Writing coursework, especially for a GCSE Geography River coursework conclusion, can be a

challenging task. It requires a thorough understanding of the topic, the ability to gather and analyze
data, and effective communication skills to present findings coherently. Crafting a conclusion
involves summarizing the key points, drawing connections between them, and providing insights
derived from the research.

Students may face difficulties in structuring their conclusions, ensuring that all relevant information
is included, and presenting a well-supported argument. Additionally, meeting the specific
requirements and guidelines set by the educational institution adds another layer of complexity.

While it's essential for students to develop their research and writing skills, seeking assistance can be
beneficial, especially when faced with time constraints or difficulties in navigating the coursework
requirements. One option is to consider professional writing services, such as ⇒ HelpWriting.net
⇔, which can provide expert support in crafting a well-structured and academically sound
coursework conclusion.

It's important for students to use such services responsibly and ethically, ensuring that they
understand and engage with the content provided. Seeking help is acceptable as long as it
contributes to the student's learning process rather than substituting it entirely.

Remember, before considering external assistance, it's advisable to explore available resources, seek
guidance from teachers or mentors, and make an effort to enhance one's own understanding of the
coursework material. External support should be seen as a supplement to the learning process, not a
replacement for personal academic development.
The river has now become wide and the valley becomes a U shape rather than the V-shape at earlier
stops. Average Depth 0.0122 0.1246 0.0686 0.093 0.09904 0.0812 0.0876 0.152. Then I would have
been able to choose sites on a straight area of the river, with fewer obstructions from weeds, and used
a smaller orange. Gradient 0.086 0.034 0.021 0.008 0.029 0.021 0.021 0.006. Depth from source to
mouth along the River Holford (m). Overall, all the depth readings at this site were what was
expected to be seen at this. However if I was carrying this study out from a professional perspective
I would be taking pictures and scanning them into a super computer to would judge the rock more
accurately. Some of the features found here include interlocking spurs, V-shaped valley, meanders
and step like waterfalls as the river meanders down its course. Our gradient data was mostly
secondary data because we did not physically take all of. Somerset is a county in the South West of
England and borders five other counties. At the first three sites there was dense forest to both sides
of the river, (which can be. In the higher profile of the river mainly vertical erosiontakes place. We
chose to sample eight sites along the River Holford’s course because this would. Also, the volume of
the pebbles was recorded using a displacement method. Ten sites could have been looked rather than
eight along the river’s course. This. Discharge is purely a calculation and is calculated by multiplying
velocity and cross-section area. Depth (m) 5 0.016 0.51 0.083 0.04 0.07 0.089 0.053 0.15. More
measurements could have been taken, ensuring a greater accuracy. River Holford which were the
width, the depth and the gradient. These are the different factors that we sampled and how many we
chose to sample at. The beaker is not very precise, it does not measure to a great deal of detail, and
more than one small pebble can accidentally be placed in the beaker. This then will put pressure on
the load of the river volume and increase the river depth. PLEASE NOTE: material written by me
and in my own words, except for quotations from published and unpublished sources which are
clearly indicated and acknowledged as such. This is the equation to work out Spearman’s Rank
Correlation. The shape of the pebbles was measured using a power scale of roundness. Where we
were along the drainage basin could have changed the width of the river. This meant that we
expected the river to be shallow at these. At Site 4 the average depth was 0.093m which was larger
then at the previous site. Callipers are a good way to measure pebbles, they are easy to use, and far
more accurate than a ruler. Somerset’s population is over sixty-five and this shows that it is a popular
retirement.
The depth stayed the same at readings 1 and 2 and was 0.105m. It then increased. Site’s 6 cross
sectional area was 0.23142 m2 which was an increase from the last site. National Park and is set in a
valley just north of the Brendon Hills. You would also be able to see if the new depth readings
followed the same trends as. The water is also getting deeper as the river is now entering its middle
course. When all the data was collectedand put into graphs. In the lower course of the river there is
lateral erosionwhich. I have chosen to represent the depth of the river as a bar chart because it is very
easy. Wetted Perimeter (m) 0.74 2.4 2.48 2.08 2 3.13 2.84 2.92. Weather information of Somerset
was looked up on the internet to see if there was. Width from source to mouth along the River
Holford (m). Overall, our river study on the River Holford was very successful because we took a.
National Park and is set in a valley just north of the Brendon Hills. Below is how we found r2 using
the Spearman’s rank equation. Ten sites could have been looked rather than eight along the river’s
course. This. We used the cailleux roundness index chart and a ruler when measuring the clast size.
However, the most greatly affected hypothesis was discharge. Depth (m) 4 0.001 0.036 0.082 0.105
0.17 0.091 0.127 0.183. Also, after each graph there is a description of it. There were many problems
that we encountered on our river study. This reduces the stream water volume and rates of lateral
and vertical erosion, also the speed velocity of the river. Spearman’s rank technique is a statistical test
which will be used for each hypothesis. A x-y plot was chosen to represent the cross sectionof the
river because it is easy to. The introduction and the methodology were then written about the
background of. Another human limitation was that we could have taken ten measurements for every.
Another human limitation was that we could have taken ten measurements for every. In the higher
profile of the river mainly vertical erosiontakes place. Debden Brook Rivers Coursework Data
Collection Table. Depth (m) 2 0.015 0.027 0.067 0.105 0.0102 0.107 0.096 0.14. My evaluation for
measuring cross-section area is shown on page.. This shows all of the problems with my methods,
and how they could have been fixed, and they all are applicable here.
At site 5 the five readings taken across the width of the channel were quite varied. Epping is in
South West Essex and is part of South East England. One limitation was that a stratified sampling
strategy had been used for the sites. More measurements could have been taken, ensuring a greater
accuracy. If I were to repeat this river study again there would be some changes that I would. See
other similar resources ?3.50 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. My hypothesis’ account for many of the key river features like the depth, velocity,
width etc, making it all possible of investigating at Loughton Brook. There were lots of objects such
as tree branches in the river. A plastic tape measure was used to measure the width of the river, it was
done a few centimetres above the river, so drag was avoided. Spearman’s Rank is a statistical
technique which is used to see if there is a correlation. The average then falls before rising and rising
again to reach 0.2mph. The average velocity keeps rising to reach the highest average gradient at
Stop 8 at 0.28mph. The average then falls at both Stops 9 and 10 to finish the average velocity at
0.06mph. When all the data was collectedand put into graphs. However, at site 4, the width
decreased by 1.38m from the previous site. Therefore, the conclusions I have drawn from my studies
are not valid on all rivers, it is not possible to automatically assume that the results for the tests will
be the same on a much larger river, such as the Nile or the Amazon. Graphs to show the depth of the
river along all eight sites. At site 5 the five readings taken across the width of the channel were quite
varied. Overall, all the depth readings at this site were what was expected to be seen at this. This is a
summary table showing if my hypotheses were accepted visually, by looking. The readings at site 2
tell us that the river was increasing in depth from an average of. This increase is because of greater
downwards (vertical) erosion due to increased water velocity, discharge and load resulting in more
abrasion due to traction and saltation. I would like to thank Mr Matthews, Mr Orme, and Mr Parker
for coming with us on. In the higher profile of the river mainly vertical erosiontakes place. This is
because rivers have their source in the watershed before descending to sea-level at the mouth.
Nettlecombe Court for accommodating us and helping us with our river study along. Join our team
of reviewers and help other students learn. At the first three sites there was dense forest to both sides
of the river, (which can be. We could have compared data with other groups taking part in this study
to see if we. In site 2 the area is mostly covered in Claygate Beds, this offers les permeability and
infiltration than the Bagshot Beds or the Pebble Gravel, thus increasing the chances of flooding on
the flood plains and surface run off. It will also erode the banks by attrition because of the rocks that
have been carried along by the river, will smash into the sides of the banks and erode more of the
earth away causing the width to increase. We were undertaking this study in the autumn and so there
were many rotting leaves.
The River Holford is 7.4 km long and has three main types of geology throughout its. See other
similar resources ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were
looking for. At site 5, the gradient was seen to increase and this could be an. We could have
compared data with other groups taking part in this study to see if we. Depth (m) 5 0.016 0.51 0.083
0.04 0.07 0.089 0.053 0.15. Measurements 1 and 2 are the same at 0.015m and this was correct
because the. The depth increases until plot 4 where it is 0.2 and. There had been little rain in
Somerset before we went on our river study. This meant. There are many possible explanations for
why the width of the river followed the. At site 7 the cross sectional area was 0.219 m2 which was a
decrease from site 6.The. One physical problem was that there was debris in the river such as tree
branches and. The third reading we took was the wetted perimeter. This is because rivers have their
source in the watershed before descending to sea-level at the mouth. Quantock Hills. It is also home
to Exmoor National park which is known for its. However, the most greatly affected hypothesis was
discharge. At site 7 the cross sectional area was 0.219 m2 which was a decrease from site 6.The.
Channel efficiency is a calculation in which cross-section area is divided by the wetted perimeter of
the river. This might not have been the case, for the reasons outlined above. A further technique is
now required to test the significance of the relationship. The. Reading 2 was the lowest measurment
that was taken and was 0.0102m. This may. There had been little rain in Somerset before we went on
our river study. This meant. This water leads transpiration to occur-which cools plants down.
Quantock Hills. It is also home to Exmoor National park which is known for its. There is also
boulder clay which vegetation has formed on top of. Reading 1 was the shallowest depth and was
0.037m. The depth then increased by. After finding the results from the Spearman’s rank, a
significance test will be used to. These are the different factors that we sampled and how many we
chose to sample at. As you can see from the table above, this hypothesis was. At site 2 the cross
sectional area was 0.28035 m2 which was higher than at the. The river increased in depth at site 2
where it was 0.14m.