Advanced Methodology For Language Teaching - Course Outline
Advanced Methodology For Language Teaching - Course Outline
GRADUATE SCHOOL
------------
COURSE OUTLINE
I. General information
1. Course title: ADVANCED METHODOLOGY FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING
2. Course Code: ENG701
3. Knowledge / Skills:
Foundation Professional knowledge ☐ Basic knowledge
4. Credits
Total Theory Practice Self – study
3 3 0 6
5. Trimester: 1 ☐2 ☐3
6. Academic year: 2021-2022
7. Mode of delivery:
8. Language of instruction: English
9. Lecturer
Name: Do Thi Hoai Thu, Ph.D
Office: Room 113, 97 Vo Văn Tan Street, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: +84-28-3909952382
1
2. Requirement course
Prerequisites: None
Prior-course: Theories of language learning and teaching
Co-requisites: None
3. Course objectives
Program
Course
Description learning
objectives
outcomes
Knowledge
Develop an understanding of the key concepts and
CO1 terminology in the field of language teaching ELO1.1
methodology
Achieve important insights into the different
CO2 teaching approaches/ methods, learning and teaching ELO1.1
of the language skills in different teaching contexts
Skills
Design optimal learning activities that engage
CO3 learners through integrating content, language and ELO2.1
culture
Incorporate key methodological principles
CO4 associated with the various teaching approaches into ELO2.3
lesson planning
Sefl-reflection and responsibility
Develop a range of effective workplace skills
CO5 including problem-solving, team work, presentation ELO7.1, ELO7.3
and self-study
2
Course
Course learning outcomes
objectives
CLO6 Design learning activities for receptive skills
CLO7 Design learning activities for productive skills
CO4 CLO8 Plan a lesson properly and appropriately
CO5 CLO9 Present effectively
CLO10 Self-study effectively
The matrix integrates the learning outcomes of the course (CLO) and the learning
outcomes of the curriculum (ELO).
ELO1 ELO2 ELO3 ELO4 ELO5 ELO6 ELO7
CLO1 X
CLO2 X
CLO3 X
CLO4 X
CLO5 X
CLO6 X
CLO7 X
CLO8 X
CLO9 X
CLO10 X
5.1. References
Carter, R. & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to
speakers of other languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Harmer, J. (2007b). How to teach English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
3
Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction.
New York: Routledge.
Prabhu, N.S. (1990). There is no best method – why? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 2, 161-176.
Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching:
An Anthology of current practice. Cambridge: CUP.
Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching.
(2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
6. Assessment
Schedule Learning Percentage
Components Assessment forms
outcomes %
6.1 Class participation , During the vd: CLO1, 3 10%
discussion and course
presentation
6.2 Personal reflection on Week 6
Mid-term
approaches and 20%
test(s)
methods
6.3 Demonstration of Week 10
techniques (Lesson 20%
plan)
Week 13
Final test 6.4 Final Project: Report 50%
Total 100%
4
7. Course contents
5
Session Content Course Materials and references
learning
outcomes
6
Session Content Course Materials and references
learning
outcomes
8. Course regulations
8.1 Class participation and presentation:
- Class attendance is mandatory. If students fail to attend more than 03 class
sessions, they are not eligible for the final project.
- Class presentations will be assigned by the instructor in particular class sessions.
8.2 Demonstration of techniques
- Students demonstrate their understanding and ability of using various teaching
techniques for language areas and skills after learning about them in class.
- This is an individual task and will be done right after the introduction of teaching
techniques in relevant sessions.
- There will be some discussion and guidance on this task in class.
7
❖ Assessment criteria for lesson plan
TOTAL 20%
TOTAL 20%
8
- Analyse and comment on how this research area can be applied to your teaching
- Conclude your findings with a synthesis on the trends, pedagogical implications,
and gaps in the reviewed articles
TOTAL 50%