1.writing Skill Bar Graph
1.writing Skill Bar Graph
• You can see this says the same thing as the title, but in a
different way.
Step 3: Give an outline
• You also need to state what the main trend or trends in the graph are. Don’t
give detail such as data here – you are just looking for something that
describes what is happening overall.
• One thing that stands out in this graph is that one type of fast food fell over
the period, whilst the other two increased, so this would be a good outline.
-Here is an example:
‘Overall, the consumption of fish and chips declined over the period,
whereas the amount of pizza and hamburgers that were eaten increased.’
This covers the main changes that took place over the whole period.
• You may sometimes see this outline as a conclusion. It does not matter if
you put it in the conclusion or the introduction, but you should provide an
outline in one of these places.
Step 4: Provide details
• You can now give more specific detail in the
body paragraphs.
• When you provide details in your body
paragraphs, you must make reference to the
data.
• The key to organizing your body paragraphs
is to group data together where there
are patterns.
• To do this you need to identify
any similarities and differences.
Look at the graph – what things are
similar and what things are different?
• The consumption of fish and
chips declined over the
period, whereas the amount
of pizza and hamburgers
that were eaten increased.
• So it is clear that pizza and
hamburgers were following a
similar pattern, but fish and
chips were different.
• On this basis, you can use
these as your ‘groups’, and
focus one paragraph on fish
and chip and the other one
on pizza and hamburgers.
Here is an example of the first paragraph:
-As you can see, the focus is on fish and chips. This
does not mean you should not mention the other two
foods, as you should still make comparisons of the data
as the questions asks.
Summarize the
information by selecting
and reporting the main
features and make
comparisons where
relevant.
‘In 2002, the score of team B far exceeded that of the other two
teams, standing at a massive 82 points compared to only 10 for
team C and a very low 5 for team A. Over the next two years, the
points for team B decreased quite considerably, dropping by
around half to 43 by 2004. In contrast, team A’s points had
increased by a massive 600% to reach 35 points, nearly equal to
team B. Team C, meanwhile, had managed only a small
increase over this time. In the final year, team B remained ahead
of the others as their points increased again to 55, while team A
and C saw their points drop to 8 and 5 respectively.’
Your chance to solve
You should spend about 20
minutes on this task.