Unit 5 Developing A ConceptualTheoretical Framework
Unit 5 Developing A ConceptualTheoretical Framework
Conceptual framework is the basic structure that services as a mental window of the
researcher because it depicts the research design and the relationships of the variables involved.
1. Previous practice
2. Felt needs
3. Innovativeness
4. Norms of the social system communication channels
A conceptual framework provides direction for programs, courses, teaching and others.
Granatin (n.d) states that “conceptual framework is the researcher’s own position on the problem
and gives direction to the study.” Aside from showing the direction of the study, through the
conceptual framework, the researcher is able to show the relationships of the different constructs
that he wants to investigate.
Family o Inattentiveness
Community o Uncooperative
Teachers
o Inactive
Learning
Environment
Externalizing Behavior
o Agression
A theory is constructed to explain, predict and master phenomenon (e.g relationship, events,
or the behavior). In many instances, we are constructing models of reality. A theory makes
generalizations about observations and consists of an interrelated, coherent set of ideas and
models.
A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house just as the foundation supports a
house, a theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationship among
variables of a research study, (Mehta, n.d).
Theoretical framework identifies the variables investigated in the study. It illustrates how the
variables interact with each other as hypothesized in the research by the aid of diagrams.
Theory provides patterns for the interpretation of data, links one study to another, supplies
framework within which concepts and variables acquire special significance and allows us to
interpret the larger meaning of our findings for ourselves and others.
Theoretical framework states the central concept(s) integral to the study. Connecting the
study to theory.
The study below is anchored on three stories that help us understand the behavior of children.
Methods of Research Page 3 of 10
Developing a Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
Theory of Behaviorism by
John B. Watson (1913) Behaviorism is concerned with the behaviors that are
associated with feelings and thinking, imagining or desiring.
Psycho-Social Theory by
Erik Erickson (1994) The theory states that successful completion of each stage
results in a healthy personality and the acquisition of basic
virtues. Basic virtues are characteristic strengths which the
ego can use to resolve subsequent crises.
In this chapter you are expected to actively engage yourself in understanding method,
approach and design and looking into the possibility of making the right choice and decision
regarding the design of your chosen research problem.
Here are the important concepts and definitions that you need to learn (Edmonds & Kennedy,
2013).
Research Method
This refers to the philosophical, theoretical, conceptual, and analytic perspective of research.
It can be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method.
Approach
Refers to the first step in creating structure to the design and it details a conceptual model or
framework of how the research will proceed, considering the objectives and variables of the
study.
Design
This refers to the plan, structure, and strategy of investigation so conceived as to obtain
answer to research questions or problems. It is the complete scheme or program of the research.
It includes an outline of what the investigator will do from writing by hypothesis and their
operational implications to the final analysis of data (Kerlinger; in Kumar, 2011).
Methods of Research Page 4 of 10
Developing a Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
According to Kerlinger (cited in Kumar, 2011), a research design is a plan, structure and
strategy of investigation so conceived as to obtain answers to research questions or problems.
It is the complete scheme or programme of the research. It includes an outline of what the
investigator will do from writing the hypotheses and their operational implications to the final
analysis of data.
As implied in the statement above, after the research topic has been finalized, the researcher
has to plan the details of what design to use, what type of data will provide answers to the
problems of the study, and how the data will be gathered, presented, analyzed, and interpreted.
The research design guides the researcher in planning the following aspects or procedures
of research:
The choice of a study design would depend largely on the philosophical perspective, objective
of the study, the inquiry mode, and the applicability of research findings.
In quantitative research, some of the commonly used designs are classified by examining
them from three different perspectives: 1) the number of contacts with the study population; 2)
the reference period of the study; and the nature of the investigation, (Kumar, 2011).
1.1. Cross-sectional studies are commonly used in the social sciences. These studies aim to
find out the prevalence of a phenomenon, situation, problem, attitude or issue, by taking a cross-
section of the population.
The cross-sectional study is the simple in design. The researcher decides what he
wants to find out, identify the study population, select a sample if needed, and contact the
respondents to find out the required information.
1.2. The before and after design (also known as the pre-test / post-test design). This design
can measure change in a situation, phenomenon, issue, problem or attitude. The before and
after design can be described as two sets of cross-sectional data collection points on the same
population to find out the change in the phenomenon or variable between two points in time. The
change is measured by comparing the difference in the phenomenon or variable before and after
the intervention. Depending upon how it is set up, a before-and-after study may be either an
experiment or non-experiment. It is a commonly used design in evaluation studies. The difference
between the two sets of data collection points with respect to the dependent variable is
considered to be the impact of the program or process evaluated.
Methods of Research Page 5 of 10
Developing a Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
1.3. The longitudinal study design. This is useful to determine the pattern of extend of change
in a phenomenon, situation, problem or attitude in relation to time. Under this design, the study
population is visited a number of time at regular intervals, usually over a longer period. Intervals
may be as short as a week or longer than a year. Irrespective of the size of the interval, the type
of information gathered each time is identical. The data collected may come from the same study
population but it may or may not be from the same respondents. A longitudinal study can be
characterized as a series of repetitive cross-sectional studies.
The reference period refers to the time frame in which a study is exploring a phenomenon,
situation, event or problem and may be categorized as 1) retrospective 2) prospective and 3)
retrospective-prospective.
2.1. The retrospective study design is used to investigate a phenomenon, situation, problem
or issue that has happened in the past. The study may be conducted either on the basis of the
data available for that period or on the basis or responding recall of the situation.
2.2. The prospective study design attempts to establish the outcome of an event or what is
likely to happen, such as the likely prevalence of a phenomenon, situation, problem, attitude or
outcome in the future. Experiments are usually classified as prospective studies since the
researcher must wait for an intervention to register its effect on the study of population.
2.3. The retrospective-prospective study design. This applies to a study wherein available
data are analyzed and used as bases of the future projections. It does now involve a control
group. Trend studies fall under this category.
3.2. In the non-experimental design, the researcher observes a phenomenon and attempts to
establish what caused it. In this instance, the research starts from the effect or outcome and
attempts to determine causation.
1. Case study
This is a dominant qualitative study design but also prevalent in quantitative research. A case
could be an individual, a group, a community, an instance, an episode, an event, a subgroup of
a population, a town or a city. To be called a case study, it is important to treat the total study
population as one entity.
It is a very useful design when exploring an area where little is known or where you want to
have a holistic understanding of the situation, phenomenon, episode, site, group or community.
This design is relevant when the focus of the study is on extensively exploring and understanding
rather than confirming and quantifying, (Kumar, 2011).
2. Grounded Theory
This is an approach to qualitative research data collection and analysis in the social sciences.
As cited by Hennink, Hutter and Bailey (2011), grounded theory is not a theory itself; but a
process for developing empirical theory from qualitative research that consists of a set of tasks
and underlying principles through which theory can be built up through careful observation of the
social world.
3. Phenomenology
This is qualitative research design which studies all possible appearances in human
experience using empirical methods (i.e, asking, observing, analyzing data, etc.) to make
empirically grounded statements that can be generalized. Various aims can be pursued such as
describing a phenomenon, or to evaluate an intervention or institution in the interest of knowledge
production (Flick, 2011).
4. Ethnography
This is a research process which deals with the scientific description of individual cultures
involving the origins, development and characteristics of human kind, including social customs,
beliefs and cultural development (Wiersma and Jurs, 2009).
5. Mixed Methods
Refers to the research design that uses both quantitative and qualitative data to answer a
particular question or sets of questions. In the mixed methods design “words, pictures and
narratives can be used to add meaning to numbers.” (in Biber, 2010).
Methods of Research Page 7 of 10
Developing a Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
IV. Reference/s:
Almeida, Adelaida B., Ed.D. Gaerlan, Amelita, Ph.D. Manly, Norita E., Ph.D. Research
Fundamentals from Concept to Output. Adriana Publisher.
https://libguides.library.cityu.edu.hk/researchmethods/ethics
V. Formative Assessment
True or False. Carefully read the statement. Write True if the statement is true
otherwise, False if the statement is incorrect. Place your answer on the left-side of
the number.
VI. Assignment
Instructions: Identify the following statement given below regarding research designs. Choose
what type of research designs in qualitative method are being identified. Write the letter of the
correct answer on the left side of the number.
A B C D E
Case study Grounded theory Phenomenology Ethnography Mixed Methods
1. This is an approach to qualitative research data collection and analysis in the social
sciences.
2. It is a very useful design when exploring an area where little is known or where you
want to have a holistic understanding of the situation, phenomenon, episode, site, group,
or community.
3. This is a research process that which deals with the scientific description of individual
cultures involving the origins, development and characteristics of human kind, including
social customs, beliefs and cultural development.
4. Refers to the research design that uses both quantitative and qualitative data to
answer a particular question or sets of questions.
5. Words, pictures, and narratives can be used to add meaning to numbers.
6. This is a qualitative research design which studies all possible appearances in human
experience using empirical methods to make empirically grounded statements that can
be generalized.
7. As cited by Hennink, Hutter and Bailey (2011), it is not a theory itself; but a process
for developing empirical theory from qualitative research that consists of a set of tasks
and underlying principles through which theory can be built up through careful
observation of the social world.
8. This is a dominant qualitative study design but also prevalent in quantitative research.
9. This design is relevant when the focus of the study is on extensively exploring and
understanding rather than confirming and quantifying.
10. Various aims can be pursued such as describing a phenomenon, or to evaluate an
intervention or institution in the interest of knowledge production.
Methods of Research Page 9 of 10
Developing a Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
VII. Evaluation
Instructions. Read and understand the statement given. Encircle the letter of the correct answer
and strictly no erasure.
8. The researcher observes a phenomenon and attempts to establish what caused it.
A. non-experimental design
B. experimental design
C. semi-experimental design
D. None of the above
9. Attempts to establish the outcome of an event or what is likely to happen, such as the
prevalence of a phenomenon, situation, problem, attitude or outcome in the future.
A. Retrospective study design
B. Retrospective-prospective study design
C. Prospective study design
D. Pre-test/Post- test design
10. This applied to a study wherein available data are analyzed and used as bases of future
projections. Does not involve a control group.
A. Retrospective study design
B. Retrospective-prospective study design
C. Prospective study design
D. Pre-test/Post-test design
Prepared by: