0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views

Autoevaluación

The document provides guidelines for students to complete a self-evaluation of their teamwork performance in two subjects: LIN4102-Environmental Protection and LQI4092-Selected Topics 3. It explains that students were divided into 4 groups of 3 members each to present on topics related to environmental protection. The self-evaluation consists of two parts: 1) rating teamwork elements on a scale of 1-4 and providing justification, and 2) answering questionnaires about contributions, skills used, and team dynamics. The results will be used to improve future teamwork activities but will not impact student grades. Students are asked to be honest in their assessments.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views

Autoevaluación

The document provides guidelines for students to complete a self-evaluation of their teamwork performance in two subjects: LIN4102-Environmental Protection and LQI4092-Selected Topics 3. It explains that students were divided into 4 groups of 3 members each to present on topics related to environmental protection. The self-evaluation consists of two parts: 1) rating teamwork elements on a scale of 1-4 and providing justification, and 2) answering questionnaires about contributions, skills used, and team dynamics. The results will be used to improve future teamwork activities but will not impact student grades. Students are asked to be honest in their assessments.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

UDLAP

LIN4102-Environmental Protection
LQI4092-Selected Topics 3
DEPARTMENT Chemical, Food and Environmental Eng. SCHOOL EDEI
PROFESSOR Martha Alicia Gómez Gallegos PERIOD Spring 2023

ABET | STUDENT OUTCOME 5


INTRODUCTION AND GUIDELINES
This document presents a self-evaluation of your teamwork in the subject of LIN4102-
Environmental Protection, LQI4092-Selected Topics 3, and provides practical evidence for the
evaluation of the Student Outcome 5 (SO5) of ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and
Technology, Inc.). The SO5 refers to the ability to function effectively on a team whose
members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive
environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meet objectives.
In the subject LIN4102, LQI4092 a total of 12 students have been organized in 4 different
groups of 3 members, to present four topics on Environmental Protection: Water; Air; Waste
Management; and Soil. The presentations were supported by terms of reference and rubrics
provided to all teams.
For the purpose of this assessment, you will perform an informed self-evaluation of your
teamwork in LIN4102, LQI4092. The self-evaluation is divided in two parts:
Part I- Read the SO5 rubrics and fill the self-evaluation table 1 using a scale from 1 to 4
and providing strong justification of your rating;
Part II- Fill questionnaires regarding the team dynamics and your behaviour in the team.
It is very important that you understand that:
 The self-evaluation of teamwork is completely anonymous , so, please, do not leave your
name, ID or any reference to yourself that might identify you in the text;
 The results of this self-evaluation of teamwork will be used to improve the design of
teamwork (SO5) activities in the department, but will not be used to evaluate you,
therefore, your self-evaluation will not affect your or your colleagues’ grades in this
class;
 Since this work is completely anonymous, does not affect your or your colleagues’
grades, please, be as honest as possible, that is most appreciated;
 In the self-evaluation questionnaires consider the average of your experience in the four
teams you were a member of;
 You should use only English in this self-evaluation;

PART I- SELF EVALUATION TABLE


Read the SO5 rubrics and fill the self-evaluation table 1 using a scale from 1 to 4 and
providing strong justification of your rating. Please, give as much detail and
1/5 23-Jun-2020
ABET | STUDENT OUTCOME 5- Self-Evaluation of Teamwork

justification as possible for the overall experience in the four teams you worked with
and be honest.
Table 1- Self-evaluation table for ABETs Student Outcome 5 on LIN2041 Summer I 2020. [1 Worst-4 Best].
SCALE
RATING
ELEMENT
Team Work
Collaboratio
n
Inclusive
Environment
Team
Enrolment
Project
Management

2/5 23-Jun-2020
ABET | STUDENT OUTCOME 5- Self-Evaluation of Teamwork

PART II- SELF EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE


A) Reply to the following questionnaires as honestly as possible.
1. In total, for the teamwork, there were (number of meetings) and I participated in (number
of meetings + %).
2. In total, the presentations had (number of slides) and I participated in (number of slides
+ %).
3. In average, each presentation took (time in days) and I dedicated, in average, (time in
hours) for each presentation.
4. The work was divided between team members and I took (% of the work) of the total work.
5. To define activities, I proposed (number of activities), participated in (number of
activities), and performed (number of activities) alone.
6. I finished (%) of my tasks on time.
7. I participated in (% of decisions) of the team decisions.
8. I decided (% of decisions) of the team decisions.
9. I defined (% of activities) of the team activities.
10. I proposed (% of meetings) for the presentation.
11. I Organized (% of meetings) for the presentation.
12. I proposed (% of activities) of the team activities.
13. I proposed (% of objectives) of the team objectives.
14. I proposed (% of topics) of the team topics to present.
15. I (choose one: always, often, sometimes, seldom, never) followed the decision other
made regarding team activities.
16. There was (choose one: always, often, sometimes, seldom, never) discussion in the
team regarding what to do and/or how to do it.
17. When there was discussion I (choose one: always, often, sometimes, seldom, never)
participated with my opinions.
18. When there was discussion I thought to myself (choose one: Let me listen, I must say
something, this is a waste of time, just tell me what to do).
19. When there was discussion I (choose one: Tried to call down the others, actively
engaged, said nothing, other?) participated with my opinions.
20. Team activities were defined (choose one: by all, by some, by me).
21. I believe that my skills and knowledge was (choose one: very well used, more or less
used, not much used, never used) for the overall result of the team. Explain why.
22. What I like to do in a team is (choose one or more: complete the work of others;
coordinate the work; implement ideas; evaluate and monitor the work; generate
ideas and activities; do research; Decide the design and structure of the work;
become an specialist on something; Help everyone with their work).
3/5 23-Jun-2020
ABET | STUDENT OUTCOME 5- Self-Evaluation of Teamwork

23. I helped (choose one: more; the same; less) than what I was helped.
B) Rate the following situations in your team (mark with a “X” a value from 1 to 5).
1. The goals are…
Goals are unclear or poorly Goals are clear, understood,
understood, resulting in little and have the full
1 2 3 4 5
commitment to them. commitment of team
members.
2. The team organization…
Tasks are not defined and All tasks are well organised,
few members participate managed and planed There
1 2 3 4 5
actively. There is no follow- is a regular follow-up for
up. feedback and monitoring.
3. The team discussion…
Members are guarded or Members express thoughts,
1 2 3 4 5
cautious in discussions. feelings, and ideas freely.
4. Mutual trust in the team…
Members are suspicious of Members trust each other
1 2 3 4 5
one another’s motives. and don’t fear reprisal.
5. Attitudes towards difference…
Members smooth over Members feel free to voice
differences and suppress or 1 2 3 4 5 differences and work through
avoid conflict. them.
6. Support in the team…
Members are reluctant to Members are comfortable
1 2 3 4 5
ask for or give help. giving and receiving help.
7. Participation in the team…
Discussion is generally All members are involved in
1 2 3 4 5
dominated by few members. discussion.
8. Diversity in the team…
The team is competitive and Diversity is a strength. Team
individualistic rather than members recognize each
cooperative and supportive. 1 2 3 4 5 other skills and abilities as
legitimate contributors to the
shared goals
9. Decision-making in the team…
There is no decision-making 1 2 3 4 5 All members are involved in
process and decisions are decision-making to set forth
made by only a few their ideas and to negotiate a
4/5 23-Jun-2020
ABET | STUDENT OUTCOME 5- Self-Evaluation of Teamwork

members alone. common ground.


10. Flexibility in the team…
The group is locked into Members readily change
established rules and procedures in response to
1 2 3 4 5
procedures that members new situations.
find difficult to change.
11. Use of Member Resources in the team…
Individuals’ abilities, Each member’s abilities,
knowledge and experience is 1 2 3 4 5 knowledge, and experience
not well utilized. are fully utilized.
(From Russ Christianson in https://www.cmu.edu and
Guide To Assessing Teamwork and Collaboration 2008 Galileo Educational Network)

C) Please check the box with a “X” on the option that best reflects the extent to which
each statement describes, in average, your teamwork dynamic.
Table 2- Personal evaluation of team interaction aspects.
TO A VERY TO A TO A TO A VERY
# IN YOUR TEAM… LITTLE LITTLE GREAT GREAT
EXTENT EXTENT EXTENT EXTENT
1 We work together.
2 There is group concern
for quality performance.
3 We share high
performance
expectations.
4 All members take group
work too lightly.
5 Some team members
with good ideas don’t
speak up.
6 Some team members act
like they know it all.
7 We listen to each
individual’s input.
8 We are comfortable in
the roles we play in the
group.
(Adapted from Watson, W.E. & Michaelsen, L.K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect
performance on an intellective task. Group and Organizational Studies. 13 (4), 495-516.)

5/5 23-Jun-2020

You might also like