Forgerock Project
Forgerock Project
Introduction
Politics (from Greek: Πολιτικά, politiká, 'affairs of the cities') is the set of activities that are
associated with making decisions in groups, or other forms of power relations among
individuals, such as the distribution of resources or status. The branch of social science that
An Iraqi woman voting in a parliamentary election in Iraq; Nene Teye Kwesi Agyeman, a
Shai Chief of Ghana; inauguration of Park Geun-hye as President of South Korea; Hemicycle of
the European Parliament in Strasbourg; Coronation of King Rama X of Thailand, protesters
demonstrating in Chile, a woman voting in the 2012 Russian presidential election
It may be used positively in the context of a "political solution" which is compromising and
nonviolent,[1] or descriptively as "the art or science of government", but also often carries a
negative connotation.[2] The concept has been defined in various ways, and different
approaches have fundamentally differing views on whether it should be used extensively or
limitedly, empirically or normatively, and on whether conflict or co-operation is more essential to it.
A variety of methods are deployed in politics, which include promoting one's own political views
among people, negotiation with other political subjects, making laws, and exercising internal and
external force, including warfare against adversaries.[3][4][5][6][7] Politics is exercised on a wide
range of social levels, from clans and tribes of traditional societies, through modern local
governments, companies and institutions up to sovereign states, to the international level.
In modern nation states, people often form political parties to represent their ideas. Members of a
party often agree to take the same position on many issues and agree to support the same
changes to law and the same leaders. An election is usually a competition between different
parties.
A political system is a framework which defines acceptable political methods within a society.
The history of political thought can be traced back to early antiquity, with seminal works such as
Plato's Republic, Aristotle's Politics, Confucius's political manuscripts and Chanakya's
Arthashastra.[
3• Political Ideologies
A political ideology is a set of ideas, beliefs, values, and opinions, exhibiting a recurring pattern,
that competes deliberately as well as unintentionally over providing plans of action for public
policy making in an attempt to justify, explain, contest, or change the social and political
arrangements and processes of a political community. The concept of ideology is subject to
partly incompatible conceptual interpretations. The Marxist tradition views it pejoratively as
distorted consciousness, reflecting an exploitative material reality, that can be overcome through
unmasking; or, more recently, as a fictitious narrative necessary to maintaining the social order.
Non-Marxist approaches split into three perspectives. The first sees ideology as abstract, closed
and doctrinaire, largely impervious to empirical evidence and superimposed on a society. The
second sees ideology as a series of empirically ascertainable attitudes towards political issues
that can be explored by means of behavioral methods. The third views ideologies as
indispensable mapping devices of cultural symbols and political concepts that constitute a crucial
resource for understanding and shaping sociopolitical life. They compete over the ‘correct’ and
legitimate meanings of political words and ideas, and by means of that control, over the high
ground of politics.
8• Elections
election, the formal process of selecting a person for public office or of accepting or rejecting a
political proposition by voting. It is important to distinguish between the form and the substance
of elections. In some cases, electoral forms are present but the substance of an election is
missing, as when voters do not have a free and genuine choice between at least two alternatives.
Most countries hold elections in at least the formal sense, but in many of them the elections are
not competitive (e.g., all but one party may be forbidden to contest) or the electoral situation is in
other respects highly compromised.
9• International Relations
international relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international
organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest
groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science,
geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.
Key People: Kim Yo-Jong Joe Biden Friedrich Gentz Tzipi Livni Thoraya Obaid
Related Topics: diplomacy intelligence war arms control new regionalism
Historical development
The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the
West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas
the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist
China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the
result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective
means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a
surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could
dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including
foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive
preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important
concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations
reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that
knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign
and military policy.
In presidential years, the primary election is held on the fourth Tuesday of April.
In a primary election, each political party selects its candidates to run for office during the general
election. The candidates who get the highest number of votes in the primary election go on to run
in the general election . Voters also vote for their party’s officers during a primary election.
In Pennsylvania, you can only vote for the candidates in the same political party you have named
in your voter registration. For example, if you registered to vote as a member of the Republican
Party then you can vote in the Republican primary, but not the Democratic primary.
constitutional amendments,
ballot questions, and
any special election contests held at the same time as a primary election.
The county or counties running the special election must advertise the date and locations for the
special election, as well as the candidates running for office.
Everyone who lives in the district the candidates will represent can vote in the special election.
The nominees from each party run against each other in the general election in November.
The president is officially elected by the Electoral College, and not the popular vote. But the
popular vote – including your vote – helps decide which candidate receives Pennsylvania's
electoral votes.
Political economists study how economic theories such as capitalism, socialism, and communism
work in the real world. Any economic theory is a means of directing the distribution of a finite
amount of resources in a way that benefits the greatest number of individuals. These ideas can
be studied both theoretically and as they are used in the real world. In the real world, public
policy is created and implemented around these economic theories. Political economists study
both the underlying roots of these policies and their results.
In a wider sense, political economy was once the common term used for the field we now call
economics. Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all used the term to
describe their theories.
1
The shorter term "economy" was substituted in the early 20th century with the development of
more rigorous statistical methods for analyzing economic factors.
Socialism: This type of political economy promotes the idea that the production and
distribution of goods and wealth are maintained and regulated by society, rather than a
particular group of people. The rationale behind this is that whatever is produced by
society is done so because of those who participate, regardless of status, wealth, or
position. Socialism aims to bridge the gap between rich and poor, eliminating the ability
of individuals or groups to control the majority of power and wealth.5
Capitalism: This theory advocates profit as a motive for advancement and the ability of
free markets to regulate and drive the economy on their own. The idea behind capitalism
is that private individuals and other actors are driven by their own interests—they control
production and distribution, set prices, and create supply and demand.6
Communism: Individuals often confuse communism with socialism, but there is a distinct
difference between these two theories. Communism was a theory developed by Karl
Marx, who felt that capitalism was limited and created a big divide between rich and poor.
He believed in shared resources, including property. Unlike socialism, however, under
communism production and distribution are overseen by the government.7
Those who research the political economy are called political economists. Their study generally
involves the examination of how public policy, the political situation, and political institutions
impact a country's economic standing and future through a sociological, political, and economic
lens.
But the term is probably best ascribed to the French writer and economist, Antoine de
Montchrestien. He wrote a book called "Traité de l'économie politique" in 1615, in which he
examined the need for production and wealth to be distributed on an entirely larger scale—not in
the household as Aristotle suggested. The book also analyzed how economics and politics are
interrelated.
Smith was a philosopher, economist, and writer who is commonly referred to as the father of
economics and of the political economy. He wrote about the function of a self-regulating free
market in his first book, which was called "The Theory of Moral Sentiments."
11
His most famous work, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (or "The
Wealth of Nations") helped shape classical economic theory. It was also used as the foundation
for future economists.
8
Mill combined economics with philosophy. He believed in utilitarianism—that actions that lead to
people's goodwill are right and that those that lead to suffering are wrong.
9
In essence, he believed that economic theory and philosophy were needed, along with social
awareness in politics in order to make better decisions for the good of the people. Some of his
work, including "Principles of Political Economy," "Utilitarianism," and A System of Logic" led him
to become one of the most important figures in politics and economics.
As the economies of more countries become interconnected through globalism and international
trade, the politics of one country can have a strong impact on the economy of another.
Understanding the relationship between political power and economic decisions in one country
can help other countries predict how their own economies will be impacted.
Understanding political economy can also help a country's economy become more resilient. If the
government leaders in power at any given moment are forward-thinking, they can put laws and
policies in place that create the greatest possibility for economic stability and growth, regardless
of changing political power.
Research by political economists is conducted in order to determine how public policy influences
behavior, productivity, and trade. Much of their study helps them establish how money and power
are distributed between people and different groups.
14
They may do this through the study of specific fields such as law, bureaucratic politics, legislative
behavior, the intersection of government and business, and regulation.
15
As mentioned above, Marx became disenchanted with capitalism as a whole. He believed that
individuals suffered under regimented social classes, where one or more individuals controlled
the greater proportion of wealth. Under communist theories, this would be eradicated, allowing
everyone to live equally while the economy functions based on the ability and needs of each
participant. Under communist regimes, resources are controlled and distributed by the
government.
7
Most people confuse socialism and communism. It's true there are some similarities—notably,
that both stress bridging the gap between rich and poor, and that society should relegate
equilibrium among all citizens. But there are inherent differences between the two. While
resources in a communist society are owned and controlled by the government, individuals in a
socialist society hold property. People can still purchase goods and services under socialism,
while those who live in a communist society are provided with their basic necessities by the
government.
The rise of globalism and international trade means that the politics of one country can have a
strong impact on the economy of another. Understanding political economy can help countries
become more resilient in the face of global economic changes.
SPONSORED
Students who are passionate about the strategic use of language and enjoy following political
news might consider specializing in political communication. What is political communication? As
the name implies, it is a subfield that blends the communications and political science fields.
Earning a communications degree and specializing in political communication can allow students
to work toward a rewarding career in public service. Some political communicators work directly
for elected officials. Others work for independent organizations that seek to influence public
policy. Many career opportunities are available, but each starts with finding an in-depth answer to
the question: “What is political communication?”
Characteristics of Political Communication
Politics describes all activities related to the government of a country and the official activities of
elected individuals. Political communication refers to the messaging surrounding politics and it
can be directed inward or outward. For example, citizens may direct political messaging toward
their elected officials to influence their governance. Conversely, elected officials can direct
political communication toward their constituents.
The defining characteristic of political communication is the creation of meaningful narratives in
society that work to inform, persuade and call citizens to action.
Examples of Political Communication
Let us consider a hypothetical example. In the fictitious town of Newtown Springs, some locals
want to create a new highway through a stretch of woods. Other people oppose this plan
because they would prefer to create mountain biking trails and a nature preserve in that area.
Both groups of people petition their local elected officials, arguing that their proposed use of the
land should prevail. Each side explains the advantages of doing things their preferred way while
pointing out the downsides of the opposing group’s plan. These groups of people are both
participating in political communication — strategic messaging designed to persuade their
elected officials to agree with their point of view.
Alternatively, imagine that the citizens of Newtown Springs do not have any particular plan in
mind for that stretch of woods. An elected official of the town decides that it would make an
excellent nature preserve to enhance the locals’ quality of life and support conservation efforts.
The elected official participates in media interviews, explaining why this plan would be best for
the town. Those interviews are another form of political communication.
Political communication can consist of media interviews, published documents, websites, op-eds
in newspapers, political campaigns and more. However, it can also include more than written and
verbal communication. Political communication encompasses a political campaign’s or elected
official’s logos, gesticulations during speeches, mannerisms and even hairstyles.
For example, two politicians may choose to reach their constituents in different ways. While one
politician chooses mild mannerisms and a calm tone of voice, the other is enthusiastic and
animated.
Although mannerisms and tone of voice don’t have much to do with the governance-related ideas
these politicians are promoting, they allow the politicians to connect with their audiences. In other
words, charisma and audience engagement are important characteristics of effective political
communication.
At the beginning of the 21st century, the flows of globalization have been shaped by five salient
trends:
The ongoing growth of international trade, both in absolute terms and in relation to global
national income, appears to be leveling off. From 1980 to 2020, the value of exports has
grown by a factor of 8.9 times if measured in current dollars, while GDP increased 7.4
times and the population increased 1.7 times. Since the 2010s, international trade
appears to be leveling and subject to more volatility.
A substantial level of containerization of commercial flows, with container throughput
growing in proportion with global trade. Containerization tends to grow at a rate faster
than that of trade and GDP. This has been associated with the setting of intermodal
transport chains connecting exporters and importers.
A concentration of finished goods exports in a limited number of producing countries. For
instance, 79% of the provision of computer equipment and 75% of the phones is
accounted by five countries. The level of concentration is lower for intermediate goods,
underlining an active trade of parts within supply chains. For imports, the destinations
tend to be much more diversified, reflecting an existing demand irrespective of the origin
of the products.
A higher relative growth of trade in emerging economies, particularly in Pacific Asia that
focus on export-oriented development strategies that have been associated
with imbalances in commercial relations.
The growing role of multinational corporations as vectors for international trade,
particularly in terms of the share of international trade taking place within corporations
and the high level of concentration of their head offices.
The Four Industrial Revolutions
Still, many challenges are impacting future developments in international trade and
transportation, mostly in terms of demographics, politics, supply chain, energy, and
environmental issues. While the global population and its derived demand will continue to
grow and reach around 9 billion by 2050, demographic changes such as the aging of the
population, particularly in developed economies, will transform consumption patterns as a
growing share of the population shifts from wealth-producing (working and saving) to
wealth consuming (selling saved assets). Demographic trends in North America, Europe,
and East Asia (e.g. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) may not place them as drivers of global
trade, a function they have assumed in recent decades. The demographic dividend in
terms of peak share of the working-age population that many countries benefited from,
particularly China, will recede. This has ramifications on both the demand side
(consumption structure) and the production side (workforce).
The regulatory environment and the involvement of governments, either directly or
indirectly, are subject to increasing contention. Reforms in agricultural trade have not
been effectively carried on, implying that many governments (e.g. in the EU) provide high
subsidy levels to their agricultural sectors, undermining the competitiveness of foreign
agricultural goods. This is undertaken with the intent to protect their agriculture,
considering the risks associated with dependency on foreign providers and possible
fluctuations in prices. Intellectual property rights remain a contentious issue as well since
many goods are duplicated, undermining the brands of major manufacturers and retailers.
There is also a whole array of subsidies that influence the competitiveness of exports,
such as low energy and land costs and tax reductions. The rise of protectionist policies,
as exemplified by higher tariffs imposed by the American government on several Chinese
goods in 2018, is underlining a contentious trade environment this is likely to endure.
As both maritime and air freight transportation depend on petroleum, international trade
remains influenced by fluctuations in energy prices. The paradox has become that
periods of high energy prices usually impose a rationalization of international trade and
its underlying supply chains. However, periods of low or sharply declining energy prices,
which should benefit international transportation, are linked with economic recessions.
Environmental issues have also become more salient with the growing tendency of the
public sector to regulate components of international transportation that are judged to
have negative externalities. International trade enables several countries to mask their
energy consumption and pollutant emissions by importing goods that are produced
elsewhere and where environmental externalities are generated. Thus, international trade
has permitted a shift in the international division of production, but also a division
between the generation of environmental externalities and the consumption of the goods
related to these externalities.
Technological changes are impacting the nature of manufacturing systems through
robotization and automation. The ongoing fourth industrial revolution is changing input
costs, particularly labor. Since a good share of international trade is the result of the
convenience of comparative advantages, automation and robotization can undermine the
standard advantages of lower labor costs and make manufacturing more productive at
other locations, such as those closer to major markets. Further, since many developing
economies remain complex places to undertake business as state and national firms are
privileged, the loss of labor cost advantages could undermine future development
prospects. This is likely to have a strong influence on the nature and volume of
international trade, which could level and even regress. If this is the case, absolute
advantages, such as resources, would play a greater influence on trade, as was the case
before the 1970s.
Conclusion
Global Governance in 2030. Prospective Scenarios on the Future of Politics
According to Edelman’s Trust Barometer (2017), one in every two countries does not have faith in the
system, and we still do not know how this picture is going to evolve. In democracies, pro-democracy
attitudes coexist with openness to nondemocratic forms of governance, such as rule by experts (49
per cent), strong leaders (26 per cent) or the military (24 per cent). This picture might be part of a
transition period or indicating that polities are not being able to cope with some of the new challenges.
It is why we need to think about the future of politics and how these trends will shape global
governance in the next 10 to 20 years. Are political systems ready to govern a digital economy? How
should political leaders evolve to address radical changes in an automated world? What will the
consequences be for global governance and for the role of G20?
This paper analyzes current global trends in domestic politics and the prospective scenarios on the
future of politics. To do so, the paper presents a brief description on three forces we know will forge
the future: technological breakthroughs, demographic changes and shifts in global economic power.
Later, it turns to the uncertainty of the future. We live in nation states, so we first attempt to devise
how these forces will shape domestic politics. We then look at global governance and the way these
trends will impact upon it. The final stop of this journey is an analysis of the implications of these
scenarios for the role of the G20.
The report draws heavily from the results of an intensive design thinking workshop led by PwC’s
Global Leader, Strategy and Leadership Development, Blair Sheppard. Workshop participants
explored how political systems can confront disruptive, rather than incremental, change, worldwide.
They engaged in a ‘strategic foresight’ exercise, an analytical exercise that involves thinking through
various ways the future might unfold. We want to thank PwC for their invaluable collaboration, and
specially to Blair Sheppard and Ramiro Albrieu (CIPPEC), Bethan Grillo (PwC), Alexis Jenkins (PwC),
Gianluca Grimalda (Kiel Institute for the Economy), Jann Lay (GIGA), Sonia Jalfin (Sociopúblico),
Colm Kelly (PwC), Martín Rapetti (CIPPEC), Justine Brown (PwC), Dennis Snower (Kiel Institute for
the Economy) and Richard Wike (Pew Research Center), for joining us in this enterprise.
The Future of Government project explored how we can rethink the social contract according to
the needs of today’s society, what elements need to be adjusted to deliver value and good to
people and society, what values we need to improve society, and how we can obtain a new
sense of responsibility. Based on the experience from previous decades, it is now very important
to think of how new governance models will be developed to anticipate and be prepared for
possible futures and what citizens’ requirements are. Large patterns and trends have emerged
from the FuturGov scenarios. This has already been discussed in The Future of Government
2030+: A Citizen-Centric Perspective on New Government Models report , published earlier this
year. Based on this, The Future of Government 2030+: Policy Implications and
Recommendations report provides follow-up insights into the policy implications and o ers a set
of 57 recommendations, organised in nine policy areas. These stem from a process based on
interviews with 20 stakeholders and a participatory workshop with 19 stakeholders. The
recommendations include a series of policy options and actions that could be implemented at di
er- ent levels of governance systems. As these recommendations have shown, collaboration is
needed across di erent policy elds and they should be acted upon as integrated package.
Although the majority of rec- ommendations is intended for the EU policymakers, their
implementation could be more e ective if done through lower levels of governance, eg. local,
regional or even national.