https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v15.

1312 REVIEW ARTICLE

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the

Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and
Systematic Literature Review
Abderrahmane Moubarek Sadou1 , Eric Tchouamou Njoya2,*

1.University of Huddersfield – Huddersfield Business School, Department of Logistics, Hospitality, Marketing and Analytics
– Huddersfield – United Kingdom. 2.University of Huddersfield – Huddersfield Business School, Department of Logistics,
Hospitality, Marketing and Analytics – Huddersfield – United Kingdom.

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

ABSTRACT
The use of artificial intelligence, along with its various components, is rapidly increasing in various fields of study today,
going beyond the traditional domains of computer science and mathematics. To gain insights into how artificial intelligence
is being applied in the air transport industry, uncover underlying correlations and trends in the literature, and identify
potential research gaps, we conducted a systematic literature review supplemented with bibliometric elements such as keyword
co-occurrence and author influence. The key findings of our research shed light on the most prolific institutions and authors
globally involved in generating knowledge about AI applications in air transport. Additionally, we identified five research
clusters that dominate the overall research direction: prediction and optimisation (constituting 65% of the articles), inter-
industry collaborations (17% of the articles), human experience (9% of the articles), safety, risks, and ethical considerations
(6% of the articles), and ecology and sustainable development (3% of the articles). Overall, further research is needed to
explore the ethical implications, legal considerations, integration processes, and impact on employment and the environment
in the air transport industry.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Air Transport; Big Data Technologies; Air Traffic Management: Airlines; Airports.

INTRODUCTION

The usage of analytical and numerical methods has pervaded two main fields today, business and research. In the former,
these methods are increasingly used to improve and enhance returns, which could take the form of financial gains or simply
optimised operations efficiency (Delen and Ram 2018). While in research, the rapidly growing usage of analytical methods could
be assimilated to a reflection of scientific progress (Mazanec et al. 2010). In the current advanced technological era, the usage of
analytical, statistical, and other scientific methods is given an even greater depth by the introduction of “intelligent” elements,
commonly defined under the non-expert term of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In many areas today, AI and its subfields are constantly
reshaping and challenging our view of what can be accomplished (Allam and Dhunny 2019).

Received: Feb 09, 2023 | Accepted: July 23, 2023

Section editor: Alison de Oliveira Moraes
Peer Review History: Single Blind Peer Review.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
2

As any other field, air transport relies heavily on different quantitative and qualitative analysis methods in order to provide
adequate insight for researchers and practitioners alike. In today’s inextricably connected world, where the use of Artificial
Intelligence is surging in every industry, in addition to the insight provided by previous literature reviews, there is an actual
demand for finding, studying and explaining the links tying AI and air transport. This work aims at filling this gap by studying
available literature and identifying the various applications of AI in air transport.

Artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence, despite its widespread use, remains a complex concept that defies a simple definition. Scholars like
Hamet and Tremblay (2017) and Kaplan and Haenlein (2019) offer a synthesised generalisation, defining AI as a collection of
algorithms designed to mimic human intelligence to some extent. These algorithms can interpret, analyse, and propose actions
based on provided data without explicit programming. AI encompasses various subfields, each with distinct applications. Notably as
shown in Fig. 1, Machine Learning, Computer Vision, and Natural Language Processing (NLP) stand out as some of the most
well-known AI applications.
These applications find relevance across various domains, spanning fields like medicine, surveillance, transportation,
pricing, operations, military applications, and intelligent enterprise planning (Smith and Eckroth 2017). In numerous
studies, the term “AI” is closely associated with other terms such as “Big Data Technologies (BDT)”, “Machine Learning
(ML)”, or “Intelligent Analytics” (Kibria et al. 2018). While there may be disagreement among scholars regarding the precise
terminology of these concepts, a consensus exists that data serves as the common currency connecting them all (Kersting
and Meyer 2018).

Artificial
Intelligence

Natural Language
Computer
Processing
Vision
NLP Machine
Problem Solving
and Learning
Planning ML

Supervised Unsupervised Reinforcement

Learning Learning Learning

Source: Adapted from Antoniou et al. (2011).

Figure 1. A summarised view of the various concepts contained within Artificial Intelligence.

The algorithms used to develop intelligent systems widely vary in terms of complexity, suitability, and area of application.
Even though most of these algorithms fall under the auspices of Machine Learning, they are still a contributing sub-component
of AI as a whole (Helm et al. 2020). With the variety of problems encountered today, it is safe to assume that there is no one-size-
fits-all solution. With that perspective, ML algorithms are usually categorised into 3 main paradigms: supervised, unsupervised,
and reinforcement learning. The desired outcome and the type of available data, control the category of the techniques that can
be employed (Ray 2019). Figure 2 illustrates a glimpse of these various ML techniques.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
3

Machine Learnning
Algorithms

Supervised
Learning
Unsupervised Semi-supervised Reinforcement
Learning Learning Learning

Support Vector
Machines (SVM)

Principal Component
Naive Bayes K-MEans Self-Training
Analysis

Decision Trees Generative Models

Transductive SVM

Source: Adapted from Mahesh (2020).

Figure 2. Most prominent machine learning algorithms and their subcategories.

As these multiple ML approaches constitute a research area mainly pursued in the fields of computer science and engineering,
they will only be briefly introduced in the following subsections to provide the reader with the notions required to understand
the practical applications of AI in the air transport industry.
Supervised learning algorithms
Supervised machine learning refers to the case in which an agent (an algorithm) performs an input-output matching of the data,
based on various patterns observed in the training sets (or examples) of input-outputs (Praveena and Jaiganesh 2017). Supervised learning
algorithms earned this denomination as a result of always requiring an external intervention, because detecting and arranging such
patterns necessitates labelling historic data for it to be readily used for the training phase (Mahesh 2020). Support Vector Machines
(SVM), Bayesian models, and decision trees are some of the most well-known algorithms used in this type of learning. Figure 3 shows
an abstract example of the general functioning of a supervised machine learning algorithm, trained and used for shape classification.

Training Data Output

This is probably a:

Rectangle
Model
Classification
Training Triangle

Labels association Rectangle

Rectangle
Test Data
Triangle

Source: Adapted from Oracle (2022).

Figure 3. Process of training and testing a supervised agent to classify shapes.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
4

Unsupervised learning algorithms

Unsupervised machine learning, also known as “cluster analysis”, “class discovery” or “outlier detection”, is significantly different
from supervised learning. More specifically, this type of algorithm does not require data labelling. In simple terms, this means
that there is no right answer for the algorithm to find, rather it must categorise features and try to find motifs on its own, implying
no external intervention. This independence from external influence has given the epithet of “unsupervised” to these types of
systems (Gentleman and Carey 2008; Mahesh 2020). Some of the algorithms that fall under this category of learning include for
example: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or K-means clustering.
The use of unsupervised data processing can lead to anomalies or errors in the output clusters, as certain data points may be assigned
to a cluster that does not correspond to their true nature (Liang and Klein 2008). This is demonstrated in the example of shape clustering
shown in Fig. 4, where the agent successfully identifies three classes of shapes, but incorrectly assigns a pentagon to the cluster of rectangles.

Unlabelled Data Output

Clustering

Source: Adapted from Oracle (2022).

Figure 4. Example of a shape clustering unsupervised algorithm.

Semi-supervised learning algorithms

Semi-supervised learning is an in-between path that allows an escape from the binary categorisation of problems. Many approaches
in the domain of semi-supervised learning involve the extension of either unsupervised or supervised learning methodologies to
incorporate supplementary information commonly associated with the alternate learning paradigm (Hady and Schwenker 2013).
In the case of “semi-supervised classification”, the agent is trained from both the labelled and unlabelled data, which is better
than the supervised classifier trained on the labelled data alone. While in “constrained clustering”, the goal is to obtain better
clustering than the clustering from unlabelled data alone (Zhu and Goldberg 2009).
Semi-supervised learning is useful when the access to labelled data is limited or expensive. This approach however faces many
challenges in real-world applications, as some empirical studies (Blum and Chawla 2001; Chen and Wang 2010; Nigam et al. 2000)
show that there are cases in which the use of the unlabelled data may degenerate the performance. Zhu and Goldberg (2009),
further argue that semi-supervised learning performance depends on the correctness of the assumptions made by the model.
Reinforcement learning algorithms
All the previously discussed algorithms share a common goal: finding correlations and patterns in large data sets. Reinforcement
learning algorithms are different, as they are firmly oriented towards maximising cumulative rewards (Mahesh 2020; Oh et al. 2020).
Under this paradigm, the primary objective of the agent is to effectively maximise the received reward signal within the given
environment. However, at the start of its interaction with the environment, the agent is initialised devoid of any prior knowledge or
experience. Consequently, the agent must embark on an exploratory phase to navigate through the state space and determine the
most favourable actions (Sutton and Barto 2018).
The agent faces the intricate task of navigating the trade-off between exploration and exploitation to maximise rewards in a
dynamic and uncertain environment. This delicate balance is further influenced by factors such as stochasticity, delayed rewards, and
non-stationarity, making exploration a vital component for the agent’s ongoing optimal decision-making process (Nian et al. 2020).
Despite being one of the 3 main machine learning paradigms, reinforcement learning remains difficult to implement, for the
simple reason that the notion of “reward” can be difficult to determine and may vary from one application to another (Oh et al. 2020).

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
5

Special case of Artificial Neural Networks

In an effort to mimic the neurons and neural networks in the human brain, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have been and
continue to be developed for effective problem resolution using complex data sets (Silva et al. 2017). ANNs have been set as a
special case because they can be used to solve problems from any category (supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement). The usual
structure of an ANN consists of an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer. A neural network is referred to as ‘shallow’
when the hidden layer consists of a single array of neurons, while a network with multiple layers is called ‘deep’ (Bianchini and
Scarselli 2014; Lopez-Martin et al. 2019). Generally, the hidden layer(s) process(es) the input data through weighted calculations,
and the results are then conveyed through the output layer (Mahesh 2020).

AI and Air Transport

The application of artificial intelligence in the air transport industry has become increasingly prevalent, offering improvements in
safety, efficiency, and customer service. Across various aspects of air transport, a multitude of analytical methods are employed to support
the industry in various ways. These methods enable the industry to better predict flight demand, optimise schedules and pricing, analyse
aircraft data to predict maintenance needs, optimise slot distribution for landing aircraft, facilitate air traffic management, plan fuel-
efficient routes, and enhance the passenger experience through AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants. By incorporating AI into
these areas, significant advancements in efficiency and quality can be achieved, leading to better outcomes for the industry as a whole.
When examining the applications of AI in various industries, it is common to find reviews that group together the subfields of
a particular industry and discuss them collectively. However, in the case of air transport, it is justified to specifically research the
applications of AI in this domain. Unlike other transport subfields, air transport is a vast and distinct field that warrants individual
attention. Moreover, the abundance of AI applications in air transport shows great promise and is supported by high-quality studies.
For example, Nikitas et al. (2020) explore the intersection of AI, transport, and smart cities, focusing on autonomous vehicles and
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Another comprehensive review by Abduljabbar et al. (2019) delves into various AI algorithms
used to enhance different aspects of the aviation industry, including congestion relief, landing safety, and in-flight monitoring
systems, among others. These reviews suggest that while algorithmic and optimisation interventions receive significant research
attention, other applications like UAVs are still in their early stages and require further development over time.
The background section of this work offers definitions and explanations to enhance understanding of the topic. It is followed by
a methodology section that outlines the step-by-step process undertaken to obtain the results presented in this study. Subsequently,
the bibliometric and network analyses of these results are presented in separate sections, followed by a discussion of the findings. Finally, the
concluding section provides recommendations for future research in this field and addresses the limitations encountered during the study.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology of a literature review becomes particularly relevant when the objective of the research is to explore existing studies
and identify potential avenues for investigation. A literature review serves to consolidate previous research conducted in related fields,
providing a comprehensive overview of prior thoughts and actions regarding the addressed problem (Boell and Cecez-Kecmanovic 2014).
Within the realm of literature analysis, a systematic literature review (SLR) goes a step further in terms of depth and rigor compared to
narrative reviews. SLRs follow a rigorous and auditable process, distinguishing them from descriptive narrative reviews that often focus
on a subset of selected studies within a specific area (Bhandal et al. 2022). Systematic reviews offer a reliable and replicable approach,
allowing the synthesis of a robust knowledge base from a wide range of literature sources. This method aims to minimise bias by analysing
all relevant studies on the topic, regardless of the authors or their primary field of expertise (Uman 2011). Given the nature and objective
of our research, we have adopted a systematic literature review approach, supplemented by elements of bibliometric analysis.

Keywords definition
The first step in the adopted methodology consists of selecting the appropriate keywords that will be used to browse the
Scopus database. Keyword choice was already clear as our research focuses on the applications of AI in the air transport industry.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
6

Although the terms AI, ML, and Big Data are usually based on a recurring set of tools, they are not equivalent to one another.
Additionally, two separate contexts were set to classify chosen keywords for higher clarity, an “industry” context and a “tools”
context. The Boolean operator “OR” is used to link keywords, while the “AND” operator is used to link contexts.
Industry context keywords include: “air transport”, “aviation”, “airline”, “airport”, “air traffic management”.
While tools context keywords are as follows: “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “big data”.
The next step involves entering the chosen search terms into the search engine of a selected database and retrieving the results.
Scopus has been selected as the preferred database due to its encompassing features, which make it comparable to other similar systems
like PubMed and Web of Science. In terms of article availability and the range of search parameters it offers, Scopus is considered
comprehensive and robust (Falagas et al. 2008). It provides both basic and advanced search options, allowing for the application of various
filters to refine the search results, including publication type, publication date, Scopus addition date, subject area, and author name.

Search results
The initial search was conducted on July 20, 2022, using the specified query in the Scopus database search engine. This search
yielded a total of 4,220 documents. Subsequent filtering steps were applied, as outlined in Table 1, to refine the results. The filters
included selecting English-only publications, peer-reviewed articles, and limiting the publication date to the last five years, resulting in
1,067 articles. Additionally, the option to display only open-access articles was enabled to ensure unrestricted access to the full texts.
Table 1. Summary of articles collection, filtering, and screening strategy.

Step Action Output quantity

Tools context: (“artificial intelligence” OR “machine learning” OR “big data “)
1. Input selected AND
4220 documents
search terms Industry context: (“air transport” OR “aviation” OR “airline” OR “air
navigation” OR “airport” OR “air traffic management”)

Limit query to English only documents

2. Filtering Limit document type to articles 1067 articles
Limit publication year to last 5 years (2017-2022)

Full access only

3. Screening 216 articles
Screen the abstracts and keywords for relevance

4. Final selection Check for doubles 216 articles

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

During the screening phase, abstracts and keywords were carefully examined for relevance to this study. Some studies that
were unrelated, primarily those focused on medical research but included keywords such as “aviation” or “airline” for illustrative
purposes, were identified and excluded. Furthermore, studies that solely aimed to solve mathematical problems and used “airports”
or “airlines” as examples were also discarded based on their end purpose.
The final sample of 216 articles underwent a thorough review to identify any duplicates, and none were found.

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

The bibliometric analysis conducted in this section plays a crucial role in comprehending the different trends that shape the
literature on AI and air transport. To begin with, the analysis includes influence statistics that identify and rank the most impactful
researchers and institutions from various geographical regions. The visualisations of bibliometric data presented in this study were
generated using VOSviewer, a software tool designed for constructing and visualising bibliometric networks based on citation,
co-citation, coupling, or co-authorship relationships. While VOSviewer offers a range of valuable features and is freely available
for use, its source code is not accessible for sharing or redistributing. However, it is worth noting that a new web-based version of
the software is currently being developed and is expected to be open-source (Van Eck and Waltman 2010).
The developers of this software have introduced a novel algorithm that effectively clusters the literature by grouping related
nodes into distinct clusters. The number of clusters generated depends on the optimal solution of the optimisation problem
presented in Eq. 1 (VOSviewer clustering optimisation problem) (Waltman and Van Eck 2013).

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
7

(1)

Where: ci denotes the cluster to which node i is assigned; δ(ci, cj) is a function that equals 1 if ci = cj and 0 otherwise; Sij represents
the similarity factor between nodes i and j; γ denotes a clustering resolution parameter. The higher the value of γ, the larger the
number of clusters that will be obtained.
The algorithm used by VOSviewer and the ones used by other famous bibliometric visualisation tools are surprisingly similar.
Gephi for example, uses the Louvain algorithm as a literature clustering approach, which is a model that aims to determine the
optimal number of partitions that maximise the modularity index through multiple iterations (Blondel et al. 2008). VOSviewer, on
the other hand, uses the smart local moving algorithm, which employs a recursive method to identify the structure of the
bibliographic network and its elements (Waltman and Van Eck 2013).
Using the Scopus export option, a comma-separated-values format (CSV) file was generated containing the filtered search
results. This file was edited to remove any non-selected studies, and was then used as an input to VOSviewer.

Author influence
By employing VOSviewer’s co-authorship analysis method, we conducted an analysis on 216 selected studies to identify the
frequency of recurring authors and the strength of their collaborations. The results were visualised in Fig. 5, revealing the presence
of 16 visible clusters of authors out of a total of 23 clusters. The largest cluster comprises the most influential authors who have
established numerous strong connections. Although the number of collaborations may be limited, this indicates a genuine endeavour
among researchers to advance the field of AI applications in air transport and expand the boundaries of knowledge in this area.
Mavris D N, Puranik, T G and Li J emerge as the most productive authors in this research field, each having contributed in 5
articles. It is worth mentioning that although Mavris is a prolific author, their influence cluster appears to be limited, suggesting
a relatively lower level of collaboration compared to other authors.

Alligier R.
Reklitis D.P.
Basora L. Delaurentis D.
Piera M.A.
Duong Mitici M.
Mavris D.N.
Chen J. Tian Y.
Kim J.
Casanova-Mateo C. Jr. Chen H.
Swinney C.J.
Feng Y.
Gardi A.
Causse M. Jennions I.K.
Yang J. Liu Y.

Ban H.J. Delahaye D.

VOSviewer Reitmann S.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 5. Author co-authorship map with article production bar graph for top authors.

Geographical influence (institutions or cities)

The affiliations field, an essential component when exporting search results from the Scopus database, provides valuable
information about the primary institutions associated with each study, including their city and country. This field proves to be
particularly valuable for analysing the geographical impact within the field of AI and air transport. By exporting this data, we can
identify and quantify the top contributing institutions based on the number of published papers they have produced.
In terms of geographical distribution, the publication of studies on AI applications in air transport showcases the global interest
and engagement of various institutions. Figure 6 highlights the top 11 territories based on study production, revealing that China
and the United States of America are the primary contributors, surpassing other territories in terms of the quantity of studies.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
8

Furthermore, there is a strong collaboration link between these two countries. However, the United Kingdom stands out with the
highest total link strength, indicating a robust network of collaborations extending to numerous territories.

Italy

Spain

United Kingdom
Australia
South Korea

Germany United States

Netherlands
China

France

Canada
VOSviewer

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 6. Article production and link map by territory with publications bar graph.

Furthermore, we conducted an examination of the global research trend by visualising the affiliations fields using the free
Google MyMaps tool. The resulting map, depicted in Fig. 7, provides insights into the distribution of contributing institutions.
Consistent with our previous analysis, the density of institutions appears to be higher in the European continent, particularly in
regions such as the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands. Additionally, two other notable clusters can be observed in the Chinese
region of Asia and in the United States in North America. In contrast, Canada, Russia, Australia and countries in South America
and Africa show comparatively lower research output in this field.

Iceland Sweden
Russia

Canada
Ukraine
Kazakhistan Mongolia
United North Italy
States Turkey China Japan
Atralntic Afeghanistan
Ocean Iraq Iran
Algeria Lybia Saudi
Mexico India
Mali Niger Sudan Arabia Thailand
Chad
Venezuela Nigeria Ethiopia
Colombia
DRC Kenya Papua New
Tanzania Indonesia
Peru Brazil Guinea
Angola
Pacific Bolivia Indian
Namibia
Ocean South Borswana Madagascar Ocean
Chile Atralntic Australia
Ocean South
Africa
Argentina

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 7. World-map with geographical location of contributing institutions.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
9

Additionally, the analysis of institutional contributions, depicted in Fig. 8, reveals that China and the UK are the leading
countries with the highest number of institutions actively involved in research on AI applications in aviation. This finding
reinforces the previous observation that there is a significant interest and investment in this field of study across multiple
regions, particularly in the Eurasian region of the world.

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 5

Georgia Institute of Technology 4
Air Space and Warfare Centre 2
University of Essex 2
China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and... 2
Agricultural University of Athens 2
Islamic Azad University 2
Shangai Central Meteorological Observatory 2

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 8. Article production by top institutions bar graph.

NETWORK ANALYSIS

VOSviewer, a powerful software tool, facilitates network analysis by allowing the visualisation of large networks through
multidimensional scaling. This capability proves invaluable during the process of exploring literature (Van Eck and Waltman
2010; VOSviewer 2022). Moreover, this software provides valuable insights into the overall structure of the AI applications
in the field of air transport, thanks to features such as modularity-based clustering analysis (Huang et al. 2022; Newman and
Girvan 2004). Our network analysis comprises two main components: citation analysis and keywords co-occurrence analysis.

Citation analysis
Citation analysis is a bibliometric technique employed to assess the impact and prominence of a publication. This method
examines the frequency with which a publication is cited in other works to gauge its reputation and influence (Ding and
Cronin 2011). By tracking the references cited in different articles, citation analysis provides valuable insights into the scholarly
communication patterns within a specific field (Hoffmann and Doucette 2012).
Conducting a citation analysis with VOSviewer is a simple process that involves utilising the generated CSV file from our sample
of 216 selected studies. In Fig. 9, the top 36 articles are represented in a constellation, where the size of each node corresponds
to the number of citations received by the respective study. The most frequently cited article, authored by Koch et al. (2019) and
focusing on Reinforcement learning for UAV attitude control, stands out with 127 citations.

Gui G. (2020)
Barratt S.T. (2019)
Martin C. (2018)
Kistan .T. (2018)
Koch W. (2019)
Castagno J. (2018)
Huang H. (2020)
Palossi D. (2019)
Balasingam M. (2017)

Kuru K. (2019)
VOSviewer
Rustam F. (2019)

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 9. Most cited articles map with top cited authors bar graph.

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
10

Keywords co-occurrence analysis

Keywords play a crucial role in providing a concise yet informative description of research content (Rajagopal et al.
2017). By analysing the co-occurrence of keywords, researchers can identify clusters, uncover underlying patterns, and
determine thematic relationships. This approach is based on the assumption that the connections between keywords reflect
the knowledge structure of the scientific or technical field under investigation (Radhakrishnan et al. 2017; Stegmann and
Grohmann 2003).
In our sample of 216 papers, we identified a total of 2,145 keywords. By applying a minimum threshold of 10 occurrences for
each keyword, we obtained a refined list of 29 keywords (refer to Table 2). It is not surprising that “machine learning” emerged
as the top-ranking term, with a frequency of 105 and a link strength of 355. From a search perspective, this indicates that
“machine learning” is the most prominent keyword used to explore literature in this particular field of study. Other frequently
occurring keywords include “air transportation” (frequency = 41, link strength = 199), “learning systems” (frequency = 39,
link strength = 204), and “artificial intelligence” (frequency = 39, link strength = 118), which align with the subject matter
being investigated.
Table 2. List of top 29 most frequent keywords.

Keyword Freq. Keyword Freq. Keyword Freq.

Air Navigation 38 Artificial Intelligence 39 Learning Systems 39

Air Traffic Control 34 Aviation 28 Machine Learning 105

Air Traffic Management 16 Big Data 13 Machine Learning Methods 10

Air Transportation 41 Data Mining 11 Neural Networks 16

Aircraft 38 Decision Making 16 Prediction 17

Aircraft Accidents 11 Decision Support Systems 11 Predictive Analytics 13

Aircraft Detection 15 Decision Trees 14 Reinforcement Learning 10

Airports 20 Deep Learning 26 Trajectories 13

Algorithm 15 Forecasting 33
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
13
(UAV)
Antennas 15 Learning Algorithms 21

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

We used VOSviewer to generate a keyword occurrence map, as shown in Fig. 10, which revealed the presence of
four distinct literature clusters, each representing different themes within our sample. The primary cluster (depicted
in orange) encompasses ten keywords, including “air navigation,” “deep learning,” and “UAV.” Conversely, the least
populated cluster (depicted in yellow) consists of only three keywords: “airports,” “big data,” and “data mining.” For a
comprehensive overview of the keywords and their associated cluster themes, please refer to Table 3. In VOSviewer, the
significance of a keyword is determined based on either its occurrence count or the total link strength (TLS). The TLS
indicates the cumulative strength of the co-occurrence links between a specific keyword and other keywords (Van Eck
and Waltman 2020).
The map displayed in Figs. 10 and 11 illustrates the relationship between keywords, with the size of each node indicating its
weight based on the number of occurrences (larger nodes represent higher occurrences). The links between keywords indicate
the network connections that a particular keyword can establish, with thicker links indicating a higher Term Frequency-Inverse
Document Frequency (TF-IDF) score. One surprising finding from this keyword co-occurrence analysis is that the keyword “airlines”
does not appear among the top 29 selected keywords. However, by lowering the minimum threshold for keyword occurrence to
7, the keyword “airlines” and many other keywords (81 in total) reappear, expanding the number of clusters to 7 (refer to Fig. 11).

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
11

Decision Support Systems

Artificial Intelligence

Big Data
Data Mining
Aircraft Detection Airport

Aviation Air Traffic Control

Antennas
Air Transportation
Aircraft Accidents Aircraft
Unmanned Aerial Trajectories Prediction
Vehicles (UAV)
Air Navigation
Machine Learning
Reinforcement
Learning Predictive Analytics
Learning Systems Algorithm

Descision Trees

VOSviewer Learning Algorithms

Machine Learning Methods

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 10. Keyword co-occurrence map for minimum occurrence threshold = 10.

Table 3. Keywords in each literature cluster with a general theme.

Cluster – Colour Keyword General Theme

Air Navigation

Aircraft Accidents

Aircraft Detection

Antennas

Deep Learning Machine learning algorithms applied

Cluster 1 – Orange
Learning Algorithms to air navigation

Learning Systems

Neural Networks

Reinforcement Learning

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)

Air Transportation

Algorithm

Decision Trees

Forecasting
Predictive analytics and ML applied
Cluster 2 – Green Machine Learning
to trajectory planning
Machine Learning Methods

Prediction

Predictive Analytics

Trajectories

Continuation...

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
12

Table 3. Continuation.

Cluster – Colour Keyword General Theme

Air Traffic Control

Air Traffic Management

Aircraft
AI supporting decision making in Air
Cluster 3 – Blue Artificial Intelligence Traffic Control (ATC) and Air Traffic
Management (ATM)
Aviation

Decision Making

Decision Support Systems

Airport

Airports Big data technologies applied to

Cluster 4 – Yellow
Big Data airports

Data Mining
Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Predictive Maintenance
Machine Learning Approaches
Aviation Industry
Machine Learning Methods Convolutional Neural Network

Cluster Analysis
Classification of Information

Algorithm Neural-Networks Deep Neural Networks

Weather Forecasting
Decision Trees
Prediction Feature Extraction

Machine Learning
China Automation
Airport
Aircraft
Aircraft Detection
Aviation Naviagation
Numerical Model
Airports
Traffic Management Antennas
Artificial Intelligence
Data Mining
Graphic Methods
Reinforcement Learning
Big Data
Decision Making
Air Traffics
Airlines Decision Support System

Scheduling
VOSviewer

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 11. Keyword co-occurrence map for minimum occurrence threshold = 7.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

By analysing the selected sample of studies, we have expanded the previously defined clusters and identified five overarching
clusters that encompass the literature in this field. The first cluster, labelled “predictions and optimisations,” includes articles that

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
13

offer predictive approaches to aviation problems or provide support for resolving optimisation problems using various intelligent
algorithms. While it can be argued that these two categories of problems are not inherently integrated within air transport and are
more focused on mathematical resolutions, it is important to note that the studies in our final sample specifically address problems
relevant to the aviation industry. Therefore, these articles cover solutions that are fundamentally related to the challenges faced
by the aviation industry, making them highly relevant to the field.
The second cluster revolves around the human experience, focusing on understanding best practices, techniques, and algorithms that
can enhance the overall experience of individuals interacting with various services related to air transport. The ecological cluster, on the
other hand, sheds light on the ongoing research direction aimed at developing eco-friendly solutions and assessing the environmental
impact of new techniques in the field. Another cluster explores inter-industry collaborations, where studies may not have been directly
targeted at aviation but offer techniques that can be applied to the aviation context. The selection criteria for these studies involved
checking the inclusion of air transport-related keywords and conducting a thorough reading of the articles. The final cluster encompasses
discussions on ethics, sustainability, responsibility, safety, and risk factors associated with AI applications in aviation. Figure 12 provides
a visual representation of the percentage distribution of each cluster based on the total number of studies covering its respective theme.

3%
Predictions and Optimisations
6%
Inter-industry Collaboration
9%
65%
Human Experience

17%
Safety, Risks, and Ethical Considerations

Ecology

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 12. Distribution of studies per cluster.

Cluster 1: predictions and optimisations

This cluster contains the largest number of studies, comprising 65% of the total. Several of these studies address the topic of
delay prediction (Etani 2019; Schultz and Reitmann 2018; Wang et al. 2018), employing algorithms from various types, including
supervised, unsupervised, artificial neural networks (ANN), and reinforcement learning. However, a critical argument can be
made: the results of these studies primarily focus on optimising algorithm parameters for improved future predictions, without
sufficient consideration for real-life applicability, as confirmed by our findings. Nevertheless, we also encountered studies that
offered actionable insights and collaborated with airports and airline companies to effectively tackle the issue of delays.
Within this cluster, another topic explored is the prediction of the impact of natural phenomena such as wind shear, fog, or icing
on aircraft operations (Huang et al. 2019; Larraondo et al. 2018; Li et al. 2020). The solutions proposed in these studies predominantly
involve supervised learning and regression algorithms. Despite the frequent occurrence of these natural phenomena and our extensive
knowledge of their effects on aircraft, the proposed solutions only offer marginal improvements (Li et al. 2020; Sim et al. 2018).
In addition, literature within this cluster covers a closely related area focused on optimising aircraft functions. This includes
upgrading navigation systems for trajectory tuning (Álvarez de Toledo et al. 2017; Celis et al. 2020; Gallego et al. 2019), regulating
fuel consumption (Malatesta et al. 2021; Matuszczak et al. 2021; Zhu and Li 2021), and suggesting intelligent diagnostic tools for
monitoring the health status of aircraft (Basora et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022; Meister et al. 2021). The results of these studies show
promise, but their successful implementation would require the support and collaboration of aircraft manufacturers.
The subsets of air transport, namely airports, airlines, and air traffic management (ATM), have all been the focus of numerous
studies exploring operations optimisation through intelligent decision-support systems based on machine learning algorithms
(Midtfjord et al. 2022; Reitmann and Schultz 2022; Xiong et al. 2022). Within the domain of airports, research primarily revolves

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
14

around estimating and improving the efficiency of various units (Szaruga and Załoga 2022) and employing intelligent scheduling
methods for both aircraft and passengers (Bruno et al. 2019). For airlines, the majority of studies are dedicated to developing
decision-support systems that utilize intelligent scheduling (Evler et al. 2021) and to optimising seat pricing (Alauddin and Ting
2020; Wozny 2022).
In the realm of Air Traffic Management (ATM), there are varying opinions regarding the integration of AI into ATM operations.
For instance, Jenab and Pineau (2018) propose a neural network approach to automate ATM processes and handle increased air
traffic, although their proposition is yet to be implemented. On the other hand, some researchers perceive extensive AI involvement
as a risk to air operations and suggest the introduction of certification criteria to approve the use of intelligent agents in such
critical positions (Kistan et al. 2018).
One notable aspect across these studies related to airports, airlines, and ATM is the empirical support they have received, with
some of the suggested techniques already being implemented in practice.

Cluster 2: human experience

The human experience cluster comprises 9% of the selected sample, with the majority of studies focused on analysing airline
customer satisfaction. These studies utilise machine learning algorithms and extract data from various sources, including customer
surveys (Park et al. 2022), airline website reviews (Kwon et al. 2021; Ullah et al. 2021; Verma and Davis 2021), and sentiment
analysis of customer tweets and social media activity (Kumar and Zymbler 2019; Rustam et al. 2020; Samah et al. 2022). While these
studies employ different technical methods, they share a common theme of leveraging machine learning algorithms to tap into
customers’ big data.
The remaining studies within this cluster cover a range of topics. For example, Chen et al. (2022) examine purchase willingness,
while Miskolczi et al. (2021) explore the attractiveness levels of airports that adopt modern technologies. Azzolina et al. (2021)
delve into the issue of price discrimination, studying how airline companies utilise customer data for discriminatory pricing and
assessing the impact of such practices on social welfare.

Cluster 3: ecology and sustainable development

In our analysis of the sample, the theme of ecology and sustainable development appears to be the least explored, with a total
of eight studies found in this cluster, accounting for only 3%. Within this cluster, two articles (Tian et al., 2019; Wan et al., 2022)
delve into the topic of aircraft gas emissions. These studies propose the utilisation of supervised machine learning algorithms to
enhance situational awareness and operational efficiency by accurately estimating flight emissions and airport air quality. While it
can be argued that these studies do not directly contribute to improving the global ecological state, as they focus on estimation
rather than mitigation, their significance lies in initiating a dialogue on this topic, considering the limited quantity of research
available. In contrast, one study (Kosir et al. 2020) directly addresses the issue by introducing an artificial neural network (ANN)
to optimise volume swell in aviation fuel, aiming to minimise greenhouse gas emissions. Although the results of this study show
promise, further replication is necessary to solidify the feasibility of its approach.
Three studies (Altringer et al. 2021; Dziak et al. 2022; Zhou et al. 2021) have addressed the issue of wildlife preservation within
this cluster. These studies primarily aim to mitigate aviation accidents caused by animal interference, also known as wildlife strikes.
Additionally, they explore the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to monitor various animal species in their natural habitats,
utilising advanced classification algorithms to effectively identify them. Another article in this cluster focuses on beach litter
monitoring, employing the same classification methods mentioned earlier. This study demonstrates improved results compared
to traditional visual-census approaches (Martin et al. 2018).

Cluster 4: inter-industry collaborations

The cluster that ranks as the second largest, accounting for 17% of the studies, exhibits a significant degree of
diversity. Within this cluster, numerous studies emerge from collaborations involving robotics, satellite imaging, and
image processing, offering innovative techniques for intelligent navigation that can be applied to UAV control (Arrouch
et al. 2022; Cai et al. 2021; Castagno and Atkins 2018). Another study, originating from the joint efforts of researchers

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
15

from agricultural backgrounds and technologists, expands on the navigation theme. It introduces the implementation of
a novel 3D filter for autonomous UAV navigation in agricultural settings, which would aid in gathering data about crop
morphology (Donati et al. 2022).
A separate set of studies primarily focused on airport security, encompassing both physical and cyber aspects, such as the
detection of suspicious behaviour, dangerous luggage, and airport x-ray scanners. In some of these studies, artificial neural
networks were employed for identifying suspicious behaviour (Kim et al. 2020), while others utilised support vector machine-
based classifiers for luggage classification (Wang et al. 2020). Additionally, certain works took a broader perspective, serving as
meta-studies that discussed various facets of AI-based airport security (Jupe and Keatley 2020) or examined the cybersecurity
threats posed by the proliferation of new intelligent systems (Koroniotis et al. 2020).
Furthermore, two studies based on review articles have explored the intersection of 6G, Aviation 4.0, and the Internet of
Everything (IoE), providing insights into the challenges that researchers will encounter when implementing such solutions,
particularly in the field of wireless communication (Janbi et al. 2020; Sekera and Novák 2021). In contrast, only one study emerged
from the collaboration between healthcare and aviation, examining the use of drones to support medical applications such as tele-
diagnostics and vaccine delivery. Although this article presents opportunities for discussion, it falls short in adequately addressing
the limitations associated with such a collaboration.

Cluster 5: safety, risks, and ethical considerations

Among the research clusters we examined, this particular group has the second lowest population, accounting for just 6% of
the articles in our sample. Several studies within this cluster focus on the impact of external interference on the functioning
of machine learning algorithms, raising concerns about safety and the potential for severe consequences (Shaikh et al. 2019;
Swinney and Woods 2021).
Our findings indicate that only a small portion of articles examine the ethical aspects of integrating AI in the aviation industry.
For example, Igonin et al. (2021) delve into the concept of situational awareness regarding UAV behaviour control. Although their
research primarily focuses on the technical aspects of the issue, there is still a discussion about the ethical considerations involved.
Another instance is the study by Chen et al. (2021), which proposes the implementation of 5G-IoT monitoring devices, processed
with machine learning algorithms, to establish the integrity of airport passengers by detecting potential dangerous traits or
behaviours. While this study shows promise in terms of enhancing safety and minimising risks, it neglects to address any ethical
dilemmas associated with monitoring human activities. Additionally, Baomar and Bentley (2021) present an impressive concept
of an intelligent autopilot system based on ANN that can replicate even the most complex manoeuvres. However, their work
overlooks any safety or ethical implications that may arise from such a system.

DISCUSSION

The application of AI in the air transport industry holds immense potential for enhancing efficiency, safety, and the overall
customer experience. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the integration of AI into this industry is currently at a nascent
stage, necessitating further research to comprehensively grasp its potential impact.
Despite delving into a wide range of topics and reviewing numerous high-quality papers, a noticeable bias towards predictive
analysis and optimisation-focused research is evident concerning AI applications in the air transport industry. It is crucial to
recognise that AI is a disruptive technology, and merely praising its technological marvels without addressing potential risks
to human life, dignity, and ethical considerations would be naïve. One crucial aspect that demands further exploration is the ethical
and legal implications of AI in the air transport sector. As the use of AI continues to grow in this industry, concerns regarding
privacy and data protection have also become pertinent.
Further research is needed to explore the integration of AI into the current air transport infrastructure. This calls for increased
collaboration between AI experts and stakeholders in the air transport industry, along with meticulous planning and seamless
integration processes. An additional aspect that warrants deeper investigation is the influence of AI on employment within the air

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
16

transport industry. The potential automation of numerous tasks currently undertaken by human workers due to AI advancements
can result in job losses and necessitate changes in the skillsets demanded by air transport occupations. Understanding the
ramifications of AI on employment in the air transport sector is crucial, and it is essential to formulate strategies that provide
support to workers as the industry undergoes transformation.
Given the current state of global warming, which has significant impacts on global fauna and flora (Dai 2011), it becomes
imperative to leverage advanced technological tools to promote environmental conservation and enhance resource efficiency
within processes. Surprisingly, the analysis conducted in this study highlights a notable dearth of research in this specific domain.
Rather than viewing air transport as a mere lock and AI as its key, our work recognises that AI serves as a transformative enabler,
necessitating an interdisciplinary approach. Thus, there is still an opportunity to address this research gap through the emergence
of interdisciplinary studies that aim to harness the power of AI in addressing complex problems while remaining mindful of other
interconnected aspects.

CONCLUSION

The potential benefits of artificial intelligence, such as enhanced efficiency, streamlined operations, and optimised actions,
are already evident across various sub-industries within air transport. Leveraging the advancements in AI, big data technologies,
and machine learning algorithms as enabling technologies, this study relied on existing literature to explore the application of
these technological tools in different aspects of air transport. Through a comprehensive analysis of the literature using systematic
and bibliometric approaches, we gained insights into the academic discourse and evaluated the extent to which the value of AI
applications has been recognised.
The findings of this study indicate that the discussions surrounding the applications of AI in the air transport industry are
primarily focused on solving predictive and optimisation problems, while other areas, such as ecology and sustainability, are still
in the early stages of exploration. Moreover, the research on safety, risks, and ethical considerations forms a small but gradually
expanding cluster of studies that is yet to reach maturity. Conversely, there is a notable emergence of research endeavours aiming
to bridge the gap between different industries by proposing adaptable solutions that can be applied to air transport, encompassing
collaborations ranging from medicine to agriculture. These findings serve as a starting point for future research, providing valuable
insights into the gaps present in the current literature concerning the intersection of AI and air transport.
Despite our diligent efforts to incorporate a wide range of robust studies, the focus on exclusively peer-reviewed and open-
access articles introduces certain limitations. To overcome these limitations, future research could consider expanding the scope to
include non-academic publications and paid publications, thus broadening the range of information sources. Additionally, further
support for the explored research areas can be obtained through empirical studies, which would provide precise insights into
the application of AI in various subsets of the aviation industry. Lastly, relying solely on the Scopus database as the source of
documents may pose another limitation, as it is possible that some relevant works may have been overlooked in our review, even
though Scopus is considered a comprehensive scholarly repository.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nothing to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Eric TN and Abderrahmane MS; Data curation: Abderrahmane MS; Formal analysis: Abderrahmane
MS and Eric TN; Research: Abderrahmane MS; Methodology: Abderrahmane MS; Software: Abderrahmane MS; Supervision:

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
17

Eric TN; Validation: Abderrahmane MS and Eric TN; Visualization: Abderrahmane MS; Writing - Preparation of original
draft: Abderrahmane MS and Eric TN; Writing - Proofreading and editing: Abderrahmane MS and Eric TN.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data will be available upon request.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Not applicable.

REFERENCES

Abduljabbar R, Dia H, Liyanage S, Bagloee SA (2019) Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Transport: An Overview.
Sustainability 11(1):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010189

Alauddin M, Ting C-Y (2020) Digital Click Stream Data for Airline Seat Sale Prediction using GBT. Int J Eng Trends Technol
24-31. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/CATI3P204

Allam Z, Dhunny ZA (2019) On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 89:80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cities.2019.01.032

Altringer L, Navin J, Begier MJ, Shwiff SA, Anderson A (2021) Estimating wildlife strike costs at US airports: A machine
learning approach. Transp Res D Transp Environ 97:102907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102907

Álvarez de Toledo S, Anguera A, Barreiro JM, Lara JA, Lizcano D (2017) A Reinforcement Learning Model Equipped with
Sensors for Generating Perception Patterns: Implementation of a Simulated Air Navigation System Using ADS-B (Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast) Technology. Sensors 17(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010188

Antoniou EA, Aretoulis GN, Kalfakakou GP (2011) Content and applications of artificial intelligence for cost management in
civil engineering projects. Paper presented at Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Construction in the 21st
Century, Construction Challenges in the New Decade, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Arrouch I, Ahmad NS, Goh P, Mohamad-Saleh J (2022) Close Proximity Time-to-Collision Prediction for Autonomous
Robot Navigation: An Exponential GPR Approach. Alex Eng J 61(12):11171-11183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aej.2022.04.041

Azzolina S, Razza M, Sartiano K, Weitschek E (2021) Price discrimination in the online airline market: an empirical study. J
Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 16(6):2282-2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060126

Baomar H, Bentley PJ (2021) Autonomous flight cycles and extreme landings of airliners beyond the current limits and
capabilities using artificial neural networks. Appl Intell 51(9):6349-6375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02202-y

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
18

Basora L, Bry P, Olive X, Freeman F (2021) Aircraft Fleet Health Monitoring with Anomaly Detection Techniques. Aerospace
8(4):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8040103

Bhandal R, Meriton R, Kavanagh RE, Brown A (2022) The application of digital twin technology in operations and supply
chain management: a bibliometric review. Int J Supply Chain Manag 27(2):182-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2021-
0053

Bianchini M, Scarselli F (2014) On the Complexity of Neural Network Classifiers: A Comparison Between Shallow and Deep
Architectures. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn 25(8):1553-1565. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2293637

Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech
2008(10):P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Blum A, Chawla S (2001) Learning from labeled and unlabeled data using graph mincuts. Carnegie Mellon University.
Journal Contribution. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6606860.v1

Boell SK, Cecez-Kecmanovic D (2014) A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches.
Commun Assoc Inf Syst 34(1):12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412

Bruno G, Diglio A, Genovese A, Piccolo C (2019) A decision support system to improve performances of airport check-in
services. Soft Comput 23:2877-2886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3301-z

Cai W, Zhang B, Wang B (2021) Scale-Aware Anchor-Free Object Detection via Curriculum Learning for Remote Sensing
Images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 14:9946-9958. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3115796

Castagno J, Atkins E (2018) Roof Shape Classification from LiDAR and Satellite Image Data Fusion Using Supervised
Learning. Sensors 18(11):3960. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113960

Celis RD, Solano P, Cadarso L (2020) Applying Neural Networks in Aerial Vehicle Guidance to Simplify Navigation Systems.
Algorithms 13(12):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13120333

Chen K, Wang S (2010) Semi-Supervised Learning via Regularized Boosting Working on Multiple Semi-Supervised
Assumptions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(1):129-143. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2010.92

Chen W, Huang Y, Yang H, Li J, Lu X (2021) A passenger risk assessment method based on 5G-IoT. J Wireless Com Network
2021:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-020-01886-z

Chen J, Diao M, Zhang C (2022) Predicting airline additional services consumption willingness based on high-dimensional
incomplete data. IEEE Access 10:39596-39603. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166157

Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2(1):45-65. https://doi.
org/10.1002/wcc.81

Delen D, Ram S (2018) Research challenges and opportunities in business analytics. J Bus Anal 1(1):2-12. https://doi.org/10
.1080/2573234X.2018.1507324

Ding Y, Cronin B (2011) Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Inf Process Manag 47(1):80-96.

Donati C, Mammarella M, Comba L, Biglia A, Gay P, Dabbene F (2022) 3D Distance Filter for the Autonomous Navigation
of UAVs in Agricultural Scenarios. Remote Sens 14(6):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061374

Dziak D, Gradolewski D, Witkowski S, Kaniecki D, Jaworski A, Skakuj M, Kulesza WJ (2022) Airport Wildlife Hazard
Management System - A Sensor Fusion Approach. Elektron ir Elektrotech 28(3):45-53. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.eie.31418

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
19

Etani N (2019) Development of a predictive model for on-time arrival flight of airliner by discovering correlation between
flight and weather data. J Big Data 6(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0251-y

Evler J, Asadi E, Preis H, Fricke H (2021) Airline ground operations: Schedule recovery optimization approach with
constrained resources. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 128:103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103129

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar:
strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Gallego CEV, Comendador VFG, Carmona MAA, Valdés RMA, Nieto FJS, Martínez MG (2019) A machine learning
approach to air traffic interdependency modelling and its application to trajectory prediction. Transp Res Part C Emerg
Technol 107:356-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.015

Gentleman R, Carey VJ (2008) Unsupervised Machine Learning. In: Hahne F, Huber W, Gentleman R, Falcon S, editors.
Bioconductor Case Studies. New York: Springer. p. 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77240-0_10

Hady MFA, Schwenker F (2013) Semi-supervised Learning. In: Bianchini M, Maggini M, Jain L editors. Handbook on Neural
Information Processing. Intelligent Systems Reference Library. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
3-642-36657-4_7

Hamet P, Tremblay J (2017) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism 69(Suppl):S36-S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

metabol.2017.01.011

Helm JM, Swiergosz AM, Haeberle HS, Karnuta JM, Schaffer JL, Krebs VE, Spitzer AI, Ramkumar PN (2020) Machine
Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13(1):69-
76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09600-8

Hoffmann K, Doucette L (2012) A Review of Citation Analysis Methodologies for Collection Management. Coll Res Libr
73(4):321-335. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-254

Huang R, Sun H, Wu C, Wang C, Lu B (2019) Estimating Eddy Dissipation Rate with QAR Flight Big Data. Appl Sci
9(23):5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235192

Huang YJ, Cheng S, Yang FQ, Chen C (2022) Analysis and Visualization of Research on Resilient Cities and Communities
Based on VOSviewer. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(12):7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127068

Igonin DM, Kolganov PA, Tiumentsev YV (2021) Situational Awareness and Problems of its Formation in the Tasks of UAV
Behavior Control. Appl Sci 11(24):11611. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411611

Janbi N, Katib I, Albeshri A, Mehmood R (2020) Distributed Artificial Intelligence-as-a-Service (DAIaaS) for Smarter IoE
and 6G Environments. Sensors 20(20):5796. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205796

Jenab K, Pineau J (2018) Automation of Air Traffic Management Using Fuzzy Logic Algorithm to Integrate Unmanned Aerial
Systems into the National Airspace. Int J Electr Comput Eng 8(5):3169-3178.https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i5.pp3169-3178

Jupe LM, Keatley DA (2020) Airport artificial intelligence can detect deception: or am i lying? Secur J 33:622-635. https://doi.
org/10.1057/s41284-019-00204-7

Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2019) Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and
implications of artificial intelligence. Bus Horiz 62(1):15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004

Kersting K, Meyer U (2018) From Big Data to Big Artificial Intelligence? Künstl Intell 32(1):3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s13218-017-0523-7

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
20

Kibria MG, Nguyen K, Villardi GP, Zhao O, Ishizu K, Kojima F (2018) Big data analytics, machine learning, and artificial
intelligence in next-generation wireless networks. IEEE Access 6:32328-32338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2837692

Kim W, Jun S, Kang S, Lee C (2020) O-Net: Dangerous Goods Detection in Aviation Security Based on U-Net. IEEE Access
8:206289-206302. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037719

Kistan T, Gardi A, Sabatini R (2018) Machine Learning and Cognitive Ergonomics in Air Traffic Management: Recent
Developments and Considerations for Certification. Aerospace 5(4):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5040103

Koch W, Mancuso R, West R, Bestavros A (2019) Reinforcement learning for UAV attitude control. ACM Trans Cyber-Phys
Syst 3(2):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301273

Koroniotis N, Moustafa N, Schiliro F, Gauravaram P, Janicke H (2020) A Holistic Review of Cybersecurity and Reliability
Perspectives in Smart Airports. IEEE Access 8:209802-209834. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036728

Kosir S, Heyne J, Graham J (2020) A machine learning framework for drop-in volume swell characteristics of sustainable
aviation fuel. Fuel 274:117832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117832

Kumar S, Zymbler M (2019) A machine learning approach to analyze customer satisfaction from airline tweets. J Big Data
6(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0224-1

Kwon H-J, Ban H-J, Jun J-K, Kim H-S (2021) Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of online review for airlines. Information
12(2):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020078

Larraondo PR, Inza I, Lozano JA (2018) A system for airport weather forecasting based on circular regression trees. Environ
Model Softw 100:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.004

Li S, Qin J, He M, Paoli R (2020) Fast Evaluation of Aircraft Icing Severity Using Machine Learning Based on XGBoost.
Aerospace 7(4):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7040036

Liang P, Klein D (2008) Analyzing the errors of unsupervised learning. Paper presented at Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT. ACL;
Columbus, United States.

Lopez-Martin M, Carro B, Sanchez-Esguevillas A, Lloret J (2019) Shallow neural network with kernel approximation for prediction
problems in highly demanding data networks. Expert Syst Appl 124:196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.063

Mahesh B (2020) Machine learning algorithms-a review. Int J Sci Res 9(1):381-386.

Malatesta WA, Yang B (2021) Aviation Turbine Fuel Thermal Conductivity: A Predictive Approach Using Entropy Scaling-
Guided Machine Learning with Experimental Validation. ACS Omega 6(43):28579-28586. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acsomega.1c02934

Martin C, Parkes S, Zhang Q, Zhang X, McCabe MF, Duarte CM (2018) Use of unmanned aerial vehicles for efficient beach
litter monitoring. Mar Pollut Bull 131(A):662-673.

Matuszczak M, Żbikowski M, Teodorczyk A (2021) Predictive modelling of turbofan engine components condition using
machine and deep learning methods. Maintenance and Reliability 23(2):359-370. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.2.16

Mazanec JA, Ring A, Stangl B, Teichmann K (2010) Usage Patterns of Advanced Analytical Methods in Tourism Research
1988–2008: A Six Journal Survey. Inf Technol Tour 12(1):17-46. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830510X12747489979583

Meister S, Wermes M, Stüve J, Groves RM (2021) Investigations on Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods for the deep
learning classification of fibre layup defect in the automated composite manufacturing. Compos B Eng 224:109160. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109160

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
21

Midtfjord AD, Bin R, Huseby AB (2022) A decision support system for safer airplane landings: Predicting runway conditions
using XGBoost and explainable AI. Cold Reg Sci Technol 199:103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103556

Miskolczi M, Jászberényi M, Tóth D (2021) Technology-Enhanced Airport Services—Attractiveness from the Travelers’
Perspective. Sustainability 13(2):705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020705

Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69(2):026113. https://
doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113

Nian R, Liu J, Huang B (2020) A review on reinforcement learning: Introduction and applications in industrial process
control. Comput Chem Eng 139:106886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106886

Nigam K, McCallum AK, Thrun S, Mitchell T (2000) Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM.
Machine learning 39:103-134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007692713085

Nikitas A, Michalakopoulou K, Njoya ET, Karampatzakis D (2020) Artificial Intelligence, Transport and the Smart City:
Definitions and Dimensions of a New Mobility Era. Sustainability 12(7):2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072789

Oh J, Hessel M, Czarnecki WM, Xu Z, van Hasselt HP, Singh S, Silver D (2020) Discovering reinforcement learning algorithms.
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:1060-1070.

Oracle (2022) Oracle Machine Learning. Oracle Help Centre. https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/machine-learning/

Park S-H, Kim M-Y, Kim Y-J, Park Y-H (2022) A deep learning approach to analyze airline customer propensities: the case of
South Korea. Appl Sci 12(4):1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041916

Praveena M, Jaiganesh V (2017) A Literature Review on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms and Boosting Process. Int
J Compt Appl 169(8):32-35. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914816

Radhakrishnan S, Erbis S, Isaacs JA, Kamarthi S (2017) Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster
systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778

Rajagopal V, Venkatesan SP, Goh M (2017) Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Comput Ind
Eng 113:646-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.043

Ray S (2019) A Quick Review of Machine Learning Algorithms. Paper presented 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning,
Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon). IEEE; Faridabad, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862451

Reitmann S, Schultz M (2022) An Adaptive Framework for Optimization and Prediction of Air Traffic Management (Sub-)
Systems with Machine Learning. Aerospace 9(2):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9020077

Rustam F, Ashraf I, Mehmood A, Ullah S, Choi GS (2019) Tweets classification on the base of sentiments for US airline
companies. Entropy 21(11):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21111078

Samah KAFA, Misdan NFA, Jono MNHH, Riza LS (2022) The Best Malaysian Airline Companies Visualization through
Bilingual Twitter Sentiment Analysis: A Machine Learning Classification. JOIV: Int J Inform Visualization 6(1):130-137.
https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.1.879

Schultz M, Reitmann S (2018) Consideration of Passenger Interactions for the Prediction of Aircraft Boarding Time.
Aerospace 5(4):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5040101

Sekera J, Novak A (2021) The future of data communication in Aviation 4.0 environment. Incas Bull 13(3):165-178. https://
doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2021.13.3.14

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Sadou AM, Njoya ET
22

Shaikh F, Rahouti M, Ghani N, Xiong K, Bou-Harb E, Haque J (2019) A Review of Recent Advances and Security
Challenges in Emerging E-Enabled Aircraft Systems. IEEE Access 7:63164-63180. https://doi.org/10.1109/
ACCESS.2019.2916617

Silva IN, Spatti, DH, Flauzino RA, Liboni LHB, Alves SFR (2017) Artificial Neural Networks. Cham: Springer. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-319-43162-8

Sim S, Im J, Park S, Park H, Ahn MH, Chan P-W (2018) Icing Detection over East Asia from Geostationary Satellite Data
Using Machine Learning Approaches. Remote Sens 10(4):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040631

Smith RG, Eckroth J (2017) Building AI Applications: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. AI Magazine 38(1):6-22. https://doi.
org/10.1609/aimag.v38i1.2709

Stegmann J, Grohmann G (2003) Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering. Scientometrics 56(1):111-135. https://
doi.org/10.1023/A:1021954808804

Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Swinney CJ, Woods JC (2021) The Effect of Real-World Interference on CNN Feature Extraction and Machine Learning
Classification of Unmanned Aerial Systems. Aerospace 8(7):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8070179

Szaruga E, Załoga E (2022) Sustainable Development Programming of Airports by Identification of Non-Efficient Units.
Energies 15(3):932. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030932

Tian Y, Huang W, Ye B, Yang M (2019) A New Air Quality Prediction Framework for Airports Developed with a Hybrid
Supervised Learning Method. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2019:1562537. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1562537

Ullah MA, Marium SM, Begum SA, Dipa NS (2020) An algorithm and method for sentiment analysis using the text and
emoticon. ICT Express 6(4):357-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.07.003

Uman LS (2011) Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20(1):57-59.

Van Eck N, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics
84(2):523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Eck N, Waltman L (2020) VOSviewer Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6. 14.

Verma K, Davis B (2021) Implicit Aspect-Based Opinion Mining and Analysis of Airline Industry Based on User-Generated
Reviews. SN Comput Sci 2(4):286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00669-7

VOSviewer (2022) Welcome to VOSviewer. Visualising scientific landscapes. https://www.vosviewer.com

Waltman L, Van Eck NJ (2013) A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. Eur
Phys J B 86(11):471. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0

Wan J, Zhang H, Lyu W, Zhou J (2022) A Novel Combined Model for Short-Term Emission Prediction of Airspace Flights
Based on Machine Learning: A Case Study of China. Sustainability 14(7):4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074017

Wang Q, Ismail KN, Breckon TP (2020) An approach for adaptive automatic threat recognition within 3D computed
tomography images for baggage security screening. J X-Ray Sci Technol 28(1):35-58. https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-190531

Wang Z, Liang M, Delahaye D (2018) A hybrid machine learning model for short-term estimated time of arrival prediction
in terminal manoeuvring area. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 95:280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.019

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023

 Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Air Transport Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
23

Wozny F (2022) The Impact of COVID-19 on Airfares—A Machine Learning Counterfactual Analysis. Econometrics 10(1):8.
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics10010008

Xiong H, Fan C, Chen H, Yang Y, Antwi CO, Fan X (2022) A novel approach to air passenger index prediction: Based on
mutual information principle and support vector regression blended model. SAGE Open 12(1):21582440211071102. https://
doi.org/10.1177/21582440211071102

Zhou M, Elmore JA, Samiappan S, Evans KO, Pfeiffer MB, Blackwell BF, Iglay RB (2021) Improving Animal Monitoring Using
Small, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) and Deep Learning Networks. Sensors 21(17):5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/
s21175697

Zhu X, Goldberg AB (2009) Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and
Machine Learning. Cham: Springer. Chapter 1, Introduction to Statistical Machine Learning; p. 1-8.

Zhu X, Li L (2021) Flight time prediction for fuel loading decisions with a deep learning approach. Transp Res Part C Emerg
Technol 128:103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103179

J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., v15, e2223, 2023