ANOVA : SINGLE FACTOR

Shampoo Brands
A B C D
7 9 2 4 Anova: Single Factor
3 8 3 5
5 8 4 7 SUMMARY
6 7 5 8 Groups Count Sum Average Variance
9 6 6 3 7 6 30 5 5.2
4 9 4 4 9 6 48 8 2
3 10 2 5 2 6 24 4 2
4 6 32 5.333333 3.466667

alpha- 0.05
Hypothesis ANOVA
Source of VSS df MS F
Ho: There is no significant diffence between anBetween G 52.5 3 17.5 5.526316
Ha: There is a significant diffence between and Within Gro 63.33333 20 3.166667

Total 115.8333 23
 Anova: Single Factor

Count Sum Average Variance

7 37 5.285714 4.904762
7 57 8.142857 1.809524
7 26 3.714286 2.238095
7 36 5.142857 3.142857

0.05

SS df MS F P-value F crit
72.28571 3 24.09524 7.968504 0.000738 3.008787
P-value F crit 72.57143 24 3.02381
0.00626 3.09839121214078
144.8571 27
Two- tailed Normal Curved

-3.00879
 Decision Decision
Reject Ho Fstat > Fcrit = Reject Ho Fstat within Fcrit
p value<alpha Reject the Ho

Two- tailed Normal Curved

7.9685

3.00879
 Perfomance of Students (Group)
A B C
40 50 40 Anova: Two-Factor With Replication
METHOD OF TEA 41 50 41
40 48 40 SUMMARY
39 48 38 METHOD OF TEACHING #1
38 45 38 Count
METHOD OF TEA 40 45 50 Sum
41 42 46 Average
39 42 43 Variance
38 41 43
38 40 42 METHOD OF TEACHING #2
METHOD OF TEA 40 40 40 Count
43 45 41 Sum
41 44 41 Average
39 44 39 Variance
38 43 38
METHOD OF TEACHING #3
alpha- 0.05 Count
Sum
Null hypothesis Average
Variance
Samples: There is no significant difference among the
(Raws) methods of teaching of the teachers. Total
Count
Colums: There is no significant difference among the Sum
(Columns) perfomance of the students. Average
Variance
Interactions:
There is no significant interaction effect between
the methods of teaching and the perfomance of
the students.
ANOVA
Source of Variation
Sample
Columns
Interaction
Within

Total
tor With Replication Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

A B C Total SUMMARYA B C

5 5 5 15 Count 5 5 5
198 241 197 636 Sum 198 241 197
39.6 48.2 39.4 42.4 Average 39.6 48.2 39.4
1.3 4.2 1.8 20.11429 Variance 1.3 4.2 1.8

METHOD OF TEACHING #2
5 5 5 15 Count 5 5 5
196 210 224 630 Sum 196 210 224
39.2 42 44.8 42 Average 39.2 42 44.8
1.7 3.5 10.7 10.14286 Variance 1.7 3.5 10.7

METHOD OF TEACHING #3
5 5 5 15 Count 5 5 5
201 216 199 616 Sum 201 216 199
40.2 43.2 39.8 41.06667 Average 40.2 43.2 39.8
3.7 3.7 1.7 5.066667 Variance 3.7 3.7 1.7

Total
15 15 15 Count 15 15 15
595 667 620 Sum 595 667 620
39.66667 44.46667 41.33333 Average 39.66667 44.46667 41.33333
2.095238 10.98095 10.52381 Variance 2.095238 10.98095 10.52381

ANOVA
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Source of VariationSS df MS
14.04444 2 7.022222 1.956656 0.156072 3.259446 Sample 14.04444 2 7.022222
178.1778 2 89.08889 24.82353 1.677E-07 3.259446 Columns 178.1778 2 89.08889
187.1556 4 46.78889 13.03715 1.164E-06 2.633532 Interaction 187.1556 4 46.78889
129.2 36 3.588889 Within 129.2 36 3.588889

508.5778 44 Total 508.5778 44

1.956656

-3.259446 3.259446 -3.259446

Total

15
636
42.4
20.11429

15
630
42
10.14286

15
616
41.06667
5.066667

F P-value F crit
1.956656 0.156072 3.259446
24.82353 1.677E-07 3.259446
13.03715 1.164E-06 2.633532

24.82353

3.259446
Male Female
14 12 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
18 9
17 11 Male
16 5 Mean 13.1
4 10 Variance 19.4333333333333
14 3 Observations 10
12 7 Pooled Variance 16.9166666666667
10 2 Hypothesized Mean Dif 0
9 6 df 18
17 13 t Stat 2.88139949576368
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.004968195368131
alpha- 0.05 t Critical one-tail 1.73406360661754
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.009936390736262
Hypothesis t Critical two-tail 2.10092204024104

Ho: There is no significant difference between the results of male and female in spelling bee.
Ha: There is a significant difference between the results of male and female in spelling bee.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Male Female Male

Mean 13.1 7.8 Mean 13.1
Variance 19.43333 14.4 Variance 19.4333333333333
Observatio 10 10 Observations 10
Pooled Var 16.91667 Hypothesized Mean Dif 0
Hypothesiz 0 df 18
df 18 t Stat 2.88139949576368
t Stat 2.881399 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.004968195368131
P(T<=t) one0.004968 t Critical one-tail 1.73406360661754
t Critical o 1.734064 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.009936390736262
P(T<=t) two0.009936 t Critical two-tail 2.10092204024104
t Critical t 2.100922
ual Variances t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Female Male
7.8 Mean 13.1
14.4 Variance 19.4333333333333
10 Observations 10
Hypothesized Mean Dif 0
df 18
t Stat 2.88139949576368
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0049681953681311
t Critical one-tail 1.73406360661754
Decision P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0099363907362623
p value<alpha Reject the Ho t Critical two-tail 2.10092204024104
t stat with in t crit Reject the Ho

spelling bee.

equal Variances

Female
7.8
14.4
10
ual Variances

Female
7.8
14.4
10
Pre-Test Post Test
20 25 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
30 35
10 25 Pre-Test Post Test
15 25 Mean 17.5 21.55
20 20 Variance 51.9473684210526 73.734210526
10 20 Observations 20 20
18 22 Pearson Correlation 0.68840966492331
14 20 Hypothesized Mean Di 0
15 20 df 19
20 15 t Stat -2.84706754655898
18 30 alpha-0.05 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00515409305174
20 10 t Critical one-tail 1.72913281152137
15 16 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.01030818610348
15 25 t Critical two-tail 2.09302405440831
18 10
40 45 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
10 15
10 10 Pre-Test Post Test
12 18 Mean 17.5 21.55
20 25 Variance 51.9473684210526 73.734210526
Observations 20 20
Pearson Correlation 0.68840966492331
Hypothesized Mean Di 0
df 19
t Stat -2.84706754655898
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00515409305174
t Critical one-tail 1.72913281152137
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.01030818610348
t Critical two-tail 2.09302405440831
 Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference between the results of the pre-test and p
Ha: There is a significant difference between the results of the pre-test and po

Decision Decision
P-value<alpha Reject the Ho p value<alpha Reject the Ho
t stat with in t crit Reject the Ho
e results of the pre-test and post test.
results of the pre-test and post test.
 OBSERVED
Group SA A DA SD TOTAL
I 12 5 12 11 40
II 5 14 14 11 44
III 5 6 12 11 34
IV 10 8 13 13 44
V 15 20 5 5 45
TOTAL 47 53 56 51 207 OVERALL TOTAL

p value= 1.537884E-05
0.0000154
Chisq. Test Stat.= 27.55
df= 12 (Group-1)(Description-1)
(column-1)(raw-1)
alpha= 0.05
Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference among the responses of the different groups.
Ha: There is a significant difference among the responses of the different groups.

-21.02
 EXPECTED
Group I II III IV V
SA 9.08212560386 9.990338 7.71980676329 9.990338 10.21739
A 10.2415458937 11.2657 8.70531400966 11.2657 11.2657
DA 10.8212560386 11.90338 9.19806763285 11.90338 12.17391
SD 9.85507246377 10.84058 8.3768115942 10.84058 11.08696

Decision
critical value= 21.0260698175 pvalue<alpha Reject the Ho
oup-1)(Description-1)
lumn-1)(raw-1)

27.55

-21.02 21.02
 EXPECTED
SA 9.08212560386473 9.990338 7.719807 9.9903381643 10.21739
10.2415458937198
A
#NAME?
DA
SD

p value
OBSERVED EXPECTED V(0-E)2/E

Err:502
DF= 12
ALPHA=0.05

0.006432 #NAME?
0.006431954199844
1.537884E-05
APPEREANCE
CategoriesTra EX
R1 3.75 4.9 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
R2 4.2 5
R3 2 5 Tra EX
R4 3 4.75 Mean 3.2375 4.9125
R5 3 5 Variance 0.925625 0.013958
Observatio 4 4
Pearson Co 0.023827
Hypothesiz 0
df 3
t Stat -3.466032
P(T<=t) one0.020231
t Critical o 2.353363
P(T<=t) two0.040463
t Critical t 3.182446

n p t stat Decision
PORTABILITY 0.0404 -3.46
SAFETY
DURABILITY
0.040463
 Observed f Expected f (O-E)^2/E
Excellent 10 1.587 44.5989722747322
Satisfactory 85 58.021 12.5448792850864
Needs Improvement 5 0.7935 22.2994861373661
Total 100
Chisq. Test Stat. = 79.4433376971848
alpha= 0.05 p value = 0.000000000000000006
df=n-1 3-1=2 critical value= 5.99146454710798

Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference among the expected ratings of the different deans.
Ha: There is a significant difference among the expected ratings of the different deans.
 chiq.test st 79.4433377
Decision pv 5.61175E-18
pvalue<alpha Reject the Ho cv T(

the different deans. 79.4

he different deans. 4
-5.99 5.99