KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT

PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

ADB Loan No. 2839-CAM (SF)
ADB Loan No. 8254-CAM

PROCUREMENT OF CIVIL WORKS

Contract Title: Improvement of PR314D

Contract No. : PRIP-CW-B1-ICB-2013-03

VOLUME 4
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

July 2013
 LIST OF CONTENTS

Part I Geotechnical Investigation Report

Part II Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

Part III Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Part IV Resettlement Plan (RP)

Part V HIIV/AIDS Transmission and Human Trafficking Awareness and

Prevention Program
PART I

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

PEPORT

PART A: EXISTING ROADS BASES AND

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

PART B: BRIDGES
PART A

EXISTING ROADS BASES AND

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Existing Roads Bases and Construction Materials

Survey Report

Contents Page
1. Introduction 1

2. Geology and Landform 1

3. Objective and Scope 3

4. Materials Investigation 3

5. Field Investigation Methodology 4

6. Finding (Test Results) 6

7. Conclusion and Recommendation 11

8. Appendix 13

8.1. Figure No.1 Geology Map 2

8.2. Figure No.2 Location Map of Borrow

Area and Quarry 10

8.3. Figure No.3 Pitting Test Log 14

8.4. Figure No.4 Summary of DCP Tests 17

8.5. Figure No.5 Summary of Laboratory Tests of Test

Pits (Road Base) 18

8.6. Figure No.6 Summary of Laboratory Test Results of

Borrow Pits 19
8.7 Figure.7 Summary of Laboratory Test Results of

Quarries 20

8.9 Figure No.8 DCP Tests at Pits along Road 21

8.10 Figure No.9 Soil Pitting Test at Laboratory 39

8.11 Figure.10 Test Results of Materials 74

8.12 Figure.11 Test Results of Seal Aggregate 178

8.13 Figure.12 Unconfined Compression Tests 202

8.14 Figure.13 Field investigation activities 208

8.15 Figure14. Sampling of Sub-base Materials 210

8.16 Figure.15 Crushing Plant 211

8.17 Figure.16 Picture of laboratory tests 214

 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
1. Introduction

Soil and materials investigation is the TOR requirements for detailed

engineering design of the Provincial Roads Improvement Project and
covers the materials investigation, finding, evaluation, analysis, pictures
and recommendations necessary for the design of highway pavement
structure, investigation of available materials sources, borrow and
embankment materials, and aggregate materials.

The Consultant undertook materials investigation for this particular project

on January 7, 2013 for the determination of subsoil condition, its relative
soil characteristics and its texture, consistency, classification and
characteristics of soil types, especially geologic and subsoil condition of
the materials beneath the Project Site for the road construction design of
PR.314D.

2. Geology and Landform

The geology of the project area and its immediate environments are
shown in Figure 1.
Cambodia is geologically composed of three different structures; they are
mostly Triassic, Jurassic-Cretaceous and Quaternary. The Triassic period
covers a large area in the east, Jurassic-Cretaceous Era forming important
highlands in the west and, between them, the Quaternary basin occupy
the whole central plain of the country.

The area of the site is situated within a belt of recent lacustrine

sediments. Near the river shore, a belt of organic deposit is overlying
alluvial of the Holocene period. In the flat area of the main Tonle Sap,
they are reported to comprise gray silts, sands, clay and organic soils. The
geological map also shows the alluvial sediments of the project area,
where it flows from vicinity high land and upper Mekong River to fulfill low
land and flat plain. Therefore the project area occurred historically from
year after years, era after era by deposited layer by layers the sediment
from the high land area.
The other site is situated within a folds-belt of indocinian of high land
sediments of Precamborian-Silurian medium to high grade metamorphics.
Near the mountain area, a belt of hilly deposit is overlying eluvia of the
Devonian-Caboneferous rocks. In the flat area of the main land, they are
reported to comprise gray silts, sands, and clay soils. The geological map
also shows the sediments of the project area, where it is coming from
vicinity high land and upper hilly to fulfill flat plain, as a deposit of recent
origin.

1
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure1. Geology Map of Cambodia

South-Eest Project

Cross-Border Facilities

2
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
3. Objective and Scope

The objective of soil and materials investigation is contributed to analyzing

various subsoil conditions including their characteristics and composition
status of strata distributed beneath the project area. The scopes and the
objectives of the subsurface investigation included the following tasks:

• Make an actual field observation and inspection.

• Test pitting in-situ CBR test and DCP tests along the road
alignment.
• Retrieve samples collection, preservation and transportation to the
laboratory.
• Investigation and field survey of available materials sources borrow
and embankment materials, aggregate materials for use of road
construction project.
• Interpret and evaluate of the field testing; and Laboratory testing
of soil samples from test pits, materials and aggregate sources.
• Determination of the factual characteristics of sub-grade soil and
existing sub-base for the purpose of getting conclusive data to
support our recommendation for the pavement new design and
construction.
• Determination of the actual existing pavement condition.
• Determination of the potential materials and aggregate sources for
the construction.
• Confirm the location, hauling distance and road condition of the
material sources to be availed during construction stage.
• Confirm the available volume and quantities and classification of
materials at the chosen locations.

4. Materials Investigation

The subcontractor commissioned to undertake materials investigation for

this particular project road project for the determination of general sub-
soil condition and its physical and mechanical characteristics of soil and
materials and its classification that may compose of the road alignment,
pavement and embankment foundations.
Materials sources, quarry sites, aggregate sources, and borrow sources
were also investigated. Field investigation such as test pitting, DCP tests,
and in-situ CBR by samples cutting edge on the road alignment, together
with laboratory testing of soil samples gathered were conducted.

3
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
5. Field Investigation Methodology

5.1 Road Alignment

1. Pit Dig

In order to identify the different type of soil encountered along the road
alignment of the project, Pit Tests were conducted on existing road
sections with intervals of 2.50 Km by a maximum depth of 0.70 m with an
area of 1.00m x 1.00m. The texture and type of soil were described and
made the pit log at every changed stratum. Soil samples along the road
were brought to routine laboratory to identify characteristics of soil along
road alignment of the construction project. The results of test pits provide
information on road alignment, existing pavement condition, soil profile as
recorded in the field. Each retrieved samples was conducted in laboratory
in according with the AASHTO standard methods and its results are shown
in the appendix.

2. DCP Test

DCP tests were performed at the every dug pit of 2.50 Km intervals to get
information of CBR in-situ along project. It is carried out by using free
dropping hammer at constant height. The test shall be used 8 Kg drive
weight at free fall height of 760 mm to drive the hammer at every 5 blows
or 10 blows. The interpreted CBRs conducted on road site are shown in
the DCP appendix attached.

5.2 Materials Sources

Investigation was undertaken for borrow materials, sub-base, base and

aggregated materials along the sketch of the road section. Test pit were
dug to the depth of 0.70m depth for each designated source (location).
Composite samples were extracted from each test pit and subjected to
require physical and mechanical testing. The quantity of material was
estimated, hauling and accessibility considered.
Laboratory test results, location plan and accessibility are shown in the
appendix.

5.3 Laboratory Tests

Soil samples extracted to present the different strata from pits tests along
the road alignment were subjected to standard laboratory soil testing for
evaluation and analysis in accordance with AASHTO standard methods
and specification to classify them for their engineering values. The

4
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
quantity and type of tests performed were also in accordance with the
TOR and contract agreement for the project.

All tests performing in following standard procedures:

• Natural Water content AASHTO T-93

• Moisture Density Relation AASHTO-T180,
• Plastic and Liquid Limit AASHTO-T89 and T90,
• Particle Size Distribution AASHTO-T88,
• Specific Gravity AASHTO-T100 and AASHTO T-84/ T-85
• California Bearing Ratio CHR AASHTO-193

Bulk samples taken from test pits on the existing sub-grade were subject
to Procter Test under AASHTO-T80 testing procedure. Method B or D was
adopted depending on the gradation of the soil or aggregate material. A
(4.54Kg) hammer was used. Five trials were performed for each
compaction test.

The sub-grade, sub-base, base strength and other engineering

characteristics were determined using the California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
tests. The three points CBR method was adopted, where the specimens
were soaked for 96 hours. The method allows interpolating the CBR
values at various dry densities of soil. Three points obtained from CBR test
represented the different compaction energies at 10, 30 and 65 blows
using 4.54 Kg hammer dropped at a height of 0.457m for five layers of
soil in the compaction cylinder mold.

The borrow materials, sub-base, base and aggregated materials were

subjected to conduct physical and mechanical tests as following:

• Gradation Test AASHTO T-27,

• Atterberg Limits AASHTO T-89/ T90,
• Moisture Density Relation AASHTO-T180,
• California Bearing Ratio CHR AASHTO-193,
• Specific gravity and Absorption AASHTO T-85,
• Unit Weight AASHTO T-19,
• Los Angeless Abrasion Test AASHTO T-96,
• Soundness Test AASHTO T-104,
• Organic Impurity Test AASHTO T-21,
• Flakiness and Elongation Test BS.812

5
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
6 Finding (Test results):

6.1 Road Alignment (Soil)

A five (5) test pits, five (5) CBRs test and ten (10) DCPs to a depth of
1.00 m respectively were undertaken for road PR314D on a road
alignments for soil profile investigation. Corresponding soil samples taken
were submitted to the routine laboratory for subsequent testing.

Five (5) soil samples from test pits representing the strata along the
stretch of the road section were submitted for routine soil classification
determination. From beginning station to the end of road section PR314D,
soil behavior is good to be embankment and/or possibly sub-graded layer,
the CBR tests is varying between 8.00% and 9.00% of the existing road
condition. And DCP test results show between 7.08% and 66.35% for
provincial road 314D road section.

Results of the laboratory test in accordance with AASHTO Standard

Specifications are shown in appendix and summary of laboratory test for
test Pits, Borrow Area, and Quarries.

6.2 Construction Material Surveys

1. Borrow Materials for Embankment

Potential borrow site from section along the construction project road
were investigated including materials from nearby the road. Materials are
suitable for embankment materials depending on its classification,
gradation, liquid limit, and plasticity index of natural soil. The soil
classifications are classified as A-6 and A-2-6 based on test results.

Five (5) were taken from these mentioned sites and subjected to routine
laboratory tests. Result of the laboratory test indicated a soil classification;
CBR test results, gradation, liquid limit, and plastic index are within the
construction standard. Detail results of laboratory test are shown in
appendix and summary of Laboratory Test Results, Materials Sources.

Three borrow area of PR.314D at PK.5+600 were rejected from the

borrow area for the use of embankment materials because the behavior
and soil character are very weak in mechanical properties.

6
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
2. Sub-base materials and soil-cement stabilization

Potential borrow site from section along the construction project road
were investigated including materials from nearby the road. Materials may
not be suitable for sub-base depending on its laboratory test results, and
may need stabilizing soil-cement to reduce plasticity index of soil and to
strengthen soil bearing capacity of CBRs.

Samples were taken from these mentioned sites and subjected to routine
laboratory tests. This investigation was undertaken to confirm previous
report information obtained and to locate new materials sources regarding
technical specification of soil-cement stabilization. It should be a well
graded soil aggregate with not more than 40% passing 0.075 mm sieve.
The fraction of material passing the 0.425 mm sieve should have a liquid
limit not greater than 40% and a plasticity index not greater than 20, then
the minimum soaked CBR value after stabilization shall be equal or greater
than 30% as determined by AASHTO-T193.

The laboratory test results indicated a soil classification; CBR values,

gradation, liquid limit, and plastic index are within the construction
standard or technical specification. Detail results of laboratory test are
shown in appendix and summary of Laboratory Test Results, Materials
Sources.

3. Base course materials

Potential aggregate sources site investigated nearby project road section

were taken samples for quality tests. The results of the test showed that
aggregate materials for base course materials are satisfied the AASHTO
standard specification requirement except for grading and plasticity index.
Mechanical analysis of materials can be corrected to meet specification
standards by blending and/or reducing the plasticity index by selecting a
good blasting rock before crush to be base course materials. Its
classifications are all within technical specification standard.

Potential aggregate materials sources were investigated along the road

section mostly nearby the road construction project. The aggregate
materials sources were subjected to routine laboratory to quality test.
Samples retrieved form the sites to identify sources and check availability
of stone crushed aggregate for Base Course, Concrete works and DBST
surfacing. Four quarries as cited above are Bratheat located beside PR
314D at station 158+500 (LHS 3.3 km), Sre Siem Quarry is located at
station 132+100 (RHS 1.3 km) of NR.7, and Chheu Kach Mountain located
at PK.71+050 of NR1, 4Km LHS and Treung Quarry at PK.103+900, 0.100

7
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Km RHS of NR7. The representative physical and mechanical properties of
the quarry stone crushed aggregates sampled and tested by routine
laboratory and supervised by consultant’s team are presented in appendix.
All the test results tabulated above appears that the crushed rock
aggregates are appropriate for use in the construction of Base Course,
Concrete and Double Bituminous Surface Treatment (DBST). Required
particle size to comply specific grading of crushed aggregates to be
adjusted by placing order with the crushing plant owner as and when
needed.

4. Aggregate Materials

Potential aggregate sources site were investigated nearby project road

section for aggregate materials were taken and subjected to quality tests.
The results of the test showed that aggregate materials satisfy the
AASHTO standard specification requirement except for grading.
Mechanical analysis of materials can be corrected to meet specification
standards by blending. Materials classification and materials specification
are all within technical specification standard.

8
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

LIST OF BORROW PIT for SVAY RIENG:

II. Svay Rieng Province
Road Quantity
Decription Number Location/Station Coordination Remarks
Number (cu-m)
BP9 Pk. 1+000 LHS Offset 100m from PR314D 45,000.00

BP10 Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D 945,000.00

BP11 Pk. 10+300 RHS Offset 500m from PR314D 90,000.00

314D
BP12 Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D 52,500.00

BP13 Pk. 17+700 LHS Offset 300m from PR314D 60,000.00

BP14 Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D 100,000.00 CBF BP for Emb

Sub Base SB1 Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 N=1275654, E=578904 10,000.00
PR.314D
Borrow Pit
SB2 Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 N=1267547, E=583708 360,000.00

BS, Q1 Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.000 Km from NR1 N=1242418, E=540459 As required Chheukach

Base Course BS, Q2 Pk. 158+500 LHS Offset 3.300 Km from NR7 N=1312831, E=583968 As required Bratheat
PR.314D
Quarries
BS, Q3 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.300 km from NR7 N=1319525, E=559007 As required Sre Siem

BS, Q4 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 0.100 Km from NR7 N=1332446, E=536230 As required Troeung

9
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure.2 Location Map of Borrow Area and Quarries

10
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
6 Conclusion and Recommendation

7.1 Existing Sub-grade or Road Foundation

The site investigation along the existing roadbed was undertaken by two
kind of test methodology to compare and accurately check in order to
ensure the test results are confidence and believable. All two testing
conduct on site is DCP test and CBR test at laboratory. The result test of
DCP test results on site showed the CBR values ranging from 7.08 % to
66.35 % for the depth of top surface down to 1.00 m depth regarding
TRL.

The test results of CBR value ranging from 8.00% to 9.00%. According to
the above test results, it is concluded that the existing sub-grade layer
could be a layer of new sub-grade layer of 10% CBR for the new
construction road. The embankment layer may be omitted for more
workability because during site investigation along the construction road
because the CBR test results show the good results of embankment
material for all along road section or there is only for the section of
widening.

7.2 Sub-base, Base Course and Borrow Materials

Potential borrow site along the project road were investigated. Materials
suitable for sub-grade and sub-base were not founded for any CBR values
ranging within the technical specification shown in the appendix. These
materials can be used as both sub-grade and sub-base materials to meet
technical specification standard by stabilizing with cement. Materials
suitable for sub-base were founded for the CBR values of stabilizing soil-
cement ranging between 50% and over 100%. Therefore the soil-cement
stabilized is recommended to use as sub-grade or sub-base for this
particular road construction project.

CBR test results of base course materials indicated that the classification is
in the specification standard required at a long road section is at Pratheat
Quarry PK.158+500 offset 1.30 Km LHS, Sre Siem Quarry PK.132+100,
0.100 Km LHS, Treung Quarry PK.103+900 RHS, Phnom Chheu Kach
PK.71+050, 4.00 Km LHS, but CBR and plastic index analysis can be
corrected when construction period.

7.3 Aggregate Materials

Potential aggregate sources site were investigated along project road

section mostly aggregate materials. On each site samples were taken and

11
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
subjected to quality tests. The results of the test showed that aggregate
materials satisfy the AASHTO standard specification requirement except
for plastic index at Sre Siem Quarry. Test analysis and some
recommendation of materials can be corrected to meet specification
standards by choosing good rock from deeper layer when blasting.
Materials classification and materials specification are all within technical
specification standard. It is recommended that all materials be crushed
and processed to meet standard requirements.

12
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

7 Appendix

13
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure.3 Pitting Test Logs

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPROT
EXISTING ROAD TEST PIT LOGS

Test Pit Log PR 314D Svay Rieng Province

Road No. 314D Road No. 314D
PK: 02+500 RS 1.5m PK: 07+500 RS 1.5m

10cm Macadam
20cm Sand and Macadam

5cm Asphaltic

30cm Laterite
60cm Clayey

30cm Clayey

Pit No. 01 Pit No. 02

Road No. 314D Road No. 314D

PK: 12+500 LS 2.0m PK: 17+500 RS 2.0m

10cm Macadam 10cm Sand and Rock

60cm Clayey 60cm Clayey

Pit No. 03 Pit No. 04

Road No. 314D

PK: 22+500 LS 2.0m

10cm Macadam

60cm Clayey

Pit No. 05

14
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.4 Summary of DCP Tests

Figure.4 SUMMARY OF AVERAGE CBR VALUES OBTAIN BY DCP TEST RESULTS ( TRRL )

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Reang Province.
Testing Date : 18.01.2013 Tested by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan

Thickness and CBR CBR

Station O ffset
Road No. Average TEST PIT CBR
(Km) (m) T1 CBR1 T2 CBR2 T3 CBR3 T4 CBR4 CBRm%

PR 314D 2+500 1.5m 55 76.48

325 11.7 385 16.78 16.74 8.9
PR 314D 5+000 1.5m 106 41.96
718 19.98 22.22
PR 314D 7+500 1.5m 150 74.69 558 54.27 58.24 9
PR 314D 10+000 1.5m 78 110297 36.28 485 12.04 23.65
PR 314D 12+500 1.5m 100 40.66
305 11.63 445 4.89 9.34 9
PR 314D 15+000 1.5m 125 32.11
502 81.27 213 18.28 51.88
PR 314D 17+500 1.5m 160 33.53 550 12.48 16.07 9
PR 314D 20+000 1.5m 66 85.49 180 21.84 599 8.31 13.4
PR 314D 22+500 1.5m 65 41.76 715 16.23 60 69.76 20.08 8
PR 314D 25+000 1.5m 175 14.66 685 5.69 7.08

15
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Figure No.5 Summary of Laboratory Tests of Test Pits (Road Base).

Figure.8 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS OF PIT

Test Results
Sampling Sample Location
Road No. Offset Pit No. Depth (m) Soil L.A Remarks
Date (Km) MDD(g/cc) OMC(%) CBR(%) LL(%) PI(%) # 0.425mm # 0.075mm
Classification (%)

PR314D 27/01/13 2+500 2.0m 1 0m-0.7m A-2-6 1.948 12.80 8.90 32.50 18.04 72.87 64.72
PR314D 27/01/13 7+500 2.0m 2 0m-0.7m A-2-6 2.098 6.80 9.00 32.5 20.64 56.05 39.13
PR314D 30/01/13 12+500 3.0m 16 0m-0.7m A-2-6 2.205 6.00 9.00 32.50 16.28 47.62 34.88
PR314D 30/01/13 17+500 3.0m 17 0m-0.7m A-2-6 2.202 6.20 9.00 32.50 18.74 59.83 45.3
PR314D 30/01/13 22+500 3.0m 16 0m-0.7m A-2-6 2.093 6.70 8.00 32.50 14.32 73.78 56.47

16
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Figure No.6 Summary of Laboratory Test Results of Borrow Pits

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS OF EMBANKMENT BORROW PIT

Test Results
Sampling Sample Location
Road No. Offset Pit No. Depth (m) Soil L.A Remarks
Date (Km) MDD(g/cc) OMC(%) CBR(%) LL(%) PI(%) # 0.425mm # 0.075mm
Classification (%)
314D 08/03/2013 Pk. 1+000 LHS 100m 003 0.2 to 2m A-2-6 2.024 6.40 5.00 34.8 16.01 97.17 69.39
314D 26/02/2013 Pk. 5+600 RHS 100m A-2-6 1.908 10.20 0.95 34.8 17.13 80.74 64.43
314D 08/03/2013 PK. 10+300 RHS 500m 0 to 1.8m A-2-6 2.065 8.70 3.30 34.8 14.88 98.12 68.41
314D 26/02/2013 Pk. 16+800 RHS 100m A-2-6 1.875 12.00 6.70 21 5.37 97.41 79.3
314D 08/03/2013 Pk. 17+700 LHS 300m A-2-6 2.025 7.70 3.40 34.8 14.38 97.56 63.39
314D 26/02/2013 PK. 23+600 RHS 300m 0 to 1m A-2-6 1.783 14.60 9.00 38.75 19.89 92.85 64.52

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS OF SUB-BASE BORROW PIT (STABILIZATION)

Test Results
Sampling Sample Location
Road No. Offset Pit No. Depth (m) Soil L.A Remarks
Date (Km) MDD(g/cc) OMC(%) CBR(%) LL(%) PI(%) # 0.425mm # 0.075mm
Classification (%)
13 26/02/13 Pk. 11+800 RHS 7000 001 1 to 2m A-2-6 2.228 9.10 Cement2%= 73 24.60 9.27 31.28 21.85 29.93
002 1 to 2m A-2-6 Cement4%= 162
003 1 to 2m A-2-6 Cement6%= 225
13 26/02/13 Pk. 20+100 RHS 4700m 004 1 to 2m A-2-6 2.23 7.90 Cement2%= 69 25.80 12.11 27.85 21.18 30.42
005 1 to 2m A-2-6 Cement4%= 166
006 1 to 2m A-2-6 Cement6%= 215

17
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Figure.7 Summary of Laboratory Test Results of Quarries

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS OF BASE AGGREGATE MATERIALS

Test Results
Road Sampling Sample
Offset, Km Pit No. Depth (m) Soil L.A Remarks
No. Date Location (Km) MDD(g/cc) OMC(%) CBR(%) LL(%) PI(%) # 0.425mm # 0.075mm
Classification (%)
NR7 24.02.13 Bratheat 1.3 LHS 1 0.5 A-1-a 2.208 5.90 80.00 22.50 6.11 9.14 5.47 14.95 PK.158+500
NR7 24.02.13 Sre Siem 0.1 RHS 2 0.5 A-1-a 2.268 6.50 96.00 24.40 8.28 6.95 2.39 13.99 Pk.132+100
NR1 24.02.13 Chheu Kach 4.0 LHS 3 0.5 A-1-a 2.220 6.60 94.00 None None 17.07 7.32 18.33 PK.71+050

18
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.8 DCP Tests at Pits along Road Section

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 27.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 1
Station: 2+500 RHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 1 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 180 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 5 185 5 1.0
10 15 235 55 5.0 55.10
5 20 400 220 33.0 7.50
5 25 497 317 19.4 13.15
5 30 560 380 12.6 20.74
5 35 610 430 10.0 26.49
5 40 680 500 14.0 18.56
5 45 767 587 17.4 14.75
5 50 885 705 23.6 10.69
5 55 945 765 12.0 21.84

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 20.98 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.1

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).
19
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.1

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.1

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 76.48 55
0

-100
CBR2 = 11.70 325

-200

-300 CBR3 = 16.78 385

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 16.74
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

20
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 27.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 2
Station: 5+000 LHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 2 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 120 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
12 12 193 73 6.1 44.79
5 17 226 106 6.6 41.09
5 22 285 165 11.8 22.23
5 27 364 244 15.8 16.33
5 32 430 310 13.2 19.75
5 37 485 365 11.0 23.95
5 42 533 413 9.6 27.65
5 47 593 473 12.0 21.84
5 52 650 530 11.4 23.06
5 57 735 615 17.0 15.12
5 62 800 680 13.0 20.07
5 67 873 753 14.6 17.75
5 72 944 824 14.2 18.28

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 23.99 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.2

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

21
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.2

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.2

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 41.96 106
0

-100
CBR2 = 19.98 718

-200

-300 CBR3 = 0.00 0

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 22.22
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

22
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tested by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Testing Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 3
Station: 7+500 RHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 3 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 120 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 5 145 25 5 55.10
5 10 169 49 4.8 57.53
10 20 205 85 3.6 77.98
10 30 238 118 3.3 85.49
10 40 270 150 3.2 88.32
10 50 298 178 2.8 101.71
15 65 329 209 2.1
15 80 360 240 2.1
15 95 395 275 2.3
15 110 456 336 4.1 68.55
10 120 520 400 6.4 42.45
10 130 580 460 6.0 45.45
10 140 638 518 5.8 47.10
10 150 710 590 7.2 37.48
10 160 740 620 3.0 94.55
10 170 786 666 4.6 60.18
10 180 820 700 3.4 82.84
10 190 868 748 4.8 57.53
10 200 922 802 5.4 50.80
5 205 953 833 6.2 43.90

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 64.53 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.3

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

23
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.3

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.3

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 74.69 150
0

CBR2 =
-200

CBR3 = 54.27 558

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 58.24
-600

-800

-1000

-1200

24
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 4
Station: 10+000 LHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 4 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 90 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
10 10 110 20 2.0
10 20 130 40 2.0
10 30 168 78 3.8 73.65
10 40 218 128 5.0 55.10
10 50 283 193 6.5 41.76
5 55 330 240 9.4 28.28
5 60 383 293 10.6 24.90
5 65 420 330 7.4 36.41
5 70 465 375 9.0 29.61
5 75 532 442 13.4 19.44
5 80 625 535 18.6 13.74
5 85 728 638 20.6 12.34
3 88 792 702 21.3 11.89
3 91 855 765 21.0 12.09
2 93 950 860 47.5 5.10

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 28.02 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.4

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

25
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Dynamic ConeImprovement
Penetration Test (DCP), TRL
of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Sheet No.4

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.4

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 110.00 78
0

-100
CBR2 = 36.28 297

-200

-300 CBR3 = 12.04 485

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 23.65
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

26
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 5
Station: 12+500 RHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 5 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 100 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 5 125 25 5.0 55.10
5 10 162 62 7.4 36.41
5 15 200 100 7.6 35.40
5 20 286 186 17.2 14.93
3 23 367 267 27.0 9.27
3 26 400 300 11.0 23.95
3 29 505 405 35.0 7.05
3 32 653 553 49.3 4.90
3 35 813 713 53.3 4.51
3 38 950 850 45.7 5.32

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 19.68 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.5

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

27
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.5

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.5

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 40.66 100
0

-100
CBR2 = 11.63 305

-200

-300 CBR3 = 4.89 445

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 9.34
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

28
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 6
Station: 15+000 LHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 6 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 110 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 5 145 35 7.0 38.61
5 10 197 87 10.4 25.41
5 15 235 125 7.6 35.40
10 25 267 157 3.2 88.32
10 35 292 182 2.5 114.65
10 45 356 246 6.4 42.45
10 55 389 279 3.3 85.49
15 70 420 310 2.1
15 85 475 365 3.7 76.48
15 100 510 400 2.3
10 110 556 446 4.6 60.18
10 120 605 495 4.9 56.29
10 130 635 525 3.0 94.55
10 140 678 568 4.3 64.63
10 150 702 592 2.4 119.71
10 160 737 627 3.5 80.34
5 165 810 700 14.6 17.75
5 170 893 783 16.6 15.50
5 175 950 840 11.4 23.06

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 61.11 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.6

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

29
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.6

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.6

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 32.11 125
0

-100
CBR2 = 81.27 502

-200

-300 CBR3 = 18.28 213

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 51.88
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

30
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 7
Station: 17+500 RHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 7 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 50 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
10 10 90 40 4.0 69.76
10 20 109 59 1.9
15 35 133 83 1.6
15 50 150 100 1.1
20 70 186 136 1.8
20 90 230 180 2.2
10 100 290 240 6.0 45.45
10 110 390 340 10.0 26.49
5 115 483 433 18.6 13.74
5 120 535 485 10.4 25.41
5 125 680 630 29.0 8.59
5 130 800 750 24.0 10.50
5 135 912 862 22.4 11.29
2 137 940 890 14.0 18.56

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 25.53 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.7

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

31
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.7

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.7

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 =
0

-100
CBR2 = 33.53 160

-200

-300 CBR3 = 12.48 550

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 16.07
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

32
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tested by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Testing Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 8
Station: 20+000 LHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 8 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 110 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
15 15 150 40 2.7 107.09
5 20 176 66 5.2 52.87
10 30 285 175 10.9 24.18
5 35 356 246 14.2 18.28
3 38 460 350 34.7 7.12
3 41 590 480 43.3 5.62
3 44 705 595 38.3 6.40
3 47 770 660 21.7 11.70
3 50 845 735 25.0 10.05
3 53 907 797 20.7 12.30
2 55 955 845 24.0 10.50

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 24.19 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.8

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

33
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.8

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.8

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 85.49 66
0

CBR2 = 21.84 180

-200

CBR3 = 8.31 599

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 13.40
-600

-800

-1000

-1200

34
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tested by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Testing Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 9
Station: 22+500 RHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 9 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 110 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
10 10 175 65 6.5 41.76
5 15 260 150 17.0 15.12
5 20 300 190 8.0 33.53
5 25 368 258 13.6 19.14
5 30 450 340 16.4 15.70
5 35 530 420 16.0 16.12
5 40 618 508 17.6 14.57
5 45 683 573 13.0 20.07
5 50 780 670 19.4 13.15
5 55 890 780 22.0 11.51
10 65 933 823 4.3 64.63
5 70 950 840 3.4 82.84

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 29.01 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.9

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

35
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.9

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.9

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 41.76 65
0

-100
CBR2 = 16.23 715

-200

-300 CBR3 = 69.76 60

-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 20.08
-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-1000

36
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project, TA-7665-CAM.

Location : Provincial Road 314D, Svay Rieng Province.
Tes ted by : Loeung Dararoth Checked by : SEA Sochivoan Tes ting Date : 30.01.2013
Type of Test done: In-Situ CBR by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), TRL Method
Field Test data Sheet No. 10
Station: 25+000 LHS Of f set 1.5m Test No. 10 Station : Test No.
Initial Reading: 95 mm Test f rom top layer Initial Reading : mm Test at Bottom of Pit
Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at Scale Cum Penetn. / CBR(%) at
No. of Cum. Nos No. of Cum. Nos
Reading Depth Blow different Reading Depth Blow different
Blows of Blows depth
Blows of Blows depth
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 5 175 80 16.0 16.12
5 10 270 175 19.0 13.44
3 13 370 275 33.3 7.42
3 16 468 373 32.7 7.58
3 19 597 502 43.0 5.67
3 22 810 715 71.0 3.34
4 26 955 860 36.3 6.79

In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth 8.62 In-Situ CBR f or f ull depth

Moisture content of material during testing: W %= Moisture content of material during testing: W %=
Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of Wt.w et Wt. dry Wt. of Wt .of Wt. of % of
soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture soil+can soil+can can dry soil moisture moisture

Comments:

Test No.10

1.00 m

Formula used to calculate CBR is TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (60oCone), Log10(CBR) = 2.48-1.057* Log10(mm/blow ).

37
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCP), TRL

Sheet No.10

Results of Dynamic Cone Penetration, TP.10

Thickness
Blow Count, N

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

CBR1 = 14.66 175
0

CBR2 = 5.69 685

-200

CBR3 =
-400
Depth, mm

CBRm = 7.08
-600

-800

-1000

-1200

38
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.9 Soil Pitting Tests at Laboratory

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Road No. PR314D
Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 1
Sample Location: PK: 2+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 22/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13
MDD(g/cc): 1.948 g/cc OMC(%): 12.8 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 4.77 6.24 6.77 5.94
30 13.94 16.87 19.80 16.07
65 27.51 31.79 39.09 30.27

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
8.9 90 12.80
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

39
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 1
Sample Location: PK: 2+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm
Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7013.9 7113.9 7213.9 7116.4
W2 Wt.of Mould g 2539.0 2539.0 2539.0 2539.0
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4474.9 4574.9 4674.9 4577.4
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2118.0 2118.0 2118.0 2118.0
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.113 2.160 2.207 2.161
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.925 1.940 1.942 1.865
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. I15 I5 I17 I24
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 178.70 311.50 153.70 184.00
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 165.60 282.50 138.70 162.80
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 13.10 29.00 15.00 21.20
m3 Weight of can g 31.20 26.70 29.10 29.20
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 134.40 255.80 109.60 133.60
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 9.75 11.34 13.69 15.87

Moisture Density Relationship

1.950

1.930
Dry Density, g/cc

1.910

MDD = 1.948 g/cc

1.890
OMC = 12.80 %

1.870

1.850
9.40 10.40 11.40 12.40 13.40 14.40 15.40

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

40
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/1/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 1
Sample Location: PK: 2+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 13 22 32 40
Unit Tin No. 94 78 187 4 140 130
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 72.55 72.41 72.30 72.18 43.76 43.86
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 63.62 64.03 64.33 64.42 40.12 40.02
W3 Weight of can g 14.89 15.02 15.00 14.89 14.21 14.21
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 8.93 8.38 7.97 7.76 3.64 3.84
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 48.73 49.01 49.33 49.53 25.91 25.81
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 18.33 17.10 16.16 15.67 14.05 14.88
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 16.70 14.46
PI Plastic Limit % 2.24

Atterburg Limit

30
18.5

29
18.0
28
Moisture content %

17.5
27

26
17.0
25
16.5
24

23
16.0
22
15.5
21

20
15.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

41
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 26/01/13
Sample Description: Existing on the Road Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Location: 2+500 RHS Offset 2.5m Pit: 1

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-6 Depth : 0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 2852 g Weight of Can: 139 g

Weight of dry soil: 2713 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 16.8 16.8 0.62 99.38
#4 4.75 0 16.8 0.62 99.38
#4
#8 2.360 0 16.8 0.62 99.38
# 10 2.000 180.7 197.5 7.28 92.72
# 16 1.180 0 197.5 7.28 92.72
# 30 0.600 0 197.5 7.28 92.72
# 40 0.425 538.6 736.1 27.13 72.87
# 50 0.300 0 736.1 27.13 72.87
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 736.1 27.13 72.87
# 200 0.075 221 957.1 35.28 64.72
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

42
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 22/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 1
Sample Location: PK: 2+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P7 A22 A74
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 10908.9 13211.5 13436.8
Wt of Mould g 6910.3 8548.3 8595.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 3998.6 4663.2 4841.4
Volume of Mould cc 2075 2245.8 2114.8
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.927 2.076 2.289
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 12.21 12.16 12.37

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.717 1.851 2.037

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A205 A201 A218 A229 A217 A77

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 318.40 316.50 330.50 330.80 350.40 312.10

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 286.50 287.40 285.40 313.20 304.80 291.80

Wt of Moisture g 31.90 29.10 45.10 17.60 45.60 20.30

Wt of can g 36.40 37.90 33.30 39.40 32.80 37.50

Wt of dry materials g 250.10 249.50 252.10 273.80 272.00 254.30

Moisture content % 12.75 11.66 17.89 6.43 16.76 7.98

Average Moisture Content % 12.21 12.16 12.37

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

43
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-823 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 22/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 1
Sample Location: PK: 2+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 22/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13 MDD(g/cc): 1.948 OMC(%): 12.8
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
22/02/13 Start 0.29 0 0.20 0 0.21 0
23/02/13 0.86 0.49 0.81 0.52 0.62 0.35
24/02/13 0.97 0.58 0.86 0.57 0.78 0.49
25/02/13 1.02 0.63 0.94 0.64 0.86 0.56
26/02/13 Ended 1.22 0.80 0.97 0.66 0.98 0.66

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 17 0.3944 2.078 42 0.9744 5.135 70 1.6240 8.558
0.050 1.27 26 0.6032 3.179 74 1.7168 9.047 154 3.5728 18.828
0.075 1.91 31 0.7192 3.790 91 2.1112 11.126 218 5.0576 26.653
0.100 2.54 39 0.9048 4.768 114 2.6448 13.938 225 5.2200 27.508
0.150 3.81 47 1.0904 5.746 131 3.0392 16.016 248 5.7536 30.320
0.200 5.08 51 1.1832 6.235 138 3.2016 16.872 260 6.0320 31.788
0.250 6.35 54 1.2528 6.602 147 3.4104 17.972 280 6.4960 34.233
0.300 7.62 58 1.3456 7.091 153 3.5496 18.706 285 6.6120 34.844
0.350 8.89 62 1.4384 7.580 165 3.8280 20.173 290 6.7280 35.455
0.400 10.16 65 1.5080 7.947 170 3.9440 20.784 294 6.8208 35.944

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

9 25 40
8 35
20
Stress in kg/cm2

7 30
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

6 25
15
5
20
4
10 15
3
2 10
5
1 5
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

44
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 4.768 Stress at 2.54mm= 13.9376 Stress at 2.54 mm= 27.508
2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm 2
CBR = 6.77 % CBR = 19.80 % CBR = 39.086 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 6.235 Stress at 5.08mm= 16.872 Stress at 5.08mm= 31.788
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 5.94 % CBR = 16.07 % CBR = 30.27 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.717 1.851 2.037

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 5.94 16.07 30.27

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.753 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.851 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.909 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

30

25
Soaked CBR (%)

20

15
CBR = 8.9%
of MDD 90%
10

5
1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

45
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled : Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Pit: 2
Soaking started on: 23/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13 Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
MDD(g/cc): 2.098 g/cc OMC(%): 6.8 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 4.16 5.50 5.91 5.24
30 13.45 16.63 19.11 15.84
65 26.90 31.79 38.22 30.27

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
9 90 6.80
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

46
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 2
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7369.2 7593.2 7754.9 7696.8
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4325.4 4549.4 4711.1 4653.0
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.056 2.162 2.239 2.212
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.002 2.061 2.096 2.036
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A20 A29 T22 A24
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 361.10 444.60 376.10 407.50
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 352.60 425.70 354.10 378.10
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 8.50 18.90 22.00 29.40
m3 Weight of can g 37.40 40.70 32.20 37.10
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 315.20 385.00 321.90 341.00
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 2.70 4.91 6.83 8.62

Moisture Density Relationship

2.100

2.080
Dry Density, g/cc

2.060

MDD = 2.098 g/cc

2.040
OMC = 6.80 %

2.020

2.000
2.40 3.40 4.40 5.40 6.40 7.40 8.40

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

47
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/1/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 2
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 12 22 32 40
Unit Tin No. 129 15 54 33 148 150
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 70.64 70.56 70.47 70.36 43.70 42.89
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 61.53 61.93 62.19 62.27 40.24 40.17
W3 Weight of can g 14.15 14.16 14.17 14.18 14.10 14.20
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 9.11 8.63 8.28 8.09 3.46 2.72
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 47.38 47.77 48.02 48.09 26.14 25.97
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 19.23 18.07 17.24 16.82 13.24 10.47
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 17.80 11.86
PI Plastic Limit % 5.94

Atterburg Limit

30
19.5

29
19.0
28
Moisture content %

18.5
27

26
18.0
25
17.5
24

23
17.0
22
16.5
21

20
16.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

48
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 26/01/13
Sample Description: Existing on the Road Date Test Start : 11/03/13
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Pit: 2

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-6 Depth : 0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3554.7 g Weight of Can: 145.8 g

Weight of dry soil: 3408.9 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 82.3 82.3 2.41 97.59
#4 4.75 0 82.3 2.41 97.59
#4
#8 2.360 0 82.3 2.41 97.59
# 10 2.000 447.3 529.6 15.54 84.46
# 16 1.180 0 529.6 15.54 84.46
# 30 0.600 0 529.6 15.54 84.46
# 40 0.425 968.7 1498.3 43.95 56.05
# 50 0.300 0 1498.3 43.95 56.05
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 1498.3 43.95 56.05
# 200 0.075 576.6 2074.9 60.87 39.13
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

49
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 28/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 2
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P1 A31 A3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11017.8 13246.9 13351.6
Wt of Mould g 6907.6 8549.1 8599.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4110.2 4697.8 4752.2
Volume of Mould cc 2077.3 2247.1 2115
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.979 2.091 2.247
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.73 6.80 6.68

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.854 1.958 2.106

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. B22 A18 A410 A11 A48 A201

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 317.50 311.70 305.90 334.90 325.30 303.10

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 299.60 294.60 288.50 316.10 306.50 286.90

Wt of Moisture g 17.90 17.10 17.40 18.80 18.80 16.20

Wt of can g 37.60 36.50 32.40 39.60 31.50 38.70

Wt of dry materials g 262.00 258.10 256.10 276.50 275.00 248.20

Moisture content % 6.83 6.63 6.79 6.80 6.84 6.53

Average Moisture Content % 6.73 6.80 6.68

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

50
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF)
Lab No: LB-824 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 27/01/13 Date Test Start : 23/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 2
Sample Location: PK: 7+500 RS Offset 2.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 23/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.098 OMC(%): 6.8
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
22/02/13 Start 0.20 0 0.20 0 0.94 0
23/02/13 0.80 0.52 0.80 0.52 0.65 -0.25
24/02/13 0.86 0.57 0.86 0.57 0.75 -0.16
25/02/13 0.93 0.63 0.90 0.60 0.86 -0.07
26/02/13 Ended 0.99 0.68 0.94 0.64 0.85 -0.08

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 13 0.3016 1.589 40 0.9280 4.890 70 1.6240 8.558
0.050 1.27 23 0.5336 2.812 70 1.6240 8.558 150 3.4800 18.339
0.075 1.91 30 0.6960 3.668 90 2.0880 11.003 197 4.5704 24.085
0.100 2.54 34 0.7888 4.157 110 2.5520 13.449 220 5.1040 26.897
0.150 3.81 40 0.9280 4.890 127 2.9464 15.527 240 5.5680 29.342
0.200 5.08 45 1.0440 5.502 136 3.1552 16.627 260 6.0320 31.788
0.250 6.35 50 1.1600 6.113 144 3.3408 17.605 280 6.4960 34.233
0.300 7.62 55 1.2760 6.724 152 3.5264 18.583 300 6.9600 36.678
0.350 8.89 60 1.3920 7.336 160 3.7120 19.562 320 7.4240 39.123
0.400 10.16 65 1.5080 7.947 168 3.8976 20.540 340 7.8880 41.568

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

9 25 45
8 40
20
Stress in kg/cm2

7 35
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

6 30
15
5 25
4 20
10
3 15
2 5 10
1 5
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

51
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 4.157 Stress at 2.54mm= 13.4486 Stress at 2.54 mm= 26.897
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2

CBR Caculations from corrected CBR = 5.91 % CBR = 19.11 % CBR = 38.217 %
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 5.502 Stress at 5.08mm= 16.627 Stress at 5.08mm= 31.788
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 5.24 % CBR = 15.84 % CBR = 30.27 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.854 1.958 2.106

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 5.24 15.84 30.27

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.888 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.993 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.056 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

30

25
Soaked CBR (%)

20

15
CBR =

of MDD 90%
10

5
1.850 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

52
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 28/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Pit: 3
Soaking started on: 01/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 05/03/13 Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
MDD(g/cc): 2.205 g/cc OMC(%): 6%
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 4.52 5.75 6.43 5.47
30 14.55 17.12 20.67 16.30
65 27.39 35.46 38.91 33.77

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
9 90 6.00
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

53
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 28/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 3
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7591.7 7941.9 7949.8 7891.6
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4547.9 4898.1 4906.0 4847.8
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.162 2.328 2.332 2.304
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.092 2.203 2.164 2.106
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. I30 I28 I10 I4
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 341.30 289.70 291.80 297.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 331.30 275.70 273.00 274.20
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 10.00 14.00 18.80 23.10
m3 Weight of can g 29.80 29.80 30.49 28.68
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 301.50 245.90 242.51 245.52
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.32 5.69 7.75 9.41

Moisture Density Relationship

2.220

2.200

2.180
Dry Density, g/cc

2.160

2.140 MDD = 2.205 g/cc

2.120 OMC = 6.00 %

2.100

2.080
3.20 4.20 5.20 6.20 7.20 8.20 9.20

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

54
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 06/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 3
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 25 33 42
Unit Tin No. 76 77 86 199 181 180
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 68.80 68.62 68.51 68.40 45.78 45.68
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 55.59 56.25 56.45 56.64 41.39 41.29
W3 Weight of can g 13.34 14.35 14.32 14.30 14.29 14.25
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 13.21 12.37 12.06 11.76 4.39 4.39
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 42.25 41.90 42.13 42.34 27.10 27.04
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 31.27 29.52 28.63 27.78 16.20 16.24
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 29.50 16.22
PI Plastic Limit % 13.28

Atterburg Limit

30
32.0

29
31.5

28
31.0
Moisture content %

27
30.5

26
30.0

25
29.5

24
29.0

23
28.5

22
28.0

21
27.5

20
27.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

55
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 26/01/13
Sample Description: Existing on the Road Date Test Start : 06/03/13
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Pit: 3
Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-6 Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 4025.7 g Weight of Can: 615.3 g

Weight of dry soil: 3410.4 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 759.2 759.2 22.26 77.74
#4 4.75 0 759.2 22.26 77.74
#4
#8 2.360 0 759.2 22.26 77.74
# 10 2.000 458 1217.2 35.69 64.31
# 16 1.180 0 1217.2 35.69 64.31
# 30 0.600 0 1217.2 35.69 64.31
# 40 0.425 569.3 1786.5 52.38 47.62
# 50 0.300 0 1786.5 52.38 47.62
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 1786.5 52.38 47.62
# 200 0.075 434.2 2220.7 65.12 34.88
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

56
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 01/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 3
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P6 A33 A9
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11213.4 13459.5 13596.4
Wt of Mould g 6908.6 8543.2 8590.3
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4304.8 4916.3 5006.1
Volume of Mould cc 2075.4 2249.3 2116
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.074 2.186 2.366
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.23 6.45 6.60

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.953 2.053 2.219

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. C05 C34 C85 C101 C17 C61

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 319.50 340.70 312.30 331.40 317.80 314.80

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 315.50 310.50 294.60 314.50 301.00 296.80

Wt of Moisture g 4.00 30.20 17.70 16.90 16.80 18.00

Wt of can g 37.60 36.50 32.40 39.60 31.50 38.70

Wt of dry materials g 277.90 274.00 262.20 274.90 269.50 258.10

Moisture content % 1.44 11.02 6.75 6.15 6.23 6.97

Average Moisture Content % 6.23 6.45 6.60

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

57
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-825 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 01/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 3
Sample Location: PK: 12+500 RS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 01/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 05/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.205 OMC(%): 6
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
01/03/13 Start 0.21 0 0.20 0 0.24 0
02/03/13 0.82 0.52 0.79 0.51 0.67 0.37
03/03/13 0.86 0.56 0.88 0.58 0.79 0.47
04/03/13 0.98 0.66 0.93 0.63 0.90 0.57
05/03/13 Ended 1.04 0.71 0.99 0.68 1.00 0.65

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 14 0.3248 1.712 45 1.0440 5.502 78 1.8096 9.536
0.050 1.27 28 0.6496 3.423 76 1.7632 9.292 150 3.4800 18.339
0.075 1.91 31 0.7192 3.790 97 2.2504 11.859 200 4.6400 24.452
0.100 2.54 37 0.8584 4.524 119 2.7608 14.549 224 5.1968 27.386
0.150 3.81 42 0.9744 5.135 132 3.0624 16.138 248 5.7536 30.320
0.200 5.08 47 1.0904 5.746 140 3.2480 17.116 290 6.7280 35.455
0.250 6.35 52 1.2064 6.358 156 3.6192 19.073 305 7.0760 37.289
0.300 7.62 60 1.3920 7.336 174 4.0368 21.273 317 7.3544 38.756
0.350 8.89 63 1.4616 7.702 181 4.1992 22.129 328 7.6096 40.101
0.400 10.16 69 1.6008 8.436 190 4.4080 23.229 330 7.6560 40.346

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

9 25 45
8 40
20
Stress in kg/cm2

7 35
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

6 30
15
5 25
4 20
10
3 15
2 5 10
1 5
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

58
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 4.524 Stress at 2.54mm= 14.5489 Stress at 2.54 mm= 27.386
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2

CBR Caculations from corrected CBR = 6.43 % CBR = 20.67 % CBR = 38.912 %
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 5.746 Stress at 5.08mm= 17.116 Stress at 5.08mm= 35.455
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 5.47 % CBR = 16.30 % CBR = 33.77 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.953 2.053 2.219

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 5.47 16.30 33.77

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.985 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.095 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.161 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

35

30

25
Soaked CBR (%)

20

15 CBR = 9.0%

of MDD 90%
10

5
1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 06/03/2013 Signature:

59
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 28/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Pit: 4
Soaking started on: 01/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 05/03/13 Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
MDD(g/cc): 2.202 g/cc OMC(%): 6.2 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 4.40 5.75 6.25 5.47
30 14.06 16.87 19.98 16.07
65 27.63 34.97 39.26 33.30

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
9 90 6.20
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

60
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 28/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 4
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm
Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7552.0 7893.1 7985.3 7855.0
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4508.2 4849.3 4941.5 4811.2
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.143 2.305 2.349 2.287
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.068 2.188 2.188 2.084
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. I10 I30 I4 I28
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 341.00 297.70 290.00 290.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 330.20 284.10 272.10 267.20
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 10.80 13.60 17.90 23.10
m3 Weight of can g 30.49 29.75 28.68 29.80
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 299.71 254.35 243.42 237.40
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.60 5.35 7.35 9.73

Moisture Density Relationship

2.220
2.210
2.200
2.190
2.180
2.170
2.160
Dry Density, g/cc

2.150
2.140
2.130
MDD = 2.203 g/cc
2.120
2.110
2.100 OMC = 6.20 %
2.090
2.080
2.070
2.060
2.050
3.40 4.40 5.40 6.40 7.40 8.40 9.40

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

61
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 06/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 4
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 12 23 32 42
Unit Tin No. 41 23 46 70 160 158
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 77.65 77.57 77.42 77.36 43.80 43.75
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 66.47 67.00 67.19 67.40 40.22 40.17
W3 Weight of can g 14.00 14.00 14.04 14.06 14.20 14.16
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 11.18 10.57 10.23 9.96 3.58 3.58
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 52.47 53.00 53.15 53.34 26.02 26.01
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 21.31 19.94 19.25 18.67 13.76 13.76
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 19.80 13.76
PI Plastic Limit % 6.04

Atterburg Limit

30
21.5

29
21.0
28
Moisture content %

20.5
27

26
20.0
25
19.5
24

23
19.0
22
18.5
21

20
18.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

62
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13
Sample Description: Existing on the Road Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Pit: 4

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-6 Depth : 0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3617.9 g Weight of Can 322 g

Weight of dry soil: 3295.9 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 386.5 386.5 11.73 88.27
#4 4.75 0 386.5 11.73 88.27
#4
#8 2.360 0 386.5 11.73 88.27
# 10 2.000 504.4 890.9 27.03 72.97
# 16 1.180 0 890.9 27.03 72.97
# 30 0.600 0 890.9 27.03 72.97
# 40 0.425 433.2 1324.1 40.17 59.83
# 50 0.300 0 1324.1 40.17 59.83
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 1324.1 40.17 59.83
# 200 0.075 478.9 1803 54.70 45.30
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

63
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 01/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 4
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P5 P34 P17
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11220.4 13484.5 13583.6
Wt of Mould g 6907.6 8549.1 8599.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4312.8 4935.4 4984.2
Volume of Mould cc 2077.3 2247.1 2115
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.076 2.196 2.357
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.53 6.89 6.24

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.949 2.055 2.218

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. B11 A24 A38 A74 A13 A28

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 319.50 320.20 334.60 331.80 328.40 319.20

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 305.60 299.50 314.50 313.50 309.50 304.30

Wt of Moisture g 13.90 20.70 20.10 18.30 18.90 14.90

Wt of can g 37.60 36.50 38.70 31.50 39.60 32.40

Wt of dry materials g 268.00 263.00 275.80 282.00 269.90 271.90

Moisture content % 5.19 7.87 7.29 6.49 7.00 5.48

Average Moisture Content % 6.53 6.89 6.24

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

64
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-826 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 01/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 4
Sample Location: PK: 17+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 01/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 05/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.203 OMC(%): 6.2
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
01/03/13 Start 0.20 0 0.23 0 0.23 0
02/03/13 0.80 0.52 0.83 0.52 0.68 0.39
03/03/13 0.86 0.57 0.88 0.56 0.79 0.48
04/03/13 0.94 0.64 0.92 0.59 0.90 0.58
05/03/13 Ended 0.99 0.68 0.96 0.63 0.99 0.65

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 15 0.3480 1.834 42 0.9744 5.135 72 1.6704 8.803
0.050 1.27 28 0.6496 3.423 73 1.6936 8.925 150 3.4800 18.339
0.075 1.91 32 0.7424 3.912 93 2.1576 11.370 198 4.5936 24.207
0.100 2.54 36 0.8352 4.401 115 2.6680 14.060 226 5.2432 27.631
0.150 3.81 43 0.9976 5.257 130 3.0160 15.894 250 5.8000 30.565
0.200 5.08 47 1.0904 5.746 138 3.2016 16.872 286 6.6352 34.966
0.250 6.35 52 1.2064 6.358 150 3.4800 18.339 293 6.7976 35.822
0.300 7.62 60 1.3920 7.336 160 3.7120 19.562 300 6.9600 36.678
0.350 8.89 68 1.5776 8.314 167 3.8744 20.417 317 7.3544 38.756
0.400 10.16 72 1.6704 8.803 174 4.0368 21.273 323 7.4936 39.490

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

10 25 45
9 40
8 20
Stress in kg/cm2

35
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

7 30
6 15
25
5
20
4 10
15
3
2 5 10
1 5
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

65
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)
6
CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows 7
Stress at 2.54mm= 4.401 Stress at 2.54mm= 14.0599 Stress at 2.54 mm= 27.631 1
2 2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm 1
CBR = 6.25 % CBR = 19.98 % CBR = 39.259 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 5.746 Stress at 5.08mm= 16.872 Stress at 5.08mm= 34.966
1
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 5.47 % CBR = 16.07 % CBR = 33.30 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.949 2.055 2.218

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 5.47 16.07 33.30

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.983 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.093 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.159 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

35

30
Soaked CBR (%)

25

20
CBR = 9.0%
15

10 of MDD 90%

5
1.940 1.990 2.040 2.090 2.140 2.190
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 01/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 02/03/2013 Signature:

66
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 5
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 22/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.093 g/cc OMC(%): 6.7 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 4.65 5.99 6.60 5.71
30 13.69 16.63 19.46 15.84
65 27.88 31.54 39.61 30.04

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
8 90 6.70
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

67
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 21/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 5
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7368.1 7594.1 7750.5 7664.5
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4324.3 4550.3 4706.7 4620.7
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.055 2.163 2.237 2.196
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.002 2.063 2.092 2.025
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A20 A29 T22 A24
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 360.90 448.60 370.10 400.50
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 352.50 429.70 348.10 372.10
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 8.40 18.90 22.00 28.40
m3 Weight of can g 37.40 40.70 32.20 37.10
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 315.10 389.00 315.90 335.00
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 2.67 4.86 6.96 8.48

Moisture Density Relationship

2.100

2.080
Dry Density, g/cc

2.060

MDD = 2.093 g/cc

2.040

OMC = 6.70 %

2.020

2.000
2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

68
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 5
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 13 23 33 42
Unit Tin No. 63 86 15 168 169 175
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 72.51 72.42 72.39 72.18 41.75 41.73
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 61.48 61.99 62.41 62.54 37.48 37.51
W3 Weight of can g 15.00 14.77 14.80 14.79 14.10 14.18
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 11.03 10.43 9.98 9.64 4.27 4.22
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 46.48 47.22 47.61 47.75 23.38 23.33
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 23.73 22.09 20.96 20.19 18.26 18.09
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 21.70 18.18
PI Plastic Limit % 3.52

Atterburg Limit

30
24.0

29
23.5
28
23.0
Moisture content %

27
22.5
26
22.0
25
21.5
24
21.0
23
20.5
22
20.0
21

20
19.5
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

69
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 26/01/13
Sample Description: Existing on the Road Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Pit: 5

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-6 Depth : 0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 4157.4 g Weight of Can 488 g

Weight of dry soil: 3669.4 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 144.5 144.5 3.94 96.06
#4 4.75 0 144.5 3.94 96.06
#4
#8 2.360 0 144.5 3.94 96.06
# 10 2.000 404.8 549.3 14.97 85.03
# 16 1.180 0 549.3 14.97 85.03
# 30 0.600 0 549.3 14.97 85.03
# 40 0.425 412.9 962.2 26.22 73.78
# 50 0.300 0 962.2 26.22 73.78
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 962.2 26.22 73.78
# 200 0.075 635 1597.2 43.53 56.47
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Date: ,Signature:

Checked by: Date: ,Signature:

70
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 22/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 5
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P1 A32 A3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11047.8 13200.4 13365.8
Wt of Mould g 6907.6 8549.1 8599.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4140.2 4651.3 4766.4
Volume of Mould cc 2077.3 2247.1 2115
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.993 2.070 2.254
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.74 6.30 6.69

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.867 1.947 2.112

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. B22 A18 A410 A11 A48 A201

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 315.50 314.70 300.50 336.90 357.90 305.10

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 297.60 297.50 286.40 317.30 327.80 296.80

Wt of Moisture g 17.90 17.20 14.10 19.60 30.10 8.30

Wt of can g 37.60 36.50 32.40 39.60 31.50 38.70

Wt of dry materials g 260.00 261.00 254.00 277.70 296.30 258.10

Moisture content % 6.88 6.59 5.55 7.06 10.16 3.22

Average Moisture Content % 6.74 6.30 6.69

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

71
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-827 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 30/01/13 Date Test Start : 22/02/13
Sample Description: Existing on the road Pit: 5
Sample Location: PK: 22+500 LS Offset 3.0m Depth: 0.0m - 0.7m
Soaking started on: 22/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 26/02/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.093 OMC(%): 6.7
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
22/02/13 Start 0.30 0 0.20 0 0.20 0
23/02/13 0.85 0.47 0.81 0.52 0.64 0.38
24/02/13 0.96 0.57 0.87 0.58 0.76 0.48
25/02/13 1.00 0.60 0.93 0.63 0.88 0.58
26/02/13 Ended 1.21 0.78 0.98 0.67 0.98 0.67

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 16 0.3712 1.956 41 0.9512 5.013 76 1.7632 9.292
0.050 1.27 25 0.5800 3.056 72 1.6704 8.803 54 1.2528 6.602
0.075 1.91 32 0.7424 3.912 90 2.0880 11.003 203 4.7096 24.819
0.100 2.54 38 0.8816 4.646 112 2.5984 13.693 228 5.2896 27.875
0.150 3.81 40 0.9280 4.890 129 2.9928 15.772 247 5.7304 30.198
0.200 5.08 49 1.1368 5.991 136 3.1552 16.627 258 5.9856 31.543
0.250 6.35 53 1.2296 6.480 145 3.3640 17.728 278 6.4496 33.988
0.300 7.62 57 1.3224 6.969 151 3.5032 18.461 297 6.8904 36.311
0.350 8.89 60 1.3920 7.336 163 3.7816 19.928 305 7.0760 37.289
0.400 10.16 63 1.4616 7.702 170 3.9440 20.784 311 7.2152 38.023

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

9 25 40
8 35
20
Stress in kg/cm2

7 30
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

6 25
15
5
20
4
10 15
3
2 10
5
1 5
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

72
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 4.646 Stress at 2.54mm= 13.6931 Stress at 2.54 mm= 27.875
2 2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm
CBR = 6.60 % CBR = 19.46 % CBR = 39.607 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 5.991 Stress at 5.08mm= 16.627 Stress at 5.08mm= 31.543
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 5.71 % CBR = 15.84 % CBR = 30.04 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.867 1.947 2.112

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 5.71 15.84 30.04

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.884 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.988 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.051 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

30

25
Soaked CBR (%)

20

15

10 CBR = 8.0%

of MDD 90%
5
1.850 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 26/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

73
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.10 Laboratory Test Results of Materials for Embankment,
Sub-base, and Base Aggregate:

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Pit:3
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m Depth:0.2m→2m
Soaking started on: 26/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 30/03/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.024 g/cc OMC(%): 6.4 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 1.71 2.32 2.43 2.21
30 6.97 11.25 9.90 10.71
65 11.25 17.73 15.98 16.88

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
5 90 6.40
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

74
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:PR:314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:3
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m Depth:0.2m→2m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7262.6 7417.6 7578.3 7537.7
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4219.0 4374.0 4534.7 4494.1
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.005 2.079 2.156 2.136
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.957 1.987 2.023 1.968
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A37 A37 T22 T55
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 473.50 473.50 456.70 400.10
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 462.80 454.00 430.70 371.60
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 10.70 19.50 26.00 28.50
m3 Weight of can g 31.10 31.10 32.20 38.60
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 431.70 422.90 398.50 333.00
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 2.48 4.61 6.52 8.56

Moisture Density Relationship

2.030

2.020

2.010

2.000
Dry Density, g/cc

1.990

1.980 MDD = 2.024 g/cc

1.970
OMC = 6.40 %
1.960

1.950

1.940
2.20 3.20 4.20 5.20 6.20 7.20 8.20

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

75
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:PR:314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:3
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m Depth:0.2m→2m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 25 35 45
Unit Tin No. 21 145 234 32 12 19
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 65.76 65.68 65.58 65.40 40.86 40.74
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 56.50 57.30 57.86 58.14 36.65 36.45
W3 Weight of can g 14.12 14.17 14.20 14.22 13.96 13.90
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 9.26 8.38 7.72 7.26 4.21 4.29
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 42.38 43.13 43.66 43.92 22.69 22.55
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 21.85 19.43 17.68 16.53 18.55 19.02
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 19.40 18.79
PI Plastic Index % 0.61

Atterburg Limit

30
22.0
21.5
29
21.0
28
20.5
Moisture content %

20.0
27
19.5
26
19.0
25
18.5
18.0
24
17.5
23
17.0
16.5
22
16.0
21
15.5
20
15.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

76
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m Pit: 1

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classificaton : A-2-4 Depth : 0m - 0.7m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3224.5 g Weight of Can: 139 g

Weight of dry soil: 3085.5 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4 4.75 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4
#8 2.360 0 0 0.00 100.00
# 10 2.000 2.4 2.4 0.08 99.92
# 16 1.180 0 2.4 0.08 99.92
# 30 0.600 0 2.4 0.08 99.92
# 40 0.425 84.8 87.2 2.83 97.17
# 50 0.300 0 87.2 2.83 97.17
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 87.2 2.83 97.17
# 200 0.075 857.2 944.4 30.61 69.39
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

77
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 26/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:3
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m Depth:0.2m→2m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P3 D1 L1
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11080.3 12744.3 13499.6
Wt of Mould g 6966.5 8460.2 8814
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4113.8 4284.1 4685.6
Volume of Mould cc 2144.2 2105.5 2100
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.919 2.035 2.231
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.29 6.58 6.72

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.805 1.909 2.091

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. B22 A111 A39 A0 A32 A78
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 397.70 400.3 415.50 333.10 375.90 376.6
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 381.60 373.8 398.20 309.60 358.50 351.2
Wt of Moisture g 16.10 26.5 17.30 23.5 17.40 25.4
Wt of can g 37.60 38.7 32.80 30.7 36.80 34.9
Wt of dry materials g 344.00 335.1 365.40 278.9 321.70 316.3
Moisture content % 4.68 7.91 4.73 8.43 5.41 8.03
Average Moisture Content % 6.29 6.58 6.72

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

78
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 26/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment
Sample Location: PK1+000 LHS Offset 100m
Soaking started on: 26/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 30/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.024 OMC(%): 6.4
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
26/03/13 Start 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.15 0
27/03/13 0.95 0.73 0.68 0.50 0.70 0.47
28/03/13 1.10 0.86 0.80 0.60 1.76 1.38
29/03/13 1.17 0.92 0.10 0.00 2.01 1.60
30/03/13 Ended 1.25 0.99 1.04 0.81 2.31 1.86

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 6 0.1392 0.734 16 0.3712 1.956 30 0.6960 3.668
0.050 1.27 10 0.2320 1.223 33 0.7656 4.035 53 1.2296 6.480
0.075 1.91 12 0.2784 1.467 46 1.0672 5.624 73 1.6936 8.925
0.100 2.54 14 0.3248 1.712 57 1.3224 6.969 92 2.1344 11.248
0.150 3.81 17 0.3944 2.078 80 1.8560 9.781 120 2.7840 14.671
0.200 5.08 19 0.4408 2.323 92 2.1344 11.248 145 3.3640 17.728
0.250 6.35 21 0.4872 2.567 104 2.4128 12.715 165 3.8280 20.173
0.300 7.62 23 0.5336 2.812 116 2.6912 14.182 185 4.2920 22.618
0.350 8.89 25 0.5800 3.056 128 2.9696 15.649 205 4.7560 25.063
0.400 10.16 27 0.6264 3.301 140 3.2480 17.116 225 5.2200 27.508

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

4 18 30

3 16
25
Stress in kg/cm2

14
Stress in kg/cm2

3
Stress in kg/cm2

12 20
2 10
15
2 8
6 10
1
4
1 5
2
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

79
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 1.712 Stress at 2.54mm= 6.96881 Stress at 2.54 mm= 11.248
2 2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm
CBR = 2.43 % CBR = 9.90 % CBR = 15.982 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 2.323 Stress at 5.08mm= 11.248 Stress at 5.08mm= 17.728
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 2.21 % CBR = 10.71 % CBR = 16.88 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.805 1.909 2.091

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 2.21 10.71 16.88

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.822 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.923 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.984 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

18
17
16
15
14
13
Soaked CBR (%)

12
11
10 CBR = 5.00%
9
8
7
6
5
4 of MDD 90%
3
2
1.790 1.840 1.890 1.940 1.990 2.040 2.090
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

80
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR 314D
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/17/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D
Soaking started on: 03/18/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/22/13 Depth :
MDD(g/cc): 1.908 g/cc OMC(%): 10.2 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 0.61 0.86 0.87 0.82
30 1.22 1.71 1.74 1.63
65 2.20 3.30 3.13 3.14

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
0.95 90 10.20
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

81
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR 314D
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 17/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D Depth :
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7069.8 7269.5 7466.4 7451.5
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4026.0 4225.7 4422.6 4407.7
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 1.914 2.009 2.102 2.095
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.802 1.859 1.907 1.855
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A74 A410 A74 A11
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 406.70 441.20 425.20 406.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 384.90 410.80 389.00 364.20
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 21.80 30.40 36.20 42.10
m3 Weight of can g 34.99 32.40 35.20 38.70
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 349.91 378.40 353.80 325.50
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 6.23 8.03 10.23 12.93

Moisture Density Relationship

1.910

1.890
Dry Density, g/cc

1.870

1.850 MDD = 1.908 g/cc

1.830 OMC = 10.20 %

1.810

1.790
6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

82
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR 314D
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 17/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth : 0

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 25 35 42
Unit Tin No. 68 156 2 204 109 104
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 72.83 72.66 72.54 72.41 42.90 42.60
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 56.83 57.51 58.01 58.22 38.49 38.39
W3 Weight of can g 14.29 14.24 14.38 14.28 14.10 14.01
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 16.00 15.15 14.53 14.19 4.41 4.21
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 42.54 43.27 43.63 43.94 24.39 24.38
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 37.61 35.01 33.30 32.29 18.08 17.27
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 34.80 17.67
PI Plastic Index % 17.13

Atterburg Limit

30
38.5
38.0
29
37.5
28
37.0
36.5
Moisture content %

27
36.0
26
35.5
35.0
25
34.5
24
34.0
33.5
23
33.0
22
32.5
32.0
21
31.5
20
31.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

83
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR 314D
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Date Test Start : 17/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-6 Depth :

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3490.3 g Weight of Can 301.7 g

Weight of dry soil: 3188.6 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 103.5 103.5 3.25 96.75
#4 4.75 0 103.5 3.25 96.75
#4
#8 2.360 0 103.5 3.25 96.75
# 10 2.000 193.6 297.1 9.32 90.68
# 16 1.180 0 297.1 9.32 90.68
# 30 0.600 0 297.1 9.32 90.68
# 40 0.425 316.9 614 19.26 80.74
# 50 0.300 0 614 19.26 80.74
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 614 19.26 80.74
# 200 0.075 520.2 1134.2 35.57 64.43
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
100.00
(ii) Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90.00
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80.00
(iv) Percentage
70.00 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

84
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd 0
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Depth : 0
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. T2 B0 I5
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 8406.4 12402.5 13024.5
Wt of Mould g 4317 8081 8221
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4089.4 4321.5 4803.5
Volume of Mould cc 2178 2175.4 2165
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.878 1.987 2.219
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 10.34 10.60 10.13

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.702 1.796 2.015

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. I7 I28 I24 I17 I38 V1

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 350.20 324.10 327.00 313.30 300.00 316.70

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 315.90 300.30 300.00 284.60 274.40 292.90

Wt of Moisture g 34.30 23.80 27.00 28.70 25.60 23.80

Wt of can g 27.22 29.80 29.16 29.08 39.80 38.10

Wt of dry materials g 288.68 270.50 270.84 255.52 234.60 254.80

Moisture content % 11.88 8.80 9.97 11.23 10.91 9.34

Average Moisture Content % 10.34 10.60 10.13

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

85
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR 314D
Lab No: LB-833 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Pit:
Sample Location: Pk. 5+600 RHS Offset 100m from PR314D Depth :
Soaking started on: 18/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 22/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 1.908 OMC(%): 10.2
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
18/03/13 Start 0.20 0 0.15 0 0.30 0
19/03/13 4.41 3.62 3.05 2.49 2.30 1.72
20/03/13 5.48 4.53 4.10 3.39 3.20 2.49
21/03/13 6.54 5.45 4.90 4.08 3.90 3.09
22/03/13 Ended 6.50 5.41 5.00 4.17 4.00 3.18

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 1 0.0232 0.122 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 2 0.0464 0.245 4 0.0928 0.489 7 0.1624 0.856
0.050 1.27 3 0.0696 0.367 6 0.1392 0.734 12 0.2784 1.467
0.075 1.91 4 0.0928 0.489 8 0.1856 0.978 16 0.3712 1.956
0.100 2.54 5 0.1160 0.611 10 0.2320 1.223 18 0.4176 2.201
0.150 3.81 6 0.1392 0.734 12 0.2784 1.467 23 0.5336 2.812
0.200 5.08 7 0.1624 0.856 14 0.3248 1.712 27 0.6264 3.301
0.250 6.35 8 0.1856 0.978 16 0.3712 1.956 31 0.7192 3.790
0.300 7.62 9 0.2088 1.100 18 0.4176 2.201 35 0.8120 4.279
0.350 8.89 10 0.2320 1.223 20 0.4640 2.445 39 0.9048 4.768
0.400 10.16 11 0.2552 1.345 22 0.5104 2.690 43 0.9976 5.257

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

2 3 6
1
3 5
1
Stress in kg/cm2

2
Stress in kg/cm2

4
Stress in kg/cm2

1
1 2 3
1
1 2
0
0 1 1
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

86
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 0.611 Stress at 2.54mm= 1.2226 Stress at 2.54 mm= 2.201
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 0.87 % CBR = 1.74 % CBR = 3.127 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 0.856 Stress at 5.08mm= 1.712 Stress at 5.08mm= 3.301
No. 9A graphs
2 2
kg/cm kg/cm kg/cm2
CBR = 0.82 % CBR = 1.63 % CBR = 3.14 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.702 1.796 2.015

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 0.82 1.63 3.14

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.717 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.813 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

3.5

2.5
Soaked CBR (%)

CBR = 0.95%
1.5

of MDD 90%

0.5
1.680 1.730 1.780 1.830 1.880 1.930 1.980 2.030
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 22/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

87
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Depth:0m→1.8m
Soaking started on: 25/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 29/03/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.065 g/cc OMC(%): 8.7 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 2.08 2.81 2.95 2.68
30 2.45 4.52 3.47 4.31
65 3.18 5.13 4.52 4.89

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
3.3 90 8.70
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

88
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Depth:0m→1.8m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7271.6 7571.6 7767.2 7621.7
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4228.0 4528.0 4723.6 4578.1
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.010 2.152 2.245 2.176
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.925 2.012 2.063 1.968
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. I34 I38 V1 C7
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 440.50 450.50 377.90 322.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 423.70 423.70 350.30 294.30
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 16.80 26.80 27.60 28.00
m3 Weight of can g 39.80 39.80 38.10 29.20
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 383.90 383.90 312.20 265.10
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 4.38 6.98 8.84 10.56

Moisture Density Relationship

2.080

2.060

2.040

2.020
Dry Density, g/cc

2.000

1.980 MDD = 2.065 g/cc

1.960
OMC = 8.70 %
1.940

1.920

1.900
4.20 5.20 6.20 7.20 8.20 9.20 10.20

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

89
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Depth:0m→1.8m
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 25 35 43
Unit Tin No. 21 18 99 72 133 132
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 70.76 70.61 70.50 70.36 40.80 40.73
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 60.73 61.50 62.03 62.28 36.49 36.40
W3 Weight of can g 13.98 13.90 13.96 14.00 14.80 14.72
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 10.03 9.11 8.47 8.08 4.31 4.33
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 46.75 47.60 48.07 48.28 21.69 21.68
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 21.45 19.14 17.62 16.74 19.87 19.97
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 19.30 19.92
PI Plastic Index % -0.62

Atterburg Limit

22.0
30
21.5
29
21.0
20.5
28
20.0
Moisture content %

27
19.5
26
19.0
18.5
25
18.0
24
17.5
17.0
23
16.5
22
16.0
21
15.5
15.0
20
1 1 1010 100
100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

90
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Pit:

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-4 Depth:0m→1.8m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 2459.3 g Weight of Can: 280.7 g

Weight of dry soil: 2178.6 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4 4.75 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4
#8 2.360 0 0 0.00 100.00
# 10 2.000 8.6 8.6 0.39 99.61
# 16 1.180 0 8.6 0.39 99.61
# 30 0.600 0 8.6 0.39 99.61
# 40 0.425 32.4 41 1.88 98.12
# 50 0.300 0 41 1.88 98.12
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 41 1.88 98.12
# 200 0.075 647.2 688.2 31.59 68.41
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

91
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Depth:0m→1.8m

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. B0 A31 T1
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12405.5 13255.3 13382.9
Wt of Mould g 8081 8549.1 8814.9
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4324.5 4706.2 4568
Volume of Mould cc 2175.4 2247.1 2007.9
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.988 2.094 2.275
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 8.33 8.24 8.43

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.835 1.935 2.098

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. P90 A47 A78 A32 A42 A0
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 306.60 302.9 308.80 317.00 304.20 300.3
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 285.00 283.1 287.80 295.80 282.10 280.1
Wt of Moisture g 21.60 19.8 21.00 21.2 22.10 20.2
Wt of can g 39.90 30.9 34.90 36.8 29.90 30.7
Wt of dry materials g 245.10 252.2 252.90 259 252.20 249.4
Moisture content % 8.81 7.85 8.30 8.19 8.76 8.10
Average Moisture Content % 8.33 8.24 8.43

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

92
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK10+300 RHS Offset 500m Depth:0m→1.8m
Soaking started on: 25/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 29/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.065 OMC(%): 8.7
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
25/03/13 Start 0.20 0 0.20 0 0.20 0
26/03/13 0.30 0.09 0.30 0.09 0.25 0.04
27/03/13 0.35 0.13 0.34 0.12 0.40 0.17
28/03/13 0.37 0.15 0.35 0.13 0.40 0.17
29/03/13 Ended 0.38 0.15 0.35 0.13 0.40 0.17

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 8 0.1856 0.978 6 0.1392 0.734 8 0.1856 0.978
0.050 1.27 11 0.2552 1.345 10 0.2320 1.223 14 0.3248 1.712
0.075 1.91 15 0.3480 1.834 15 0.3480 1.834 20 0.4640 2.445
0.100 2.54 17 0.3944 2.078 20 0.4640 2.445 26 0.6032 3.179
0.150 3.81 21 0.4872 2.567 29 0.6728 3.546 36 0.8352 4.401
0.200 5.08 23 0.5336 2.812 37 0.8584 4.524 42 0.9744 5.135
0.250 6.35 25 0.5800 3.056 45 1.0440 5.502 48 1.1136 5.868
0.300 7.62 27 0.6264 3.301 53 1.2296 6.480 58 1.3456 7.091
0.350 8.89 29 0.6728 3.546 61 1.4152 7.458 68 1.5776 8.314
0.400 10.16 30 0.6960 3.668 69 1.6008 8.436 78 1.8096 9.536

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

4 9 12
4 8
10
Stress in kg/cm2

3 7
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

6 8
3
5
2 6
4
2 4
3
1 2
2
1 1
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

93
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 2.078 Stress at 2.54mm= 2.4452 Stress at 2.54 mm= 3.179
2 2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm
CBR = 2.95 % CBR = 3.47 % CBR = 4.517 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 2.812 Stress at 5.08mm= 4.524 Stress at 5.08mm= 5.135
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 2.68 % CBR = 4.31 % CBR = 4.89 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.835 1.935 2.098

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 2.68 4.31 4.89

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.859 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.962 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.024 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

5.5

5.0

4.5
Soaked CBR (%)

4.0

3.5
CBR = 3.3%

3.0
of MDD 90%
2.5

2.0
1.820 1.870 1.920 1.970 2.020 2.070 2.120
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 29/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

94
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/18/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314
Soaking started on: 03/19/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/23/13 Depth :
MDD(g/cc): 1.875 g/cc OMC(%): 12 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 1.96 3.06 2.78 2.91
30 6.97 13.82 9.90 13.16
65 13.08 28.12 18.59 26.78

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
6.7 90 12.00
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

95
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Borrow Pit:
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314 Depth :
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7204.9 7328.6 7466.9 7410.6
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4161.1 4284.8 4423.1 4366.8
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 1.978 2.037 2.103 2.076
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.830 1.849 1.874 1.808
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A47 A32 A23 T22
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 451.90 387.50 375.60 436.50
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 420.30 355.20 338.90 384.40
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 31.60 32.30 36.70 52.10
m3 Weight of can g 30.90 36.80 38.50 32.20
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 389.40 318.40 300.40 352.20
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 8.12 10.14 12.22 14.79

Moisture Density Relationship

1.880

1.860
Dry Density, g/cc

1.840 MDD = 1.875 g/cc

OMC = 12.00 %
1.820

1.800
8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

96
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth :

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 22 31 43
Unit Tin No. 150 47 39 117 124 128
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 68.40 65.30 64.23 65.22 40.27 40.31
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 57.84 56.10 56.00 57.44 36.80 36.72
W3 Weight of can g 14.15 14.22 14.35 14.12 14.15 14.19
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 10.56 9.20 8.23 7.78 3.47 3.59
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 43.69 41.88 41.65 43.32 22.65 22.53
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 24.17 21.97 19.76 17.96 15.32 15.93
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 21.00 15.63
PI Plastic Index % 5.37

Atterburg Limit

30
25.0
24.5
29
24.0
23.5
28
23.0
Moisture content %

27
22.5
22.0
26
21.5
25
21.0
20.5
24
20.0
19.5
23
19.0
22
18.5
18.0
21
17.5
20
17.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

97
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-4 Depth :

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3025.8 g Weight of Can: 112 g

Weight of dry soil: 2913.8 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4 4.75 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4
#8 2.360 0 0 0.00 100.00
# 10 2.000 24.8 24.8 0.85 99.15
# 16 1.180 0 24.8 0.85 99.15
# 30 0.600 0 24.8 0.85 99.15
# 40 0.425 50.7 75.5 2.59 97.41
# 50 0.300 0 75.5 2.59 97.41
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 75.5 2.59 97.41
# 200 0.075 527.8 603.3 20.70 79.30
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

98
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 19/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Depth :
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. V1 H6 H4
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 10699.5 12758.5 12799.6
Wt of Mould g 6889.4 8459.5 8146.5
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 3810.1 4299 4653.1
Volume of Mould cc 2077.21 2200.17 2195.76
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.834 1.954 2.119
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 12.02 12.12 12.14

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.637 1.743 1.890

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A410 A74 B22 A211 A20 A111

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 321.40 339.30 318.20 325.20 321.10 313.40

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 291.00 306.17 288.80 293.19 290.80 282.20

Wt of Moisture g 30.40 33.13 29.40 32.01 30.30 31.20

Wt of can g 38.50 30.07 39.27 36.27 38.19 28.40

Wt of dry materials g 252.50 276.10 249.53 256.92 252.61 253.80

Moisture content % 12.04 12.00 11.78 12.46 11.99 12.29

Average Moisture Content % 12.02 12.12 12.14

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

99
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-834 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 19/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit Pit:
Sample Location: Pk. 16+800 RHS Offset 100m from PR314 Depth :
Soaking started on: 19/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 23/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 1.875 OMC(%): 12
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
19/03/13 Start 0.15 0 0.20 0 0.20 0
20/03/13 1.88 1.49 0.65 0.39 0.95 0.64
21/03/13 2.15 1.72 2.00 1.55 1.90 1.46
22/03/13 2.23 1.79 2.05 1.59 1.98 1.53
23/03/13 Ended 2.35 1.89 2.10 1.63 2.04 1.58

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 4 0.0928 0.489 10 0.2320 1.223 20 0.4640 2.445
0.050 1.27 8 0.1856 0.978 22 0.5104 2.690 40 0.9280 4.890
0.075 1.91 12 0.2784 1.467 40 0.9280 4.890 70 1.6240 8.558
0.100 2.54 16 0.3712 1.956 57 1.3224 6.969 107 2.4824 13.082
0.150 3.81 21 0.4872 2.567 90 2.0880 11.003 165 3.8280 20.173
0.200 5.08 25 0.5800 3.056 113 2.6216 13.815 230 5.3360 28.120
0.250 6.35 29 0.6728 3.546 125 2.9000 15.282 285 6.6120 34.844
0.300 7.62 34 0.7888 4.157 137 3.1784 16.750 340 7.8880 41.568
0.350 8.89 40 0.9280 4.890 151 3.5032 18.461 395 9.1640 48.293
0.400 10.16 46 1.0672 5.624 163 3.7816 19.928 445 10.3240 54.406

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

6 25 60

5 20 50
Stress in kg/cm2

4
Stress in kg/cm2

40
Stress in kg/cm2

15
3 30
10
2
20
1 5
10
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

100
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 1.956 Stress at 2.54mm= 6.96881 Stress at 2.54 mm= 13.082
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 2.78 % CBR = 9.90 % CBR = 18.587 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 3.056 Stress at 5.08mm= 13.815 Stress at 5.08mm= 28.120
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 2.91 % CBR = 13.16 % CBR = 26.78 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.637 1.743 1.890

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 2.91 13.16 26.78

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.688 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.781 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

28.0
26.0
24.0
22.0
20.0
18.0
Soaked CBR (%)

16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
CBR = 6.7%
8.0
6.0
of MDD 90%
4.0
2.0
0.0
1.600 1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 23/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 24/03/2013 Signature:

101
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Pe

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Depth :
Soaking started on: 26/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 30/03/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.025 g/cc OMC(%): 7.7 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 1.22 1.83 1.74 1.75
30 5.50 7.70 7.82 7.34
65 7.46 13.08 10.60 12.46

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
3.4 90 7.70
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

102
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Depth:
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7277.1 7417.1 7631.7 7541.6
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4233.5 4373.5 4588.1 4498.0
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.012 2.079 2.181 2.138
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.941 1.968 2.025 1.958
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A32 A34 A20 A410
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 502.20 505.70 434.00 538.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 485.80 480.70 405.70 495.70
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 16.40 25.00 28.30 42.60
m3 Weight of can g 37.50 37.50 37.40 32.40
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 448.30 443.20 368.30 463.30
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.66 5.64 7.68 9.19

Moisture Density Relationship

2.040

2.020

2.000
Dry Density, g/cc

1.980
MDD = 2.025 g/cc

1.960
OMC = 7.70 %

1.940

1.920
3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

103
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Depth:
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 25 35 43
Unit Tin No. 23 123 34 56 112 125
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 70.71 70.91 70.47 70.32 40.84 40.64
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 60.91 61.79 61.94 62.13 36.39 36.30
W3 Weight of can g 13.95 13.91 13.95 14.10 14.80 14.85
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 9.80 9.12 8.53 8.19 4.45 4.34
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 46.96 47.88 47.99 48.03 21.59 21.45
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 20.87 19.05 17.77 17.05 20.61 20.23
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 19.00 20.42
PI Plastic Index % -1.42

Atterburg Limit

30
20.6
29
20.1
28
19.6
Moisture content %

27
19.1
26
18.6
25
18.1
24
17.6
23
17.1
22
16.6
21
16.1

20
15.6
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

104
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. PR314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Date Test Start : 25/03/13
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Pit:

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-4 Depth :

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 2767.9 g Weight of Can: 200.4 g

Weight of dry soil: 2567.5 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 5.6 5.6 0.22 99.78
#4 4.75 0 5.6 0.22 99.78
#4
#8 2.360 0 5.6 0.22 99.78
# 10 2.000 2.1 7.7 0.30 99.70
# 16 1.180 0 7.7 0.30 99.70
# 30 0.600 0 7.7 0.30 99.70
# 40 0.425 54.9 62.6 2.44 97.56
# 50 0.300 0 62.6 2.44 97.56
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 62.6 2.44 97.56
# 200 0.075 877.4 940 36.61 63.39
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

105
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 26/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Depth :

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. C3 V2 B1
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 10989.4 12496.4 13326.9
Wt of Mould g 6863 7906.3 8637.9
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4126.4 4590.1 4689
Volume of Mould cc 2141.2 2246.6 2116
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.927 2.043 2.216
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 7.35 7.39 7.21

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.795 1.903 2.067

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A15 A7 A48 A38 A18 A33
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 505.70 528.6 527.50 529.60 606.70 566.3
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 475.10 493.2 492.30 496.40 569.10 530.3
Wt of Moisture g 30.60 35.4 35.20 33.2 37.60 36
Wt of can g 36.10 35.6 31.50 31.4 36.50 41.8
Wt of dry materials g 439.00 457.6 460.80 465 532.60 488.5
Moisture content % 6.97 7.74 7.64 7.14 7.06 7.37
Average Moisture Content % 7.35 7.39 7.21

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

106
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soil Testing and Georesearch Inc.
# 35 A, 464 Street, Tuol Tumpung I, Chamkar Mon, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tel : 088 818 5555, 097 730 0760, Tel/Fax: 855-23 996 804, Email : [email protected], P.O.Box : 2470 Phnom Penh 3.

PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road:314D
Lab No: LB-836 Sample 01 Date Sampled : 08/03/13 Date Test Start : 26/03/13
Sample Description: Borrow Pit Embankment Pit:
Sample Location: PK17+700 LHS Offset 300m Depth :
Soaking started on: 26/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 30/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.025 OMC(%): 7.7
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
26/03/13 Start 0.40 0 0.40 0 0.20 0
27/03/13 1.50 0.94 1.80 1.20 1.05 0.73
28/03/13 1.65 1.07 2.10 1.46 1.25 0.90
29/03/13 1.70 1.12 2.34 1.67 1.35 0.99
30/03/13 Ended 1.75 1.16 2.54 1.84 1.43 1.06

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 4 0.0928 0.489 18 0.4176 2.201 18 0.4176 2.201
0.050 1.27 6 0.1392 0.734 25 0.5800 3.056 33 0.7656 4.035
0.075 1.91 8 0.1856 0.978 37 0.8584 4.524 50 1.1600 6.113
0.100 2.54 10 0.2320 1.223 45 1.0440 5.502 61 1.4152 7.458
0.150 3.81 13 0.3016 1.589 52 1.2064 6.358 85 1.9720 10.392
0.200 5.08 15 0.3480 1.834 63 1.4616 7.702 107 2.4824 13.082
0.250 6.35 17 0.3944 2.078 76 1.7632 9.292 120 2.7840 14.671
0.300 7.62 19 0.4408 2.323 88 2.0416 10.759 141 3.2712 17.239
0.350 8.89 22 0.5104 2.690 100 2.3200 12.226 162 3.7584 19.806
0.400 10.16 25 0.5800 3.056 113 2.6216 13.815 182 4.2224 22.251

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

5 16 25
4 14
20
Stress in kg/cm2

4 12
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

3
10 15
3
8
2
6 10
2
1 4
5
1 2
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

107
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 1.223 Stress at 2.54mm= 5.50169 Stress at 2.54 mm= 7.458
2 2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm
CBR = 1.74 % CBR = 7.82 % CBR = 10.597 %
CBR Caculations from corrected
load / stress of Form No. 9A graphs Stress at 5.08mm= 1.834 Stress at 5.08mm= 7.702 Stress at 5.08mm= 13.082
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 1.75 % CBR = 7.34 % CBR = 12.46 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.795 1.903 2.067

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 1.75 7.34 12.46

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.823 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.924 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.985 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 5.08 mm level penetration

12
11
10
9
Soaked CBR (%)

8
7 CBR = 3.40%
6
5
4
3
of MDD 90%
2
1
1.780 1.830 1.880 1.930 1.980 2.030 2.080
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 30/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 31/03/2013 Signature:

108
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/18/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF)
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D
Soaking started on: 03/19/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/23/13 Depth : 0 to 1m
MDD(g/cc): 1.783 g/cc OMC(%): 14.6 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 3.06 4.03 4.34 3.84
30 6.97 11.37 9.90 10.83
65 18.34 28.73 26.06 27.36

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
9 90 14.60
95
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

109
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF) Borrow Pit: 08
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D Depth : 0 to 1m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7095.6 7318.6 7363.9 7291.9
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8 3043.8
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4051.8 4274.8 4320.1 4248.1
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7 2103.7
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 1.926 2.032 2.054 2.019
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 1.719 1.780 1.764 1.703
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. B22 A70 A211 A201
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 416.70 406.80 376.20 415.50
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 376.00 360.90 328.50 356.40
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 40.70 45.90 47.70 59.10
m3 Weight of can g 37.60 36.10 38.40 38.70
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 338.40 324.80 290.10 317.70
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 12.03 14.13 16.44 18.60

Moisture Density Relationship

1.800

1.780

1.760
Dry Density, g/cc

1.740
MDD = 1.783 g/cc

1.720
OMC = 14.60 %

1.700

1.680
11.80 12.80 13.80 14.80 15.80 16.80 17.80 18.80

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

110
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF)
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth : 0 to 1m

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 14 25 35 42
Unit Tin No. 74 25 27 122 114 154
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 72.08 74.28 75.86 76.13 45.15 45.25
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 54.72 57.43 59.33 59.96 40.24 40.34
W3 Weight of can g 14.18 14.15 14.22 14.17 14.15 14.35
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 17.36 16.85 16.53 16.17 4.91 4.91
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 40.54 43.28 45.11 45.79 26.09 25.99
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 42.82 38.93 36.64 35.31 18.82 18.89
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 38.75 18.86
PI Plastic Index % 19.89

Atterburg Limit

30
44.0
43.5
29
43.0
42.5
28
42.0
41.5
Moisture content %

27
41.0
40.5
26
40.0
39.5
25
39.0
38.5
24
38.0
37.5
23
37.0
36.5
22
36.0
35.5
21
35.0
34.5
20
34.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

111
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF) Date Test Start : 18/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-6 Depth : 0 to 1m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3412.9 g Weight of Can: 128 g

Weight of dry soil: 3284.9 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
1/2'' 12.50 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/8'' 10.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4 4.75 0 0 0.00 100.00
#4
#8 2.360 0 0 0.00 100.00
# 10 2.000 25 25 0.76 99.24
# 16 1.180 0 25 0.76 99.24
# 30 0.600 0 25 0.76 99.24
# 40 0.425 210 235 7.15 92.85
# 50 0.300 0 235 7.15 92.85
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 235 7.15 92.85
# 200 0.075 930.5 1165.5 35.48 64.52
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

112
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 19/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF) Depth : 0 to 1m
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. V1 V2 T3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 10491.1 12091.5 13010.3
Wt of Mould g 6889.4 7906.8 8814.9
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 3601.7 4184.7 4195.4
Volume of Mould cc 2077.21 2246.6 2079
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 1.734 1.863 2.018
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 14.52 14.33 14.64

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.514 1.629 1.760

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. P90 T55 A111 A4 A23 A20

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 340.90 329.60 339.60 344.90 331.50 343.50

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 302.55 292.90 301.98 306.18 294.31 304.18

Wt of Moisture g 38.35 36.70 37.62 38.72 37.19 39.32

Wt of can g 39.90 38.60 38.70 36.90 38.50 37.40

Wt of dry materials g 262.65 254.30 263.28 269.28 255.81 266.78

Moisture content % 14.60 14.43 14.29 14.38 14.54 14.74

Average Moisture Content % 14.52 14.33 14.64

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

113
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 314D
Lab No: LB-835 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 19/03/13
Sample Description: Embankment Borrow Pit (CBF) Pit: 8
Sample Location: Pk. 23+600 RHS Offset 300m from PR314D Depth : 0 to 1m
Soaking started on: 19/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 23/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 1.783 OMC(%): 14.6
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
19/03/13 Start 0.20 0 0.20 0 0.62 0
20/03/13 0.52 0.27 0.52 0.27 0.88 0.22
21/03/13 1.20 0.86 0.96 0.65 1.05 0.37
22/03/13 1.26 0.91 1.20 0.86 1.11 0.42
23/03/13 Ended 1.32 0.96 1.28 0.93 1.20 0.50

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 10 0.2320 1.223 16 0.3712 1.956 50 1.1600 6.113
0.050 1.27 17 0.3944 2.078 32 0.7424 3.912 87 2.0184 10.637
0.075 1.91 21 0.4872 2.567 46 1.0672 5.624 120 2.7840 14.671
0.100 2.54 25 0.5800 3.056 57 1.3224 6.969 150 3.4800 18.339
0.150 3.81 28 0.6496 3.423 75 1.7400 9.169 200 4.6400 24.452
0.200 5.08 33 0.7656 4.035 93 2.1576 11.370 235 5.4520 28.731
0.250 6.35 38 0.8816 4.646 110 2.5520 13.449 275 6.3800 33.621
0.300 7.62 43 0.9976 5.257 123 2.8536 15.038 305 7.0760 37.289
0.350 8.89 48 1.1136 5.868 136 3.1552 16.627 340 7.8880 41.568
0.400 10.16 53 1.2296 6.480 149 3.4568 18.217 375 8.7000 45.847

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

7 20 50
18 45
6
16 40
5 14 35
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

4 12 30
10 25
3
8 20
2 6 15
1 4 10
2 5
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

114
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 3.056 Stress at 2.54mm= 6.96881 Stress at 2.54 mm= 18.339
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 4.34 % CBR = 9.90 % CBR = 26.057 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 4.035 Stress at 5.08mm= 11.370 Stress at 5.08mm= 28.731
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 3.84 % CBR = 10.83 % CBR = 27.36 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.514 1.629 1.760

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 3.84 10.83 27.36

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.605 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.694 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

27.0

25.0

23.0

21.0

19.0
Soaked CBR (%)

17.0

15.0

13.0
CBR = 9.00%
11.0
of MDD 90%
9.0

7.0

5.0

3.0
1.510 1.560 1.610 1.660 1.710 1.760
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 27/02/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 28/02/2013 Signature:

115
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13
Soaking started on: 03/15/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/19/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.228 g/cc OMC(%): 9.1 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 17.85 30.56 25.36 29.11
30 45.24 70.42 64.27 67.07
65 61.13 90.84 86.86 86.51

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
73 95 9.17
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

116
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Borrow Pit:
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7812.6 7966.5 8155.6 7863.4
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4769.0 4922.9 5112.0 4819.8
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.267 2.340 2.430 2.291
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.156 2.182 2.221 2.060
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A34 A75 A0 A12
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 454.90 379.10 389.20 352.10
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 434.50 355.70 358.40 319.90
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 20.40 23.40 30.80 32.20
m3 Weight of can g 37.50 31.70 30.70 32.85
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 397.00 324.00 327.70 287.05
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 5.14 7.22 9.40 11.22

Moisture Density Relationship

2.260
2.240 y
2.220
y
2.200
2.180
Dry Density, g/cc

2.160
2.140
2.120
MDD = 2.228 g/cc

2.100
OMC = 9.10 %
2.080
2.060
2.040
2.020
5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

117
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth : 1 to 2.0m

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 23 35 45
Unit Tin No. 90 53 42 30 140 52
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 66.86 66.62 66.42 66.30 42.80 43.62
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 55.69 56.10 56.50 56.92 38.96 39.72
W3 Weight of can g 14.14 14.20 14.15 14.18 13.96 14.24
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 11.17 10.52 9.92 9.38 3.84 3.90
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 41.55 41.90 42.35 42.74 25.00 25.48
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 26.88 25.11 23.42 21.95 15.36 15.31
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 24.60 15.33
PI Plastic Index % 9.27

Atterburg Limit

30
27.5
27.0
29
26.5
28
26.0
Moisture content %

27
25.5
25.0
26
24.5
25
24.0
24
23.5
23.0
23
22.5
22
22.0
21
21.5
20
21.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

118
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled : 26/02/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-6 Depth : 1 to 2.0m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3837 g Weight of Can: 481 g

Weight of dry soil: 3356 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 92 92 2.74 97.26 100
3/4'' 19.00 0 92 2.74 97.26
1/2'' 12.50 0 92 2.74 97.26
3/8'' 10.00 1018.2 1110.2 33.08 66.92 50 to 85
#4 4.75 0 1110.2 33.08 66.92
#4
#8 2.360 0 1110.2 33.08 66.92
# 10 2.000 1068.1 2178.3 64.91 35.09 25 to 50
# 16 1.180 0 2178.3 64.91 35.09
# 30 0.600 0 2178.3 64.91 35.09
# 40 0.425 128 2306.3 68.72 31.28 25 to 45
# 50 0.300 0 2306.3 68.72 31.28
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 2306.3 68.72 31.28
# 200 0.075 316.3 2622.6 78.15 21.85 5 to 15
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
Grade C
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

119
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. C2 D1 I5
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12957.8 13259.6 13506.9
Wt of Mould g 8412.5 8460.2 8221
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4545.3 4799.4 5285.9
Volume of Mould cc 2114.8 2105.5 2165
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.149 2.279 2.442
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 9.18 9.15 9.18

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.968 2.088 2.236

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A12 A22 A20 A74 A211 A410

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 421.50 388.40 362.90 374.30 324.50 350.70

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 388.80 358.80 335.50 346.00 300.50 323.90

Wt of Moisture g 32.70 29.60 27.40 28.30 24.00 26.80

Wt of can g 32.52 36.70 37.40 35.20 38.40 32.40

Wt of dry materials g 356.28 322.10 298.10 310.80 262.10 291.50

Moisture content % 9.18 9.19 9.19 9.11 9.16 9.19

Average Moisture Content % 9.18 9.15 9.18

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

120
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S09 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.228 OMC(%): 9.1
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.62 0 1.21 0 0.35 0
16/03/13 0.66 0.03 1.22 0.01 0.35 0.00
17/03/13 0.67 0.04 1.22 0.01 0.35 0.00
18/03/13 0.67 0.04 1.22 0.01 0.35 0.00
19/03/13 Ended 0.67 0.04 1.22 0.01 0.35 0.00

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 42 0.9744 5.135 143 3.3176 17.483 178 4.1296 21.762
0.050 1.27 68 1.5776 8.314 200 4.6400 24.452 250 5.8000 30.565
0.075 1.91 99 2.2968 12.104 290 6.7280 35.455 389 9.0248 47.559
0.100 2.54 146 3.3872 17.850 370 8.5840 45.236 500 11.6000 61.130
0.150 3.81 190 4.4080 23.229 459 10.6488 56.117 620 14.3840 75.801
0.200 5.08 250 5.8000 30.565 576 13.3632 70.422 743 17.2376 90.839
0.250 6.35 320 7.4240 39.123 685 15.8920 83.748 860 19.9520 105.143
0.300 7.62 397 9.2104 48.537 800 18.5600 97.808 985 22.8520 120.426
0.350 8.89 475 11.0200 58.073 890 20.6480 108.811 1085 25.1720 132.652
0.400 10.16 550 12.7600 67.243 970 22.5040 118.592 1170 27.1440 143.044

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

80 140 160
70 120 140
60 120
100
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

50 100
80
40 80
30 60
60
20 40
40
10 20
20
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

121
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 17.850 Stress at 2.54mm= 45.2361 Stress at 2.54 mm= 61.130
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 25.36 % CBR = 64.27 % CBR = 86.857 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 30.565 Stress at 5.08mm= 70.422 Stress at 5.08mm= 90.839
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 29.11 % CBR = 67.07 % CBR = 86.51 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.968 2.088 2.236

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 29.11 67.07 86.51

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.005 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.117 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

85.0

CBR = 73.00%
75.0
Soaked CBR (%)

65.0
95% of MDD=
55.0

45.0

35.0

25.0
1.960 2.010 2.060 2.110 2.160 2.210
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

122
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13

Sample Descriptions: Sub Base

Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13

Sample No.01, Date: 26/02/2013, Lab No. 840, Test Date: 16/03/2013 Pit: 1
Test Method: AASHTO T96. Depth : 0
Grading used:__D__, No. of steel ball used: ___8____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5000.50

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 3503.70

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 29.93
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 29.93

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

123
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13
Soaking started on: 03/15/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/19/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.228 g/cc OMC(%): 9.1 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 50.13 75.80 71.22 72.19
30 91.69 152.21 130.29 144.97
65 130.82 205.40 185.87 195.62

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
162 95 9.13
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

124
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. D1 D2 L2
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12886.5 13469.1 13616.4
Wt of Mould g 8622.7 8747.5 8612.3
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4263.8 4721.6 5004.1
Volume of Mould cc 2008 2085 2048
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.123 2.265 2.443
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 9.14 9.13 9.12

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.946 2.075 2.239

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. C12 A4 A41 T55 A15 A4
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 284.50 366.40 325.60 374.50 371.50 382.40
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 263.20 338.40 301.00 346.40 343.50 353.50
Wt of Moisture g 21.30 28.00 24.60 28.10 28.00 28.90
Wt of can g 29.62 32.70 31.80 38.60 36.10 36.90
Wt of dry materials g 233.58 305.70 269.20 307.80 307.40 316.60
Moisture content % 9.12 9.16 9.14 9.13 9.11 9.13
Average Moisture Content % 9.14 9.13 9.12

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

125
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.228 OMC(%): 9.1
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.52 0 0.38 0 0.11 0
16/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
17/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
18/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
19/03/13 Ended 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 140 3.2480 17.116 210 4.8720 25.675 430 9.9760 52.572
0.050 1.27 220 5.1040 26.897 390 9.0480 47.681 650 15.0800 79.469
0.075 1.91 300 6.9600 36.678 549 12.7368 67.121 820 19.0240 100.253
0.100 2.54 410 9.5120 50.127 750 17.4000 91.695 1070 24.8240 130.818
0.150 3.81 510 11.8320 62.352 1045 24.2440 127.761 1352 31.3664 165.295
0.200 5.08 620 14.3840 75.801 1245 28.8840 152.213 1680 38.9760 205.396
0.250 6.35 745 17.2840 91.084 1480 34.3360 180.945 1855 43.0360 226.792
0.300 7.62 870 20.1840 106.366 1720 39.9040 210.287 2015 46.7480 246.354
0.350 8.89 980 22.7360 119.815 1915 44.4280 234.128 2240 51.9680 273.862
0.400 10.16 1100 25.5200 134.486 2140 49.6480 261.636 2460 57.0720 300.759

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

160 300 350
140 300
250
120
250
Stress in kg/cm2

200
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

100
200
80 150
60 150
100
40 100
20 50
50
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

126
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 50.127 Stress at 2.54mm= 91.6949 Stress at 2.54 mm= 130.818
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 71.22 % CBR = 130.29 % CBR = 185.874 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 75.801 Stress at 5.08mm= 152.213 Stress at 5.08mm= 205.396
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 72.19 % CBR = 144.97 % CBR = 195.62 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.946 2.075 2.239

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 72.19 144.97 195.62

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.005 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.117 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

210.0
200.0
190.0 CBR = 162.00%
180.0
170.0
160.0
Soaked CBR (%)

150.0
95% of MDD=
140.0
130.0
120.0
110.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
1.940 1.990 2.040 2.090 2.140 2.190 2.240
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

127
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.228 g/cc OMC(%): 9.1 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 75.80 104.53 107.70 99.55
30 143.66 215.18 204.11 204.93
65 195.62 270.19 277.94 257.33

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
225 95 9.16
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

128
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. B2 B3 A3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 13078.4 12978.4 13755.3
Wt of Mould g 8554.7 8212.2 8599.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4523.7 4766.2 5155.9
Volume of Mould cc 2108.22 2096.2 2115
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.146 2.274 2.438
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 9.17 9.17 9.13

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.966 2.083 2.234

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. C33 A13 B22 A47 A11 A23
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 299.60 314.80 384.50 380.50 378.60 364.20
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 277.50 291.20 355.30 351.20 350.20 336.90
Wt of Moisture g 22.10 23.60 29.20 29.30 28.40 27.30
Wt of can g 36.45 33.70 37.60 30.90 38.70 38.50
Wt of dry materials g 241.05 257.50 317.70 320.30 311.50 298.40
Moisture content % 9.17 9.17 9.19 9.15 9.12 9.15
Average Moisture Content % 9.17 9.17 9.13

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

129
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-840 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.228 OMC(%): 9.1
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.52 0 0.38 0 0.11 0
16/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
17/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
18/03/13 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02
19/03/13 Ended 0.55 0.03 0.40 0.02 0.13 0.02

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 250 5.8000 30.565 550 12.7600 67.243 840 19.4880 102.698
0.050 1.27 330 7.6560 40.346 740 17.1680 90.472 1080 25.0560 132.041
0.075 1.91 475 11.0200 58.073 945 21.9240 115.536 1340 31.0880 163.828
0.100 2.54 620 14.3840 75.801 1175 27.2600 143.655 1600 37.1200 195.616
0.150 3.81 785 18.2120 95.974 1420 32.9440 173.609 1960 45.4720 239.629
0.200 5.08 855 19.8360 104.532 1760 40.8320 215.177 2210 51.2720 270.194
0.250 6.35 990 22.9680 121.037 1925 44.6600 235.350 2460 57.0720 300.759
0.300 7.62 1120 25.9840 136.931 2120 49.1840 259.191 2710 62.8720 331.324
0.350 8.89 1270 29.4640 155.270 2345 54.4040 286.699 2930 67.9760 358.221
0.400 10.16 1450 33.6400 177.277 2570 59.6240 314.208 3120 72.3840 381.451

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

200 350 450
180 400
300
160 350
140 250
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

300
Stress in kg/cm2

120
200 250
100
80 150 200
60 150
100
40 100
20 50
50
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

130
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 75.801 Stress at 2.54mm= 143.655 Stress at 2.54 mm= 195.616
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 107.70 % CBR = 204.11 % CBR = 277.942 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 104.532 Stress at 5.08mm= 215.177 Stress at 5.08mm= 270.194
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 99.55 % CBR = 204.93 % CBR = 257.33 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.966 2.083 2.234

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 99.55 204.93 257.33

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.005 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.117 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

260.0
250.0
240.0
230.0
220.0
210.0 CBR = 225.00%
200.0
Soaked CBR (%)

190.0
180.0 95% of MDD=
170.0
160.0
150.0
140.0
130.0
120.0
110.0
100.0
90.0
1.960 2.010 2.060 2.110 2.160 2.210
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

131
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13
Soaking started on: 03/15/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/19/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.230 g/cc OMC(%): 7.9 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 14.67 26.90 20.85 25.62
30 39.73 59.91 56.46 57.05
65 58.20 88.39 82.69 84.18

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
69 95 7.94
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

132
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Borrow Pit:
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7752.6 8002.0 8106.7 7822.9
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6 3043.6
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4709.0 4958.4 5063.1 4779.3
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.238 2.357 2.407 2.272
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.141 2.203 2.223 2.051
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A03 A23 A79 A47
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 355.80 394.60 391.60 383.30
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 341.70 371.40 364.40 349.10
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 14.10 23.20 27.20 34.20
m3 Weight of can g 32.80 38.50 35.80 30.90
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 308.90 332.90 328.60 318.20
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 4.56 6.97 8.28 10.75

Moisture Density Relationship

2.260
2.240
2.220
2.200
Dry Density, g/cc

2.180
2.160
2.140 MDD = 2.230 g/cc
2.120
OMC = 7.90 %
2.100
2.080
2.060
2.040
4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

133
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth : 1 to 2.0m

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 23 33 45
Unit Tin No. 82 125 194 157 126 28
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 76.86 76.60 76.44 76.32 44.80 43.87
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 63.34 63.75 64.10 64.48 41.16 40.24
W3 Weight of can g 14.58 14.46 14.66 14.60 14.00 14.28
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 13.52 12.85 12.34 11.84 3.64 3.63
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 48.76 49.29 49.44 49.88 27.16 25.96
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 27.73 26.07 24.96 23.74 13.40 13.98
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 25.80 13.69
PI Plastic Index % 12.11

Atterburg Limit

30
28.5
28.0
29
27.5
28
27.0
Moisture content %

27
26.5
26
26.0
25
25.5
24
25.0
23
24.5
22
24.0
21
23.5
20
23.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

134
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Date Test Start : 14/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-6 Depth : 1 to 2.0m

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3428.2 g Weight of Can: 170 g

Weight of dry soil: 3258.2 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 10 10 0.31 99.69
3/4'' 19.00 0 10 0.31 99.69
1/2'' 12.50 0 10 0.31 99.69
3/8'' 10.00 1008.4 1018.4 31.26 68.74
#4 4.75 0 1018.4 31.26 68.74
#4
#8 2.360 0 1018.4 31.26 68.74
# 10 2.000 1105.4 2123.8 65.18 34.82
# 16 1.180 0 2123.8 65.18 34.82
# 30 0.600 0 2123.8 65.18 34.82
# 40 0.425 226.9 2350.7 72.15 27.85
# 50 0.300 0 2350.7 72.15 27.85
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 2350.7 72.15 27.85
# 200 0.075 217.3 2568 78.82 21.18
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
Grade C
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

135
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. C2 A12 T3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 13244.4 13444.4 13856.9
Wt of Mould g 8599.8 8617.2 8814.9
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4644.6 4827.2 5042
Volume of Mould cc 2212.3 2169.48 2079
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.099 2.225 2.425
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 7.97 7.93 7.92

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.944 2.062 2.247

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A21 A24 T55 A41 P90 A15

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 286.30 277.50 363.40 338.70 333.40 370.50

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 268.00 259.40 339.50 316.20 311.80 346.00

Wt of Moisture g 18.30 18.10 23.90 22.50 21.60 24.50

Wt of can g 37.90 32.80 38.60 31.80 39.90 36.10

Wt of dry materials g 230.10 226.60 300.90 284.40 271.90 309.90

Moisture content % 7.95 7.99 7.94 7.91 7.94 7.91

Average Moisture Content % 7.97 7.93 7.92

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

136
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.230 OMC(%): 7.9
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.63 0 0.65 0 0.40 0
16/03/13 0.66 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.43 0.03
17/03/13 0.66 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.43 0.03
18/03/13 0.66 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.43 0.03
19/03/13 Ended 0.66 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.43 0.03

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 35 0.8120 4.279 90 2.0880 11.003 175 4.0600 21.395
0.050 1.27 62 1.4384 7.580 185 4.2920 22.618 290 6.7280 35.455
0.075 1.91 85 1.9720 10.392 250 5.8000 30.565 384 8.9088 46.948
0.100 2.54 120 2.7840 14.671 325 7.5400 39.734 476 11.0432 58.196
0.150 3.81 175 4.0600 21.395 400 9.2800 48.904 580 13.4560 70.911
0.200 5.08 220 5.1040 26.897 490 11.3680 59.907 723 16.7736 88.394
0.250 6.35 278 6.4496 33.988 566 13.1312 69.199 850 19.7200 103.921
0.300 7.62 310 7.1920 37.901 670 15.5440 81.914 975 22.6200 119.203
0.350 8.89 365 8.4680 44.625 780 18.0960 95.363 1055 24.4760 128.984
0.400 10.16 400 9.2800 48.904 860 19.9520 105.143 1125 26.1000 137.542

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

60 120 160

140
50 100
120
Stress in kg/cm2

40 80
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

100
30 60 80

20 40 60

40
10
20
20
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

137
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 14.671 Stress at 2.54mm= 39.7344 Stress at 2.54 mm= 58.196
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 20.85 % CBR = 56.46 % CBR = 82.688 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 26.897 Stress at 5.08mm= 59.907 Stress at 5.08mm= 88.394
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 25.62 % CBR = 57.05 % CBR = 84.18 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.944 2.062 2.247

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 25.62 57.05 84.18

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.007 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.119 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

90.0

80.0
CBR = 69.00%
70.0
Soaked CBR (%)

60.0 of MDD 95%

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0
1.940 1.990 2.040 2.090 2.140 2.190 2.240
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

138
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13

Sample Descriptions: Sub Base

Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13

Sample No.01, Date: 26/02/2013, Lab No. 841, Test Date: 16/03/2013 Pit: 1
Test Method: AASHTO T96. Depth : 0
Grading used:__D__, No. of steel ball used: ___8____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5001.80

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 3480.50

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 30.42
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 30.42

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

139
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13
Soaking started on: 03/15/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/19/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.230 g/cc OMC(%): 7.9 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 50.74 74.58 72.09 71.03
30 103.31 157.10 146.79 149.62
65 134.49 198.67 191.09 189.21

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
166 95 7.94
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

140
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. D1 V11 L1
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12862.9 12574.8 13875.5
Wt of Mould g 8162.5 7970.4 8814.7
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4700.4 4604.4 5060.8
Volume of Mould cc 2217.24 2049.9 2100
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.120 2.246 2.410
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 7.97 7.95 7.91

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.963 2.081 2.233

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A72 A05 A78 A7 A79 A4
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 362.50 320.80 448.60 363.20 304.50 307.20
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 338.20 299.70 418.10 339.10 284.80 287.40
Wt of Moisture g 24.30 21.10 30.50 24.10 19.70 19.80
Wt of can g 33.80 34.78 34.90 35.60 35.80 36.90
Wt of dry materials g 304.40 264.92 383.20 303.50 249.00 250.50
Moisture content % 7.98 7.96 7.96 7.94 7.91 7.90
Average Moisture Content % 7.97 7.95 7.91

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

141
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.230 OMC(%): 7.9
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.12 0 0.34 0 0.20 0
16/03/13 0.15 0.03 0.36 0.02 0.22 0.02
17/03/13 0.15 0.03 0.36 0.02 0.23 0.03
18/03/13 0.15 0.03 0.36 0.02 0.23 0.03
19/03/13 Ended 0.15 0.03 0.36 0.02 0.23 0.03

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 130 3.0160 15.894 200 4.6400 24.452 430 9.9760 52.572
0.050 1.27 224 5.1968 27.386 410 9.5120 50.127 650 15.0800 79.469
0.075 1.91 310 7.1920 37.901 620 14.3840 75.801 820 19.0240 100.253
0.100 2.54 415 9.6280 50.738 845 19.6040 103.310 1100 25.5200 134.486
0.150 3.81 520 12.0640 63.575 1045 24.2440 127.761 1355 31.4360 165.662
0.200 5.08 610 14.1520 74.578 1285 29.8120 157.104 1625 37.7000 198.672
0.250 6.35 730 16.9360 89.250 1489 34.5448 182.045 1875 43.5000 229.237
0.300 7.62 850 19.7200 103.921 1650 38.2800 201.729 2080 48.2560 254.300
0.350 8.89 957 22.2024 117.003 1920 44.5440 234.739 2240 51.9680 273.862
0.400 10.16 1022 23.7104 124.950 2100 48.7200 256.746 2470 57.3040 301.982

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

140 300 350

120 250 300

100 250
Stress in kg/cm2

200
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

80 200
150
60
150
40 100
100
20 50
50
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

142
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 50.738 Stress at 2.54mm= 103.31 Stress at 2.54 mm= 134.486
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 72.09 % CBR = 146.79 % CBR = 191.085 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 74.578 Stress at 5.08mm= 157.104 Stress at 5.08mm= 198.672
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 71.03 % CBR = 149.62 % CBR = 189.21 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.963 2.081 2.233

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 71.03 149.62 189.21

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.007 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.119 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

190.0

180.0
CBR = 166.00%
170.0

160.0

150.0
Soaked CBR (%)

140.0 of MDD 95%

130.0

120.0

110.0

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0
1.960 2.010 2.060 2.110 2.160 2.210
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

143
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 02/26/13 Date Test Start : 03/14/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13
Soaking started on: 03/15/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/19/13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
MDD(g/cc): 2.230 g/cc OMC(%): 7.9 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 77.02 111.26 109.44 105.96
30 141.82 213.34 201.51 203.18
65 186.45 260.41 264.91 248.01

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
215 95 7.91
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

144
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%) Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. S1 V2 L3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12431.5 12976.5 14035.5
Wt of Mould g 7695.5 7906.8 8843.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4736 5069.7 5192.1
Volume of Mould cc 2246.5 2246.6 2141
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.108 2.257 2.425
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 7.86 7.94 7.94

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.955 2.091 2.247

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A14 A05 A11 A37 A48 A33

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 325.60 366.80 376.70 326.20 343.20 317.20

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 304.00 342.80 351.90 304.50 320.20 297.00

Wt of Moisture g 21.60 24.00 24.80 21.70 23.00 20.20

Wt of can g 31.52 34.80 39.60 31.10 31.50 41.80

Wt of dry materials g 272.48 308.00 312.30 273.40 288.70 255.20

Moisture content % 7.93 7.79 7.94 7.94 7.97 7.92

Average Moisture Content % 7.86 7.94 7.94

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

145
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No. 13
Lab No: LB-841 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 26/02/13 Date Test Start : 15/03/13
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%) Pit: 0
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 Depth : 1 to 2.0m
Soaking started on: 15/03/13 CBR Testing Date: 19/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.230 OMC(%): 7.9
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
15/03/13 Start 0.85 0 1.52 0 0.45 0
16/03/13 0.86 0.01 1.55 0.03 0.48 0.03
17/03/13 0.86 0.01 1.55 0.03 0.48 0.03
18/03/13 0.86 0.01 1.55 0.03 0.48 0.03
19/03/13 Ended 0.86 0.01 1.55 0.03 0.48 0.03

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 250 5.8000 30.565 320 7.4240 39.123 650 15.0800 79.469
0.050 1.27 370 8.5840 45.236 550 12.7600 67.243 915 21.2280 111.868
0.075 1.91 500 11.6000 61.130 845 19.6040 103.310 1200 27.8400 146.712
0.100 2.54 630 14.6160 77.024 1160 26.9120 141.821 1525 35.3800 186.446
0.150 3.81 750 17.4000 91.695 1450 33.6400 177.277 1810 41.9920 221.290
0.200 5.08 910 21.1120 111.256 1745 40.4840 213.343 2130 49.4160 260.413
0.250 6.35 1020 23.6640 124.705 1980 45.9360 242.074 2345 54.4040 286.699
0.300 7.62 1150 26.6800 140.599 2230 51.7360 272.639 2580 59.8560 315.430
0.350 8.89 1275 29.5800 155.881 2570 59.6240 314.208 2790 64.7280 341.105
0.400 10.16 1400 32.4800 171.164 2885 66.9320 352.720 3010 69.8320 368.002

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

180 400 400
160 350 350
140 300 300
Stress in kg/cm2

120
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

250 250
100
200 200
80
60 150 150
40 100 100
20 50 50
0
0 5 10 15 0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

146
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 77.024 Stress at 2.54mm= 141.821 Stress at 2.54 mm= 186.446
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 109.44 % CBR = 201.51 % CBR = 264.914 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 111.256 Stress at 5.08mm= 213.343 Stress at 5.08mm= 260.413
No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 105.96 % CBR = 203.18 % CBR = 248.01 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.955 2.091 2.247

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 105.96 203.18 248.01

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.007 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.119 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

260.0
250.0
240.0
CBR = 215.00%
230.0
220.0
210.0
Soaked CBR (%)

200.0
of MDD 95%
190.0
180.0
170.0
160.0
150.0
140.0
130.0
120.0
110.0
100.0
1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200 2.250
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 19/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 20/03/2013 Signature:

147
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968)
Soaking started on: 28/2/2013 CBR Testing Date: 04/03/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.268 g/cc OMC(%): 6.5 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 8.24 19.39 11.71 18.47
30 62.96 88.03 89.46 83.84
65 64.19 140.60 91.20 133.90

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
95
96 98 6.54
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

148
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968)
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7764.8 7981.3 8162.8 8178.5
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4682.8 4899.3 5080.8 5096.5
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.226 2.329 2.415 2.423
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.173 2.231 2.267 2.227
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A03 A18 A47 A11
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 311.20 468.00 444.60 595.10
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 304.60 449.90 419.20 549.80
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 6.60 18.10 25.40 45.30
m3 Weight of can g 35.10 36.00 30.90 34.99
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 269.50 413.90 388.30 514.81
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 2.45 4.37 6.54 8.80

Moisture Density Relationship

2.280

2.260

2.240
Dry Density, g/cc

2.220 MDD = 2.268 g/cc

2.200 OMC = 6.50 %

2.180

2.160
2.30 3.30 4.30 5.30 6.30 7.30 8.30

Moisture content %

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

149
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968)
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 20 25 31
Unit Tin No. R1 T3 D4 D6 I37 C5
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 39.64 40.26 40.83 40.70 61.97 51.92
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 36.35 36.42 36.89 36.91 58.90 48.93
W3 Weight of can g 23.92 21.26 20.75 20.82 40.40 29.83
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 3.29 3.84 3.94 3.79 3.07 2.99
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 12.43 15.16 16.14 16.09 18.50 19.10
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 26.47 25.33 24.41 23.56 16.59 15.65
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 24.40 16.12
PI Plastic Index % 8.28

Atterburg Limit

30
27.0

29
26.5
28
26.0
Moisture content %

27
25.5
26

25
25.0

24
24.5
23
24.0
22
23.5
21

20
23.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

150
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Bratheat) Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification: A-2-4

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 4740.3 g Weight of Can: 715.2 g

Weight of dry soil: 4025.1
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 229.5 229.5 5.70 94.30 -
3/4'' 19.00 0 229.5 5.70 94.30
1/2'' 12.50 0 229.5 5.70 94.30
3/8'' 10.00 1820.2 2049.7 50.92 49.08 30 to 65
#4 4.75 0 2049.7 50.92 49.08
#4
#8 2.360 0 2049.7 50.92 49.08
# 10 2.000 1348.7 3398.4 84.43 15.57 15 to 40
# 16 1.180 0 3398.4 84.43 15.57
# 30 0.600 0 3398.4 84.43 15.57
# 40 0.425 347.1 3745.5 93.05 6.95 8 to 20
# 50 0.300 0 3745.5 93.05 6.95
# 80 0.180
# 100 0.150 0 3745.5 93.05 6.95
# 200 0.075 183.6 3929.1 97.61 2.39 2 to 8
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition
Gradecumulative
A retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90
100
(ii) Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
80
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70Percentage of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
(iv)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size
Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

151
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. P3 T2 I2
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11304.5 11328.2 13876.8
Wt of Mould g 6883 6345.6 8719.9
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4421.5 4982.6 5156.9
Volume of Mould g/cc 2059.43 2187 2118
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.147 2.278 2.435
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.56 6.50 6.55

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 2.015 2.139 2.285

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. C13 C9 C2 C3 C07 D3
Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 316.00 340.80 364.20 405.40 408.50 311.40
Wt of can +Dry Materials g 298.30 321.60 343.70 382.50 385.00 293.70
Wt of Moisture g 17.70 19.20 20.50 22.90 23.50 17.70
Wt of can g 28.90 28.35 28.48 29.70 28.85 21.84
Wt of dry materials g 269.40 293.25 315.22 352.80 356.15 271.86
Moisture content % 6.57 6.55 6.50 6.49 6.60 6.51
Average Moisture Content % 6.56 6.50 6.55

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

152
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 158+500 Turn Left to NR 73 Pk. 3+300 RHS Offset 100m (N=1312831, E=583968)
Soaking started on: 28/2/2013CBR Testing Date: 4/3/2013 MDD(g/cc): 2.268 OMC(%): 6.5
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
28/2/2013 Start 0.03 0 0.57 0 0.22 0
1/3/2013 0.09 0.05 0.59 0.02 0.26 0.03
2/3/2013 0.12 0.08 0.60 0.03 0.27 0.04
3/3/2013 0.13 0.09 0.61 0.03 0.28 0.05
4/3/2013 Ended 0.15 0.10 0.61 0.03 0.29 0.06
.
Proving Ring Reading and Stress
Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 11 0.5060 2.667 91 2.1112 11.126 120 2.7840 14.671
0.050 1.27 18 0.8280 4.363 278 6.4496 33.988 240 5.5680 29.342
0.075 1.91 27 1.2420 6.545 434 10.0688 53.061 395 9.1640 48.293
0.100 2.54 34 1.564 8.242 515 11.9480 62.964 525 12.1800 64.186
0.150 3.81 56 2.5760 13.575 620 14.3840 75.801 822 19.0704 100.498
0.200 5.08 80 3.6800 19.393 720 16.7040 88.027 1150 26.6800 140.599
0.250 6.35 104 4.7840 25.211 819 19.0008 100.131 1478 34.2896 180.700
0.300 7.62 128 5.8880 31.029 920 21.3440 112.479 1805 41.8760 220.679
0.350 8.89 152 6.9920 36.847 1018 23.6176 124.460 2134 49.5088 260.902
0.400 10.16 178 8.1880 43.149 1121 26.0072 137.053 2463 57.1416 301.126

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

50 160 350
45 140 300
40
120
250
Stress in kg/cm2

35
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

100
30 200
25 80
150
20 60
15 100
40
10 50
20
5
0 0
0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

153
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 8.242 Stress at 2.54mm= 62.9638 Stress at 2.54 mm= 64.186
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 11.71 % CBR = 89.46 % CBR = 91.200 %
corrected load / stress of
Stress at 5.08mm= 19.393 Stress at 5.08mm= 88.027 Stress at 5.08mm= 140.599
Form No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 18.47 % CBR = 83.84 % CBR = 133.90 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 2.015 2.139 2.285

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 18.47 83.84 133.90

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.041 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.155 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.223 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

140

130

120

110

100 CBR = 92.00%

Soaked CBR (%)

90

80 of MDD 98%
70

60

50

40

30

20

10
2.010 2.060 2.110 2.160 2.210 2.260
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

154
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course (Bratheat)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__A__, No. of steel ball used: ___12____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.60

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4303.60

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 13.99
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 13.99

Remarks:

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

155
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Sample Descriptions: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100 8.29 100 96.3 3.7 3.7 0.31

1.18 0.600 100 10.39 100 97.1 2.9 2.9 0.30

2.36 1.18 100 4.58 100 97.4 2.6 2.6 0.12

4.75 2.36 100 27.49 100 96.7 3.3 3.3 0.91

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 49.25 303.1 297.4 5.7 1.9 0.93

Totals = 100 703.1

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 28.49 303.1 297.4 5.7 1.9 0.54

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 14.65 331.5 328.6 2.9 0.9 0.13

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 32.52 667.1 660.10 7 1.0 0.34

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50 24.34 1530.5 1514.2 16.3 1.1 0.26

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 2832.2 3.82

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

156
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course (Bratheat)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013
Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 3416.20 2975.10 3315.20 3235.50
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 3316.20 2875.10 3215.20 3135.50
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 3327.20 2890.60 3226.80 3148.20
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 2033.40 1767.60 1970.50 1923.83
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.561 2.558 2.557 2.559
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.570 2.572 2.566 2.569
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.583 2.594 2.581 2.586

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.332 0.539 0.361 0.411

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 04/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 05/03/2013 Signature:

157
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Sre Siem)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)
Soaking started on: 26/2/2013 CBR Testing Date: 03/02/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.208 g/cc OMC(%): 5.9 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 13.33 24.24 18.94 23.09
30 55.99 85.34 79.56 81.27
65 79.71 101.96 113.26 97.11

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
80 95 5.92
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

158
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Sre Siem)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm

Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7659.9 7959.1 8024.9 7910.0
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4577.9 4877.1 4942.9 4828.0
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.176 2.318 2.350 2.295
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.107 2.202 2.184 2.099
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. I31 I37 I38 I40
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 266.40 453.00 470.40 497.40
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 259.10 432.30 439.90 458.00
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 7.30 20.70 30.50 39.40
m3 Weight of can g 35.60 40.40 37.60 35.80
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 223.50 391.90 402.30 422.20
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.27 5.28 7.58 9.33

Moisture Density Relationship

2.240

2.220

2.200
Dry Density, g/cc

2.180

2.160 MDD = 2.208 g/cc

2.140
OMC = 5.90 %
2.120

2.100

2.080
3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Moisture content %

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

159
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Sre Siem)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows 15 20 25 30
Unit Tin No. I8 I25 I29 I26 I16 I4
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g 47.07 47.36 46.74 48.35 48.47 49.21
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g 43.65 43.94 43.50 45.01 45.95 46.35
W3 Weight of can g 29.58 29.26 29.10 29.71 30.76 28.68
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g 3.42 3.42 3.24 3.34 2.52 2.86
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g 14.07 14.68 14.40 15.30 15.19 17.67
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) % 24.31 23.30 22.50 21.83 16.59 16.19
LL Liquit limit (from graph) % 22.50 16.39
PI Plastic Index % 6.11

Atterburg Limit

30
25.0

29
24.5
28
24.0
Moisture content %

27
23.5
26

25
23.0

24
22.5
23
22.0
22
21.5
21

20
21.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

160
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Sre Siem) Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Soil Classification : A-2-4

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 4403.6 g Weight of Can 495.8 g

Weight of dry soil: 3907.8 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 489.5 489.5 12.53 87.47 -
3/4'' 19.00 0 489.5 12.53 87.47
1/2'' 12.50 0 489.5 12.53 87.47
3/8'' 10.00 1906.9 2396.4 61.32 38.68 30 to 65
#4 4.75 0 2396.4 61.32 38.68
#4
#8 2.360 0 2396.4 61.32 38.68
# 10 2.000 921.2 3317.6 84.90 15.10 15 to 40
# 16 1.180 0 3317.6 84.90 15.10
# 30 0.600 0 3317.6 84.90 15.10
# 40 0.425 232.9 3550.5 90.86 9.14 8 to 20
# 50 0.300 0 3550.5 90.86 9.14
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3550.5 90.86 9.14
# 200 0.075 143.5 3694 94.53 5.47 2 to 8
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
Grade A
= 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
100
(ii)100
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
90
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
80
(iv) Percentage
70 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

161
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Sre Siem)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. T1 H5 L3
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11213 13444 13866.8
Wt of Mould g 6905.2 8438.1 8843.4
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4307.8 5005.9 5023.4
Volume of Mould cc 2056.4 2247 2141
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.095 2.228 2.346
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 5.94 5.90 5.91

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.977 2.104 2.215

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A29 A11 A2 A20 A10 A23

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 547.10 479.20 395.20 442.60 455.40 461.70

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 518.60 454.50 375.30 420.00 432.00 438.00

Wt of Moisture g 28.50 24.70 19.90 22.60 23.40 23.70

Wt of can g 40.70 37.60 38.40 37.10 34.99 38.50

Wt of dry materials g 477.90 416.90 336.90 382.90 397.01 399.50

Moisture content % 5.96 5.92 5.91 5.90 5.89 5.93

Average Moisture Content % 5.94 5.90 5.91

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

162
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description Base Course (Sre Siem)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)
Soaking started on: 26/2/2013CBR Testing Date: 02/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.208 OMC(%): 5.9
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
26/02/13 Start 6.02 0 1.02 0 3.41 0
27/02/13 6.09 0.06 1.07 0.04 3.42 0.01
28/02/13 6.10 0.07 1.08 0.05 3.44 0.03
01/03/13 6.12 0.09 1.08 0.05 3.44 0.03
02/03/13 Ended 6.13 0.09 1.09 0.06 3.44 0.03
.
Proving Ring Reading and Stress
Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 17 0.7820 4.121 145 3.3640 17.728 350 8.1200 42.791
0.050 1.27 30 1.3800 7.272 248 5.7536 30.320 470 10.9040 57.462
0.075 1.91 42 1.9320 10.181 318 7.3776 38.879 561 13.0152 68.588
0.100 2.54 55 2.530 13.333 458 10.6256 55.995 652 15.1264 79.713
0.150 3.81 80 3.6800 19.393 568 13.1776 69.444 745 17.2840 91.084
0.200 5.08 100 4.6000 24.241 698 16.1936 85.337 834 19.3488 101.965
0.250 6.35 120 5.5200 29.089 776 18.0032 94.874 925 21.4600 113.090
0.300 7.62 140 6.4400 33.938 869 20.1608 106.244 1016 23.5712 124.216
0.350 8.89 160 7.3600 38.786 960 22.2720 117.369 1107 25.6824 135.342
0.400 10.16 180 8.2800 43.634 1052 24.4064 128.617 1198 27.7936 146.467

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

50 140 160
45 140
120
40
Stress in kg/cm2

120
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

35 100
30 100
80
25 80
60
20 60
15 40 40
10
20 20
5
0 0 0
0 20 0 20 0 20

Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

163
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 13.333 Stress at 2.54mm= 55.995 Stress at 2.54 mm= 79.713
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm
2

CBR Caculations from CBR = 18.94 % CBR = 79.56 % CBR = 113.261 %

corrected load / stress of
Stress at 5.08mm= 24.241 Stress at 5.08mm= 85.337 Stress at 5.08mm= 101.965
Form No. 9A graphs
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 23.09 % CBR = 81.27 % CBR = 97.11 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.977 2.104 2.215

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 23.09 81.27 97.11

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.987 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.098 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

100

90 % CBR = 80.00

80
Soaked CBR (%)

70

60 of MDD 95%

50

40

30

20
1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

164
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Sub-Consultant: Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course from NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 26/2/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__A__, No. of steel ball used: ___12____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.20

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4255.20

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 14.95
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 14.95

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

165
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course from NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 26/2/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100 8.31 100 96.78 3.22 3.2 0.27

1.18 0.600 100 9.72 100 98.1 1.9 1.9 0.18

2.36 1.18 100 4.03 100 95.6 4.4 4.4 0.18

4.75 2.36 100 25.36 100 98.2 1.8 1.8 0.46

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 52.58 300.4 295.4 5 1.7 0.88

Totals = 100 700.4

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 19.87 300.4 295.4 5 1.7 0.33

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 10.16 332.5 328.6 3.9 1.2 0.12

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 26.39 676.2 665.40 10.8 1.6 0.42

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50 43.67 1536.8 1526.9 9.9 0.6 0.28

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100.09 2845.9 3.11

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

166
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Sample Descriptions: Base Course from NR 7 Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.3Km (N=1319525, E=559007)
Sample No.01, Date: 24/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 26/2/2013
Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 3369.40 3564.70 3105.80 3346.63
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 3269.40 3464.70 3005.80 3246.63
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 3281.80 3478.90 3018.60 3259.77
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 2003.60 2126.50 1842.60 1990.90
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.556 2.560 2.554 2.557
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.565 2.570 2.565 2.567
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.581 2.587 2.582 2.583

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.379 0.410 0.426 0.405

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

167
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.13
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

Soaking started on: 02-27-13 CBR Testing Date: 03-03-13 Depth :

MDD(g/cc): 2.220 g/cc OMC(%): 6.6 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 29.59 52.33 42.04 49.84
30 39.12 75.80 55.59 72.19
65 64.19 105.14 91.20 100.14

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
95
94 98 6.63
100

Remarks:

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

168
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course Depth :
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm
Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7288.1 7528.9 7581.0 7392.5
W2 Wt.of Mould g 2599.0 2599.0 2599.0 2599.0
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4689.1 4929.9 4982.0 4793.5
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2118.0 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.214 2.343 2.368 2.279
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.129 2.211 2.208 2.073
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A37 A18 A38 A10
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 469.40 550.70 623.50 548.10
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 452.60 521.70 583.50 501.90
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 16.80 29.00 40.00 46.20
m3 Weight of can g 31.10 36.50 30.50 35.50
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 421.50 485.20 553.00 466.40
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.99 5.98 7.23 9.91

Moisture Density Relationship

2.270

2.250

2.230

2.210
Dry Density, g/cc

2.190

2.170

2.150 MDD = 2.220 g/cc

2.130
OMC = 6.60 %
2.110

2.090

2.070

2.050
3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Moisture content %

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

169
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 27/02/13
Sample Description: Base Course Depth :
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. T20 T2 D6
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 11280.4 11077.6 13737.3
Wt of Mould g 6906.6 6347.6 8681.8
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4373.8 4730 5055.5
Volume of Mould cc 2141.21 2187.2 2125
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.043 2.163 2.379
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 6.59 6.65 6.64

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.916 2.028 2.231

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. A70 A77 A29 A11 A78 A4

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 492.00 468.30 434.60 448.80 403.90 377.40

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 463.80 441.50 410.00 423.20 381.00 356.10

Wt of Moisture g 28.20 26.80 24.60 25.60 22.90 21.30

Wt of can g 35.60 35.70 39.30 38.70 34.90 36.90

Wt of dry materials g 428.20 405.80 370.70 384.50 346.10 319.20

Moisture content % 6.59 6.60 6.64 6.66 6.62 6.67

Average Moisture Content % 6.59 6.65 6.64

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

170
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).

Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 27/02/13
Sample Description Base Course Depth :
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)
Soaking started on: 27/02/13 CBR Testing Date: 03/03/13 MDD(g/cc): 2.220 OMC(%): 6.6
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
27/02/13 Start 0.05 0 0.10 0 1.11 0
28/02/13 0.10 0.04 0.12 0.02 1.18 0.06
01/03/13 0.10 0.04 0.13 0.03 1.18 0.06
02/03/13 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.03 1.19 0.07
03/03/13 Ended 0.20 0.13 0.15 0.04 1.20 0.08

Proving Ring Reading and Stress

Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 70 1.6240 8.558 80 1.8560 9.781 160 3.7120 19.562
0.050 1.27 128 2.9696 15.649 140 3.2480 17.116 280 6.4960 34.233
0.075 1.91 190 4.4080 23.229 230 5.3360 28.120 390 9.0480 47.681
0.100 2.54 242 5.6144 29.587 320 7.4240 39.123 525 12.1800 64.186
0.150 3.81 335 7.7720 40.957 490 11.3680 59.907 740 17.1680 90.472
0.200 5.08 428 9.9296 52.327 620 14.3840 75.801 860 19.9520 105.143
0.250 6.35 497 11.5304 60.763 834 19.3488 101.965 1050 24.3600 128.373
0.300 7.62 566 13.1312 69.199 991 22.9912 121.159 1225 28.4200 149.768
0.350 8.89 636 14.7552 77.757 1148 26.6336 140.354 1460 33.8720 178.499
0.400 10.16 704 16.3328 86.071 1246 28.9072 152.336 1550 35.9600 189.503

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

100 160 200

90 180
140
80 160
Stress in kg/cm2

120
Stress in kg/cm2

Stress in kg/cm2

70 140
60 100 120
50 80 100
40 60 80
30 60
40
20 40
10 20
20
0 0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20 0 10 20
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

171
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

CBR Test (AASHTO T193)

CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Stress at 2.54mm= 29.587 Stress at 2.54mm= 39.1231 Stress at 2.54 mm= 64.186
2
kg/cm2 kg/cm kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 42.04 % CBR = 55.59 % CBR = 91.200 %
corrected load / stress of
Stress at 5.08mm= 52.327 Stress at 5.08mm= 75.801 Stress at 5.08mm= 105.143
Form No. 9A graphs
2
kg/cm kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 49.84 % CBR = 72.19 % CBR = 100.14 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.916 2.028 2.231

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 49.84 72.19 100.14

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.998 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.109 g/cc
Plotting value for 98% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.176 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

110.0

100.0

90.0 CBR = 94.00%

Soaked CBR (%)

80.0

of MDD 98%
70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0
1.910 1.960 2.010 2.060 2.110 2.160 2.210
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

172
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90 Depth : 0

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows
Unit Tin No.
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g
W3 Weight of can g
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) %
LL Liquit limit (from graph) %
PI Plastic Index %

Atterburg Limit

30
58.0

29
57.0
28
Moisture content %

56.0
27

26
55.0
25
54.0
24

23
53.0
22
52.0
21

20
51.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberof
ofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

173
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: 808 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88 Depth : 0

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3801.5 g Weight of Can 322.4 g

Weight of dry soil: 3479.1 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 371.3 371.3 10.67 89.33 -
3/4'' 19.00 0 371.3 10.67 89.33
1/2'' 12.50 0 371.3 10.67 89.33
3/8'' 10.00 1008.4 1379.7 39.66 60.34 30 to 65
#4 4.75 0 1379.7 39.66 60.34
#4
#8 2.360 0 1379.7 39.66 60.34
# 10 2.000 851.2 2230.9 64.12 35.88 15 to 40
# 16 1.180 0 2230.9 64.12 35.88
# 30 0.600 0 2230.9 64.12 35.88
# 40 0.425 654.4 2885.3 82.93 17.07 8 to 20
# 50 0.300 0 2885.3 82.93 17.07
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 2885.3 82.93 17.07
# 200 0.075 339 3224.3 92.68 7.32 2 to 8
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, additionGradecumulative
A retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90 100
(ii)
80 Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70
(iv) Percentage of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

174
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.:

Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013

Sample Description: Base Course Depth :

Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__A__, No. of steel ball used: ___12____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.80

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4086.70

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve

C % 18.33
= (A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 18.33

Remarks:

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

175
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013

Sample Description Base Course Depth :

Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100 8.31 100 96.78 3.22 3.2 0.27

1.18 0.600 100 9.72 100 98.1 1.9 1.9 0.18

2.36 1.18 100 4.03 100 95.6 4.4 4.4 0.18

4.75 2.36 100 25.36 100 98.2 1.8 1.8 0.46

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 52.58 300.4 295.4 5 1.7 0.88

Totals = 100 700.4

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 19.87 300.4 295.4 5 1.7 0.33

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 10.16 332.5 328.6 3.9 1.2 0.12

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 26.39 676.2 665.40 10.8 1.6 0.42

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50 43.67 1536.8 1526.9 9.9 0.6 0.28

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100.09 2845.9 3.11

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

176
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP).
Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.:
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Location: NR.1, Pk. 71+050 LHS Offset 4.0Km (E=540459,N=1242418)

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
0
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 3369.40 3564.70 3105.80 3346.63
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 3269.40 3464.70 3005.80 3246.63
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 3281.80 3478.90 3018.60 3259.77
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 2003.60 2126.50 1842.60 1990.90
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.556 2.560 2.554 2.557
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.565 2.570 2.565 2.567
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.581 2.587 2.582 2.583

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.379 0.410 0.426 0.405

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by: Chuon Sokcheak Date: 10/02/2012 ,Signature:

Checked by: Sea Sochivoan Date: 11/02/2012 ,Signature:

177
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CBR Penetration Test (AASHTO T-193): Result Summary

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled :24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 27/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)
Soaking started on: 27/2/2013 CBR Testing Date: 03/03/13
MDD(g/cc): 2.228 g/cc OMC(%): 7.7 %
DATA SHEET
CBR CALCULATIONS
No.of Blows per Corrected Unit Load(Kg/m2) CBR (%)
layer 2.54mm 5.08mm 2.54mm 5.08mm
10 23.03 39.76 32.72 37.86
30 69.69 95.97 99.02 91.40
65 92.31 124.70 131.15 118.77

CBR = Corrected Unit Load/Standard Unit Load * 100

Standard Unit Load at 2.54 mm penetration level = 70.36 Kg/cm2
Standard Unit Load at 5.08 mm penetration level = 105 Kg/cm2

CBR Reporting:
At % of Specified Dry
CBR (%) Moisture Content (MC) at Moulding (%)
Density(AASHTO T-193)
90
96 95 7.71
98
100

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

178
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship(AASHTO T-180) for CBR Test
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)
Weight of Rammer: 4.54 kg ,Free fall height = 457 mm with a flat circular face of dia: 50.8 mm
Determination of Density
Trial No. I II III IV V
W1 Wt.of wet compacted material+mould g 7816.2 7920.2 8118.8 8150.0
W2 Wt.of Mould g 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0 3082.0
W3 Wt.of wet compacted materials(W1-W2) g 4734.2 4838.2 5036.8 5068.0
Vm Volume of Mould(by filling water) cc 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8 2103.8
γwd Wet Density = W3 / Vm g/cc 2.250 2.300 2.394 2.409
γdd Dry Density = γwd / (1 + mc / 100) g/cc 2.172 2.179 2.227 2.197
Determination of Moisture Content :
Can Nos. A05 A18 C9 I39
m Wt.of weight matrial+ Can g 288.70 488.70 437.10 527.00
m1 Wt.of dry material + Can g 279.90 465.00 408.50 484.20
m2 Weight of water (m-m 1) g 8.80 23.70 28.60 42.80
m3 Weight of can g 34.80 35.56 28.35 40.60
md Weight of dry material(m 1-m 3) g 245.10 429.44 380.15 443.60
mc Moisture Content (m 2 /m d) x100 % 3.59 5.52 7.52 9.65

Moisture Density Relationship

2.240

2.220
Dry Density, g/cc

2.200
MDD = 2.228 g/cc

2.180
OMC = 7.70 %

2.160

2.140
3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Moisture content %

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

179
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Plasticity Index Test AASHTO T-89 and T-90
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)
Test Method : AASHTO T89 and T90

Data Sheet
Liquit Limit (LL)
Plstic Limit (PI)
Number of blows
Unit Tin No.
W1 Weight of can + Wet soil g
W2 Weight of can + Dry soil g
W3 Weight of can g
W4 Weight of water = (W1-W2) g
W5 Weight of dry soil = (W2-W3) g
W6 Moisture content =(W4/W5*100) %
LL Liquit limit (from graph) %
PI Plastic Index %

Atterburg Limit

30
27.0

29
26.5
28
26.0
Moisture content %

27
25.5
26

25
25.0

24
24.5
23
24.0
22
23.5
21

20
23.0
11 10
10 100

Number
Numberofofblows
blows(in
(inLL
LLDevice)
Device)

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

180
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung) Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 4363.9 g Weight of Can 151.8 g

Weight of dry soil: 4212.1 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 307.6 307.6 7.30 92.70 -
3/4'' 19.00 0 307.6 7.30 92.70
1/2'' 12.50 0 307.6 7.30 92.70
3/8'' 10.00 1988.3 2295.9 54.51 45.49 30 to 65
#4 4.75 0 2295.9 54.51 45.49
#4
#8 2.360 0 2295.9 54.51 45.49
# 10 2.000 973.2 3269.1 77.61 22.39 15 to 40
# 16 1.180 0 3269.1 77.61 22.39
# 30 0.600 0 3269.1 77.61 22.39
# 40 0.425 459.1 3728.2 88.51 11.49 8 to 20
# 50 0.300 0 3728.2 88.51 11.49
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3728.2 88.51 11.49
# 200 0.075 272.6 4000.8 94.98 5.02 2 to 8
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition
Gradecumulative
A retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90 100
(ii)80Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii)
70
Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
(iv) Percentage of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

181
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Moisture-Density Relationship for Different Blows in CBR Test(T-193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01Date Sampled : 24/2/2013Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

DETERMINATION OF DENSITY

No. of Blows per layer 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

Mould No. B3 A3 T4
Wt. of compacted wet materials +Mould g 12619.8 13364.9 13923.5
Wt of Mould g 8212.1 8739.6 8724
Wt of wet compacted materials in mould g 4407.7 4625.3 5199.5
Volume of Mould cc 2095.22 2048 2165
Wet Density = Wt.of wet compacted
g/cc 2.104 2.258 2.402
materials/volume of mould

Moisture Content % 7.70 7.71 7.71

Dry Density=Wet Density/(1+m/100) g/cc 1.953 2.097 2.230

MOISTURE DETERMINATION
No. of blows per layer 10 30 65
Moisture Can No. I32 A36 A23 A7 A18 A5

Wet of Can+Wet Materials g 296.40 314.50 301.00 336.70 299.40 302.50

Wt of can +Dry Materials g 277.90 294.50 282.10 315.20 280.50 283.60

Wt of Moisture g 18.50 20.00 18.90 21.50 18.90 18.90

Wt of can g 37.60 35.13 38.50 34.86 35.56 38.00

Wt of dry materials g 240.30 259.37 243.60 280.34 244.94 245.60

Moisture content % 7.70 7.71 7.76 7.67 7.72 7.70

Average Moisture Content % 7.70 7.71 7.71

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

182
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Determination of California Bearing Ratio(CBR) ( AASHTO T 193)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.
Lab No: Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013 Date Test Start : 26/2/2013
Sample Description: Base Course (Treung)
Sample Location: NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)
Soaking started on: 27/2/2013CBR Testing Date: 3/3/2013 MDD(g/cc): 2.228 OMC(%): 7.7
CBR Test (T193): Swell and Pennetration Data
SWELL DATA Surcharge Weights: 4.581 kg
Mld. No.1 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.2 Ht(mm) = 116.43 Mld. No.3 Ht(mm) = 116.43
Date Time Remarks
Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell % Reading in mm Swell %
27/2/13 Start 4.85 0 6.00 0 1.58 0
28/2/13 4.91 0.05 6.01 0.01 1.59 0.01
1/3/2013 4.92 0.06 6.02 0.02 1.59 0.01
2/3/2013 4.94 0.08 6.02 0.02 1.60 0.02
3/3/2013 Ended 4.95 0.09 6.03 0.03 1.61 0.03
.
Proving Ring Reading and Stress
Penetration
Mould No. (10 Blows) Mould No. (30 Blows) Mould No. (65 Blows)
Dial Stress in Dial Stress in Dial Stress in
inch mm Load in kN Load in kN Load in kN
Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2 Reading kg/cm2
0.000 0.00 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000
0.025 0.64 28 1.2880 6.788 220 5.1040 26.897 305 7.0760 37.289
0.050 1.27 43 1.9780 10.424 359 8.3288 43.891 495 11.4840 60.519
0.075 1.91 61 2.8060 14.787 479 11.1128 58.562 620 14.3840 75.801
0.100 2.54 95 4.370 23.029 570 13.2240 69.688 755 17.5160 92.306
0.150 3.81 124 5.7040 30.059 657 15.2424 80.325 887 20.5784 108.444
0.200 5.08 164 7.5440 39.756 785 18.2120 95.974 1020 23.6640 124.705
0.250 6.35 189 8.6940 45.816 876 20.3232 107.100 1185 27.4920 144.878
0.300 7.62 210 9.6600 50.906 975 22.6200 119.203 1354 31.4128 165.540
0.350 8.89 235 10.8100 56.967 1054 24.4528 128.862 1486 34.4752 181.678
0.400 10.16 259 11.9140 62.785 1125 26.1000 137.542 1600 37.1200 195.616

10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows

70 160 250

60 140
200
120
Stress in kg/cm2

50
Stress in kg/cm2
Stress in kg/cm2

100 150
40
80
30 100
60
20 40
50
10 20
0 0
0 0 5 10 15
0 5 10 15
0 5 10 15
Penetration mm Penetration in mm Penetration in mm

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

183
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
CBR Test (AASHTO T193)
6
CBR Calculation : 10 Blows 30 Blows 65 Blows 7
Stress at 2.54mm= 23.029 Stress at 2.54mm= 69.6881 Stress at 2.54 mm= 92.306
kg/cm2 kg/cm 2 kg/cm 2
CBR Caculations from CBR = 32.72 % CBR = 99.02 % CBR = 131.154 %
corrected load / stress of Form
Stress at 5.08mm= 39.756 Stress at 5.08mm= 95.974 Stress at 5.08mm= 124.705
No. 9A graphs
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
CBR = 37.86 % CBR = 91.40 % CBR = 118.77 %

No.of blows 10 30 65
Moisture-Density Data from sheet " CBR MD"
Dry-Density , g / cc 1.953 2.097 2.230

Corresponding CBR from 2.54mm penetration level Corrected CBR ( %) 37.86 91.40 118.77

Plotting value for 90% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.005 g/cc
Plotting value for 95% of Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 2.117 g/cc

CBR Density Curve for 2.54 mm level penetration

120

110
% CBR = 96.00
100

90
Soaked CBR (%)

80
of MDD 95%
70

60

50

40

30
1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200
Dry Density g/cc

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

184
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__A__, No. of steel ball used: ___12____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5002.60

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4221.90

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 15.61
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 15.61

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

185
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.

Sample Descriptions: Base Course from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100 9.28 100 99.1 0.9 0.9 0.08

0.600 0.300 100 12.64 100 95.7 4.3 4.3 0.54

1.18 0.600 100 13 100 96.7 3.3 3.3 0.43

2.36 1.18 100 5.43 100 97.4 2.6 2.6 0.14

4.75 2.36 100 28.45 100 96.7 3.3 3.3 0.94

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 31.2 301.6 296.8 4.8 1.6 0.50

Totals = 100 701.6

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 16.89 301.6 296.8 4.8 1.6 0.27

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 11.86 332.5 326.8 5.7 1.7 0.20

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 39.91 671.4 669.20 2.2 0.3 0.13

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50 31.34 1548.4 1510.6 37.8 2.4 0.77

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 2853.9 3.92

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

186
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.11 Laboratory Test Results of Aggregate 12.5mm & 19mm

Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2546.80 2845.60 2633.50 2675.30
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2446.80 2745.60 2533.50 2575.30
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2467.50 2768.60 2556.90 2597.67
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1549.80 1737.30 1604.40 1630.50
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.664 2.660 2.658 2.661
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.687 2.682 2.682 2.684
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.726 2.721 2.725 2.724

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.846 0.838 0.924 0.869

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

187
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__C__, No. of steel ball used: ___8____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5000.50

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4264.80

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 14.71
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 14.71

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

188
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATION OF AGGREGATE

TEST METHOD: BS812: SECTION105.1&105.2

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Lab No: LB-807 Sample No: 1

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5 mm Location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km
Sampling Date: 24/02/2013 Test Date: 5/3/2013

Flakiness Index Elongation

Fraction Size Sieve Sizes (mm) Test Weight Wt.Passing Flaky Test Weight Wt.Passing Elongation

(g) (g) (%) (g) (g) (%)

50-37.5

>15%200 pieces 37.5-28

28-20

20-14
Minimum
14-10 1000.0 504.4 50.44% 1000.0 46.1 4.61%

>5<15%100pieces
10-6.3 500.5 178.6 35.68% 500.5 164.6 32.89%
Minimum

Total Weight (g) 1500.5 683 45.5% 1500.5 210.7 14.04%

NOTE:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

189
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
g j ( )
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-807 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Aggregate 12.5 mm Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3502.2 g Weight of Can 179.5 g

Weight of dry soil: 3322.7 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00 100
1/2'' 12.50 131.5 131.5 3.96 96.04 90-100
3/8'' 10.00 1604.5 1736 52.25 47.75 0-40
#4 4.75 1575.4 3311.4 99.66 0.34 0-8
#4
#8 2.360 5.1 3316.5 99.81 0.19 0-2
# 10 2.000 0 3316.5 99.81 0.19
# 16 1.180 0.1 3316.6 99.82 0.18 0-0.5
# 30 0.600 0 3316.6 99.82 0.18
# 40 0.425 0 3316.6 99.82 0.18
# 50 0.300 0 3316.6 99.82 0.18
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3316.6 99.82 0.18
# 200 0.075 0 3316.6 99.82 0.18
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100.00 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90.00 100
(ii)80.00
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70.00
(iv) Percentage
60.00 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

190
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm
Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 100 304.2 298.2 6 2.0 1.97

Totals = 100 304.2

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 32.54 304.2 298.2 6 2.0 0.64

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 57.88 332.7 329.5 3.2 1.0 0.56

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 9.58 668.7 650 18.7 2.8 0.27

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 1305.6 3.44

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

191
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Unit Weight and Voids in Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km

Description: Sample used for DBST work. Test Method:AASHTO T 19

Data Sheet

Test Procedure Unit Trials No.

1 2 3
1 Loose Weight Determination(Jigging or Shoveling)
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 15531.20 15569.10 15547.30
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 10545.50 10583.40 10561.60
D Unit weight of aggregate = C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.507 1.512 1.509
Average g/cc 1.509
2 Rodded Weight determination
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16361.70 16359.70 16362.80
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11376.00 11374.00 11377.10
D Unit weight of aggregate= C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.625 1.625 1.625
Average g/cc 1.625
3 Volume of Measure
0
A Temperature of water C

B Wt of measure+ Water+Glass sheet g

C Weight of measure+Glass sheet g

D Weight of water to fill measure= (B-C) g

Volume of Measure= (wt of water / Density of
E cc
water at test temperature).
Average cc 7000.00
Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT ) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

192
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2457.50 2633.50 2415.60 2502.20
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2357.50 2533.50 2315.60 2402.20
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2375.60 2548.90 2326.30 2416.93
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1489.80 1598.30 1454.40 1514.17
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.659 2.663 2.654 2.659
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.680 2.679 2.666 2.675
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.715 2.707 2.687 2.703

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.768 0.608 0.462 0.613

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

193
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__B__, No. of steel ball used: ___11____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.80

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4262.60

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 14.81
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 14.81

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

194
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATION OF AGGREGATE

TEST METHOD: BS812: SECTION105.1&105.2

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Lab No: LB-807 Sample No: 1
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm Location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km
Sampling Date: 24/02/2013 Test Date: 5/3/2013
Flakiness Index Elongation

Fraction Size Sieve Sizes (mm) Test Weight Wt.Passing Flaky Test Weight Wt.Passing Elongation
(g) (g) (%) (g) (g) (%)
50-37.5

>15%200 pieces 37.5-28

28-20
20-14 2000.4 426.8 21.34% 2000.4 180.9 9.04%
Minimum
14-10 1001.0 739.8 73.91% 1001.0 498.0 49.75%
>5<15%100pieces
10-6.3
Minimum

Total Weight (g) 3001.4 1166.6 38.9% 3001.4 678.9 22.62%

NOTE:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

195
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

Totals =

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 7.92 331.4 324.8 6.6 2.0 0.16

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 92.08 668.5 654.2 14.3 2.1 1.97

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 999.9 2.13

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

196
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Road Asset Management Project (RAMP)

Determination of Unit Weight and Voids in Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km

Description: Sample used for DBST work. Test Method:AASHTO T 19

Data Sheet

Test Procedure Unit Trials No.

1 2 3
1 Loose Weight Determination(Jigging or Shoveling)
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16022.50 16023.10 16022.70
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11036.80 11037.40 11037.00
D Unit weight of aggregate = C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.577 1.577 1.577
Average g/cc 1.577
2 Rodded Weight determination
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16869.40 16868.30 16868.70
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11883.70 11882.60 11883.00
D Unit weight of aggregate= C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.698 1.698 1.698
Average g/cc 1.698
3 Volume of Measure
0
A Temperature of water C

B Wt of measure+ Water+Glass sheet g

C Weight of measure+Glass sheet g

D Weight of water to fill measure= (B-C) g

Volume of Measure= (wt of water / Density of
E cc
water at test temperature).
Average cc 7000.00
0
Specific Gravity of Water at 23 C(GT ) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

197
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
g j ( )
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-807 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Aggregate19 mm Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: Pk. 132+100 RHS Offset 1.0Km (Sre Siem Quarry)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3664.5 g Weight of Can 314.6 g

Weight of dry soil: 3349.9 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00 100
3/4'' 19.00 498.7 498.7 14.89 85.11 90-100
1/2'' 12.50 2819.6 3318.3 99.06 0.94 0-30
3/8'' 10.00 23.7 3342 99.76 0.24 0-8
#4 4.75 0 3342 99.76 0.24
#4
#8 2.360 0.5 3342.5 99.78 0.22 0-2
# 10 2.000 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
# 16 1.180 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22 0-0.5
# 30 0.600 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
# 40 0.425 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
# 50 0.300 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
# 200 0.075 0 3342.5 99.78 0.22
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100.00 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90.00 100
(ii)80.00
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70.00
(iv) Percentage
60.00 of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

198
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 5/03/2013

Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2715.40 2633.70 2126.80 2491.97
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2615.40 2533.70 2026.80 2391.97
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2626.10 2542.50 2033.20 2400.60
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1603.30 1554.10 1240.80 1466.07
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.555 2.561 2.556 2.557
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.566 2.570 2.564 2.567
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.582 2.584 2.577 2.581

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.409 0.347 0.316 0.357

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

199
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

EDCF Loan No. KHM-11 Package CW-A:KEXIM

Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 5/03/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__C__, No. of steel ball used: ___8____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5001.30

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4298.90

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 14.04
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 14.04

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

200
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATION OF AGGREGATE

TEST METHOD: BS812: SECTION105.1&105.2

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Lab No: LB-807 Sample No: 1
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5 mm Location: Base Course (Bratheat)
Sampling Date: 24/02/2013 Test Date: 5/3/2013

Flakiness Index Elongation

Fraction Size Sieve Sizes (mm) Test Weight Wt.Passing Flaky Test Weight Wt.Passing Elongation

(g) (g) (%) (g) (g) (%)

50-37.5

>15%200 pieces 37.5-28

28-20

20-14
Minimum
14-10 1000.0 523 52.30% 1000.0 43.2 4.32%

>5<15%100pieces
10-6.3 500.5 167 33.37% 500.5 159.7 31.91%
Minimum

Total Weight (g) 1500.5 690 46.0% 1500.5 202.9 13.52%

NOTE:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

201
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
g j ( )
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-807 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Aggregate 12.5 mm Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3603 g Weight of Can 172.9 g

Weight of dry soil: 3430.1 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00
3/4'' 19.00 0 0 0.00 100.00 100
1/2'' 12.50 131.5 131.5 3.83 96.17 90-100
3/8'' 10.00 1604.5 1736 50.61 49.39 0-40
#4 4.75 1575.4 3311.4 96.54 3.46 0-8
#4
#8 2.360 5.1 3316.5 96.69 3.31 0-2
# 10 2.000 0 3316.5 96.69 3.31
# 16 1.180 0.1 3316.6 96.69 3.31 0-0.5
# 30 0.600 0 3316.6 96.69 3.31
# 40 0.425 0 3316.6 96.69 3.31
# 50 0.300 0 3316.6 96.69 3.31
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3316.6 96.69 3.31
# 200 0.075 0 3316.6 96.69 3.31
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100.00 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90.00 100
(ii)80.00
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70.00
(iv)60.00
Percentage of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

202
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Unit Weight and Voids in Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Description: Sample used for DBST work. Test Method:AASHTO T 19

Data Sheet

Test Procedure Unit Trials No.

1 2 3
1 Loose Weight Determination(Jigging or Shoveling)
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 15531.20 15569.10 15547.30
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 10545.50 10583.40 10561.60
D Unit weight of aggregate = C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.507 1.512 1.509
Average g/cc 1.509
2 Rodded Weight determination
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16361.70 16359.70 16362.80
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11376.00 11374.00 11377.10
D Unit weight of aggregate= C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.625 1.625 1.625
Average g/cc 1.625
3 Volume of Measure
0
A Temperature of water C

B Wt of measure+ Water+Glass sheet g

C Weight of measure+Glass sheet g

D Weight of water to fill measure= (B-C) g

Volume of Measure= (wt of water / Density of
E cc
water at test temperature).
Average cc 7000.00
Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT ) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

203
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 5/03/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in

Loss after Weighted percentage
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after
test (%) loss(%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 100 299.7 296.2 3.5 1.2 1.17

Totals = 100 299.7

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 27.4 299.7 296.2 3.5 1.2 0.32

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 72.6 327.5 324.7 2.8 0.9 0.62

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 627.2 2.11

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

204
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
g j ( )
Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Lab No: LB-807 Sample No.: S01 Date Sampled : 24/2/2013
Sample Description: Aggregate19 mm Date Test Start : 05/03/13
Sample Location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Test Method : AASHTO T27/T88

Weight of dry soil + weight of can: 3873.2 g Weight of Can: 314.6 g

Weight of dry soil: 3558.6 g
ASTM Weight Cumulative Cumulative Passing Percentage (%)
Size (mm) Specification
Sieve Retained(g) wieght retained (%) Observation Report
3'' 75.00 0 0 0 100
2'' 50.00 0 0 0 100
11/2'' 37.50 0 0 0 100
1'' 25.00 0 0 0.00 100.00 100
3/4'' 19.00 498.7 498.7 14.01 85.99 90-100
1/2'' 12.50 2819.6 3318.3 93.25 6.75 0-30
3/8'' 10.00 23.7 3342 93.91 6.09 0-8
#4 4.75 0 3342 93.91 6.09
#4
#8 2.360 0.5 3342.5 93.93 6.07 0-2
# 10 2.000 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
# 16 1.180 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07 0-0.5
# 30 0.600 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
# 40 0.425 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
# 50 0.300 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
# 80 0.180 0
# 100 0.150 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
# 200 0.075 0 3342.5 93.93 6.07
Pan -0.075
Fneness Modulus (FM) = (1:2 ratio of sieves, addition cumulative retained % from (+) # 100/100)
100.00 = 75+38+19+9.5+4.75+2.36+1.18+0.6+.03+0.15
90.00 100
(ii)80.00
Dry constance wt. of sample aftre washing + #200 sieve,
(iii) Loose percentage of sample during test (ii-Pan)/I x 100
70.00
(iv) Percentage of materials Finer than No.200 sieve by washing, [(i)-(ii)/(i) x 100]
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00
Grain Size

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

205
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T 0C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2457.50 2633.50 2415.60 2502.20
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2357.50 2533.50 2315.60 2402.20
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2375.60 2548.90 2326.30 2416.93
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1489.80 1598.30 1454.40 1514.17
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.659 2.663 2.654 2.659
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.680 2.679 2.666 2.675
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.715 2.707 2.687 2.703

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.768 0.608 0.462 0.613

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

206
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__B__, No. of steel ball used: ___11____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.80

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4262.60

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 14.81
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 14.81

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

207
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX AND ELONGATION OF AGGREGATE

TEST METHOD: BS812: SECTION105.1&105.2

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd

Lab No: LB-807 Sample No: 1

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5 mm Location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Sampling Date: 24/02/2013 Test Date: 5/3/2013

Flakiness Index Elongation

Fraction Size Sieve Sizes (mm) Test Weight Wt.Passing Flaky Test Weight Wt.Passing Elongation
(g) (g) (%) (g) (g) (%)
50-37.5

>15%200 pieces 37.5-28

28-20
20-14 2000.4 430.2 21.51% 2000.4 185.2 9.26%
Minimum
14-10 1001.0 739.8 73.91% 1001.0 501.5 50.10%
>5<15%100pieces
10-6.3
Minimum
Total Weight (g) 3001.4 1170 39.0% 3001.4 686.7 22.88%

NOTE:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

208
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

Totals =

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 7.92 331.4 324.8 6.6 2.0 0.16

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 92.08 668.5 654.2 14.3 2.1 1.97

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 999.9 2.13

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

209
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

Determination of Unit Weight and Voids in Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm

Sample No.01, Date: 24/02/2013, Lab No.807, Test Date: 05/03/2013

Sample location: Base Course (Bratheat)

Test Method:AASHTO T 19

Data Sheet

Test Procedure Unit Trials No.

1 2 3
1 Loose Weight Determination(Jigging or Shoveling)
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16022.50 16023.10 16022.70
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11036.80 11037.40 11037.00
D Unit weight of aggregate = C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.577 1.577 1.577
Average g/cc 1.577
2 Rodded Weight determination
A Weight of measure filled with aggregate g 16869.40 16868.30 16868.70
B Weight of measure g 4985.70 4985.70 4985.70
C Weight of aggregate=(A-B) g 11883.70 11882.60 11883.00
D Unit weight of aggregate= C / Volume of measure g/cc 1.698 1.698 1.698
Average g/cc 1.698
3 Volume of Measure
0
A Temperature of water C

B Wt of measure+ Water+Glass sheet g

C Weight of measure+Glass sheet g

D Weight of water to fill measure= (B-C) g

Volume of Measure= (wt of water / Density of
E cc
water at test temperature).
Average cc 7000.00
0
Specific Gravity of Water at 23 C(GT ) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...………

210
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP)
Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 26/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 3/03/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__C__, No. of steel ball used: ___8____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5001.40

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4220.90

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 15.61
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 15.61

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

211
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP)
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 26/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 3/03/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 100 299.7 296.2 3.5 1.2 1.17

Totals = 100 299.7

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5 27.4 299.7 296.2 3.5 1.2 0.32

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 72.6 327.5 324.7 2.8 0.9 0.62

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 627.2 2.11

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

212
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Roads Improvement Project (PRIP)
Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 12.5mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 26/2/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 3/03/2013

Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
0
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2715.40 2633.70 2126.80 2491.97
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2615.40 2533.70 2026.80 2391.97
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2626.10 2542.50 2033.20 2400.60
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1603.30 1554.10 1240.80 1466.07
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.555 2.561 2.556 2.557
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.566 2.570 2.564 2.567
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.582 2.584 2.577 2.581

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.409 0.347 0.316 0.357

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

213
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Road Improvement Project (PRIP)
ADB Loan No. 2670-CAM (SF)
Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles
Machine ( AASHTO T 96)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 26/02/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 03/03/2013

Test Method: AASHTO T96.

Data Sheet
Grading used:__B__, No. of steel ball used: ___11____Nos. Trials No.
Unit
Cycles: 500 1 2 3
A Initial Weight of sample g 5003.50

B Weight retained after test on 1.7 mm sieve g 4321.90

% of wear by weight passing 1.7mm sieve =

C % 13.62
(A-B)/A*100

D Average of _______ trials % 13.62

Remarks:

Tested by:………….....….…..…………….…………...Date:………….…...………,Signature:………………..

Checked by:………….....….…..……….……………...Date:……….…..…….……,Signature:………………..

214
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Road Improvement Project (PRIP)
Soundness of Aggregate by use of Sodium Sulphate (T 104)
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7

Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)

Sample No.01, Date: 26/02/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 03/03/2013

Grading of Wt. of Test Weight of Loss in Weighted

Loss after
Sieve Size(mm) Original Fraction bef- Test Fraction w eight after percentage
test (%)
Sample (%) ore Test (g) after Test (g) test (g) loss(%)

Passing Retained i ii iii iv v vi

Soundness Test of Fine Aggregate

0.150 -

0.300 0.150 100

0.600 0.300 100

1.18 0.600 100

2.36 1.18 100

4.75 2.36 100

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

Totals = 0 0

Soundness Test of Coarse Aggregate

9.5 4.75 300 ± 5

12.5 9.50 330 ± 5 20.4 326.7 321.8 4.9 1.5 0.31

19.0 12.5 670 ± 10 79.60 662.5 653.40 9.1 1.4 1.09

37.5 19.0 1500 ± 50

63.0 37.5 5000 ± 300

Totals = 100 989.2 1.40

Weight for Testing Individual Size

63 mm------------ 50mm 3000 ± 300 19 mm--------------12.5mm 670 ± 10

50mm--------------37.5 mm 2000 ± 200 12.5 mm-------------9.5 mm 330 ± 5

37.5 mm----------25 mm 1000 ± 50 9.5 mm---------------4.75mm 300 ± 5

25 mm------------19.0 mm 500 ± 30

Tested by:………….....….…..….……......…….Date:…………….………,Signature:…………..……

Checked by:……...………..……..…..…….…...Date:…………...…….…,Signature:…………………

215
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Provincial Road Improvement Project (PRIP)
Determination of Sprcific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate

ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor : Sakor Co.,Ltd Road No.: 7
Sample Descriptions: Aggregate 19mm from NR 7 Pk. 103+900 RHS Offset 100m (N=1332446, E=536230)
Sample No.01, Date: 26/02/2013, Lab No., Test Date: 03/03/2013
Test Method:AASHTO T85,

Data Sheet
Pycnometer No. Determination No.
Average
1 2 3
0
T Temperature of Water during testing C 26 26 26 26
0
GT Specific Gravity of Water at T C - 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968 0.9968
A1 Weigth of Oven Dry sampel+Container g 2218.40 2634.70 2489.70 2447.60
A2 Weight of Container g 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
A Weigth of oven dry sample in air =(A1-A2) g 2118.40 2534.70 2389.70 2347.60
B Weight of SSD Specimen in air g 2126.50 2548.20 2398.10 2357.60
C Weight of SSD Specimen in water g 1299.30 1555.80 1465.80 1440.30
Specific Gravity:
Bulk Sp. Gravity (Oven Dry Basis)
- 2.559 2.552 2.561 2.557
=A/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Bulk Sp. Gravity (SSD Basis)
- 2.569 2.566 2.570 2.568
=B/(B-C)*(GT/G23)
Apparent Sp. Gravity=A/(A-C)*(GT/G23) - 2.584 2.587 2.584 2.585

Water Absorption= (B-A)/A * 100 % 0.382 0.533 0.352 0.422

Specific Gravity of Water at 230C(GT) = 0.9976

Tested by:.............................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

Checked by:..........................................., date: ................................., Signature:……………...…………

216
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure No.12 Laboratory Test Results of Unconfined Com. Strength
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/15/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 (X:583708, Y:1267547)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Cylinder Testing Age in Dimensions in cm Area Load Compre. Strength

Strength for Cube Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa) (150mm)
1 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 3.1 0.36 0.37 Shear

2 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 15.6 0.00 Shear

3 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 3.4 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 22/03/13 Average for 7 days age 0.36

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 995.789025 0.000
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.000

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

217
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/6/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 (X:583708, Y:1267547)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Cylinder Testing Age in Dimensions in cm Area Load Compre. Strength

Strength for Cube Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa) (150mm)
1 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 15.6 1.80 1.87 Shear

2 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

3 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 13/03/13 Average for 7 days age 0.60

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 995.789025 0.000
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.000

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

218
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/15/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%)
Sample Location: Pk. 20+100 RHS Offset 4700m from PR13 (X:583708, Y:1267547)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Dimensions in cm Strength
Compre.
Cylinder Testing Age in Area Load for Cube
Strength Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN (150mm)
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa)
Mpa
1 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 3.4 0.39 0.41 Shear

2 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

3 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 22/03/13 Average for 7 days age 0.13

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 995.789025 0.000
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.000

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

219
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/15/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 98% and Cement 2%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 (X:578904, Y:1275654)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Cylinder Testing Age in Dimensions in cm Area Load Compre. Strength

Strength for Cube Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa) (150mm)
1 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 16.1 1.86 1.93 Shear

2 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

3 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 22/03/13 Average for 7 days age 0.62

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 2275.4 995.789025 2.285
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.762

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

220
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/6/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 96% and Cement 4%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 (X:578904, Y:1275654)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Cylinder Testing Age in Dimensions in cm Area Load Compre. Strength

Strength for Cube Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa) (150mm)
1 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 28.1 3.25 3.37 Shear

2 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

3 13/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 13/03/13 Average for 7 days age 1.08

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 2310.3 995.789025 2.320
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.773

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

221
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
PROVINCIAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ADB LOAN NO. 2839-CAM (SF) Contractor: Sarkor., Co.,Ltd Road No.: 13
Lab No. Date Moulded: 3/15/2013 RFT No.
Sample Description: Sub Base (Laterite 94% and Cement 6%)
Sample Location: Pk. 11+800 RHS Offset 7000m from PR13 (X:578904, Y:1275654)
Curing Lab/Field : Laboratory of SARKOR Test Method: AASHTO T-22

Dimensions in cm Strength
Compre.
Cylinder Testing Age in Area Load for Cube
Strength Type of Failure
I.D No. date days (cm2) KN (150mm)
L D1 D2 Av.D (MPa)
Mpa
1 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 35.7 4.12 4.29 Shear

2 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

3 22/03/13 7 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 86.59 0.00 0.00 Shear

Tested by : Date: 22/03/13 Average for 7 days age 1.37

Cylinder No. SSD weight (g) Volume (cm3) Density(g/cm3) Remarks

1 2279.3 995.789025 2.289
2 995.789025 0.000
3 995.789025 0.000

Average = 0.763

Cone Cone & Split Cone & Shear Shear Columnar

Sketches of Types of Concrete Cylinder Fractures or Failure

Tested by: Lang Chamnab Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Checked by: Loeung Dararoath Date: 13/03/2013 Signature:

Witnessed by ……………...….………….Date:………………………………….Signatute:
1 Mpa = 10.1971 Kg/cm2 = 10.2 kgf/cm2 (Say)

222
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure13. Field investigation activities:

223
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads

224
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure14. Sampling of Sub-base Materials:

225
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure15. Crushing Plant:

Crushing Plant:

226
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Crushing Plant:

227
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Crushing Plant:

228
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part A Roads
Figure16. Laboratory activities:

229
PART B

BRIDGES
 CONTENTS Page

I. General 1

1. Introduction 1
2. Geology and Landform 1

II. Geotechnical Investigation 3

1. Objective and Scope 3

2. Field Investigation Methodology 4
3. Laboratory Test Methodology 4

III. Findings 5

1. Subsoil Condition 5
2. Underground Water Condition 6

IV. Conclusion and Recommendation 8

V. Appendices 9

Figure1. Geology Map 2

Figure2. Location of Borehole Logs 10

Table1. Underground Water Table 6

Chart1. Soil Classification Chart 11

Table2. Summary of Laboratory Test Results 12-13

Figure.3 Grain Size Analysis and Distribution 14-19

Figure.4 Borehole Logs 20-23

Table.3 Spreadsheet of Deep Foundation Calculation 24-25

Figure.5 Photos of Boring Operations and Laboratory Activities 26-27

Figure.6 Legends 28-29

 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

I. General

1. Introduction

Subsurface soil investigation is the TOR requirements for detail engineering

design of Provincial Roads Improvement Project and covers the soil investigation,
finding, evaluation, analysis, pictures and recommendations necessary for the
design of foundations of bridge structures.

The Consultants undertook subsurface soil investigation for this particular project
of Provincial Roads Improvement Project on January 7, 2013 for the
determination of subsurface soil condition, its relative soil characteristics and its
texture, consistency, classification and characteristics of soil types, especially
geologic and subsurface soil condition of the soil beneath the Project Site for the
construction of bridge structures. These provide economical cost and safety of
construction structures.

2. Geology and Landform

The geology of the project area and its immediate environments are shown in
Figure1. Cambodia is geologically composed of three different structures; they
are mostly Triassic, Jurassic-Cretaceous and Quaternary. The Triassic period
covers a large area in the east, Jurassic-Cretaceous Era forming important
highlands in the west and, between them, the Quaternary basin occupy the
whole central plain of the country.

The area of the site is situated within a belt of recent lacustrine sediments. The
project site is covering by diluvia of the high land or mountain area of Paleozoic
sedimentary units, mainly Carboniferous-Permian. In the flat area of the site,
they are reported to comprise brown, gray, light gray and reddish silts, sands,
clay and organic soils layer. The geological map also shows the alluvial
sediments of the project area, where it come from vicinity high land and
mountain area to fulfill swamp and flood plain.

Therefore the project area occurred historically from year after years, era after
era by deposited layer by layers the sediment covering carboniferous rock at the
depth some 50.00m depth. Moreover, the top ground layer in boreholes is firm
or medium dense gray, yellow, brown, black sticky sand and clay from the
ground surface down to the rock layer. The project site is close to the mountain,
therefore the depth of the strength layer is not so depth and the soil stratum
from borehole to borehole is dramatically inclined.

1
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Figure1. Geology Map of Cambodia

South-Eest Project

Cross-Border Facilities

2
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

II. Geo-technical Investigation

Soil Testing and Geo-research Inc. namely Sarkor Cambodia was commissioned
to undertake geotechnical investigation for this particular project on January 7,
2013 for the determination of subsurface soil condition, its consistency,
resistance, classification and characteristics of soil types, especially geologic and
geotechnical condition of the soil beneath the project site for the construction
design bridges of Provincial Roads Improvement Project. The investigation site is
located at the Svay Rieng Province located at road PR314D and led by Mr. SEA
Sochivoan, professional engineer in geotechnical engineering.

1. Objective and Scope

The objective of soil investigation is contributed to analyzing various subsurface

soil conditions including their characteristics and composition status of strata
distributed beneath the project area. The scopes and the objectives of the
subsurface investigation included the following tasks:

• Make an actual field observation and inspection,

• Operate soil boring and to carry out the Standard Penetration Test at the
proposed location site,
• Retrieve samples collection, preservation and transportation to the routine
laboratory,
• Conduct laboratory testing of the soil samples from split-barrel sampler of
Standard Penetration Test and thin-walled sampler,
• To interpret and evaluate the field and laboratory test results,
• Determine the factual characteristics of soil and engineering properties of
soil for the purpose of getting a conclusive data to support the
recommendation for the construction design,
• Suggest and recommend types, depth, and dimension of foundation for
the design of bridge structures referring to field investigation data.

2. Site Methodology

Subsurface soil investigation was carried out to determine the arrangement of

soil strata and engineering properties of the underlying soils, particularly strength
and deformation characteristics for foundation designs of the construction
project. The field operations were carried out in accordance with ASTM
Standards as summarizing following:

• Standard Penetration test (SPT) ASTM D-1586,

• Field Soil classification ASTM D-2487, D-2488,
• Preservation and Transportation of soil samples ASTM D-4220,

3
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

• Ground Water Table Observation ASTM D-4750,

• Soil boring

The main activities of the whole field investigations consisted of the following
tasks:

• Located the borehole to the required position as directed by consultant,

• Bored out the soil and observed soil cuttings to classify the soil layers and
prepare of borehole log,
• Carried out Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at 1.50m intervals,
• Seal and label all disturbed and undisturbed soil samples in the core boxes
and deliver to the laboratory (Protected from the exposure to the sun),
• Observed the stable ground water table by using measuring tape,
• Collected disturbed sample at 1.50 meters intervals and every soil strata
changes, and undisturbed soil samples,
• The borehole depth terminated when the N-value of SPT exceeds 50 blow
counts for three times or consultant consideration.

Soil boring

Boring Machines used in the project area is Toho (Japan), 200 meters depth
capacity and the diameter of 100 mm, equip with SPT testing operation. A rotary
flight auger was employed in this operation. The process is continued boring
every 1.50 meters depth, and then take out the flight auger to operate the thin-
walled sampler and conducted SPT test. The field soil classification and
observation such as soil name, consistency, color, soil strata, percent of soil grain
size estimation, ground water table, seal and label, protection from sun shine,
making note and putting in core boxes are undertaken. All disturbed and
undisturbed samples were transported to routine laboratory in Phnom Penh.

Standard Penetration Test

After the borehole has advanced to required depth, the rotary flight auger was
withdrawn and replaced with thin-wall sampler (59mm) first to push slowly into
the natural soil in order to get undisturbed sample and than put split barrel
sampler into soil layer to conducted SPT test. The correct depth after boring out
the soil is also checked.
The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) used 65.00 kg drive weight at free fall
height of 760 mm to drive standard split barrel and the number of blows for
every 150 mm penetration was noted. The first 150mm was the setting blow and
the total number of blows for the last 300mm was the N-value. The samples
extracted by the split spoon sampler (ASTM D-1586) during the penetration test
would be tested for their engineering properties. Procedure was repeated on

4
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

each succeeding depth down to the bottom of the borehole. The water level in
the borehole was measured 24 hours after completion of boring works.

3. Laboratory Test Methodology

The soil samples extracted to represent the different strata from machine auger
borings and SPT test were subjected to soil testing laboratory for evaluation and
analysis in accordance with ASTM Standard methods and specifications to
classify them for their engineering values. The quantities and the types of tests
performed were in accordance with the TOR and Contract Agreement for the
construction project.

The laboratory-testing programs were carried out in accordance with ASTM

Standards as summarizing following:

• Natural water content determination ASTM D-2216,

• Atterberg limit ASTM D-4318,
• Specific Gravity of Soil ASTM D-854 and ASTM C-128,
• Sieve Analysis ASTM D-421 and ASTM D-422,
• Wet Unit weight, Dry Unit weight (Calculation),
• Soil Classification ASTM D-2488,

III. Findings

1. Subsurface soil conditions

Underlying the site are uniform layers of both cohesive and non-cohesive soil
mostly alluvial in characters. The soil layers stretched beneath the project site
are mostly comprised of low plasticity lean clay, high plasticity fat clay, poorly
graded sand, and clayey sand. In accordance to its USCS classifications are CL,
CH, SP, and SC. There was not similar defined pattern to the progression of the
layers from clay or clayey sand and the thickness of layers was also found not to
be similar.

The boring results are shown as follows:

Bridge 5, Boring No.11 BH11/A1:

The topsoil layer is stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish fat clay with sand
from the depth of ground surface down to the depth of 4.00 m, with SPT N-value
ranging ranging 13 to 15 blows. The soil layer is stiff yellow, brown, reddish
sandy fat clay from the depth of 4.00m down to 5.50m depth, with SPT-N value
of 11 blows. The next layer is medium dense yellow, brown, reddish clayey sand

5
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

from the depth of 5.50m down to 7.00m depths, with SPT-N value of 14 blows.
Under the above layer is very stiff yellow, brown, reddish fat clay from the depth
of 7.00m down to 8.50m depths, with SPT-N value of 22 blows. Underlying the
above layer is stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish lean clay with sand from
the depth of 8.50m down to 10.00m, with SPT-N value of 15 blows. Beneath the
above layer is stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish lean clay from the depth of
10.00m down to 13.00m, with SPT-N value ranging from 14 to 19 blows. The
underneath layer is hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay with sand from the
depth of 13.00m down to 16.00m, with SPT-N value ranging from 32 to 41
blows.

Underlying the above layer is hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay from the
depth of 16.00m down to 17.50m, with SPT-N value of 31 blows. Below the
above layer is hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay with sand from the depth of
17.50m down to 19.00m, with SPT-N value of 33 blows. The bottom layer is
dense yellow, brown, reddish clayey sand from the depth of 19.00m down to
20.00m, with SPT-N value of 36 blows.

Bridge 5, Boring No.12 BH12/A2:

The topsoil layer is soft to firm black, brown, gray sandy fat clay from the depth
of ground surface down to the depth of 4.00 m, with SPT N-value ranging from 4
to 6 blows. The soil layer is medium dense gray, brown, white clayey sand from
the depth of 4.00m down to 10.00m depth, with SPT-N value ranging from 10 to
19 blows. The next layer is very stiff gray, brown, white sandy lean clay from the
depth of 10.00m down to 16.00m depths, with SPT-N value ranging from 21 to
31 blows.

Under the above layer is very stiff to hard gray, brown, white lean clay with sand
from the depth of 16.00m down to 17.50m depths, with SPT-N value of 30
blows. Underlying the above layer is hard gray, brown, white sandy lean clay
from the depth of 17.50m down to 19.00m, with SPT-N value of 31 blows. The
bottom layer is very stiff to hard gray, brown, white lean clay with sand from the
depth of 19.00m down to 20.00m, with SPT-N value of 30 blows.

2. Underground water condition

The ground water met during operation of boring is one of the important factors
for soil investigation because the variation of ground water level, the
characteristic of soil mechanic also can be changed. The underground water level
is met 3.00m and 3.70 meter depth-measuring 24 hours after finished boring.
The underground water will be increased in the rainy season because of the
project area is located in the flat area. The underground water is considerably
not wastewater affecting structure foundation.

6
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Table No.1

Ground water table measured

Bridge Name Boring Number Boring Location Elevation
after lapsed 24hr
Oyadav BH11,A1 X:601494, Y:1200674 3.74m 3.70 m

Oyadav X:601492, Y:1200632 3.72m 3.00 m

BH12,A2

IV. Conclusion and Recommendation

Laboratory tested results and field operation showed that the stratigraphy of
subsoil layers beneath project area is varied; it is mostly not similar layer, it is

7
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

changed within low plasticity lean clay, high plasticity fat clay, poorly graded
sand, and clayey sand characters. In according to the geology formation the area
occurred in Quaternary Sedimentary (during Holocene period), so the soil texture
is performed by recent sedimentation of clay and sand strata in the soil layer.
There is not seismic record in the project area as well as in the whole country,
therefore the seismic factor and potential liquefaction under seismic effects is not
considered for our construction project or it depends on decision of engineer.

The soil formation consists of very soft to hard clay layer and very loose to dense
sand soil layer. The physical and mechanical properties of subsurface ground
condition are good for supporting bridge structure by pile foundation. The soil
consistency or relative density is very soft to hard clay layer and very loose to
dense sand layer according to N (SPT) blows results and laboratory test. The all
soil characters are summarizing in the appendices.

According to laboratory and field test, the soil layer and its characters are mostly
not uniform. The bearing capacity of soil calculated for deep foundation attached
in the next sheet by using SPT blow-count and laboratory test results for all
boreholes of testing. The bearing capacity of soil can be chosen of any types and
depth of foundation depending upon the decision of engineer. Safety factor to be
taken is 3 for deep foundation.

The field load test should be conducted during the construction period in order to
confirm the bearing capacity of soil computed from soil investigation. If the
calculated bearing capacity of soil was found inappropriate, the modification shall
be promptly brought into. The site and design engineers shall be informed
immediately of such a variation.

The suggestion and recommendation stated herein being base on data obtained
from limited soils, the homogeneity of soil formation assumption, and these
theoretical equations for calculation, such prediction or recommendation should
be verified by full-scale investigation during the construction period to obtain
more precise reliable data. Should any variation were founded, construction
method will be modified accordingly to best suit the actual condition at site.

8
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

V. Appendix

9
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Figure.2 Location of Borehole Logs

Bridge 5 (Boring No. BH11/A1, BH12/A2)

BH1-A1

BH2-A2

27.00 m

27.00 m

Bridge 5 (BH11-A1, BH12-A2)

10
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Chart.1 Soil Classification Chart

PLASTICITY CHART

80

A Line

70

60
Plastricity Index - %

50 CH

40 MH, OH

30
CL

20

CL

10 ML, OL
CL - ML

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Liquid Limit - %

11
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Table.2 Summary of Laboratory Test Results

SOIL TESTING LABORATORY & GEO-RESEARCH INC.

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS OF BORING HOLE

Project: Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Date: 05-03-13
Site: PR314D, PK23+790, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1 Sheet No: 39
Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
BOREHOLE

WATER
STRATUM

DEPTH
SAMPLE

DENSITY OF PARTICLE SIZE Direc Shear Unconfined Spesific Group

INTERVA DEPTH INTERVAL OF STRATA CONTE ATTEBERG LIMIT SPT Test
SOIL DISTRIBUTION Test Compressive gravity Symbol
L NT

B.D D.D M & C SAND GRAVEL Cu Ø qu qu/2 N-VALUE

No No No (M) No W% L.L% P.L% I.P I.L Gs ASTM
KN/m 3 KN/m 3 % % % KN/m 2 Deg. Kpa Kpa 300MM
D1 0.00-1.50 Stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish fat 20.50 53.88 17.56 36.32 0.08 19.17 15.91 72.93 26.87 0.20 - - 87 44 2.70 CH 13
1
D2 1.50-3.00 clay with sand. 23.28 54.81 17.03 37.78 0.17 19.48 15.80 84.01 15.99 0.00 - - 100 50 2.71 CH 15
2 D3 3.00-4.50 Stiff yellow, brown, reddish sandy fat clay. 28.90 66.68 20.48 46.20 0.18 18.89 14.65 63.96 32.96 3.08 - - 75 38 2.69 CH 11
Medium dense yellow, brown, reddish
3 D4 4.50-6.00 25.24 57.77 19.23 38.54 0.16 19.35 15.45 37.33 62.52 0.15 - - 93 47 2.66 SC 14
clayey sand.
4 D5 6.00-7.50 Very stiff yellow, brown, reddish fat clay. 27.18 57.04 21.15 35.89 0.17 20.01 15.73 91.45 7.49 1.06 - - 150 75 2.72 CH 22
Stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish lean
5 D6 7.50-9.00 22.80 29.09 12.18 16.91 0.63 19.50 15.88 74.24 25.76 0.00 - - 100 50 2.70 CL 15
BH11 clay with sand.
, A1 D7 9.00-10.50 Stiff to very stiff yellow, brown, reddish lean 21.53 29.99 14.30 13.74 0.46 19.38 15.95 95.68 4.32 0.00 - - 93 47 2.72 CL 14
6
D8 10.50-12.00 clay. 26.13 28.27 15.68 12.59 0.83 19.97 15.83 94.46 5.54 0.00 - - 127 64 2.72 CL 19
D9 12.00-13.50 Hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay with 23.20 32.93 23.42 9.51 -0.02 20.07 16.29 79.44 20.56 0.00 - - - - 2.71 CL 41
7
D10 13.50-15.00 sand. 24.00 31.66 23.94 7.72 0.01 20.03 16.15 76.10 23.90 0.00 - - - - 2.70 CL 32
8 D11 15.00-16.50 Hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay. 23.09 32.52 22.85 9.67 0.02 20.02 16.26 90.39 9.61 0.00 - - - - 2.72 CL 31
Hard yellow, brown, reddish lean clay with
9 D12 16.50-18.00 21.93 29.36 22.14 7.22 -0.03 20.04 16.44 75.89 23.62 0.49 - - - - 2.70 CL 33
sand.
10 D13 18.00-19.50 Dense yellow, brown, reddish clayey sand. 18.26 25.41 13.28 12.13 0.41 20.05 16.95 17.77 82.23 0.00 - - - - 2.64 SC 36

12
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

SOIL TESTING LABORATORY & GEO-RESEARCH INC.

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS OF BORING HOLE

Project: Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Date: 06-03-13
Site: PR314D, PK23+810, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A2 Sheet No: 40
Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
BOREHOLE

WATER
STRATUM

DEPTH
SAMPLE

DENSITY OF PARTICLE SIZE Direc Shear Unconfined Spesific Group

INTERVA DEPTH INTERVAL OF STRATA CONTE ATTEBERG LIMIT SPT Test
SOIL DISTRIBUTION Test Compressive gravity Symbol
L NT

o
B.D D.D M & C SAND GRAVEL Cu Ø qu qu/2 N-VALUE
No No No (M) N W% L.L% P.L% I.P I.L Gs ASTM
3
KN/m KN/m 3
% % % KN/m Deg.
2
Kpa Kpa 300MM
D1 0.00-1.50 Soft to firm black, brown, gray sandy fat 31.31 59.68 23.87 35.81 0.21 18.46 14.06 67.23 32.57 0.20 - - 40 20 2.69 CH 6
1
D2 1.50-3.00 clay. 26.60 56.20 21.64 34.56 0.14 18.33 14.48 67.90 32.10 0.00 - - 27 14 2.69 CH 4
D3 3.00-4.50 36.10 45.51 16.12 29.39 0.68 18.85 13.85 43.70 56.22 0.08 - - 67 34 2.67 SC 10
D4 4.50-6.00 Medium dense gray, brown, white clayey 26.13 42.62 17.24 25.38 0.35 19.55 15.50 35.13 52.89 11.98 - - 110 55 2.66 SC 16
2
D5 6.00-7.50 sand. 21.11 35.62 16.22 19.40 0.25 19.55 16.14 25.60 74.40 0.00 - - 110 55 2.65 SC 16
D6 7.50-9.00 20.93 39.52 18.52 21.00 0.11 19.93 16.48 26.38 73.62 0.00 - - 127 64 2.65 SC 19
BH12 D7 9.00-10.50 21.53 36.33 19.78 16.55 0.11 20.00 16.46 64.51 35.49 0.00 - - 140 70 2.69 CL 21
, A2
D8 10.50-12.00 Very stiff gray, brown, white sandy lean 24.09 31.52 21.42 10.10 0.26 20.01 16.13 69.92 30.08 0.00 - - 160 80 2.70 CL 24
3
D9 12.00-13.50 clay. 21.68 37.62 19.24 18.38 0.13 20.03 16.46 69.62 30.38 0.00 - - 200 100 2.70 CL 30
D10 13.50-15.00 22.87 30.84 21.44 9.40 0.15 20.04 16.31 63.25 36.75 0.00 - - 210 105 2.69 CL 31
Very stiff to hard gray, brown, white lean
4 D11 15.00-16.50 19.55 30.58 19.98 10.60 -0.04 20.03 16.75 69.43 29.81 0.76 - - 200 100 2.70 CL 30
clay with sand.
5 D12 16.50-18.00 Hard gray, brown, white sandy lean clay. 22.63 31.80 22.57 9.23 0.01 20.04 16.34 65.36 34.36 0.28 - - - - 2.69 CL 31
6 D13 18.00-19.50 Very stiff to hard gray, brown, white lean clay22.76 31.92 21.87 10.05 0.09 20.03 16.32 70.54 22.32 7.14 - - - - 2.70 CL 30

13
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Figure.3 Grain Size Analysis and Distribution

Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+790, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH No.11, A1 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing

D10 D30 D60 Cc
Cu
Sample Depth (m) 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 #4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer D60/D10
D302/

No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm)
D10xD60

D1 0.00-1.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.73 95.69

D2 1.50-3.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.58 98.41 92.12
D3 3.00-4.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.82 96.45
D4 4.50-6.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.78 97.91 87.87
D5 6.00-7.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.38 92.94

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00 D1
D2
20.00 D3
D4
10.00 D5

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

14
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+790, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH No.11, A1 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing Cc

D10 D30 D60 Cu
Sample 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 # 4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer 2
D30 /
Depth (m) D60/D10
No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm) D10xD60

D6 7.50-9.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.95 98.33 26.05

D7 9.00-10.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.41 27.31
D8 10.50-12.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.25 24.77
D9 12.00-13.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.87 23.99
D10 13.50-15.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.88 98.08 21.15

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00
D6
D7
20.00 D8
D9

10.00 D10

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

15
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+790, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH11, A1 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing Cc

D10 D30 D60 Cu
Sample 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 # 4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer 2
D30 /
Depth (m) D60/D10
No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm) D10xD60

D11 15.00-16.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.47 18.31

D12 16.50-18.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.87 99.77 98.00 20.57
D13 18.00-19.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.93 98.17 17.77
D14 19.50-21.00
D15 21.00-22.50

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00
D11
D12
20.00 D13
D14

10.00 D15

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

16
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+810, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH No.12, A2 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing

D10 D30 D60 Cc
Cu
Sample Depth (m) 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 #4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer D60/D10
D302/

No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm)
D10xD60

D1 0.00-1.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.49 97.38 86.29

D2 1.50-3.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.77 96.42 94.59 78.12
D3 3.00-4.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.74 97.47 61.98
D4 4.50-6.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.83 98.99 13.61
D5 6.00-7.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 96.09 18.05

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00 D1
D2
20.00 D3
D4
10.00 D5

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

17
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+810, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH No.12, A2 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing Cc

D10 D30 D60 Cu
Sample 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 # 4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer 2
D30 /
Depth (m) D60/D10
No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm) D10xD60

D6 7.50-9.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.32 25.09

D7 9.00-10.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 96.85 18.79
D8 10.50-12.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.58 27.30
D9 12.00-13.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.59 96.87 28.36
D10 13.50-15.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.91 97.29 25.77

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00
D6
D7
20.00 D8
D9

10.00 D10

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

18
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Grain size analysis and distribution curve (ASTM-D 422)

Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Client: Korean Consultants International (KCI).
Location : PR314D, PK23+810, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A1
Tested : Loeung Dararoth Date: 05-03-13 Checked : Ou Saody Date: 05-03-13

BH12, A2 Mechanical Analysis Cummulative % Passing Cc

D10 D30 D60 Cu
Sample 1-1/2. # 3/4 # 3/8 # 4 # 10 # 40 # 200 Hydrometer 2
D30 /
Depth (m) D60/D10
No. 37.50 19.00 9.50 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010 0.005 0.002 0.001 (mm) (mm) (mm) D10xD60

D11 15.00-16.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.91 98.56 27.34

D12 16.50-18.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.00 25.60
D13 18.00-19.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.23 27.96
D14 19.50-21.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
D15 21.00-22.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sand Gravel
Clay Silt
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse

100.00

90.00

80.00

70.00
Percent Passing %

60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00
D11
D12
20.00 D13
D14

10.00 D15

0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Particle Size, mm

19
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Figure.4 Borehole Logs

20
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

21
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

22
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

23
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Table.3 Spreadsheet of Deep Foundation Calculation

Ref: DM-7.02 Foundations and Earth Structures
Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Structure: Bridge Ultimate Load in Piles: kN Sheet No.51

3
Borelog: BH-11. A1 Density in KN/m
Surface elevation 0.00 m Stress Increment in Kpa Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project.
Observed WL 3.70 m Vertical Stress in Kpa
Depth to Water -3.70 m Cohesion of Clay in KN/m2 Location: PR314D, PK23+790, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A
2
Pile Size: 0.30 Adhesion, CA in KN/m
Pile Area: 0.09 Friction Increment inKN Data Base : SPT Blows Test
Pile Perimeter: 1.20 Friction in KN
Pile Spacing: 1.50 End Bearing in KN Calculated by : SEA Sochivoan Date: 28.03.13
Ratio of Horiz to Vertical Stress: 1.25 Ultimate Capacity in KN
Limit of Increase in Vertical Effective Stress: 7.5 Safety Factor is 3 for allowable bearing Capacity Position : P.E, Geotechnical/Materials Engineer
Depth of Soft Soil: 1.50 m

From To Distance Strata SPT N Friction Delta Tan Nq Density Sub Stress Vertical Clay Clay Friction Friction End Ultimate
m m m Angle Delta Density Increm Stress C CA Increm Bearing Capacity
0.0 -1.5 1.5
-1.5 -3.0 1.5 clay 15 19.48 9.48 14.22 14.22 125 35 63.0 63.0 87.8 150.8
-3.0 -4.5 1.5 clay 11 18.89 8.89 13.34 27.56 100 30 54.0 117.0 70.2 187.2
-4.5 -6.0 1.5 sand 14 32 24.00 0.4453 29 19.35 9.35 14.03 41.58 27.8 144.8 108.5 253.3
-6.0 -7.5 1.5 clay 22 20.01 10.01 15.02 56.60 150 40 72.0 216.8 105.3 322.1
-7.5 -9.0 1.5 clay 15 19.50 9.50 14.25 70.85 125 35 63.0 279.8 87.8 367.5
-9.0 -10.5 1.5 clay 14 19.38 9.38 14.07 84.92 100 30 54.0 333.8 70.2 404.0
-10.5 -12.0 1.5 clay 19 19.97 9.97 14.96 99.87 150 40 72.0 405.8 105.3 511.1
-12.0 -13.5 1.5 clay 41 20.07 10.07 15.11 114.98 400 65 117.0 522.8 280.8 803.6
-13.5 -15.0 1.5 clay 32 20.03 10.03 15.05 130.02 200 55 99.0 621.8 140.4 762.2
-15.0 -16.5 1.5 clay 31 20.02 10.02 15.03 145.05 200 55 99.0 720.8 140.4 861.2
-16.5 -18.0 1.5 clay 33 20.04 10.04 15.06 160.11 200 55 99.0 819.8 140.4 960.2
-18.0 -19.5 1.5 sand 36 38 28.50 0.5430 86 20.05 10.05 15.08 175.19 142.7 962.5 1355.9 2318.4

24
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Ref: DM-7.02 Foundations and Earth Structures

Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Structure: Bridge Ultimate Load in Piles: kN Sheet No.52

Borelog: BH-12. A2 Density in KN/m3

Surface elevation 0.00 m Stress Increment in Kpa Project : Provincial Roads Improvement Project.
Observed WL 3.00 m Vertical Stress in Kpa
2
Depth to Water -3.00 m Cohesion of Clay in KN/m Location: PR314D, PK23+810, Oyadav Bridge (314D), Abutment A
2
Pile Size: 0.30 Adhesion, CA in KN/m
Pile Area: 0.09 Friction Increment inKN Data Base : SPT Blows Test
Pile Perimeter: 1.20 Friction in KN
Pile Spacing: 1.50 End Bearing in KN Calculated by : SEA Sochivoan Date: 28.03.13
Ratio of Horiz to Vertical Stress: 1.25 Ultimate Capacity in KN
Limit of Increase in Vertical Effective Stress: 7.5 Safety Factor is 3 for allowable bearing Capacity Position : P.E, Geotechnical/Materials Engineer
Depth of Soft Soil: 1.50 m

From To Distance Strata SPT N Friction Delta Tan Nq Density Sub Stress Vertical Clay Clay Friction Friction End Ultimate
m m m Angle Delta Density Increm Stress C CA Increm Bearing Capacity
0.0 -1.5 1.5
-1.5 -3.0 1.5 clay 4 18.33 8.33 12.50 12.50 37.5 13 23.4 23.4 26.3 49.7
-3.0 -4.5 1.5 sand 10 30 22.50 0.4143 21 18.85 8.85 13.28 25.77 16.0 39.4 48.7 88.1
-4.5 -6.0 1.5 sand 16 32 24.00 0.4453 29 19.55 9.55 14.33 40.10 26.8 66.2 104.6 170.8
-6.0 -7.5 1.5 sand 16 32 24.00 0.4453 29 19.55 9.55 14.33 54.42 36.3 102.5 142.0 244.6
-7.5 -9.0 1.5 sand 19 32 24.00 0.4453 29 19.93 9.93 14.90 69.32 46.3 148.8 180.9 329.8
-9.0 -10.5 1.5 clay 21 20.00 10.00 15.00 84.32 150 40 72.0 220.8 105.3 326.1
-10.5 -12.0 1.5 clay 24 20.01 10.01 15.02 99.33 150 40 72.0 292.8 105.3 398.1
-12.0 -13.5 1.5 clay 30 20.03 10.03 15.05 114.38 175 47.5 85.5 378.3 122.9 501.2
-13.5 -15.0 1.5 clay 31 20.04 10.04 15.06 129.44 200 55 99.0 477.3 140.4 617.7
-15.0 -16.5 1.5 clay 30 20.03 10.03 15.05 144.48 175 47.5 85.5 562.8 122.9 685.7
-16.5 -18.0 1.5 clay 31 20.04 10.04 15.06 159.54 200 55 99.0 661.8 140.4 802.2
-18.0 -19.5 1.5 clay 30 20.03 10.03 15.05 174.59 175 47.5 85.5 747.3 122.9 870.2

25
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges
Figure5. Boring Operations

26
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Laboratory Activities

27
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

Figure6. Legends

28
 Provincial Roads Improvement Project
Improvement of PR314D
Geotechnical Investigation Report : Part B Bridges

29
 PART II
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN PLAN
Environmental Management Plan 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A Mitigation 1-17

B Monitoring 17-20

C Implementation Arrangements 20-22

Bidding Document for CW-B1: Improvement of PR314D Procurement of works

 Environmental Management Plan 1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

1. This EMP gives mitigation and management measures to be taken during Project implementation to
avoid, reduce, and mitigate adverse environmental impacts in compliance with ADB SPS 2009.

A. Mitigation

2. Table 1 presents the environmental impacts and corresponding mitigation measures. The table
also shows responsibilities for implementation of mitigation measures and monitoring. MPWT shall ensure
that the EMP is included in the tender and contract documents for civil works.

3. This EMP is part of the tender documents. The responsibilities given in this EMP are contractually
binding on the contractor. Failure by the contractor to comply with the EMP may result in penalties being
imposed.

4. Within 1 month of contract signing the contractor must prepare a CEMP (Contractors
Environmental Management Plan) and submit to the DDIS consultants for approval. The EMP is of
necessity general. The CEMP must be site specific and give details of contractors operations and their
locations.

5. The conformity of contractors with environmental contract procedures and specifications shall be
regularly monitored by the Project Management Unit (PMU3) through the Social and Environmental
O f f i c e (SEO) within M P W T during Project implementation. PMU3/SEO shall be assisted by the
detailed design and implementation supervision consultant (DDIS) to undertake EMP monitoring and to
prepare corresponding semi-annual reports for submission to ADB.

Table 1 Environmental Mitigation Measures

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Pre-construction
Location of Safety risks due to The detailed design and implementation All project roads Part of DDIS MPWT/PMU3
Project roads presence of supervision consultant (DDIS) shall project cost
unexploded ordnance engage a UXO specialist to determine the
(UXO) level of risk of the project roads and
advise on the need for clearance.
Any clearance that is required will be All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS,
undertaken through the civil works project cost MPWT/PMU3/SEO
contracts, by the engagement of
qualified local UXO clearance firms.
The contractor shall only commence site All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS,
works after the UXO clearance firm has project cost MPWT/PMU3/SEO
certified that areas are already cleared.
Lack of mechanism to Establish a grievance redress All project roads No additional MPWT/PMU3 DDIS
address mechanism (GRM), as described in the cost
environmental IEE (Chapter Ⅸ).
complaints Make public the existence of the GRM All project roads No additional MPWT/PMU3 DDIS
through public awareness campaigns. cost
Ensure that names and contact numbers All project roads No additional MPWT/PMU3 DDIS
of representatives of MPWT and cost
contractors are placed on the notice
boards outside the construction site and
at local government offices (e.g.,
provincial and commune levels)
Encroachment on Excavation for sourcing fill materials for All project roads No additional Design: DDIS,
historical/ cultural areas the Project shall not be undertaken within cost DDIS MPWT/PMU3/SEO,
conservation zones. Construction:
Contractor

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 2

Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring

Impacts/Concerns
Except for the road works itself, no All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS,
project facilities (temporary or permanent) cost MPWT/PMU3/SEO,
shall be established within conservation Ministry of Culture
areas. Such facilities include, but are not and Fine Arts
limited to, construction camps, workers (MCFA)
camps, asphalt plants, concrete mixing
plants, crushing plants, vehicle and
equipment maintenance areas, materials
storage sites, etc.
The Project shall not establish or use All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS,
quarry and borrow areas within cost MPWT/PMU3/SEO,
conservation areas. MCFA
Location of Siting of quarry and Sourcing of quarry and borrow materials Quarry and Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
quarry and borrow areas could from existing sites shall be preferred borrow sites contractor’s
borrow cause damage to over establishment of new sites, as bid cost
areas ecologically sensitive much as possible.
sites, productive land Quarries and borrow pits shall not be ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and nuisance to established in national, provincial, cost
sensitive receptors district and village conservation forests
(residential areas, and other ecologically sensitive and
schools, etc.) protected areas.
Existing borrow/quarry sites shall have the ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
appropriate environmental permits from cost
Government of Cambodia.
In case the Project will involve new ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
quarry/borrow sites, necessary approvals contractor’s
from environmental authorities shall be bid cost
obtained prior to operation of such sites.
Such sites shall be located over 300 m
away from residential, school, hospital
and other sensitive receptors.

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Location of Siting of various project Workers camp location and facilities All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction facilities could shall be located at least 300 m from cost
camps/workers adversely affect settlements and agreed with local
camps and other sensitive receptors communities and local officials.
project facilities (residential areas, etc.) Siting of asphalt plants, concrete mixing All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
due to dust emission, plants, crushing plants and other cost
wastewater generation, facilities that cause high dust and/or
etc. gaseous emissions will be at least 300
m from settlements and other sensitive
receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.)
Necessary environmental All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
clearance/approval shall be obtained contractor’s
prior to establishment and operation of bid cost
asphalt mixing plants, crushing plants
and other facilities.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 3

Project design Climate change and Incorporate in the project design the All project roads Part of DDIS MPWT/PMU3
hydrological impacts measures that have been developed project cost
under the Climate Change Adaptation
Component of the Project (e.g.,
ecosystem-based adaptation
measures).
Provide for appropriate design of All project roads Part of DDIS MPWT/PMU3
roadside and cross drainage systems, project cost
where necessary, to avoid flooding on
project roads as well as in areas
surrounding the project roads, especially
at sections where road embankments
will be raised to prevent flooding of
roadways.
The road embankment, bridges and All project roads Part of DDIS MPWT/PMU3
drainage facilities shall be designed project cost
based on the historical flood data and
flood forecasting.
Erosion control and slope stabilization All project roads Part of DDIS MPWT/PMU3
measures shall be included in the project cost
design, as appropriate, such as side
ditches and berms, rock lining and slope
walls along the road, shrub buffer strips
sites in areas of high erosion risk, cross
drainage to accommodate
floodwater/run-off in case road sections
are on elevated fills that will obstruct
natural drainage.
Site preparation Disruption to community Prior to commencement of site works, All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS, MPWT/PMU3
utilities relocate or re-provision water supply contractor’s
pipelines, irrigation canals and other bid cost
facilities that may be affected by
construction works This will be done in
agreement with the local community and
the utility company.
Construction
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Operation of Encroachment/damage Within conservation areas and vicinity; All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO,
construction to historically/culturally project activities, e.g., operation of cost MCFA
equipment, significant areas. jackhammers, piling, blasting, etc. that
excavation may cause damage to nearby
works, spoils and archaeological relics shall be prohibited.
waste disposal, Spoils and other construction wastes All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO,
transport of shall be disposed sites approved by cost MCFA
construction concerned authorities.
materials The contractor shall ensure that all All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO,
project-related trucks and vehicles (i.e., cost MCFA
those owned by the contractor, sub-
contractor, suppliers, etc.) are not
overloaded to avoid damage to access
roads. This measure shall be
implemented for the entire Project.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 4

The following ‘chance-find’ principles will All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO,
be implemented by the contractor for all cost MCFA
Project roads to account for any
undiscovered items identified during
construction:
a. In coordination with MCFA,
workers will be provided orientation
in the location of cultural/heritage
zones within the construction area
and in the identification of potential
items of cultural/heritage
significance.
b. Upon discovery of any objects of
possible archaeological significance that
may be uncovered during construction,
the site supervisor shall immediately
suspend construction activities affecting
the area and shall alert MCFA or its
provincial or district offices to inspect the
site.
c. Work will remain suspended until a site
assessment has been made by the
concerned authority (MCFA, etc.), an
agreement has been reached as to any
required mitigation measures (which may
include excavation and recovery of the
item), and the contractor has been given
permission by the concerned authority to
proceed with the construction activities.

Project Activity Potenti Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

al Cost Implementation Monitoring
Environment
Earthworks, Air pollution due to Construction equipment will be All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
excavation elevated levels of maintained to a good standard. contractor’s
activities, dust Immediate repairs of any malfunctioning bid cost
transport of and gaseous emissions construction vehicles and equipment
materials, shall be undertaken.
operation of
construction Equipment and vehicles not in use shall ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
equipment, be switched off. cost
vehicles and Machinery and vehicles causing ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
other facilities excessive pollution (e.g., visible smoke) cost
(asphalt plants, will be banned from construction sites.
crushing plants,
concrete mixing All construction equipment and vehicles ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
plants), shall have valid certifications indicating cost
stockpiling and compliance to vehicle emission
waste disposal standards.
On rainless day undertake watering, at All project roads, Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
least twice per day, on dusty and access roads, and contractor’s
exposed areas at construction yards, other project- bid cost
materials stockpile, construction sites, related areas
access roads, quarry areas, borrow sites
and other project areas where
residential sites and other sensitive
receptors are located nearby.
Tightly cover trucks transporting All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction materials (sand, soil, and access roads cost
cement, gravel, etc.) to avoid spills and
dust emission.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 5

Impose speed limits on construction All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
vehicles to minimize dust emission and access roads cost
along areas where sensitive receptors
are located (houses, schools, hospitals,
temples, etc.).
Position any stationary emission All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
sources (e.g., portable diesel cost
generators, compressors, etc.) as far as
is practical from sensitive receptors.
Burning of wastes generated at the All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction sites, work camps and and other project- cost
other project-related activities shall be related areas
strictly prohibited. (workers camps,
etc.)
Provide temporary covers (e.g., Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
tarpaulins, grass, etc.) on long term project sites contractor’s
materials and spoils stockpiles. bid cost
Clean road surfaces of debris/spills from All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction equipment and vehicles and access roads contractor’s
bid cost
Install temporary fencing or barriers Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
around particularly dusty activities in project sites contractor’s
vicinity of sensitive receivers. bid cost
Locations for stockpiling spoils, fill and Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
other materials with high dust content project sites cost
shall be at least 300 m from the nearest
residential areas and other sensitive
receivers.
Earthworks, Elevated noise and No noisy construction-related activities Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
transport of vibration levels that (e.g., transport of materials along project sites cost

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
materials, could cause nuisance residential areas and other sensitive
operation of and damage to receptors, piling, use of jackhammer,
construction properties etc.) will be carried out from 2100 hrs to
equipment 0600 hrs along residential areas,
and vehicles hospitals and other sensitive receptors.
Noisy construction activities will be ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
avoided during religious or cultural cost
events in close proximity to the roadside
such as Friday prayers attended by
Muslim Cham, when ethnic Khmer are
attending temple festivals or holding
weddings, etc.
All construction equipment and vehicles ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
shall be well maintained, regularly contractor’s
inspected for noise emissions, and shall bid cost
be fitted with effective muffler and other
appropriate noise suppression
equipment consistent with applicable
national and local regulations.
Use only vehicles and equipment that ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
are registered and have necessary cost
permits.
Truck drivers and equipment operators ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
shall avoid, as much as possible, the cost
use of horns in densely populated areas
and where there other sensitive
receptors are found such as schools,
temples, hospital, etc. are located.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 6

Impose speed limits on construction ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO

vehicles to minimize noise emission cost
along areas where sensitive receptors
are located (houses, schools, temples,
hospitals, etc.).
Provide temporary noise barriers (3-5 ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
meter high barrier can reduce 5-10 contractor’s
dB(A), as necessary, if site works will bid cost
generate high noise levels that could
disturb nearby households, hospital,
school and other sensitive receptors
Avoid noisy construction activities in ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
vicinity of sensitive receivers during cost
night time or other sensitive periods
(e.g. during school hours in vicinity of
schools)
Truck drivers and equipment operators ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
shall avoid the use of horns cost
Various Improper handling and Segregate and regularly collect wastes Construction and Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction disposal of wastes could at worker camps and offices. workers camps contractor’s
activities, cause odor and vermin bid cost
operation of problems, pollution and Construction/workers’ camps shall be Construction and Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction flow obstruction of provided with garbage bins. workers camps contractor’s
and workers nearby watercourses bid cost
camps and could negatively Prohibit disposal of solid wastes into Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
impact the landscape. canals, rivers, other watercourses, project sites cost
agricultural field and public areas.
There will be no site-specific landfills ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
established by the contractors. All solid contractor’s
waste will be regularly collected and bid cost
removed from the work camps and
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
disposed to areas approved by local
authorities.
Prohibit burning of construction and ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
domestic wastes. cost
Recyclables shall be recovered and sold ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
to recyclers. cost
Residual and hazardous wastes shall be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
disposed of in disposal sites approved contractor’s
by local authorities. bid cost
Ensure that wastes are not haphazardly ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
dumped within the project site and cost
adjacent areas
Establishment Operation of these Drainage shall be provided to facilitate Construction/Work Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and operation of facilities will generate the rapid removal of surface water from ers camps contractor’s
construction solid and liquid wastes all areas and prevent flooding and bid cost
and workers and if improperly accumulation of stagnant water.
camps handled, these could Provide adequate housing for all ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
cause health problems workers at the construction camps and contractor’s
and pollution. establish clean canteen/eating and bid cost
cooking areas.
Portable lavatories (or at least pit ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
latrines in remote areas) shall be contractor’s
installed and open defecation shall be bid cost
prohibited and prevented by cleaning
lavatories daily and by keeping lavatory
facilities clean at all times.
Provide separate hygienic sanitation ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
facilities/toilets and bathing areas with contractor’s
sufficient water supply for male and bid cost
female workers.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 7

Wastewater effluents from contractors’ ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO

workshops and equipment washing- contractor’s
yards will be passed through bid cost
gravel/sand beds and all oil/grease
contaminants will be removed before
wastewater is discharged. Oil and
grease residues shall be stored in tightly
covered drums. Such wastes shall be
disposed consistent with national and
local regulations.
Construction/workers camps shall be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
cleaned up after use to the satisfaction contractor’s
of MPWT/SEO/DDIS and local bid cost
community. All waste materials shall be
removed and disposed to disposal sites
approved by local authorities.
Land used for campsites shall be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
restored to the original condition as far contractor’s
as practicable and the area shall be bid cost
planted with appropriate trees/shrubs as
soon as practicable after it is vacated
and cleaned.
Quarry Operation of quarry and Prior to extraction, topsoil (about 15 cm) All quarries and No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and borrow sites could shall be stockpiled, preserved and then borrow areas cost
borrow site cause adverse impacts refilled after completion of quarry/borrow operated for the
operation to surface water quality, pit operation for rehabilitation purposes project
elevated dust emission after excavation is over.
during excavation and
transport, erosion and

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Dust control during transport (e.g., ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
siltation of nearby water water spraying on access roads and contractor’s
courses, damage to provision of truck cover) and excavation bid cost
productive land and shall be undertaken in areas where
ecologically sensitive there are sensitive receptors such as
areas and pose health Long-term material stockpiles shall be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and safety risks. covered to prevent wind erosion. contractor’s
bid cost
During quarry and borrow site operation, ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
provide adequate drainage to avoid contractor’s
accumulation of stagnant water. bid cost
The use of river bed sources shall be ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
avoided, as much as possible, however cost
if this is unavoidable the contractor shall
minimize use of river bed for
construction materials and sources of fill
and quarry materials lying on small
rivers and streams shall be avoided.
Alluvial terraces or alluvial deposits
which lie on the river beds but not
covered by water in normal hydrological
conditions shall be preferred.
Confine winning river bed materials to ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
less than 20% of river width in any cost
location and keep away from river
banks.
Protect and reinstate river banks if ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
unexpected erosion occurs. contractor’s
bid cost

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 8

Quarry and borrow sites must be ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
selected amongst those offering the cost
highest ratio between extractive capacity
(both in terms of quality) and loss of
natural state.
Quarry and borrow sites lying close to ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
the alignment, with a high level of cost
accessibility and with a low hill gradient,
are preferred.
Upon completion of extraction activities, ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
re-contour borrow/quarry pit wall or fill- contractor’s
up when there are available and suitable bid cost
materials such as excavation spoils,
replace topsoil, and re-vegetate with
native species such as grasses and fast-
growing shrubs and trees.
Upon completion of extraction activities, ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
borrow pits shall be dewatered and contractor’s
fences shall be installed, as appropriate, bid cost
to minimize health and safety risks.
In quarries in mountainous or hilly areas, ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
or wherever slopes are important, contractor’s
terraces shall be cut after extraction, bid cost
drainage system and vegetation cover
shall be provided for rehabilitation to
enhance slope stability
Implement compensatory planting (at ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
least one is to one ratio) if trees will contractor’s
have to be removed at quarry and bid cost
borrow sites.
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Borrow pits will be left in a tidy state with ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
stable side slopes and proper drainage contractor’s
in order to minimize soil erosion, bid cost
siltation of nearby bodies of water and to
avoid creation of water bodies favorable
for mosquito breeding.
To avoid drowning when pits become ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
water-filled, measures such as fencing, contractor’s
providing flotation devices such as a bid cost
buoy tied to a rope, etc. shall be
implemented.
It is possible that villagers may request ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
borrow pits to be left excavated so that cost
they may be used as water reservoirs or
fishponds. If this were to be agreed
between the contractors and the
villagers, all the full safety measures
detailed above must be observed. Such
agreements would be formalized in
writing between the contractors and the
villagers after full discussion with all
concerned parties.
Use of Pollution and safety Store fuel and hazardous substances Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous risks due to use of and wastes in paved areas with roof and project sites contractor’s
substances hazardous materials embankment. If spills or leaks do occur, bid cost
such as fuel, and disposal of undertake immediate clean up.
oil, bitumen, hazardous wastes Train relevant construction personnel in All project roads Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
etc. handling of fuels and other hazardous contractor’s
substances as well as spill control bid cost
procedures.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 9

Ensure availability of spill clean up Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO

materials (e.g., absorbent pads, etc.) project sites contractor’s
specifically designed for petroleum bid cost
products and other hazardous
substances where such materials are
being stored.
Segregate hazardous wastes (oily Designated No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
wastes, used batteries, fuel drums) and storage sites cost
ensure that storage, transport and
disposal shall not cause pollution and
shall be undertaken consistent with
national and local regulations.
Store waste oil, lubricant and other Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous materials and wastes in storage sites contractor’s
tightly sealed containers to avoid bid cost
contamination of soil and water
resources.
Ensure all storage containers of Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous substances and wastes are storage sites contractor’s
in good condition with proper labeling. bid cost
Regularly check containers for leakage Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and undertake necessary repair or storage sites contractor’s
replacement. bid cost
Store hazardous materials above flood Designated No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
level. storage sites cost
Storage areas for fuel, oil, lubricant, Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
bitumen and other hazardous substance storage sites contractor’s
will be located at least 100 m away from bid cost
any watercourses.
Project Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Activity Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Storage areas will be bunded and Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
provided with interceptor traps so that storage sites contractor’s
accidental spills do not contaminate the bid cost
environment.
Storage, transport and disposal of Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous wastes, including spill project sites contractor’s
wastes, shall be consistent with national bid cost
and local regulations.
Wherever possible, refueling will be Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
carried out at a fuel storage area. project sites cost
Refuelling shall not be permitted within Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
or adjacent to watercourses. project sites cost
Where significant amount of oily Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
wastewater or spill/leakage of oil and project sites contractor’s
grease may occur (e.g., equipment bid cost
maintenance areas), drainage leading to
an oil-water separator shall be provided
for treatment of wastewater. The oil-
water separator shall be regularly
skimmed of oil and maintained to ensure
efficiency.
Vehicle maintenance and refueling will Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
be confined to areas in construction project sites contractor’s
sites designed to contain spilled bid cost
lubricants and fuel.
Bitumen shall not be allowed to enter Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
either running or dry streambeds and project sites cost
nor will be disposed of in ditches or
small waste disposal sites prepared by
the contractor.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 10

Bitumen storage and mixing areas as Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
well as storage areas for other project sites contractor’s
petroleum products used in the bid cost
preparation of the bitumen mixture shall
be protected against spills and all
contaminated soil must be properly
handled according to national and local
regulations. As a minimum, these areas
must be provided with concrete flooring
and surrounded by an embankment to
readily contain and clean-up spills.
Adequate precaution will be taken to Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
prevent oil/lubricant/ hydrocarbon project sites cost
contamination of channel beds. Spillage
if any will be immediately cleared with
utmost caution to leave no traces.
All areas intended for storage of Designated Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous materials will be quarantined storage sites contractor’s
and provided with adequate facilities bid cost
(e.g., fire fighting equipment, sorbent
pads, etc.) to combat emergency
situations complying with all the
applicable statutory stipulation.
Blasting Safety risks to workers Blasting will be carried out only with All areas where No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and the public permission of the concerned authority, blasting will be cost
using a pre-established schedule. undertaken

All the statutory laws, regulation, rules Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
etc., pertaining to acquisition, transport, project sites contractor’s
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
storage, handling and use of explosives bid cost
will be strictly followed.
The timing will be made available to the All areas where No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
local people within 500 m of the blasting blasting will be cost
site in all directions, depending on the undertaken
total charge used.
Blasting will be held only during day time ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and shall be carried out not using high cost
powered explosives. Under no
circumstance will blasting be undertaken
at night.
Where possible blasting mats will be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
used to reduce noise levels when contractor’s
blasting is carried out to reduce flying bid cost
rock.
No blasting will take place without ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
condition survey of the buildings within cost
500 m and permission and monitoring
by the DDIS
People living near blasting sites will be ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
informed of blasting times prior to the cost
blasting.
Warning sirens will be sounded before ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
blasting. cost
Pre-splitting shall be undertaken. ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
contractor’s
bid cost
Where the vibration from blasting is ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
exceeding the maximum permissible cost
level, or damage occurs to local property
information from the blasting shall be
used to modify blasting patterns and
calculate a reduced charge for future
blasts

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 11

Blasting shall be under careful and strict ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
management/supervision of properly cost
trained and licensed personnel. Workers
at blasting sites will be trained prior to
blast operations and provided with
safety equipment and earplugs.
Observe proper warning and ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
precautionary measures to ensure cost
safety of residents, pedestrians,
motorists and structures during blasting.
All expenses/costs to address injuries, ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
damage to properties, accidents, etc. contractor’s
due to blasting shall be shouldered by bid cost
the contractor.
Earthworks/exca Improper spoils Provide grass cover and other suitable Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
vation disposal could cause slope stabilization measures on road project sites contractor’s
deterioration of water embankment slopes and on long term bid cost
quality, damage to stockpile of spoils.
productive land and
flow obstruction of Spoil disposal shall not cause ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
water courses. sedimentation and obstruction of flow of cost
watercourses, damage to agricultural
land and densely vegetated areas.
The spoils disposal site shall be located ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
at least 50 m from surface water contractor’s
courses and shall be protected from bid cost
erosion by avoiding formation of steep
slopes, provisions of adequate drainage
and grassing.
Spoils shall only be disposed to areas ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
approved by local authority. contractor’s
bid cost
Water courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
be kept free of excavation spoil and cost
construction debris, floating and
submerged.
Spoil and construction materials ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
stockpile area shall be located away cost
from waterbodies and under no
circumstances will these materials be
dumped into watercourses.
Dredged and excavated materials shall ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
be reused or provided to local residents cost
as soon as possible, if they require such
materials, for land reclamation. The
remaining spoils can be disposed into
low elevation sites for road construction.
Bridge works Bridge repair and Rocks, stones, soil and other materials All bridge repair No additional Contractor DDIS,
replacement could shall not be dumped onto rivers and and replacement cost PMU3/SEO/DPWT
cause obstruction of streams. sites
river flow and
deterioration of water
quality due to siltation
Ensure bridge works shall not cause ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
obstruction of river flow and flooding of cost
adjacent area.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 12

At bridge repair and demolition sites, the ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
bridge structure will not be dropped into contractor’s
the river but alternative means will be bid cost
used to avoid "dropping the bridge" into
rivers/streams. This shall be done by
"sawing" appropriate sections of the
bridge and using cranes to lift these
sections away or alternatively by
construction of a platform onto which the
bridge could be lowered.
Cofferdams, silt fences, sediment ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
barriers or other devices will be used as contractor’s
appropriate based on the design to bid cost
prevent migration of silt during
excavation and boring operations within
streams. If cofferdams are used, these
will be dewatered and cleaned to
prevent siltation by pumping from
cofferdams to a settling basin or a
containment unit.
Exposed surfaces shall be provided with ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
native grasses and creepers to reduce contractor’s
runoff as early as possible in bid cost
construction.
Transport of Damage to community The contractor shall not allow Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
materials and utilities such as water overloading of trucks used for all project- project sites cost
spoils, supply pipes, irrigation related activities.
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
of construction canals, drainage, etc.
equipment may occur during The contractor shall immediately repair ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and various construction activities. any damage caused by the Project to contractor’s
construction community facilities such as water bid cost
activities supply, power supply, irrigation canals,
drainage and the like. Adequate
compensation shall be paid to affected
parties, as necessary.
Access roads damaged during transport ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
of construction materials and other contractor’s
project-related activities shall be bid cost
reinstated upon completion of
construction works.
Bridge works, Deterioration of surface Firmly consolidate river banks using Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
stockpiling of water quality, flooding stones, concrete and other suitable project sites contractor’s
construction and flow obstruction of retaining measures at each bridge bid cost
materials watercourses construction site and ensure that water
and spoils, courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall be
use of kept free of excavation spoil and
hazardous construction debris, floating and
materials submerged.
and Spoils, construction wastes and Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
earthworks construction materials stockpile area project sites cost
shall be located away from water bodies
and under no circumstances will these
materials be dumped into watercourses.
Do not fill up canals and creeks at the Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction site. In case filling of local project sites cost
drainage system is necessary,
consultation with local
authorities shall be undertaken and their
permission obtained beforehand. An
alternative drainage shall be established
before the existing canal is filled-up.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 13

Prohibit placement of construction Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO

materials, waste storage areas or project sites cost
equipment in or near drainage channels
and water courses.
Discharge of oily wastewater, fuel, Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
hazardous substances and wastes, and project sites cost
untreated sewage to
watercourses/canals and on the
ground/soil shall be prohibited.
Provide adequate drainage at the Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction sites and other project project sites contractor’s
areas to avoid flooding of surrounding bid cost
areas and minimize flow obstruction of
existing watercourses.
Regularly inspect and maintain all Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
drainage channels to keep these free of project sites cost
obstructions.
Slope stabilization measures (e.g., Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
planting of fast growing native species of project sites contractor’s
grass and shrubs, etc.) shall be bid cost
implemented on exposed surfaces along
river embankments to reduce material
wash-away.
Construct retaining structures such as Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
gabion baskets, rip-rap, etc. for river project sites contractor’s
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
bank protection. bid cost
Road and bridge Traffic disruption and In cooperation with the local traffic All project roads No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
works obstruction of access to authorities, properly organize transport and access roads cost
roadside properties of materials for the project to avoid
congestion.
Set up clear traffic signal boards and Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
traffic advisory signs at the roads going project sites, contractor’s
in and out the road and bridge where appropriate bid cost
construction sites to minimize traffic
build-up.
Regularly monitor traffic conditions Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
along access and Project roads to project sites cost
ensure that project vehicles are not
causing congestion.
Provide sufficient lighting at night within Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and in the vicinity of construction sites. project sites, contractor’s
where appropriate bid cost
Implement suitable safety measures to Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
minimize risk of adverse interactions project sites contractor’s
between construction works and traffic bid cost
flows through provision of temporary
signals or flag controls, adequate
lighting, fencing, signage and road
diversions, as necessary.
Provide safe temporary accesses to ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
properties and establishments affected contractor’s
by disruption to their permanent bid cost
accesses.
Reinstate good quality permanent ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
accesses following completion of contractor’s
construction. bid cost
Provide safe vehicle and pedestrian ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
access around construction areas. Pay contractor’s
particular attention to areas near schools. bid cost
Provide adequate signage, barriers and ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
flag persons for traffic control. contractor’s
bid cost

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 14

If necessary, traffic will be diverted for ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
safe and smooth movement of vehicles cost
to ensure smooth traffic flow and
minimize accidents, traffic hold ups and
congestion.
The diversion signs would be bold and ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
clearly visible particularly at night. contractor’s
bid cost
Temporary bypasses will be constructed ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and maintained (including dust control) contractor’s
during the construction period bid cost
particularly at bridge crossings. Location
of temporary bypasses shall be agreed
with local authorities and such sites shall
reinstated upon completion of works.
Earthworks, Soil erosion On hill slopes and other potentially Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
stockpiling erodible places along the roadside, project sites contractor’s
and appropriate native vegetation that bid cost
roadworks retards erosion will be planted.
As much as possible, construction ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
activities in hilly areas are to be cost
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
undertaken during dry season only.
Road embankments and slopes shall be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
monitored during construction for signs contractor’s
of erosion, vegetative cover shall be bid cost
provided on slopes by planting native
grass and creepers on erosion prone
sections.
Long-term material stockpiles will be ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
covered with native species of grass or contractor’s
other suitable materials to prevent wind bid cost
erosion.
Operation of Impacts to flora and Spoils and all types of wastes shall not Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction fauna be dumped into forested areas, project sites cost
equipment agricultural land, densely vegetated
and vehicles, areas, and water courses.
site works, Workers shall be prohibited from ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
spoils collecting firewood and construction cost
disposal and materials from surrounding forests, and
presence of from hunting wild animals.
workers Ensure that construction works are ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
carried out without unnecessary cost
clearing of roadside vegetation.
The contractor shall prohibit cutting of ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
trees for firewood and for use in for cost
construction-related activities
Construction vehicles will operate within ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
the corridor of impact, i.e., cost
approximately within ROW, to avoid
damaging soil and vegetation. It will be
most important to avoid soil compaction
around trees. Generally the rule will be
to avoid driving heavy equipment or
trucks anywhere into the 'drip-line' of a
tree (defined as imaginary line around a
tree where rainwater falls freely to
ground unimpeded by the tree's foliage)

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 15

The contractor will not use or permit the ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
use of wood as a fuel for the execution cost
of any part of the Works, including but
not limited to the heating of bitumen and
bitumen mixtures, and to the extent
practicable shall ensure that fuels other
than wood are used for cooking, and
water heating in all his camps and living
accommodations.
Contractor shall not buy or use wood ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
from the illegal sources (that come from cost
the illegal logging)
Construction camps, asphalt mixing ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
plants, material storage sites and other cost
project facilities shall not be located in
the forest areas and other densely
vegetated sites.
Contractor will take all precautions ditto Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
necessary to ensure that damage to contractor’s
vegetation is avoided due to fires bid cost
resulting from execution of the works.
Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility
Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
The Contractor will immediately
suppress the fire, if it occurs, and shall
undertake replanting to replace
damaged vegetation.
As much as possible, bridge works will ditto No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
be scheduled in dry season to minimize cost
adverse impacts to fishery, river water
quality and other aquatic resources.
Construction Health and safety risks Conduct orientation for construction Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
works, to workers and the workers regarding emergency response project sites contractor’s
operation of public procedures and equipment in case of bid cost
workers camps accidents (e.g., burns from hot bitumen,
spills of hazardous substances, etc.),
fire, etc.; health and safety measures,
such as on the use of hot bitumen
products for paving of Project roads,
etc.; prevention of HIV/AIDS, malaria,
diarrhea, and other related diseases.
Provide drainage at construction sites Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
and workers camps to prevent water project sites contractor’s
logging/ accumulation of stagnant water bid cost
and formation of breeding sites for
mosquitoes.
Provide fire fighting equipment and Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
appropriate emergency response project sites contractor’s
equipment (based on on-going bid cost
construction activities) at the work areas
and at construction and workers camps.
Provide first aid facilities that are readily Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
accessible by workers. project sites contractor’s
bid cost
At the workers camps, provide adequate Workers camps Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
housing for all workers at the contractor’s
construction camps, provide reliable bid cost
supply of potable water, install separate
hygienic sanitation facilities/toilets and
bathing areas with sufficient water
supply for male and female workers and
establish clean eating areas and
kitchen.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 16

Provide workers with appropriate safety Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
equipment/devices (such as dust mask, project sites contractor’s
hard hats, safety shoes, goggles, ear bid cost
plugs, etc.) and strictly require them to
use these as necessary.
Install sign boards, lighting system at the Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction sites, borrow pits, or places project sites, contractor’s
which may cause accidents for people where appropriate bid cost
and workers
Strictly impose speed limits on Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction vehicles along residential project sites, cost
areas and where other sensitive where appropriate
receptors such as schools, hospitals,
and other populated areas are located.
Educate drivers on safe driving practices Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
to minimize accidents and to prevent project sites cost
spill of hazardous substances and other
construction materials during transport.
Barriers (e.g., temporary fence) shall be Throughout project Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
installed at construction areas to deter sites, contractor’s
pedestrian access to these areas except where appropriate bid cost
at designated crossing points.

Project Activity Potential Proposed Mitigation Measures Location Estimated Responsibility

Environmental Cost Implementation Monitoring
Impacts/Concerns
Sufficient lighting at night as well as Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
warning signs shall be provided in the project sites, contractor’s
periphery of the construction site. where appropriate bid cost
The general public/local residents shall Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
not be allowed in high – risk areas, e.g., project sites, cost
excavation sites and areas where heavy where appropriate
equipment is in operation.
Ensure proper collection and disposal of Construction/ work Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
solid wastes within the construction ers camps contractor’s
camps consistent with local regulations. bid cost
Provide fencing on all areas of Throughout Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
excavation greater than 2 m deep. project sites, contractor’s
where appropriate bid cost
Ensure reversing signals are installed on Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
all construction vehicles. project sites cost
Measures to prevent malaria shall be Construction/work Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
implemented (e.g., provision of ers camps contractor’s
insecticide treated mosquito nets to bid cost
workers, spraying of insecticides,
installation of proper drainage to avoid
formation of stagnant water, etc.).
Discharge of untreated sewage shall be Construction/work Part of Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
prohibited. ers camps contractor’s
bid cost
Operation of Social conflicts Regularly inform in advance the local Throughout No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
construction/wor officials and local residents on the project sites cost
k ers camps location and schedule of construction
activities which may cause impacts on
the environment and life of people (e.g.,
road sections to be constructed; roads
used for transport, locations of worker
camps etc.).
Locate construction camps away from Construction/ No additional Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
communities (at least 300 m away) in workers camps cost
order to avoid social conflict in using
resources and basic amenities such as
water supply.
Maximize number of local people Throughout Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
employed in construction works. project sites
Maximize goods and services sourced Throughout Contractor DDIS, PMU3/SEO
from local commercial enterprises. project sites
Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 Environmental Management Plan 17

Operation
Increased Elevated noise levels Along schools, hospitals, etc., provide All project roads Part of DPWT, Local MPWT/PMU3
number traffic signs prohibiting blowing of horns project cost traffic authority
of and impose speed limits
vehicles Road safety risks Implementation of a community-based All project roads Part of DPWT MPWT/PMU3
road safety program under the Project to project cost
increase safety awareness. The
program includes education program for
schools, drivers, road users, and the
community.
Proper maintenance of traffic signs, All project roads Part of DPWT, Local MPWT/PMU3
markings and other devices used to project cost traffic authority
regulate traffic at appropriate places.
Potential damage to the Under the Project, each project province All project roads project cost DPWT MCFA
Conservation areas shall be provided with portable weigh
scales to control overloading of trucks.
This measure will help ensure that
overloaded trucks shall not be allowed
to pass through PSP and other Project
roads.

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
Environmental Management Plan 18

B. Monitoring

6. Table 2 presents the environmental monitoring activities to be undertaken during various

project phases. Monitoring of the contractor’s environmental performance in terms of
implementation of mitigation measures for pre-construction and construction phases shall be
undertaken by the detailed design and implementation consultant (DDIS). The DDIS shall also
conduct ambient measurements (dust, noise and surface water quality) and shall assist the
MPWT in preparing semi-annual environmental monitoring reports for submission to ADB.
The monitoring reports shall describe progress with the implementation of the EMP and
compliance issues and corrective actions, if any.

Table 2 Environmental Monitoring Measures

Aspects/Parameters to be Monitored and Applicable Location Means of Monitoring Schedule / Responsible to
Standards Frequency Undertake
Monitoring
Pre-construction
1. Completion of detailed design in accordance with Phnom Penh Review of detailed design Prior to approval MPWT/PMU3
EMP requirements to address climate change documentation of detailed
and hydrological impacts (see IEE Table VI.B) design
2. Implementation of all mitigation measures
specified in IEE Table VII.3 on the following:
a. UXO clearing All project roads Confirm necessary UXO removal Prior to start of DDIS,
is completed and certified by site works MPWT/PMU3
authorized UXO clearing firm
b. establishment of grievance redress All project roads Confirm GRM is established and Prior to start of DDIS
mechanism (GRM) disclosed to the public site works
c. siting of quarry and borrow areas consistent All project roads Check contractor’s construction Prior to DDIS,
with EMP materials plans, site visit establishment of MPWT/PMU3
quarry and borrow
areas

d. siting of various project facilities All project roads Check contractor’s facilities Prior to DDIS,
(workers/construction camps, crushing location plans, site visit establishment of MPWT/PMU3
plants, asphalt plants, etc.) consistent with contractor’s
EMP facilities

e. relocation of community facilities (e.g., water All project roads Site visit, confirm with local Prior to start of DDIS,
supply pipelines, irrigation canal, etc.) officials site works MPWT/PMU3

3. Ambient surface water quality (fecal coliform, All project roads --- on Field sampling Once, prior to DDIS
dissolved oxygen,pH, oil and grease, suspended rivers or streams close to establishment of
solids, biological oxygen demand – 5 days or proposed sites for workers /
BOD5) to be compared to standards specified in construction/workers construction
Subdecree on Water Pollution Control, 1999 (No. camps camps
27 ANK.BK)

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
Environmental Management Plan 19

Aspects/Parameters to be Monitored and Applicable Location Means of Monitoring Schedule/Frequency Responsible to

Standards Undertake
Monitoring
Construction
4. Implementation of construction phase Locations indicated in Site visit, interviews with local Quarterly (on a DDIS,
environmental mitigation measures specified in IEE Table VII.3 for residents, coordination with regular basis) MPWT/PMU3/SE
IEE Table VII.3 specific mitigation concerned agencies (e.g. O, DPWTs
measures MCAFA, local traffic Random checks and
authorities, etc.) to validate complaints As appropriate –
MCFA
5. Noise in dB(A) compared to standards specified All project roads and other Noise measurement In response to DDIS
in Subdecree on the Control of Air Pollution and areas where project- complaints
Noise Disturbance, 2000 (No. 42 ANK.BK) related activities are
undertaken
6. Total suspended particulate/dust compared to All project roads and other Field sampling In response to DDIS
standard specified in Subdecree on the Control of areas where project- complaints
Air Pollution and Noise Disturbance, 2000 (No. related activities are
42 ANK.BK) undertaken
7. Ambient surface water quality (fecal coliform, Upstream, midstream and Field sampling Quarterly and in DDIS
dissolved oxygen,pH, oil and grease, BOD5) downstream of rivers and response to
stream close to complaints/validate
8. Other parameters to be sampled, as appropriate, construction/workers pollution events
to validate complaints and pollution event(s) due camps
to project activities
Other locations to validate
complaints or where
pollution occurred due to
the project (e.g., fuel spill)

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
Environmental Management Plan 20

4. The estimated costs for implementing the EMP are provided in Table 3 as follows:

Table 3 : Estimated Costs for EMP Implementation (4 years)

Item Estimated Total Cost (USD)
1. Environmental monitoring to be undertaken by
DDIS environment specialists
a. International (1 person for 4 months 80,000
USD20,000/month)
b. National (1 person for 4 months @ 6,000
USD1,500/month)
2. Environmental management capacity building 20,000
program/training to be undertaken by DDIS for
SEO staff (estimates only, to be determined
during Project implementation)
3. Environmental effects monitoring for noise, dust 16,000
and surface water quality (allow USD
1,000/quarter)
4. Construction phase mitigation measures N/A
(included in project costs)
5. Transportation for environmental monitoring (@ 16,000
USD1000/quarter for 4 years)
Sub-total 138,000
6. Contingency (15%) 20,700
Total 158,700

C. Implementation Arrangements

5. The table below shows the institutional responsibilities for implementation of the EMP.

Table 4 : Responsibilities for EMP Implementation

Agency Responsibilities
Ministry of • Executing agency, shall ensure that sufficient funds are available to
Public Works properly implement the EMP
and Transport • Ensure that all Project components, regardless of financing source,
(MPWT) complies with the provisions of the EMP and ADB Safeguard Policy
Statement 2009 (SPS)
• Ensure that Project implementation complies with Government
environmental policies and regulations
• Ensure that tender and contract documents include the EMP
• Maintain a Social and Environmental Office during Project
implementation
• Submit semi-annual monitoring reports on EMP implementation to
ADB

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
Environmental Management Plan
21

Project Management • Responsible for overall project implementation, management and

Unit (PMU3)/Social coordination;
and Environmental • Include the EMP in the tender and contract documents;
Office (SEO) • Ensure that EMP provisions are strictly implemented during various
project phases (design/pre-construction, construction and operation) to
mitigate environmental impacts to acceptable levels
• Undertake monitoring of the implementation of the EMP (mitigation
and monitoring measures) with assistance from DDIS.
• With support from DDIS, prepare semi-annual environmental
monitoring reports for submission to ADB.
• Ensure that Project implementation complies with ADB's Safeguard
Policy Statement (SPS) principles and requirements
• Commit and retain dedicated staff for the SEO to oversee EMP
implementation
• Ensure that environmental protection and mitigation measures in the
EMP are incorporated in the detailed design
• Obtain necessary approval(s) from MOE prior to award of civil works
contracts
• Prior to start of site works, establish an environmental grievance redress
mechanism, as described in the IEE, to receive and facilitate
resolution of affected peoples' concerns, complaints, and grievances
about the Project's environmental performance
• With assistance from DDIS, prepare semi-annual environmental
monitoring reports for submission to ADB
• Based on the results of EMP monitoring, identify environmental
corrective actions and prepare a corrective action plan, as
necessary, for submission to ADB

Detailed Design and • Incorporate into the project design the environmental protection and
Implemenation mitigation measures identified in the EMP for the design/pre-
Supervision construction stage;
Consultant (DDIS) • Assist PMU3/SEO to ensure that all environmental requirements
and mitigation measures from the IEE and EMP are incorporated in
the bidding documents and contracts
• Prior to start of site works, assist MPWT in establishing a
grievance redress mechanism as described in the IEE,
• Implement all mitigation and monitoring measures for various project
phases specified as DDIS’s tasks in the EMP
• Undertake environmental management capacity building activities for
SEO as required in the EMP
• Undertake regular monitoring of the contractor’s environmental
performance as scheduled in the EMP
• Conduct field measurements for surface water quality, dust and noise
as required in the EMP

Contractor • Provide sufficient funding and human resources for implementation of

the EMP
• Ensure proper and timely implementation of required pre-construction
and construction mitigation measures in the EMP
• Implement additional environmental mitigation measures, as
necessary
DPWT • Responsible for operation and maintenance of Project road

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
Environmental Management Plan
22

• Implement EMP mitigation and monitoring measures during operation

Ministry of • Issue necessary approvals to the Project prior to implementation

Environment • Undertake monitoring of the Project based on their mandate
(MOE),
MCFA

Bidding Document for Improvement of NR13, PR314D and Prey Vor CBF Procurement of Works
 PART III

INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE)

-i-
Initial Environmental Examination

September 2011

Cambodia: Provincial Roads Improvement Project

Prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Transport, Cambodia for the Asian Development
Bank.
 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(As of 1 September 2011)

Currency Unit – Riel (KR)

$ 1.00 = KR 4,107
KR 1.00 = $ 0.00024

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank

BOD – biological oxygen demand
CBF – cross border facility
DDIS – detailed design and implementation supervision
DOE – Department of Environment
EIA – environmental impact assessment
EMP – environmental management plan
GPS – global positioning system
GRM – grievance redress mechanism
ha – hectare
IBA – Important Bird Area
IEE – initial environmental examination
IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature
km – kilometer
km2 – square kilometer
L – liter
MEF – Ministry of Economy and Finance
mg – milligram
m – meter
m2 – square meter
mm/s – millimeter per second
MOAFF – Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, and Fisheries
MOE – Ministry of Environment
MOWRAM – Ministry of Water Resources, Hydrology, and Meteorology
MPWT – Ministry of Public Works and Transport
MRD – Ministry of Rural Development
NGO – non government organization
NR – National Road
NTFP – non-timber forest products
PAWS – Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary
PDE – Provincial Department of Environment
PDRD – Provincial Department of Rural Development
ROW – right of way
SEO – social and environment office
SEU – social and environmental unit
SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement
TA – technical assistance
TSP – total suspended particulates
TSBR – Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve
UNESCO – United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
UXO – unexploded ordnance
 NOTES

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.

This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed
herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff,
and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any
designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the
Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status
of any territory or area.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 2
A. Policy Framework 2
B. Legal Framework 3
C. Administrative Framework 5
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 9
A. The Project Overview 9
B. Road Design and Realignments 14
C. Project Environmental Classification 15
D. Current Conditions of Project Roads 15
IV. WATER CAPTURE PROJECTS 17
A. Rainwater Capture 17
B. Dams, Spillways and Canals, Chiprong and Svay Chek,Tuek Phos District,
Kampong Chhnang Province 17
C. Water Capture and Distribution, PAWS, Tuek Phos, and Khset Lake, Kampong
Chhnang Province 21
V. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 25
A. Physical Resources 25
B. Ecological Resources 27
C. Economics 32
D. Socio-economic Profile 33
E. Poverty 34
F. Gender 35
VI. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 35
A. Impacts of Roads on Protected Areas due to Location 35
B. Potential Impacts Pre-construction Phase 43
C. Potential Impacts Due to Construction Works 44
D. Potential Impacts Due to Workers Camps 46
E. Potential Impacts Due to Operation 47
F. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Location 49
G. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Construction Works 50
H. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Workers Camps 56
I. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Operation 58
J. Climate Change 67
K. Land Acquisition and Resettlement 69
L. Social and Labor Impacts 72
M. Poverty Impacts 73
N. Gender Issues 73
O. Indigenous Peoples 73
VII. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 74
VIII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION 74
A. General Public Consultation on Environmental Issues 74
 B. Perception towards the Project NR13, 314D and CBF 74
C. Perception about the Project PR150B, NR53, andPR151B 74
IX. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 77
A. Grievance Redress 77
X. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 78
A. General Environmental Management Plan 78
B. Contractors Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) 78
C. Guidance on Environmental Issues 78
D. Social and Environment Office (SEO) 78
E. EMMP 80
XI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 97

ANNEXES:
Annex 1: Condition Surveys 99
Annex 2: Check Lists for EMP 105
Annex 3: Baseline Community Level Survey Abstracted from Socio-economic Study (July 2011) 121
Annex 4: Public Consultation on Water Capture (September 2011) 139

FIGURES
Figure III-1 Map of Project Roads NR13 and road 314D and CBF (marked in green) 12
Figure III-2 Map of Project Roads 150B, NR53 and 151B (marked in green) 13
Figure III-3 Road 150B, Realignment at Alngkae Village 15
Figure 0-1 Location of Dam, Spillway and Primary Canal 18
Figure 0-2 Old Wooden Dam 18
Figure 0-3 Concrete Dam 18
Figure 0-4 Bomb Damage to Dam 18
Figure 0-5 Primary Canal 18
Figure 0-6 Location of Svay Check Dam and Primary Canal 19
Figure 0-7 Svay Check Dam 19
Figure 0-8 Dam built by MOWRAM 20
Figure 0-9 Water Capture in PAWS 22
Figure 0-10 Water Delivery to houses in PAWS 22
Figure 0-11 Water Tower in Tuek Phos 23
Figure 0-12 Khset Lake, embankment and spillways 23
Figure 0-13 Location of Water Tank in Railway Yards 24
Figure 0-14 Location of Khset Lake Proposed Works 24
Figure V-1 PAWS Zones 30
Figure V-2 PAWS Types of Forest Cover 31
Figure VI-1 Road 150B in relation to Outer Zone of TLSBR 36
Figure VI-2 Road 150B, NR53 and 151B in relation to All Zones of TLSBR 36
Figure VI-3 Road NR53 in relation to Outer Zone of PAWS 38
Figure VI-4 The 80 Perimeter Marking Points of PAWS as marked by FFI and MoE 39
Figure VI-5 Concrete Marker Post showing Boundary of PAWS 40
Figure VI-6 Concrete Marker Post 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 and 50 and UTM coordinates showing
Boundary of PAWS contiguous with NR53 41
Figure VI-7 PAWS Zones in Vicinity of NR53 42
Figure VI-8 Road 151B in relation to Kirirom National Park 43
Figure VI-9 Spill Protection for Fuel Oil Storage / Rain Proofing for Waste Oil Storage 54
6

Figure VI-10 Septic Tanks Locally Available with Installation Instructions 56

Figure VIII-1 Public Consultations on Water Capture Projects, Kampong Chhnang 76
Figure X-1 Complaints Investigations Procedure 84

TABLES
Table II-1 List of Projects that require an Initial Environmental Impact Assessment 7
Table III-1 Project Road Lengths 11
Table IV-1 Summary of Evaluation Results (US$ mill) 33
Table IV-2 PAWS Internal Demarcation Zones 41
Table IV-3 Distance of NR53 from PAWS Internal Zones 42
Table IV-4 Policy on Crops and Trees Removal 59
Table IV-5 Quantities of Affected Perennials PR314D 59
Table IV-6 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR314D 60
Table IV-7 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF 60
Table IV-8 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13 60
Table IV-9 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13 61
Table IV-10 Compensation for Perennials PR314D 61
Table IV-11 Compensation for Timber Trees PR314D 61
Table IV-12 Compensation for Assorted Trees CBF 62
Table IV-13 Compensation for Perennials NR13 62
Table IV-14 Compensation for Timber Trees NR13 62
Table IV-15 Summary of Impacts PR 314D and NR13 62
Table IV-16 Quantities of Affected Perennials PR150B 63
Table IV-17 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR150B 63
Table IV-18 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR53 64
Table IV-19 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR53 64
Table IV-20 Quantities of Affected Perennials PR151B 64
Table IV-21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR151B 64
Table IV-22 Compensation for Perennials PR150B 65
Table IV-23 Compensation for Timber TreesPR150B 65
Table IV-24 Compensation for Perennials NR53 65
Table IV-25 Compensation for Timber Trees NR53 65
Table IV-26 Compensation for Perennials PR151B 66
Table IV-27 Compensation for Timber Trees PR151B 66
Table IV-28 Summary of Tree Removal 66
Table IV-29 Treatment of Adaptation to Climate Change and Notional Budget 68
Table IV-30 Summary of Resettlement Costs (PR314D, CBF, NR13) 71
Table IV-31 Summary of Resettlement Costs (PR150B, NR53, andPR151B) 72
Table V-1 Measurement of Environmental Parameters 82
 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. The terms of reference require the Consultants to prepare the Initial Environmental
Examination (IEE) for the project roads and the cross border facility (CBF) in accordance with
both the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Social Safeguards Policy (SPS, 2009) and the
Government guidelines, and to confirm if the project should be categorized as B or re-
categorized, and recommend on mitigation measures for the Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) including its implementation and monitoring.

2. Consultations were conducted with all stakeholders, including the Ministry of Public
Works and Transport (MPWT) and its Social and Environment Unit (SEU), Ministry of the
Environment (MOE), Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, and Fisheries (MOAFF), the Ministry of
Culture and Fine Arts, their Provincial Departments in the project area, and relevant non-
government organizations (NGOs).

3. Detailed maps were obtained and field studies undertaken to identify the proximity of
places of religious, cultural, and traditional value, and Sites of Special Ecological Interest such
as protected areas, natural reserves, and national parks.

4. Only minor environmental impacts are anticipated. Such impacts will be experienced
during site works mainly due to dust and noise emissions as well as potential occupational,
community health, and safety risks, but can be mitigated. Some minor mitigation measures will
be specified but no major impacts have been identified.

5. Some slopes on National Road (NR) 13 will be eased from 1:2 to 1:3 to improve slope
stability. Road 314D will be improved by filling in of old roadside narrow rectangular borrow pits
which are a source of vector breeding.

6. Provision of a concrete road on 150B at the approach to Ta Ches market will reduce
airborne dust and improve muddy conditions during rain and flooding.

7. A short section of NR 53 will have its alignment adjusted slightly on the opposite side to
Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary (PAWS) to avoid a concrete marker post of PAWS which has
been placed actually outside the PAWS boundary close to the shoulder of the road.

8. None of the eastern project roads (NR13, 314D and the CBF) are in close proximity to
any protected areas of ecological significance.

9. For the western roads, none traverses the transition, buffer or core zones of ecologically
protected areas.

10. Road 150B has an eastern section of 5.5 kilometers (km) which connects NR 5 to Tonle
Sap River. It terminates at the village of Ta Ches at the ferry crossing point of the river. This
point is the nearest that any project road approaches to the boundaries of Tonle Sap Biosphere
Reserve. Road 150B is approximately 4.5 km from the boundary of the outer zone, known as
the Transition zone. There will be no impacts from the road on the Tonle Sap Biosphere
Reserve.

11. NR 53 runs alongside part of the eastern boundary of PAWS for a distance of
approximately 6.5 km. The boundary is defined in Royal Decree 1993 and is indicated by concrete
marker posts. Site surveys have been conducted to confirm the exact location of the boundary
2

markers, and these have agreed by local villagers and the Provincial Department of Environment
(PDE) officers. The PDE officers confirmed that NR 53 does not intrude into the PAWS.

12. Road 151B marks the most southern point of the western project roads. This road is
further away from PAWS than NR 53 and more than 50 km from Kirirom National Park. No
adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from this section of the project road on protected
areas.

13. The Sub-decree No. 72 ANRK.BK dated 11 August 1999 contains an annex “List of the
projects that require an Initial Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)”. This stipulates that an
IEE is required for “National Road Construction ≥ 100 km and bridges ≥ 30 tons”. As this project
is rehabilitation of existing roads, and the only major bridge will be 25 tons capacity, according
to MOE Legislation, an IEE will not be required by MOE.

14. To avoid or mitigate negative impacts arising from the project, an EMP detailing
mitigation measures and monitoring activities has been prepared as part of the IEE.

15. Public consultations involving affected people and local officials have been conducted
during the preparation of the IEE in compliance with ADB information disclosure and
consultation requirements through focus group discussions and individual interviews in all
project affected provinces. Environment was not seen as a major issue by those persons
interviewed.

16. Climate change adaptation was included in the project. The residents’ knowledge of
climate change induced effects and adaptation strategies was limited. However, they were
strongly in favor of water capture projects.

17. Temporary environmental impacts caused by the civil works have been identified and
mitigation measures are given in the EMP. The EMP (and EMMP) will be included in the IEE
and will form part of the tender documents which becomes legally binding on the selected
contractor.

18. To ensure that the project is carried out in accordance with the EMP requirements,
MPWT will specify details of the implementation of the EMP in the tender documents and civil
works contracts.

19. Social and Environment Office (SEO), previously SEU, is operational but needs capacity
building. The detailed design and implementation supervision (DDIS) consultant will provide on-
the-job training to the field personnel of the SEO of MPWT to build their capacity in
environmental management and monitoring.

20. All potential environmental impacts have been identified. The project is confirmed as
Category B according to ADB guidelines. No environmental impacts were identified that would
warrant the conduct of an environmental due diligence study.

II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

A. Policy Framework

21. In 1993, the Royal Government of Cambodia confirmed a new Constitution in which
environmental considerations were included for the first time. Specifically Article 59 states: The
 3

State shall protect the environment and balance of abundant natural resources and establish a
precise plan of management of land, water, air, wind, geology, ecological system, mines,
energy, petrol and gas, rock and sand, gems, forests and forestry products, wildlife, fish and
aquatic resources and it was within this constitutional context that the MOE was established.

22. The hierarchy of legislation in Cambodia is:

Royal Decree signed by the King
Sub-decree signed by the Prime Minister
Ministerial Decision signed by a Minister
Regulation issued by a Ministry

23. The major legislation in Cambodia is the Royal Decree which ratifies laws passed by
parliament. These can be supplemented by “prakas” or ministerial decisions. These laws allow
sub-decrees and regulations to be passed which can stipulate procedures and standards to be
met in order to ensure compliance with the law. Many of these sub-decrees and standards have
been drafted but have not yet been ratified by parliament. However, contractors are still
expected to make sure their operations comply with the draft regulations.

B. Legal Framework

1. Laws on Environment

24. In 1996, the Law on Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management
(NS/RKM/1296/36) came into force and it requires the government to prepare national and
regional environmental plans and sub-decrees concerning a wide range of environmental
issues, including EIAs, pollution prevention and control, public participation and access to
information.

25. Other ministries explicitly mentioned at the time were Ministry of Water Resources,
Hydrology, and Meteorology (MOWRAM), and the Ministry of Land Use Management,
Urbanization, and Construction. The list was later expanded to include MPWT, MOAFF, the
Ministry of Rural Development (MRD), the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Tourism.

2. Laws on Historical Monuments

26. There is a general law in Cambodia which covers all national monuments. This is the
"Law on Protection of Cultural and National Heritage" (1996). This is supplemented by the
"Decision on the Definition of 3 Zones to Protect Temple Surrounding Areas in All Provinces and
Municipalities Except Angkor Wat", 1996. These laws protect small temples or ancient
structures.

3. Laws on Nature Reserves

27. Royal Decree "Protected Natural Areas" issued in November 1993 gives protection to
environment, land, forests, wetlands, and coastal zones. This decree covers 23 locations
representing 18% of Cambodia's total area and is under the jurisdiction of MOE.

4. Laws on Wildlife

28. The “Joint Prakas of MOE and MOAFF on Prohibition of Hunting and Catching of Wildlife
4

Animals” (1996) specifically bans hunting of animals and birds for food. A contractor’s workers
must observe this law.

5. Subsidiary Laws on Environmental Protection

a. Sub-decrees and Regulations

29. The “Law on Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management” (1996) is
“enabling legislation”, in that it enables MOE to pass sub-decrees and regulations to protect the
environment. This subsidiary legislation lays down quantitative standards which must be met by
contractors in their operation.

30. Several sub-decrees are already laws. Others have been drafted and are expected to
become law in the near future. These standards give parameters and values which must be
measured to check compliance with the regulations. Even if the regulations are in draft form, the
contractors are expected to comply with them.

b. Sub-Decree on Air and Noise Pollution Control (Draft)

i. Air Quality (Draft)

31. The air pollution regulations are contained in Draft Sub-Decree on Air and Noise
Pollution. For dust control, there should no visible emissions from stockpiles of materials,
crushers or batching plants. At sensitive receptors, a standard of total suspended particulates
(TSP) < 0.33 milligrams/cubic meter at 24-hour average should be met. All vehicles should be
well maintained and comply with the air quality regulations.

ii. Noise (Draft)

32. The noise regulations are contained in Draft Sub-Decree on Air and Noise Pollution. The
regulations do not stipulate a level for noise from construction sites but refer to mixed
commercial and/or industrial and residential property. Neither do they give the measurement
method. Therefore the following standards are recommended. Noise levels at the perimeter of
any site should not exceed:

Continuous Equivalent Level (Leq) = 75dB(A) 12 hours daytime (0700–1900)

Continuous Equivalent Level (Leq) = 65dB(A) 12 hours nighttime (1900–0700)

33. The descriptor “Continuous Equivalent Level (Leq)” is a commonplace measurement

and most noise monitoring equipment measures it directly. The measurement is made at the
construction site perimeter which makes monitoring easier as it does not require one gaining
access to a private residence. The level of 75dB(A) daytime/65 dB(A) nighttime is a “good”
standard and commonly used in countries such as Singapore and Malaysia.

iii. Vibration

34. There is no standard for vibration in Cambodia, therefore the following standard is
recommended: the vibration levels at any vibration sensitive property or location should be less
than 1 millimeter/second (mm/s) peak particle velocity (PPV). The level of 1 mm/s PPV is a
good “standard” and is derived from the United States Bureau of Mines publications for
 5

avoidance of damage and the United Kingdom Greater London Council standard for avoidance
of nuisance.

c. Sub-Decree on Water Pollution Control (No. 27 ANRK.BK 1999)

(Draft)

35. As a minimum, all discharges of liquid wastes from construction camps, work sites or
operations, to streams or water courses should be: biological oxygen demand < 50 milligrams
(mg)/liter (l); turbidity < 5 NTU; suspended solids < 50 mg/l; temperature < 45oC; pH = 6–9; oil
and grease < 5 mg/l and dissolved oxygen > 4mg/l.

36. There is no legal standard for performance of septic tanks but they should be checked
for correct operation: that is absence of smell; no overflowing; and no surface water logging.

d. Sub-Decree on Solid Waste Management (No. 36 ANRK.BK 1999)

(Draft)

37. Under the Draft Sub-Decree on Solid Waste Management (No. 36 ANRK.BK 1999),
Article 7 “the disposal of waste in public sites or anywhere that is not allowed by authorities shall
be strictly prohibited”. There are no quantitative parameters given but good sensible practice is
expected. Such practices would include:

(i) All general waste and food waste should be removed to a government approved
landfill.
(ii) All demolition waste must be removed to a government approved location.
(iii) All waste oils and greases should be removed by a registered subcontractor. The
final destination should be established.

38. Failure to employ sensible precautions may cause sanitation problems to workers living
in camps and also may result in prosecution.

e. Hazardous Substances

39. There is no specific regulation for hazardous substances in Cambodia. This aspect is
covered in the Sub-Decree on Water Pollution Control Annex 1 and Sub-Decree on Solid Waste
Management, which give details of classifications of what are defined as hazardous substances.
Any hazardous substances must be stored correctly and only disposed in a manner approved
by the MOE.

C. Administrative Framework

40. There are two particular types of areas of special ecological interest in relation to this
project. These are:

1. Protected Areas

41. Cambodia has a network of 23 natural protected areas managed through the MOE.
These areas cover 2.2 million hectares (ha) or 18% of Cambodia’s land area and include most
of its important habitats. The Forest Administration has also designated protected forests (from
cancelled logging concessions) bringing the total area under protection to around 25% which is
more than twice the global average. Protected Areas are sites which are protected by Royal
6

Decrees, Laws and Regulations. Such mandatory stipulations are promulgated in Khmer
language. These have been obtained and if necessary, translated. The Khmer version takes
precedence over the translated version.

42. In 2008 Cambodia introduced the Protected Area Law (No. NS/RKM/0208/007), which
defines:

(i) national parks

(ii) wildlife sanctuaries
(iii) protected landscapes
(iv) multiple use areas
(v) Ramsar sites
(vi) biosphere reserves
(vii) natural heritage sites and
(viii) marine parks

Details are:
National Parks (International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] category
II) – Natural and scenic area of significance for their scientific, educational and
recreational values.
Wildlife Sanctuaries (IUCN category IV) – Natural area where nationally
significant species of flora or fauna, natural communities, or physical features
require specific intervention for their perpetuation.
Protected Landscapes (IUCN category V) – Nationally significant natural and
semi-natural landscapes that must be maintained to provide opportunities for
recreation.
Multiple-Use Areas (IUCN category VIII) – Areas that provide for the sustainable
use of water resources, timber, wildlife, fish, pasture, and recreation with the
conservation of nature primarily oriented to support these economic activities.
The Tonle Sap Multiple-Use Area was nominated as Cambodia’s first Biosphere
Reserve in 1997. The Boeung Chmar portion of Tonle Sap Multiple-Use Area
(28,000 ha) is designated as a Ramsar site.
Ramsar Sites – There are two sites in the IUCN categories IV and VIII above
and one site in the middle stretches of the Mekong River between Stung Treng
and the border with Laos.

43. The Law on Forestry Management prohibits the hunting of wildlife within such protected
areas. As well as maintaining checkpoints and providing rangers, MOE has an active
community education program to promote environmental awareness especially within the rural
communities.

44. This law is recent (2008) and many of the protected areas predate this by many years.
Both the original legislation and the most current have been reviewed during this project.
Several protected areas, of differing designations, are located in proximity to several of the road
segments, and these are discussed.

2. Important Bird Area

45. An Important Bird Area (IBA) is an area recognized as being a globally important habitat
for the conservation of bird populations. Currently there are about 10,000 IBAs worldwide. The
 7

program was developed and sites are identified by Bird Life International. These sites are small
enough to be entirely conserved and differ in their character, habitat or ornithological importance
from the surrounding habitat.

46. Bird Life International is an international organization working to protect the world’s birds
and their habitats. It is a global conservation federation with a worldwide network of over 100
partner organizations. Bird Life International was founded in 1922 and was originally known as
the International Council for Bird Preservation, acting as a lobbying group. It changed its name
in 1993 to Bird Life International and is the official IUCN Authority for the Red List for birds.

47. Often IBAs form part of a country's existing protected area network, and so are protected
under national legislation. Both the Cambodia’s PAWS and the Phnom Samkos Wildlife
Sanctuary contain designated IBAs.

3. Cambodian IEE Requirements

48. On 11 August 1999, a Sub-decree (72 ANRK.BK) on EIA processes was promulgated
requiring an initial EIA or EIA for selected projects listed in the sub-decree annex to be
submitted by public or private project owners to the MOE for review.

Table II-1: List of Projects that require an Initial Environmental Impact Assessment
No. Type and activities of the projects Size / Capacity
A. Industrial
a) Foods, Drinks, Tobacco
1 Food processing and caned ≥ 500 tons/year
2 All fruit drinks manufacturing ≥ 1,500 liters / day
3 Fruit manufacturing ≥ 500 ones/year
4 Orange Juice manufacturing All sizes
5 Wine manufacturing All sizes
6 Alcohol and Beer brewery All sizes
7 Water supply ≥ 10,000 users
8 Tobacco manufacturing ≥ 10,000 boxes/day
9 Tobacco leave processing ≥ 350 tons/ year
10 Sugar refinery ≥ 3,000 tons / year
11 Rice mill and cereal grains ≥ 3,000 tons / year
12 Fish, soy bean, chili, tomato sources ≥500,000 liters/ year
b) Leather tanning, Garment and Textile
13 Textile and dyeing factory All sizes
14 Garments, washing, printing, dyeing All sizes
15 Leather tanning, and glue All sizes
16 Sponge- rubber factory All sizes
c) Wooden production
3
17 Plywood ≥100,000m /year(log)
3
18 Artificial wood ≥ 1,000 m /year (log)
3
19 Saw mill ≥ 50,000m /year (log)
d) Paper
20 Paper factory All sizes
21 Pulp and paper processing All sizes
e) Plastic, Rubber and Chemical
22 Plastic factory All sizes
23 Tire factory ≥ 500 tons /year
24 Rubber factory ≥ 1,000 tons /year
25 Battery industry All sizes
26 Chemical production industries All sizes
8

No. Type and activities of the projects Size / Capacity

27 Chemical fertilizer plants ≥ 10,000 tons /year
28 Pesticide industry All sizes
29 Painting manufacturing All sizes
30 Fuel chemical All sizes
31 Liquid, powder, solid soaps manufacturing All sizes
f) Mining production other than metal
32 Cement industry All sizes
33 Oil refinery All sizes
34 Gas factory All sizes
35 Construction of oil and gas pipeline ≥ 2 kilometers
36 Oil and gas separation and storage facilities ≥ 1,000,000 liters
37 Fuel stations ≥ 20,000 liters
38 Mining All sizes
39 Glass and bottle factory All sizes
40 Bricks, roofing tile manufacturing 150,000 piece /month
41 Flooring tile manufacturing 90,000 piece /month
42 Calcium carbide plants All sizes
43 Producing of construction materials(Cement) 900 tons/month
44 Cow oil and motor oil manufacturing All sizes
45 Petroleum study research All sizes
g) Metal industries
46 Mechanical industries All sizes
47 Mechanical storage factory All sizes
48 Mechanical and shipyard enterprise All sizes
h) Metal Processing Industrials
49 Manufacturing of harms, barbed wires, nets ≥ 300 tons/month
50 Steel mill, Irons, Aluminum All sizes
51 All kind of smelting All sizes
i) Other Industries
52 Waste processing, burning All sizes
53 Waste water treatment plants All sizes
54 Power plants ≥ 5 megawatt
55 Hydropower ≥ 1 megawatt
56 Cotton manufacturing ≥ 15 tons/month
57 Animal's food processing ≥ 10,000 tons/year
B. AGRICULTURE
58 Concession forest ≥ 10,000 hectares
59 Logging ≥ 500 hectares
60 Land covered by forest ≥ 500 hectares
61 Agriculture and agro-industrial land ≥ 10,000 hectares
62 Flooded and coastal forests All sizes
63 Irrigation systems ≥ 5,000 hectares
64 Drainage systems ≥ 5,000 hectares
65 Fishing ports All sizes
C. TOURISM
66 Tourism areas ≥ 50 hectares
67 Golf Course ≥ 18 holes
D. INFRASTRUCTURE
68 Urbanization development All sizes
69 Industrial zones All sizes
70 Construction of bridge-roads ≥ 30 tons weight
2
71 Buildings Height ≥ 12 m or floor ≥ 8,000 m
72 Restaurants ≥ 500 seats
73 Hotels ≥ 60 rooms
74 Hotel adjacent to coastal area ≥ 40 rooms
 9

No. Type and activities of the projects Size / Capacity

75 National road construction ≥ 100 kilometers
76 Railway construction All sizes
77 Port construction All sizes
78 Air port construction All sizes
3
79 Dredging ≥ 50,000 m
80 Damping site ≥ 200,000 people
2 3
m = meter, m = square meter, m = cubic meter.

49. The Sub-decree No. 72 ANRK.BK dated 11 August 1999 Annex “List of the projects that
require an Initial Environmental Impact Assessment” refers to “National Road Construction ≥
100 km and bridges ≥ 30 tons”. As this project is rehabilitation of existing roads, and bridges are
25-ton capacity, an IEE will not be required. This has been confirmed in discussions with MOE.

III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

A. The Project Overview

50. The Government of Cambodia has requested ADB for project preparatory technical
assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. This project is a priority
project in the Government’s key infrastructure development agenda as it provides all-year
access to provincial and rural agricultural communities of Prey Veng and Svay Rieng provinces
of southeastern Cambodia. The project aims to rehabilitate 87 km of provincial roads in Prey
Veng and Svay Rieng provinces to paved condition to provide a safer, cost-effective provincial
road network with all-year access to markets and other social services for provincial centers of
southeastern Cambodia. A new CBF will be constructed at Prey Var-Mocva to facilitate efficient
cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam. The project will support a
sustainable road maintenance regime in MPWT, HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention
program, and climate change adaptation measures.

51. Roads are the principal mode of transportation in Cambodia. The road network of
approximately 39,600 km includes: (i) national roads (primary national highways) with a total
length of about 2,100 km; (ii) provincial roads (secondary national highways) with a total length
of about 9,500 km; and (iii) about 28,000 km of rural roads. Management of national and
provincial roads is the responsibility of MPWT, whereas management of rural roads is the
responsibility of MRD.

52. The TA is included in the ADB Cambodia Country Operation and Business Plan 2009–
2012. The business plan aims to provide pro-poor and socially inclusive growth by enhancing
environmentally sustainable agriculture and rural development by diversifying rural growth and
bolstering poverty reduction efforts.

53. The remote rural economy is becoming increasingly dependent on the improved national
road network, yet the provincial road network, with a paved ratio of 11%, continues to
deteriorate because of the rapid growth in traffic, combined with a lack of maintenance
financing, and poor road maintenance standards.

54. NR 13 that links NR 1 and NR 8 in north-south direction and NR 314D linking NR 1 with
CBF at Prey Var-Mocva are two provincial roads that are vital for transport within Prey Veng and
Svay Rieng provinces and for cross-border transport and trade. These roads do not provide all-
year accessibility. During the inception phase, the improvement of continuous sections of Road
150B, NR 53 and Road 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces
10

were included in the project scope. The output for these roads is civil works. This output has
associated DDIS consulting services, and land acquisition and resettlement studies required for
the project roads.

55. The impact of the project is improved access to markets, jobs, social services, and cross
border transport and trade in Prey Veng and Svay Rieng provinces.

56. The outcome of the project is the safe, cost effective, all-year access provided in the
road network of provincial agricultural areas of Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Speu, Prey Veng,
and Svay Rieng provinces.

57. The outputs of the project are:

Civil works to: (i) improve, to paved condition, NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear and Prosot, 65 km; and NR 314D from Prosot town to
the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; and construct a new CBF at
Prey Var-Mocva, and (i) Civil works to improve roads 150B, NR53 and a short
length of road 151B, Total length 69 km approximately. This output has
associated DDIS consulting services, and land acquisition and resettlement
required for roads and the CBF.
Improved road asset management through axle load control at strategic locations
of national and provincial roads, to expand the ongoing axle load control
programs of MPWT.
Increased road safety and safeguards by implementing: (i) a community-based
road safety awareness program in line with the national program; (ii) an
HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention program; and (iii) a sex-
disaggregated baseline socioeconomic survey of beneficiaries.
Climate change adaptation to assess vulnerability to climate change in NRs and
vulnerability mapping for NRs to improve planning for climate changes by
introducing ecosystem-based adaptation strategies. The output will also develop
emergency management planning for NRs and planning water capture and
storage systems.
Efficient project management support to MPWT. As well as the support in the
design, approach and methodology for the improvement of the project roads from
the engineering perspective, there are many innovative features. These include
road asset management through axle load control, road safety, social
safeguards, effective gender mainstreaming, and climate change adaptation.
With the CBF at Prey Var-Mocva, the project has regional cooperation features
as well.

58. A symposium on axle load control for the executing agency’s staff and a two day training
course on Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseil also for executing agency staff was
held.

59. The project roads are given below (Table III-1) and their locations shown in Figure III-1
and Figure III-2.
 11

Table III-1: Project Road Lengths

Road Province From To Length, km

NR 13 Prey Veng/Svay Rieng NR 8 NR 1 62.4
314D Svay Rieng NR 1 at Border at Prey Vor 25.6
Proseth
150Ba (east of NR 5) Kampong Chhnang NR 5 Taches market 5.6
150Bb (west of NR 5) Kampong Chhnang NR 5 Tuek phos 25.6
Alangkae local road Kampong Chnang 150B 150B 3.0
NR 53 Kampong Chhnang Tuek Phos Junction with 151B 31.8
(culvert 7)
151B Kampong Speu NR 53 Thnal Bambeak 3.6
(Amleang)
Total 157.6
km = kilometer, NR = national road.
12

CBF

Figure III-1: Map of Project Roads NR13 and road 314D and CBF (marked in green)
 13

Figure III-2: Map of Project Roads 150B, NR53 and 151B (marked in green)
14

B. Road Design and Realignments

60. The road design is intended to be within the existing construction limits, with no widening
or realignment. However it will be seen below that one realignment is recommended.

61. Road 150B west will be realigned to the east to bypass the village of Alangkae. Within
Ta Ches market the road length maybe adjusted slightly (0.5 km) to provide paving within the
town, without widening. Road 150B will be realigned just east of the village of Alangkae to pass
directly to Tuek Phos. This will protect the village community. The length on the realigned route
is 1.4 km shorter than the existing route through the village.

62. The existing alignment of road 150B through the village will be paved to ensure the
community is not isolated. Minor road pavement works will be carried out and it will be surfaced,
all within the existing width with no resettlement.

63. For NR 53 the project begins where the ongoing Department of Works and Public
Transport improvements end. This is approximately 8.6 km southwest of Tuek Phos. The project
roads terminate at Thnal Bambaek in Amleang. The MPWT is planning other road
improvements that will connect the end of the project roads to the important centre at Oudong,
to the west on NR 5 and to Aoral town to the east. Both connections are along continuations of
road 151B.

64. As mentioned above road 150B will be realigned at Alangkae village. The existing route
(blue line) and the realigned route (red line) are shown in Figure III-3. The existing route has 3
curves will very low radii, the first immediately in front of a school and the others as the road
traverses the edge of the village. The approaches to the existing bridge donated by Japan in
2009 are extremely poor, suitable for a community road but unsuitable for an MPWT road where
heavy traffic will pass in the future.

65. As well as providing a more direct route to Tuek Phos the realignment reduces the
number of railway crossings from three to one. The railway is shown as a black line in the figure.
The realignment is along existing local roads and near parallel and slightly (30 m) to the east of
the existing railway line.

66. Where it crosses the river a new bridge will be provided. The new bridge will be
approximately parallel to the existing railway bridge. On the northern bank of the river the land is
open and largely unused. This area may provide a suitable civil engineering construction camp.
It is 0.6 km into Tuek Phos along an existing local road.

67. A minor realignment is under consideration within at the town of Kampong Rou on road
314D. This will be a minor improvement to provide curvature at two right angled bends and
protect access to a school. The realignment may take part of the land of a Government office.
 15

Figure III-3: Road 150B, Realignment at Alangkae Village

C. Project Environmental Classification

68. The Project is classified as environment category B and an lEE has been conducted as
part of project preparation in accordance with ADB SPS.

D. Current Conditions of Project Roads

1. NR 13

69. NR 13 has an alignment that is generally consistent throughout and has a 22 km

northern gravel section, a central section from km 22 to a road junction at km 48, which has a
sealed surface that is in poor condition, and a southern section from km 48 to the junction with
NR 1 at km 62, which is sealed and is in generally fair condition. There are two significant
settlements along the road at Kampong Trach and Rumduol, with a market area at Angk
Prasrae.

2. Road 314D

70. Road 314D is a gravel road with two very short sections of sealed surface. The whole
length is in flat terrain. There is residential property and roadside activity along much of the
length of the road, with one major settlement at Kampong Rou. There has clearly been recent
establishment of commercial activity in the border area.

3. CBF

71. Freight traffic on road 314D is believed to be seasonal, with heavier traffic during the rice
harvesting period. The road ends at a border crossing into Vietnam. There is some international
traffic but it is not yet significant. Some goods are transferred from road to barge at this location
16

and carried into Vietnam by water transport. A CBF will be constructed at Prey Var-Mocva to
facilitate efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam.

4. Road 150B

72. Road 150B must be considered as two roads; the short section of approximately 5.5 km
to the east of NR 5 and the longer section of about 28 km to the west of NR 5.

73. The eastern section is a gravel road to the village of Ta Ches, which is a major local
market centre and from where there is a ferry taking vehicles across the Tonle Sap River. A
road continues south from Ta Ches along the western bank of the Tonle Sap River.

74. The section of 150B to the west of NR 5 is also a gravel road, which terminates at a
junction with NR 53 at Tuek Phos. It passes through flat terrain used for rice production, and
connects with numerous local access roads. The road alignment changes direction sharply
when passing south of Tuel Phos and a new section of approximately 1.5 km is being
considered. This will be a straighter section following the railway line. A new river crossing will
be necessary.

5. NR53 and 151B

75. NR 53 connects the village of Tuek Phos northwards to Kampong Chhnang, and in the
opposite direction westwards before turning in a southerly loop to give a connection to Udong. It
is already being upgraded to a sealed standard (6 m carriageway plus shoulders) to a point 8.7
km to the west of Tuek Phos. The proposed project would continue this road westward for about
31 km to the junction with road 151B just north of Amleang. This is a gravel road about 6 m wide
in generally good to fair condition. The first 17 km to Kbal Tuek passes through flat terrain used
for rice cultivation that is densely populated. Where rice paddies are prevalent on both sides of
the road they tend to be inundated with water and consequently the road is on embankment.
Beyond Kbal Tuek the land is undulating and much less intensively farmed. There are five
single-lane bridges on this section of NR 53.

76. It was proposed that the works to improve NR 53 would be continued southwards along
road 151B for 3.5 km to Amleang, and then westwards via an unclassified road to Aural, a total
distance of 40 km. This road is currently a gravel road in mostly poor condition. The existing
road traverses undulating country and in part passes through PAWS. However, this section of
road is no longer included in this ADB-funded Project, and will not be considered further in this
assessment.

6. Condition Survey

77. A condition survey was carried out to identify visually environmentally sensitive locations
on the ground. These included: (i) pedestrian crossing points, (ii) watercourses, lakes, ponds,
rivers, and streams, (iii) schools, kindergartens, hospitals, clinics, and medical centres, (iv)
pagodas, temples, churches, mosques; cemeteries, and individual graves, (v) high and low
tension power lines and mobile phone towers, and (vi) trees, orchards, and vegetation. Details
are given in Annex 1.
 17

IV. WATER CAPTURE PROJECTS

A. Rainwater Capture

78. Most rural communities rely on wells, ponds, and canals. The project area experiences
both very wet and very dry periods throughout the year. Very little infrastructure has been built
to capture water and store it during the rainy season so that it can be available during extended
dry periods. Where water storage exists in some areas, water appears to run out before the next
rains.

79. Currently, when roads are being constructed, materials are being extracted from the
roadside lands to be used for embankment construction. Local people ask for these ditches to
remain so that rainwater can collect in them. However, these are not rehabilitated and some are
eroding close to the road. In addition, they can pose a road safety problem if cars fall off the
road in places where ditches are dug deep and close to the road.

80. Rainwater harvesting to improve water supply for safe drinking water has been identified
as an adaptation priority for the country (NAPA, 2006) and this project will contribute to the
supply of water sources primarily for agriculture and livestock along the project road.

B. Dams, Spillways and Canals, Chiprong and Svay Chek,Tuek Phos District,
Kampong Chhnang Province

1. Background

81. Project Road NR53 exits Tuek Phos Village and runs west towards PAWS. It crosses
the river west of Tuek Phos Village on a Japan International Cooperation Agency-funded
concrete bridge. Just upstream of this crossing point there is the remains of a wooden dam
constructed in earlier regime and now destroyed. MPWT have been approached by local
villagers and asked to assist in rehabilitation of the dam. The dam originally was intended to
obstruct water flow and divert it to a concrete dam and spillway. The spillway then controlled the
flow of the river into a primary canal which irrigated downstream fields. The dam has suffered
extensive bomb damage. MOWRAM have been asked to repair it. The primary canal also needs
rehabilitation.

82. At a point 1 km west of Tuek Phos and 3 km south of NR 53, there is a dam constructed
in an earlier regime which is still operating but requires some repair and maintenance. MPWT
have been approached and asked to assist in rehabilitation of the dam. The dam originally was
intended to control water flow and divert it to a primary canal which irrigated downstream fields.
The primary canal also needs rehabilitation and further works in order to provide irrigation to
farmers.

2. Location Chiprong Dam

83. The location of the Chiprong old wooden dam, the damaged concrete spillway and the
primary canal are shown below (Road 142 is actually NR 53). Tuek Phos is to the east (right of
picture) and PAWS is to the West (left of picture).
18

Figure IV-1: Location of Dam, Spillway and Primary Canal

Figure IV-2: Old Wooden Dam Figure IV-3: Concrete Dam

Figure IV-4: Bomb Damage to Dam Figure IV-5: Primary Canal

3. Location Svay Chek Dam

84. The location of the existing dam and primary canal are shown below.
 19

Figure IV-6: Location of Svay Check Dam and Primary Canal

Figure IV-7: Svay Check Dam

4. Links with Ministry of Water Resources

85. The Kampong Chhnang Provincial Department of Water Resources act as a design
consultant to Life with Dignity NGO on water resources projects. They charge $1,000 to $2,000
for such services plus field expenses. Meetings have taken place with Mr. Eng Daravuth,
Deputy Director MOWRAM (Mob 0975521000). He and his department have previous links with
ADB. He was Project Manager on Emergency Food Assistance Project funded by ADB.
20

86. He has already prepared design drawings, bill of quantities and engineers estimated
costs for similar projects, but not for these dams. The photo below shows a concrete dam which
MOWRAM built for a cost of $60,000.

Figure IV-8: Dam built by MOWRAM

5. Proposed Works

87. For Chiprong dam, the proposed works would include:

An earth dam, 65 m wide across the main river with 3 gates
Refurbishment of the concrete dam.
Upgrading of the Primary canal

88. For Svay Chek dam, MOWRAM have already examined the dam for structural integrity
and have confirmed that the foundations of the dam are structurally sound. The superstructure
and railings require some repairs. The gates are in good condition but are jammed with
branches and debris.

89. The dam is still working and the gates are operated by two local farmers. The main issue
is not the dam but the offtake primary canal. The primary canal is intended to deliver water to
secondary and tertiary canals when the dam gates are closed. However, the primary canal has
no water gates so the water flows directly to the downstream users. This is a source of
complaint from the upstream users.

90. The proposed works would include:

refurbishment of the superstructure of the concrete dam
cleaning of the gates mechanisms
upgrading of the primary canal
provision of water gates to primary canal
provision of secondary and tertiary canals
widening of dam slab to carry motorized transport

6. Budget

91. The cost for the earth dam has not yet been estimated. The concrete spillways would
cost approximately $60,000 each. The upgrading of the primary canals has not yet been costed.
 21

7. Objectives

92. The objectives of this project are: (i) to provide water catchment facilities to farmers
besides NR 53; (ii) to enable the farmers to grow 2 rice crops per year, possibly 3; (iii) to
increase use of NR 53 as the farmers will make more use of NR 53 to take their rice crops to
market in Teuk Phos and Kampong Chhnang; (iv) to show cooperation between MPWT,
MOWRAM, and ADB; and (v) to show that MPWT’s activities go far beyond building
infrastructure and support sustainable development.

C. Water Capture and Distribution, PAWS, Tuek Phos, and Khset Lake, Kampong
Chhnang Province

1. Background

93. Project Road NR 53 runs alongside PAWS for about 6 km in Kampong Chhnang
Province. There is no intrusion of the road into PAWS and MOE has no objection to the road
project. However, the project does offer an opportunity to support the activities to preserve the
park.

94. An existing NGO, Life with Dignity, is actively implementing a Climate Change
Adaptation program in PAWS. They have been invited to the Cambodia Resident Mission
recently to discuss aspects of climate change in this area with ADB officers from Manila.

95. Under the Climate Adaptation program they are running a pilot project to capture water
from a stream in the mountains. This stream flows during the dry season. The project is located
in PAWS, in the outer Community Zone where development is encouraged. It is a simple
system. There is a stream or small waterfall at the top of the nearby mountain where they have
created a small dam. This feeds a concrete box type reservoir of 20 m3 capacity. This then
feeds down the mountain in 150 mm diameter PVC pipes to the village, about 2 km away and
80 m lower in altitude. Individual houses then have 25mm PVC pipe connectors. The villagers
must pay for their own connections out of their own pocket. Due to the altitude difference all
flows are gravity driven. Simple PVC taps and valves are used to control flow. There are no
moving parts, and no pumping. Materials were supplied by Life with Dignity. Labor was supplied
by the villagers.
22

Figure IV-9: Water Capture in PAWS

Figure IV-10: Water Delivery to houses in PAWS

96. They currently are installing supplies to 4 villages and are keen to extend to more. The
mountain stream flows in all seasons, even in the dry season, and the intention is to supply
water to the villagers during the dry season to improve household sanitation and permit small
scale irrigation of household vegetable gardens, with a view to improving food intake and
general nutritional health.
 23

97. The railway sidings in Tuek Phos village have an abandoned water tank. Villagers are
short of water, particularly in the dry season. By rehabilitating the tank, drilling a well,
disinfecting the water and providing a controlled access point, free drinking water of potable
quality could be provided to the local residents. This would improve the health of local people,
especially infants who are most vulnerable to gastro-enteric diseases.
98. The East Meets West Foundation, and NGO, began working in Cambodia in early 2009
and has successfully completed one clean water project using a similar storage tank in April
2011. This project provides safe drinking water for students and teachers in Soramarith school,
by installation of filters and ultraviolet system run by solar panels.

Figure IV-11: Water Tower in Tuek Phos

99. East Meets West Foundation plans to select Sre Tachey village, Aphiwat Commune,
Teuk Phos District in Kampong Chhnang Province for its second Clean Water and Sanitation
Project in Cambodia. They intend to install a small water treatment system that will connect all
households in Aphiwat Commune, Teuk Phos District.

100. To the south of Tuek Phos is Khset Lake. This was created artificially by the villagers
who constructed an embankment across a natural drainage basin into which a stream runs. A
local road runs on top of the embankment. Two spillways allow the captured water to overflow
and be directed to the nearby rice fields. The villagers wish to deepen the lake by excavating
and use the dredged material to widen the approach road on the embankment. This will
increase the capacity of the lake and give water supplies during the dry season.

Figure IV-12: Khset Lake, embankment and spillways

24

2. Locations

101. The water collection system is located alongside NR53. The water tower is located in
Tuek Phos as shown below.

Figure IV-13: Location of Water Tank in Railway Yards

102. The lake is situated south of Tuek Phos as shown below.

Figure IV-14: Location of Khset Lake Proposed Works

103. The major items of equipment for the PAWS water distribution would be:
PVC pipes
Concrete
Taps and connectors

104. The major items of equipment for the water tank would be:
Down the hole pump
Solar panels, voltage regulator and batteries
Water filters
UV disinfection lamps
Piping and taps
Epoxy sealant
 25

105. The major items for the lake would be:

Dredging
Placing of dredged overburden

3. Budget

106. For the water supply project the concrete water tank cost US$6,000. It costs about
US$5,000 to install supply to 1 village.

107. For the water tower the full budget is not yet calculated but previous experience suggest
US$40,000

108. The cost of dredging the lake is subject to estimation.

4. Objectives

109. The objectives of this project are :

To provide a water source to local villagers

To show by example how renewable resources can be used (e.g. solar power at
water tank)
To show cooperation between Ministry of Public Works and Transport and local
commune
To show that MPWT’s activities go far beyond building infrastructure and support
sustainable development.

V. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

A. Physical Resources

1. Geography

110. Cambodia lies in the southwestern part of the Southeast Asian peninsula and has a land
area of 181,035 km2. International borders are shared with Thailand to the west, the Lao
People's Democratic Republic to the north, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on the east
and southeast. The country is bounded on the southwest by the Gulf of Thailand and has a
coastline of 440 km.

2. Climate

111. Cambodia's climate is dominated by the monsoon which causes distinct wet and dry
seasons. The southwest monsoon typically brings the rainy season from May to October.
The northeast monsoon brings drier and cooler air from early November to March, then
hotter air prevails in April and early May. The southern part of the country typically has a two-
month dry season whereas the northern areas have a four-month dry season although weather
patterns have been changing and what is typical is now increasingly problematic.

3. Rainfall

112. The annual mean rainfall is 1,400 mm in the central lowland regions and can reach
26

5,000 mm in coastal areas. However, there are really no reliable rainfall databases for the
Project zones and rainfall can vary from a low of less than 1,000 mm to a high of 2,000 mm. The
relative humidity is high throughout the year, usually exceeding 90%, and even in the dry
season rarely falls below 50%.

4. Temperatures

113. Temperatures are fairly uniform throughout the country, with only small variations from
the average annual temperature of around 28°C. January is the coldest month where
temperatures as low as 12°C have been recorded and April is the warmest where temperatures
reach 42°C. Most of Cambodia’s regions have an average wind velocity of less than 3 m/s.
Maximum wind speeds can reach in excess of 20 m/s during the wet season. During the dry
season the maximum wind velocities are lower and are commonly in the range of 6 - 8 m/s.

5. Topography.

114. Cambodia is divided into three distinct topographic regions: the central plains, the
flat coastal areas, and the mountain ranges with high plateaus. The central plains form 75% of
the country and consist of the alluvial plains of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap basin
where the project roads are located. These are Cambodia's two dominant topographical
features and this is where over 90% of the population resides. The road sections are generally
in flat terrain.

6. Air Quality and Noise

115. The Project roads traverse primarily agricultural areas and villages/residential areas in
rural settings with no industrial development. Currently, main sources of air pollution are
dust emission due to passage of vehicles along the unpaved project roads. Sources of noise
are community activities (especially near markets) and the existing traffic largely composed
of motorcycles.

7. Surface Water

116. The Project roads cross a number of rivers, streams and irrigation canals. Road
371 in Kampong Cham is located on the southern bank of the Mekong River. Within the
Project area, surface run-off on exposed soil and erosion of river embankments cause
turbidity in some of the watercourses. Surface water pollution from domestic sewage along
sections where densely populated villages are found as well as run-off from surrounding
agricultural fields may also be expected.

8. Flooding

117. Generally the southeast roads are not expected to flood. There is a greater risk over
future years for midwest roads. The main issues for flooding are NR13 along Lake Viaco where
it is planned to raise the road by up to 1m along a 1 km length and provide slope protection. The
lake is not subject to high energy wave action, but might need some toe protection. The water
level does vary seasonally, on occasion reaching up to the top of the shoulder, and at the
moment clay dumping is taking place on the side slopes to try to prevent erosion.

118. PR150B east in Ta Ches market on Tonle Sap is intended to have a cement concrete
road as a one way traffic system. Locals report the existing road is flooded by 300mm almost
 27

every other year. In the year 2000 floods the water marks on the walls are about 1.7m above
the road level. This is very localized and as one exits the market the road is about 3m above the
level of the usual flooding with locals saying it has never flooded.

9. Soil T ypes

119. Cambodia has 27 different soil types but the main ones are either soils developed on
the old alluvial terraces of the colluvial-alluvial plains. Four types – Prey Khmer, Prateah
Lang, Bakan and Tuol Samroung – are where most of the agricultural production occurs
although just one, the Toul Samroung, which occupies just 10% of the rice area is really suited
to high yielding rice production. Soils developed on the active flood plains – Kabal Po and
Krakor – are also highly suited for rice production and occupy approximately 30% of soils
where rice production takes place. Such soils respond well to improved ditch and drainage
irrigation and judicious application of fertilizers. Yields have increased over the past two
decades with wet season yields averaging 2.4 tons per ha and dry season yields (only 15% of
rice produced) averaging almost 3.7 tons per ha. These are below regional averages but the
labor intensive system is currently recording average yields of 3.6 tons per ha in the wet
season. In 2008, Cambodia produced a surplus of 3 million tons although there are still food
security problems for rice deficit households.

10. Minerals

120. Cambodia’s natural mineral resources include gem stones such as sapphires, ruby and
zircon; coal, offshore gas and oil; basalt, granite, limestone, dolomite, quartzite; and phosphate
deposits. There are no major mineral resources in the vicinity of the project roads, although
there are white clay deposits in Kampong Chhnang

B. Ecological Resources

1. Flora

121. Forests make up a major part of the country's natural resources. Hill evergreen,
tropical rain and dry land evergreen forests are found in the humid coastal ranges, humid
northeastern uplands, and the very humid to sub-humid low altitude areas. Freshwater
inundated forests are found in the Tonle Sap Lake and in areas of the Mekong River. Mangrove
forests are found along the coasts of Kaput and Kohl Kong provinces. In 1960 Cambodia's
forests covered 73% of the total land area of the country. By 1998 the forest cover had
decreased to 58% and at least until the mid-2000s it was estimated that Cambodia was losing
forest cover at the rate of 2% per annum. The reduction has been attributed mainly to
commercial logging, illegal logging (both large and small scale), large scale agricultural
concessions, fuel wood collection, non-traditional shifting cultivation and the settlement of new
villages. Secondary measures include forest fires and infrastructure development. Nevertheless,
Cambodia still has substantial forest cover in comparison with other GMS countries with the
exception of the Lao PDR.

122. Forests are divided into concession forests and protected forests. In the Project
provinces, there are some protected forest areas and indigenous tree species (e.g. the
Diptherocarpus species) that are protected by Cambodia’s Forestry Law of 1995. However, as
the primary land use along the Project roads is agricultural and residential, these forests are not
located in the vicinity of the roads proposed for upgrading. Community forests are
managed by local residents who must abide by a management plan that is supervised
28

by the Forestry Department. The community has access to the forest and may remove forest
products and cut trees for their own use but they are prohibited from selling the trees. Timber
harvesting for sale is only allowed from forest concessions. There are also non- timber forest
products (NTFPs) that poorer households rely on such as bamboo, resins, wild fruits and
vegetables, honey bees and other insects, and larger wildlife, although the collection of some
NTFPs for commercial purposes are prohibited by Cambodian laws.

123. Vegetation cover along the project roads largely consists of agricultural crops such as
rice, while some sections traverse areas covered with shrubs, grasses and sparse trees.
Lowland rice cropping is the main activity but other crops grown include soybean, cassava,
and cashew. Fruit and vegetables crop are also cultivated although primarily for domestic
consumption.

2. Fauna

124. Cambodia has a rich biodiversity. The forests, wetlands and other habitats support
many species of flora and fauna, including 212 species of mammals, 536 species of birds, 240
reptile species, 850 freshwater and 436 marine fish species and more than 2,300 plants (800
of these plants are used in for the local manufacture of traditional Khmer medicine).

125. Along the Project roads, fauna is mainly made up of the large and small livestock raised
by some households. There are indigenous endangered species such as the Siamese
Crocodile and a variety of monkeys (e.g. silvered leaf monkey) and birds (e.g. white-
shouldered Ibis) within p r o t e c t e d a r e a s b u t a s n o project roads are located in
protected areas adverse impacts to endangered species are not anticipated.

3. Fishery

126. Fish is the most important source of animal protein in the diet of all Cambodians,
constituting upwards of 75% of total animal protein input. Fish are also an important source of
calcium and Vitamin A, especially for the rural poor. On average the countrywide consumption
rate is 65.5 kg/capita/year. Each year, Cambodia’s combination of subsistence, middle-scale
and large- scale commercial fishing harvests produce 300,000 to 430,000 tons of freshwater
fish. This production ranks fourth in the world and is worth approximately US$300 million.
However, there have been incremental declines in fish catches and it is now estimated that
less than 250,000 tons of fish is being caught, consisting of approximately 105,000 tons of
household fisheries, 75,000 tons of rice field fisheries and 68,000 tons of middle and large-
scale fisheries (marine fisheries production account for an additional estimated 55,000 tons).

4. Ecologically Protected Areas

a. Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve

127. The Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve is protected by national legislation and is recognized
by UNESCO under the MAB program. The Tonle Sap is the largest freshwater lake in the
Greater Mekong Sub-Region with an area of 2,500-3,000 km2 in the dry season and 10,000 –
15,000 km2 in the wet season. The water depth ranges from 1 meter in the dry season to 10
meters in the wet season and it is home to nearly one-third of Cambodia’s population. In 1997 it
was nominated as a Biosphere Reserve under the Man and the Biosphere Reserve Program of
United Nations Education and Scientific Cooperation Organization (UNESCO). Biosphere
 29

reserves are nominated by governments and remain under their jurisdiction. Reserves are
intended to fulfil three complementary functions: (i) a conservation function; (ii) a development
function; and (iii) a logistic function.

128. The Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve (TSBR) has the following zones: (i) Core areas are
securely protected sites for conserving biodiversity, monitoring minimally disturbed ecosystems,
and undertaking research and other low-impact uses such as education. The TSBR core areas
cover a total of about 43,000 ha which are characterized by a flooded forest, streams and water
bodies, and rich biodiversity. Nearly 100 water bird species are found there, a dozen of which
are of global significance. The areas are also known for their fish, mammals, and reptiles.
There are three core areas in TSBR.

(ii) The buffer zone covers about 541,482 ha and is used for cooperative activities compatible
with sound ecological practices, including environmental education, recreation, ecotourism, and
research. Its boundary corresponds to the outer boundary of the Tonle Sap Multiple-Use Area.
The TSBR buffer zone surrounds the core areas up to the outer limit of the flooded forest.

(iii) The transition area is the outer zone which covers 899,600 ha. It is intended to be flexible
and allows development in keeping with the needs of the local population. The transition area
forms the interface between the TSBR and common land. The southern edge of TSBR transition
zone forms a boundary with national road NR5. The flexible transition area is the integrated
economic zone, which is managed for sustainable agriculture, human settlement and land uses,
without having adverse effects on the flooded forest, water quality and soils of the region around
the Tonle Sap Lake.

129. None of the project roads are located within the core, buffer zones and transition zones
of TSBR.

b. Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary

130. The Phnom Aural wildlife sanctuary is located in western Cambodia and lies within the
Cardamom Mountain range, covering parts of the three 3 provinces of Kampong Chhnang,
Kampong Speu and Pursat. It was created by Royal Decree in 1993 and is one of the oldest
protected areas in Cambodia. It covers a large area of 2,500 km2 (1,000 square miles) or
250,000 ha.

131. The Phnom Aural wildlife sanctuary has been subject to a zoning process. Following
consultation with local stakeholders and a series of ecological and socioeconomic surveys of
the areas, a set of four zones was demarcated :

Core zone ─ access only for research.

Conservation zone ─ small-scale community uses of Non Timber Forest
Products (NTFP)
Sustainable use zone ─ community sustainable use of resources including
NTFPs, fuel-wood collection, timber cutting, fisheries, ecotourism and agro-
forestry (outside of community protected area)
Community zone ─ in addition to the above, small animal trapping for
subsistence use, agriculture, and livestock grazing for both subsistence and
commercial objectives
30

132. No consumptive use of resources is permitted in more than 60% of the land area.

133. The zones are shown below.(Figure V-1)

Figure V-1: PAWS Zones

134. The topography is dominated by Mount Aural which at around 1,813m ASL is
Cambodia's highest mountain. At elevations below 1,200m ASL the vegetation is dominated by
lowland evergreen forest. Elevations between 1,200 and 1,500m ASL support lower montane
evergreen forest, while elevations above 1,500m ASL support upper montane evergreen forest.
The forest types are shown below. (ha = hectare, PAWS = Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary.
Source: Calculations by Ministry of Environment, Cambodia.

Table IV-1: Forest Types in Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary (PAWS) in 2003
Total in Core zone Conservation Sustainable Community
Type PAWS (ha) (ha) zone (ha) use zone (ha) zone (ha)
Agriculture and bare soil. 5,493.24 41.13 206.17 653.74 4,592.20
Evergreen hill forest on dacite 17,509.36 17,390.28 119.07 0.01
and rhyolite.
Evergreen hill forest on 49,886.64 49,163.27 723.34 0.03
granite.
Evergreen hill forest on 13,220.91 12,457.99 732.58 29.17 1.17
sandstone.
High elevation woodland and 295.24 295.24 ─ ─ ─
grassland often with pine.
Highly disturbed forest with 1,519.85 774.54 570.07 154.31 20.93
abundant bamboo.
Low elevation of woodland 126,953.25 46,711.81 51,573.18 19,835.31 8,832.95
and grassland.
 31

Total in Core zone Conservation Sustainable Community

Type PAWS (ha) (ha) zone (ha) use zone (ha) zone (ha)
Lowland forest: large crowned, 39,727.18 24,669.97 11,173.78 3,301.91 581.52
low elevation forest with high
proportion of deciduous tree
species.
Montane forest. 428.54 428.54 ─ ─ ─
Grand total 255,034.21 151,932.77 65,098.19 23,974.48 14,028.77
ha = hectare, PAWS = Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary.
Source: Calculations by Ministry of Environment, Cambodia.

135. PAWS contains an IBA which comprises all areas of evergreen and semi-evergreen
forest above 400 m ASL, which is thought to be the lower altitudinal limit of the Chestnut-
headed Partridge Arborophila cambodiana.

136. The IBA supports both restricted-range species found in the Cambodia-Thailand-
Mountains Endemic Bird Area: Chestnut-headed Partridge and Cambodian Laughing thrush
Garrulax ferrarius.

137. Within the IBA, hunting pressure on bird populations appears to be relatively low, and
largely restricted to the snaring of ground birds for domestic consumption. Such snaring is
mainly conducted by wood collectors. Another potential threat to biodiversity is selective
logging, which can lead to habitat degradation and loss. This threat is, however, currently low,
since no large-scale, commercial logging is taking place within the IBA, and small-scale, illegal
logging is on the decline.

c. Phnom Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary

138. The Phnom Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary was established in 1994 and is located in the
Cardamom Mountains in western Cambodia, adjacent to the border with Thailand. It is a
mountainous area containing three peaks: Mount Samkos which is Cambodia's second highest
mountain (1,717 m), Mount Khmaoch (1,496 m) and Mount Tumpor (1,250 m). The area
includes an IBA.

d. Cardamom Mountains Wildlife Sanctuaries Project

139. The Cardamom mountain range extends along a southeast-northwest axis from Koh
Kong Province to Pursat Province. The highest elevation of the Cardamom Mountains is Phnom
Aural. Dense tropical rain forest prevails on the wet western slopes, which annually receive from
3,800–5,000 mm of rainfall. By contrast only 1,000 to 1,500 mm fall in Kirirom National Park on
the wooded eastern slopes in the rain shadow facing the interior Cambodian plain.

140. Threats to the biological diversity of the Cardamom Mountain Range include habitat loss
due to illegal logging, wildlife poaching, and forest fires caused by slash-and-burn agriculture.
The government has been increasing support for protected area management but still relies
extensively on donor and NGO assistance for implementing effective management. Many
international conservation organizations are working in the area including Wildlife Alliance,
Conservation International, Fauna and Flora International, and World-Wide Fund for Nature.
Sections of the area have been designated as protected areas, including Phnom Samkos
Wildlife Sanctuary and PAWS. The level of active protection in all parks in the mountains has
been criticized as being too low.
32

141. The Cardamom Mountains are an emerging tourist destination, with the opening of
Wildlife Alliance's Chi-Phat eco-tourism area in the southern Cardamoms in 2008 followed by
their second Cardamon Mountains eco-tourism site in Trapeang Roung.

142. The Phnom Aural and Phnom Samkos wildlife sanctuaries were established in 1993
under the Royal Decree on the Creation and Defining of Natural Protected Areas. They are
located at the south-eastern end and north-western end, respectively, of the Cardamom
Mountains. The two sanctuaries combined cover nearly 600,000 ha. Surveys carried out since
2001 have shown the special importance of the two sanctuaries for biodiversity conservation
and environmental services. They have diverse geography, extensive forests, and many
endemic and globally threatened species. Evergreen hill forest covers most of the two
sanctuaries and the area is listed among the World Wildlife Funds Global 2000 Ecoregions as a
priority for biodiversity conservation

143. The two wildlife sanctuaries are home to about 30,000 people who rely on subsistence
agriculture, cattle raising, and collection of non-timber forest products for their livelihoods. These
communities are among the poorest in Cambodia. Under the Cardamom Mountains Wildlife
Sanctuaries Project, a joint project of the Cambodian MOE and Fauna and Flora International,
zoning plans have been developed for both sanctuaries through participatory consultation with
local stakeholders but the sanctuaries face threats from clearance of land by in-migrating
settlers and the granting of economic concessions as in 2009 a decree was issued permitting
limited economic development in PAWS.

e. Kirirom National Park

144. Kirirom National Park is located mostly in Phnom Sruoch District, Kampong Speu
Province, while a smaller section is in neighboring Koh Kong Province. It was established in
1993 and covers 350 km2. The park extends over the eastern part of the Cardamom Mountains.
It is located 112 km from Phnom Penh off National Highway 4 on the road to Sihanoukville. It is
located at an altitude of 675 m (2,215 ft) above sea level and was Cambodia's first officially
designated national park. Among the animals in the park are Asian elephant, deer, gaur,
banteng, leopard, spotted linsang, pileated gibbon and tiger.

C. Economics

145. The economic appraisal has been carried out for six road sections. NR 13 was
analyzed as three sections, but the results have been combined for the whole road; all three
sections are individually economically viable. The results for Road 314D are shown for two
cases; one with only the cost of the road upgrading and one with the capital cost of the
development of the CBF at Prey Vor included. No additional benefit for the CBF has been
calculated. Road 150B has been analyzed as two sections, east and west of NR 5, and the
results are shown on this basis, as the two sections are distinct in terms of the road network.
The sealing of the 3.1km of the western section of Road 150B in the village of Alnkae that will
be bypassed by the proposed realignment has not been included. The analysis of the western
section of Road 150B includes the new alignment and the distance saving obtained applied to
all traffic. NR 53 and Road 151B were both analyzed as single sections. The results are shown
in Table V-1 where they are summarized for the six road sections and for the project as a whole,
with the total based on Road 314D including the CBF. In this table, the values of the main
components of project costs and benefits are shown as discounted present values. The Net
Present Value (NPV) shown is the sum of all savings minus the capital costs, discounted to
 33

base year values at 12%. The Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) is shown in the final
column.

Table V-1: Summary of Evaluation Results ($ millions)

Capital Pass. Non-
Cost Maintenance VOC Time Motorized IRR
Increase Cost Savings Savings Savings Savings NPV (%)
NR 13 12.72 0.52 15.66 3.67 0.20 7.33 16.8
314D: road only 5.29 0.07 8.53 1.34 0.10 4.74 18.2
With CBF 7.90 0.07 8.53 1.34 0.10 2.13 14.2
150B East 1.00 0.01 1.23 0.27 0.01 0.52 15.9
150B West 3.55 0.05 3.93 0.55 0.09 1.07 14.6
NR 53 2.15 0.06 2.01 0.28 0.05 0.25 13.1
151B 0.27 0.01 0.64 0.08 0.00 0.46 22.7
Total 27.59 0.71 32.01 6.19 0.45 11.77 15.5
IRR = international rate of return, NPV = net present value, NR = national road, VOC = vehicle operating cost.
Note: Total includes option for Road 314D With CBF Source: Consultants

146. All of the road sections are shown to be viable, with positive NPVs and EIRRs above the
target rate of 12%. Overall the project has an EIRR of 15.5%. The EIRRs are similar for all
sections. The higher traffic levels on NR 13 and Road 314D produce higher benefits but the
higher design standard results in much higher costs per km for the upgrading.

147. By far the largest source of benefits is VOC savings, being on average five times those
of passenger time savings. Benefits to non-motorized traffic, almost entirely bicycles, are
insignificant despite the large numbers on some road sections. There is a small net saving from
routine road maintenance costs.

D. Socio-economic Profile

148. During the baseline survey conducted in June 2011, 99.4% of respondents were in favor
of the project while less than 1% are not in favor due to fear that their houses and shops might
be affected during the construction. Overall, the key stakeholders are in favor of the project due
to the following positive impacts: (i) greater access to basic facilities and services, specially for
women/girls, children, elderly and disabled persons; (ii) improved roads will increase
household’s income; (iii) prices of commodities and transportation costs will be reduced due to
improved roads; (iv) greater job opportunities for both unskilled women and men who would like
to work during the road construction and maintenance; (v) children will be motivated to go to
schools, and will increase enrollment and completion rates; (vi) faster and more convenient
travel; (vii) the mothers will no longer be tired doing laundry for the uniform of their children daily
(which is costly and time consuming), especially during rainy season; (viii) easy to transport
agricultural products (although there is a need to improve further roads in their
communes/villages); and (ix) there will be more jobs that will be created in the future as more
business investors will put up factories and other business establishments. Negative impacts
raised by the key stakeholders include: (i) increase in road accidents; (ii) increase in number of
individuals with HIV/AIDs/sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs), and human trafficking cases;
(iii) possible increase in school drop-outs and child labor during the construction period; (iv)
economic and physical displacement of some households (permanent and temporary); and (v)
dust and noise during the construction, but this is only temporary.

149. During the baseline survey conducted in June 2011, less than 30% of the key informants
mentioned that the project will result to spread of HIV/AIDS/STDs and will increase human
34

trafficking cases. However, the community leaders have expressed that public awareness
campaign on HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention program (HHTPP) will be of great
help. There are NGOs that conduct HHTPP and road safety awareness in the communities. The
teachers and the MoWA also mentioned the possibility for children who are enrolled in school
(especially the girls) to work during the construction of the project. This could mitigated by
implementing the labor and gender action plan (LGAP) where the “no child labor policy” will be
strictly enforced.

E. Poverty

150. Cambodia is one of the least developed countries in Southeast Asia, and in the Asia-
Pacific region, it ranks 131 of the 179 countries included in the UNDP’s Human Development
Index (HDI). It has a total population of 14.3 million as of 2010 with an annual population growth
rate of 1.6%. The country’s population in 2009 was 13.9 million and of this number, 51.23% are
women. There were 2.9 million households with an average of 5 people and over 82% are in the
rural areas. ADB mentioned in the Country Poverty Assessment for 2011 that based on the
2008 census, a quarter of Cambodian households (25.6%) are headed by women. The
population is young, with more than half (56.1%) under the age of 25. The fertility rate has
declined slightly but remains high. Rapid population growth from 1998–2008 at 1.54% per year
is higher than the 1.3% average for Southeast Asia as a whole. Around 72% of the workforce is
engaged in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. Urbanization is low, with just 19.5% of the
population living in cities in 2008 and only a 1.3 percentage point increase over the previous
decade (18.2% in 1998). While the annual growth rate of the rural population was 1.4% from
1998 to 2008, the urban population grew at 2.2% per year.

151. The country’s national poverty incidence in 2008 was 30.1% but rural areas have higher
poverty rate of 34.7%. Cambodia ranked 33 in the “alarming” countries with high level of hunger
and under nutrition, where 12% of the households were classified as food insecure due to
increase in food prices (UNDP Poverty Reduction Report, 21 March 2011). The UN-WFP
Cambodia reported that although the poverty rate in the country fell by 4.7% from 2004 to 2007,
the 30.1% poverty level among the country’s total population was still high. The unemployment
rate in Cambodia is projected to reach 20% by end of 2011. The poverty rate in Svay Rieng
province was 24% and 35% in Kampong Chhnang province (2008 Census).

152. The total population in the project areas covering 10 districts in 4 provinces (Svay Rieng,
Prey Veng, Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu) was 705,738 with 140,818 households in
2008. Of this number, 25,755 or 18% were female-headed households (2008 Census).
Agriculture is the primary source of income and food for the households. In Svay Rieng province
(with 5 out of 10 districts included in the project areas), only 5% of the farmers have access to
irrigation and 33% owned less than 1 ha of land, and 4% do not own land for rice cultivation. In
Kampong Chhnang province (with 3 districts included in the project areas), 54% of the
households owned less than 1 ha of land and 8% do not own land for rice cultivation. Around
30%of the households in Kampong Chhnang have access to irrigation. Based on the baseline
survey conducted in June 2011, 26% of farmers who have land do not have legal land title.
Absence of proof of land ownership makes the farmers vulnerable to losing land and inhibits
them from investing long-term in agricultural production. Landless farmers and those with less
than 1 ha are included among the poor households in Cambodia. Based on the international
poverty line (in 2006 purchasing parity terms), 40% of the population in Cambodia lived on less
than $1.25 a day, and 68% on less than $2 a day (A. Bauer et. al. 2008, World Bank’s New
Poverty Data: Implications for ADB, Sustainable Working Development Working Paper Series
No. 2. Manila).
 35

F. Gender

153. Women account for 52% of the population in the project areas. Female-headed
households comprise 13% of the total households who were interviewed during the baseline
survey conducted in June 2011. Of this number, 3% have children less than 5 years old. The
country’s child mortality rate in 2010 was 350 per 100,000 live births. Of the 4 provinces
covered by the project, Kampong Chhnang has the highest maternal mortality rates with more
than 500 mothers who died within 1 month after giving birth in 2008, followed by Kamchay Chay
Mear district in Prey Veng with 305 and Svay Rieng with 350. Neonatal mortality rate per 1,000
live births in the country was 60 in 2010. Kamchay Mear district (Prey Veng province) has the
highest neonatal mortality rate of 42 cases, followed by Svay Rieng with an average of 25 cases
per 1,000 live births in 2008.

VI. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

A. Impacts of Roads on Protected Areas due to Location

1. National road NR 13

154. NR 13 will not pass in close proximity to any legally designated protected areas or sites
of special ecological, cultural or religious interest. The only localized environmental concern at
this time is the large water body through which the road passes on embankment which may be
subject to periodic inundation in the short term, or extreme weather events in the long term.

2. Road 314D and CBF

155. Road 314D will not pass in close proximity to any legally designated protected areas or
sites of special ecological, cultural or religious interest.

156. The CBF site is already developed and in use by cross border traffic. No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated by further development and upgrading of this facility.

3. Road 150B

157. Road 150B has an eastern section of 5.5 km which connects NR5 to Tonle Sap river. It
terminates at the village of Ta Ches at the ferry crossing point of the river. This point is the
nearest that any project road approaches to the boundaries of Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve. It
is approximately 4.5 km from the boundary of the outer zone, known as the Transition zone.
There will be no impacts from the road on TSBR.
36

Figure VI-1: Road 150B in relation to Outer Zone of TSBR

158. None of the project roads are located within the core, buffer zones and transition zones
of TSBR. The location of the project roads in relation to TLSBR are shown in Figure IV-8.

Figure VI-2: Road 150B, NR53 and 151B in relation to All Zones of TSBR
 37

4. Road NR53

159. NR 53 runs alongside part of the eastern boundary of Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary
for a distance of approximately 6.5 km.

160. The figure below depicts the location of PAWS based on public domain information with
the project road superimposed. he road does not intrude into the PAWS but runs contiguous
with the boundary (Figure VI-3).

161. This has been confirmed by detailed investigations and “ground truthing” as described
below.

162. Under the Royal Decree on the Protection of Natural Areas 1993 Article 3: Amendments
“The protected natural areas may be modified or expanded in the future on the basis of scientific
information involved in the conservation of ecology and the maintenance of the existing
landscape in the Kingdom of Cambodia.” It is possible that the boundary may have been
modified and yet still be completely in accordance with the law. However, site visits have
established this has not occurred.
38

Figure VI-3: Road NR53 in relation to Outer Zone of PAWS

163. The boundary of PAWS was given in the Royal Decree of 1993 which showed a
boundary line drawn on a map. The consultants obtained a copy of the original decree to
confirm this. Flora and Fauna International, an NGO, have recently been very active in PAWS
with regards to the boundaries. They took coordinates off the original map and transformed
these into cartographic coordinates using the UTM system. (The consultants have obtained
these coordinates, called “Waypoints”.) The waypoints were then used by Flora and Fauna
International on a global positioning system (GPS) system to identify locations on the ground
where concrete posts could be erected to mark the boundary of the PAWS. In some cases the
intended location was inaccessible and could not be used to locate a concrete marker. In this
case, discussions were held between Flora and Fauna International, MOE, Provincial officers
and local villagers to agree on a location for the marker post (Figure VI-4).
 39

Figure VI-4: The 80 Perimeter Marking Points of PAWS as marked by FFI and MoE

164. The boundary shown in the Royal Decree 1993, the estimated waypoints and the
concrete marker posts could possibly be different. Site surveys were conducted to “ground truth”
the data and confirm in reality exactly where the boundaries are, as indicated by the marker
posts and agreed by local villagers.

165. Site surveys were carried out together with the PAWS Rangers from the Provincial
Department of Environment (DOE), and the District Village Heads. A series of concrete posts
were identified which mark the boundary of PAWS. Each post is numbered, states the Royal
Decree and has the UTM Coordinates written on it. Some of these have been moved slightly at
the request of the villagers to avoid natural features such as a drainage ditch (Figure VI-5).
40

Figure VI-5: Concrete Marker Post showing Boundary of PAWS

166. The locations were checked with a GPS unit and the findings crossed checked with the
UTM coordinates written on the post. All were found to be correct. Six posts mark the boundary
of PAWS where it runs contiguous to NR 53 (Figure VI-6).
 41

Figure VI-6: Concrete Marker Post 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 and 50 and UTM coordinates showing
Boundary of PAWS contiguous with NR 53

167. Having established the boundary of PAWS in relation to NR 53, it is possible to show the
distance of the project road from the various zones of PAWS. PAWS is divided into 4 zones
which are not concentric (unlike TSBR). The characteristics of the zones are described below
(Table IV-2) and the location of them with respect to NR53 given in Figure VI-7. It can be seen
that NR53 has no adverse impact on the activities designated by the zones of PAWS.

Table VI-1: PAWS Internal Demarcation Zones

PAWS Zone Use Area (ha) % Total
Core Zone Access only for research 151,993 60
Conservation Zone Small-scale community uses of NTFPs 65,099 26
Sustainable Use Zone Community sustainable use of resources 23,975 9
including NTFPs, fuel-wood collection, timber
cutting, fisheries, ecotourism and agro-forestry
(outside of community protected area).
Community Zone In addition to those activities above, small 14,029 6
animal trapping for subsistence use,
agriculture, and livestock grazing for both
subsistence and commercial objectives.
Total 255,036 100
ha = hectare, NTFP = non-timber forest products, PAWS = Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary.
42

Figure VI-7: PAWS Zones in Vicinity of NR53

Table VI-2: Distance of NR53 from PAWS Internal Zones

NR 53 runs contiguous to the outer boundary of PAWS for about 6.5 km.
The distances of NR 53 to the nearest point of each zone are :
Distance to Community Zone (Red) 10 m (for approximately 3.5 km)
Distance to Sustainable Use Zone (Blue) 10 m (for approximately 3 km)
Distance to Conservation Zone (Yellow) 2 km (at nearest point)
Distance to Core Area (Green) 5 km (at nearest point)
km = kilometer, m = meter, NR = national road, PAWS = Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary.

168. It is intended to support activities to the villagers in PAWS to enhance their activities in
line with sustainable development in locations adjacent to project roads. Discussions have been
initiated with the stakeholders in PAWS to develop collaborative assistance in the future and
these are reported in the public consultations sections.

5. Road 151B

169. Road 151B marks the most southern point of the project roads. This road is further away
from PAWS than NR 53 and more than 50 kms from Kirirom National Park. No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated from this section of the project road on these two
protected areas.
 43

Figure VI-8 Road 151B in relation to Kirirom National Park

B. Potential Impacts Pre-construction Phase

1. Unexploded Ordnance

170. A land mine or unexploded ordnance (UXO) risk is widespread in Cambodia including
the provinces in which the proposed project will be conducted. The works are to upgrade
existing roads without widening. Nevertheless, a risk remains since there may be deep seated
mines that could be exploded by heavy construction equipment and shallow ordnance may be
uncovered during the works. The detailed design and implementation supervision consultant
(DDIS) shall engage a UXO specialist to determine the level of risk of all project roads and
advise on the need for clearance. Any clearance that is required will be undertaken through the
civil works contracts, by the engagement of qualified local UXO clearance firms. The contractor
shall only commence site works after the UXO clearance firm has certified that areas are
already cleared.

2. Climate Change and Hydrological Impacts

171. Existing climate change projections supported by field observations highlight two major
concerns related to current and future climate changes. Specifically, there appears to be an
overall increase in average total annual rainfall and, this increase is poorly distributed over
seasons, resulting in increased floods during the rainy season and increased drought during the
dry season. Droughts are significant especially for unpaved roads as dust levels increase and
reduce visibility and create poor local air quality. Flooding and soil moisture content is a primary
concern for protecting investments in roadworks and will be addressed as a priority in the climate
change adaptation strategy to be implemented under the Project. The strategy will seek to
strengthen the overall objective of the Project to improve rural road mobility. It will do so by:
44

(i) Protecting the road infrastructure from the impacts of climate change and,
(ii) Ensuring that the road infrastructure does not increase the vulnerability of the
surrounding area to climate change.

172. The adaptation activities fall under two outcomes: Outcome 1: improved planning for
rural road infrastructure development to accommodate climate changes and, Outcome 2:
increased resilience of road infrastructure to climate changes. In particular, Outcome 2 will
involve design and implementation of ecosystem-based adaptation strategies focusing on
environmental/green planning for project roads to improve flood and drought management, i.e.
increasing ground cover and infiltration of floods and water retention during droughts, which has
the added co-benefits of improving rural livelihoods by improving the soil structure for
agriculture.

173. In selecting species of trees and other vegetation for the ecosystem-based adaptation,
the consultants for the climate change adaptation component of the Project shall ensure new
species (i.e., species not currently established in the country or region of the project) shall not
be intentionally introduced unless carried out in accordance with the existing regulatory
framework for such introduction, if such framework is present, or unless the introduction is
subject to a risk assessment. Under no circumstances must species known to be invasive be
introduced into new environments.

174. To address hydrological impacts, the project shall provide for appropriate design of
roadside and cross drainage systems, where necessary, to avoid flooding on project roads as
well as in areas surrounding the road embankment. The road embankment, bridges and
drainage facilities shall be designed based on the historical flood data and flood forecasting.
Erosion control and slope stabilization measures shall be included in the design, as appropriate,
such as side ditches and berms, rock lining and slope walls along the road, shrub buffer strips
sites in areas of high erosion risk, cross drainage to accommodate floodwater/run-off in case
road sections are on elevated fills that will obstruct natural drainage.

C. Potential Impacts Due to Construction Works

1. Potential Impacts from Operating Outside Agreed Areas

175. Contractors must be instructed as to where construction works, materials storage,

workers camps, fabrication yards and borrow areas may be located. Operating outside these
areas may intrude into protected areas or lead to conflict with local residents.

2. Borrow Areas

176. Widening and raising of embankments will use a variety of earth, laterite and rock
materials. Soil will be obtained from borrow pits or excavated material taken from trenches
running lateral to the road. Temporary roads may be needed to access borrow pits. After work is
completed borrow areas (borrow pits and borrow roads) must be reinstated to their original
condition.

3. Rock Extraction
 45

177. Where rock extraction is by explosives, blasting noise and vibration impacts may occur.
The blasting method statement must be submitted to the resident engineer in advance for his
approval.

4. Fabrication Sites

178. Construction of bridges and culverts will be by the use of pre-cast concrete structures,
which will be transported to site and installed. The location of fabrication sites and their
operation may have impacts on surrounding areas.

5. Transport of Construction Materials

179. Construction materials such as earth, gravel and rock will be hauled by trucks to the
project sites. Concrete beams will be pre-cast in a fabrication yard and then transported to site
and erected. If contractors' haulage trucks exceed weight limits there may be damage to
bridges.

6. Fuel and Oils

180. Vehicles will require fuel and lubrication oils which may leak into watercourses. Vehicle
wash down water may cause contamination.

7. Bitumen Use for Asphalt

181. Bitumen for asphalt and batching plants will be stored on site. Storage areas must be
strictly controlled and not located near watercourses. Bitumen will need a fuel source for
heating. Wood should not be used as an alternative fuel. Asphalt applied during rain can be
washed into watercourses.

8. Noise and Vibration

182. During construction, noise and vibration may be generated by construction equipment,
vehicles, pile driving, demolition and blasting.

9. Dust

183. Dust from unpaved roads is a major nuisance for roadside residents, especially those in
built-up areas. During construction, fabrication sites and access roads, material stockpiles,
crushers and batching plants may generate dust.

10. Construction Waste Materials

184. Demolition of old structures may give rise to waste construction materials. These may
comprise waste concrete rubble, wood, nails and old steel re-bars. These can be sharp and
pose a threat to grazing animals.

11. Erosion and Sedimentation

185. Borrow pits, quarries, road embankments, culverts and bridge abutments and road
diversions will expose bare soils where material can be eroded. Work within channels and
dumping of excavated material into flowing channels can cause blockage of drainage channels.
46

12. Damage to Services

186. Services within the right-of-way (ROW) may include electrical cable, fibre optic
telephone cables, mobile telephone transmission towers and underground water pipelines.
Damage to such utilities must be avoided.

13. Road Diversions

187. It may be necessary to divert traffic around certain areas. Drivers must be forewarned of
changed road conditions. Old signage may be misleading if not removed.

14. Forest and Roadside Trees

188. In order to allow widening large numbers of roadside trees will be removed. These must
be disposed of adequately. These are discussed in detail under “Mitigation”.

15. Discovery of Relics

189. No ancient monuments have been located along the project roads, but contractors must
exercise care as historic artifacts may be discovered during excavation.

16. Accidents and Injuries

190. The Contractor must have a stated policy and clear program for Occupational Health
and Labor Safety. Trained first aid personnel and emergency response facilities are required.

D. Potential Impacts Due to Workers Camps

1. Location of Camps and Works

191. The conceptual layout of the construction camps, workers quarters and quarries has not
yet been proposed. In addition to permanent camps there may be temporary camps for teams
of workers who move around the project roads. Their exact locations are not yet specified.
More details will become available as the works progress.

2. Camp Amenities for Fixed Teams

192. Workers living in camps will need adequate facilities for food preparation and cooking
facilities, laundry, personal hygiene and waste removal. Contractors must provide these to
avoid unsanitary impacts on nearby residents.

3. Construction Camps for Mobile Teams

193. If teams move around the route as works progress contractors may try to use temporary
camps with containers for sleeping and temporary latrines on rented land. This is considered
too disruptive to local villagers and renting houses as temporary quarters is preferred.

4. Stagnant Water Areas

194. Stagnant water can gather in borrow pits, discarded solid waste such as plastics, old
 47

tires and metal containers and provide temporary breeding habitats for mosquitoes. Malaria
and dengue fever are prevalent. Contractors should provide preventive control measures.

5. Health and Safety

195. Risks may arise during the construction stage from (i) inadequate sanitation facilities in
work camps (ii) lack of preparation for accidents and injuries (iii) introduction of contagious
diseases by immigrant workers (iv) outbreaks of malaria in the labor force. Contractors must
take steps to avoid these.

6. Social Issues – STIs

196. The introduction of sexually transmitted diseases or other infections by immigrant

workers is a concern. These issues should be addressed.

7. Cleanup of the Construction Site

197. When construction is completed, the contractors must clean up the construction sites by
removing all equipment and buildings and carrying out site remediation work, unless the site
and buildings are to be left intact and handed over to the local authorities.

E. Potential Impacts Due to Operation

1. Road Accidents

198. As a result of the improved road and with long straight stretches and relatively long
distances between the villages, it will be possible for vehicle speeds to increase. This may
increase road accidents. Traffic safety is an issue and a road safety program will be
implemented.

2. Community Based Road Safety Program

199. Cambodia experiences an extremely high accident rate that is three times that of other
countries in the ASEAN region, and accidents, casualties and fatalities have all increased
proportionally faster than the growth in road traffic and the population. Consequently the
government has committed to a national target of reducing road crash fatalities by 30% in 2010.
This project will improve selected provincial roads and the rural communities are aware that
paving the roads is likely to lead to an increase in traffic speeds, and have expressed concern
over road safety. The project includes a component to address the Road Safety problem
through the provision of road safety experts who will, in concert with existing programs in
Cambodia, support the NRSAP and deliver practical solutions including public awareness of the
road law, road user competence and education and vulnerability awareness.

200. The National Road Safety Committee supports and coordinates road safety action plans
throughout Cambodia such as the Cambodia Road Safety Week before Khmer New Year. The
2011-2020 National Road Safety Action Plan (NRSAP) is aligned to the UN Global Decade of
Action for Road Safety and consists of 7 pillars : Pillar 1 Road Safety Management; Pillar 2
Infrastructure; Pillar 3 Safe Vehicles; Pillar 4 Safe Road User Behaviour; Pillar 5 Post Crash
Care; Pillar 6 Legislation and Enforcement; Pillar 7 Driver Licensing. Under the ADB funded
Provincial Roads improvement Project TA 7665-CAM baseline studies have been carried out in
August 2011 on selected roads. These included helmet surveys, road user surveys, school
48

surveys, hospital surveys and road safety consciousness surveys. Drawing on these results the
7 pillars of NRSAP are to be applied to Community Based Road Safety (CBRS) through a
Technical Assistance Project.

201. The CBRS program aims to:

Raise awareness of road safety for all road users in target areas
Work with local communities, in particular youth and women, to promote road safety
Support communities in developing road safety planning based on accurate and relevant
information

202. The CBRS project will focus on districts, communes and villages adjacent to project
roads. It will be coordinated by the CBRS Management Team at MPWT; District Level
facilitators of whom 30% will be female; Commune level facilitators (30% female); and Village
level volunteers of whom 40% will be female and the majority youth. A fundamental aim is to
ensure long term sustainability at grass roots level.

203. The CBRS activities will include:

Road safety seminars
Volunteer training
Road Safety Training for teachers
Road Safety show
Road Safety information for farmers
Local Road Safety Information
Annual Road Safety week
Road Safety Information Boards
Road Safety Focal points at Schools
Road Safety School program
Helmets on Our Heads Program
Driver training of farm tractors
Headlight on in Daytime Program
Mentor Program for women
Enhancing pedestrian safety

204. These will comprise annual and weekly events, school events, exhibitions and ground
breaking events. Consultants will be hired who will be responsible for facilitating all of these
actions and for monitoring and evaluation of progress.

3. Noise

205. Noise from road traffic is a nuisance for roadside residents. As traffic grows, with more
heavy goods vehicles, noise levels will increase. However smoother road surfaces can reduce
road / wheel interaction noise.

4. Air Pollution

206. Air pollution from vehicle operation, especially heavy diesel powered vehicles will
increase. However, higher speeds give more engine efficiency which reduces air pollution.
 49

5. Toxic Spills

207. Currently transport operators face a poor road system with the attendant risks of a high
proportion of accidents attributable to these poorly maintained roads. With the new road and
better road conditions transport accidents attributable to poor road conditions will decrease but
accidents attributable to speed are likely to be several times greater. Thus as traffic densities
and speeds increase there is increased likelihood of accidents and toxic materials being
released into the air, ground and aquatic systems. To date there do not appear to have been
any major accidental spills.

6. Illegal Settlement

208. Illegal dwellings should be discouraged as encroachments and squatters can effectively
reduce the road width and contribute to accidents.

7. Loss of Forests

209. Improved access to an area can sometimes result in accelerated loss of forests due to
illegal logging. Illegal logging is controlled by MoE Rangers and they reported that is not a major
activity in PAWS, the main protected area near to any project roads.

8. Loss of Wildlife

210. A concern with increased access is the possibility of an increase in illegal wildlife hunting
and threats to endangered species. As stated above MoE Rangers patrol to control such illegal
activities.

9. Positive Operational Impacts - Social Enhancement

211. Not all impacts are adverse. The project will have several positive benefits which
include:

Hiring of Local Communities for construction work

Reduce Transport Costs
Improved Public Access
Improved Transport of Goods for Rural Communities
Tourism Benefits

212. These will enhance the quality of life and living standards of the local population.

F. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Location

1. Avoidance of Impacts Outside Agreed Areas

213. Contractors must follow instructions as to location of construction works, materials

storage, workers camps, fabrication yards, and borrow areas. They must not work in protected
reserves without prior permission from the relevant authorities.
50

2. Ancient Bridges and Temple

214. There are no ancient bridges or old temples adjacent to the project roads.

3. Religious Edifices

215. There are no religious edifices in the immediate vicinity of the project roads. There are
several pagodas and graves located near some of the roads. Contractors must employ normal
care when working near these. Details are given in the Conditions Surveys. (Annex1)

G. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Construction Works

1. Intrusion into Protected Areas

216. All of the construction activities, including structural work and laydown yards, quarries,
borrow pits, fabrication yards and workers camps must be located outside any protected areas.

2. Borrow Areas

217. The borrow areas are still to be identified and finalized. Details of location, excavation
and rehabilitation are still to be decided. Many villagers stated during consultations that they
wished borrow pits to be left open so that they could be used for water reservoirs, duck ponds or
fish ponds. As borrow areas will be subject to a private contract between the villagers and the
contractor, the decision as to rehabilitation will be made on a case by case basis. However,
should the villagers specify rehabilitation, the contractor must comply with this request.
Otherwise all borrow pits must be filled in after project completion, and resurfaced with topsoil
and revegetation, as indicated in the borrow pit excavation plan, to such a condition that they do
not pose a hazard to local residents. Temporary roads will be needed to access borrow pits.
After work is completed these must be removed. This includes breaking up compaction and
reinstating the original ground surface.

3. Quarry and Borrow Sites Operation

218. The following measures should be implemented at quarry and borrow sites to
minimize impacts on water quality, reduce dust emission during transport, minimize erosion
and siltation of nearby water courses and avoid damage to productive land and ecologically
sensitive areas:

(i) Sourcing of quarry and borrow materials from existing sites shall be preferred
over establishment of new sites, as much as possible.
(ii) Quarries and borrow pits shall not be established in national, provincial, district
and village conservation forests and other ecologically sensitive and protected
areas.
(iii) Borrow/quarry sites shall not be located in productive land.
(iv) In case the Project will involve new quarry/borrow sites, necessary approvals
from environmental authorities shall be obtained prior to operation of such
sites. Such sites shall be located over 300 m away from residential, school,
hospital and other sensitive receptors.
(v) Prior to extraction, topsoil (about 15 cm) shall be stockpiled, preserved and
then refilled after completion of quarry/borrow pit operation for rehabilitation
purposes after excavation is over.
 51

(vi) Dust control during excavation and transport e.g. water spraying on access roads
and covering of truck loads with tarpaulins shall be undertaken in areas where
there are sensitive receptors such as residential areas, school, hospital, etc.
(vii) Long-term material stockpiles shall be covered to prevent wind erosion.
(viii) During quarry and borrow site operation, provide adequate drainage to
avoid accumulation of stagnant water.
(ix) The use of river bed sources shall be avoided, as much as possible, however if
this is unavoidable the contractor shall minimize use of river bed for
construction materials and sources of fill and quarry materials lying on small rivers
and streams shall be avoided. Alluvial terraces or alluvial deposits which lie on the
river beds but are not covered by water in normal hydrological conditions shall be
preferred.
(x) It is possible that villagers may request borrow pits to be left excavated so that
they may be used as water reservoirs or fishponds. If this were to be agreed
between the contractors and the villagers, all full safety measures must be
observed to prevent drowning. Such agreements would be formalized in writing
between the contractors and the villagers after full discussion with all concerned
parties.

4. Rock Extraction

219. Where rock extraction is to be by explosives blasting, normal industry standards and
safety practices must be followed to minimize noise and vibration impacts. The blasting
method statement must be submitted to the resident engineer in advance for his approval.

220. The contractor, or his appointed blasting subcontractor, must advise on location of drilled
holes, depth of drilling, diameter of hole and charge per hole. The total number of holes and the
total maximum quantity of explosive to be used must be given. If pattern blasting is to be
utilized, then 10-20 millisecond delays between holes must be used to minimize vibrations.
Stemming to holes must be used to minimize noise and projection of “flyrock.”

221. If explosives are to be stored on site, a licensed magazine must be used. This must
have strict security and restricted access. An inventory of explosives transported in, used and
stored must be kept and reported monthly to the R.E.

222. Details of the type of explosive must be given, whether it proprietary or prepared on site
(e.g. ANFO). The type of initiation must be stated, whether electrical, cortex, etc. Local
residents must be made aware of blasting taking place and warned in advance. If possible
blasting must take place at some regular prearranged time so that residents become
accustomed to it and are not alarmed. Audible (siren) and visual (red flag) signals must be used
to warn passersby of an imminent blast.

223. Charges and hole spacing must be selected to minimise any subsequent “bouldering”
blasting. All intended blasting of quarries or for demolition of structures must be notified to the
UXO officer to ensure that any related areas have been cleared, in order to avoid secondary
detonations. Blasting for demolition of structures must be notified to local residents at least 7
days in advance. Written notices (in Khmer) must be distributed or attached to notice boards,
trees and the like in the area. Audible and visual warnings must be given in advance of the
blast.
52

5. Fabrication Sites

224. Concrete beams and culverts will be pre-cast in a fabrication yard and then transported
to site and erected. Cement and aggregate must be kept on the yard and not transported to site.

6. Transport of Construction Materials

225. Materials such as earth, gravel and rock will be required for the road construction.
Borrow pits may be located along the roads. Gravel and crushed stone will be hauled by trucks
to the project sites. If contractors' haulage trucks exceed weight limits there may be damage to
bridges and road surfaces. Weight restrictions must be imposed on contractor’s vehicles to
prevent damage to structures. Wheel washing facilities must be provided at roadside camps to
prevent mud being carried over onto roads.

7. Fuel Storage and Vehicle Maintenance

226. It is expected that vehicles will be stored at construction sites. Fuel stored on site must
follow good industry practice. Fuel suppliers must provide skid mounted tanks with a metered
off take and pump, mounted on a concrete hard standing. The concrete base must have a
perimeter kerb to catch and retain any minor leaks or spills from the main tank manifold. Some
vehicle maintenance may take place at commercial garages. This will have no impact on the
project area. If maintenance takes place on site, measures must be implemented to control oily
water runoff.

8. Waste Oil

227. Waste oil can be sold to local waste contractors. This process is endorsed. The project
contractor is at liberty to subcontract with any one he chooses. This approach has several
advantages:

It allows the contractor to avoid a cost of disposal

It brings in some revenue to the contractor
It is believed that the waste oil is used as a fuel additive in the scrap metal recovery
business, which currently uses wood. This disposal route may, to a limited extent, assist in
reducing deforestation.
The subcontractor will have paid for the waste oil. It is now a valuable commodity to him.
Therefore he is extremely unlikely to illegally dump the waste oil or allow any spillage on the
road.

228. Any waste oil must be stored in drums which are clearly marked “waste material”. The
drums must be of sound structural integrity and not leak, or be covered on the outside with dirty
oil.

229. Drums must be stored on a concrete hard standing with a perimeter kerb to catch and
retain any minor leaks or spills from the drums. The base must be covered with a lightweight
rain proof shelter. Simple inclined corrugated lightweight material is sufficient. This must stop
rain falling on the drums. (See figure below)
 53

9. Bitumen Use for Asphalt

230. Bitumen will be heated by kerosene or gas. Fuel wood must not be used or as an
alternative cold mix bitumen can be employed. Asphalt must not be applied during rain so as to
avoid it being washed into watercourses.

10. Noise Impacts

231. Pile driving, improper silencing of vehicles and equipment used on the road construction
site may impact on communities. The Contractor must ensure that machinery is adequately
silenced and operations are restricted to normal daylight hours. Blasting noise must also be
controlled as described above.

11. Dust Impacts

232. The Contractor must maintain dust abatement procedures where roads, construction
sites and access areas pass through villages and at sites where workers are employed. In rock
quarries which are privately owned dust abatement will be owner's responsibility, unless the
crusher, screens and storage are owned by the contractor. Abatement measures can include
covering piles of raw material with tarpaulins to prevent dust being blown away, and water
spraying of roads and construction areas.
54

Spill Protection for Fuel Oil Storage

Fuel
Oil Rain Water Drain
"Normally Closed"

Brick Kerb to Contain

Spills

Concrete Base

Rain Proofing for Waste Oil Storage Area

Lightweight Roof to Protect

from Rain

Supports

Waste Oil Concrete Base

Figure VI-9: Spill Protection for Fuel Oil Storage / Rain Proofing for Waste Oil Storage

12. Construction Waste Materials

233. Demolition of old structures may give rise to waste construction materials. These may
comprise waste concrete rubble, wood, nails and old steel re-bars. These can be sharp and
pose a threat to grazing animals. They must be disposed of at an agreed location approved by
the local authorities. This must be reported to the resident engineer.

13. Erosion and Sedimentation

234. Borrow pits, quarries, road embankments, culverts and bridge abutments and road
diversions will expose bare soils where material can be eroded. Areas must be re-vegetated as
soon as possible after disturbance. Depending on the season this may require watering to
 55

ensure establishment of vegetation until the wet season arrives. Re-vegetation work may be
carried out by project affected people within the Resettlement Plan as a form of income
generation. Re-vegetation specifications will be included in the Detailed Design. The contractor
must take care to avoid unnecessary work within channels and avoid dumping of excavated
material into flowing channels. If possible, work which could affect water channels must take
place during the dry season, before heavy rainfall flows occur.

14. Damage to Services

235. The Contractor must liaise with the relevant utility companies to check location of
services and avoid damage.

15. Road Diversions

236. It may be required to divert traffic around certain areas. Warning signs and flagging
must displayed at the commencement of any road construction or diversion so as to forewarn
drivers of changed road conditions. Old signage must be removed by the Contractor.

16. Forest and Roadside Trees

237. Trees to be cut down are on 314D are 2,234 and NR13 it is 9,906. On NR53 there are
3,010 and 2,612 on the other western roads. For road 150B the trees on the shoulders are
15m high and along NR 13 planting on the shoulder/ sideslope must be removed as will the
short section in Prey Veng province where they are 10m high. Where they are under the new
road it will be necessary to remove the roots where widening from 4m to 8m as the tap root is
thought to be about 5m long. Replacement of trees is discussed under Resettlement.

17. Discovery of Relics

238. If during excavation relics are discovered, under the Law on Cultural Heritage, 1996, the
discovery must be reported to the responsible agency.

18. Accidents and Injuries

239. The Contractor shall have a Safety Officer trained in first aid and the contractor must
check the response time of emergency facilities such as fire and ambulance. All workers must
be issued with PPE – Personal Protective Equipment – such as safety boots, helmets, goggles
and gloves. Workers must be trained in their use and reminded daily at morning “Toolbox
Briefings” when the day’s tasks are assigned. Records must be kept of accidents, lost time due
to fatalities, injury or medical attention. Workers should be offered incentives to report “near
misses” and correct carelessness. Extra efforts must be made to prevent children injuring
themselves on site after working hours. Emergency telephone numbers must be displayed
prominently on site.

19. Dislocation of People

240. The road is being built within an established ROW but minor dislocations such as
temporary bypasses around structures must be agreed by the contractor and local people.
56

H. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Workers Camps

1. Camp Amenities for Fixed Teams

241. Potable water must be supplied for cooking and washing but it is not intended for
drinking. If wells are drilled on sites the supply must be 100 L / man / day. It must be stored in
overhead storage tanks for gravity distribution. If no wells are planned water for personal
washing, laundry, cooking and toilets must be supplied to the camp by road tanker. The supply
must be 100 L / man / day.

2. Drinking Water

242. Adequate drinking water must be supplied. Between 1-4 litres per day bottled water
must be supplied per worker.

3. Sanitation

243. Toilets must be flushed by water which connects to septic tanks. Prefabricated septic
tanks must be used which have internal baffles and connect to underground soakaways. These
are readily available in the local market. It is recommended that local subcontractors / builders
be used to install them as they have local knowledge of soil conditions, water table depth and
are low cost.

Figure VI-10: Septic Tanks Locally Available with Installation Instructions

Septic tanks must be covered with concrete slabs to control odour and must have vent pipes.
They must be accessible by manhole covers with grease seals to allow emptying when needed.
Soakaways must be constructed below the ground surface to allow dissipation of liquid effluents
and be subsurface.

4. Food Preparation
244. Food must be prepared by offsite local contractors to provide 3 meals per day. Food
waste must be collected daily and removed regularly to discourage vermin.

5. Camp Fuel Needs

245. If the labor force is not supplied with adequate rations they may exert demands on local
supplies of fuelwood, fruit and wildlife. The Contractor must provide gas, kerosene or similar for
cooking and heating, and regular meals three times a day.
 57

6. Washwater

246. Potable water must be used for personal hygiene washing, laundry and washing cooking
utensils. Such wash waters must be kept in a separate waste stream and not mixed with
sanitary waste. If discharged to water courses the waste water must first pass through a grease
trap to retain detergents and oil / grease. This must be cleaned regularly and the grease waste
buried.

7. Solid Waste Disposal

247. Biodegradable waste must be buried in pits and covered with soil on a daily basis. Non
biodegradable wastes such as paper, plastics, cans bottles and the like must be collected and
removed from the site by a subcontractor.

8. Mobile Teams

248. If mobile teams are used they may move around the route as the works progress. The
contractors must rent houses as temporary quarters, with full water supply, sanitation and
cooking facilities for each team of workers. These locations must be determined through the
approval of the Engineer.

9. Stagnant Water Areas

249. Contractors must check borrow pits, discarded plastic sacks, old tires and metal
containers for stagnant water to avoid temporary breeding habitats for mosquitoes. This must
be at least every 7 days to interrupt the breeding cycle of the mosquito which is 12 days.
Contractors must implement regular pesticide sprays and provide mosquito nets for workers
during sleeping.

10. Health and Safety

250. The contractors must implement a pre-employment health screening, employ a safety
officer skilled in first aid, and carry out regular sanitary checks. They must also liaise with the
local emergency services (fire, police, ambulance) to check the response time of emergency
facilities.

11. Social Issues – STIs

251. Workers from outside the community must be given pre-employment HIV screening.
Work camps should be sited away from local communities. An HIV/AIDS awareness program
has been developed and should be implemented by a specialist subcontractor.

12. Cleanup of the Construction Site

252. When construction is completed, the contractors must clean up the construction sites by
removing all equipment and buildings and carrying out site remediation work.
58

I. Mitigation of Impacts Due to Operation

1. Alignments

253. A short section of NR53 will have its alignment adjusted slightly on the opposite side to
PAWS to avoid a concrete marker post of PAWS which has been placed actually outside the
PAWS boundary close to the shoulder of the road.

2. Embankments

The raising of the embankment to a flood free height will avoid flooding of the road. It may
cause runoff to be held behind the embankment and so additional cross drainage has been
included. Some slopes on NR13 will be eased from 1:2 to 1:3 to improve slope stability.

3. Noise

254. Noise from road traffic can be a nuisance for roadside residents. The project will have
positive impacts on the quality of life of roadside residents as paved roads will be less noisy, but
as traffic grows with more heavy goods vehicles noise levels will increase. The paved road will
assist in reducing noise. Other controls include; prohibition on the use of air horns at night and
fining drivers who operate vehicles without adequate silencers.

4. Air Pollution

255. Air pollution from vehicle operation, especially heavy diesel powered vehicles will
increase. The project will pave roads reducing dust which will have a major immediate beneficial
impact on those people living alongside the road. Road 314D will be improved by filling in of old
roadside narrow rectangular borrow pits which are a source of vector breeding. Provision of a
concrete road on 150B at the approach to Taches market will reduce airborne dust and improve
muddy conditions during rain and flooding.

5. Religious Edifices

256. There are no religious artefacts located near the roads. Graves will be avoided.

6. Road Accidents

257. Control of speeding and overloaded vehicles is the responsibility of the police. A
community based road safety program will be implemented.

7. Toxic Spills

258. Control of vehicles carrying hazardous materials is the responsibility of the police.
Vehicles in Cambodia do carry HAZCHEM warning signs. To date there do not appear to have
been any major accidental spills.

8. Illegal Settlement

259. MPWT will discourage illegal dwellings, encroachments and squatters within the RoW.
 59

9. Loss of Forests

260. While the Project will improve access to PAWS protected area it is not expected to
increase any forest loss beyond that taking place at the moment. The Departments of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries are active in controlling illegal logging and impound vehicles
if caught involved in such activities.

10. Loss of Roadside Trees

a. Policy

261. All standing annual crops will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in
a particular section of the Project roads. This can be achieved with the synchronization of the
start of civil works and the cropping schedule of DPs cultivating plots of land in the ROW. This is
shown below.

Table VI-3: Policy on Crops and Trees Removal

Crops and Loss of, or Owners DPs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
trees damage to, regardless of the start of civil works in the locality.
assets tenure status To the extent possible, DPs will be allowed to
harvest their annual and perennial crops prior to
construction.
Perennial and timber trees will be compensated in
cash as per replacement cost study.

b. PR 314D, CBF, and NR13 – Affected crops and trees

262. All standing annual crops will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works
in a particular section of the Project road. This can be achieved with the synchronization of the
start of civil works and the cropping schedule of DPs cultivating plots of land in the ROW.

263. PR314D: A total of 584 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the
COI in PR314D. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the
ROW. Of this number, 82 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 1,650 of timber trees of
commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table VI-4: Quantities of Affected Perennials PR314D

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 14 124 10 148
Jackfruit 12 25 3 40
Teuk Doh Kor 2 14 0 16
Coconut 2 18 0 20
Betel nut 1 5 5 11
Palm tree 3 145 31 179
Kampingreah 9 0 6 15
Guava 4 0 17 21
Papaya 2 2 3 7
Tamarind 1 3 11 15
Cashew 0 4 2 6
Others 32 36 38 106
Total 82 376 126 584
*Not yet bearing fruits
60

Table VI-5 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR314D

Categories
Type of Timber Trees Total
1 2 3
Pine tree 0 10 0 10
Chankiry 0 0 30 30
Bamboo 8 100 270 378
Cassia 10 246 612 868
Eucalyptus 0 1 44 45
Chhat 0 1 4 5
Flamboyant tree 0 1 13 14
Loeung Reach 0 0 3 3
Rubber tree 0 1 0 1
Smach 0 0 148 148
Other trees 0 13 135 148
Total 18 373 1,259 1,650

264. CBF: A total of 583 timber trees and 15 fruit trees on private and government land will be
acquire in the expansion and development of the CBF.

Table VI-6 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF

Categories
Type of Trees Total
1 2 3
Coconut 0 3 0 3
Palm 0 5 7 12
Shade tree (Chankiri) 0 0 9 9
Acacia 344 230 0 574

265. NR13: A total of 966 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI
in NR13. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of
this number, 195 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 8,940 of timber trees of
commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table VI-7 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 86 333 29 448
Coconut 21 12 2 35
Betel nut 8 0 6 14
Tamarind 1 8 0 9
Jackfruit 18 30 3 51
Palm tree 13 85 1 99
Teuk Doh Kor 0 4 0 4
Papaya 2 15 0 17
Guava 9 4 19 32
Cashew 37 8 0 45
Other tree 0 163 49 212
Total 195 662 109 966
*Not yet bearing fruits
 61

Table VI-8 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13

Categories
Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total
Pine Tree 2 0 0 2
Chankiry 38 0 1 39
Bamboo 3,188 1 8 3,197
Cassia 5,140 15 0 5,155
Eucalyptus 39 2 21 62
Chhat 0 18 2 20
Flamboya 0 9 0 9
Loeungreach 0 4 0 4
Other tree 0 452 0 452
Total 8,407 501 32 8,940

266. Compensation for removed trees is shown below.

Table VI-9 Compensation for Perennials PR314D

Unit Rate Categories
Type of Perennial ($) 1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Mango 55.84 14 781.76 124 6,924.16 10 558.4
Jackfruit 49.71 12 596.52 25 1,242.75 3 149.13
Teuk Doh Kor 31.25 2 62.5 14 437.5 0 0
Coconut 46.41 2 92.82 18 835.38 0 0
Betel nut 17.5 1 17.51 5 87.55 5 87.55
Palm tree 51.5 3 154.5 145 7,467.5 31 1,596.5
Kampingreah 17.0 9 153.0 0 0 6 102.0
Guava 7.18 4 28.72 0 0 17 122.06
Papaya 5.33 2 10.66 2 10.66 3 15.99
Tamarind 39.17 1 39.17 3 117.51 11 430.87
Cashew 18.84 0 0 4 75.36 2 37.68
Others 15.0 32 480.0 36 540.0 38 570
Total 82 2,417.16 376 17,738.37 126 3,670.18
*Not yet bearing fruits

Table VI-10 Compensation for Timber Trees PR314D

Unit Rate Categories
Type of Timber Trees ($) 1 Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Pine tree 12.0 0 0 10 120.0 0 0
Chankiry 12.33 0 0 0 0 30 369.9
Bamboo 0.96 8 7.68 100 96.0 270 259.2
Acacia 6.50 10 65.0 246 1,599.0 612 3,978.0
Eucalyptus 6.50 0 0 1 6.5 44 286.0
Chhat 4.0 0 0 1 4.0 4 16.0
Flamboyant tree 7.5 0 0 1 7.5 13 97.5
Loeung Reach 5.0 0 0 0 5.0 3 15.0
Rubber tree 15.0 0 0 1 15.0 0 0
Smach 6.0 0 0 0 0 148 888.0
Other trees 15.0 0 0 13 195.0 135 2,025.0
Total 18 72.68 373 2,048 1,259 7,934.6
62

Table VI-11 Compensation for Assorted Trees CBF

Unit Rate Categories
Type of Trees ($) 1 Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Coconut 46.41 0 0 3 139.23 0 0
Palm 51.5 0 0 5 257.5 7 360.5
Shade tree (Chankiri) 12.33 0 0 0 0 9 110.97
Acacia 6.50 344 2,236.0 230 1,495.0 0 0
Total 344 2,236 238 1,891.73 16 471.47

Table VI-12 Compensation for Perennials NR13

Unit Rate Categories
Type of Perennial ($) 1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Mango 55.84 86 4,802.24 333 18,594.72 29 1,619.36
Coconut 46.41 21 974.61 12 556.92 2 92.82
Betel nut 17.5 8 140.0 0 0 6 105.0
Tamarind 39.17 1 39.17 8 313.36 0 0
Jackfruit 49.71 18 894.78 30 1,491.3 3 149.13
Palm tree 51.5 13 669.5 85 4,377.5 1 51.5
Teuk Doh Kor 31.25 0 0 4 125.0 0 0
Papaya 5.33 2 10.66 15 79.95 0 0
Guava 7.18 9 64.62 4 28.72 19 136.42
Cashew 18.84 37 697.08 8 150.72 0 0
Other tree 15.0 0 0 163 2,445.0 49 735.0
Total 195 8,292.66 662 28,163.19 109 2,889.23
*Not yet bearing fruits

Table VI-13 Compensation for Timber Trees NR13

Unit Rate Categories
Type of Timber Trees ($) 1 Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Pine Tree 12.0 2 24.0 0 0 0 0
Chankiry 12.33 38 468.54 0 0 1 12.33
Bamboo 0.96 3,188 3,060.48 1 .96 8 7.68
Acacia 6.50 5,140 33,410.0 15 97.5 0 0
Eucalyptus 6.50 39 253.5 2 13.0 21 136.5
Chhat 4.0 0 4 18 72.0 2 8.0
Flamboyant tree 7.5 0 0 9 67.5 0 0
Loeungreach 5.0 0 0 4 20.0 0 0
Other tree 15.0 0 0 452 6,780.0 0 0
Total 8,407 37,220.52 501 7,050.96 32 164.51

Table VI-14 Summary of Impacts PR 314D and NR13

Quantity
Items Unit PR314D* CBF+ NR13*
Perennial trees no. 584 15 966
Not yet bearing fruit No. 82 0 195
Fruit bearing class A No. 208 0 513
Fruit bearing class B No. 168 8 149
Fruit bearing class C No. 46 7 60
Fruit bearing class D No. 80 0 49
Timber trees no. 1,650 583 8,940
Class A No. 18 344 8,407
Class B No. 373 230 501
Class C No. 1,098 0 26

267. The replacement cost of 584 perennials in PR314D is estimated to be $23,825.71, while
the 1,650 timber trees in said section are estimated to be $10,055.28. At the CBF, the
replacement cost of 598 perennials and timbers trees thereat is estimated to be $4,599.20. In
 63

NR13, the replacement cost of 966 perennials is estimated to be $39,345.08, while the 8,940
timber trees in said section are estimated to be $44,435.99.

268. The estimated cost of resettlement for the rehabilitation of PR314D, CBF, NR13 is
US$1,676,977.00. Table VI-29 provides a breakdown of these costs. As can be seen from the
summary of resettlement costs replacement costs for trees along PR314D, CBF, NR13
represents 7.3% of total resettlement costs.

c. PR150B, NR53, andPR151B – Affected crops and trees

269. PR150B: A total of 2,278perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the
COI in PR150B. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the
ROW. Of this number, 224 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 1,912 timber trees of
commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table VI-15 Quantities of Affected Perennials PR150B

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 45 172 35 252
Jackfruit 9 18 5 32
Teuk Doh Kor 10 38 15 63
Coconut 46 295 29 370
Betel nut 0 5 0 5
Palm tree 30 397 4 431
Guava 1 31 6 38
Papaya 1 4 3 8
Tamarind 4 27 1 32
Cashew 48 848 0 896
Lemon 1 3 0 4
Longan 1 1 3 5
Custard Apple 4 58 31 93
Others 24 21 4 49
Total 224 1,918 136 2,278
*Not yet bearing fruits
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)

Table VI-16 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR150B

Categories
Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total
Chankiry 0 7 1 8
Bamboo 3 106 13 122
Cassia 17 1,131 20 1,168
Eucalyptus 15 139 19 173
Other trees 1 412 28 441
Total 36 1,795 81 1,912
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)

270. NR53: A total of 637 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI
in NR53. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of
this number, 28 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 687 timber trees of commercial
value will also be cleared from the COI.
64

Table VI-17 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR53

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 2 33 4 39
Jackfruit 1 7 1 9
Teuk Doh Kor 1 5 0 6
Coconut 3 24 0 27
Palm tree 0 121 1 122
Guava 0 22 0 22
Tamarind 0 63 2 65
Cashew 21 57 2 80
Custard Apple 0 5 4 9
Others 0 207 51 258
Total 28 544 65 637
*Not yet bearing fruits
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)

Table VI-18 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR53

Categories
Type of Timber Trees Total
1 2 3
Chankiry 0 5 4 9
Bamboo 0 16 0 16
Cassia 9 519 5 533
Eucalyptus 3 23 0 26
Loeung Reach 0 3 0 3
Others 0 96 4 100
Total 12 662 13 687
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)

271. PR151B: A total of 95 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the
COI in PR151B. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the
ROW. Of this number, 44 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, 13 timber trees of commercial
value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table VI-19 Quantities of Affected Perennials PR151B

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 31 5 5 41
Jackfruit 1 0 0 1
Teuk Doh Kor 2 2 0 4
Coconut 7 10 3 20
Palm tree 2 9 0 11
Guava 0 4 2 6
Tamarind 0 5 0 5
Lemon 0 1 0 1
Custard Apple 1 1 2 4
Others 0 2 0 2
Total 44 39 12 95
*Not yet bearing fruits
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)

Table VI-20 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees PR151B

Categories
Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total
Chhat 3 0 10 13
Total 3 0 10 13
Category 1 (1-3 years), Category 2 ( 4-5 years) and Category 3 (5-10 years)
 65

Compensation for removed trees is shown below.

Table VI-21: Compensation for Perennials PR150B
Full Unit Rate Categories
Type of Perennial
($) 1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Mango 48.81 45 732.15 172 5,596.88 35 1,708.35
Jackfruit 42.50 9 127.50 18 510.00 5 212.50
Teuk Doh Kor 31.25 10 104.17 38 791.67 15 468.75
Coconut 44.37 46 680.34 295 8,726.10 29 1,286.73
Betel nut 17.50 0 0.00 5 58.33 0 0.00
Sugar palm tree 46.75 30 467.5 397 12,373.17 4 187.00
Guava 7.75 1 2.58 31 160.17 6 46.50
Papaya 5.00 1 1.67 4 13.33 3 15.00
Tamarind 38.33 4 51.11 27 689.94 1 38.33
Cashew 21.75 48 348.00 848 12,296.00 0 0.00
Lemon 36.66 1 12.22 3 73.32 0 0.00
Longan 30.00 1 10.00 1 20.00 3 90.00
Custard Apple 13.58 4 18.11 58 525.09 31 420.98
Others 15.00 24 120.00 21 210.00 4 60.00
Total 224 2,675.35 1,918 42,044.00 136 4,534.14
*Not yet bearing fruits (1/3 of full unit rate); Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-22: Compensation for Timber TreesPR150B

Full Categories*
Type of Timber Trees Unit Rate
1 Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
($)
Chankiry (Ampil Teuk) 12.6 0 0 7 58.8 1 12.6
Bamboo 0.3 3 .3 106 21.2 13 3.90
Cassia 6.25 17 35.42 1,131 4,712.5 20 125
Eucalyptus 6.25 15 31.25 139 579.17 19 118.75
Others 15 1 5 412 4,120 28 420
Total 36 71.97 1,795 9,491.67 81 680.25
*Cat 1 = 1/3 of full unit rate; Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-23Compensation for Perennials NR53

Full Categories
Type of Trees Unit Rate
1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
($)
Mango 48.81 2 32.54 33 1,073.82 4 195.24
Jackfruit 42.5 1 14.17 7 198.33 1 42.5
Teuk Doh Kor 31.25 1 10.42 5 104.17 0 0
Coconut 44.37 3 44.37 24 709.92 0 0
Palm tree 46.75 0 0 121 3,771.17 1 46.75
Guava 7.75 0 0 22 113.67 0 0
Tamarind 38.33 0 0 63 1,609.86 2 76.66
Cashew 21.75 21 152.25 57 826.5 2 43.5
Custard Apple 13.58 0 0 5 45.27 4 54.32
Others 15 0 0 207 2,070 51 765
Total 28 253.75 544 10,522.71 65 1,223.97
**Not yet bearing fruits (1/3 of full unit rate); Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-24Compensation for Timber Trees NR53

Full Unit Categories*
Type of Perennial
Rate ($) 1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Chankiry 12.6 0 0 5 42 4 50.4
Bamboo 0.3 0 0 16 3.2 0 0
Cassia 6.25 9 18.75 519 2,162.5 5 31.25
Eucalyptus 6.25 3 6.25 23 95.83 0 0
Loeung Reach 5 0 0 3 10 0 0
Others 15 0 0 96 96 4 60
66

Full Unit Categories*

Type of Perennial
Rate ($) 1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
Total 12 25 662 2,409.53 13 141.65
*Cat 1 = 1/3 of full unit rate; Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-25Compensation for Perennials PR151B

Full Categories
Type of Trees Unit Rate
1* Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
($)
Mango 48.81 31 504.37 5 162.7 5 244.05
Jackfruit 42.50 1 14.17 0 0 0 0
Teuk Doh Kor 31.25 2 20.83 2 41.67 0 0
Coconut 44.37 7 103.53 10 295.8 3 133.11
Palm tree 46.75 2 31.17 9 280.5 0 0
Guava 7.75 0 0 4 20.67 2 15.5
Tamarind 38.33 0 0 5 127.77 0 0
Lemon 36.66 0 0 1 24.44 0 0
Custard Apple 13.58 1 4.53 1 9.05 2 27.16
Others 15 0 0 2 10 0 0
Total 44 678.6 39 972.6 12 419.82
*Not yet bearing fruits (1/3 of full unit rate); Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-26 Compensation for Timber Trees PR151B

Full Categories*
Type of Timber Trees Unit Rate
1 Count Amount 2 Count Amount 3 Count Amount
($)
Chhat 5 3 5 0 0 10 50
Total 3 5 0 0 10 50
*Cat 1 = 1/3 of full unit rate; Cat 2 = 2/3 of full unit rate; Cat 3 = full unit rate

Table VI-27 Summary of Tree Removal

Quantity
Items
Unit PR150B NR53 PR151B
Perennial trees no. 2,278 637 95
Not yet bearing fruit No. 224 28 44
Fruit bearing class A No. 1,918 544 39
Fruit bearing class B No. 136 65 12
Timber trees no. 1,912 687 13
Class A No. 36 12 3
Class B No. 1,795 662 0
Class C No. 81 13 10

272. The replacement cost of 2,278 perennials in PR150B is estimated to be $49,253.49,

while the 1,912 timber trees in said section are estimated to cost $10,243.87.In NR53, the
replacement cost of 637 perennials is estimated to be $12,000.43, while the 687 timber trees in
said section are estimated to cost $2,576.18. The 95 perennials in PR151B are estimated to
cost $2,071.02, while the 13 timber trees in said section are estimated to cost $55.
273. The estimated cost of resettlement for the rehabilitation of PR150B, NR53 and PR151B
US$773,779.12 Table K-VI-30 provides a breakdown of these costs. As can be seen from the
summary of resettlement costs replacement costs for trees along PR150B, NR53, andPR151B
represents 10% of total resettlement costs.
 67

11. Loss of Wildlife

274. There are no wildlife-protected areas within the immediate project area and there are
considerable numbers of rangers deployed to protect wildlife.

12. Positive Operational Impacts - Social Enhancement

275. The project will have several positive benefits which will enhance the quality of life and
living standards of the local population. No mitigation is required but efforts must be made to
maximize these benefits.

13. Consultations and Liaison

276. The contractors must maintain contact on a working level with the local authorities :

Provincial DoE
Provincial DoCF
Provincial DoAFF

277. In addition liaison with community heads, local village representatives, individual
landowners and utility companies must be maintained.

J. Climate Change

1. Adaptation Strategy

278. In Cambodia, there appears to be an overall increase in average total annual rainfall
and, this increase is poorly distributed over seasons, resulting in increased floods during the
rainy season as well as increased drought incidence during the dry season.

279. Some of the ways in which climate change can impact on road infrastructure is damage
due to land-slides and mud-slides, increased moisture in the subsurface causing failure to the
structure, increased erosion to unpaved shoulders from rapid water runoff, increased winds
erosion of unpaved roads, and penetration of rainwater through poor surface treatment.
Increased wind and reduced moisture on unpaved roads can increase dust levels and reduce
visibility. These issues are of concern to the infrastructure itself as well as pose a safety issues
for drivers and other road and roadside users.

280. Flooding and soil moisture content is a primary concern for protecting investments in
road works and will be addressed as a priority in the adaptation strategy of this project. There is
no evidence of major landslides damaging the road in what is a relatively flat topography.
However, ditches alongside the road, created when materials are extracted for construction of
the embankments, are increasingly eroded and cause safety problems to people, livestock and
infrastructure.

281. The proposed project roads experience regular flooding both from surface runoff during
the rainy season and stream overflows each year in the rainy season. The most recent high
intensity event were the 2000/2001 floods. Experts recollect this to have been the only major
flood in the last 60 years in the project area (other parts of the country were affected by typhoon
Ketsana in 2009). With high likelihood of increasing intensity of rainfalls causing stronger floods
68

than usual, the roads need to be strengthened structurally to withstand intensified climate
events.

282. The proposed adaptation strategy therefore includes a combination of engineering, non-
engineering and planning activities to manage the changes observed and predicted in the
project area. The engineering changes have been mainstreamed in the project design itself for
mainstreaming adaptation into core development planning activities. These include elevation of
the road in areas where major flooding is becoming increasingly common and changing the
selection of sub-grade materials to withstand higher moisture contents.

Table VI-28 Treatment of Adaptation to Climate Change and Notional Budget

Notes Budget from
PPCR (TBC)
Output 1. Project road and CBF Civil engineering adjustments USD 12M
rehabilitated are made to make roads
more climate resilient under
current and future conditions
Output 4. Reduced vulnerability of project “Non”-civil works USD 5.5M
road area to climate change
Policy and Planning (300,000)
4.1 MPWT completes and uses the detailed Coordinate with NDF 150,000
vulnerability map for climate change for activities with MRD
project provinces: by 2016.
4.2 Review the sustainability and capacity Coordinate with NDF 50,000
of MPWT current engineering designs, activities with MRD
standards and guidelines to withstand
climate change and propose amendments
4.3 Design and implement a training Coordinate with NDF 100,000
program for MPWT SEU, in coordination activities with MRD, little
with NDF-MRD activities being planned additional budget required
Ecosystem-based measures (3,000,000)
4.4 MPWT completes a green infrastructure 200,000
planning strategy to reduce vulnerability to
climate change by 2016
4.5 2 temporary nurseries are constructed 300,000
and produce locally available species for
land-cover extension affecting project area
4.4 Planting program engaging 1,000,000
communities and women is implemented to
reduce flooding and water from damaging
roads and surrounding areas
4.5 Completion and piloting of a plan for 1,500,000
water capture and storage systems
integrated in road construction features for
the project province by 2016
Others TBC
Emergency Management Systems (1,550,000)
4.3 MPWT completes a pilot climate Review of road maintenance 50,000
monitoring system-based road maintenance and management system and
and management program: by 2016 budget to anticipate changes
 69

Notes Budget from

PPCR (TBC)
to needs due to the impacts
of climate change

MPWT can also integrate

disaster risk management
and reduction in its planning.
4.4 MPWT establishes a pilot emergency Coordination with 1,500,000
management system in selected project gendarmerie, the National
area and operates it: by 2016 /4.5 MPWT Disaster Management
installs the pilot early warning system the Committee and the
project province (of 4.4): by 2016 Department of Meteorology

2. Impacts of Water Capture Projects

283. All the water capture projects are rehabilitation and repair of existing structures. The
planned works will simply return them to their original state or improve them. No additional
impacts on the environment will be generated by these works.

284. The Cambodian legislation requires IEEs for irrigation projects greater than 5,000 ha. All
these projects are below this figure and so no IEE needs to be submitted to MoE.

3. Water Capture Projects Mitigation Measures

285. In view of the absence of impacts no major mitigation measures are required.

K. Land Acquisition and Resettlement

1. PR314D and NR13

286. The major impacts caused by the project in the rehabilitation of PR314D and NR13
include demolition of structures used for residence and business, and acquisition of occupied
land in the road ROW. According to the inventory of losses (IOL) conducted on 20 May 2011 –
2 June 2011, around 697 households (215 in PR 314D and 482 in NR13) in 20 communes (7
PR314D and 11 in NR13) are affected by the loss of fixed assets and sources of incomes or
livelihoods.1 45 households in PR314D and 108 households in NR13 are affected by impacts on
their homes and house-and-shops, of which 20 households in PR314D and 26 households in
NR13 will lose entirely their homes and house-and-shops and will need to reconstruct behind
the construction corridor.

287. Moreover, 62 households in PR314D and 114 households in NR13 are affected by
impacts on their independent shops (i.e., detached from other buildings), of which 45
households in PR314D and 57 households will have to relocate their business behind the
construction corridor. In PR314D, some 27,936 m2 of land in the ROW are used or occupied by
private households (12,004 m2 for agriculture and 15,932 m2 for residence and business), while
in NR13, around 47,398.3 m2 of land in the ROW are used or occupied by private households
(44,681 m2 for agriculture and 2,717 m2 for residence and business).

1
This number excludes the 14 houses and shops in PR314D and the 44 houses and shops in NR13 whose owners
could not be determined at the time of the IOL because said structures were unattended or locked.
70

288. Other fixed structures affected include fences, concrete pavements, extended eaves,
pipe culverts and sign boards. In addition, 96 electric and telecommunication posts (75 in
PR314D and 21 in NR13) need to be relocated behind the COI. Around 12,140 perennials and
timber trees (2,234 in PR314D and 9,906 in NR13) need to be removed from the COI.

289. In the expansion of the CBF at Prey Var, an aggregate of 24,945.12 m2 of private land
will be acquired, in addition to 2 houses and 1 store with a combined floor area of 90 m 2. Some
15 perennial and 583 timber trees owned by these private individuals will likewise be acquired.
Two absentee (i.e., living abroad or in Phnom Penh) and one landed local farmer own the
affected plots of land. Two other households have built structures on the land of two of the
landowners to oversee the properties. The existing CBF facilities are standing on a 10,982 m 2
government land.

2. PR150B, NR53, and PR151B

290. The major impacts caused by the Project in the rehabilitation of PR150B, NR53, and
PR151B include demolition of structures used for residence and business, and acquisition of
occupied land in the road ROW. According to the inventory of losses (IOL) conducted on 6 – 21
June 2011, a total of 39 houses, 34 house-and-stores, and 89 shops in PR150B; 17 houses,
and 43 shops in NR53; and 2 houses and 10 shops in PR151B are adversely affected by the
rehabilitation of the Project roads; 38 houses and house-and-stores in PR150B; 12 houses in
NR 53; and 1 house in PR151B are entirely affected and must shift behind the corridor of
impact.

291. Moreover, 67 independent shops in PR150B, 29 shops in NR53, and 3 shops in PR151B
are entirely affected. Some150,290.5 m2 of ROW land in PR150B are used or occupied by
private households for farming, for residence and business; while 18,228.5 m2of ROW land is
occupied by private persons in NR53; and 2,485 m2in PR151B.

292. Other fixed structures affected include fences, concrete pavements, extended eaves,
pipe culverts and sign boards. In addition, 41electric and telecommunication posts (39in
PR150B and 2 in PR151B) need to be relocated behind the COI. Around 3,010 of perennials
and 2,612 timber trees need to be removed from the COI of the Project roads.

3. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement

293. In order to avoid or minimize displacement of people from assets and livelihoods, the
existing road alignment will be followed and construction works will be confined within a corridor
of impact (COI) of 10 meters measured either way from the road centerline. In addition, as part
of the Project’s resettlement strategy, project displaced persons (DPs) will be provided sufficient
time to rebuild their homes and shops prior to the commencement of civil works and that they
are able to continue with their present livelihood activities even during Project implementation.
Also, all standing annual crops, including privately-owned trees, will be allowed to be harvested
before the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project roads. The MPWT, through its
Project Management Unit 3 (PMU3) and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC),
through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Finance (RD-MEF), will ensure that this
resettlement strategy is followed diligently.

4. Resettlement and Compensation Costs

 71

294. The project will acquire approximately 24.4ha of land within the existing ROW of various
roads and 2.5ha of privately owned land at the site of the Prey Vor cross border facility (CBF).
Land acquisition will cause temporary and permanent displacement of an estimated 936
households. Of the 566 households experiencing impacts on structures (houses and/or shops)
most will be partially affected and will be able to remain on remaining unaffected land. There
will 4 households that are expected to require relocation in Akphi Vot commune in Tuek Phos
district. The other affected households are expected to lose use of productive land within the
right of way only and/or secondary structures or trees/crops.

295. The total costs of resettlement for provincial roads 314D and 13 is US$1,676,977. The
total costs of resettlement for PR150B, NR 53, and PR151B is estimated at US$773,779.12.

Table VI-29Summary of Resettlement Costs (PR314D, CBF, NR13)

Rate AMOUNT
Items Unit Quantity
($/Unit) (US$)
LAND 103,113.74
Cultivated ROW land (loss of land use) m² 55,685.3 0.75 103,113.74
Private residential land (CBF) m² 2,250.6 11.80 26,557.08
Private agriculture/grazing land (CBF) m² 57,935.9 1.5 232,784.56

MAIN STRUCTURES 108,918.21

Partially affected houses and independent shops m² 2,162.9 varied 50,018.26
Repair cost of partially affected main structures $ 50,018.26 20% 10,003.65
Entirely affected houses and independent shops m² 3,846.80 varied 48,896.30

SECONDARY STRUCTURES 487,304.41

Extended eaves m² 10,011.90 varied 352,481.47
Fence LM 35,152.80 varied 59,754.95
Shed m² 240.0 varied 3,996.20
Assorted other structures - - varied 71,071.79

TREES (Perennials and timber) No 12,738 9.60 122,261.26

Sub-Total 1 821,597.62
ALLOWANCES AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS
Moving allowance for relocating house and shops no. 151 $50 7,550.0
Moving allowance for 6 relocating house/shop renters no. 6 $50 300.0
Living allowance for relocating house no. 48 5,400.0
Living allowance for relocating independent shops no. 103 3,862.5
Income loss allowance for relocating shop, house/shop no. 106 $50 5,300.0
Rental allowance for relocating renters of house/store 2 mo 6 $25 300.0
Living allowance for vulnerable AHs 3 mo 385 100 kg 43,312.
Income restoration program (IRP) block fund lump sum 322,800
Hiring of IRP specialists/consultants 322,800 20% 64,560.0

Sub-Total 2 453,385.0
External Monitoring/Evaluation Lump sum 15,000.00
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 1,289,982.62
Administrative Cost (15%) 193,497.39
Costs contingencies (15% 193,497.39
GRAND TOTAL (rounded) 1,676,977.0
72

Table K-VI-30Summary of Resettlement Costs (PR150B, NR53, andPR151B)

Rate AMOUNT
Items Unit Quantity
($/Unit) (US$)
LAND 45,175.5
Cultivated ROW land (loss of land use) m² 60,234 0.75 45,175.5

MAIN STRUCTURES 121,774.48

Partially affected houses and independent shops m² 1,146 varied 45,618.06
Repair cost of partially affected main structures $ 45,618.06 20% 9,123.61
Entirely affected houses and independent shops m² 3,740 varied 67,032.81

SECONDARY STRUCTURES 111,989.73

Extended eaves m² 1,630 varied 26,219.76
Fence LM 12,527 varied 41,153.54
Assorted other structures - varied 44,616.43

TREES (Perennials and timber) No 5,622 varied 76,200.

Sub-Total 1 355,139.70
ALLOWANCES AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS
Moving allowance for relocating houses and shops no. 150 $50 7,500
Moving allowance for 1relocating shop renter no. 1 $50 50
Living allowance for relocating house and house-and-
no. 51 $112.5 5,737.5
store
Living allowance for relocating independent shops no. 99 $37.5 3,712.5
Income loss allowance for relocating shop, house/shop no. 115 $50 5,750
Rental allowance for relocating renters of shop 2 mo 1 $25 50
Living allowance for vulnerable AHs no 134 $112.5 15,075
Income restoration program (IRP) block fund 260 $600 156,000
Hiring of IRP specialists/consultants 156,000 20% 31,200

Sub-Total 2 225,075
External Monitoring/Evaluation Lump sum 15,000.00
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 595,214.70
Administrative Cost (15%) 89,282.21
Costs contingencies (15% 89,282.21
GRAND TOTAL (rounded) 773,779.12

L. Social and Labor Impacts

296. Bidding documents and civil works contracts will require implementation of appropriate
labor standards and basic occupational/health and safety measures. Civil works contracts will
also require unskilled men and women to be given priority for employment using LBES, and that
no child labor nor trafficked individuals be hired for the construction or maintenance works.

297. Monitoring tools with sex-disaggregated data will be developed and used for monitoring
project impacts (social benefits, employment and other economic opportunities, cases of
HIV/AIDS/STDs, human trafficking, etc.). These indicators will be included in the baseline
survey with sex-disaggregated and will be used for project impact monitoring. Actual inspection
and meeting/consultation with the laborers will be done at the project sites during road
construction and maintenance. Other monitoring tools will be designed. Monthly and quarterly
progress reports will also be prepared, in addition to the mid-term and final reports. The local
communities (CC/VDC) and the commune/district women and children’s consultative
committee) will be trained and encouraged them to participate in monitoring and evaluation
activities during and after project implementation.
 73

M. Poverty Impacts

298. The project has 5 outputs: (1) civil works/road rehabilitation and construction of a cross
border facility at Prey Vor –Mocva; (2) improved road asset management; (3) increased road
safety (RS) and safeguards by implementing: a) a community-based RS awareness program in
line with the national program; b) an HIV-AIDS and human trafficking prevention program; and
c) a sex-disaggregated baseline socio-economic survey of beneficiaries; (4) climate change
adaptation to assess vulnerability to climate; develop emergency management planning; and (5)
efficient project management support to MPWT. During the road construction, unskilled men
and women will be given job opportunities using labor-based equipment support (LBES).
Around 30% of women will be hired during the construction and 30% during road maintenance
and in climate change adaptation and other community-based climate change activities. A labor
and gender action plan (LGAP) was prepared to serve as guide to ensure gender
mainstreaming before and during project implementation.
N. Gender Issues

299. The project will have significant positive impacts to women particularly female-headed
households. Majority of the houses are located more than 3km away from urban centers, where
hospitals, markets, banks and agencies are located. Lack of access to basic health facilities
affects women and children’s health as oftentimes they will just resort to self-medication instead
of going to the health center/hospitals for medical check-up. The schools are also located far
with 53% of households located 2-3 km from schools and 27% located more than 3km from
schools. Around 56% of the children go to school using bicycles while 37% go to school by foot.

300. The mothers also mentioned that their children’s health is at risk due to dust which they
inhale everyday when they go to school. There is a high rate of school drop-outs, especially
among girls in lower secondary levels due to the distance of schools from their houses and poor
economic conditions of households. Livelihood opportunities for women are even less than for
men. Agricultural production is low due to farmers’ limited access to irrigation facilities with the
majority being limited to planting rice only once a year. There are also few job opportunities in
rural areas, and low educational levels among girls would limit their capacity to compete with
others with higher educational attainment for waged employment. Lack of job opportunities in
the area push men and women to migrate to other areas. Migration rate in the project areas is
high (7.2%) and female migrants comprised 6% (2008 census). There are risks involved in
working in areas away from their families, e.g. engaging in risky behavior such as unprotected
sex with casual partners and sex workers, and drug use.

O. Indigenous Peoples

301. There will be improved access to markets, education, health, banks, and government
agencies. One hundred percent of the Cham and Vietnamese in Kampong Tralach and Tuek
Phos districts are highly in favor of the road project. For the Cham, they could go to mosques
faster, and the Vietnamese in Ta Ches market expressed that better roads will improve their
profit. There are over 10,000 IPs in the projects areas with more than 3,000 households.

302. An estimated 33 IP households will be affected by land acquisition and resettlement,

comprising 2 ethnic Cham and 31 ethnic Vietnamese. Most of the resettlement impacts will be
temporary in nature and will not cause relocation. Otherwise IPs in the project areas will not be
74

adversely affected other than the generalized potential risks of HIV/AIDS, human trafficking and
road safety.

VII. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

303. This project was originally classified as Category B and this has been confirmed by this
IEE. No Analysis of Alternatives is required.

VIII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION

A. General Public Consultation on Environmental Issues

304. A total of 40 public information meetings/ consultations with various stakeholders were
conducted in 25 communes from May-July 2011. A total of 319 people attended (50%) were
women. The meetings provided information on the project, anticipated impacts (environmental,
involuntary resettlement and social risks) and mitigation measures. Participants were provided
opportunities to raise questions, clarify information and express their opinions. There were also
7 separate consultations with the IPs/ethnic groups (i.e. Cham and the Vietnamese) conducted
in the districts of Kampong Tralach and Tuek Phos in Kampong Chhnang province from June-
July 2011. In addition to stakeholder consultations, a total of 700 households also participated
in the socio-economic baseline survey conducted in June 2011 and 437 (62%) of the
respondents were women.

B. Perception towards the Project NR13, 314D and CBF

305. Most of the male-headed (92.0% or 47 respondents) and women-headed (81.0% or 21

respondents) AHs in PR314D are supportive of the Project. Percentage-wise, the sample AHs
in NR13 are not as supportive as those in PR314. Only 61.0% (44 respondents) of the 72 male-
headed AHs and only 50.0% (7 respondents) of the 14 women-headed AHs in NR13 expressed
support for the Project. It implies that the surveyed AHs in NR13 are satisfied with the present
condition of their paved (asphalt) road and are apprehensive of the disruption the rehabilitation
of the road will bring about to their existing activities.

C. Perception about the Project PR150B, NR53, andPR151B

306. Majority (69% or 42 respondents) of the male-headed and all 4 of the women-headed
AHs in PR150B are supportive of the Project. Similarly, most (82.76% or 24 respondents) and
all 8 of the women-headed AHs in NR53 are supportive of the Project. Also, most (77% or 10
respondents) of the male-headed and the 2 women-headed AHs in PR151B are supportive of
the Project. Among the reasons cited for their support of the Project are (a) good road will
facilitate the development of the villages, communes, and districts; (b) better access to health
care; (c) cheaper transport cost; and (c) cleaner environment. Reasons for the negative view
about the Project are (a) income loss due to disruption in business operation during
construction; (b) damage to or loss of houses and other structures; and (c) the need to rebuild
public structures, such as Pagoda gates, wells, and drainage system.
Full details are given in Annex 3.

1. Public Consultation on Water Capture Projects

307. Under the Climate Change Mitigation Measures component of TA 7665 Project, a series
of five water capture projects have been identified in Kampong Chhnang Province. Each of
 75

these projects must be described in the IEE and an essential component of this evaluation is
Public Consultation. Public Consultation Meetings were conducted on 7-8 September 2011 in
Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province

308. The public consultations were organized with the assistance of the Commune Chiefs in
each locality. Potentially Affected Persons from the villages were invited verbally, relevant
provincial government officers invited in writing by MPWT, and suitable locations organized in
pagodas. The venues were :

Roleang Ke Pagoda, Chaong Maong Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong

Chhnang Province
Keo Buthearam Pagoda, Akphivodth Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong
Chhnang Province
Vihear Beth Meas Pagoda, Kbal Tuek Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong
Chhnang Province

309. There were 3 venues for 4 meetings covering 5 communes, all in Tuek Phos District,
Kampong Chhnang Province. The 4 meetings took 2 days in total.

310. In order to demonstrate Gender Equity in the meetings and ensure a correct record of
comments from villagers the services of a female rapporteur were retained. A “break out group”
to hold discussions among females only was offered but proved not necessary.

311. It was estimated that 150 people might attend the 4 meetings over 2 days and
refreshments were offered to attendees. No other incentives were offered to any persons. The
budget was US$550. In the event 109 villagers attended plus provincial government staff and
consultants.

312. No disputes or conflicts were raised. Competing needs were described but in general all
the villagers were very supportive of the plan to provide more irrigation water for generating two
rice crops a year instead of one. Some pertinent points were :

A dam across the river was needed but it would raise the water level upstream
where people currently wade across the river because the water level is low.
Could a crossing be provided on top of the dam ?
One lady was concerned that she was so poor she could not afford the money for
a connection to a piped water supply and asked if she could offer her labor in
exchange for a connection?
The use of the ex-railway water tank to provide water was enthusiastically
supported. Local residents asked for drinking water not general garden irrigation
water. They were willing to pay for the water if it was cheaper than commercially
available bottled water. They were concerned over who would manage the water
supply, would it be taken over by private operators, and would the raise the price
of the water.
A villager offered use of his land for free to show his support for the projects
76

313. Government officers from MOE, MRD and MOWRAM also concurred with the proposals
and endorsed inter ministry cooperation.

Figure VIII-1 Public Consultations on Water Capture Projects, Kampong Chhnang

314. Full details are given in Annex 4.

 77

IX. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

A. Grievance Redress

315. During site preparation and construction phases, there may be complaints related to the
environmental performance of the project. To ensure that there will be a mechanism to resolve
such complaints, MPWT shall undertake the following prior to start of site works:

(i) establish a grievance redress mechanism (GRM)

(ii) make public the existence of the GRM through public awareness campaigns
(iii) ensure that names and contact numbers of representatives of MPWT and
contractors are placed on the notice boards outside the construction site and at
local government offices (e.g., provincial and commune levels)

316. Through a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC), MPWT shall promptly address
affected people’s concerns, complaints, and grievances about the Project’s environmental
performance at no costs to the complainant and without retribution. The GRC, which shall
be established before commencement of site works, shall be chaired by PMU to be assisted
by the SEU. The GRC shall have members from the Provincial Department of Rural
Development (PDRD), commune councils, local NGO, and women’s organization. Grievances
can be filed in writing or verbally with any member of the GRC. The committee will have 15
days to respond with a resolution. If unsatisfied with the decision, the existence of the GRC
shall not impede the complainant’s access to the Government’s judicial or administrative
remedies.

317. PMU, through the PDRDs, shall make public the existence of this grievance redress
mechanism through public awareness campaigns. PMU shall also set-up a hotline for
complaints and the hotline shall be publicized through the media and numbers placed on the
notice boards outside the construction site and at local government offices (e.g., provincial,
district, commune levels). Locally affected people will still be able to express grievances through
the commune councils and these would be referred to PMU through the usual channels in those
committees.

318. The GRC, through the SEU, will receive, follow-up and prepare monthly reports
regarding all complaints, disputes or questions received about the Project and corresponding
actions taken to resolve the issues. The SEU will develop and maintain a database of
complaints received related to the Project. The GRC will also use the punitive clauses of the
1996 Law on Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Management in conjunction with
MOE to prosecute offending parties.
78

X. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

A. General Environmental Management Plan

319. The General Environmental Management Plan (EMP) gives guidance on how to mitigate
the environmental concerns identified in connection with this project The EMP deals with
mitigation and management measures to be taken during Project implementation to avoid,
reduce, and mitigate adverse environmental impacts.

320. MPWT will ensure that the EMP is included in the tender documents for civil works. It
will form part of the contract between MPWT and the selected contractor and the requirements
of the EMP will be contractually binding on the contractor. The conformity of contractors with
environmental contract procedures and specifications shall be regularly monitored by the
project management unit (PMU) through the Social and Environmental Unit (SEU) during
Project implementation. PMU/SEU shall be assisted by the detailed design and implementation
supervision consultant (DDIS) to undertake EMP monitoring and to prepare corresponding
semi-annual reports for submission to ADB.

B. Contractors Environmental Management Plan (CEMP)

321. After appointment and mobilization the contractor must prepare his own version of the
EMP known as the Contractors EMP (CEMP). This must give specific details of locations of
borrow areas, borrow roads, workers camps and other facilities. This must be submitted to the
Supervising Consultant for their approval before works commence.

C. Guidance on Environmental Issues

322. A document has been produced jointly by MRD and MPWT entitled “Guidance on the
Implementation of Environmental Safeguards”. This was produced under the “Provincial and
Rural Infrastructure Project (PRIP) PHRD Grant No. TF056974.(May 2010) It is a guidance
document and has no regulatory authority but the contractor should obtain a copy and follow its
recommendations.

D. Social and Environment Office (SEO)

a. Social and Environmental Unit

323. SEU is a team in MPWT who have responsibilities in : socio-economics; resettlement;

environment and HIV/ female trafficking. Their current duty is to implement "The Resettlement
Plan (RP)". SEU works in close cooperation with the of Inter-Ministerial Resettlement
Committee and liaises on a regular basis with :

Team of Working Group MPWT

Provincial Sub-Committees
Representative of District, Commune and Village authority

324. SEU staff with environmental knowledge will respond to complaints during the
construction phase, and support the environmental inspectors in the field.
 79

2. Organization of SEU (SEO)

325. On 20th October 2005 MPWT engaged the services of an Independent Consultant under
the Cambodia Road Improvement Project, ADB Loan 1945. His duties were to assist in the
reorganizing of MPWT. The reorganized structure was to be submitted to the Council of
Ministers within 24 months of loan effectiveness.

326. The Consultants responsibilities included assisting Department of Planning in

preparation of the duties and job descriptions of the Social and Environmental Division, assist in
its establishment and train SED staff so that they could effectively carry out their mandate.

327. In December 2006 the consultant recommended the staff needed for Social and
Environmental Impact Evaluation were :

Chief of Division
Social specialist
Environmental specialist
Land / property surveying supervisor

328. Job descriptions were provided. In February 2007 the SED was reviewed again and the
need for further training noted. This review was repeated in October 2007. The SED staff were
involved in the resettlement and land acquisition issues associated with NR5, NR6 and NR56.

329. Currently the SED is located in the MWPT under the Department of Planning and
Investment (DPI). The Director of DPI has the additional duties of being Head of SED. He
reports to the General Directorate of Planning and Administration who in turn reports to the
Undersecretary of State, Secretary of State and Minister. He has three staff who have a
background in legal studies and the social sciences. There is a strong need for more technical
skills. There mandate is oversight, monitoring and evaluation.

3. Duties of SEU Environmental Staff

330. SEU Environmental Staff must coordinate the site assessment procedures undertaken
by the consultants site inspectors. They will be involved in the finalization of the EMP, the
familiarization of the inspectors with the check lists and reporting procedures and the interaction
of the inspectors with the contractors. (see Table Annex 1)

331. They must review the monthly reports of the inspectors and comment on them before
submitting to the Project Manager for discussion at the monthly progress meetings. Where
issues are identified and remedial measures proposed by the contractors, the SEU must check
before the next monthly meeting if these measures have in fact been implemented, and if they
proved effective. If not, the issues must be raised at the next progress meeting.

332. If the DoE or MoE are needed for environmental monitoring, or analysis, using
equipment that is not available to consultants’ inspectors, the SEU must coordinate with MoE in
Phnom Penh to arrange the necessary support. SEU will be responsible for receiving any
analytical data from the MoE and interpreting it in terms of the legislation, and the obligations it
places on the contractors of MPWT. The duties and responsibilities of SEU must include
ensuring that the contractors comply with the relevant legislation.
80

E. EMMP

333. The Environmental Monitoring Program is included in the Environmental Management

Plan and so the EMP can be considered as an EMMP - Environmental Management and
Monitoring Plan.

1. Environmental Monitoring

334. The essence of monitoring is to ensure Compliance with Environmental Legislation. The
contractors have a duty to comply with the relevant legislation. The supervising consultant must
check their activities and report to MPWT. In the event of noncompliance MPWT can exert
pressure on the contractor to comply.

2. Measurements

335. It will be necessary to carry out measurements to establish if the regulations are being
met. In fact, simple compliance with the standards is not necessarily the final objective. There is
no harm in the contractor “going beyond compliance” and running an operation better than that
required by the standard. The measurements to be made and standards to be met are given
below. There will be a “hierarchy” of monitoring and measurements. This would be based on :

Contractors
Consultants inspectors
SEU environmental staff
Ministry of Environment

336. Initially, contractors should check daily that all operations are being conducted correctly.
In general “good housekeeping” must be employed. Overflowing of septic tanks must be
checked by visual inspection. Dust must be controlled by covering of stockpiles and water
sprays. Solid waste, engine oil and grease, must be taken away by waste removal contractors
and records kept.

337. Construction supervision inspectors must make daily spot checks and weekly formal
checks on site operations. They must cross check all of the above and view records for waste
disposal. They must also investigate any pollution incidents or complaints. They must use the
checklists for record purposes and make sure that the complaint or incident is brought to the
notice of the contractor immediately, verbally and with a follow up written notice.

338. SEU staff will have access to noise and water quality monitoring equipment. This will be
kept at a central location and made available as necessary. SEU staff will be responsible for
care and maintenance of the equipment and regular calibration. When requested by inspectors
SEU staff must visit the site and make measurements. The equipment for noise and water will
give direct results so data will be available immediately. In the event that more detailed
information is required on water quality SEU staff must take samples of water and deliver them
to a commercial laboratory for analysis. This may be MOE or other labs which are available. In
addition SEU staff should make monthly visits to site to check the veracity of reporting. They
should also review the reports submitted by the consultants to the MPWT and report to the
MPWT project manager.
 81

339. If vibration measurements or dust measurements are required then specialized

equipment will be needed. The responsibility for requesting the measurements will be the
contractor’s. SEU must liaise with MOE and DOE to arrange the measurements. MOE have
vibration equipment for measurement of traffic and blasting vibrations.

340. If dust measurements are needed than a two stage process must be adopted. A high
volume sampler (HVS) will be deployed by MOE. After a suitable period, usually 24 hours, the
filter in the HVS will be retrieved by MOE staff and transported to the laboratory for the second
stage which is analysis. This requires highly specialized equipment which MOE possess in
Phnom Penh. The MOE will charge for this service. These charges must be covered by the
contractor.

341. The results must be submitted to SEU who will interpret them with respect to the
relevant regulations. Discussions must then be held with SEU, the consultants’ inspectors and
the contractor to determine how to resolve any problems.

342. After extraction from borrow areas is finished, revegetation and reinstatement must be
carried out. Warning signs must be erected to avoid drowning if deep ponds are left. Inspectors
and SEU staff must make regular checks by visual inspection.

3. Timing of Monitoring

343. The timing of the monitoring is important. The following list is for guidance and is
indicative only.

Liquid emissions from sites must be checked every three months or after heavy
rain if overflowing is reported. Measurements in streams and water courses
must be made.
Dust emissions on site must be checked weekly by visual inspection and monthly
by examining records of water spraying. Ambient air quality must be checked
over a 24 hour continuous period at sensitive receptors in the event of
complaints.
Noise levels must be checked every three months at site perimeters, or in the
event of a complaint, at night as well as during the daytime.
Correct removal and disposal of food waste and waste engine oil and grease
must be checked weekly by visual inspection of the camps and checking of
records from the waste disposal contractors.
Noise and vibration must be checked at sensitive receptors when blasting first
occurs or in the event of complaint. Before blasting commences warning notices
must be posted to local residents.
Reinstatement of borrow pits and quarries must be checked after closure of the
facility.

344. In addition to regular monitoring, unannounced spot checks must be made by SEU on
contractors operations. All of the above procedures should be carried out by the site inspectors,
in conjunction with SEU, and where appropriate MOE/ DOE. The results should be formally
recorded every week and compiled into a monthly report. This should be submitted to the
Engineer, the Chief Resident Engineer and discussed with SEU and the contractors as
necessary but at a minimum on a monthly basis. Monthly reports should be compiled into
quarterly and annual reports to be submitted to ADB.
82

Table X-1 Measurement of Environmental Parameters

Environmental Institutional
Regulation Issue Parameter Standard Timing Equipment Responsibilities
Sub-decree on Water Quality BOD < 50mg/L every 3 months or Water Sampler Inspector, SEU
Water Pollution SS < 50mg/L after heavy rain
0
Control Temperature <45 C
pH 6-9
Oil & Grease < 5mg/L
Dissolved > 4mg/L
Oxygen
Sub-decree on Air Quality TSP < 0.33 mg/m3 24 hours H.V.S + Lab MoE
Air and Noise Noise Quality Leq 75dB(A) (daytime 07-19) Noise Meter SEU
Pollution Control Leq 65dB(A) (nighttime, 19-07)
No Regulation Vibration PPV < 1mm/sec During blasting Vibration meter MoE
Sub-decree on Solid Waste Food Waste Properly Removed Daily Visual Inspection Contractor
Solid Waste Liquid Waste Waste Oil, Properly Controlled Weekly Visual Inspection Contractor
Management Grease After Removed by
Subcontractor
No Regulation Septic Tank Smell, Sewage No Smell, No During Operation Visual Inspection Inspector
Overflowing
No Regulation Borrow Pits Condition of Filled after Project After Closure Visual Inspection Inspector
Borrow Pits Completion, Topsoil
resurfaced
No Regulation Borrow Pits Depth of No Drowning Hazard After Closure Visual Inspection Inspector
Borrow pits
No Regulation Borrow Road Location for Meet the Engineer After Closure Visual Inspection Inspector
Borrow Road Demand
No Regulation Quarries Condition of Quarries reinstated After Closure Visual Inspection Inspector
Quarries
No Regulation Tree if Cut Tree Tree Replanted After Removal Visual Inspection FA
MOE = Ministry of Environment, SEU = social and environment unit.
 83

4. Review Procedures

345. Successful implementation of the EMP will require combined efforts from contractors,
consultants, MPWT and local authorities. The EMP is a dynamic document and may be subject
to change as the project progresses. Periodic reviews may be necessary and these should in
fact be encouraged. These changes should be driven by the SEU in MPWT.

5. Staffing for Monitoring

346. The contractors should have an environmental specialist on their staff who will advise on
implementing the EMP. MPWT will retain supervision consultants. They will maintain a
Resident Engineer on site and a team of inspectors. The inspector’s responsibilities will include
environmental issues and they must check activities and progress against environmental
checklists. (See Annex 2) The inspectors must report to the resident engineer who in turn
submits reports to the Consultants. Environmental results must be reported to the social and
environment division (SEU) which has been established in the Department of Planning, MPWT.
The results must also be incorporated in the progress reports submitted to ADB.

6. Response to Complaints

347. Villagers and APs are encouraged to voice complaints and these are to be duly
investigated and reported through the contractor to SEU and so to MPWT. As a
complaints procedure exists it is recommended that this procedure be maintained and
extended to include environmental issues.

348. Environmental monitoring must be carried out by the construction supervision

inspectors, all of whom have previous experience of environmental issues on similar projects.
Response to complaints will be based on the following schedule:

(i) Complaint made to contractor or others

(ii) Response by contractor or construction supervision consultants’ inspectors.
(iii) Weekly compiling of checklists by inspectors. Copies of checklists to be given to
contractors as official notification of action being required, confirmation of receipt
obtained by contractor signing copy, and joint inspection carried out if necessary.
(iv) Monthly progress reports by inspectors by consolidating weekly reports.
(v) Corrective Action Reports (CARs) from contractors, as soon as action taken.
(vi) Monthly progress meetings with contractors at which CARs from previous month
examined and checked.
(vii) Three monthly progress reports to ADB detailing problems and Corrective
Actions taken.
(viii) Regular checks by the Local Environmental Specialist (SEU) and regular
oversight checks by International Environmental Specialist.
(ix) Checks with complainants that they are satisfied

349. Review of progress must be checked on a daily basis by the inspectors. Any urgent
issues must be drawn to the contractors’ attention immediately. Failure by the contractor to
respond in a timely or adequate manner must be raised with them at the monthly progress
meetings. The procedure is shown below.
84

Figure X-1 Complaints Investigations Procedure

 85

7. Costs for EMP

350. The estimated costs for implementing the EMP are provided in Table VII.3 as follows:

Table VII.3: Estimated Costs for EMP Implementation (4 years)

Item Estimated Total Cost ($)
1. Environmental monitoring to be undertaken by
DDIS environment specialists
a. International (1 person for 4 months 80,000
US$20,000/month)
b. National (1 person for 4 months @ 10,000
US$2,500/month)
2. Environmental management capacity building 20,000
program/training to be undertaken by DDIS for ESO (SEU)
staff (estimates only, to be determined during Project
implementation)
3. Environmental effects monitoring for noise, dust and surface 20,000
water quality at US$5,000 / year
4. Construction phase mitigation measures N/A
(included in project costs)
5. Transportation for environmental monitoring (@ US$5,000 20,000
year for 4 years)
Sub-total 150,000
6. Contingency (10%) 15,000
Total 165,000

8. Table of Environmental Management Plan

351. The EMP is given in tabular form below.

 86

Table VII.3: SUMMARISED POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising
Organisation Organisation
(a) Road alignment Damage to marker posts showing  Road alignment was changed slightly widen Consultant MoCF, MPWT
boundary of PAWS. road on opposite side to PAWS.
(b) Raising Road Increase erosion, possible road  All bridges stream flow area increased, extra Consultant MPWT
Affecting Hydrology or failure due to impoundment of cross drainage provided. Included in detailed
Drainage. flood waters. design.
(c) Road Widening Loss of infrastructure  Minimal Impacts, alignment changed to Consultant N/A
change number of railway crossings from 3 to
1. No mitigation required.
(d)Need for fill material Loss of livehood, Loss of  Develop alternative uses for borrow pit areas Contractor SEU, MPWT
Agricultural Land for Borrow Pits. with agreement of farmers and villagers. Some
villagers request borrow pits to be left as water
ponds for use by village.
(e) Cutting of roadside Loss of roadside trees, loss of  Compensation to be paid under Resettlement IMRC MPWT
trees shade and utility. Plan. No replanting is required by contractor.
(f) Cut faces and borrow Erosion and instability of cut  Design cut slope to minimize instability. Consultant MPWT
pits faces and borrow pits  Use structural stabilization measures such as
retaining walls and gabions, if necessary.
 Use adequate design, siting, and sizes of
drainage structures.
All included in detailed design.
(g) Outflow from drainage Erosion of Lands below the  Position drainage structures to avoid a Consultant MPWT
structures roadbed receiving concentrated cascade effect and to ensure that runoff is
outflow carried by drainage conveyed into natural drainage lines at
structures– in contravention of controlled velocities.
Draft Sub-Decree on Water  Line receiving areas with stones or concrete to
Quality. protect soils at outflow areas
 Incorporate sufficient number of drainage
outlets such that flow from any individual outlet
is not excessive.
Included in detailed design.
(h) Road alignment Loss of riverside vegetation, Minimise areas of bridge abutments Consultant MPWT
across river disturbance river flow. Minimise area of bridge pillars.
(i) Road widening for Loss of vegetation and habitat Shoulders will be approx 1 metre. No mitigation Contractor Consultant
hard shoulders through road widening, and hard necessary.
shoulders
(j) Road alignment Impacts on wildlife through No impacts. Consultant Consultant,
interruption of migratory routes MPWT, DoE
 87

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
and other habitat disturbances–
in contravention of Law on
Environmental Protection and
Natural Resource Management
(1996)
(k) Road alignment Encroachment on irrigation  Use appropriate drainage structures to replace Contractor Consultant,
structures from road widening those presently used in irrigation systems. SEU, MAFF
and realignment  Avoid encroachment on irrigation systems in
use.
 Consult with relevant government offices and
villagers.
Already included in detailed design
(l) Road Construction Encroachment on water supply  Identify places where there are existing and Contractor Consultant,
systems from road construction planned water pipes and make appropriate MPWT,
activities arrangement avoid water pipes. MoWM
 Detailed design must include plans for
avoidance of damage to water systems and
replacement/repair of water systems where
avoidance is not possible. Coordination should
be exercised through the Inter-Ministerial
Resettlement Committee, as well as normal
inter-ministry liaison.
(m) Road widening onto Destruction of agricultural land  Minimize realignment through agricultural land. Consultant MAFF, SEU
agricultural land through road widening and  Ensure appropriate compensation for loss of
realignment agricultural lands.
(n) Road shoulder Encroachment on previously  Consult with villagers during detailed design to Consultant , MPWT,
widening unidentified cultural sites– in avoid encroachment on graveyard, and other MoCF
contravention of Law on unidentified sites of cultural importance.
Protection of Cultural and
National Heritage (1996)
(a) Mobilization of Accident risk from mobilizing  Minimize the mobilization of heavy equipment Contractor, SEU
equipment and workforce construction equipment to nighttime. Police
 Over-width and over-length vehicles should
display adequate warnings such as flashing
lights, signs, and flags on extending parts of
equipment.
(b) Mobilizing workforce The introduction of an outside  Conduct special briefing or on-site training on Contractor SEU
workforce can have a negative environmental requirement of the project to
 88

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
impact on the health and social workers.
well-being of local people  Strictly supervise workers not to interference
with local affairs or quarrel with local people.
 In case of complaints from local people on the
issues caused by workers, the complaints
should be solved as soon as possible, by
collaboration of contractor and village
representatives.
(c) Behaviour of workers Impacts on local wildlife by  Carry out awareness-raising campaigns on Contractor SEU, MoE,
workforce– in contravention of wildlife value for workers. MAFF
Joint Prakas of the Ministry of  Any worker conduct hunting, or buying wildlife
Environment and the Ministry of from local people, will be dismissed from job.
Agriculture on Prohibition of  Supply workers with sufficient food from
Hunting and Catching of Wildlife outside the project.
Animals (1996)
(d) Protecting workers Accident risk from mobilizing The following safety precautions should be Contractor SEU, MPWT
safety provided to workers.
 Warning and/or Precaution Signs on safety.
 Provide full PPE; Helmets, boots, warning
jackets etc.
 Instruction on health and safety.
 Establishment of all relevant safety measures
required by law and good engineering
practices.
(e) Health Aspects Outbreak of disease  The contractor shall have all his workers Contractor SEU, MoH
undergo a medical screening prior to their
arrival on site, to check for HIV/AIDS, sexually
transmitted diseases, and to provide an
awareness program. Any workers screening
positive for such diseases shall not be allow
on the site.
 Site construction camps far away from local
communities and rivers.
 Keep camps from becoming blight on the local
environment.
 Provide enough water supplies for workers,
and ensure sufficient sanitation for the camp:
the proper location for solid waste disposal.
 89

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
 Make medical treatment available for workers.
Provide workers mosquito nets and malaria-
prevention medication, if needed, spray
around camp area with chemicals against
mosquitoes.
(f) Providing fuel for Depletion of natural resources  Do not harvest wood resources within Contractor SEU, MoE, FA
workers through demand for building protected area.
materials, fuel and food for  Where local materials must be used, make
workers– in contravention of agreements with local communities about the
Royal Decree on the Creation areas or the volume that can be harvested
and Designation of Protected without significant impact.
Areas (1993)  Support community development by paying an
adequate price for any local resources used.
 All supplies for building camps should be
brought from outside area.
(i) Construction work Loss of water quality– in  Revegetation of construction area. This relates Contractor MPWT
area contravention of Sub-Decree on to grass seeding of slopes of new
Water Quality embankments for soil stabilisation and control
of sediment run off.
(ii) Work in stream Loss of water quality– in  Limit work in channels to low flows. Contractor MPWT
channels contravention of Sub-Decree on Diversionary works to be completed in dry
Water Quality season.
(iii) Fuel, lubricants and Loss of soil and water quality – in  Fuel storage in properly designed Contractor MPWT, DoE
asphalt contravention of MOE Praka No. facilities, careful refueling systems
992 on the Regulation of
Industrial Solid and Liquid Waste
Management (1994)
(iv) Solid waste disposal Loss of soil and water quality– in  Solid waste management procedures Contractor MPWT, DoE
contravention of Sub-Decree on
Waste Management
(v) Dust impacts Loss of quality of life values– in  Road watering, cover stock piles Contractor MPWT
contravention of Draft Sub-
Decree on Air Pollution
Prevention
(vi) Noise impacts Loss of quality of life values– in  Vehicle noise control, Timing of work, Give Contractor MPWT
contravention of Draft Sub- advance notice of time of blasting
Decree on Noise Prevention
(vii) Vibration impacts Loss of quality of life values– in  Schedule work to minimize nuisance Contractor MPWT
 90

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
contravention of Draft Sub-
Decree on Noise Prevention
(viii) Damage to services Loss of services  Contractor liaise with utility company on Contractor MPWT
location of services
(ix) Damage to bridges Loss of access  Truck overloading must be controlled Contractor MPWT/Police
and pavements
(x) Altered road Driver hazards  Reduce waiting time delays; signage Contractor MPWT/Police
conditions
(xi) Inadequate sanitation Increased disease– in  Provide sanitation through septic tanks; Contractor MPWT
contravention of Law on potable water, by wells and tankers. Well to be
Environmental Protection and sunk on permanent campsites. Septic tanks to
Natural Resource Management be installed on permanent campsites.
(1996) Temporary camps to be in rented
accommodation with existing sanitation, and
extra water provided by tanker if needed.
(xii) Being ready for Slow response to injury, no  Worker Health and Safety Plan, First Aid Contractor Contractor,
accidents and injuries treatment for illness officer on site identifying nearest medical Consultant,
facilities. MPWT
(xiii) Transmission of Spread of diseases to  Pre-employment worker screening, Public Separate MPWT/
sexually communicable communities education program. study and Contractor
diseases program
implemented
(xiv) Stagnant water Breeding habitats for mosquito  Siting camps distant to communities. Contractor Consultant
areas vector Removal of stagnant water areas.
(xv) Dislocation of people Loss of livelihood and assets  Resettlement and compensation plan SEU MPWT/ IRC
within RoW
(xvi) Discovery of Permanent loss of cultural items–  Contractor awareness; inform MoCF Contractor MoCF
artifacts and relics in contravention of Law on
Protection of Cultural and
National Heritage (1996)
(xvii) Earthworks and Erosion and instability of cut  No new side roads should be permitted in Contractor SEU
operating of quarries and faces and borrow pits areas with steep slopes.
borrow pits  Minimize major earthworks during the rainy
season, to the extent feasible.
 Pile topsoil from digging of borrow pits
carefully to one side, where it can be later
used for reclamation.
 During construction, employ erosion
 91

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
prevention measures such as the use of hay
bales.
 At the end of the construction phase,
recontour borrow pit walls, replace topsoil, and
revegetate.
 At the end of the construction phase,
revegetate cut slopes where feasible.
(xviii) Disposal of Erosion from disposal of cut spoil  Dispose of spoil only where there is vegetated Contractor SEU
overburden strip at least 50m wide between the disposal
site and the nearest water body. To the extent
feasible, avoid disposal on slopes greater than
30%.
 Where spoil disposal in vegetated sites cannot
be avoided, select areas with scrub growth
over areas of healthy forest.
 No disposal in protected areas such as PAWS
 No disposal into gullies or watercourses.
 No disposal in or adjacent to cultivated areas,
unless such areas lie within the road reserve
width, in which case owner will be
compensated under the Resettlement Plan.
 No disposal by direct tipping of spoil down
slope.
 Revegetate spoil dumps to maintain the soil
stability.
(xix) Construction near Loss of riverside vegetation  Avoid clearing riverside vegetation during road Contractor SEU
riverside construction except where absolutely
necessary. Revegetate riverbanks where
clearing is unavoidable.
(xx) Construction of Loss of vegetation from detour  In flat areas, leave enough of a roadside edge Contractor SEU
detour construction for vehicle to pass on the other half of the
roadway.
 Remove the base soil of any necessary
detours and revegetate after road
construction.
 Avoid use of detour where at all possible.
 Where realignments are being built, use the
existing roadway for traffic to pass.
 92

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
 Where detour are unavoidable, as in areas
where bridges are being built, limit the length
and impact of each detour to the degree
possible.
 Limit the width of any necessary detours to a
minimum.
(xxi) Construction near Loss of vegetation and habitat  Do not allow side roads in forested area. Contractor SEU, DoE
forests through road widening,  There must be no new quarries within the
realignment of right-of-way, PAWS nor in any of the provincial or district
quarries and borrow pits– in prohibited areas.
contravention of Royal Decree on  Do not cut any trees outside of the
the Creation and Designation of construction zone.
Protected Areas (1993)  In case of new quarries operation, the
environmental authorities – DoE - must
approve the quarries.
 Where possible, avoid cutting trees along the
edge of the construction zone.
 Quarrying activity should be limited to a
minimum of necessary sites, with previously
used sites preferred.
(xxii) Construction near Impacts on wildlife through  Strict monitoring in this area should be used to Contractor SEU, DoE
Areas Protected by Royal interruption of migratory routes prevent opportunistic "salvage" logging or
Decree and other habitat disturbances– illegal timber harvest. If observed, notify
in contravention of Royal Decree relevant authorities or police.
on the Creation and Designation  No side roads should be built in the PAWS, as
of Protected Areas (1993) may encourage poaching of wildlife. If
observed, notify PAWS rangers or police.
(xxiii) Construction near Encroachment on water supply  Contractors should pay a fee to villagers for Contractor SEU
village water supplies systems from road construction damage to water system, perhaps based on
activities number of days without water until the system
is fixed. Fees might be specifically targeted
toward women's groups, since they are
usually the ones who will have the main
burden of carrying water when the system is
down.
(xxiv) Construction near Encroachment on previously  Alert local authority upon discovery of any Contractor SEU, MoCF
cultural sites unidentified cultural heritage objects of possible archaeological significance
sites– in contravention of Law on that may be uncovered during construction.
 93

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
Protection of Cultural and  Construction activity affecting the area of the
National Heritage (1996) find should stop until qualified site assessment
has been made and contractors have been
given permission to proceed.
 Bring in a qualified archaeologist as needed.
(xxv) Construction Dust / Air pollution– in  Use water bowsers to water the road when Contractor SEU, DoE
Causing Air Pollution contravention of Draft Sub- dust occurs, particularly in the dry season.
Decree on Air Pollution  Maintain all construction vehicles to minimize
Prevention vehicle emission.
(xxvi) Construction Noise and Vibration– in  All road construction vehicles must have Contractor SEU, DoE
Causing Noise contravention of Draft Sub- working mufflers and be properly maintained.
Decree on Noise Prevention  Time blasting activities so as not to disrupt
local people.
 Avoid working at night near settled areas
 Inform people of possible damage from
vibration before using Vibration Rollers near to
settled area.
 Avoid, as much as possible, using Vibration
Rollers for soil compaction in settled areas
(xxvii) Excavation of Creation of stagnant water  Incorporate adequate drainage and fill in Contractor SEU
Borrow pits bodies in borrow pits, quarries borrow pits and quarries.
 Maintain borrow pits and quarries by
landscaping and revegetating after operation.
(xxviii) Construction of Accidental risks by traffic  Employ "flag men" to regulate the traffic flow. Contractor SEU
by-pass disruption during construction.  Where new alignments are being built, allow
Interference with railway line traffic to continue on old alignments.
 Where possible, as in flat areas, provide
enough edge space for one-way traffic flow.
(xxix) Visual impact of Visual Impact of road cut, spoil  Where feasible, quarries should be sited away Contractor SEU
construction disposal, borrow pits, and from the road.
quarries.  In sites where quarries must be close to the
road, trees and other vegetation should be left
between the quarry/crushing plant sites and
the road.
(xxx) Removal of unused Construction waste– in  Dispose only on sites approved by DoE. No Contractor, SEU
structures and pavement contravention of Draft Sub- disposal in the area of the PAWS. Consultant
Decree on Waste Management  No disposal into gullies or watercourses.
 No disposal in or adjacent to cultivated and
 94

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
settled area.
(xxxi) Setting up and Water pollution by oil, grease,  Locate storage areas for diesel and bitumen at Contractor Consultants,
operating an asphalt and fuel around gas stations and least 500 meters from watercourses. SEU
plants, bitumen operation parking areas– in contravention  Employ safe practices in filling bitumen
area. of Draft Sub-Decree on distributor tanks and in healing bitumen. Do
Hazardous Substances not allow smoking or fire of any kind in the
vicinity of bitumen and kerosene blending
tanks. Provide a carbon dioxide fire
extinguisher at the bitumen tank site for fire-
fighting.
 Collect and recycle all lubricants and take
precautions to prevent accidental spills.
 Prohibit road asphalting activities during
rainfall.
 Develop and implement plans for safe storage
of all toxic and potentially toxic materials into
construction planning and design.

(xxxii) Construction Destruction of agricultural land  Do not dispose cut spoil and construction Contractor SEU, MAFF
activities near prime through spoil and construction waste at agricultural land.
agricultural lands waste disposal– in contravention
of Draft Sub-Decree on Waste
Management
(xxxiii) Construction Solid waste– in contravention of  Provide garbage bins & sanitary facilities for Contractor SEU
Camps Operation Draft Sub-Decree on Waste workers. Waste in the bins should be cleared
Management periodically.
 Special attention should be paid to the
sanitary condition of camps.
(xxxiv) Residual Effects Depletion of natural resources  Do not harvest wood resources within the Contractor SEU
from Construction Camps through demand for building PAWS
materials, fuel and food for  Do not allow construction camps to become
workers– in contravention of Law permanent settlements. Remove camps prior
on Environmental Protection and to project completion.
Natural Resource Management  Use non-wood fuels such as Liquid Propane
(1996) Gas or kerosene for cooking food and heating
bitumen.
 Where local materials must be used, make
agreements with local communities about the
 95

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
areas or the volume that can be harvested
without significant impact.
 Support community development by paying an
adequate prices for any local resources used.
 All supplies for building camps should be
brought from outside the area.
 Upon close of construction, consider
transferring camp structures to local people for
community or government use.
(xxxv) Health Effect from Creation of a new pathway for  All workers will have a medical screening Contractor SEU, MoH
Construction Camps disease vectors affecting humans conducted by "Cambodian Red Cross", to
check for HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted
diseases, etc.
 Keep camps from becoming blight on the local
environment.
 Provide enough water supplies for workers,
and ensure sufficient sanitation for the camp:
the proper drainage systems and the proper
location for solid waste disposal.
 Make medical treatment available for workers.
Provide workers mosquito nets and malaria-
prevention medication. If needed, spray
around camp area with chemical against
mosquitoes.
 Plan post-construction clean-up activities to
assure no unsanitary or otherwise hazardous
debris are left behind at camp sites.
(a) Better quality road Increase in road accidents to  Speed limits enforced. Driver and community Police Police
and higher speeds people and livestock awareness; road signs
(b) More traffic volume Increased air pollution and noise  Control of vehicle air and noise emissions from DoE MoE, Police
– in contravention of Draft Sub- vehicles. Paved road will decrease noise and
Decree on Noise and Air dust.
Pollution Prevention

(c) Poor control of Accidental Risk of Toxic Spills –  Enforcement of transport regulations and Police DoE, Police
increased traffic volume in contravention of Draft Sub- HAZCHEM procedures
with more vehicles Decree on Hazardous
carrying hazardous Substances
 96

Activities Potential Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Implementing Supervising

Organisation Organisation
chemicals.
(d) Increased access Illegal Settlement along RoW  Restriction of development within RoW; offer of Provincial SEU, MPWT
alternative sites for activities. Government
(e) Increased access Accelerated Loss of Forests and  Not anticipated as no wildlife conservation DoE MoE, MAFF
Wildlifes – in contravention of areas near to project roads.
Joint Prakas of the Ministry of
Environment and the Ministry of
Agriculture on Prohibition of
Hunting and Catching of Wildlife
Animals (1996)
(f) Increased vehicular Overexploitation of forest  Strengthen enforcement of existing laws FA, MAFF, MAFF, MoE
traffic resources through illegal and regulating timber harvest, achieved through DoE Rangers,
unsustainable harvesting– in inputs in training, staffing, resources and
contravention of Royal Decree on regulatory powers of Forestry officials at all
the Creation and Designation of levels.
Protected Areas (1993)  Improve border area controls on all sides with
increased staffing, training, and resources.
 Support community forestry initiatives.
(g) Increased vehicular Impacts of wildlife through  Enforce of existing wildlife regulations FA, DoE MAFF, MoE
traffic increased pressure from illegal prohibiting trade in endangered species.
trade– in contravention of Joint  Build Cambodia government capacity for
Prakas of the Ministry of enforcement of wildlife laws through training
Environment and the Ministry of resources, and increased staffing.
Agriculture on Prohibition of  Improved border area controls on all sides
Hunting and Catching of Wildlife (Vietnam and Cambodia) with increased
Animals (1996) staffing, training and resources.
(h) Increased vehicular Loss of cultural resources and  Support well-planned eco-tourism that DoCF MoCF
traffic tradition – in contravention of involves solicitation of continuous feedback
Law on Protection of Cultural and from both local residents and travelers.
National Heritage (1996)  Support the development of village cultural
preservation groups, as already occur in
several villages along the Project Road.
G = Gabion, M = Mattress, Geo. = Geo Textile, RP = Resettlement Plan, DoE = Department of Environment, MoE = Ministry of Environment, FA = Forestry
Administration, MAFF, MAFF = Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, DoCF = Department of Culture and Fine Arts, MoCF = Ministry of Culture and Fine
Arts, SEU = Social and Environment Unit, MPWT = Ministry of Public Works and Transport, IRC = Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee, MoH = Ministry of
Health, MoWM = Ministry of Water Resource and Meteorology
 Annex 1 97

XI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

352. All potential environmental impacts have been identified. The project is confirmed as
being Category B according to ADB guidelines.

353. Only minor environmental impacts are anticipated. Such impacts will be experienced
during site works mainly due to dust and noise emissions as well as potential occupational and
community health and safety risks, but can be mitigated. Some minor mitigation measures will
be specified but no major impacts have been identified.

354. Some slopes on NR13 will be eased from 1:2 to 1:3 to improve slope stability. Road
314D will be improved by filling in of old roadside narrow rectangular borrow pits which are a
source of vector breeding.

355. Provision of a concrete road on 150B at the approach to Taches market will reduce
airborne dust and improve muddy conditions during rain and flooding.

356. A short section of NR53 will have its alignment adjusted slightly on the opposite side to
PAWS to avoid a concrete marker post of PAWS which has been placed actually outside the
PAWS boundary close to the shoulder of the road.

357. None of the eastern project roads (NR13, 314D and the CBF) are in close proximity to
any protected areas of ecological significance.

358. For the western roads, none traverses the transition, buffer or core zones of ecologically
protected areas.

359. Road 150B has an eastern section of 5.5 kms which connects NR5 to Tonle Sap river. It
terminates at the village of Ta Ches at the ferry crossing point of the river. This point is the
nearest that any project road approaches to the boundaries of Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve.
Road 150B is approximately 4.5 kms from the boundary of the outer zone, known as the
Transition zone. There will be no impacts from the road on TLSBR.

360. NR 53 runs alongside part of the eastern boundary of Phnom Aural Wildlife Sanctuary
for a distance of approximately 6.5 kms. The boundary is defined in the Royal Decree 1993 and
is indicated by concrete marker posts. Site surveys have been conducted to confirm the exact
location of the boundary markers, and these have agreed by local villagers and the PDE
officers. The PDE officers confirmed that NR53 does not intrude into the PAWS.

361. Road 151B marks the most southern point of the western project roads. This road is
further away from PAWS than NR53 and more than 50 kms from Kirirom National Park. No
adverse environmental impacts are anticipated from this section of the project road on protected
areas.

362. The Sub-decree No 72 ANRK.BK. Date 11, August 1999 contains an annex “List of the
projects that require an Initial Environmental Impact Assessment”. This stipulates that an IEE is
required for “National Road Construction ≥ 100 Kilometers and bridges ≥ 30 tonnes”. As this
project is rehabilitation of existing roads, and the only bridge will be 25 tonnes capacity, then
according to MOE Legislation an IEE will not be required.
98 Annex 1

363. To avoid or mitigate negative impacts arising from the project, an environmental
management plan (EMP) detailing mitigation measures and monitoring activities has been
prepared as part of the IEE.

364. Public consultations involving affected people and local officials have been conducted
during the preparation of the IEE in compliance with ADB information disclosure and
consultation requirements through focus group discussions and individual interviews in all
project affected provinces. Environment was not seen as a major issue by those persons
interviewed.

365. Climate change adaptation was included in the project. The residents knowledge of
climate change induced affects, and adaptation strategies, was limited. However, they were
strongly in favor of water capture projects.

366. Temporary environmental impacts caused by the civil works have been identified and
mitigation measures are given in the EMP. The EMP (and EMMP) will be included in the IEE
and will form part of the tender documents which becomes legally binding on the selected
contractor.

367. To ensure that the project is carried out in accordance with the EMP requirements,
MPWT will specify details of the implementation of the EMP in the tender documents and civil
works contracts.

368. ESO (previously SEU) is operational but needs capacity building. The detailed design
and implementation supervision consultant will provide on-the-job training to the field personnel
of the ESO of MPWT to build their capacity in environmental management and monitoring.

369. No environmental impacts were identified that would warrant the conduct of an
environmental due diligence study.
 Annex 1 99

Annex 1: Condition Surveys

Condition Survey Road NR13

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
KRABAU 122
kms from
NR13 PHNOM PENH NR1 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
1 0 0 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension 0954
2 0 RHS Electricity post; Low Tension
3 0.4 LHS / RHS Electricity post; Low Tension
crossing, culvert
4 1.0 RHS Mature trees
5 1.4 LHS / RHS Trees
6 1.5 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension,
lateral borrow areas both sides
7 2.3 LHS/ RHS Close trees
8 2.9 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension, no
trees, road very dusty
9 3.9 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension,
cross drainage
10 4.6 LHS Andong Trabek school
11 4.8 Both Open Padi
12 6.5 LHS/RHS Excavations, Electricity post; Low
Tension, LHS
13 7.4 LHS Low shrubs
14 9.6 LHS Andong Trabek Police Station
15 10.2 LHS Temple
16 13.1 LHS/RHS Open Padi
17 14.4 RHS School
18 14.5 LHS Commune Building
19 15.3 LHS Pagoda
20 16.8 Both Bushes
RHS Mobile Tour
21 17.6 RHS EU FAO Food Program
22 17.7 RHS Svay Rien province boundary,
road dusty
23 19.7 Both Crossroads, Commune office,
police station, EU/FAO signs.
Roads dusty
24 22.3 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension
25 23.5 Both Tarmac surface begins
26 23.7 Both 15Tonne bridge over river. Built
2001, needs replacing
27 23.8 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension
28 24.0 Both High school. Small town, market,
Kampong Trach
29 24.7 LHS Kampong Trach health centre
30 24.8 Both Romeashek Referral Hospital
(LHS); District office (LHS); School
(LHS); Pagoda (RHS)
100 Annex 1

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
KRABAU 122
kms from
NR13 PHNOM PENH NR1 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
31 25.9 LHS High school
32 28.0 Both 16T bridge, Culvert
33 31.1 LHS Pagoda entrance; primary school
34 32.9 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension
35 36.2 LHS / RHS Mobile phone towers; Hospital,
pagoda (RHS)
36 38.2 38+200 Both Bridge Built 2003 no weight limit
37 38.9 LHS / RHS Pagoda (RHS), High school (LHS)

38 40.0 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension;

Mobile phone towers
39 41.1 RHS Pagoda
40 42.7 LHS Primary school
41 43.5 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension
42 44.1 44+100 LHS / RHS Mobile phone tower (LHS); primary
school (RHS); mature houses
43 45.6 RHS Pagoda
44 46.0 Both Pagoda (RHS); Police station,
primary school (LHS)
45 46.8 Both T-junction road to Vietnam, NR1

46 47.0 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension

47 47.6 LHS Pagoda
48 47.9 Both Grave (LHS); Mobile tower
49 48.8 RHS Police station
50 50.3 Both Bridge no weight sign
51 51.4 RHS Dry well
52 52.3 RHS School. Lots of electrical cables
53 53.2 Both Pagoda (LHS); District office,
primary school, mobile phone
tower (RHS)
54 53.6 Both Bridge 15T, Tax office (RHS)
55 53.8 LHS / RHS Pagoda (LHS); Electricity post,
High Tension (RHS)
56 54.3 Both Culvert; Electricity post, High
Tension (RHS)
57 55.7 RHS Primary school; Electricity post,
High Tension (RHS)
58 56.7 RHS Graves 100m from road
59 57.2 RHS Pagoda; Electricity post, High
Tension (RHS)
60 58.7 Both Electricity post, High Tension and
step down transformers (RHS);
Pagoda (LHS)
61 59.7 Both Bridge over Lake Vigo; lake both
sides, some birds, some fishermen
 Annex 1 101

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
KRABAU 122
kms from
NR13 PHNOM PENH NR1 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
62 60.0 LHS Pagoda
63 60.8 Both Box culvert
64 61.1 Both Primary schools
65 61.3 Both Highway 1 1135

Condition Survey Road 314D and CBF

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
NR13 Highway 1 CBF 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
1 0 0 Rasot, T-junction Highway 1. 1200
Height restriction Max 16T axle 2,
20T axle 3
2 0.5 RHS Hospital
3 1.0 RHS Electricity post; Low Tension,
gravel road
4 2.3 Both Electricity lines crossing
5 2.4 RHS Electricity from Vietnam
6 2.9 LHS Pagoda
7 3.4 LHS Primary school
8 5.3 RHS Electricity posts High Tension
9 6.0 LHS Pagoda
10 6.4 LHS Christian church
11 6.7 RHS Pagoda
12 7.3 LHS Mobile Phone tower
13 7.4 LHS/RHS Electricity post High Tension
14 10.1 LHS Electricity post; Low Tension
15 11.4 RHS Pagoda; electric poles crossing
16 13.6 RHS Pagoda
17 14.7 Both Road very dusty
18 15.0 Both Road changes from gravel to
blacktop
19 15.2 LHS Kampomg Gro high school
20 15.5 Both Roundabout, dual carriageway
21 15.6 Both Blacktop ends, gravel resumes
22 15.8 LHS Market
23 16.3 LHS Mobile phone tower, high tension
electricity poles
24 17.8 RHS Primary school
25 19.3 Both Water gate and water channel
102 Annex 1

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
NR13 Highway 1 CBF 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
crossing road
26 21.1 LHS Pagoda
27 21.4 LHS Mobile phone tower
28 22.9 Both Bridge 16T. Viet Nam border
markers
29 24.5 LHS Boats loading rice to Viet Nam
30 25.0 Both Viet Nam border crossing 1400

Condition Survey Section 150B

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
Crossing
BEGINNING NR5 to
150B and POINT Tonle Tuek Phos
NR53 Sap River Village 16.6.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
1 0 0 LHS Tak Ches Village Market; very 0900
narrow road
2 1.1 RHS Pagoda, school
3 1.3 LHS Rice padi
4 1.7 LHS Rice padi
5 2.6 LHS Mosque
6 3.5 LHS School
7 4.7 LHS/ RHS School; Health centre
8 5.1 RHS Mobile phone tower
9 5.3 Both NR5 intersection
10 5.7 RHS School setback 200m
11 6.2 LHS Commune office
12 6.7 Both Rice paddies
13 7.5 LHS Mobile phone tower
14 8.4 Both Road on embankment, rice padis
15 9.0 LHS Sharp left hand bend
16 9.6 LHS/RHS Mobile phone tower/School
17 12.7 Both Embankments
18 13.3 RHS School
19 13.5 LHS Mosque
20 15.7 Both Rice padis
21 17.5 LHS Old sign Primary school
22 19.1 LHS Road to school
23 19.6 RHS Mobile phone tower
24 20.2 LHS Grave setback 100m
25 21.7 Both HT Electric poles crossing
26 22.9 RHS Sharp right hand bend, rice padis
both sides
27 23.5 LHS Left hand bend
 Annex 1 103

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
Crossing
BEGINNING NR5 to
150B and POINT Tonle Tuek Phos
NR53 Sap River Village 16.6.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature /End Reference
28 23.8-24.2 LHS Grave, school, many mature trees
29 25.1-25.3 LHS Dense stands of trees
30 26.9 Both Rice padis

31 28.5 Both Railway line crossing

32 29.3 LHS Pagoda
33 29.6 Both Bridge 15T, river
34 30.9 Both Bridge
35 31.1 LHS Water tower, railway line
36 31.6 LHS Pagoda
37 31.9 LHS / RHS Tuek Phos village 1100

Condition Survey Section NR53 and 151B

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
Tuek Phos
NR13 Village End 151B 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start /
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature End Reference
1 0 0 Culvert #7 0954
2 2.5 LHS LT Electric poles
3 3.6 LHS School
4 3.7 RHS Pagoda
5 3.8 LHS Mobile phone tower
6 5.2 Both sides Mobile phone towers

7 5.9 LHS School, LT Electric poles

8 6.2 LHS Pagoda entrance
9 7.8 LHS/RHS LT Electric poles/ Mobile phone
tower
10 8.4 LHS Private school
11 9.2 LHS Mobile phone towers
12 10.7 LHS Pagoda
13 11.6 RHS School
14 14.0 RHS Pagoda
15 16.1 LHS Mobile phone tower
16 16.8 RHS Mobile phone tower, school,
pagoda
17 16.9 RHS School, waterfall
18 18.7 Both Rice padi both sides
19 20.4 Both Mature trees
104 Annex 1

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING
POINT
Tuek Phos
NR13 Village End 151B 17.3.2011
Measured Marked Start /
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature End Reference
20 22.2 LHS LT Electric poles
21 23.8 RHS School
22 26.7 LHS LT Electric poles
23 28.9 LHS Fishponds
24 29.3 LHS Watergate
25 30.3 RHS Y-junction
26 306 Both River
27 31.2 Both Y-junction 151B 1500

Condition Survey Section 151B

ROAD Date of
SECTION FROM TO Survey
BEGINNING Chinese
151B POINT NR53 Road 09.07.2011
Measured Marked Start
# distance Chainage LHS / RHS Feature / End Reference
1 0 0 LHS LT Electric poles 1330
2 0.4 LHS Borrow pits full of water
3 1.7 LHS Private school
4 1.8 LHS Pagoda
5 3.3 RHS Mobile phone tower
6 3.7 LHS Oblique junction; end of 151B 1400
section; junction with “Chinese
road”.
 Annex 2 105

Annex 2: Check Lists for EMP

CHECKLIST 1 Construction Camps

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity.

"Good Housekeeping" must be observed and "General Industry Practice" followed)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly during preparation of camp, at opening of camp, then weekly or in response to
complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
1. Is the camp / yard located in a protected area, next to a community
water source or any other ecologically or otherwise sensitive area?

If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:

2. Is the camp / yard being properly maintained?

If no, list what is not being done properly:

3. Is the wastewater being disposed of properly?

If no, comment on how it is being disposed and what are the impacts:

If no, comment on.

Have septic tanks been installed?
Are they working correctly, that is not overflowing, or emitting smell?

4. Is the solid waste being disposed off properly?

If no, comment on how it is being disposed and the impacts of such disposal:

5. Is attention being paid to "Good housekeeping"?

106 Annex 2

If no, comment on what is not being done:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
6. Are the contractor's vehicles being maintained at the campsite / yard?

If yes, are appropriate precaution taken to avoid water and land contamination?

7. Is the waste from vehicle maintenance being disposed off properly?

If no, comment on how it is being disposed:

8. Is the fuel storage area properly surfaced and has a containment kerb
around it?

If no, comment on how the surrounding area is being affected:

9. Are occupational health and hygiene precautions being taken?

If no, comment on where they are being neglected:

10. Does the community have any issues with the camp?

If yes, what are the issues?

Any additional comments:

 Annex 2 107

CHECKLIST 2 Borrow Pits / Quarries

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly during preparation of borrow pit, at opening, then weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
11. Is the borrow pit / quarry located in a protected area, next to a
community water source or any other ecologically or otherwise
sensitive area?

If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:

12. Is the borrow pit / quarry being properly maintained?

If no, state what is not being done :

13. Is there adverse visual impact due to the borrow pit?

If yes, comment how:

14. Is borrow pits / quarries excavation / mining adequately employing

drainage and fill methodology to avoid any water pools formation
during rains?

If no, comment:

15. Is the borrow pits / quarry properly rehabilitated at least partially

before the start of the rainy season?

If no, comment on what needs to be done:

108 Annex 2

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
16. Are there any signs of erosion and instability?

If yes, what seems to be the reason?

17. Are the cut faces stabilized with appropriate materials and methods?

If no, what are the impacts?

18. Is the borrow pit / quarry to be closed and rehabilitated?

If yes, Is there a closure plan?

19. Are the borrow pit / quarry operations creating excessive dust / noise?

If yes, are any measures being taken to minimize dust and noise?

20. Do the communities have any concerns / issues with borrow pit /
quarry during operation or after closure?

If yes, what are those concerns / issues?

Any additional comments:

 Annex 2 109

CHECKLIST 3 Erosion of Slopes

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
1. What is / are the reason(s) for erosion / landslides / instability?

a. Improper design / stripping of cut faces

b. Improper drainage

c. Clearing of vegetation / lack of gabions, geotextiles

d. Improper leveling after earth removal

e. Are the slopes properly stabilized before the start of the rainy
season?

f. Inadequate water channel diversion, or

g. A combination of some of the reasons above

2. Is remedial action required?

If yes, comment:

3. Did the erosion / landslide / instability cause any damage?

If yes, what was the nature of the damage?

4. Did the contractor take appropriate mitigatory measures, pre and post
erosion / instability / landslides, to avoid / counter the problem?

If no, why did the contractor not consider it necessary to take appropriate mitigatory measures?

5. Was the erosion brought to the notice of appropriate authorities by the

communities?

If yes, was there any action taken?

If no, why was action not taken?

Any additional comments:

110 Annex 2

CHECKLIST 4 Air Pollution

(N.B. The contractor must carry out his activities to ensure compliance with
the regulations stated in draft Sub Decree on Air and Noise Pollution Control)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question

21. What is the nature of air pollution?

a. Dust from road

b. Dust from stock piled materials
c. Generator, batching plant emissions
d. Vehicular emissions
Checklist Question Yes No Additional
Data needs
22. Is the problem significant enough to warrant attention?

If yes, did the contractor take appropriate measure to mitigate the problem?

What is / are the measures taken?

a. Periodic water sprays on road surface / borrow pits
b. Vehicle tire washing facilities at borrow pits and other locations
c. Speed limit enforced on project vehicles
d. Vehicles speeding checked by posting signs on roads, and awareness raising of
staff and local communities
e. Covering of stock piled materials
f. Vehicles regularly maintained
g. Equipment regularly maintained

3. Is air pollution creating problems for the surrounding communities?

If yes, what type of problems?

 Annex 2 111

CHECKLIST 5 Water Pollution

(N.B. The contractor must carry out his activities to ensure compliance with
the regulations stated in Sub Decree on Water Pollution Control, No. 27 ANRK.BK, April 06, 1999)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question

23. What is the nature of water contamination?

1.1 Surface Water (stream, pond etc.)

a. disposal of cut spoil into water body or on slope leading to water body
b. discharge of wastewater from camp into fresh water body
c. road run-off into water body
d. discharge of used oil, fuel, grease, etc. into water body

1.2 Groundwater
e. leakage of oil, fuel, wells, etc. on land resulting in
contamination of ground water and wells
f. any other reason

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
1. Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures?

If yes, provide necessary details:

4. Is the impact long term?

If yes, comment:

4. Can it be ratified by mitigatory measures?

If yes, what type of mitigatory measures should be taken?

Did community bring the problem to the notice of authorities?

Has action been taken to counter the problem? Is it effective?

Additional comments:
112 Annex 2

CHECKLIST 6 Agriculture

(N.B. The contractor must carry out his activities to ensure compliance with
the regulations stated in draft Law on Agriculture made by MAFF)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question

24. What is the impact of project activities on agriculture activities?

a. road encroachment on paddy / agricultural land

b. borrow pit located on agricultural land
c. spoil dump located on agricultural land
d. diversion of water channels and road construction resulting in inundation of
agricultural land
e. irrigation channels broken / diverted due to project activities
f. oil, grease and fuel road run-off contaminating agricultural fields
g. any other project activities resulted in destruction of agricultural land
Checklist Question Yes No Additional
Data needs
25. Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures?

If yes, provide necessary details:

5. Is the impact permanent?

5. If permanent, could it have been avoided by taking appropriate

mitigatory measures?

If yes, how?

6. Is the impact temporary?

If yes, when and how could it be corrected?

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
7. Is the contractor using any insecticides on the site which adversely
affect farmland?
 Annex 2 113

If yes, comment:

8. Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the contractor

to protect farmland?

If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?

9. Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by the

contractor to protect farmland?

If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?

Any additional comments:

114 Annex 2

CHECKLIST 7 Land Contamination

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question

26. What are the impacts of project activities on land?

a. road run-off of oil, grease and fuel contaminating land

b. fuel oil / used oil / grease spill on land in equipment yards / camps sites
c. indiscriminate discharge of waste water on land
d. indiscriminate disposal of solid waste
e. any other project activities resulting in land contamination
Checklist Question Yes No Additional
Data needs
27. Is the impact significant enough to warrant mitigatory measures?

If yes, provide necessary details:

6. Is the impact permanent?

10. If permanent, could it have been avoided by taking appropriate

mitigatory measures?

If yes, what type pf mitigatory measures should have been taken?

11. Is the impact temporary?

If yes, when and how could it be corrected?

 Annex 2 115

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
12. Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the contractor
to protect agricultural activities?

If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?

13. Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by the
contractor to protect agricultural activities?

If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?

14. Did the community allow the use of their land for borrow pit or any
other purpose?

If yes, what was the motivation behind it?

If no, did the contractor take permission from the land owner and local administration for the specific use?

Any additional comments:

116 Annex 2

CHECKLIST 8 Cultural Heritage

(N.B. The contractor must carry out his activities to ensure compliance with the regulations stated
in "Law on Protection of Cultural and National Heritage", (1996)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
28. Does the project area have any cultural heritage, archaeological,
historical or religious sites?

2. If yes, are they affected in any way by the project activities?

If yes, how?

3. Did the concerned authorities and the contractor take any appropriate
measures to protect the site?

If yes, what are the measures taken?

4. Are the communities satisfied with the measures taken?

5. Is the community satisfied with the measures taken by the contractor

to protect land?

If no, how and with what measures can it be improved?

6. Is the local administration satisfied with the measures taken by the

contractor to protect land?

If no, what is being suggested by the local administration?

Any additional comments:

 Annex 2 117

CHECKLIST 9 Noise Pollution

(N.B. The contractor must carry out his activities to ensure compliance with
the regulations stated in draft Sub Decree on Air and Noise Pollution Control)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check weekly or in response to complaint.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question

29. What is the nature of noise pollution?

a. vehicles on road
b. Generators, construction plant
c. Construction vehicles
d. vibration from equipment
e. vibration from road vehicles
f. vibration from explosive blasting
Checklist Question Yes No Additional
Data needs
30. Is the problem significant enough to warrant attention?

If yes, did the contractor / consultant take appropriate measure to mitigate the problem?

What is / are the measures taken?

e. vehicles regularly maintained and silencers checked
f. speed limit enforced on project vehicles
g. construction equipment maintained and silenced
h. compressors and generators operated with silencing panels closed
i. awareness raising of staff over causing nuisance to local communities
j. blasting at fixed times and communities notified
k. Avoid undertaking construction activities and blasting close to communities at night
7. Is noise pollution creating problems (health, aesthetic & nuisance) for
the surrounding communities?

If yes, what type of problems?

118 Annex 2

CHECKLIST 10 Drainage and Flooding

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: As required

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
31. Is the flooding extensive or not?

If yes, give details:

32. Have contractors activities caused flooding or blocked drains?

If yes, give details:

33. Have cross drainage structures been built in correct location as

shown in contract?

If no, give details:

34. Are cross drainage structures "as built" same as in "detailed design"?

If no, give details:

35. Any other issues

If yes, give details

 Annex 2 119

CHECKLIST 11 Construction Camps Closure

(N.B. There is no specific regulation for this activity)

Project Site:

Observer:

Frequency: Check at closure of camp.

Date: Time:

Location / Road Distance:

Weather Condition:

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
36. Is the camp / yard located in a protected area, next to a community
water source or any other ecologically or otherwise sensitive area?

If yes, comment on the adverse impacts on the environment:

37. Has the camp / yard been properly cleared of all debris and
revegetated?

If no, list what was not done properly:

38. Was the wastewater disposed of properly?

If no, comment on how it was being disposed and what were the impacts:

39. Were septic tanks installed? Have they been removed?

If no, why not?

40. Was solid waste disposed of properly?

If no, comment on how it was being disposed and the impacts of such disposal:

41. Was attention being paid to housekeeping?

If no, comment on what was not being done:

120 Annex 2

Checklist Question Yes No Additional

Data needs
42. Have all the contractor equipments being removed from the campsite
/ yard?

If yes, have all appropriate precautions been taken to avoid water and land contamination?

43. Has the scrap metal from vehicle maintenance being disposed of
properly?

If no, comment on how it is to be disposed:

44. Has all fuel storage been removed from the site?

If no, comment on how the surrounding area is being affected:

45. Have all general offices and staff dwellings been removed?

If no, comment on if they are to be handed over to new owner or other plans:

46. Does the community have any issues with the camp closure?

If yes, what are the issues?

Any additional comments:

 Annex 3 121

Annex 3: Baseline Community Level Survey Abstracted from Socio-economic Study

(July 2011)

Table 9. Data on Wet Season Rice Irrigation and Farmers’ Access to Irrigation
Province Description 2007 2008
Svay Total area of wet season rain fed rice land 98% 597,452 ha
Rieng Percentage of wet season rice land that is 2% 3,001 ha (1%)
Province irrigated & are in hectares (2008):
(i) Area irrigated from canal/dam 75% 2,364 ha (78%)
(ii) Area irrigated from river, stream, etc. 7% 11 ha (0%)
(iii) Area irrigated from drilled well 11% 370 ha (12%)
(iv) Area irrigated from dug pond 8% 266 ha (9%)
Families who have access to irrigation 5% 5,826 families (5%)
water
Families who have irrigation wells 1% 1,532 families (1%)
Number of irrigation wells in the province 1,029 wells 1,272 wells
Percentage of families per district (with
access to (supplemental) irrigation for wet No Data in 2008
season cultivation 2007
Project (i) Kampong Rou District - 11.0% (access to irrigation); 4.8%
Areas (access to supplemental irrigation);
(Svay 478 families owned irrigation; wells-
Rieng) 429 number of irrigation wells.
(ii) Rumduol District - 0.0% (access to irrigation); 0.1%
(access to supplemental irrigation);
53 families owned irrigation; wells -
47 number of irrigation wells .
(iii) Romeas Haek District - 0.9% (access to irrigation); 0.2%
(access to supplemental irrigation);
493 families owned irrigation; wells
378 number of irrigation wells.
(iv) S vay Teab District - 0.7% (access to irrigation); 0.0
(access to supplemental irrigation);
26 families owned irrigation; wells 25
number irrigation wells .

Prey Total area of wet season rain fed rice land 88% 180,744 ha (87%)
Veng Percentage of wet season rice land that is 12% 25,928 ha (13%)
Province irrigated & are in hectares (2008):
(i) Area irrigated from canal/dam 56% 15,847 ha (61%)
(ii) Area irrigated from river, stream, etc. 26% 5,451 ha (21%)
(iii) Area irrigated from drilled well 17% 4,455 ha (17%)
(iv) Area irrigated from dug pond 0% 175 ha (1%)
Families with access to irrigation 22% 47,278 families (21%)
Families who have irrigation wells 7% 15,554 families (7%)
Number of irrigation wells in the province 14,649 wells 14,467 wells
Percentage of families per district with
access to irrigation for wet season No Data 2007 2008
cultivation
Project (i) Kamchay Mear District - 8.7% (access to irrigation); 3.6%
Area (access to supplemental irrigation);
892 families owned irrigation; wells-
681 number of irrigation wells (dist.)

Kampong Total area of wet season rainfed rice land 78% 84,905 ha (83%)
Chhnang Percentage of wet season rice land that is 22% 16,988 ha (17%)
Province irrigated & are in hectares (2008):
(i) Area irrigated from canal/dam 22% 16,988 ha (17%)
(ii) Area irrigated from river, stream, etc. 70% 10,435 ha (22%)
122 Annex 3

(iii) Area irrigated from drilled well 24% 5,242 ha (31%)

(iv) Area irrigated from dug pond 0% 25 ha (0%)

Families who have access to irrigation 30% 25,099 families (31%)

water
Families who have irrigation wells 1% 447 families (1%)
Number of irrigation wells in the province 357 wells 255 wells
Percentage of families per district (project
area only) with access to irrigation for wet No Data 2007 2008
season cultivation (2008 data):
38.5% (access to irrigation); 7.4%
Project (i) Kampong Tralach District - (access to supplemental irrigation);
Areas 39% number of families owned wells;
39% number of irrig.
(ii) Tuek Phos District - 22.1% (access to irrigation); 24.2%
rice land with supplemental irrigation.
(iii) Sameakki Mean Chey - 27.3 (access to irrigation); 38% -rice
land with supplemental irrigation.

Total area of wet season rain fed rice land 87% 267,089 ha (87%)
Kampong Percentage of wet season rice land that is 13% 13,037 ha (5%)
Speu irrigated & are in hectares (2008):
Province (i) Area irrigated from canal/dam 80% 11,253 ha (86%)
(ii) Area irrigated from river, stream, etc. 19% 1,760 ha (14%)
(iii) Area irrigated from drilled well 0% 0 ha (0%)
(iv) Area irrigated from dug pond 0% 24 ha (0%)
Families who have access to irrigation 17% 21,632 families (16%)
water
Families who have irrigation wells 0% 0 families (0%)
Number of irrigation wells in the province 68 wells 0 wells
Percentage of families per district with
access to irrigation for wet season No Data 2008
cultivation
Project (i) Thpong District - 4.4% (access to irrigation); 18.6%
Area (access to supplemental irrigation); 0
irrigation wells

(N.B. Original Table Numbers retained to allow cross reference to SES)

Table 28. Over-all assessment on the impacts of road project by Sex and Province
In Favor of the Road Project Not in Favor of the Road Project
Province
F (N) M (N) F (N) M (N)
Svay Rieng 233 152 0 2
Prey Veng 30 20 0 0
Kampong Chhnang 152 77 1 0
Kampong Speu 21 12 0 0
Total 436 (62%) 261 (37%) 1 (1%) 2 (3%)
Grand Total 697 (99.6%) 3 (0.4%)
Source: HSES, June 2010.
 Annex 3 123

Table 29. Perceptions on the Positive Impacts of the Road Project

Svay Prey Kampong Kampong Rank per

Positive Impacts Rieng Veng Chhnang Speu Province
N N N N
st
Faster travel time and convenient 387 50 230 33 1
Beneficial to children (no more
nd
dust, favorable in going to school, 210 50 203 32 2
no more mud)
Improve income/revenues of the
government (will facilitate th
6 1 9 0 4
economic growth within the
project areas)
Will provide employment/greater
rd
job opportunities to the 245 40 82 6 3
people/local communities
th
Prices of land will increase 20 0 7 3 5
*Multiple responses
*100% of the perceive impacts will have long-term impacts
Source: HSES, June 2010.
Negative Impacts of the Project

Table 30. Perceptions on the Negative and Level of Impacts of the Project
Negative Impacts Svay Prey Kg Kg Total & Rank Level of Impacts
Rieng Veng Chhnang Speu (All provinces)
N N N N N High Med. Low
Dust during construction 134 100
49 20 62 3 rd 12 22
(4 )
Noise during construction 109 18
50 5 51 3 th 12 79
(5 )
Some houses/lot will be
affected (families will be 349
183 18 130 18 nd 24 80 245
displaced), loss of jobs (2 )
and source of income
Increase number of
74
migrants/ increase of 72 0 2 0 th 52 14 8
(7 )
human trafficking cases
Increase in number of
women/girls who will
82
work in casinos/hotels 82 0 0 0 th 39 12 31
(6 )
and other business
centers
Increase in 12
10 0 2 0 th 1 6 5
HIV/AIDS/STDs cases (9 )
Increase in number of 13
13 0 0 0 th 0 1
child labor cases (8 )
Increase road accidents;
over-speeding vehicles 400
250 15 130 5 st 196 170 34
dangerous to children (1 )
and old people
No negative Impacts
316
what’s important is to 190 35 76 15 rd - - -
(3 )
have improved roads)
Total 790 93 453 44 1,380* 196 383 442
*Multiple responses
Source: HSES, June 2011
124 Annex 3

Table IPs’ Ethnic Origin by Gender Source: HSEBS, June 2011

Female Male Both Gender

Ethnicity/Ethnic (Total N %)
Group N % N % N %
Cham 35 49 10 14 45 63
Vietnamese 11 15 9 13 20 28
Chinese 6 8 1 1 7 9
Total 52 72% 20 28% 72 100%

Table Breakdown of the Baseline Respondents by Gender

Province/District Total Number of Respondents Total Number and Percentage
by Gender (Both F/M)
Female Male N %
Svay Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 57 44 101 14
(ii) Svay Teab 58 28 86 12
(iii) Romeas Haek 72 34 106 15
(iv) Rumduol 37 37 74 11
(v) Svay Rieng City 8 12 20 3
Total: 232 (33%) 155 (22%) 387 55%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 31 19 50 7
Total: 31 (4%) 19 (3%) 50 7
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 85 41 126 18
(ii) Tuek Phos 48 22 70 10
(iii) Sameakki
20 14 34 5
Mean Chey
Total: 153 (22%) 77 (11%) 230 33%
Kampong Speu Province: 21 12 33 5
(i) Thpong 21 (3%) 12 (2%) 33 5%
Total: 437 (62%) 263 (38%) 700 100%

Table Age Breakdown of the Respondents by Gender

Age Bracket Svay Rieng Prey Veng Kampong Kampong Total of the Number and
Chhnang Speu Percentage
(per age bracket)
F M F M F M F M F (N) F M M
(%) (N) (%)
Below 18 years 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 0
old
18 - 30 years old 54 14 5 2 33 23 6 1 98 14 40 6
31 - 40 years old 44 54 11 6 37 12 8 3 100 14 75 11
41 -50 years old 71 48 7 5 33 15 4 3 115 16 71 10
51- 60 years old 37 25 4 6 33 13 1 5 75 11 49 7
61 -70 years old 12 9 4 0 12 10 2 0 30 4 19 3
71 years old and 8 5 0 0 4 4 0 0 12 2 9 1
above
Total Per 232 155 31 19 153 77 21 12 437 62% 263 38%
Province
Grand Total 387 (55%) 50 (7%) 230 (33%) 33 ( 5%) 700 (100%)
Source: HSES, June 2011
 Annex 3 125

Table Marital Status of the Respondents by Gender

Civil Status Svay Prey Kampong Kampong Total Number and
Rieng Veng Chhnang Speu Percentage
(per civil status)
F M F M F M F M F F M M
(N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (%) (N) (%)
Single/Never
Married/Never Lived 16 5 1 1 13 6 3 0 33 5 12 1
with a Partner
Married/Living
170 153 22 18 101 68 15 11 308 44 250 36
Together
Female - Headed
40 0 8 0 39 0 3 0 90 13 0 0
Household
Male Headed
0 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 7 1
Household
Total Per Province 232 155 31 19 153 77 21 12 431 62% 269 38%
Grand Total 387 (55%) 50 (7%) 230 (33%) 33 (5%) 700 (100%)

Table Respondents’ Ethnic Origin by Gender

Province Khmer Cham Vietnamese Chinese Total Number and
Percentage
(Combined both F/M)
F M (N) F (N) M F (N) M F M F F M M
(N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (%) (N) (%)
Svay Rieng 226 152 0 1 2 1 4 1 232 33 155 22
Prey Veng 31 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 4 19 3
Kampong 109 60 35 9 9 8 0 0 153 22 77 11
Chhnang
Kampong Speu 19 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 21 3 12 2
Total per 385 243 35 10 11 9 6 1 437 62 263 38
Ethnic Goup (55%) (35%) (5%) (1%) (16%) (1%) (1%) (0.0 % %
1%)
Grand Total
628 (90%) 45 (6%) 20 (3%) 7 (1%) 700 (100%)
Source: HSES, June 2011

Table 42. Occupation of Household Heads in the Project Areas

Occupation Svay Prey Kampon Kampon Total Number and Total
Rieng Veng g g Speu Percentage Both
Chhnan (per occupation) Sex
g
F M F M F M F M F F M M (%)
(N) (%) (N) (%)
Farming 146 128 25 13 290 41 203 29 70
101 51 18 11
Fishing 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 4 1 7 1 2
Selling/Owned a
60 10 3 4 37 15 2 0 101 15 29 4 19
Shop/Store
Carpenter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0.01 0.01
Construction 0.0
1 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 5 1 1.01
Worker/Laborer 1
Driver 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.01 0.01
Casino Worker 0.0 0.02
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.01
1
Factory Worker 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 1
Handicraft Making 0.0
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.02
1
Mechanic/
0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 1 1
Repair Vehicles
126 Annex 3

Occupation Svay Prey Kampon Kampon Total Number and Total

Rieng Veng g g Speu Percentage Both
Chhnan (per occupation) Sex
g
Teacher 0.0 1.01
2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 1
1
Making Palm 1.01
3 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 7 1 4 0.01
Sugar/Wine
Dressmaker/ 1
8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 1 0 0
Tailor
No Job 6 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 12 2 2 0 2
Total per province 62
232 155 31 19 153 77 21 12 437 263 38% 100%
%
Source: HSES, June 2011

Table Primary Source of Water for Drinking

Faucet inside Water Ring Well/ Rain Water Stream,
Province the house (with Pump Open Well (with jars or River or
water pipes water Lake
connected to container)
the water
source)
N N N N N
Svay Rieng 35 287 32 33 0
Prey Veng 5 35 8 2 0
Kampong Chhnang 3 60 120 12 35
Kampong Speu 0 0 6 16 11
Total (N) 43 382 166 63 46
% (by Water Source) 6% 55% 24% 9% 6%
Source: HSES, June 2011

Table Households’ Monthly Income

Monthly Svay Prey Kg Kampong Total Number and Total Rank
Income Rieng Veng Chhnang Speu Percentage N&% (by
(per income bracket) (both Income)
Sex)
F M F M F M F M F F M M N&
(N) (%) (N) (%) (%)
st
$50.00 257 1
and 82 55 13 5 58 31 10 3 163 23 94 13 (36%)
below
nd
$51.00 to 190 2
60 40 9 7 35 22 10 7 114 16 76 11
$100.00 (27%)
rd
$101 - 153 3
$150.00 40 38 9 4 43 18 0 1 92 13 61 9 (22%)
monthly
th
$151.00 - 66 4
32 15 0 2 14 3 0 0 46 7 20 3
$200.00 (10%)
th
$201.00 20 5
to $ 14 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 2 6 1 (3%)
250.00
th
$251.00 2 0 0 14 6
4 3 3 1 1 8 1 6 1
and more (2%)
Total (N)
Per 700
Province 62 38 (100%)
437 263
232 155 31 19 153 77 21 12 % %
Source: HSES, June 2011
 Annex 3 127

Table Households’ Status of Land Ownership and Size of Farm Land

Province Size of Farm Land Total
Do not Less 1-2 ha. 3-4 ha. More than (N & %)
owned than 1 4 ha. Households
Land ha. Who Owned Land
N N N N
Svay Rieng 124 138 95 25 5 263 (54%)
Prey Veng 8 26 14 1 1 42(9%)
Kampong 77 153 (31%)
92 45 11 5
Chhnang
Kampong 4 29 (6%)
15 12 2 0
Speu
Total (size 213 487
271 166 39 11
of land) (30%) (70%)
(38%) (24%) 6%) (2%)
Source: HSES, June 2011

Table Households’ Type of Toilet Facilities

Open Use of Use of Improved Close pit
Province Defecation public or unimproved (but toilet facility (no automatic
(No Toilet) shared not shared), i.e. (water sealed flush but use
latrine open pit, no with flush) water)
(communal flush type
)
N N N N N
Svay Rieng 221 3 15 3 145
Prey Veng 45 1 1 0 3
Kampong
168 2 2 0 58
Chhnang
Kampong Speu 24 0 0 0 9
Total (N) 458 6 18 3 215
( %) 65% 0.07% 3% 0.02 31%
Source: HSES, June 2011

Table Other Health/Nutrition Projects Suggested by the Respondents

Provide Provide Provide Provide Feeding Health &
Province Additional Clean Sanitary Free Center Nutrition
Food water Toilets Medicines Education
Supplies Source & Vitamins,
etc.
N N N N N N
Svay Rieng 56 89 98 112 25 7
Prey Veng 10 12 10 7 4 7
Kampong
50 45 60 18 19 38
Chhnang
Kampong
10 8 9 0 0 6
Speu
Total (N) 126 154 177 130 48 58
18%
th 22% 25% 20% 7% 8%
% & Rank 4 Rank nd st rd th th
2 Rank 1 Rank 3 Rank 6 Rank 5 Rank
Source: HSES, June 2011
128 Annex 3

Table Respondents Recommendations to Improve the Health Condition

by Gender and per Province *
Svay Rieng Prey Veng Kampong Kampong
Recommendations Chhnang Speu
and Rank F M Both F M Both F M Both F M Both
F/M F/M F/M F/M
Improve health facilities 1 0 1
(hospitals/health centers
should have complete
30 11 41 2 3 5 4 8 12
facilities and hire additional
qualified health personnel)
th
(6 Rank)
Provide free medical check-
up & medicines to poor 75 45 120 13 8 21 48 19 67 7 3 10
st
households (1 Rank)
Provide sanitary toilets (toilet
th 26 20 46 2 2 4 15 8 23 0 0 0
bowls) (4 Rank)
Provide safe drinking water
(construct more water
pumps in villages and 20 18 38 4 2 6 13 7 20 4 1 5
schools without clean
th
drinking water) (5 Rank)
Construct health center in
the commune in every 17 15 32 4 3 7 44 19 63 2 2 4
nd
commune (2 Rank)
Implement a feeding
program for undernourished
16 11 27 2 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 1
children in every
th
commune/village (8 Rank)
Improve roads (provincial,
rural and farm to market 31 26 57 1 1 2 16 9 25 3 3 6
rd
roads) (3 Rank)
Health education seminars/
trainings on (HHTPP/repro-
th 17 9 26 3 0 3 12 5 17 2 3 5
ductive health,etc. (7
Rank)
Total per
232 155 387 31 19 50 153 77 230 21 12 33
Province
Source: HSES, June 2011 * Multiple Responses

Table 54. Primary Source of Water for Drinking

Faucet inside the Water Ring Rain Water Stream, River
Province house (with water Pump Well/Open (with jars or or Lake
pipes connected Well water container)
to the water
source)
N N N N N
Svay Rieng 35 287 32 33 0
Prey Veng 5 35 8 2 0
Kampong
3 60 120 12 35
Chhnang
Kampong
0 0 6 16 11
Speu
Total (N) 43 382 166 63 46
(%) 6% 55% 24% 9% 6%
Additional Data: Majority of the respondents’ water source is just beside the house. The rest are located within 5-10
meters.
 Annex 3 129

Table 57. Source of Power or Lighting Facilities

Electricity Re-chargeable Lamp Total Number and
Province Battery (using oil or gas) Percentage per
province
N N N N
Svay Rieng 191 115 81 387
Prey Veng 24 24 1 50
Kampong
3 178 49 230
Chhnang
Kampong Speu 0 23 10 33
Total (N) 219 340 141 700
(%) 31% 49% 21% 100%

Table 84. Respondent’s Answer to the Question, Have you experience flood or drought?
Province and District Yes No Total Number and Percentage
(per province)
N % N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 42 59 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 40 46 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 34 72 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 32 42 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 10 10 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 12 38 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 56 70 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 21 49 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
10 24 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 8 25 33 5%
Total 265 37.86%) 435 (62.14%) 700 100%

Table 85. Information Received by the Respondents on Flood/Drought per Province/District

Province and Heard from Others Need to Protect No information Total Number and
District that a big flood is Environment to received, no training Percentage
coming Protect Flood yet on climate per province/district
change or disaster
preparedness
N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong Rou 10 5 86 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 18 5 63 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 8 6 92 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 5 5 64 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng
3 2 15 20 3%
City
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 4 3 43 50 7%
Kampong
Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong
8 14 104 126 18%
Tralach
(ii) Tuek Phos 0 0 70 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki
Mean 0 0 34 34 5%
Chey
130 Annex 3

Province and Heard from Others Need to Protect No information Total Number and
District that a big flood is Environment to received, no training Percentage
coming Protect Flood yet on climate per province/district
change or disaster
preparedness
N N N N %
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 0 0 33 33 5%
Total Per
56 (8%) 40 (6%) 604 (86%) 700 100%
Response

Table 86. Specific Information Received on Climate Change

Conserve Be prepared Conduct disaster No Idea/No Total Number and
Province and District forest, do not always for disaster, preparedness Training Percentage
cut trees, plant and what to do training for the attended yet on per province/district
more trees and before and during local communities climate
take care of disasters, prepare with emergency change/disaster
nature all things, drills preparedness
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong Rou 5 5 7 84 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 2 8 1 75 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 3 7 5 91 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 4 5 6 59 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 1 5 1 13 20 3%
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 1 9 1 39 50 7%
Kampong
Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 4 5 5 112 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 1 1 1 67 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki
0 1 1 32 34 5%
Mean Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 0 0 1 32 33 5%
Total Per
21 (3%) 46 (7%) 29 (4%) 604 (86%) 700 100%
Response

Table 87. Specific Information Received on What to Do in Case of Flood

Province and Evacuate or Open spillway Always watch Just stay at No Idea / Total Number
District leave house in areas with TV, listen to home (it is Not and Percentage
and go to big rivers / radio and still safer at experience per
higher irrigation information from home) d flood yet
province/district
grounds; don’t structures the commune /
stay close to village chief
rivers
N N N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong
3 3 8 22 65 101 14%
Rou
(ii) Svey Teab 2 3 7 30 44 86 12%
(iii) Romeas
2 3 6 20 75 106 15%
Haek
(iv) Rumduol 2 7 5 24 36 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng
3 1 2 10 4 20 3%
City
 Annex 3 131

Province and Evacuate or Open spillway Always watch Just stay at No Idea / Total Number
District leave house in areas with TV, listen to home (it is Not and Percentage
and go to big rivers / radio and still safer at experience per
higher irrigation information from home) d flood yet
province/district
grounds; don’t structures the commune /
stay close to village chief
rivers
N N N N N N %
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay
1 1 5 22 21 50 7%
Mear
Kampong
Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong
9 7 5 10 95 126 18%
Tralach
(ii) Tuek Phos 1 1 0 0 68 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki
0 1 0 0 33 34 5%
Mean Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 0 0 0 0 33 33 5%
Total Per
23 (3%) 27 (4%) 38 (4%) 138 (20%) 474 (68%) 700 100%
Response

Table 88. Information Received on What to Do During Drought (all provinces)

Information Received N %
Dig canal or have water reservoir 60 9
Plant more trees (to prevent drought) 48 7
No Idea 592 84
Total: 700 100%

Table 89. Respondents’ Answers to the Question, “Have you attended any training
on climate change/disaster preparedness?”
Province and District Attended Not Yet Attended Total Number and Percentage
per province/district
N F N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 16 85 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 18 68 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 16 90 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 8 66 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 7 13 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 10 40 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)KampongTralach 5 121 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 14 56 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean Chey 1 33 34 5%
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 1 32 33 5%
Total Per Response 96 (14%) 604 (86%) 700 100%
132 Annex 3

Table 90. Early Warning Systems Known by the Respondents (all provinces)
Province and Use Information Making noise Personal No Total Number and
District bells in from the by knocking experience, just Idea / No Percentage
school Commune/ on some observe the Response per
and Village Chiefs ; objects made weather; and province/district
pagoda neighbors and of wood, and watch TV/listen
during other local other to radio; just do
emergen people indigenous whatever is safe
cy materials for the family
during typhoon

N N N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong
2 1 2 72 24 101 14%
Rou
(ii) Svey Teab 2 1 3 44 36 86 12%
(iii) Romeas
4 1 1 54 46 106 15%
Haek
(iv) Rumduol 2 4 3 45 20 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng
1 2 10 5 20 3%
City 2
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 1 1 1 35 12 50 7%
Kampong
Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong
3 14 4 26 79 126 18%
Tralach
(ii) Tuek Phos 0 9 0 2 59 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki
0 3 0 1 30 34 5%
Mean Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 0 0 0 0 33 33 5%
Total Per
16 35 16 289 344 700 100%
Response

Table 91. Source of Information During Floods/Typhoons

Province and Commune Neighbors TV/Radio Personal Total Number and
District /Village /local observation/strategy Percentage
Chiefs villagers /Just do what is best per
based on province/district
observation of the
weather/climate
No idea/ No answer
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong Rou 4 2 12 83 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 3 1 10 72 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 6 9 15 76 106 15%
(iv)Rumduol 3 1 17 53 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 4 1 2 13 20 3%
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 5 10 12 23 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 8 10 21 87 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 10 1 0 59 70 10%
 Annex 3 133

Province and Commune Neighbors TV/Radio Personal Total Number and

District /Village /local observation/strategy Percentage
Chiefs villagers /Just do what is best per
based on province/district
observation of the
weather/climate
No idea/ No answer
N N N N N %
(iii) Sameakki Mean
5 0 0 29 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 0 0 0 33 33 5%
Total Per Response 48 35 89 528 700 100%

Table 92. Strategies Used by Households During Flood/Typhoon

Province and District Just stay at home If flood is No Idea Total Number and
(it’s safe than high, go to Percentage
staying outside a higher per province/district
the house) level
N N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 36 20 45 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 28 19 39 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 32 24 50 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 35 19 20 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 7 10 3 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 15 10 25 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 33 18 75 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 19 5 46 70 10%
(iii)Sameakki Mean Chey 9 5 20 34 5%
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 2 5 26 33 5%
Total Per Response 216 (31%) 135 (19%) 349 (50%) 700 100%

Table 93. Place Where Households Bring their Livestock During Floods by Province
Province and Near the Near the Road Have not experienced Pagoda Total Number and
District House (Higher Grounds) any flood yet (just leave Percentage
animals where they will per province/district
be safe)
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 8 6 85 2 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 11 5 69 1 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 12 4 88 2 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 13 10 50 1 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 3 5 11 1 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 6 5 36 3 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 4 13 109 0 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 8 2 60 0 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
6 1 27 0 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
134 Annex 3

Province and Near the Near the Road Have not experienced Pagoda Total Number and
District House (Higher Grounds) any flood yet (just leave Percentage
animals where they will per province/district
be safe)
N N N N N %
(i) Thpong 1 0 32 0 33 5%
Total Per Response 10
72 (10%) 51 (7%) 567 (82%) 700 100%
(1%)

Table 94. Suggestions on what else is needed by the commune/village to best respond during disasters
Province and Conduct Organize disaster The govt. should Construct Improve Total Number and
District public preparedness team raise funds, have irrigation roads Percentage
awareness / (with medical team, money/resources facilities – it can and per province/district
training on trained volunteers, (relief goods/foods, provide water canals
disaster etc. who will help medicines and for rice fields
prepared the people during other supplies any season
ness with disasters ready always) for
drills distribution to the
people or could be
used anytime
N N N N N N %
Svey Rieng
Province
(i) Kampong
14 22 16 20 29 101 14%
Rou
(ii) Svey Teab 26 13 12 3 32 86 12%
(iii) Romeas
37 23 20 6 20 106 15%
Haek
(iv)Rumduol 15 15 14 4 26 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng
3 4 3 1 9 20 3%
City
Prey Veng
Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 14 9 5 4 18 50 7%
Kampong
Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong
21 27 28 27 23 126 18%
Tralach
(ii) Tuek Phos 10 17 12 9 22 70 10%
(iii)Sameakki
9 9 7 0 9 34 5%
Mean Chey
Kampong Speu
Province:
(i) Thpong 7 11 3 0 12 33 5%
Total Per 156 (22%) 150 (21%) 120 (17%) 74 (11%) 20(29 700
100%
Response %)

Table 95. Respondents’ Answer to the Question, “Do you run out of Water During Dry Season?” (per
province)
Province and District Yes No Total Number and Percentage (Per
province)
N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 29 72 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 26 60 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 23 83 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 24 50 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 3 17 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 14 36 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang Province:
 Annex 3 135

Province and District Yes No Total Number and Percentage (Per

province)
N N N %
(i)Kampong Tralach 52 74 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 16 54 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
15 19 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu
(i) Thpong 0 33 33 5%
Total: 202 (29%) 498 (71%) 700 100%

Table 96. Respondents’ answer to the question, “Do you Need the Borrow Pits?” (by province)
Province and District Yes No Total Number and Percentage (Per
province)
N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 38 63 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 27 59 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 22 84 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 27 47 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 8 12 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 12 38 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 42 84 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 15 55 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean 10 24 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu
(i) Thpong 14 19 33 5%
Total: 215 485 700 100%

Table 97. Purpose of borrow pits as perceived by the respondents (per province)
Province and District Source of Source of Serve as No Benefits Total Number and
Water for Irrigation Fish Percentage
Livestock During Dry Ponds per province/district
Season
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 15 8 12 66 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 11 5 8 62 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 8 8 10 80 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 12 5 9 48 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 5 3 1 11 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 21 5 14 10 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 5 29 8 84 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 2 9 4 55 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
2 7 1 24 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 0 12 2 19 33 5%
Total Per Response 81 (11%) 91 (13%) 69 (10%) 459(66%) 700 100%
136 Annex 3

Table 98. Respondents’ reasons why they do not like borrow pits (per Province)
Province and District Possible Risky to Land No Idea / Total Number and
Negative Children used for Answer Percentage
Effects on (might get Borrow per province/district
People’s drowned) Pits
Health could
still be
Used as
Farm
Land
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 24 10 4 63 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 15 8 5 58 84 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 14 7 2 83 106 15%
(iv) Rumduol 14 9 1 50 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 12 6 1 1 20 3%
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 32 8 3 7 50 7%
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 26 8 28 64 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 4 1 8 57 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
1 1 2 30 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 8 1 17 7 33 5%
Total Per Response 150 (21%) 59 (9%) 71 (10%) 420 (60%) 700 100%

Table 99. Respondents’ Answer to the Question, “Do you Need More Water Capture?”
(per Sex and Province/District)
Yes No No Answer/No Idea Total (both sexes)
Province
F (N) M (N) F (N) M (N) F (N) M (N) N %
Svey Rieng 44 51 26 34 143 89 387 55%
(i) Kampong Rou 10 10 8 6 50 17 101 14%
(ii) Svey Teab 10 11 5 11 36 13 86 12%
(iii) Romeas Haek 13 15 4 7 33 34 106 15%
(iv) Rumdoul 9 10 5 6 22 22 74 11%
(v) Svey Rieng City 2 5 4 4 2 3 20 3%
Prey Veng 8 1 15 17 7 2 50 7%
(i) Kamchay Mear
Kampong Chhnang 18 24 44 21 91 32 230 33%
(i) Kampong Tralach 12 17 19 10 54 14 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 5 7 17 7 26 8 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean Chey 1 0 8 4 11 10 34 5%
Kampong Speu 0 1 16 7 5 4 33 5%
(i) Thpong

Total: 70 77 101 79 246 127 700 100%

 Annex 3 137

Table 100. Purpose of Water Capture as Perceived by the Respondents

(per sex and province)
Province and District Source of Use as Fish Could be No Idea Total Number and
Clean Water Ponds used for Percentage
for Drinking / Irrigating per province/district
Household Farm
Use During Dry
Season
N N N N N %
Svey Rieng Province 36 9 31 17 292
(i) Kampong Rou 12 3 10 76 101
(ii) Svey Teab 8 3 5 70 86
(iii) Romeas Haek 10 1 7 88 106
(iv) Rumduol 4 1 5 64 74
(v) Svey Rieng City 2 1 4 13 20
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 3 5 1 41 50
Kampong Chhnang
Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 15 9 5 97 126 18%
(ii) Tuek Phos 11 1 0 58 70 10%
(iii) Sameakki Mean
1 0 0 33 34 5%
Chey
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 0 1 0 32 33 5%
Total Per Response 49 (7%) 26 (3%) 25 (3%) 3(1%) 700 100%

Table 101. Respondents’ Answer to the Question, “Do you Need More Planting to Reduce
Damage to Erosion?” (all provinces)
Respondents’ Answer N %
Yes 593 85%
No 56 8%
No idea 51 7%
Total 700 100%

Table 102. Respondents’ Perceptions on the Usage/Purpose of Planting Trees (all provinces)
Usage/Purpose of Planting Trees N Rank
th
Livestock Fodder 37 5 rank
nd
Source of food (fruits) 408 2 rank
th
Fuel wood/firewood and fiber 73 4 rank
st
Shade from the un 534 1 rank
rd
Stabilize soil 84 3 rank
Note: * Multiple Responses

Table 103. Respondents’ Perception on Who are Usually Involved in Planting Trees in the Communes
Province and District Commune / Father (Men) Mothers Youth (both
Village leaders (Women) Sexes)
N N N N
Svey Rieng Province
(i) Kampong Rou 11 50 13 27
(ii) Svey Teab 7 40 20 19
(iii) Romeas Haek 9 33 33 31
(iv) Rumduol 6 41 11 16
(v) Svey Rieng City 5 27 18 20
Prey Veng Province:
(i) Kamchay Mear 5 27 15 15
Kampong Chhnang Province:
(i)Kampong Tralach 24 56 50 42
(ii) Tuek Phos 27 45 29 20
(iii) Sameakki Mean 6 24 18 1
138 Annex 3

Province and District Commune / Father (Men) Mothers Youth (both

Village leaders (Women) Sexes)
N N N N
Chey
Kampong Speu Province:
(i) Thpong 2 27 18 2
nd
Total/Rank 102 370 225 (2 193
th st rd
(4 rank) (1 rank) rank) (3 rank)
Note: Multiple responses.
 Annex 4 139

Annex 4: Public Consultation on Water Capture (September 2011)

1. Under the Climate Change Mitigation Measures component of TA 7665 Project, a series
of five water capture projects have been identified in Kampong Chhnang Province. Each of
these projects must be described in the IEE and an essential component of this evaluation is
Public Consultation. Public Consultation Meetings were conducted on 7-8 September 2011 in
Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province. The public consultations were organized with
the assistance of the Commune Chiefs in each locality. Potentially Affected Persons from the
villages were invited verbally, relevant provincial government officers invited in writing by
MPWT, and suitable locations organized in pagodas. The venues were :

(i) Roleang Ke Pagoda, Chaong Maong Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong
Chhnang Province
(ii) Keo Buthearam Pagoda, Akphivodth Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong
Chhnang Province
(iii) Vihear Beth Meas Pagoda, Kbal Tuek Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong
Chhnang Province
(iv) There were 3 venues for 4 meetings covering 5 communes, all in Tuek Phos
District, Kampong Chhnang Province. The 4 meetings took 2 days in total.

2. In order to demonstrate Gender Equity in the meetings and ensure a correct record of
comments from villagers the services of a female rapporteur were retained. A “break out group”
to hold discussions among females only was offered but proved not necessary.

3. It was estimated that 150 people might attend the 4 meetings over 2 days and
refreshments were offered to attendees. No other incentives were offered to any persons. The
budget was US$550. In the event 109 villagers attended plus provincial government staff and
consultants.

4. No disputes or conflicts were raised. Competing needs were described but in general all
the villagers were very supportive of the plan to provide more irrigation water for generating two
rice crops a year instead of one. Some pertinent points were :

5. A dam across the river was needed but it would raise the water level upstream where
people currently wade across the river because the water level is low. Could a crossing be
provided on top of the dam ?

6. One lady was concerned that she was so poor she could not afford the money for a
connection to a piped water supply and asked if she could offer her labor in exchange for a
connection?

7. The use of the ex-railway water tank to provide water was enthusiastically supported.
Local residents asked for drinking water not general garden irrigation water. They were willing to
pay for the water if it was cheaper than commercially available bottled water. They were
concerned over who would manage the water supply, would it be taken over by private
operators, and would the raise the price of the water.
A villager offered use of his land for free to show his support for the projects

8. Government officers from MOE, MRD and MOWRAM also concurred with the proposals
and endorsed inter ministry cooperation.
140 Annex 4

Public Consultation Meeting Report

Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province

Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation

Subject: Boeung Khset and Svay Chek Dam
Chaong Maong and Akphivodth Commune
“First of all, I would like to pay the great gratitude to all his/her excellence,
official and non-officials part, and all the participants being present here this
morning. I have the honor to inform you that this morning we are to going to
talk about the new project on the infrastructure in this district. We would like to
get all the possible suggestion and recommendation from all of you to start the
project. At the end, I do hope you all say out your ideas without hesitation.”
Thanks You!
The purposes of the topic/project today are:
First to examine what are the needs of the resident
Question: To examine what the residents do not need?
Question: What are the effects of its both negative and positive on the local
residents?
Request:
The local want us to drain water up, need bigger road to strengthen the
people’s health. I do eager you all say out loud of what you want or not?
How do they affect to all of you? Or any opposed ideas or suggestions.
If there is enough water, bridges, and road, we need to preserve it before and
after draining up.
Some family are even poorer and poorer due to borrowing money from banks
to prepare their son or daughter reception, to buy new materials and at the end
they will have lost their land of having no money to repay the debt.
In order to gain the higher living standard, the villagers should increase the
crops on free space. Delay the planting period to gain the higher yield and
price rather than plant half a hectare and borrow half a hectare.
The villagers should expose themselves to the market information and plant
those crops upon needs annually, as this year: peas cost two million riels per
ton or 2300 riel per kilogram, and rice cost more than one million riel per ton.
Welcome speech from the minister of the Ministry of Agriculture on how to get
high yield of doing farming and spend less.

All in all, I am to show my sincere thank for your actively participation. After the
examination, if it responds to the development of people, ADB will start doing
it.
The topic raised on dams are:
Review the pass: Boeung Khset
Svay Chek dam: since 1989, eight open streams were demolished by the
thieves and its location was full of sand caused soil eroded into the marsh.
Mr. Dork Bunthun, Direcotr of Review the pass: He has been working and development of irrigation system
PDWRAM, Kampong Chhnang for Akphivodth commune, Teuk Phos district since 2006. This project was
Province spend $USD8 million (including buy the land and pay for affected area,
construct).
Svay Chek dam: nearby Svay Chek dam, there was shallow and need to drain
it deeper up, which will be used for irrigating 1800 ha rice field. It was built in
1980 in which supported by AFFC. Up to now, there had been guarded by Mr
Chan Sim, for more than 24 years. Additionally, he has added that this
irrigation system study has been conducted for years including examining the
geographical area and our budget to see how much water it could store. At the
end he concluded that Provincial Department of Water Resource and
Meteorology will try to develop the irrigation system for the villagers and
 Annex 4 141

Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation

support this project wholeheartedly (100%).
Mrs. Ngim Bunra, First Vice Request:
Chief of Akphivodth commune Want the project to rehabilitation the irrigation system in order to cultivate the
rice field for two crops per year, fishing and improve the villagers’ life.
Want nice and bigger road which will be easy for travelling and transport goods
Mr. Tun Chhern, Village Chief, Request:
Thmey village , Chaong Want the project to rehabilitation the irrigation system in order to cultivate the
Maong commune rice field for two crops per year, fishing and improve the villagers’ life.

Mrs. Chhub Vern, Villager, Request:

Khset village, Chaong Maong Want the project to rehabilitation the irrigation system in order to cultivate the
commune rice field for two crops per year, fishing and improve the villagers’ life.

Mrs. Chhub Hein, villager, Request:

Khset village, Chaong Maong Want the project to rehabilitation the irrigation system in order to cultivate the
commune rice field for two crops per year, fishing and improve the villagers’ life.

Mr. Ker Lin, villager, Thmey Request:

village, Chaong Maong Need to have water and agreed to provide piece of his land along/nearby the
commune project.
Mr. Un Sokhom, villager, Difficulties:
Chong Mong village, Chaong His villagers affected by the lack of water to do the farming because their fields
Maong commune are beyond and away from canal.
Mr. Chan Yan, First commune Request:
chief, Chaong Maong Want to have the water level up in the canal in order to be able to irrigate the
Commune lower fields

Svay Chek village Perception: All villagers who are living within project areas very happy and
welcome to have a big bridge in Svay Chek village.
Mr. Mao Key, village chief, The government always develops new irrigation system; the quality of water
Trapaing Chum village, gate must be good and reliable unlike the previous one has been damage
Chaong Maong commune some part already.
Mr. Som Kim, Village Very happy and welcome to have Svay Chek dam and rehabilitation the canal
development, Trapaing Raing that will make his life even better.
village
Mr. Bun Phan, Villager, Need to have bridge with box culvert because it is too weak to support heavy
Ralaing Ker village weight trucks etc., and the old one has been damaged
Mrs. Phoeuk Vy, Villager, Srae Want to have the automatic water gate in order easily to control the in-let and
Prich, Akphivodth commune out-let of water for irrigating into the rice field. It should be better to clearly
study the canal location before construct.
Mrs. Phong Yeit, Villager, Want to have canal and small dike to irrigate water into the rice field.
Trapaing Chum village,
Chaong Maong commune
Mr. Lay Phal, village chief, Pea On behalf of the villager, he very happy and welcome to have these projects
Raing, Chaong Maong because his villagers will be gotten benefit from the dam and there is no
commune problem of construct.

Subject: Water Tower

Akphivodth Commune
Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation
Mr. Ung Vong Doeun,osition: Opening Remark: “This is the precious chance for our villagers that will receive
Deputy-district chief the pure water, bridge, and road. New bridge is going to born here too. In the
recent day, we lack of toilet, health care center, and surrounding environment.
142 Annex 4

Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation

There are more than 4000 villagers benefited from this project and in Taing
commune, there are 267 families and 1980 villagers. Inevitably, water is
precious for life such as drinking, washing, irrigating, and cooking and so on so
forth. However, there is a problem of liquid waste, the villagers should control
carefully, because it can cause health problems. In the final statement, I am
sincerely wishing you all healthy, wealthy, success, prosperity, happiness and
noble. Thanks You!
Mr. Kuy Leng, Commune There are now 2053 families, 300 increases compare to 2010. The population
chief, Akphivat commune in SreTachey village increase to 877 families, but in 2009 the total family is
only 500. Thus, the total population in this commune is 9587 families and 5000
is female (2009) including 18-year population be able to get married is 3050.
So how much land should be prepared for them? What are the possible
problems can be take place unexpectedly.
Mr. Huy Sovanndara, villager, Recommendation:
SreTachey village, Akphivodth He thinks that right now, there are existing some of tube wells within this
commune. areas, therefore, if the water supply fee is higher, it may be difficult for local
villager to use it.
Should be negotiation with the affect people prior construction on water pipe
network.
Mr. Maen Kaing, villager, Water and electricity is government property, can it be handed to the private
SreTachey village, Akphivodth counterpart?
commune If it is handed to the private counterparts, does government have any program
or regulation to help the villagers?
“I do agree with this project”
Mr. Uon BunThoeun, Vender, Question:
Srea Tachey village, He wants to clearly know about the alignment of the project road construction?
Akphivodth commune When will the construction start?
If it is handed to the private counterparts, does government have any program
or regulation to help the villagers?
Mr. Men Sopheap, Former Suggestion:
Health Center Staff, Sre Ta The provider water supply should determine clearly conditions and follow those
Chey Vallage, Akphivodth conditions to the customers and vice versa; and what is the parameter should
Commune be stated within the condition or contract between receiver and provider.
Question:
How much does utility service (water supply fee)?
“Totally, I am wholeheartedly agree and welcome to this project”
What are the problems of this utility set up?
What are the problems of studying project?
Subject: Chiprong Dam
Chaong Maong, Akphivodth and Klong Porpok Commune
Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation
Mr. UngVongDoeun Welcome Speech: “Welcome to all staff and participants for the public
Deputy District Chief consultation meeting, and the villagers.
Question: Do you want a dam in our area?
Looking at Chiprong dam, it was first established in 1973 and had been
damaged in war age. So at to our road lies from Ta Ches village nearby
riverside to Armlaing commune (NR 52) Having seen the difficulties of all
villagers including road condition, water and electricity supply; the Ministry of
Public and Transport Pregame is seeking fund from ADB to help us and we will
have the accessible road, water and utilities supply sooner or later. So I eager
you all please to share your own ideas and this is the significance chance for
you.
What do you want from this project? Do not want from the project? Any affect?
Any question? Please do not hesitate to answer with all questions. Our life is
 Annex 4 143

Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation

prosperous depending on available road for travelling or transporting goods
and services, stable water and electricity supply as we can plant crop, rice and
feeding the fish raising as commercial one.
Question:
Where can our dam be located?
What the techniques in construct this dam are?
What are the possible effects from this dam?
How many families will be affected? How much land will be affected?
How many people will be benefited from this dam?
We cannot escape from the natural forces, but we do have to find way to
protect ourselves in advance. I do hope and happy to hear this project and it
would be succeeded in the near future.
Mr. Tep Bern, village chief, Problem:
Klung Porpok village, Klong We always lack of water annually even though there is some water supplying
Porpok commune from the other sources or dam. It cannot be reached his village.
Please our villagers share idea and opinion about this project?
Question:
How many areas will be flooded if the water gate of Chiprong dam is closed?
Mr. TepChea, village, Klung I am very happy and welcome to have this project
Porpork village, Klong Porpok Recommendation:
commune To establish the Dam Maintenance Committee and Canal Repairing.
Improve the canal in which connecting from the river for irrigation to the rice
fields,
Establishing dam will affect those who use waterwheel due to the water level in
the river will be up and local people can not pass through the river, so they
request to have a small bridge.
Mr. Sem Sat, villager, Sre Ta I am very happy and welcome to have this project
Chey Village, Akphivodth Problem:
commune Related to this matter, there have problem for long time (more than ten years)
the upstream user can be flooded whereas downstream user lack of water for
using.
Recommendation:
To establish the Dam Maintenance Committee and Canal Repairing in order to
manage the water using and avoid to have conflict between the upstream and
downstream users.
Mr. Taon Sel, village chief, Ta Suggestion:
Kam village, Klong Porpok Is that possible to have secondary irrigation canal and water gate, and
commune possible to have water gate of small canal located along the rice field?
Question:
Who is responsible for managing water use?
Mr. Men Sot, village chief, Suggestion:
Boeung Steng village, Klong Create small water gate for water sharing to all village along the canal, and
Porpok Commune rehabilitation the damaged canal.
Mr. Chan Yann, first commune “I do welcome this project of construct dam from 100% to 200%. This project
chief, Chong Mong commune will not affect me at all and those small water gates must have built. Our
commune one-year fund can contribute for two small water gates.
Mr. Keo Chamroeun, vender, Questions:
Sre Ta Cher village, After construct the irrigation system, what will you do next?
Akphivodth commune Create automatic water gate to allocate to all villages along the channel when
the height of water reaches the peak level.
Suggestion:
Provide training course on how to feed the fish or plant any suitable crop
during the flooding time.
The upstream should plant crop depend on the season when it is the flooding
144 Annex 4

Personnel Information Suggestion, Opinion, Question, Recommendation

time, they should feed the fish instead of planting rice, establish resort or part
and so on so forth.
Mr. Chhim Van, villager, Kraoy Suggestion:
Wat, Akphivodth commune There is needed to be managing the water for both seasons (wet and dry
season).
Create automatic water gate to allocate to all villages along the canal.
Subject: Water Capture for using within Communities
Kbal Tuek Commune
Mrs. Sim Run, First commune “Welcome, Ladies and gentlemen! Our topic today is going to talk about water
chief, Chipouk village capture for using within communities and pipe line system distributed to
local communities within the Kbal Tuek Commune.
Mrs. Ngorm Sary, Villager, Request:
Taing Ksach village The quality of pipe lines system, especially primary and secondary pine lines
must be good in order to keep for long time.
Mr. Louch Touch, Vice village Request:
chief, Mong village Want to have a water storage and water tank in his village (Mong village)
Mr. Ngim Leng, Pagoda Request:
committee Want to have a water tank in his pagoda (the Vihear Beth Meas) and in each
village.
Want to have water tap which have 4-5 m from the house in order to avoid
dirty place, so the villagers will not contaminated.
Mrs. Prak Lun, Village Request:
member, Mong village Her house is a little bit far away from the primary pipe line, so she wanted to
know whether the ADB can distribute the water for her or just a well is better.
Want to have water user committee and she want to share water fee for
sustainable used.
Mrs. Kong Din, villager, Taing Request:
Ksach village She cannot afford to connect the water for using and ask the ADB whether it
can pay for her of connecting water in which regarding to the equipment and
she can contribute with labor.
Opinion:
she could pay some money for the water usage committee
Mrs. Ol Sreyvuth, village Request:
assistant, Taing Sya village she want to have water tank, but it is not big in Buddhist structure
want to have a water storage in her village
Mr. Has Nom, village Request:
development committee, Want to have water storage in his village.
Doung village
Mr. Yim Narith, Director of Request:
Wildlife Conservation The primary pipe line should be laid on the ground which have over height
Kampong Chhnang, about 1.50 m above the land.
Want to access the water use in Sleng village, Toul Kposh commune due to
this village is also located within PAWS.
There is needs to establish by-law and water user committee in order to
manage the water using
Mr. Ma Him, Chief of Kbal Request:
Teuk commune, Krasaing Dos Thanks you for your participation in this discussion to let the ADB direct it
Lerng village project properly. I do welcome this project wholeheartedly. The discussion is
ended now!
 Annex 4 145

List of Participants invited within Public Consultation Meeting for

Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Date: 7 – 8 September, 2011

No Participants Person Number Remark

I. Provincial Department
1.1 Provincial DoPWT 1
1.2 Provincial DoWRM 1
1.3 Provincial DoE 1
1.4 Provincial DoRD 1
1.5 Provincial DoAFF 1
1.6 Social-Environmental Unit (SEU) 3
1.7 Director of PAWS 2
Sub-total (People) 10
II District
2.1 Tuek Phos Governor 1
III Commune and Village
Date: 7 September, 2011; at 9:30 AM,
The Public Consultation Meeting will be held in Roleang Ke Pagoda (Wat Ekly Phal), Chaong
Maong Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province
3.1 The Public Consultation for Boeung Khset and Svay Chek Dam Project
A Chaong Maong Commune Chief/Council 2
Thmey Village 3
Chaong Maong Village 3
Roleang Kèr Village 3
Trapaing Chrum Village 3
Khset Village 3
Pea Raing Village 3
B Akphiwadth Commune Chief/Council 2
Trapaing Prinh village 4
Srae Prich village 4
Trapaing Raing village 4
Sub-Total 35
Date: 7 September, 2011; At 13:00 PM
The Public Consultation Meeting will be held in Keo Buthearam Pagoda, Akphivodth Commune,
Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province
3.2 The Public Consultation for Water Tower Project
C Akphiwadth Commune Chief/Council 2
Srae Ta Chey Village 15
Romeas Village 15
Sub-Total 32
Date: 8 September, 2011; At 9:30 AM,
The Public Consultation Meeting will be held in Keo Buthearam Pagoda, Akphivodth Commune,
Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province.
3.3 The Public Consultation for Chiprong Dam Project
D Klong Popok Commune Chief/Council 2
Boeng Steng Village 4
Kroy Wat Village 4
Klong Popok village 4
Tropang Chrey village 4
146 Annex 4

No Participants Person Number Remark

Krobao village 4
E Choang Mong Commune Chief/Council 2
Rolaing Ker village 5
Svay Chek village 5
F Akphivodth Commune Chief/Council 2
Srae Ta Chey Village 5
Sub-Total 41
Date 8 September, 2011; At 13:00 PM,
The Public Consultation Meeting will be held in Vihear Beth Meas Pagoda, Kbal Tuek Commune,
Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang Province
3.4 The Public Consultation for Water Pipe Project
G Kbal Tuek Commune Chief/Council 2
Moang villagel 5
Doung village 5
Tang Khsach village 5
Ngoy village 5
Taing Tya villagel 5
Chi Pouk villagel 5
Krasang Dos Loeung village 5
Representative of Water User Community 1
Sub-total 38
Total (people) 156
Annex 4 147
148 Annex 4
Annex 4 149
150 Annex 4
Annex 4 151
152 Annex 4
 PART IV

RESETTLEMENT PLAN (RP)

-i-
Resettlement Plan

November 2011

CAM: Provincial Roads Improvement Project

(314D, Cross-Border Facility, NR13)

Prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Transportfor the Asian Development Bank.
 ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank

BST – bituminous surface treatment
DMS – detailed measurement survey
EMO – External Monitoring Organization
FGD – focus group discussion
IOL – inventory of losses
IRC – Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee
M&E – monitoring and evaluation
MEF – Ministry of Economy and Finance
MPWT – Ministry of Public Works and Transport
MRD – Ministry of Rural Development
NR – National Road
PDPWT – Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport
PIB – public information brochure
PMU – project management unit
RCS – replacement cost study
ROW – right of way
RSCWG – resettlement sub-committee working group
SES – socioeconomic survey
SEU – social and environmental unit
TA – Technical Assistance

NOTE

In this report, “$” refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.

 DEFINITION OF TERMS

Cut-off date – This refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area
makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorised as affectedpeople.
Persons not covered in the census are not eligible for compensation and other
entitlements, unless they can show proof that (i) they have been inadvertently
missed out during the census and the inventory of losses (IOL); or (ii) they have
lawfully acquired the affected assets following completion of the census and the
IOL and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS).
Affected – In the context of involuntary resettlement, affectedpeople are those who are
Household/ physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter)
AffectedPeople and/or economically affected (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income
sources, or means of livelihood) as a result of (i) involuntary expropriation of
land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally
designated parks and protected areas.
In the case of affected household, it includes all members residing under one
roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by a
project or any of its components.
Detailed – This activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the IOL,
Measurement severity of impacts, and list of affected people earlier done during resettlement
Survey plan preparation. The final cost of resettlement can be determined following
completion of the DMS.
Entitlement – Refers to a range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration
support, transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which
are due to the affected people, depending on the type and severity of their
losses, to restore their economic and social base.
Income – This is the re-establishment of sources of income and livelihood of the affected
restoration households.
Inventory of – This is the process where all fixed assets (i.e. lands used for residence,
Losses commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops;
secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial
value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the Project right-of-way
are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed,
and their replacement costs calculated. Additionally, the severity of impact to the
affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive
capacity of affected people will be determined.
Land acquisition – Refers to the process whereby an individual, household, firm or private
institution is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land it
owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency for public
purposes in return for compensation at replacement costs.
Relocation – This is the physical relocation of a displaced people from her/his pre-project
place of residence and/or business.
Replacement Means the amount in cash or in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing
Cost condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged, at
prevailing market value, or its nearest equivalent, at the time of compensation
payment. The replacement rates of affected assets as determined during the
conduct of the replacement cost study (RCS) will be updated to reflect prevailing
market values at the time of payment of compensation.
Replacement – This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected
Cost Study assets based on empirical data.
Resettlement - This is a time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement
Plan objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities,
resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.
Severely – This refers to affected households who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total
affected productive land and/or assets, (ii) have to relocate; and/or (iii) lose 10% or more
households of their total income sources due to the Project.
Vulnerable – These are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face
groups the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement and
specifically include: (i) households headed by women with dependents, (ii)
disabled household heads, (iii) households falling under the generally accepted
indicator for poverty, (iv) children and the elderly households who are landless
and with no other means of support, and (v) landless households,.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1

A. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement...................................................... 1
C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement .............................................. 2
D. Legal and Policy Framework .............................................................................. 2
E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress ............................................... 2
F. Vulnerability, and gender issues .......................................................................... 3
G. Implementation Arrangements ........................................................................... 3
H. Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 3
I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation
3
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4
A. Project Background ............................................................................................ 4
B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13 ................................................................. 4
C. Civil Works to be undertaken.............................................................................. 6
D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts ........................... 6
III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ................................................. 8
A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts ............................................ 8
B. Data Gathering Instrument ................................................................................. 8
C. The survey team ................................................................................................ 9
D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility ................................................................ 9
E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS) ......................................................................... 9
F. Affected fixed assets ........................................................................................... 9
IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ...................................................... 25
A. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 25
B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs ....................................... 25
C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs .................................................. 27
D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs ......................... 31
E. Amenities of the sample AHs ............................................................................ 35
V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ....................... 41
A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation............................... 41
B. Public consultations during RP preparation ...................................................... 42
C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan ................................................................ 44
D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation ................ 44
VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................... 45
VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................. 46
A. Relevant Laws .................................................................................................. 46
 B. ADB Policies .................................................................................................... 49
C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies ............................ 51
VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS......................................................... 53
A. Objectives ........................................................................................................ 53
B. Key Principles .................................................................................................. 53
C. Entitlements ..................................................................................................... 55
D. Strategy to address gender issues ................................................................... 59
E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households.......................................................... 59
F. Unforeseen Impacts .......................................................................................... 59
IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS ....................................................... 59
A. Relocation Strategy .......................................................................................... 59
B. Temporary Impacts ........................................................................................... 60
X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION .......................................................... 60
A. General Provisions ........................................................................................... 60
B. Loss of productive land .................................................................................... 61
C. Loss of Business Income ................................................................................. 61
XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ..................................................... 62
A. Procedures for flow of funds ............................................................................. 62
B. Cost estimates and inflation adjustment .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.
C. Implementation, administration and contingency costs ..................................... 62
D. Estimated Costs of Resettlement ..................................................................... 62
XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................................................................. 64
A. Environmental and Social Office....................................................................... 64
B. IRC and the Resettlement Department ............................................................. 64
C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee ........................................................... 65
D. Project Supervision Consultants ....................................................................... 66
XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 66
A. RP Updating and Implementation ..................................................................... 66
B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP .................................................. 67
XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................................. 67
A. Indicators for Internal monitoring ...................................................................... 67
B. External monitoring agency .............................................................................. 68
Appendixes
Appendix 1.1: Mitigation Option 62
Appendix 2.1: Socioeconomic Survey Questionnaire 63
Appendix 2.2: Inventory of Losses 64
Appendix 2.3 Master List of affected people 71
Appendix 2.4 Estimated of compensation unit price 84
Appendix 2.5 Minutes of GD Meetings/Attendance 85
Appendix 2.6 Resettlement sites 89
Appendix 2.7 Project Information Booklet 90
Appendix 2.8 Terms of Reference Replacement Cost 94

List of Tables
Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule 3
Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D 4
Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13 5
Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2) 10
Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads 11
Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D 12
Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13 13
Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use 13
Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss 14
Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity 14
Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss 15
Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D 15
Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13 16
Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D 16
Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13 16
Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D 17
Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13 17
Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves 18
Table III.16 Quantities of Fence 18
Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures 19
Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13 19
Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts 20
Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D 20
Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D 21
Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF 21
Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13 21
Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13 22

vii
Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D 22
Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D 23
Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13 23
Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13 24
Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D 25
Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13 26
Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures 26
Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D 27
Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13 27
Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D 28
Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13 29
Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D 29
Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13 30
Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D 31
Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13 31
Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D 31
Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D 32
Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D 33
Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13 33
Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13 34
Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13 34
Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs 314D 35
Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D 35
Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36
Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36
Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D 36
Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D 36
Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D 37
Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D 37
Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D 37
Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13 38
Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13 38
Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 38
Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 39
Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13 39
Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13 39
Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13 40
Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13 40
Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13 40
Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP 41
Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations 44
Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations 44
Table VII.1 Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia 52
Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix 55
Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way 61
Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF 61
Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance 62
Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13) 62
Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities 67

ix
 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. Introduction

1. The Government of Cambodia, through the Ministry of Public Works and Transport
(MPWT), has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for a project preparatory technical
assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. The project aims to
rehabilitate an aggregate of approximately 176 km of provincial road 314D, national road (NR) 13,
150B, NR53, and 151B, located in Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, Kampong Chhnang, and Kampong
Speu provinces, to paved condition to provide a safer, cost-effective provincial road network with
all-year access to markets and other social services for provincial centers of southeastern and
mid-western Cambodia. The existing cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva will be
expanded and developed to facilitate efficient cross border transport and trade between
Cambodia and Vietnam. This resettlement plan is for 314D, the CBF, and NR13. (See Figure 1
for the project location map).

B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

2. The major impacts caused by the project in the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13 include
demolition of structures used for residence and business, and acquisition of occupied land in the
road right-of-way (ROW). According to the inventory of losses (IOL) conducted in 20 May 2011 –
2 June 2011, around 697 households (215 in 314D and 482 in NR13) in 19 communes (7 in
314D and 12 in NR13) are affected by the loss of fixed assets and sources of incomes or
livelihoods.1Forty-fivehouseholds in 314D and 108 households in NR13 are affected by impacts
on their homes and house-and-shops, of which 20 households in 314D and 26 households in
NR13 will lose entirely their homes and house-and-shops and will need to reconstruct behind the
construction corridor. Moreover, 62 households in 314D and 114 households in NR13 are
affected by impacts on their independent shops (i.e., detached from other buildings), of which 45
households in 314D and 57 households will have to relocate their business behind the
construction corridor. In 314D, some 27,936 square meter (m2) of land in the ROW are used or
occupied by private households (12,004 m2 for agriculture and 15,932 m2 for residence and
business), while in NR13, around 47,398.3 m2 of land in the ROW are used or occupied by
private households (44,681 m2 for agriculture and 2,717 m2 for residence and business). Other
fixed structures affected include fences, concrete pavements, extended eaves, pipe culverts and
sign boards. In addition, 96 electric and telecommunication posts (75 in 314D and 21 in NR13)
need to be relocated behind the COI. Around 12,140 perennials and timber trees (2,234 in 314D
and 9,906 in NR13) need to be removed from the COI.

3. In the expansion of the CBF at Prey Var, an aggregate of 24,945.12 m2 of private land will
be acquired, in addition to twohouses and onestore with a combined floor area of 90 m2.
Fifteenperennial and 583 timber trees owned by these private individuals will likewise be
acquired. Twoabsentees (i.e., living abroad or in Phnom Penh) and onelanded local farmer own
the affected plots of land. Twoother households have built structures on the land of twoof the
landowners to oversee the properties. The existing CBF facilities are standing on a 10,982 m 2
government land.

1
This number excludes the 14 houses and shops in 314D and the 44 houses and shops in NR13 whose owners
could not be determined at the time of the IOL because said structures were unattended or locked.
2

C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement

4. In order to avoid or minimize displacement of people from assets and livelihoods, the
existing road alignment will be followed and construction works will be confined within a COI of
10 meters (m) measured either way from the road centerline. In addition, as part of the Project’s
resettlement strategy, affected peoplewill be provided sufficient time to rebuild their homes and
shops prior to the commencement of civil works and that they are able to continue with their
present livelihood activities even during Project implementation. Also, all standing annual crops,
including privately-owned trees, will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in a
particular section of the Project road. The MPWT, through its Project Management Unit (PMU) 3
and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department at
the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will ensure that this resettlement strategy is
carried through diligently.

D. Legal and Policy Framework

5. This resettlement planhas been prepared to address land acquisition and resettlement in
the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13, consistent with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (June
2009) and relevant laws and regulations of the Royal Government of Cambodia, notably the
1993 Constitution, the 2001 Land Law, 2010 Expropriation Law, and Prakas (Government Order)
No. 6, dated 27 September 1999. The resettlement plan includes the resettlement policy and
specific time-bound and budgeted measures for mitigating the adverse social impacts of the
Project, and for rehabilitating all physically and economically displaced persons.

6. The basic compensation and rehabilitation principles adopted in this resettlement plan
are: (i) land acquisition is minimized if avoidance is not possible; (ii) compensation and cash and
no-cash assistance will be provided to help ensure that affected persons are able to maintain, if
not improve, their pre-Project living standards; (iii) affected persons are fully informed and
consulted on compensation and relocation options; (iv) existing socio-cultural institutions of
affected persons are supported and used; (v) the project resettlement policy will equally apply to
women and men; (vi) lack of formal title will not be a bar to compensation and rehabilitation; (vii)
particular attention will be extended to vulnerable groups, such as households headed by women
and the elderly with no other social support; (viii) resettlement is planned and implemented as an
integral part of the project and that the budget for resettlement is part of Project costs; and (ix)
affected persons are not displaced from assets until they are fully compensated for the same.

E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress

7. Key information on the draft resettlement plan has been disclosed to the affected persons
through the holding in June 2011 of public meetings to: (i) present the results of the IOL; (ii)
discuss the salient points of the Project resettlement policy in general term; and (iii) find out from
the affected persons their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation, allowances
and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress and participation. A project
information leaflet in Khmer will be distributed to the affected persons in the first half of
September 2011. Likewise, during the first half of September 2011, the draft resettlement plan
will be posted in provincial, district, and commune offices and on the ADB website. Following
concurrence by ADB of the resettlement plan, the summary of the agreed resettlement plan will
again be disclosed to the affected peoplewith its posting at local government offices, while the full
text of the approved resettlement plan will be uploaded on the ADB website (www.adb.org).
Social monitoring reports will be made available to the affected peopleand will be submitted to
ADB for web posting.

2
 3

8. In case of grievances, the affected persons will first lodge their complaint with the
commune office. If within 15 days settlement could not be reached, the grievance would be
elevated to the district office. If the same could still not be settled at the district level, the
complaint would be lodged at the provincial office. A court of law is the final arbiter of complaints
that are not settled at the local government levels.

F. Vulnerability, and gender issues

9. The IOL has provisionally identified 157 women-headed households, 86 affected

householdsthat are headed by persons within the retirement age bracket of the Government (i.e.,
60 years and older), 6 affected households that are headed by persons with disabilities, and 176
affected households living on very low incomes. Additional measures are incorporated in the
resettlement plan to help ensure that these affected households, who are considered particularly
vulnerable, are not further disadvantaged and that, along with the other affected households,
they will equally benefit from the Project.

G. Implementation Arrangements

10. The MPWT, through PMU3 and the Social and Environmental Office (SEO), and the
Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department of the
Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), are overall responsible for preparing, updating,
implementing and financing the resettlement plan. At the local government level, the MPWT and
IRC are assisted by Resettlement Subcommittee in the provinces and districts through the
Resettlement Sub-committee Working Groups (RSWG).

H. Monitoring

11. The SEO is the Project’s internal monitor, while an external monitoring organization will
be hired by IRC to do external monitoring and evaluation (M&E). During resettlement plan
implementation, which is reckoned to begin at the time of the detailed measurement survey
(DMS), quarterly progress report of internal monitoring and semi-annual external M&E report will
be submitted to ADB. Within one year after the completion of resettlement plan implementation, a
resettlement completion report will be submitted to ADB that includes lessons learned to improve
resettlement work in future projects.

I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation

12. The total costs of resettlement for provincial roads 314D and NR 13 and construction of
the CBF is $1,380,966.58. Below is an indicated schedule of resettlement plan preparation and
implementation.

Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule

Activities Schedule
Resettlement Plan preparation June – November 2011
ADB concurrence of draft resettlement plan November 2011
Resettlement Plan updating April 2012
Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated resettlement plan June 2012
Implementation of the approved updated resettlement plan July – December 2012
Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012
External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013
ADB = Asian Development Bank, M&E = monitoring and evaluation.
4

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Project Background

13. In response to the Government of Cambodia’s request for TA to prepare the Provincial
Roads Improvement Project, the ADB mobilized a group of international and national consultants
in March 2011. The TA was for a period of 14 months with most of the outputs of the consultants
being completed in the first 6 months. Among others, the TA consultants were tasked to do the
following:
a. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of NR13 and 314D. The overall
length of these roads is 91 kilometer (km).
b. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of 150B, NR53 and 151B. The
overall length of these roads is approximately 85 km.
c. Prepare the engineering design for a CBF at Prey Var-Mocva that will provide
efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam.
B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13

14. Provincial Road 314D is gravel road and it starts from NR1 in Prasout Village, Kandieng
Reay commune, Svay Teab in Svay Rieng Province. It runs for 26.6 km to the south and ends at
the Cambodia-Vietnam Border in Prey Var village, Thmei commune, Kampong Rou district. The
ROW of 314D is 40 m, measured 20 m each way from the road centerline.2 With the exception
of several locations where the road crosses a bustling business center (such as Rou village in
Kampong Rou), the existing ROW is basically clear of structures, interspersed occasionally by
huts used for selling goods. Shops within 8 m either way from the centerline of the road are found
in Ro Village. Table below lists the districts and communes traversed by 314D.
Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D
Province District Km Point Communes Village
Svay Teab Kandieng Reay Prasout Ti Muoy
Prasout Ti Pi
Prasout Angk Ta Mouk
Prey Rumduol
Pou Vong
Kampong Rou Preah Ponlea Pring Chrum
Trapeang Run
Tradaet
Prey Thum Prey Sakum
Nhor Trapeang Chhlonh
Rou
Svay Anat
Trapeang Trav
Ksetr Ruessei Am
Thmei Ou
Prey Var
km = kilometer.

15. The CBF at Prey Var will be expanded and developed under the proposed project. The
present CBF is located on a 10.9 hectare (ha) land and an additional 2.49 ha of land adjacent to
2
Government decree Prakas 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachment” (dated 27
September 1999), set the ROW for 2-digit national roads at 25 m from the road centerline, and for provincial roads
at20 m from the road centerline.

4
 5

the present facilities will be acquired. The CBF is located on the right hand side of 314D towards
the Vietnam border.

16. NR13 starts from NR1 at Thmey village, Sangkhor commune, Svay Rieng town in Svay
Rieng province. It runs northward for about 65 km before joining NR8 in Veal Smach village,
Krabau commune, Kamchay Mear district in the province of Prey Neng. For the first 43 km, the
road, with a carriageway of typically 6 m, is paved with double surface treatment (DBST). The
remaining 22 km of the road is earth and gravel. There is visibly more traffic on NR13 than on
314D. However, there are more densely populated areas traversed where houses and shops are
built close to the carriageway, such as in Chak village (Kompong Chak commune), Kampong
Trach village (Kampong Trach commune), and Samruong village (Angk Prasrae commune). Also,
there are more perimeter fences put up by the residents close to the carriageway.
Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13
Province District Communes Km Point Village
Svay Rieng Sangkhor Thmey
Bak Ronorse
Thlork
Preah Tonle
Po Phlear
Akna Kot
Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak
Prey Keav
Sangkae Kouk Srama
Ta Naeng
Poun
Ta Chou
Chrung Popel Trapeang Kruos
Trapeang Kraet
Preah Angk Kaev
Krouch
Kampong Ampil Trasak
Trapeang Damrei
Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong
Trapeang Rumdenh
Thnal Peam
Andoung Pou Bos Kokir
Trapeang Tbal
Trapeang Choar
Trapeang Banteay
Areaks Svay
Kampong Trach Chong Ou
Ta Trav
Kampong Trach
Amkpil Tuek Vil
Trapeang Prei
Ta Mau
Trapeang Popel
Ampil
Traok
Tras Muni Proeksa
Voat
Andoung Trabaek Trapeang Smach
Andoung Trabaek
Kamchay Krabau Tboung Voat
6

Province District Communes Km Point Village

Mear Veal Smach
km = kilometer, NR = national road.

C. Civil Works to be undertaken

17. NR13 and 314D will be paved with single bituminous treatment (SBST) and will have a
standard carriageway of 7 m (i.e. 3.5 m either way from the centerline) and a paved shoulder of 1
m on each side of the carriageway. Existing bridges will be replaced and will have the same width
as the road. Culverts will be extended or replaced as necessary. Ditches through major
commune centers will be lined and covered, and the road will be raised on embankments in
flood-prone areas.

18. The existing CBF facilities at Prey Var are very basic. Land to the east of the road is being
developed by private owners and land to the east has government buildings offering greater
scope for the CBF location. The design of the improvement of the CBF at Prey Var will be
patterned, albeit smaller, after that of the Bavet-Moc Bai CBF located at the end of NR1
bordering Vietnam.

D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts

19. The following measures have been adopted in order to minimize adverse social impacts:
a. There will be no re-alignment of any segment of the road sections.
b. A corridor of only 10 m from either side of the road centerline will be cleared of
obstructions. 314D has a ROW of 40 m (i.e., 20 m from either side of the road
centerline) while NR13 has a ROW of 50 m (i.e., 25 m from either side of the road
centerline).
20. The construction of concrete and covered side drains in major commune centers will also
reduce the COI in said locations. The carriageway and paved shoulder will only be 4.5 m from
the centerline and additional 2 m would be needed for the construction of a side drain on each
side of the road. The covered side drain can double as sidewalk. Following completion of
detailed engineering design, the data on affected assets and people will be updated to reflect any
reduction in the COI in commune centers.

21. Owners of entirely affected shops will be allowed to construct replacement structures
before demolishing the existing ones in order to minimize, if not avoid, income loss arising from
the disruption of business operation. Prior to and after the conduct of the IOL, local officials and
residents have been advised to refrain from building new fixed structures along the COI.

6
 7

CBF
8

III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts

22. The potential impacts of the Project have been determined with the conduct of the IOL
where all fixed assets (i.e., lands used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds;
dwelling units; stalls and shops; miscellaneous structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees
with commercial value; etc.) located inside the COI were identified, tagged, measured, their
owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement values calculated.
Likewise, the severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood
and productive capacity of persons affected by such losses were determined. Photographs of the
affected assets with a placard indicating their location and owners had been taken. Also,
information on the households of the affected persons, such as sources of livelihood, income
level, and ownership of productive assets were gathered. The IOL and census of affected
peoplein 314D were conducted 20–25 May 2011 and in NR13 on 26 May to 2 June 2011. The
IOL and census affected peoplein the proposed expanded CBF were conducted on 5–7 August
2011 based on preliminary information of the boundaries of the expanded area of the CBF.

B. Data Gathering Instrument

23. The basic tool used in the IOL and census of affected peoplewas a survey questionnaire.
Detailed socioeconomic information on the household of affected peoplewhose main structures
(i.e., houses and shops but excluding government buildings) stand to be partially or entirely
affected was obtained with the use of a survey questionnaire written in Khmer. The questionnaire
is divided into 3 sections. The first section seeks basic socioeconomic information on the
displacd people, while the second section deals on the affected assets and livelihoods. The third
section seeks information on other landholdings of the affected people’s households, including
relocation options for those who lose entire houses and shops. (See Appendix 1 for a copy of the
IOL questionnaire).

24. The survey of affected land in 314D and NR13 was limited to measuring the areas of land
within the COI on each side of the roadway that were visibly occupied, and determining their use
(i.e., for agriculture, residence, commerce, both for residence and commerce). With the
exception of ROW land with houses and shops that were attended to when the survey team
conducted the IOL and census of displacd people, it was impossible for the team to determine
the identities of the occupants or users of land in the COI. It was likewise impossible for the
survey team to determine the boundaries, and therefore the areas, of cultivated or built-on plots
of ROW land in open swathes of land adjacent to the roadway because said occupied lands are
not demarcated and there are no cadastral plans available. Also, even for plots of ROW land that
had structures on them, the names and gender of the users or occupants of said plots of ROW
land could not be determined if said houses and shops were locked or unattended to during the
survey.

25. In view thereof, the survey team could only estimate the area of cultivated land (i.e.,
farmland) and woodlands (i.e., degraded public forest with naturally growing tree species) within
the COI. Relatedly, the survey team could only estimate the area of ROW land used for
residence and commerce that had structures on them (i.e., footprint of the structures) and those
that are fenced in. These estimates will be validated and corrected as necessary during the
updating of the resettlement plan, with the assistance of commune officials who will also sit as
members of the Provincial RSWG, the main resettlement body that is tasked to carry out the

8
 9

DMS.

26. Plots of land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF are private.
The identities of the owners of these plots of land, including residents who serve as caretakers of
the properties, have been determined. Fixed assets found on the properties have also been
surveyed.

C. The survey team

27. Other than an international and a domestic resettlement consultants, a team of 13

research assistants that included a survey coordinator, 8 enumerators, 2 computer data
encoders, 1 statistician, and 1 replacement cost (market rates) researcher was organized to help
prepare this resettlement plan. Except for the statistician and the replacement cost study (RCS)
researcher, the rest of the local research assistants were based in the field. The research team
was accompanied by commune or village officials in their data gathering activities.

D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility

28. The survey team met with district and commune officials, including the local population,
prior to the commencement of the IOL and census of affected people. Among others, the
purpose of said public meetings was to discuss the need for the IOL and socioeconomic survey
(SES) and to explain the Project policy on cut-off date for eligibility to resettlement entitlements.
For the purpose of the preparation of the resettlement plan, local official and residents were
informed that the cut-off date coincides with the announcement about the Project and the
completion of the IOL and census of the affected peoplein the districts, which was 25 May 2011
for 314D and 2 June 2011 for NR13. The list of affected peoplewill be updated and/or validated
during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the project feasibility study. The IRC,
the government body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the
implementation of the resettlement plan, will confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS)

29. In parallel with the conduct of the IOL and census of AHs, an RCS was carried out by a
professional appraiser. The objective of the RCS was to establish compensation rates for land,
structures, trees and crops that are sufficient for AHs to acquire or purchase a replacement for
assets lost to the Project without deductions for taxes, and/or costs of transaction. The IOL
survey team members and the RCS specialist spent some time visiting the project sites and
agreed on the classifications to use in categorizing the various affected structures.

F. Affected fixed assets

1. Land
30. A total of [number] ha of land will be acquired for the Project in 314D, NR13 and for the
CBF. All affected lands in 314D and NR13 are within the ROW and as such are State public
land. However, affected plots of land in the expanded CBF are private.
31. 314D. A total of 27,936.2 m² of ROW land in 314D that are occupied or used by local
residents will be cleared for the Project. Of these, 51.19% (14,300 m²) are used for residence,
while 42.97% (12,004 m²) are cultivated, and 5.84% (1,632.2 m²) are used for commercial
activities. All affected plots of land in 314D are inside the ROW and not covered with title or with
legally recognized proof of ownership.
10

32. NR13. Some 47,398.3m² of ROW land in NR13 will be cleared for the Project. Of this,
94.27% (44,681.3m²) is cultivated, while 3.57% (1,690.1 m²) is used for residence, and 2.17%
(1,026.9 m²) is used for commercial activities. There is no private land (i.e., covered by title or
with legally recognized proof of ownership) affected in the rehabilitation of NR13.

33. CBF. In connection with the expansion and development of the CBF at Prey Var, a total of
24,945.72m² of private plots of land belonging to 3 individuals will be acquired. Of the private
land to be acquired, 48.65% (12,135.12 m2) is rain-fed farmland belonging to a landed farming
household. Grazing land makes up 42.33% (10,560 m2) of the total private land to be acquired,
and this belongs to a Cambodian national presently living abroad. The rest of the private land to
be acquired (2,250.6 m2) is residential land belonging to the owner of an adjacent property that is
being developed into a hotel. Government land in the present CBF area is 10,982m².

Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2)

Commune Residential Commercial Farmland Total
314D
Kandeang Reay 1,677.4 808.5 60.0 2,545.9
Prasout 3,624.9 6.0 4,978.0 8,608.9
Preah Ponlea 1,414.0 329.0 0.0 1,743.0
Prey Thum 24.0 0.0 12.0 36.0
Nhor 4,161.9 96.5 720.0 4,978.4
Ksetr 2,767.8 0.0 4.0 2,771.8
Thmei 630.0 392.2 6,230.0 7,252.2
Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2
NR13
Sangkhor 126.0 48.0 12,420.0 12,594.0
Kampong Chak 265.9 128.1 6,445.4 6,839.4
Sangkae 0.0 0.0 5,345.8 5,345.8
Chrung Popel 201.2 120.0 4,311.0 4,632.2
Kampong Ampil 106.0 0.0 810.0 916.0
Angk Prasrae 148.5 88.0 3,840.0 4,076.5
Andoung Pou 107.0 60.0 4,204.0 4,371.0
Kampong Trach 429.0 582.8 4,545.8 5,557.6
Amkpil 22.5 0.0 845.3 867.8
Andoung Trabaek 14.0 0.0 16.0 30.0
Krabau 270.0 0.0 1,898.0 2,168.0
Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3
km = kilometer, NR = national road.

34. In settlement areas and business centers, the identities of occupants of affected ROW
lands had been determined. However, occupants or users of swathes of cultivated ROW land
between settlement areas could not be determined, including plots of land in settlement areas
with no houses or shops or when said houses or shops were unattended to during the IOL and
census of AHs. Their identities will be determined with the active involvement of local cadastral
officials during the DMS. Table below gives a breakdown of the affected ROW land in 314D and
NR13 according to the gender of the head of the affected households (AHs).

10
 11

Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads

Gender of Head of Grazing
Residential Commercial Farmland Total
AH land
314D
Male 8,331.0 1,213.2 60.0 9,604.2
Female 3,504.0 217.0 0.0 3,721.0
Owners not known 2,465.0 202.0 11,944.0* 14,611.0
Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2
CBF+
Male 2,250.6 0.0 12,135.1 10,560.0 24,945.72
Female 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
Total
NR13
Male 1,526.6 596.4 16,342.6 18,465.6
Female 118.5 45.5 4,769.7 4,933.7
Owners not known 45.0 385.0 23,569.0* 23,999.0
Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3
2
m = square meter, NR = national road.
2
*Strips of cultivated ROW land outside settlement areas. +Excluding the 10,982 m of government land at the CBF

2. Main Structures
35. 314D: A total of 107 main structures 3 in 314D are adversely affected by the road
improvement. Of this number, 57.94% (62 structures) are independent shops; while 33.64% (36
structures) are houses, and 8.41% (9 structures) are house-and-shops (see Table C-8).

36. Houses. Of the 36 affected houses in 314D, 6 were locked and unattended at the time of
the survey. Therefore, the identities of the owners of these structures could not be obtained. All of
these 6 unattended houses are entirely affected. Of the remaining 30 affected houses in 314D,
21 belong to male-headed households, of which 9 are entirely affected. Moreover, 4 of the
affected houses belonging to male-headed households are being rented out for about $25 per
month per house. There are 9 affected houses owned by women-headed households, of which 3
are entirely affected. (see Table III.6).

37. The 18 partially affected houses in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 397.8 m 2. Five
partially affected houses of construction grade of 2J (i.e., single floor with plastered brick walls,
concrete columns, and concrete floor) account for 48.14% (or 191.5 m2) of the floor area of
partially affected houses. The 18 entirely affected houses in 314D (comprising 9 of male-headed
households, 3 of women-headed households and 6 of unidentied owners) have an aggregate
floor area of 594.0 m2. Of this area, houses of 2J construction grade account for 29.46% (or 175
m2), followed by houses of 2C construction grade (i.e., single floor with earthen wall combined
with temporary material, such as metal sheet, wood, thatch, or plastic; wooden posts; and
earthen floor) that account for 26.94% (or 160 m2) of the aggregate floor area of entirely affected
houses (see Table III.9).

38. House-and-stores. Of the 9 affected house-and-stores in 314D, 6 belong to male-headed

3
These include houses, buildings, and shops with four walls (not moveable temporary structures of
ambulant vendors).
12

households, of which 2 are entirely affected. All 3 house-and-stores that belong to

women-headed households are partially affected (see Table C-10).

39. The 7 partially affected house-and-stores in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 103.5
m , while the 2 entirely affected house-and-stores have an aggregate floor area of 26.0 m2 only.
2

All of the affected house-and-stores in 314D are of construction grades 2 (see Table C-14).

40. Independent shops. Of the 62 affected shops in 314D, 8 were locked and unattended at
the time of the survey. 7 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. Of the remaining 54
affected shops in 314D, 36 belong to male-headed households, of which 28 are entirely affected.
On the other hand, of the 18 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 10 are
entirely affected (see Table C-11).

41. The 17 partially affected independent shops in 314D have an aggregate floor area of
167.0 m2. 4 shops of construction grade 2F (i.e., single floor with metal sheet walls, low quality
wooden posts, and earthen floor) account for 27.54% (46.0 m2) of the combined floor area of the
partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of entirely affected shops in 314D is 1,003.2 m2.
16 shops of 2C construction grade account for 27.26% (273.5 m2) of the combined floor area of
entirely affected shops (see Table C-16).

Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D

District Communes Village No. Affected Shops*
Kampong Rou Nhor Rou
Ksetr Ruessei Am
Thmei Ou
*Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops

42. CBF: 3 concrete single floor buildings4 with a combined floor area of 332.0 m2 and a 32
2
m thatched hut (construction grade 2C) all belonging to the custom and immigration offices at
the CBF are entirely affected. The household taking care of the affected grazing land has a 35 m2
house (construction grade 1C) and a 35 m2 shop (construction grade 1B), while the household
taking care of the affected private residential has a 20 m2 house-and-shop of construction grade
1A. These caretaker households are male-headed and their houses and shops are affected
entirely.

43. NR13. A total of 222 main structures in NR13 are adversely affected by the road
improvement. Of this number, 51.35% (114 structures) are independent shops, while 47.30%
(105 structures) are houses, and 1.35% are (3 structures) house-and-shops.

44. Houses. 24 of the 105 affected houses in NR13 were locked and unattended at the time
of the survey. 6 of these unattended houses are entirely affected. 57 of the remaining 81 affected
houses in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 12 are entirely affected. Moreover,
1 of the affected houses belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25
per month. Of the 24 affected houses owned by women-headed households, 8 are entirely
affected (see Table C-9).

45. The 79 partially affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 910.3 m 2. 18
partially affected houses of construction grade of 2F account for 27.50% (or 250.30 m 2) of the

4 2
By construction grade, 2 buildings are of construction grade 3D with a combined floor area of 236 m ,
2
and 1 building of construction grade 2J with a floor area of 96 m .

12
 13

floor area of partially affected houses. 14 other partially affected houses of 2J construction grade
account for 25.82% (235.0 m2) of the combined floor area of partially affected houses. The 26
entirely affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 717.5 m2. Of this area, 7
houses of 2FJ construction grade account for 32.47% (or 233.0 m 2), followed by 7 other houses
of 2C construction grade that account for 26.90% (or 193.0 m2) of the aggregate floor area of
entirely affected houses (see Table C-13).

46. House-and-stores. 2 of the affected house-and-stores in NR13 belong to male-headed

households, while 1 belongs to a woman-headed household. All 3 house-and-stores are partially
affected (see Table C-10).

47. The 3 partially affected house-and-stores in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 35.0
m2 only. 2 of these house-and-stores are of construction grade 2J and have an aggregate area of
23.0 m2. There are no entirely affected house-and-stores in NR13 (see Table C-15).

48. Independent shops. 20 of the 114 affected shops in NR13 were locked and unattended at
the time of the survey. 6 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. 73 of the remaining 94
affected shops in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 45 are entirely affected. 1
of the affected shops belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25
per month. Of the 21 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 6 are entirely
affected (see Table C-11).

49. The 57 partially affected independent shops in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of
549.3 m2. 23 shops of construction grade 2F account for 40.92% (224.8 m2) of the combined
floor area of the partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of the 57 entirely affected
shops in NR13 is 1,416.1 m2. 16 shops of 2F construction grade account for 25.07% (355.0 m2)
of the combined floor area of entirely affected shops (see Table C-17).

Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13

No. Affected
District Communes Village Shops*
Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak
Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong
Kampong Trach Kampong Trach
NR = national road.
*Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops

Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use

House-and-
Commune House store Store/shops Total
314D
Kandeang Reay 6 4 7 17
Prasout 10 2 11 23
Preah Ponlea 0 0 6 6
Prey Thum 0 0 0 0
Nhor 5 3 21 29
Ksetr 13 0 6 19
Thmei 2 0 11 13
Total 36 9 62 107
CBF*
Thmei 1 1 1 3
14

House-and-
Commune House store Store/shops Total
Total 1 1 1 3
NR13
Sangkhor 15 1 23 39
Kampong Chak 28 0 14 42
Sangkae 10 0 16 26
Chrung Popel 13 0 7 20
Kampong Ampil 2 0 9 11
Angk Prasrae 9 1 6 16
Andoung Pou 5 0 7 12
Kampong Trach 22 1 19 42
Amkpil 1 0 8 9
Andoung Trabaek 0 0 1 1
Krabau 0 0 4 4
Total 105 3 114 222
CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road.
Excluding the 3 concrete offices and 1 thatched hut of the customs and immigration offices.

Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners*
Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total
314D
Kandeang Reay 5 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0
Prasout 2 4 6 1 0 1 0 3 3
Nhor 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 2
Ksetr 4 4 8 3 2 5 0 0 0
Thmei 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Total 12 9 21 6 3 9 0 6 6
CBF
Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
NR13
Sangkhor 6 1 7 4 1 5 2 1 3
Kampong Chak 12 2 14 6 1 7 6 1 7
Sangkae 3 2 5 2 1 3 0 2 2
Chrung Popel 6 2 8 3 0 3 1 1 2
Kampong Ampil 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
Angk Prasrae 7 0 7 0 1 1 1 0 1
Andoung Pou 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 0 0
Kampong Trach 9 3 12 1 1 2 7 1 8
Amkpil 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total 45 12 57 16 8 24 18 6 24
CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road.
*Houses were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners*
Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total
314D
Kandeang Reay 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0
Prasout 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nhor 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0
Total 4 2 6 3 0 3 0 0 0
CBF

14
 15

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners*

Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total
Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
NR13
Sangkhor 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Kampong Trach 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0
CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road.
*House-stores were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners*
Commune Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total
314D
Kandeang Reay 1 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Prasout 1 5 6 3 1 4 0 1 1
Preah Ponlea 0 2 2 2 1 3 0 1 1
Nhor 3 8 11 1 5 6 0 4 4
Ksetr 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 0 0
Thmei 2 3 5 2 2 4 1 1 2
Total 8 28 36 8 10 18 1 7 8
CBF
Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
NR13
Sangkhor 3 9 12 4 4 8 1 2 3
Kampong Chak 5 5 10 1 1 2 2 0 2
Sangkae 2 8 10 5 0 5 1 0 1
Chrung Popel 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kampong Ampil 2 5 7 0 0 0 1 1 2
Angk Prasrae 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andoung Pou 4 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 0
Kampong Trach 5 6 11 2 1 3 5 0 5
Amkpil 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2 6
Krabau 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total 28 45 73 15 6 21 14 6 20
CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road.
*Shops were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
1A 1 24.0 1A 0 0.0
1C 0 0.0 1C 1 25.0
1D 0 0.0 1D 2 41.0
2B 0 0.0 2B 1 8.0
2C 1 4.0 2C 6 160.0
2D 0 0.0 2D 1 48.0
2F 5 145.3 2F 4 137.0
2G 2 13.0 2G 0 0.0
2J 6 191.5 2J 3 175.0
16

Partially Affected Entirely Affected

Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
3C 1 9.0 3C 0 0.0
4A 2 11.0 4A 0 0.0
Total 18 397.8 Total 18 594.0
2
m = square meter.

Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
1C 1 18.0 1C 0 0.0
1E 1 6.5 1E 1 36.0
2A 1 12.5 2A 1 24.0
2B 7 71.5 2B 1 20.0
2C 2 33.8 2C 7 193.0
2D 2 30.5 2D 0 0.0
2E 2 13.0 2E 2 51.0
2F 18 250.3 2F 7 233.0
2G 5 34.3 2G 2 54.0
2H 3 48.0 2H 4 90.5
2I 1 5.5 2I 0 0.0
2J 14 235.0 2J 0 0.0
2K 1 9.0 2K 0 0.0
3C 6 40.8 3C 1 16.0
4A 12 83.8 4A 0 0.0
4B 2 17.8 4B 0 0.0
Total 78 910.3 Total 26 717.5
2
m = square meter.

Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
2A 0 0.0 2A 1 20.0
2B 1 28.5 2B 0 0.0
2C 0 0.0 2C 1 6.0
2E 1 4.0 2E 0 0.0
2F 2 36.0 2F 0 0.0
2J 3 35.0 2J 0 0.0
Total 7 103.5 Total 2 26.0
2
m = square meter.

Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13

Partially Affected
Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²) Entirely Affected
2J 2 23 0
2B 1 12 0
Total 3 35 0
2
m = square meter, NR = national road.

16
 17

Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
1A 0 0.0 1A 2 52.0
1B 0 0.0 1B 1 6.5
1C 2 34.0 1C 6 95.0
1E 0 0.0 1E 1 24.0
2A 0 0.0 2A 2 30.0
2B 3 34.5 2B 4 119.0
2C 3 8.5 2C 16 273.5
2F 4 46.0 2F 5 126.0
2G 0 0.0 2G 4 123.2
2H 2 22.0 2H 0 0.0
2J 2 15.0 2J 4 154.0
3C 1 7.0 3C 0 0.0
Total 17 167.0 Total 45 1,003.2
2
m = square meter.

Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13

Partially affected Entirely affected
Structure Frequency Total affected Structure Total affected
Classification Entire area (m²) Classification Frequency area (m²)
1A 2 22.0 1A 4 87.0
1B 0 0.0 1B 1 30.0
1C 1 15.0 1C 4 63.5
1E 0 0.0 1E 2 57.0
2A 7 79.5 2A 4 189.5
2B 8 35.5 2B 3 43.0
2C 4 52.0 2C 10 212.0
2D 1 12.0 2D 0 0.0
2E 3 29.5 2E 0 0.0
2F 23 224.8 2F 16 355.0
2G 1 8.0 2G 0 0.0
2H 3 29.0 2H 8 234.0
2J 4 42.0 2J 4 132.6
2K 0 0.0 2K 1 12.5
Total 57 549.3 Total 57 1,416.1

3. Secondary (miscellaneous) structures

50. 314D: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in 314D include 83
pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 12,677.2 linear meters; 107 pieces of extended
eaves with an aggregate area of 2,515.4 m2 (normally used as shops); 89 pieces of concrete
pavement with an aggregate area of 1,970.0 m2; 473 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; a 16 m2
concrete public waiting shed; 12 pieces of metal signboards, and 2 concrete pagoda gates. In
addition, 135 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

51. CBF: The customs and immigration offices at the CBF will also lose a thatched shed and
18

a stupa (small altar for venerating spirits of deceased relatives). Additionally, a concrete fence of
construction grade F6 and measuring 206 meters long will be acquired.

52. NR13: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in NR13 include
126 pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 22,269.6 linear meters; 399 extended eaves with
an aggregate area of 7,496.5 m2 (normally used as shops); 284 pieces of concrete pavement
with an aggregate area of 7,455m2; 13 pieces of tiled pavement with an aggregate area of 218
m2; 3 deep wells and 4 dug wells; 11 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; 10 waiting sheds with an
aggregate area of 224 m2; 9 pieces of metal signboards, and 3 concrete pagoda gates. In
addition, 21 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Structure
Classification Frequency Area (m²) Classification Frequency Area (m²)
314D
1C 1 15.0 1C 2 77.0
2A 4 79.5 2A 4 125.0
2B 24 486.0 2B 25 578.2
2C 0 0.0 2C 5 123.0
2D 0 0.0 2D 1 30.0
2F 0 0.0 2F 15 268.0
2G 0 0.0 2G 1 11.0
2J 3 29.0 2J 15 452.2
2I 0 0.0 2I 1 21.0
3C 3 64.1 3C 2 141.4
4A 0 0.0 4A 1 15.0
Total 35 673.6 Total 72 1,841.8
NR13
1A 12 157.0 1A 44 1,042.9
2A 121 1,678.5 2A 113 2,452.2
2F 0 0.0 2F 1 12.0
4A 8 146.0 4A 46 898.8
4B 28 369.0 4B 26 741.0
Total 169 2,350.5 Total 230 5,146.9
2
m = square meter, NR = national road.

Table III.16 Quantities of Fence

Partially Affected Entirely Affected
Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m)
314D
F1 10,077.0 F1 168.5
F2 1,460.2 F2 465.5
F3 0.0 F3 14.0
F4 220.0 F4 121.0
F5 53.0 F5 22.0
F6 0.0 F6 76.0
Total 11,810.2 867.0
CBF
F6 0.0 F6 206.0
Total 0.0 206.0
NR13
F1 19,168.0 F1 87.0

18
 19

Partially Affected Entirely Affected

Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m)
F2 1,341.2 F2 191.5
F3 587.9 F3 349.0
F4 327.0 F4 211.0
F5 3.0 F5 0.0
F6 4.0 F6 0.0
Total 21,431.1 Total 838.5
CBF = cross-border facility, m =meter, NR = national road.

Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures

Tiled Pipe Metal Sheet Concrete
Concrete Pavement Culvert Sign Board Pagoda gate
2
Communes pavement (m²) (m ) (Count) (Count) (Count)
314D
Kandeang Reay 410.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 0.0
Prasout 110.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 1.0
Preah Ponlea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Prey Thum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nhor 1,327.0 0.0 11.0 6.0 1.0
Ksetr 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Thmei 117.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Total 1,970.0 0.0 473.0 12.0 2.0
NR13
Sangkhor 737.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Kampong Chak 2,008.0 63.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sangkae 940.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Chrung Popel 715.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Kampong Ampil 122.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Angk Prasrae 475.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
Andoung Pou 494.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Kampong Trach 1,868.0 139.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amkpil 81.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Andoung Trabaek 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Krabau 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 7,455.0 218.0 11.0 9.0 3.0
2
m = square meter, NR = national road.

Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13

2
Deep Well Dug Well Waiting Shed (m )
2
Commune (Count) (Count) Construction Grade Area (m )
Sangkhor 0 1 2H 25
Kampong Chak 0 0 2F 9
Sangkae 1 0 2G 43
Chrung Popel 1 0 2H 14
Kampong Ampil 0 0 2H 13
Angk Prasrae 1 1 2G 14
Andoung Pou 0 1 2H 18
Kampong Trach 0 0 2H 52
Amkpil 0 0 2G 21
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 2F 15
Krabau 0 0 - 0
Total 3 4 - 224
20

Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts

Communes Concrete Steel Wooden
314D
Kandeang Reay 4 3 0
Prasout 0 0 0
Preah Ponlea 0 0 0
Prey Thum 0 0 0
Nhor 48 0 69
Ksetr 5 0 0
Thmei 0 0 6
Total 57 3 75
NR13
Sangkhor 2 0 4
Kampong Chak 0 2 5
Sangkae 1 0 0
Chrung Popel 2 0 0
Kampong Ampil 1 0 0
Angk Prasrae 1 0 0
Andoung Pou 1 0 0
Kampong Trach 1 0 0
Amkpil 0 0 0
Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0
Krabau 1 0 0
Total 10 2 9
NR = national road.

4. Affected crops and trees

53. All standing annual crops will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in
a particular section of the Project road. This can be achieved with the synchronization of the start
of civil works and the cropping schedule of AHs cultivating plots of land in the ROW. In the event
that crops can not be harvested before construction, AHs will be compensated at replacement
cost.

54. 314D: A total of 584 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI in
314D. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of this
number, 82 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 1,650 of timber trees of commercial value
will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 14 124 10 148
Jackfruit 12 25 3 40
Teuk Doh Kor 2 14 0 16
Coconut 2 18 0 20
Betel nut 1 5 5 11
Palm tree 3 145 31 179
Kampingreah 9 0 6 15
Guava 4 0 17 21
Papaya 2 2 3 7
Tamarind 1 3 11 15
Cashew 0 4 2 6

20
 21

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Others 32 36 38 106
Total 82 376 126 584
*Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D

Categories
Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total
Pine tree 0 10 0 10
Chankiry 0 0 30 30
Bamboo 8 100 270 378
Cassia 10 246 612 868
Eucalyptus 0 1 44 45
Chhat 0 1 4 5
Flamboyant tree 0 1 13 14
Loeung Reach 0 0 3 3
Rubber tree 0 1 0 1
Smach 0 0 148 148
Other trees 0 13 135 148
Total 18 373 1,259 1,650

55. CBF: A total of 583 timber trees and 15 fruit trees on private and government land will be
acquire in the expansion and development of the CBF.

Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF

Categories
Type of Trees 1 2 3 Total
Coconut 0 3 0 3
Palm 0 5 7 12
Shade tree (Chankiri) 0 0 9 9
Acacia 344 230 0 574

56. NR13: A total of 966 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI
in NR13. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of
this number, 195 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 8,940 of timber trees of commercial
value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Mango 86 333 29 448
Coconut 21 12 2 35
Betel nut 8 0 6 14
Tamarind 1 8 0 9
Jackfruit 18 30 3 51
Palm tree 13 85 1 99
Teuk Doh Kor 0 4 0 4
Papaya 2 15 0 17
Guava 9 4 19 32
Cashew 37 8 0 45
Other tree 0 163 49 212
22

Categories
Type of Perennial 1* 2 3 Total
Total 195 662 109 966
*Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13

Categories
Type of Timber Trees 1 2 3 Total
Pine Tree 2 0 0 2
Chankiry 38 0 1 39
Bamboo 3,188 1 8 3,197
Cassia 5,140 15 0 5,155
Eucalyptus 39 2 21 62
Chhat 0 18 2 20
Flamboya 0 9 0 9
Loeungreach 0 4 0 4
Other tree 0 452 0 452
Total 8,407 501 32 8,940

5. Net incomes from shops

57. Information on the monthly net incomes of households with partially and entirely affected
shops in 314D and NR13 were obtained for the purpose of calculating the probable loss in
income these households would incur if they were to totally stop operation during re-construction
and/or relocation.

58. 314D: Among the 10 households in 314D whose shops are partially affected and who
responded to the query on net income, 6 claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a
month, while 2 claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 2 others
claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops. Similarly, among the
26 households losing entire shops who responded to the query on net income, 15 households
(57.69% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month,
while 6 households (23.08%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month.
5 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops.

59. NR13: Among the 39 households in NR13 whose shops are partially affected and who
responded to the query on net income, 30 (76.92% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a
net income of less than $100 a month, while 7 claimed to earn a net income of between $101
and $200 a month. 2 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their
shops. Similarly, among the 43 households losing entire shops would responded to the query
on net income, 29 (67.44% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than
$100 a month, while 10 households (23.26%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and
$200 a month. 4 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their
shops.

Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D
Net Monthly Income
Total
Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 -
> $200 N/A*
Less $200
Male Kandeang Reay 0 0 1 0 1
Prasout 1 0 0 0 1
Nhor 1 0 1 1 3

22
 23

Net Monthly Income

Total
Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 -
> $200 N/A*
Less $200
Ksetr 0 0 0 1 1
Thmei 0 1 0 1 2
Total 2 1 2 3 8
Female Prasout 2 0 0 1 3
Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1 2
Nhor 0 0 0 1 1
Thmei 2 0 0 0 2
Total 4 1 0 3 8
Thmei 1 1
Owners not known
Total 1 1
*No answer

Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D
Net Monthly Income
Head of AH Commune $100 or $101 - Total
> $200 N/A*
Less $200
Kandeang Reay 1 0 3 2 6
Prasout 2 0 1 2 5
Preah Ponlea 0 1 1 0 2
Male Nhor 4 2 0 2 8
Ksetr 1 0 0 3 4
Thmei 0 2 0 1 3
Total 8 5 5 10 28
Prasout 0 0 0 1 1
Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 0 1
Nhor 4 0 0 1 5
Female
Ksetr 1 0 0 0 1
Thmei 2 0 0 0 2
Total 7 1 0 2 10
Prasout 1 1
Preah Ponlea 1 1
Owners not known Nhor 4 4
Thmei 1 1
Total 7 7
*No answer

Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13
Net Monthly Income
Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total
>$200 N/A
Less $200
Male Sangkhor 1 1 1 0 3
Kampong Chak 3 0 1 1 5
Sangkae 0 1 0 1 2
Chrung Popel 2 0 0 0 2
Kampong Ampil 2 0 0 0 2
Angk Prasrae 3 0 0 0 3
Andoung Pou 3 0 0 1 4
Kampong Trach 3 1 0 1 5
Amkpil 0 1 0 0 1
Krabau 1 0 0 0 1
24

Net Monthly Income

Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total
>$200 N/A
Less $200
Total 18 4 2 4 28
Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4
Kampong Chak 1 0 0 0 1
Sangkae 4 1 0 0 5
Andoung Pou 1 0 0 0 1
Kampong Trach 2 0 0 0 2
Amkpil 1 0 0 0 1
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 1
Total 12 3 0 0 15
Kampong Chak 2 2
Sangkae 1 1
Kampong Ampil 1 1
Owners not known
Kampong Trach 5 5
Amkpil 4 4
Total 13 13

Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13
Net Monthly Income
Gender Commune $100 or $101 - Total
>$200 N/A
Less $200
Male Sangkhor 7 1 0 0 8
Kampong Chak 2 2 0 1 5
Sangkae 1 0 2 5 8
Chrung Popel 3 0 1 0 4
Kampong Ampil 3 1 0 1 5
Angk Prasrae 3 0 0 0 3
Andoung Pou 1 1 0 1 3
Kampong Trach 4 2 0 0 6
Krabau 1 1 1 0 3
Total 25 8 4 8 45
Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4
Kampong Chak 1 0 0 0 1
Kampong Trach 0 1 0 0 1
Total 4 2 0 0 6
Owners not known Chrung Popel 1 1
Kampong Ampil 1 1
Amkpil 2 2
Total 4 4

24
 25

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

A. Introduction

60. A socioeconomic survey (SES) of the affected households (AHs) was conducted in
parallel with the IOL. A sample of at least 20% of AHs losing entire houses and shops and
sources of income, and a sample of at least 10% of AHs are affected by the partial loss of their
houses and shops, were randomly selected from the list of affected households generated
immediately following the IOL in each road section. In road sections where there were less than
50 severely affected households, the SES covered 100% of the severely affected while
maintaining the 10% sample size of the partially affected AHs. Not covered in the SES were AHs
affected only by the loss of secondary structures, such as fences, gates, driveways, in addition
to randomly grown trees (i.e., not in a commercial plantation or orchard) inside the COI.

61. The SES gathered information on the AHs’ living standards and living conditions as well
as their perceptions towards the project. Information gathered has guided the preparation of an
appropriate resettlement strategy for the Project. The SES data set also serves as a baseline of
AH living conditions to form part of the monitoring and evaluation data that will assess the extent
to which the measures of this resettlement plan are effective in mitigating land acquisition and
resettlement impacts.

B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs

62. 314D: 26 of the 51 male-headed AHs and 9 of the 26 women-headed AHs surveyed in
314D are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 17 male-headed AHs
and 11 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their house-and-stores.
Another 8 male-headed AHs and 56 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss
of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are mostly located in the
communes of Kandien Reay, Prasout, Nhor, and Ksetr.

Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Affected assets
Commune Total
Head House House-store Shop
Male Kandieng Reay 5 9 1 15
Prasout 7 1 1 9
Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1
Nhor 2 5 3 10
Ksetr 12 1 1 14
Thmei 0 0 2 2
Total 26 17 8 51
Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 2
Prasout 1 0 2 3
Preah Ponlea 0 1 2 3
Nhor 0 6 1 7
Ksetr 6 0 0 6
Thmei 1 3 1 5
Total 9 11 6 26

63. NR13: In NR13, thirty-four of the 72 male-headed AHs and 6 of the women-headed
AHs surveyed are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 26
male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their
26

house-and-stores. Another 12 male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the
partial or entire loss of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are
mostly located in the communes of Kampong Chak and Kampong Trach.

Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Affected assets
Commune Total
Head House House-store Shop
Male Sangkhor 4 3 1 8
Kampong Chak 4 4 3 11
Sangkae 0 3 0 3
Chrung Popel 6 0 1 7
Kampong Ampil 3 1 2 6
Angk Prasrae 4 0 2 6
Andoung Pou 4 2 1 7
Kampong Trach 9 8 1 18
Amkpil 0 1 1 2
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 1
Krabau 0 3 0 3
Total 34 26 12 72
Female Kampong Chak 2 1 0 3
Sangkae 2 1 1 4
Chrung Popel 1 0 0 1
Angk Prasrae 0 1 0 1
Kampong Trach 1 0 2 3
Amkpil 0 1 1 2
Total 6 4 4 14

64. In 314D, 36 of the 51 male-headed AHs (or 70.59%) and 20 of the 26 women-headed
AHs (or 76.92%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9
years already. In NR13, while 31 of the 72 male-headed AHs (or 43.06%) have been living or in
occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9 years already, 22 other AHs (30.56%)
have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 1 to 2 years only.
Women-headed AHs in NR13 seem to have settled to live and conduct business inside the road
right-of-way more recently than male-headed AHs.

Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures

Years in Affected assets
Gender of AH Head Total
possession House House-store Shop
314D
Male 1 – 2 Ys 3 1 1 5
3 – 4 Ys 5 3 2 10
5 – 9 Ys 18 13 5 36
Total 26 17 8 51
Female 1 – 2 Ys 0 4 0 4
3 – 4 Ys 1 1 0 2
5 – 9 Ys 8 6 6 20
Total 9 11 6 26
NR13
Male 1 – 2 Ys 10 9 3 22
3 – 4 Ys 5 8 4 17
5 – 9 Ys 19 7 5 31
Over 9 ys 0 2 0 2

26
 27

Years in Affected assets

Gender of AH Head Total
possession House House-store Shop
Total 34 26 12 72
Female 1 – 2 Ys 3 0 1 4
3 – 4 Ys 2 4 1 7
5 – 9 Ys 1 0 2 3
Over 9 ys 0 0 0 0
Total 6 4 4 14

C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs

1. Marital status of sample AH Heads

65. Majority (52.94% or 27 persons) of the 51 sample male household heads in 314D are
married, while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other hand, widowed and
married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample 26 AH heads). Also,
single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed AHs.

Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D

Civil Status
Gender of AH
Commune Widow/ Total
Head Single Married Divorced
Widower
Male Kandieng Reay 8 0 7 0 15
Prasout 3 0 6 0 9
Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 0 1
Nhor 5 0 4 1 10
Ksetr 5 0 9 0 14
Thmei 2 0 0 0 2
Total 23 0 27 1 51
Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 1 0 2
Prasout 2 0 1 0 3
Preah Ponlea 0 1 2 0 3
Nhor 2 3 2 0 7
Ksetr 3 2 1 0 6
Thmei 0 2 2 1 5
Total 7 9 9 1 26

66. In NR13, most (97.22% or 70 persons) of the 72 sample male household heads are
married. In contrast, all of the while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other
hand, widowed and married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample
26 AH heads). Also, single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed
AHs.

Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Civil Status
Commune Total
Head Widow/Widower Married
Male Sangkhor 0 8 8
Kampong Chak 0 11 11
Sangkae 0 3 3
Chrung Popel 0 7 7
Kampong Ampil 0 6 6
Angk Prasrae 0 6 6
28

Gender of AH Civil Status

Commune Total
Head Widow/Widower Married
Andoung Pou 0 7 7
Kampong Trach 1 17 18
Amkpil 1 1 2
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1
Krabau 0 3 3
Total 2 70 72
Female Kampong Chak 3 0 3
Sangkae 4 0 4
Chrung Popel 1 0 1
Angk Prasrae 1 0 1
Kampong Trach 3 0 3
Amkpil 2 0 2
Total 14 0 14

2. Physical condition and age of sample AH Heads

67. None of the sample male AH heads in 314D is disabled, although 11 (21.57%) of the 51
male respondents are aged 60 or older. 5 (19.23%) of the 26 women respondents are aged 60
years or older. In addition 2 of the women respondents have disabilities.

Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D
Gender of AH Physical Age grouping
Commune Total
Head condition < 60 Years > 60 Years
Male Normal Kandieng Reay 13 2 15
Prasout 9 0 9
Preah Ponlea 1 0 1
Nhor 4 6 10
Ksetr 12 2 14
Thmei 1 1 2
Total 40 11 51
Female Normal Kandieng Reay 1 1 2
Prasout 3 0 3
Preah Ponlea 3 0 3
Nhor 4 3 7
Ksetr 4 0 4
Thmei 4 1 5
Total 19 5 24
Handicapped Ksetr 2 0 2
Total 2 0 2

68. In NR13, nine (12.50%) of the 72 male respondents are aged 60 years or older, 2 of
whom also have disabilities. None of the women respondents has disabilities, although 3 fall
within the elderly age bracket.

28
 29

Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13
Age AH Grouping
Gender of AH Physical
Commune < 60 Total
Head condition > 60 Years
Years
Male Normal Sangkhor 8 0 8
Kampong Chak 6 5 11
Sangkae 3 0 3
Chrung Popel 6 0 6
Kampong Ampil 6 0 6
Angk Prasrae 6 0 6
Andoung Pou 6 1 7
Kampong Trach 16 1 17
Amkpil 2 0 2
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1
Krabau 3 0 3
Total 63 7 70
Handicapped Chrung Popel 0 1 1
Kampong Trach 0 1 1
Total 0 2 2
Female Normal Kampong Chak 1 2 3
Sangkae 3 1 4
Chrung Popel 1 0 1
Angk Prasrae 1 0 1
Kampong Trach 3 0 3
Amkpil 2 0 2
Total 11 3 14

3. Ethnicity and religion of the sample AH Heads

69. All respondent AH heads in 314D and NR13 are Khmer. All of them are Buddhists by
religion.

4. Educational attainment of the sample AH Heads

70. Majority (49.02% or 25 persons) of the 51 male respondents in 314D went to high school
but did not graduate, while 11 (21.57%) of the male respondents only reached primary school. 4
(7.84%) did not attend school. Among the 26 women AH heads, 9 (34.62%) went to high school
but did not graduate, and only 1 did not attend school.

Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D

Educational attainment
Not
Gender of Finished
Commune Finished finished Total
AH Head None Primary high
Elementary high
school
school
Male Kandieng Reay 2 4 1 7 1 15
Prasout 0 3 1 4 1 9
Preah Ponlea 0 0 0 1 0 1
Nhor 1 2 1 4 2 10
Ksetr 1 1 2 8 2 14
Thmei 0 1 0 1 0 2
Total 4 11 5 25 6 51
30

Educational attainment
Not
Gender of Finished
Commune Finished finished Total
AH Head None Primary high
Elementary high
school
school
Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 0 1 0 2
Prasout 1 0 1 1 0 3
Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 1 1 3
Nhor 0 4 2 0 1 7
Ksetr 0 1 1 4 0 6
Thmei 0 2 1 2 0 5
Total 1 8 6 9 2 26

71. In NR13, majority (48.61% or 35 persons) of the 72 male respondents attended high
school but did not graduate, while 20 (27.78%) of the male respondents only reached primary
school. Five(6.94%) did not attend school. None of the 14 women AH heads attended school,
however.

Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13

Educational attainment
Gender Not Colleg
Finished Finished
of AH Commune finished e Total
None Primary Element high
Head high gradua
ary school
school te
Male Sangkhor 0 1 2 5 0 0 8
Kampong Chak 1 2 0 6 2 0 11
Sangkae 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Chrung Popel 0 2 0 5 0 0 7
Kampong Ampil 0 1 3 2 0 0 6
Angk Prasrae 0 2 1 2 1 0 6
Andoung Pou 0 3 0 3 1 0 7
Kampong Trach 3 8 0 7 0 0 18
Amkpil 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Krabau 0 0 0 2 0 1 3
Total 5 20 6 35 4 2 72
Female Kampong Chak 3 3
Sangkae 4 4
Chrung Popel 1 1
Angk Prasrae 1 1
Kampong Trach 3 3
Amkpil 2 2
Total 14 14

5. Household size of the sample AHs

72. The 77 sample AHs in 314D are composed of 225 male and 155 female members. The
average household size in 314D is 4.96. In NR13, the 86 sample AHs are made up of 214 male
and 205 female members. The average household size in NR13 is 4.93.

30
 31

Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D

Number of Persons in the AH
Commune No of AH Average AH Size
Male Female
Kandieng Reay 52 34 17 5.1
Prasout 33 21 12 4.5
Preah Ponlea 5 8 4 3.3
Nhor 51 32 17 4.9
Ksetr 66 42 20 5.4
Thmei 18 18 7 5.1
Total 225 155 77 4.9

Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13

Number of Persons in the Affected
Average HH
Commune Households No of HH
Size
Male Female
Sangkhor 25 20 8 5.6
Kampong Chak 35 39 14 5.3
Sangkae 10 15 7 3.6
Chrung Popel 13 15 8 3.5
Kampong Ampil 18 12 6 5.0
Angk Prasrae 16 19 7 5.0
Andoung Pou 22 13 7 5.0
Kampong Trach 50 57 21 5.1
Amkpil 13 6 4 4.8
Andoung Trabaek 5 3 1 8.0
Krabau 7 6 3 4.3
Total 214 205 86 4.9

D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs

1. 314D
73. Almost half (43.14% or 22 AHs) of the 51 sample male AH heads derive their main source
of income from farming. Another 13 male-headed AHs (25.49%) are primarily involved in selling
food and non-food items. While a significant percentage (34.62% or 9 persons) of the 26 sample
women AH heads are earning through selling goods, an equally significant percentage (30.77%
or 8 persons) are not involved in productive activities.

Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D

Primary Source of Income
Gender None/
Factory/ Remittance
of AH Commune retired/ Selling Private Total
Farming shop (Cambodia Other*
Head old/ goods employee
worker )
sick
Kandieng
Male 0 9 3 0 1 0 2 15
Reay
Prasout 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 9
Preah
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ponlea
Nhor 4 2 2 0 1 0 1 10
 32

Primary Source of Income

Gender None/
Factory/ Remittance
of AH Commune retired/ Selling Private Total
Farming shop (Cambodia Other*
Head old/ goods employee
worker )
sick
Ksetr 1 7 4 0 0 0 2 14
Thmei 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 6 22 13 1 2 0 7 51
Female Kandieng
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Reay
Prasout 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
Preah
0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Ponlea
Nhor 3 1 2 0 0 1 0 7
Ksetr 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 6
Thmei 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 5
Total 8 5 9 0 0 2 2 26
*Other: Motor bike and bicycle repair, and hair dresser.

74. More than half (53.0% or 27 AHs) of the 51 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a
monthly household income of less than $65/month for a family of 5 people in rural areas. Nine
(17.65%) other male-headed AHs have monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. Similarly, half
(50.0% or 13 AHs) of the 26 sample women-headed AH have a monthly household income
below $65. Another 7 (26.92%) women-headed AHs live on the borderline of poverty.

Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D

Gender Combined Monthly Income of AHs
of AH Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total
Head $65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500
Male Kandieng Reay 2 6 4 1 1 1 15
Prasout 7 0 1 0 1 0 9
Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Nhor 7 0 3 0 0 0 10
Ksetr 10 2 2 0 0 0 14
Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Total 27 9 11 1 2 1 51
Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
Prasout 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
Preah Ponlea 1 0 2 0 0 0 3
Nhor 4 2 0 1 0 0 7
Ksetr 2 2 1 1 0 0 6
Thmei 4 0 1 0 0 0 5
Total 13 7 4 2 0 0 26

75. It can be seen from table below that the sample AHs could only spend for their needs
within the limits of their incomes. A number of them, however, are apparently spending beyond
what they earn in a month and are probably in debt.

32
 33

Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D

Combined Monthly Expenses
Gender of AH
Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total
Head
$65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500
Male Kandieng Reay 1 5 4 3 1 1 15
Prasout 5 2 2 0 0 0 9
Preah Ponlea 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Nhor 4 3 3 0 0 0 10
Ksetr 4 7 3 0 0 0 14
Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Total 15 17 14 3 1 1 51
Female Kandieng Reay 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Prasout 2 1 0 0 0 0 3
Preah Ponlea 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
Nhor 3 3 1 0 0 0 7
Ksetr 3 1 1 1 0 0 6
Thmei 3 1 1 0 0 0 5
Total 13 6 6 1 0 0 26

2. NR13
76. The 3 most common primary livelihood of the 72 sample male AH heads are running
repair shops/barber shops (33.33%), farming (30.56%), and selling food and non-food items
(18.06%). While majority (42.86%) of the 14 sample women AH heads are earning through
selling goods, an equally significant percentage (35.71%) are not involved in productive
activities.

Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13

Primary source(s) of income
Gender Factor
None/ live Sell Private Repair Tota
of AH Commune Far y/
retire stoc good Govt emplo shop/ l
Head m shop
d k s yee barber
worker
Male Sangkhor 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 3 8
Kampong Chak 2 2 0 2 0 1 0 4 11
Sangkae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
Chrung Popel 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 7
Kampong Ampil 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 6
Angk Prasrae 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 6
Andoung Pou 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
Kampong Trach 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 6 18
Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Andoung
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Trabaek
Krabau 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
Total 2 22 0 13 0 9 2 24 72
Female Kampong Chak 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Sangkae 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
Chrung Popel 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Kampong Trach 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
 34

Primary source(s) of income

Gender Factor
None/ live Sell Private Repair Tota
of AH Commune Far y/
retire stoc good Govt emplo shop/ l
Head m shop
d k s yee barber
worker
Amkpil 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 5 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 14

77. More than half (52.78% or 38 AHs) of the 72 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a
monthly household income of less than $65/month. 12 (16.67%) other male-headed AHs have a
monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. In contrast, only 4 (28.57%) of the 14 sample
women-headed AH have a monthly household income below $65. Five(35.71%) women-headed
AHs reportedly earn a monthly income of $101 ~ $200. The amount of poor people will be
confirmed during Detailed Measurement Survey and updating the RP based on appropriate
poverty line.

Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13

Gender Combined Monthly Income of AHs
of AH Commune < >$65 $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total
Head $65 ~ $100 $200 $300 $500 $500
Male Sangkhor 3 2 1 1 1 0 8
Kampong Chak 7 0 2 0 1 1 11
Sangkae 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
Chrung Popel 5 2 0 0 0 0 7
Kampong Ampil 5 0 1 0 0 0 6
Angk Prasrae 2 3 0 0 0 1 6
Andoung Pou 4 2 1 0 0 0 7
Kampong Trach 5 2 6 1 2 2 18
Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Krabau 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 38 12 12 2 4 4 72
Female Kampong Chak 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
Sangkae 2 0 1 1 0 0 4
Chrung Popel 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Angk Prasrae 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Kampong Trach 1 0 2 0 0 0 3
Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Total 4 2 5 1 1 1 14

78. It can be seen from table below that a number of the sample AHs spend beyond what
they earn in a month. It can only be surmised that they are in constant debt.

Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13

Combined Monthly Expenditure
Gender of >$65
Commune < $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total
AH Head ~
$65 $200 $300 $500 $500
$100
Sangkhor 1 4 3 0 0 0 8
Male
Kampong Chak 5 2 3 1 0 0 11

34
 35

Combined Monthly Expenditure

Gender of >$65
Commune < $101 ~ $201 ~ $301 ~ > Total
AH Head ~
$65 $200 $300 $500 $500
$100
Sangkae 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
Chrung Popel 4 3 0 0 0 0 7
Kampong Ampil 2 2 1 1 0 0 6
Angk Prasrae 1 3 0 1 1 0 6
Andoung Pou 1 2 3 1 0 0 7
Kampong Trach 4 2 6 3 3 0 18
Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Krabau 0 0 1 1 0 1 3
Total 20 21 18 8 4 1 72
Kampong Chak 1 1 1 0 3
Sangkae 1 2 1 0 4
Chrung Popel 0 1 0 0 1
Female Angk Prasrae 0 1 0 0 1
Kampong Trach 1 0 2 0 3
Amkpil 0 1 0 1 2
Total 3 6 4 1 14

E. Amenities of the sample AHs

1. 314D
79. Health and sanitation. Most of the 77 sample AHs in 314D have their own well for
drinking (86.0%) and washing (83.0%). However, 40.0% (31 AHs) do not have a toilet in their
homes. Relatedly, 64.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (88.0%) of the AHs
burn or bury their refuse.
Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs314D
Source of potable water
Commune Total
Own well Public well Neighbor wells
Kandieng Reay 16 0 1 17
Prasout 8 1 3 12
Preah Ponlea 3 0 1 4
Nhor 16 0 1 17
Ksetr 16 0 4 20
Thmei 7 0 0 7
Total 66 1 10 77

Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D
Water for washing/bathing
Commune Total
Own well Public well Neighbor wells
Kandieng Reay 15 0 2 17
Prasout 8 1 3 12
Preah Ponlea 2 0 2 4
Nhor 16 0 1 17
Ksetr 16 0 4 20
Thmei 7 0 0 7
Total 64 1 12 77
36

Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D

Toilet facilities
Commune Total
Water-sealed Open pit None
Kandieng Reay 11 1 5 17
Prasout 7 0 5 12
Preah Ponlea 3 0 1 4
Nhor 10 1 6 17
Ksetr 10 0 10 20
Thmei 3 0 4 7
Total 44 2 31 77

Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D

Bathing facilities
Commune Total
Own bathroom None
Kandieng Reay 7 10 17
Prasout 1 11 12
Preah Ponlea 1 3 4
Nhor 10 7 17
Ksetr 6 14 20
Thmei 3 4 7
Total 28 49 77

Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D

Garbage Disposal Used
Commune Dumped by AH on Burned/buried by Total
Collected
wasteland AH
Kandieng Reay 2 1 14 17
Prasout 0 2 10 12
Preah Ponlea 0 0 4 4
Nhor 1 0 16 17
Ksetr 0 2 18 20
Thmei 0 1 6 7
Total 3 6 68 77

80. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. Except for 1, the rest of the 77 sample AHs in
314D get electricity for lighting the public service provider. Wood is the most commonly used fuel
for cooking among the AHs.

Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D

Main source of power for lighting
Commune Total
Rechargeable battery Public electricity
Kandieng Reay 0 17 17
Prasout 1 11 12
Preah Ponlea 0 4 4
Nhor 0 17 17
Ksetr 0 20 20
Thmei 0 7 7
Total 1 76 77

36
 37

Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D

Main source of Fuel for cooking
Commune Total
Wood Gas
Kandieng Reay 16 1 17
Prasout 12 0 12
Preah Ponlea 3 1 4
Nhor 15 2 17
Ksetr 20 0 20
Thmei 6 1 7
Total 72 5 77

81. Household appliances and transportation. Television set is the most common
household appliance, with 65 (84.0%) of the AHs owning one. Next is electric fan (75%), followed
by hand phone (74%). Majority of the 77 sample AHs own a bicycle (84.0%) and a motorbike
(81.0%).

Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D

Household Appliances
Radio/
Commune DVD/ Oven/ Electri Comp
TV Ref casset Phone Plows
CD stove c fan uter
te
Kandieng Reay 17 2 8 13 11 1 14 3 0
Prasout 8 2 6 9 3 0 6 2 1
Preah Ponlea 2 0 1 4 1 0 3 0 0
Nhor 13 0 3 10 9 2 13 1 2
Ksetr 19 1 9 15 13 0 15 1 1
Thmei 6 0 2 6 4 1 7 1 0
Total 65 5 29 57 41 4 58 8 4

Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D

Transportation
Commune
Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck Other*
Kandieng Reay 16 15 0 0 1 1
Prasout 10 7 3 1 1 1
Preah Ponlea 2 3 1 0 0 0
Nhor 13 14 2 0 0 0
Ksetr 19 17 1 1 0 1
Thmei 5 6 0 0 0 0
Total 65 62 7 2 2 3
*Other: Koyon, Oxcarts

2. NR13
82. Health and sanitation. Majority of the 86 sample AHs in NR13 have their own well for
drinking (58.0%) and washing (56.0%). However, 57.0% (49 AHs) do not have a toilet in their
homes. Relatedly, 65.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (95.0%) of the AHs
burn or bury their refuse.
38

Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13

Source of potable water
Commune Buy from Neighbor's Total
Own well Public well
retailers Well
Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8
Kampong Chak 10 0 0 4 14
Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7
Chrung Popel 4 0 0 4 8
Kampong Ampil 3 2 0 1 6
Angk Prasrae 2 2 1 2 7
Andoung Pou 2 1 1 3 7
Kampong Trach 11 1 0 9 21
Amkpil 4 0 0 0 4
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1
Krabau 2 0 0 1 3
Total 50 6 2 28 86

Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13
Water for washing/bathing
Commune Buy from Neighbor's Total
Own well Public well
retailers Well
Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8
Kampong Chak 10 0 0 4 14
Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7
Chrung Popel 4 0 0 4 8
Kampong Ampil 3 2 0 1 6
Angk Prasrae 2 2 1 2 7
Andoung Pou 2 0 1 4 7
Kampong Trach 11 1 0 9 21
Amkpil 3 1 0 0 4
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1
Krabau 1 1 0 1 3
Total 48 7 2 29 86

Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13

Toilet facilities
Commune Total
Water-sealed Open pit None Others
Sangkhor 3 0 3 2 8
Kampong Chak 6 0 8 0 14
Sangkae 4 0 3 0 7
Chrung Popel 2 0 6 0 8
Kampong Ampil 1 1 4 0 6
Angk Prasrae 2 2 3 0 7
Andoung Pou 0 0 7 0 7
Kampong Trach 6 2 13 0 21
Amkpil 3 0 1 0 4
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1
Krabau 2 0 1 0 3
Total 30 5 49 2 86

38
 39

Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13

Bathing facilities
Commune Total
Own bathroom None
Sangkhor 3 5 8
Kampong Chak 6 8 14
Sangkae 4 3 7
Chrung Popel 1 7 8
Kampong Ampil 1 5 6
Angk Prasrae 3 4 7
Andoung Pou 0 7 7
Kampong Trach 6 15 21
Amkpil 3 1 4
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1
Krabau 2 1 3
Total 30 56 86

Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13

Disposal - Dumped by Disposal - Burned/
Commune Total
AH on wasteland buried by AH
Sangkhor 0 8 8
Kampong Chak 0 14 14
Sangkae 1 6 7
Chrung Popel 0 8 8
Kampong Ampil 0 6 6
Angk Prasrae 1 6 7
Andoung Pou 0 7 7
Kampong Trach 2 19 21
Amkpil 0 4 4
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1
Krabau 0 3 3
Total 4 82 86

83. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. While majority (56.0%) of the 86 sample AHs
get electricity from the public service provider, the rest of the sample AHs still use rechargeable
car batteries for lighting and running electric appliances. All 86 sample AHs use wood for cooking,
although some of them also use gas and electricity.
Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13
Main source of power for lighting
Commune Total
Rechargeable battery Public electricity
Sangkhor 0 8 8
Kampong Chak 3 11 14
Sangkae 3 4 7
Chrung Popel 7 1 8
Kampong Ampil 6 0 6
Angk Prasrae 4 3 7
Andoung Pou 7 0 7
Kampong Trach 6 15 21
Amkpil 2 2 4
Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1
40

Main source of power for lighting

Commune Total
Rechargeable battery Public electricity
Krabau 0 3 3
Total 38 48 86

Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13

Main source of Fuel for Cooking
Commune Total
Wood Electricity Gas Cow Dung
Sangkhor 8 4 2 0 8
Kampong Chak 14 3 0 1 14
Sangkae 7 1 2 1 7
Chrung Popel 8 0 1 0 8
Kampong Ampil 6 0 2 0 6
Angk Prasrae 7 0 2 0 7
Andoung Pou 7 0 1 0 7
Kampong Trach 21 2 6 0 21
Amkpil 4 1 1 0 4
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 0 0 1
Krabau 3 2 3 0 3
Total 86 13 20 2 86

84. Household appliances and transportation. The hand phone is the most common
household appliance, with 79.0% of the AHs owning one. Next is a television set (78.0%),
followed by electric fan (43.0%). Majority of the 86 sample AHs own a bicycle (77.0%) and a
motorbike (71.0%).

Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13

Appliances
Commune Radio/ DVD/ Oven/ Electric
TV Phone Computer Iron
cassette CD stove fan
Sangkhor 8 2 6 5 2 8 1 0
Kampong Chak 12 2 10 3 1 8 1 0
Sangkae 7 5 6 4 2 2 0 0
Chrung Popel 7 2 6 4 3 1 0 0
Kampong Ampil 6 0 6 2 3 4 0 0
Angk Prasrae 3 1 7 1 1 3 0 0
Andoung Pou 5 0 4 1 2 0 0 0
Kampong Trach 11 2 15 6 3 7 0 2
Amkpil 4 1 4 4 0 1 0 0
Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Krabau 3 1 3 3 1 2 0 0
Total 67 16 68 34 18 37 2 2

Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13

Means of Transportations
Commune
Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck
Sangkhor 8 8 0 0 0
Kampong Chak 12 12 2 0 0
Sangkae 6 5 1 0 0
Chrung Popel 7 5 1 0 0
Kampong Ampil 5 6 1 0 0

40
 41

Means of Transportations
Commune
Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck
Angk Prasrae 4 5 3 1 0
Andoung Pou 5 2 2 0 0
Kampong Trach 15 12 6 3 2
Amkpil 2 2 2 0 0
Andoung Trabaek 1 1 0 0 0
Krabau 1 3 2 0 0
Total 66 61 20 4 2

V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

85. Participation provides for the occasion and the process by which stakeholders influence
and become co-responsible for development initiatives and decisions that affect them. Through
participation, the needs and priorities of the local population are ventilated; the adverse social
impacts of the Project, including the corresponding mitigating measures, are collectively
identified; and the commitment and feeling of ownership over the Project is engendered among
the APs.

A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation

86. The public, especially the AHs, the local governments and road users will be consulted
and their opinions solicited, and will in fact participate in the preparation, updating, and
implementation of the resettlement plan. Table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities
of the Executing Agency, the local governments, and the AHs in the preparation, updating, and
implementation of the resettlement plan.

Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP

Project Process Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution
Stage
Preparation

Pre-feasibility/ Briefing of the provincial, district, commune, and PMU3 and Consultants
Feasibility village officials; PDWT; and stakeholders about the
Project TA, the resettlement policy, and the
activities of the consultants

Conduct of IOL, census of APs, social impact Consultants, assisted by

assessment, and replacement cost study (RCS) commune/village officials

Discussion with Resettlement Department Ministry of Consultants

Economy and Finance (RD-MEF) and ESO about
the proposed Project resettlement policy

Initial disclosure meeting with AHs to discuss the Consultants, assisted by

results of the IOL and gather suggestions on how to commune/village officials
minimize and mitigate impacts, and discuss about
relocation options.
42

Project Process Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution

Stage
Drafting of the resettlement plan and project Consultants
5
information leaflet and submission to PMU3,
RD-MEF, and ADB for review and approval.

Distribution of information leaflets to AHs, posting of PMU3, IRC-WG and ESO

summary resettlement plan at district and sub-district
local government offices
ADB
Posting on the ADB website
Updating and
Implementation

Drafting/Finalization Set-up resettlement coordinating committee IRC through RD-MEF

of
Technical Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS), updating unit IRC-WG and PRSC-WG,
Design costs (as necessary) assisted by Consultants

Second disclosure meeting/consultation with APs to IRC-WG and PRSC-WG,

discuss results of DMS and discuss the resettlement assisted by Consultants
policy, entitlements and relocation options

Updating/revision of the resettlement plan and the ESO, assisted by

project information leaflet Consultants

Submission of updated resettlement plan and project PMU3

information leaflet to RD-MEF and PMU3 for
approval and endorsement to ADB

Distribution of the updated information leaflets to the IRC-WG and ESO,

AHs and posting of summary updated resettlement assisted by PRSC-WG
plan at district and commune offices

Implementation of Updated resettlement plan IRC-WG and ESO with

assistance of PRSC-WG

Monitoring of resettlement plan implementation ESO (internal) and

RD-MEF (external)
through external
monitoring organization
EMO)

B. Public consultations during RP preparation

87. The resettlement survey team conducted consultations in the affected districts prior to the
IOL and SES activities. The agenda of the consultations included (a) explaining to local officials
and residents what the TA was all about; (b) introducing the members of the survey team, the
reasons for the survey and the schedule for the conduct of the same, including the policy on

5
The Project information leaflet, written in Khmer, contains the following brief information: (i) Project background,
specifically about the civil works to be done; (ii) results of the IOL; (iii) entitlements due to the AHs; (iv) bases for
computing compensation for affected assets; (v) schedule of delivery of entitlements and displacement; (vi) grievance
redress mechanism; and (vii) contact persons at PMU3. (See Appendix 5 for the draft leaflet).

42
 43

cut-off date for eligibility to Project entitlements; and, (c) identifying the major project
stakeholders in the districts and getting their views regarding the road improvement project,
including their suggestions on how to avoid and minimize adverse impacts. A total of 199 local
officials and residents participated in the consultations, 60 of whom were women. (See
Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the pre-IOL consultations).
44

Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations

Location of Number of Participants
No Road Section Date of Meeting
Meeting (District) Male Female Total
1 314D 20 May 2011 Svay Tep 12 01 13
2 314D 21 May 2011 Kampong Ro 19 01 20
3 NR13 21 May 2011 Rom Duol 27 16 43
4 NR13 22 May 2011 Romeas Haek 20 01 21
5 NR13 24 May 2011 Kamchay Mear 40 36 76
6 NR13 25 May 2011 Svay Rieng 21 05 26
Total Participants 139 60 199

88. Following the conclusion of the IOL and SES, the resettlement survey team returned to
the affected districts to hold a second round of consultations, specifically with the AHs. The
agenda of said consultations included (a) highlights of the results of IOL, such as information on
the types and magnitude of impacts; (b) discussion of basic resettlement principles to be used in
the project, such as compensation at replacement cost, public participation, and grievance
redress; and, (c) finding out from the AHs what their views and suggestions are regarding
compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress, and
participation. A total of 525 persons participated in the post-IOL consultations, 234 of whom were
women. See Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the post-IOL consultations).

Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations

Location of Number of Participants
No Road Section Date of Meeting
Meeting (District) Male Female Total
1 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Svay Tep 29 49 78
2 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Kampong Ro 30 13 43
3 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Rom Duol 33 27 60
4 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Romeas Haek 35 30 65
5 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Kamchay Mear 35 36 71
6 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Svay Rieng 130 79 209
Total Participants 292 234 525

C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan

89. The resettlement plan has been disclosed to affected households by way of public
information meetings and dissemination of the public information brochure (attached as an
annex to the resettlement plan). Translated copies of the resettlement plan (key isssues) have
also been disseminated to each district and commune office within the project areas and are to
be AHs accessible. The resettlement plan is also uploaded on the project website of the
Ministry of Public Works and Transport as well as ADB’s website.

D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation

90. Consultation with AHs will continue during resettlement plan updating up to
implementation or resettlement. Particular attention will be given to the poor and other vulnerable
AHs. All consultation and disclosure activities will be properly documented; minutes of

44
 45

meetings, photos, and attendance sheets will be prepared and recorded.

91. Disclosure of the updated RP to AHs will be undertaken through each Commune Office in
the project areas (where it will be made available for AH reading). MPWT (through the PMU3 and
ESO) will disclose the final updated resettlement plan approved by the Government and the ADB
and any revisions to the updated resettlement plan as a result of changes in scope or design
layout. Key information in the updated resettlement plan to be disclosed to the commune office
include (a) relocation and rehabilitation options, (b) entitlements, (c) grievance procedures, (d)
schedule of delivery of assistance, and (e) displacement schedule. The information will be made
publicly available at MPWT, district, and commune offices and will be provided to the AHs in the
form of a project information leaflet (see Appendix 5 for the Project information leaflet). Social
monitoring reports will also be made available to the AHs and will be uploaded on the ADB
website.

VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

92. The objective the grievance redress provisions are to resolve complaints as quickly as
possible and at the local level through a process of conciliation; and, if that is not possible, to
provide clear and transparent procedures for appeal. AHs are entitled to lodge complaints
regarding any aspect of the preparation and implementation of the RP. A well-defined grievance
redress and resolution mechanism will be established to resolveAH grievances and complaints in
a timely and satisfactory manner. All AHs will be made fully aware of their rights, and the detailed
grievance redress procedures will be publicized through an effective public information
campaign. The grievance redress process includes four stages:

a. First stage: AHs will present their complaints and grievances verbally or in writing to the
village chief, commune chief or IRC and PRS working groups. The receiving agent will
be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after
15 days the aggrieved AH does not hear from the village and commune chiefs or the
working groups, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
b. Second stage: The District Office has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to
the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the
District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.
c. Third stage: The Provincial Grievance Redress Committee meets with the aggrieved
party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS
by the external monitor (IMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the
Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM,
PDOWRAM, PDRD, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH.

Final stage: If the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee
or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for
adjudicating complaints. The Court will make a written decision and submit copies to the
MOWRAM, PDOWRAM, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.
46

VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

92. The legal and policy framework for addressing the adverse social impacts of the Project is
provided by relevant policies and laws of the Royal Government of Cambodia and of the ADB.

A. Relevant Laws

1. 1993 Constitution
93. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia sets two basic principles for land acquisition. The
first is Article 44 which states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be
exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just
compensation in advance” (Article 44). The second principle is Article 20 which stipulates that
“nobody shall be forced to transfer his or her ownership, if forcing is not necessary in the public
interest and (if) no proper and just indemnity has been paid to the owner”. These two
principles are also adhered to in almost all countries.

94. Articles 73 and 74 of the Constitution provide for special consideration and support to
vulnerable people including mothers and children, the disabled and families of combatants who
sacrificed their lives for the nation. Indigenous minorities however are not explicitly included in
these two articles but included in the Land Law.

2. Land Law (2001)

95. The 2001 Land Law governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the
provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it defines the regime of ownership of immovable properties,
such as land, trees and fixed structures.

96. The rights and responsibilities of the Government with respect to eminent domain are
specified in the Land Law. The Government can acquire private land for public purposes but has
to pay a fair and just compensation in advance of the land acquisition. The Land Law, Article 5,
states that “No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An
ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided
by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

97. Other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition, compensation and
resettlement include:

a. Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all
transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with the
required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court decision.
(Article 6)

b. Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be recognized.
(Article 7)

c. Only persons or legal entities of Khmer nationality are entitled to own land in
Cambodia; or to buy or sell land. (Articles 8, 66)

d. State public land includes, among other categories, any property a) that has a natural
origin, such as forests, courses and banks of navigable and floatable rivers or natural
lakes; b) that is made available for public use such as roads, tracks, oxcart ways,

46
 47

pathways, gardens, public parks and reserved land; or, c) that is allocated to render a
public service, such as public schools, public hospitals or administrative buildings.
(Article 15)

e. Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to State public land cannot claim
any compensation. This includes land established by the Government as public
rights-of-way for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally occupied
land in a timely manner is subject to fines and/or imprisonment. (Article 19)

f. Ownership of the lands is granted by the State to indigenous communities 6 as

collective ownership, including all the rights and protections enjoyed by private
owners. The exercise of collective ownership rights are the responsibility of the
traditional authorities and decision-making mechanisms of the indigenous community,
according to their customs and subject to laws such as the law on environmental
protection. (Article 26)

g. No authority outside the community may acquire any rights to immovable properties
belonging to an indigenous community. (Article 28)

h. Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law came
into effect) are allowed to be registered as the owner of the land (Article 30). Persons
who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had not yet
completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they were eligible
to be registered as the owner. (Article 31)

i. However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into
effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law for
acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34)

j. Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming purposes
at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The concessionaire may
obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out in a separate
Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

k. Acquisition of land through gifts is permitted with the following conditions: (i) the gift of
immovable property is only effective if it is made in writing and registered with the
Cadastral Registry Unit; (ii) once accepted, gifts of immovable property are
irrevocable; and, (iii) the donor may retain the right of usufruct in the property, and the
right of use and habitation of an immovable property. (Articles 80-84)

3. Other relevant laws and edicts

98. In addition to the Land Law, there are also other laws, decrees, sub-decrees and other
regulations and guidelines that may be relevant to the resettlement in design and implementation

6
As per Article 23 of the Land Law, “An indigenous community is a group of people that resides in
Cambodia whose members manifest ethnic, social, cultural and economic unity and who practice a
traditional lifestyle, and who cultivate the lands in their possession according to the customary rules of
collective use”
48

of subprojects under the Project. The Sub-Decree on Social Concessions, enforced on 19

March 2003, provides legal basis for allocations of State private land for purposes of the
alleviation of landlessness and poverty, including the replacement of land lost in the context of
involuntary resettlement.

99. The private ownership of land was re-established in 1989, and confirmed in the 2001
Land Law (Article4). Cambodians are able to register the land they occupy with the local
Cadastral Administration Office, whereupon a certificate of land title is granted. Issuing land titles
is a lengthy process and most offices have a major backlog of applications. People are given a
receipt and until the official title deed is issued, this receipt is accepted as title for land purpose or
sale.

100. The present legal status of land use in Cambodia can be classified as follows:

a. Privately owned land with title: The owner has official title to land, and both owner and
the Cadastral Administration Office have a copy of the deed.
b. Privately owned land without title: The owner has make application for title to land, and is
waiting for the issuance of a title deed. The Cadastral Administration Office recognizes
the owner.
c. Land use rights certified by the Government: In this case, a receipt for long-term land
use has been issued. This land use right is recognized by the Cadastral
Administration Office.
d. Lease land: The Government or private owners lease the land, usually for a short
period. There is provision for the owner to reclaim land if it is needed for development.
e. Non-legal occupation: The user has no land use rights to State land that he occupies
or uses. The Cadastral Administration Office does not recognize the use of this land.

100. Prakas No. 6, entitled “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and
Encroachments”, sets a ROW of 50 m for NR 2, 3, 6, and 7, and a ROW of 60 m for NR 1, 4, 5,
11, 22, 64, and 78. Exceptions are made for urban areas traversed by these national roads,
where the ROW can be reduced, subject to the decision of the Government. In support of this
Prakas, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) on 6 April 2000 issued Decree No. 961
prohibiting compensation for structures and other assets located in the road ROW.

101. Prakas No. 6 must have been prompted by the influx of people inside the road ROW
following the ouster from power of the Khmer Rouge in 1979 after a reign of four years. During
that short period, private property was abolished and all land records destroyed. The years that
followed after 1979 until the restoration of private property in 1989 were very disorderly, often
chaotic, exacerbated by more armed conflicts. Returning people who were forced to do manual
farm labor during the Khmer Regime occupied any vacant or empty property they could find
along the road and in town centers. To make the re-occupation of abandoned properties and
the distribution of land more systematic, the post-1979 government introduced usufruct rights,
organizing families in rural areas into groups that collectively owned land and assets. Each group
of families had a head, and land was distributed to individual families according to fertility.

4. Expropriation Law
101. The Expropriation Law, passed by the National Assembly on 29 December 2009 and
promulgated by the King on 04 February 2010, contains 8 Chapters with 39 Articles. It provides

48
 49

clear procedures on acquiring private properties for national and public interests. Key Articles of
the Law are listed below.

a. Article 2: the law has the following purposes: (i) ensure reasonable and just
deprivation of a legal right to ownership of private property; (ii) ensure payment of
reasonable and just prior compensation; (iii) serve the public and national interests;
and (iv) development of public physical infrastructure. Article 7:

b. Only the State may carry out an expropriation for use in the public and national
interests.
c. Article 8: the State shall accept the purchase of part of the real property left over
from an expropriation at a reasonable and just price at the request of the owner of
and/or the holder of right in the expropriated real property who is unable to live near
the expropriated scheme or to build a residence or conduct any business.
d. Article 12: an expropriation committee shall be established and headed by a
representative from the Ministry of Economy and Finance and composed of
representatives from relevant ministries and institutions. The organization and
functioning of the expropriation committee shall be determined by a sub-decree.
e. Article 22: an amount of compensation to be paid to the owner of and/or holder of
rights in the real property shall be based on the market value of the real property or
the alternative value as of the date of the issuance of the Prakas on the expropriation
scheme. The market value or the alternative value shall be determined by an
independent commission or agent appointed by the expropriation committee.

B. ADB Policies

102. The objectives of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) are (a) to avoid impacts on
people and the environment, where possible; (b) where avoidance is not possible, minimize,
mitigate, or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people;
and (c) help the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB
resettlement policy includes the following principles:

a. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary
resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through
a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically
related to resettlement impacts and risks.

b. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i)
land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based where
possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land
does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to
assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for
assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through
benefit sharing schemes where possible.

c. Provide physically and economically affected persons with needed assistance,

including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land,
better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and
production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially
into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii)
50

transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit

facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and
community services, as required.

d. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups,
including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them
with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide
them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate
housing.

e. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land

acquisition is through negotiated settlement.

f. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to
land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land
assets.

g. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income

and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and
reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

h. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income

and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and
reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

i. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation

process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a
form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders.
Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other
stakeholders.

j. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or

program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and
benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider
implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone
operation.

k. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or

economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision
throughout project implementation.

l. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of
affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been
achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of
resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

103. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoplesas set out in the Safeguard Policy
Statement (2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for
Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness
as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive culturally appropriate

50
 51

social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result of projects, and (iii)
can participate actively in projects that affect them.

104. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (2006) adopts gender mainstreaming as
a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate in and
that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development
activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is
prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the
design, implementation and monitoring of the project.

C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies

105. In dealing with ODA funded projects, the Government has adapted on a
project-by-project basis to the resettlement policies of donor agencies. Thus, starting in 1999
with the ADB-assisted Phnom Penh to Ho Chi Minh City Highway Improvement Project (Loan
1659-CAM), projects supported by such funding agencies are governed by the resettlement
policies of these agencies and relevant laws and government regulations not consistent with the
same are waived.

106. Table below summarizes how the resettlement policy ADB is applied in Cambodia.
52

Table VII.1Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia

ADB Policy Application in Cambodia \
ADB Policy Resettlement Work
Involuntary Resettlement Policy is applied to ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy is being applied
all development projects resulting in (i) loss of to ADB-financed projects in Cambodia.
productive assets, including land, income and
livelihood; (ii) lost of housing, possibly entire
community structure, systems, and service;
(iii) loss of other assets; loss of community
resources, habitat, cultural sites, and goods.
Involuntary resettlement should be avoided Involuntary resettlement has been avoided as much as
where feasible. possible through consideration of alternative project
locations and narrowing the irrigation ROWs to a
designated corridor of impact (COI) and realigning the
COI.
Where population displacement is Various project options (e.g. bypass road design) have
unavoidable, all viable project options should been explored to minimize displacement to as few
be explored to minimize displacement. households as possible.
People unavoidably affected should be Land-for-land is offered in some cases, though not all
compensated and assisted so that their affected persons who lost land have been allocated a
economic and social future would be generally relocation site. Cash compensation for affected house,
as favorable as it would have been in the trees and other structures and privately owned land.
absence of the project. Additional assistance is given to female headed,
disabled, elderly, and very poor households, and cost
of removal and transport of salvage materials. Some
rehabilitation assistance has been given but not yet
specified to restore to pre-project level. Future job
opportunities at relocation sites have not generally
been considered, with some exceptions.
Compensation paid does not ensure income
restoration and living standards, with a few exceptions.
Existing social and cultural institutions of The existing social and economic situations of the
re-settlers and their hosts should be supported affected persons and their hosts have, in some cases,
and used to the greatest extent possible, and been supported, but not consistently applied.
re-settlers should be integrated economically
and socially into host communities.
The full cost of resettlement and compensation Compensation costs are budgeted in projects funded
should be included in the presentation of by the Banks. It is not possible to determine if this is
project costs and benefits. consistently applied in non-bank-funded projects.
The absence of a formal legal title to land by Absence of legal title to land has not been a
some affected groups should not be a bar to determining factor in compensation payments, as long
compensation; particular attention should be as the AHs are outside of the ROW and other state
paid to households headed by women and land. It is against the law to compensate for ROW
other vulnerable groups,, and appropriate land; however, such compensation has been paid on
assistance provided to help improve their some ADB-financed projects as agricultural land use
7
status. assistance .

7
Land use assistance is provided for productive land in the ROW.

52
 53

VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

107. The Project resettlement policy has been developed taking into account the types,
characteristics, and severity of Project impacts on assets and living conditions of the affected
population, guided by the Constitution of the Royal Government of Cambodia, prevailing legal
and government procedures and policies, not to mention resettlement policies adopted by the
government for specific development projects funded by the ADB.

A. Objectives

108. The paramount objective of the Project Resettlement Policy is to ensure that AHs are not
worse off because of the Project. The Project should provide an opportunity for the local
population to derive benefits from it, and it should likewise serve as an occasion for the local
population to participate in its planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of
ownership over the same.

B. Key Principles

109. Cognizant of the aforementioned, the Royal Government of Cambodia commits itself to
the following principles in the implementation of the Project road:

a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be avoided or
minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project designs and
appropriate social, economic, operational and engineering solutions that have the
least impact on the population.
b. No land acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW in anticipation or
ahead of it being considered for implementation under the Project. Relatedly, no land
acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW until and after the RP has
been updated and approved both by Royal Government of Cambodia and the ADB,
and until and after all entitlements due to the AHs as provided for in this resettlement
policy have been delivered.
c. AHs will be eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of
tenure status, social or economic standing and any such factors that may discriminate
against achievement of the Project resettlement objective. Lack of legal rights to lost
assets or adversely affected tenure status and social or economic status will not bar
the AHs from entitlements to such compensation for non-land assets and
rehabilitation measures or resettlement objectives.
d. AHs residing, working, doing business and/or cultivating land within the Project
impacted areas during the conduct of the IOL, to be validated or updated during the
detailed measurement survey (DMS), are entitled to be compensated for their lost
assets, incomes and businesses at replacement cost prevailing at the time of
compensation, and, depending on the severity of impact on their livelihood and
income capacity, will be provided with rehabilitation measures to improve or restore
their pre-Project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels.
e. There will be no deductions in compensation payments for land, structures or other
affected assets for salvage value, depreciation, taxes, stamp duties, fees or other
payments.
54

f. If ownership over any affected asset is under dispute, the compensation for the same
will be held in a court designated bank until its lawful owner is decided by competent
legal authorities.
g. AHs that lose only part of their physical assets will not be left with a portion that will be
inadequate to sustain their current standard of living. The minimum size of remaining
land and structures will be agreed between the MPWT, the Inter-Ministerial
Resettlement Committee (IRC), and ADB during the updating of the RP and prior to
the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS).
h. Shop owners will be assisted in gradually dismantling and setting up their shops in a
new location to be agreed with the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee-Working
Group (PRSC-WG) in the residual area of the ROW and in a way that will allow them
to gradually phase out their operation in their present location place and gradually
begin their operation in their new place. Under this arrangement, disruption in the
operation of shop owners will be minimized, thereby averting severe impact on the
AHs’ livelihood.
i. People presently cultivating plots inside the ROW will be allowed to continue
cultivating the residual area of their cultivated plots in the ROW, if there is any. If
during RP updating it is determined that the loss of these farmers is equivalent to 10%
or more of their total livelihood or income from various sources, the PRSC-WG will
assist in finding an affordable replacement land with similar productive attributes for
the farmers to lease.
j. Temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-project
conditions.
k. Project stakeholders, especially AHs, will be consulted and given the opportunity to
participate in matters that will have adverse impacts on their lives during the design,
implementation and operation of the Project.
l. Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to, resources owned or managed by the
AHs as a common property, e.g., communal forest, communal farm, will be mitigated
by arrangements that will ensure access of those AHs to equivalent resources on a
continuing basis. Similarly, temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will
be restored to pre-Project conditions.
m. Plans for the acquisition of land and other assets will be carried out in consultation
with the AHs who will receive prior information of the compensation, relocation and
other assistance available to them.
n. There shall be an effective mechanism for hearing and resolving grievances during
the planning, updating and implementation of the RP.
o. Existing cultural and religious practices shall be respected and, to the extent possible,
preserved.
p. Special measures will be incorporated in the RP to protect socially and economically
vulnerable groups who face greater risk of further hardship. These vulnerable groups
include women-headed households, households headed by persons with disabilities,
landless households, children and elderly people without support structures, and
people living below poverty line. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help AHs
belonging to any of these vulnerable groups improve their socio-economic status.
q. Adequate resources will be identified and committed during the preparation of the RP.
This includes sufficient budgetary support that is fully committed and made available

54
 55

to cover resettlement costs within the agreed implementation period; and, adequate
human resources for supervision, liaison and monitoring of land acquisition,
resettlement and rehabilitation activities.
r. Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified and
set in place as part of the resettlement management system.
s. The RP or its summary will be translated in Khmer and placed in district and
commune offices for the information of the AHs as well as other interested groups.
t. Civil works contractors will not be issued notice of possession or notice to proceed
(NTP) for any section or segment of the Project roads until (i) compensation has been
satisfactorily completed for that area; (ii) agreed rehabilitation measures are in place;
and (iii) the area is free from all encumbrances. The schedule of the start of civil
works in any section or segment of the Project road will be coordinated and planned
with the PRSC-WG whose members include male and women representatives of the
AHs.
C. Entitlements

110. For purposes of this resettlement plan (RP), the cut-off date coincides with the date the
IOL was held which was preceded by a public meeting in the districts during which MPWT
representatives and TA consultants briefed local officials and residents about the project, the
compensation policy and the need to conduct the IOL, including the policy regarding cut-off date.
The IOL in PR 314D and NR13 was carried out in on 20 May 2011 – 2 June 2011. The list of AHs
will be updated and/or validated during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the
project feasibility study. The Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), the government
body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the implementation of the RP, will
confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

111. Based on the impacts identified during the IOL, the corresponding entitlements to be
provided to the AHs are presented in the entitlement matrix below. It should be noted that these
entitlements may be enhanced, as necessary, following the conduct of the DMS during RP in
consultation with the AHs to ensure that their livelihoods are restored, if not improved

Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements
Loss/Impacts Persons
Loss of Land Partial loss; All AHs with AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
(all kinds) i.e., only a recognized the start of civil works in the locality.
OUTSIDE the portion of the proof of For the affected portion of the land: cash
ROW land of the AH is ownership who compensation at replacement cost (based on
acquired by the will be affected findings of replacement cost study or RCS; in case
Project and the by the there is no active market in the locality, based on
residual expansion of productive capacity or attributes; without deduction
un-affected is the CBF at for taxes and transaction costs)
STILL VIABLE Prey Var and To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to
for continued the harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber
use. construction of products prior to construction.
by-pass road in If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
3 AHs (at CBF) Chaung entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
Moung
commune
(PR150B)
Entire land is All AHs with AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
lost; i.e., the recognized the start of civil works in the locality.
56

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements

Loss/Impacts Persons
whole land is proof of For the entire land: cash compensation at
affected by the ownership who replacement cost (based on findings of
Project, or the will be affected replacement cost study or RCS and updated to
residual by the reflect prevailing market rates at the time of
un-affected is expansion of compensation; in case there is no active market in
NO LONGER the CBF at the locality, based on productive capacity or
VIABLE for Prey Vor attributes; without deduction for taxes and
continued use transaction costs)
and, therefore, To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to
the entire land harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber
will be acquired products prior to construction.
by the Project. If during RP updating, farmer AHs are found to be
severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10%
1 AH (at CBF) or more of their total income capacity), the AH will be
provided (i) rehabilitation assistancethrough an
income restoration program (IRP) that will be
planned by the Project with the active participation of
the AHs; and (ii) one time assistance allowance of
$200 per household.
If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
Loss of use of Partial loss; All AHs AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
Productive i.e., only a utilizing ROW the start of civil works in the locality.
Land portion of the land for To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to
INSIDE the land cultivated productive use harvest their crops prior to construction.
ROW by the AH within AHs will be tolerated to cultivate the residual area
the COI is of the ROW.
affected. For the affected portion, cash assistance for loss
of land use equivalent to $0.50/m2.
(Identities of the If during RP updating, said farmers are found to be
AHs will be severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10%
determined or more of their total income capacity), the AH will (i)
during DMS and be assisted by the PRSC in finding affordable
RP updating) replacement land with similar productive attributes
for these farmers to lease; (ii) be provided
rehabilitation assistance through an income
restoration program (IRP) that will be planned by the
Project with the active participation of the AHs; and
(iii) one time assistance allowance of $200 per
household.
If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
House, Partial loss of Owners with or AHs to be notified at least3 months in advance of
House-cum-sto house, without the start of civil works in the locality.
re; house-cum-sto acceptable For the affected portion, cash compensation at
Independent re; proof of replacement cost (i.e., present cost of construction
Shops independent ownership over materials in the locality, plus cost of labor and repair
shop; i.e., only the land; with [i.e., 20% of the cost of labor and materials] of the
a portion of the or without unaffected portion). AHs to get cash compensation
main structure building permit at least 3 months ahead of civil works in the
of the house, locality to provide them sufficient time to gradually
house-and-store re-organize the house and/or shop, thereby
, or shop is avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of the same.
affected and the If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
remaining entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
unaffected
portion is STILL Renters of said AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
structures the start of civil works in the locality.

56
 57

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements

Loss/Impacts Persons
VIABLE for use. No other entitlements if not relocating and if
business operation is not disrupted.
Entire house, Owners with or AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
house-cum-sto without the start of civil works in the locality.
re, store is acceptable Cash compensation at replacement cost for the
lost ;i.e., entire proof of entire structure (i.e., present cost of construction
main structure is ownership over materials and labor in the locality). AHs to get cash
affected, or the the land; with compensation at least 3 months ahead of civil
unaffected or without works in the locality to provide them sufficient time
portion of the building permit to gradually re-organize the house and/or shop,
main structure is thereby avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of
NO LONGER the same.
VIABLE for One time assistance allowance per household.as
continued use. follows:
 Houses and regular shops (i.e., can be closed
with four walls) that will move back in
residual area of the ROW: (i) $100 for
affected house; and (ii) $33 for the affected
regular store).
 Houses and regular shops that will relocate
outside the ROW: (i) $200 for affected house;
and (ii) $100 for the affected regular store).
Transportation (moving) allowance as follows:
 Shops and stalls made of light and temporary
materials: $20
 Regular shops and houses moving into the
residual area of the ROW: $40
 Regular shops and houses relocating within the
same village outside of the ROW: $60
 Houses relocating in another village outside of
the ROW: $70
Income loss allowance for AHs of entirely
affected house-and-stores and independent
shops:
 Unregistered: Businesses owners who cannot
show any tax receipt and cannot otherwise
confirm income amount will be provided
one-time cash assistance of $50
 Cash compensation equivalent to the daily net
income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied
by the days of business disruption
If landless, to be provided free of charge with
substitute plot with an area of approximately 105
m² outside of the ROW and in a location acceptable
to the AH, with secure tenure under the land
concession law, accessible, with or close to source of
potable water, and with latrine.
If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
Renters of AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
entirely the start of civil works in the locality.
affected house Transportation (moving) allowance of $50
and One time assistance allowance of $33 per
house-and-stor household. for relocating tenants of affected regular
e shop and house.
Rental allowance equivalent to 2 months of rent of a
similar building in the locality.
58

Type of Application Eligible Entitlements

Loss/Impacts Persons
If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see
entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.
Miscellaneous/o Loss of, or Owners of the AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
ther structures damage to, structures with the start of civil works in the locality.
(porch, assets or without Cash compensation at replacement cost for the
extended eaves, acceptable affected assets (i.e., present cost of construction
spirit house, proof of materials and labor in the locality).
fence, etc.) ownership over
the land; with
or without
building permit
Crops and trees Loss of, or Owners AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of
damage to, regardless of the start of civil works in the locality.
assets tenure status To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to
harvest their annual and perennial crops prior to
construction.
Perennial and timber trees will be compensated in
cash as per replacement cost study.
Public Facilities Loss of, or Institutions that Institution to be notified at least 3 months in
(Government-o damage to, own the advance of the start of civil works in the locality.
wned structures) assets affected assets To be reconstructed, restored and/or relocated by the
civil works contractor

Higher risks of Loss of house Vulnerable One time assistance allowance of $100 per
hardship due to and shops, Groups: AHs household.
project impacts paddy land belonging to Participate in income restoration program
within the ROW one or more of
the following
vulnerable
groups: (i)
living below the
poverty line; (ii)
AHs headed by
women and
AHs headed by
the elderly with
no social
support; and
(iii) households
that are
headed by
persons with
disabilities;
Impacts during Contractors will be responsible for paying rental in
Construction cash for land outside the ROW which will be not less
than the net income that would have been derived
from the affected property during disruption.
Restoration of land within 3 months after use.
Non-land assets within the residual area of the ROW
and/or outside of the ROW that are adversely
impacted by construction activities will be
compensated at replacement cost by the civil works
contractor.

58
 59

D. Strategy to address gender issues

112. The Project includes the following specific actions to address gender issues in the Project:

a. A male representative and a female representative of the AHs in a commune will

seat in the district RSC-WG.
b. In conducting the DMS, consultations on resettlement activities and relocation
options, both women and men will participate in the discussions.
c. Gender issues will be included in training on the Project resettlement policy that
will be provided to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO of MPWT, and the
RSC-WGs.
d. Special measures will be taken in the relocation of elderly, disabled and
women-headed households in terms of location of new sites for affected shops
and houses.
e. Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for monitoring
social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities.
E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households

113. As discusses in the preceding sections, on top of the compensation and applicable
allowance that vulnerable AHs will receive for their losses as provided in the entitlement matrix,
vulnerable AH, AHs are entitled to participate in the income restoration that will be designed with
their active involvement.

114. The project will foster full participation of vulnerable households in meaningful
consultations so that they are able to participate in decisions which affect them.

F. Unforeseen Impacts

115. If during the DMS, additional adverse social impacts are identified and/or additional AHs
are found, these persons and households are entitled to receive Project entitlements as the
others on condition that it can be ascertained that they have actually been in the Project ROW
even before 20-15 May 2011 in 314D and on 26 May to 2 June 2011 in NR13, the cut-off date for
eligibility8. New AHs that will emerge due to changes in Project design or alignment prior to or
even during construction works are likewise entitled to the same entitlements as those of the
other AHs.

IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS

A. Relocation Strategy

116. The PRSC-WG will endeavor to ensure minimal disruption in the livelihood activities of
the owners of the 103 entirely affected independent shops (i.e., 45 in 314D, 1 in the CBF, and 57
in NR13); the 74 partially affected independent shops (i.e., 17 in 314D and 57 in NR13); the 3
entirely affected house-and-stores (i.e., 2 in 314D and 1 at the CBF); and 10 partially-affected

8
To be confirmed by the IRC.
60

house-and-stores (i.e., 7 in 314D and 3 in NR13). Through the PRSC-WG the shop owners
will be informed regarding the schedule of civil works in a specific section of 314D and NR13 at
least 3 months in advance.

117. All AHs affected by the entire loss of their houses and shops can move behind the
residual area of the ROW. If it is not possible for the AH to rebuild behind where their affected
structures presently stand, the PRSC-WG, in consultation and with the active participation of the
AHs, will look for a place elsewhere in the ROW outside of the COI. The shifting of entirely
affected shops will be done in a way that will allow the AHs to gradually phase out their operation
in their present location and gradually begin their operation in their new place. Under this
arrangement, the shop owners, whose business caters greatly to road users, will not experience
total disruption in their operation.

B. Temporary Impacts

118. To ensure that temporary impacts during construction will be avoided, if not minimized,
the contract for civil works will include the following provisions: (a) contractor to pay rent for any
land required for construction work space outside the ROW; (b) to the extent possible, only idle
land will be used as construction work space to avoid disruption to households and business
establishments; and (c) temporary use of land will be restored or improved to its pre-Project
condition. The PMU3, assisted by the PRSC, will review any written agreement with the AHs,
payment records, and disbursement of payment to ensure proper monitoring and compliance
with the Project resettlement policy. Said monitoring will be included in the quarterly progress
reports of the PMU3 to be submitted to MPWT and the ADB.

X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

A. General Provisions

119. An income restoration program (IRP) will be planned and developed with the assistance
of community development specialists to be hired by IRC for the purpose. While those who are
entitled to participate in program include AHs affected by the loss of entire shops, it is not
expected that the Project will severely disrupt the business operation of shop owners. Therefore,
the focus of the IRP is more on helping the poor and other vulnerable AHs improve their
situation. For this purpose, the IRP will be designed during the updating of the RP and will be
implemented in parallel with the implementation of the RP with the active involvement of the
participating AHs.

120. The IRP will be geared towards helping the participating AHs produce for their basic
needs within one years. This will be accomplished by helping them find ways to (a) maximize the
use of their remaining lands for food production (rice and vegetables), (b) engage in fast-return
and short-cycle backyard livestock production, and (c) find work in urban areas. The IRP strategy
puts emphasis on food production, aware of the fact that the AHs are mostly, if not all, farmers
and that production in the project area is basically for home consumption. Farm production will
be augmented by small-scale, short-cycle livestock production on the remaining lands of the
AHs. This activity is intended to provide both food and cash to the AHs. It is also intended to
provide livelihood to members of the AHs who are no longer able to seek employment in
factories and shops in urban areas, such as the elderly. In addition to the two activities, members
of the AHs that are within the working age (15 to 60 years old) will be provided training, as
needed, and referred to establishments in need of workers. This component of the strategy is
also intended to bring in cash for the other basic needs of the AHs.

60
 61

121. For purposes of budgeting, and assuming that there is not double counting9, a total of 536
AHs are entitled to participate in the IRP. A provisional sum is allocated in the resettlement
budget to finance the various components of the IRP, notably, training in food production, seed
capital for home-based livestock and food production, and training for job placement. The
allocated amount for each AH will not be given to the household but will be used as a block fund
to support the various components of the program. The specific implementation mechanism for
the use of the IRP funds will be spelled out in the planning of the program. Therefore, the block
fund that will be put up for the 536 AHs is $160,800.

B. Loss of productive land

1. Land within the Right of Way

122. Occupied land in the ROW will not be compensated. However, AHs affected by the loss
of ROW land used for agriculture will be provided cash assistance for permanent loss of land use
at $0.50per m2 as explained in the section on Project Resettlement Policy.

Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way

Road Section Quantity (m2)
314D 12,004.0
NR13 44,681.3
Total 55,685.3

2. Privately Owned Land

123. Privately owned land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF at
Prey Var (314D) will be compensated at prevailing market rates.

Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF

Types of Land Area (m2)
Farmland 12,135.12
Grazing land 10,560.0
Total 24,945.72

C. Loss of Business Income

124. Owners of unregistered independent shops and house-and-stores that are entirely
affected are each entitled to receive one-time cash assistance (allowance) of $50 for loss of
income. None of the owners of entirely affected shops claimed to be registered.10 In all, $2,350
is allocated for 314D for income loss allowance, while $100 is allocated for the CBF, and $2,850
for NR13.

9
Some of the AHs in the vulnerable groups could also be among those losing entire houses and shops.
10
If during the DMS, registered entirely affected shops are found, owners of the same will be provided
income loss allowance equivalent to the daily net income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied by the
days of business disruption.
62

Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance

314D CBF NR13
Income Loss Income Loss Income Loss
Main Structures Count Count Count
Allowance ($) Allowance ($) Allowance ($)
House-and-store 2 100 1 50 0 00
Independent
45 2,250 1 50 57 2,850
shops
Total 47 2,350 2 100 57 2,850

XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

125. Funds for the implementation of the RP are part of the Project budget. Costs have been
estimated based on results of the IOL and the RCS as of July 2011.

A. Procedures for flow of funds

126. The IRC will request the MEF for the funds to implement the RP. The funds will be
forwarded to the Provincial Department of Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the
RD-MEF for submission to and approval by the IRC. Funds for compensation and other
entitlements will be forwarded by the Provincial Department of Finance to the PRSC for
disbursement. Payment of compensation and other entitlements, except for land-for-land
arrangements, will be in cash and will be given in commune offices. The AHs will be notified
through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

B. Implementation, administration and contingency costs

127. Implementation costs cover payment of allowances and per diem of concerned personnel
involved in the updating and implementation of the RP, including members of the provincial and
district resettlement working groups. Administrative costs and contingencies amounting to 15%
each have been added on top of the cost of resettlement. MPWT and IRC will ensure that
adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely
implementation of resettlement.

C. Estimated Costs of Resettlement

128. The estimated cost of resettlement is US$1,380,966.58, inclusive of the cost for hiring an
external monitoring agency. Table XI.1 provides a breakdown of these costs.

Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13)

Rate AMOUNT
Items Unit Quantity
($/Unit) (US$)
LAND 88,442.41
Cultivated ROW land (loss of land use) m² 55,685.3 0.50 27,842.65
Private residential land (CBF) m² 2,250.6 11.80 26,557.08
Private agriculture/grazing land (CBF) m² 57,935.9 1.5 34,042.68

MAIN STRUCTURES 108,918.21

Partially affected houses and independent shops m² 2,162.9 varied 50,018.26
Repair cost of partially affected main structures $ 50,018.26 20% 10,003.65
Entirely affected houses and independent shops m² 3,846.80 varied 48,896.30

SECONDARY STRUCTURES 487,304.41

Extended eaves m² 10,011.90 varied 352,481.47

62
 63

Rate AMOUNT
Items Unit Quantity
($/Unit) (US$)
Fence LM 35,152.80 varied 59,754.95
Shed m² 240.0 varied 3,996.20
Assorted other structures - - varied 71,071.79

TREES (Perennials and timber) No 12,738 varied 122,261.26

Sub-Total 1 806,926.29
ALLOWANCES AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS
@
Transportation allowance for relocating house and shops AH 151 $50 7,550.00
Transportation allowance for 6 relocating house/shop
AH 6 $50 300.00
renters
One time assistance allowance for relocating house * AH 48 200 9,600.00
One time assistance allowance for relocating independent
AH 103 100 10,300.00
shops *
Income loss allowance for relocating shop, house/shop AH 106 $50 5,300.00
Rental allowance for relocating renters of house/store AH 6 $33 198.00
&
One time assistance allowance for vulnerable AHs AH 90 100 9,000.00
Income restoration program (IRP) block fund 536 $300 160,800.00

Sub-Total 2 203,048.00
External Monitoring/Evaluation Lump sum 68,000.00
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 1,009,974.29
Administrative Cost (15%) 151,496.14
Costs contingencies (15%) 151,496.14
GRAND TOTAL (rounded) 1,380,966.58
* Based on the assumption that all those entitled will relocated outside ROW. The number of AHs relocating in or
outside the ROW will be determined during DMS
&
The precise number of vulnerable AHs will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan
@
The unit rate for transportation allowance used above is an estimated average. The precise entitlements per
household will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan depending on type of impact and where they
relocate to.

129. Additional resources will also be provided by the Project to prepare and implement the
updated resettlement plan which are costed elsewhere in the overall Project budget. These
include:

a. Dedicated officers within the Social and Environment Unit of the PMU including
resettlement, gender and social specialists.

b. Specialist consultants in the Project Supervision Assistant team including the

following specialists:

(i) Resettlement specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24

person-months);
(ii) Social/gender/IP specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24
person-months);

c. Other Provincial Line Agencies and mass organizations to be mobilized in support

of implementation of the Resettlement Plan (refer also to the section on
Institutional Arrangements).
130. The details of the resettlement budget estimates are presented in Annex 7.
64

XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

131. The owner of the project is MPWT, the Executing Agency; therefore, it has over-all
responsibility for the successful implementation of the RP. MPWT will be assisted by a number
of offices within and outside the Ministry, starting with the Project Management Unit 3 (PMU3)
that is tasked with undertaking the Project. With assistance from the ESO of MPWT, the PMU3
will work closely with the Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement
Committee (RD-IRC) relative to the preparation, updating, and implementation of the RP.

A. Environmental and Social Office

132. The Environmental and Social Office (ESO)11, under the Department of Planning of
MPWT is the lead arm of the PMU3 in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The ESO
presently has 9 staff, with plans to get 3 additional persons from other units of the Ministry. The
staff members of the ESO work for both resettlement and environmental tasks. However, while
all of them claim to be familiar with the conduct of socioeconomic survey, only 3 claim to know
how to do the inventor of losses. None of the staff has the capacity to write an RP. For this reason,
the project supervision consultants should prepare a training program for the staff of ESO in
connection with the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of the RP.

133. The ESO will work closely with the IRC and Resettlement Department at the Ministry of
Economy and Finance (RD-MEF). Its tasks include the following:
a. Secure the approval of the RP by the IRC;
b. Secure prior approval by IRC and the ADB for any variations in the approved RP;
c. Secure the data base of affected persons and assets that will be gathered during
the preparation and updating of the RP;
d. Prepare progress reports on RP implementation for submission to the MPWT and
PMU3.

B. IRC and the Resettlement Department

134. The IRC is a collegial body composed of representatives from concerned line ministries,
such as the Council of Ministers (COM); the MPWT; and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries (MAFF), including representatives of the Municipality of Phnom Penh, the Governor
and Deputy Governor of provinces traversed by the Project road. Created by the Prime Minister
through Decision No. 13, dated 18 March 1997, in connection with the resettlement of APs in the
Highway 1 Project (Loan 1659-CAM), it has since been involved in other foreign-assisted
government infrastructure projects with involuntary resettlement.

135. The IRC will assume the function of a quasi-regulatory body, ensuring that funds for
resettlement are spent properly and that the RP is carried out as intended. The technical arm of
the IRC is RD-MEF. The RD-MEF will assist IRC in the following tasks:

11
Formerly the Social and Environmental Unit (SEU)

64
 65

a. Reviewing and approving the RP, ensuring that the RP is consistent with ADB’s
2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and, later, the loan agreement;
b. Endorsing the approved RP to ADB;
c. Establishing or convening the Provincial Resettlement Committee (PRSC) and its
Working Group (WG);
d. Orienting, as needed, the PRSC and its working group (PRSC-WG) on their tasks
relative to RP updating and implementation;
e. Securing from the national treasury the budget for carrying out the RP, ensuring
that funds are available in a timely manner and in sufficient amounts;
f. Approving all disbursements connected with the implementation of the RP, such
as payment of compensation and other entitlements, acquisition and preparation
of replacement plots, operational expenses of personnel, etc.;
g. Ensuring that funds for resettlement are spent judiciously; and
h. With assistance from an independent organization, monitoring the implementation
of the RP, ensuring that this is carried out in compliance with the Project
resettlement policy and with the loan agreement.
C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee

136. The Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee (PRSC) is a collegial body at the provincial
level. Headed by the Provincial Deputy Governor, the members of the PRSC are provincial
department directors of line ministries represented in the IRC, and also the chiefs of the districts
and communes traversed by the Project road.

137. The technical arm of the PRSC is the Working Group (PRSC-WG). The PRSC-WG is
headed by the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works and
Transport (PDPWT). The regular members of the PRSC-WG come from the Provincial
Government, Provincial Department of Economy and Finance (MDEF), and the Ministry of
Interior. The PRSC-WG has a counterpart at the district level composed of personnel from
various line agencies.

138. In an effort to make the whole process of resettlement effective, participatory and
transparent, the chiefs of the affected communes and villages, and a male and female
representative each of the APs in affected communes will seat in the district RSC-WG in matters
concerning their respective areas of jurisdiction.

139. The PRSC, through the provincial and district working groups, will have the following
functions:
a. Facilitate a sustained public information campaign, ensuring that the public,
especially the AHs, are updated on any developments regarding the Project and
resettlement activities;
b. Spearhead the DMS and updated census of APs, including the updating of the
rates used in calculating compensation and other entitlements to reflect prevailing
market rates at the time of compensation;
c. Spearhead the selection, acquisition, and preparation of replacement plots,
including the preparation of a coordinated schedule of delivery of compensation
66

and other entitlements, the relocation of people, harvesting of standing crops, and
the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road sections;
d. Spearhead the delivery of compensation and other entitlements to the AHs;
e. Receive and act on the complaints and grievances of AHs in accordance with the
Project resettlement policy; and
f. Maintain a record of all public meetings, grievances, and actions taken to address
complaints and grievances.
D. Project Supervision Consultants

140. The Project Supervision Consultants (PSC), together with the ESO and the PRSC-WG,
will spearhead the updating of the RP through the conduct of the DMS in a participatory and
transparent way and consistent with the Project resettlement policy. Once approved by the IRC
and MPWT and concurred in by ADB, the PSC will provide technical advice in the
implementation of the approved RP. The PSC will likewise provide capacity-building orientation
and skills training, as needed, to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO, and the Provincial
and District Working Groups.

141. Together with the PMU3 and ESO, the PSC will supervise civil works activities to ensure
that the contractors adhere with the terms of their contract relative to avoiding and/or minimizing
resettlement impacts, in addition to ensuring that contractors provide the necessary
compensation and/or assistance to the AHs prior to and/or during construction activities.

142. The PSC will have one international resettlement specialist (6 months, intermittent), a
local resettlement specialist (12 months, intermittent), a local livelihood specialist (6 months,
intermittent), and a local gender specialist (3 months, intermittent).

XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

A. RP Updating and Implementation

143. Following completion of detailed engineering design, the RP will be updated.

Resettlement implementation (i.e., land clearing and relocation of AHs) can only commence once
ADB has reviewed and given its concurrence to it. Consultations with the AHs will be carried out
on a continuing basis, paying particular attention to the vulnerable and severely affected
households.

1. Setting-up the PRSC-WG

144. The Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) will
convene the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee which in turn will work for the establishment
of its Working Group (PRSC-WG). Headed by the Deputy Provincial Governor with the
participation of the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works
and Transport (PDPWT), the regular members (i.e., not changing within the province) of the
PRSC-WG come from the Provincial Government, Provincial Department of Economy and
Finance (MDEF), and the Provincial Department of the Interior. Moreover, a male and female
representative each of the AHs in a commune traversed by the project will be represented in the
PRSC-WG. The PRSC-WG will coordinate closely with the Project supervision consultant (PSC),
the civil works contractor, the local government, and the AHs to ensure the smooth and
orchestrated updating and implementation of the RP.

66
 67

2. Detailed measurement survey and updated census of APs

145. Following final design and staking of the corridor of impact (COI), a detailed
measurement survey (DMS) and updated census of AHs will be carried out by the PRSC-WG
with assistance from the Project supervision consultants (PSC). The procedures of the DMS
are similar to those of the IOL, i.e., detailed recording of all users of land and owners of other
assets. The PSC will train members of the resettlement sub-committee working group (RSWG)
on the categorization scheme used in the RP as employed in the replacement cost study (RCS).

146. A new socio-economic survey will be carried out if RP updating does not commence
within two years as demographic and socio-economic factors may change significantly within
that period. It will cover at least 20% of severely affected AHs and at least 10% of other AHs
losing main structures and productive assets.

B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP

147. The table below summarizes the various inter-related activities connected with the
updating and implementation of the RP.

Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities

Activities Schedule
RP preparation June – November2011
ADB concurrence of draft RP November2011
RP updating April 2012
Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated RP June 2012
Implementation of the approved updated RP July – December 2012
Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012
External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013

XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING

148. The ESO of MPWT and the IRC, through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of
Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of the updating
and implementation of the RP. Said monitoring and evaluation is intended to help ensure that
the RP is prepared according to the resettlement policy and that it is implemented as planned.
The ESO is Government’s in-house monitoring body, while the RD-MEF, which will hire an
independent organization, will be the Project’s external monitor.

A. Indicators for Internal monitoring

149. The following indicators will be monitored periodically by ESO:

a. Compensation and entitlements are computed at rates and procedures as provided in

the approved RP;
b. AHs are paid as per agreement with Project authorities;
c. Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed
as described in the approved RP;
d. Public facilities and infrastructure affected by the Project are restored promptly; and,
e. The transition between resettlement and civil works is smooth.
68

B. External monitoring agency

150. The IRC will hire an independent organization to carry out external monitoring and
post-implementation evaluation. The IRC will prepare the terms of reference (TOR) for this
purpose. The TOR of the external monitoring organization (EMO) and the selection of the monitor
will require the prior consent of ADB. The EMO will provide RD-MEF and ADB a copy of its
semi-annual monitoring reports. The EMO will likewise conduct a Post-RP Implementation
Evaluation Study one (1) year following the completion of resettlement.

68
 Appendix 1

INVENTORY OF LOSSES
INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished for all persons/households with affected assets (i.e., structures,
crops, trees, and land located within 10 meters from the centerline of the roadway or carriageway).

I. Identification of the Displaced Person (DP) / Affected Household (AH)

Name of Occupant/User/Owner of Affected Asset(s): Gender: [ ] Male [ ]
Female
Age: ____ Physical condition: [ ] Normal [ ] Disabled Average Monthly Household Income ($): __________
Marital status:[ ] Married; [ ] Single; [ ] Divorced; [ ] Widow/er Name of spouse:
Ethnic affiliation: [ ] Khmer [ ] Cham [ ] Thai [ ] Other, specify:______________
Location of affected asset/s: Code of DP/AH:
Village: Commune:

II. Affected Assets

A.1 Land:
Area and Tenure Status Over the Affected Land (indicate area of affected
portion of the land [m²] in appropriate box below) Total Area of
Classification/
Certificate Occupying Occupying Occupied/
Use of Land* Title/ Rent or
under WITH WITHOUT Owned Land (m²)
Certificate Lease
application Permission Permission
1.
2.
*Examples of land classification or use: residential, commercial, farmland, forestland

A.2 If renting or occupying the affected land with permission from owner:
With Lease Agreement (Renting) With permission (not
Amount of rental Address/Location of Land Owner paying rent)Check the
Name of Land Owner box below
fee (Indicate in US$)
1.
2.

B.1 Structures* found on the affected land:

State whether
Area (m²) Area (m²)
Total area (m²) / impact on
Type/Use of Affected Structure /Length (LM) of /Length (LM) of
Length (LM) of structure is
Structure Classification** Structure Structure to be
Structure PARTIAL or
Affected Acquired
TOTAL
1.
2.
3.
*Examples of structures:house, storage, store/shop, house-and-store, fence, tomb, well, kitchen, toilet, waiting shed, concrete
pavement, box culvert (driveway) access to residence, irrigation canal, etc.
** Specifics of classification: Use classification system of the local government.

B.2 Tenure status over the affected house/store/building:

Tenure*
Structure Tenant/ Occupying WITH Occupying WITHOUT
Owner
Renter Permission Permission
1.
2.
*Check the appropriate box.

B.3 If affected house/store/building does not belong to the DP/AH:

Paying Rent? Check If Paying Rent, How
Name of Owner of Affected Address/Location of Building
appropriate box below much is Monthly Rent?
House/Store/ Building Owner
No Yes (Indicate in US$)
1.
2.
 Appendix 1

C. Annual crops found on the affected land:

Name/Type of Annual Crops* Actual Area Planted to the Crop (m²) During IOL
1.
2.
*Examples of annual crops:rice, corn, sugarcane, cassava, etc.

D. Type and number (count) of perennials found on the affected land:

Not Yet Fruit-bearing Fruit-bearing Categories*
Name of Perennial About to
Young A B C D
bear fruit
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total
*Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

E. Type and count of timber trees found on the affected land:

Timber Tree Categories*
Name of Perennial
A B C D
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total
*Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

F. Loss of business, job, and income:

Duration of Disruption in
Business Operation (Check Paid Workers (if any)
Nature of Net Monthly
appropriate box)
Business* Income ($)
Average Monthly
Permanent Temporary Number
Salary of Workers ($)
1.
2.
*Examples of business:motor vehicle repair shop, grocery store, restaurant

III. Other Relevant Information on the DP/AH:

A. Information on other landholdings of the DP/AH not affected by the project:
Specifics Residential Commercial Land for Garden and Pond
Annual Crop Land for
Perennial
Tenure status*
Total area (m²)
*Specifics of tenure status: with title/certificate, certificate/title under process, with lease agreement, occupying with permission,
occupying without permission

B. Relocation options for AHs losing entire (totally) house or building: (Check the appropriate box)
Construct on remaining land in Relocate to other landholdings Landless (Relocate to
Relocation options the ROW of the AH government relocation site)

__________________________
____________________
Name and Signature of AH or Representative Relationship with the
AH

____________________________
Name and Signature of Enumerator Date accomplished:________________

70
 Appendix 1

IV. Sketch of affected land and relative location of other assets found thereat:

10 m COI

Start of Road Centerline

10 m COI
 Appendix 2

REPLACEMENT COST STUDY

1. Introduction

1. This report is to present the survey results of the Study of Replacement Cost for provincial
roads improvement project, Southeast NR314D, NR 13 and Midwest NR150B, NR53 and
NR151B, funded by ADB TA 7665-CAM.

2. Data collection for this study was conducted from 21 May 2011 to 01 July 2011 for
Southeast section and from 06 July to 13 July 2011 for section Midwest.

2. Objective of the Study

3. The study is to establish compensation rates for structures, trees, and other non-land
based income (e.g., businesses, fishponds, etc.). The aim is to ensure full restoration value of
the affected/expropriated assets by the Project.

3. Survey Methodology

4. In order to achieve the above research objectives, the study required detailed
preparations. First, it was necessary be become familiar with legal framework and associated
resettlement and compensation issues in Cambodia. This was done during the first days of
research planning.

5. Next, all available literature related to replacement cost study, and more particularly,
resettlement and replacement cost study of road improvement projects.

6. The information gathering at the field for the calculation of replacement cost in the project
area are as follows:

Canvass of construction material in districts traversed by the project road

sections;
Interview contractors and builders in the local area to determine the current cost
of labor in the construction sector;
Meet with government officials from the agriculture department, and land
management department;
Hold focus group discussion with land owners and villagers together with
commune and village officials; and
Interview local (commune and village) officials and residents, to find out the
current market rate of fixed assets, especially land, in the project area as per
record of recent sale transactions;
Interview with resident and agriculture product sellers to find out current market of
fruit tree affected by the project.

7. Field data survey including measurement of affected stall and houses along the project
road. Categories of houses are classified based on the roofing material and its sub-categories
also were classified for those houses with similar material and price in average.

72
 Appendix 2

4. Cambodia Legal Framework and Eligible Entitlements

4.1 Land Use within the right of way (ROW) in Cambodia

8. Throughout Cambodia it is very common to see people lives on and uses the land within
the right of way (ROW) of a highway or road. Since we have full peace in Cambodia, 1993, the
government never publicly claimed the land located within the later announced ROW, average
Cambodians moved into the ROW zone, cultivating, operating business, building stores and
houses.

4.2 Cambodia Legal Framework

9. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia states that the “right to confiscate properties from any
person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and
just compensation in advance” (Article 44).

10. The Land Law of 2001 (NS/RKM/0801/14, 20 July 2001) governs land and property rights
in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it determines the regime of
ownership of immovable properties that are defined as including land, trees and immovable
structures.

11. The rights and responsibilities of the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) with respect
to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The RGC can acquire private land (i) for public
purposes under condition of (ii) fair and just compensation, (iii) paid in advance. The Land Law,
Article 5, states:

“No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An
ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and
procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just
compensation in advance.”

12. There are other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition,
compensation and resettlement. The key provisions are indicated below:

(i) Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all
transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with
the required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court
decision. (Article 6)
(ii) Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be
recognized. (Article 7)
(iii) State public land includes, among other categories, any property that is made
available for public use such as roads. (Article 15)
(iv) Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to state public land cannot
claim any compensation. This includes land established by the RGC as public
rights-of-way (ROW) for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally
occupied land in a timely manner is subject to expel. (Article 19)

73
 Appendix 2

(v) Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law
came into effect) are allowed to register as the owner of the land (Article 30).
Persons who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had
not yet completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they
were eligible to be registered as the owner. (Article 31)
(vi) However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into
effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law
for acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34)
(vii) Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming
purposes at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The
concessionaire may obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out
in a separate Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

13. The RGC Prakas No. 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and
Encroachment” (No. 06 BRK, 27 September 1999) prohibits private ownership of State lands,
including land adjacent to roads and railways. The Prakas establishes rights-of-way (ROW) for
2-digit national roads such as NR33 of 25 metres from the centerline. Ministry of Economy and
Finance (MEF) Decree No. 961 (2000) declares that, in order to implement Prakas No. 6, the
RGC will not pay compensation to people who occupy the ROW, for any structures or assets
located on the land.

Table 4.1: Dimensions of Road ROW

Road Category ROW Dimensions
National Road 1, 4, 5 30 m from the centerline
Other 1-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline
2-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline
Provincial roads 20 m from the centerline
Commune roads 15 m from the centerline

5 ADB Policy

14. The objectives of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and as refined in
the New Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) are (i) to avoid impacts on people and the
environment, where possible; (ii) where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or
compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people; and (iii) help
the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB resettlement
policy includes the following principles:

m. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary
resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning
through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis,
specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

n. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i)
land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based

74
 Appendix 2

where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss
of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with
access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full
replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues
and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

o. Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed assistance,

including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land,
better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and
production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and
socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host
communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land
development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic
infrastructure and community services, as required.

p. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups,
including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide
them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas
provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to
adequate housing.

q. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land

acquisition is through negotiated settlement.

r. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights
to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of
non-land assets.

s. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the

income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring
and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

t. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the

income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring
and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

u. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation

process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a
form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders.
Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other
stakeholders.

v. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project

or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s
cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts,
consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a
stand-alone operation.

w. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or

economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision
throughout project implementation.

75
 Appendix 2

x. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of

living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan
have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results
of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

15. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoples (1998) and as refined in the New
Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters
full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and
cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive
culturally appropriate social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result
of projects, and (iii) can participate actively in projects that affect them.

16. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (ADB, 2006; ADB, 1998) adopts gender
mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women
participate in and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for
development activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a
gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of
women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.

17. However, since this project has minor negative impact on vendors at the above project area
and the demolishment was done before the project study, the report of losses assessment has been
required for the project based on the ADB safeguard policy rather than a resettlement plan.

6. Cost Calculation of Structure

6.1 Material Used for Shop Construction, Stall, House and Fence

18. To assess the loss of structures of both in this study, consultant will use the market rate
from construction shop seller in the area as basis to estimate the impact. Hence compensation to
affected people will reflect market rate.

19. In order to produce the table of materials for structures, the consultant interview
construction shops along the project road that supply to people living in the area. An average of
construction material was produced provided the assumption that people may buy construction
material from different sources.

20. This study will produce two separate replacement cost tables for different geographic area
and distance of transportation of construction materials. First table will be for Southeast section
and second table is for Midwest section.

Table 6.1: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road- SOUTHEAST
Average for RCS
Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
A CEMENT
1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton
2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton
3 Diamond cement 1 ton 99.76
4 Camel cement 1 ton
5 Mountain cement 1 ton

76
 Appendix 2

Average for RCS

Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
B STEEL
1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.93
2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.38
3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.25
4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.29
C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1
1 Paper plywood 1 piece 4.21
2 3mm plywood 1 piece 5.78
3 5mm plywood 1 piece 6.00
D FLOORING
1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 4.12
2 Chinese tile for wall 1 m2 4.19
3 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.17
4 Concrete block 1 m2 4.00
E DOOR AND WINDOW
1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00
2 Wooden door 1000x2000 1 set 60.00
3 Wooden door 800x1900 1 set 45.00
4 Wooden door 800x2000 1 set 60.00
5 Wooden door 1000x1800 1 set 48.75
6 Wooden door 1200x2000 1 set 50.00
7 Plastic door 1 set 14.58
8 Wood window, Duong Chem: 600x800 1 set 11.13
9 Wood window, Duong Chem: 700x900 1 set 12.75
10 Wood window, Duong Chem: 800x1000 1 set 14.50
F ROOF COVER
1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 piece 0.51
2 Khmer Tile 1 piece 0.18
3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.09
4 Steel sheet (2meters long) 1 sheet 2.44
5 Steel sheet (2.4meters long) 1 sheet 2.94
6 Steel sheet (3meters long) 1 sheet 3.40
7 Steel sheet (3.6meters long) 1 sheet 4.04
8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.50
G OTHERS
1 Terracotta (Kansaeng) 1 piece 0.25
2 Brick 1 piece 0.05
3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 27.75
4 Gravel 1x2 White 1 m3 23.75
5 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.00
6 Sand 1 m3 9.17
7 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.25
8 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 10.00
9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 5.50
10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 8.25
11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 11.25
12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 15.00
13 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 30.00
14 Soil filling 1 m3 1.63
15 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.25
H WOOD AND BAMBOO
1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m 440.00

77
 Appendix 2

Average for RCS

Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
2 Wood for other structure 2x20 1 m 2.40
3 Wood for other structure 4x4 1 m 0.83
4 Wood for other structure 4x12 1 m 2.38
5 Wood for other structure 12x12 1 m 8.75
6 Small pole 1 pole 1.00
7 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.50
8 Bamboo L=4000mm 20 pieces 3.00
I PAINTING
1 U 90 interior 1 cont. 21.50
2 U 90 exterior 1 cont. 25.13
3 Campaint 1 cont. 32.50
J PLASTIC PIPE
1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.00
2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 1.88
3 Dia. No 42 1 pipe 2.00
4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 8.75
K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE
1 Cheurng Tang L=300 1 column 1.25
2 Cheurng Tang L=400 1 column 1.50
3 Cheurng Tang L=500 1 column 2.00
4 Cheurng Tang L=600 1 column 2.00
5 Cheurng Tang L=800 1 column 2.25
6 Cheurng Tang L=1000 1 column 4.63
7 Concrete support column L=1500 1 column 5.50
8 Concrete support column L=2000 1 column 6.50

Table 6.2: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road (Midwest)
Average for RCS
Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
A CEMENT
1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton
2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton
3 Diamond cement 1 ton
95.58
4 Camel cement 1 ton
5 Mountain cement 1 ton
6 Dragon Cement 1 ton
B STEEL
1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.89
2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.69
3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.13
4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.30
C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1
1 Paper plywood 1 piece 5.75
2 3mm plywood 1 piece 6.63
3 5mm plywood 1 piece 8.13
D FLOORING
1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 3.75
2 Chinese tile for wall 200x300 1 m2 3.63
3 Chinese tile for wall 250x400 1 m2 4.50
4 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.88

78
 Appendix 2

Average for RCS

Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
E DOOR AND WINDOW
1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00
2 Wooden door 1000x2000 1 set 60.00
3 Wooden door 800x2000 1 set 101.25
4 Wooden door 1000x1800 1 set 120.00
5 Wooden door 1200x2000 1 set 140.00
6 Plastic door 1 set 20.00
7 Wood window, Duong Chem: 800x1100 1 set 35.00
F ROOF COVER
1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 pice 0.50
2 Khmer Tile 1 pice 0.54
3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.05
4 Steel sheet (2 m long) 1 sheet 2.38
5 Steel sheet (2.4 m long) 1 sheet 2.75
6 Steel sheet (3 m long) 1 sheet 3.38
7 Steel sheet (3.6 m long) 1 sheet 4.00
8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.43
9 Concrete block 5.00
G OTHERS
1 Terracota (Kansaeng) 1 m2 3.00
2 Brick 1 piece 0.05
3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 21.50
4 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.58
5 Sand 1 m3 5.50
6 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.50
7 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 8.25
8 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 4.38
9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 7.50
10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 12.00
11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 16.00
12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 32.00
13 Soil filling 1 m3 1.50
14 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.50
H WOOD AND BAMBOO
1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m3 300.00
2 Pole dia. 50-60 1 pole 0.88
3 Small pole dia. Smaller than 50mm 1 pole 0.45
4 Bamboo L=5000 mm (1 m bamboo = 3000 R) 20 pieces 3.75
5 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.25
I PAINTING
1 U 90 interior 1 Bucket 20.00
2 U 90 exterior 1 Bucket 25.00
3 Campanit interior 1 Bucket 18.75
4 Campanit exterior 1 Bucket 25.00
J PLASTIC PIPE
1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.10
2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 2.00
3 Dia No 42 1 pipe 2.20
4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 9.00
K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE
1 Concrete support column L=300 1 column 1.50

79
 Appendix 2

Average for RCS

Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey
2 Concrete support column L=400 1 column 1.70
3 Concrete support column L=500 1 column 2.00
4 Concrete support column L=600 1 column 2.50
5 Concrete support column L=800 1 column 3.00
6 Concrete support column L=1000 1 column 4.00
7 Concrete support column L=1500 1 column 5.00
8 Concrete support column L=2000 1 column 6.50

6.2 Replacement Cost For Southeast Section (NR314D, NR13)

6.2.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House

21. The affected structures in the project area can be physically identified and classified into
stall, shop, fence, house and other structures.

22. Below is the summary list of cost calculation for stall and shop with above market survey
rate. The shops, stall and house of type 1 cannot compensate for setback labor since the moving
of structure may damage to material and some of them cannot re-use. It is suggested that these
type 1 structures shall be compensated at full market price.

Table 6.3: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House.

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)
STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE
1A No wall Small pole for Use soil as floor Single 3.90
supporting roof
structure
1B No wall Small pole or used Used wood or Single: 0.3m-0.6m 5.84
wood bamboo with small higher than natural
wood or bamboo soil
structure, higher
1. Thatch/Leave Roof

from soil about

0.3m-0.6m
1C Thatch/ Leaves/ Pole or used wood Use soil as floor or Single 7.32
plastic, or mixed with moveable
temporary materials bamboo bed or
wooden bed

1D Used metal with Pole or used wood Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 9.29
used wood or bamboo with small higher than natural
mixed temporary wood or bamboo soil
materials structure, higher
from soil about
0.3m-1.2m
1E Earth wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 6.28

80
 Appendix 2

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)
1F Thatch/ Leaves/ Pole or used wood Lean Concrete Single 13.78
plastic, or mixed
temporary materials

2A No wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 7.20

2B No wall Pole or used wood or Concrete Single 13.23
low quality wood
2C Earth wall with Pole or used wood or Use soil as floor Single 9.40
some temporary low quality wood
wall material such
as metal sheet,
wood, thatch,
plastic.
2. Metal / Fiber Cement Roof

2D Earth wall with Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 10.11
some temporary low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural
wall material such wood or bamboo soil
as metal sheet, structure, higher
wood, thatch, from soil about
plastic. 0.3m-1.2m
2E Wood wall with Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 18.48
temporary material low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural
less than 10% wood or bamboo soil
structure, higher
from soil about
0.3m-1.2m
2F Metal wall Pole or used wood or Use soil as floor Single 10.04
low quality wood
2G Thatch wall Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 0.3m-1.2m 10.08
low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural
wood or bamboo soil
structure, higher
from soil about
0.3m-1.2m
2H Thatch wall Pole or used wood or Used wood or Single: 1.2m-2.5m 10.90
low quality wood bamboo with small higher than natural
wood or bamboo soil
structure, higher
from soil about
1.2m-2.5m
2I Wood wall at first Wood column with Wood floor (house Single: 1.2m-2.5m 42.45
floor and only concrete support on still), ground higher than natural
column at ground 0.60m floor can be used soil
floor for other purpose,
not higher than
2.5m
2J Brick wall with Concrete column Concrete floor Single 33.66
plastering 20cm x 20cm

81
 Appendix 2

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)
2K Brick wall for Hardwood columns Tile at ground floor Two stories: Ground 66.64
ground floor and and wooden floor floor with tile and first
wood wall for first with wood structure floor with wood plank
floor at first floor

3A Wooden wall with Wood column Concrete floor Single 52.76

wooden structure

3B Wood wall at first Wood column with Wood floor (house Single: 1.2m-2.5m 59.89
floor and only concrete support on still), ground higher than natural
3. Tile Roof

column at ground 2.5m floor can be used soil

floor for other purpose,
not higher than
2.5m
3C Wood wall at first Wood column with Tile at ground floor Two stories: Ground 71.18
floor and only concrete support and wooden floor floor with tile and first
column at ground 2.5m with wood structure floor with wood plank
floor at first floor

4A Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor and One story plus half 102.45
with foundation mezzanine (half floor with concrete
floor) slab (compensation
4. Concrete

rate for this type is

based on every
affected floor area)
4B Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor, Multiple stories 141.59
with foundation mezzanine, first house (compensation
floor and possibility rate for this type is
of additional floor based on every
house affected floor area)

6.2.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

23. In order to establish market price of fence and gate, construction material from above
table and local contractor were interviewed and use as basis for the calculation.

24. Below costing the summary table of fence and gate.

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
A FENCE

F1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small 1 LM 0.95 Some of the materials used not
wooden bar or mix of available local available in the market. In this
material) case labor cost will be estimated
for the calculation
F2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wire 1 LM 1.43
F3 Concrete column with its foundation, ground 1 LM 14.36 In case there is no foundation, it is
beam of 20cmx20cm; 2meters interval; no suggested to compensate per

82
 Appendix 2

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
wire post as indicated in price list of
construction material from the
shop plus labor cost and
transportation to site (20% to
material cost)
F4 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter 1 LM 4.04
high with 8 horizontal wire
F5 Concrete post 2meter interval, 2 meters high 1 LM 7.99
with wire or wire mesh; brick wall at lower
part 0.3m-0.6m high
F6 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1 LM 31.31 Ventilation brick in some as part of
1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval brick wall also classified in same
type
F7 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 1 LM 58.95
20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval;
decorative concrete baluster and decoration
capital
F8 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 1 LM 62.31
20cm; 1.8m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval;
decoration capital and steel rebar decoration
with painting
B GATE

1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m column LS 122.15

of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door
2 Pagoda balustrade at the entrance gate 1 LM 44.24 Normally the entrance balustrade
is at road entrance and some
pagoda this balustrade locates in
the ROW
3 School entrance or other public property LS 189.83 Public property
entrance

6.2.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

25. The methodology to calculate the cost of other structure and non structure also based on
the interview with local people for their knowledge, labor cost together with price list from
construction material shops.

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark

US Dollar
OTHER STRUCTURE
1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) 1 75.00
and 6-12 meters depth
2 Pumped well 1 120.00
3 Earth grave 1 150.00
4 Concrete grave (Pray place) 1 500.00
5 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.99
6 Concrete block 1m2 5.59
7 Terracotta 1m2 7.78
8 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 35.97
9 Brick drainage 1LM 31.96 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide

83
 Appendix 2

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark

US Dollar
with concrete cover
10 Drainage pipe, dia. 40cm 1LM 12.09
11 Drainage pipe, dia. 60cm 1LM 19.97
12 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth
13 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00
14 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.69 For structure that not able to
move as it may damage more
than 50%. Full compensation is
encouraged.
LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE
1 Labor to remove wooden passage LS 5.00
crossing small canal into house
2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00
3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15
meters from existing location

6.2.4 Land Value Estimation

26. Since the world economic downturn in late 2008, land price market in Cambodia is stable
and has little sign of going up. From interview with local people, village chief and other property
owner, the real estate sector in Cambodia is being recovered back especially in the area where
development activities are planned i.e border between Cambodia-Vietnam (NR314D). Up to now
there is no transaction in the study area, according to commune chief in Svay Rieng.

27. According to the data collection the price of land can be summarized as below table.
Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 1 (near junction of NR1 and
NR314D) and land near border with Vietnam.
b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also
doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level.
c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land
within the village area.
d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project.
e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and
undergrowth.

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 Remark

($)
A National Road 314D (NR314D)
1 Commercial 112.27 Near border with Vietnam and
Junction with NR1 only (where new
market construction is on-going)
2 Resident-cum-commercial 22.00
3 Resident 11.80
4 Agriculture 1.50
B National Road 13 (NR13)
1 Commercial 45.20 Junction with NR1 and NR8
2 Resident-cum-commercial 20.00

84
 Appendix 2

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 Remark

($)
3 Resident 11.70
4 Agriculture 1.40
5 Forest land 0.60

6.2.5 Crops and Trees

28. Crop and tree were calculated based on harvesting yield and maturity time of different tree
species interviewed with local people in the area. According to compensation experience of IRC
in previous project tree below 3 years get 1/3 of full mature cost, 3 to 5 year compensate 2/3 of full
mature cost and 5 years over compensate with full yield cost.

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
TREE
1 Mango Tree 55.84
2 Coconut Tree 46.41
3 Tamarin Tree 39.17
4 Lemon/Lime Tree 29.00
5 Jackfruit Tree 49.71
6 Custard apple Tree 9.29
7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 51.50
8 Bamboo Tree 0.96
9 Persimon tree Tree 16.89
10 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.50
11 Cashew Tree 18.84
12 Pring tree Tree 25.00
13 Kantuort Tree 6.31
14 Jujube Tree 6.00
15 Kro khob Tree 2.50
16 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.33
17 Sdao Tree 12.75
18 Chom-phu Tree 5.33
19 Oy Moy Tree 6.88
20 Sandoricum tree Tree 17.00
21 Kor Tree 6.21
22 Krasang Tree 26.25
23 Makak Tree 12.88
24 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00
25 Tkov Tree 10.00
26 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50
27 Ka ngork Tree 7.50
28 Deum Chhat Tree 4.00
29 Kvet Tree 13.46
30 Orange Tree 26.00
31 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50
32 Ampil Teuk Tree 18.00
33 Pine tree Tree 12.00

85
 Appendix 2

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
34 Angkear Dei Tree 8.00
35 Rubber tree Tree 15.00
36 Smach Tree 6.00
37 Guava Tree 7.18
38 Ang Kanh Tree 5.00
39 Champei Tree 10.00
40 Others Tree 4.00 to
15.00
CROP
1 Papaya Tree 5.33
2 Banana Tree 2.60
3 Cassava Tree 0.50

6.3 Replacement Cost For Midwest Section (NR150B, NR53, NR151B)

6.3.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House

29. The Midwest section of this study combines three road sections, NR150B, NR53 and
NR151B. Type of structures along these sections is not very much different. They can be
classified into types and category12 as in below table. All structures are classified into four
categories in which each category has different types.

Table 6.4: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)

STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE

1a No wall Small pole for Use soil as floor Single 3.70

(stall on ROW) supporting roof
structure
1b Thatch/ Leave Pole or used wood Used wood or Single: 0.3m-0.6m 7.04
1. Thatch/Leave Roof

bamboo with small higher than natural

wood or bamboo soil
structure, higher
from soil about
0.3m-0.6m

1c Thatch/ Leaves or Pole or used wood Bamboo or used Single: 8.76

partly metal wood or mix of House-on-still;
bamboo and wood Ground floor is soil;
with small wooden more than 2.0 -2.5
structure meters high

12
The structure’s category and type in this study is not equivalence to same category in other study (in
Southeast Section).

86
 Appendix 2

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)

1d Used wood/ wood Pole or used wood Concrete floor Single 12.06
with thatch (10-15%
of total wall area)
2a No (selling stall on Pole No: use soil as floor Single 6.68
ROW)
2b Thatch/ thatch and Pole/ wood - Bamboo/ used Single 12.10
used wood wood:
(15-20%) 0.3m-0.6m high
from ground
- Concrete floor:
on compacted
ground
2c Metal Pole/ wood Concrete floor on Single 14.77
compacted land/
raised land of less
than 20cm high
2d Wood/ Brick with no Pole/ wood Concrete floor on Single 15.06
2. Metal/ Fiber Cement Roof

plaster compacted soil

2e Wood/ Brick with no Pole/ wood - Concrete floor Single: 0.30m-0.60m 20.29
plaster on compacted above soil
soil
- Wood floor:
0.30m-0.60m
above soil
2f Thatch -Concrete column at House on still: Single: 26.55
from ground Bamboo or used House-on-still;
-Wood column/ pole wood with wooden Ground floor is soil;
on upper floor structure more than 2.0 -2.5
meters high
2g Metal 80% and Pole/ wood House on still: Single: 27.10
Thatch 20% wood with wooden House-on-still;
structure Ground floor is soil;
more than 2.0 -2.5
meters high
2h Brick with Concrete Tile on compacted Single: only ground 35.45
plastering: exterior soil floor
and interior
2i Wood wall - Concrete for first - Compacted soil at Single: 36.37
floor ground floor House-on-still;
- Wood column on - Wood floor with Ground floor is soil;
first floor wooden structure more than 2.0 -2.5
on first floor meters high
3a Thatch: for house Wood Wood with wooden Single: 42.48
on still structure House-on-still;
3. Tile
Roof

Ground floor is soil;

more than 2.0 -2.5
meters high

87
 Appendix 2

Unit
Type Wall Column Floor No. of Floor Cost
($/m2)

3b Wood plank with - Concrete from Wood with wooden Single: 49.85
wooden structure ground structure House-on-still;
- Wood on first floor Ground floor is soil;
more than 2.0 -2.5
meters high
4a Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor and One story plus half 99.75
with foundation mezzanine (half floor with concrete
floor) slab (compensation
rate for this type is
4. Concrete

based on every
affected floor area)
4b Brick wall Concrete column Ground floor, Multiple stories 140.96
with foundation mezzanine, first house (compensation
floor and possibility rate for this type is
of additional floor based on every
house affected floor area)

6.3.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

30. The road project will need to remove some property fences of different classification.
Material chosen will alter the cost of building a fence and gate. Below costing the summary table
of fence and gate based on market rate of construction material available in the project area.

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
A FENCE

f1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small 1 LM 0.83 Some of the materials used not
wooden bar or mix of available local available in the market. In this
material) case labor cost will be estimated
for the calculation
f2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wood 1 LM 1.78
rebar
f3 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter 1 LM 4.52
high with 8 horizontal wire
f4 Concrete post 2meter interval; brick wall at 1 LM 12.20
lower part with plastering both sides of
about 60-80cm; 2 meters high (from
ground) with wire or wire mesh; brick wall
at lower part 0.3m-0.6m high
f5 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1 LM 34.20 Ventilation brick in some as part of
1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval brick wall also classified in same
type
f6 Concrete column with plastering brick wall 1 LM 61.15
of 20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m
interval; decorative concrete baluster and
decoration capital
B GATE

88
 Appendix 2

Type Description Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m LS 131.26
column of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door
2 School entrance or other public property LS 190.26 Public property. Fence will
entrance compensated based on above
type.

6.3.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

31. To get the cost of this structure it is also based on the interview with local people for their
knowledge, labor cost together with price list from construction material shops.

Item Description Unit Unit Rate Remark

US Dollar
OTHER STRUCTURE
1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) 1 80.00
and 6-12 meters depth
2 Pumped well 1 120.00
3 Earth grave 1 1800.00
4 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.59
5 Concrete block 1m2 5.67
6 Terracotta 1m2 7.89
7 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 33.64
8 Brick drainage 1LM 30.00 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide
with concrete cover
9 Drainage pipe, dia. 40cm 1LM 11.19
10 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth
11 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00
12 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.50 For structure that not able to
move as it may damage more
than 50%. Full compensation is
recommended.

LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE

1 Labor to remove wooden passage LS 5.00
crossing small canal into house
2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00 Stall with thatch roof/wall shall
be compensated 100%
3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15
meters from existing location

6.3.4 Land Value Estimation

32. The land market in Cambodia has very little sign of going up in urban area. From interview
with local people, village chief and other property owner the land in rural area has no activity at all
since the down turn of world economic. Up to now there is no transaction in the study area,
according to commune chief along the project influence area.

89
 Appendix 2

33. According to the data collection (from group discussion and interview with commune chief)
the price of land was calculated based on its category. Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 5 (near junction of NR5 and
NR150B; NR150B and NR53).
b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also
doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level.
c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land
within the village area.
d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project.
e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and
undergrowth.

34. Except from junction of NR5 and NR150B to riverside, the rest of national roads are pass
through similar category of land i.e. residential, agriculture and forestland. The average cost of
land can be summarized in below table.

No. Category of Land Average Price / Remark

m2
US Dollar
National Road NR150B, NR53 and NR151B
1 Commercial 105.00 Market area near NR5 and
junction of NR150B and NR53
2 Resident-cum-commercial 28.68 Taches and Teuk Phos
3 Resident 8.08
4 Agriculture 1.20
5 Forest land 0.18

6.3.5 Crops and Trees

35. In order to simplify the study, trees have been classified in three types as following:

a. Sapling- below one year: will not get compensation as it can be re-planted,
b. Small tree- one to three year: 1/3 of full price,
c. Young tree- bearing some fruit: 2/3 of full price,
d. Mature- full bearing tree: compensate full price.

36. From the survey, full compensation cost of trees is calculated and summary in below
table:

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
TREE
1 Mango Tree 48.81
2 Coconut Tree 44.37
3 Tamarin Tree 38.33
4 Lemon/Lime Tree 36.66
5 Jack Tree 42.50

90
 Appendix 2

No. Type Unit Unit Cost Remark

US Dollar
6 Custard apple Tree 13.58
7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 46.75
8 Bamboo Tree 0.30
9 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.25
10 Cashew Tree 21.75
11 Pring tree Tree 24.28
12 Kantuort Tree 5.83
13 Jujube Tree 5.00
14 Kro khob Tree 2.25
15 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.60
16 Sdao Tree 12.50
17 Chom-phu Tree 6.00
18 Oy Moy Tree 5.00
19 Sandoricum tree Tree 10.00
20 Kor Tree 5.50
21 Krasang Tree 25.00
22 Makak Tree 12.88
23 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00
24 Tkov Tree 8.00
25 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50
26 Ka ngork Tree 7.50
27 Deum Chhat Tree 5.00
28 Kvet Tree 13.46
29 Orange Tree 26.00
30 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50
31 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.50
32 Guava Tree 7.75
33 Longan Tree 30.00
34 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 31.25
35 Leung Reach Tree 5.00
36 Others Tree 4.00 to
15.00
CROP
1 Papaya Tree 5.00
2 Banana Tree 2.77

7. Recommendation for Replacement Cost Implementation

37. The compensation of the affected structure will be calculated based on the affected floor
area at market price for every development projects in Cambodia. During IOL survey it is found
that:

a. Some of the structures are partially affected;

b. Some structures can setback;
c. Some structures of type 2 and 3 can cut and repair with not much difficult and
disturbance; and

91
 Appendix 2

d. Structure of type 4 is very hard to cut or dismantle, as it is concrete structure that

has fixed foundation. Compensation to only affected structure cannot cover its
replacement cost since the damage will be bigger than estimated (affected square
meter of floor area x market price of structure).

38. Based on the above findings, it is recommended that:

No. Structure type Recommendation

1 Type I If the column is fix into the soil, 100% compensation if

setback or relocated, regardless if it is partially affected
2 Type II Compensation based on affected floor area of the
structure
3 Type III Compensation based on affected floor area of the
structure
4 Type IV During implementation, compensation should not be
based on affected area if it is partially affected from
road axis to the front of house (less than 3meters).

The replacement cost calculation for this type is: Width

of affected structure x 3/4 meters of first two columns
(first span) x market rate per floor area.

92
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
1 53 L Mom Saphy Sangkhor 126 Partial
2 6 R Noun Somarn Sangkhor 28 48 Partial
3 67 L Chan Sinat Sangkhor 90 Entire
4 21 R Owner not available Sangkhor 500 Entire
5 3 L Leav Soun Sangkhor 350 Entire
6 15 L Put Saran Sangkhor 280 Entire
7 55 L Hei Chourn Sangkhor 280 Partial
8 31 L Meak Phalla Sangkhor 157.5 Entire
9 45 L Mao Kunthea Sangkhor 126 Entire
10 51 L Owner not available Sangkhor 114 Partial
11 27 L Sin Makara Sangkhor 90 Partial
12 23 L Tae Chorn Sangkhor 75 Entire
13 17 L Mob Chan Sangkhor 60 Partial
14 20 R Paen Sokha Sangkhor 54 Entire
15 63 L Prak Net Sangkhor 37.5 Entire
16 73 L Chark Chorn Sangkhor 36 Entire
17 32 R Orn Saran Sangkhor 24 Entire
18 50 R Neang Cheanorna Sangkhor 20 Partial
19 19 L Ghean Chan Sangkhor 18 Partial
20 5 L Langh Keomleang Sangkhor 16 Entire
21 58 R Saom Sreymom Sangkhor 13 Partial
22 8 R Owner not available Sangkhor 12 Entire
23 61 L Mom Sarourn Sangkhor 12 Entire
24 13 L Pop Anararn Sangkhor 12 Entire
25 37 R Kheav Vanny Sangkhor 185 Partial
26 18 R Morn Vanaroum Sangkhor 168 Partial
27 48 R Haor Muoy Sangkhor 112.5 Partial
28 78 R Owner not available Sangkhor 96 Partial

93
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
29 35 L Khut Hourn Sangkhor 60 Partial
30 66 R Mom Tha Sangkhor 60 Partial
31 71 L Mao Phally Sangkhor 40 Partial
32 57 L Pich Sitha Sangkhor 39 Partial
33 64 R Owner not available Sangkhor 30 Entire
34 38 R Meas Chinda Sangkhor 18 Entire
35 29 L Meak Vantha Sangkhor 12 Entire
36 81 L Pov Socheat Sangkhor 10 Partial
37 42 R Owner not available Sangkhor 9 Partial
38 12 R Chaiy Veasna Sangkhor 8 Partial
39 79 L Pov Vichet Sangkhor 5.5 Partial
40 83 L So Somart Sangkhor 32
41 75 L Reach Someourn Sangkhor 4
42 Sangkhor Sangkhor 5820
43 43 L Owner not available Sangkhor 400
44 70 R Owner not available Sangkhor 180
45 49 L Saus Sovan Sangkhor 168
46 72 R Owner not available Sangkhor 160
47 4 R Owner not available Sangkhor 150
48 47 L Sok Saoun Sangkhor 150
49 59 L Bun Thoul Sangkhor 133
50 68 R Peork Savun Sangkhor 120
51 1 L Saom Chanthy Sangkhor 120
52 39 L Owner not available Sangkhor 116
53 33 R Owner not available Sangkhor 112
54 62 R Owner not available Sangkhor 110
55 2 R Owner not available Sangkhor 106
56 94 R Owner not available Sangkhor 100
57 82 R Nhem Sitha Sangkhor 100

94
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
58 25 L Owner not available Sangkhor 94
59 46 R Owner not available Sangkhor 78
60 16 R Meong Sararn Sangkhor 74
61 52 R Van Sophana Sangkhor 72
62 10 R Owner not available Sangkhor 70
63 24 R Owner not available Sangkhor 69
64 65 L Em Someourn Sangkhor 66
65 56 R Kaov Somol Sangkhor 57
66 34 R Owner not available Sangkhor 50
67 26 R Owner not available Sangkhor 44
68 54 R Owner not available Sangkhor 44
69 41 L Srey Euom Sangkhor 40
70 22 R Owner not available Sangkhor 35
71 36 R Owner not available Sangkhor 35
72 30 R Sos Samala Sangkhor 35
73 80 R Chab Phalla Sangkhor 32
74 9 L Sous Sear Sangkhor 30
75 14 R Kol Savun Sangkhor 30
76 7 L Pich Sinong Sangkhor 20
77 11 L Sin Komphaerk Sangkhor 20
78 69 L Sok Sarnd Sangkhor 19
79 28 R Hum Sokda Sangkhor 14
80 60 R Owner not available Sangkhor 12
81 89 R Owner not available Sangkhor 10
82 85 L Owner not available Sangkhor 9
83 40 R Eaem Bros Sangkhor 9
84 77 L Chan Shart Sangkhor 8
85 76 R Doch Sitha Sangkhor 5
86 216 R Vea Sanorn Kampong Chak 368 Entire

95
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
87 179 L Kheom Sophy Kampong Chak 279 Partial
88 248 R Sao Sarin Kampong Chak 117 Entire
89 192 R Srey Oark Kampong Chak 90 Partial
90 234 R So Seorn Kampong Chak 78 Entire
91 212 R Chab Den Kampong Chak 55 Partial
92 232 R Ouk Peng Kampong Chak 45 Entire
93 244 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 40 Partial
94 242 R Chin Raen Kampong Chak 37 Entire
95 173 R Sem Bontuern Kampong Chak 30 Partial
96 88 R kong Rith Kampong Chak 20 Partial
97 181 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 18 Partial
98 175 L Sem Bonton Kampong Chak 11 Entire
99 93 L Arn Rithy Kampong Chak 8 Partial
100 168 R Touch Sarith Kampong Chak 31.5 Partial
101 176 R Yuong Vanny Kampong Chak 3 Partial
102 151 L Men Saren Kampong Chak 65.6 Partial
103 159 L Pong Savon Kampong Chak 24.8 Partial
104 95 L Koy Chinda Kampong Chak 22 Partial
105 177 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 183 Partial
106 202 R Keom Sakhorn Kampong Chak 165 Partial
107 183 L Thorn Boraen Kampong Chak 110 Partial
108 138 R Horm Somart Kampong Chak 76 Entire
109 180 R Seing Heang Kampong Chak 60 Entire
110 166 R Mom Phal Kampong Chak 45 Partial
111 123 L Laiy Ky Kampong Chak 40 Partial
112 160 R Agen Sochea Kampong Chak 40 Partial
113 174 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 35 Partial
114 150 R Agou Vannary Kampong Chak 34 Partial
115 172 R Toch Veasna Kampong Chak 33.6 Partial

96
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
116 210 R Som Sindara Kampong Chak 33 Partial
117 198 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 Entire
118 156 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 20 Partial
119 190 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 20 Partial
120 154 R Chear Lung Kampong Chak 20 Entire
121 182 R Eaek Sokhom Kampong Chak 20 Partial
122 188 R Bo Kosal Kampong Chak 20 Partial
123 170 R Mouk Chantha Kampong Chak 18 Partial
124 144 R Ngen Thoun Kampong Chak 16 Partial
125 178 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 8 Partial
126 184 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 8 Partial
127 186 R Porng Charoun Kampong Chak 8 Partial
128 139 L Yeon Horn Kampong Chak 46.8
129 137 L koy Bophal Kampong Chak 46.8
130 119 L Raot Someourn Kampong Chak 56
131 145 L Chea Net Kampong Chak 28
132 117 L Raort Someourn Kampong Chak 24
133 129 L Preab Chantha Kampong Chak 18
134 208 R Tey Sokong Kampong Chak 15
135 87 L Yonh Sarorn Kampong Chak 12.5
136 Kampong Chak Kampong Chak 610
137 230 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 312
138 236 R Kort Saphart Kampong Chak 300
139 113 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 200
140 96 R Ou Rady Kampong Chak 180
141 169 L Som Sindara Kampong Chak 115
142 99 :L Kong Chan Kampong Chak 108
143 143 L Ngun Kan Kampong Chak 104
144 218 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 96

97
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
145 214 R Ghorn Somnang Kampong Chak 92.5
146 90 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 90
147 163 L Yem Sain Kampong Chak 87.5
148 220 R Eaek Nourn Kampong Chak 84
149 224 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 81.4
150 125 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 64
151 111 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 56
152 238 R Paen Sitha Kampong Chak 56
153 240 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 54
154 246 R Sor Pleak Kampong Chak 52
155 162 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 51
156 228 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 51
157 106 R Ork Orn Kampong Chak 49
158 127 L Keaov Sounry Kampong Chak 48
159 142 R Hem Rathy Kampong Chak 48
160 204 R Pich Heng Kampong Chak 45
161 167 L En Mara Kampong Chak 43
162 108 R Sok Chanthorn Kampong Chak 41
163 101 L Horm Somoun Kampong Chak 40
164 194 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 39
165 122 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 39
166 97 L khen Savorn Kampong Chak 38
167 92 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 36
168 131 L Paen Kunthea Kampong Chak 35
169 140 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 34.5
170 120 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 32
171 100 R Peang Sourn Kampong Chak 32
172 171 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 30
173 149 L Koy Ang Kampong Chak 30

98
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
174 130 R Van Hong Kampong Chak 29.8
175 102 R Gheom Sophal Kampong Chak 28
176 200 R Hor Sarun Kampong Chak 28
177 206 R Nou Samut Kampong Chak 25
178 124 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24
179 141 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24
180 118 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 24
181 155 L Doch Sitha Kampong Chak 24
182 94 R Ngun Chenda Kampong Chak 24
183 98 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 21
184 229 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 20
185 158 R Som Saophaurn Kampong Chak 20
186 121 L Sun Chea Kampong Chak 20
187 91 L Chab Panha Kampong Chak 18
188 84 R Eoung Phea Kampong Chak 18
189 112 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16
190 132 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16
191 148 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 16
192 146 R Ngen Ra Kampong Chak 16
193 164 R Rous Nary Kampong Chak 16
194 152 R Saem Lynna Kampong Chak 16
195 222 R Nay Sor Kampong Chak 14
196 116 R Tit Sophal Kampong Chak 14
197 114 R Pich Saran Kampong Chak 14
198 161 L Eom Sokha Kampong Chak 14
199 128 R Bei Sinart Kampong Chak 13.4
200 134 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 13
201 115 L Preeab Vuthy Kampong Chak 12.9
202 107 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12

99
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
203 103 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12
204 110 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 12
205 196 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 12
206 135 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 12
207 153 L Meas Kala Kampong Chak 12
208 157 L Maen Vanno Kampong Chak 12
209 133 L Sok Sanourn Kampong Chak 12
210 147 L Kem Oun Kampong Chak 12
211 226 R Mok Samet Kampong Chak 10.8
212 105 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 10
213 126 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 10
214 86 R Yun Solaod Kampong Chak 10
215 109 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 9
216 104 R Peng Charly Kampong Chak 8
217 136 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 4
218 165 L Owner not available Kampong Chak
219 282 R Nhean Sara Sangkae 200 Entire
220 215 L Vong Ban Sangkae 164 Entire
221 205 L Pov Sareon Sangkae 156 Partial
222 274 R Vong Soka Sangkae 148 Entire
223 207 L Vong Sary Sangkae 130 Partial
224 191 L Owner not available Sangkae 120 Partial
225 235 L Nuon Khemsoly Sangkae 112 Entire
226 280 R Ou Savan Sangkae 110 Partial
227 254 R Chai Rith Sangkae 77 Entire
228 284 R Paen Someourn Sangkae 72 Partial
229 237 L Kem Leok Sangkae 68 Entire
230 189 L Ping Somant Sangkae 53.8 Entire
231 262 R Hun Sangh Sangkae 45 Partial

100
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
232 203 R Meas Sal Sangkae 40 Partial
233 278 R Kheom Horn Sangkae 30 Partial
234 223 L Ky Chanthy Sangkae 20 Entire
235 276 R Som Raksa Sangkae 196 Entire
236 185 L Owner not available Sangkae 70 Entire
237 195 L Sen Savan Sangkae 48 Partial
238 213 L Mok Sangkae 46 Partial
239 231 L Agom Heng Sangkae 32 Partial
240 225 L Owner not available Sangkae 30 Entire
241 199 L Som Saphan Sangkae 24 Partial
242 227 L Yen Nimit Sangkae 20 Partial
243 219 L Meong Soun Sangkae 12 Entire
244 221 L Thy Chuomneagh Sangkae 8 Entire
245 Sangkae Sangkae 1780
246 233 L Chuom Sitha Sangkae 186
247 264 R Tem Net Sangkae 161
248 252 R Agoum Sinon Sangkae 148
249 197 L Owner not available Sangkae 144
250 260 R Key Kheorn Sangkae 120
251 217 R Kem Por Sangkae 104
252 266 R Ey Som Sangkae 96
253 268 R Owner not available Sangkae 78
254 256 R Peong Southy Sangkae 72
255 209 L Owner not available Sangkae 70
256 258 R Prum Sokhom Sangkae 66.5
257 250 R Owner not available Sangkae 66
258 187 R Owner not available Sangkae 60
259 193 L Real Vantha Sangkae 44
260 211 L Nhem Seak Sangkae 27.5

101
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
261 288 R Eoung Meang Sangkae 24
262 286 R Yard Sina Sangkae 22.5
263 201 L Pin Ant Sangkae 20
264 270 R Pin Sinat Sangkae 16.5
265 272 R Owner not available Sangkae 8
266 304 R Horn Sarin Chrung Popel 34 Entire
267 253 L Pov Saarn Chrung Popel 200 Entire
268 263 L Sem Kim Chrung Popel 42 Entire
269 334 R Heang Sookha Chrung Popel 39.6 Partial
270 338 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 20 Entire
271 251 L Koy Know Chrung Popel 20 Entire
272 239 L Som Saran Chrung Popel Partial
273 316 R Taong Peangly Chrung Popel 182 Partial
274 259 L Chy Chaun Chrung Popel 40 Partial
275 249 L Kaov Pong Chrung Popel 36 Entire
276 255 L Porn Parn Chrung Popel 35 Partial
277 336 R Pov Phyone Chrung Popel 35 Entire
278 312 R Chem Somoun Chrung Popel 22 Partial
279 265 L En Dara Chrung Popel 16 Partial
280 267 L Prak Sarem Chrung Popel 15 Partial
281 247 L Prak Chanra Chrung Popel 14 Partial
282 257 L Pov Sameurn Chrung Popel 12.5 Partial
283 241 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 11 Entire
284 245 L Bo Rithy Chrung Popel 5 Partial
285 243 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 4.5 Partial
286 292 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 120
287 300 R Peach Sarorn Chrung Popel 68
288 314 R Pich Sarin Chrung Popel 66.2
289 308 R Neob Norn Chrung Popel 33

102
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
290 Chrung Popel Chrung Popel 1830
291 332 R Nong Vana Chrung Popel 307.5
292 290 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 210
293 346 R Seong Sophart Chrung Popel 200
294 298 R Sao Sophal Chrung Popel 142.5
295 326 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 120
296 324 R Kov Neang Chrung Popel 120
297 296 R Chan Chorn Chrung Popel 80
298 273 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 66
299 294 R Soun Satja Chrung Popel 60
300 320 R Sea Sisophorn Chrung Popel 54
301 271 L Khen Nourn Chrung Popel 52.5
302 269 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 47.1
303 322 R Kong Someak Chrung Popel 41.8
304 310 R Teib Chantha Chrung Popel 40
305 302 R Yi Sarin Chrung Popel 40
306 261 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 30
307 318 R Ghorn Sophea Chrung Popel 28
308 328 R Pov Dara Chrung Popel 27
309 340 R Soun Kim Chrung Popel 21
310 330 R Nut Saraen Chrung Popel 18
311 342 R Van Bunrorn Chrung Popel 12
312 306 R Kao Oun Chrung Popel 9
313 344 R Yen Nourn Chrung Popel 5
314 285 L Toch Saban Kampong Ampil 40 Entire Entire
315 289 L Mork Toch Kampong Ampil 80 Partial
316 287 L Noun Ra Kampong Ampil 14 Entire
317 275 L Sous Sokhom Kampong Ampil 12 Entire
318 279 L Chan Laord Kampong Ampil 64 Entire

103
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
319 378 R Chan Saban Kampong Ampil 18 Entire
320 283 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 16 Entire
321 277 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 8 Partial
322 352 R Vea Thea Kampong Ampil 6 Partial
323 281 L Morn Somporse Kampong Ampil 10 Entire
324 Kampong Ampil Kampong Ampil 370
325 348 R Leok Suod Kampong Ampil 160
326 356 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 50
327 350 R Khourn Sarin Kampong Ampil 48
328 354 R Kaort Sothuon Kampong Ampil 20
329 414 R Sao Lin Angk Prasrae 12 Partial
330 426 R Ou Sophal Angk Prasrae 20 Entire
331 333 L Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 12 Partial
332 456 R Chan Sameon Angk Prasrae 136 Partial
333 369 L Vel Saruon Angk Prasrae 45 Entire
334 295 L Chem Sararn Angk Prasrae 32 Partial
335 351 L Kong Saroun Angk Prasrae 24 Entire
336 458 R Kheive Sarong Angk Prasrae 27 Entire
337 398 R Sors Romly Angk Prasrae 25 Partial
338 392 R Laorn Thy Angk Prasrae 24 Partial
339 335 L Mom Chourn Angk Prasrae 24 Partial
340 341 L Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 21 Partial
341 337 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 16 Partial
342 430 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 15 Partial
343 432 R Ouk Varn Angk Prasrae 15 Partial
344 349 L Mork Savart Angk Prasrae 10 Partial
345 Angk Prasrae Angk Prasrae 1850 48
346 327 L Kaeov Piset Angk Prasrae 6 20
347 434 R Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 20

104
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
348 424 R Hao Vong Angk Prasrae 28
349 442 R Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 20
350 331 L Chaom Mao Angk Prasrae 16
351 404 R Peaok Karith Angk Prasrae 15
352 410 R Eong Hong Angk Prasrae 13.5
353 446 R Pao Sapoun Angk Prasrae 12
354 317 R Mork Toch Angk Prasrae 12
355 358 R Prak Sareom Angk Prasrae 180
356 291 L Peong Vanna Angk Prasrae 150
357 343 L Nong Saly Angk Prasrae 100
358 329 L En Sarin Angk Prasrae 69
359 448 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 66
360 460 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 46
361 293 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 40
362 368 R Kim Yen Angk Prasrae 38
363 366 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 32
364 303 L Eaem Sokhom Angk Prasrae 28
365 299 L Paen Choun Angk Prasrae 27
366 339 L Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 27
367 362 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 26
368 408 R Ngoy Nasim Angk Prasrae 26
369 396 R Oung Sokhom Angk Prasrae 25
370 420 R Hao Va Angk Prasrae 25
371 388 R Srey Kheang Angk Prasrae 24
372 412 R Orng Sokhoum Angk Prasrae 24
373 386 R Pol Porn Angk Prasrae 24
374 390 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 22
375 374 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 20
376 372 R Mao Kosal Angk Prasrae 20

105
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
377 402 R Svaiy Eaom Angk Prasrae 20
378 364 R Heom Sakum Angk Prasrae 20
379 370 R Chea Sotheany Angk Prasrae 20
380 436 R Paen Lun Angk Prasrae 20
381 416 R Eaem Yorn Angk Prasrae 20
382 400 R Eang Sokhom Angk Prasrae 20
383 307 L Bal Sokheoun Angk Prasrae 18
384 440 R Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 18
385 323 L Eng Khorn Angk Prasrae 16
386 428 R Pich Saran Angk Prasrae 16
387 418 R Hun Lei Angk Prasrae 16
388 454 R Cheang Two Angk Prasrae 16
389 422 R Chan Sombat Angk Prasrae 16
390 394 R Paen Chun Angk Prasrae 15
391 311 L Sao Noy Angk Prasrae 15
392 376 R Nong Peon Angk Prasrae 15
393 309 L Brak Chaort Angk Prasrae 15
394 313 L Ngoy Sina Angk Prasrae 15
395 325 L Saom Mun Angk Prasrae 15
396 444 R Charng Veay Angk Prasrae 15
397 305 L Oum Chang Angk Prasrae 14
398 384 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 13
399 360 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 13
400 452 R Gheam Chan Angk Prasrae 12.5
401 321 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 12
402 345 L Nong Houy Angk Prasrae 12
403 450 R Koy Sat Angk Prasrae 12
404 438 R Maen Saleang Angk Prasrae 12
405 315 L Eaem Eourn Angk Prasrae 12

106
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
406 406 R Keov Sokha Angk Prasrae 12
407 301 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 12
408 382 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 10
409 380 R Laek Sreynourn Angk Prasrae 10
410 319 L Prak Rorn Angk Prasrae 8
411 297 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 7.5
412 347 L Preab Sung Angk Prasrae 6
413 365 L Mean Senglone Andoung Pou 45 Partial
414 468 R Kaov Orn Andoung Pou 160 Partial
415 490 R Kem Saophea Andoung Pou 100 Partial
416 488 R Rouas Kao Andoung Pou 80 Partial
417 367 L Saom Chinda Andoung Pou 40 Entire
418 480 R Preab Somnang Andoung Pou 28 Partial
419 357 L Pruom Chorn Andoung Pou 15 Entire
420 355 L Meak Sokhourn Andoung Pou 90 Partial
421 472 R Chea Chanthy Andoung Pou 81 Entire
422 474 R Proum Saran Andoung Pou 48 Entire
423 359 L Pich Sapourn Andoung Pou 24 Entire
424 363 L Chab Dara Andoung Pou 15 Partial
425 Andoung Pou Andoung Pou 2540 60
426 476 R Pich Moneiy Andoung Pou 48
427 478 R Chab Savourn Andoung Pou 14
428 492 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 200
429 484 R Sek Saophea Andoung Pou 160
430 353 L Owner not available Andoung Pou 150
431 464 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 120
432 466 R Va Chean Andoung Pou 80
433 470 R Prak Dorn Andoung Pou 75
434 486 R Saom Sarin Andoung Pou 70

107
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
435 462 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 68
436 482 R Van Saraen Andoung Pou 60
437 578 R Preab Chhuern Kampong Trach 57 Partial
438 435 L Va King Kampong Trach 8 Entire
439 391 L Chak Prom Kampong Trach 96 Partial
440 494 R Ma Kearithy Kampong Trach 90 Entire
441 371 L Prugh Norb Kampong Trach 60 Partial
442 379 L Ben Song Kampong Trach 48 Partial
443 594 R Ouk Saren Kampong Trach 37 Partial
444 506 R Rath Yol Kampong Trach 36 Partial
445 649 L Prom Sean Kampong Trach 30 Entire
446 643 L Sau Pin Kampong Trach 30 Entire
447 651 L Kong Sarun Kampong Trach 28 Entire
448 510 L Kong Thy Kampong Trach 27 Partial
449 361 L Sok Dy Kampong Trach 16 Entire
450 415 L Hei Ratna Kampong Trach 9 Entire
451 542 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 6 Partial
452 552 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial
453 546 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3.5 Partial
454 548 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3.5 Partial
455 544 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 3 Partial
456 375 L Ted Borarnd Kampong Trach Partial
457 540 R Chue Oun Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial
458 573 L Bras eang Kampong Trach 28.5 Partial
459 671 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 150 Partial
460 655 L Kert Siruern Kampong Trach 105 Entire
461 610 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 100 Partial
462 405 L Yan Chouch Kampong Trach 52 Partial
463 417 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial

108
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
464 524 R Ghean Sovany Kampong Trach 40 Entire
465 669 L Hon Nuern Kampong Trach 32 Partial
466 520 R Paen Saroun Kampong Trach 24 Partial
467 592 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20 Partial
468 526 R Kem San Kampong Trach 20 Entire
469 617 L Kim Sopheap Kampong Trach 18 Partial
470 539 L Luerng man Kampong Trach 17 Partial
471 383 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 16 Entire
472 605 L Sok Chay Kampong Trach 13.5 Partial
473 571 L Chea Sophan Kampong Trach 12.5 Partial
474 504 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 12 Partial
475 389 L Phat Savat Kampong Trach 12 Entire
476 556 R Teav Kun Kampong Trach 12 Partial
477 600 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 Partial
478 411 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial
479 611 L En Yaen Kampong Trach 98
480 574 R Chea Youy Kampong Trach 63
481 479 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 48
482 597 L Chhen Von Kampong Trach 43
483 499 L Tep Chun Kampong Trach 36
484 536 R Seng Huern Kampong Trach 34
485 Kampong Trach Kampong Trach 30
486 465 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 23
487 547 L Nut Sim Kampong Trach 22.5
488 545 L Sorn Titouny Kampong Trach 20.3
489 461 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
490 575 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 18
491 535 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 18
492 439 L Hong Tei Kampong Trach 18

109
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
493 565 L Doung Savuern Kampong Trach 15
494 538 R Kem Sokom Kampong Trach 80
495 558 R Teav Vanna Kampong Trach 42
496 419 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
497 589 L Koev An Kampong Trach 25
498 505 L Leat Chuern Kampong Trach 25
499 601 L Va Tav Kampong Trach 22
500 584 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
501 615 L Mau Yon Kampong Trach 18
502 537 L Sok Oun Kampong Trach 18
503 433 L Chan Tha Kampong Trach 15
504 663 L Sok Ouk Kampong Trach 15
505 587 L Mey Chanton Kampong Trach 14
506 579 L Ly Kerng Kampong Trach 13.5
507 566 R Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5
508 445 L Haem Sokha Kampong Trach 12
509 407 L Chan Sokha Kampong Trach 6
510 512 R Hem Yut Kampong Trach 150
511 409 L Kim Ron Kampong Trach 112
512 631 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 67
513 619 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 63
514 385 L Merng Sarith Kampong Trach 63
515 529 L Mao Kead Kampong Trach 63
516 519 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 60
517 572 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 57
518 421 L Chan Bonthuern Kampong Trach 56
519 639 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 55
520 407 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 52
521 443 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 40

110
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
522 509 L ACLEDA BANK Kampong Trach 40
523 580 R Soam Lon Kampong Trach 40
524 508 R Ork Chantha Kampong Trach 39
525 518 R Mom Ty Kampong Trach 36
526 453 L Chea Vantha Kampong Trach 36
527 623 L Kem Yat Kampong Trach 35
528 635 L Kuy Pech Kampong Trach 34
529 659 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 33
530 661 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 33
531 657 L Chay Savut Kampong Trach 33
532 500 R Ngaed Chan Kampong Trach 32
533 534 R Luern Man Kampong Trach 32
534 653 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 30
535 498 R Meong Sarith Kampong Trach 30
536 485 L Pork Sovana Kampong Trach 30
537 516 R Bras Sokon Kampong Trach 30
538 645 L Sam Lan Kampong Trach 30
539 401 L Toch Khorn Kampong Trach 30
540 593 L Chreong Sam Kampong Trach 27
541 483 L Chy Sophaon Kampong Trach 27
542 576 R Va Savat Kampong Trach 27
543 569 L Saom Manen Kampong Trach 27
544 507 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
545 588 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
546 429 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
547 489 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
548 525 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
549 555 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
550 557 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25

111
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
551 625 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
552 641 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 25
553 521 L Yoak Sovan Kampong Trach 25
554 598 R Sao Lam Kampong Trach 25
555 561 L An Pech Kampong Trach 25
556 563 L Tep Kampong Trach 25
557 527 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 24
558 586 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 24
559 562 R Chhoa Soaphea Kampong Trach 24
560 532 R Luerng Keav Kampong Trach 24
561 543 L E Ratnak Kampong Trach 22.5
562 423 L Chhom Phal Kampong Trach 22.5
563 441 L Chen Suern Kampong Trach 22.5
564 554 R Teav Pouy Kampong Trach 21.3
565 568 R Srey Ta Kampong Trach 21
566 481 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
567 511 L Korean Centre Kampong Trach 20
568 477 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
569 495 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
570 562 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
571 621 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
572 627 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
573 629 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
574 633 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
575 523 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
576 581 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 20
577 590 L Sim Vonghan Kampong Trach 20
578 559 L Sterng Sachea Kampong Trach 20
579 612 R Em Savon Kampong Trach 20

112
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
580 339 L Lueok Pov Kampong Trach 20
581 451 L Dong Molykhun Kampong Trach 20
582 533 L Ou Sinun Kampong Trach 20
583 437 L Maen Kong Kampong Trach 18
584 609 L Dom Tara Kampong Trach 18
585 613 L Pech Agon Kampong Trach 18
586 585 L Khun Bolyna Kampong Trach 18
587 397 L Braeng Vanny Kampong Trach 18
588 528 R Chhem Chanra Kampong Trach 18
589 549 L Kem Yet Kampong Trach 18
590 463 L Yu Somart Kampong Trach 18
591 591 L Ngou Mao Kampong Trach 18
592 517 L Tun Sokom Kampong Trach 18
593 583 L Hei Cha Kampong Trach 18
594 603 L Chay May Kampong Trach 18
595 425 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 16
596 403 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 16
597 427 L Dok Vang Kampong Trach 16
598 431 L Ou Rathana Kampong Trach 16
599 377 L Chan Keong Kampong Trach 16
600 564 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 15
601 560 R Kem Nat Kampong Trach 15
602 503 L Kim Sokha Kampong Trach 15
603 497 L Kaem Agon Kampong Trach 15
604 513 L Meas Vantheon Kampong Trach 15
605 493 L Kau Sophal Kampong Trach 15
606 570 R Sterng Yan Kampong Trach 15
607 515 L Mi Rath Kampong Trach 15
608 531 L Sok Chea Kampong Trach 15

113
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
609 491 L Bras Salout Kampong Trach 15
610 553 L Cheom Thourn Kampong Trach 15
611 665 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 14
612 381 L Ban Kadin Kampong Trach 14
613 457 L Pov Peark Kampong Trach 14
614 581 L Teb Mao Kampong Trach 14
615 514 R Kim Veasna Kampong Trach 14
616 567 L Reach Tak Kampong Trach 14
617 413 L Duerk Saron Kampong Trach 13.5
618 607 L Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5
619 637 L Oum Sophea Kampong Trach 13.5
620 455 L Pech Savy Kampong Trach 13.5
621 595 L Ly Sokhom Kampong Trach 13.5
622 459 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 13
623 599 L Kong Yong Kampong Trach 13
624 647 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 12
625 395 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 12
626 496 R Hun Ratha Kampong Trach 12
627 606 R Put Rasmey Kampong Trach 12
628 596 R Chen Sopheak Kampong Trach 12
629 471 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10
630 473 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10
631 475 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10
632 469 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 10
633 608 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 10
634 522 R Seng Rany Kampong Trach 10
635 530 R Ouk Sarorn Kampong Trach 10
636 577 L Oum Sakhurn Kampong Trach 10
637 582 R Kong Tol Kampong Trach 10

114
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
638 467 L Ou Angy Kampong Trach 10
639 541 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 10
640 551 L Chen Salon Kampong Trach 10
641 447 L Ham Huern Kampong Trach 9
642 502 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 8
643 373 L Leang vuthy Kampong Trach 8
644 393 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 7
645 602 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5.5
646 604 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5
647 387 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 5
648 487 L Ream Setha Kampong Trach 5
649 501 L Luerng Minh Kampong Trach 5
650 449 L Ouk Thanin Kampong Trach 4.5
651 550 R Kong Vannak Kampong Trach
652 667 L Seng Samon Kampong Trach
653 689 L Koev Yan Amkpil 22.5 Partial
654 697 L Owner not available Amkpil 90 Entire
655 622 R Ti Savon Amkpil 83 Partial
656 681 L Owner not available Amkpil 25 Partial
657 695 L Owner not available Amkpil 25 Partial
658 679 L Owner not available Amkpil 20 Partial
659 683 L Owner not available Amkpil 20 Partial
660 693 L Owner not available Amkpil 12 Entire
661 699 L Owner not available Amkpil 4 Partial
662 Amkpil Amkpil 410
663 624 R Seng Lan Amkpil 48
664 691 L Sou Sabol Amkpil 42
665 620 R Keb Mil Amkpil 30
666 687 L Meav Yin Amkpil 18.8

115
 Appendix 3

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Name of Affected Residential Commercial Farmland
2 2 2
No. Code Side Household Commune (m ) (m ) (m ) House House and Store Store/ Shop
667 685 L Ouch Kemsean Amkpil 17.5
668 701 L Kun Set Andoung Trabaek 14 Partial
669 703 L Prom Seng Andoung Trabaek 16
670 Andoung Trabaek Andoung Trabaek
671 630 R Pung Sarim Krabau 270 Entire
672 626 R Ream Phanna Krabau 1200 Entire
673 709 L Niy Chamnang Krabau 600 Entire
674 628 R Ream Mab Krabau 86 Partial
675 707 L Kat Sitha Krabau 12
676 'Krabau Krabau

116
 Appendix 4

Summary of Pre-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South)

Agenda:
Introduce purpose of the project and road section and what TA is all about
Introduce survey team and date for conduct IOL and SES
Why conducted IOL and ESE?
Cut off date
Minimize impact of the project

Location of
Road Date of Meeting Number of
No Section Meeting (District) Participants Concerns Raised by the People
When this road will started
construction?
They proposed to construct this
road as soon as possible,
Proposed to build drainage along
NR - 20 May
1 Svay Tep 13 road side,
314D 2011
Proposed to compensation for fruit
trees and other threes
make clear between compensation
price for rural and urban land area,

make clear between compensation

price for rural, urban land area and
land near the Vietname Border
proposed minimize impact of the
NR - 21 May project for urban area
2 Kampong Ro 20
314D 2011 When this road will started
construction?
During relocated or moved back of
structure propose to project to
inform them at least two week first.
proposed minimize impact of the
project for urban area especially at
Dumduol town
If people that affected 100% of their
land affected, where should their
21 May live?
3 NR - 13 Rom Duol 43
2011 When this road will started
construction?
All of properties that affected, the
project will compensation or not?
How price are compensation?

Propose to the project to rebuild

drainage for them, because they
just collected money with all of APs
to build that drainage, don’t be
22 May Romeas
4 NR - 13 21 collected the money again, they
2011 Haek
have no money.
I am landless, how should the
project solve problem for me?
When this road will started

117
 Appendix 4

Location of
Road Date of Meeting Number of
No Section Meeting (District) Participants Concerns Raised by the People
construction?
He affected his house 100%, he
proposed to project to pay for
relocated his house is possible.
During the first construction nearly
two year ago, the authorities
proposed to contributed his land for
road construction, during this time,
24 May Kamchay he propose suitable price for
5 NR - 13 76
2011 Mear compensation.
When this road will started
construction?
How many meters of ROW for our
road NR-13
When this road will started
construction?
25 May Don’t excavated land in ROW to
6 NR - 13 Svay Rieng 26
2011 used for road construction, should
get from borrow pit far from the
road ROW.

118
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Svay Tep District (South)

- Date: Friday, 20/ May, 2011

- Place: District Center
- Time: 2h00 to 3h 15

Participants

1-Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Governor of Svay Tep District)

2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant)
3- Mr. Sao Primarak (MPWT)
4- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
5- Koung Sary (Chief office of district)
6- Hay Chan Nak (Deputy Chief of Admin of district)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Post-IOL consultation

A- Mr. Sao Primarak (Staff of MPWT)

1. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear 65 km;
NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we
need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

1. Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the
meeting today.
2. The members of the survey team will start to measurement tomorrow afternoon from Svay
Teap to Kampong Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and inform
to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to
measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when
have participated from authorities and people
3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to identify impacts from land acquisition and
make an assessment of eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like,

119
 Appendix 4

Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly,
Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc.
4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all
people by no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.
5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public
consultation again
C- Deputy of District
Referring to ideas for MPWT’s officer and Resettlement Consultant provided all of the
information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to
participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide this to commune
head to repot some of structures and fences etc,

The Commune Head of Prasot

Prasot cmmune has 7500m from Prasot commune to Kampong Ro district is not so much
affected with structures, affected agriculture only
- Affected some Fences and 13 structures and severely affected 3 structures
- Affected with 4 villages
1. Tuol Trabaek village: affected with 24 stalls/Shops
2. Pothy Vuong village: affected 5 stalls/shops and 5 fences,
3. Prey Ruodol village: 3 relocated structures and 1 gateway Pagoda
4. Ang Tamouk village: affected with 1 gateway of pagoda

E- Number Commune and Village at Svay Teab District along NR-314

District Commune Village Remarks

Prasoutr Ti Muoy
Kandieng Reay
Prasoutr Ti Pi
Svay Teap Angk Ta Mouk
Prasout Prey Rumduol
Pou Vong

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District: Svay Tep, Commune: Kandeang Reay, Village:

/ Sign or Thumb
No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village Print
1 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI
2 Sao Primarak M MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Phenh Pha M Deputy of District Svay Teap
5 Koung Sary M District officer Chief of office
6 Men Saran M District officer Chief of Admin
7 Hay Chan M District officer Deputy Chief of Admin
Nak
8 Gnoun Sat F Commune head Kandeang Reay
9 Ouk Pak M Commune head Prasot village
10 Sek Saline M Village head Prey Rumdol village

120
 Appendix 4

11 Am San M Village head Tuol Trabaek village

12 Phouk M Village head Prasot Pir village
Savaen
13 Mok Savun M Village head Prasot Muy village

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

121
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011

- Place: District Center of Kampong Ro
- Time: 9h00
Participants

1- Mr. Pich Sovan (Chief Governor of district)

2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant)
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Mr. Sok Sam Ol (Chief Admin of Kampong Ro district)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and
NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Vulnerable grou

A- Chief of District
Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314 and Participants
during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local
Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement
Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the meeting
today.
6. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear 65 km;
NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we
need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement from Svay Teap to Kampong
Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this
information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct

122
 Appendix 4

IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project
successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear
what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign
agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for
each site, total is 20 m.
3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living
life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household
and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line
etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by
road construction project.
4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all
people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.
7. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public
consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site.
C- Chief of District
Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to
inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions
to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and
fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that
all people lose.

Number Commune and Village at Kampong Ro District along NR-314D

District Commune Village

1- Pring Chrum
1 Pras Ponlea 2- Trapeang Lun
3- Tradaet
2 Prey Thom 1- Prey Sakom
1- Trapeang Chhlonh
Commercial area (around PK:
Kampong Ro 3 Nhor 2- Ro 16+900)
3- Svay Anat
4- Trapeang Treav
4 khsaet 1- Resay Orm
Commercial area( around
1- Oh PK:20+600)
5 Thmey 2- Prey Voir
5 11

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Kampong Ro, Commune, Village:

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Pich Sovan M Chief of District Kampong Ro
2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI

123
 Appendix 4

4 Sok Sam Ol M Chief admin of District Kampong Ro

5 Prach Koung M Commune head Ksaet
6 Real Sear M Village head Nhor
7 Sao Savaen M Village head Thmey
8 Sam Sorn M Village head Nhor
9 Noun Phal M Village head Nhor
10 Phae Sarorn M Village head Pring Chrum
11 Kim Rithy M Commune head Prash Ponlea
12 Hing Pae M Village head Tra Baek
13 Chea Young M Deputy of commune Thmey
14 Rot Soueng F Commune head Prey Thom
15 Some Hang M Commune head Nhor
16 Som Sam At M Village head Oh
17 Sao Samaen M Village head Ay anak
18 Long Sary M Village head Trapeang Run
19 Chan Yong M Village head Resay Orm
20 Nhim Pa M Village head
21
22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

124
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Rum Duol District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011

- Place: District Center of Rum Duol
- Time: 2h00
Participants

1- Mr. Chan Heng (Deputy Governor of Rum Duol district)

2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant)
2- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant
3- Communes Chief, Commune Councils and villages head and affected people
(APs)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and
NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Vulnerable group

A- Dputy of District
Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Rum Duol District area and
Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora
(Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement
Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you very much for Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant) that has
present, Deputy of district, Chief of Communes, Village head and all of the people that
participated for this meeting today.
8. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear 65 km;
NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we
need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after
construction.

125
 Appendix 4

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay
Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district around between next
week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to
all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to
measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful
when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets,
others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement
with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site,
total is 20 m.
3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living
life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household
and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line
etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by
road construction project.
4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all
people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.
5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public
consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site.
C- Deputy of District
Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to
inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions
to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and
fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that
all people lose.

Number Communes and Villages at Rom Duol district along

NR-13

District Commune Village

1- Kampong Chork Commercial area(Pk: 7+600)
1- Chork
2- Prey Keav
1- Kok Sramor
2- Ta Naeng
2- Sang Ke
3- Puon
4- Ta chou
Rum Duol
1- Trapeang Kros
2- Trapeang Kraet
3- Chrung Popel
3- Prah Ang Keo
4_Kroch
1- Tasork
4- Kampong Ampil
2- Trapeang damrey
4 12

126
 Appendix 4

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Rum Duol, Commune: Village:

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Pich Heng M Village head Chork
2 Chet Chan Thorn M Village head Prey Keav
3 Koeng Ny F Village head Kok Sramor
4 Park Sa Khorn M Village head Tanaeng
5 Ros Seay M Village head Pon
6 Mork Chhorn M Village head Tachou
7 Prum Vath M Village head Trapeang Krous
8 Ma Sarin M Village head Trapeang Kraet
9 Sao Saphon M Village head Kroch
10 Men Bun thoeurn M Village head Prah Ang Keo
11 Keo Reth M Village head Trapeang Damrey
12 Sor Va M Village head Tasork
13 Ou Saval M Commune head Sang Kae
14 Reach Saphon M Commune head Kampong Ampil
15 Souce Pheng M Commune head Chrong Popel
16 Oung Sarorn M People Prey Keav
17 So Navy M People Prey Keav
18 Chen Raem People
19 Chin Phaly M People Prey Keav
20 San Chhorvorn M People Prey Keav
21 Loek Siyat M People Prey Keav
22 Sao Sarorn People Prey Keav
23 En Vanna People Prey Keav
24 Chet Chan Thorn Village head Prey Keav
25 Sear Lakhana People Prey Keav
26 En Phear Village head Svay Roung
27 Keo Boraen People Prey Keav
28 Kim vanna People Prey Keav
29 Kim Boraen People Prey Keav
30 Pov Sinareth People Prey Keav
31 Mey salim People Prey Keav
32 Men Sitha People Prey Keav
33 Em Da People Chork
34 Chea Soklida People Chork
35 Oung Nary People Chork
36 Sim Sithoeurn People Prey Keav

127
 Appendix 4

37 Men Sam At People Prey Keav

38 OU Dany People Prey Keav
39 Pheng Sophat People Chork
40 Toch Sinat People Chork
41 Ouk Kunthea People Chork
42 Has Neang People Chork
43 Pen Sam An Commune Council Kampong Chork

Writing by Local Resettlement consultan

Mr. Seang Bora

128
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Romeas Haek District

- Date: Saturday, 22/ May, 2011

- Place: District Center
- Time: 9h00
Participants

1- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor)

2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant)
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Pen Savorn (district Officer)
5- Men Samoeurn (district Officer)
6- Commune Chiefs, commune council and all of village head

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and
NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Vulnerable group

A- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from Rum Duol District
border to border of Kamchay Mear and Participants during this meeting (see attach
files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement
Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you very much for Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant) that has
present, Deputy of district, Chief of Communes, Village head and all of the people that
participated for this meeting today. And, I would like inform the purpose of the meeting
and project introduction as following:
9. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear 65 km;
NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we

129
 Appendix 4

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after
construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay
Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district and after conducted
at Romeas Haek district around between next week and also Kamchay Mear district at
NR-8, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to
all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to
measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful
when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets,
others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement
with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site,
total is 20 m.

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living
life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household
and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line
etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by
road construction project.
4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all
people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.
5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public
consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site.
C- Deputy of District
Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to
inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions
to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and
fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that
all people lose.

Number Commune and Village at Romeas Haek District along NR_13

District Commune Village Others

1- Samroung Commercial area
1- Angpra Sre 2- Trapeang Rumdenh
3- Thnal Peam
1- Bos Koki
2- Trapeang Thbal
2- Andong Po 3- Trapeang Chor
4- Trapeang Banteay Commercial area
Romeas Haek
5- Arak Svay
1- Chong Oh
3- kampong Trach 2- Ta Trav
3- Kampong Trach Commercial area
1- Touek Vil
4- Amkpil 2- Trapeang Prey
3- Ta Mao

130
 Appendix 4

District Commune Village Others

4- Trapeang Popel
5- Ampil
6- Troak
1- Mony Proeksa
5- Trorse
2- Voat
1- Trapeang Smach
6- Andong Trabaek
2- Andong Trabaek
6 Communes 21Villages

Attendants List
Province: Svay Rieng, District Romeas_Haek, Commune: , Village:

/
No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village
1 Hen Sokun M Deputy Chief of District Romeas Haek
2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Pov Savonng M Commune head Trorse
5 Pov Seap M Village head Andong Po
6 Koung Vaet M Commune Council 2 Andong Trabaek
7 Koung Sok M Commune Council 2 Ampil
8 Soeng Sarorn F Commune Council Ampil
9 Prach Yim M Village head Trorse
10 Mom Sorn M Commune head Andong Po
11 Ros Phan M Village head Arak Svay
12 Keo Rim M Village head Trapeang Rum Denh
13 Ouk Van M Commune head Ang Prasre
14 Tep Chan Savuth M Village head Ang Prasre
15 Chan Samoeurn M Village head Ang Prasre
16 Chan Saban M Village head Ang Prasre
17 Moek Moung M Village head Vat
18 Pen Oeurn M Village head Trapeang Smach
19 Korng Bunthoeurn M Village head Andong Trabaek
20 Pen Savorn M District Officer Romeas Haek
21 Men Samoeurn M District Officer Romeas Haek
22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

131
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 24/ May, 2011

- Place: Veal Smach Village
- Time: 2h00
Participants

1- Mr. Yaeng Cham (Commune council of Krabao)

2- Mr. Yat Yorn( district Public Works and Transport)
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Commune councils , village heads and Affected people (APs)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and
NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Vulnerable group

A- Chief of district Public Work and Transport

Had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune
head had
Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Kamchay Mear District
from border of Romeas Haek to NR 08 affected with one commune and two villages:
namely, Kra Bao Commune, 1, Thbong Vat Village, 2, Veal Smarch Thmey Village, to
Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora
(Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district Public Work and
Transport , Commune head that has present that had arrange meeting today, thanks for
all village head Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting
today.

10. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,
between Komchay Mear 65 km;
NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we

132
 Appendix 4

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after
construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom
Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek
and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all
of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all
others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size
of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have
participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of
the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is
20 m. so, all of properties/ assets/lands/ trees and other assets will collected during team
survey conduct OL and SES

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and
living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each
household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under
poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household
that affected by road construction project.

4. Cutoff date:
We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along
the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to
build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI.
5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to
conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along
the project site.

C- Chief of commune
Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to
inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate
strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report
some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the
COI and assts that all people loss.

Number Commune and Villages at Kamchay Mear District along NR-13

District Commune Village Others

1- Thbong Vat
1- Kra Bao
Svay Rieng 2- Veal Smach Thmey
1- Communes 2 Villages

133
 Appendix 4

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District: Kamchay Mear, Commune: Village:

/
No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village
1 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Yat Yorn M Public Work of District Kamchay Mear
5 Yaeng Cham M Commune Council Kra Bao
6 Sao Sonay M Commune Council Kra Bao
7 Teap Run M Village head Veal Smach
8 Heng SamOn F Village head Thbong Vat
9

Note:76 people participated during that meeting (see Pictures attachment)

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

134
 Appendix 4

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 25/ May, 2011

- Place: Baek Ronose Village (along NR-13)
- Time: 9h00 AM
Participants

1- Mr. Chhiv Sarorn (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng)

2- Mr. Choup Chanrithy (Community Development Town)
3- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Mr. Sin Yong (Chief ofCommune of Sangkhor)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and
NR13
2- Resettlement Introduction
3- Conduct IOL
3- Conduct SES
5- Time table for field work
6- Cutoff Date
7- Entitlements of Affected people
8- Vulnerable group

A- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town

He had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune
head had report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Svay Rieng
District from NR- 1 to border of Rum Duol district affected with one commune and
6 villages: namely, Sang Khor Commune, 1, Thmey Village, 2, Baek Ronorse Village, 3,
Thlork, 4 Preah Tonle, 5 Po Phlear, 6 Aknakot village to Participants during this meeting
and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng
Town, Public Work and Transport , Commune head that has present and arranged
meeting today, thanks for all village head Village head and all of lady and gentlemen
that have participated for this meeting today. I would like to introduce purpose of meeting
as follow:

11. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D
from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new
cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,

135
 Appendix 4

between Komchay Mear 65 km;

NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we
need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after
construction.

2. Why Conduct IOL and SES?

Because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and living life of the people along
the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable
group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out
that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction
project.

3. Cutoff date:
We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along
the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to
build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI.

4. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom
Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek
and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all
of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all
others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size
of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have
participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of
the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is
20 m. so, all of properties, assets, lands, trees and other assets will collected during team
survey conduct IOL and SES

5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to
conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along
the project site.

C- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town

Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to

inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate
strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report
some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the
COI and assts that all people loss. And don’t be have more structures like : Shops, Stalls,
Houses or other structures build in COI or ROW from to date, if have some build
temporary structures should have agreement from authorities and agreement between
owners of structures and authorities, when Government need land in ROW, they will
moved out by no compensation.

136
 Appendix 4

6- Number Commune and Village at Svay Rieng District along NR_13

District Commune Village Others

1- Thmey
2- Bak Ronorse
3- Thlork
Svay Rieng 1- Sangkhor
4- Preah Tonle
5- Po Phlear
6- Akna Kot
1- Communes 6 Villages

7- Attendants List

/
Organization/Villag
No. Name Sex Position
e
1 Chhiv Sarorn M Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Svay Rieng Town
2 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Souce Sear M Village head Bak Ronorse
5 Pal Saban M Village head Po Phlear
6 Sam Samet M Thlork
7 Ros Hun M Staff of village Bak Ronorse
8 Tith Salei F Deputy of village Po Phlear
9 Nem Savoeurn F Staff of village Po Phlear
10 Kim Sina F Staff of village Aknakot
11 Em Kroch M Deputy of village Aknakot
12 Pen Malida F Deputy of village Thlork
13 Sao Han M Village head Aknakot
14 Phouk Cheat M Village head Preah Tonle
15 Meas Horn M Commune Council Sang Khor
16 Torn Samon M Deputy of village Bak Ronorse
17 Sin Yong M Chief of Commune Sang Khor
18 Sok Norn M Deputy Chief of Commune Sang Khor
19 Sorn Sam At M Village head Thmey
20 Choup Chanrithy M Community Development Town Svay Rieng
21 M
22

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

137
 Appendix 5

Summary of Post-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South)

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such as electric and communication poles need to be relocated
Discuss Resettlement policy in general terms (affected houses and other structures will be
compensated at replacement cost
find out from the affected people their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation,
allowances and assistance, relocation of structures
Re-inform the cutoff date

Location of
Road Date of Number of
No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People
Section Meeting Participants
(District)
He has two place of Residential
land along road NR-314D but, he
participated to measured only one
place, how should he do?
Proposed to constructed drainage
Mon, 20 June
1 NR 314D Svay Tep along the during road
2011
construction.
When will project stared
compensation?
For example: If landless where
people should live?
Proposed to constructed drainage
along the during road construction
Project construct road in district
50% people to proposed to
Mon, 20 June Kampong constructed 50% more road to
2 NR 314D
2011 Ro improve the town in district if
possible.
Compensation rate, how much
per quare meter?

If affected fences or stalls, will the

project pay for compensation or
Tu, 21 June
3 NR 13 Svay Rieng not?
2011
If affected public assets, how
should they pay compensation?
If People that landless, where
should they can live and how to
do?
Mrs. Loek Nary, she did not
complain with project if
government need.
Mr. Prum Savan, Survey team
Tu, 21 June
4 NR 13 Rom Duol measure for his residential land
2011
and structure, but, he did not
measured his farm land along the
road site
Mrs.Pum Phanna, During
measurement survey she did not
stay at home, hoe should she do?
Mr. Ros Mara, the project need

138
 Appendix 5

Location of
Road Date of Number of
No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People
Section Meeting Participants
(District)
10m each side total 20m, do the
project need some more land or
not?
Proposed to minimize COI around
7 to 8m each side for urban area?

Mr. Pich Saran, Culvert for waste

water in samroung Urban area is
money collected from local
people, if road constructed
Wed, 22 June Romeas
5 NR 13 affected with their culvert,
2011 Haek
collected money from local people
again or responsible by road
project?

Don’t excavated land in ROW like

canal, to used for road
construction, should get from
borrow pit far from the road ROW.
Mr. Heng Sam On, Proposed
project to study to be suitable
Wed, 22 June Kamchay
6 NR 13 71 compensation rate.
2011 Mear
Propose contractor vehicle slow
down their speed and proposed
spray water at least two time aday.
How much the ROW of the roas
number 13?

Compensation rate, how much

per quare meter?
If affected Concrete Grave, how
the project compensation for this
Grave?
Don’t excavated land in ROW like
canal, to used for road
construction, should get from
borrow pit far from the road ROW.
Thu, 23 June Kampong The project need 10m each side
7 NR 150B
2011 Tralach total 20m, do the project need
some more land or not?
How the project compensation for
all properties that affected by
project base on currently market
value?
If people that affected 100% of
their land affected, where should
their live?

Road construction need only 10

Thu, 23 June Samki each site for road construction or
8 NR 150B
2011 Meanchey need more top soil?
How the project compensation for

139
 Appendix 5

Location of
Road Date of Number of
No Meeting Main Points Raised by the People
Section Meeting Participants
(District)
all properties that affected by
project base on currently market
value?
If affected fences or stalls, will the
project pay for compensation or
not?

If affected fences or stalls, will the

project pay for compensation or
not?
Road construction need only 10
each site for road construction or
need more for top soil?
Provincial Road Improvement
NR 150B Fri, 24 June Project is a project that important
9 Tuok Phos
and 53 2011 to develop rural area all people
very happy with this project and
proposed to start constructed as
soon as possible they did not build
any more structures from now,
and thanks for Government of
Cambodia that have this project.

NR 53 and Fri, 24 June N/A

10 Thpong
151B 2011

140
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting at Svay Teap District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011

- Place: Prasot Commune
- Time: 8h00
Participants
1- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District)
2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Commune Chiefs,
5- Village headman

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Kampong Ro District
from Svay Tep district to Prey Vao Vietname border and Participants during this meeting
(see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit
from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant.

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for Deputy of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman
and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and
Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia
has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical
assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among
others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of
Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 26,5 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF)
at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65
km; NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong
Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and
ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL
are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result

141
 Appendix 5

will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all
of affected people that has present here today.
We was first meeting with authorities, not participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed
authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured,
interview APs along the NR 314D.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to
understand the first result during conducted IOL.
As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with
affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total length around 26,5 Km, the total
affected people are 288households, Interview with men are 159 households, interview
with women are 56 households and did not meet owners are 73 households. In 288
households affected residential land 14300m2, Commercial land is 1632.2m2;
agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor 40 household, disable 01.
Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57 Steel 03 and Wood 75),
affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18, Divorced 01 household,
Widow 23, Poor 40 and Disable 01.
Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to
IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly,
handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will
haveassistance out of properties affected by project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(i) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from
the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
(ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at
this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.
(iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a

142
 Appendix 5

review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.
(iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District, Svay Tep,

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Penh Pha M Deputy Chief of district Svay Tep
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Sin Somaly M Seller Brosot I
5 Long Theun M Seller Brosot I
6 So SiThuon M Seller Brosot I
7 Hun Savat M Seller Pothivong
8 Hun Song F People Pothivong
9 Yous Samith M People Pothivong
10 Sao Sameun F People Pothivong
11 Chim Thany F People Pothivong
12 Sao sokhom M People Pothivong
13 Sao Chantha M People Pothivong
14 Koy Vat M People Pothivong
15 Put Chea M People Pothivong
16 Lek Sin F People Pothivong
17 Yak Ral M People Pothivong
18 Not Socheat M People BrosotI
19 Srey Som auon M People BrosotI
20 Un Sok F People BrosotI
21 To Vei F People Brosot I
22 To Leng M People Brosot I
23 Suos Hong M People Brosot I
24 Meas Chea M People Brosot II

143
 Appendix 5

25 Kong Somaean M People Brosot II

26 Put Nouv F People Brosot II
27 Preap Tith M People BrosotII
28 Prom Saroeun F People Pothivong
29 On Somalay M Teacher Pothivong
30 Mey Saran F People Pothivong
31 Choeuk Phan F People Pothivong
32 Ruos Sina F People Brosot
33 Ruos Sombath F People Brosot
34 Chea Somnang M People Brosot
35 Preap Chantha M People Brosot
36 Prom Nouy F People Tuol trobek
37 Te kieng F People Brosot
38 Va Chom M People BrosotI
39 Khiev Bopha M People BrosotI
40 To Raty M People BrosotI
41 Mao Sarith F People Brosot
42 Kao Sokha F People Brosot
43 Mao Sophy F People Tuol trobek
44 Som Savin M Seller BrosotI
45 Pok Saroeun F Seller Tuoltrobek
46 Long Chan M Seller Prey Roduol
47 Som Phaly M People Tuoltrobek
48 Nhim Boran M People Tuoltrobek
49 Suos Sarong M People Tuoltrobek
50 Prak Sovanara M People Tuoltrobek
51 Net Chantha F People Tuoltrobek
52 Va Nget F People Tuoltrobek
53 Thong Sakun F People Tuoltrobek
54 Nuon Pok M People Tuoltrobek
55 Net Sarith F People Tuoltrobek
56 Prom Somaol F People Tuoltrobek
57 Hel Choeun F People Tuoltrobek
58 Min San F People Tuoltrobek
59 Hok Yon F People Tuoltrobek
60 Duong Chinh M People Tuol trobek
61 Um Saron M People Tuoltrobek
62 Prak Sakhon M People Tuoltrobek

144
 Appendix 5

63 Prom Phan M People Tuoltrobek

64 Nhanh Sonoeun M People Pothivong
65 Po Leat M People Pothivong
66 El Ry F People Pothivong
67 Nhem Ravy M People Pothivong
68 Uk Somnang M People BrosotI
69 Prak Sombat F People Tuoltrobek
70 Meas Somaly F People Brosot I
71 Ben Yin M People Tuoltrobek
72 Prak Sitha F People Brosot II
73 Suos Sokha M People Tuoltrobek
74 Ruos Sakun M People Brosot II
75 Sok Chany M People BrosotII
76 Chea Somnang M People Brosot
77 Phat Sochea M People Brosot
78 Cheng Vannak M People Prey Roduol
79 Koy Sarin M People Brosot II
80 Val Leng M Soldier Brosot II
81 Sok Vanna M Soldier Brosot I

Participants 81, Female 30

145
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011

- Place: Pagoda Ro
- Time: 2h00
Participants
1- Souce Samreth (Deputy of District)
2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Saom Hang Commune head
5- Kat Kim Village head
6- Sao Samen Village head
7- Sam Sorn Village head

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Souce Samreth (Deputy of District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Svay Tep District from
NR-1 to Kampong Ro district’s border and Participants during this meeting (see attach
files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)
and Local Resettlement Consultant to presentation the primary result of IOL and SES,

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for Deputy of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman
and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and
Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia
has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical
assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among
others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of
Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 26,5 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF)
at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65
km; NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong
Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and

146
 Appendix 5

ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL
are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result
will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all
of affected people that has present here today.
First, I would like to inform the meeting that, We had first meeting with authorities, not
participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know
information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 314D.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to
understand the first result during conducted IOL.
As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with
affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total affected people along road
number 314D that have distance around 26,5 Km are affected 288households, Interview
with men are 159 households, interview with women are 56 households and did not meet
owners are 73 households. In 288 households affected residential land 14300m2,
Commercial land is 1632.2m2; agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor
40 household, disable 01. Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57
Steel 03 and Wood 75), affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18.
Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to
IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly,
handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will
haveassistance out of properties affected by project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(v) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from
the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
(vi) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at
this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.

147
 Appendix 5

(vii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a
review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.
(viii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the MOWRAM, PDWRAM, PDRD, EMO, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any
party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the
case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List
No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village
1 Souce Samreth M Deputy of District Kampong Ro
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Sam Sorn M Village headman Trapeang Trave
5 Chin Em M People Trapeang Trave
6 Seth Koeng M People Trapeang Trave
7 Chhuon Sakoun M People Trapeang Trave
8 Bive Sinath F People Trapeang Trave
9 Loeng Sitha F People Trapeang Trave
10 Boek Saroeurn F People Trapeang Trave
11 Kok Him F People Trapeang Trave
12 Hemh Sam Phorse F People Trapeang Trave
13 Kiv Many F People Trapeang Trave
14 Heng Sam On F People Trapeang Trave
15 Chuon Vanna M People Trapeang Trave
16 Gnuoy Chanda M People Trapeang Trave
17 Long Vuthy M People Trapeang Trave
18 Put Eng M People Trapeang Trave
19 Khmao Sareth M People Trapeang Trave
20 Keo Phearum M People Trapeang Trave
21 Chhan Thim M People Trapeang Trave
22 Ngin Khemra M People Trapeang Trave
23 Ouk Kory M People Trapeang Trave
24 Pol Rorn M People Svay Anath
25 Duch Try M People Svay Anath
26 Sok Ouk M People Svay Anath
27 Sar Tith M People Svay Anath
28 Suo Phorse M People Ro

148
 Appendix 5

29 Pin Ty F People Ro
30 Seang Sina F People Ro
31 Khat Pheach F People Svay Anath
32 Chab Hean M People Svay Anath
33 Neang Peak M People Svay Anath
34 Sao Samen M Deputy ofvillage Svay Anath
35 Sek Nhim M Deputy ofvillage Ro
36 Sar Phal M People Svay Anath
37 Chan Sokha F People Trapeang Trave
38 Pok Chanda F People Ro
39 Chea Mavany F People Svay Anath
40 Ke Samon F People Svay Anath
41 Sam Sporn M Village head Trapeang Trav

Total participants are 41person, female 12person

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

149
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Svay Rieng District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011

- Place: Preah Ponlea Village
- Time: 8h00
Participants

1- Chhive Saroen (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town)

2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Sin Yong (Commune Chief)
5- Kat Kim Village head
6- a Lady commune council
7- All of 6 Villages head

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Municipal of Svay Rieng Town (Mr. Chhiv Saroen)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from National road 1 to
border of Rumduol district have 6 villages. and Participants during this meeting (see
attach files ), and after that Municipal transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn
(Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the
result as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town,
Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present
here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day
to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development
Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the
Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to
rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border
facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between

150
 Appendix 5

Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and
Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to
Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was
conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding
the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement
Consultant

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy of Municipal of Svay Rieng
Town, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present
here today.
We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed
authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured,
interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to
understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the
team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and
Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side fro centerline, the total affected people
around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with
women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676
households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2;
agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 45
houses, Partial houses 25 and entire houses 20. Shops/Stalls 62, Partial 17 and entire
45.
Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable
group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national
poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Except Sangkhor
commune were conducted with 85 households, Male 41 households, Female 16
households and did not meet owner 28 households that affected Farm land12420m2,
Residential land 429m2 and commercial land is 48m2, the total is 12594m2.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures builds in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(ix) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from

151
 Appendix 5

the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
(x) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at
this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.
(xi) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a
review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.
(xii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List
Province: Svay Rieng Town

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Souce Samreth M Deputy Municipal of Svay Svay Rieng
Rieng town
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Phae Oul M People
5 Sao Han M Village headman Aknakot
6 Pal Saban M Village headman Poplea
7 Souce Sear M Village headman Bak Roneas
8 Phouk Cheat M Village headman Prash Tole
9 Srey Eam M People Prash Tole
10 Manh Lun F People Prash Tole
11 Roth Sokhon F People Aknakot
12 So Keayou F People Aknakot
13 Phoeuk Savun F People Aknakot
14 Roth Sanen F People Aknakot
15 So Phear F People Aknakot
16 So Phy M People Aknakot
17 Seng Phalla F People Aknakot
18 Mao Ra F People Aknakot
19 Yang Sok M People Aknakot
20 Prum Yong F People Aknakot
21 Moeurn Son F People Aknakot
22 Sok sophy F People Aknakot
23 Chan Sinath M People Aknakot

152
 Appendix 5

24 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot

25 Nou Sophorn M People Aknakot
26 Mom Von M People Aknakot
27 Kao Thy M People Poplea
28 Im Samoeurn M People Aknakot
29 Sok Sat M People Aknakot
30 Nhim Sitha M People Aknakot
31 Chan Sath M People Aknakot
32 Chea Vanna M People Aknakot
33 Tep Thach F People Aknakot
34 Pov Saran F People Aknakot
35 Ra Yan F People Aknakot
36 Som Chanda F People Aknakot
37 Yim Ponry F People Aknakot
38 Chork Chhorn F People Aknakot
39 Chan Sopheap F People Aknakot
40 Pich Sithan F People Aknakot
41 Pich Savorn F People Aknakot
42 Yim Koung Kear F People Aknakot
43 En Sinath F People Aknakot
44 Kem Ray F People Aknakot
45 Mao Sareth F People Aknakot
46 Khuon Yan F People Aknakot
47 Roth Savan F People Aknakot
48 Roth Vantha F People Aknakot
49 Roth Vanthorn F People Aknakot
50 Kim Srey Lak F People Aknakot
51 Top Naroth F People Aknakot
52 Kim Ath F People Aknakot
53 Sar Saphan M People Thlok Viilage
54 Sek Sa Em M People Thlok Viilage
55 Meas Buntha M People Prash Tole
56 Phouk Pilot M People Prash Tole
57 Keo Chetna M People Prash Tole
58 Morn Vanara M People Thlok Viilage
59 Nhean Dara M People Thlok Viilage
60 Som Chanthy M People Baroneas
61 Prak Kalan M People Thlok Viilage

153
 Appendix 5

62 Neang Sun F People Prash Tole

63 Nhek Phy M People Aknakot
64 Tith Phang M People Aknakot

65 Srey On M People Aknakot

66 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot

67 PovVichet M People Aknakot

68 Chab Phala M People Aknakot

69 Hem Vibol M People Aknakot

70 Ham Sok M People Aknakot

71 Sam Chorn M People Aknakot

72 Sok Saketh F People Prash Tole

73 Po Chhoy M People Prash Tole

74 Pork Saruon F People Prash Tole

75 Sok Sun F People Prash Tole

76 Kaen Puth M People Prash Tole

77 Saom Phon M People Prash Tole

78 Saom Buny M People Prash Tole

79 Yush Proeurn M People Prash Tole

80 Khut Horn F People Prash Tole

81 Mom Phalla F People Prash Tole

82 Meas Lath F People Prash Tole

83 Saom Sokhara F People Prash Tole

84 Kheo Vaney M People Prash Tole

85 Hong Pov M People Prash Tole

86 Orn Manphath F People Prash Tole

87 Orn Manna F People Prash Tole

88 Pe Hun M People Prash Tole

89 Oung Buunthoeurn F People Prash Tole

90 KoungChanty F People Prash Tole

91 Pen Sambath M People Thlok Viilage

92 Pen Sitho F People Thlok Viilage

93 Ouk Chan thy F People Thlok Viilage

94 RathSao M People Thlok Viilage

95 Pok Naran F People Thlok Viilage

96 Souce Somala F People Thlok Viilage

97 Chan Sem F People Thlok Viilage

98 MeasSeang M People Thlok Viilage

99 Kao Sam OL M People Prash Tole

154
 Appendix 5

100 Meas Phorn F People Thlok Viilage

101 Nhon Sakhoeurn M People Thlok Viilage

102 Tang Sopheap M People Thlok Viilage

103 Pen Sokha M People Thlok Viilage

104 Min Phalla F People Thlok Viilage

105 Yin Kimhan M People Thlok Viilage

106 Heng Song F People Thlok Viilage

107 Som Sambath F People Thlok Viilage

108 Mom Koy M People Aknakot

109 Ros Han F People Aknakot

110 Chhun Saran M People Poplea

111 Som Soum M People Poplea

112 Lay Lun M People Poplea

113 Tep Tharachan F People Poplea

114 Tep Neang M People Poplea

115 Kim Lay M People Poplea

116 Tith Saley M People Poplea

117 Heang Sam Oeurn M People Poplea

118 Ham Soda M People Thlok Viilage

119 Heng Puth F People Thlok Viilage

120 Kaeng Phal M People Thlok Viilage

121 Ham Soy M People Thlok Viilage

122 Khuon Narin M People Thlok Viilage

123 Reach Sovanna F People Thlok Viilage

124 Tith Chamroeurn M People Thlok Viilage

125 Phay Seang Ly M People Bak Roneas

126 Saom Channy F People Bak Roneas

127 saom Sao M People Prash Tole

128 Pin Thol M People Aknakot

129 Koung Soeurn M People Aknakot

130 Sok Kan M People Poplea

131 Kaen Duk M People Poplea

132 Kaen Rany M People Poplea

133 LongKoy M People Poplea

134 Ey Sophat M People Poplea

135 Sou Nun F People Poplea

136 Mom Pha M People Poplea

137 Kao Sithorn F People Poplea

155
 Appendix 5

138 Yan Sim F People Aknakot

139 Ya Nay F People Aknakot

140 Sou Sam Ath M People Aknakot

141 Pov Socheat M People Aknakot

142 Puk sey M People Poplea

143 Pen Phaly F People Bak Roneas

144 Noun Phally F People Bak Roneas

145 So Sokhunthea F People Prash Tole

146 orn Saran M People Prash Tole

147 Chay Tan M People Prash Tole

148 Sin Kom Pheak F People Bak Roneas

149 Mao Sary F People Bak Roneas

150 Peb Sorn F People Prash Tole

151 Chum San F People Prash Tole

152 Koung Saveth F People Prash Tole

153 Hour Saphoeurn M People Bak Roneas

154 Pov Chan F People Bak Roneas

155 Chay Veasna M People Bak Roneas

156 Chhay Chamrong F People Bak Roneas

157 Meas Yam M People Thlok Viilage

158 En Saroeurn F People Prash Tole

159 Orn Sothany F People Prash Tole

160 Puth Sokhany F People Prash Tole

161 En Sak F People Prash Tole

162 Sao Saman M People Prash Tole

163 Prak Kear Thy F People Prash Tole

164 So Saroeurn F People Prash Tole

165 Srey Soeurn F People Prash Tole

166 Norn Phanna F People Prash Tole

167 Yi Chakriya F People Prash Tole

168 Meas Lat F People Prash Tole

169 Nhem Chanda F People Prash Tole

170 En Line M People Prash Tole

171 Meas Saran F People Prash Tole

172 Long Sarin F People Prash Tole

173 Yi Than F People Prash Tole

174 Penh Yin F People Prash Tole

175 Van Phanna M People Prash Tole

156
 Appendix 5

176 Pork Sarem F People Prash Tole

177 Sin Sokha F People Bak Roneas

178 Sok Nhorn F People Poplea

179 Sok Bun F People Aknakot

180 Manh Chean F People Prash Tole

181 Om Sa Orn M People Prash Tole

182 Ey Mao F People Prash Tole

183 Po Chuy M People Prash Tole

184 Orn Suon F People Prash Tole

185 Ken Phalla F People Prash Tole

186 Hoeurng Sophay F People Aknakot

187 En Sarin M People Aknakot

188 Sok Pith M People Poplea

189 Ouk Chea M People Poplea

190 Gnoun Sophan F People Poplea

191 Ngoun Kosal M People Poplea

192 Chain Sareth M People Poplea

193 Pon Sophal F People Poplea

194 Pen Sireth M People Poplea

195 Sok Dy M People Poplea

196 Chem Sakhorn M People Poplea

197 Kim Phorn M People Aknakot

198 Puth Chhoet M People Aknakot

199 Puth Sipha M People Aknakot

200 Prum Kunthea F People Aknakot

201 Nay Ren M People Aknakot

202 Khat Sang F People Aknakot

203 Kim Savan F People Aknakot

204 Peb Saran M People Aknakot

205 Prak Pich M People Aknakot

206 He Choeurn M People Aknakot

207 Ouk Orn F People Aknakot

208 Sok Buntha F People Aknakot

209 Chan rithy M People Poplea

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

157
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Rum Duol District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011

- Place: Rumduol District center
- Time: 2h00 PM
Participants

1- PenSam An (Chief of Dumduol District)

2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Pen Sam An (Chief of Romduol district)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Svay Rieng
to border of Romeas Haek district have 4 communes and 12villages. and Participants
during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of
meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement
Consultant to explain the result as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village
headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to
population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government
of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project
preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from
NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey
Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B,

158
 Appendix 5

53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces,
we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved
after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are
inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will
introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs,
Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today.
We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed
authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured,
interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Rumduol
district.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to
understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the
team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and
Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people
around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with
women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676
households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2;
agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 105
houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow
30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor 96 households.
Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for
vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income
under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project.
Rumduol district were conducted with 4 communes, 12 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xiii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from
the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.

159
 Appendix 5

(xiv) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at
this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.
(xv) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a
review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.
(xvi) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List
Province: Rumduol District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Pen Sam An M Rumduol
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Da Boraen M People Prey Keav
5 Sao Sarim M People Prey Keav
6 Sao Sarorn M People Prey Keav
7 Yin Outh F People Chork
8 Sun Phalla F People Prey Keav
9 Nuon Kim M People Prey Keav
10 Sem Bunthorurn M People Prey Keav
11 Yang Sarorn M People Chork
12 Duch Chantha F People Chork
13 Kim Sarin F People Prey Keav
14 Kung Kunthea M People Prey Keav
15 Prak Sary F People Prey Keav
16 Chet Chanthorn M Village head Prey Keav
17 Pov Sinareth F People Prey Keav
18 Prum Sopha F People Chork
19 Heang Bunthoeurn M People Chork
20 Sok Sarorn M Village deouty Chork
21 Kem Vanna F People Prey Keav
22 Soch Saroeurn F People Chork
23 Nuon Khan M People Chork
24 Pen Sam An M Commune council Kampong Chork
25 Orn Rithy M People Prey Keav
26 Mao Phalla M People Chork
27 Has Srey Neang F People Chork
28 Ou Phany F People Prey Keav
29 Yi Vany F People Prey Keav

160
 Appendix 5

30 Em Da F People Chork
31 Chea Thida F People Chork
32 Phal Sitha F People Chork
33 Hun Vanny F People Prey Keav
34 Naiy Sar M Admin Rumduol district
35 Kao Boren F People Prey Keav
36 Mey Navy F People Chork
37 Kung Piseth F People Chork
38 Pich Srey Naeng F People Chork
39 Toch Sinath M People Chork
40 Me Sophon F People Chork
41 Uk Kunthea F People Chork
42 Sorn Vanthorn F People Chork
43 Nuon Saron M People Chork
44 Ros Mara M Director of High school Chork
45 Long Saron M Teacher Chork
46 Seng Heang M People Chork
47 Loek sary F People Prey Keav
48 Kim Sakhorn M People Chork
49 Roth Sam Oeurn M People Chork
50 Em Sothea M People Chork
51 Mao Chanra M People Chork
52 Chap Sok F People Chork
53 Orn Saphat F People Prey Keav
54 Hing Vanna M People Prey Keav
55 Pov Khanpanharith M People Chork
56 Prum Savan M People Chork
57 Bo Kosal M People Chork
58 Meas Kala M People Chork
59 Kuy Ang M People Chork
60 Pen Sam M People Chork
61 Um Sopha F People Chork
62 Yim Heang F People Chork
63 Tang Sokhorn F People Chork
64 Pe OL M People Chork

65
Total participants are 64 persons, Female 27 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

161
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Romeas Haek District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011

- Place: Prasre Commune post center
- Time: 9h00 AM
I- Participants

1- Mr.Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District)

2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
4- Chief of police post
5- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

II- AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Rumduol to
border of Kamchay Mear district have 5 communes and 19villages. and Participants
during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of
meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement
Consultant to explain the primary result during IOL as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy district of Romeas Haek, Commune
Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today.
Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The
Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from
NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey
Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B,
53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces,

162
 Appendix 5

we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved
after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are
inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will
introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs,
Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today.
We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed
authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured,
interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Romeas Haek
district.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to
understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the
team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and
Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people
around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with
women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676
households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2;
agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/
Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households,
Poor is 96 households.
Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for
vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income
under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project.
Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xvii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from
the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
(xviii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at

163
 Appendix 5

this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.
(xix) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a
review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT,PRS/IRC and the AP.
(xx) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the IMPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List
Province: Romeas Haek District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Haen Sakun M Deputy of District Romeas Haek
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Prak Chhoet M People Samroung
5 Chang vay M People Samroung
6 Mao Sophal M People Samroung
7 Pich Chea M People Samroung
8 Saom Rin M People Thnal Peam
9 Nong Saly M People Samroung
10 Mork Savat M People Trapeang Rum Denh
11 Chheang Thou M People Trapeang Rum Denh
12 Srey Khean M People Samroung
13 Hun Ley M People Samroung
14 Chhaom Mao M People Samroung
15 Sam Ean M People Trapeang Rum Denh
16 Yu Voen M People Samroung
17 Ou Saphal M People Samroung
18 En Nary F People Trapeang Rum Denh
19 Taen Vibol M People Trapeang Rum Denh
20 Some May F People Trapeang Rum Denh
21 Meas Saroeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh
22 Gnuy Nay Sim F People Samroung
23 Keo Tiem M People Trapeang Rum Denh
24 Pen Kosal M People Trapeang Rum Denh
25 Nung Huy F People Trapeang Rum Denh
26 Kuy Sath M People Trapeang Rum Denh
27 Chan Sambath F People Thnal Peam
28 Kung Savuth M People Trapeang Rum Denh
29 Nun Thy M People Samroung
30 Rach Bandol F People Samroung

164
 Appendix 5

31 Sok Sopheap M People Samroung

32 Koung Sinoeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh
33 Keo Navy F People Samroung
34 Ean Savorn F People Samroung
35 Hing Manh F People Samroung
36 Hing Saron F People Samroung
37 Sao Chhao F People Samroung
38 Srey Navy F People Samroung
39 Lak Srey Noeurn F People Samroung
40 Keo Sokha F People Samroung
41 Pich Neang F People Samroung
42 Saom Navy F People Samroung
43 Svay Kapha F People Trapeang Rum Denh
44 Tith Raem F People Trapeang Rum Denh
45 Tith Kheng F People Trapeang Rum Denh
46 Svay Em F People Trapeang Rum Denh
47 chuon Thorn M People Trapeang Rum Denh
48 Hang Ham F People Trapeang Rum Denh
49 Chan Sambo F People Thnal Peam
50 Kroch Pha F People Thnal Peam
51 Ey Samey F People Samroung
52 Prum Phanna People Samroung
53 Him Dary People Samroung
54 Hing Saroeurn People Samroung
55 Chan Sokha People Thnal Peam
56 Hem Bopha People Samroung
57 Ros Ear People Thnal Peam
58 Keo Srey on People Thnal Peam
59 Um Chheng People Samroung
60 Keo Pha People Thnal Peam
61 Kung Ean People Trapeang Rum Denh
62 Preap Chantha People Thnal Peam
63 Chan Saban Village head Samroung
64

65
Total participants are 60 persons, Female 24 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

165
 Appendix 5

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Kamchay Mear District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011

- Place: Krabao Village
- Time: 2h00 PM
I- Participants

1- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune)

2- Mr. Yaet Yort (Pubblic Work of District)
3- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT
4- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)
5- Commune Councils and Villages head)

II- AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities
such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial
Land, Farm land
Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be
compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value
find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions
andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of
structures, grievance redress and participation
Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date
grievance redress and participation
Minimize impact of the project

A- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Romeas
Haek to National road number 8, have 1 commune and 2villages. and Participants during
this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting
to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to
explain the primary result during IOL as following:

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for present of Deputy of district, Chief of Commune,
Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring
to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The
Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads
Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from
NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey
Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B,
53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces,
we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

166
 Appendix 5

after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are
inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will
introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs,
Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today.
We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed
authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured,
interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Kamchay Mear
district.

Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to
understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the
team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and
Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people
that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people
around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with
women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676
households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2;
agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/
Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households,
Poor is 96 households.
Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR
13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost
study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for
vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income
under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project.
Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project.

Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more
structures will build in the COI.

The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or
decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering.

Grievance redress and participation:

The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before
complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(i) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing
to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation
of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from
the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the
complaint may be brought to the District Office.
(ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the
complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at
this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee.

167
 Appendix 5

(iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the
aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a
review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and
submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.
(iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance
Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial
Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the
submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit
copies to the, MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the
Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List
Province: Kamchay Mear District

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1
2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT
3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI
4 Sam Sy M People Thbong Vat village
5 Ya F People Veal Smach village
6 Hem Sarith M People Thbong Vat village
7 Pon Run F People Veal Smach village
8 Yin Pin M People Veal Smach village
9 Yang Hean M People Thbong Vat village
10 Put Sam Ol M People Thbong Vat village
11 Lean Dorn M People Thbong Vat village
12 Kroch Phay F People Thbong Vat village
13 Sam Mao M People Thbong Vat village
14 Saom Loeurng M People Thbong Vat village
15 Sorn Vin F People Thbong Vat village
16 Yu Kim San F People Thbong Vat village
17 Heng Soteang F People Thbong Vat village
18 Horm Try F People Thbong Vat village
19 Mao Sopheap F People Thbong Vat village
20 Um Veasna M People Veal Smach village
21 Heng Sokny F People Thbong Vat village
22 Yum Rom F People Thbong Vat village
23 Pich San F People Veal Smach village
24 Ma Kear F People Thbong Vat village
25 Chin Sovan M People Veal Smach village
26 Hing Samon M People Thbong Vat village
27 Kung Malate M People Thbong Vat village
28 Put Samnang M People Thbong Vat village

168
 Appendix 5

29 Him Salom M People Veal Smach village

30 Vuth Srey F People Veal Smach village
31 Thoeurn Los M People Veal Smach village
32 NHoung Saran M People Veal Smach village
33 Sarin Hay M People Veal Smach village
34 Oun Sa Em M People Veal Smach village
35 Ney Cham Nan M People Thbong Vat village
36 Khal Khun M People Veal Smach village
37 Yus Tha M People Veal Smach village
38 Saom Luy M People Thbong Vat village
39 Yung Saet M People Thbong Vat village
40 Nguy Heang M People Thbong Vat village
41 Ream Phanna M People Thbong Vat village
42 Sum Chan M People Thbong Vat village
43 Saom Thuch M People Thbong Vat village
44 Chhit Sras M People Thbong Vat village
45 Huot Saran M People Thbong Vat village
46 Rith Heng M People Thbong Vat village
47 Nhiek Laly F People Thbong Vat village
48 Horm Tuel M People Thbong Vat village
49 Nhiek Yoeurn F People Thbong Vat village
50 Neth Bopha F People Thbong Vat village
51 Em Salouth F People Thbong Vat village
52 Nhe Sokly F People Veal Smach village
53 Khuon Yon M People Thbong Vat village
54 Bun Mon F People Thbong Vat village
55 Chon Samphost F People Thbong Vat village
56 Reth Soeurn M People Thbong Vat village
57 Oung Thy F People Thbong Vat village
58 Neth Nov F People Thbong Vat village
59 Saom Yoeurng F People Thbong Vat village
60 Sao Sovin F People Thbong Vat village
61 Meas Savoeurn F People Thbong Vat village
62 Kem Siban F People Thbong Vat village
63 Saom Saveth F People Thbong Vat village
64 Khem Sreng M People Thbong Vat village

65 Mey Sok Kem F People Thbong Vat village

66 Hem Phan F People Thbong Vat village

169
 Appendix 5

67 Von Canal F People Thbong Vat village

68 Pon Kheng F People Thbong Vat village

69 Py Mom F People Thbong Vat village

70 Hong Heng M People Thbong Vat village

71 Toeur Nay San F People Thbong Vat village

72 Se San Ath F People Thbong Vat village

73 Bean Han F People Veal Smach village

74 Yung Chonh M People Thbong Vat village

Total participants are 74 persons, Female 34 persons

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

170
 Appendix 6

PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE (IRC) will supervise the implementation of existing road. The COI is narrower than the
the Resettlement Plan (RP). The Ministry of road right-of-way (ROW) that has been
Cambodia Provincial Roads Public Works and Transport (MPWT) has established along road section. The COI
Improvement Project established a Social and Environmental has a width of maximum 20 m (10 m either
Office (SEO) to implement and monitor the side of the road centerline). MPWT will
PUBLIC INFORMATION BOOKLET implementation of the RP for affected land, place demarcation markers on the ground
1. QUESTION: What is the Asian structures, crops and trees along the road. before a detailed measurement survey
Development Bank (ADB) Cambodia (DMS) starts. Its purpose is to define an
3. QUESTION: Are the improvements of
Provincial Roads Improvement Project? area reserved for the road improvements,
the roads and cross-border facility
and to establish who is affected by the
ANSWER: The Royal Government of intended to benefit us?
Project.
Cambodia (RGC) proposes to use funds ANSWER: Yes. The roads will be improved
from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to Everyone that is occupying or using land in
to paved condition to provide a safer,
improve Provincial Road Improvement the COI must move out of the COI. All
cost-effective provincial road network with
Project No. 314D, 13 at Svay Rieng and people must also remove from land
all-year access to markets and other social
Prey Veng province and road numbers, acquired to expand the border facilities or
services for provincial centers in the project
150B, 53 and 151B at Kampong Chhnang for the road realignment. During detailed
areas Improved roads will enable the
and Kampong Speu province, and to design, every effort will be made to
transportation of goods and people to be
upgrade and expand the border facilities at minimize the impacts.
quicker, more efficient and cheaper. The
Prey Var in Kampong Rou district (Svay new and improved roads will improve A preliminary census and inventory of
Rieng province). The TA is part of a regional inter-provincial connectivity as well as losses (IOL) was conducted in May-June
project to improve road links between cross-border trade and movement at the 2011 to determine the potentially affected
Cambodia and Viet Nam on road No. 314D Prey Var-Moc Va border crossing point. persons and the severity of impacts on their
from NR-1 at Svay Teab to Kampong Rou properties. Based on the IOL, a preliminary
district and NR-13 from National road No. 1 4. QUESTION: If there are road
list of eligible persons and their losses has
to National Road No.8 at Prey Veng construction activities in our locality,
been prepared, and is available in your
province, NR-150B,53 and 151B from will we be affected?
commune office. After the detailed design
Taches to Amleang commune in Tphong ANSWER: There will be three main types of for road improvements is finalized and the
district (Kampong Speu province). land acquisition impacts: (i) expansion of COI demarcated, DMS will be conducted
The project will also support a sustainable the existing roads within the existing road and a final list of eligible persons prepared.
road maintenance regime in the Ministry rights of way; (ii) creation of a 1.2km new
5. QUESTION: What if my land will be
ofPublic Works and Transport (MPWT), alignment on PR150B at Chaung Moung
affected by the Project?
HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention commune requiring privately owned farming
program, road safety and climate change land; and (iii) expansion of the Cross Border ANSWER: Acquired privately owned land
adaptation measures. Facility at Prey Var requiring approximately will be compensated at replacement cost
5ha of land, of which 2.5ha is privately which is market value plus reasonable
2. QUESTION: Who is responsible for owned. transaction costs. Land within the existing
the Project? road right of way will not be compensated.
As part of the Provincial Road Improvement
ANSWER: The RGC represented by the However, those losing use of productive
Project, MPWT will establish a Corridor of
Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee (farming) land within the road right of way
Impact (COI) on 10m each side of the

171
 Appendix 6

will be entitled to assistance for loss of land will be used by the Project and that they resettlement plan. Those relocating
use of productive land. must harvest their crops in time. If standing outside the road right of way altogether
crops are ripening and cannot be under this project will be entitled to higher
6. QUESTION: What are the entitlements
harvested, eligible affected persons can be levels of support compared to those
that we have in order to be
compensated for the loss of the relocating within the road right of way.
compensated?
unharvested crops at the current market
Affected persons will receive compensation
ANSWER: Cut off dates for entitlement to value. For perennial crops, affected
at replacement cost for affected structures
compensation and assistance have been persons will be compensated for the loss of
plus transitional allowances to assist in the
established for each project section fruit and timber trees at replacement value,
process of relocating. Transitional
corresponding to the date of completion of which value will take account of lost
assistance will consist of: (i) Transportation
the inventory of losses. The respective cut potential income and time required to
allowance; (ii) One time assistance
off dates are 20 May 2011 for PR314D; 2 re-establish the perennial trees. This will
allowance of $100 if movingback within the
June 2011 for NR13 and CBF; 12 June compensate for lost income until the newly
road right of way or $200 if moving outside
2011 for PR150B; 17 June 2011 for NR13; planted seedlings bear fruit. Affected
the road right of way; (iii) income loss
and 19 June 2011 for PR151B. Those persons will be awarded the full value of any
allowance for disrupted businesses; and (iv)
persons who have occupied and used the lost crops/fruit where the plants are near or
additional assistance for vulnerable
land prior to this cut off date are entitled to ready to harvest.
households. Renters will be eligible for
compensation if the project construction
9. QUESTION: What about public three months rental assistance.
affects their land and/or structures. Anyone
property resources?
who encroaches and occupies the land The specific amounts for compensation
after the cut off date will not be eligible for ANSWER: Affected buildings and rates as well as allowances and assistance
compensation or assistance. structures will be restored to original or will be advised at the time the resettlement
better condition. plan is updated.
7. QUESTION: Does compensation apply
to my affected houses or structures? 10. QUESTION: If in case there will be 11. QUESTION: If in case our livelihoods
relocation of houses or businesses are affected, how can the Project help
ANSWER: Yes. Houses and structures that
involved, how can the Project help me me restore my livelihood and living
will be affected by the Project shall be
rebuild my house during relocation? standards?
compensated at replacement cost without
deduction for depreciation or salvageable ANSWER: Affected persons will have the ANSWER: The census and detailed
materials. Partially affected houses will be option of moving back outside the corridor measurement survey (DMS) will take note
compensated for the lost affected portion as of impact but within the road right of way, or of the livelihoods of affected persons and
well as repair costs. Other structures (e.g. moving outside the right of way altogether. any impacts the Project may have. The
fences, wells, pavement) will also be Those relocating within the road right of way Project will provide various forms of
compensated at replacement cost. will be permitted to remain there until assistance to enable affected people to
theland is needed by the Government for restore their livelihoods and living
8. QUESTION: What about my crops and
any future public works but will not be conditions to at least pre-project levels. For
trees?
permitted to build permanent structures. If vulnerable households (e.g. those classed
ANSWER: For annual crops, affected such future displacement is required those as poor, disabled, etc.), the Project will
persons will be given advance notice that required to relocate will be entitled to similar seek to improve living standards to at least
the land on which their crops are planted forms of assistance as provided under this minimum national standards. Such forms of

172
 Appendix 6

assistance will include: (i) one time will only be carried out in the presence of providing a translated version to each local
assistance allowance to households losing the affected persons. The affected persons district and commune office for public
more than 10% of the productive assets or and the local authorities will be informed access and by uploading it on ADB’s
being required to relocate their houses or prior to the activity. website.
shops outside the corridor of impact
13. QUESTION: How will the Project 14. QUESTION: If I disagree or problems
depending of the type and severity of
consult with me and provide arise during project implementation
impact; (ii) for those losing loss of use of
information? such as compensation, technical, and
productive land within the road right of way,
other project-related issues, do I have
cash assistance for loss of land use; (iii) ANSWER: The Project has prepared a
the right to voice my complaint?
cash assistance to cover transportation communication and consultation plan. The
costs; (iv) cash grant for temporary Project will keep local communities
ANSWER: Yes. If the affected person is not
disruption to business income for affected informed of significant activities. Regular
clear about or not satisfied with the
shops/stalls; (v) potentially other forms of information will be provided to the
compensation package offered or, if for any
income restoration measures to be commune offices, village chiefs and local
reason, the compensation does not
determined during updating of the community-based organizations as well as
resettlement plan in consultation with those materialize according to the agreed
other culturally recognized community
affected; and (vi) additional special schedule, the affected person has the right
leaders. The local commune offices will
to lodge a complaint. The grievance
assistance to vulnerable households. maintain a public notice board where
redress mechanism consists of a four stage
significant information and schedules will
In addition the Project will seek to maximize process as follows:
be posted. In addition to this affected
project work opportunities to adults in the
households will be consulted directly First Stage, Commune Level: An aggrieved
affected local communities (both men and
through public consultation meetings on person may bring his/her complaint to the
women) during the implementation phases.
significant matters affecting them. Such commune leader. The commune leader
Such opportunities will be announced in the
public consultation meetings will take place together with the representative/s of the
local areas.
(i) prior to the conduct of the DMS (to Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee
12. QUESTION: What is the detailed advise survey schedules and procedures), Working Group (PRSC-WG) coming from
measurement survey and when will it be (ii) following the DMS (to advise of DMS the district offices will call for a meeting of
conducted? results and proposed mitigation measures), the Group to decide on a course of action
(iii) during preparation of the updated to resolve the complaint within 15 days
ANSWER: The DMS is a detailed survey of
resettlement plan (to identify appropriate following the lodging of the complaint by
100% of affected persons to document all
livelihood restoration measures, advise of the aggrieved person. The commune
affected assets including land, houses,
compensation rates and details of leader is responsible for documenting and
shops, other structures, crops and trees. It
allowances and assistance measures as keeping file of all complaints that are
establishes the official list of affected
well as details of resettlement coursed through it.
persons who are eligible for compensation
arrangements); and (iv) on-going through Second Stage, Provincial Resettlement
and other assistance. It will be conducted
implementation of the resettlement plan. In Sub-committee Working Group: If after 15
after detailed engineering for the road and
addition the Project will publically disclose days the aggrieved person does not hear
border facilities is completed, and the COI
the approved updated resettlement plan from the commune leader, or if the person
has been marked on the ground. The
through a public information brochure is not satisfied with the decision taken by
activity will be carried out early in the project
(distributed to all affected households), by the commune and district officials, the
implementation stage in 2012. The activity

173
 Appendix 6

complaint can be brought to the office of expected to commence in the 4th quarter of 16. If you have further queries and
the PRSC-WG (provincial level), either in 2012. Affected communities will be kept suggestions, please contact us at:
writing or verbally. It is incumbent upon said informed of updated activity schedules from
(i) Provincial Department of Public Works
member of the PRSC-WG to notify the May 2012.
(PDPW) Resettlement Sub-Committee in the
other members of the Group. The Team
14. QUESTION: How will you know if following provinces: Svay Rieng, Kampong
Leader of the PRSC-WG will call for a
these undertakings are kept and the Chhnang. Prey Veng and Kampong Speu
meeting of the Group to decide on a course
objectives of this Project are met? Ministry of Public Works and Transport
of action to resolve the complaint within 15
(Phnom Penh) .
days following the lodging of the complaint ANSWER: All project activities will be
by the aggrieved person. The PRSC-WG is monitored by: The Social and Environment (ii) Project Management Unit 3, Provincial
responsible for documenting and keeping Office of the Project Management Unit-3 of Roads Improvement Project
file of all complaints that are coursed the Ministry of Public Works and Transport
Attention: Social and Environment Office
through it. and by an External Monitoring Agency
th
Third Stage, Inter-ministerial Resettlement (EMA). Address: 4 Floor, Eastern Building,
Committee: If after 15 days the aggrieved Corner Norodom Blvd. & Street 106, Phnom
person does not hear from the PRSC-WG, Monthly Report and Quarterly Reports will
Penh
or if the person is not satisfied with the be prepared and submitted to ADB. A
post-resettlement impact evaluation will Phone: [add]
decision taken by the PRSC-WG, the
also be undertaken to assess whether
complaint may be brought to the office of Email: [add]
impacts of the Project have been mitigated
the IRC, through the IRC-RD, either in
adequately and the pre-project standard of (iii) Inter-Ministerial Resettlement
writing or verbally. The IRC has 15 days
within which to resolve the complaint to the living of affected persons have been Committee, Resettlement Department,
satisfaction of all concerned. The IRC is restored as a result of the resettlement and Ministry of Economy and Finance (Phnom
responsible for documenting and keeping
project. ADB will also monitor these Penh) – Tel/Fax: 023 42 66 82
activities in its regular supervision missions
file of all complaints that reaches it. (iv) Asian Development Bank Resident
during project implementation. Semi-annual
Final Stage, Court of Law: If after 15 days Mission - Phnom Penh. Tel: (023) 215 805,
following the lodging of the complaint the reports of the EMA will be disclosed to
aggrieved person is not satisfied with the affected communities. Fax: 023 215 807
decision taken by the IRC, or if the person 15. QUESTION: Are there any other
does not hear from the IRC, the complaint documents available to know more
may be brought to a court of law for about the Project and resettlement
adjudication. The rules of court will be issues?
followed in the resolution of the complaint.
ANSWER: The draft RP prepared during
13. QUESTION: When is the project the feasibility studies for the Project can be
expect to start? obtained from the commune, district and
provincial offices. Following detailed
ANSWER: The project is expected to engineering design and the DMS, the RP
commence in April 2012. The updated will be updated and the final version will be
resettlement plan will require at least 4 available in these offices.
months to prepare and site clearance is

174
 PART V

HIV/AIDS TRANSMISSION AND HUMAN TRAFFCKING AWARENESS AND

PREVENTION PROGRAM

-i-
PART V

HIV AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AWARENESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAM

1 Introduction

Recognizing the potential risk that the road construction may exacerbate the spread of
HIV and the risk of human trafficking in the project areas, an integrated prevention and
mitigation package is included as part of the road project design. The HHTPP aims to
strengthen and scale-up previous and ongoing initiatives in the national umbrella
programs.

2 Background

National HIV Situation. Cambodia has made good progress in containing the HIV
epidemic with HIV prevalence falling from 1.2% in 2003 to an estimated 0.9% in 2006. The
decline has been attributed to the 100% Condom Use Programme and safe-sex campaigns
that have targeted brothel-based sex workers and their clients. However, a second wave of
HIV infections is being seen among most-at-risk populations, including indirect female sex
workers, clients of sex workers and their partners, men who have sex with men, and
injecting drug users (IDUs). The confluence of unprotected paid sex and sharing of
contaminated needles during female sex workers have decreased from 21.4% in 2003 to
12.7% in 2006. According to 2006 data, HIV prevalence among IDUs tested was at 14.3%.
As male clients of sex workers also have sex with their wives and girlfriends, more
traditionally low-risk women are increasingly getting infected. In 2006, among the total
number of people living with HIV, 52% were estimated to be women compared to 37% in
1998. In 2005m married women accounted for almost half of new infections.

Under the de-concentration and decentralization (D&D) policy of the Government, local
governments at district and commune levels are being strengthened to plan, implement and
manage their community development plans. In 2002, commune councils were established
in all of the 1,621 communes in the country, each on receiving a discretionary budget
of %15,000 per year as their community Sangkat fund. Selected communes are also
receiving additional funds from development partners (mainly from United Nations
Development Programme, United National Population Fund and United Nations Children’s
Fund) to create and pilot different committees on social sector issues, e.g. Commune
Committee on Women and Children. In line with the D&D policy, National Aids Authority
(NAA) mandated the creation of District AIDS Committees and Commune AIDS Committees
in 2006. Roll-out of this NAA sub-decree commenced in 2009, but it has been slow due to
limited funding.

3 Description of the Program

Impact and Outcome. The impact of the proposed intervention if to have contributed to
achieving the Millennium Development Goal 6, Target 7: to have halted and begun to
reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS by 2015 in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. The outcome is
reduced HIV transmission and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among workers
and communities associated with the Project and prevention of human trafficking. The
project will focus on four outputs: (i) community-based risk mitigation package for HIV and
human trafficking; (ii) focused HIV initiatives in the work setting/construction sites; (iii)
strengthened sexual and reproductive health services at district-level; and (iv) a rigorous
monitoring and evaluation system.

Methodology Outputs and Key Activities. The program will focus on four outputs:

Output 1: Community-Based Risk Mitigation Package for HIV and Human

Trafficking. The output will be strengthened capacity of local communities to address
HIV and human trafficking issues associated with road construction. In line with the D&D
policy, focus will be placed on supporting local communities in designing, implementing
 and monitoring community-based HIV and human trafficking prevention activities. The
consultant will support the commune AIDS committees in reviewing, implementing and
updating the strategies and actions plans they developed under Regional TA 6467:
Mitigating Risk in the Greater Mekong Subregion, for continued HIV and human
trafficking risk mitigation during and after the improvement of subproject roads. The
consultant will also coordinate activities under RETA 6448: Integrating Human Trafficking
and Safe Migration Concerns for Women and Children into Regional Cooperation,
conducted by UN Interagency Project on Trafficking (UNIAP). The activities under this
component represented below.

Output 2: Focused HIV Initiatives in Work Settings. The output will be effective and
gender-responsive HIV and STI prevention services for the construction workforce,
entertainment and casino workers, and border police and officials. In collaboration with
the local AIDS authorities, NGO and other relevant government agencies, HIV prevention
activities and services should include the activities below.

Output3: Strengthened Sexual and Reproductive Health Services at District-Level.

The output will be sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services that are responsive to
the needs of men, women and youth in the community, including the construction
workforce and other migrant workers. The activities are presented below.

Output 4: Monitoring and Evaluation. The output will be high-quality, timely

information on the progress and effectiveness of the project activities being implemented.
This will be implemented in close collaboration with the provincial, district and commune
AIDS committees. The activities included are presented below.

4 Implementation Arrangements

MPWT will select a program-implementing consultant, which maybe a consulting firm, joint
venture, or consortium of consulting firms or an NGO, following the quality and cost-based
selection and simplified technical proposal in accordance with ADB’s Guideline on Use of
Consultants. The consultant team should consist of one national team leader(15 pm), one
national deputy team leader(15 pm), two national program officers( a total of 20 pm), and a
national M&E officer(4 pm). The civil works contractors and subcontractors need to be
involved in the HIV prevention program, as does the DDIS team representative.

The cost of the consulting services is estimated US$320,000. The details are shown in the
following table.
Cost Estimate($’000)
Item Cost ($)
1. National Consultants
a. Remuneration and Per Diem 160
b. Local Travel (air and land) 10
2. IEC Materials, Office and Communication Costs
• Print and audio-visual materials and equipment 10
• STI diagnostic kits, medicines and condoms 15
• Communication 5
3. IEC/BCC Activities, Trainings and Workshops 70
4. Facilitators and Outreach Workers 30
5. Contingencies 20
Total 320
BCC= Behavior Change Communication, IEC=Information, Education
and Communication, STI= sexually-transmitted infections