Broad and Narrow Transcription
Broad and Narrow Transcription
This section deals with Phonetic transcription. Basically, we shall study the two main forms of
phonetic transcription i.e. broad and narrow transcription as we lay a foundation for future
studies in phonetics and phonology.
Topic Objectives
By the end of this topic you should be able to:
Define phonetic transcription.
Distinguish between broad and narrow transcription.
Explain and illustrate broad and narrow transcriptions.
Carry out a variety of transcription exercises.
Phonetic transcription
Phonetic transcription is the visual representation of speech sounds (or phones) by means
of symbols. The most common type of phonetic transcription uses a phonetic alphabet, such as
the International Phonetic Alphabet.
Most phonetic transcription is based on the assumption that linguistic sounds are segmentable
into discrete units that can be represented by symbols. Many different types of transcription, or
"notation", have been tried out: these may be divided into Alphabetic (which are based on the
same principle as that which governs ordinary alphabetic writing, namely that of using one single
simple symbol to represent each sound), and Analphabetic (notations which are not alphabetic)
which represent each sound by a composite symbol made up of a number of signs put together.
Broad transcription indicates only the most noticeable phonetic features of an utterance, whereas
narrow transcription encodes more information about the phonetic characteristics of
the allophones in the utterance. The difference between broad and narrow is a continuum, but the
difference between phonemic and phonetic transcription is usually treated as a binary distinction.
For example, one particular pronunciation of the English word title may be transcribed using the
IPA as /ˈtaɪtəl/ (broad, phonemic transcription) or [ˈtaɪɾɫ̩ ] (narrow, allophonic transcription); the
former transcription, placed between slashes, indicates merely that the word ends with the
phoneme /l/, but the other transcription, placed between square brackets, indicates that the
final /l/ ([ɫ]) is dark (velarized or pharyngealized). Continuing with this example, in North
American English, the phoneme /t/ when it occurs after a stressed vowel and precedes an
unstressed syllable beginning with a vowel or a syllabic /l/ or /n/ is normally pronounced as a
flap or tap (t-/d-flapping) resembling a brief /d/, for which the phonetic symbol is [ɾ]:
consequently there is little or no audible difference between the pronunciation
of title [ˈtaɪɾɫ̩ ] and tidal /'taɪdəl/]. Indeed, middle /ˈmɪdəl/; [ˈmɪɾɫ̩ ] is a perfect rhyme of little in
most North American accents.
The advantage of the narrow transcription is that it can help learners to produce exactly the right
sound, and allows linguists to make detailed analyses of language variation. The disadvantage is
that a narrow transcription is rarely representative of all speakers of a language. While most
Americans, Canadians and Australians would pronounce the /t/ of little as a tap [ɾ], many
speakers in southern England would pronounce /t/ as [ʔ] (a glottal stop; t-glottalization) and/or
the second /l/ as a vowel resembling [ʊ] (L-vocalization), possibly yielding [ˈlɪʔʊ].
The advantage of broad transcription is that it usually allows statements to be made which apply
across a more diverse language community. It is thus more appropriate for the pronunciation data
in foreign language dictionaries, which may discuss phonetic details in the preface but rarely
give them for each entry. A rule of thumb in many linguistics contexts is therefore to use a
narrow transcription when it is necessary for the point being made, but a broad transcription
whenever possible. Below is a transcription of some English words.