and Mensah, B.S., 2020. Hardware Module Design and Software
Implementation of Multisensor Fire Detection and Notification System Using Fuzzy Logic and Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNNs). Journal of Engineering, 2020.
[29] Silvani, X., Morandini, F. & Innocenti, E. (2014) Evaluation of a Wireless Sensor Network with Low Cost and Low
Energy Consumption for Fire Detection and Monitoring. Fire Technology (Springer, US). 3(12). p 51-4.
[30] Herutomo, A., Abdurohman, M., Suwastika, N.A., Prabowo, S. and Wijiutomo, C.W., 2015, May. Forest fire
detection system reliability test using wireless sensor network and OpenMTC communication platform. In 2015 3rd
International conference on information and communication technology (ICoICT) (pp. 87-91). IEEE.
[31] Muneer, A. and Fati, S.M., 2019. Automated Health Monitoring System Using Advanced Technology. Journal of
Information Technology Research (JITR), 12(3), pp.104-132.
[32] Muneer, A., Fati, S.M. and Fuddah, S., 2020. Smart health monitoring system using IoT based smart fitness
mirror. Telkomnika, 18(1), pp.317-331.
[33] Faraci, G., Raciti, A., Rizzo, S.A. and Schembra, G., 2020. Green wireless power transfer system for a drone fleet
managed by reinforcement learning in smart industry. Applied Energy, 259, p.114204.
[34] Ayaz, M., Ammad-Uddin, M., Sharif, Z., Mansour, A. and Aggoune, E.H.M., 2019. Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based
smart agriculture: Toward making the fields talk. IEEE Access, 7, pp.129551-129583.
[35] Hamdan, O., Shanableh, H., Zaki, I., Al-Ali, A.R. and Shanableh, T., 2019, January. IoT-based interactive dual mode
smart home automation. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) (pp. 1-2). IEEE.
[36] Vishwakarma, S.K., Upadhyaya, P., Kumari, B. and Mishra, A.K., 2019, April. Smart energy efficient home
automation system using iot. In 2019 4th international conference on internet of things: Smart innovation and usages
(IoT-SIU) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[37] Tayyaba, S., Khan, S.A., Ashraf, M.W. and Balas, V.E., 2020. Home Automation Using IOT. In Recent Trends and
Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (pp. 343-388). Springer, Cham.
[38] Hsu, W.L., Jhuang, J.Y., Huang, C.S., Liang, C.K. and Shiau, Y.C., 2019. Application of Internet of Things in a
Kitchen Fire Prevention System. Applied Sciences, 9(17), p.3520.
[39] Khalaf, O.I., Abdulsahib, G.M. and Zghair, N.A.K., 2019. IOT fire detection system using sensor with Arduino.
[40] Mahgoub, A., Tarrad, N., Elsherif, R., Al-Ali, A. and Ismail, L., 2019, July. IoT-based fire alarm system. In 2019
Third World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems Security and Sustainablity (WorldS4) (pp. 162-166). IEEE.

Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2020 : xx - xx

View publication stats