An Introduction To The Global Positionin
An Introduction To The Global Positionin
T. H. Dixon
JetPropulsionLaboratory
Divisionof EarthandPlanetarySciences
Pasadena,California
Copyright1991 by theAmericanGeophysical
Union. Reviews
of Geophysics,
29, 2 / May 1991
pages249-276
8755-1209/91/91RG-00152 $05.00 Papernumber91RG00152
ß 249 ß
250 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
error sources.For example,in simplifiedform the phase wherem• andm2 are the angularfrequencies (m = 2•rf)
observable, sometimes called integrated Doppler or associated withtheL1andL2carriers andA• andAcare
accumulated deltarange,canbe written(in unitsof cycles) the relative amplitudesof the P and C/A codes. The
for a singlereceiver-satellitepairas amplitudeof the C/A signalis higherto facilitateinitial
signalacquisition.One effect of the PRN code modula-
•(t) =-f'c(t) + v(t) + a (3) tionson the carriersis to spreadthe energyof the P code
signal+10.23 MHz aroundthe carriercenterfrequency;
wherethedelayx(= p/c) is thegeometric delaydueonlyto becauseof this wide bandwidththe GPS signal is often
thesatellite-stationgeometry,ignoringpropagation effects, referred to as "spread spectrum."Figure 1 illustrates
v represents errors("noise")includingpropagation effects, schematicallyhow a carrier signalis biphasemodulated
and a is a constant,representing a combinationof the with a PRN code.A receiverwith knowledgeof the code
carrierphasecycleambiguityand an initial phaseoffset structure and an internal clock can recover an estimate of
between satellite and receiver oscillators.Equation (3) signaltransittime by cogenerating the codesequence and
ignorestime-dependent clockerrorsin both the satellite performinga crosscorrelationbetweenthe receivedsignal
andreceiver;also,the variouseffectsrepresented by v and andits internalcode,determining thetimedelaynecessary
a mustbe considered in moredetail.King et al. [1985]and to matchthe two sequences.
Leick [1990] give a completederivationof the phase P-CODE CHIP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314-..
observable equations. SEQUENCE
C/A CODE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0...
SignalStructure VALUE
The followingdiscussion
is abbreviatedfrom Spilker C/A CODE
+1
exactly.
The L1 carrier has two components.The "inphase"
componentis modulatedby the precision(P) code. A
lower frequencycoarse/acquisition (C/A) code is modu-
lated in quadrature,i.e., on the samecarrier frequency
I SHh=Tr ß = P-CODE = C/ACODE
shifted90ø (Figure1). TheL2 carrieris normally
modu- TRANSITION TRANSITION
lated only with the P code. All threecarriersalso are
modulatedwith a low bit rate (50 Hz) data streamtrans-
Figure 1. Schematicillustration of biphase and quadrature
mittingsatellitehealth,ephemeris, andotherhousekeepingmodulationof the L1 carrier signal (1575.42 MHz) by the P
information.These codes,P(t), C(t), and D(t), can be (10.23 MHz) and C/A (1.023 MHz) pseudorandom noise(PRN)
consideredas squarewaves with valuesof +1 and are codes. Small circles on modulated carriers denote phase
termedpseudorandom noise (PRN) codesbecausethey inversion points.Note90ø phaseshiftbetween P andC/A
havesufficientlylongrepeattimesthattheyappearrandom modulations.In this illustrationthereis only one carriercycleper
to a user without knowledge of code structure.For P codechip.In actualitythereare 154L1 cyclesperP codechip.
example,theP coderepeattimeis 37 weeks.Eachsatellite
is assigned a unique1-weekportionof thecode,and,since Receiverdesignaffectsthe type of observablethat can
the number of active satellites will not exceed 24, each be extractedfrom the spectrumof GPS signals.There are
satellite can be uniquely identified by a PRN number currentlytwo basicreceiverarchitectures in commonuse
corresponding to thecodeportiontransmitted. for high-precision
geodesy, code correlating (as described
We canrepresent L 1 andL2 signalsas above) and codeless,where only the carrier phase observ-
able is available. Code-correlatingreceiverscan recover
Sl(t) =A•,t P(t)D(t) cos(tot t) ("reconstruct")the phaseobservableas a by-productof the
(4) correlationprocess.Recoveryof carrierphasewithoutcode
+ AcC(t)D(t) sin (tot t) knowledgerequiresa nonlineardetectionschemesuchas
signalsquaring.In effect,the signalis multipliedby itself,
S2(t) = A•,2P(t)D(t) cos(0•2t) (5) making the original phaseinversions(equivalentto an
252 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
amplitudechangeof +1) unity,givingthesecondharmonic positionat the time of signal transmission, and carrier
of the carrier with no code modulations at double the phasecycle ambiguities. The remainderof this paperis
originalfrequency,or half the wavelength.The advantage devotedto relative(as opposedto poin0 positioning and
of the codelessapproachis that the high-precision part of associated conceptsthat enable high-accuracygeodetic
the signal (the carrier phase) can be utilized without measurements with GPS. Relative positioninginvolves
knowledgeof the classifiedP code, which may not be simultaneous observationof a group of satellitesby a
availablein the future.Disadvantages includereductionof network of groundreceivers.Three-dimensionalvectors,
signal-to-noise ratio, possiblyimportantunder marginal termed baselines, are def'med between all stations in the
observingconditionssuchas periodsof high ionospheric network, relative to one or more fixed stations whose
activity,andreducedeffectivewavelength,makingcarrier positionsare known a priori. The combinationof simul-
phasecycle ambiguityresolutionmore difficult. Also, P taneous networkobservations andtheanalyticaltechniques
code data, which are otherwise useful for clock designed to accommodate suchdataenablesusto eliminate
synchronization, data editing, and, dependingon data or greatlyreducethe errorslistedabove,resultingin the
quality,resolutionof carrierphasecycle ambiguities,are millimeter-to centimeter-level positiondatawe requirefor
obviouslyunavailable.Some civilian receiversemploy a mostgeologicalandgeophysical applications.
hybridapproach,with code-correlating capabilityon L1 to
recoverthe nonclassified C/A codefor clock synchroniza- Frequency Standards, Time,and ReferenceFrames
tion and navigationinformation,anda codeless channelto One key to high-precisiongeodesy with GPS is
recover the second harmonic of L2. simultaneous satelliteobservations by a numberof ground
Block 2 satelliteshave additionalsecurityfeaturesthat receivers.Simultaneityin this case is defined quite
will affect civilian users. "Selective availability" (SA) stringently;in 1 millisecond(ms) a stationat mid-latitudes
reducespoint positioningaccuracyto about 100 m by moves more than 30 cm to the east as a result of Earth
reducingthe accuracyof thebroadcast ephemeris, altering rotation,a GPS satellite,orbitingat about3 km/s,moves3
the clock epoch,and ditheringthe clock frequency,thus m, and a pseudorange signal propagates300 kin. Ul-
affecting both code-correlatingand codelessreceivers. timately,we will relateobservations at widely separated
"Antispoofing"(AS) will be activatedperiodicallyfor test groundstationsto better than a microsecond(gs), al-
purposesand consistsof encryptionof the P code; this though,as we shallsee,physicalclocksynchronization at
would not affect codelessreceivers.Most aspectsof SA anythingnear this level is unnecessary. We nevertheless
and AS will not causeseriousimpacton high-precision require a precise time definition and measurement
geodeticapplications.However, if activated,AS would capability,a methodfor eliminatingclock errors,and the
limit high-precisiondynamic applications,and one abilitytorelatewithgreatprecision thepositions of ground
important aspect of SA (clock dithering) is discussed receiversanywhereon the Earth to satellitesin orbit. The
below. following discussionis summarizedfrom King et al.
[1985],Lambeck[1980, 1988], andLeick [1990].
BothGPS satellitesandreceivershaveprecise"clocks,"
HIGH-PRECISION GEODESY: RELATIVE i.e., high-frequency,highly stableoscillators.A receiver
POSITIONING might employa quartzoscillator,a mechanicalresonator
that exploits the frequency-selective propertiesof the
Uncertaintiesin a GPS point positionmay be several piezoelectric effect, with a fractionalfrequencystability
meters to several tens of meters, althoughMalys and Af/fof about 1 partin 10•øperday.MostGPSsatellites
Jensen [1990] recently reported point position uncer- employ higher-qualityrubidium or cesium frequency
tainties of about 1 m using data from a speciallycon- standards, where atomicresonance phenomena basedon
figuredglobalexperiment.One sourceof uncertaintyin a the energy difference between two states def'me the
GPS point positionis the inherentimprecisionof the P "clock."Forexample, thecesiumclock[Essen andParry,
code group delay measurement,meter level for most 1956] is basedon the splittingof the groundelectronic
receivers,althoughat least one recentmodelachievesa stateof cesium133,depending on whetherthe spinof the
severalcentimeterprecisionwith just severalminutesof unpairedvalenceelectronis parallelor antiparallelto the
averaging[Melbourne, 1990]. For this reasonwe make nuclearspin.The transition betweenthesetwo hyperfme
phase measurementson the carrier itself [Bossleret al., levelshasa frequencyof 9,192,631,770Hz andis thebasis
1980;Remondi,1985], with an inherentprecisionof a few for the currentlyaccepted(SI) definitionof the second
millimeters or better. Major remaining error sources (moreon thisbelow).
include clock biases (in both the satelliteand ground Onemeasure of clockstabilityis theAllan(twosample)
receiver, althoughgroundreceiversare likely to have variance[Allan,1966].FollowingThompson et al. [1986],
larger biases),the atmosphere,includingthe frequency- if thefractional average frequency deviationjr(t) fromthe
dispersiveionosphereand the nondispersive troposphere, nominal frequency f0 overa timeintervalx is
bothof whichaffect signalvelocityand thusour estimate
of satellite-receiverdistance, uncertaintiesin the satellite [(t) = [{(t + x) - d•(t)]/2gfox (6)
29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMß 253
then
theAllan
variance
O'2A
is mentedby leap seconds.Thusthe differencebetweenGPS
time andUTC increases by integralseconds,roughlyone
O'2n
(1;)
= <[f'(t+1;)- f'(t)]2
>/2 (7) per yearsince1980whentheyweresetequal.
We will need to relate the orbital positionsof the GPS
where the angular brackets denote the infinite time satellites, computed in a celestial (--inertial) reference
average. TheAllanstandard deviations (N/-•a
2) ofseveralframe,to the locationsof the groundstations,definedin an
commonclocksare plottedin Figure2. Note the long-term Earth-fixed(terrestrial)referenceframe. This requires
stability of cesium clocks, making them attractivefor preciseknowledgeof the Earth's orientationin inertial
satelliteapplications,the short-termstability of quartz space. Earth orientation exhibits a rich spectrum of
oscillators,making them adequatefor groundreceivers, temporal variation. Aside from intrinsic geophysical
which can be periodically synchronizedwith satellite interest, we neeA to understand,measure, and correct for
signals,and the exceptionalstabilityof hydrogenmasers, these effects in order to relate inertial and terrestrial
makingthemthebestchoicefor groundreferencestations. referenceframes.In termsof causeswe can distinguish
externaltorquesactingon theequatorialbulgeof theEarth
(forcedmotion),associatedwith relative orbital motionof
the Earth and moon about the Sun, and free motion,
associated with the responseof the Earth to internalmass
redistribution and correspondingangular momentum
exchanges in the Earth system,includingthe hydrosphere
and atmosphere.Effects include changesin spin axis
directionwith respectto inertial space(precessionand
nutation),spin axis changeswith respectto the Earth's
crest(polarmotion),and changesin spinrate. Following
Soversand Border [1990], it is convenient to consider the
transformation from a terrestrial to inertial reference frame
as a series of rotation matricescorrespondingto these
majoreffects.
-16
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Precession
(P) is a large-amplitude
(-23.5ø) slow
Log• (sec)
circularmotionof the pole with a periodof 26,000 years,
causedby lunar-solarattractionon the equatorialbulge.
Figure 2. Frequencystability of "best commercial"clocks, Accurate models are describedby Kaplan [1981] and
measured by thesquare rootof theAllanvariance(oa,equation Melbourneet al. [1983, 1985]. Nutations(N) are smaller
(7)), asa functionof timeintervalx. Notetheshort-term
stability (maximumamplitude9 s of arc), more rapid oscillations
of quartzcrystaloscillatorsandthelong-termstabilityof Cs and
superimposed on thisprecession,withperiodsfrom9 days
H Maser clocks. Rb, Cs, and H Maser data from Allan et al.
to 18.6 years.They are excitedby externaltorques,but
[1989].QuartzcrystaldatafromHellwig [1979].
their responseincludesa free component.Nutation series
are available from the 1980 International Astronomical
Now that we can measure time, let's define it more Union (IAU) theoryof nutafions[Kaplan, 1981; Seidel-
precisely. Sidereal "time," the kind many people are man, 1982], basedon the theoryof Wahr [1981]. Addi-
familiar with, is basedon the Earth's irregularrotation tional annual and shorter-periodterms are now known
about its axis and is no longer usedas a time standard. from very long baselineinterferometry(VLBI) observa-
Ephemeristime (ET) is more regular and exploitsthe tions [Herring et al., 1986]. Correctionsto the standard
periodicnatureof the orbitalmotionsof the Earth, moon, precession-nutation model can be incorporatedin a
and Sun. Although no longer in use, ET is related to perturbationmatrix, f•. Polar motionrepresentsboth free
currenttime standardsbecausethe atomic (SI) secondis and forced responses.In addition to contributionsfrom
defined equal to the ET second,in mm defined as a externaltorques,possibleinternalexcitationmechanisms
fractionof the tropicalyear 1900.Universaltime (UT1) is include large earthquakes [Slade and Yoder, 1989],
a form of siderealtime, correctedfor someirregularities aseismicdeformation,motionsof the atmosphereand
[Aokiet al., 1982]. Coordinateduniversaltime (UTC) is an hydrosphere,and core-mantlecoupling. The dominant
internationallyacceptedstandardbasedon atomic time, periodis 14 months(theChandlerwobble),with additional
roughly synchronizedto UT1 by adding"leap seconds" annualand shorter-period motions,causingthe pole to
whenrequired.Over the lasttwo decadesthisadditionhas wander in a circle less than a few tens of meters in
averagedaboutone secondper year,reflectingthe change diameter.Pole positionis describedby two coordinates,
x
of the Earth's rotationrate aboutits axis with respectto and y (correspondingtranslationmatrices X and Y),
gravitationalorbitalmotion(thebasisof theET, andhence representingrotationsabouttwo orthogonalaxeslying in
atomic,second).GPS satellitesbroadcast time signalsthat theequatorialplane(1 cmof polarmotioncorresponds to a
are synchronizedwithin 1 gs of UTC but are not incre- rotationof about 0.3 millarc seconds(mas). The time-
254 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
varyingrotationrate of the Earth, U, and corresponding centerof masswith a precisionof about5 cm or better
changesin length of day (LOD), whose annual and [Smithet al., 1985;Tapleyet al., 1985].ColocatedVLBI
shorter-period variationscouldonly be measuredafter the and SLR sites define the center of mass correction for a
invention of atomic clocks in the mid-1950s, can be VLBI reference framewithcomparable precision.
representedby the differencebetweenatomictime (UTC) The completetransformation from a positionvex:torin a
and UT1. Time seriesof LOD or UT1-UTC showstrong terrestrial referenceframerr toaninertialreference frame
(several millisecondsamplitude) annual and semiannual r• isgivenby
periodsassociatedwith seasonalchangesin wind circula-
tion. Shorter-periodfluctuations(2 week and lunar rI = •PNUXY(co¾+ rcm+ A•o•+ Aoc+ Apd+ Aatm) (8)
monthly) are due to tidal effects, while longer-period
"decadefluctuations"may reflectcore-mantleinteractions whereot is an empiricalcoordinate framescalingfactor.
(seereviewsby Wahr [1988], Lainbeck[1988], and Hide Note thatfor localGPS networks,tidal and atmospheric
and Dickey [1991]). Values for both polar motion termscan be ignored,and the precisionrequirements for
(precision~1 mas)andUT1-UTC (precision~0.1 mswhen the otherparameters may be lessstringentthanfor large
averagedover a day) come from VLBI observationsof apertureor globalnetworks.
quasars[Carter et al., 1985]. Satellitelaserranging(SLR)
[Cohenand Smith, 1985] providescorresponding preci- Eliminating ClockErrors:Singleand Double
sionsof approximately 2-4 masand0.2 msaveragedover Differencing
severaldays[Smithet al., 1985;Tapleyet al., 1985].Lunar A GPSpointpositionis limitedto meter-level accuracy
laser ranging (LLR) providesroughly comparabledata by a combinationof uncertaintiesin clocks, orbits, and
[Dickey et al., 1985]. Sensitivityanalysesindicatethat atmospheric effects.However,for a relativepositioning
systematicerrors in GPS orbit and baselineestimates experiment involvinga networkof groundstationswithina
causedby theselevels of uncertaintyin Earth orientation specificregion,theseerrorsarecommonmodeor nearlyso
are negligible[Lichtenand Border, 1987; Dixon et al., and can be eliminatedor greatlyreducedin subsequent
1991c]. data processing[Bossler et al., 1980]. Consider two
In summary,spin axis changeswith respectto inertial receiverssimultaneouslyobservingtwo satellites.There
space(precession and nutafion)are largelydue to external are four geometricrangeequationsand a maximumof 16
torques(forcedmotion),canbe largein amplitude,andcan observation equations, sinceeachrangecouldbe estimated
be modeledquitewell. Polarmotionis a spinaxischange with botha pseudorange andcarderphaseequation,each
with respectto the Earth's crest, consistsof both forced at two frequencies. For a single-frequency pseudorange
and free motions,is much smallerin amplitudeand less measurement, R (equation(1)), denotingsatellites(id) by
easily modeled.UT1-UTC likewise cannotbe modeledat superscripts andreceivers(1,2) by subscripts, we havethe
presentwith sufficientaccuracy.Both polar motionand followingfor satellitei:
UT1-UTC are measuredadequatelyfor our purposesby
VLBI and SLR. R1 =p• +c(Aq -At / +A •) (9)
Tide-relatedelastic deformationsmay be important,
i i
particularlywhere high accuracyis desiredfor widely R2=P2+c(At2 - At/ +Att;2) (10)
separatedstations(the effectslargely cancelfor stations
closeto eachother).Therearethreemajoreffects:the solid Subtraction givesthe singledifferenceobservableR '.'
Earth tide Asd (maximumamplitude-50 cm); ocean
loading effectsin coastal
areas,Aoc(maximum
amplitude Ri' =pi'+c(Atl- At2+At}'
) (11)
~5cm);andthepoletideApd,
representing
elastic
response
of the Earthto changesin spinaxisorientation(maximum wheretheprimedvariables denotethedifferential
pseudo-
amplitude ~1 cm).Differential atmosphericloadingAatm rangeor true rangeand differentialpropagation delay,
[Rabbeland Schuh,1986] may causeeffectsat the several respectively. Satellite
clockerror(At•) is eliminated,and
millimeter level for large stationseparationsbut is not differential
propagation delayis considerablysmallerthan
believed to be significant for local or regional GPS theoriginaldelay.Similarly,for satellitej,
networks.This effect may become importantwith the
adventof high-precision globalGPSnetworks. Rj'=p/'+c(Atl-At2+
An Earth-fixed reference frame based on VLBI
observations
doesnot preciselydefinethe locationof the Subtractionof equations(11) and (12) gives the double
Earth's center of mass. However, GPS-determined difference observable R ":
positionsare intimately related to GPS satelliteorbits,
which are sensitive to the center of mass. To account for
R"= p"+ c (6t;,") (13)
offsets between the VLBI-based reference frame and the
actualcenterof mass,we definea vector,rc,•, to be whicheliminatesreceiverclockerror and leavesonly
incorporatedin the final transformation.
SLR definesthe differentialpropagationdelays as a significanterror
29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM ß 255
source,which can be calibrated,or solvedfor, independ- bending.There are two main regions to consider:the
ently(seebelow).Note thatfor stationsreasonably closeto frequency-dispersive ionosphere(--50-500 km altitude)
one another(<<satellitealtitude)the effect of orbit error is and the nondispersive neutralatmosphere, especiallythe
also largely common mode. Similar equationscan be troposphere (4}-10 km altitude).Thompsonet al. [1986]
formedfor thecarrierphaseor beatphaseobservable[King give a comprehensive review.
et al., 1985], which is actually more important for Free electronsexist in the ionospherebecausesolar
high-precisionmeasurements. ultravioletradiationis absorbedby gaseousmoleculesin
If there are more than two receiversin the ground the upperatmosphere, liberatingoutershellelectrons.The
network, each pseudorangeor phase measurementcan electrons interactstronglywith any electromagnetic signal
contribute to more than one differenced observable without in the frequencyrange of GPS. Ionosphericeffects are
adding new information;the observables are correlated, proportional to the integratedelectroncontentalongthe
complicating error calculation.While thereare methodsto signalpathandthusdependon solaractivity,the elevation
deal with thesecorrelations[Beutler et al., 1986; Goad and angleof theobservation, time of day,andlatitude.
Mueller, 1988], it may be desirableto operatedirectlyon The traveltime• for a groupdelaymeasurement canbe
undifferenceddata (sometimescalled one-way range or represented by
phase),considering clocktermsasnuisance parameters to be
eliminatedby otherapproaches [e.g.,Goad,1985]. •=p+A B
The simplepictureof clock error cancellationthrough
• • +f• +... (14)
simultaneous observations is complicatedby $A and re- where thetermA/f represents mostof theionospheric
ceiverclockepochand samplingoffsets.King et al. [1985] delayexperiencedat frequencyf, A is constant,and B is
providea completetreatment, but we canillustratetheprob- proportional to the averagemagneticfield strength.If we
lemby considering observation in thepresence of $A, where ignore the third- and higher-orderterms, the differential
the effectsare particularlyimportant. $A affectssatellite groupdelayA• betweenobservations at f2 (the L2
clocksin two ways.First, the satelliteclockcorrectionrela- frequency) andfl (theL1 frequency) is [Spilker,1978]:
tive to "true"GPS time,normallybroadcast in thedatames-
sage,is corrupted. Fortunately, thishaslittleimpacton non-
real time relative positioningapplications.Second,clock
"dithering"changesthebasicP codefrequency, resultingin
commensurate changesin thederivedL1 andL2 signals.Ir-
regularvariations of severalhertzaroundthenominalcarrier
centerfrequencyover periodsof a few minuteshavebeen (15)
observedwith the Block2 satellites.Sincegroundmeasure-
mentsare taggedby receivetime,but SA effectsare com- = '1;1[(fl If2 )2 _ 1]
mononly at the sametransmittime,doubledifferencing or
analogous schemes to eliminateclockerrorscanresultin in-
completeerrorcancellation. The maximumnonsimultaneity where• is thegroupdelayatL1. Similarequations canbe
due to $A for receivers at different locations on the Earth is constructedfor the carrier phase observable.Dual fre-
about 20 ms, which, at currentlevels of $A, inducesmilli- quencyobservations thereforeallow eliminationof major
meter-levelerrorsonly on the longestbaselines. The effects ionospheric effects(but not third-andhigher-order terms)
of nonsimultaneity dueto receiverclocksare usuallynegli- for bothpseudoronge andcarrierphasemeasurements.
gible with the double-differencing approach,sincethese The magnitudeof the ionospheric effectcan be large.
clockscanbe periodicallysynchronized to GPStime,for ex- Recallingthatn = c/v,
ample,with the C/A code. More seriousnonsimultaneity
(severaltenthsof seconds)canresultsimplyfrom different nion= 1- Nq•2/2e0 m•o)2 (16)
receivertypessamplingthe signalat arbitrary(anddifferen0
times.While thereare techniques for dealingwith thisnon- wherenio n is theionospheric indexof refraction appropri-
simultaneity[Feigl et al., 1990a],thesimplestapproachis to ateto thephasevelocityof a particularfrequency, N is the
ensurethatall receiversare in a networksampleat common number density ofelectrons (-10• - 10•2/m3), q•andm•
GPS time. Recent resultssuggestthat with this simple aretheelectron charge andmass, respectively,ande0isthe
precautionthe impactof $A on high-precision geodesyis permittivity. Equivalently, the index of refraction at a
negligible[RockenandMeertens,1990;Feigl et al., 1990a; given frequencycan be estimatedfrom the plasma
Rosenblattet al., 1990]. Additional discussioncan be found frequency
f•,oftheionosphere:
in theworksby Melbourne[1990]andWu et al. [1990].
nion
--1- fv2/2f
2 (17)
The Ionosphere where
The GPS signalis affectedby propagationthroughthe
atmosphere,through changesin velocity, and by ray .fv
2=Nq•2
[•m• (18)
256 ß Dixon:THE GLOBALPOSITIONINGSYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
If•2L1
-f22L2)
(20) model.All components of theatmosphere
delay,but it is convenient
separately.
to consider
contributeto the
two components
The "dry" delay is associated with molecular
whereL1 andL2 hererepresent carrierphaseranges at the constituents of theatmosphere in hydrostatic
equilibrium
two frequencies for a particular
receiver-satellite
pair (i.e., (including H20), andthe"wet"delayis associated with
L1 = -cO)l/f1 andsimilarly forL2),Lc is theionosphere-watervapornotin hydrostatic equilibrium.Thedrydelay
corrected phase, andtheeffective wavelength is•c = c/(f• is typically200-230 cm at zenith(elevation angle,0 =
+f2) -- 10.7cm(5.4cmforcompletely codelessreceivers). 90ø)ataltitudes nearsealevel,whilethezenith wetdelay
The shortereffectivewavelength of •c impliesthat mightrangefrom3 to 30 cm.Thedelayat otherelevation
resolution of carrierphasecycleambiguities will be more anglesis larger,increasing approximately as 1/sin(0),but
complicated.For this reason, and also becausenoise othereffectsareincorporated in a "mapping function" for
(particularly multipath) is amplified by L•, it maybe greateraccuracy,includingthe finite height of the
deskableto usesingle-frequency measurements for very atmosphere, theverticaldistribution
of components, Earth
short(a few kilometers or less,depending on ionosphericcurvature,andmy bending[e.g.,Blackand Eisner,1984;
activity)baselineswhereionospheric effectsare smallor Lanyi,1984;Daviset al., 1985].Thetotalpathdelaycan
process thetwofrequencies separately. be written as
29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMß 257
t,(0)= + (0) (22) have a small bias that dependson site, season,or data
reductionalgorithm.
where p0refers to thepathdelayat zenith (hereafterthe Unfortunately,most WVRs are big and expensive.
zenith delay), subscriptsd and w refer to dry and wet Fortunately, comparison of GPS baseline estimates
components, respectively,andM(0) is a mappingfunction, involving WVR calibration and stochasticestimation
assumedto be azimuthallysymmetric. generally indicates no significant differences between
The dry zenithdelay is determinedby measurement of the two approaches(for example, Figures 3 and 4),
surfacepressure.If suchmeasurements are not available, implying that at current precision levels WVR calibra-
standardatmosphericconditionscan be assumed,and an tion of the wet delay is not required. In fact, it is even
initial estimatefor the dry zenithdelayapproximated from possibleto lump the wet and dry delays togetherand
the standardpressureP (in bars), basedon the surface estimatethem jointly, avoidingall neutral atmosphere
elevationof the station,h, anda scaleheightH, typically7 calibration(includingsurfacepressure)entirely [Tralli
km [Tralli et al., 1988]: and Lichten, 1990]. This works at current levels of GPS
precisionbecausethe mappingfunctionsfor wet anddry
P = 1.013e-4'm (23) delaysare very similarabove10ø or 15ø, the typical
cutoff angle usedwith GPS to avoid groundmultipath
Subsequentanalysisof the GPS data can improve the (see below).
initial estimate and reduce the effect of errors in this In spite of the success of stochastic estimation
parameteron thebaselineestimates. techniques,for GPS experimentsin regionsof high wet
The wet zenithdelay can be estimatedin at leastthree path delay and high variability (for example, some
ways:by measurement of surfacetemperature andrelative conditionsin the tropics), troposphericcalibration is
humiditycoupledwith a simpleatmospheric model [e.g., probablythe dominanterror sourcefor baselinesin the
Chao, 1974]; with a water vapor radiometer(WVR), an geologicallyimportantlength range of several tens to
instrumentthat measuresatmospheric blackbodyradiation several hundred kilometers. Orbital effects dominate at
in the microwaveregion,which is affectedby a rotational longer baseline lengths, and receiver effects and other
moleculartransitionof water vapor near 22.2 GHz [e.g., errors dominate at shorter baseline lengths. This is
Janssen, 1985; Robinson, 1988]; and by stochastic discussed in more detail in the sectionon precisionand
estimation techniques without a priori calibration, accuracy.Troposphericcalibrationdoesnot appearto be
exploiting the data strength of GPS and the known a significanterror sourcein some other regions(for
elevationangledependence of the wet delay [Tralli et al., example, typical conditionsin the southwesternU.S.)
1988; Dixon and Kornreich Wolf, 1990; Dixon et al., when the wet path delay is low and not particularly
1991a]. Stochasticmodels make use of the fact that the variable.Future improvementsin the accuracyof GPS,
wet path delay is likely, in a statisticalsense,to vary particularlyfor the vertical component,will dependin
within a limitedrangeover a shorttime interval.For SM, part on improvedtroposphericcalibrationand estimation
WVR, or other a priori calibrations,residuals(wet delay techniques. By analogywith VLBI, direct line of sight
corrections) can be estimated along with geodetic calibrationwith a WVR or othertechniquemay improve
parametersof interest.This improvesthe final resultbut GPS baseline estimateswhen calibration accuracy
implies errorsin the calibration.Studieshave shownthat exceeds~5-10 mm [Herring, 1986;Elgeredet al., 1991;
SM calibrationby itself can lead to unreliableGPS results Dixon and KornreichWolf, 1990]. It hasbeendifficult to
[Tralli et al., 1988;Dixon et al., 1991a],confirmingearlier deployhigh-accuracy WVRs to a majorityof sitesin a
studiesindicatingpoorcorrelationbetweensurfacerelative GPS networkbecauseof the excessive cost,weight,and
humidityandthe wet pathdelay[Reberand Swope,1972; power consumptionof these sophisticatedinstruments.
Elgered,1982].K. Hurstet al. (Estimationof GPSbaseline Recentdevelopments in the areaof monolithicmicrowave
errorsdueto imperfectretrievalof wet atmospheric delays integratedcircuit(MMIC) technology havethepotentialto
using surface meteorologymeasurements,submittedto improvethe accuracyand reducethe cost,weight,and
Journalof Geophysical Research,1991)compareSM and powerconsumption of WVRs, makingextensivedeploy-
WVR estimatesof wet zenith delay and concludethat ment of these instrumentsviable. Improved stochastic
SM-basedestimates wouldhavean rmserrorproportional modelsare anotherpromisingarea of research.Current
to the magnitudeof the delay, given by 1.2 cm + 0.08 modelsassumeazimuthalsymmetryin the wet delay.
(SMT), where "SMT" is the SM-basedzenith delay in However,azimuthalasymmetryhasbeenobserved[Dixon
centimeters.Tralli et al. [1988] and Tralli and Lichten and KornreichWolf, 1990;Rockenet al., 1991]. Estimat-
[1990] suggested that the errorin SM calibrationcan also ing two stochastic,orthogonalspatialgradientsin addition
show considerabletime variation. In contrast,corrections to thestochasticwetzenithdelayshouldimproveprecision
to WVR calibrationare generallysmall(1-2 cm in zenith in the presenceof asymmetryand shouldbe feasiblewith
wet delay) and constantor nearlyso over severalhours, sufficientdata strength,presumablyavailable with the
implyingthattheseinstruments cangive a goodindication enhanced Block 2 constellation and receiverscapableof
of temporalvariabilityin the wet zenith delay but may trackingmorethanfour satellites.
258 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
• STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION --
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: •
- iiiiii!iii!i!ili!iiiiiiiiiiil
85%86% 87% 87%
86%
86% 87%
• 86%
..
•
iii.dliiill
• ilili
86% 88%
86%
87%
88ø/* --
::::::::.,..__
::i::i:::: STOCHASTIC
RESIDUAL
0.0 0.48 0.80 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.4 0.48 0.80 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.4
O• (cm/x/h-• O• (cm/•--•
WVR CALIBRATION STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION,
NO PRIOR CALIBRATION
I I I I i i
ables,
c.,based ofx,x•,plusincrementalconstant parameters (y), a vector of process noise
onapriorivalues
corrections,[?ffob)/15x]dx, by thedataand parameters(p) and v, definedhere as a zero meanwhite
to be constrained
its errors.The linearizedobservationequationin matrix noise vector:
form is
Z= AxX +At, P+AyY+v (28)
c. + A dx= l + v (26)
where z is the difference between an observation and its
where A (the design matrix) is the matrix of partial modelvalue.Parametersmodeledas processnoiseinclude
derivatives, dxis a vectorof smallcorrections tox., andv clocks(modeledas whitenoise)andwet tropospheric path
is now the vector of postfit residuals.The quantity delays (modeledas random walks). Measurementsare
minimizedis theweightedsumof squared residuals,given groupedinto finite time intervalsor batches(typicallyone
byvrWv,where W, theweight matfix,istheinverse of P, to severalminutes)and processedsequentially,leadingto
the covariance matfix. The solution is updatedparameterestimatesand covariancesafter each
batch.After filteringall dataa smoothingalgorithmcanbe
• = x. + dx (27) applied that works backward in time to update the
estimatesand covariances,for example, allowing inves-
where • isthebestestimate ofx, dx= N-1ArW(/- c.), tigationof the time-varyingbehaviorof the troposphere
andN isthenormal equation matrix given byArWA.This [e.g.,Dixon andKornreichWolf, 1990].
approachmay be appliedto bothdifferenced and undif- We sawfrom equations(2) and(3) that the initial phase
ferenceddata.It is alsopossibleto transformundifferenced measurementupon acquisitionof the carder signal is
data to derived parameterscontainingno clock terms biasedby an unknown number of cycles. Assuminga
through orthogonalizationmethods without forming receivermaintainslock on the signal,the range change
normalequations[Lawsonand Hanson,1974]. Additional between the receiver and satellite can be determined, and
discussion of GPS dataanalysisapproaches canbe found the initial range (the cycle ambiguity) can be estimated
in worksby Goad [1985],Bocket al., [1985a,b], Lindler along with the geodeticparametersof interest.However,
and Wells [1985], Bock et al. [1986], Beutler et al. [1986, this degradesthe accuracyof horizontalbaselinecompo-
1987],SchaffrinandGraffarend[1986],andLeick[1990]. nentsrelative to the case where the cycle ambiguity is
Most of the datadiscussed in thisreportwereprocessed knownor can be fixed to the correctvalue.Techniquesto
with the GPS Inferred Positioning System (GIPSY) resolvethe ambiguityrely on the fact that, given enough
software developedat the Jet PropulsionLaboratory. data,the rangebias can be estimatedto betterthan half a
GIPSY processesundifferenceddata using a modified carderwavelength(cycle),after which the bias is fixed to
Kalman filter, describedby Lichten [1990b]. Briefly, a the nearest integer value. Orbits, ionosphericeffects,
conventionalKalman filter updatesmeasurements from tropospheric effects(Figure 7), multipath,and othererror
one observationepochto the next on the basisof the sourcescan corruptGPS signalssuchthat errorsbecome
covariance matrix P. Factorization of P into upper significantrelative to one half wavelength,affectingour
triangular (U) anddiagonal (D) matrices (P = UDUr) abilityto fix ambiguitiesto thecorrectvalue.It is common
improvesaccuracyandcomputational efficiency[Thornton practiceto resolvethe ambiguitiesfirst on shorter(<100
and Bierman, 1980] and is the basis for the parameter kin) baselineswhere the effect of most of theseerrors is
estimation.The formulationof the linearizedleastsquares reduced[Bocket al., 1985b; Abbot and Counselman,1987;
observation equationdiffersslightlyfrom(26), partitioning Dong andBock,1989;Blewitt, 1989].The methodusedfor
parametersinto a satellitestate vector(x), a vectorof mostof the data presentedhere also exploitsthe fact that
lOO
L!.I
X
,'7' 95
Figure 7. Percentage of carder phase cycle
ambiguities(biases)resolvedas a functionof the
stochastic(randomwalk) modelusedto characterize
C9 90
the wet zenithpathdelayfor a GPS networkin the
northernCaribbean.Optimum model has random
C.) 85
walkparameter
ct= 1.0cmP•-•(compare
toFigure
3) [from Dixon et al., 1991a].
80
0
RANDOMWALKPARAMETER
(a..cm/,J'•'r)
29, 2/REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS Dixon'THE GLOBALPOSITIONINGSYSTEMß 263
theionospheric groupdelayof theP codemodulation is et al. [1991a, b], Blewitt [1990], and Beyis [1991]. From
the samemagnitude(thoughoppositesign)as the phase ourdiscussion of theprecision of carderphasemeasure-
delay,providedthecorrectnumberof cyclesis associated ments and ionosphericeffects it should be clear that
with thephasemeasurement [Melbourne,1985;Wubbena, phase-tracking, dual-frequencyreceiversare critical. P
1985].Blewitt[ 1989]givesa completediscussion. codepseudorange capabilityis usefulbut not criticalfor
Another"bootstrap"techniquethat assistsbias resolu- editingcycle slips,high-precision clock synchronization,
tion involvesthe "wide-lane"ambiguity.A linearcombi- andcarderphasecycleambiguityresolution.If P codeis
nationof observables,
thewide-lanephase L,•,definedas not present,C/A code pseudorangecan provide clock
synchronization to the microsecondlevel or better. The
Lw =- (•)1- 1•2)•Lw ability to tracksix or moresatellitesis helpful.If possible,
(29) commonreceiversandantennasshouldbe usedthroughout
= (f 1L1 -- f2 L2 )/fl -- f2 ) the network to ensure common time tagging in the
presenceof SA and reducethe effect of antennaphase
isuseful
because
thewide-lane
wavelength,
• = c/(f1-f2) centervariation [Rockenand Meertens, 1989].
-• 86 cm, is more easilyresolvedthan the "narrow-lane" In addition to adequatelysamplingthe geophysical
(•1, L2)ambiguities
(compare (20)and(29)and phenomenonof interest,two other aspectsof network
equations
definitions
of • and•). Subsequent canbe designare important.First, if baselineslongerthanabout
techniques
ambiguities 50-100 km are to be determinedwith high accuracy,an
appliediterativelyto resolvethenarrow-lane
(X•-- 10.7cm)asdiscussed above. WithP codereceiversadequate(three or more station) fiducial network is
the wide-laneambiguitymay be resolvableevenif the P important.A covarianceanalysiscan be performedto
codedataarerelativelynoisy(P codeerroraveragedover determine optimum configuration.Variations in the
several hours justneeds tobelessthan•/2, i.e.,<43cm). number,geometry,andqualityof fiducialstationsbetween
Codelessreceivershave an effectivewide-lanewavelength experimentscan lead to large, spuriousvariations in
of only 43 cm, thus the wide-laneambiguityis more geodeticpositionestimates[Larson, 1990a]. Second,the
difficult to resolve. regionof interestmustbe coveredwith a sufficientlydense
Most high-precision relative positioningexperiments networkof stationsto ensureresolutionof carrierphase
with GPS are "static,"in the sensethat a given receiver cycleambiguities. If a largeregionmustbe coveredwith a
observes in onepositionfor manyhoursor daysto obtain sparsenetwork,at least 2-3 baselinesshouldbe shorter
datastrength adequate to resolvethecycleambiguities and than 100 km. If necessary,the networkcan be coveredin
reduce other errors. However, over short (<30 km) two or more observingsessionswith a few common
baselines,it is also possibleto operatein a "kinematic" stations[e.g.,Kellogget al., 1989].
mode, with a receivermaintaininglock on the satellite With the satelliteconstellationavailableup until 1990,
signalsand movingfrom stationto station,continuously high-precisionresults have been achieved in several
recordingdata. As long as lock is maintained,only one regionswith 3-5 daysor moreof observation, assumingat
cycle ambiguityper receiver-satellite pair needsto be least 7-8 hoursof observationper day [e.g., Tralli and
resolved,regardless of the numberof stationscoveredby Dixon, 1988; Dong and Bock, 1989; Dixon et al., 1990;
therovingreceiver.The technique hasobviousadvantages Kornreich Wolf et al., 1990; Kellogg et al., 1990].
for rapidsurveyof largenumbers of points.A variationof Observingfor two or more days allows a check of data
this approach,"rapidstatic"surveying, doesnot require qualityby treatingeachday independently in the subse-
continuous signallock,exploitinghigh-quality P codedata quentanalysisandcomparingresultsandreducestheeffect
or priordatato resolvetheambiguities directly[Blewittet of randomerror by averaging.Another advantageof
al., 1989]. severaldays of observationis that multiday orbital arc
The assumption of linearity(equations(26) and (28)) analysisis possible.
means that the initial model for the observables must be The durationof observations in a givenday dependson
sufficientlyaccuratethat second-and higher-orderterms experiment locationandsatelliteconstellationgeometry,as
canbe neglected. Accuracycanbe estimated afterthe fact well as receiverdesign,multipath environment, and
by inspecting the solutionoffsetfromtheassigned a priori logisticalconsiderations. Experiencewith the Block 1
value. The solutions should be iterated unless the satellite constellationusingmainly four-channelreceiversallows
epochstatesare accurateto about1 km, andinitialground somegeneralizations. King andBlewitt[1990] suggestthat
positionsaccurateto severalhundredmeters[Lichten, observing for 6.5 hours or less per day may degrade
1990b]. results.Freymuellerand Golombek[1988] compared7-
and9-hourobservations for a GPS experimentin northern
Experiment Design SouthAmericawith covarianceanalysesand suggested
On the basis of the preceding discussionwe can improvementwith the longerobservingtime. Davis et al.
summarizethe importantaspectsof a successfulhigh- [1989] reportedthat carrierphasecycleambiguitiescould
precision GPSgeodetic experiment. Additionaldiscussionsnot be resolved reliably even on short (30-50 km)
canbe foundin worksby King andBlewitt [1990],Dixon baselineswith short(4.5 houror less)observingsessions.
264 ß Dixon:THEGLOBAL
POSITIONING
SYSTEM 29, 2/REVIEWS
OF GEOPHYSICS
Optimumobservingtimesmay decrease
oncetheBlock2 address
mainly"bestachievable"
accuracies;
in somecases
constellationapproaches operationalcapability,assumingan application mayhavelessstringent accuracyrequire-
receiversare capableof trackingmorethanfour satellites ments,andconsiderable savings in fieldoperation
anddata
anddepending on SA effects.High-quality P codedata,if analysiscostsmay be possible by accepting slightly
available,
couldalsoshorten observingtimesbyproviding reducedaccuracy.
constraints
oncarrierphasecycleambiguities. Bothprecisionandaccuracy of GPSbaselineestimates
Finally,siteselection and siteintegrityare important. dependstronglyonwhether or notthecarrier phase cycle
Sitesshouldhaveadequate sky visibilityandbe located ambiguitieshavebeenresolved [Blewitt,1989,Dangand
away from buildingsor other reflectingsurfacesthat Back, 1989].Bias fixing improvesthe precision and
introducemultipath.Instabilityof the groundmonument accuracy of GPShorizontal baseline componentestimates
maybe a substantial sourceof noisein a long-term GPS by factorsof 2-3; the verticalcomponent is usually
experiment,introducing spuriouspositionshiftsunrelated unaffected(Figure8). Theabilityto resolvethebiasesis a
to tectonicsignals,and is an importantand oftenover- good indicationthat certainerrorshave been reducedto
lookedaspectof GPSexperiment design.Monuments not somethreshold value;in general,it is difficultto resolve
emplaced in bedrock aremostsusceptible
andmayrequire thebiases
withlowerquality
data.Forconsistency,
mostof
specialdesign[Wyatt,1989]. the examplesdiscussedin this section will therefore
involve bias-fixed data.
As with mostphysicalmeasurements, it is usefulto
PRECISION AND ACCURACY distinguishrandom errors, the effects of which can be
reduced by averaging moredata,andsystematic errors.
Theprecisionandaccuracyachievable in a givenGPS The majorrandomerror sourcein GPS is the noiseof the
experimenthaveimprovedgreatlyin the lastdecadewith phase observable.
Systematic errorsareof twotypes.The
betterexperiment
design,
receiver
hardware, andanalytical firstisduetoerrorsintheinput(nonestimated)parameters,
techniques,
and furtherimprovements are likely. I will for example, fiducialsitelocation,
Earthorientation,
and
6
6
SINGLEDAYARCS EAST
5
[] BIAS ESTIMATED
[] BIAS-FIXED
4
4
3
3
1
1
0 - i
, 0 Figure8. Histograms
of short-term
repeatability
(equation(30)) for 15 baselinesin the northern
NORTH
4
Caribbeanbefore and after resolutionof carrier
phasecycle ambiguities (bias fixing). Note
improvement
in horizontal
components forbaselines
shorterthan about500 kin. Biasescouldnot be
resolved
on thelonger
baselines
withsingle-day
orbitalarcs(compare
to Figure6) [fromDixonet
al., 199la].
VERTICAL
i i ß
200 300
11 oo 1300
15
MOJAVE-VANDENBERG (350 km)
+ + Vert,cal
+ + [] East + 10 --
4' + +
• . ++ + o
uJ
m _ + []
21 ß ß
o/ 0 200 400
, , ,-, ,-,', ',1
600 800 1000 1200
LENGTH (km)
long-termrepeatability,
we have undoubtedly
overa rangeof tropospheric
conditions.
averaged O
-,-
Orbit
Mostof theGPS-VLBI
comparisons
performed
todate 0
arerestrictedto a fairly limitedregionin the southwestern
U.S.,
andanote
of
caution
isin
order
Sensitivity when
studies applying
indicate
that the8•I' ' ' ' ' ' '©'' '
resultingargumentson GPS precisionand accuracyto
other
regions. fiducial
network
are
less
uncertainties
orientation. are
Geodetic
susceptible
tothis
the
largest
networks contributor
to
systematicorbit and baseline error, the exact amount
dependingon experimentlocationandbaselinelengthand
inthesouthwestern
effect
because
ofthe
U.S.
proximal
<• • © [-'] ß North
4
location
ofseveral
high-quality
fiducial
sites,
i.e.,sitesm
n 2E3 [3 East
with a long historyof VLBI occupations
and well- rr • Model
(Total)
established
localtiesbetween
theVLBIantenna
phase 0 , • ., • , • , ' ,
center and the GPS mark. Even so, uncertainties in
VLBI-GPS ties at the 1-2 cm level are common [Tralli
andLichten,
1990;Dixonetal., 199lc]. Theeffectofthese 40
errors
grows
with
distance
from
the
fiducial
network
but
•30• O O O
will not causeincreasedscatterover severaldays,as the
orbitgeometryis essentiallyconstantoverthisperiod.The
effects may even be small over 1-2 year periodsif the
satellite constellationhappensto be similar for several
consecutiveexperiments,and if the same or similar 2o
fiducial networksare used.However,over the 5-10 year
or longer periods likely tocharacterize
manyGPSmm
10 Ve'•'•cal
experiments (see
below),
suchfidelity
is unlikely,
mm Model
implying the need for care in the establishment and 0I • I , i • I • I •
maintenance of fiducial networks. 0 1 O0 200 300 400 500
When we perform a seriesof GPS experiments,we
LENGTH (km)
generallywish to obtain estimatesof strainrate or fault
motion rate. Many geologicproblemsrequire rate ac-
curaciesin the range 1-5 mm/yr [Jordanand Minster,
1988].In orderto planexperiments it is importantto know Figure12. (a) Individualerrorcomponents andtotal(rss)error
how long it will taketo acquirea damsetwith a givenrate fromequation (32)forthehorizontal componentof a hypotheti-
accuracy,or how often an experimentmustbe repeated calGPSexperiment, witha = 2 mm("receiver"),
b = 4 ram,• =
withina fixed period(for example,5-10 years)to achieve 10km(b and• together define"troposphere"),
andc = 1 x 10-8
thataccuracy.
The uncertainty
in a rateestimate
•r is a ("orbit").(b) Long-term repeatability
(weighted
rmsscatterabout
function
of thesinglemeasurement
position
accuracy a bestfit straightline)for GPShorizontalcomponent measure-
the intervalbetweenexperimentsAt (assumedconstantin mentsin central and southernCalifornia between 1986 and 1988
therelationbelow),andthe totaltime spanof observations, compared
to anerrormodel(equation (32)).All dataplottedare
T, and can be estimatedfrom [Coateset al., 1985]: fromTI-4100receivers,
represent
fourormoreexperiments,
and
have all or mostcarrierphasebiasesresolved.Data are from
Daviset al. [1989] andLarson[1990b]."Model"curveis same
as"total"in Figure12a. (c) Similarto Figure12b,for vertical
component. Modelcurvefromequation(32)), with a = 5 ram,b
C•r c•,•
=-•- [(1+T/At)(2
12T/At
+T/At) (33) = 20mm,k= 10km,andc= 1 x 10-8.
29,2/REVIEWS
OFGEOPHYSICS Dixon:
THEGLOBAL
POSITIONING
SYSTEM
ß269
12
10 STRAIN = 10 plate boundary
0 , I • I • I , I , zone
0 2 4 6 8 10 tectonics
103 yr
10 volcanic post
TIME AFTER FIRST EXPERIMENT (yrs) 10 post-seismic
events rebound, glacial
rebound
coupling
after10years
forallcases
shown. • 10
GPS-1990
1 day
GEOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS AND ACCURACY lO4 GPS-1995 ?
REQUIREMENTS 1 hr
baselines,
it is temptingto speculate
on thedetectability
of zonethrustfaultsaregivenby Savage[1983] andThatcher
seismic precursorsproposedby Lorenzetti and Tullis and Rundle[1984]). The fault-parallelsurfacedisplace-
[1989] with a densearray of continuouslyoperatingGPS mentratev duringan earthquakecyclefor a simpleelastic
stations. half-spacemodelis [SavageandBurford,1973]:
In the limit of long length scales,GPS accuracywill
improveas globaltrackingnetworksevolveto includea v= (Vo/•)tan-• (x/D) (34)
uniform set of well-distributed,high-accuracyground
systemswith strict configurationcontrol,and as force where D is the fault or "locking" depth related to the
models for solar radiation pressure and other orbit brittle-ductiletransitiondepth,x is distanceperpendicular
perturbations are ref'med.This will enablea numberof to thefault,andv0 is the totalsliprateat largedistances
platemotionandregionalplateboundaryzoneproblemsto from the fault or beneaththe locking depth.If T is the
be attacked.Even with currentperformance thereare many earthquakerecurrence interval,thenthecoseismicslipthat
moreapplications of GPS thanwe canaddresshere,but to relieves
accumulated
elasticstrain(andstress)
is justvoT.
give someflavorfor thediversity,I will considertwo types Geodeticdatamay be invertedfor D and v. Constraints
on
of applications,dividedarbitrarilyby lengthscale. D are also availablefrom seismicity(large earthquakes
tend to nucleate near the base of the fault, at the brittle-
Short (0-100 km) Baselines:The Near Field ductiletransition),
andv0maybedetermined
fromfar-field
Geodetic measurements within about 50-100 km of a spacegeodeticmeasurements (VLBI, SLR, or GPS) or, for
fault systemmay provideconstraints on crustand mantle a simpleplateboundary,froma globalplatemotionmodel.
rheology,faultingmechanics, andtheearthquake cycle.This For strike-slipfaultsin continentalcrust,D is typically
lengthscaleis alsoappropriate for monitoring uppercrustal about10-20 kin, on thebasisof inversionof geodeticdata
deformation associated with inflation/deflation of shallow [e.g.,King et al., 1987],seismicdepthdata,andrheologi-
magmachambers.Until recently,mostsuchstudieswere cal properties of crustalmaterialsfrom laboratoryexperi-
performedby conventionalterrestrialgeodetictechniques ments [Sibson, 1983]. Figure 15 plots differencesin
(triangulation,
tri!aterafiondistancemeasurement, andlevel- fault-paralleldisplacementrates for elastic half-space
ing). The accuracy,siteflexibility,easeof dataacquisition, modelswith D = 10, 15, and 20 kin. The largestrate
andincreasingly straightforwarddamanalysisallowsGPS to differences are observed at horizontal distances from the
complement, and in somecases,replacetheseapproaches. faultroughlyequalto fault depth,givingsomeguidanceas
The accurate three-dimensional vector nature of GPS to stationplacement.Distinguishingamongthe models
positioningalso allowsconstraints to be placedon block would require resolutionof fault-paralleldisplacement
rotations,somethingthat is not possiblewith conventional ratesat the 1-3 mm/yrlevel.
techniques alone [e.g.,Davis et al., 1989].Minsteret al.
, [
a springand dashpotin series,a viscoelasticsubstance degreesor betterin azimuth[DeMetset al., 1990]. These
behaveselasticallyover shorttime scalesand viscously models are based on spreadingrates from mid-ocean
over long time scales.Viscousrelaxationin the viscoelas- ridges,determined frommagneticanomalies averagedover
tic "asthenosphere" dampsshort-termperturbations in the severalmillion years, azimuthsof transformfaults that
overlyingelastic"lithosphere."The rate of stressrelaxa- averageover a similartime interval,andearthquake slip
tion is related to a time constant2•l/!.t, where •1 is the vectors representing essentially instantaneouslocal
viscosityof the lower layer and !x is the averagemodulus azimuthinformation.There is no reasonto suspectthat
of rigidity of the two layers.Expressions for the surface plate motionaveragedover severalmillion yearsdiffers
strainspredictedby couplingmodelsare givenby Savage over shorter(for example, geodetic)time scaleswhen
and Prescott [1978], Turcotte et al. [1984], and Li and measured betweenplateinteriors,away from the transient
Rice [1987]. Inspectionof these models suggeststhat effectsof plate boundarydeformation,unlessa plate
differencesin fault-parallelsurfacedisplacement ratesof boundaryis undergoing rapid evolution.This hypothesis
1-2 mm/yr or better are required for discrimination. hasbeenlargelyconfirmedby NASA's CrustalDynamics
However,for mostpartsof the earthquake cycle,predicted Project,which hasmadevelocitydeterminations between
surfacedeformationwith the elastichalf-spacemodeland severalmajorplateswith VLBI [e.g.,Argusand Gordon,
eventhe simplest(two layer) viscoelastic couplingmodel 1990] and SLR [e.g., Harrison and Douglas, 1990].
may be surprisinglysimilar and thus difficult to dis- Nevertheless,there are some plate boundarieswhere
criminatewith GPS or any othergeodetictechniquealone relativeplatemotionis poorlyconsmined,andwhereGPS
[Savage and Prescott, 1978; Thatcher, 1983; Savage, (as well as VLBI and SLR) measurementscan make
1990].On theotherhand,time-varyingsignalsoverpartof uniquecontributions. Plates lacking a spreadingcenter
the earthquakecycle are a potentiallyusefulobservable boundary (for example,thePhilippineplate)or with only
[Thatcher, 1983; Li and Rice, 1987], and we should not small or poorly definedspreadingcenterboundaries (for
rely on long(> 10-15 years)observation timesto achievea example,the Caribbeanplate) will have poorly defined
given rate accuracy.Davis et al. [1989] obtainedrate relativemotionrateswith respectto adjacentplates.Plate
uncertaintiesof 1 mm/yr in horizontalcomponentsand boundaries wheretransform faulttrendsor earthquake slip
3-4 mm/yr in the verticalcomponentfor baselinesup to azimuths may be biased due to the influence of
12 km in lengthin 3 yearsusingGPS data takenseveral heterogeneous continentalcrust(for example,the Pacific-
timesper year. North Americaplate boundarynorthof the southernGulf
GPS is also well suited to define the coseismic strain of California)will havepoorlydetermined relativemotion
field associatedwith earthquakes.These strains may azimuths.Predictedmotionat subduction zonesmay be
exhibit great spatial variation within a few tens of biasedbecauseof systematic biasesin trenchearthquake
kilometersof the fault, particularlyfor complex fault slip vectors[DeMets et al., 1990]. In caseswhere local
geometry,implyingthe needfor densesurveys.It may be data are lackingor biased,relativeplate motion is deter-
useful to separatecoseismicrupture from postseismic minedmainlyfromclosureconditions on otherplates,and
relaxationphenomena,implying a requirementfor rapid GPS or otherspacegeodetictechniquecanprovideuseful
responseand frequentresurveyafter an event.If required complementaryinformation. GPS stands out as the
accuracies are not high (severalcentimetersare sufficient appropriate techniqueif economicor logisticalconsidera-
for most studiesof coseismicoffset),kinematicor rapid tionsprecludethe useof SLR or VLBI, bothof whichhave
static techniquesenabling survey of large numbersof larger, more cumbersomeground systems,and if the
points may be useful. Larsen [1990] used kinematic problemcan be solvedwith stationseparations lessthan
techniquesto measure coseismicoffsets for the 1987 1000-2000km (bothVLBI andSLR havebetterperform-
Superstition Hills earthquake sequence in southern anceat longerstationseparations).
California. Figure16 showsthe uncertainty in relativevelocitiesof
someplatepairswith convergent boundaries. If at leastone
LongBaselines (100 > 1000 km) of theplatesisoceanic, nearbymeasurement sitesspanning
Long baselinemeasurements with GPS are challenging the trenchplateboundary may not exist.One of the goals
becausethe influenceof orbit errorsis directly propor- of the CASA (Centraland SouthAmerica)GPS experi-
tional to baselinelength,and becausecarrierphasecycle ments[Kellogget al., 1989;Kelloggand Dixon, 1990] is
ambiguity resolutionbecomesmore difficult at station to determine the rate and direction of subduction of the
separationsexceeding 100-200 km. Special care is Cocos and Nazca plates beneathCentral and northern
requiredin networkdesign,and covarianceanalysesprior SouthAmerica,amongthe mostpoorlydetermined plate
to the actualexperimentmay be important.The geologic pairsin theNUVEL 1 platemotionmodel[DeMetset al.,
rationalefor pursuingsuch difficult GPS experiments, 1990](Figure16).Thisrequiresmeasurements fromCocos
someexamples,andpreliminaryresultsare givenbelow. Island(the only point of land on the Cocosplate) and
Relativevelocitiesof mostof the majorplatesare now MalpeloIsland(theonlypointof landon theNazcaplate
well known from globalgeologicmodels,with precisions within 500 km of mainlandSouthAmerica)to pointsin
of a few millimetersper year or betterin rate and a few Central and South America, defining numerouslong
272 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS
INCREASING UNCERTAINTY has at least three major faults that are importantin
! ! accommodating thetangential
components of relativeplate
CO-NA •////•.///•.////////•J motionbetweenthe Pacific and North Americanplates.
! I
Dixon, T. H., and S. Komreich Wol•, Some tests of wet Hager,B. H., R. W. King, andM. H. Murray,Measurementof
tropospheric
calibration
for theCASAUnoGlobalPositioning crustaldeformationusingGPS,Ann.Rev. Geophys.,
in press,
Systemexperiment,
Geophys. Res.Len.,17, 203-206, 1990. 1991.
Dixon, T. H., M.P. Golombek, and C. L. Thornton,Constraints Harrison,C. G. A., andN. B. Douglas,Satellitelaserrangingand
on Pacific plate kinematics and dynamics with Global geologicconstraints
on plate motion,Tectonics,9, 935-952,
PositioningSystem (GPS) measurements, IEEE Geosci. 1990.
RemoteSens.,GE-23, 491-501, 1985. Hellwig, H., Microwave time and frequencystandards,
Radio
Dixon, T. H., G. Blewitt, K. Larson,D. Agnew, B. Hager, P. Sci., 14, 561-572, 1979.
Kroger,L. Scrumeda,and W. Strange,GlobalPositioning Herring,T. A., Precisionof verticalpositionestimatesfromvery
Systemmeasurements of crustaldeformationin southern long baseline interferometry, J. Geophys. Res., 91,
California: Some constraintson performance,Eos Trans. 9177-9182, 1986.
AGU, 71, 1051-1056, 1990. Herring, T. A., C. R. Gwinn, and I. I. Shapiro,Geodesyby
Dixon, T. H., G. Gonzalez,S. Lichten, and E. Katsigris,First radio interferometry:Studiesof the forced nutationsof the
epochgeodeticmeasurements with the Global Positioning Earth, part 1, Data analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 91,
Systemacross
thenorthern Caribbean
plateboundary
zone,J. 4745-4754, 1986.
Geophys.
Res.,96, 2397-2415,1991a. Hide, R., and J. O. Dickey, The Earth's variable rotation,
Dixon, T. H., D. M. Tralli, G. Blewitt, and J.P. Dauphin, Science,in press,1991.
Geodetic baselinesacrossthe Gulf of California using the Ivins, E. R., T. H. Dixon, and M.P. Golombek, Extensional
GlobalPositioning System,Am.Assoc.Petrol.Geol.,in press, reactivationof an abandoned thrust:A boundon shallowingin
1991b. thebrittleregime,J. Struct.Geol.,12, 303-314, 1990.
Dixon, T. H., G. Gonzalez, S. Lichten, D. Tralli, G. Ness, and J. Ivins, E. R., New aspectsof rotational dynamicswithin the
P. Dauphin, Preliminarydeterminationof Pacific-North North-American-Pacific ductileshearzone,in DeepStructure
America Plate motion in the southern Gulf of California with andPast Kinematicsof AccretedTerranes,Geophys.Monogr.
the Global PositioningSystem,Geophys.Res.Lett., in press, Ser., vol. 50, editedby J. W. Hillhouse,pp. 179-201, AGU,
1991c. Washington,D.C., 1989.
Dong, D., and Y. Bock, GPS network analysiswith phase Janssen,M. A., A new instrumentfor the determinationof radio
ambiguityresolutionappliedto crustaldeformation studiesin path delay due to atmosphericwater vapor, IEEE Trans.
California,J. Geophys.Res.,94, 3949-3966, 1989. Geosci.RemoteSens.,GE23, 485-490, 1985.
Easton,R. L., The NavigationTechnologyProgram,Nay. J. Inst. Jordan,T. H., andJ. B. Minster,Beyondplatetectonics: Looking
Nay.,25, 107-120, 1978. at plate deformationwith spacegeodesy,in The Impact of
Elgered,G., Tropospheric wet pathdelaymeasurements, IEEE VLBI on Astrophysics and Geophysics,editedby M. J. Reid
Trans.Antennas Propag.,AP-30,502-505, 1982. andJ.M. Moran,pp. 341-350, 1988.
Elgered,G., J. L. Davis, T. A. Herring,and I. I. Shapiro, Kaplan,G. H., The IAU resolutionsof astronomical constants,
Geodesyby radiointerferometry: watervaporradiometryfor time scales and the fundamental reference frame, Circ. 163,
estimationof thewet delay,J. Geophys.Res.,in press,1991. U.S.Nay. Observ.,Washington,D.C., 1981.
Essen,L., and J. V. L. Parry,An atomicstandardof frequency Kaula, W. M., Theoryof SatelliteGeodesy,124 pp., Blaisdell,
and time interval, Nature, 176, 280-282, 1956. Waltham, Mass., 1966.
Feigl, K. L., R. W. King, T. A. Herring,andM. Rothacher,A Kellogg, J., and T. H. Dixon, Central and SouthAmericaGPS
schemefor reducingthe effect of selectiveavailabilityon geodesy-CASA Uno, Geophys. Res.Lett., 17, 195-198, 1990.
precise GPScarrierphasemeasurements EosTrans. Kellogg, J., T. H. Dixon, and R. Neilan, CASA: Central and
(abstract),
AGU, 71, 1268, 1990a. SouthAmerica GPS Geodesy-CASA,Eos Trans. AGU, 70,
Feigl, K. L., R. W. King, andT. H. Jordan,Geodeticmeasure- 649-656, 1989.
ment of tectonic deformation in the Santa Maria fold and Kellogg,J. N., et al., First GPS baselineresultsfrom the North
thrust belt, California, J. Geophys.Res., 95, 2679-2699, Andes,Geophys. Res.Lett.,17, 211-215, 1990.
1990b. King, N. E., P. Segall,andW. Prescott,Geodeticmeasurements
Fleigel,H. F., A. A. Feess,W. C. Layton,andN. W. Rhodus, near Parkfield,California,1959-1984, J. Geophys.Res.,92,
The GPS radiationforce model, paper presentedat First 2747-2766, 1987.
InternationalSymposium on PrecisePositioningWith Global King,R. W., andG. Blewitt,Presentcapabilities of GPSfor high
PositioningSystem,Int. Assoc.of Geod., Rockville,Md., precisionregionalsurveys,in Global PositioningSystem:An
1985. Overview,lnt. Assoc.Geod.Syrup.102, editedby Y. Bock and
Freymueller,J., andM. Golombek,Geometryandtreatmentof N. Leppard,pp. 24-39, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
fiducialnetworks:Effect on GPS baselineprecisionin South King, R. W., E.G. Masters,C. Rizos, A. Stolz, and J. Collins,
America,Geophys. Res.Lett., 15, 1467-1469, 1988. SurveyingWith Global PositioningSystemGPS, 128 pp.,
Freymueller,J., and J. N. Kellogg, The extendedtracking Dummler, Bonn, 1985.
networkand indicationsof baselineprecisionandaccuracyin KornreichWolff S., T. H. Dixon, and J. Freymueller,The effect
theNorth Andes,Geophys. Res.Lett.,17, 207-210, 1990. of trackingnetwork configurationon GPS baselineestimates
Goad,C. C., Preciserelativepositiondetermination usingGlobal for the CASA Uno experiment,Geophys.Res. Lett., 17,
PositioningSystemcarrierphasemeasurements in a nondif- 647-650, 1990.
ferencemode, paper presentedat First InternationalSym- Lambeck, K., The Earth's Variable Rotation: Geophysical
posium on Precise PositioningWith Global Positioning Causesand Consequences, CambridgeUniversityPress,New
System,Int. Assoc.of Geod.,Rockville,Md., 1985. York, 1980.
Goad, C. C., and A. Mueller, An automatedprocedurefor Lambeck,K., GeophysicalGeodesy:The Slow Deformationsof
generating an optimumset of independent doubledifference theEarth, 718 pp., Clarendon,Oxford, 1988.
observables using Global PositioningSystemcarrierphase Lanyi,G. E., Tropospheric delayeffectsin radiointerferometry,
measurements,Man. Geod., 13, 365-369, 1988. JPL Prog.Rep.,42-78, 152-159, 1984.
Gordon,R. G., S. Stein,C. DeMets, and D. F. Argus,Statistical Larson,K., Precision,accuracyand tectonicsfrom the Global
testsfor closureof platemotioncircuits,Geophys. Res.Lett., PositioningSystem,Ph.D. thesis,269 pp., Univ. of Calif., San
14, 587-590, 1987. Diego, 1990a.
29, 2 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS Dixon:THE GLOBALPOSITIONINGSYSTEMß 275
Larson, K., Evaluationof GPS estimatesof relative positions Melosh, J., Nonlinear stresspropagationin the Earth's upper
from centralCalifornia,1986-1988, Geophys.Res.Lett., 17, mantle,J. Geophys. Res.,81, 5621-5632, 1976.
2433-2436, 1990b. Melosh,J., Shearstresson the baseof a lithosphericplate,Pure
Larsen, S., Global Positioning System measurementsof Appl.Geophys., 115, 429-439, 1977.
deformationin southernCalifornia,Ph.D. thesis,Calif. Inst. of Minster,J. B., T. H. Jordan,B. H. Hager, D.C. Agnew, and L.
Technol., 1990. H. Royden,Implicationsof precisepositioning,in Geodesyin
Lawson, C. L., and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares the Year 2000, editedby J. B. Rundle, pp. 23-45, National
Problems,340 pp., Prentice-Hall,EnglewoodCliffs, N.J., AcademyPress,Washington, D.C., 1990.
1974. Neilan, R., T. Dixon, T. Meehan, W. Melbourne, J. Scheid, J.
Leick, A., GPSSatelliteSurveying,352 pp., Wiley-Interscience, Kellogg,and J. Stowell,Operationalaspectsof CASA UNO
New York, 1990. '88raThe first largescaleinternationalGPS geodeticnetwork,
Li, V. C., and J. R. Rice, Crustaldeformationin greatCalifornia IEEE Trans. Inst. Measur., 38, 648-651, 1989.
earthquakecycles,J. Geophys.Res., 92, 11,533-11,551, Neilan,R. E., W. G. Melbourne,andG. L. Mader,The develop-
1987. mentof a globalGPS trackingsystemin supportof spaceand
Li, V. C., and H. S. Lim, Modelling surfacedeformationat ground-based GPS programs,in Global PositioningSystem:
complex strike-slipboundaries,J. Geophys.Res., 93, An Overview,lnt. Assoc.Geod.Syrup.,vol. 102, editedby Y.
7943-7954, 1988. Bock and N. Leppard,pp. 165-178, Springer-Verlag, New
Lichten,S. M., High accuracy
GlobalPositioning
Systemorbit York, 1990.
determination: in Global Positioning Nut, A., H. Ron, and O. Scotti, Kinematics and mechanics of
Progressandprospects,
System:An Overview,lnt. Assoc.Geod. Syrup.,vol. 102, tectonicblock rotations,in Slow Deformationand Transmis-
editedby Y. Bock andN. Leppard,pp. 146-164, Springer- sion of Stressin the Earth, Geophys.Monogr. Ser., vol. 49,
Verlag,New York, 1990a. edited by S.C. Cohen and P. Vanicek, pp. 31-46, AGU,
Lichten,S. M., Estimationand filtering for high precisionGPS Washington, D.C., 1989.
positioningapplications,
Man.Geod.,15, 159-176,1990b. Preston, R. A., R. Ergas, H. Hinteregger, C. Knight, D.
Lichten, S. M., and J. S. Border, Strategiesfor high precision Robertson,I. Shapiro,A. Whitney, A. Rogers,and T. Clark,
Global PositioningSystemorbit determination, J. Geophys. Interferometric observationsof an artificial satellite, Science,
Res., 92, 12,751-12,762, 1987. 178, 407-409, 1972.
Lichten,S. M., and W. I. Bettiger,Demonstration of sub-meter Rabbel,W., andH. Schuh,The influenceof atmospheric loading
GPS orbit determinationand 1.5 partsin 108 three dimen- on VLBI experiments, J. Geophys.,59,164-170, 1986.
sionalbaselineaccuracy, Bull. Geod.,63, 167-189, 1989. Reeber,E. E., and J. R. Swope,On the correlationbetweentotal
Lindlohr, W., and D. Wells, GPS designusing undifferenced precipitablewater in a colurn and absolutehumidityat the
carrierbeat phaseobservations, Man. Geod.,10, 255-295, surface,J. Appl. Meteorol.,11, 1322-1325, 1972.
1985. Remondi, B. W., Global PositioningSystem carrier phase:
Lorenzetti,E., and T. E. Tullis, Geodeticpredictionsof a strike Descriptionanduse,Bull. Geod.,59, 361-377, 1985.
slip faultmodel:Implications for intermediate andshortterm Rizos, C., and A. Stolz, Forcemodellingfor GPS satelliteorbits,
earthquake prediction,J. Geophys. Res.,94, 12,343-12,361, paperpresentedat First InternationalSymposiumon Precise
1989. PositioningWith Global PositioningSystem,Int. Assoc.of
Luyendyk,B. P., andJ. S. Homafius,Neogenecrustalrotation, Geod., Rockville, Md., 1985.
fault slip and basindevelopmentin southernCalifornia,in Robinson,S. E., The profile algorithmfor microwavedelay
CenozoicBasin Developmentof Coastal California, Rubey estimationfrom water vapor radiometerdata,Radio Sci., 23,
vol. VI, edited by R. V. Ingersoll and W. G. Ernst, pp. 401-408, 1988.
259-283, Prentice-Hall,EnglewoodCliffs, N.J., 1987. Rocken, C., J. Johnson,R. E. Neilan, M. Cerezo, J. Jordan, M.
MacDoran, P., Satellite emission radio interferometricEarth Falls, L. Nelson, R. Ware, and M. Hayes, The measurement
surveying:SERIES GPS geodeticsystems,Bull. Geod.,53, of atmosphericwater vapor: Radiometercomparisonand
117-138, 1979. spatial variation, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., in
Malys, S., and P. A. Jensen,Geodeticpoint positioning with press,1991.
carrier beat phase data from the CASA Uno experiment, Rocken, C., and C. M. Meettens, GPS antenna and receiver
Geophys. Res.Lett.,17, 651-654, 1990. tests: Multipath reduction and mixed receiver baselines,
McCaskill,T. B., andJ. A. Buisson,On-orbitfrequencystabilityof Proceedingsof Fifth International Symposiumof Satellite
NAVSTAR GPS clocks and the importanceof frequency Positioning,Las Cruces,New Mexico, pp. 375-385, 1989.
stability to precise positioning,paper presentedat First Rocken,C., and C. M. Meertens,MonitoringS/A and its effect
InternationalSymposiumon PrecisePositioning With Global on GPS geodesy(abstract),EosTrans.AGU, 71, 1268, 1990.
Positioning System, Int. Assoc. of Geod.,Rockville,Md., 1985. Rosenblatt,D., Y. Bock, J.-B. Minster, and D.C. Agnew,The
Melbourne,W. G., The casefor rangingin GPS-basedgeodetic impact of recent SelectiveAvailability on precise relative
systems, FirstInternationalSymposium on PrecisePositioning positioningwith GPS (abstract),Eos Trans.AGU, 71, 1268,
With Global PositioningSystem, Int. Assoc. of Geod., 1990.
Rockville, Md., 1985. Rundle,J. B., An approachto modellingpresent-daydeformation
Melbourne,W. G., GPS-basedgeodesytracking:Technology in southernCalifornia, J. Geophys.Res., 91, 1947-1959,
prospects for theyear2000,in Geodesy in theYear2000,edited 1986.
by J. Rundle, pp. 124-176, National Academy Press, Savage,J. C., A dislocationmodel of strain accumulationand
Washington,D.C., 1990. release at a subductionzone, J. Geophys. Res., 88,
Melbourne,W. G., R. Anderie,M. Feissel,R. King, D. McCar- 4984-4996, 1983.
thy, D. Smith, B. Tapley, and R. Vicente, Projectmerit Savage,J. C., Equivalentstrike-slipearthquakecycles in half
standards,Circ. 167, U.S. Nay. Observ.,Washington,D.C., space and lithosphere-asthenosphere Earth models, J.
1983. Geophys.Res.,95, 4873-4879, 1990.
Melbourne,W. G., R. Anderie,M. Feissel,R. King, D. McCarthy, Savage,J. C., and R. O. Burford, Geodeticdeterminationof
D. Smith,B. Tapley,R. Vicente,Projectmeritstandards, Circ. relativeplate motionin centralCalifornia,J. Geophys.Res.,
167, Update1, U.S. Nay. Observ.,Washington, D.C., 1985. 78, 832-845, 1973.
276 ß Dixon: THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 29, 2 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS
Savage,J. C., andW. H. Prescott,Precisionof Geodolitedistance Tralli,D. M., andT. H. Dixon,A fewpartsin l0s geodetic
measurements, J. Geophys.Res.,78, 6001-6008, 1973. baselinerepeatabilityin the Gulf of Califomiausingthe
Savage,J. C., and W. H. Prescott,Asthenosphere readjustment GlobalPositioning
System,Geophys.Res.Lett., 15, 353-356,
and the earthquakecycle,J. Geophys.Res.,83, 3369-3376, 1988.
1978. Tralli, D. M., and S. M. Lichten, Stochastic estimation of
Schaffrin, B., and E. W. Grafarend, Generatingclassesof tropospheric path delays in Global PositioningSystem
equivalentlinear modelsof nuisanceparameterelimination: geodeticmeasurements, Bull. Geod.,64, 127-159, 1990.
Applicationto GPS observations,Man. Geod.,11, 262-271, Tralli, D. M., T. H. Dixon, andS. A. Stephens, The effectof wet
1986. tropospheric pathdelayson estimationof geodeticbaselinesin
Schutz,B. E., C. S. Ho, P. A.M. Abusali,and B. D. Tapley, theGulf of CalifomiausingtheGlobalPositioning System,J.
CASA Uno orbit and baselineexperiments,Geophys.Res. Geophys. Res.,93, 6545-6557, 1988.
Lett., 17, 643-646, 1990. Turcotte,D. L., J. Y. Liu, and F. H. Kulhawy,The role of an
Seidelman,P. K., 1980 IAU theoryof nutation:The final report intracrustalasthenosphere on thebehaviorof majorstrike-slip
of the IAU workinggroupon nutation,CelestialMech., 27, faults,J. Geophys. Res.,89, 5801-5816, 1984.
79-106, 1982. Wahr,J. M., Theforcednutations
of anelliptical,rotating,elastic
Sibson, R. H., Continental fault structure and the shallow and oceanlessEarth, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 64,
earthquakesource,J. Geol. Soc. London, 140, 741-767, 705-727, 1981.
1983. Wahr, J. M., The Earth's rotation rate, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet.
Slade, M., and C. Yoder, 1960 Chile: New estimateof polar Sci., 16, 231-249, 1988.
motion excitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 1193-1196, Ware, R. H., C. Rocken, and J. B. Snider, Experimental
1989. verification
of improvedGPS-measuredbaselinerepeatability
Smith, D. E., D.C. Christodoulidis,R. Kolenkiewicz, P. Dunn, using water vapor radiometer corrections,IEEE Trans.
S. Klosko,M. Torence,S. Fricke,and S. Blackwell,A global Geosci.RemoteSens.,GE-23, 467-473, 1985.
geodeticreferenceframefrom LAGEOSranging,J. Geophys. Webb, F., Geodetic measurement of deformation in the offshore
Res., 90, 9221-9233, 1985. of southemCalifomia, Ph.D. thesis,Calif. Inst. of Technol.,
Sovers,O. J., and J. Border, Observationmodel and parameter Pasadena,1990.
partials for the JPL GPS geodetic modeling software Weldon, R., and E. Humphreys,A kinematicmodel of southem
"GPSOMC," JPL Publ., 87-21, Rev. 2, 1990. California, Tectonics,5, 33-48, 1986.
Spence,D. A., and D. L. Turcotte,Viscoelasticrelaxationof Wu, S.C., W. I. Bertiger,andJ. T. Wu, Minimizingselective
cyclic displacement
on the San Andreasfault, Proc. R. Soc. availability error on Topex GPS measurements, paper
London, Ser. A, 365, 121-144, 1979. presented at American Institute of Aeronautics and
Spilker,J. J., GPS signalstructureandperformancecharacteris- Astronautics
Conference,Portland,Oreg.,1990.
tics, Nay. J. Inst. Nay., 25, 121-146, 1978. Wubbena,G., Softwaredevelopments
for geodeticpositioning
Tapley,B. D., B. E. Schutz,andR. J. Eanes,Stationcoordinates, with GPS using TI-4100 code and cartier measurements,
baselinesand earth rotation from LAGEOS laser ranging: paperpresentedat First InternationalSymposiumon Precise
1976-1984,J. Geophys. Res.,90, 9235-9248, 1985. PositioningWith Global PositioningSystem,lnt. Assoc.of
Thatcher,W., Non-linearstrainbuildupand the earthquakecycle Geod., Rockville, Md., 1985.
on the San Andreasfault, J. Geophys.Res.,88, 5893-5902, Wyatt, F., Displacementsof surface monuments:Vertical
1983. motion,J. Geophys. Res.,94, 1655-1664, 1989.
Thatcher,W., and J. B. Rundle, A viscoelasticcouplingmodel Young, L. E., R. Neilan, N and F. Bletzacker, GPS satellite
for the cyclic deformation due to periodically repeated multipath:An experimental investigation,
paperpresented
at
earthquakesat subductionzones, J. Geophys.Res., 89, First IntemationalSymposium on PrecisePositioning
With
7631-7640, 1984. Global PositioningSystem,lnt. Assoc.of Geod., Rockville,
Thompson,A. R., J. M. Moran, and G. W. Swenson,Inter- Md., 1985.
ferometry and Synthesisin Radio Astronomy,534 pp.,
Wiley-Interscience,New York, 1986.
Thornton,
C. L., andG. J. Bierman,
UDUT covariance
factoriza-
tion for Kalman filtering, in Control and DynamicSystems, T. H. Dixon,JetPropulsion
Laboratory,
Divisionof Earth
Advancesin TheoryandApplications,vol. 16, editedby C. T. and PlanetarySciences,
4800 Oak Grove Drive,Pasadena,
Leondes,pp. 177-248, Academic,Troy, Mo., 1980. CA 91109.