CH-3 - Risk Assessment and Internal Control
CH-3 - Risk Assessment and Internal Control
3 Internal Control
CHAPTER
AUDIT RISK
Auditor gives an INAPPROPRIATE OPINION
when the FS ARE MM
Inherent Control
Risk Risk
Audit risk means the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated.
It means that an auditor expresses an unmodified opinion when financial statements are materially
misstated. In such a case, not only reputation of auditor would be damaged, but he could also invite
regulatory action from professional body and could face probable legal action by intended users.
To avoid such unpleasant consequences, the auditor will plan and perform the audit in such a
way that audit risk is reduced to an acceptably low level. SA-200 states that the auditor shall obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level and thereby
enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor’s opinion.
Consider, for example, that profits of a company have been increased artificially by showing fake
revenues of sizeable amounts in its financial statements. In such a case, financial statements are
materially misstated. The probability, that auditor in such a case, expresses an inappropriate audit
opinion is referred to as audit risk. It is the possibility that auditor expresses an unmodified opinion
even when financial statements are materially misstated.
Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection risk.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
1. While conducting the audit of Smart TV Ltd, engagement team of HTR& Co, has considered
materiality and audit risk throughout the audit. Discuss explaining the meaning of audit risk.
Ans. Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement
and detection risk. Materiality and audit risk are considered throughout the audit, in particular,
when:
(a) Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement;
(b) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures; and
(c) Evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in
forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Notes to Add
F E
* RoMM @ Overall FS. Level → Relate Pervasively to FS. as a whole
+
Potentially affect many assertions
SA 200 states that risk of material statement is the risk that the financial statements are materially
misstated prior to audit. It simply means that there is a probability of frauds or errors in financial
statements before audit.
What is meant by misstatement?
Misstatement refers to a difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or
disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification, presentation, or
disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework. Misstatements can arise from error or fraud.
Few examples of misstatements could be:
Charging of an item of capital expenditure to revenue or vice-versa
Difference in disclosure of a financial statement item vis-à-vis its requirement in applicable
financial reporting framework
Selection or application of inappropriate accounting policies
Difference in accounting estimate of a financial statement item vis-à-vis its appropriateness in
applicable financial reporting framework
Intentional booking of fake expenses in statement of profit and loss
Overstating of receivables in financial statements by not writing off irrecoverable debts
Overstating or understating inventories
The risks of material misstatement may exist at two levels:
The overall financial statement level
The assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, & disclosures.
Notes to Add
The risk of material misstatement at assertion level comprises of two components i.e., inherent risk
and control risk. Both inherent risk and control risk are the entity’s risks and they exist independently
of the audit of financial statements. Inherent risk and control risk are influenced by the client. These
are entity’s risks and are not influenced by the auditor.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
2. “Risk of material misstatement consists of two components” Explain clearly defining risk of
material misstatement.
Ans. Refer to heading “Components of risk of material misstatement”.
Notes to Add
Individually Aggregate
CoT
May be Higher for some A ssertions A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
Eg: Complex Calculations
Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance or
disclosure to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements before consideration of any related controls as described in SA-200.
There is always a risk that before considering any existence of internal control in an entity, a
particular transaction, balance of an account or a disclosure required to be made in the financial
statements of an entity have a chance of being misstated and such misstatement can be material. This
risk is known as inherent risk.
Inherent risk is higher for some assertions and related classes of transactions, account balances,
and disclosures than for others. For example, it may be higher for complex calculations.
Inherent risk factors are considered while designing tests of controls and substantive
procedures. Category of auditor’s assessment lower or higher, each category covers a range of degrees
of inherent risk. Auditor may assess the inherent risk of two different assertions as lower while
recognizing that one assertion has less inherent risk than the other, although both have been assessed
as lower.
It is important to consider the reason for each identified inherent risk even if the risk is lower,
when auditor designs tests of controls and substantive procedures.
External circumstances giving rise to business risks may also influence inherent risk. For example,
technological developments might make a particular product obsolete. Factors in the entity and its
environment may also influence the inherent risk related to a specific assertion.
Few examples of inherent risks could include:
An accounting standard provides guidance on some complex issue which might not be understood
by the management. Therefore, recording of this issue in financial statements carries inherent risk
of being misstated.
88 Auditing & Ethics PW
There are large number of business failures in an industry. Therefore, assertions in financial
statements of an entity operating in such an industry carry an inherent risk of being misstated.
QUESTIONS
Correct/Incorrect Questions
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
3. Control risk is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of transactions to misstatement that
could be material either individually or, when aggregated with misstatements in other balances
or classes, assuming that there were no related internal controls.
Ans. (Incorrect)
Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of transactions to misstatement
that could be material either individually or, when aggregated with misstatements in other balances
or classes, assuming that there were no related internal controls. Control risk, on the other hand is
the risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion about a class of transaction, account
balance or disclosure and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the
entity’s internal control.
Notes to Add
WILL NOT BE
In accordance with SA-200, control risk is the risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion
about a class of transaction, account balance or disclosure and that could be material, either individually
or when aggregated with other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a
timely basis by the entity’s internal control.
Control risk is a risk that internal control existing and operating in an entity would not be
efficient enough to stop from happening, or find and then rectify in an appropriate time, any material
misstatement relating to a transaction, balance of an account or disclosure required to be made in
the financial statements of that entity. Therefore, in a way, it can be said that there exists an inverse
relation between control risk and efficiency of internal control of an entity. When efficiency of internal
control of an entity is high, the control risk is low and when efficiency of internal control of that entity
is low, the control risk is high.
Examples of control risk could include:
A company has devised control that cash and cheque books should be kept in a locked safe and access
is granted to authorized personnel only. There is risk that control is not being followed.
An entity has devised a control that fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are in place and are
in working condition at all times to reduce the risk of damage to inventories caused by fire. There
is a risk that fire extinguishers in place are expired and are not being refilled. Similarly, there is a
possibility that smoke detectors are not working.
A company has devised a control relating to petty cash that items of expenditure of only less than
` 10000 should be routed through imprest system of petty cash. There is a risk that control is not
being followed.
Theory Questions
4. When auditor identifies deficiencies and report on internal controls, he determines the significant
financial statement assertions that are affected by the ineffective controls in order to evaluate the
effect on control risk assessments and strategy for the audit of the financial statements. Explain
Ans. Control risk assessment when control deficiencies are identified: When auditor identifies
deficiencies and report on internal controls, he determines the significant financial statement
assertions that are affected by the ineffective controls in order to evaluate the effect on control
risk assessments and strategy for the audit of the financial statements.
When control deficiencies are identified and auditor identifies and tests more than one control
for each relevant assertion, he evaluates control risk considering all of the controls he has tested.
If auditor determines that they support a ‘rely on controls’ risk assessment, or if compensating
controls are identified, tested and evaluated to be effective, he may conclude that the ‘rely on
controls’ is still appropriate. Otherwise we change our control risk assessment to ‘not rely on
controls.’
When a deficiency relates to an ineffective control that is the only control identified for an assertion,
he revises risk assessment to ‘not rely on controls’ for associated assertions, as no other controls
have been identified that mitigate the risk related to the assertion. If the deficiency relates to
one WCGW (what can go wrong) out of several WCGW’s, he can ‘rely on controls’ but performs
additional substantive procedures to adequately address the risks related to the deficiency.
Notes to Add
Individually Aggregate
Risk Influenced by
Inherent Risk Control Risk Entity
Detection Risk Auditor
Persons in team
SA 200 defines detection risk as the risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce
audit risk to an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be
material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements.
For example, auditor of a company uses certain audit procedures for the purpose of obtaining
audit evidence and reducing audit risk, but still there will remain a risk that audit procedures used
by the auditor may not be able to detect a misstatement which by nature is material, then that risk is
known as detection Risk.
Notes to Add
Audit risk is a technical term related to the process of auditing; it does not refer to the auditor’s
business risks such as loss from litigation, adverse publicity, or other events arising in connection
with the audit of financial statements.
For purposes of the SAs, audit risk does not include the risk that the auditor might express an
opinion that the financial statements are materially misstated when they are not. This risk is ordinarily
insignificant.
Notes to Add
As discussed at the outset, audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection
risk. The assessment of risks is based on audit procedures to obtain information necessary for
that purpose and evidence obtained throughout the audit. The assessment of risks is a matter of
professional judgment, rather than a matter capable of precise measurement. The distinguishing
feature of the professional judgment expected of an auditor is that it is exercised by an auditor whose
training, knowledge and experience have assisted in developing the necessary competencies to
achieve reasonable judgments.
Audit risk
Risks of material
Detection risk
misstatement
Non-Sampling
Control risk
risk
Notes to Add
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
5. “The SAs do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but rather to a
combined assessment of the “risks of material misstatement.” Explain
Ans. The SAs do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but rather to a combined
assessment of the “risks of material misstatement”. However, the auditor may make separate or
combined assessments of inherent and control risk depending on preferred audit techniques or
Identify
+ F Providing
RoMM due to
Assess E
@ Basis for
RAP
CoT
FS Assertion A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
* SA 315 + Identifying & Assessing ROMM through
Entity
Objectives Understanding the
Environment
Identify Providing
+
Assess Basis for
Responses
Auditor shall
(1) Identify Risk throughout the process
Relate pervasively to FS
(2) Assess + Evaluate Risk
Potentially affect many assertions
(3) Relate Risks to WCGW @ Assertion level
Likelihood of misstatement
(4) Consider Possibility of multiple misstatement
Misstatement could be material
As per SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 99
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion
levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control,
thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material
misstatement. This will help the auditor to reduce the risk of material misstatement to an acceptably
low level.
The objective of the auditor as stated in SA 315 is to identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement.
(i) The auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at:
(a) the financial statement level
(b) the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures.
to provide a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures
(ii) For the purpose of identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement, the auditor
shall:
(a) Identify risks throughout the process of obtaining an understanding of the entity and its
environment, including relevant controls that relate to the risks, and by considering the classes
of transactions, account balances, and disclosures in the financial statements
(b) Assess the identified risks, and evaluate whether they relate more pervasively to the financial
statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions.
(c) Relate the identified risks to what can go wrong at the assertion level, taking account of relevant
controls that the auditor intends to test and
(d) Consider the likelihood of misstatement, including the possibility of multiple misstatements,
and whether the potential misstatement is of a magnitude that could result in a material
misstatement.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
6. Risk of material misstatement consists of two components” Explain clearly defining risk of material
misstatement.
Ans. As per SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion
levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks
of material misstatement. This will help the auditor to reduce the risk of material misstatement
to an acceptably low level.
The auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at:
(a) the financial statement level
(b) the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures to provide
a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures
Entity
Audit Procedures to obtain understanding of Env.
I.C.
Identify
To RoMM due to
Assess
@ F E
FS Assertion
level
* RAP by themselves DO NOT PROVIDE Suff· + Appro. A.E
on which to base Audit Opinion
You have already gained a little knowledge about risk assessment procedures in Chapter 2.
The audit procedures performed to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment,
including the entity’s internal control, to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion level are defined as risk
assessment procedures.
Risk assessment procedures are a basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels The auditor shall perform risk assessment
procedures to provide a basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement
at the financial statement and assertion levels. Risk assessment procedures by themselves, however,
do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.
The risks to be assessed include both those due to error and those due to fraud.
What is included in risk assessment procedures?
The risk assessment procedures shall include the following:
(a) Inquiries of management and of others within the entity who in the auditor’s judgment may have
information that is likely to assist in identifying risks of material misstatement due to fraud or
error.
(b) Analytical procedures.
(c) Observation and inspection.
(a) Inquiries of Management and Others Within the Entity: Much of the information obtained by
the auditor’s inquiries is obtained from management and those responsible for financial reporting.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 101
However, the auditor may also obtain information, or a different perspective in identifying risks
of material misstatement, through inquiries of others within the entity and other employees
with different levels of authority.
Inquiries directed toward internal audit personnel may provide information about internal
audit procedures performed during the year relating to the design and effectiveness of the
entity’s internal control and whether management has satisfactorily responded to findings
from those procedures.
Inquiries of employees involved in initiating, processing or recording complex or unusual
transactions may help the auditor to evaluate the appropriateness of the selection and
application of certain accounting policies.
Inquiries directed toward in-house legal counsel may provide information about such
matters as litigation, compliance with laws and regulations, knowledge of fraud or suspected
fraud affecting the entity, warranties, post-sales obligations, arrangements (such as joint
ventures) with business partners and the meaning of contract
Inquiries directed towards marketing or sales personnel may provide information about
changes in the entity’s marketing strategies, sales trends, or contractual arrangements with
its customers.
Inquiries directed to the risk management function (or those performing such roles) may
provide information about operational and regulatory risks that may affect financial reporting.
Inquiries directed to information systems personnel may provide information about
system changes, system or control failures, or other information system- related risks.
(b) Analytical Procedures: Analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures may
identify aspects of the entity of which the auditor was unaware and may assist in assessing the risks
of material misstatement in order to provide a basis for designing and implementing responses
to the assessed risks. Analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures may
include both financial and non-financial information, for example, relationship between sales and
square footage of selling space or volume of goods sold.
Analytical procedures may help identify the existence of unusual transactions or events, and
amounts, ratios, and trends that might indicate matters that have audit implications. Unusual
or unexpected relationships that are identified may assist the auditor in identifying risks of
material misstatement, especially risks of material misstatement due to fraud. However, when
such analytical procedures use data aggregated at a high level (which may be the situation with
analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures), the results of those analytical
procedures only provide a broad initial indication about whether a material misstatement may
exist. Accordingly, in such cases, consideration of other information that has been gathered
when identifying the risks of material misstatement together with the results of such analytical
procedures may assist the auditor in understanding and evaluating the results of the analytical
procedures.
(c) Observation and Inspection: Observation and inspection may support inquiries of
management and others, and may also provide information about the entity and its environment.
Examples of such audit procedures include observation or inspection of the following:
The entity’s operations.
Documents (such as business plans and strategies), records, and internal control manuals.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
7. Discuss how “analytical procedures” performed as “risk assessment procedures” can be useful
to an auditor.
Ans. Refer to heading on “What is included in risk assessment procedures” and gather usefulness of
analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures.
Notes to Add
Misstatements Omissions
are considered
to be
Individually
MATERIAL
Aggregrate
SA 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit states that misstatements, including
omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
financial statements.
The objective of an independent auditor is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared,
in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework.
Herein, lies the significance of materiality. The auditor has to obtain reasonable assurance that
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.
As a result, an audit strives to identify significant risks of material misstatement and audit procedures
are geared towards it.
Materiality is not always a matter of relative size. For example, a small amount lost by fraudulent
practices of certain employees can indicate a serious flaw in the enterprise’s internal control system
requiring immediate attention to avoid greater losses in future.
Notes to Add
Misstatement
RAP
NET
Provide basis FAP
Identifying
+ RoMM
Assessing
Circumstances may cause the Auditor to Evaluate Amount < Materiality
Nature
Auditor Considers Size uncorrected misstatements
Occurance
When evaluating their effect on FS.
+
Apply Prof. Judgement in
The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing the audit, and
in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
8. There is direct relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk.
Ans. (Incorrect)
There is an inverse relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk. The higher the
materiality level, the lower the audit risk and vice versa. For example, the risk that a particular
account balance or class of transactions could be misstated by an extremely large amount might
be very low but the risk that it could be misstated by an extremely small amount might be very
high.
Notes to Add
The auditor’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment, and is affected by the
auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial statements. In this
context, it is reasonable for the auditor to assume that users:
(a) Have a reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting and a
willingness to study the information in the financial statements with reasonable diligence;
(b) Understand that financial statements are prepared, presented and audited to levels of
materiality;
(c) Recognize the uncertainties inherent in the measurement of amounts based on the use of
estimates, judgment and the consideration of future events; and
(d) Make reasonable economic decisions on the basis of the information in the financial statements.
Notes to Add
Uncorrected Undetected
misstatements
Practically, it is difficult for auditors to design tests to identify individual misstatements. It is likely
that misstatements are material in aggregate. It takes us to the concept of “performance materiality.”
Performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality
for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability
that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. If applicable, performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set
by the auditor at less than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures.
Performance materiality is set at a value lower than overall materiality. It lowers the risk that
auditor will not be able to identify misstatements that are material when added together.
Notes to Add
When establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall determine materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. If, in the specific circumstances of the entity, there is one or more particular
classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts
than the materiality for the financial statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence
the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements, the auditor shall also
determine the materiality level or levels to be applied to those particular classes of transactions,
account balances or disclosures.
Notes to Add
Examples of benchmarks that may be appropriate, depending on the circumstances of the entity,
include categories of reported income such as profit before tax, total revenue, gross profit and total
expenses, total equity or net asset value. Profit before tax from continuing operations is often used
for profit-oriented entities. When profit before tax from continuing operations is volatile, other
benchmarks may be more appropriate, such as gross profit or total revenues.
Notes to Add
The period to-date financial results and financial position, and Budgets or forecasts for the current
period,
Adjusted for significant changes in the circumstances of the entity (for example, a significant
business acquisition) and relevant changes of conditions in the industry or economic environment
in which the entity operates.
Consider, for example, when, as a starting point, the materiality for the financial statements as a
whole is determined for a particular entity based on a percentage of profit before tax from continuing
operations, circumstances that give rise to an exceptional decrease or increase in such profit may
lead the auditor to conclude that the materiality for the financial statements as a whole is more
appropriately determined using a normalized profit before tax from continuing operations figure
based on past results.
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
Factors that may indicate the existence of one or more particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts than materiality for the financial
statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of the financial statements include the following:
Whether law, regulations or the applicable financial reporting framework affect users’ expectations
regarding the measurement or disclosure of certain items like in case of related party transactions,
and the remuneration of management and those charged with governance.
The key disclosures in relation to the industry in which the entity operates. For example, research
and development costs for a pharmaceutical company.
Whether attention is focused on a particular aspect of the entity’s business that is separately
disclosed in the financial statements like in case of newly acquired business.
Notes to Add
as a Result of
Materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, the materiality level or levels for
particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) may need to be revised as a result
of a change in circumstances that occurred during the audit (for example, a decision to dispose of a
major part of the entity’s business), new information, or a change in the auditor’s understanding of
the entity and its operations as a result of performing further audit procedures.
If during the audit it appears as though actual financial results are likely to be substantially different
from the anticipated period end financial results that were used initially to determine materiality for
the financial statements as a whole, the auditor revises that materiality.
If the auditor concludes that a lower materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and,
if applicable, materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or
disclosures) than that initially determined is appropriate, the auditor shall determine whether it is
necessary to revise performance materiality, and whether the nature, timing and extent of the further
audit procedures remain appropriate.
Notes to Add
CoT
F.S. as a Particular A/c. Bal.
whole Disclosure
The audit documentation shall include the following amounts and the factors considered in their
determination:
(a) Materiality for the financial statements as a whole
(b) If applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures
(c) Performance materiality and
(d) Any revision of (a)-(c) as the audit progressed
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
9. Is materiality required to be documented by the auditor? What factors have to be considered this
regard?
Ans. Refer to heading on “documenting the materiality”.
Notes to Add
Planning
Concept is Applied Performing Stage + Forming the Opinion
Evaluating
The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing the audit, and
in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if
any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report. In conducting an
audit of financial statements, the overall objectives of the auditor are to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the
financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial
reporting framework; and to report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the
SAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings. The auditor obtains reasonable assurance by obtaining
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and
detection risk.
Materiality and Audit Risk are considered throughout the audit, in particular, when:
(a) Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement;
(b) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures; and
(c) Evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in
forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Illustration 3: One of the team members of auditors of Highly Capable Limited was of the view that
Materiality and Audit Risk are only considered at planning stage of an audit. Comment as an auditor.
Solution: The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing
the audit, and in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected
misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Notes to Add
(ii) Nature
operation
Ownership of the entity
Governance
Financial Structure
Selection
(iii) Entity's Application Accounting Policies
Reason for
Objectives
(iv) Entity's Strategies
Business Risk
(v) Measurement
Financial Performance
Review
SA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the
Entity and its Environment states that the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following:
(a) Relevant industry, regulatory, and other external factors including the applicable financial
reporting framework
Relevant industry factors include industry conditions such as the competitive environment,
supplier and customer relationships, and technological developments.
Examples of matters the auditor may consider include market and competition, whether
entity is engaged in seasonal activities, product technology relating to the entity’s products.
The industry in which the entity operates may give rise to specific risks of material misstatement
arising from the nature of the business or the degree of regulation.
Relevant regulatory factors include the regulatory environment. The regulatory environment
includes, among other matters, the applicable financial reporting framework and the legal
and political environment.
Examples of matters the auditor may consider include accounting principles and industry
specific practices, regulatory framework for a regulated industry, legislation and regulation
that significantly affect the entity’s operations, including direct supervisory activities, taxation,
government policies currently affecting the conduct of the entity’s business, environmental
requirements affecting the industry and the entity’s business.
Examples of other external factors affecting the entity that the auditor may consider include the
general economic conditions, interest rates and availability of financing, and inflation etc.
(c) The entity’s selection and application of accounting policies, including the reasons for changes
thereto
The auditor shall evaluate whether the entity’s accounting policies are appropriate for its
business and consistent with the applicable financial reporting framework and accounting
policies used in the relevant industry.
(d) The entity’s objectives and strategies, and those related business risks that may result in risks
of material misstatement.
The entity conducts its business in the context of industry, regulatory and other internal and
external factors. To respond to these factors, the entity’s management define objectives, which
are the overall plans for the entity. Strategies are the approaches by which management intends
to achieve its objectives. The entity’s objectives and strategies may change over time. Business
risk is broader than the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, though it
includes the latter. Business risk may arise from change or complexity.
An understanding of the business risks facing the entity increases the likelihood of identifying
risks of material misstatement, since most business risks will eventually have financial
consequences and, therefore, an effect on the financial statements. However, the auditor does
not have a responsibility to identify or assess all business risks because not all business risks
give rise to risks of material misstatement.
Examples of matters that the auditor may consider when obtaining an understanding of the
entity’s objectives, strategies and related business risks that may result in a risk of material
misstatement of the financial statements include:
122 Auditing & Ethics PW
Industry developments (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that the
entity does not have the personnel or expertise to deal with the changes in the industry).
New products and services (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that
there is increased product liability).
Expansion of the business (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that the
demand has not been accurately estimated).
(e) The measurement and review of the entity’s financial performance
Management and others will measure and review those things they regard as important.
Performance measures, whether external or internal, create pressures on the entity.
These pressures, in turn, may motivate management to take action to improve the business
performance or to misstate the financial statements. Accordingly, an understanding of the
entity’s performance measures assists the auditor in considering whether pressures to achieve
performance targets may result in management actions that increase the risks of material
misstatement, including those due to fraud.
Examples for measuring and reviewing financial performance which may be used by an auditor
may include:
Key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) and key ratios, trends and
operating statistics.
Period-on-period financial performance analyses.
Budgets, forecasts, variance analyses, and departmental or other level performance reports.
Notes to Add
Understanding the entity and the environment in which it operates is very significant. It helps the
auditor in planning the audit and in identifying areas requiring special attention. Gaining knowledge
about client’s business is one of the important principles in developing an overall audit plan. In fact,
without adequate knowledge of client’s business, a proper audit is not possible.
Notes to Add
Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control
(referred to hereafter as an “understanding of the entity”), is a continuous, dynamic process of
gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit. The understanding establishes
a frame of reference within which the auditor plans the audit and exercises professional judgment
throughout the audit, for example, when:
Assessing risks of material misstatement of the financial statements
Determining materiality in accordance with SA 320
Considering the appropriateness of the selection and application of accounting policies
Identifying areas where special audit consideration may be necessary, for example, related party
transactions, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption, or
considering the business purpose of transactions
Developing expectations for use when performing analytical procedures Evaluating the sufficiency
and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained such as the appropriateness of assumptions and
of management’s oral and written representations.
Illustration 4: The auditor of ABC Textiles Ltd chalks out an audit plan without understanding the
entity’s business. Since he has carried out many audits of textile companies, there is no need to
understand the nature of business of ABC Ltd. Advise the auditor how he should proceed.
Solution: Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s
internal control (referred to hereafter as an “understanding of the entity”), is a continuous, dynamic
process of gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit. The auditor should
proceed accordingly.
Illustration 5: While auditing the books of accounts of Heavy Material Limited for the financial year
2022-23, a team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited showed no inclination towards
understanding the business and the business environment of the above mentioned company. Is the
approach of team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited correct or incorrect? Also give
reason for your answer.
Solution: The approach of team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited is incorrect
because understanding the business and the business environment of company whose audit is to be
conducted is very important, as it helps in planning the audit and identifying areas requiring special
attention during the course of audit of that company.
Illustration 6: Prince Blankets is engaged in business of blankets. Its major portion of sales is taking
place through internet. Advise the auditor how he would proceed in this regard as to understanding
the entity and its environment.
Solution: While understanding entity and its environment, internet sales is being perceived as risky
area by the auditor and thereby would be spending substantial time and extensive audit procedures
on this particular area.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 125
INTERNAL CONTROL
Meaning of internal Control
As per SA-315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the internal control may be defined as “the process designed,
implemented and maintained by those charged with governance, management and other personnel
to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of an entity’s objectives with regard to
reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, safeguarding of assets,
and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The term “controls” refers to any aspects of one
or more of the components of internal control.”
Notes to Add
Its compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and Safeguarding of assets.
The way in which internal control is designed, implemented and maintained varies with an entity’s
size and complexity.
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
(i) Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance: Internal control, no matter how
effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the entity’s
financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected by inherent
limitations of internal control.
(ii) Human judgment in decision-making: Realities that human judgment in decision-making
can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human error. For
example, there may be an error in the design of, or in the change to, a control.
(iii) Lack of understanding the purpose: Equally, the operation of a control may not be effective,
such as where information produced for the purposes of internal control (for example, an
exception report) is not effectively used because the individual responsible for reviewing the
information does not understand its purpose or fails to take appropriate action.
(iv) Collusion among People: Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two
or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For example,
management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditions
of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may result in improper revenue recognition.
Also, edit checks in a software program that are designed to identify and report transactions
that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.
(v) Judgements by Management: Further, in designing and implementing controls, management
may make judgments on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses to implement, and the
nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.
(vi) Limitations in case of Small Entities: Smaller entities often have fewer employees due to
which segregation of duties is not practicable. However, in a small owner-managed entity, the
owner-manager may be able to exercise more effective oversight than in a larger entity. This
oversight may compensate for the generally more limited opportunities for segregation of
duties. On the other hand, the owner- manager may be more able to override controls because
the system of internal control is less structured. This is taken into account by the auditor when
identifying the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Illustration 7: Auditor GR and Associates, appointed for audit of PNG Ltd, a manufacturing company
engaged in manufacturing of various food items. While planning an audit, the auditor does not think
that it would be necessary to understand internal controls. Advise the auditor in this regard.
Solution: The auditor shall obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit.
Although most controls relevant to the audit are likely to relate to financial reporting, not all controls
that relate to financial reporting are relevant to the audit. It is a matter of the auditor’s professional
judgment whether a control, individually or in combination with others, is relevant to the audit.
Illustration 8: The team member of the auditor of Simple and Easy Limited was of the view that
understanding the internal control of the company would not help them in any manner in relation
to audit procedures to be applied while conducting the audit.
Solution: The view of the team member of the auditor is incorrect because understanding the
internal control of the company would help the auditor and his team members in designing the
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be applied while conducting the audit of the company.
The division of internal control into the following five components provides a useful framework for
auditors to consider how different aspects of an entity’s internal control may affect the audit:
(a) The control environment
(b) The entity’s risk assessment process
(c) The information system, including the related business processes, relevant to financial
reporting, and communication
(d) Control activities
(e) Monitoring of controls
Component of internal control
Notes to Add
P D C
MM
Elements of the control environment that may be relevant when obtaining an understanding of the
control environment include the following:
(a) Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values: The effectiveness of
controls cannot rise above the integrity and ethical values of the people who create, administer,
and monitor them. Integrity and ethical behaviour are the product of the entity’s ethical and
behavioural standards, how they are communicated, and how they are reinforced in practice.
The enforcement of integrity and ethical values includes, for example, management actions
to eliminate or mitigate incentives or temptations that might prompt personnel to engage in
dishonest, illegal, or unethical acts. The communication of entity policies on integrity and ethical
values may include the communication of behavioural standards to personnel through policy
statements and codes of conduct and by example.
(b) Commitment to competence: Matters such as management’s consideration of the competence
levels for particular jobs and how those levels translate into requisite skills and knowledge.
(c) Participation by those charged with governance: It includes attributes of those charged
with governance such as their independence from management, their experience and stature,
the extent of their involvement and the information they receive and the scrutiny of activities.
(d) Management’s philosophy and operating style: Management’s philosophy and operating style
encompass a broad range of characteristics. For example, management’s attitudes and actions
towards financial reporting- what approach is taken by management in selecting accounting
policies, approach in developing accounting estimates etc. Matters such as approach of
management to taking and managing business risks, management’s attitude towards information
processing and accounting function and personnel reflects upon management’s philosophy and
operating style.
(e) Organisational structure: The framework within which an entity’s activities for achieving its
objectives are planned, executed, controlled, and reviewed. Establishing a relevant organisational
structure includes considering key areas of authority and responsibility and appropriate lines
of reporting. The appropriateness of an entity’s organisational structure depends, in part, on its
size and the nature of its activities.
(f) Assignment of authority and responsibility: Matters such as how authority and responsibility
for operating activities are assigned and how reporting relationships and authorisation hierarchies
are established.
(g) Human resource policies and practices: Policies and practices that relate to, for example,
recruitment, orientation, training, evaluation, counselling, promotion, compensation, and remedial
actions. Human resource policies and practices often demonstrate important matters in relation
to the control consciousness of an entity.
For example, standards for recruiting the most qualified individuals – with emphasis on educational
background, prior work experience, past accomplishments, and evidence of integrity and ethical
behaviour – demonstrate an entity’s commitment to competent and trustworthy people. Training
policies that communicate prospective roles and responsibilities and include practices such as training
schools and seminars illustrate expected levels of performance and behaviour. Promotions driven
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
MONITORING OF CONTROLS
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the major activities that the entity uses to monitor
internal control over financial reporting. Monitoring of controls is a process to assess the effectiveness
of internal control performance over time. It helps in assessing the effectiveness of controls on a
timely basis. It involves assessing the effectiveness of controls on a timely basis and taking necessary
remedial actions. It includes considering whether controls are operating as intended and that they are
modified as appropriate for change in conditions.
Management accomplishes monitoring of controls through ongoing activities, separate evaluations,
or a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring activities are often built into the normal recurring
activities of an entity and include regular management and supervisory activities.
Management’s monitoring activities may include using information from communications from
external parties such as customer complaints and regulator comments that may indicate problems or
highlight areas in need of improvement.
7. CA Smriti is auditor of a company. As part of audit, she is going through company policies and
practices regarding employee recruitment, training, orientation and related matters. She seems
to be very much interested in finding out whether company hires best candidates from applicant
pool. Identify what she is trying to do? How gaining knowledge about this aspect is useful to
her as an auditor?
Ans. The study of company policies and practices regarding employee recruitment, training,
orientation and related matters including hiring of best candidates is part of understanding HR
function of the company. It, in turn, helps in understanding control environment of the company.
By gaining such a knowledge, she can better understand internal control of the company.
Notes to Add
The nature of the entity’s business, including its organisation and ownership characteristics.
The nature and complexity of the systems that are part of the entity’s internal
Whether, and how, a specific control, individually or in combination with others, prevents, or
detects and corrects, material misstatement.
Notes to Add
Designing Performing
FAP
Controls over the completeness and accuracy of information produced by the entity may be relevant
to the audit if the auditor intends to make use of the information in designing and performing further
procedures. For example, in auditing revenue by applying standard prices to records of sales volume,
the auditor considers the accuracy of the price information and the completeness and accuracy of the
sales volume data. Controls relating to operations and compliance objectives may also be relevant to
an audit if they relate to data the auditor evaluates or uses in applying audit procedures.
Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition
may include controls relating to both financial reporting and operations objectives. The auditor’s
consideration of such controls is generally limited to those relevant to the reliability of financial
reporting. For example, use of access controls, such as passwords, that limit access to the data and
programs that process cash disbursements may be relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely,
safeguarding controls relating to operations objectives, such as controls to prevent the excessive
use of materials in production, generally are not relevant to a financial statement audit.
Controls relating to Objectives-Not relating to Audit
Broader Detailed
Notes to Add
Considered First
P D C
MM
(ii) Implementation of control = control EXISTS + Entity USING it
Design
R,A.P. to obtain A.E. of IC
Implementation
Evaluating the design of a control involves considering whether the control, individually or in
combination with other controls, is capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting,
material misstatements. Implementation of a control means that the control exists and that the entity
is using it. There is little point in assessing the implementation of a control that is not effective, and so
the design of a control is considered first.
An improperly designed control may represent a significant deficiency in internal control. Risk
assessment procedures to obtain audit evidence about the design and implementation of relevant
controls may include
Inquiring of entity personnel.
Observing the application of specific controls.
As part of the risk assessment, the auditor shall determine whether any of the risks identified are, in
the auditor’s judgment, a significant risk. In exercising judgment as to which risks are significant risks,
the auditor shall consider at least the following:
(a) Whether the risk is a risk of fraud
(b) Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or other developments
like changes in regulatory environment, etc., and, therefore, requires specific attention
(c) The complexity of transactions
(d) Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties
(e) The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk,
especially those measurements involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty and
(f) Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the normal course of business
for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual.
Notes to Add
Significant risks often relate to significant non-routine transactions or judgmental matters. Non-
routine transactions are transactions that are unusual, due to either size or nature, and that therefore
occur infrequently. Judgmental matters may include the development of accounting estimates for
which there is significant measurement uncertainty. Significant risks are inherent risks with both
a higher likelihood of occurrence and a higher magnitude of potential misstatement. The auditor
assesses assertions affected by a significant risk as higher inherent risk. The following are always
significant risks:
Risks of material misstatement due to fraud
Significant transactions with related parties that are outside the normal course of business for the
entity
Notes to Add
Greater manual intervention for data collection and processing. Complex calculations or accounting
principles.
The nature of non-routine transactions, which may make it difficult for the entity to implement
effective controls over the risks.
Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant judgmental matters that require the
development of accounting estimates, arising from matters such as the following:
Accounting principles for accounting estimates or revenue recognition may be subject to differing
interpretation.
Required judgment may be subjective or complex, or require assumptions about the effects of
future events, for example, judgment about fair value.
QUESTIONS
So far as the auditor is concerned, the examination and evaluation of the internal control system is an
indispensable part of the overall audit programme. The auditor needs reasonable assurance that the
accounting system is adequate and that all the accounting information which should be recorded has
in fact been recorded. Internal control normally contributes to such assurance.
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
A review of the internal control can be done by a process of study, examination and evaluation of the
control system installed by the management. The first step involves determination of the control
and procedures laid down by the management. By reading company manuals, studying organisation
charts and flow charts and by making suitable enquiries from the officers and employees, the auditor
may ascertain the character, scope and efficacy of the control system.
The auditor must ask the right people the right questions if he is to get the information he wants.
It would be better if he makes written notes of the relevant information and procedures contained in
the manual or ascertained on enquiry. To facilitate the accumulation of the information necessary for
the proper review and evaluation of internal controls, the auditor can use one of the following to help
him to know and assimilate the system and evaluate the same:
(a) Narrative record
(b) Check List
(c) Internal Control questionnaire and
(d) Flow chart
Methods of evaluation of
internal control
Notes to Add
Notes to Add
FLOW CHART
It is a graphic presentation of each part of the company’s system of internal control. A flow chart is
considered to be the most concise way of recording the auditor’s review of the system. It minimises the
amount of narrative explanation and thereby achieves a consideration or presentation not possible
in any other form.
It gives bird’s eye view of the system and the flow of transactions and integration and in
documentation, can be easily spotted and improvements can be suggested. It is also necessary for the
auditor to study the significant features of the business carried on by the concern, the nature of its
activities and various channels of goods and materials as well as cash, both inward and outward and
also a comprehensive study of the entire process of manufacturing, trading and administration. This
will help him to understand and evaluate the internal controls in the correct perspective.
Illustration 11: In order to evaluate the Internal Control of Your and My Limited, a team member of
the auditors used a method according to which, number of questions relating to internal control of the
company were required to be answered by the employees of the company. After obtaining the answers
there was a discussion relating to those answers between team member of the auditor and employees
of the company for a clear picture. State the method of evaluation of internal control as discussed above.
Solution: The method of evaluation of internal control used in the above question is known as
Internal Control Questionnaire because in questionnaire method, a number of questions relating to
internal control of a company are required to be answered by employees of that company and when
answers to the questions are obtained, there is a discussion relating to those answers between team
members of the auditors and employees of that company for a clear picture.
Illustration 12: Healthy and Useful Limited is into small manufacturing as well as trading business.
For the purpose of evaluating the internal control of Healthy and Useful Limited, a team member
of the auditors of the company used a method according to which the whole description of internal
control that was operating in the said company was to be recorded. Identify the method of evaluation
of internal control as mentioned above.
Solution: The method of evaluation of internal control referred above is known as Narrative Record
because in Narrative Record method, a whole description of internal control operating in an entity
is recorded. Narrative Record method is also appropriate for small manufacturing as well as trading
business as is mentioned in the question above case.
Notes to Add
ToC are performed to obtain A.E. about effectiveness of operation of I.C. through the audit
P D C
MM
After assimilating the internal control system, the auditor needs to examine whether and how far the
same is actually in operation. For this, he resorts to actual testing of the system in operation. This he
does on a selective basis: he can plan this testing in such a manner that all the important areas are
covered in a period of, say, three years.
Test of controls are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of the:
(i) Design of the accounting and internal control system
(ii) Operation of the internal control throughout the period
Test of controls include tests of elements of the control environment where strengths in the
control environment are used by auditors to reduce control risk. Some of the procedures performed
to obtain the understanding of the accounting and internal control systems may not have been
specifically planned as tests of control but may provide audit evidence about the effectiveness of the
design and operation of internal controls relevant to certain assertions and, consequently, serve as
tests of control. For example, in obtaining the understanding of the accounting and internal control
systems pertaining to cash, the auditor may have obtained audit evidence about the effectiveness of
the bank reconciliation process through inquiry and observation. When the auditor concludes that
procedures performed to obtain the understanding of the accounting and internal control systems
also provide audit evidence about the suitability of design and operating effectiveness of policies
and procedures relevant to a particular financial statement assertion, the auditor may use that audit
evidence, provided it is sufficient to support a control risk assessment at less than a high level.
Notes to Add
Procedures Controls
� Inspection of documents supporting transactions and other events to gain audit evidence that internal
controls have operated properly, for example, verifying that a transaction has been authorised.
Inquiries about, and observation of, internal controls which leave no audit trail, for example,
determining who actually performs each function and not merely who is supposed to perform it.
Re-performance involves the auditor’s independent execution of procedures or controls that were
originally performed as part of the entity’s internal control, for example, reconciliation of bank
accounts, to ensure they were correctly performed by the entity.
Testing of internal control operating on specific computerised applications or over the overall
information technology function, for example, access or program change controls.
While obtaining audit evidence about the effective operation of internal controls, the auditor
considers how they were applied, the consistency with which they were applied during the period
and by whom they were applied. The concept of effective operation recognises that some deviations
may have occurred. Deviations from prescribed controls may be caused by such factors as changes
in key personnel, significant seasonal fluctuations in volume of transactions and human error. When
deviations are detected, the auditor makes specific inquiries regarding these matters, particularly,
the timing of staff changes in key internal control functions. The auditor then ensures that the tests of
control appropriately cover such a period of change or fluctuation.
Based on the results of the tests of control, the auditor should evaluate whether the internal
controls are designed and operating as contemplated in the preliminary assessment of control risk.
The evaluation of deviations may result in the auditor concluding that the assessed level of control
risk needs to be revised. In such cases, the auditor would modify the nature, timing and extent of
planned substantive procedures.
Before the conclusion of the audit, based on the results of substantive procedures and other audit
evidence obtained by the auditor, the auditor should consider whether the assessment of control risk is
confirmed. In case of deviations from the prescribed accounting and internal control systems, the auditor
would make specific inquiries to consider their implications. Where, on the basis of such inquiries, the
auditor concludes that the deviations are such that the preliminary assessment of control risk is not
supported, he would amend the same unless the audit evidence obtained from other tests of control
supports that assessment. Where the auditor concludes that the assessed level of control risk needs to
be revised, he would modify the nature, timing and extent of his planned substantive procedures.
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
11. Tests of control are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of Internal Controls
Systems.
Ans. (Correct)
Tests of Control are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of:
(a) the design of the accounting and internal control systems that is whether, they are suitably
designed to prevent or detect or correct material misstatements and
(b) the operation of the internal controls throughout the period.
12. Maintenance of Internal Control System is the responsibility of the Statutory Auditor.
Ans. (Incorrect)
The management is responsible for maintaining an adequate accounting system incorporating
various internal controls to the extent appropriate to the size and nature of the business.
Maintenance of Internal Control System is responsibility of management because the internal
control is the process designed, implemented and maintained by those charged with governance/
management to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of entity’s objectives.
13. Mr. W, one of the team members of auditor of Different Limited was of the view that understanding
the Internal Control of Different Limited will not help in developing an Audit Programme.
Ans. Incorrect: Understanding the Internal Control of Different Limited will help in developing an
Audit Programme because it will assist the auditor and his team to understand as to how much
they can rely on internal control of the company and what audit procedures would be appropriate
to be used during the course of audit.
There is direct relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk.
14. Internal control cannot eliminate risk of material misstatements in the financial statements.
Ans. Correct: Control risk is a function of the effectiveness of the design, implementation and
maintenance of internal control by management. However, internal control can only reduce but
not eliminate risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. This is because of the
inherent limitations of internal control.
There is possibility of human errors or mistakes, or of controls being circumvented by collusion.
Accordingly, some control risk will always exist.
15. “The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the major activities that the entity uses to monitor
internal control over financial reporting” Explain.
Ans. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the information system, including the related business
processes, relevant to financial reporting, including the following are as:
(a) The classes of transactions in the entity’s operations that are significant to the financial
statements;
(b) The procedures by which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, corrected as
necessary, transferred to the general ledger and reported in the financial statements;
(c) The related accounting records, supporting information and specific accounts in the financial
statements that are used to initiate, record, process and report transactions;
(d) How the information system captures events and conditions that are significant to the
financial statements;
(e) The financial reporting process used to prepare the entity’s financial statements;
(f) Controls surrounding journal entries.
16. Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and analysing information
throughout the audit. Analyse and explain giving examples.
Ans. Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and analysing information
throughout the audit. The understanding establishes a frame of reference within which the auditor
plans the audit and exercises professional judgment throughout the audit, for example, when:
Assessing risks of material misstatement of the financial statements;
Determining materiality in accordance with SA 320;
Considering the appropriateness of the selection and application of accounting policies;
Identifying areas where special audit consideration may be necessary, for example, related party
transactions, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption, or
considering the business purpose of transactions;
Developing expectations for use when performing analytical procedures;
Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained, such as the
appropriateness of assumptions and of management’s oral and written representations.
17. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Explain with the help of example in
respect of the procedure for sales
Ans. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Procedural tests simply mean testing
of the compliance with the procedures laid down by the management in respect of initiation,
authorisation, recording and documentation of transaction at each stage through which it flows.
For example, the procedure for sales requires the following:
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 157
1. Before acceptance of any order the position of inventory of the relevant article should be
known to ascertain whether the order can be executed in time.
2. An advice under the authorisation of the sales manager should be sent to the party placing
the order, internal reference number, and the acceptance of the order. This advice should be
prepared on a standardised form and copy thereof should be forwarded to inventory section
to enable it to prepare for the execution of the order in time.
3. The credit period allowed to the party should be the normal credit period. For any special
credit period a special authorisation of the sales manager would be necessary.
4. The rate at which the order has been accepted and other terms about transport, insurance,
etc., should be clearly specified.
5. Before deciding upon the credit period, a reference should be made to the credit section to
know the creditworthiness of the party and particularly whether the party has honoured its
commitments in the past.
18. Briefly discuss the limitations of Internal Control.
Ans. (b) Limitations of Internal Control:
(i) Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance: Internal control, no matter
how effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the
entity’s financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected
by inherent limitations of internal control.
(ii) Human judgment in decision-making: Realities that human judgment in decision-
making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of
human error.
(iii) Lack of understanding the purpose: Equally, the operation of a control may not be
effective, such as where information produced for the purposes of internal control
(for example, an exception report) is not effectively used because the individual
responsible for reviewing the information does not understand its purpose or fails to
take appropriate action.
(iv) Collusion among People: Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion
of two or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control.
For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter
the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may result
in improper revenue recognition. Also, edit checks in a software program that are
designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may
be overridden or disabled.
(v) Judgements by Management: Further, in designing and implementing controls,
management may make judgments on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses
to implement, and the nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.
(vi) Limitations in case of Small Entities: Smaller entities often have fewer employees
due to which segregation of duties is not practicable. However, in a small owner-
managed entity, the owner-manager may be able to exercise more effective oversight
than in a larger entity. This oversight may compensate for the generally more limited
opportunities for segregation of duties. On the other hand, the owner-manager
may be more able to override controls because the system of internal control is less
structured. This is taken into account by the auditor when identifying the risks of
material misstatement due to fraud.
Also known as
QUESTIONS
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
30. An automated environment basically refers to a business environment where the processes,
operations, accounting except the decisions are carried out by using computer systems.
Ans. Incorrect: An automated environment basically refers to a business environment where the
processes, operations, accounting and even decisions are carried out by using computer systems.
31. All automated environments are complex.
Ans. Incorrect: The complexity of an automated environment depends on various factors including
the nature of business, level of automation, volume of transactions, use of ERP and so on. There
could be environment where dependence on IT and automation is relatively less or minimal and
hence, considered less complex or even non-complex.
164 Auditing & Ethics PW
KEY FEATURES OF AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
Key Features
(1) Enables faster business operations
(2) Accuracy in → Data Processing → Computation
(3) Better → Security → Control
(4) Less prone to human errors
(5) Provides Latest info.
(6) Ability to process large volume of transactions
(7) Connectivity → Networking → Capabilities
The fundamental principle of an automated environment is the ability to carry out business with less
manual intervention and more system driven. The complexity of a business environment depends
on the level of automation i.e., if a business environment is more automated, it is likely to be more
complex. Key features of an automated environment are as under:
Enables faster business operation
Accuracy in data processing and computation
If a company uses an integrated enterprise resource planning system (ERP) viz., SAP, Oracle etc.,
then it is considered more complex to audit. On the other hand, if a company is using an off-the-shelf
accounting software, then it is likely to be less automated and hence less complex environment.
Notes to Add
In an audit of financial statements, an auditor is required to understand the entity and its business,
including IT. Understanding the entity and its automated environment involves understanding how
IT department is organised, IT activities, the IT dependencies, relevant risks and controls. Given below
are some of the points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the company’s
automated environment:
Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are)
Their purpose (financial and non-financial)
Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application).
Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist). In-house vs Packaged.
Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support). Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators).
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
32. Briefly mention three reasons why IT should be considered relevant to an audit of financial
statements.
Ans. The auditor should consider relevance of IT in an audit of financial statements for the following
reasons:
(a) Since auditors rely on the reports and information generated by IT systems, there could be
risk in the IT systems that could have an impact on audit.
(b) Standards on auditing SA 315 and SA 330 require auditors to understand, assess and respond
to risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
(c) By relying on automated controls and using data analytics in an audit, it is possible to increase
the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit process.
33. In an audit of financial statements, the auditor should plan response to all IT risks.
Ans. Incorrect: The auditor should plan response to those IT risks that are relevant to financial
reporting and not “all” IT risks.
166 Auditing & Ethics PW
34. When a business operates in a more automated environment, we are likely to see several business
functions and activities happening within the systems. List down the business functions and
activities happening within the systems.
Ans. Relevance of Information Technology in an Audit: When a business operates in a more automated
environment it is likely that we will see several business functions and activities happening within
the systems.
Consider the following aspects instead of:
(i) Computation and Calculations are automatically carried out (for example, bank interest
computation and inventory valuation).
(ii) Accounting entries are posted automatically (for example, sub-ledger to GL postings is
automatic).
Notes to Add
Having obtained an understanding of the IT systems and the automated environment of a company,
the auditor should now understand the risks that arise from the use of IT systems. Given below are
some such risks that should be considered:
Inaccurate processing of data, processing inaccurate data, or both.
Loss of data.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
35. The auditor should understand and consider the risks that may arise from the use of Information
Technology (IT) Systems.
Ans. Having obtained an understanding of the IT systems and the automated environment of a company,
the auditor should now understand the risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
Given below are some such risks that should be considered,
Inaccurate processing of data, processing inaccurate data, or both
Loss of data
36. When the company is working in an automated environment, it is not necessary for its auditor
to understand its automated environment and depends upon the professional judgement of the
auditor as to whether gaining knowledge of company’s IT systems is required or not. Do you agree
with this statement?
168 Auditing & Ethics PW
Ans. Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: When a business operates in a more
automated environment it is likely that auditor will see several business functions and activities
happening within the systems.
Consider the following aspects instead of:
(i) Computation and Calculations are automatically carried out (for example, bank interest
computation and inventory valuation).
(ii) Accounting entries are posted automatically (for example, sub-ledger to GL postings is automatic).
(iii) Business policies and procedures, including internal controls, are applied automatically
(for example, delegation of authority for journal approvals, customer credit limit checks are
performed automatically).
(iv) Reports used in business are produced from systems. Management and other stakeholders
rely on these reports and information produced (for example, debtors ageing report).
(v) User access and security are controlled by assigning system roles to users (for example,
segregation of duties can be enforced effectively).
Companies derive benefit from the use of IT systems as an enabler to support various
business operations and activities. Auditors need to understand the relevance of these IT
systems to an audit of financial statements.
While it is true that the use of IT systems and automation benefit the business by making operations
more accurate, reliable, effective and efficient, such systems also introduce certain new risks,
including IT specific risks, which need to be considered, assessed and addressed by management.
To the extent that it is relevant to an audit of financial statements, even auditors are required
to understand, assess and respond to such risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
From the above discussion, it is quite apparent that it is necessary for an auditor to understand
the automated environment.
Alternative Solution
Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: In an audit of financial statements, an
auditor is required to understand the entity and its business, including IT as per SA 315. Understanding
the entity and its automated environment involves understanding how IT department is organised, IT
activities, the IT dependencies, relevant risks and controls.
Given below are some of the points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of
the company’s automated environment:
(i) Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are).
(ii) Their purpose (financial and non-financial).
(iii) Location of IT systems - local vs global.
(iv) Architecture (desktop based, client-server, web application, cloud based).
(v) Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application).
(vi) Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist).
(vii) In-house vs Packaged.
(viii) Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support).
(ix) Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators).
The understanding of a company’s IT environment that is obtained should be documented.
From the above discussion, it is quite apparent that it is necessary for an auditor to understand
the automated environment.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 169
IMPACT OF IT RELATED RISKS
(1) Substantive Audit
(a) Cannot rely on data Obtained from system
(b) System → Data → Reports → Should be tested substantively for more → Completeness →
Accuracy
(2) Controls
(a) Cannot relay on automated controls, system calculations & A/c.ing procedures
(b) More substantive Audit work is needed
(3) Reporting
(a) Communication to TCWG
(b) Modified Audit Report
The above risks have to be mitigated. If not mitigated, such risks, could have an impact on audit in
different ways discussed as under:
Impact on substantive checking
Inability to address above discussed risks may lead to non-reliance of data obtained from systems. In
such a case, all information, data, and reports would have to be tested thoroughly for their completeness
and accuracy. It could lead to increased substantive checking i.e., detailed checking.
Impact on controls
It can lead to non-reliance on automated controls, system calculations and accounting procedures
built into applications. It may result in additional audit work.
Impact on reporting
Due to regulatory requirements in respect of internal financial controls (discussed in subsequent
paras) in case of companies, it may lead to modification of auditor’s report in some instances.
Notes to Add
General IT Controls
(1) P & P that relates to many Applications + Support effective function of
Application controls
(2) They apply to Main frames Mini frames
(3) General IT controls that Maintain integrity of info Security of Data
Commonly includes controls over
IT Sys. Applications
(2) Even though Controls are performed manually The Design Effectiveness
of such controls Depends upon The reliability of Source of Data
(3) Due to Internet dependency on IT The Effectiveness Reliability of
Automation IT Dependent
Controls
These are IT controls generally implemented to mitigate the IT specific risks and applied commonly
across multiple IT systems, applications and business processes. Hence, General IT controls are known
as “pervasive” controls or “indirect” controls.
(a) Controls over Data centre and network operations: The objective of controls over Data centre
and network operations is to ensure that production systems are processed to meet financial
reporting objectives. These include activities such as overall management of computer operation
activities, preparing, scheduling and executing of batch jobs, monitoring, storage and retention
of backups. Such controls also help in performance monitoring of operating system, database
and networks. Matters such as BCP (Business continuity plan) and DRP (Disaster recovery plan)
which deal with recovery from failures are also taken care of by such type of controls.
(b) Program Change: The objective of program change controls is to ensure that modified systems
continue to meet financial reporting objectives. It includes activities such as change management
process, recording, managing and tracking change requests, making and testing changes etc.
(c) Access Security: The objective of controls over access security is to ensure that access to programs
and data is authenticated and authorized to meet financial reporting objectives. It includes
activities such as security organization & management, security policies & procedures, application
security, data security, operating system security, network security, physical security etc.
(d) Application system acquisition, development, and maintenance: The objective of such controls
is to ensure that systems are developed, configured and implemented to meet financial reporting
objectives. It includes overall management of development activities, project initiation, analysis
& design, construction, testing & quality assurance etc.
QUESTIONS
Application Controls
Application controls include both automated or manual controls that operate at a business process
level. Automated Application controls are embedded into IT applications viz., ERPs and help in
ensuring the completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated
applications include edit checks and validation of input data, sequence number checks, user limit
checks, reasonableness checks, mandatory data fields.
IT Dependent Controls
IT dependent controls are basically manual controls that make use of some form of data or information
or report produced from IT systems and applications. In this case, even though the control is performed
manually, the design and effectiveness of such controls depends on the reliability of source data. Due
to the inherent dependency on IT, the effectiveness and reliability of automated application controls
and IT dependent controls require the General IT controls to be effective.
These two categories of control over IT systems are interrelated.
The relationship between the application controls and the General IT Controls is such that General
IT Controls are needed to support the functioning of application controls, and both are needed to
ensure complete and accurate information processing through IT systems.
QUESTIONS
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
40. In an automated environment, the relationship between the application controls and the General
IT controls over IT systems are not interrelated.
Ans. Incorrect: The relationship between the application controls and the General IT Controls is such
that General IT Controls are needed to support the functioning of application controls, and both
are needed to ensure complete and accurate information processing through IT systems. These
two categories of control over IT systems are interrelated.
41. Discuss relationship between “General IT controls” and “application controls” in an automated
environment.
Reperformance most effective + gives Best A.E. But Time Consuming Least icient
Inspection Most Eff. & Eff. A.E. But Which When What Test to use
+
Inquiry Is a matter of professional Judgement
Depends up on
Having learnt about the various IT risks and controls, let us understand the different ways testing is
performed in an automated environment. There are basically four types of audit tests that should be
used. These are inquiry, observation, inspection and reperformance. Inquiry is the most efficient audit
test but it also gives the least audit evidence. Hence, inquiry should always be used in combination
with any one of the other audit testing methods. Inquiry alone is not sufficient. Reperformance is most
effective as an audit test and gives the best audit evidence. However, testing by reperformance could
be very time consuming and least efficient most of the time.
Generally, applying inquiry in combination with inspection gives the most effective and efficient
audit evidence. However, which audit test to use, when and in what combination is a matter of
QUESTIONS
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
43. Inquiry is often the most efficient audit testing method, but least effective.
Ans. Correct: Inquiry is the most efficient but least effective. Moreover, testing through inquiry alone is
not sufficient. Inquiry should be corroborated by applying any one or a combination of observation,
inspection or reperformance.
44. Generally, applying inquiry in combination with re performance as audit testing method gives
the most effective and efficient audit evidence
Ans. Incorrect: Generally, applying inquiry in combination with inspection gives the most effective
and efficient audit evidence.
Theory Questions
45. What are the different testing methods used when auditing in an automated environment. Which
is the most effective and efficient method of testing?
Ans. When auditing in an automated environment, the following testing methods are used:
(a) Inquiry
(b) Observation
(c) Inspection
(d) Reperformance
A combination of inquiry and inspection is generally the most effective and efficient testing method.
However, determining the most effective and efficient testing method is a matter of professional
judgement and depends on the several factors including risk assessment, control environment,
desired level of evidence required, history of errors/misstatements, complexity of business,
assertions being addressed.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 177
CHARACTERISTICS OF MANUAL & AUTOMATED ELEMENTS OF IC RELEVANT TO
AUDITOR’S RISK ASSESSMENT
Manual
® An entity's system of I.C. ® contains elements
Automated
® Use of Manual Elements in I.C. ® Affects the manner
Automated ¯
in which transactions are
I R P R
Controls in Manual
Approval
(1) Review
Procedures
Reconciliations
Follow up
(2) MayuseAutomated Procedures Electronic format
An entity’s system of internal control contains manual elements and often contains automated
elements. The characteristics of manual or automated elements are relevant to the auditor’s risk
assessment and further audit procedures based thereon. The use of manual or automated elements
in internal control also affects the manner in which transactions are initiated, recorded, processed,
and reported:
(a) Controls in a manual system may include such procedures as approvals and reviews of transactions,
and reconciliations and follow-up of reconciling items. Alternatively, an entity may use automated
procedures to initiate, record, process, and report transactions, in which case records in electronic
format replace paper documents.
(b) Controls in IT systems consist of a combination of automated controls (for example, controls
embedded in computer programs) and manual controls. Further, manual controls may be
independent of IT, may use information produced by IT, or may be limited to monitoring the
effective functioning of IT and of automated controls, and to handling exceptions.
Manual elements in internal control may be more suitable where judgment and discretion are required
such as for the following circumstances:
Large, unusual or non-recurring transactions.
Circumstances where errors are difficult to define, anticipate or predict.
In changing circumstances that require a control response outside the scope of an existing
automated control.
In monitoring the effectiveness of automated controls.
Manual elements in internal control may be less reliable than automated elements because they
can be more easily bypassed, ignored, or overridden and they are also more prone to simple errors
and mistakes. Consistency of application of a manual control element cannot therefore be assumed.
Manual control elements may be less suitable for the following circumstances:
High volume or recurring transactions, or in situations where errors that can be anticipated or
predicted can be prevented, or detected and corrected, by control parameters that are automated.
Control activities where the specific ways to perform the control can be adequately designed and
automated.
The extent and nature of the risks to internal control vary depending on the nature and characteristics
of the entity’s information system. The entity responds to the risks arising from the use of IT or from use
of manual elements in internal control by establishing effective controls in light of the characteristics
of the entity’s information system.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 179
AUDIT APPROACH IN AN AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
Understand and Test for Operating Reporting
Risk Assessment
Evaluate Effectiveness
Notes to Add
DATA ANALYTICS
Tools
that Auditor uses CAATs
Techniques
In today’s digital age when companies rely on more and more on IT systems and networks to
operate business, the amount of data and information that exists in these systems is enormous. The
combination of processes, tools and techniques that are used to tap vast amounts of electronic data
to obtain meaningful information is called data analytics. While it is true that companies can benefit
immensely from the use of data analytics in terms of increased profitability, better customer service,
gaining competitive advantage, more efficient operations, etc., even auditors can make use of similar
tools and techniques in the audit process and obtain good results.
The tools and techniques that auditors use in applying the principles of data analytics are known
as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs in short. Data analytics can be used in testing of
electronic records and data residing in IT systems using spreadsheets and specialised audit tools viz.,
IDEA and ACL to perform the following:
Check completeness of data and population that is used in either test of controls or substantive
audit tests.
Selection of audit samples – random sampling, systematic sampling.
Fraud investigation.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
46. A company functions in an automated environment. Discuss in what areas data analytics can be
useful for auditor of the company.
Ans. Refer to heading on “data analytics”
Entities are embracing digitization as part of their operations to keep pace with changing times. New
technologies are helping companies revamp their operations and rethink the way business is
conducted. Companies are restructuring their business models driven by technology. Automation is
key to digitization.
In such a business environment, use of digital technology is being made by auditors right from
planning to expression of final opinion. Auditors are making use of artificial intelligence, data analytics
and other latest technologies to help understand business processes in a better way. By using such
tools, auditors can conduct audit in a better way and devote more attention to areas requiring greater
focus. Digital audit is helping auditors to better identify risks making use of technology.
Notes to Add
Reliability of Compliance with app. Eff. & Eff. of Safeguarding P & D of Fraud
Financial Reporting Laws Regulations Operations of Assets
Requirements of :
Ack./Rule Section/Rule Responsibility Applicability
The companies Act, Sec.134(5)(e) B.O.D. Check – Ch.4
2013
Sec.149(8) & Independent Director All Companies having
Schedule IV (I.D) I.D.
Sec.177 Audit Committee (A.C.) All Companies Having
A.C.
Sec.143(3)(i) Statutory Auditor All Companies
The Companies Rule 8(5) (viii) BOD All Companies
(Accounts Rules, 2014
The term Internal Financial Controls (IFC) basically refers to the policies and procedures put in place
by companies for ensuring:
Reliability of financial reporting
The Companies Act, 2013 has placed a greater emphasis on the effective implementation and
reporting on the internal controls for a company. The term “internal financial controls” is used at
some places in Companies Act, 2013 casting responsibilities as under:
Relevant provision of Nature of Responsibility
Companies Act,2013
Section 134 (5) (e) In case of listed Companies, the Directors’ responsibility statement
shall state that the Directors had laid down Internal financial
controls to be followed by the company and that such Internal
financial controls are adequate and were operating effectively.
Section 143 (3) (i) of the Act The auditor’s report shall state whether the company has
adequate Internal financial controls system in place and also on
the operating effectiveness of such controls.
QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
47. The auditor’s responsibility includes reporting on Internal Financial Controls over Financial
Reporting which includes an understanding IT environment of the company and relevant risks
and controls. Mention the situations where IT will be relevant to an audit.
Ans. With the introduction of the Companies Act 2013, there is greater emphasis given to internal
financial controls (IFC) from a regulatory point of view. Directors and those charged with
governance (including Board of directors, Audit committee) are responsib le for the implementation
of internal controls framework within the company. The auditors’ responsibilities now include
reporting on Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting which include and understanding
IT environment of the company and relevant risks & controls.
Following are some situations in which IT will be relevant to an audit:
(i) Increased use of Systems and Application software in Business (for example, use of ERPs)
(ii) Complexity of transactions has increased (multiple systems, network of systems)
(iii) Hi-tech nature of business (Telecom, e-Commerce).
(iv) Volume of transactions are high (Insurance, Banking, Railways ticketing).
(v) Company Policy (Compliance).
(vi) Regulatory requirements - Companies Act 2013 IFC, IT Act 2008.
(vii) Required by Indian and International Standards - ISO, PCI-DSS, SA 315, SOC, ISAE
(viii) Increases efficiency and effectiveness of audit.
At the conclusion of each audit, it is possible that there will be certain findings or exceptions in
IT environment and IT controls of the company that need to be assessed and reported to relevant
stakeholders including management and those charged with governance viz., Board of directors,
Audit committee.
Some points to consider are as follows:
Are there any weaknesses in IT controls?
What is the impact of these weaknesses on overall audit?
QUESTIONS
Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
50. During the assessment of Internal Controls, if the auditor can test Compensating controls, he
should obtain evidence of other mitigating factors.
Ans. Incorrect: If the auditor can test Compensating controls , he should obtain additional evidence
that may be required.
Obtaining evidence of other mitigating factors is required when he can’t test compensating controls
during his assessment of the Internal Controls.
51. As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 private companies are not required to appoint
internal auditor.
Ans. Correct: Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires every private company to appoint an
internal auditor having turnover of ₹ 200 crore or more during the preceding financial year; or
outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding ₹ 100 crore
or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.
Theory Questions
52. Sweet Fruits Private Limited had a turnover of ₹ 155 crore for the financial year 2019-20. Explain
whether during the financial year 2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited would be required
or not required to appoint an internal auditor, keeping in view the provisions of Companies
Act, 2013.
Ans. During the financial year 2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited would not be required to appoint
an internal auditor because according to Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 every private
company having a turnover of more than or equal to ₹ 200 crore during the preceding financial
year is required to appoint an internal auditor.
It is given in the question that Sweet Fruits Private Limited during the financial year 2018-19
had a turnover of ₹ 155 crore which is less than ₹ 200 crore. Therefore, during the financial year
2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited will not be required to appoint an internal auditor.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 187
53. Internal audit not only analyses the effectiveness with which the internal control of a company
is operating but also improves the effectiveness of internal control. Elucidate the statement.
Ans. Improvement in Effectiveness of Internal Control: Internal Audit means “An independent
management function, which involves a continuous and critical appraisal of the functioning of an
entity with a view to suggest improvements thereto and add value to and strengthen the overall
governance mechanism of the entity, including the entity’s strategic risk management and internal
control system”.
Activities Relating to Internal Control:
(i) Evaluation of internal control: The internal audit function may be assigned specific
responsibility for reviewing controls, evaluating their operation and recommending
improvements thereto. In doing so, the internal audit function provides assurance on the
control. For example, the internal audit function might plan and perform tests or other
procedures to provide assurance to management and those charged with governance
regarding the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of internal control,
including those controls that are relevant to the audit.
(ii) Examination of financial and operating information: The internal audit function may be
assigned to review the means used to identify, recognize, measure, classify and report
financial and operating information, and to make specific inquiry into individual items,
including detailed testing of transactions, balances and procedures.
(iii) Review of operating activities: The internal audit function may be assigned to review
the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of operating activities, including non-financial
activities of an entity.
(iv) Review of compliance with laws and regulations: The internal audit function may be assigned
to review compliance with laws, regulations and other external requirements, and with
management policies and directives and other internal requirements.
Therefore, one of the important aspects of internal audit is not only to evaluate internal
control system of an organization but also to suggest improvements for adding value and
strengthening it.
54. List any five points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the Company’s
automated environment.
Ans. Understanding of the Company’s Automated Environment: Given below are some of the points that
an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the company’s automated environment
Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are)
their purpose (financial and non-financial)
Location of IT systems - local vs global
Architecture (desktop based, client-server, web application, cloud based)
Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application)
Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist)
In-house vs Packaged
Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support)
Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators)
188 Auditing & Ethics PW
AUDITOR’S RESPONSE TO ASSESSED RISK
Design
SA 330 Auditor'sResponsibility F.A.P
Implement
Objective obtainSuff. + Appro. A.E. Responses
To Risks
Identiied Assessed
SA 315
* Designing FAP Auditor shall
Relevant Controls
(control Risk)
Substantive analytical
Tests of Details procedures
when
SA 330 The auditor’s responses to assessed risks deals with the auditor’s responsibility to design
and implement responses to the risks of material misstatement identified and assessed by
the auditor in accordance with SA 315, “Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement
Through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment” in a financial statement audit. The objective
of the auditor is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the assessed risks of material
misstatement, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to those risks.
SA 330 states that:
(a) The auditor shall design and implement overall responses to address the assessed risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement level.
(b) The auditor shall design and perform further audit procedures whose nature, timing and extent are
based on and are responsive to the assessed risks of material misstatement at the assertion level.
In designing the further audit procedures to be performed, the auditor shall:
(a) Consider the reasons for the assessment given to the risk of material misstatement at the assertion
level for each class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure, including:
(i) The likelihood of material misstatement due to the particular characteristics of the
relevant class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure (i.e., the inherent risk); and
(ii) Whether the risk assessment takes into account the relevant controls (i.e., the control risk),
thereby requiring the auditor to obtain audit evidence to determine whether the controls
are operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness of
controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures); and
(b) Obtain more persuasive audit evidence the higher the auditor’s assessment of risk.
The auditor shall design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
as to the operating effectiveness of relevant controls when:
(a) The auditor’s assessment of risks of material misstatement at the assertion level includes an
expectation that the controls are operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the
operating effectiveness of controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures); or Substantive procedures alone cannot provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence
at the assertion level.
190 Auditing & Ethics PW
In designing and performing tests of controls, the auditor shall obtain more persuasive audit
evidence the greater the reliance the auditor places on the effectiveness of a control.
A higher level of assurance may be sought about the operating effectiveness of controls when the
approach adopted consists primarily of tests of controls, in particular, where it is not possible or
practicable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence only from substantive procedures.
Notes to Add
period.
Notes to Add
The auditor shall test controls for the particular time, or throughout the period, for which the auditor
intends to rely on those controls in order to provide an appropriate basis for the auditor’s intended
reliance. Audit evidence pertaining only to a point in time may be sufficient for the auditor’s purpose,
for example, when testing controls over the entity’s physical inventory counting at the period end.
If, on the other hand, the auditor intends to rely on a control over a period, tests that are capable of
providing audit evidence that the control operated effectively at relevant times during that period are
appropriate. Such tests may include tests of the entity’s monitoring of controls.
Notes to Add
In determining whether it is appropriate to use audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of
controls obtained in previous audits, and, if so, the length of the time period that may elapse before
retesting a control, the auditor shall consider the following:
(a) The effectiveness of other elements of internal control, including the control environment,
the entity’s monitoring of controls, and the entity’s risk assessment process
(b) The risks arising from the characteristics of the control, including whether it is manual or
automated
(c) The effectiveness of general IT-controls
(d) The effectiveness of the control and its application by the entity, including the nature and
extent of deviations in the application of the control noted in previous audits, and whether
there have been personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control
(e) Whether the lack of a change in a particular control poses a risk due to changing circumstances and
(f) The risks of material misstatement and the extent of reliance on the control
If the auditor plans to use audit evidence from a previous audit about the operating effectiveness of
specific controls, the auditor shall establish the continuing relevance of that evidence by obtaining
audit evidence about whether significant changes in those controls have occurred subsequent to the
previous audit.
Notes to Add
When evaluating the operating effectiveness of relevant controls, the auditor shall evaluate whether
misstatements that have been detected by substantive procedures indicate that controls are not
operating effectively. The absence of misstatements detected by substantive procedures, however,
does not provide audit evidence that controls related to the assertion being tested are effective. A
material misstatement detected by the auditor’s procedures is a strong indicator of the existence of a
significant deficiency in internal control.
Notes to Add
When deviations from controls upon which the auditor intends to rely are detected, the auditor shall
make specific inquiries to understand these matters and their potential consequences, and shall
determine whether:
(a) The test of controls that have been performed provide an appropriate basis for reliance on the
controls
(b) Additional test of controls are necessary or
(c) The potential risks of misstatement need to be addressed using substantive procedures.
Irrespective of the assessed risks of material misstatement, the auditor shall design and perform
substantive procedures for each material class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure.
This requirement reflects the facts that:
(i) the auditor’s assessment of risk is judgmental and so may not identify all risks of material
misstatement and
(ii) there are inherent limitations to internal control, including management override.
Substantive procedures are audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at
the assertion level. Substantive procedures comprise: (i) Tests of details (of classes of transactions,
account balances, and disclosures), and (ii) Substantive analytical procedures.
Notes to Add
Tests of details are further classified into tests of transactions i.e., vouching and tests of balances i.e.,
verification.
For example, a purchase transaction may be verified by examining the related purchase invoice,
goods received note, inward gate entry register. Such tests of transactions help in establishing the
authenticity of transactions recorded in books of accounts.
Tests of balances consist of verification of assets as well as liabilities. Verification of an item of
fixed asset, for example, would help in establishing existence of that asset as on date of balance sheet.
This may be obtained by reviewing entity’s plan for performing physical verification of fixed assets
and obtaining evidence for performance of physical verification of fixed assets by management.
Notes to Add
Among
Investigation of Relationships that are in
Identiied consistent with other
Fluctuations inancial info. Financial Non-Financial
OR DATA
Deviate signiicantly from
predicted amount
Notes to Add
A combination of substantive analytical procedures and tests of details are most responsive to the
assessed risks.
Because the assessment of the risk of material misstatement takes account of internal control, the
extent of substantive procedures may need to be increased when the results from test of controls are
unsatisfactory.
In designing tests of details, the extent of testing is ordinarily thought of in terms of the sample
size. However, other matters are also relevant, including whether it is more effective to use other
selective means of testing.
Auditor's responses
to assessed risks
Tests of Substantive
Controls Procedures
Substantive analytical
Tests of procedures
Details
Tests of transactions Tests of balances
i.e.vouching i.e.veriication
CASE STUDY 1
CA Paritosh is auditor of a company. The financial statements of the company have just been
received for audit. Following issues have been flagged pertaining to the financial statements
of the company for purpose of risk assessment:
The revenue of company has fallen from ` 50 crore in last year to ` 5 crore in current year
(for which financial statements have been received for audit) due to lack of demand in the
market for company’s products.
Due to advent of new products in the market, company’s products are fast becoming
outdated.
A large customer having an outstanding balance of ` 5 crore has failed to pay to the company
despite efforts made by the company.
Inventory holding period has increased from 30 days in last year to 90 days.
The company also gets carried out job operations from third parties. Therefore, parts
of inventories are lying with third parties.
Notes to Add
Theory Questions
Based on above, answer the following questions:
55. Regarding drastic fall in revenue of the company, which of the following is an audit risk?
(a) Fall in revenue would result in fall of profits for the company.
(b) Drastic fall in revenue may imply that company is not able to carry out its operations in
foreseeable future due to lack of demand in the market for company’s products. There is a
risk that going concern disclosure is omitted to be made in financial statements.
(c) The company can explore some new line of activity, if demand of its products is falling.
(d) Fall in revenue would mean lower tax liabilities for the company.
Ans. (b)
56. The company’s products are getting outdated in the market. Which of the following is an audit
risk?
(a) The company should devise strategies to sell products in the market
(b) Inventories may be understated in such a scenario
(c) Inventories may be overstated in such a scenario
(d) The company should launch a 1+1 free offer for its customers
Ans. (c)
57. A large customer has failed to pay to the company. Identify audit risk from below:
(a) Receivables may be misstated if irrecoverable debt is not written off
(b) Receivables may be overstated if irrecoverable debt is not written off
(c) Writing off irrecoverable debt would impact profits of company adversely
(d) Failure to recover outstanding debt would impact cash flows of company adversely
Ans. (b)
58. Identify audit risk involved when inventory holding period has increased from 30 days to 90 days.
(a) There is a risk of overstatement of inventories
(b) There is a risk relating to existence of inventories
(c) There is a risk that slow movement of stocks would increase tax liability when GST rates are
increased
(d) There is a risk relating to holding and storage cost of inventories
Ans. (a)
59. Part of inventories are lying with third parties. Identify audit risk involved.
(a) There is a risk that third parties do not manufacture according to specifications of the company
(b) There is a risk that by getting job work done from third parties, company is increasing its costs
(c) There is a risk that sufficient and appropriate evidence would not be available in respect of
quantity and condition of inventories lying with third parties
(d) There is a risk that sufficient and appropriate evidence would not be available for quality
control in respect of inventories lying with third parties
Ans. (c)
202 Auditing & Ethics PW
CASE STUDY 2
CA Piyush is understanding internal controls as part of audit exercise of a company.
It is a new client. He has studied controls in place in various operational areas of the company.
After studying and gaining an understanding of such controls, he has decided to test few controls
to actually see whether these are operating as intended by the management.
Till now, he has studied controls over inventories and bank. Few of such controls are listed below:
Nature of Control Control description
Control over inventories Inventories of the company lying at each location should be insured.
Control over inventories There should be inventory counts on a regular basis for each location
of the company.
Control over Bank operations Bank reconciliations are to be performed at regular intervals.
Theory Questions
Based on above, answer the following questions:
60. Which of the following most appropriately describes test of control regarding insurance of
inventories?
(a) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are insured for fire &
burglary. The sum insured & period of validity of policy are not relevant.
(b) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are comprehensively
insured. Ensure adequacy of sum insured by comparing it with value of inventories. Also
ensure policy period has not expired.
(c) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are comprehensively
insured. Ensure policy period has not expired.
(d) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are insured for fire and
burglary. Ensure policy period has not expired.
Ans. (b)
61. Which of the following most appropriately describes test of control regarding inventory counts?
(a) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure.
(b) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure. Attend inventory count.
(c) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure. Attend inventory count and perform test count.
(d) Attend inventory count and perform test count.
Ans. (c)
62. While testing control over bank reconciliations, it has been noticed that bank reconciliations are
not being performed at regular intervals. Identify the most appropriate description of “control
deficiency” in this regard:
(a) Bank reconciliations are not being performed regularly as concerned staff is overburdened.