0% found this document useful (1 vote)
231 views

CH-3 - Risk Assessment and Internal Control

Audit risk is the risk that an auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when financial statements are materially misstated. It means an auditor issues an unmodified opinion even when statements are misstated. To reduce this risk, auditors plan procedures to obtain sufficient evidence to issue reasonable opinions. Risk of material misstatement refers to the probability of fraud or error in statements prior to audit. It has two components - inherent risk, which is the susceptibility of an assertion to misstatement before considering controls, and control risk, which is the risk that controls fail to prevent or detect misstatements.

Uploaded by

atishayjjj123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
231 views

CH-3 - Risk Assessment and Internal Control

Audit risk is the risk that an auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when financial statements are materially misstated. It means an auditor issues an unmodified opinion even when statements are misstated. To reduce this risk, auditors plan procedures to obtain sufficient evidence to issue reasonable opinions. Risk of material misstatement refers to the probability of fraud or error in statements prior to audit. It has two components - inherent risk, which is the susceptibility of an assertion to misstatement before considering controls, and control risk, which is the risk that controls fail to prevent or detect misstatements.

Uploaded by

atishayjjj123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 122

Risk Assessment and

3 Internal Control
CHAPTER

AUDIT RISK
Auditor gives an INAPPROPRIATE OPINION

when the FS ARE MM

Auditor expresses  unmodiied Opinion  when the FS ARE MM

Reputation Regulatory Legal


Damage Action Action
Plan
Auditor Audit  AUDIT RISK is
Perform

REDUCED TO AN ACCEPTABLY LOW LEVEL
Audit Risk = f(RoMM-Detection Risk)

Inherent Control
Risk Risk

Audit risk means the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated.
It means that an auditor expresses an unmodified opinion when financial statements are materially
misstated. In such a case, not only reputation of auditor would be damaged, but he could also invite
regulatory action from professional body and could face probable legal action by intended users.
To avoid such unpleasant consequences, the auditor will plan and perform the audit in such a
way that audit risk is reduced to an acceptably low level. SA-200 states that the auditor shall obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level and thereby
enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor’s opinion.
Consider, for example, that profits of a company have been increased artificially by showing fake
revenues of sizeable amounts in its financial statements. In such a case, financial statements are
materially misstated. The probability, that auditor in such a case, expresses an inappropriate audit
opinion is referred to as audit risk. It is the possibility that auditor expresses an unmodified opinion
even when financial statements are materially misstated.
Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection risk.
QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
1. While conducting the audit of Smart TV Ltd, engagement team of HTR& Co, has considered
materiality and audit risk throughout the audit. Discuss explaining the meaning of audit risk.
Ans. Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement
and detection risk. Materiality and audit risk are considered throughout the audit, in particular,
when:
(a) Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement;
(b) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures; and
(c) Evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in
forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Notes to Add

84 Auditing & Ethics PW


RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
FS are MM PRIOR TO AUDIT
F
Probability o in FS Before Audit
E
* Misstatement = Amount, ication, Presentation, Disclosure
[Recorded F.S. - As per App. FR.F]

F E
* RoMM @ Overall FS. Level → Relate Pervasively to FS. as a whole
+
Potentially affect many assertions

Assertion level → Assessed to determine

CoT A/c. Bal Disclosures N E T


of FAP

SA 200 states that risk of material statement is the risk that the financial statements are materially
misstated prior to audit. It simply means that there is a probability of frauds or errors in financial
statements before audit.
What is meant by misstatement?
Misstatement refers to a difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or
disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification, presentation, or
disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework. Misstatements can arise from error or fraud.
Few examples of misstatements could be:
‰ Charging of an item of capital expenditure to revenue or vice-versa
‰ Difference in disclosure of a financial statement item vis-à-vis its requirement in applicable
financial reporting framework
‰ Selection or application of inappropriate accounting policies
‰ Difference in accounting estimate of a financial statement item vis-à-vis its appropriateness in
applicable financial reporting framework
‰ Intentional booking of fake expenses in statement of profit and loss
‰ Overstating of receivables in financial statements by not writing off irrecoverable debts
‰ Overstating or understating inventories
The risks of material misstatement may exist at two levels:
‰ The overall financial statement level
‰ The assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, & disclosures.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 85


Risks of material misstatement at the overall financial statement level refer to risks of
material misstatement that relate pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and potentially
affect many assertions.
Risks of material misstatement at the assertion level are assessed in order to determine the
nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence. This evidence enables the auditor to express an opinion on the financial statements at an
acceptably low level of audit risk.

Notes to Add

86 Auditing & Ethics PW


COMPONENTS OF RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT (RoMM)

Inherent Risk Control Risk

(1) Are Entity's Risk


(2) Exist independently of → Audit of F.S.
(3) Inluenced by client
(4) Not I luenced by Auditor

The risk of material misstatement at assertion level comprises of two components i.e., inherent risk
and control risk. Both inherent risk and control risk are the entity’s risks and they exist independently
of the audit of financial statements. Inherent risk and control risk are influenced by the client. These
are entity’s risks and are not influenced by the auditor.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
2. “Risk of material misstatement consists of two components” Explain clearly defining risk of
material misstatement.
Ans. Refer to heading “Components of risk of material misstatement”.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 87


INHERENT RISK
CoT
Susceptibility of an Assertion A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
To a MM Before Consideration of any Related Control

Individually Aggregate
CoT
May be Higher for some A ssertions A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
Eg: Complex Calculations

External Factors May I luence Inherent Risk

Eg.: (1) Mgt misunderstands AS Still Preparing FS


(2) Industry has Business Failures

Entity may have MM

Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance or
disclosure to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements before consideration of any related controls as described in SA-200.
There is always a risk that before considering any existence of internal control in an entity, a
particular transaction, balance of an account or a disclosure required to be made in the financial
statements of an entity have a chance of being misstated and such misstatement can be material. This
risk is known as inherent risk.
Inherent risk is higher for some assertions and related classes of transactions, account balances,
and disclosures than for others. For example, it may be higher for complex calculations.
Inherent risk factors are considered while designing tests of controls and substantive
procedures. Category of auditor’s assessment lower or higher, each category covers a range of degrees
of inherent risk. Auditor may assess the inherent risk of two different assertions as lower while
recognizing that one assertion has less inherent risk than the other, although both have been assessed
as lower.
It is important to consider the reason for each identified inherent risk even if the risk is lower,
when auditor designs tests of controls and substantive procedures.
External circumstances giving rise to business risks may also influence inherent risk. For example,
technological developments might make a particular product obsolete. Factors in the entity and its
environment may also influence the inherent risk related to a specific assertion.
Few examples of inherent risks could include:
‰ An accounting standard provides guidance on some complex issue which might not be understood
by the management. Therefore, recording of this issue in financial statements carries inherent risk
of being misstated.
88 Auditing & Ethics PW
‰ There are large number of business failures in an industry. Therefore, assertions in financial
statements of an entity operating in such an industry carry an inherent risk of being misstated.

QUESTIONS

Correct/Incorrect Questions
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
3. Control risk is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of transactions to misstatement that
could be material either individually or, when aggregated with misstatements in other balances
or classes, assuming that there were no related internal controls.
Ans. (Incorrect)
Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of transactions to misstatement
that could be material either individually or, when aggregated with misstatements in other balances
or classes, assuming that there were no related internal controls. Control risk, on the other hand is
the risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion about a class of transaction, account
balance or disclosure and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the
entity’s internal control.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 89


CONTROL RISK
Risk that MM could occur  in an Assertion

Individually Aggregate CoT A/c. Bal. Disclosure

WILL NOT BE

Prevented (P) Detected (D) Corrected (c)

on a timely basis by I.C.

Eficiency of I.C  Control Risk   Eficiency of I.C.  Control Risk 

 Examples of Control Risk


(1) Cash or Cheque Book controls
Not working
(2) Fire Extinguishers or smoke detectors

In accordance with SA-200, control risk is the risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion
about a class of transaction, account balance or disclosure and that could be material, either individually
or when aggregated with other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a
timely basis by the entity’s internal control.
Control risk is a risk that internal control existing and operating in an entity would not be
efficient enough to stop from happening, or find and then rectify in an appropriate time, any material
misstatement relating to a transaction, balance of an account or disclosure required to be made in
the financial statements of that entity. Therefore, in a way, it can be said that there exists an inverse
relation between control risk and efficiency of internal control of an entity. When efficiency of internal
control of an entity is high, the control risk is low and when efficiency of internal control of that entity
is low, the control risk is high.
Examples of control risk could include:
A company has devised control that cash and cheque books should be kept in a locked safe and access
is granted to authorized personnel only. There is risk that control is not being followed.
An entity has devised a control that fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are in place and are
in working condition at all times to reduce the risk of damage to inventories caused by fire. There
is a risk that fire extinguishers in place are expired and are not being refilled. Similarly, there is a
possibility that smoke detectors are not working.
A company has devised a control relating to petty cash that items of expenditure of only less than
` 10000 should be routed through imprest system of petty cash. There is a risk that control is not
being followed.

90 Auditing & Ethics PW


QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
4. When auditor identifies deficiencies and report on internal controls, he determines the significant
financial statement assertions that are affected by the ineffective controls in order to evaluate the
effect on control risk assessments and strategy for the audit of the financial statements. Explain
Ans. Control risk assessment when control deficiencies are identified: When auditor identifies
deficiencies and report on internal controls, he determines the significant financial statement
assertions that are affected by the ineffective controls in order to evaluate the effect on control
risk assessments and strategy for the audit of the financial statements.
When control deficiencies are identified and auditor identifies and tests more than one control
for each relevant assertion, he evaluates control risk considering all of the controls he has tested.
If auditor determines that they support a ‘rely on controls’ risk assessment, or if compensating
controls are identified, tested and evaluated to be effective, he may conclude that the ‘rely on
controls’ is still appropriate. Otherwise we change our control risk assessment to ‘not rely on
controls.’
When a deficiency relates to an ineffective control that is the only control identified for an assertion,
he revises risk assessment to ‘not rely on controls’ for associated assertions, as no other controls
have been identified that mitigate the risk related to the assertion. If the deficiency relates to
one WCGW (what can go wrong) out of several WCGW’s, he can ‘rely on controls’ but performs
additional substantive procedures to adequately address the risks related to the deficiency.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 91


DETECTION RISK
Risk  Procedures performed by the Auditor

To reduce the risk to an Acceptably Low level

WILL NOT DETECT A MM  that exists

Individually Aggregate

Sampling Risk Non Sampling Rusk

Auditor's CONCLUSION Different Auditor teaches an


Erroneous Conclusion
based on a SAMPLE from the CONCLUSION
for any reason
If the population is subject to SAME AUDIT
PROCEDURES NOT RELATED TO
Sampling Risk
Sample was NOT REPRESENTATIVE of the
population

Risk Influenced by
Inherent Risk Control Risk Entity
Detection Risk Auditor

must REDUCE Detection Risk To keep Low Audit Risk By

Increasing Testing Including

Area of Checking Larger Sample Size Competent + Experienced

Persons in team

SA 200 defines detection risk as the risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce
audit risk to an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be
material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements.
For example, auditor of a company uses certain audit procedures for the purpose of obtaining
audit evidence and reducing audit risk, but still there will remain a risk that audit procedures used
by the auditor may not be able to detect a misstatement which by nature is material, then that risk is
known as detection Risk.

92 Auditing & Ethics PW


Detection risk comprises sampling and non-sampling risk
‰ Sampling risk is the risk that the auditor’s conclusion based on a sample may be different from the
conclusion if the entire population were subjected to the same audit procedure. It simply means
that the sample was not representative of the population from which it was chosen.
‰ Non-sampling risk is the risk that the auditor reaches an erroneous conclusion for any reason not
related to sampling risk. Like an auditor may reach an erroneous conclusion due to application to
some inappropriate audit procedure.
Examples of detection risk could include
‰ Sizeable work-in-progress inventories are expected in financial statements of a company. However,
auditor of the company does not devote time to attending inventory count. Instead, he chooses to
rely upon alternative audit procedures.
‰ The auditor of a company has audited revenue of a company by taking a sample. However, there is
a risk that sample of revenue is not representative of overall revenue.
‰ The auditor can only influence detection risk. Inherent risk and control risk belong to the entity
and are influenced by the entity. Therefore, auditor must reduce detection risk in order to keep
audit risk at low level. Detection risk may be reduced by increasing area of checking, testing
larger samples and by including competent and experienced persons in the engagement team.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 93


AUDIT RISK-WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED?

Auditor's Business Risk Risk that the Auditor might express an


opinion

That the FS. ARE MM
Loss from Adverse Other Events 
Litigation Publicity  when they are NOT
connected 
with Audit This is ordinarily Insigniicant

Audit risk is a technical term related to the process of auditing; it does not refer to the auditor’s
business risks such as loss from litigation, adverse publicity, or other events arising in connection
with the audit of financial statements.
For purposes of the SAs, audit risk does not include the risk that the auditor might express an
opinion that the financial statements are materially misstated when they are not. This risk is ordinarily
insignificant.

Notes to Add

94 Auditing & Ethics PW


ASSESSMENT OF RISK-MATTER OF PROF. JUDGEMENT
* Audit Risk = f( RoMM - Detection Risk)
Assessment of Risk

Matter of proof judgement Not a matter capable of Precise measurement

Training Knowledge Experience Competencies

As discussed at the outset, audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection
risk. The assessment of risks is based on audit procedures to obtain information necessary for
that purpose and evidence obtained throughout the audit. The assessment of risks is a matter of
professional judgment, rather than a matter capable of precise measurement. The distinguishing
feature of the professional judgment expected of an auditor is that it is exercised by an auditor whose
training, knowledge and experience have assisted in developing the necessary competencies to
achieve reasonable judgments.

Audit risk

Risks of material
Detection risk
misstatement

Inherent risk Sampling risk

Non-Sampling
Control risk
risk

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 95


COMBINED ASSESSMENT OF ROMM
Generally  Inherent Risk × Control Risk = ROMM
COMBINED
Quantitative
Combined
But  Auditor may make Assessment
Separate
 Non Quantitative
Depending on

Preferred Audit Methodologics Practical


Techniques Consideration

1. Combined Assessment of the Risk of Material Misstatement


Standards on auditing do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but
rather to a combined assessment of the “risks of material misstatement”. However, the auditor may
make separate or ombined assessments of inherent and control risk depending on preferred audit
techniques or methodologies and practical considerations. The assessment of the risks of material
misstatement may expressed in quantitative terms, such as in percentages, or in non-quantitative
terms. In any case, the need for the auditor to make appropriate risk assessments is more important
than the different approaches by which they may be made.
It can be concluded from the above that:
Audit risk = Risks of material misstatement × Detection risk
Since risks of material misstatement is a function of inherent risk and control risk, it can also be
shown as:
Audit risk = Inherent risk × Control risk × Detection risk
Illustration 1: XYZ Ltd is engaged in the business and running several stores dealing in variety of
items such as ready made garments for all seasons, shoes, gift items, watches etc. There are security
tags on each and every item. Moreover, inventory records are physically verified on monthly basis.
Discuss the types of inherent, control and detection risks as perceived by the auditor.
Inherent Risk: Because items may have been misappropriated by employees, therefore, risk to
the auditor is that inventory records would be inaccurate.
Control Risk: There is a security tag on each item displayed. Moreover, inventory records are
physically verified on monthly basis. Despite various controls being implemented at the stores, still
collusion among employees may be there and risk to auditor would again be that inventory records
would be inaccurate.
Detection Risk: Auditor checks the efficiency and effectiveness of various control systems in
place. He would do that by making observation, inspection, enquiry, etc. In addition to these, the
auditor would also employ sampling techniques to check few sales transactions from beginning
to end. However, despite all these procedures, the auditor may not detect the items which have
been stolen or misappropriated.

96 Auditing & Ethics PW


Illustration 2: A Partnership Firm of Chartered Accountants HT and Associates was appointed to
audit the books of accounts of Wind and Ice Limited for the financial year 2020 -21. There was a risk
that HT and Associates would give an inappropriate audit opinion if the financial statements of Wind
and Ice Limited are materially misstated. State the Risk mentioned in the question.
Solution: The risk mentioned in the question is known as Audit Risk, because risk that auditor of
a company will give an inappropriate audit opinion if the financial statements of that company are
materially misstated is known as Audit Risk.

Test Your Understanding


1. Wear & Tear Private Limited is a “start-up” engaged in providing holistic solutions to problem
of paddy stubble burning mainly catering to needs of farmers of North western India. Due to
importance given by governments to this issue, companies have entered in the market in past
few years. Many of these companies have not been successful and have gone bust. As an auditor
of the company, can you spot the component of risks of material misstatement involved in above?
Ans. It has been stated that many companies engaged in providing holistic solutions to problem
of stubble burning have not been successful. It shows that line of activity is inherently risky.
Therefore, there is a greater possibility of misstatements. The component of risks of material
misstatement involved is “inherent risk.”
2. A company has devised a control that its inventory of perishable goods is stored in appropriate
conditions in a controlled environment to prevent any damages to inventory. Responsibility is
fixed on two persons to monitor environment using sensors and to report on deviations. Identify
the component of risks of material misstatement involved as an auditor of the company.
Ans. The company has devised a control that its inventory of perishable goods is stored in appropriate
conditions and responsibility is fixed on two persons to monitor environment using sensors and to
report on deviations. There is a possibility that persons given responsibility do not perform their
work and report deviations. The component of risks of material misstatement is “control risk”.
3. Shree Foods Private Limited is engaged in manufacturing of garlic bread. The auditors of
company have planned audit procedures in respect of recognition of revenues of the company.
Despite that, there is a possibility that misstatements in revenue recognition are not identified
by planned audit procedures. Which risk is being alluded to?
Ans. There is a possibility that planned audit procedures may not achieve desired result and fail to
detect misstatements in revenue recognition. The risk alluded to it is “detection risk”.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
5. “The SAs do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but rather to a
combined assessment of the “risks of material misstatement.” Explain
Ans. The SAs do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but rather to a combined
assessment of the “risks of material misstatement”. However, the auditor may make separate or
combined assessments of inherent and control risk depending on preferred audit techniques or

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 97


methodologies and practical considerations. The assessment of the risks of material misstatement
may be expressed in quantitative terms, such as in percentages, or in non-quantitative terms. In
any case, the need for the auditor to make appropriate risk assessments is more important than
the different approaches by which they may be made.
It can be concluded from the above that
Risk of Material Misstatement = Inherent Risk × Control Risk (2) From (1) and (2), we
arrive at Audit Risk = Inherent Risk × Control Risk × Detection Risk
SA 315 establishes requirements and provides guidance on identifying and assessing the
risks of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels.
Notes to Add

98 Auditing & Ethics PW


IDENTIFYING & ASSESSING ROMM

* SA 315 + Identifying & Assessing RoMM through


Entity
Objectives Understanding the
Environment

Identify
+ F Providing
RoMM due to
Assess E
@ Basis for
RAP
CoT
FS Assertion A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
* SA 315 + Identifying & Assessing ROMM through
Entity
Objectives Understanding the
Environment

Identify Providing
+
Assess Basis for

FAP Designing Implementing

Responses

to the assessed RoMM

Auditor shall
(1) Identify Risk throughout the process
Relate pervasively to FS
(2) Assess + Evaluate Risk
Potentially affect many assertions
(3) Relate Risks to WCGW @ Assertion level

Taking A/c of ToC

Likelihood of misstatement
(4) Consider Possibility of multiple misstatement
Misstatement could be material

As per SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 99
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion
levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control,
thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material
misstatement. This will help the auditor to reduce the risk of material misstatement to an acceptably
low level.
The objective of the auditor as stated in SA 315 is to identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement.
(i) The auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at:
(a) the financial statement level
(b) the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures.
to provide a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures

(ii) For the purpose of identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement, the auditor
shall:
(a) Identify risks throughout the process of obtaining an understanding of the entity and its
environment, including relevant controls that relate to the risks, and by considering the classes
of transactions, account balances, and disclosures in the financial statements
(b) Assess the identified risks, and evaluate whether they relate more pervasively to the financial
statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions.
(c) Relate the identified risks to what can go wrong at the assertion level, taking account of relevant
controls that the auditor intends to test and
(d) Consider the likelihood of misstatement, including the possibility of multiple misstatements,
and whether the potential misstatement is of a magnitude that could result in a material
misstatement.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
6. Risk of material misstatement consists of two components” Explain clearly defining risk of material
misstatement.
Ans. As per SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the objective of the auditor is to identify and assess the risks of
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion
levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks
of material misstatement. This will help the auditor to reduce the risk of material misstatement
to an acceptably low level.
The auditor shall identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at:
(a) the financial statement level
(b) the assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures to provide
a basis for designing and performing further audit procedures

100 Auditing & Ethics PW


RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES (R.A.P)

Entity
Audit Procedures  to obtain understanding of Env.
 I.C.
Identify
To RoMM  due to
Assess

@ F E
FS Assertion

level
* RAP  by themselves  DO NOT PROVIDE  Suff· + Appro. A.E

on which to base Audit Opinion

(1) Inquiries Mgt.


(2) Analytical Procedures Others within
* RAP Includes
(3) Observation
(4) Inspection

You have already gained a little knowledge about risk assessment procedures in Chapter 2.
The audit procedures performed to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment,
including the entity’s internal control, to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion level are defined as risk
assessment procedures.
Risk assessment procedures are a basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels The auditor shall perform risk assessment
procedures to provide a basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement
at the financial statement and assertion levels. Risk assessment procedures by themselves, however,
do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the audit opinion.
The risks to be assessed include both those due to error and those due to fraud.
What is included in risk assessment procedures?
The risk assessment procedures shall include the following:
(a) Inquiries of management and of others within the entity who in the auditor’s judgment may have
information that is likely to assist in identifying risks of material misstatement due to fraud or
error.
(b) Analytical procedures.
(c) Observation and inspection.
(a) Inquiries of Management and Others Within the Entity: Much of the information obtained by
the auditor’s inquiries is obtained from management and those responsible for financial reporting.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 101
However, the auditor may also obtain information, or a different perspective in identifying risks
of material misstatement, through inquiries of others within the entity and other employees
with different levels of authority.
 Inquiries directed toward internal audit personnel may provide information about internal
audit procedures performed during the year relating to the design and effectiveness of the
entity’s internal control and whether management has satisfactorily responded to findings
from those procedures.
 Inquiries of employees involved in initiating, processing or recording complex or unusual
transactions may help the auditor to evaluate the appropriateness of the selection and
application of certain accounting policies.
 Inquiries directed toward in-house legal counsel may provide information about such
matters as litigation, compliance with laws and regulations, knowledge of fraud or suspected
fraud affecting the entity, warranties, post-sales obligations, arrangements (such as joint
ventures) with business partners and the meaning of contract
 Inquiries directed towards marketing or sales personnel may provide information about
changes in the entity’s marketing strategies, sales trends, or contractual arrangements with
its customers.
 Inquiries directed to the risk management function (or those performing such roles) may
provide information about operational and regulatory risks that may affect financial reporting.
 Inquiries directed to information systems personnel may provide information about
system changes, system or control failures, or other information system- related risks.
(b) Analytical Procedures: Analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures may
identify aspects of the entity of which the auditor was unaware and may assist in assessing the risks
of material misstatement in order to provide a basis for designing and implementing responses
to the assessed risks. Analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures may
include both financial and non-financial information, for example, relationship between sales and
square footage of selling space or volume of goods sold.
Analytical procedures may help identify the existence of unusual transactions or events, and
amounts, ratios, and trends that might indicate matters that have audit implications. Unusual
or unexpected relationships that are identified may assist the auditor in identifying risks of
material misstatement, especially risks of material misstatement due to fraud. However, when
such analytical procedures use data aggregated at a high level (which may be the situation with
analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures), the results of those analytical
procedures only provide a broad initial indication about whether a material misstatement may
exist. Accordingly, in such cases, consideration of other information that has been gathered
when identifying the risks of material misstatement together with the results of such analytical
procedures may assist the auditor in understanding and evaluating the results of the analytical
procedures.
(c) Observation and Inspection: Observation and inspection may support inquiries of
management and others, and may also provide information about the entity and its environment.
Examples of such audit procedures include observation or inspection of the following:
 The entity’s operations.
 Documents (such as business plans and strategies), records, and internal control manuals.

102 Auditing & Ethics PW


 Reports prepared by management (such as quarterly management reports and interim
financial statements) and those charged with governance (such as minutes of board of
director’s meetings)
 The entity’s premises and plant facilities.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
7. Discuss how “analytical procedures” performed as “risk assessment procedures” can be useful
to an auditor.
Ans. Refer to heading on “What is included in risk assessment procedures” and gather usefulness of
analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 103


INFORMATION OBTAINED BY PERFORMING RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES-USED
AS AUDIT EVIDENCE
CoT Related Assertions
Auditor may obtain A.E. A/c. Bal. + +
Disclosure Operating Eff. of Controls
+ ToC
Auditor may choose to perform Simultaneously
Substantive 
procedures Eficient to do so

Information obtained by performing risk assessment procedures - Used as audit evidence


Information obtained by performing risk assessment procedures and related activities may be
used by the auditor as audit evidence to support assessments of the risks of material misstatement.
In addition, the auditor may obtain audit evidence about classes of transactions, account balances,
or disclosures and related assertions and about the operating effectiveness of controls, even though
such procedures were not specifically planned as substantive procedures or as tests of controls. The
auditor also may choose to perform substantive procedures or tests of controls concurrently with risk
assessment procedures because it is efficient to do so.
Test Your Understanding
4. Jo Jo Limited is planning to list on Bombay Stock Exchange next year. As an auditor of Jo Jo
Limited, identify any one reason of increased audit risk due to listing of the company next year.
Ans. Jo Jo Limited is planning to list on Bombay Stock Exchange next year. There is a greater chance
of misstatements in the financial statements due to planned listing next year. There could
be a possibility of intentional manipulation of financial statements so that good response
is received to proposed issue. Therefore, there is increased audit risk i.e., risk of expressing
inappropriate opinion by the auditor when financial statements are materially misstated.
On perusing financial statements of Jo Jo Limited put up for audit, it is observed by the auditor
that current ratio has improved from 1.20:1 (in preceding year) to 1.75:1 (in current year).
Identify what kind of risk assessment procedures are being performed by auditor? Has it any
relation with listing of the company next year on Bombay Stock Exchange?
5. On perusing financial statements of Jo Jo Limited put up for audit, it is observed by the auditor
that current ratio has improved from 1.20:1 (in preceding year) to 1.75:1 (in current year).
Identify what kind of risk assessment procedures are being performed by auditor? Has it any
relation with listing of the company next year on Bombay Stock Exchange?
Ans. It is noticed by the auditor that current ratio has improved from 1.20:1 (in preceding year)
to 1.75:1 (in current year). The auditor is using “analytical procedures” as risk assessment
procedures. Current ratio has improved from previous year. There could be a possibility of
misstatement in current assets and current liabilities. It is possible that improvement in current
ratio is artificial due to misstatements and has been done to secure good response to the proposed
issue of company next year.

104 Auditing & Ethics PW


WHAT IS MEANT BY MATERIALITY?
SA320 "Materiality in Planning & Performing an Audit“

States that

Misstatements Omissions
are considered
to be
 Individually
MATERIAL
Aggregrate

If they could reasonably be expected  to inluence



The Economic Decision of the user

* Objective of Auditor  to obtain R.A.  F.S. as a whole


 F
are free from MM  due to
 E
Thereby enabling an Auditor to Express an Opinion

In ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS

In accordance with App. F.R.F.
* Materiality  NOT Always  Matter of Size / Volume

SA 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit states that misstatements, including
omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the
financial statements.
The objective of an independent auditor is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared,
in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework.
Herein, lies the significance of materiality. The auditor has to obtain reasonable assurance that
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.
As a result, an audit strives to identify significant risks of material misstatement and audit procedures
are geared towards it.
Materiality is not always a matter of relative size. For example, a small amount lost by fraudulent
practices of certain employees can indicate a serious flaw in the enterprise’s internal control system
requiring immediate attention to avoid greater losses in future.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 105


QUESTIONS

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)


1. Which of the following is true regarding materiality?
(a) It is unaffected by nature of an item.
(b) It is unaffected by requirements of law or regulations.
(c) It is not a matter of professional judgment.
(d) It is not always a matter of relative size.
Ans. (d)

Notes to Add

106 Auditing & Ethics PW


MATERIALITY IN PLANNING AND PERFORMING AN AUDIT-AUDITOR’S
RESPONSIBILITY
* Concept of Materiality Applied by Auditor in

Planning Evaluating the effect of In Forming


+ Audit an Opinion
Performing on F.S.
ied Uncorrected

Misstatement

Concept discussed in App. F.R.F.


 Judgements about materiality
If Not-based on:
(i) Surrounding circumstances
(ii) Size/Nature of misstatement
(iii) Common Financial Info. needs of users  As a Group

Speciic Individuals  Not Considered

RAP
NET
Provide basis FAP
Identifying
+ RoMM
Assessing
 Circumstances  may cause the Auditor  to Evaluate  Amount < Materiality
Nature
 Auditor Considers Size uncorrected misstatements
Occurance 
When evaluating their effect on FS.
+
Apply  Prof. Judgement in

Determining Choosing Appro. Determining level of


Materiality Benchmark Benchmark
Determination of Audit Scope
 Materiality forms Basis
Level of testing the transaction

 If  Statutory Requirement ALWAYS MATERIAL

The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing the audit, and
in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 107


any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report. SA 320 deals with
auditor’s responsibility to apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing an audit of
financial statements.
Financial reporting frameworks often discuss the concept of materiality in the context of the
preparation and presentation of financial statements. Although financial reporting frameworks may
discuss materiality in different terms, they generally explain that:
‰ Misstatements, including omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the
aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of the financial statements;
‰ Judgments about materiality are made in the light of surrounding circumstances, and are affected
by the size or nature of a misstatement, or a combination of both; and
‰ Judgments about matters that are material to users of the financial statements are based on a
consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group. The possible effect
of misstatements on specific individual users, whose needs may vary widely, is not considered.
Such a discussion, if present in the applicable financial reporting framework, provides a frame of
reference to the auditor in determining materiality for the audit. If the applicable financial reporting
framework does not include a discussion of the concept of materiality, the characteristics referred to
above provide the auditor with such a frame of reference.
In planning the audit, the auditor makes judgments about the size of misstatements that will be
considered material. These judgments provide a basis for:
(a) Determining the nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures;
(b) Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement; and
(c) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures.
The materiality determined when planning the audit does not necessarily establish an amount
below which uncorrected misstatements, individually or in aggregate, will always be evaluated as
immaterial. The circumstances related to some misstatements may cause the auditor to evaluate
them as material even if they are below materiality. Although, it is not practicable to design audit
procedures to detect misstatements that could be material solely because of their nature, the auditor
considers not only the size but also the nature of uncorrected misstatements, and the particular
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial statements.
The auditor has to apply his professional judgement in determining materiality, choosing
appropriate benchmark and determining level of benchmark. Materiality forms the basis for
determination of audit scope and the levels of testing the transactions.
While judging materiality, the significance of an item has to be viewed from different perspectives.
Materiality of an item may be judged by considering the impact on the profit and loss, or on the
balance sheet, or in the total of the category of expenditure or income to which it pertains, and on its
comparison with the corresponding figure for the previous year.
If there is any statutory requirement of disclosure, it is to be considered material irrespective of
the value of amount. Examples are given below:
‰ As per Division I of schedule III of Companies Act, 2013, any item of income or expenditure which
exceeds one percent of the revenue from operations or ` 1,00,000, whichever is higher, needs to
be disclosed separately.
‰ A company should disclose in notes to accounts, shares in the company held by each shareholder
holding more than 5 per cent shares specifying the number of shares held as per requirements of
Division I of Schedule III of Companies Act,2013.

108 Auditing & Ethics PW


QUESTIONS

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
8. There is direct relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk.
Ans. (Incorrect)
There is an inverse relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk. The higher the
materiality level, the lower the audit risk and vice versa. For example, the risk that a particular
account balance or class of transactions could be misstated by an extremely large amount might
be very low but the risk that it could be misstated by an extremely small amount might be very
high.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 109


DETERMINATION OF MATERIALITY- A MATTER OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT
+
Affected by Auditor's perception of

Financial Info NEEDS of user of F.S.

* Auditor Assumes: user of F.S. has

Reasonable Understanding F.S. Recognised Made Reasonable


knowledge uncertainties Economic
decisions
in measurement
Prepared Presented Audited of amount on the basis of
to levels of materiality Info. in F.S.
Base on

Business Economic Accounting Willingness Diligence


Activities Activities Estimates Judgements Future
Events
Consideration

The auditor’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment, and is affected by the
auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial statements. In this
context, it is reasonable for the auditor to assume that users:
(a) Have a reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting and a
willingness to study the information in the financial statements with reasonable diligence;
(b) Understand that financial statements are prepared, presented and audited to levels of
materiality;
(c) Recognize the uncertainties inherent in the measurement of amounts based on the use of
estimates, judgment and the consideration of future events; and
(d) Make reasonable economic decisions on the basis of the information in the financial statements.

Notes to Add

110 Auditing & Ethics PW


PERFORMANCE MATERIALITY (PM)
Amount (s) set by the Auditor
CoT
At LESS than materiality for F.S. as a whole OR A/c. Bal.
Disclosure
To reduce to an appropriately LOW LEVEL

Probability that the aggregate of

Uncorrected Undetected
misstatements

EXCEEDS materiality for F.S. as a whole


* PM < OM

Practically, it is difficult for auditors to design tests to identify individual misstatements. It is likely
that misstatements are material in aggregate. It takes us to the concept of “performance materiality.”
Performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality
for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability
that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. If applicable, performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set
by the auditor at less than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures.
Performance materiality is set at a value lower than overall materiality. It lowers the risk that
auditor will not be able to identify misstatements that are material when added together.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 111


DETERMINING MATERIALITY (DM) & PM
When establishing O.A.S
 CoT
Auditor DM F.S. as a whole OR Particular A/c. Bal.
Disclosure

When establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall determine materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. If, in the specific circumstances of the entity, there is one or more particular
classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts
than the materiality for the financial statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence
the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements, the auditor shall also
determine the materiality level or levels to be applied to those particular classes of transactions,
account balances or disclosures.

Notes to Add

112 Auditing & Ethics PW


USE OF BENCHMARKS IN DETERMINING MATERIALITY FOR THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS A WHOLE
Involves → Exercise of Prof. Judgement

A % age is often applied to a chosen benchmark

As a STARTING POINT
* Factors → that may affect → Identification of Appro. Benchmark
(i) Elements of F.S.
(ii) Items in F.S. ← users tend to Focus
(iii) Nature of Entity + position at its Life Cycle + Industry & Economic Environment + Ownership
structure
(iv) Volatility of Benchmark
Best Benchmark Operations Orientation
PBT Continuing Profit
GP or Sales Volatile NPO

Determining materiality involves the exercise of professional judgment. A percentage is often


applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. Factors that may affect the identification of an appropriate benchmark include
the following:
The elements of the financial statements like assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses
‰ Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular entity’s financial
statements tends to be focused. For example, for the purpose of evaluating financial performance
users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets.
‰ The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life cycle, and the industry and economic
environment in which the entity operates, the entity’s ownership structure and the way it is
financed. For example, If an entity is financed solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more
emphasis on assets, and claims on them, than on the entity’s earnings;
‰ The relative volatility of the benchmark.

Examples of benchmarks that may be appropriate, depending on the circumstances of the entity,
include categories of reported income such as profit before tax, total revenue, gross profit and total
expenses, total equity or net asset value. Profit before tax from continuing operations is often used
for profit-oriented entities. When profit before tax from continuing operations is volatile, other
benchmarks may be more appropriate, such as gross profit or total revenues.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 113


CHOSEN BENCHMARK-RELEVANT FINANCIAL DATA

Prior pd. Current Budget/ Forecast icant s in


Financial Pd inancial C.Y. circumstances

Result Position Result Position

In relation to the chosen benchmark, relevant financial data ordinarily includes:


‰ Prior periods’ financial results and financial positions,

‰ The period to-date financial results and financial position, and Budgets or forecasts for the current
period,
‰ Adjusted for significant changes in the circumstances of the entity (for example, a significant
business acquisition) and relevant changes of conditions in the industry or economic environment
in which the entity operates.
Consider, for example, when, as a starting point, the materiality for the financial statements as a
whole is determined for a particular entity based on a percentage of profit before tax from continuing
operations, circumstances that give rise to an exceptional decrease or increase in such profit may
lead the auditor to conclude that the materiality for the financial statements as a whole is more
appropriately determined using a normalized profit before tax from continuing operations figure
based on past results.

Notes to Add

114 Auditing & Ethics PW


DETERMINING A PERCENTAGE TO BE APPLIED TO A CHOSEN BENCHMARK
INVOLVES THE EXERCISE OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT
Best Benchmark Operations Orientation
PBT (Higher) Continuing Profit
GP or Sales (Lower) Volatile NPO
There is a relationship between the percentage and the chosen benchmark, such that a percentage
applied to profit before tax from continuing operations will normally be higher than a percentage
applied to total revenue.
Consider, for example, that the auditor may consider 5% of profit before tax from continuing
operations to be appropriate for a profit-oriented entity in a manufacturing industry, while the
auditor may consider 1% of total revenue or total expenses to be appropriate for a not-for-profit
entity. Higher or lower percentages, however, may be deemed appropriate in different circumstances.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 115


MATERIALITY LEVEL OR LEVELS FOR PARTICULAR CLASSES OF TRANSACTIONS,
ACCOUNT BALANCES OR DISCLOSURES
Factors that may  indicate  Misstatements

Amount < Materiality

could inluence the economic decision of users.
Law
(1) Regulations
App. F.R.F. Related Party Transactions
Disclosures Mgt.
Remuneration
TCWG
(2) Key Disclosures
(3) Particular aspects  separately disclosed

Factors that may indicate the existence of one or more particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures for which misstatements of lesser amounts than materiality for the financial
statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of the financial statements include the following:
‰ Whether law, regulations or the applicable financial reporting framework affect users’ expectations
regarding the measurement or disclosure of certain items like in case of related party transactions,
and the remuneration of management and those charged with governance.
‰ The key disclosures in relation to the industry in which the entity operates. For example, research
and development costs for a pharmaceutical company.
‰ Whether attention is focused on a particular aspect of the entity’s business that is separately
disclosed in the financial statements like in case of newly acquired business.

Notes to Add

116 Auditing & Ethics PW


REVISION IN MATERIALITY LEVEL (S) AS THE AUDIT PROGRESSES

Materiality F.S. as a whole. CoT


particular A/c. Bal.
May need to be REVISED Disclosure

as a Result of

in New in Auditor's Difference in in


Circumstances Info. understanding Materiality
Actual Anticipated
Entity its Operations More
Results Appro.

Materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, the materiality level or levels for
particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) may need to be revised as a result
of a change in circumstances that occurred during the audit (for example, a decision to dispose of a
major part of the entity’s business), new information, or a change in the auditor’s understanding of
the entity and its operations as a result of performing further audit procedures.
If during the audit it appears as though actual financial results are likely to be substantially different
from the anticipated period end financial results that were used initially to determine materiality for
the financial statements as a whole, the auditor revises that materiality.
If the auditor concludes that a lower materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and,
if applicable, materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or
disclosures) than that initially determined is appropriate, the auditor shall determine whether it is
necessary to revise performance materiality, and whether the nature, timing and extent of the further
audit procedures remain appropriate.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 117


DOCUMENTING THE MATERIALITY

Materiality ( M) Performance Materiality (PM)  in DM/PM

CoT
F.S. as a Particular A/c. Bal.
whole Disclosure

The audit documentation shall include the following amounts and the factors considered in their
determination:
(a) Materiality for the financial statements as a whole
(b) If applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account
balances or disclosures
(c) Performance materiality and
(d) Any revision of (a)-(c) as the audit progressed

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
9. Is materiality required to be documented by the auditor? What factors have to be considered this
regard?
Ans. Refer to heading on “documenting the materiality”.
Notes to Add

118 Auditing & Ethics PW


MATERIALITY & AUDIT RISK

Planning
Concept is Applied Performing Stage + Forming the Opinion
Evaluating

Identiied MM Uncorrected misstatement


* Materiality & Audit Risk  considered  Throughout the Audit

Identifying Determining Evaluating effect


+ RoMM  
Assessing NET UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENT
(RAP) 
FAP
F.S. Opinion

The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing the audit, and
in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected misstatements, if
any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report. In conducting an
audit of financial statements, the overall objectives of the auditor are to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the
financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial
reporting framework; and to report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the
SAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings. The auditor obtains reasonable assurance by obtaining
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and
detection risk.
Materiality and Audit Risk are considered throughout the audit, in particular, when:
(a) Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement;
(b) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures; and
(c) Evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in
forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
Illustration 3: One of the team members of auditors of Highly Capable Limited was of the view that
Materiality and Audit Risk are only considered at planning stage of an audit. Comment as an auditor.
Solution: The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing
the audit, and in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected
misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 119


Test Your Understanding
6. CA A. Raja is auditor of Build Well Forgings Private Limited having a revenue of ` 25 crore. The
company has been sanctioned a term loan of ` 50 lacs from a bank. However, as at end of the
year, only ` 1 lac was availed due to delay in procurement of asset. The financial statements of
the company do not disclose nature of security against which loan has been taken. Schedule III
of Companies Act, 2013 requires disclosure in this respect. Discuss, whether, non-disclosure of
nature of security is material for auditor.
Ans. If there is any statutory requirement of disclosure, it is to be considered material. Schedule III
mandates disclosure of nature of security in relation to loan. The amount involved is irrelevant.

Notes to Add

120 Auditing & Ethics PW


UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY & ITS ENVIRONMENT
As per SA315  Auditor shall obtain understanding:
Industry
(i) Relevant Regulatory Factors + App. F.R.F.
External

(ii) Nature
operation
Ownership of the entity
Governance
Financial Structure
Selection
(iii) Entity's Application Accounting Policies
Reason for 

Objectives
(iv) Entity's Strategies
Business Risk

(v) Measurement
Financial Performance
Review

SA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the
Entity and its Environment states that the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following:
(a) Relevant industry, regulatory, and other external factors including the applicable financial
reporting framework
Relevant industry factors include industry conditions such as the competitive environment,
supplier and customer relationships, and technological developments.
Examples of matters the auditor may consider include market and competition, whether
entity is engaged in seasonal activities, product technology relating to the entity’s products.
The industry in which the entity operates may give rise to specific risks of material misstatement
arising from the nature of the business or the degree of regulation.
Relevant regulatory factors include the regulatory environment. The regulatory environment
includes, among other matters, the applicable financial reporting framework and the legal
and political environment.
Examples of matters the auditor may consider include accounting principles and industry
specific practices, regulatory framework for a regulated industry, legislation and regulation
that significantly affect the entity’s operations, including direct supervisory activities, taxation,
government policies currently affecting the conduct of the entity’s business, environmental
requirements affecting the industry and the entity’s business.
Examples of other external factors affecting the entity that the auditor may consider include the
general economic conditions, interest rates and availability of financing, and inflation etc.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 121


(b) The nature of the entity, including:
(i) its operations;
(ii) its ownership and governance structures;
(iii) the types of investments that the entity is making and plans to make, including investments
in special-purpose entities; and
(iv) the way that the entity is structured and how it is financed; to enable the auditor to understand
the classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures to be expected in the financial
statements.
An understanding of nature of entity enables the auditor to understand whether entity
has a complex structure for example, whether it has subsidiaries. Complex structures
often introduce issues that may give rise to risks of material misstatement. It also helps in
understanding matters relating to the ownership, and relations between owners and other
people or entities. This understanding assists in determining whether related party transactions
have been identified and accounted for appropriately.
Examples of matters that the auditor may consider while obtaining understanding of nature of
entity include:
 Business operations such as nature of revenue sources, products or services, conduct of
operations, location of production facilities, key customers and suppliers of goods and
services
 Investment and investment activities such as capital investment activities and planned
or recently executed acquisitions
 Financing and financing activities such as major subsidiaries, debt structure etc.

 Financial reporting such as accounting principles and revenue recognition practices

(c) The entity’s selection and application of accounting policies, including the reasons for changes
thereto
The auditor shall evaluate whether the entity’s accounting policies are appropriate for its
business and consistent with the applicable financial reporting framework and accounting
policies used in the relevant industry.
(d) The entity’s objectives and strategies, and those related business risks that may result in risks
of material misstatement.
The entity conducts its business in the context of industry, regulatory and other internal and
external factors. To respond to these factors, the entity’s management define objectives, which
are the overall plans for the entity. Strategies are the approaches by which management intends
to achieve its objectives. The entity’s objectives and strategies may change over time. Business
risk is broader than the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, though it
includes the latter. Business risk may arise from change or complexity.
An understanding of the business risks facing the entity increases the likelihood of identifying
risks of material misstatement, since most business risks will eventually have financial
consequences and, therefore, an effect on the financial statements. However, the auditor does
not have a responsibility to identify or assess all business risks because not all business risks
give rise to risks of material misstatement.
Examples of matters that the auditor may consider when obtaining an understanding of the
entity’s objectives, strategies and related business risks that may result in a risk of material
misstatement of the financial statements include:
122 Auditing & Ethics PW
 Industry developments (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that the
entity does not have the personnel or expertise to deal with the changes in the industry).
 New products and services (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that
there is increased product liability).
 Expansion of the business (a potential related business risk might be, for example, that the
demand has not been accurately estimated).
(e) The measurement and review of the entity’s financial performance
Management and others will measure and review those things they regard as important.
Performance measures, whether external or internal, create pressures on the entity.
These pressures, in turn, may motivate management to take action to improve the business
performance or to misstate the financial statements. Accordingly, an understanding of the
entity’s performance measures assists the auditor in considering whether pressures to achieve
performance targets may result in management actions that increase the risks of material
misstatement, including those due to fraud.
Examples for measuring and reviewing financial performance which may be used by an auditor
may include:
 Key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) and key ratios, trends and
operating statistics.
 Period-on-period financial performance analyses.

 Budgets, forecasts, variance analyses, and departmental or other level performance reports.

 Credit rating agency reports

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 123


SIGNIFICANCE OF UNDERSTANDING
Helps Auditor in:
(i) Planning the Audit
(ii) Identify Areas → Special Attention
(iii) Gaining knowledge → Client’s Business → Imp. principles
(iv) Without Knowledge → Proper Audit → NOT POSSIBLE

Understanding the entity and the environment in which it operates is very significant. It helps the
auditor in planning the audit and in identifying areas requiring special attention. Gaining knowledge
about client’s business is one of the important principles in developing an overall audit plan. In fact,
without adequate knowledge of client’s business, a proper audit is not possible.

Notes to Add

124 Auditing & Ethics PW


UNDERSTANDING ENTITY - CONTINUOUS PROCESS
Gathering
Dynamic process Updating Info.  Throughout the Audit
Analysing

Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control
(referred to hereafter as an “understanding of the entity”), is a continuous, dynamic process of
gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit. The understanding establishes
a frame of reference within which the auditor plans the audit and exercises professional judgment
throughout the audit, for example, when:
‰ Assessing risks of material misstatement of the financial statements
‰ Determining materiality in accordance with SA 320
‰ Considering the appropriateness of the selection and application of accounting policies
‰ Identifying areas where special audit consideration may be necessary, for example, related party
transactions, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption, or
considering the business purpose of transactions
‰ Developing expectations for use when performing analytical procedures Evaluating the sufficiency
and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained such as the appropriateness of assumptions and
of management’s oral and written representations.
Illustration 4: The auditor of ABC Textiles Ltd chalks out an audit plan without understanding the
entity’s business. Since he has carried out many audits of textile companies, there is no need to
understand the nature of business of ABC Ltd. Advise the auditor how he should proceed.
Solution: Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s
internal control (referred to hereafter as an “understanding of the entity”), is a continuous, dynamic
process of gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit. The auditor should
proceed accordingly.
Illustration 5: While auditing the books of accounts of Heavy Material Limited for the financial year
2022-23, a team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited showed no inclination towards
understanding the business and the business environment of the above mentioned company. Is the
approach of team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited correct or incorrect? Also give
reason for your answer.
Solution: The approach of team member of the auditor of Heavy Material Limited is incorrect
because understanding the business and the business environment of company whose audit is to be
conducted is very important, as it helps in planning the audit and identifying areas requiring special
attention during the course of audit of that company.
Illustration 6: Prince Blankets is engaged in business of blankets. Its major portion of sales is taking
place through internet. Advise the auditor how he would proceed in this regard as to understanding
the entity and its environment.
Solution: While understanding entity and its environment, internet sales is being perceived as risky
area by the auditor and thereby would be spending substantial time and extensive audit procedures
on this particular area.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 125
INTERNAL CONTROL
Meaning of internal Control

Internal Control (I.C.) Designed Mgt.


As per SA-315  The process Implemented by TCWG
 Maintained Other Personnel
To provide R.A. about

achievement of Entity’s objectives

Reliability of Eff. & Eff. Of Safeguarding Compliance with


inancial Reporting operations of Assets laws & Regulations

As per SA-315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the internal control may be defined as “the process designed,
implemented and maintained by those charged with governance, management and other personnel
to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of an entity’s objectives with regard to
reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, safeguarding of assets,
and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The term “controls” refers to any aspects of one
or more of the components of internal control.”

Notes to Add

126 Auditing & Ethics PW


PURPOSE OF INTERNAL CONTROL
D
I.C. I to Address  Identiied  Identiied Business Risk
M 
that threaten the achievement of

ENTITY'S OBJECTIVES

Reliability of Eff. & Eff. Of Safeguarding Compliance


Financial Operations of Assets with Laws &
Reporting Regulations

As derived from above definition, the purpose of Internal Control is as under


Internal control is designed, implemented and maintained to address identified business risks that
threaten the achievement of any of the entity’s objectives that concern:
‰ The reliability of the entity’s financial reporting;
‰ The effectiveness and efficiency of its operations;

‰ Its compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and Safeguarding of assets.

The way in which internal control is designed, implemented and maintained varies with an entity’s
size and complexity.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 127


BENEFITS OF UNDERSTANDING OF INTERNAL CONTROL

Identifying types of Identifying factors Designing N.E.T.


  
Potential That affect RoMM If further Audit
Misstatements procedures

An understanding of internal control assists the auditor in:


(i) Identifying types of potential misstatements;
(ii) Identifying factors that affect the risks of material misstatement, and
(iii) Designing the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.

Notes to Add

128 Auditing & Ethics PW


LIMITATIONS OF INTERNAL CONTROL
(i) Only R.A. (ii) Human Judgement in Decision Making
(iii) Lock of understanding of purpose (iv) Collusion among people
(v) Judgement by Mgt. (vi) Limitations in case of small Entities

(i) Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance: Internal control, no matter how
effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the entity’s
financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected by inherent
limitations of internal control.
(ii) Human judgment in decision-making: Realities that human judgment in decision-making
can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human error. For
example, there may be an error in the design of, or in the change to, a control.
(iii) Lack of understanding the purpose: Equally, the operation of a control may not be effective,
such as where information produced for the purposes of internal control (for example, an
exception report) is not effectively used because the individual responsible for reviewing the
information does not understand its purpose or fails to take appropriate action.
(iv) Collusion among People: Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two
or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For example,
management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditions
of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may result in improper revenue recognition.
Also, edit checks in a software program that are designed to identify and report transactions
that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.
(v) Judgements by Management: Further, in designing and implementing controls, management
may make judgments on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses to implement, and the
nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.
(vi) Limitations in case of Small Entities: Smaller entities often have fewer employees due to
which segregation of duties is not practicable. However, in a small owner-managed entity, the
owner-manager may be able to exercise more effective oversight than in a larger entity. This
oversight may compensate for the generally more limited opportunities for segregation of
duties. On the other hand, the owner- manager may be more able to override controls because
the system of internal control is less structured. This is taken into account by the auditor when
identifying the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
Illustration 7: Auditor GR and Associates, appointed for audit of PNG Ltd, a manufacturing company
engaged in manufacturing of various food items. While planning an audit, the auditor does not think
that it would be necessary to understand internal controls. Advise the auditor in this regard.
Solution: The auditor shall obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit.
Although most controls relevant to the audit are likely to relate to financial reporting, not all controls
that relate to financial reporting are relevant to the audit. It is a matter of the auditor’s professional
judgment whether a control, individually or in combination with others, is relevant to the audit.
Illustration 8: The team member of the auditor of Simple and Easy Limited was of the view that
understanding the internal control of the company would not help them in any manner in relation
to audit procedures to be applied while conducting the audit.
Solution: The view of the team member of the auditor is incorrect because understanding the
internal control of the company would help the auditor and his team members in designing the
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be applied while conducting the audit of the company.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 129


COMPONENTS OF IC
Components of Internal control

Control Entity's risk Information Control Monitoring


environment assessment system and activities of controls
process communiaction

(A) Control Environment  Auditor to Evaluates

Mgt. has created culture of Strength of Control


Environment

Honesty Ethical Behavior

The control Environment

Governance Attitude, Awareness & Sets the tone of


& Actions of Mgt. /TCWG originations
Management luencing control
function consciousness of
people

The division of internal control into the following five components provides a useful framework for
auditors to consider how different aspects of an entity’s internal control may affect the audit:
(a) The control environment
(b) The entity’s risk assessment process
(c) The information system, including the related business processes, relevant to financial
reporting, and communication
(d) Control activities
(e) Monitoring of controls
Component of internal control

Control Entity's risk Information system Control Monitoring


environment assessment process and communication activities of controls

Notes to Add

130 Auditing & Ethics PW


CONTROL ENVIRONMENT
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the control environment. As part of obtaining this
understanding, the auditor shall evaluate whether:
(i) Management has created and maintained a culture of honesty and ethical behaviour and
(ii) The strengths in the control environment elements collectively provide an appropriate
foundation for the other components of internal control.
What is included in Control Environment?
The control environment includes:
(i) the governance and management functions and
(ii) the attitudes, awareness, and actions of those charged with governance and management.
(iii) the control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control
consciousness of its people.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 131


ELEMENTS OF CONTROL ENVIRONMENT
Communication+Enforcement
Integrity &EthicalValues
(ii) Commitment to Competence
(iii) Participation by TCWG
Philosophy
(iv) Mgt's
Operating style.

(v) Organisational Structure


Authority
(vi) Assessment of
Responsibility
Policies
(vii) H.R
Practice

 Existence of Satisfactory Control Environment



NOT AN ABSOLUTE DETERRENT TO FRAUD

Can be a POSITIVE FACTOR  when Auditor assess  RoMM
 Control Environment in luence  Auditor's Evaluation  of Eff. Of Controls

Does Not

P D C
MM

132 Auditing & Ethics PW


Control Activities → Relevant to → Significant Risk → As per Auditor → Identified by R.A.P.
Monitoring → helps in assessing → effectiveness of control → on timely basis

Elements of the control environment that may be relevant when obtaining an understanding of the
control environment include the following:
(a) Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values: The effectiveness of
controls cannot rise above the integrity and ethical values of the people who create, administer,
and monitor them. Integrity and ethical behaviour are the product of the entity’s ethical and
behavioural standards, how they are communicated, and how they are reinforced in practice.
The enforcement of integrity and ethical values includes, for example, management actions
to eliminate or mitigate incentives or temptations that might prompt personnel to engage in
dishonest, illegal, or unethical acts. The communication of entity policies on integrity and ethical
values may include the communication of behavioural standards to personnel through policy
statements and codes of conduct and by example.
(b) Commitment to competence: Matters such as management’s consideration of the competence
levels for particular jobs and how those levels translate into requisite skills and knowledge.
(c) Participation by those charged with governance: It includes attributes of those charged
with governance such as their independence from management, their experience and stature,
the extent of their involvement and the information they receive and the scrutiny of activities.
(d) Management’s philosophy and operating style: Management’s philosophy and operating style
encompass a broad range of characteristics. For example, management’s attitudes and actions
towards financial reporting- what approach is taken by management in selecting accounting
policies, approach in developing accounting estimates etc. Matters such as approach of
management to taking and managing business risks, management’s attitude towards information
processing and accounting function and personnel reflects upon management’s philosophy and
operating style.
(e) Organisational structure: The framework within which an entity’s activities for achieving its
objectives are planned, executed, controlled, and reviewed. Establishing a relevant organisational
structure includes considering key areas of authority and responsibility and appropriate lines
of reporting. The appropriateness of an entity’s organisational structure depends, in part, on its
size and the nature of its activities.
(f) Assignment of authority and responsibility: Matters such as how authority and responsibility
for operating activities are assigned and how reporting relationships and authorisation hierarchies
are established.
(g) Human resource policies and practices: Policies and practices that relate to, for example,
recruitment, orientation, training, evaluation, counselling, promotion, compensation, and remedial
actions. Human resource policies and practices often demonstrate important matters in relation
to the control consciousness of an entity.
For example, standards for recruiting the most qualified individuals – with emphasis on educational
background, prior work experience, past accomplishments, and evidence of integrity and ethical
behaviour – demonstrate an entity’s commitment to competent and trustworthy people. Training
policies that communicate prospective roles and responsibilities and include practices such as training
schools and seminars illustrate expected levels of performance and behaviour. Promotions driven

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 133


by periodic performance appraisals demonstrate the entity’s commitment to the advancement of
qualified personnel to higher levels of responsibility.
Existence of a satisfactory control environment-not an absolute deterrent to fraud
The existence of a satisfactory control environment can be a positive factor when the auditor
assesses the risks of material misstatement. However, although it may help reduce the risk of fraud,
a satisfactory control environment is not an absolute deterrent to fraud. Conversely, deficiencies
in the control environment may undermine the effectiveness of controls, in particular in relation to
fraud. For example, management’s failure to commit sufficient resources to address IT security risks
may adversely affect internal control by allowing improper changes to be made to computer programs
or to data, or unauthorized transactions to be processed.
The control environment in itself does not prevent, or detect and correct, a material misstatement.
It may, however, influence the auditor’s evaluation of the effectiveness of other controls (for
example, the monitoring of controls and the operation of specific control activities) and thereby, the
auditor’s assessment of the risks of material misstatement.

Notes to Add

134 Auditing & Ethics PW


THE ENTITY’S RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of whether the entity has a process for:
(a) Identifying business risks relevant to financial reporting objectives
(b) Estimating the significance of the risks
(c) Assessing the likelihood of their occurrence
(d) Deciding about actions to address those risks
The entity’s risk assessment process forms the basis for the risks to be managed. If that process is
appropriate, it would assist the auditor in identifying risks of material misstatement. Risks can arise
or change due to factor such as new technology, new business models, products or activities, changes
in operating environment etc. Whether the entity’s risk assessment process is appropriate to the
circumstances is a matter of judgment.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 135


THE INFORMATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE RELATED BUSINESS PROCESSES,
RELEVANT TO FINANCIAL REPORTING AND COMMUNICATION
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the information system, including the related business
processes, relevant to financial reporting, including the following areas: -
(a) The classes of transactions in the entity’s operations that are significant to the financial
statements
(b) The procedures by which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, corrected
as necessary, transferred to the general ledger and reported in the financial statements
(c) The related accounting records, supporting information and specific accounts in the financial
statements that are used to initiate, record, process and report transactions
(d) How the information system captures events and conditions that are significant to the
financial statements
(e) The financial reporting process used to prepare the entity’s financial statements
(f) Controls surrounding journal entries.
An information system consists of infrastructure (physical and hardware components), software,
people, procedures, and data. Many information systems make extensive use of information
technology (IT). Information system should provide qualitative financial information. The
quality of system-generated information affects management’s ability to make appropriate
decisions in managing and controlling the entity’s activities and to prepare reliable financial
reports.
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of how the entity communicates financial reporting
roles and responsibilities. It may take such forms as policy manuals, accounting and financial
reporting manuals, and memoranda. Communication also can be made electronically, orally,
and through the actions of management.

Notes to Add

136 Auditing & Ethics PW


CONTROL ACTIVITIES
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of control activities relevant to the audit, which the auditor
considers necessary to assess the risks of material misstatement. An audit requires an understanding
of only those control activities related to significant class of transactions, account balance, and
disclosure in the financial statements and the assertions which the auditor finds relevant in
his risk assessment process. Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that
management directives are carried out. Control activities, whether within IT or manual systems, have
various objectives and are applied at various organisational and functional levels.
Control activities relevant to audit generally include policies and procedures relating to performance
reviews (reviews of actual performance with budgets), information processing (for example controls
over checking arithmetical accuracy of records, program change controls etc), physical controls
(like controls over physical security of assets) and segregation of duties (controls over ensuring that
different people are assigned the responsibilities of authorising transactions, recording transactions
and maintaining custody of assets)

MONITORING OF CONTROLS
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the major activities that the entity uses to monitor
internal control over financial reporting. Monitoring of controls is a process to assess the effectiveness
of internal control performance over time. It helps in assessing the effectiveness of controls on a
timely basis. It involves assessing the effectiveness of controls on a timely basis and taking necessary
remedial actions. It includes considering whether controls are operating as intended and that they are
modified as appropriate for change in conditions.
Management accomplishes monitoring of controls through ongoing activities, separate evaluations,
or a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring activities are often built into the normal recurring
activities of an entity and include regular management and supervisory activities.
Management’s monitoring activities may include using information from communications from
external parties such as customer complaints and regulator comments that may indicate problems or
highlight areas in need of improvement.

Test Your Understanding

7. CA Smriti is auditor of a company. As part of audit, she is going through company policies and
practices regarding employee recruitment, training, orientation and related matters. She seems
to be very much interested in finding out whether company hires best candidates from applicant
pool. Identify what she is trying to do? How gaining knowledge about this aspect is useful to
her as an auditor?
Ans. The study of company policies and practices regarding employee recruitment, training,
orientation and related matters including hiring of best candidates is part of understanding HR
function of the company. It, in turn, helps in understanding control environment of the company.
By gaining such a knowledge, she can better understand internal control of the company.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 137


8. During the audit of same company, CA Smriti is keen to find out whether there exists a proper
system of segregation of duties in the company. She wants to be sure that a person responsible
for recording a transaction is different from the person authorising it. Discuss what she is trying
to do and how its understanding is significant to her as an auditor.
Ans. She is keen to find out whether there exists a proper system of segregation of duties in the
company. She is gaining an understanding of internal control of the company. In particular, she
is understanding “control activities”. When a person recording a transaction is different from
one authorizing it, she gains confidence that there exists a system for preventing misstatements.
It helps her in gaining insight into the internal control system of the company.

Notes to Add

138 Auditing & Ethics PW


ARE ALL CONTROLS RELEVANT TO THE AUDIT?
There is a direct relationship between an entity’s objectives and the control it implements to provide
reasonable assurance about their achievement. The entity’s objectives, and therefore controls, relate
to financial reporting, operations and compliance; however, not all of these objectives and controls
are relevant to the auditor’s risk assessment.
Factors relevant to the auditor’s judgment about whether a control, individually or in combination
with others, is relevant to the audit may include such matters as the following:
‰ Materiality.

‰ The significance of the related risk. The size of the entity.

‰ The nature of the entity’s business, including its organisation and ownership characteristics.

‰ The diversity and complexity of the entity’s operations.

‰ Applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

‰ The circumstances and the applicable component of internal control.

‰ The nature and complexity of the systems that are part of the entity’s internal

‰ control, including the use of service organisations.

‰ Whether, and how, a specific control, individually or in combination with others, prevents, or
detects and corrects, material misstatement.

CONTROLS RELEVANT TO AUDIT


‰
Entity’s objectives
Direct Relationship b/w
Control it implements
‰ Relevant Factors
 Materiality

 Significance of → related risk

 Size of the entity

 Nature of the entity’s business

 Organisation + Ownership characteristics

 Diversity + Complexity of operations

 Applicable legal + regulatory requirements

 Circumstances + applicable component of IC

 Nature + Complexity of the systems

 Whether → control → prevents, or detects and corrects → material misstatement

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 139


CONTROLS OVER THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF INFORMATION

May be relevant to Audit



If Auditor intends to make use of Info.

In

Designing Performing
FAP

Controls over the completeness and accuracy of information produced by the entity may be relevant
to the audit if the auditor intends to make use of the information in designing and performing further
procedures. For example, in auditing revenue by applying standard prices to records of sales volume,
the auditor considers the accuracy of the price information and the completeness and accuracy of the
sales volume data. Controls relating to operations and compliance objectives may also be relevant to
an audit if they relate to data the auditor evaluates or uses in applying audit procedures.

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER SAFEGUARDING OF ASSETS


Acquisition
Against  Unauthorised Use
Disposition


May include controls relating to

Financial Reporting Operations

Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition
may include controls relating to both financial reporting and operations objectives. The auditor’s
consideration of such controls is generally limited to those relevant to the reliability of financial
reporting. For example, use of access controls, such as passwords, that limit access to the data and
programs that process cash disbursements may be relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely,
safeguarding controls relating to operations objectives, such as controls to prevent the excessive
use of materials in production, generally are not relevant to a financial statement audit.
Controls relating to Objectives-Not relating to Audit

NEED NOT BE CONSIDERED


Statute
If Require Auditor’s review of IC
Regulation
More

Broader Detailed

140 Auditing & Ethics PW


CONTROLS RELATING TO OBJECTIVES THAT ARE NOT RELEVANT TO AN AUDIT
An entity generally has controls relating to objectives that are not relevant to an audit and therefore
need not be considered. For example, an entity may rely on a sophisticated system of automated
controls to provide efficient and effective operations (such as an airline’s system of automated
controls to maintain flight schedules), but these controls ordinarily would not be relevant to the
audit. Further, although internal control applies to the entire entity or to any of its operating units
or business processes, an understanding of internal control relating to each of the entity’s operating
units and business processes may not be relevant to the audit.
In certain circumstances, the statute or the regulation governing the entity may require the auditor
to report on compliance with certain specific aspects of internal controls as a result, the auditor’s
review of internal control may be broader and more detailed.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 141


NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE UNDERSTANDING OF RELEVANT CONTROLS
Capable of

Considered First
P D C
MM
(ii) Implementation of control = control EXISTS + Entity USING it

Design
 R,A.P. to obtain  A.E. of IC
Implementation

Inquiring Observing Inspecting Tracing


   
Entity's Personnel Application of Documents Transactions
 Speciic Control +
Alone NOT Reports
SUFFICIENT
 Understanding I.C.  NOT SUFFICIENT

Unless their is SOME AUTOMATION

provides for Consistent operation of control

Evaluating the design of a control involves considering whether the control, individually or in
combination with other controls, is capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting,
material misstatements. Implementation of a control means that the control exists and that the entity
is using it. There is little point in assessing the implementation of a control that is not effective, and so
the design of a control is considered first.
An improperly designed control may represent a significant deficiency in internal control. Risk
assessment procedures to obtain audit evidence about the design and implementation of relevant
controls may include
‰ Inquiring of entity personnel.
‰ Observing the application of specific controls.

‰ Inspecting documents and reports.

‰ Tracing transactions through the information system relevant to financial reporting.

Inquiry alone, however, is not sufficient for such purposes.


Obtaining an understanding of an entity’s controls is not sufficient to test their operating
effectiveness, unless there is some automation that provides for the consistent operation of the
controls. For example, obtaining audit evidence about the implementation of a manual control at a
point in time does not provide audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the control at other
times during the period under audit.
However, because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, performing audit procedures to
determine whether an automated control has been implemented may serve as a test of that
control’s operating effectiveness, depending on the auditor’s assessment and testing.

142 Auditing & Ethics PW


RISK THAT REQUIRE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
 In R.A.P. Auditor shall determine  Any Risk SIGNIFICANT RISK

Consider

Risk is a Risk relate Complexity Risk involves Degree Transactions


Risk of to of Related Party of outside normal
Fraud SIGNIFICANT transaction Transactions subjectivity Course of
Business

Economic Accounting in Regulatory


Environment

As part of the risk assessment, the auditor shall determine whether any of the risks identified are, in
the auditor’s judgment, a significant risk. In exercising judgment as to which risks are significant risks,
the auditor shall consider at least the following:
(a) Whether the risk is a risk of fraud
(b) Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or other developments
like changes in regulatory environment, etc., and, therefore, requires specific attention
(c) The complexity of transactions
(d) Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties
(e) The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk,
especially those measurements involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty and
(f) Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the normal course of business
for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 143


IDENTIFYING SIGNIFICANT RISK
Identifying icant Risk

Higher likelihood of OCCURANCE often relate to SIGNIFICANT


+
Higher magnitude of POTENTIAL MISSTATEMENT

Non-Routine Transactions Judgements

Transactions that are Development of Accounting


Estimates

Unusual Occur infrequently for which there is


SIGNIFICANT MEASUREMENT
UNCERTAINITY

Significant risks often relate to significant non-routine transactions or judgmental matters. Non-
routine transactions are transactions that are unusual, due to either size or nature, and that therefore
occur infrequently. Judgmental matters may include the development of accounting estimates for
which there is significant measurement uncertainty. Significant risks are inherent risks with both
a higher likelihood of occurrence and a higher magnitude of potential misstatement. The auditor
assesses assertions affected by a significant risk as higher inherent risk. The following are always
significant risks:
‰ Risks of material misstatement due to fraud

‰ Significant transactions with related parties that are outside the normal course of business for the
entity

Notes to Add

144 Auditing & Ethics PW


RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT – GREATER FOR SIGNIFICANT NON-
ROUTINE TRANSACTIONS
Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant non-routine transactions arising
from matters such as the following:
‰ Greater management intervention to specify the accounting treatment.

‰ Greater manual intervention for data collection and processing. Complex calculations or accounting
principles.
‰ The nature of non-routine transactions, which may make it difficult for the entity to implement
effective controls over the risks.
Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant judgmental matters that require the
development of accounting estimates, arising from matters such as the following:
‰ Accounting principles for accounting estimates or revenue recognition may be subject to differing
interpretation.
‰ Required judgment may be subjective or complex, or require assumptions about the effects of
future events, for example, judgment about fair value.

QUESTIONS

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)


2. Which of the following is not a risk to a company’s internal control due to its IT environment?
(a) Potential loss of data
(b) Inability to access data when required
(c) Unauthorized access to data
(d) Processing of large volumes of data
Ans. (d)
Theory Questions
10. What is understood by “non-routine” transactions? Briefly outline why risks of material
misstatement is greater for such transactions.
Ans. Refer to heading on “identifying significant risks”.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 145


EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM

Indispensable part of overall Audit Program

So far as the auditor is concerned, the examination and evaluation of the internal control system is an
indispensable part of the overall audit programme. The auditor needs reasonable assurance that the
accounting system is adequate and that all the accounting information which should be recorded has
in fact been recorded. Internal control normally contributes to such assurance.

Notes to Add

146 Auditing & Ethics PW


BENEFITS OF EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL TO THE AUDITOR

The review of internal controls will enable the auditor to know:


(i) whether errors and frauds are likely to be located in the ordinary course of operations of the business
(ii) whether an adequate internal control system is in use and operating as planned by the
management
(iii) whether an effective internal auditing department is operating
(iv) whether any administrative control has a bearing on his work (for example, if the control
over worker recruitment and enrolment is weak, there is a likelihood of dummy names being
included in the wages sheet and this is relevant for the auditor)
(v) whether the controls adequately safeguard the assets
(vi) how far and how adequately the management is discharging its function in so far as correct
recording of transactions is concerned
(vii) how reliable the reports, records and the certificates to the management can be
(viii) the extent and the depth of the examination that he needs to carry out in the different areas of
accounting
(ix) what would be appropriate audit technique and the audit procedure in the given circumstances
(x) what are the areas where control is weak and where it is excessive and
(xi) whether some worthwhile suggestions can be given to improve the control system.
Illustration 9: Mr. Y, one of the team member of the auditors of What and Where Limited was
very keen in knowing whether the internal control of the company would safeguard the company’s
assets. Advise Mr. Y.
Solution: The review of internal controls will enable the auditors to know whether the controls
adequately safeguard the assets.
Illustration 10: Mr. H, a team member of the auditor of There and Here Limited was of the view
that evaluation of internal control of the company would help in identifying the areas where internal
control is weak. Advise
Solution: The review of internal controls will enable the auditor to know what are the areas where
control is weak and where it is excessive.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 147
Formulate Audit Program after understanding Internal Control
The auditor can formulate his entire audit programme only after he has had a satisfactory
understanding of the internal control systems and their actual operation. If he does not care to
study this aspect, it is very likely that his audit programme may become unwieldy and unnecessarily
heavy and the object of the audit may be altogether lost in the mass of entries and vouchers. It is also
important for him to know whether the system is actually in operation. Often, after installation of a
system, no proper follow up is there by the management to ensure compliance.
The auditor, in such circumstances, may be led to believe that a system is in operation which in
reality may not be altogether in operation or may at best operate only partially. This state of affairs
is probably the worst that an auditor may come across and he would be in the midst of confusion, if
he does not take care.
It would be better if the auditor can undertake the review of the internal control system of client.
This will give him enough time to assimilate the controls and implications and will enable him to be
more objective in the framing of the audit programme. He will also be in a position to bring to the
notice of the management the weaknesses of the system and to suggest measures for improvement.
At a further interim date or in the course of the audit, he may ascertain how far the weaknesses have
been removed.
From the foregoing, it can be concluded that the extent and the nature of the audit programme is
substantially influenced by the internal control system in operation. In deciding upon a plan of test
checking, the existence and operation of internal control system is of great significance. A proper
understanding of the internal control system in its content and working also enables an auditor to
decide upon the appropriate audit procedure to be applied in different areas to be covered in the
audit programme.
In a situation where the internal controls are considered weak in some areas, the auditor might
choose an auditing procedure or test that otherwise might not be required; he might extend certain
tests to cover a large number of transactions or other items than he otherwise would examine and
at times he may perform additional tests to bring him the necessary satisfaction.
For example, normally the distribution of wages is not observed by the auditor. But if the internal
control over wages is so weak that there exists a possibility of dummy workers being paid, the
auditor might include observation of wages distribution in his programme in order to find out the
workers who do not turn up for receipt of wages.
On the other hand, if he is satisfied with the internal control on sales and trade receivables, the
auditor can get trade receivables’ balances confirmed at almost any time reasonably close to the
balance sheet date. But if the control is weak, he may feel that he should get the confirmation exactly
on the date of the year closing so that he may eliminate the risk of errors and frauds occurring
between the intervening period. Also, he may in that situation, decide to have a large coverage of
trade receivables by the confirmation procedure.

Notes to Add

148 Auditing & Ethics PW


EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL– METHODS
Method of Evaluation of I.C.

Narrative Record Check List Questionnaire Flow Chart


   
Complete & Exhaustive Series of Comprehensive A graphic presentation
description of System Instruction & / or series of questions of each part of Co’s
 questions  System of I.C.
As found in operation  Concerning I.C.
by Auditor Auditing staff must
follow
Disadvantages
(i) Difficult to Comprehend → System in operation
Weakness
(ii) Identify in system
Gap
(iii) Incorporate Δs → arising out of → Reshuffeling of Manpower

A review of the internal control can be done by a process of study, examination and evaluation of the
control system installed by the management. The first step involves determination of the control
and procedures laid down by the management. By reading company manuals, studying organisation
charts and flow charts and by making suitable enquiries from the officers and employees, the auditor
may ascertain the character, scope and efficacy of the control system.
The auditor must ask the right people the right questions if he is to get the information he wants.
It would be better if he makes written notes of the relevant information and procedures contained in
the manual or ascertained on enquiry. To facilitate the accumulation of the information necessary for
the proper review and evaluation of internal controls, the auditor can use one of the following to help
him to know and assimilate the system and evaluate the same:
(a) Narrative record
(b) Check List
(c) Internal Control questionnaire and
(d) Flow chart

Methods of evaluation of
internal control

Narrative Check Internal Flow


record list Control Chart
questionnaire

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 149


NARRATIVE RECORD
This is a complete and exhaustive description of the system as found in operation by the auditor. Actual
testing and observation are necessary before such a record can be developed. It may be recommended
in cases where no formal control system is in operation and would be more suited to small business.
The basic disadvantages of narrative records are:
(i) To comprehend the system in operation is quite difficult.
(ii) To identify weaknesses or gaps in the system.
(iii) To incorporate changes arising on account of reshuffling of manpower, etc.
Check List
This is a series of instructions and/or questions which a member of the auditing staff must follow
and/or answer. When he completes instruction, he initials the space against the instruction. Answers
to the check list instructions are usually Yes, No or Not Applicable. This is again an on-the-job
requirement and instructions are framed having regard to the desirable elements of control.
Example:
A few examples of check list instructions are given hereunder:
(1) Are tenders called before placing orders?
(2) Are the purchases made on the basis of a written order?
(3) Is the purchase order form standardised?
(4) Are purchase order forms pre-numbered?
(5) Are the inventory control accounts maintained by persons who have nothing to do with custody
of work, receipt of inventory, inspection of inventory and purchase of inventory?
The complete check list is studied by the Principal/Manager/Senior to ascertain existence of
internal control and evaluate its implementation and efficiency.

Notes to Add

150 Auditing & Ethics PW


INTERNAL CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE
This is a comprehensive series of questions concerning internal control. This is the most widely used
form for collecting information about the existence, operation and efficiency of internal control in an
organisation. An important advantage of the questionnaire approach is that oversight or omission of
significant internal control review procedures is less likely to occur with this method. With a
proper questionnaire, all internal control evaluation can be completed at one time or in sections. The
review can more easily be made on an interim basis. The questionnaire form also provides an orderly
means of disclosing control defects. It is the general practice to review the internal control system
annually and record the review in detail. In the questionnaire, generally questions are so framed that
a ‘Yes’ answer denotes satisfactory position and a ‘No’ answer suggests weakness.
Provision is made for an explanation or further details of ‘No’ answers. In respect of questions
not relevant to the business, ‘Not Applicable’ reply is given. The questionnaire is usually issued to the
client and the client is requested to get it filled by the concerned executives and employees. If on a
perusal of the answers, inconsistencies or apparent incongruities are noticed, the matter is further
discussed by auditor’s staff with the client’s employees for a clear picture. The concerned auditor then
prepares a report of deficiencies and recommendations for improvement.
Few illustrative examples of Internal Control Questionnaire in different areas of an entity are given
as under:
Examples of Extracts of Internal Control Questionnaire in respect of purchases, creditors,
inventories and fixed assets
(A) Purchases
(1) Are purchases centralised in the Purchase Department?
(2) (a) Are purchases made only from approved suppliers?
(b) Is a list of approved suppliers maintained for this purpose?
(c) Does the master list contain more than one source of supply for all important materials?
(i) Are the purchase orders based on valid purchase requisitions duly signed by authorised
persons in this behalf?
(ii) Are purchases based on competitive quotations from two or more suppliers?
(iii) Are purchase orders pre-numbered?
(iv) Are purchase orders signed only by employees authorized in this behalf?
(v) Are all materials received only in the Receiving Department?
(vi) Are persons connected with receipt of materials and the keeping of receiving records
denied authority to issue purchase orders or to approve invoices?
(vii) Are materials inspected and counted, weighed or measured in the Receiving
Department?
(viii) Are receipt of materials evidenced by pre-numbered Goods Received Note?
(B) Creditors
(1)
(a) Are suppliers’ invoices routed direct to the Accounts Department?
(b) Are they entered in a Bill register before submitting them to other departments for check
and/or approval?
(c) Are advance and partial payments entered on the invoices before they are submitted to
other departments?
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 151
(2) Does the system ensure that all invoices are duly processed?
(3) In respect of raw material and supplies, are reconciliations made of quantities and/or values
received as shown by purchase invoices with receipt into stock records?
(4) Does the Accounts Department match the invoices of supplies with Goods Received Notes and
purchase orders?
(5) Do all invoices bear evidence of being checked for prices, freight, terms etc.?
(6) Are all advance payments duly authorized by persons competent to authorize such payments?
(7) Are duplicate invoices marked immediately on receipt to avoid payment against them?
(8) Are all supplier’s statements compared with ledger accounts?
(9) Is there any follow-up action to investigate difference, if any, between the suppliers’ statements
and the ledger accounts?
(10) Is a list of unpaid creditors prepared and reconciled periodically?
(C) Inventories
(1) Are stocks stored in assigned areas?
(2) Are stocks insured comprehensively against different risks? If some risk is not insured, whether
it is due to specific decision taken by a senior official?
(3) Is a record maintained for the insurance policies?
(4) Is the record reviewed periodically?
(5) Is there an official who decides on the value for which stocks are to be insured?
(6) Is the adequacy of insurance cover reviewed periodically?
(7) Are perpetual stock records kept for raw materials, work-in-progress, finished goods and
stores?
(8) Are stock records periodically reconciled with accounting records?
(9) Where there is a system of perpetual inventory count:
(a) Is there a periodical report of shortages/excess?
(b) If so, are these differences investigated?
(c) Are these differences adjusted in the stock records and in the financial accounts?
(d) Is written approval obtained from a responsible official to adjust these differences?
(10) Are there norms for stock levels to be held?
(D) Fixed Assets
(1) Are budgets for capital expenditure approved?
(2) Is the authority to incur capital expenditure restricted to specified officials?
(3) Are purchases of capital expenditure subject to same controls as applicable to purchases of raw
materials, stores etc.?
(4) Is there proper check to see that amounts expended do not exceed the amount authorized?
(5) Are fixed assets verified periodically?
(6) Is there a written procedure for such verification?
(7) Are reports prepared on such verification?
(8) Do such reports indicate damaged/obsolete items of fixed assets?
(9) Are discrepancies disclosed by such reports investigated?
(10) Are the records and financial accounts corrected with appropriate authority?

152 Auditing & Ethics PW


Note: The Internal Control questionnaire is usually issued to the client and the client is requested
to get it filled by the concerned executives and employees by giving replies as Yes/No/Not applicable
along with explanatory notes, if any.

FLOW CHART
It is a graphic presentation of each part of the company’s system of internal control. A flow chart is
considered to be the most concise way of recording the auditor’s review of the system. It minimises the
amount of narrative explanation and thereby achieves a consideration or presentation not possible
in any other form.
It gives bird’s eye view of the system and the flow of transactions and integration and in
documentation, can be easily spotted and improvements can be suggested. It is also necessary for the
auditor to study the significant features of the business carried on by the concern, the nature of its
activities and various channels of goods and materials as well as cash, both inward and outward and
also a comprehensive study of the entire process of manufacturing, trading and administration. This
will help him to understand and evaluate the internal controls in the correct perspective.
Illustration 11: In order to evaluate the Internal Control of Your and My Limited, a team member of
the auditors used a method according to which, number of questions relating to internal control of the
company were required to be answered by the employees of the company. After obtaining the answers
there was a discussion relating to those answers between team member of the auditor and employees
of the company for a clear picture. State the method of evaluation of internal control as discussed above.
Solution: The method of evaluation of internal control used in the above question is known as
Internal Control Questionnaire because in questionnaire method, a number of questions relating to
internal control of a company are required to be answered by employees of that company and when
answers to the questions are obtained, there is a discussion relating to those answers between team
members of the auditors and employees of that company for a clear picture.
Illustration 12: Healthy and Useful Limited is into small manufacturing as well as trading business.
For the purpose of evaluating the internal control of Healthy and Useful Limited, a team member
of the auditors of the company used a method according to which the whole description of internal
control that was operating in the said company was to be recorded. Identify the method of evaluation
of internal control as mentioned above.
Solution: The method of evaluation of internal control referred above is known as Narrative Record
because in Narrative Record method, a whole description of internal control operating in an entity
is recorded. Narrative Record method is also appropriate for small manufacturing as well as trading
business as is mentioned in the question above case.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 153


TESTING OF IC
Testing of I.C. How far I.C. is actually in operation?
On selective basis

ToC are performed to obtain A.E. about effectiveness of operation of I.C. through the audit

Design of A/c. & I.C. System

i.e. whether they are suitably designed to

P D C

MM

After assimilating the internal control system, the auditor needs to examine whether and how far the
same is actually in operation. For this, he resorts to actual testing of the system in operation. This he
does on a selective basis: he can plan this testing in such a manner that all the important areas are
covered in a period of, say, three years.
Test of controls are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of the:
(i) Design of the accounting and internal control system
(ii) Operation of the internal control throughout the period
Test of controls include tests of elements of the control environment where strengths in the
control environment are used by auditors to reduce control risk. Some of the procedures performed
to obtain the understanding of the accounting and internal control systems may not have been
specifically planned as tests of control but may provide audit evidence about the effectiveness of the
design and operation of internal controls relevant to certain assertions and, consequently, serve as
tests of control. For example, in obtaining the understanding of the accounting and internal control
systems pertaining to cash, the auditor may have obtained audit evidence about the effectiveness of
the bank reconciliation process through inquiry and observation. When the auditor concludes that
procedures performed to obtain the understanding of the accounting and internal control systems
also provide audit evidence about the suitability of design and operating effectiveness of policies
and procedures relevant to a particular financial statement assertion, the auditor may use that audit
evidence, provided it is sufficient to support a control risk assessment at less than a high level.

Notes to Add

154 Auditing & Ethics PW


TEST OF CONTROLS MAY INCLUDE
(1) Inspection → of Document supporting transactions & other events to gain A.E. → that I.C. has
operated properly.
(2) Inquiries + observation → about I.C. → which leaves → No Audit trail
(3) Reperformance → involves the Auditor’s Independent execution of

Procedures Controls

That were originally framed


(4) Testing → of I.C. → operating on specified computerized application
OR
over the overall Infor. Technology function

� Inspection of documents supporting transactions and other events to gain audit evidence that internal
controls have operated properly, for example, verifying that a transaction has been authorised.
‰ Inquiries about, and observation of, internal controls which leave no audit trail, for example,
determining who actually performs each function and not merely who is supposed to perform it.
‰ Re-performance involves the auditor’s independent execution of procedures or controls that were
originally performed as part of the entity’s internal control, for example, reconciliation of bank
accounts, to ensure they were correctly performed by the entity.
‰ Testing of internal control operating on specific computerised applications or over the overall
information technology function, for example, access or program change controls.
While obtaining audit evidence about the effective operation of internal controls, the auditor
considers how they were applied, the consistency with which they were applied during the period
and by whom they were applied. The concept of effective operation recognises that some deviations
may have occurred. Deviations from prescribed controls may be caused by such factors as changes
in key personnel, significant seasonal fluctuations in volume of transactions and human error. When
deviations are detected, the auditor makes specific inquiries regarding these matters, particularly,
the timing of staff changes in key internal control functions. The auditor then ensures that the tests of
control appropriately cover such a period of change or fluctuation.
Based on the results of the tests of control, the auditor should evaluate whether the internal
controls are designed and operating as contemplated in the preliminary assessment of control risk.
The evaluation of deviations may result in the auditor concluding that the assessed level of control
risk needs to be revised. In such cases, the auditor would modify the nature, timing and extent of
planned substantive procedures.
Before the conclusion of the audit, based on the results of substantive procedures and other audit
evidence obtained by the auditor, the auditor should consider whether the assessment of control risk is
confirmed. In case of deviations from the prescribed accounting and internal control systems, the auditor
would make specific inquiries to consider their implications. Where, on the basis of such inquiries, the
auditor concludes that the deviations are such that the preliminary assessment of control risk is not
supported, he would amend the same unless the audit evidence obtained from other tests of control
supports that assessment. Where the auditor concludes that the assessed level of control risk needs to
be revised, he would modify the nature, timing and extent of his planned substantive procedures.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 155


QUESTIONS

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)


3. Who is responsible for maintaining effective internal financial controls?
(a) Statutory auditor (b) Audit Committee
(c) Management (d) Shareholders
Ans. (c)

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
11. Tests of control are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of Internal Controls
Systems.
Ans. (Correct)
Tests of Control are performed to obtain audit evidence about the effectiveness of:
(a) the design of the accounting and internal control systems that is whether, they are suitably
designed to prevent or detect or correct material misstatements and
(b) the operation of the internal controls throughout the period.
12. Maintenance of Internal Control System is the responsibility of the Statutory Auditor.
Ans. (Incorrect)
The management is responsible for maintaining an adequate accounting system incorporating
various internal controls to the extent appropriate to the size and nature of the business.
Maintenance of Internal Control System is responsibility of management because the internal
control is the process designed, implemented and maintained by those charged with governance/
management to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of entity’s objectives.
13. Mr. W, one of the team members of auditor of Different Limited was of the view that understanding
the Internal Control of Different Limited will not help in developing an Audit Programme.
Ans. Incorrect: Understanding the Internal Control of Different Limited will help in developing an
Audit Programme because it will assist the auditor and his team to understand as to how much
they can rely on internal control of the company and what audit procedures would be appropriate
to be used during the course of audit.
There is direct relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk.
14. Internal control cannot eliminate risk of material misstatements in the financial statements.
Ans. Correct: Control risk is a function of the effectiveness of the design, implementation and
maintenance of internal control by management. However, internal control can only reduce but
not eliminate risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. This is because of the
inherent limitations of internal control.
There is possibility of human errors or mistakes, or of controls being circumvented by collusion.
Accordingly, some control risk will always exist.

156 Auditing & Ethics PW


Theory Questions

15. “The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the major activities that the entity uses to monitor
internal control over financial reporting” Explain.
Ans. The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the information system, including the related business
processes, relevant to financial reporting, including the following are as:
(a) The classes of transactions in the entity’s operations that are significant to the financial
statements;
(b) The procedures by which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, corrected as
necessary, transferred to the general ledger and reported in the financial statements;
(c) The related accounting records, supporting information and specific accounts in the financial
statements that are used to initiate, record, process and report transactions;
(d) How the information system captures events and conditions that are significant to the
financial statements;
(e) The financial reporting process used to prepare the entity’s financial statements;
(f) Controls surrounding journal entries.
16. Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and analysing information
throughout the audit. Analyse and explain giving examples.
Ans. Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control, is a continuous, dynamic process of gathering, updating and analysing information
throughout the audit. The understanding establishes a frame of reference within which the auditor
plans the audit and exercises professional judgment throughout the audit, for example, when:
Assessing risks of material misstatement of the financial statements;
Determining materiality in accordance with SA 320;
Considering the appropriateness of the selection and application of accounting policies;
Identifying areas where special audit consideration may be necessary, for example, related party
transactions, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption, or
considering the business purpose of transactions;
Developing expectations for use when performing analytical procedures;
Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained, such as the
appropriateness of assumptions and of management’s oral and written representations.
17. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Explain with the help of example in
respect of the procedure for sales
Ans. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Procedural tests simply mean testing
of the compliance with the procedures laid down by the management in respect of initiation,
authorisation, recording and documentation of transaction at each stage through which it flows.
For example, the procedure for sales requires the following:
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 157
1. Before acceptance of any order the position of inventory of the relevant article should be
known to ascertain whether the order can be executed in time.
2. An advice under the authorisation of the sales manager should be sent to the party placing
the order, internal reference number, and the acceptance of the order. This advice should be
prepared on a standardised form and copy thereof should be forwarded to inventory section
to enable it to prepare for the execution of the order in time.
3. The credit period allowed to the party should be the normal credit period. For any special
credit period a special authorisation of the sales manager would be necessary.
4. The rate at which the order has been accepted and other terms about transport, insurance,
etc., should be clearly specified.
5. Before deciding upon the credit period, a reference should be made to the credit section to
know the creditworthiness of the party and particularly whether the party has honoured its
commitments in the past.
18. Briefly discuss the limitations of Internal Control.
Ans. (b) Limitations of Internal Control:
(i) Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance: Internal control, no matter
how effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the
entity’s financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected
by inherent limitations of internal control.
(ii) Human judgment in decision-making: Realities that human judgment in decision-
making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of
human error.
(iii) Lack of understanding the purpose: Equally, the operation of a control may not be
effective, such as where information produced for the purposes of internal control
(for example, an exception report) is not effectively used because the individual
responsible for reviewing the information does not understand its purpose or fails to
take appropriate action.
(iv) Collusion among People: Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion
of two or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control.
For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter
the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may result
in improper revenue recognition. Also, edit checks in a software program that are
designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may
be overridden or disabled.
(v) Judgements by Management: Further, in designing and implementing controls,
management may make judgments on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses
to implement, and the nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.
(vi) Limitations in case of Small Entities: Smaller entities often have fewer employees
due to which segregation of duties is not practicable. However, in a small owner-
managed entity, the owner-manager may be able to exercise more effective oversight
than in a larger entity. This oversight may compensate for the generally more limited
opportunities for segregation of duties. On the other hand, the owner-manager
may be more able to override controls because the system of internal control is less
structured. This is taken into account by the auditor when identifying the risks of
material misstatement due to fraud.

158 Auditing & Ethics PW


19. The division of internal control into five components provides a useful framework for auditors to
consider how different aspects of an entity’s internal control may affect the audit. Mention those
components of internal control.
Ans. Division of Internal Control into Components: The division of internal control into the following
five components provides a useful framework for auditors to consider how different aspects of
an entity’s internal control may affect the audit:
(i) The control environment;
(ii) The entity’s risk assessment process;
(iii) Monitoring of controls.
(iv) Control activities; and
(v) The information system, including the related business processes, relevant to financial
reporting, and communication;
20. Explain the matters which should be included for factors relevant to the auditors’ judgement
about whether a control is relevant to the audit.
Ans. Controls Relevant to the Audit: Factors relevant to the auditor’s judgment about whether a control,
individually or in combination with others, is relevant to the audit may include such matters as
the following:
(i) Materiality.
(ii) The significance of the related risk.
(iii) The size of the entity.
(iv) The nature of the entity’s business, including its organisation and ownership characteristics.
(v) The diversity and complexity of the entity’s operations.
(vi) Applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
(vii) The circumstances and the applicable component of internal control.
(viii) The nature and complexity of the systems that are part of the entity’s internal control,
including the use of service organisations.
(ix) Whether, and how, a specific control, individually or in combination with others, prevents,
or detects and corrects, material misstatement.
21. Saburi Textile Ltd is an established player in the textile manufacturing sector. It has developed
strong internal controls in almost every area. It has appointed you as an Internal Audit team
head. Internal audit has a very strong relation with internal control of the company. Internal
Audit analyses the effectiveness with which the internal control of the company is operating and
also makes suggestions for improvement in that internal control. Explain stating clearly activities
relating to Internal Control.
Ans. The objectives and scope of internal audit functions typically include assurance and consulting
activities designed to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of the entity’s governance processes,
risk management and internal control such as the activities Relating to Internal Control:
(i) Evaluation of internal control: The internal audit function may be assigned specific
responsibility for reviewing controls, evaluating their operation and recommending
improvements thereto. In doing so, the internal audit function provides assurance on the
control. For example, the internal audit function might plan and perform tests or other
procedures to provide assurance to management and those charged with governance
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 159
regarding the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of internal control,
including those controls that are relevant to the audit.
(ii) Examination of financial and operating information: The internal audit function may be
assigned to review the means used to identify, recognize, measure, classify and report
financial and operating information, and to make specific inquiry into individual items,
including detailed testing of transactions, balances and procedures.
(iii) Review of operating activities: The internal audit function may be assigned to review the
economy, efficiency and effectiveness of operating activities, including nonfinancial activities
of an entity.
(vi) Review of compliance with laws and regulations: The internal audit function may be assigned
to review compliance with laws, regulations and other external requirements, and with
management policies and directives and other internal requirements.
Internal audit has a very strong relation with internal control of a company. Internal Audit
analyzes the effectiveness with which the internal control of a company is operating and also
makes suggestions for improvement in that internal control.
22. Z Ltd. is a manufacturer of ready-made garments. During the year 2021-22, they have opened two
new branches and there is a substantial increase in their sales. The management has appointed
CA R to review the internal control system of the company as they feel that there are lapses in
the control environment of the company. What is included in the control environment and what
will the auditor evaluate in order obtain an understanding of the control environment?
Ans. Control Environment:
The control environment includes:
(i) the governance and management functions and
(ii) the attitudes, awareness, and actions of those charged with governance and management.
(iii) the control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control
consciousness of its people.
The auditor shall obtain an understanding of the control environment. As part of obtaining
this understanding, the auditor shall evaluate whether:
(a) Management has created and maintained a culture of honesty and ethical behavior;
and
(b) The strengths in the control environment elements collectively provide an appropriate
foundation for the other components of internal control.
23. ABC Ltd. has many divisions and branches across the country. They have an internal control system
which is well established maintained by the management on a regular basis. Explain the meaning
of internal control as per SA-315 and also state the benefits of understanding the internal controls
of a company.
Ans. Meaning and benefits of understanding Internal Control: Meaning of Internal Control: As per
SA-315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Through Understanding
the Entity and its Environment”, the internal control may be defined as “the process designed,
implemented and maintained by those charged with governance, management and other personnel
to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of an entity’s objectives with regard to
reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, safeguarding of assets,
and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The term “controls” refers to any aspects of

160 Auditing & Ethics PW


one or more of the components of internal control.” Benefits of Understanding of Internal Control:
An understanding of internal control assists the auditor in:
(i) identifying types of potential misstatements;
(ii) identifying factors that affect the risks of material misstatement, and
(iii) designing the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
24. Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition
may include controls relating to both financial reporting and operations objectives. Explain stating
clearly the objectives of Internal Control.
Ans. Objectives of Internal Control: Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised
acquisition, use, or disposition may include controls relating to both financial reporting and
operations objectives. The auditor’s consideration of such controls is generally limited to those
relevant to the reliability of financial reporting.
For example, use of access controls, such as passwords, that limit access to the data and programs
that process cash disbursements may be relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely,
safeguarding controls relating to operations objectives, such as controls to prevent the excessive
use of materials in production, generally are not relevant to a financial statement audit.
Objectives of Internal Control are:
(i) transactions are executed in accordance with managements general or specific authorization;
(ii) all transactions are promptly recorded in the correct amount in the appropriate accounts
and in the accounting period in which executed so as to permit preparation of financial
information within a framework of recognized accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements, if any, and to maintain accountability for assets;
(iii) assets are safeguarded from unauthorised access, use or disposition; and
(iv) the recorded assets are compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and
appropriate action is taken with regard to any differences.
25. Define Monitoring of Controls and in respect of monitoring of controls, answer the following
questions:
(i) How monitoring of controls would be helpful in assessing the effectiveness of controls?
(ii) How can management accomplish monitoring of controls?
(iii) What is included in the Management’s monitoring activities?
Ans. Monitoring of controls Defined: Monitoring of controls is a process to assess the effectiveness of
internal control performance over time.
(i) Helps in assessing the effectiveness of controls on a timely basis: It involves assessing the
effectiveness of controls on a timely basis and taking necessary remedial actions.
(ii) Management accomplishes through ongoing activities, separate evaluations etc.: Management
accomplishes monitoring of controls through ongoing activities, separate evaluations, or
a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring activities are often built into the normal
recurring activities of an entity & include regular management and supervisory activities.
(iii) Management’s monitoring activities include: Management’s monitoring activities may
include using information from communications from external parties such as customer
complaints and regulator comments that may indicate problems or highlight areas in need
of improvement.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 161


26. The review of internal controls will enable the auditor to know the areas where control is weak.
Explain stating clearly the benefits of evaluation of internal control to the auditor.
Ans. Benefits of Evaluation of Internal Control to the Auditor The review of internal controls will enable
the auditor to know:
(i) whether errors and frauds are likely to be located in the ordinary course of operations of the
business;
(ii) whether an adequate internal control system is in use and operating as planned by the
management;
(iii) whether an effective internal auditing department is operating;
(iv) whether any administrative control has a bearing on his work (for example, if the control
over worker recruitment and enrolment is weak, there is a likelihood of dummy names being
included in the wages sheet and this is relevant for the auditor);
(v) whether the controls adequately safeguard the assets;
(vi) how far and how adequately the management is discharging its function in so far as correct
recording of transactions is concerned;
(vii) how reliable the reports, records and the certificates to the management can be;
(viii) the extent and the depth of the examination that he needs to carry out in the different areas
of accounting;
(ix) what would be appropriate audit technique and the audit procedure in the given
circumstances;
(x) what are the areas where control is weak and where it is excessive; and
(xi) whether some worthwhile suggestions can be given to improve the control system.
27. Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition
may include controls relating to both financial reporting and operations objectives. Explain stating
clearly the objectives of Internal Control.
Ans. Objectives of Internal Control Internal control over safeguarding of assets against unauthorised
acquisition, use, or disposition may include controls relating to both financial reporting and
operations objectives. The auditor’s consideration of such controls is generally limited to those
relevant to the reliability of financial reporting. For example, use of access controls, such as
passwords, that limit access to the data and programs that process cash disbursements may be
relevant to a financial statement audit. Conversely, safeguarding controls relating to operations
objectives, such as controls to prevent the excessive use of materials in production, generally are
not relevant to a financial statement audit.
Objectives of Internal Control are :
(i) transactions are executed in accordance with managements general or specific authorization;
(ii) all transactions are promptly recorded in the correct amount in the appropriate accounts
and in the accounting period in which executed so as to permit preparation of financial
information within a framework of recognized accounting policies and practices and relevant
statutory requirements, if any, and to maintain accountability for assets;
(iii) assets are safeguarded from unauthorised access, use or disposition; and
(iv) the recorded assets are compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and
appropriate action is taken with regard to any differences.

162 Auditing & Ethics PW


28. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Explain with the help of example in
respect of the procedure for sales.
Ans. It has been suggested that actual operation of the internal control should be tested by the
application of procedural tests and examination in depth. Procedural tests simply mean testing
of the compliance with the procedures laid down by the management in respect of initiation,
authorisation, recording and documentation of transaction at each stage through which it flows.
For example, the procedure for sales requires the following:
1. Before acceptance of any order the position of inventory of the relevant article should be
known to ascertain whether the order can be executed in time.
2. An advice under the authorisation of the sales manager should be sent to the party placing
the order, internal reference number, and the acceptance of the order. This advice should be
prepared on a standardised form and copy thereof should be forwarded to inventory section
to enable it to prepare for the execution of the order in time.
3. The credit period allowed to the party should be the normal credit period. For any special
credit period a special authorisation of the sales manager would be necessary.
4. The rate at which the order has been accepted and other terms about transport, insurance,
etc., should be clearly specified.
5. Before deciding upon the credit period, a reference should be made to the credit section to
know the creditworthiness of the party and particularly whether the party has honoured its
commitments in the past.
29. Generally, IT benefits an entity’s internal control by enabling an entity to enhance the timeliness,
availability, and accuracy of information. Discuss explaining the other relevant points in the above
context.
Ans. Generally, IT benefits an entity’s internal control by enabling an entity to:
(i) Consistently apply predefined business rules and perform complex calculations in processing
large volumes of transactions or data;
(ii) Enhance the timeliness, availability, and accuracy of information;
(iii) Facilitate the additional analysis of information;
(iv) Enhance the ability to monitor the performance of the entity’s activities and its policies and
procedures;
(v) Reduce the risk that controls will be circumvented; and
(vi) Enhance the ability to achieve effective segregation of duties by implementing security
controls in applications, databases, and operating systems.
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 163


WHAT IS AN AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
A Business Environment
Where
Process Operation Accounting Decisions

Are carried out

Using computer system

Also known as

Information System Info Technology System

An automated environment basically refers to a business environment where the processes,


operations, accounting and even decisions are carried out by using computer systems – also known
as Information Systems (IS) or Information Technology (IT) systems. Nowadays, it is very common to
see computer systems being used in almost every type of business.

QUESTIONS

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)


4. The operations of a company are automated substantially. Which of the following statements
is most appropriate in this respect?
(a) It results in complex business environment.
(b) It results in simple business environment and easier audit.
(c) Automation has no relationship with complexity of business environment.
(d) It results in simple business environment. However, it increases complexity of audit.
Ans. (a)

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
30. An automated environment basically refers to a business environment where the processes,
operations, accounting except the decisions are carried out by using computer systems.
Ans. Incorrect: An automated environment basically refers to a business environment where the
processes, operations, accounting and even decisions are carried out by using computer systems.
31. All automated environments are complex.
Ans. Incorrect: The complexity of an automated environment depends on various factors including
the nature of business, level of automation, volume of transactions, use of ERP and so on. There
could be environment where dependence on IT and automation is relatively less or minimal and
hence, considered less complex or even non-complex.
164 Auditing & Ethics PW
KEY FEATURES OF AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
Key Features
(1) Enables faster business operations
(2) Accuracy in → Data Processing → Computation
(3) Better → Security → Control
(4) Less prone to human errors
(5) Provides Latest info.
(6) Ability to process large volume of transactions
(7) Connectivity → Networking → Capabilities

The fundamental principle of an automated environment is the ability to carry out business with less
manual intervention and more system driven. The complexity of a business environment depends
on the level of automation i.e., if a business environment is more automated, it is likely to be more
complex. Key features of an automated environment are as under:
‰ Enables faster business operation
‰ Accuracy in data processing and computation

‰ Ability to process large volume of transactions

‰ Integration amongst business operations

‰ Better security and controls

‰ Less prone to human errors Provides latest information

‰ Connectivity and networking capability

If a company uses an integrated enterprise resource planning system (ERP) viz., SAP, Oracle etc.,
then it is considered more complex to audit. On the other hand, if a company is using an off-the-shelf
accounting software, then it is likely to be less automated and hence less complex environment.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 165


UNDERSTANDING AND DOCUMENTING AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
(1) Info system being used (One/more application system + What they are)
(2) Their purpose (Financial or Non-Financial)
(3) Location of IT system (Local V/s Global)
(4) Architecture (Desktop Based, Cloud Based, Client – Server Based)
(5) Version (Functions & Risks could vary in different versions)
(6) Interfaces with systems (in case of multiple → Entries → Exits)
(7) In house v/s packaged
(8) Outsourced Activities
(9) Key Persons (CIO)

In an audit of financial statements, an auditor is required to understand the entity and its business,
including IT. Understanding the entity and its automated environment involves understanding how
IT department is organised, IT activities, the IT dependencies, relevant risks and controls. Given below
are some of the points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the company’s
automated environment:
Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are)
‰ Their purpose (financial and non-financial)

‰ Location of IT systems - local vs global

‰ Architecture (desktop based, client-server, web application, cloud based)

‰ Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application).

‰ Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist). In-house vs Packaged.

‰ Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support). Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators).

The understanding of a company’s IT environment that is obtained should be documented.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
32. Briefly mention three reasons why IT should be considered relevant to an audit of financial
statements.
Ans. The auditor should consider relevance of IT in an audit of financial statements for the following
reasons:
(a) Since auditors rely on the reports and information generated by IT systems, there could be
risk in the IT systems that could have an impact on audit.
(b) Standards on auditing SA 315 and SA 330 require auditors to understand, assess and respond
to risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
(c) By relying on automated controls and using data analytics in an audit, it is possible to increase
the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit process.
33. In an audit of financial statements, the auditor should plan response to all IT risks.
Ans. Incorrect: The auditor should plan response to those IT risks that are relevant to financial
reporting and not “all” IT risks.
166 Auditing & Ethics PW
34. When a business operates in a more automated environment, we are likely to see several business
functions and activities happening within the systems. List down the business functions and
activities happening within the systems.
Ans. Relevance of Information Technology in an Audit: When a business operates in a more automated
environment it is likely that we will see several business functions and activities happening within
the systems.
Consider the following aspects instead of:
(i) Computation and Calculations are automatically carried out (for example, bank interest
computation and inventory valuation).
(ii) Accounting entries are posted automatically (for example, sub-ledger to GL postings is
automatic).
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 167


RISKS ARISING FROM USE OF IT SYSTEMS
(1) Inaccurate processing of data, processing in accurate data, or both
(2) Unauthorized access to data
(3) Direct Data Δs
(4) Excessive Access / Privileged (Super Users)
(5) Lack of Adequate Segregation of Duties
(6) Unauthorized Δs to → Systems → Programs
(7) Lose of Data

Having obtained an understanding of the IT systems and the automated environment of a company,
the auditor should now understand the risks that arise from the use of IT systems. Given below are
some such risks that should be considered:
‰ Inaccurate processing of data, processing inaccurate data, or both.

‰ Unauthorized access to data.

‰ Direct data changes (backend changes).

‰ Excessive access / Privileged access (super users).

‰ Lack of adequate segregation of duties.

‰ Unauthorized changes to systems or programs.

‰ Failure to make necessary changes to systems or programs.

‰ Loss of data.

QUESTIONS
Theory Questions
35. The auditor should understand and consider the risks that may arise from the use of Information
Technology (IT) Systems.
Ans. Having obtained an understanding of the IT systems and the automated environment of a company,
the auditor should now understand the risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
Given below are some such risks that should be considered,
 Inaccurate processing of data, processing inaccurate data, or both

 Unauthorized access to data

 Direct data changes (backend changes)

 Excessive access / Privileged access (super users)

 Lack of adequate segregation of duties

 Unauthorized changes to systems or programs

 Failure to make necessary changes to systems or programs

 Loss of data

36. When the company is working in an automated environment, it is not necessary for its auditor
to understand its automated environment and depends upon the professional judgement of the
auditor as to whether gaining knowledge of company’s IT systems is required or not. Do you agree
with this statement?
168 Auditing & Ethics PW
Ans. Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: When a business operates in a more
automated environment it is likely that auditor will see several business functions and activities
happening within the systems.
Consider the following aspects instead of:
(i) Computation and Calculations are automatically carried out (for example, bank interest
computation and inventory valuation).
(ii) Accounting entries are posted automatically (for example, sub-ledger to GL postings is automatic).
(iii) Business policies and procedures, including internal controls, are applied automatically
(for example, delegation of authority for journal approvals, customer credit limit checks are
performed automatically).
(iv) Reports used in business are produced from systems. Management and other stakeholders
rely on these reports and information produced (for example, debtors ageing report).
(v) User access and security are controlled by assigning system roles to users (for example,
segregation of duties can be enforced effectively).
Companies derive benefit from the use of IT systems as an enabler to support various
business operations and activities. Auditors need to understand the relevance of these IT
systems to an audit of financial statements.
While it is true that the use of IT systems and automation benefit the business by making operations
more accurate, reliable, effective and efficient, such systems also introduce certain new risks,
including IT specific risks, which need to be considered, assessed and addressed by management.
To the extent that it is relevant to an audit of financial statements, even auditors are required
to understand, assess and respond to such risks that arise from the use of IT systems.
From the above discussion, it is quite apparent that it is necessary for an auditor to understand
the automated environment.
Alternative Solution
Understanding and Documenting Automated Environment: In an audit of financial statements, an
auditor is required to understand the entity and its business, including IT as per SA 315. Understanding
the entity and its automated environment involves understanding how IT department is organised, IT
activities, the IT dependencies, relevant risks and controls.
Given below are some of the points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of
the company’s automated environment:
(i) Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are).
(ii) Their purpose (financial and non-financial).
(iii) Location of IT systems - local vs global.
(iv) Architecture (desktop based, client-server, web application, cloud based).
(v) Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application).
(vi) Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist).
(vii) In-house vs Packaged.
(viii) Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support).
(ix) Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators).
The understanding of a company’s IT environment that is obtained should be documented.
From the above discussion, it is quite apparent that it is necessary for an auditor to understand
the automated environment.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 169
IMPACT OF IT RELATED RISKS
(1) Substantive Audit
(a) Cannot rely on data Obtained from system
(b) System → Data → Reports → Should be tested substantively for more → Completeness →
Accuracy
(2) Controls
(a) Cannot relay on automated controls, system calculations & A/c.ing procedures
(b) More substantive Audit work is needed
(3) Reporting
(a) Communication to TCWG
(b) Modified Audit Report

The above risks have to be mitigated. If not mitigated, such risks, could have an impact on audit in
different ways discussed as under:
Impact on substantive checking
Inability to address above discussed risks may lead to non-reliance of data obtained from systems. In
such a case, all information, data, and reports would have to be tested thoroughly for their completeness
and accuracy. It could lead to increased substantive checking i.e., detailed checking.
Impact on controls
It can lead to non-reliance on automated controls, system calculations and accounting procedures
built into applications. It may result in additional audit work.
Impact on reporting
Due to regulatory requirements in respect of internal financial controls (discussed in subsequent
paras) in case of companies, it may lead to modification of auditor’s report in some instances.

Notes to Add

170 Auditing & Ethics PW


TYPES
Types OF CONTROLS
of Controls IN AN AUTOMATED
in Automated Environment ENVIRONMENT

General IT Controls Application Controls IT Dependent Control


(Known as pervasive controls or Indirect Controls)

General IT Controls
(1) P & P  that relates to many  Applications + Support effective function of
Application controls
(2) They apply to  Main frames  Mini frames
(3) General IT controls that  Maintain integrity of info  Security of Data 
Commonly includes controls over

Data Centre & Program s Access Security Application System


Network Operations
Acquisition Development Maintenance
Application Controls
(1) Include  Automated  Manual  Controls  that operate at Business process level
(2) Automated controls are embedded into IT applications via ERPs
+
Completeness
Help in ensuring Accuracy of those system
Integrity
IT Dependent Controls Data
(1) Basically  Manual Controls  That make use of some form of Info.
Produced from
Report

IT Sys. Applications
(2) Even though  Controls are performed manually  The  Design  Effectiveness
 of such controls  Depends upon  The reliability of Source of Data
(3) Due to Internet dependency on IT  The  Effectiveness  Reliability  of

Automation IT Dependent

Controls

Requires General IT Controls to be Effective

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 171


Controls in an automated environment can be categorized as under:
(a) General IT controls
(b) Application controls
(c) IT-dependent controls
General IT controls are policies and procedures that relate to many applications and support
the effective functioning of application controls. General IT-controls that maintain the integrity of
information and security of data commonly include controls over the following:
‰ Data centre and network operations

‰ Program change Access security

‰ Application system acquisition, development, and maintenance (Business Applications)

These are IT controls generally implemented to mitigate the IT specific risks and applied commonly
across multiple IT systems, applications and business processes. Hence, General IT controls are known
as “pervasive” controls or “indirect” controls.
(a) Controls over Data centre and network operations: The objective of controls over Data centre
and network operations is to ensure that production systems are processed to meet financial
reporting objectives. These include activities such as overall management of computer operation
activities, preparing, scheduling and executing of batch jobs, monitoring, storage and retention
of backups. Such controls also help in performance monitoring of operating system, database
and networks. Matters such as BCP (Business continuity plan) and DRP (Disaster recovery plan)
which deal with recovery from failures are also taken care of by such type of controls.
(b) Program Change: The objective of program change controls is to ensure that modified systems
continue to meet financial reporting objectives. It includes activities such as change management
process, recording, managing and tracking change requests, making and testing changes etc.
(c) Access Security: The objective of controls over access security is to ensure that access to programs
and data is authenticated and authorized to meet financial reporting objectives. It includes
activities such as security organization & management, security policies & procedures, application
security, data security, operating system security, network security, physical security etc.
(d) Application system acquisition, development, and maintenance: The objective of such controls
is to ensure that systems are developed, configured and implemented to meet financial reporting
objectives. It includes overall management of development activities, project initiation, analysis
& design, construction, testing & quality assurance etc.

QUESTIONS

Multiple choice Questions (MCQ)


5. Which of the following is not an example of “General IT controls”?
(a) Controls pertaining to Disaster recovery plan
(b) Controls pertaining to batch preparation
(c) Controls pertaining to data security
(d) Controls pertaining to validation of input data in an application
Ans. (d)

172 Auditing & Ethics PW


Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
37. General IT controls support the functioning of Application controls.
Ans. Correct: General IT controls support the functioning of automated application controls and IT
dependent controls.
Theory Questions
38. Explain the objective and enlist the activities involved in the General IT Controls over “Program
Change”.
Ans. Program Change
Objective: To ensure that modified systems continue to meet financial reporting objectives.
Activities:
Change Management Process – definition, roles & responsibilities
Change Requests – record, manage, track
Making Changes – analyze, design, develop
Test Changes – test plan, test cases, UAT
Apply Changes in Production
Emergency & Minor Changes
Documentation – user/technical manuals
User Training
39. In an automated environment, General IT controls are policies and procedures that relate to many
applications and support the effective functioning of application controls. One such area is access
security. What is the objective of access security and what are the activities included in it?
Ans. Access Security in Automated Environment:
Objective of access security: The objective of Access Security is to ensure that access to programs
and data is authenticated and authorized to meet financial reporting objectives.
Activities:
(i) Security Organization & Management
(ii) Security Policies & Procedures
(iii) Application Security
(iv) Data Security
(v) Operating System Security
(vi) Network Security – internal network, perimeter network
(vii) Physical Security – access controls, environment controls
(viii) System Administration & Privileged Accounts – Sysadmins, DBAs, Super users
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 173


GENERAL IT CONTROLS VS. APPLICATION CONTROLS
� These 2 category of controls over IT system → Interrelated
 The relationship between them is such that

General IT controls are needed to Both are needed to ensure


support the functioning of complete & accurate info.
application controls Processing through IT System

Application Controls
Application controls include both automated or manual controls that operate at a business process
level. Automated Application controls are embedded into IT applications viz., ERPs and help in
ensuring the completeness, accuracy and integrity of data in those systems. Examples of automated
applications include edit checks and validation of input data, sequence number checks, user limit
checks, reasonableness checks, mandatory data fields.
IT Dependent Controls
IT dependent controls are basically manual controls that make use of some form of data or information
or report produced from IT systems and applications. In this case, even though the control is performed
manually, the design and effectiveness of such controls depends on the reliability of source data. Due
to the inherent dependency on IT, the effectiveness and reliability of automated application controls
and IT dependent controls require the General IT controls to be effective.
‰ These two categories of control over IT systems are interrelated.
‰ The relationship between the application controls and the General IT Controls is such that General
IT Controls are needed to support the functioning of application controls, and both are needed to
ensure complete and accurate information processing through IT systems.

QUESTIONS

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
40. In an automated environment, the relationship between the application controls and the General
IT controls over IT systems are not interrelated.
Ans. Incorrect: The relationship between the application controls and the General IT Controls is such
that General IT Controls are needed to support the functioning of application controls, and both
are needed to ensure complete and accurate information processing through IT systems. These
two categories of control over IT systems are interrelated.
41. Discuss relationship between “General IT controls” and “application controls” in an automated
environment.

174 Auditing & Ethics PW


Ans. Refer to heading on “General IT controls vs. Application controls”.
42. Describe how risks in IT systems, if not mitigated, could have an impact on audit.
Ans. When risks in IT systems are not mitigated the audit impact could be as follows:
(a) The auditor may not be able rely on the reports, data obtained, automated controls,
calculations and accounting procedures in the IT system.
(b) The auditor has to perform additional audit work by spending more time and efforts.
(c) The auditor may have to issue a modified opinion, if necessary. Program Change
Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 175


TESTING METHODS IN AN AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
Testing Methods
 Inquiry + Reperformance + Inspection + Observation
 Inquiry Most icient But gives least A.E.
Reperformance
To be used in combination of Inspection

Alone not icient Observation

 Reperformance most effective + gives Best A.E. But Time Consuming Least icient

 Inspection  Most Eff. & Eff. A.E.  But  Which  When  What  Test to use
+
Inquiry Is a matter of professional Judgement

Depends up on

Risk Control Env. Desired History of Complexity Assertions


Assessment Level of A.E. Errors / of Business being
required Mistakes addressed?

 Auditor should document the Test + Judgement Applied (SA 230)


Most Common Method of Testing
(1) Obtain Understanding  of how an Automated Transaction is processed

By doing  Reperformance  Using

Inquiry Observation Inspection


(2) Observe
(2) Observe→ How
How user
user processes
processes transaction
transaction  → under
under different
different scenarios
scenarios
(3) Inspect
(3) Inspect → the
the con
configurations defined
igurations de in application
ined in application

Having learnt about the various IT risks and controls, let us understand the different ways testing is
performed in an automated environment. There are basically four types of audit tests that should be
used. These are inquiry, observation, inspection and reperformance. Inquiry is the most efficient audit
test but it also gives the least audit evidence. Hence, inquiry should always be used in combination
with any one of the other audit testing methods. Inquiry alone is not sufficient. Reperformance is most
effective as an audit test and gives the best audit evidence. However, testing by reperformance could
be very time consuming and least efficient most of the time.
Generally, applying inquiry in combination with inspection gives the most effective and efficient
audit evidence. However, which audit test to use, when and in what combination is a matter of

176 Auditing & Ethics PW


professional judgement and will vary depending on several factors including risk assessment, control
environment, desired level of evidence required, history of errors/misstatements, complexity
of business, assertions being addressed etc. The auditor should document the nature of test (or
combination of tests) applied along with the judgements in the audit file.
When testing in an automated environment, some of the more common methods are as follows:
‰ Obtain an understanding of how an automated transaction is processed by doing a walkthrough of
one end-to-end transaction using a combination of inquiry, observation and inspection.
‰ Observe how a user processes transactions under different scenarios.
‰ Inspect the configuration defined in an application.
Where the general IT controls are not existing or existing but ineffective, the auditor should assess
the impact of IT risks and complexity of the automated environment in which the business operations
take place and plan alternative audit procedures in order to rely on the system-based information.

QUESTIONS

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
43. Inquiry is often the most efficient audit testing method, but least effective.
Ans. Correct: Inquiry is the most efficient but least effective. Moreover, testing through inquiry alone is
not sufficient. Inquiry should be corroborated by applying any one or a combination of observation,
inspection or reperformance.
44. Generally, applying inquiry in combination with re performance as audit testing method gives
the most effective and efficient audit evidence
Ans. Incorrect: Generally, applying inquiry in combination with inspection gives the most effective
and efficient audit evidence.
Theory Questions
45. What are the different testing methods used when auditing in an automated environment. Which
is the most effective and efficient method of testing?
Ans. When auditing in an automated environment, the following testing methods are used:
(a) Inquiry
(b) Observation
(c) Inspection
(d) Reperformance
A combination of inquiry and inspection is generally the most effective and efficient testing method.
However, determining the most effective and efficient testing method is a matter of professional
judgement and depends on the several factors including risk assessment, control environment,
desired level of evidence required, history of errors/misstatements, complexity of business,
assertions being addressed.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 177
CHARACTERISTICS OF MANUAL & AUTOMATED ELEMENTS OF IC RELEVANT TO
AUDITOR’S RISK ASSESSMENT
Manual
® An entity's system of I.C. ® contains elements
Automated
® Use of Manual Elements in I.C. ® Affects the manner
Automated ¯
in which transactions are

I R P R
Controls in Manual
Approval
(1) Review
Procedures
Reconciliations
Follow up
(2) MayuseAutomated Procedures Electronic format

Replaces paper document


I R P R
Controls in IT System
Automated
(1) Combination of Controls
Manual
(2) Manual Controls May be Independent of IT
use Info. produced by IT
limited to monitoring
Handling exceptions

An entity’s system of internal control contains manual elements and often contains automated
elements. The characteristics of manual or automated elements are relevant to the auditor’s risk
assessment and further audit procedures based thereon. The use of manual or automated elements
in internal control also affects the manner in which transactions are initiated, recorded, processed,
and reported:
(a) Controls in a manual system may include such procedures as approvals and reviews of transactions,
and reconciliations and follow-up of reconciling items. Alternatively, an entity may use automated
procedures to initiate, record, process, and report transactions, in which case records in electronic
format replace paper documents.

(b) Controls in IT systems consist of a combination of automated controls (for example, controls
embedded in computer programs) and manual controls. Further, manual controls may be
independent of IT, may use information produced by IT, or may be limited to monitoring the
effective functioning of IT and of automated controls, and to handling exceptions.

178 Auditing & Ethics PW


MANUAL ELEMENT VS. AUTOMATED ELEMENT
Judgement
®Manual®MoreSuitable Required
¯ Discretion
Example

Transaction Circumstances D Circumstances Monitoring


¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
Large Unusual Errors are Required a Effectiveness of
Non-Recurring dif"icult to controlled response Automated Control

De"ine Anticipate Predict


Less Reliable than Automated

Easily More prone to simple

Bypassed Ignored Overridden Error Mistake


Consistency cannot be assumed
High volume / Recurring transaction
Less suitable
Where speci c way to perform

Manual elements in internal control may be more suitable where judgment and discretion are required
such as for the following circumstances:
‰ Large, unusual or non-recurring transactions.
‰ Circumstances where errors are difficult to define, anticipate or predict.
‰ In changing circumstances that require a control response outside the scope of an existing
automated control.
‰ In monitoring the effectiveness of automated controls.

Manual elements in internal control may be less reliable than automated elements because they
can be more easily bypassed, ignored, or overridden and they are also more prone to simple errors
and mistakes. Consistency of application of a manual control element cannot therefore be assumed.
Manual control elements may be less suitable for the following circumstances:
‰ High volume or recurring transactions, or in situations where errors that can be anticipated or
predicted can be prevented, or detected and corrected, by control parameters that are automated.
‰ Control activities where the specific ways to perform the control can be adequately designed and
automated.
The extent and nature of the risks to internal control vary depending on the nature and characteristics
of the entity’s information system. The entity responds to the risks arising from the use of IT or from use
of manual elements in internal control by establishing effective controls in light of the characteristics
of the entity’s information system.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 179
AUDIT APPROACH IN AN AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENT
Understand and Test for Operating Reporting
Risk Assessment
Evaluate Effectiveness

• Identify • Document • Assess Nature, • Evaluate Control


significant understanding Timing and Deficiencies
accounts and of business Extent (NTE) of • Significant
disclosures processes using controls testing deficiencies,
Flowcharts/
• Qualitative and • Assess reliability Material
Narratives
Quantitative of source data; Weaknesses
considerations • Prepare Risk completeness of • Remediation
and Control population
• Relevant of control
Matrices (RCM)
Financial • Testing of key weaknesses
Statement • Understand reports and • Internal Controls
Assertions (FSA) design of spreadsheets Memo (ICM) or
controls by
• Identify likely • Sample testing Management
performing
sources of Letter
walkthroughts • Consider
misstatement
of end-to-end competence and • Auditor’s report
• Consider risk process independence
arising from use of staff/team
• Process wide
of IT systems performing
considerations controls testing.
for Entity
Level Controls,
Segregation of
Duties
• IT General
Controls,
Application
Controls

Notes to Add

180 Auditing & Ethics PW


DATA ANALYTICS FOR AUDIT
Processes
Combination of Tools That are used to tap
Techniques
vast amount of

To obtain meaningful information

DATA ANALYTICS
Tools
that Auditor uses CAATs
Techniques

In today’s digital age when companies rely on more and more on IT systems and networks to
operate business, the amount of data and information that exists in these systems is enormous. The
combination of processes, tools and techniques that are used to tap vast amounts of electronic data
to obtain meaningful information is called data analytics. While it is true that companies can benefit
immensely from the use of data analytics in terms of increased profitability, better customer service,
gaining competitive advantage, more efficient operations, etc., even auditors can make use of similar
tools and techniques in the audit process and obtain good results.
The tools and techniques that auditors use in applying the principles of data analytics are known
as Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques or CAATs in short. Data analytics can be used in testing of
electronic records and data residing in IT systems using spreadsheets and specialised audit tools viz.,
IDEA and ACL to perform the following:
‰ Check completeness of data and population that is used in either test of controls or substantive
audit tests.
‰ Selection of audit samples – random sampling, systematic sampling.

‰ Re-computation of balances – reconstruction of trial balance from transaction data.

‰ Reperformance of mathematical calculations – depreciation, bank interest calculation.

‰ Analysis of journal entries

‰ Fraud investigation.

‰ Evaluating impact of control deficiencies.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
46. A company functions in an automated environment. Discuss in what areas data analytics can be
useful for auditor of the company.
Ans. Refer to heading on “data analytics”

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 181


DIGITAL AUDIT
Embracing Digitisation
New Technologies
Entities Business model restructured
Automation
Auditors → use Digital Technology → Planning to Final opinion

Entities are embracing digitization as part of their operations to keep pace with changing times. New
technologies are helping companies revamp their operations and rethink the way business is
conducted. Companies are restructuring their business models driven by technology. Automation is
key to digitization.
In such a business environment, use of digital technology is being made by auditors right from
planning to expression of final opinion. Auditors are making use of artificial intelligence, data analytics
and other latest technologies to help understand business processes in a better way. By using such
tools, auditors can conduct audit in a better way and devote more attention to areas requiring greater
focus. Digital audit is helping auditors to better identify risks making use of technology.

Notes to Add

182 Auditing & Ethics PW


IFC AS PER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Internal Financial Controls (IFC) as per Regulatory Requirements

Deined V/s 134 (5)(e) of the companies Act, 2013

P&P  Placed by Co.. for ensuring

Reliability of Compliance with app. Eff. & Eff. of Safeguarding P & D of Fraud
Financial Reporting  Laws  Regulations Operations of Assets

Requirements of :
Ack./Rule Section/Rule Responsibility Applicability
The companies Act, Sec.134(5)(e) B.O.D. Check – Ch.4
2013
Sec.149(8) & Independent Director All Companies having
Schedule IV (I.D) I.D.
Sec.177 Audit Committee (A.C.) All Companies Having
A.C.
Sec.143(3)(i) Statutory Auditor All Companies
The Companies Rule 8(5) (viii) BOD All Companies
(Accounts Rules, 2014

The term Internal Financial Controls (IFC) basically refers to the policies and procedures put in place
by companies for ensuring:
‰ Reliability of financial reporting

‰ Effectiveness and efficiency of operations

‰ Compliance with applicable laws and regulations Safeguarding of assets

‰ Prevention and detection of frauds

The Companies Act, 2013 has placed a greater emphasis on the effective implementation and
reporting on the internal controls for a company. The term “internal financial controls” is used at
some places in Companies Act, 2013 casting responsibilities as under:
Relevant provision of Nature of Responsibility
Companies Act,2013
Section 134 (5) (e) In case of listed Companies, the Directors’ responsibility statement
shall state that the Directors had laid down Internal financial
controls to be followed by the company and that such Internal
financial controls are adequate and were operating effectively.
Section 143 (3) (i) of the Act The auditor’s report shall state whether the company has
adequate Internal financial controls system in place and also on
the operating effectiveness of such controls.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 183


This requirement shall not apply to a private company which –
(i) is One Person Company or a small company; or
(ii) has turnover less than ₹ 50 crore as per latest audited Financial
Statements; and which has aggregate borrowings from banks
or financial institutions or any body corporate at any point of
time during the financial Year for less than ₹ 25 crore.
Section 177 (4) (vii) of the Act Every audit Committee shall act in accordance with the terms
of reference specified in writing by the Board which shall, inter
alia, include-evaluation of internal financial controls and risk
management systems.
As per Section 149 (8) of the Act The company and independent directors shall abide by the
provisions specified in Schedule IV which lays down the Code for
independent Directors. As per this code, the role and functions of
independent directors include that they shall satisfy themselves
on the integrity of financial information and that financial controls
and the systems of risk management are robust and defensible.
The directors and management have primary responsibility of implementing and maintaining an
effective internal controls framework and auditors are expected to evaluate, validate and report on
the design and operating effectiveness of internal financial controls.

QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
47. The auditor’s responsibility includes reporting on Internal Financial Controls over Financial
Reporting which includes an understanding IT environment of the company and relevant risks
and controls. Mention the situations where IT will be relevant to an audit.
Ans. With the introduction of the Companies Act 2013, there is greater emphasis given to internal
financial controls (IFC) from a regulatory point of view. Directors and those charged with
governance (including Board of directors, Audit committee) are responsib le for the implementation
of internal controls framework within the company. The auditors’ responsibilities now include
reporting on Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting which include and understanding
IT environment of the company and relevant risks & controls.
Following are some situations in which IT will be relevant to an audit:
(i) Increased use of Systems and Application software in Business (for example, use of ERPs)
(ii) Complexity of transactions has increased (multiple systems, network of systems)
(iii) Hi-tech nature of business (Telecom, e-Commerce).
(iv) Volume of transactions are high (Insurance, Banking, Railways ticketing).
(v) Company Policy (Compliance).
(vi) Regulatory requirements - Companies Act 2013 IFC, IT Act 2008.
(vii) Required by Indian and International Standards - ISO, PCI-DSS, SA 315, SOC, ISAE
(viii) Increases efficiency and effectiveness of audit.

184 Auditing & Ethics PW


48. Which are specific risks to the company’s internal control having IT environment?
Ans. IT poses specific risks to the Company’s internal control, which include-
(i) Reliance on systems or programs that are inaccurately processing data, processing inaccurate
data, or both.
(ii) Unauthorised access to data that may result in destruction of data or improper changes
to data, including the recording of unauthorised or nonexistent transactions, or inaccurate
recording of transactions. Particular risks may arise where multiple users access a common
database.
(iii) The possibility of IT personnel gaining access privileges beyond those necessary to perform
their assigned duties thereby breaking down segregation of duties.
(iv) Unauthorised changes to data in master files.
(v) Unauthorised changes to systems or programs.
(vi) Failure to make necessary changes to systems or programs. Inappropriate manual
intervention.
(vii) Potential loss of data or inability to access data as required.
49. Explain the meaning of Internal Financial Controls clearly stating reporting requirement (with
reference to audit) on adequacy of internal financial controls. Also discuss about its (reporting
requirement on adequacy of internal financial controls) applicability on various types of
Companies.
Ans. Explanation given in Clause (e) of Sub-section 5 of Section 134 explains the meaning of internal
financial controls as, “the policies and procedures adopted by the company for ensuring the orderly
and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding
of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness
of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information.”
From the above definition, it is clear that internal financial controls are the policies and procedures
adopted by the company for:
(1) ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s
policies,
(2) the safeguarding of its assets,
(3) the prevention and detection of frauds and errors,
(4) the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and
(5) the timely preparation of reliable financial information.”
Section 143 (3) (i) of the Act requires an auditor to report whether the company has adequate
internal financial controls with reference to financial statements in place and the operating
effectiveness of such controls.
However, it may be noted that the reporting requirement on adequacy of internal financial controls
(IFCs) with reference to financial statements shall not be applicable to a private company which is a:
(i) One person company; or
(ii) Small company; or
(iii) Company having turnover less than ₹ 50 crore as per latest audited financial statement and
having aggregate borrowings from banks or financial institutions or anybody corporate at
any point of time during the financial year less than ₹ 25 crore.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 185


DOCUMENTING THE RISKS
 Auditor Document

Discussion Key Elements Identiied Identiied Risk


RoMM
 Assessed +
Engagement Team Related Control
+
Signiicant Decision FS Assertion
Level

Entity Env. I.C.


+
Sources of Info. + R.A.P

The auditor shall document:


(a) The discussion among the engagement team and the significant decisions reached
(b) Key elements of the understanding obtained regarding each of the aspects of the entity and its
environment and of each of the internal control components, the sources of information from
which the understanding was obtained; and the risk assessment procedures performed
(c) The identified and assessed risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level and
at the assertion level and
(d) The risks identified, and related controls about which the auditor has obtained an understanding.

ASSESS AND REPORT AUDIT FINDINGS


Findings
At AuditConclusion ®Assess+ Report At
Exceptions
¯ ¯
IT
Consider
Environment Control

Weaknesses Impact of Deficiencies Communicate in


weakness writing
P
Unable D MM
∗ Deficiencyin I.C.®Control
Missing C

At the conclusion of each audit, it is possible that there will be certain findings or exceptions in
IT environment and IT controls of the company that need to be assessed and reported to relevant
stakeholders including management and those charged with governance viz., Board of directors,
Audit committee.
Some points to consider are as follows:
‰ Are there any weaknesses in IT controls?
‰ What is the impact of these weaknesses on overall audit?

‰ Report deficiencies to management – Internal controls memo or Management letter.

186 Auditing & Ethics PW


‰ Communicate in writing any significant deficiencies to those Charged with governance.
The auditor needs to assess each finding or exception to determine impact on the audit and
evaluate if the exception results in a deficiency in internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists if a control is designed, implemented or operated in such
a way that it is unable to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements in the financial statements
on a timely basis; or the control is missing. Evaluation and assessment of audit findings and control
deficiencies involves applying professional judgement that include considerations for quantitative
and qualitative measures. Each finding should be looked at individually and in the aggregate by
combining with other findings/deficiencies.

QUESTIONS

Correct/Incorrect
State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:

50. During the assessment of Internal Controls, if the auditor can test Compensating controls, he
should obtain evidence of other mitigating factors.
Ans. Incorrect: If the auditor can test Compensating controls , he should obtain additional evidence
that may be required.
Obtaining evidence of other mitigating factors is required when he can’t test compensating controls
during his assessment of the Internal Controls.
51. As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 private companies are not required to appoint
internal auditor.
Ans. Correct: Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires every private company to appoint an
internal auditor having turnover of ₹ 200 crore or more during the preceding financial year; or
outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding ₹ 100 crore
or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.
Theory Questions

52. Sweet Fruits Private Limited had a turnover of ₹ 155 crore for the financial year 2019-20. Explain
whether during the financial year 2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited would be required
or not required to appoint an internal auditor, keeping in view the provisions of Companies
Act, 2013.
Ans. During the financial year 2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited would not be required to appoint
an internal auditor because according to Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 every private
company having a turnover of more than or equal to ₹ 200 crore during the preceding financial
year is required to appoint an internal auditor.
It is given in the question that Sweet Fruits Private Limited during the financial year 2018-19
had a turnover of ₹ 155 crore which is less than ₹ 200 crore. Therefore, during the financial year
2020-21, Sweet Fruits Private Limited will not be required to appoint an internal auditor.
Risk Assessment and Internal Control 187
53. Internal audit not only analyses the effectiveness with which the internal control of a company
is operating but also improves the effectiveness of internal control. Elucidate the statement.
Ans. Improvement in Effectiveness of Internal Control: Internal Audit means “An independent
management function, which involves a continuous and critical appraisal of the functioning of an
entity with a view to suggest improvements thereto and add value to and strengthen the overall
governance mechanism of the entity, including the entity’s strategic risk management and internal
control system”.
Activities Relating to Internal Control:
(i) Evaluation of internal control: The internal audit function may be assigned specific
responsibility for reviewing controls, evaluating their operation and recommending
improvements thereto. In doing so, the internal audit function provides assurance on the
control. For example, the internal audit function might plan and perform tests or other
procedures to provide assurance to management and those charged with governance
regarding the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of internal control,
including those controls that are relevant to the audit.
(ii) Examination of financial and operating information: The internal audit function may be
assigned to review the means used to identify, recognize, measure, classify and report
financial and operating information, and to make specific inquiry into individual items,
including detailed testing of transactions, balances and procedures.
(iii) Review of operating activities: The internal audit function may be assigned to review
the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of operating activities, including non-financial
activities of an entity.
(iv) Review of compliance with laws and regulations: The internal audit function may be assigned
to review compliance with laws, regulations and other external requirements, and with
management policies and directives and other internal requirements.
Therefore, one of the important aspects of internal audit is not only to evaluate internal
control system of an organization but also to suggest improvements for adding value and
strengthening it.
54. List any five points that an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the Company’s
automated environment.
Ans. Understanding of the Company’s Automated Environment: Given below are some of the points that
an auditor should consider to obtain an understanding of the company’s automated environment
Information systems being used (one or more application systems and what they are)
their purpose (financial and non-financial)
Location of IT systems - local vs global
Architecture (desktop based, client-server, web application, cloud based)
Version (functions and risks could vary in different versions of same application)
Interfaces within systems (in case multiple systems exist)
In-house vs Packaged
Outsourced activities (IT maintenance and support)
Key persons (CIO, CISO, Administrators)
188 Auditing & Ethics PW
AUDITOR’S RESPONSE TO ASSESSED RISK
Design
SA 330  Auditor'sResponsibility F.A.P
Implement
 
Objective obtainSuff. + Appro. A.E. Responses

To Risks

Identiied Assessed
SA 315
* Designing FAP Auditor shall

Consider Reason for given Assessment Obtain more Persuasive A.E.

Likelyhood of MM Risk Assessment


(Inherent Risk) takes into Account

Relevant Controls
(control Risk)

Auditor's responses to assessed risks

Tests of Controls Substantive Procedures

Substantive analytical
Tests of Details procedures

Tests of transactions i.e.


vouching

Tests of balances i.e.


veri ication

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 189


* Auditor Design ToC to obtain Suff. + Appro. A.E.
Perform
OPERATING EFFECTIVENESS OF RELEVANTCONTROLS

when

Auditor's Assessment of ROMM SAP alone CANNOT provide

At Assertion Level Suff. + Appro. A.E.

Includes an EXPECTATION At Assertion Level

Controls are operating Effectively

SA 330 The auditor’s responses to assessed risks deals with the auditor’s responsibility to design
and implement responses to the risks of material misstatement identified and assessed by
the auditor in accordance with SA 315, “Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement
Through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment” in a financial statement audit. The objective
of the auditor is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the assessed risks of material
misstatement, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to those risks.
SA 330 states that:
(a) The auditor shall design and implement overall responses to address the assessed risks of material
misstatement at the financial statement level.
(b) The auditor shall design and perform further audit procedures whose nature, timing and extent are
based on and are responsive to the assessed risks of material misstatement at the assertion level.
In designing the further audit procedures to be performed, the auditor shall:
(a) Consider the reasons for the assessment given to the risk of material misstatement at the assertion
level for each class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure, including:
(i) The likelihood of material misstatement due to the particular characteristics of the
relevant class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure (i.e., the inherent risk); and
(ii) Whether the risk assessment takes into account the relevant controls (i.e., the control risk),
thereby requiring the auditor to obtain audit evidence to determine whether the controls
are operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness of
controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures); and
(b) Obtain more persuasive audit evidence the higher the auditor’s assessment of risk.
The auditor shall design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
as to the operating effectiveness of relevant controls when:
(a) The auditor’s assessment of risks of material misstatement at the assertion level includes an
expectation that the controls are operating effectively (i.e., the auditor intends to rely on the
operating effectiveness of controls in determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive
procedures); or Substantive procedures alone cannot provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence
at the assertion level.
190 Auditing & Ethics PW
In designing and performing tests of controls, the auditor shall obtain more persuasive audit
evidence the greater the reliance the auditor places on the effectiveness of a control.
A higher level of assurance may be sought about the operating effectiveness of controls when the
approach adopted consists primarily of tests of controls, in particular, where it is not possible or
practicable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence only from substantive procedures.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 191


NATURE (N)&&Extent
Nature (N) EXTENT (E)(E) OF TOC
of ToC

In designing & Performing ToC  Auditor Shall

Perform Determine whether the control to be tested



Depends upon other controls
Other Audit + Inquiry

Procedure
If so, necessary to obtain A.E.

Supporting the operating effectiveness of
such controls
To obtain A.E. about operating
Effectiveness of Control

Including
How Controls were applied Consistently By whom & What means

In designing and performing test of controls, the auditor shall:


(a) Perform other audit procedures in combination with inquiry to obtain audit evidence about the
operating effectiveness of the controls, including:
(i) How the controls were applied at relevant times during the period under audit.
(ii) The consistency with which they were applied.
(iii) By whom or by what means they were applied.
(b) Determine whether the controls to be tested depend upon other controls (indirect controls), and
if so, whether it is necessary to obtain audit evidence supporting the effective operation of those
indirect controls.
Inquiry alone is not sufficient to test the operating effectiveness of controls. Accordingly, other
audit procedures are performed in combination with inquiry. In this regard, inquiry combined with
inspection or reperformance may provide more assurance than inquiry and observation, since an
observation is pertinent only at the point in time at which it is made.
The nature of the particular control influences the type of procedure required to obtain audit
evidence about whether the control was operating effectively.
For example, if operating effectiveness is evidenced by documentation, the auditor may decide
to inspect it to obtain audit evidence about operating effectiveness.
When more persuasive audit evidence is needed regarding the effectiveness of a control, it may be
appropriate to increase the extent of testing of the control as well as the degree of reliance on controls.
Matters the auditor may consider in determining the extent of test of controls include the
following:
‰ The frequency of the performance of the control by the entity during the

‰ period.

192 Auditing & Ethics PW


‰ The length of time during the audit period that the auditor is relying on the operating effectiveness
of the control.
‰ The expected rate of deviation from a control.
‰ The relevance and reliability of the audit evidence to be obtained regarding the operating
effectiveness of the control at the assertion level.
‰ The extent to which audit evidence is obtained from tests of other controls related to the assertion.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 193


T OF TOC
Timing (T) of ToC
Auditor shall test conrols for → Particular Time → Throughout the period

Which the Auditor intends to rely on those controls

The auditor shall test controls for the particular time, or throughout the period, for which the auditor
intends to rely on those controls in order to provide an appropriate basis for the auditor’s intended
reliance. Audit evidence pertaining only to a point in time may be sufficient for the auditor’s purpose,
for example, when testing controls over the entity’s physical inventory counting at the period end.
If, on the other hand, the auditor intends to rely on a control over a period, tests that are capable of
providing audit evidence that the control operated effectively at relevant times during that period are
appropriate. Such tests may include tests of the entity’s monitoring of controls.

Notes to Add

194 Auditing & Ethics PW


USING A.E. OBTAINED IN THE PREVIOUS AUDIT
In determining whether → It is appropriate to use A.E. → about operating effectiveness of controls
→ Obtained in the previous Audit → Length of time period that may elapse before retesting the controls
The Auditor may consider the following points:
(1) The effectiveness of other elements of I.C.

Control Entity’s Monitoring of Entity’s R.A.P.


Environment Control
(2) The risk arising from → Characteristics of control → Manual → Automated
(3) The effectiveness of → General IT Controls
(4) The effectiviness of Control + its application by entity
+
N.E. of deviation in application → Noted in previous audit
+
Whether any personel Δs → That significantly affect application of control
(5) Whether lack of Δs in particular control → Poses a risk Δs → Due to Δing circumstances
(6) The RoMM & the extent of reliance on control

In determining whether it is appropriate to use audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of
controls obtained in previous audits, and, if so, the length of the time period that may elapse before
retesting a control, the auditor shall consider the following:
(a) The effectiveness of other elements of internal control, including the control environment,
the entity’s monitoring of controls, and the entity’s risk assessment process
(b) The risks arising from the characteristics of the control, including whether it is manual or
automated
(c) The effectiveness of general IT-controls
(d) The effectiveness of the control and its application by the entity, including the nature and
extent of deviations in the application of the control noted in previous audits, and whether
there have been personnel changes that significantly affect the application of the control
(e) Whether the lack of a change in a particular control poses a risk due to changing circumstances and
(f) The risks of material misstatement and the extent of reliance on the control
If the auditor plans to use audit evidence from a previous audit about the operating effectiveness of
specific controls, the auditor shall establish the continuing relevance of that evidence by obtaining
audit evidence about whether significant changes in those controls have occurred subsequent to the
previous audit.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 195


EVALUATING THE OPERATING EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROL
Auditor should evaluate → whether Misstatement → detected by substantive procedure

Indicate that control are not operating effectively → Absence of Misstatements →Does not provide
A.E. → That control are effective

When evaluating the operating effectiveness of relevant controls, the auditor shall evaluate whether
misstatements that have been detected by substantive procedures indicate that controls are not
operating effectively. The absence of misstatements detected by substantive procedures, however,
does not provide audit evidence that controls related to the assertion being tested are effective. A
material misstatement detected by the auditor’s procedures is a strong indicator of the existence of a
significant deficiency in internal control.

Notes to Add

196 Auditing & Ethics PW


SPECIFIC INQUIRIES WHEN DEVIATION FROM CONTROLS ARE DETECTED
Auditor to make speciic Inquiries to understand the matter
+
Potential consequences
+
Determining

ToC provide appropriate Additional ToC Potential RoMM needs to be


basis for reliance on necessary addressed using Substantive
control procedure

When deviations from controls upon which the auditor intends to rely are detected, the auditor shall
make specific inquiries to understand these matters and their potential consequences, and shall
determine whether:
(a) The test of controls that have been performed provide an appropriate basis for reliance on the
controls
(b) Additional test of controls are necessary or
(c) The potential risks of misstatement need to be addressed using substantive procedures.
Irrespective of the assessed risks of material misstatement, the auditor shall design and perform
substantive procedures for each material class of transactions, account balance, and disclosure.
This requirement reflects the facts that:
(i) the auditor’s assessment of risk is judgmental and so may not identify all risks of material
misstatement and
(ii) there are inherent limitations to internal control, including management override.
Substantive procedures are audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at
the assertion level. Substantive procedures comprise: (i) Tests of details (of classes of transactions,
account balances, and disclosures), and (ii) Substantive analytical procedures.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 197


TESTS OF DETAILS
An audit procedure  designed to detect MM  At assertion Level

ToD Substantive Analytical


Procedure (SAP)

CoT A/c. Balance Presentation &


Disclosure

Tests of details are further classified into tests of transactions i.e., vouching and tests of balances i.e.,
verification.
For example, a purchase transaction may be verified by examining the related purchase invoice,
goods received note, inward gate entry register. Such tests of transactions help in establishing the
authenticity of transactions recorded in books of accounts.
Tests of balances consist of verification of assets as well as liabilities. Verification of an item of
fixed asset, for example, would help in establishing existence of that asset as on date of balance sheet.
This may be obtained by reviewing entity’s plan for performing physical verification of fixed assets
and obtaining evidence for performance of physical verification of fixed assets by management.

Notes to Add

198 Auditing & Ethics PW


SUBSTANTIVE ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Analytical Procedure  consists of  Evaluation of Finaincial Info.

Also encompasses Made by a study of plausible relationship

Among
Investigation of Relationships that are in
Identiied consistent with other
Fluctuations inancial info. Financial Non-Financial
OR DATA
Deviate signiicantly from
predicted amount

Substantive analytical procedures refer to analytical procedures used as substantive procedures by


auditor. The term “analytical procedures” means evaluations of financial information through analysis
of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Analytical procedures
also encompass such investigation as is necessary of identified fluctuations or relationships that are
inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ from expected values by a significant amount.
The use of widely recognised ratios (such as profit margins for different types of retail entities)
can often be used effectively in substantive analytical procedures to provide evidence to support the
reasonableness of recorded amounts.
Analytical procedures involving, for example, the prediction of total rental income on a building
divided into apartments, taking the rental rates, the number of apartments and vacancy rates into
consideration, can provide persuasive evidence and may eliminate the need for further verification
by means of tests of details.
Substantive analytical procedures are generally more applicable to large volumes of transactions
that tend to be predictable over time.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 199


NATURE AND EXTENT OF SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURES
(1) It reflects that → Auditor may not identify all RoMM → There are inhervent limitations to I.C.
including Mgt. Override
(2) Auditor may determine
(i) SAP will be sufficient
(ii) Only ToD will be appropriate
(iii) Combination of (i) & (ii)
(3) SAP are generally more applicable → To Large volume of transactions

That tends to be predictable over time
(4) The Nature of → Risk → Assertion → is relevant to design ToD
(5) Because of Assessment of RoMM → Takes account of I.C.

Extent of substantive procedures may need to be increased

When the result from ToC are unsatisfactory
(6) In designing ToD → the extent of Testing → is ordinarily thought of → In terms of sample size

Depending on the circumstances, the auditor may determine that:


‰ Performing only substantive analytical procedures will be sufficient to reduce audit risk to an
acceptably low level. For example, where the auditor’s assessment of risk is supported by audit
evidence from tests of controls.
‰ Only tests of details are appropriate.

‰ A combination of substantive analytical procedures and tests of details are most responsive to the
assessed risks.
Because the assessment of the risk of material misstatement takes account of internal control, the
extent of substantive procedures may need to be increased when the results from test of controls are
unsatisfactory.
In designing tests of details, the extent of testing is ordinarily thought of in terms of the sample
size. However, other matters are also relevant, including whether it is more effective to use other
selective means of testing.
Auditor's responses
to assessed risks

Tests of Substantive
Controls Procedures

Substantive analytical
Tests of procedures
Details
Tests of transactions Tests of balances
i.e.vouching i.e.veriication

200 Auditing & Ethics PW


Test Your Understanding
9. Zomba Products Private limited is a small company. The control systems in the company are
rudimentary. How, you as an auditor of the company, would proceed to evaluate internal control
of the company?
Ans. In a small company, control systems are basic and not formalized. Therefore, auditor should
proceed to evaluate internal control using narrative record.
10. A Chartered accountant during course of audit of a company finds that cash is not deposited
into bank frequently although concerned staff of company was required to do so. Further, the
official responsible for ensuring performance of above function, has also not paid any attention
to it. Discuss what does it represent from auditor’s perspective.
Ans. Cash is not deposited into bank frequently, although, concerned staff of company was required
to do so. Further, the official responsible for ensuring performance of above function, has also
not paid any attention to it. It means that control is not working as planned. It would not be
able to prevent misstatement and very purpose of control is defeated. It represents a “control
deficiency”.

CASE STUDY 1
CA Paritosh is auditor of a company. The financial statements of the company have just been
received for audit. Following issues have been flagged pertaining to the financial statements
of the company for purpose of risk assessment:
 The revenue of company has fallen from ` 50 crore in last year to ` 5 crore in current year
(for which financial statements have been received for audit) due to lack of demand in the
market for company’s products.
 Due to advent of new products in the market, company’s products are fast becoming
outdated.
 A large customer having an outstanding balance of ` 5 crore has failed to pay to the company
despite efforts made by the company.
 Inventory holding period has increased from 30 days in last year to 90 days.
 The company also gets carried out job operations from third parties. Therefore, parts
of inventories are lying with third parties.

Notes to Add

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 201


QUESTIONS

Theory Questions
Based on above, answer the following questions:
55. Regarding drastic fall in revenue of the company, which of the following is an audit risk?
(a) Fall in revenue would result in fall of profits for the company.
(b) Drastic fall in revenue may imply that company is not able to carry out its operations in
foreseeable future due to lack of demand in the market for company’s products. There is a
risk that going concern disclosure is omitted to be made in financial statements.
(c) The company can explore some new line of activity, if demand of its products is falling.
(d) Fall in revenue would mean lower tax liabilities for the company.
Ans. (b)
56. The company’s products are getting outdated in the market. Which of the following is an audit
risk?
(a) The company should devise strategies to sell products in the market
(b) Inventories may be understated in such a scenario
(c) Inventories may be overstated in such a scenario
(d) The company should launch a 1+1 free offer for its customers
Ans. (c)
57. A large customer has failed to pay to the company. Identify audit risk from below:
(a) Receivables may be misstated if irrecoverable debt is not written off
(b) Receivables may be overstated if irrecoverable debt is not written off
(c) Writing off irrecoverable debt would impact profits of company adversely
(d) Failure to recover outstanding debt would impact cash flows of company adversely
Ans. (b)
58. Identify audit risk involved when inventory holding period has increased from 30 days to 90 days.
(a) There is a risk of overstatement of inventories
(b) There is a risk relating to existence of inventories
(c) There is a risk that slow movement of stocks would increase tax liability when GST rates are
increased
(d) There is a risk relating to holding and storage cost of inventories
Ans. (a)
59. Part of inventories are lying with third parties. Identify audit risk involved.
(a) There is a risk that third parties do not manufacture according to specifications of the company
(b) There is a risk that by getting job work done from third parties, company is increasing its costs
(c) There is a risk that sufficient and appropriate evidence would not be available in respect of
quantity and condition of inventories lying with third parties
(d) There is a risk that sufficient and appropriate evidence would not be available for quality
control in respect of inventories lying with third parties
Ans. (c)
202 Auditing & Ethics PW
CASE STUDY 2
CA Piyush is understanding internal controls as part of audit exercise of a company.
It is a new client. He has studied controls in place in various operational areas of the company.
After studying and gaining an understanding of such controls, he has decided to test few controls
to actually see whether these are operating as intended by the management.
Till now, he has studied controls over inventories and bank. Few of such controls are listed below:
Nature of Control Control description
Control over inventories Inventories of the company lying at each location should be insured.
Control over inventories There should be inventory counts on a regular basis for each location
of the company.
Control over Bank operations Bank reconciliations are to be performed at regular intervals.

Theory Questions
Based on above, answer the following questions:
60. Which of the following most appropriately describes test of control regarding insurance of
inventories?
(a) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are insured for fire &
burglary. The sum insured & period of validity of policy are not relevant.
(b) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are comprehensively
insured. Ensure adequacy of sum insured by comparing it with value of inventories. Also
ensure policy period has not expired.
(c) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are comprehensively
insured. Ensure policy period has not expired.
(d) Inspect insurance policies to verify that inventories at each location are insured for fire and
burglary. Ensure policy period has not expired.
Ans. (b)
61. Which of the following most appropriately describes test of control regarding inventory counts?
(a) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure.
(b) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure. Attend inventory count.
(c) Obtain detail of inventory counting procedure and ensure that inventory count is carried out
according to laid down procedure. Attend inventory count and perform test count.
(d) Attend inventory count and perform test count.
Ans. (c)
62. While testing control over bank reconciliations, it has been noticed that bank reconciliations are
not being performed at regular intervals. Identify the most appropriate description of “control
deficiency” in this regard:
(a) Bank reconciliations are not being performed regularly as concerned staff is overburdened.

Risk Assessment and Internal Control 203


(b) Bank reconciliations are not being performed regularly as concerned staff is overburdened.
It could result in errors.
(c) Bank reconciliations are not being performed regularly as concerned staff is overburdened.
It could result in errors. It may result in misstatement of cash and bank balance in financial
statements.
(d) Bank reconciliations are not being performed regularly as concerned staff is overburdened.
These should be performed monthly and reviewed by senior accountant.
Ans. (c)
63. Since the company is a new client, which of the following statements is most appropriate?
(a) There is reduced detection risk.
(b) There is increased detection risk.
(c) There is no effect on detection risk.
(d) Detection risk should be increased to lower audit risk.
Ans. (b)
64. Which of the following statements is most appropriate regarding auditor’s response to assessed
risk of a new client?
(a) More substantive procedures would require to be performed
(b) Less substantive procedures would require to be performed
(c) There is no effect on substantive procedures
(d) There is no effect on substantive procedures as audit risk is low
Ans. (a)



204 Auditing & Ethics PW

You might also like