See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/358671943

A First Insight into the Production of Bone, Antler and Tooth Objects at the
Copper And Bronze Age Site of Fulgeriş - La Trei Cireşi

Chapter · February 2022

CITATIONS READS

0 312

2 authors, including:

Andreea Terna
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
30 PUBLICATIONS 74 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Andreea Terna on 17 February 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 INSTITUTUL DE ARHEOLOGIE „VASILE PARVAN”

MATERIALE ŞI CERCETĂRI ARHEOLOGICE

SERIE NOUĂ, SUPPLEMENTUM I

SCRIPTA PRAEHISTORICA.
MISCELLANEA IN HONOREM
MARIAE BITIRI DICATA

EDITED BY
ROXANA DOBRESCU, ADINA BORONEANŢ, ADRIAN DOBOŞ

EDITURA CETATEA DE SCAUN

2021
COVER: Dan Iulian Mărgărit

MCA SERIE NOUA

SUPPLEMENTUM I

www.mcajournal.ro

Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României

Scripta praehistorica : miscellanea in honorem Mariae Bitiri dicata /
ed. by Roxana Dobrescu, Adina Boroneanţ, Adrian Doboş. - Târgovişte :
Cetatea de scaun, 2021
Conţine bibliografie
ISBN 978-606-537-545-1

I. Dobrescu, Roxana (ed.)

II. Boroneanţ, Adina (ed.)
III. Doboş, Adrian (ed.)
902

All papers published in Materiale şi Cercetări Arheologice are peer-reviewed.

Materiale şi Cercetări Arheologice is indexed in the following data-bases:
Persee, Copernicus, ERIH PLUS, Scopus, CEEOL, EBSCO and DOAJ.

This volume was edited with the financial support of the ”Vasile Parvan” Institute of Archaeology in Bucharest.

© 2021, EDITURA CETATEA DE SCAUN

MARIA BITIRI
 CONTENTS/SOMMAIRE

Tabula gratulatoria........................................................................................................................................................... 5

List of contributors/Liste des contributeurs..................................................................................................................... 9

Maria Bitiri - La Dame du Paléolithique de la Roumanie............................................................................................... 13

Maria Bitiri - Photographic retrospective/Retrospective photographique .....................................................................17

Maria Bitiri - Selected bibliography/Bibliographie séléctive ........................................................................................ 21

Editorial .......................................................................................................................................................................... 27

* * *

Alain TUFFREAU, Les premiers peuplements humains de l'Est des Carpates et de leurs abords dans le
contexte européen ........................................................................................................................................................ 29

Vadim STEPANCHUK, Sergii RYZHOV, Yurii VEKLYCH, Oleksandr NAUMENKO, Zhanna MATVIISHYNA,
Sergii KARMAZYNENKO, The Lower Palaeolithic assemblage of Medzhibozh 1 layer III (Ukraine)
and its palaeoenvironmental context ............................................................................................................................ 37

Andrea PICIN, At the onset of the Micoquian in Central Europe: raw material constraints and technological
versatility at Neumark-Nord 2/0 (Germany) ................................................................................................................. 71

Maria GUROVA, Stefanka IVANOVA, Mishin Kamik Cave: an unusual Pleistocene site in Northwestern Bulgaria ..... 85

Leonid VISHNYATSKY, Vitalie BURLACU, New research on the Middle Paleolithic of the Middle Prut Basin,
Moldova........................................................................................................................................................................... 105

Stanimira TANEVA, On the Middle Paleolithic leaf points from Bulgaria (Southeast Europe)......................................125

Yuri E. DEMIDENKO, Petr SKRDLA, Béla RÁCZ, Adrián NEMERGUT, Sándor BÉRES, The Aurignacian in the
Carpathian Basin of Eastern Central Europe and its Proto-Aurignacian industry type.................................................141

Jacopo GENNAI, Set in Stone? Discussing the early Upper Palaeolithic taxonomy using European and Levantine
assemblages ................................................................................................................................................................... 183

Paolo BIAGI, Elisabetta STARNINI, The Palaeolithic sequence of the Arma dell'Aquila (Finale Ligure, Savona,
North-western Italy)....................................................................................................................................................... 217

tVasile CHIRICA, Pierre NOIRET, Philip R. NIGST, Valentin-Codrin CHIRICA, Marjolein D. BOSCH, Timothée LIBOIS,
Les stations paléolithiques de Mitoc, sur le Prut (Roumanie) ....................................................................................... 229

Roxana DOBRESCU, Adrian DOBOŞ, Constantin HAITĂ, Ancuţa BOBÎNĂ, Bogdan BOBÎNĂ - L'Atelier
aurignacien découvert à Busag (Nord-Ouest de la Roumanie). Données préliminaires .............................................. 259

Marin CÂRCIUMARU, Elena-Cristina NIŢU, Ovidiu CÎRSTINA, Theodor OBADĂ, Florin-Ionuţ LUPU,
Marian LEU, Gravettian and Epigravettian personal ornaments in Eastern Carpathians ............................................ 275
Loredana NITA, Mircea ANGHELINU, Cristina CORDOS, The shouldered points and the Gravettian of the
Eastern Carpathian area: insights from Bistridoara-Lutarie III (Ceahlau Basin, Northeastern Romania) ... 291

Natalya B. AKHMETGALEEVA, Aleksandr E. DUDIN, New art works made of ivory and bone animals from
the Upper Palaeolithic site of Kostenki 11 (Russian Plain) ........................................................................................... 313

Marian COSAC, George MURĂTOREANU, Daniel VERES, Loredana NIŢĂ, Cristoph SCHMIDT, Ulrich HAMBACH,
Alexandru RADU, Roxana CUCULICI, Dan Lucian BUZEA, Dan ŞTEFAN, Monica MĂRGĂRIT, Ştefan VASILE, Valentin
DUMITRAŞCU, Marius ROBU, Alexandru PETCULESCU, Tiberiu SAVA, Valentin GEORGESCU, Gabriel ŞERBĂNESCU,
Ionel GEAMBAŞU, Recent archaeological researches in the Vârghiş Gorges karst area (Eastern Carpathians,
Romania). A synthesis of the 2014-2020 campaigns .................................................................................................. 325

Serghei COVALENCO, Roman CROITOR, Palaeolithic reindeer hunting camps from Cosăuţi
(Middle Dniester, Moldova) ......................................................................................................................................... 351

Ştefan VASILE, Valentin DUMITRAŞCU, Zooarchaeological analysis of the faunal remains from the Palaeolithic
site of La Adam Cave (Dobrogea, SE Romania) - new data from recent excavations...................................................361

Adrian Balăşescu, Valentin Radu, Adina Boroneanţ, Clive Bonsall, Mesolithic Icoana revisited (II) -
a reappraisal of the faunal remains.............................................................................................................................. 373

Dragana ANTONOVIC, Vidan DIMIC, Ground and abrasive stone tools from the Early Neolithic site of Batasevo
(Serbia) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 413

Costel ILIE, Florian MIHAIL, The lithic material discovered in the Starcevo-Criş cultural layer from the
archaeological site of Negrileşti-Curtea Scolii, Galaţi County ..................................................................................... 429

Tanya DZHANFENOVA - Exploring the beginnings: a multianalytical archaeometric study of the Early Neolithic
pottery production at Koprivets, Northern Bulgaria.................................................................................................... 445

Erika GÂL, Anna Zsofia BILLER, Éva Âgnes NYERGES, Anett OSZTÂS, Bird remains from the Starcevo and
Lengyel culture settlements of the site Alsonyék-Bataszék (South-western Hungary)................................................ 467

Selena VITEZOVIC, The Neolithic bone industry from the site of Slatina-Paracin (excavations of 1962-1985) ......... 487

Cristian Eduard ŞTEFAN, Human bones from Şoimuş-io Avicola (Ferma 2), Romania, in context.............................. 499

Katalin T. BIRO, Gyorgy SZAKMÂNY, Veronika SZILÂGYI, Zoltán KOVÂCS, Zsolt KASZTOVSZKY, Ildiko HARSÂNYI,
The first greenstone axe in Hungary ............................................................................................................................. 517

Andreea ŢERNA, Elena-Lăcrămioara ISTINA, A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth
objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi......................................................................... 529

Radu BĂJENARU, The Glina-type flanged axes revisited ..............................................................................................553

Vasile DIACONU, Adela KOVACS, Deer antler mace-heads from the Late Bronze Age in Northeastern Romania..... 569

Monica MĂRGĂRIT, Adrian BĂLĂŞESCU, Adina BORONEANŢ, Reinterpreting an intriguing osseous assamblage
from Chitila-Fermă (Bucharest, Romania)...................................................................................................................... 581

Abréviations/ Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 591

A FIRST INSIGHT INTO THE PRODUCTION OF BONE, ANTLER AND TOOTH
OBJECTS AT THE COPPER AND BRONZE AGE SITE OF FULGERIŞ - LA TREI
CIREŞI

Andreea ŢERNAa, Lăcrămioara-Elena ISTINAb

a Institute of Pre-and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University, Kiel, e-mail: [email protected]
b "Iulian Antonescu" Museum Complex, Bacău, e-mail: [email protected]

Key words: Copper Age, Cucuteni-Tripolye, Bronze Age, Monteoru culture, technology, osseous materials
Abstract: Artefacts from bone, antler and wild boar tusk were recovered from both Copper Age and Bronze Age contexts during the archaeological
excavations at the site o f Fulgeriş-La trei cireşi, between 2004 and 2013. The intention o f this study is to offer a first characterization o f the
manufacturing process and to build up a classification based on morpho-functional and technological criteria. The assemblages are composed
mainly o f domestic equipment and one can observe a clear preference towards the exploitation o f bone over tusks and antler. Due to the larger size
o f the Copper Age collection one can recognize the use o f various methods o f blank production: fracturing, bi-, quadri- and multi-partitioning,
sectioning, while for the Bronze Age only fracturing and partitioning were identified. With few exceptions, the assemblage shows a low degree of
elaboration, where shaping plays a marginal role in the transformation o f the blanks.

Cuvinte cheie: eneolitic, Cucuteni-Tripolie, epoca bronzului, cultura Monteoru, tehnologie, materii dure animale
Rezumat: Săpăturile arheologice întreprinse în situl de la Fulgeriş-La trei cireşi între anii 2004-2013 au furnizat şi artefacte din materii dure animale:
os, corn şi defense de mistreţ. Acestea provin atât din contexte eneolitice cât şi din complexe datate în epoca bronzului. Scopul lucrării de faţă este
de a oferi o primă caracterizare a procesului tehnologic de fabricare a obiectelor din MDA şi de a realiza o clasificare a acestora utilizând criterii
morfo-funcţionale şi tehnologice. Colecţia este compusă în principal din unelte şi poate f i observată o preferinţă clară în exploatarea osului în
detrimentul defenselor de mistreţ şi al cornului. întrucât colecţia de artefacte eneolitice este mai mare, au putut fi identificate mai multe metode de
transformare a blocului de materie primă: fracturarea, divizarea longitudinală în jumătăţi şi în sferturi, divizarea multiplă, secţionarea transversală,
spre deosebire de epoca bronzului, pentru care au fost identificate doar fracturarea şi divizarea longitudinală. Cu câteva excepţii, obiectele din MDA
din situl de la Fulgeriş prezintă un nivel scăzut de elaborare tehnologică, în sensul în care forma finală a produselor a fo st obţinută în urma
operaţiunii de debitaj, fasonarea suporturilor fiind de cele mai multe ori superficială.

INTRODUCTION

Bone, antler and tooth are raw materials that were commonly exploited by prehistoric human societies. Their
economic importance, the knowledge involved in the manufacturing process or the symbolic values attributed to
them by people differed greatly on the scale of time and space.
The site of Fulgeri? - La trei cire$i/Dealul Fulgeris (Fig. 1) has the potential to offer a prospect of how different
human communities that inhabited the same region at different times took advantage of these particular raw
materials. Despite the shortcomings resulted from operating with a small data set, we aim to get a first insight into the
process of production of bone, antler and tooth objects at two different moments in the lifespan of the site of
Fulgeri?: the Copper Age settlement dated to the Cucuteni A-Trypolie BI phase and the Bronze Age habitation,
represented by the Monteoru culture.

MATERIALE ŞI CERCETĂRI ARHEOLOGICE (serie nouă), SUPPLEMENTUM 1, 2021, p. 529-552.

530 Andreea ŢERNA, Lăcrămioara-Elena ISTINA

Figure 1. The location of the site Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi (marked with a red dot).

The study focuses on the characterisation of the manufacturing processes, including here the methods and
techniques of manufacturing and the raw material acquisition strategy, and the classification of finds based on
morpho-functional and technological criteria.
The site of Fulgeriş is located in the western part of the Tutovei Hills, a subunit of the Bârlad Plateau, in the
basin of Siret River. Administratively, the location belongs to the municipality of Pânceşti, situated in the south -
eastern part of Bacău County. It occupies a promontory that is bordered at the south by the Fulgeriş brook, at
northwest by the Soci brook, at east by a small tributary of the Fulgeriş brook, and to the west by the Cristea Hill.
The archaeological site was discovered during fieldwalking in the 1960s, by Marilena Florescu and Viorel Căpitanu
(Căpitanu 1982, p. 148). In the 1980s, Viorel Căpitanu carried out trial excavations, concluding the presence of a rich
archaeological site attributed to the Cucuteni culture (Căpitanu 1996, p. 50).
The stratigraphy of the site can be described as follows: the oldest layer is dated to the Copper Age period, phase A3
of the Cucuteni culture; then, a layer dated to the Bronze Age, the Monteoru culture; and finally, an occupation
belonging to the period between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD.
Between 2003 and 2018 a new phase of archaeological investigations began at the site, with a focus on the
Copper Age habitation (Artimon et alii 2004; Istina 2005; Istina et alii 2005; Istina et alii 2007; Istina et alii 2008; Istina
et alii 2009; Istina, Bucşă 2012; Istina et alii 2013; Istina, Bucşă 2015; Istina 2016). Geophysical prospections took place
in 2009, carried out by a team from the ARHEOINVEST Platform ("Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iaşi) (Asăndu lesei
et alii 2012), and then continued in 2015 by another team from the Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Friedrich­
Alexander - Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and the Institute of Archeology in Iaşi (Mischka C. et alii 2016).
An area of 753.5 m2was excavated out of the total of cca. one and a half hectares of the Cucuteni settlement.
In the 17 trenches that were opened, various archaeological features were investigated: nine Copper Age burnt
houses, 60 pits - of which 32 belonged to the Copper Age, other three were attributed to the Bronze Age occupation,
and 25 to the 1st century BC-1st century AD period, and three Copper Age ditches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The assemblage is composed of 53 objects, of which 34 are made of bone, 11 of wild boar tusks and eight of
antler (Table 1). All are the result of on-site identification and no scrutiny of the faunal remains was performed. Most
of the artefacts were recovered from the strata. In some cases, due to the multi-layered stratigraphy of the site and
thus the inherent admixtures between the strata, it was not possible to accurately connect the artefacts to the
chronological context to which they belong. In this case, the finds were included in the Unattributed finds category.
Thus, 34 items were attributed to the Copper Age occupation, six to the Bronze Age and for 13 objects we could not
establish a secure dating (Table 1).
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 531

Raw material Copper Age Bronze Age Unattributed To tal

Bone 20 5 9 34

Antler 5 1 2 8

Tusk 9 0 2 11

To tal 34 6 13 53

Table 1. Quantification of raw material type for each archaeological layer.

As for the Copper Age, 16 objects were recovered from the stratum, six from houses and 12 from pits (Table 2). The
houses that yielded the worked osseous material, namely no. 4, 6 and 7 were only partially excavated (Table 3). All are
one single-storey houses, built directly on the soil; the outline of each house was roughly defined by the remains of
the collapsed walls. Their inventory comprised pottery vessels, clay miniatures, flint artefacts and faunal remains. The
Copper Age pits (Table 3) vary in configuration and inventory.

Pit no. 1 contained a high number of sherds and compact layers with fragments of walls from a burnt house.
Besides these, animal bones, an anthropomorphic figurine and a sandstone endscraper were recovered. The inventory
of pit no. 11 was formed mainly of pottery and animal bones. Pit no. 15 contained a compact burnt layer with sherds,
animal bones and daub. Pit 36 was filled with sherds, animal bones, burnt daub and contained several layers of ash
and charcoal. Pit no. 42 had a poorer inventory consisting of several pottery sherds, animal remains and a miniature
vessel. Pit no. 49 was discovered under the remains of house 8 and was refilled with burnt daub fragments from the
wall of a dismantled house. Finally, pit 50 contained layers of ashes alongside sherds and fragments of burnt daub.
The Bronze Age assemblage was recovered mainly from pit no. 47 and only one item came from pit 46
(Table 2). Both pits contain a great amount of Copper Age finds such as pottery and fragments of daub from burnt
houses that were lately destroyed by the Bronze Age occupation. Thus, material admixtures are not excluded also for
the worked osseous material.
The preservation of the artefacts is generally good and it allowed the observation of surface modifications
related to manufacturing and use. However, on some finds, the use of protective coating in the conservation process
completely obliterated the wear.
The differences in the post-depositional conditions between the Copper Age and the Bronze Age layers may
be the cause for the distinctive coloration of the bone tools. Thus, the finds from the Cucuteni features display a dark
yellowish colour, while those from the Bronze Age are dark greyish.
The classification of finds seeks to capture the interdependency of one object's shape, function, and schema of
manufacturing, and it can be summarized within the following hierarchical structure: type or raw material (bone,
antler, tooth) ^ morpho-functional parameter i.e. the shape of the active end (pointed, bevelled etc.) ^ techno­
morphological parameters, meaning the morphology of the blank (flake, rods, bi-partites, quadri-partites, and
segments) as resulted from the use of specific manufacturing methods and raw materials (fracturing, longitudinal
partitioning, and sectioning) ^ use related parameters, where it was possible to determine.
The technological analysis is based on traceology. The marks left on objects by the manufacturing process
were identified by means of microscopic observations. An Optika stereo microscope was used at magnifications from
5x to 50x. For the classification and interpretation of traces we used the large set of literature dedicated to this
subject (Peltier, Plisson 1986; Sidéra 1993; Averbouh 2000; Legrand 2007; Legrand, Sidéra 2007).

CLASSIFICATION OF FINDS
1. THE CUCUTENI ASSEMBLAGE
BONE
1. Points
Points are the most common category of bone objects within the collection, accounting for 16 specimens. It is
also the category that shows the highest morphological and technological variability. Based on the criteria described in
the above section, we identified the following types of points:
- 1-1 on bone flakes (Id 1-6)
Six items were made from flakes resulted from the fracturing of long (Fig. 2/2, 4) and flat bones (Fig. 2-2, 5).
 532
M o rp h o -
Year of D epth Inv. R aw M an u fa ctu rin g
Layer ID Tre n ch Fe atu re Sq u a re fu n ctio n a l Ty p e Frag m e n tatio n Illu stratio n
ex ca vatio n (cm ) no. m aterial stage
cate go ry

near finished
1
2012 13 house 7 9d 30 bone product Point 1-1. entire no
finished
2
2005 4 pit i i 50 35313 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig 2/1
finished
3
2006 7 pit 15 7a 60 35303 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig. 2/2
finished
4
2013 14 2f 80 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig- 3/3
6 finished
5
2004 3 40 35315 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig- 2/4
finished
6
2013 14 4d 55 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig- 2/5

Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

finished
7
2013 14 pit 49 4f 120 bone product Point 1-2. entire fig. 2/6
finished
s
2013 14 3c 50 bone product Point 1-3. entire fig 3/1
finished
9
Copper Age

2013 14 If 75 bone product Point 1-4. entire fig. 4/1

finished
10
2008 10 house 4 5b 45 35100 bone product Point 1-4. entire fig- 2/8
90- finished
11
2003 1 pit 1 3d 100 35317 bone product Point 1-5. entire fig- 4/2
finished
12
2011 12 house 6 4f 45 bone product Point uncategorized distal fig- 2/7
finished
13
2013 14 lb 100 bone product Point uncategorized distal fig- 3/2
finished
14
2013 14 5c 50 bone product Point uncategorized distal fig- 3/4
finished
15
2012 13 6a 20 bone product Point uncategorized distal fig- 2/9
finished
16
2013 14 3e 80 bone product Point uncategorized distal fig- 2/3
finished
17
2012 13 house 7 7d 35 bone product Bevelled tool 2-1. entire fig. 5/1
finished
18
2012 13 house 7 7d 35 36143 bone product Bevelled tool uncategorized distal fig- 5/3
finished
19
2013 14 6f 30 bone product Bevelled tool uncategorized distal fig 5/2
 finished
20
2013 14 4d 55 bone product Spatula-like entire fig- 5/4
finished
21
2008 10 house 4 4B 30 35101 antler product Point 1-1. entire fig. 6/1

A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi
finished
22
2012 13 9c 20 antler product Bevelled tool 2-1. entire fig- 6/3
finished
23
2013 14 5d 50 antler product Bevelled tool 2-1. entire fig 6/2
finished
24
2012 13 9c 20 antler product Receptacle almost entire fig. 6/4
25 2011 12 pit 42 antler undetermined Undetermined proximal fig. 12/1
finished
26
2008 10 pit 36 lb 34 35102 tusk product Pendant entire fig- 7/3
2005 4 pit 15 11a 50 34938 0. with a
finished pointed
27
product extremity and
tusk concave edge entire fig- 7/1
2013 14 2d 80 preform O.with a
(probably) pointed
28
extremity and
tusk concave edge entire fig- 7/2
finished Elongated
29
2005 5 10 80 36142 tusk product object almost entire fig. 7/5
finished
30
2013 14 pit 50 lc 175 tusk product Uncategorized broken fig. 7/4
31 2013 14 pit 50 le 110 tusk waste Undetermined undetermined fig- 7/6
32 2011 12 pit 42 115 940 tusk waste Undetermined entire fig. 8/4
85-
33
2011 12 pit 42 120 561 tusk undetermined Undetermined undetermined fig- 8/3
120-
34
2011 12 pit 42 145 251 tusk undetermined Undetermined distal fig- 8/1
finished
35
2013 14 pit 46 9d 45 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig. 9/3
finished
36
2013 14 pit 47 7b 150 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig. 9/4
finished
Bronze Age

37
2013 14 pit 47 8b 30 bone product Point 1-1. entire fig. 9/5
finished
38
2013 14 pit 47 6b 140 bone product Point 1-2. entire fig. 9/1
finished
39
2013 14 pit 47 8b 95 bone product Point 1-3. entire fig. 9/2
finished
40
2013 14 pit 47 7b 85 antler product Bevelled tool entire fig. 10/1
U natt
j ,r.±

finished
41
2013 14 7c 50 bone product Point undetermined fig. 11/1

533
 534
finished Bevelled
42
2013 14 8a 50 bone product object distal fig. 10/2
finished Worked
43
passim passim passim passim passim 35318 bone product knucklebone entire fig. 11/3
finished Worked
44
2013 14 pit 47 8b bone product knucklebone entire fig. 11/4
finished Worked
45
passim passim passim passim passim 35314 bone product knucklebone entire fig. 11/5
Finished Modified
46
2012 13 3c 30 bone product phalanx entire fig. 11/2
47 2012 13 5d 25 bone undetermined Uncategorized broken fig. 10/5
finished
48

Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

2013 14 8 50 bone product Uncategorized broken fig. 10/4
49 2012 13 3d 30 bone undetermined Uncategorized broken fig. 10/3
finished Punch
50
passim 36140 antler product tool/retoucher entire fig. 12/2
Adze-like
51
2005 passim passim passim passim 35312 antler undetermined object entire fig. 12/3
52 2013 14 7b 80 tusk preform Undetermined entire fig- 8/2
53 2013 14 8 20 tusk waste Undetermined undetermined fig. 8/5

Table 2. List of artefacts with relevant information regarding the archaeological context, raw material, manufacturing stage, typology and fragmentation
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 535

N o. o f
Layer Fe atu re Y e a r o f e x ca va tio n T re n ch M e te r D ep th
o b je cts

2005-2006 VI 2.30-10 30-60

House 4 2007 VIII 2-10 30-60 2

2008 X 3.8-10 30-60

House 6 2011 XII 0-6/b-f 35-75 1
House 7 2012 XIII 0-6/b-f 25-60 3
Copper Age

Pit 1 2003 I 1.90-6.10 40-210 1

Pit 11 2005 IV 13.40-14.80 30-175 1

2005 IV 7.70-10.60 40-60

Pit 15 2
2006 VII 6.75-9.80 40-60
Pit 36 2008 X 0.20-0.60 35-130 1
Pit 42 2011 XII 6-8 60 4
Pit 49 2013 XIV 3.10-3.65 95-225 1
Pit 50 2013 XIV 0.75-2.94 40-170 2
Pit 46 2013 XIV 8-10 30-215 1
Bronze Age Pit 47 2013 XIV 5-9 40-180 6

Table 3. List of Copper and Bronze Age features that provided the analysed artefacts.

Figure 2. Various types of bone points from the Copper Age occupation: on bone flakes (1-2, 4-5), on long bone obtained by sectioning,
with the anatomic proximal end preserved (6), on bi-partite rod with anatomic proximal end (8), uncategorized (3, 7, 9).
536 Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

The blanks were acquired most probably from the butchering debris. Bones from undetermined species of
large and small ruminants, but also middle size mammals were used at equal extent.
The shaping technique observed in most cases is transversal abrasion (Fig. 3/3), and only in one case, scraping was
employed. Both were usually applied on the distal extremity of the point.

- type 1-2 on long bone segment, with anatomic proximal end (Id 7)
One item was made from the fibula of a wild boar by sectioning; it preserves the distal epiphysis as a handle
(Fig. 2/6). The tool was shaped by abrasion and was used for a short time.

Figure 3. Bone points from the Copper Age occupation obtained by various methods of debitage: fracturation (3),
oblique sectioning (1, 4) and partitioning (2).

- type 1-3 on long bone obtained by oblique sectioning, with anatomical proximal end (Id 8)
The type is represented by one object made from the distal part of a dog humerus. The distal part was
shaped by abrasion (Fig. 3/1). The aspect of the apex points to a short duration of use.

- type 1-4 on bi-partite rod with anatomic proximal end (Id 9-10)
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 537

The assemblage comprise two points made by bi-partitioning from the metatarsal bones of small ruminants
(goat in one case). One item preserves part of the distal epiphysis, and the other, part of the proximal one (fig. 2/8).
Both were shaped by abrasion, at different extents.

- type 1-5 on quadri-partite rod with anatomic proximal end (Id 11)
One point was obtained by quadri-partitioning. The first sequence of debitage was performed by indirect
percussion, while the second stage, by internal grooving. Part of the proximal epiphysis was preserved as handle. The
implement bears traces of shaping by abrasion. The proximal extremity was flattened and displays volume
modification (Fig. 4/2) which suggest the possible use of the implement in indirect percussion.

- uncategorized fragments (5)

The assemblage contains five distal fragments of points which due to the fragmentation state cannot be
attributed to a specific category. Two of them seem to be the result of quadri-partitioning of metapodials from large
ruminants (Fig. 2/7), while other two were made from rods of long bones from small ruminants (Fig. 3/2) and medium
size mammals (Fig. 2/9). Another was probably obtained by oblique sectioning of a long bone (Fig. 2/4). In all cases,
the shaping was performed by abrasion.

Figure 4. Bone points from the Copper Age habitation obtained by quadri-and bi-partitioning of metapodials.
538 Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

2. Bevelled tools
Only three bevelled tools made of bone were identified within the assemblage. Two of them are fragmented
and one was preserved completely. The fragments are distal parts from two different types of implements. One was
manufactured from a humerus of a small ruminant species by oblique sectioning (Fig. 5/3, Id 18), while the other,
probably from an ulna of a large ruminant, by transversal sectioning (Fig. 5/2, Id 19). The latter was burnt. Both display
abrasion traces on the distal end.
The completely preserved item can be categorize as type 2-1 bevelled tool with modified proximal end used
in indirect percussion. The implement was manufactured from the diaphysis of a long bone, probably from cattle (Fig.
5/1, Id 17). The blank was obtained either by fracturing or by multiple partitioning. The proximal end was shaped in
order to obtain a striking platform. The crushed aspect of the platform along with the traces of accidental flaking on
the sides indicate that the tool was used in indirect percussion. The distal part was shaped by abrasion. The
technological traces are almost entirely covered by a well-developed use wear, showing a long duration of use
(Fig. 5/1).

3. Spatula-like object
The category comprises one implement which has an elongated flat shape and a thin rectangular active end
(Fig. 5/4, Id 20). The blank was obtained from a wild boar fibula by removing both epiphyses. It was abraded on the
entire length.

Figure 5. Bevelled tools (1-3) and a spatula-like object (4) from the Copper Age occcupation.
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 539

ANTLER
The antler assemblage contains five finished products which belong to three morpho-functional categories.

1. Points
- type 1-1 on tine segment: one item was made from the distal part of a red deer tine, by sectioning (Id 21, Fig. 6/1).
On the proximal part, the cancellous tissue was partially removed on a narrow area, so that the object could be
shafted. Due to the conservation treatment applied on the surface, the manufacturing and use traces were
obliterated.

2. Bevelled tools
type 2-1 on tine segments: two items were made on red deer tines, by sectioning (Fig. 6/2, 3 Id 22, 23). The active end
is bifacial in both cases and was shaped by abrasion. On the proximal part, one object displays two short parallel
grooves (Fig. 6/3).

3. Receptacle (Id 24): a highly elaborated item, which could have been used as receptacle or ladle was recovered
nearby a hearth close to dwelling no. 7 (Istina 2016, p. 92). The object is made from shed red deer d antler and is
broken at one end (Fig. 6/4). In order to obtain the blank, the basal part of the antler and the curvature of the beam
was detached from the rest by cutting the beam longitudinally and removing the bez tine and part of the brow tine.
The traces left by the debitage techniques were removed during shaping. The cancellous tissue was scooped out and
the outer surface of the antler including the burr was strongly shaped by scraping (Fig. 6/4) and abrasion leaving a
smooth surface.

Figure 6. Antler objects from the Copper Age occupation: point (1), bevelled tools (2,3) and receptacle (4).
540 Andreea JERNA, Lâcrâmioara-Elena ISTINA

Undetermined:
-one item which is broken at one end and could represent a preform for the manufacturing of a large size antler axe
(Id 25, Fig. 12/1). It is made on the base of a shed antler whose burr displays rich pearling. On a narrow portion, the
edges of the burr were flattened. Traces of percussion from the detachment of the brow tine are still visible. The item
was perforated; the hole has an oval-rectangular shape.

TOOTH
The use of animal tooth as raw material in the settlement of Fulgeri? is attested by eight products
representing various stages of manufacturing, all worked on wild boar tusk. We have defined three categories of
artefacts:

1. Pendant
One item is made from the distal part portion of a tusk, by longitudinal partitioning (Id 26). The interior face
of the pendant and the proximal extremity were shaped by abrasion. A hole was drilled by rotation, from both sides,
and the striations left by the flint borer are still visible on the interior walls (Fig. 7/3).

Figure 7. Various types of products made from wild boar tusks from the Copper Age settlement:
finished products (1, 3-5), preform (3), waste (6).
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 541

2. Objects with a pointed extremity and concave edge

This type refers to objects of elongated shape, with a pointed extremity, one short concave edge and a
rounded proximal end. Two such items were identified within the assemblage. One is a finished product and was
perforated at the proximal end (Id 27, Fig. 7/1). For the second one, we could not determine if it represents a finished
object or a preform (Id 28Fig. 7/2). Both were obtained from the medial wall of the tusk. The concave edge was
fashioned on the natural curvature of the tooth, near the wear facet; on the perforated item this area was deepened
by scraping. The internal face of both objects was evened out by abrasion. The hole on the finished item was drilled
mainly from the internal side and then enlarged from the opposite one. The function of such artefacts is yet to be
understood and multiple use should not be excluded. The presence of the fastening hole on the finished product could
indicate that the item was used for display, probably as adornment. In the same time, volume modifications that could
have resulted from use were observed on the point and the curved edge (flaking on one edge and slightly rounding on
the point).

3. Elongated object
One slender item obtained from the medial or lateral wall of a tusk, displays an irregular edge which becomes
concave towards one of the ends (Id 29, Fig. 7/5). One of the extremities is slightly rounded, while the other, now
broken, was probably pointed, resembling the above-described type 2.
The irregular edge was highly shaped by scraping and the internal face of the object and the opposite edge were
evened by abrasion. The function of the artefact is unknown, as no evident traces of wear were identified on the
object.

Uncategorized
-fragment representing the end part of an object (Id 30). It is made from the medial wall of a tusk. It has one concave
edge shaped by scraping, and a triangular extremity. On the internal face it was evened by abrasion. Flaking, most
probably due to use, was observed on the extremity (Fig. 7/4).

Production wastes:
- the distal part of a tusk attests the use of grooving in longitudinal partitioning (Id 31, Fig. 7/6). The grooving was
performed on the wear facet of the tooth and went deeper into the cavity, creating a large channel that should have
reached the opposite side. As the artefact was glued during restoration, it is not sure if the division was accomplished.
- item resulted from the longitudinal partitioning of a tusk, made probably by indirect percussion. The fragment is part
of the lateral wall of the tusk (Id 32, Fig. 8/4).

Undetermined manufacturing stage:

- the distal part of a tusk, either a finished object or a preform. It is highly exfoliated on one side and it displays traces
of abrasion (Id 33, Fig. 8/3)
- fragment from an object with a pointed extremity. It was obtained by partitioning, using indirect percussion (Id 34).
Abrasion was used for evening the irregular edges resulted from the debitage operation (Fig. 8/1). The distal end was
shaped by scraping (Fig. 8/1).

2. THE BRONZE AGE ASSEMBLAGE

BONE

Points are the only morpho-functional category of objects identified within the Bronze Age assemblage. We
distinguished several types:

- type 1-1 on bone flakes (Id 35-37)

Based on the raw material, this type knows two versions: points obtained from the fracturing of long bones
and of flat bones. The former was identified on two items, made on skeletal elements from medium size mammals
(Fig. 9/3-4), while the latter, on one object only, obtained from a large ruminant rib (Fig. 9/5). All items had the distal
end fashioned by abrasion.
542 Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

-type 1-2 on long bone rod (Id 38)

One item was obtained from the long bone (proximal tibia or femur) of a medium size mammal (Fig. 9/1). It
was not possible to determine the method and the technique of debitage. The shaping was performed by abrasion
and was applied on the distal end.

- type 1-3 on long bone rod with modified proximal end (Id 39)
One item with modified proximal end was made on a rod obtained from a long bone of a large mammal (Fig. 9/2).
Though the method of debitage was not determined, we identified the use of indirect percussion as technique.

Figure 8. Various types of products made from wild boar tusks recovered from the Copper Age layer (1, 3, 4)
and from uncertain contexts (2, 5).

Abrasion was used to shape the distal end and the edges on almost the entire length. The proximal end has a
rounded aspect and displays medium size flaking (Fig. 9/2), pointing to the possible use of the implement in indirect
percussion.
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 543

Figure 9. Bone points from the Bronze Age occupation.

ANTLER
The Bronze Age occupation yielded one bevelled object made from red deer antler (Id 40). It was
manufactured from the distal part of a tine, by longitudinal partitioning. The active end is bifacial and displays a
pronounced bevel on the inner face (Fig. 10/1).

3. UNATTRIBUTED ARTIFACTS

In this category we included artefacts whose context of discovery is unknown (passim) and finds recovered
from the strata which could not be attributed with accuracy to an archaeological context.

BONE
Points
A pointed tool was made on a rod obtained from a small ruminant's long bone (Id 41, Fig. 11/1). The method
of debitage is either fracturing of partitioning. Shaping was performed by abrasion on the distal end.
544 Andreea JERNA, Lâcrâmioara-Elena ISTINA

Figure 10. Various objects made from bone (2-5) and antler (1) recovered from the Bronze Age (1) layer
and from uncertain contexts (2-5)

Bevelled tools
One implement made from a quadripartite rod from a metapodial diaphysis of a large ruminant species (Id
42). Two sequences of abrasion, one transversal and another oblique were identified on the distal part. The active end
is convex and one can observe on both faces an attempt of reshaping, by grooving Fig. 10/2).
The worked knucklebones/astragali are artefacts found within a large temporal and spatial frame. North of
the Danube, astragali were discovered both in Copper Age (Bejenaru et alii 2010; Sidéra, Vornicu 2016) and Bronze
Age contexts (Frînculeasa et alii 2011). Thus, in the absence of reliable contextual data, it is difficult to link the finds to
one of the two periods. The assemblage from Fulgeri? contains three specimens of small calibre (ID 43-45). The
archaeological context for two of them is unknown, while one item was recovered from pit 47 (Id 44). The latter
belongs to the Bronze Age occupation, but it cuts a Cucuteni dwelling, so that there is a high possibility of finds
mixture.
The knucklebones from Fulgeri? display various stages of flattening localized on different areas of the bone
(Fig. 11/3-5). Two skeletal elements come from sheep or goat (the right side limb) and one from pig (the left side
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 545

limb). The debate regarding the function of knucklebones in different cultural backgrounds is usually focused on the
utilitarian versus the symbolic value of the items (Sidéra, Vornicu 2016; Mărgărit 2017).

Modified phalanx
One proximal phalanx of cattle displays a large, oval perforation on the anterior face (Id 46, Fig. 11/2). The
hole has irregular walls and was made probably by indirect percussion. No evident use wear was identified on the
artifact. Such items are known both from Early Copper Age sites (Precucuteni-Tripolye A) and from Bronze Age sites of
Monteoru culture (Mărgărit et alii 2011). There are no reports of perforated phalanges at sites of Cucuteni A phase.
The item from Fulgeriş was found in the upper most layer of the burnt remains of house no. 7 (unspecified if among or
above them), thus an accurate attribution to one of the two occupations is not currently possible.

Figure 11. Bone objects recovered from uncertain contexts: point (1), modified phalanx (2), worked knucklebones (3-5).

Uncategorized:
- the end part of an object with thin convergent edges (Id 47, Fig. 10/5). The item was well worked and displays a
brownish colour caused by heat treatment. It was made from a rod resulted from the partitioning of a large ruminant
long bone and was shaped by multiple sequences of abrasion applied in various directions (obliquely, transversally,
and vertically). Especially the internal face corresponding to the medullary cavity of the bone was highly abraded in
order to even it out. The extremity of the artefact displays post recovery fractures. On the preserved part of the object
546 Andreea JERNA, Lacramioara-Elena ISTINA

there are no clear traces of use. Considering the unworn aspect of the technological stigma, it is quite probable that
the item was not used before discard.
- one fragment from an object with a rounded end, obtained from a flat bone (Id 48, Fig. 10/4). Several longitudinal,
disorganized striations, probably from the shaping operation were observed on one side of the item.
- fragment from an object whose distal part is missing; by the way the edges converge, we assume the item is part of a
large size point (id 49, Fig. 10/3). It was obtained by partitioning, probably in half, from the long bone of a large
ruminant species. The item shows unworn traces of abrasion (mostly transversal, but also a sequence of oblique
striations) distributed on almost the entire length, with a higher intensity on the internal face and on the edges. The
object was burnt and has a black colour with brownish spots.

ANTLER
We identified a punch tool/retoucher obtained from the distal segment of a red deer tine (Id 50). It displays
oblique striations of abrasion towards the active end. The apex has a flat shape and a crushed aspect (Fig. 12/2). On
the proximal end there are traces of animal gnawing.
Another artefact from an unknown archaeological context is an adze-like object, for which we could not
determine with accuracy the manufacturing stage (Id 51, Fig. 12/3). The object preserves unworn traces of
manufacturing and an active end with volume modifications of unknown origin. It was manufactured from the basal
part of a shed red deer antler. The brow and the bez tines were removed and the area between them was perforated
in order to be hafted. The hole was made by percussion; the traces associated with this technique are well preserved
on the walls of the perforation. The distal part was shaped by longitudinally removing part of the beam by percussion.
The active end displays rounding and large size flaking.

Figure 12. Antler objects recovered from the Copper Age layer (1) and from uncertain contexts (2-3).
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 547

WILD BOAR TUSK

Two items could not be attributed to any of the two habitations:

- one preform was obtained from the lateral side of a wild boar tusk, by grooving (Id 52, Fig. 8/2). The distal part is
pointed and one of the edges is concave, resembling the Copper Age objects described above (objects with a pointed
extremity and concave edge). Abrasion was used to even out the edges and the internal face. Close to the extremity,
on the internal face, a perforation by rotation was started but was abandoned before reaching the end.
- one waste piece, resulted from the longitudinal partitioning of the tusk by indirect percussion (Id 53, Fig. 8/5).

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

The small size of the assemblage does not allow a detailed characterization of the manufacturing process.
Still, one can recover important information regarding the technological behaviour of the community, especially for
the Copper Age habitation.

THE COPPER AGE ASSEMBLAGE

Following the trend observed at other Cucuteni sites (Mantu et alii 1995; Bodi 2010; Jurcanu, Bejenaru 2012;
Vornicu 2014) the manufacturing process revolves around the exploitation of bones, while tusk and antler represent
raw materials of secondary importance. However, it is worth mentioning that, compared to other sites of the same
period, at Fulgeris, the objects made from tusk are better represented.
Long bones are by far the favourite skeletal elements and were used for producing various categories of
implements. Flat bones were occasionally employed and when so, for the manufacturing of points.
In close connection to the desired calibre of the final product, the craftsmen acquired bones from small ruminants,
middle size mammals and large ruminants (Table 4). For the manufacturing of points, the first two categories are more
frequent and when large ruminant bones were chosen, then a schema of fabrication that produced thinner blanks was
employed, i.e. quadri-partitioning. To the contrary, bevelled tools are made on large size blanks. The identification of
animal species was possible only for a small number of artefacts, thus no conclusions can be drawn on the preferences
of the community for domestic versus wild animal resources.
As regards the methods of bone blank production, the ratio between them is quite equilibrated, though one
can observe a slightly predominance of fracturing (Table 4). Quadri-and bi-partitioning were employed exclusively for
the manufacturing of points. The oblique sectioning, which is a method that started to be used in the Cucuteni-
Tripolye milieu only from the half of the 5th millennium BC (the Cucuteni A phase) was used in the production of points
and bevelled tools.
Blanks that preserve the entire volume of the raw material block, which are the results of transversal
sectioning were used for producing the entire assemblage of tine-based implements. Only for the manufacturing of
the antler recipient, a more elaborated schema of debitage which combines different procedures was employed.
The production of objects from wild boar tusk was based on the exploitation of rods. The medial wall of the
tusk was preferred for manufacturing, as its wide and regular shape could have been considered an advantage over
the opposite wall, which is naturally more sinuous.
As regards the techniques used in the debitage operation for the three raw material categories, one can
observe the clear predominance of percussion techniques over cutting techniques (Table 4). The latter were identified
only on bone points obtained by partitioning and on two items made of tusk.
548 Andreea ŢERNA, Lăcrămioara-Elena ISTINA

D e b itage S h a p in g
Ske le tal Bone A n im al
Perio d No. T y p e o f b lan k
elem e n t o rie n tatio n sp e cie s/ca te g o ry M e th od T e ch n iq u e T e ch n iq u e

rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis large ruminants fracturing percussion abrasion
1 flake
rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis cattle fracturing percussion abrasion
2 flake
middle size rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis fracturing percussion abrasion
3 mammal flake
middle size rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis fracturing percussion abrasion
4 mammal flake
rod-shaped
undetermined undetermined undetermined fracturing percussion abrasion
5 flake
rod-shaped
flat bone body large ruminants fracturing percussion abrasion
6 flake
7 fibula distal wild boar segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
oblique
humerus distal dog (prob.) segment undetermined abrasion
8 sectioning
9 metatarsal distal small ruminants bipartite rod bi-partitioning grooving/sawing abrasion
indirect
metatarsal proximal goat bipartite rod bi-partitioning abrasion
10 percussion
quadripartite quadri-
metapodial proximal large ruminants grooving/sawing abrasion
11 rod partitioning
quadripartite quadri-
metapodial diaphysis large ruminants grooving/sawing abrasion
12 rod partitioning
13 metapodial diaphysis small ruminants rod partitioning undetermined abrasion
oblique
long bone diaphysis undetermined segment undetermined abrasion
14 sectioning
middle size
long bone diaphysis rod undetermined percussion abrasion
15 mammal
Copper Age

long bone diaphysis undetermined undetermined undetermined undetermined abrasion

16
17 long bone diaphysis large ruminants rod undetermined percussion abrasion
oblique
humerus diaphysis large ruminants segment undetermined abrasion
18 sectioning
19 ulna (prob.) diaphysis undetermined segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
20 fibula diaphysis pig/wild boar segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
21 tine distal red deer segment sectioning undetermined
22 tine distal red deer segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
23 tine distal red deer segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
scraping,
basal part red deer segment sectioning undetermined abrasion,
24 percussion
25 basal part red deer segment sectioning percussion undetermined
abrasion,
multiple
tusk distal wild boar rod undetermined drilling by
partitioning
26 rotation
scraping,
distal, medial
tusk wild boar bipartite rod bi-partitioning undetermined abrasion,drilling
wall
27 by rotation
distal, medial abrasion,
tusk wild boar bipartite rod bi-partitioning undetermined
28 wall scraping
multiple abrasion,
tusk distal (prob.) wild boar rod undetermined
29 partitioning scraping
distal, medial abrasion,
tusk wild boar bipartite rod bi-partitioning grooving/sawing
30 wall scraping
31 tusk distal wild boar bipartite rod bi-partitioning grooving/sawing not the case
indirect
tusk lateral wall wild boar bipartite rod bi-partitioning not the case
32 percussion
abrasion,
tusk distal wild boar segment sectioning undetermined
33 scarping
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 549

indirect
tusk undetermined wild boar rod partitioning abrasion
34 percussion
middle size rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis fracturing percussion abrasion
35 mammal flake
middle size rod-shaped
long bone diaphysis fracturing percussion abrasion
36 mammal flake
Bronze Age

rod-shaped
rib body large ruminants fracturing percussion
37 flake
middle size
tibia/femur metaphysis rod undetermined undetermined abrasion
38 mammal
39 long bone diaphysis large ruminants rod undetermined percussion abrasion
indirect
tine distal red deer rod bi-partitioning
40 percussion
middle size
long bone diaphysis rod undetermined percussion abrasion
41 mammal
quadripartite quadri- indirect
metapodial diaphysis large ruminants abrasion
42 rod partitioning percussion
43 knucklebone entire sheep/goat not the case not the case not the case undetermined
44 knucklebone entire small ruminants not the case not the case not the case undetermined
45 knucklebone entire pig/wild boar not the case not the case not the case undetermined

perforation by
Unattributed finds

phalanx entire cattle not the case not the case not the case
percusssion
46
scraping,
long bone diaphysis large ruminants rod partitioning undetermined
47 abrasion

flat bone undetermined undetermined segment undetermined undetermined undetermined

48
49 long bone diaphysis large ruminants bipartite rod bi-partitioning grooving/sawing abrasion
50 tine distal red deer segment sectioning undetermined abrasion
percussion,
basal part red deer segment sectioning percussion
51 drilling
distal, lateral
tusk wild boar rod partitioning grooving/sawing abrasion
52 wall
distal, medial indirect
tusk wild boar rod partitioning not the case
53 wall percussion

Table 4. Summary table with the manufacturing parameters for the studied assemblage.

The assemblage contains mainly unelaborated shapes, which result from the blank production sequence of
the chaîne opératoire. That means that the shaping operation was usually limited to the fashioning of the active part,
with little or no impact on the rest of the object (Table 4). This is a trait observed also in other contemporary and
earlier Cucuteni-Tripolye sites (Dumitrescu et alii 1954; Mantu et alii 1995; Bodi 2010; Jurcanu, Bejenaru 2012;
Vornicu 2014; Lazarovici, Babes 2015). Abrasion was the main technique used. Sometimes, it was combined with
scraping or percussion techniques (Table 4).
A higher investment in the shaping procedures is seen in the manufacturing of boar tusks objects, which
could have been used for display; another case is the antler receptacle. The latter is part of a series of products that
appear for a short sequence of time, at the end of the Cucuteni A phase, i.e. Cucuteni A3 and A4 subphases (Bolomey,
Marinescu-Bîlcu 2000). Together with the bone spoons, found mainly in the A4 subphase (Bolomey, Marinescu-Bîlcu
2000), they represent for this area the only examples of highly elaborated bone and antler products until
approximately the middle of the 4th millennium BC when the bone daggers and the large antler axes appear.
In terms of morpho-functional categories, the structure of the assemblage does not differ from other contemporary
sites and it contains mainly domestic equipment. In the case of bone, points make up the majority of finds and show
the highest morpho-technological variation. Bevelled tools come second in importance, followed by the spatula-like
category which is (represented by one specimen only). The latter is a specific type that occurs in the Cucuteni-Tripolye
milieu at the middle of the 5th millennium BC and beside Fulgeris, similar specimens are known from the
contemporary settlement of Hoisesti - La Pod (Bodi 2010, 118, pl. 39/1) and from the later site of Draguseni - Ostrov,
where a more elaborated version was found (Bolomey, Marinescu-Bîlcu 2000, 74, fig. 51/15).
550 Andreea ŢERNA, Lăcrămioara-Elena ISTINA

As regards antler, only five items have been attributed with certainty to the Cucuteni occupation, but, the
adze-like object and the punch tool, whose archaeological context are not known could have also been part of the tool
kit of the Copper Age community.
Unlike bone and antler, wild boar tusks were employed also for the production of adornments or items used
for display, a choice rather related to the aesthetics than to the structural and morphological qualities of the raw
material.
The insights gained into the technological behaviour of the Copper Age community from Fulgeris allowed us
to observe that the behaviour of the community towards the technological exploitation of osseous materials is similar
to that observed at other contemporary sites in the region east of the Carpathians. The correlation is visible mainly in
the inventory of methods and techniques used in the debitage and shaping operations.

THE BRONZE AGE ASSEMBLAGE

Accounting only six artefacts, the Bronze Age assemblage comprises objects made almost exclusively from
bones. Though the collection cannot be considered representative due to its small size, it still can offer an insight into
the methods and techniques used in the manufacturing process.
All bone items fall into the category of points and one can differentiate various morpho-technological types.
Except one item obtained from a flat bone, all others were made from rods or flakes of long bones. Percussion
techniques (direct and indirect percussion) were used in all cases.
As for the antler artefact, the longitudinal partitioning method was used for the manufacturing of a bevelled tool.
Similar to the bone inventory, percussion techniques were preferred for performing the débitage operation.
For the Bronze Age habitation, the available data does not allow a wider comparative approach. An interesting aspect
that should be mentioned in this context is that the assemblage is composed only from domestic equipment of which
any form of elaborated products is lacking.
Overall, despite the small size of the assemblage, the combined technological and morpho-functional
approach proves to be a valuable tool for characterizing the strategies of osseous materials exploitation in various
chrono-cultural contexts. Further investigations into the site will hopefully enlarge the assemblage of worked osseous
materials and will enable a more detailed insight into the production strategies during the different occupation
periods of the Fulgeris site.

REFERENCES

Asăndulesei et alii - A. Asăndulesei, L. Istina, V. Cotiugă, F. A. Tencariu, Ş. Caliniuc, R. Balaur, A. P. Creţu, C. Nicu, B. Venedict, Cesium magnetometer
survey in the Cucuteni settlement o f Fulgeriş-La trei cireşi, Bacău County, Romania, Romanian Reports in Physics 64(3), 2012, p. 878-890.
Averbouh 2000 - A. Averbouh, Technologie de la matière osseuse travaillée et implications paléotechnologiques. L'exemple des chaînes
d'exploitation du bois de cervidés chez les Magdaléniens des Pyrénées, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2000.
Artimon et alii 2004 - A. Artimon, L. E. Istina, M. A. Istina, I. David, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct Dealul Fulgeriş/ La 3 cireşi, CCA,
Campania 2003, Cluj-Napoca, 2004, p. 124-125.
Bejenaru et alii 2010 - L. Bejenaru, D. Monah, G. Bodi, A Deposit o f Astragali at the Cooper Age Tell o f Poduri-Dealul Ghindaru, Romania, Antiquity
84 (323), URL: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/bejenaru323.
Bodi 2010 - G. Bodi, Hoiseşti - La Pod. O aşezare cucuteniană pe Valea Bahluiului, Iaşi, 2010.
Bolomey, Marinescu-Bîlcu 2000 - A. Bolomey, S. Marinescu-Bîlcu, The Bone and Antler Industry, in: S. Marinescu-Bîlcu, A. Bolomey (Eds.),
Drăguşeni: a Cucutenian Community, Bucureşti, Tübingen, 2000, p. 63-90.
Căpitanu 1982 - V. Căpitanu, Cercetări arheologice de suprafaţă pe teritoriul judeţului Bacău (II), Carpica 14, 1982, p. 139-158.
Căpitanu 1996 - V. Căpitanu, Raport de săpătură Fulgeriş (jud. Bacău), in: Situri arheologice cercetate în perioada 1983-1992, Brăila, 1996, p. 108.
Dumitrescu et alii 1954 - V. Dumitrescu, H. Dumitrescu, M. Petrescu-DImboviţa, Hăbăşeşti, monografie arheologică, Bucureşti, 1954.
Frînculeasa et alii 2011 - A. Frînculeasa, A. Soficaru, O. Negrea, M. Mărgărit, M. Frînculeasa, B. Preda, C. David, Cimitirul din epoca bronzului de la
Câmpina (jud. Prahova), SP 8, 2011, p. 139-181.
Istina 2005 - L. E. Istina, Observaţii privind cercetările arheologice în situl cucutenian de la Fulgeriş, jud. Bacău. Campania 2004, Carpica 34, 2005,
p. 55-74.
Isitina 2016 - L. E. Istina, Aşezarea cucuteniană de la Fulgeriş. Catalogul descoperirilor arheologice, Oneşti, 2016.
Istina, Bucşă 2012 - L. E. Istina, V. Bucşă, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct: Dealul Fulgeriş/La 3 cireşi, CCA, Campania 2011, Târgu Mureş,
2012, p. 117.
Istina, Bucşă 2015 - L. E. Istina, V. Bucşă, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct: Dealul Fulgeriş/La 3 cireşi, CCA, Campania 2014, Piteşti, 2015,
p. 200-202.
Istina et alii 2005 - L. E. Istina, F. A. Tencariu, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct Dealul Fulgeriş/ La 3 cireşi, CCA, Campania 2004, Mangalia,
2005, p. 152-153.
 A first insight into the production of bone, antler and tooth objects at the Copper and Bronze Age site of Fulgeriş - La trei cireşi 551

Istina et alii 2007 - L. E. Istina, O. D. Boldur, D. David, L. Ursachi, C. S. Munteanu, M. O. Ghiur, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct Dealul
Fulgeriş/La 3 cireşi, CCA, Campania 2006, Tulcea, 2007, p. 158-160.
Istina et alii 2008 - L. E. Istina, D. David, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct Dealul Fulgeriş/La trei cireşi, CCA, Campania 2007, Iaşi, 2008,
p. 139-141.
Istina et alii 2009 - L. E. Istina, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct: Dealul Fulgeriş/La 3 cireşi, CCA, Campania 2008, Târgovişte, 2009, p. 301­
303.
Istina et alii 2013 - L. E. Istina, V. Bucşă (CMIA Bacău), S. Gania, F. A. Tencariu, Fulgeriş, com. Pânceşti, jud. Bacău, Punct: Dealul Fulgeriş/La 3 cireşi,
CCA, Campania 2012, Craiova, 2013, p. 162-163.
Lazarovici, Babeş 2015 - C. M. Lazarovici, M. Babeş, Poieneşti - Aşezări preistorice, Suceava, 2015.
Legrand 2007 - A. Legrand, Fabrication et utilisation de l'outillage en matières osseuses du Néolithique de Chypre : Khirokitia et Cap Andreas-
Kastros, BARIntSer 1678, Oxford, 2007.
Legrand, Sidéra 2007 - A. Legrand, I. Sidéra, Methods, means, and results when studying European bone industry, in: C. Gate, R. Walker (eds.),
Bones as Tools: Current Methods and Interpretations in Worked Bone Studies, BARIntSer 1622, Oxford, 2007, p. 291-304.
Mantu et alii 1995 - C. M. Mantu, M. Ştirbu, N. Buzgar, Consideraţii privind obiectele din piatră, os şi corn de cerb din aşezarea cucuteniană de la
Scânteia (1985-1990), ArhMold 18, 1995, p. 115-132.
Mărgărit 2017 - M. Mărgărit, Spatulas and abraded astragalus: Two types o f tools used to process ceramics? Examples from the Romanian
prehistory, Quaternary International 438, 2017, p. 201-211.
Mărgărit et alii 2011 - M. Mărgărit, M. Constantinescu, V. Dumitraşcu, A. Bălăşescu, Obiecte din materii dure animale din aşezarea de epoca
bronzului de la Năeni-Zănoaga Cetatea 2 (jud. Buzău), Peuce 9, 2011, p. 15-54.
Mischka C. et alii 2016 - C. Mischka, Doris Mischka, A. Rubel, Geomagnetic survey o f Cucuteni-settlements in Modova - results o f the FAU -
campaign 2015, ArhMold 39, 2016, p. 339-341.
Peltier, Plisson 1986 - A. Peltier, H. Plisson, Microtracéologie fonctionnelle sur l'os, quelques résultats expérimentaux, in: Outillage peu élaboré en os
et en bois de cervidés II (Artefact 3), 3ème réunion du groupe de travail numéro 1 sur l'industrie de l'os préhistorique, Viroinval, 1986,
p. 69-80.
Sidéra 1993 - I. Sidéra, Les assemblages osseux en bassin parisien et rhénan du VIe au IVe millénaire B.C. Histoire, techno-économie et culture, Ph.D.
thesis, Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, 1993.
Sidéra, Vornicu 2016 - I. Sidéra, A. Vornicu, The Archaeology Of Games. Playing with Knucklebones in the Early Chalcolithic o f the Balkans, in:
K. Bacvarov, R. Gleser, Southeast Europe and Anatolia in prehistory. Essay in honor o f Vassil Nikolov on his 65th anniversary, Bonn, p. 379­
388.
Ţurcanu, Bejenaru 2012 - S. Ţurcanu, L. Bejenaru, Industria materiilor dure animale, in: Lazarovici, C.-M., Lazarovici, G, Ruginoasa - Dealul Drăghici.
Monografie arheologică, Suceava, 2012, p. 173-190.
Vornicu 2014 - A. Vornicu, Analiza preliminară a artefactelor din materii dure de origine animală din situl de la Costeşti, in: D. Boghian, S. C. Enea,
S. Ignătescu, L. Bejenaru, S. Stanc (Eds.), Comunităţile cucuteniene din zona Târgu Frumos. Cercetări interdisciplinare în siturile Costeşti şi
Giurgeşti, Iaşi, 2014, p 51-61.

View publication stats