MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

CLEARED
For Open Publication
By kempr on Apr 24, 2023

Department of Defense
OFFICE OF PREPUBLICATION AND SECURITY REVIEW

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

Mobile Protected Firepower

(MPF)
FY 2024 President's Budget
Defense Acquisition Visibility
Environment (DAVE)

UNCLASSIFIED 1
 MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Table of Contents

Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

Program Information .............................................................................................................................................................. 5
Responsible Office................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Mission and Description ........................................................................................................................................................ 6
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 7
Schedule ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
Performance ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Acquisition Budget Estimate ............................................................................................................................................... 16
Unit Cost .............................................................................................................................................................................. 18
Risks .................................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Low Rate Initial Production ................................................................................................................................................. 20
Contracts .............................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Deliveries and Expenditures................................................................................................................................................. 24
Operating and Support Costs ............................................................................................................................................... 25

UNCLASSIFIED 2
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

$B - Billions of Dollars
$K - Thousands of Dollars
$M - Millions of Dollars
ACAT - Acquisition Category
Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance
ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
Blk - Block
BY - Base Year
CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description
CDD - Capability Development Document
CLIN - Contract Line Item Number
CPD - Capability Production Document
CY - Calendar Year
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
DoD - Department of Defense
DSN - Defense Switched Network
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
EVM - Earned Value Management
FMS - Foreign Military Sales
FOC - Full Operational Capability
FRP - Full Rate Production
FY - Fiscal Year
FYDP - Future Years Defense Program
ICE - Independent Cost Estimate
Inc - Increment
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council
KPP - Key Performance Parameter
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
MDA - Milestone Decision Authority
MDAP - Major Defense Acquisition Program
MILCON - Military Construction
N/A - Not Applicable
O&M - Operations and Maintenance
O&S - Operating and Support
ORD - Operational Requirements Document
OSD - Office of the Secretary of Defense
PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost
PB - President's Budget
PE - Program Element

UNCLASSIFIED 3
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

PEO - Program Executive Officer

PM - Program Manager
POE - Program Office Estimate
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
SCP - Service Cost Position
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
U.S. - United States
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting
USD(A&S) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment)
USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)

UNCLASSIFIED 4
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Program Information
Program Name
Mobile Protected Firepower

DoD Component
Army

Responsible Office
Program Manager
Name: DAVID J. DOPP, JR Phone: (586) 282-0114

Email: [email protected]
-

UNCLASSIFIED 5
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Mission and Description

The Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) system is a U.S. Army program to procure a light tank that is capable of providing
Infantry Brigades a protected, long range, precision direct fire capability to neutralize enemy prepared positions and bunkers and
defeat heavy machine guns and armored vehicle threats during offensive operations or when conducting defensive operations. On
25 Sep 2018, the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE) approved the use of Middle Tier Acquisition (MTA) authorities to execute
MPF Rapid Prototyping. On June 24, 2022, the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE) approved both an MTA Outcome
Determination (OD) that transitioned MPF to the Adaptive Acquisition Framework (AAF) Major Capability Acquisition (MCA)
pathway as an Acquisition Category (ACAT) 1B Program, as well as the MPF Milestone C (MS C) and entry into LRIP. On June
28, 2022, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) was awarded the MPF LRIP contract.

UNCLASSIFIED 6
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Executive Summary
MPF

Program Highlights Since Last Report

This is the initial SAR submission for the MPF program. On September 25, 2018, the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE)
approved the use of Middle Tier Acquisition (MTA) authorities to execute MPF Rapid Prototyping. On June 24, 2022, the Army
Acquisition Executive (AAE) approved both an MTA Outcome Determination (OD) that transitioned MPF to the Adaptive
Acquisition Framework (AAF) Major Capability Acquisition (MCA) pathway as an Acquisition Category (ACAT) 1B Program,
as well as the MPF Milestone C (MS C) and entry into Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). On June 28, 2022, General
Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) was awarded the MPF LRIP contract. FY 2024 President's Budget (PB) funding is adequate to
meet cost, schedule, and performance objectives. There are no significant software-related issues with this program currently.

History of Significant Developments Since Program Initiation

History of Significant Developments Since Program Initiation
Date Significant Development Description
Aug - 2022 Acquisition Program Baseline Approved
Jun - 2022 Capability Development Document- Update Approved
Jun - 2022 Low Rate Initial Production Contract Award to General Dynamics Land Systems
Jun - 2022 Milestone C Army Cost Position Approved
Jun - 2022 Milestone C Army System Acquisition Review Council (ASARC)
Jun - 2022 MPF Designated ACAT IB
Jan - 2022 Pre-Production Prove-Out Test Completion
Nov - 2021 Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Request for Proposal (RFP) Release
Oct - 2021 Limited User Test (LUT) Completion
Sep - 2021 Soldier Vehicle Assessment (SVA) Completion
Jun - 2020 Initial Prototype Delivery
Dec - 2018 Rapid Prototyping Contracts Awarded
Sep - 2018 Middle Tier of Acquisition Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP) Authorization
Jun - 2018 Capabilities Development Document (CDD) Approved
Middle Tier of Acquisition-Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP) Request for Proposal (RFP)
Nov - 2017
Release
Sep - 2017 Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Completed
Oct - 2016 Materiel Development Decision (MDD)
Feb - 2016 Designated a New Start program in the FY17 President's Budget Submission
Dec - 2015 Initial Capabilities Development approval by the Joint Req. Oversight Council

UNCLASSIFIED 7
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Schedule
MPF

Milestone
Current Baseline Current
Events Baseline Deviation
Objective/Threshold Estimate/Actual
Objective

Milestone C Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Jun 2022 Jun 2022 Jun 2022 Jun 2022
Decision-Low-Rate Initial Production Decision (Start)

LRIP Initial Delivery Nov 2023 May 2024

Live Fire Test & Evaluation (FUSL) Dec 2023 Jun 2024

Initial Operational Test & Evaluation Aug 2024 Feb 2025

Milestone C Full-Rate Production Decision Mar 2025 Sep 2025
First Unit Equipped Aug 2025 Feb 2026

Initial Operational Capability Sep 2027 Mar 2028

Notes
In accordance with the MPF Capability Development Document Update (CDD-U), signed June 24, 2022, the number of assets
required to attain FUE is one Company set of 14 MPFs, while one Battalion set of 42 MPFs is required to achieve IOC. The CDD
-U defines the number of assets required for FOC as the complete AAO of 504 MPFs.

Deviation Explanation

UNCLASSIFIED 8
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Performance
MPF

Performance Characteristics
Demonstrated Current
Milestone Baseline Current Baseline Objective/Threshold Deviation
Performance Estimate/Actual
(KPP)7 Protection - KPP 1 Force Protection
MPF should be MPF shall protect TBD. Program will Initial analysis
capable of the crew from update pending results indicates that the
protecting the crew small arms, heavy of LRIP phase testing. program will
from Explosive machine gun, meet the
Formed Penetrators overhead artillery, threshold.
(EEPs), chemical underbelly mine,
energy (CE) threats side IED, and
and integrating VPS kinetic energy
through the use the (KE) threats. It
Army's Modular will protect the
Active Protection crew from serious
System (MAPS) soft or greater injuries
-kill program due to onboard
currently in fires, various
development. blasts, shock,
overpressure,
fragments, spall,
and accelerated
effects of attack by
the specified
threats. MPF shall
extinguish fires in
the crew
compartment with
an automatic fire
suppression
system.
(KPP)7 Protection - KPP 2 System Survivability (Cyber)
MPF will survive MPF shall seek to TBD. Program will Initial analysis
against the objective employ safeguards update pending results indicates that the
threats outlined in leverage built-in of LRIP phase testing. program will
the classified annex. test to inform meet the
operators of threshold.
potentially
malicious cyber
activity to aid in
prevention,
mitigation, and
recovery from
cyber-attacks
(deny, degrade,
and destroy cyber

UNCLASSIFIED 9
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

(KPP)7 Protection - KPP 2 System Survivability (Cyber)

systems as well as
exploitation of
data). To the extent
possible, and
toward future
growth, the MPF
shall seek the
capacity to
authenticate
messaging across
internal data links/
interchange(s). To
the extent possible,
the MPF shall
check for
anomalous activity
on interchanges
and seek ways to
segregate sub-
system functions if
anomalous activity
is detected. MPF
must be able to
perform critical
mission functions
and operate fully
mission capable
with a degraded or
no network
connection. MPF
shall meet
assessment and
authorization
requirements per
DoDI 8500-Series
(RMF), 5200.44,
and 5200.39; and
use NSA-
approved crypto
for wireless
communications.
MPF's prevent,
mitigate, and
recover
capabilities must
be capable of
withstanding ATT
3-level cyber-
attack TTPs.

UNCLASSIFIED 10
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

(KPP)7 Protection - KPP 2 System Survivability (Kinetic)

MPF will survive MPF shall survive TBD. Program will Initial analysis
against the objective against designated update pending results indicates that the
threats outlined in threat weapon of LRIP phase testing. program will
the classified annex. systems, outlined meet the
in the classified threshold.
annex, on the
contemporary
battlefield while
maintaining its
ability to perform
its primary
mission, to include
in the degraded
mode (defined as
anything less than
full operational
capability) during
a single mission,
when attacked by
any of the defined
threats. MPF shall
extinguish fires in
the engine
compartment with
an automatic fire
suppression
system. MPF shall
incorporate
thermal and visual
signature
management
capabilities. The
MPF is designated
CBRN Mission
Critical IAW DoDI
3150.09. The MPF
shall ensure that
CBRN
contaminates can
effectively be
removed using
standard
decontamination
processes. The
MPF shall
withstand High
Altitude
Electromagnetic
Pulse (HEMP); it
is not expected to
survive exposure
to other initial
nuclear effects (i.e.,
blast, thermal,

UNCLASSIFIED 11
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

etc.).
Accomplishment
of the mission
requires the
ability to shoot,
move and
communicate
with no more than
one full vehicle
reboot. Non-
mission essential
GFE and MEP
equipment are
exempt.

(KPP)6. Net-Centric - KPP 3 Net Ready

Sufficient SWaP-C Sufficient SWaP-C TBD. Program will Initial analysis
to facilitate to facilitate update pending results indicates that the
integration of integration of of LRIP phase testing. program will
network network meet the
technologies technologies threshold.
currently found on currently found on
existing Infantry existing Infantry
Brigade vehicles. Brigade vehicles.
(KPP)4. Logistics - KPP 4 Sustainment (Materiel Availability (Am))
85.1% The MPF over a TBD. Program will Initial analysis
26-year life cycle update pending results indicates that the
shall average a of LRIP phase testing. program will
Material meet the
Availability (Am) threshold.
of 76.7%.
(KPP)4. Logistics - KPP 4 Sustainment (Operational Availability (Ao))
An MPF shall have The MPF must TBD. Program will Initial analysis
an Ao of 96% when provide a 90% update pending results indicates that the
measured Operational of LRIP phase testing. program will
continuously across Readiness (OR) meet the
the 30 day scenario Rate. The MPF threshold.
in the MPF shall have an Ao
OMS/MP (Seize sufficient to
Initiative, Dominate, maintain at least 8
Stability phases) of 14 (57%) MPF
in a company
available at least
90% of the time
measured across
the Seize Initiative
Phase of the
OMS/MP (72
hours).

UNCLASSIFIED 12
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

(KPP)1. Force Support - KPP 5 Training

95% critical tasks Accomplish 80% TBD. Program will Initial analysis
or greater of the update pending results indicates that the
critical tasks of LRIP phase testing. program will
required to operate meet the
and maintain MPF. threshold.

(KPP)4. Logistics - KPP 6 Energy

The MPF, using The MPF, using TBD. Program will Initial analysis
standard Army fuel, standard Army update pending results indicates that the
shall be capable of fuel, shall be of LRIP phase testing. program will
completing the 72- capable of meet the
hour mission cycle completing the 72- threshold.
identified in the hour mission cycle
MPF OMS/MP identified in the
without refueling. MPF OMS/MP
without refueling.

UNCLASSIFIED 13
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

(KPP)3. Force Application - KPP 7 Lethality

Total ammunition Utilizing TBD. Program will Initial analysis
shall be no less than ammunition update pending results indicates that the
28 rounds, should be available in the of LRIP phase testing. program will
capable of DoD inventory, the meet the
integrating anti-tank MPF's main gun threshold.
guided missile shall apply precise,
(ATGM) and defeat lethal, long-range
objective threats fire, capable of
outlined in the neutralizing a
classified annex. bunker, conducting
a wall breach, and
defeating light
armor and 2nd tier
main battle tank
equivalent armor
while on the move,
in day, night, and
all weather
conditions. The
system will
provide the
capability to fire
the second and
subsequent rounds
in no more than
seven seconds.
The system shall
provide electrical
and manual
safe/arm, provide
electrical/mechani
cal firing, enable
the crew to
perform misfire
procedures, and
load/unload/reload
the main weapon.
MPF shall defeat
threats identified
in the classified
annex during the
72-hr Seize phase
without re-
boresighting the
system. MPF shall
be capable of
identifying,
tracking, and
engaging threats in
a degraded mode
(no electrical
power). MPF shall
have ammunition

UNCLASSIFIED 14
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

sufficient to defeat
all threats IAW the
72-hr Seize phase
in the MPF
OMS/MP.

Requirement Reference
CDD, MPF Capability Development Document Update (CDD-U)
Validated: June 24, 2022
The MPF CDD-U contains classified information. Key Performance Parameters 2 and 7 in the Performance Attributes section
below contain information that needs to be input into SIPR DAVE. The SIPR DAVE system is expected to be ready for input in
late 1QFY23.

Deviation Explanation
No deviations for this program/subprogram

Notes
MPF KPPs are Classified, Controlled Unclassified Information, and Unclassified. These KPPs are being pulled from the APB.

UNCLASSIFIED 15
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Acquisition Budget Estimate

MPF

Total Acquisition Cost

Milestone
Current Baseline Budget Estimate PB 2024
APB

Base Objective Objective Threshold

Category BY$M TY$M Deviation
Year (BY$M) (BY$M) (BY$M)

RDT&E 2022 1,185.4 1,185.4 1,303.9 1,179.1 1,156.3

Procurement 2022 4,555.5 4,555.5 5,011 4,531.3 5,215.7

MILCON 2022 576.9 576.9 634.6 576.9 662.5
Acq. O&M 2022 167.4 167.4 184.2 167.4 229.5
Total 6,485.2 6,485.2 6,454.7 7,264.0
PAUC 2022 17.202 17.202 18.922 17.121 19.268
APUC 2022 13.016 13.016 14.317 12.947 14.902

UNCLASSIFIED 16
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Appropriation Category Deviation Explanations

PAUC Deviation Explanation

APUC Deviation Explanation

Budget Notes
Current APB Cost Estimate Reference: MPF MS C Army Cost Position (ACP) signed June 7, 2022. SAR Baseline = APB
Objective = Current Estimate; APB Threshold = 10% over APB Objective. The MPF Total Life Cycle Cost includes sunk costs
incurred to complete MPF Middle Tier Acquisition - Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP) effort. Total MPF MTA-RP costs, in Then-
Year dollars, were $854.2M RDT&E and $18.7M Acq O&M. Total MPF MTA-RP costs, in Base-Year 2022 dollars, were
$891.4M RDT&E and $19.3M Acq O&M.

Total End Item Quantity

Quantity Category Current APB Quantity Current Estimate Quantity

Development 27 27

Procurement 350 350

O&M-Acquired

Quantity Notes
The MPF Army Cost Position (ACP) scope reflects a quantity of 350 vehicles in the Army Procurement Objective vs. the full
quantity of 504 vehicles in the Army Acquisition Objective. RDTE funded vehicles: - 12 MPFs from each MTA-RP phase vendor
x 2 vendors = 24 MPFs. 3 production MPFs for LRIP phase Full-Up System Level (FUSL) live fire testing. Procurement funded
vehicle: APO Qty of 350 Vehicles: 4 Active Army Divisions (42 MPFs x 4 Battalions) = 168 vehicles. 2 Guard Divisions (42
MPFs x 2 Battalions) = 84 vehicles. 1 Army Prepositioned Stock set 42 vehicles. Institutional Training, Training and Doctrine
Command (TRADOC) = 28 vehicles. Repair Cycle Float = 28 vehicles.

UNCLASSIFIED 17
 MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Unit Cost
MPF

Current UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)

Category ($M) Base Year:2022 Current UCR Baseline Current Estimate % Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 6,485.2 6,454.7
Quantity 377 377
Unit Cost 17.202 17.121 -0.47%
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 4,555.5 4,531.3
Quantity 350 350
Unit Cost 13.016 12.947 -0.53%
Original UCR Baseline and Current Estimate (Base-Year Dollars)
Category ($M) Base Year:2022 Original UCR Baseline Current Estimate % Change

Program Acquisition Unit Cost

Cost 6,485.2 6,454.7
Quantity 377 377
Unit Cost 17.202 17.121 -0.47%
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 4,555.5 4,531.3
Quantity 350 350
Unit Cost 13.016 12.947 -0.53%
Cost Growth Details
Current Baseline PAUC Breach Explanation

Current Baseline APUC Breach Explanation

Original Baseline PAUC Breach Explanation

Original Baseline APUC Breach Explanation

Impacts of Schedule Changes on Unit Cost

N/A, initial SAR submission.
Impacts of Performance Changes on Unit Cost
N/A, initial SAR submission.
Actions Taken or Proposed to Control Future Cost Growth
MPF LRIP is being executed though a Fixed Price Incentive Firm contract type to control costs during LRIP, cap the government's
exposure to cost growth during LRIP, and incentivize the contractor to implement production efficiencies during LRIP to reduce MPF
production costs in follow-on contracts.

UNCLASSIFIED 18
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Risk and Sensitivity Analysis

MPF

Risk and Sensitivity Analysis

Current Procurement Cost (December - 2022)
1.If the current log manual development schedule slips due to force design changes, TDP drawing delays, potential redesigns
identified during testing, or tech manual verification & validation delays, then the program could require additional funding for
contractor support to maintain fielding schedules.
2. The MPF ACP generated in support of the Milestone C decision in June 2022, was used to establish the current APB. ACP
identified labor learning, material economies of scale, and inflation as the primary risks to the MPF procurement cost estimate.
The MS C ACP leveraged actual costs from build of MPF prototypes to project expected procurement costs. If labor learning
during production is less than expected, or if the MPF prime contractor cannot achieve expected subcontracted material
economies of scale, then MPF procurement costs will be greater than forecasted within the MPF APB Objective. Additionally, if
actual economic conditions involve inflation at levels greater than forecasted, then MPF procurement costs will rise above those
within the APB Objective.
Original Baseline Estimate (August - 2022)
The Risk and Sensitivity Analysis is uploaded in the AIR system under Milestone C Army Cost Position Cost Analysis Brief,
dated 7 June 2022.
Current Baseline Estimate (August - 2022)
The Risk and Sensitivity Analysis is uploaded in the AIR system under Milestone C Army Cost Position Cost Analysis Brief,
dated 7 June 2022.

UNCLASSIFIED 19
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Schedule Risk
MS C 2022-12-19 If long lead hardware items are not
procured during the designated lead time
windows or items are delayed due to
ongoing global supply chain challenges,
then there may be schedule delays and
cost increases to future lot builds.
Technical Risks

Low Rate Initial Production

MPF

Item Initial LRIP Decision Current Total LRIP

Approval Date 02/13/2023 02/13/2023

Approved Quantity 26 26

Reference MPF MS C ADM MPF MS C ADM

Start Year 2022 2022

End Year 2026 2026

Rationale if quantity exceeds 10% of the total number of articles to be procured:

During LRIP, the MPF program will procure up to a total of 96 vehicles (19% of the MPF AAO) over three LRIP lot buys
between FY22 and FY24. This three-year LRIP strategy provides the Army with several means to significantly reduce program
cost and schedule risk. The three-year LRIP will ensure LRIP 1 actual costs (obtained through contractor cost reporting) are
available to inform FRP contract negotiations. The three-year LRIP also provides the Army with flexibility to alter LRIP
production activities to mitigate the likelihood of a production break between LRIP and FRP in the event of a delay to the FY25
FRP decision. The three-year LRIP will also ensure an orderly ramp-up to planned FRP levels. The MPF LRIP 1 lot will support
performance, Live Fire, and Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) testing and provide vehicles for FUE. The LRIP 2
and LRIP 3 production lots will deliver systems to complete fielding of the initial MPF battalion, support fielding of a second
MPF battalion, and provide a company set to TRADOC for institutional training.

Notes
1) The MPF program does not require advance procurement funds for the LRIP option awards or STS efforts.
2) LRIP 1 for up to 26 vehicles approved on June 24, 2022. Approval for LRIP 2 (up to 28 vehicles) & LRIP 3 (up to 42 vehicles)
targeted for 3QFY23.3) Mobile Protected Firepower Milestone C and Low-Rate Initial Production Acquisition Decision
Memorandum approved June 24, 2022.

UNCLASSIFIED 20
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Contracts & Efforts

Contract Data

Contract Number W56HZV-19-C-0036

Effort Number

Modification Number P00050

Award Date 12/17/2018

Definitization Date 06/28/2022

Order Number

CAGE Code/CAGE Legal Name 7W356/General Dynamics Land Systems

Contract Title MPF MTA/EMD, LRIP, and STS Contract

Contract Address Sterling Heights, MI

Contracting Office ACC-DTA 6501 E. 11 Mile Road Detroit Arsenal, MI 48397-5000

Supported Phase Production

Contract Strategy FAR 15 (Negotiated)

Contract Type Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee

Modification Date November 07, 2022

Work Start Date December 17, 2018

Technical Data Rights None

Work Completed

Contracts/Effort Price, Quantity, and Performance (TY$M)

Initial Target Price Current Target Price

$660.5 $677.7

Initial Ceiling Price Current Ceiling Price

$689.4 $706.6

Contractor EAC PM EAC

$677.7

Initial Quantity Current Quantity Delivered Quantity

25 25 0

BAC BCWP ACWP

UNCLASSIFIED 21
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

BCWS Cost Variance Schedule Variance

Contract Notes:
General Dynamics Land Systems Inc., was awarded an incrementally funded, Fixed Price Incentive Fee (Cost Based) and Firmed
Fixed Price contract (W56HZV-19-C-0036) with options, for the MPF program. Work will be performed in Sterling Heights, MI;
Lima, OH; and Anniston, AL; with an estimated completion date of October 2026.
Factors Contributing to Cost Variance and Projected Effects on Program Costs

Factors Contributing to Schedule Variance and Projected Effects on Program Schedule

UNCLASSIFIED 22
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

External Government Activities

Activity Title Government Entity Supported Phase

CAGE Work Start Date

City State/Province:

Notes

UNCLASSIFIED 23
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Deliveries and Expenditures

MPF

Deliveries
Delivered to Date Planned to Date Actual to Date Total Quantity Percent Delivered
Development 27 24 27 88.89%
Production 350 350 0.00%

Total Program Quantity Delivered 377 24 377 6.37%

Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)
Years Appropriated to date: 6
Total Years Appropriated Funding (Current Baseline): 46
Percent Years Appropriated: 13.04%
Then-Year Funding Appropriated as Percentage of Total Acquisition Estimate: 17.00%
Then-Year Funding Expended as Percentage of Total Acquisition Estimate: 11.00%
Total Acquisition Cost: 7,264

Deliveries & Expenditures Notes:

The above data is current as of December 1, 2022.

UNCLASSIFIED 24
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Operating and Support Costs

MPF

O&S Cost Breakdown:

Category (BY$ Million) MPF

Unit-Level Manpower 3,490.5

Unit Operations 2,071.0

Maintenance 1,924.9

Sustaining Support 439.6

Continued System
941.7
Improvements

Other .0

Total 8,867.7

Cost Estimate Source: CCP dated June 07, 2022

O&S Cost Notes:
ASA(FM&C)

Total Program O&S Cost Compared with Baseline

Current Baseline

Current Current
Objective Threshold
Estimate Estimate Deviation
(BY$M) (BY$M)
(BY$M) (TY$M)

Total O&S 8,859.3 9,745.3 8,867.7 14,974.3

Note:
Please note the TY total O&S $M is $14,974.3.
O&S Cost Deviation Explanation

UNCLASSIFIED 25
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Operating and Support Costs - Disposal and Unitized Costs

MPF

Annual Unitized O&S Cost Definition and Calculation Relative to Total O&S Cost:

System Name: Mobile Protected

Sustainment Factors Antecedent System Name:
Firepower

Quantity to Sustain 350

Unit of Measure Vehicles

Unit Expected Service Life 30

Base Year:
Annual Unitized O&S Cost by System Name: Mobile Protected
Antecedent System Name:
Category Base Year $ Unit:($K) Firepower

Unit-Level Manpower 332.4

Unit Operations 197.2

Maintenance 183.3

Sustaining Support 41.9

Continued System Improvements 89.7

Other

Total O&S 844.5 0.0

Disposal/Demilitarization Cost Estimate

(Base Year $Millions) System Name: Mobile Protected Firepower Antecedent System Name:

Total Disposal 12.7

Cost Estimate Source - Disposal

Type: Component Cost Position

Approval Authority and Date: Ms. Caral E. Spangler, ASA(FM&C) 06/07/2022

Note:

N/A

Disposal Cost Notes:

N/A

Additional O&S Estimate Assumptions:

N/A

UNCLASSIFIED 26
MPF UNCLASSIFIED SAR DEC 2022

Sustainment Strategy:

Soldiers will organically maintain and support the MPF. Commercial or commercial partnerships will be used for field-level
maintenance where organic support is not available or where ongoing analysis indicates it is not cost effective. At the
sustainment level, repair/overhaul of the end item will be performed at an organic depot. The MPF Core Logistics Analysis
(CLA), approved in 2017, has determined that the requirements of Title 10 U.S.C 2464 (Core Logistics Capabilities) are
applicable to the MPF. PdM MPF will establish an organic depot repair capability to support new core workload requirements
four years after IOC in accordance with the Title 10 U.S.C 2464 and Title 10 U.S.C 2466 (Limitations on the Performance of
Depot-Level Maintenance), which mandates a 50% ceiling, measured in dollars, on the amount of depot maintenance workload
that may be performed by contract during a fiscal year. For Depot Level Repairables (DLRs) at the sub-system/Line
Replaceable Unit (LRU) level, existing depot maintenance, supply, and contract support infrastructure will be leveraged
whenever possible to minimize increases in the logistics footprint. This includes leveraging or updating (if required) existing
National Maintenance Work Requirements (NMWRs) for legacy DLRs. For new, MPF-unique DLRs, the use of Government
vs. contractor sources for sustainment level maintenance will be informed by the availability of technical data to develop
NMWRs needed to establish organic repair programs.
Antecedent Estimate Assumptions:

N/A

UNCLASSIFIED 27