Jlynns Final Thesis
Jlynns Final Thesis
______________________________
MALLARI, VANDOLF, A.
ROBLES, RANDY, A.
JULY, 2021
BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Bulihan, City of Malolos, Bulacan
APPROVAL SHEET
July, 2021
requirement for the degree, Bachelor of Technical Vocational Teacher Education, has been
examined and recommended for acceptance and approval for Oral Examination.
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
TITLE PAGE……………………………………………………………………………i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………………………………………………………………ii
DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………..v
ABSTRACT ……………………………………………...…………………………….vi
Introduction…………………………….………………………………..1
Related Literature………………………………………………………16
Related Studies…………………………………………………………20
Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………24
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………….26
Statistical Tools………………………………………………………....38
DATA………………………………………………………………...39
RECOMMENDATION
Summary of Findings…………………………………………………..99
Conclusion…………….……………………………………………….102
Recommendation………………………………………………………102
BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………104
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………...106
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………….107
LIST APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………108
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, praises and thanks to our Almighty God for his showers of
We want to express our deep and sincere gratitude to the following people for
College (BPC). She is very hands-on in giving us guidance and corrections immediately,
even if it is weekends or that supposedly her time to rest. She shapes us to be good
write or say. Being part of her class makes us feel that we are reliable and trusted. Her
patience was undeniably good as she helps and gives good criticism in each group via email
and through an online class. With that, we are genuinely thankful as we learn every
To the Vice President for Academic Affairs, Ms. Victoria Beth M. Sison, for giving
us her time to answer and share the different aspects they cope up during the development
of the BPC e-Learning. And also, for giving us detailed and precise information that helps
us deepen our understanding of the factors they have considered and the challenges they
have faced. And lastly, for giving us her kind words and good luck that cheers our team to
Information Systems (MIS), for guiding our group and being available in times that we are
having difficulty with this paper. We thank her also for explaining to us the focus of our
study with enthusiasm and clarity. Finally, to her team in making and organizing this
system for every BPCian across the eight campuses, we are very grateful.
We thank Mrs. Erica S.D Dumlao, Research Officer of BPC, for sharing their paper
that helps and serves as our guidelines in this study. We also thank her for being available
To Engr. Arman M. Giron, the Vice President for Administration and Finance, we
thank you for giving us a precise outlook on how should we do our computation,
analyzation in terms of a specific data, for giving us kind words and motivation for our
To Mr. Amado A. Caluscusin, the Vice President for Planning Research and
Extension Services and Quality Assurance, we are grateful for your kind words during our
Technical Vocational Teacher Education of BPC, for giving us support and guidance.
education in this trying time. For their effort and love for every BPCian, we are very
thankful as we feel the tagline that BPC is our partner to reach the world.
We appreciate the support of all the faculty members for being the respondents of
this study.
To our parents, we are incredibly grateful for their love, prayers, caring, and
And lastly, to our dear friends for sending us their warm wishes and being our
source of motivation despite our different levels of hardships and emotional breakdown
DEDICATION
We dedicate this study to our future students, "anak," who has been our source of
inspiration and gave us strength when we are about to lose hope, tired, and feeling down.
To our parents who are always there to pat our back, provide their moral, emotional,
and financial support for their kind words, advice, and encouragement to finish this study.
To our Almighty God, for the strength, power of the mind, protection, skills, and
ABSTRACT
College's e-learning system in the teaching and learning experienced of its students and
faculty members. Given the rise in using online teaching and learning platforms, more
study needs to improve and develop e-Learning systems to maximize the generation and
acquisition of knowledge.
The study evaluated the software, Format, Quality of Operation, and content
through functionality, accessibility; technical aspect; mobile designs; privacy and data
Sets of questionnaires were used and answered by random students from BPC
Malolos and faculty members from eight campuses of the BPC. The gathered data were
The study found that the BPC e-Learning system was reliable, functional, and
effective in all its aspects, from the software to its content. In addition, the e-Learning
system was found efficient as a teaching tool that the instructors effectively facilitate
teaching using it. Thus, the study recommended that to enhance further that e-Learning
system, the administration may seek more funds as it suggested as one of the significant
CHAPTER I
Introduction
throughout the country because of the World Health Organization (WHO) pronouncements
first semester of SY-2020-2021 to ensure the delivery of quality education despite the
crisis.
(VPAA)and OIC- College President of the BPC, together with the members of the
Mr. Amado A. Caluscusin decided to develop a system that will offer a teaching and
learning platform for every BPCian to continue the institution's vision, mission, goals, and
objectives (VMGO) in providing quality technical and vocational education amidst the
Information Systems (MIS), and her team, Mr. Dan Villareal- Senior Moodle Expert
Developer, Mr. Charles Carlo Baltazar- Best Programmer at BPC (2020-2021), and Marc
Management System (LMS) and named it as BPC e-Learning System. Dr. Guirre led the
One of those is an e-learning system that will use for the online education of the
students of BPC. The focus of this research is the evaluation of the system, which directly
concerns the teaching and learning process scheme of the educational system of the
College. The e-learning system aims to deliver an efficient and effective learning
experience for students, practical ways for the faculty members to administer their classes
In preparation, all faculty members take part in series of webinars about distance
online training conducted by the school administration focused on the mechanism of the e-
learning system. To use and utilize the system properly, especially those who are not
computer literate. "This time, the faculty needs to be mentally and emotionally prepared,"
the VPAA said when asked about the importance of all the training. She further said that
the school is open, and faculty members are welcome to conduct their classes in school.
When asked if all the instructors have gadgets and devices and access to the internet as a
means for online teaching, she responds that "not all of them, to be honest"; hence, we
offered the BPC's facilities. Some teachers have no internet connection installed in their
houses and have no latest "high-end" gadgets. That is why we invited them to conduct their
Quinn, Alem, and Eklund (1997) proposed methodology for evaluating e-learning
systems that will consider design factors and acceptance factors: the former comprises
instructional goal, instructional content, learning tasks, learning aids, and assessment,
whereas the latter include level of motivation uses the product, level of active participation
entailed, quality of learning support, and status of user satisfaction. The BPC’s developed
system has the same factors as Quinn’s model except that the e-learning system is only one
of the systems of the BPC portal and the baseline of the evaluation scheme of this research.
timetables, exam schedules, and department contact numbers. It also provides links to
helpful web resources, such as research tools and online journals. It is used commonly
in colleges and universities where prompt information and necessary updates must be
readily available to many students and faculty. The Department of Education also used
portals to direct students to educational resources for fun and learning (Suzannah
Windsor, 2020). The school portal developed by MIS is somewhat similar to Windsor's.
Still, BPC's portal is more innovative and complex because there are six systems, including
the different information and features that direct users to the other systems they need.
The BPC Portal consists of six systems to wit: 1. admission system; the
requirements of enrollees will be stored and submitted through online 2. entrance exam
system; the enrollees will answer and complete their exam through this system 3.
enrollment system; this is where the registrar works on sorting the information and subjects
of students accordingly 4. grading system; will store the grades of the students 5.
scholarship system, and 6. e-Learning system; this is where the teaching and learning
process occurs. The system plays a crucial role in the program because this is where the
subjects, modules, assessments, and progress in the students' grades were stored.
The e-learning system evaluated in this study serves as a bridge to bind the learners
and educators. This study focused on assessing its software/ system regarding its technical,
pedagogical, other factors, and effectiveness on the teaching and learning process. The
research aimed to address the challenges that the users encountered while using the
software/ system and recommended possible solutions to the weaknesses that will identify
based on the data collected from the study's respondents. This study may help the system
developers decide what considerations and actions to address the challenges and other
factors to improve the present e-learning system/ software. The gathered relevant, and
appropriate data managed and reached the objectives of this study; used different
the users.
The study used several instruments to gather relevant, valid, and reliable data to
answer the survey's specific questions. The study adapts instrumentations from the "Rubric
for evaluating e-Learning tools in Higher Education" (Antsey and Gavan 2018). It plays a
significant role among the other tools used in this study. It focused on evaluating the
(designs, and privacy protection of the system), and lastly, the pedagogical aspects of the
plan (social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence). The elements of the
instrument mentioned already cover the three parts that the researchers would like to
evaluate, e.g., the effectiveness of the e-learning system, the point of the e-learning system
to faculty members as perceived by the students, and vice-versa. While, the other ten (10)
instruments such as the three (3) semi-structured interview for teachers, VPAA, and Dr.
Guirre, and the other seven (7) are Questionnaire in 5 point Likert scale; Questionnaire for
(Bangert, 2004), instrument to evaluate the success of Online Learning (Biggs, 1999),
Kristen A. Walker and Katherine E. Morales (2018), Faculty self-assessment to assess their
technical, administrative, and pedagogical competencies using the LMS tool of the BPC
towards their experiences in using BPC e-Learning (Doculan, 2014), Questionnaire for
parents towards their feedback on the online class of their child (Universal American
School (UAS) Dubai, 2020) will served as the supporting tools to broaden the details and
gathered data, for the researchers have a big picture to look on each aspects and to address
appropriately the strengths, challenges and weaknesses of the system so that we can come
up with appropriate solutions, suggestions and recommendations to make the system more
The general problem of the study is: How may the BPC e-Learning be enhanced
1.1 conceptualization;
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
2.2 quality;
2.2.1 operation;
2.2.3 format?
3. How may the faculty members and students evaluate the BPC e-Learning in terms
of its:
3.1 functionality;
3.2 accessibility;
4. What is the level of effectiveness of the BPC e-Learning system when used by the
5. What is the level of effectiveness of the BPC e-Learning system when used by the
6. How may the faculty assess their Technical, Administrative, and Pedagogical
Learning?
7.3 content;
7.6 abilities;
7.8 usefulness?
8. What are the challenges encountered by the faculty and the students while using the
challenges observed?
10. What may be proposed to enhance the present BPC e-Learning system based on the
Teachers. This study will benefit all teachers, especially now that we deal with the new
baseline learning because of the pandemic. Through this study, teachers may purposely
discover how to teach students Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Affective using online
learning.
Students. The direct recipients of the output of this research since any improvement
that the admins and developers will make to the BPC e-Learning software will benefit, and
knowledge and skills and serve the client in its most possible way.
System Developers. This study can be of great use to the team developer of the
application of the said program since they will be able to determine the weaknesses and
strengths of the software that they have chosen to use to serve the client of the school.
Future Researchers. This study can guide future researchers to enhance the BPC e-
Learning software application to deliver the kind of performance that the clients expect.
The specific purpose of this study is to evaluate the BPC e-Learning software/ system
to determine its effectiveness in reaching the learners and the teaching methods applied by
the teachers on online teaching to continue education despite the present situation due to
pandemic. This paper contains different instruments used to gather the data to confirm its
The factors used in evaluating the BPC e-Learning software/ system are its quality
privacy data, protection and rights, social presence, teaching, and cognitive presence. In
this paper, we also include the perceived effectiveness of faculty and students while using
the software and the challenges they've faced while coping and adapting to this new normal
This paper only evaluates one system of the program out of the six components of the
portal (admission, entrance exam, enrollment, grading system, BPC e-Learning, and
scholarship) of all those systems that were now available and organized online. Still, the
researchers pick one of its major system (BPC e-Learning) to examine. In our set of
respondents, we gather some random students enrolled in S.Y. 2020-2021 from each
presidents from Senior High School (SHS), students from BPC-Malolos, and some parents.
At the same time, researchers gathered some faculty members from BPC-Malolos to seven
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter presents the relevant theories, related literature, related studies,
Relevant Theories
developed by Garrison, Anderson & Archer (2000) on the concept of three distinct
presence: cognitive, social, and teaching. While recognizing the overlap and relationship
among the three components, Anderson, Rourke, Garrison, & Archer (2001) advised
further research on each element. Their model supports online and blended courses as
sharing ideas, information, and opinions. Of particular note is that "presence" is a social
phenomenon and manifests itself through interactions among students and instructors. The
community of inquiry has become one of the most popular models for online and blended
courses designed to be highly interactive among students and faculty using discussion
Cognitive Social
Presence Presence
Learning
Experience
Teaching
Presence
explored by chaos, network, and complexity and self-organization theories where learning
is a process that occurs within nebulous environments of shifting core elements ˗ not
entirely under the control of the individual. George Siemens has been the leading proponent
and information flows, grows, and changes because of vast data communication networks.
As a result, web innovation has moved to gain from inner, individualistic exercises to the
group, local area, and even group exercises. In building up the theory, Siemens recognized
the work of Alberto Barabasi and the force of organizations. He additionally referred to an
article composed by Karen Stephensen (1998) named "What knowledge tears apart,
networks make whole," which precisely recognized how huge scope networks become
(OCL) that focuses on the facilities of the internet to provide learning environments that
foster collaboration and knowledge building, and internet use as a means to reshape formal,
In OCL, there exist three phases of knowledge building through group discourse.
gathered.
2. Idea organizing is the phase where ideas are compared, analyzed, and
OCL also derives from social constructivism to challenge students to take care of
issues through talk cooperatively. It is where the instructor plays the part of the facilitator
just as a learning community member. It is a significant part of OCL yet in addition to other
constructivist theories where the educator is not discrete and separated but rather a
There are three of the more popular theories in learning that are relevant to online
Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an Integrated Model," learning theory explains
initially studying digestion in dogs. He discovered that any object or event which the dogs
learned to associate with food would trigger the same response. Watson and Rayner (1920)
conditioned an orphan called Albert B (aka Little Albert) to fear a white rat. In their
experiment, after the continuous association of the white rat and loud noise, Little Albert
was classically conditioned to experience fear at the sight of the rat, generalized to other
stimuli that were similar to the rat, including a fur coat and some cotton wool. In education,
behaviorism examines how students behave while learning. More focuses on observing
how students respond to certain stimuli that, when repeated, can be evaluated, quantified,
constructing things for one another, collaboratively creating a small culture of shared
social forces, essentially contingent and independent of rational methods, and analyzable
Lev Vygotsky, posits that individuals are active participants in creating their knowledge
(Schreiber & Valle, 2013). Vygotsky believed that learning occurs primarily in social and
cultural settings rather than solely the individual (Schrieber & Valle, 2013).
The social constructivism theory focuses heavily upon dyads (Johnson & Bradbury,
2015) and small groups. For example, students learn primarily through interactions with
their peers, teachers, and parents, whereas teachers stimulate and facilitate conversation
through harnessing the natural flow of discussion in the classroom (Powell & Kalina,
2009). These three learning theories may explain the performances of students in online
learning. Thus, behaviorism, cognitivism, and social constructivism are related to one
another.
Whatever the environment of a student in his online learning process would affect
his behavior. If he lives in a house where his family does not support him (either morally
or financially) or has too much noise pollution, these factors will create distractions in the
student's learning process that could have failing grades. Online class also forced the
student to study independently and work their tasks independently, limiting the interactions
from peers to peers that lessen the student's excitement in performing its tasks and
activities.
Related Literature
The related readings used as bases of the study are the following.
There is so much discussion around online learning that there are many purported
students, using teaching, and professional development. The ability to provide a world-
postsecondary level are some of the most critical online learning issues. (De la Varre,
Keane, & Irvin, 2011; Gratton-Lavoie & Stanley, 2009; Koller & Ng, 2014; Lorenzetti,
Principles framework are well-suited for guiding the design and delivery of Quality of
Internet-based instruction (e. g., Billings, 2000; Chickering & Erhmann, 1996).
The Seven Principles emerged from a panel of higher education scholars who asked
to synthesize findings from research studies that identified effective college and university
teaching practices.
As a result of this panel’s work, Chickering and Gamson concluded that student
with faculty has been identified as a critical component. In highly challenging and anxiety-
social process that works best in interaction with others seen as essential for learning
learning- is any approach to instruction in which all students are asked to engage in
the learning process (Center for Educational Innovation, 2021); 4) prompt feedback- a
general consensus amongst students that feedback should inform them of their strengths
and weakness and help them to identify what and how to improve (Paula Mendes et.al,
2015); 5) time on task- an observation technique that measures the average time students
are observed to be engaged in learning during a lesson (Educators at Work, 2015); 6) high
expectations- students who are expected to learn more or perform better generally do so,
while those held to lower expectations usually achieve less (The Glossary of Education
Reform, 2013) ; and 7) respect for diverse talents and ways of learning- Some people
refer to learning styles, a belief that students approach learning differently from one another
with different preferences, such as some students learning better by listening, some better
The college "classroom" certainly looks different these days. Due to campus
closures in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we no longer travel to a shared space to
instruction, there was insufficient time to prepare for this new model. Instead, we are amid
affective, and metacognition aspects. Metacognition involves not just having knowledge
and processing information cognitively but also controlling these mental processes. This
transition typically involves modification, monitoring, and organization of the data to apply
determine which problem-solving approach would be the most effective (Pappas, 2015);
Schmidt (2011) describe cognitive engagement as the extent to which students are willing
and able to take on the learning task at hand. Learners' cognitive engagement in an online
learning as well as in groups' learning. Interaction processes students' emotions that affect
achievement by influencing their involvement and attitude toward learning and learning
environments that naturally have a significant effect on how students and groups work on
lot of students are involved in a flexible and self-paced method of teaching to attain their
degree. Taking into consideration of technology in education, the researchers were in line
with Chomsky (2014). According to Sabir, Ahmad, Ashraf, and Ahmad (2013), Higher
Education Commission (HEC), in Pakistan, 70% of the students are registered privately or
students who joined distance education face problems attending tutorials and workshops
as they live far away from study or examination centers. Many of them stop studying due
to many issues they have faced, specially mentioned above. Due to these reasons’ students
are now focusing on online and e-Learning programs, as they can quickly assess their
Universities and colleges have embraced online instruction as a strategy for meeting
the demands of students who prefer or find it necessary to take classes at a distance. The
significant growth in online courses is not surprising, considering that many students want
to earn degrees that will positively affect their careers. At the same time, allow them to
sustain family and work responsibilities. (Motiwalla & Tello, 2000; Phipps, Wellman, &
Merisotis, 2000).
Quinn, Alem, and Eklund (1997) proposed methodology for evaluating e-learning
systems that consider design factors and acceptance factors: the former comprises
instructional goal, instructional content, learning tasks, learning aids, and assessment,
whereas the latter include level of motivation uses the product, level of active participation
entailed, quality of learning support, and status of user satisfaction. With the growing
demand for e‐learning and striving for excellence associated with globalization, worldwide
calls for enhancing and assuring quality in e‐learning, specifically in developing countries.
(D. Masoumi, B. Lindström, 2011). According to Claire Bradin (1999), to measure and
evaluate the quality of e-learning is divided into three sub-categories; a) operation- the
navigation and accessible collection of software which administers maintain and provides
access to the resources of the system which enables a user to perform a task (Science Daily,
2019), b) content- the organization of modules and lessons, supported with quizzes, tests,
and discussions, and in many systems today, integrated into the college or university's
student information system (Downes, 2005), c) format- the establish layout of information/
Anstey and Gavan, 2018 proposed that evaluating e-Learning must consider the
combination of technical and pedagogical aspects. The evaluation consists of eight (8)
categories; (1) functionality that defines how well a system meets users' requirements and
the effort required for adapting the system, which software developers have traditionally
used for effort estimation utilizing concepts such as function points (Berger et al., 2013);
(2) accessibility- the practice of making your websites usable by as many people as
possible and also benefits other groups such as those using mobile devices, or those with
slow network connections (Glaly, 2020); (3) technical- the usability and utilization of the
interface of the system in technology (Antsey and Gavan, 2018); (4) mobile designs. The
mobile tool's design entirely considers the constraints of a smaller-sized screen (Antsey
and Gavan, 2018); (5) the privacy, data protection, and rights the purpose (Barker,
2007); (6) social presence; (7) teaching presence. (Antsey and Gavan, 2018); 8)
cognitive presence- the tool enhances engagement in a targeted cognitive task(s) that were
once overly complex or inconceivable through other means and to exercise higher-order
Related Studies
The paper of Rosa Lanzilotti, Maria Francesca, and Carmelo Ardito of the
specific inspection with user testing. The inspector aims to have vast experience in using
the e-Learning system and perform accurate evaluations to confirm the efficiency of the
systems.
The result of their study shows that the e-Learning systems are practical and
efficient tools that improve performance but lacks in some aspect and proposed that to
achieve its reliability, they've suggested systematically combining the inspection with user-
based evaluation.
(2018)” by Imran Latif Saifi of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan, conducted
this research to find out the effects of e-learning on students interest and learning at the
university level.
This paper is related to this study since we evaluate the effectiveness of the BPC e-
Learning system to the students' cognitive, metacognitive, and practical aspects. Their
report has concluded that e-Learning is the prevailing system in the present era for
education, especially for youth's education, and motivates students to do their work without
others' help. E-Learning is a system that provides time flexibility to the students for their
learning, and the use of e-Learning gives them access to the global world for study
purposes. Ali, Nargis, Yasmeen & Iqbal (2015) found that secondary teachers have a keen
desire to use ICT and its integration within the classroom environment. E-Learning also
requests, and this feedback is helpful for students. In contrast, to help students access online
material through technical assistance. On the contrary, students face difficulties in using
online materials. But another good sign is that e-Learning provides an opportunity for the
students to join social media groups. The study concluded that students share their learning
material through social media, e.g., WhatsApp groups, and they also consult other libraries
for material to improve their learning. The students supported the idea that instructors
contacted quickly and enhanced the teaching and learning process quality. The study
concluded that students feel comfortable when they are exploring and surfing the internet.
evaluating the quality of e-Learnings for any up-to-date higher educational institutions. In
addition, the paper is for automating related processes based on a modern technology
satisfaction and compliance with appropriate quality standards. This study resembles our
objectives to know the quality and effectiveness of e-learning software to students and
integration approach for HE needs. It also provides a joint base for integrating the full range
The study of Zuhal Yonca Odabas, Huseyin Odabas, and Aytul Kasapoglu of
Learning program and its human relations as a tool for creating a learning society.
This study is somewhat similar to our research since both studies aim to evaluate
the e-Learning system as a tool for the teaching and learning process. The only difference
is that their respondents are students who graduate using the program. At the same time, in
our research, our audience is currently using the program and the teacher since the
researcher aims to seek the tool's effectiveness to both students and teachers. Both studies
are very similar because the researchers want to know how to enhance the quality of the
The study's findings reveal that the program reaches its goal to deliver education in
a "learning society." According to some participants, the program "adds many things" to
them and learned the "importance of education." In addition, the program rate is
Colorado, relates to our research regarding evaluating the e-learning system. To know its
effects on the faculty members of BPC while in Simon's (2012) paper, his goal is to explore
how online learning changes both teachers and the teaching profession in higher education.
teachers who have transitioned to the online classroom. I also considered the role played
by technology in this process. Prior research has shown that developing a stable teaching
contributor to success and effectiveness in the classroom (Alsup, 2005; Day et al., 2006).
He contends that a stable teaching identity is equally important for online teachers.
Results from the case studies revealed that while for some faculty, teaching online
has become an integral part of their professional selves, others experience difficulty
reconciling their beliefs and teaching practices with the online modality. For most Case
Study One participants, the disruption caused by online teaching led them to marginalize
their online teaching identities, define themselves primarily as classroom teachers, and
Study Two participants had made significant changes to their professional identities by
adjusting their beliefs and practices and becoming more technologically engaged. This
education, allowed them to integrate online teaching more fully into their teaching selves,
thus finding equal levels of professional fulfillment in the face-to-face and online
classroom. Case Study Two participants were fully aware of the differences between each
modality, the different purposes that each modality serves, and the different pedagogical
approaches that each requires. Findings from the survey confirmed the critical importance
Conceptual Framework
shown in Figure 2.
In Frame 1, the input was the articles, journals, websites, and semi-structured
interviews to the system developer, administration, and teachers that help the researchers
In Frame 2, the process sorted the details and research gathered from surfing,
While in Frame 3, the output gathered from the data, such as the challenges faced
and coped up by the students, management, and faculty members. The proposed or
1. The e-Learning system of BPC will be convenient and reliable in terms of its
2. The e-Learning system of BPC will be effective as a pedagogical tool for the
Definition of Terms
activities that all students in a class are called upon to do, alternating with instructor-led
intervals in which student processes the responses and presented new information (Felder
Cognitive Presence. The extent to which learners can construct and confirm
meaning through sustained reflection and discourse (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2001).
world, containing the objects, concepts, and other entities that presumed interest for some
Cooperation among students. Good learning, like good work, is collaborative and
social, not competitive and isolated. Working with others often increases involvement in
education. Sharing one's ideas and responding to others' reactions improves thinking and
Content. The information and experiences toward an end-user or audience are the
tablets, and even cellular phones connect to the internet. Format. An arrangement or plan
Functionality. The ability to perform a task or function; that set of tasks that
High expectations. It refers to any effort to set the same high educational standards
for all students in a class, school, or education system (The Glossary of Education)
objects and human and non-human resources that a teacher may use in teaching and
Metacognitive Aspect. Put simply, thinking about one's thinking. More precisely,
it refers to the processes used to plan, monitor, and assess one's understanding and
Mobile Design. The design of user experiences for hand-held and wearable devices
(interaction-design.org)
Portal Development. A web portal is a single access point for various kinds of
Privacy Data. A branch of data security concerned with the proper handling of data
– consent, notice, and regulatory obligations. More specifically, practical data privacy
Protection and Rights. It refers to a legal mechanism that ensures privacy. Privacy
is the right of any citizen to control their personal information and to decide about it (to
Quality. Refers to the comparison of how good something is to other similar things.
In other words, its degree of excellence. When used to describe people, it refers to a
(Lustbader, 1999).
Social Presence. A term can take on vastly different meanings depending on the
Software. Software is a collection of instructions and data that tell the computer how to
work. In contrast to physical hardware, the system is built and performs the work.
and aspirations as faculty and seeking faculty mentorship were important antecedents for
determining the frequency and quality of student contact with faculty. (Pascarella, 1980).
Teaching Presence. The organization of the learning experience occurs before the
course opening and during the run of the course (Bruff, 2020).
Time on task. The portion of instructional time that students spend directly
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the methods and techniques of the study, population and
sample, instruments of the research, data gathering procedure, and statistical tools used.
The research method used in this study is the qualitative research method and
evaluation research since it intends to evaluate and measure the quality of the BPC e-
Learning system developed by the institution in terms of its development, feasibility, and
effectiveness. The qualitative approach would be a good fit in this study since it aims to
understand how effective the system was and what other parts can be enhanced or develop
more. This study includes questionnaires and semi-structured interviews that will broaden
the different challenges, weaknesses, and strengths that the system has.
Qualitative research methods are a manner that helps reveal the behavior and
perception of a target audience concerning a particular topic. There are different qualitative
research methods like an in-depth interview, focus groups, ethnographic research, content
analysis, case study research. It is more descriptive and can draw inferences quickly from
the obtained data (Bhat, 2020). Evaluation research, also known as program evaluation,
systematic assessment of the worth or merit of time, money, effort, and resources spent to
The sample taken from the population for this research is the students enrolled in
S.Y. 2020-2021 from degree courses and technical courses offered by school and class
presidents of Senior High School (SHS) from BPC-Malolos. At the same time, some
faculty members came from the eight (8) campuses of BPC who are conducting online
classes. Thus, in this study, the accessible respondents comprised 262 students, 24 faculty
Table I
The study used a random sampling procedure for selecting the participants in this
study at the main campus of Bulacan Polytechnic College in Brgy. Bulihan, City of
Malolos, Bulacan. Within each section, the selection of students was by simple random
sampling. This procedure is through an online survey of students from different year levels
and courses. After Gathering all the online survey forms, followed by a recording of data
Interview Questions for Ms. Victoria Beth M. Sison, MAed- VPAA/ OIC College
The researchers developed questions specifically for this study to have a broader
knowledge of how the administrators created, planned, and implemented the system, the
factors they have considered, and how they perceived or what their views of the program
are so far. This instrument also aims to know what the administration made to make the
faculty members ready for this sudden change, adjust the curriculum, and the faculty's
challenges during online teaching preparation. It contains ten questions that address the
planning, conceptualization, and considerations they have done to pursue this program.
The instrument answered by Dr. Guirre, specifically developed for this research,
responds to how the program was designed, conceptualized its mechanics, and its
and efficiently. It contains ten questions that address the strength, challenges, weaknesses,
and development of the learning software/ system and plans to strengthen the program.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
System
assessment tool by Cecilia Mercado (2008), aiming to identify the potential aspects as a
guide to achieve the online program's goal and know where it should invest. This
instrument addresses the factors that the institution’s administrators and developers
Column “C” contains the response; first part (Strongly Agree=5, Agree=4,
The instrument used in this study adapts the Software Product Evaluation Survey
look at evaluating software and important aspects of the software to consider when
choosing the program for a particular setting. She divides the process of software
evaluation into two parts. The first part is exploring the feasibility, and the second part is
determining quality. This instrument measures the quality of the e-learning system and the
The study used a multidimensional Likert scale instrument to evaluate BPC Online
Technology Program based on the “Rubric for evaluating e-Learning tools in Higher
at Western University residing in London, ON, Canada and Gavan Watson the Associate
Vice President, Teaching and Learning of the Memorial University of Newfound Land at
Labrador, Canada. The instrument by non-tech experts and applied in various learning
contexts to help draw their attention to aims to evaluate online programs to assist with the
predictive evaluation of e-Learning tools. The study could use this framework in the
compelling aspects of evaluating any e-Learning tools. The respondents for this instrument
An instrument to perceive the effectiveness of the faculty in online teaching using the
e-Learning system
from Montana University. The wordings are explicit about eliciting responses about the
quality of teaching within the context of online learning environments to assess each of the
Effective Teaching.
It contains seven (7) principles of effective teaching with twenty-six (26) items:
metacognitive, and affective outcomes for students, in general, is adapted from the
abilities during online classes, and for the Affective aspect by Kristen A. Walker and
improvement of intellectual abilities and skills are examples of cognitive skills. Individual
desires, attitudes, and values are classified as affective skills. Finally, meta-cognition is the
Column "A" contains the statements describing the three aspects; 33 items
Competencies for Online Teaching (2011)” developed by Penn State University to measure
know the competencies and readiness of the instructors and assumes that he has teaching
experience—it includes questions about familiarity with LMS features and teaching online,
for instance. Still, it does highlight for instructors new to online teaching the skills and
expectations required.
teach others=4, I have done this successfully=3, I have done this and had
University.
Interview Questions for Teachers on how they are handling the challenges in Online
experienced by the teachers and how they are handling them, or what solutions they have
in mind. It has ten questions focused on extracting the program's possible weaknesses and
strengths to adequately address the possible solution we may develop based on the data.
Questionnaire for parents towards their feedback on the online class of their child
School (UAS) Dubai (2020) aims to know the feedback of parents on the online classes of
their child and what challenges they think their child encounters.
At first, the researcher constructs a title validated by the professor. It also stated the
general problem and specific problem to be answered through the results of the study.
Then, the researcher gathered different and appropriate instruments in the form of a Likert
After data gathering and modifying instruments, we sent a letter of request for an
interview with the developer and administration involved in the conceptualization and
development of the system. The instruments encode in the form of questionnaires. Were
encoded on Google forms that the faculty members and students answered.
questionnaires, the most widely used approach to scaling responses in survey research
After collecting all the data, the researchers collate, analyze, and interpret the data
The study statistically analyzed gathered data from the respondents using the
today's education, especially in times of pandemic, and used Descriptive statistics such as
CHAPTER IV
This chapter presents analyzes and interprets the data gathered from the
respondents.
The section presents the different tables that answered the specific questions and
BPC e-Learning was one of the six systems in the online technology program of
the BPC, wherein the teaching and learning process happens. This system developed at
first was available in web-based form and immediately turn it into software when face-to-
face was still far from occurring due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The main goal in this
development was to continue the teaching and learning process and still deliver quality
education across the 8 Campuses of BPC. The system developed a mobile design and
downloadable from Google Play Store, Windows Store, and App Store.
considerations, especially those that will involve the students. According to the Vice
President for Academic Affairs/ OIC College President Victoria Beth M. Sison, the reviews
done by the management are the budget capability of the institution, the teachers, and what
will be the most convenient and accessible methodologies for the majority. Hence, the
developed BPC e-Learning with its primary objective of having an efficient and effective
way of monitoring productive and hopefully effective classes online. While according to
the Head Department of MIS, Dr. Guirre, the considerations were the possible resources of
teachers and students when the online class session occurred. The design made it easier to
navigate because it is web-based before, and the adjustment took to fit it to mobile phones.
The major components of the system are the Info sheets that serve as the learning materials
of students. The Assessments were provided and developed by the teachers. The Video
Conferencing wherein the discussion and collaboration between students and teachers
occurred while another component was virtual classrooms, real-time grading, and
attendance. Its mechanics starts from the Learning Management System Committee that
Figure 3: The Personnel involved in the BPC e-Learning’s Mechanics of the System
Figure 3. Shows the role of each committee in ensuring the quality of the learning
Part 2. Focuses on evaluating the portal developed by the MIS to cater to the alternative
Presented in Table II, the descriptive measures of the evaluation of the portal as
Table II
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. ICT Infrastructure for a Successful E-Learning Implementation
1.1 There is
sufficient ICT 11 7 4 1 1 24 4.08 Sufficient
hardware for e-
learning use
1.2 There is a
stable internet 5 10 7 2 0 24 3.75 Sufficient
connection in the
institution or at
my home.
1.3 There is an
existing
contingency plan 6 9 6 2 1 24 3.71 Sufficient
in case of
breakdown
Average 3.85 Sufficient
Standard Deviation 0.2 Homogenous
2. Administrative Support (Commitment and Policies)
2.1 The e-
learning is Very
aligned with the 19 5 0 0 0 24 4.79 Supportive
institution’s
Vision, Goals,
Mission, and
Objectives
2.2 There is a Very
commitment on 18 6 0 0 0 24 4.75 Supportive
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
the part of
institutional
leaders to use
technology to
achieve strategic
academic goals
2.3 There is a
commitment on
institutional 12 11 1 0 0 24 4.46 Supportive
leaders to use
technology to
achieve strategic
goals and that
such commitment
extends beyond
just using
technology.
2.4 The
institution is
willing to employ
or assign an
academically Very
capable and 14 10 0 0 0 24 4.58 Supportive
experienced
faculty to oversee
the
implementation
of the e-learning
environment.
2.5 The
institution is
willing to accept 16 7 1 0 0 24 4.63 Very
e-learning as a Supportive
mode for teaching
and learning.
2.6 The
institution support
employees who
seek out non- 13 10 1 0 0 24 4.50 Supportive
traditional
development
programs or
experiences.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
2.7 The
institution ensures
to put up a
committee that Very
will work directly 19 4 1 0 0 24 4.75 Supportive
with online
courses and
programs.
2.8 The
institution
provides teachers
with professional 13 8 3 0 0 24 4.42 Supportive
development
opportunities to
assist them in
improving their
online teaching.
2.9 The
institution support
teachers to have
access to a
network of other 12 9 3 0 0 24 4.38 Supportive
online
practitioners to
discuss
pedagogical and
curricular issues.
2.10 The
institution is
willing to provide
a professional
support system to 11 12 1 0 0 24 4.42 Supportive
ensure teacher
success in
delivering the
online course.
2.11 The
institution is
willing to make 12 9 3 0 0 24 4.38 Supportive
provisions for
collaborative
teaching
arrangement
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
2.12 The
institution is
committed to 14 9 1 0 0 24 4.54 Supportive
learner-centered
instruction.
2.13 Computing
firmly integrates 24 4.25 Supportive
into institution's 8 14 2 0 0
culture
Average 4.52 Supportive
Standard Deviation 0.17 Homogenous
3. Resource Support (Financial, Human, Technical)
3.1 The e-
learning is
aligned with the
institution’s 6 11 3 1 3 24 3.67 Supportive
Vision, Goals,
Mission, and
Objectives
3.2 There is a
commitment on
the part of
institutional 13 10 1 0 0 24 4.50 Supportive
leaders to use
technology to
achieve strategic
academic goals
3.3 There is a
commitment on
institutional
leaders to use
technology to
achieve strategic 8 10 4 2 0 24 4.00 Supportive
goals and that
such commitment
extends beyond
just using
technology.
3.4 The
institution is
willing to employ 6 12 4 2 0 24 3.92 Supportive
or assign an
academically
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
capable and
experienced
faculty to oversee
the
implementation
of the e-learning
environment.
3.5 The
institution is 11 13 0 0 0 24 4.46 Supportive
willing to accept
e-learning as a
mode for teaching
and learning.
3.6 The
institution support
employees who
seek out non- 11 11 2 0 0 24 4.38 Supportive
traditional
development
programs or
experiences.
3.7 The
institution ensures
to put up a
committee that 11 10 2 0 1 24 4.25 Supportive
will work directly
with online
courses and
programs.
Average 4.17 Supportive
Standard Deviation 0.31 Homogenous
Table II shows the result of the descriptive measures of the portal development
evaluated by the faculty members. The category of ICT Infrastructure for a Successful E-
Learning Implementation rated as "Sufficient” with the weighted average mean of 4.08. It
implies that the program's implementation has sufficient ICT hardware for e-learning used,
a stable internet connection in the institution and their home. Lastly, there is a contingency
In the 2nd category, Administrative Support (Commitment and Policies) reaches the
learning environment's implementation and support the faculty members before adopting
the new modalities of the program also means that the institution is willing to accept e-
The 3rd category, Resource Support (Financial, Human, Technical), with its average
mean of 4.17, resulted in the verbal interpretation of "Supportive," which implies that the
e-learning suffices the institution's Vision, Mission, Goals, and goals Objectives, the
faculty members receives supports when they seek out non-traditional development
programs or experiences, and the administration ensures to put up a committee that will
perceived by the faculty members show successful implementation of the program. There
deviation indicates that most of the faculty members positively agreed in each category.
Presented in Table III, the descriptive measures of the instrument to evaluate the software
Table III
clarity of text,
graphics, the
maximum number
of colors, and the
maximum image
resolution (in
pixels horizontally
by pixels
vertically)
3.1.3 The
motivational 92 137 44 10 3 286 4.07 Effective
devices used is
effective
Average 4.10 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.06 Homogenous
3.2 Operation
3.2.1 The software
easy to use and 78 129 60 17 2 286 3.92 Intelligible
access
3.2.2 The text and
graphics can be 96 135 41 14 0 286 4.09 Intelligible
printed
3.2.3 You have
control over the
application which 88 140 44 12 2 286 4.05 Intelligible
is engaged on the
platform
3.2.4 There is an
interaction in the 102 126 43 15 0 286 4.10 Intelligible
software such as
messaging and
video conferencing
3.2.5 The Quality
and degree of 71 144 58 12 1 286 3.95 Intelligible
feedback is
adequate
3.2.6 The software
records and keep 94 138 38 16 0 286 4.08 Intelligible
your activity and
interaction online
Average 4.03 Intelligible
Standard Deviation 0.08 Homogenous
3.3 Content
3.3.1 The software
able to gets its goal 112 120 40 14 0 286 4.15 Fulfilled
3.3.2 The level of
content is
appropriate 108 132 36 10 0 286 4.18 Fulfilled
(content on the
dashboard of
users)
3.3.3 The content
of teaching/
learning materials 106 135 35 10 0 286 4.18 Fulfilled
is accurate and up
to date
3.3.4 The material
is culturally 97 140 36 11 2 286 4.12 Fulfilled
appropriate
3.3.5 The software
accommodates the
students' learning 90 138 39 16 3 286 4.03 Fulfilled
styles and
preferences
3.3.6 The
software is 101 131 43 8 3 286 4.12 Fulfilled
exciting and
motivating to be
used
Average 4.12 Fulfilled
Standard Deviation 0.06 Homogenous
The results of Table III show that in the category of Software Product Evaluation,
rated as “Reliable” with a weighted average mean of 4.00, claims to say that the e-Learning
assistance.
the software could be used in the current environment and able be used in different
While in quality, the last category in this evaluation was rated as "Effective" in
terms of Format with a 4. 10 average that claims the Format was clear and compelling.
Operation with an average of 4.03, which is interpreted as "Intelligible," means the users
two aspects: the level of content is appropriate (content on the dashboard of users), and the
content of teaching/ learning materials are accurate and up to date. In conclusion, the results
indicate that the software was developed accordingly, in good quality, and feasibly.
computed.
Lanzilotti, Maria Francesca, and Carmelo Ardito from the University of Bari is comparable
to our evaluation of BPC e-learning. Their research focuses on the quality of e-learning
systems, which has become one of the most significant researchers in recent years. This
study refines the notion of e-learning system quality and introduces TICS (Technology,
Interaction, Content, and Services). This new framework focuses on the most significant
their study show that while e-Learning systems are “valuable” and “effective” tools in
terms of boosting performance, they are unreliable in some areas. Therefore, they
dependability. While in our study, as seen in the results in the aspect of quality that was
composed of three constructs (Format, Operation, content), it shows that it was "Effective,"
Table IV presents the descriptive measures of the evaluation of the respondents on the
Table IV
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. Functionality
1.1 Scale: The tool
can be scaled to
accommodate any size 76 149 49 10 2 286 4.00 Functional
class with the
flexibility to create
smaller sub-groups or
communities of
practice
1.2 Ease of Use:
The tool has a user-
friendly interface, and 99 131 43 12 1 286 4.10 Functional
it is easy for
instructors and
students to become
skillful within a
personalized and
intuitive manner.
1.3 Tech Support/
Help Availability:
Campus-based
technical support and
/or help 81 144 48 12 1 286 4.02 Functional
documentation is
readily available and
aids users in
troubleshooting tasks
or solving problems
experienced; or the
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
typically available to
instructors and
students (computer
with built-in speakers
and microphone,
internet connection,
etc.)
Average 4.03 Accessible
Standard Deviation 0.01 Homogenous
3. Technical
3.1 Integration/
Embedding Within a
Learning Management
System (LMS): The
tool can be embedded
(as an object via 87 123 63 12 1 286 3.99 Efficient
HTML code) or fully
integrated (e.g., LTI-
compliant tools) into
an LMS while
maintaining the full
functionality of the
tool.
3.2 Desktop/Laptop
Operating System:
Users can effectively 95 132 46 12 1 286 4.08 Efficient
utilize the tool with
any standard, up-to-
date operating system.
3.3 Browser: Users
can effectively utilize
the tool with any 95 131 46 13 1 286 4.07 Efficient
standard, up-to-date
browser
3.4 Additional
Downloads: Users do
not need to download 87 130 53 12 4 286 3.99 Efficient
additional software or
browser extensions.
Average 4.04 Efficient
Standard Deviation 0.05 Homogenous
4. Mobile Design
4.1 Access: The
tool can be accessed 112 118 45 9 2 286 4.15 Accessible
by downloading an
app or via a mobile
browser, regardless of
the mobile operating
system and device.
The design of the
mobile tool entirely
takes into
consideration the
constraints of a
smaller-sized screen.
4.2 Functionality:
There is little to no
functional difference
between the mobile
and the desktop
version, regardless of 80 144 49 11 2 286 4.01 Functional
the device used to
access it. No
difference in
functionality between
apps designed for
different mobile
operating systems.
4.3 Offline Access:
Offers an offline
mode: Core features
of the tool can be 65 113 75 14 19 286 3.67 Accessible
accessed and utilized
even when offline,
maintaining
functionality and
content.
Average 3.94 Accessible
Standard Deviation 0.25 Homogenous
5. Privacy, Data Protection, and Rights
5.1 Sign Up/Sign
in: Use of the tool
does not require the
creation of an external
account or additional 97 130 49 9 1 286 4.09 Protected
login, such that no
personal user
information is
collected and shared
5.2 Data Privacy
and Ownership: Users
maintain ownership
and copyright of their
intellectual 114 121 43 8 0 286 4.19 Protected
property/data; they
can keep data private
and decide if / how it
is shared.
5.3 Archiving,
Saving, and Exporting
Data: Users can
archive, save, or 100 132 47 6 1 286 4.13 Protected
import and export
content or activity
data in a variety of
formats
Average 4.14 Protected
Standard Deviation 0.05 Homogenous
6. Social Presence
6.1 Collaboration:
The tool can support a
community of
learning through both
asynchronous and
synchronous 121 118 37 9 1 286 4.22 Collaborative
opportunities for
communication,
interactivity, and
transfer of meaning
between users
6.2 User
Accountability:
Instructors can control
learner anonymity; the 93 138 43 8 4 286 4.08 Accountable
tool provides technical
solutions for holding
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
learners accountable
for their actions.
6.3 Diffusion: The
tool is widely known 107 127 38 11 3 286 4.13 Collaborative
and famous; it is
likely that most
learners are familiar
with the tool and have
basic technical
competence with it.
Average 4.14 Collaborative
Standard Deviation 0.07 Homogenous
7. Teaching Presence (Teachers Only)
7.1 Facilitation: The
tool has easy-to-use
features that would
significantly improve
an instructor’s ability
to be present with 12 11 1 0 0 24 4.46 Efficient
learners via active
management,
monitoring,
engagement, and
feedback.
7.2 Customization:
Tool is adaptable to its
environment: easily 14 9 1 0 0 24 4.54 Efficient
customized to suit the
classroom context and
targeted learning
outcomes
7.3 Learning
Analytics: The
instructor can monitor
learners' performance Highly
on a variety of 15 8 1 0 0 24 4.58 Efficient
responsive measures. It
can access these
measures through a
user-friendly
dashboard
Average 4.52 Efficient
Standard Deviation .06 Homogenous
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
the developed BPC e-Learning System as understood by the students and teachers. For the
concludes that the BPC e-Learning can cater to many users and still function well. It also
means that in terms of ease of use, the software was smooth to navigate. While in
Hypermedia, it means that it lets the users engage in the materials provided and allows
them to communicate through different channels. Lastly, it also means that technical
that implies the software meets the accessibility guidelines, was designed to address the
For category 3, Technical got an average mean of 4.04 rated as "Efficient," which
concludes that the software performs efficiently in integration and operating systems.
Finally, in terms of Mobile Design, its average mean of 3.94 resulted in verbal
interpretation as "Accessible." It indicates that the BPC e-Learning can be accessed either
through the downloaded app or via a mobile browser, regardless of the mobile operating
system and device designed to consider the smaller-sized screen's constraints fully.
In the category of Privacy, Data Protection and Rights got an average of 4.14, which
interpreted as "Protected" therefore, the users maintain ownership and copyright of their
intellectual property/data; the user can keep data private and decide if / how data is to be
shared.
The category of Social Presence shows that there is motivation in the software and
the fact that the tool can support a community of learning through both asynchronous and
between users.
Teaching Presence (Teachers Only) with the mean of 4.52 interpreted as "Efficient"
implies that there is teaching presence in the software that allows the teachers to facilitate
For the last category, Cognitive Presence (Students Only), with an average of 4.05
that interpreted as "Efficient," which indicates that the software also promotes Higher
Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and executes metacognitive engagement. In conclusion, the
whole totality of BPC e-learning based on the descriptive measures claims that it was
efficient in terms of technical and pedagogical tools of e-learning. The respondents have
the same perceptions as observed by the small value of the standard deviation.
This analysis is somewhat similar to the study of Imran, S.M. & Malik, B.A.
entitled “Evaluation of E-Learning Web-Portals” for the fact that they are also
evaluating web-portals used in different universities. Likewise, ours are the e-learning
itself, but in terms of category, this is where both studies were likely. Their result regarding
functionality and clarity found that the portals have a "clear and complete course
overview."
Part 5. The Effectiveness of the BPC e-Learning System when used by the faculty as
Table V presents the descriptive measures of the level of effectiveness of the BPC e-
Table V
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. Student Faculty Contact (SFC)
1.1 The instructors
communicated 97 114 44 4 3 262 4.14 Effective
effectively
1.2 The instructors
were enthusiastic 100 115 41 5 1 262 4.18 Effective
about online
teaching
1.3 The instructors
were accessible to 79 126 44 9 4 262 4.02 Effective
me outside of the
course
1.4 The amount of
contact with the
instructors was 94 116 44 7 1 262 4.13 Effective
satisfactory
Average 4.11 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.07 Homogenous
2. Cooperation Among Class (CAS)
2.1 The course
was structured so 87 121 44 8 2 262 4.08 Effective
that I could discuss
assignments with
other students.
2.2 I felt
comfortable
interacting with the 80 125 48 6 3 262 4.04 Effective
instructors and other
students.
2.3 This course
included activities
and assignments that
provided students 94 116 41 9 2 262 4.11 Effective
with opportunities to
feedback related to
course assignments.
Average 3.95 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.03 Homogenous
5. Time on Task (T.T.)
5.1 The program
was structured to be 92 121 41 7 1 262 4.13 Effective
user friendly
5.2 The program
was designed to
provide an efficient 91 124 39 8 0 262 4.14 Effective
learning
environment.
5.3 The program
allowed me to
complete 90 126 38 8 0 262 4.14 Effective
assignments across a
variety of learning
environments
Average 4.13 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.006 Homogenous
6. High Expectations (HE)
6.1 The instructors
used examples that
communicated
expectations for 88 127 41 6 0 262 4.13 Effective
completing course
tasks, assessments,
and assignments.
6.2 The instructors
used good examples
and links to other
examples published 86 137 31 7 1 262 4.15 Effective
on the web to
explain concepts and
skills.
6.3 The
assignments given
by the instructors for
this course in online 87 125 42 7 1 262 4.11 Effective
learning were of
appropriate
difficulty level.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Table V shows the descriptive measures of the effectiveness of the BPC e-learning
system when used by the faculty as perceived by the students. The category Student-
Faculty Contact (SFC) with an average mean of 4.11, interpreted as “Effective," means
In Active Learning (A.L.), the weighted average mean was 4.13, which is
interpreted as "Effective" therefore, the students find themselves and their teachers still
Terms of Prompt Feedback (P.F.) also one of the categories in this evaluation. It
has an average mean of 3.95, interpreted as "Effective," which implies that the faculties
Time on Task (T.T.) shows that the instructors provide enough time for students to
complete their course work. It has an average mean of 4.13, interpreted as "Effective."
weighted average mean, shows that the instructors' activities were realistic and explained.
Finally, the category Diverse Talents and Ways of Learning (DTWL) got a total
average of 4.15, interpreted as "Effective," proving that the instructors respect students'
differences and recognize the diverse talents even in online classes learning of students. In
conclusion, the teachers' teaching method or guiding the students was still effective, and
the teachers could utilize the BPC e-Learning tools. The slight standard deviation computed
This analysis is similar to the result of the paper “E-learning Programs: The Case
of Ankara University, Turkey” by Zuhal Yonca Odabas, Huseyin Odabas, and Aytul
Kasapoglu. Both pieces have the same result that the e-learning program of the Ankara
University and the e-learning system of BPC are “sufficient” in the technical infrastructure,
courses, and social communication of the program. Though there are some disruptions in
the system, the overall structure is sufficient and effective in delivering education.
student learning. While in the study of A.W. Bangert (2016), his research shows that
the Cooperation Among Students (SAC) factor assesses how well instructors incorporate
activities in their online courses that consider the social factors associated with quality
online learning environments. The Time of Task (T.T.) factor comprises items that assess
dimensions represented by this factor are essential for supporting online learning
environments where the use of technology is to support and motivate learners' efforts
toward efficient task engagement and proficient task completion. At the same time, the
Active Learning factor represents student perceptions of the quality of interactive online
world contexts. These activities promote self-regulated learning because learners are
afforded choices in how they will accomplish learning goals and can see the connection of
Part 6: Evaluation of the level of effectiveness of the BPC e-Learning system when used
Table VI presents the descriptive measures of the level of effectiveness of the BPC e-
Table VI
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. Cognitive Aspect
1.1 Giving the learner
enough time to study their 13 8 3 0 0 24 4.42 Effective
lesson makes them learn
more.
1.2 Presenting a lesson on
real-life situations makes 12 11 1 0 0 24 4.46 Effective
the students more interested.
1.3 Poor score or output on
a student's test makes them 7 15 2 1 0 24 4.12 Effective
worry and try performance
better next time.
1.4 Students have a strong
desire to excel in their 9 11 3 1 0 24 4.17 Effective
studies.
1.5 Students are ambitious
people and want to get to
the top of their performance 7 14 2 1 0 24 4.13 Effective
whenever possible.
1.6 Learners to try to do
their assignments as soon as 8 10 4 2 0 24 4.00 Effective
2.5 Student-reporter
presented the kind of 9 12 3 0 0 24 4.25 Effective
information that is most
important to learn.
2.6 Students know what
the teachers are expecting 9 14 1 0 0 24 4.33 Effective
them to know and present
during their report.
2.7 Student-reporter able
to remember information
needed to be shared with 9 12 3 0 0 24 4.25 Effective
their fellow students to
learners who are not in the
book.
2.8 Student-reporter able
to ask the point of view of
their classmates in terms of 10 10 4 0 0 24 4.25 Effective
more profound
understanding of something
related to the lesson.
2.9 Students push
themselves to learn more 12 9 3 0 0 24 4.38 Effective
not only for completing
their grades but also for
their self-improvement.
2.10 Student-reporter
create and present their
examples to make 10 9 5 0 0 24 4.21 Effective
information more
meaningful to their fellow
students.
2.11 Student-reporter try to
translate new information 10 8 6 0 0 24 4.17 Effective
into their own words for
easy understanding of their
fellow students.
2.12 Student-reporter able
to inspire their fellow 10 9 5 0 0 24 4.21 Effective
learners more to be
interested in the new topic.
Average 4.21 Affective
Standard Deviation 0.10 Homogenous
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
3. Affective Aspect
3.1 Student-reporter able
present a live viewing 13 8 3 0 0 24 4.42 Effective
lecture to their online class.
3.2 Students participate in
virtual breakout
rooms/discussion groups
with a small group of 10 8 4 2 0 24 4.08 Effective
students (3–5) to work on an
activity or discuss a topic
where the instructor visits
"virtually."
3.3 Students able to answer
instructor-led polls during 9 11 4 0 0 24 4.21 Effective
class.
3.4 Students use the chat
function during class. 12 9 2 0 1 24 4.29 Effective
3.5 Students can attend a
field trip or see a hands-on
demonstration of an activity 11 8 3 1 1 24 4.13 Effective
"live" through virtual
technology.
3.6 Learners able to
responding/comment on 10 9 4 1 0 24 4.17 Effective
peer discussion board posts.
3.7 Students participate in
reading an article before
class and answering a 8 11 4 1 0 24 4.08 Effective
question on a quiz or asking
a question on a discussion
board about the article.
3.8 Learners complete a
self-reflection quiz at the
end of each week to express
which topics they felt their 9 12 3 0 0 24 4.25 Effective
best understood and which
issues they are still
struggling with.
3.9 Students get involved
in peer-review of other 9 9 6 0 0 24 4.13 Effective
students’ materials (e.g.,
essays, presentations)
Table VI shows the descriptive measures of the level of effectiveness of the BPC
e-learning system in the cognitive, metacognitive, and affective aspects when used by the
students as perceived by the teachers. In the Cognitive Aspect of the students with an
average mean of 4.24, interpreted as "Effective," the e-Learning, teaching, and learning
The metacognitive aspects of the students of the e-learning system with its average
mean of 4.21 show that the e-Learning and process of learning are "Effective."
On the affective aspect of the students in using the e-learning system, rated as
"Effective" with its average mean of 4.21. The slight standard deviation implies almost the
Student’s Academic Learning at University Level” by Imran Latif Saifi. Both papers
examined the cognitive, metacognitive, and affective aspects of the e-learning system to
college students. This paper's result in the mental part is "effective" with an average mean
of 4.24, and their study's result was that e-learning tools “enhance” their learning. In the
affective aspect, our paper’s result shows that the e-learning system is “effective" with an
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
average mean of 4.21, which is similar to their study where the students responded that e-
learning “motivates” them to do their work without others help. They also concluded that
the e-learning system provides time “flexibility” to the students for their learning, and the
use of e-learning gives them access to the global world for study purposes.
Table VII presents the descriptive measures of the faculty self-assessment to assess
their technical, administrative, and pedagogical competencies using the LMS tool of the
BPC e-Learning.
Table VII
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. Technical Competencies
1.1 Complete Basic
Computer Operations: I
can complete basic
computer operations, 14 9 1 0 0 24 4.54 Competent
including creating and
manipulating
documents, managing
files, and folders, and
working with multiple
windows
1.2 Login to LMS and
Access Class: I can log Very
into the Learning 16 8 0 0 0 24 4.67 competent
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Management System
(LMS) and access the
class.
1.3 Navigate Course
Space: I can navigate
the course space in the
Learning Management
System (LMS) to locate 17 7 0 0 0 24 4.71 Very
critical class elements Competent
such as the syllabus,
lessons, grade book,
course mail, or other
features.
1.4 Set up Grade
Books and Manage Very
Grades: I can set up the 13 9 0 0 0 24 4.59 Competent
class grade book and
manage student grades
in the Learning
Management System
(LMS), such as set a
grading scale, use
points/percentages, and
submit final grades
1.5 Use Course
Communication
System: I can use
course communication Very
systems in the Learning 15 8 1 0 0 24 4.58 Competent
Management System
(LMS) such as email,
chat, web conferencing,
discussion forums, or
announcements.
1.6 Manage Course
Roster: I can manage
the course roster in the
Learning Management
System (LMS) to set up 12 10 2 0 0 24 4.42 Competent
and manage
teams/groups and add
instructors, teaching
assistants, or outside
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
examination policy, a
basis for grades, an
academic integrity
policy, and a disability
access statement.
2.4 Mediate Course
Conflicts: I can mediate
course-related student 14 9 1 0 0 24 4.54 Competent
conflicts by my
institution's policies.
2.5 Adhere to FERPA
Policies: I can adhere to
the institutional policies 11 10 2 1 0 24 4.29 Competent
regarding the Federal
Educational Rights &
Privacy Act (FERPA)
2.6 Revise Course
Content: As needed, I
can revise course 12 9 2 1 0 24 4.33 Competent
content and
instructional materials
based on student
feedback.
2.7 Obtain Technical
Assistance: I can obtain
technical assistance and 12 10 2 0 0 24 4.42 Competent
support for either
myself or my students
at the appropriate time.
2.8 Communicate
Student Behavior
Expectations: I can 15 9 0 0 0 24 4.63 Very
communicate my Competent
expectations about
student behavior in my
course (i.e., netiquette)
2.9 Communicate and
Monitor Academic Very
Integrity Policies: I can 16 6 2 0 0 24 4.58 Competent
communicate and
monitor compliance
regarding institutional
academic integrity
policies.
2.10 Report Grades
Securely: I can securely
report grades to Very
students and input final 16 7 1 0 0 24 4.63 Competent
grades into the
University's grading
system as required.
2.11 Notify Students
of Your Availability: I
can notify students
through various 16 7 1 0 0 24 4.63 Very
communication tools Competent
when I am unavailable
to participate in course-
related activities.
Average 4.52 Competent
Standard Deviation 0.12 Homogenous
3. Pedagogical Competencies
3.1 Attend the Unique
Challenges of
Asynchronous: 14 7 3 0 0 24 4.46 Competent
Learning I can attend to
the unique challenges
of distance learning
where learners are
separated by time and
geographic proximity,
and interactions are
primarily
asynchronous.
3.2 Provide
Appropriate
Educational Experience
for Diverse Learners: I
am familiar with both
traditional and adult 13 11 0 0 0 24 4.54 Competent
learners' unique
learning needs and
situations, providing an
appropriate educational
experience for both.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
learning environment
by communicating with
students in a positive
tone and by following
and promoting
Netiquette guidelines
3.8 Monitor and
Manage Student
Progress: I can
continuously monitor 15 9 0 0 0 24 4.63 Very
and manage student Competent
progress by using
course statistics or
reports to identify
students who are not
accessing course
materials, participating
in learning activities,
etc., and reach out to
encourage engagement.
3.9 Communicate
Course Goals and
Outcomes: I can
communicate course
goals and outcomes 15 8 1 0 0 24 4.58 Very
using the syllabus and Competent
course announcements
at the beginning of the
course.
3.10 Establish My
Presence in the Course:
I can establish my
presence in the course 13 8 3 0 0 24 4.42 Competent
regularly via course
announcements,
assignments, emails,
online office hours, and
various other methods.
3.11 Demonstrate
Sensitivity to
Disabilities and 12 10 2 0 0 24 4.42 Competent
Diversities: I can
provide a departmental-
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
accepted statement of
accessibility in the
course syllabus and,
throughout the course,
demonstrate sensitivity
to disabilities and
diversities, including
aspects of cultural,
cognitive, emotional,
and physical
differences
Average 4.47 Competent
Standard Deviation 0.10 Homogenous
Table VII shows the descriptive measures of the faculty self-assessment of their
technical, administrative, and pedagogical competencies using the LMS tool of the BPC e-
Competent," which means teachers can complete basic computer operations and fix other
"Competent," means that the teachers can effectively navigate and utilize e-Learning.
with the verbal interpretation as “competent," which means the teacher can still execute
their teaching method with the pedagogical tools/aspect of BPC e-Learning. Almost the
same assessment was observed because of the small value of the standard deviation
computed.
in our research papers. Their study focuses on integrating the e-learning system in the
classroom or their teaching. The findings of their research show that the E-learning systems
are reliable in classroom-based teaching. Comparatively, both our study has a positive
response that theirs being "reliable" in integrating the e-learning in their teaching and ours
as "competent" for the results that the teachers find themselves as competent in using the
Part 8: The Assessment of Students Towards their Experiences in using BPC e-Learning.
Table VIII presents the self-assessment of students towards their experiences in using the
BPC Online Technology Program. The following tools are additional instruments.
Table VIII
Frequency Verbal
Statements 5 4 3 2 1 N Mean Interpretation
1. Internet Online Skills
1.1 I can send an
email with file 117 104 29 11 1 262 4.24 Effective
attachments
1.2 I am familiar
with online etiquette 108 116 28 9 1 262 4.23 Effective
1.3 I can use web
browsers (e.g., 128 99 26 8 1 262 4.32 Effective
Internet Explorer,
Google Chrome)
confidently
1.4 I know how to
resolve common
errors while using
the tool (browser and 91 105 52 11 3 262 4.03 Effective
application) "seldom
lagging of app
during the
assessment."
1.5 I am
comfortable with
things like doing 101 117 37 8 2 262 4.16 Effective
searches, setting
bookmarks, and
downloading files
1.6 I know how to
access the course 94 117 38 12 1 262 4.11 Effective
space and organize
my account
1.7 I know how to
use asynchronous
and synchronous
tools (e.g., 118 106 27 11 0 262 4.26 Effective
Discussion boards,
chat tools, video
conference, face
time) effectively
Average 4.20 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.10 Homogenous
2. Software Application Skills
2.1 The learning
materials are easily 87 131 35 5 4 262 4.11 Effective
accessible
2.2 I am
comfortable in
uploading my
assessment/ activity
(videos, pictures, 95 119 39 4 5 262 4.13 Effective
files, etc.) to the
platform of our
online technology
program
2.3 I can navigate
the course space of 80 130 42 8 2 262 4.06 Effective
our tools or use its
other features
6. Abilities
6.1 I can express
my thoughts and 83 132 35 9 3 262 4.08 Effective
ideas in writing
6.2 I am a self-
starter 82 123 44 7 6 262 4.02 Effective
6.3 I can
communicate
effectively with 98 122 35 4 3 262 4.18 Effective
others using online
technologies and
applications
6.4 I take
responsibility for my 98 124 32 5 3 262 4.18 Effective
learning
6.5 Taking
responsibility for
staying in contact 90 117 44 5 6 262 4.07 Effective
with my instructor
would be easy for
me
Average 4.11 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.07 Homogenous
7. Motivation
7.1 I consider
flexibility in time as
an essential
motivating factor in 98 116 42 5 1 262 4.16 Effective
taking an online
class
7.2 I am highly
motivated and
enthusiastic about 83 118 44 13 4 262 4.00 Effective
taking my course
online
7.3 I enjoy learning
that is both
interesting and
challenging, and I
am motivated in 84 123 42 6 7 262 4.03 Effective
such situations to go
beyond the
minimum
requirements
7.4 I would be able
to remain motivated
even though the 73 130 43 13 3 262 3.98 Effective
instructor is not
online at all times
7.5 I set a goal
before starting a task 77 139 33 11 2 262 4.06 Effective
7.6 I would be able
to complete my work
even when there are
online distractions 84 126 40 10 2 262 4.07 Effective
(e.g., Friends
sending emails,
websites to search)
7.7 I would be able
to complete my work
even when there are 83 130 36 9 4 262 4.06 Effective
in my home (e.g.,
Television, children,
and such).
Average 4.05 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.06 Homogenous
8. Time Management
8.1 Considering my
schedule, I can
spend significant 86 124 43 5 4 262 4.08 Effective
time and energy
engaging in online
learning class
8.2 I do not have
trouble getting 58 125 61 12 6 262 3.83 Effective
things done on time
8.3 I can organize
my time well so that
work/ chores and 66 127 54 9 6 262 3.91 Effective
tasks don't build-up
Average 3.94 Effective
Standard Deviation 0.13 Homogenous
9. Usefulness
9.1 Learning would
be more effective
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
using the BPC e-Learning shown in Table VIII. In category 1, Online Internet Skills can
have an average mean of 4.20 with the verbal interpretation of "Effective." It implies that
the students can send an email with file attachments. They are familiar with online
etiquette. The students can also use web browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer, Google Chrome)
confidently and know how to resolve common errors while using the tool (browser and
application).
average mean of 4.11, implies that the learning materials are easily accessible. Students are
comfortable in uploading the assessment/ activity (videos, pictures, files, etc.) to they are
also able to navigate the course space of tools or use its other features.
In terms of content, rated as "Effective" with a weighted average mean of 4.13, the
learning materials are interesting, the timing of activities, sequencing of modules, and
assessments are precise. The students can modify and add content and review using an
The Social Support category rated as "Effective" with a weighted average mean of
4.10 indicates the technical support is readily accessible, timely, and teachers gave
Study Habits rated as "Effective" with a weighted average mean of 3.96, which
means the students find it easier to study independently and learn new skills. It also means
that the students were confident during online discussion and able to refrain from
distractions and stay on task while looking also determined to stick to studies despite
challenging situations (environment). The students catch up with the lessons without the
The 6th category, Abilities, was rated as "Effective" with an average mean of 4.11,
which means the students could express their thoughts and ideas in writing and
The motivation rated as "Effective" with an average mean of 4.05 implies the
class. Students enjoy learning that is interesting, challenging, and motivated in such
with an average mean of 3.95 implies the students can spend significant time and energy
engaging in online learning. The students do not have trouble getting things done on time.
Lastly, they can organize their time for study/work/ chores and tasks.
Usefulness the last category was rated as "Effective" with an average mean of 4.03,
implying that learning and e-Learning would improve students' learning process. It also
claims that learning online reduces the students' time spent on unproductive activities.
Also, learning online saves money that students spend on printed learning materials and
transportation costs. Lastly, online collaboration improves the written communication and
analytical thinking skills of the students. In conclusion, e-learning was an effective tool in
Philippines Higher Education Institution” is similar in our research papers. Their study
focuses on the usefulness of the E-learning system. The findings of their research that the
E-learning systems are helpful and practical, and they are reliable. Both of our studies have
Table 9 presents the feedbacks of parents towards the effectiveness of BPC e-Learning for
their children.
Table IX
Table IX shows the Feedback of Parents towards the effectiveness of the BPC e-
Learning to their Children. The BPC e-Learning was effective to their child and secured an
We noticed that our parents were not involved in our online learning for these
reasons; 1st, we are in senior high and tertiary level. Therefore, parents usually do not apply
themselves too much in their day-to-day education. 2nd, they did not have a complete
overview of the software, but they know that we have this kind of system and are amazed
by it. 3rd, most of the parents were not that updated in technologies or what we call not that
"techy" for this reason, we decided to have only a few questions. Almost the same
feedbacks were received from the parents which means that they are satisfied towards the
effectiveness of the BPC e-Learning, as shown by the slight standard deviation computed.
Part 9: The challenges encountered by the faculty and the students while using the BPC
e-Learning system.
Table X presents the challenges stated by the students in the questionnaire about the
challenges they have faced during their class and while using the BPC e-Learning.
Table X
Challenges Faced by Students during Class and while using the BPC e-Learning
Table X shows that the challenges faced by the students. The common challenge
they have encountered was the "502/504 Bad Gateway," with 72 responses. This message
usually appears during the significant examination period. According to Dr. Rosemarie S.
Guirre, this problem occurs because the system's capacity per five (5) minutes to take an
assessments/primary examination was limited to 500 users. When this problem occurs, it
means that another student got in while you are "nalaglag" in BPCian's term. 2nd to the list
was the "Lagging or Slowing of the Application," with 68 responses; this problem may
occur in many ways. This problem usually happens when the user's internet connection
slows down when the Random-Access Memory (RAM) of their phone storage is full of
memory and slowing down. The phone versions may also affect some applications, or
simply the user's phone and the application were not compatible.
With 48 responses, the "Internet Connection" was also listed as one of the
significant challenges of virtual education. Since this kind of pedagogy requires internet
access to study online, in this trying time, without it, education will be more critical, but
this challenge was beyond the user’s control. According to the respondents, the frequent
lagging and slowing of the internet make it harder to learn since it was glitching. Worse,
the conference will automatically drop, and it won't be easy to connect or get back to the
call. In the 4th challenge, the students categorized as "Others" with 41 responses were more
on personal/psychological aspects since some say that the current education modality was
manage their time while some are more on the system, such as it is sometimes crashing
when used and its capacity was a bit small. One of the students' challenges is the
"Assessment Matters," with 31 responses. They said that the time limit would only become
their problem when the students encounter the “bad gateway” many times that sometimes
last for 3-10 minutes or worst when the exam will submit automatically due to this limit.
There are also cases where you cannot access the assessment, and during submission, it
will not submit. And lastly, the “System Bugs” points out by 11 respondents, this may also
observation, including in the questionnaire. The challenges, according to them was more
on the physical aspect of students; in this modality, the self-discipline of students in the
form of the sleeping pattern becomes a problem since the learners tend to work late at night
at home to wait for a fast connection of the internet. They also observe that the validity of
skills in terms of writing becomes dependent on the computer correction system; hence the
learners tend not to think on their own in a correct manner of constructing a sentence or a
paragraph. In addition, the information they gathered through internet surfing was not
100% accurate. And lastly, the physical aspect of the learner might not lead to a healthier
body since the learner is not engaging in any physical activity since they usually stay seated
for a long time attending their classes and doing their school activities.
Challenges Faced by the Teachers during Class and while using the BPC e-Learning
Some teachers at first struggle in some parts of the system; this was understandable
since we suddenly shifted from face-to-face instruction to online classes. Another factor
Dr. Guirre showed us was the design and features of e-Learning for teachers and students;
there is a vast difference in the design with those features. Since in the system of teacher
are more complex and technical. One of the challenges they've also encountered was the
laboratory subjects. Skilled and hands-on were difficult to teach online, not so that the
teachers were difficult to discuss the topic but in a way that they don't know if the students
grasp the information, lesson, and skills needed. Internet connection is also one of their
problems during discussion. Another challenge is the time given to discuss the readings.
Since the regular schedule is of two parts-the synchronous and asynchronous classes, they
are also struggling to sign in/ logging in or enter the portal/ e-learning—lastly, the validity
Some challenges stated are more on the teachers' personal/ psychological aspect
related to students. Some of them noted that this modality was not fulfilling, especially for
teachers who handle a technical subject. Demonstration and hands-on teaching were vital
because they know that the skills were not appropriately absorbed and demonstrated
thoroughly. Because these subjects were more on performing and actual practices were
complex for students to grasp face-to-face, what more in online classes? But we do not
have any choice for now but to continue and focus more on theoretical. There are also
concerns about the SHS work immersion that requires hands-on teaching and experiential
learning but was not possible in the current situation. Most of the lessons from the first
discussion, which is somehow tricky and unfulfilling. Some teachers from Electrical
Department raise their concern because not all the students have the proper tools and
equipment at home. Just as I stated above, they are not so sure if the students absorb the
debate. Moreover, they are worried about their future since demonstrations rarely happened
online.
Presented in Table XI the strength of the system stated by Dr. Rosemarie S. Guirre, the
system developer of the BPC e-Learning System and Head of the Department of MIS
Table XI
Category Strength
The Software Free
Video Conferencing Google Meet (Free)
Portability Any Type of Gadget
Downloadable in Google Play Store,
Compatibility Windows App, and App Store
Table XI shows the system's strength; according to Dr. Rosemarie S. Guirre, its
primary strength was free. There is no such fee that the users needed to pay. It was also
made alone by the institution. In fact, according to Ms. Sison and Dr. Guirre, the budget
required for an e-learning system from others that also offered to them was needed a budget
ranging from 500 000 pesos or higher. The system is also connected to Google Meet since
it is free and convenient to users, unlike Zoom, so the developers and management agreed
to use it for video conferencing. The system was also portable to phone, iPad, tablet,
netbook, laptop, personal computers, and more. It was also compatible to download from
Google Play Store, Windows Store, and App store to make sure that each user can acquire
the software.
Part 10: The solutions/ suggestions posited by the respondents to address the challenges
observed.
The respondents cited some challenges they have encountered and suggested
solutions. According to Dr. Guirre, the system developer, to avoid most of the technical
issues of the system cited by the respondents, it needs enough funds so that the system's
capacity will be top-up and be enhanced. While according to the other respondents, when
the class encountered a sudden glitch or the internet was suddenly slowing down, the
students were allowed by the teacher to drop the call for about five minutes and get back
to it. One of the teachers- respondent, cited that he implemented a 5-minute rule. Wherein
if the discussion or the internet connection was disrupting the class, they will stop for a
while or reschedule the course (e.g., if the synchronous class was 1:30-3:00 pm. The
asynchronous was 3:00-4:30 pm then the disruption happen during the synchronous the
Some teachers send their presentations in their respective group chats, or some
provide a PDF of their production to make it more accessible to the majority. Some teachers
also suggested recording their online class for those absent due to financial matters and
For the subjects that more on actual practices, the teachers made sure that they have
some video to present so that the needed skills may emphasize elaborate more. They also
use GIFs and Images to visualize the specific topic. They also suggested that, if possible,
maybe the teachers in the electrical department. And others as well were allowed to borrow
some tools for further demonstration so that the students may see actual tools/ equipment
that is not commonly seen in four corners of their home and have an accurate visualization
In terms of technicalities in the system, they suggested that it is best to contact the
persons in charge. For example, it could be from the admin or the MIS. But the case was
different in terms of "502/ 504 Bad Gateway; according to the students, when encountering
this problem, all they can do was to wait patiently and refresh the software until they were
While in terms of validity of exam, assessments, and activities, the solutions/ suggestions
3. Use the Grade book and do the counter checking and accurate time grading once the
4. Requesting the students to answer the exam while attending Google meet so that
to meet the competencies required for their subject. But they were still practicing
equal attention.
6. Communicate to students during the schedule of exams and utilize the features of
BPC LMS.
The solutions/ suggestions they made to promote Interactive Learning during online
class;
1. Participate using some of the platforms as Google meet, F.B. messenger for both
discussions.
4. Provide online performance tasks and interactive quizzes and or on-cam quiz.
5. Conducts a webinar and invite some professionals that could share their expertise.
CHAPTER V
conduct of the study, and recommendations that the school can pursue to enhance the
system further.
Summary of Findings
Based on the data collation and statistical analysis, the study comes out with the
1. The institution developed the BPC e-learning to cope with the current
situation and composed three (3) significant components; info sheets, assessments,
3. The software and feasibility study of BPC e-Learning were found "reliable"
and "feasible" and can use it to aid virtual education during the pandemic.
Furthermore, its quality in terms of format was “effective” to the users, its operation
was "intelligible," which means that it was easy to comprehend, and the purpose of
In a part of accessibility, the result shows that it was “accessible" and user-focused.
The technical aspect was “efficient” while the mobile design resulted as
"functional" and "accessible." The study also shows that the users of e-Learning
account were "protected" in terms of privacy data, protection, and rights. It was
"efficient" as it lets the faculty members facilitate and monitor their students in
promotes Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). It also supports social presence,
faculty contact in the class, cooperation among students, and active participation
learning. It also shows that when the students have some queries, the teachers give
prompt feedback. While in regards to time on task, the e-Learning was user-friendly
and let the students finish their assignment by the allotted time set by the teachers.
In addition, they are giving examples through video conferencing and info sheets
in terms of high expectations. After that, the assessments and assignments will be
open right after the class and answered during the asynchronous time. According
to the results, even virtual class teachers still respect students' diverse talents and
learning ways.
in each aspect and conducted education even during pandemic through virtual
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
classes. The teaching and learning process using the BPC e-learning tool was still
BPC, the study shows that they are “competent” and can navigate to the dashboards/
competencies.
BPC e-learning and during online class resulted as "effective." The students can
assignment/task and utilize their software application skills while using the
software of e-learning. They also comprehend its content (learning materials) and
can still receive social support from the faculty and technical team of the
effective since they have more time in their hands. It also shows that the software
and virtual classes still effective in terms of motivation and usefulness as they
9. We found out that most of the challenges faced by the students and faculty
members focused on the technical aspects of the system. However, one of the
Conclusion
protection, and rights in the teaching and learning process in virtual education.
Recommendations
Based on the results and conclusion of the study, researchers made the following
recommendations.
1.1 The system was already commendable. To further enhance, raise a fund for
the system's financial needs so that the developer may improve the technical aspect
of the BPC e-Learning. To avoid lagging, bad gateway during major examinations,
which happens if it reaches the maximum 500 users per five (5) minutes, the system
bugs the flaw or glitch, and crashing of the program. The fund plays a vital role in
1.2 Allow the teachers to borrow some equipment and tools from their
video conferencing and for the students to visualize and operate the tools and
equipment properly.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
2.1 Considering technical problems beyond your control, always seek help from
2.2 Practice oral recitation ranging from easy to difficult category the next
meeting right after the significant examinations occur. By this method, you will
have at least less doubt about the validity and reliability of their scores.
2.3 For simple assessment, use situational questions. You will see how much
knowledge the students grasp during the video conferencing that may also enhance
3. To the Students:
3.1 Do not tap the back button when encountering the "504/ 502 Bad Gateway"
during major examination and assessment. You will lose an "attempt." Instead,
keep refreshing the website/ software; wait patiently until your exam shows again.
name, seek help immediately to the Technical Team of your Department assigned
4.1 Focus more on the technical aspect and capacity of the system.
4.2 Include the effects of the system on other aspects such as mental health,
motivation, or performance.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES
Anstey, L., Watson, G., “A Rubric for Evaluating E-Learning Tools in Higher Education”
EDUCAUSE, September 2018
Baldominos, A., Marquez, N., Nieto, M. “Digital Teaching Materials and Their
Relationship with the Metacognitive Skills of Students in Primary Education”
Technology Enhanced Education, April 2020
Downes, Stephen “E-learning 2.0” E-learn Magazine, Volume 2005, Issue 10, October
2015
CONFERENCE PAPER
Kasapoglu, A., Odabas, H., Odabas, Z.Y. “e-Learning Programs: The Case of Ankara
University Turkey” 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational
Leadership, Turkey, 2013
JOURNALS
Ahmad, G., Bakht, M.I., Saifi, I.L. “Effects of e–Learning on Students’ Academic Learning
at University Level” Asian Innovative Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
(AIJSSH) - April 2018
Kim, H.S., Oh, E.G. “Understanding Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussion: Use of
a Scaffolded, Audio-based Argumentation Activity” International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning- Volume 17, September 2016
LIST OF TABLES
Tables Page
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1. Community of Inquiry………………………………………………………...12
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX
1. What made the school administration decide to develop our own e- learning system
instead of using the existing online teaching platform like Google Classroom and
Lark?
2. What are the factors you considered in deciding on how the school will implement
online education?
3. How does the school administration ensure and monitor the quality of online class
4. What kind of support the school offers to students who are vocal about their
Internet connection)?
5. From a personal and professional perspective, what do you think are the challenges
6. Does the school administration made changes in the curriculum to fit in the e-
learning system?
7. Do all instructors equipped with gadgets and devices to use for online teaching?
8. Regarding to instructors who are not familiar with using modern technology like
computer, how the school administration helps them cope in the new teaching
platform?
9. How long the faculty trained to be able to adapt this sudden change in teaching?
10. Based on your observation last semester, what do you think our e-learning system
is going so far?
1. Who are the persons involved in the development of the BPC e- learning system?
3. Why did you develop an e-learning system? What are your objectives?
4. Can you provide us with a written form of how the platform was developed?
7. What are the challenges/problems the team encountered during the development of
the program?
9. How will your team cope up with the unexpected outcomes during the
10. What are your future plans to further strengthen the program in terms of;
10.1 mechanics/system;
10.3 accessibility;
and
10.5 portability?
Directions: Put check on the following response with each statement that best represents
Part I
Part II
Administrative Support (Commitment and Policies) 5 4 3 2 1
The e-learning is aligned with the institution’s Vision, Goals, Mission,
and Objectives
There is a commitment on the part of institutional leaders to use
technology to achieve strategic academic goals.
There is commitment on the part of institutional leaders to use
technology to achieve strategic goals and that such commitment
extends beyond just using technology.
The institution is willing to employ or assign an academically capable
and/or experienced faculty to oversee the implementation of the e-
learning environment.
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Direction: Put a check (/) on the box that corresponds to your answer: Strongly Agree,
RESPONSE
1. SOFTWARE PRODUCT EVALUATION 5 4 3 2 1
The system uses standard equipment that is reliable, widely
available, and applicable to a variety of use.
Computer capabilities such as graphics, color, or sound are used for
appropriate instructional reasons
If the program requires special equipment, the requirements are
minimal and clearly stated by the developer
The program is reliable in normal use. Software is bug free
The program provides a copy or summary of its basic information to
the user for future reference
Learning materials are clear and well organized and are dated
Updates can be loaded easily into the system
If any processing in the program is based on assessment scores,
course grades, or other client records, the program explains to the
user how the records are being used
If the program uses client records, it does not restrict an individual in
exploring any of the information in the program
If the program creates a permanent record for a user, that record is
secure and confidential. There is provision for erasing the record
when the information is no longer valuable in providing services
The site coordinator's manual explains the content and process for
updating information
Print or computer materials explain the content and effective use of
the program to local site coordinators
There is a system of communication between user sites and the
system developer which may include newsletters, telephone
assistance, and annual evaluations
On-site technical assistance is available for effective program use
2. FEASIBILITY
2.1 The software can be used in the current environment.
2.2 The software can run on computer and other platform
(e.g. laptop, mobile phones)
2.3 Does the software run on your network?
2.4 The software is made available to many students,
teachers or other users.
2.5 The software requires internet access.
3. QUALITY
3.1 FORMAT
3.1.1 The interface is consistent
Directions: Evaluate the BPC Online Technology Program by its level of effectiveness:
Very Effective, Effective, Moderately Effective, Less Effective, and Not Effective. All
categories must be completed. Mark to select the best response that represents the program.
LEVELS OF
CATEGORY ELEMENT INDICATORS EFFECTIVENESS
5 4 3 2 1
The tool can be scaled
1. Functionality Scale to accommodate any
size class with the
flexibility to create
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
smaller sub-groups or
communities of
practice.
The tool has a user-
Ease of Use friendly interface, and
it is easy for instructors
and students to become
skilful with in a
personalized and
intuitive manner.
Tech Support/ Campus-based
Help technical support and
Availability /or help documentation
is readily available and
aids users in
troubleshooting tasks
or solving problems
experienced; or the
tool provider offers a
robust support
platform
The tool allows users
Hypermedia to communicate
through different
channels (audio,
visual, textual) and
allows for non-
sequential,
flexible/adaptive
engagement with
material
Accessibility The tool meets
Standards accessibility
2. Accessibility guidelines (e.g., local
accessibility
legislation and/or W3C
WCAG 2.0 standards)
User Focused The tool is designed to
Participation address the needs of
diverse users, their
various literacies, and
capabilities, thereby
widening opportunities
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
for participation in
learning
Required Proper use of the tool
Equipment does not require
equipment beyond
what is typically
available to instructors
and students (computer
with built-in speakers
and microphone,
internet connection,
etc.)
3. Technical Integration/ The tool can be
Embedding embedded (as an
Within a object via HTML
Learning code) or fully
Management integrated (e.g., LTI-
System (LMS) compliant tools) into
an LMS while
maintaining full
functionality of the
tool.
Desktop/ Users can effectively
Laptop utilize the tool with
Operating any standard, up-to-
System date operating system.
Browser Users can effectively
utilize the tool with
any standard, up-to-
date browser
Additional Users do not need to
Downloads download additional
software or browser
extensions.
4. Mobile The tool can be
Design accessed, either
Access through the download
of an app or via a
mobile browser,
regardless of the
mobile operating
system and device.
Design of the mobile
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
responsive measures.
These measures can be
accessed through a
user-friendly
dashboard
8. Cognitive Enhancement of The tool enhances
Presence Cognitive Task engagement in targeted
(For Students cognitive task(s) that
Only) were once overly
complex or
inconceivable through
other means
Higher Order Use of the tool easily
Thinking facilitates learners to
exercise higher order
thinking skills
(considered design,
facilitation, and
direction from
instructor)
Metacognitive Through the tool,
Engagement learners can regularly
receive formative
feedback on learning
(i.e. they can track
their performance,
monitor their
improvement, test their
knowledge)
Directions: Evaluate the online teaching effectiveness by rating the items using the
response scale; Strongly Agree, Agree, Moderately Agree, Less Agree, Disagree
Respondents: Students
to Students
and affective aspect by rating the items using the response scale; 5=Strongly Agree,
RESPONSE
COGNITIVE 5 4 3 2 1
1. Giving the learner enough time to study their lesson makes
them study more.
2. Presenting a lesson of real-life situations makes the students be
more interested.
3. Poor score or output on a test of a student’s makes them worry
and try performance better next time.
4. Students have strong desire to excel in their studies.
5. Students are basically as an ambitious person and want to get
to the top of their performance, whenever possible.
6. Learners to try to do their assignments as soon as possible after
they are given to them.
7. Learners relate what they have learned in one subject which
are interrelated to each.
8. New topics makes students interested to learners and try to
spend extra time to obtain more information about it.
9. Getting a high-grade student feel inspired and study more.
10. Students present a report by group or person and their ideas in
their best of their knowledge and ability.
11. The students who presented a report as a lesson or topic makes
sure that is correct and validated to avoid doubt.
META-COGNITIVE
1. Learners make learning just to pass the course while doing as
little work as possible.
2. Students accept only what is given out in class or in the course
outlines and does not try to ask other matter.
3. Learners consider several alternatives to a problem before he/she
presented their report.
4. Students try to understand the intellectual strengths and
weaknesses of their fellow students.
5. Student-reporter presented the kind of information is most
important to learn.
6. Students know what the teachers are expecting from them to
know and present during their report.
7. Student-reporter able to remember information which is needed to
be shared to his/her fellow students to learners which is not in the
book.
8. Student-reporter able to ask point of view of their classmates in
terms of deeper understand of something related to the lesson.
9. Students to push themselves to learn more not only for the
completion of their grades but also for their self-improvement.
Directions: Please put check to select the best response that represents you during the
program. 5- I am an expert and can teach others, 4- I have done this successfully, 3- I
have done this and had mixed success, 2- I have done this, 1-I have never done this.
RESPONSE
CATEGORY ELEMENT INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1
Complete Basic I can complete basic
Computer computer operations
Operations including creating and
manipulating
documents, managing
files and folders, and
working with multiple
windows
1. Technical Log into LMS I can log into the
Competencies and Access Learning Management
Class System (LMS) and
access the class.
Navigate I can navigate the
Course Space course space in the
Learning Management
System (LMS) to locate
critical class elements
such as the syllabus,
lessons, gradebook,
course mail, or other
features.
Set Up I can set up the class
Gradebooks and gradebook and manage
Manage Grades student grades in the
Learning Management
System (LMS), such as
set a grading scale, use
points/percentages, and
submit final grades.
Use Course I can use course
Communication communication systems
System in the Learning
Management System
(LMS) such as email,
chat, web conferencing,
discussion forums, or
announcements.
I can manage the course
roster in the Learning
Manage Course Management System
Roster
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
primarily asynchronous
in nature.
Provide I am familiar with the
Appropriate unique learning needs
Educational and situations of both
Experience for traditional age and adult
Diverse Learner learners, providing an
educational experience
that is appropriate for
3. Pedagogical both.
Competencies Achieve I can achieve mastery of
Mastery of the teaching and
Teaching and learning environment
Learning by becoming familiar
Environment with all course
materials, as well as the
structure and
organization of the
course environment
Respond to I can respond to student
Student inquiries within 12-24
Inquiries hours to guide students
towards a positive
learning outcome
Provide I can provide detailed
Detailed feedback on
Feedback assignments and exams
through facilitation,
guidance, directed
learning, and progress
assessment
Communicate I can communicate as
Course Progress needed with students
and Changes about course progress
and changes via email,
course announcements,
etc.
Promote Safe, I can promote and
Inviting, and encourage a safe,
Mutually inviting, and mutually
Respectful respectful learning
Environment environment by
communicating with
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
students in a positive
tone and by following
and promoting
Netiquette guidelines
Monitor and I can continuously
Manage Student monitor and manage
progress student progress by
using course statistics
or reports to identify
students who are not
accessing course
materials, participating
in learning activities,
etc., and reach out to
encourage engagement.
Communicate I can communicate
Course Goals course goals and
and Outcomes outcomes using the
syllabus and course
announcements at the
beginning of the course.
Establish My I can establish my
Presence in the presence in the course
Course on a regular basis via
course announcements,
assignments, emails,
online office hours, and
various other methods.
Demonstrate I can provide a
Sensitivity to departmental-accepted
Disabilities and statement of
Diversities accessibility in the
course syllabus and,
throughout the course,
demonstrate sensitivity
to disabilities and
diversities, including
aspects of cultural,
cognitive, emotional,
and physical differences
Directions: Put check on the following response with each statement that best represents
What are the challenges you’ve encountered while using the BPC e-Learning
System?
1. How do you handle the disruption caused by online teaching conditions such as;
1.1 slow internet connection (both parties of educator and learners); and
2.1 beliefs;
3. How do you handle the technical problems of e-Learning tools used in the program?
(state at least three problems and how you are handling it)
4.2 participation?
5. In today’s situation, most of the courses are being taught in text-based environment,
how are you handling it and what strategies you are using especially most of the
6. What are your other concerns and recommendations to enhance the e-learning tools
a. Very Satisfied
b. Satisfied
c. Moderately satisfied
d. Less Satisfied
e. Dissatisfied
2. What is going well for your child in this course? (Can mark multiple answers)
appropriate pace.
a. Very Satisfied
b. Satisfied
c. Moderately satisfied
d. Less Satisfied
e. Dissatisfied
4. Other Feedback:
12: Documentation
Robles, Randy, A.
Mallari, Vandolf, A.
Respectfully Yours,
Robles, Randy, A.
Mallari, Vandolf, A.
Messages sent to Faculty Members and Students via Messenger Application asking
To Faculty Members:
Good afternoon Ma'am and Sir, I'm name of the researcher/ course, section, and
major one of the assigned students by Ma'am Erlinda P. Villamoran to conduct our research
team mates Mr. Mallari, Robles, Rueme and I would like to ask your permission to answer
our instruments for faculty members for us to broaden our knowledge and evaluate the
software/system that we are using right now appropriately. This study will be a great help
not only for us and to our fellow BPCian but also to the faculty members and the developers
as well. Your response will be a great help and highly appreciated Ma'am and Sir. Thank
you so much, May God continue to bless you and your family.
To Students:
Hi, Good Afternoon I’m name of the researcher/ course, section, and major,
answer our instruments for us to know and measure the effectiveness of our e -
Interview with Ms. Victoria Beth M. Sison, MAEd- VPPA/ OIC- College President of
Interview with Ms. Rosemarie S. Guirre, DIT- Developer of the E-learning System/
Online Attendance
Video Conferencing
who conduct this study with aims to help the institution and the developers of the system
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Randy A. Robles
Currently Enrolled in Bachelor of Technical
Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTEd) Major in
Food Services Management (FSM) at BPC Malolos
News Writer of The Sentry The Official Publication
of BPC Malolos, Bulacan
Hotel and Restaurant Services (HRS) Graduate at BPC Pandi, Bulacan
Commercial Cookery NCII
Housekeeping NCII
Food and Beverage Services NCII
Seminars/ Webinar Attended
Backyard Farming: Maging Plantito at Plantita Upang Kumita
Environmental Summit: Sustainable Practices for the Protection of the
Environment, Healthy Lifestyle and Greening Economy
Creating a Personal Brand Working in Personal Growth: A Way to Progress
and Success
Industry Immersion in Cookery and Food and Beverage
VIRTUAL EDUCATION, A BIG CHALLENGE: AN EVALUATION
OF THE e-LEARNING SYSTEM OF THE BULACAN POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Vandolf A. Mallari
Currently Enrolled in Bachelor of Technical Vocational
Teacher Education (BTVTEd) Major in Food Services
Management (FSM) at BPC Malolos
Contributor of The Sentry The Official Publication of
BPC Malolos
Hotel and Restaurant Services (HRS) Graduate at BPC Obando, Bulacan
Former Student Government in BPC Obando, Bulacan
NCII Cookery
NCII Food and Beverage Services
NCII Housekeeping
Seminars/ Webinar and Training Attended
#KAMALAYAN Progressive Webinar Series: Student’s Mind, Body and
Soul in the New Normal
An Echo Seminar for BTVTEd Students “Kindling Commitment to the
Teaching Profession” (Speaker)
Industry Immersion/ Workshop on Cookery and Food and Beverage
Good Manufacturing Practices and Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures
Industry Immersion/ Workshop on Housekeeping and front Office Services