ASSIGNMENT: AN IN-DEPTH

ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIC

ROADMAP FOR ADAPTIVE
LEADERSHIP
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 2

Executive Summary
Condensing a thorough evaluation of the supplied case study, the executive summary offers a
high-level overview of the difficulties encountered and solutions proposed. The research
reveals geopolitical changes, problems, and the assignment's goal after a brief overview of
the context. Internal and external elements are examined in a situational evaluation using
SWOT and PESTO assessments. By identifying significant problems and investigating their
origins, the study establishes connections between issues and various leadership theories.

Assessments of leadership philosophies and critical thinking techniques examine how healthy
methods work. Hypothetical situations and different ways of leading are investigated in the
"what-if" examination. The five strategic suggestions are based on a pros and cons study that
weighed the benefits and downsides. These include building cultural awareness, investing in
adaptive leadership training, improving collaborative information sharing, coordinating
military operations strategically, and supporting inclusive decision-making. The executive
summary lays forth a plan for resilient, adaptable, and culturally sensitive leadership to tackle
the complicated problems posed by the current geopolitical climate.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary...............................................................................................................................2

1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................3

1.1 Background of the Case Study...................................................................................................3

1.2 Purpose of the Assignment..........................................................................................................4

1.3 Overview of the Analytical Approach........................................................................................4

2. Situational Assessment......................................................................................................................5

2.1 External Environmental Factors................................................................................................5

2.2 Internal Environmental Factors.................................................................................................5

2.3 SWOT Analysis............................................................................................................................6

3. Environmental Analysis (PESTO Analysis).....................................................................................7

4. Issue Identification and Analysis......................................................................................................9

4.1 Recognizing Key Challenges.......................................................................................................9

4.2 Explaining the Root Causes........................................................................................................9

4.3 Relating Issues to Leadership Concepts..................................................................................10

4.3.1 Transformational Leadership in Geopolitical Shifts.......................................................10

4.3.2 Distributive Leadership for Resource Allocation:...........................................................11

4.3.3 Adaptive Leadership in Hybrid Threat Environments...................................................12

5. Leadership Styles and Concepts.....................................................................................................13

5.1 Overview of Leadership Approaches.......................................................................................13

5.2 Identification of Leadership Styles in the Case.......................................................................14

5.3 Evaluation of Leadership Methods Used.................................................................................15

6. Critical Thinking Evaluation..........................................................................................................16

6.1 Assessment of the Suitability of Leadership Approaches.......................................................16

6.2 Correct Application of Leadership Concepts..............................................................................16

6.3 Adequacy of Leadership Strategies..........................................................................................17

6.3.1 Strategic Alignment with Objectives.................................................................................18

6.3.2 Adaptability and Flexibility...............................................................................................18

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 4

6.3.3 Collaboration and Inclusivity............................................................................................18

6.3.4 Risk Mitigation....................................................................................................................19

7. What-if Analysis...............................................................................................................................19

7.1 Scenarios and Implications.......................................................................................................19

7.2 Consideration of Alternate Leadership Approaches..............................................................20

7.3 Analysis of Potential Outcomes................................................................................................20

8. Pros and Cons Analysis...................................................................................................................22

8.1 Positive Aspects of Current Approaches..................................................................................22

8.2 Drawbacks of Current Leadership Strategies.........................................................................22

9. Recommendations............................................................................................................................23

10. Future Action Points......................................................................................................................24

10.1 Formulation of Specific Measures..........................................................................................24

10.2 Benefits Associated with Proposed Plan................................................................................25

11. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................25

References.............................................................................................................................................26
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 5

1. Introduction

1.1 Background of the Case Study

The subject of this case study is on Admirals James Stavridis as North Atlantic Treaty
Organization's Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR). CEOs faced from 2009 to
2013 with strategic decision-making inside a political climate that was highly specialized.
(Harvard Business Review, n.d.). Stavridis has acted as a key player in the context of the
primary international exercises NATO has implemented. The two main frameworks for
analysis were the Afghanistan NATO campaign's evolving security background and rather
complicated geopolitical factors found in the region. Steering across the difficult coastline
required a skill of maintaining a fine balance among the allies' members states' contribution
and common goals and objectives.

Amidst the backdrop of geopolitics following 9/11, the case study unfolds as the world
grapples with the repercussions of devastating terrorist attacks. A pivotal role for NATO in
the collective reaction to new threats caused a dramatic shift in the international security
environment. International cooperation, particularly within NATO, played a crucial role in
addressing complex issues such as the Afghanistan mission following the 9/11 attacks
(Harvard Business Review, n.d.).

The US, a substantial NATO member at that time, had to argue over the mission in
Afghanistan to reach the balance. This showed that it was a very subtle matter. All these
elements encompass security issues, alliances politics and obligations of a collective defence,
which are, generally, more complex. The focus of this case reflects on the Admiral Stavridis's
leadership era with a specific consideration of the complex geopolitical situation as well as
highlighting a fact that the success was largely dependent on flexibility and tactical ingenuity
of the leadership. This is well within the intelligence-sharing system of NATO, especially the
Five Eyes Agreement, which unites US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, in a united
intelligence organization. Harvard Business Review (No date) indicates that Stavridis had
some difficulties related to the flow of information and underscores how important the
alliance partners are.

In the case study, the NATO alliance faced intricate challenges amid evolving global
dynamics. Encouraging member states to provide many soldiers to the International Security
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 6

Assistance Force (ISAF) operation in Afghanistan was a significant challenge. The Afghan
war was quite complex, with various viewpoints within the alliance leading to substantial
obstacles (Harvard Business Review, n.d.). This case also emphasizes the challenges of
sharing information across different levels of an alliance. Managing the transmission of secret
information among NATO members was challenging due to the various levels based on
historical ties and geopolitical concerns (Harvard Business Review, n.d.). Enhancing the
intelligence unit's abilities to navigate these challenges was a complex endeavour that
Admiral Stavridis grappled with, emphasizing the significance of persuasive methods and
thorough preparation.

As in the case with the operational acts, also the creation of a united system among NATO
members who wish to pursue their own agendas and have different viewpoints was just as
brave venture. While examining the level of leadership in the diplomatic and military context,
this instance demonstrates the need to fine-tune the balance between the two for the sake of
success. In a time of a clear strategic turn in international relations, Admirael Stavridis's
strategic actions influenced how NATO could reorganize to the new reality.

1.2 Purpose of the Assignment

This paper aims to analyse a specific example in depth, considering the strategic and
operational challenges encountered by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
alliance. This project will help improve your analytical and critical thinking skills by
applying what you've learned in the classroom. This project allows students to improve their
management and leadership skills by exploring the challenges faced by the NATO alliance.

The overarching goal is for students to adopt the perspective of management consultants to
evaluate the internal and external environments of the partnership objectively. We look at
their ideologies, tactics, and methods to help students evaluate the efficacy of the alliance's
leadership. Using "what-if" analysis, students are to consider several approaches and best-
practice strategies that may apply to this scenario as part of the assignment.

Furthermore, students are urged to pinpoint the underlying causes of issues rather than
address the symptoms and develop solutions based on their observations. This task
encourages a more personal approach by outlining five possible courses of action for the
future and highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each. The overarching goal is to
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 7

help students integrate theoretical understanding with practical insights to handle complex
organizational difficulties better when they enter the workforce.

1.3 Overview of the Analytical Approach

To tackle this study, a multi-pronged strategy will be used to understand the complex
problems that the NATO alliance is facing. A thorough SWOT analysis, which takes stock of
both internal and external factors, is used to kick off the investigation. This lays the
groundwork for comprehending the alliance's present situation.

The next task is to investigate the PECO situation of NATO, which is the analysis of NATO
via the political, economic, social, technical, and operational conditions. A study that will
integrate "What If" will seek to examine several scenarios, thus thorough enumeration of
outcomes where various conditions are involved.

Focusing on the NATO alliance's leadership landscape, this article will dissect the ideas,
styles, and practices of leadership that are common in this setting. The effectiveness of these
methods, which are connected to what students have learned in class, will be determined by a
critical evaluation.

In addition, this study will show both the good and bad sides of the suggestions. We'll make
sure to explain the main findings clearly and simply in the summary. By the end of it, you'll
see five smart ideas that could really help NATO stand strong through tough times. We're
making the whole case study easier to understand for everyone.

2. Situational Assessment

2.1 External Environmental Factors

Geopolitical, economic, technical, and security issues are all external forces that shape the
alliance's dynamics.

 Geopolitical Landscape
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 8

NATO operates in a world where geopolitical upheavals are constant and unpredictable.
According to Fries et al. (2021), the alliance is significantly impacted by changes in global
politics, local conflicts, and the dynamics between solid states. Consider the Middle East's
complex dynamics and Russia's growing aggressiveness in Eastern Europe; both pose severe
threats to NATO's collective security objectives.

 Economic Considerations

How much money member nations are willing to put into the military and collective security
depends heavily on how their economy is doing. National budgets may be strained during
economic downturns, which might result in reduced spending on military. Additionally, when
nations' economies are booming, NATO's missions and capacities may be greatly enhanced
(Specchia et al., 2021). Understanding the alliance's financial health and ability to ride out
economic storms requires looking at each member's financial situation.

 Technological Dynamics

NATO needs to adjust to incorporate new military technology quickly. Utilizing advanced
technologies such as AI, cyber capabilities, and weaponry is crucial to outperform
adversaries. Cybercrimes are constantly evolving. There is a need for enhancement in
NATO's cyber defences and collaboration, as highlighted by Alblooshi et al. (2021).

 Security Landscape

Along with traditional military threats, NATO must also contend with cybercrime and
international terrorism. Adapting to both traditional and emerging forms of conflict requires
constant vigilance and the development of novel defensive strategies (Sussa & Rocha, 2019).

2.2 Internal Environmental Factors

Being well-versed in NATO's inner workings is essential for enhancing the organization's
capacity to handle external threats. Huertas-Valdivia et al. (2019) suggest that to understand
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 9

the internal environment, one must examine the decision-making procedures, organisational
structures, and cooperative endeavours of the member states.

 Organizational Structures

The responsiveness of NATO is greatly affected by the several committees, commands, and
agencies that make up the organization's structure. Group projects go more smoothly when
everyone is on the same page and the decision-making procedure is well-defined (Abasilim et
al., 2019). In response to new and different threats, NATO has reorganised to be more flexible
and efficient.

 Member Nations' Commitment

NATO is only as strong as the commitment and cooperation of its member states. Disparities
in the political will, military might, and defence spending of the member nations may impact
the alliance's long-term viability, say Kelly and MacDonald (2019). When individuals are
motivated to create a positive impact and fulfil their responsibilities, collaboration and
cohesiveness are improved.

 Interoperability and Integration

To maintain the strength of the alliance, it is crucial that the armed forces of the member
states work together. The coalition's defence capabilities are amplified when its many armed
forces coordinate their efforts effectively. Factors influencing interoperability include
standardizing procedures, engaging in collaborative training activities, and establishing
common doctrines (Kalkan et al., 2020). By prioritizing these internal factors, NATO can
enhance its ability to address security issues in a more unified manner.

 Decision-Making Processes

To understand NATO's readiness to confront new threats, it is crucial to grasp the decision-
making process within the alliance. It is essential to find a middle ground between acting
quickly and coming to an agreement during urgent security scenarios (Saleem et al., 2020).
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 10

Examining how the alliance makes decisions can provide insights into its resilience and
adaptability.

2.3 SWOT Analysis

Strengths

1. Collective Defense Mechanism: Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty establishes the
collective defence system, which is the fundamental strength of NATO. This
dedication promotes solidarity and discourages harm by making it clear that any
assault on one member is an assault on all (Gemeda & Lee, 2020).

2. Intelligence Sharing (Five Eyes): The Five Eyes agreement, which originated in
WWII, offers NATO nations, mainly the United States, a structure for sharing
information considered to be of the highest quality and level. Thanks to this
partnership, the alliance can better assess its environment and implement its
strategies.

Weaknesses

1. Divergent Defense Budgets: Variances in military capabilities and commitments

stem from variations in defense spending among member states. These distinctions
suggest that the alliance would benefit some help responding consistently to emerging
security challenges (Atasoy, 2020).

2. Internal Cohesion Challenges: When NATO members have divergent goals and
levels of commitment, it becomes difficult to maintain unity. During a crisis, internal
conflicts can impede swift and cohesive decision-making.

Opportunities

1. Global Partnerships: One way, to achieve the common securitization, would be that
the members of NATO help build a global community by intertwining of forces closer
that would not include the non-NATO nations. Per research conducted by Mwesigwa
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 11

and team (2020), colloborations produce better outcomes through the work of people
combined.

2. Technological Advancements: The security community of the North Atlantic Treaty

Organization is looking into cyber defence and more effective monitoring systems as
some of their recent ideas. To win over the opponents who go fast, creating a novelty
in technology will be vital.

Threats

1. Regional Conflicts: The NATO's mission is called into question in every new crisis
in the region, when the alliance should deal with not only the direct challenges, but
also with the multilayered international circumstances that may spill over the borders.

2. Unconventional Threats: Cyber-hacking, info-wars and new-wave propaganda are

emerging dangers the allied NATO countries must address. It is apparent that as the
security environment changes, the UN must also evolve to deal with existing and new
challenges while preserving the alliance’s relevance.

3. Environmental Analysis (PESTO Analysis)

Table 1: PESTO Analysis

Factor Description
Political Concerning the current political context, NATO's operational approaches
are at the mercy of most of the prevailing turbulences. As stated by Khan
et al. (2020) the principle of keeping diplomatic ties with member states
and other external bodies is of great importance for an alliance keeping
stability and being successful. The advent of internal changes in the
members of the alliance can mean political decisions made inside the
country, as well as shifts in leadership or foreign policy, which may affect
the alliance's strategic direction. The exact effectiveness of collective
security moves adopted by NATO and the international community
depends, however, on the way political disputes are resolved within
NATO and internationally (Pishgooie et al., 2019). When faced with
geopolitical threats requiring a collective response, the ability to navigate
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 12

political intricacies is essential for preserving unity and cohesion among

NATO members.

Economical NATO's ability to have good defense depends a lot on how much money it
has. The amount of money a country spends on defence and helps with
collective security depends on how well off they are economically. The
power of NATO could be impacted by changes in military spending
during economic tough times or instability (Rabiul & Yean, 2021).
Working together on defence projects can be good and bad because the
countries involved are linked economically. Peacekeeping operations and
the development of new technologies also consume resources, which are
considered economic issues. We need to grasp the actual composition of
NATO's economy to comprehend how the alliance deals with financial
issues and adjusts to various security scenarios (Berraies & Zine El
Abidine, 2019).
Social NATO's social components—cultural, demographic, and sociological—
influence member nations' military policy and collaboration. Ohunakin et
al. (2019) considered public opinion on defence spending, society
perspectives on foreign interventions, and social trends on military
recruitment. According to Asgari et al. (2020), societal variables influence
member country people' views on NATO and their support or opposition.
Studying social components illuminates NATO operations' human side,
enhancing public trust and solidarity amid complicated geopolitical
problems.

Technological Advancements in technology can significantly influence a country's

capabilities and strategies. To ensure the alliance remains competitive in
the current security market, it must be able to adapt to emerging
technologies swiftly. Regarding technology, focusing on enhancing
cyberwarfare, artificial intelligence, and military equipment is crucial.
NATO must utilise the latest technology to address emerging challenges
effectively (Purwanto et al., 2020). When nations' military technologies
are compatible, it enhances the efficiency of their collaborative missions.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 13

Today, with technology becoming more important, NATO needs to keep

up with new advancements to stay safe. The alliance can make its defense
stronger by working together and using compatible systems.

Operational All parts of NATO military operations, both strategic and tactical, are
considered operational variables. According to Hansen and Pihl-Thingvad
(2019), these elements are vital in deciding how well the alliance can
carry out tasks and adapt to changing security threats. Joint military
operations' overall efficiency, logistical capabilities, and methods for
deploying forces are all operational factors. The operational preparedness
of NATO is shown by its capacity to plan and execute missions smoothly
across multiple theatres and circumstances. To evaluate these aspects, one
must look at the alliance's responsiveness, logistical strength, and ability
to adjust to different operational settings (Kelly & Hearld, 2020). To
maximise its military capabilities and maintain a strong stance in response
to ever-changing geopolitical threats, NATO must have a thorough grasp
of operational elements.

4. Issue Identification and Analysis

4.1 Recognizing Key Challenges

Successfully navigating NATO's strategic terrain requires thoughtful deliberation on many
complex issues. The partnership is confronted with three significant difficulties that highlight
the complexity:

1. Geopolitical Uncertainty: Maintaining strategic cohesion within NATO is very

difficult considering the dynamic nature of the global political scene. Geopolitical
tensions have flared up again, and new global power centres have emerged. Therefore,
alliance objectives must be readjusted (Guterresa et al., 2020). Striking a balance
between multiple member states’ needs and wants requires of diplomatic capability
and strategic insight in these circumstances.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 14

2. Resource Allocation Dilemmas: Following the appearance of the new security risks,
NATO tries to manage to use its resources both wisely and effectively. Different
capabilities in defense, as well as varied scope of perception regarding the threats to
be fought, make sharing the resources a time-consuming (Donkor et al., 2021). It is
very difficult to discover a compromise that makes the states' interests supplement
each other as well as the group's collective security concerns. The role of the
aforementioned parties is multifaceted; they have to be engaged in a conversation and
come to terms with each other.
3. Adapting to Hybrid Threats: Hybrid threats are in actual existence, in the current
security surroundings, as conventional military methods concurrently use cyber,
informational, and unconventional ones. To demonstrate its desire to implement
necessary solutions, NATO should exchange its strategy and organisation format (Lee
et al., 2019). To tackle the said issue and to improve the alliance's ability to adjust to a
dynamic security environment, cybersecurity platform, information sharing, and
innovation are the possible solutions.

4.2 Explaining the Root Causes

Identifying and fixing the root causes of NATO's most significant difficulties is critical if the
alliance wants to keep winning.

1. Geopolitical Shifts and Power Dynamics

Uncertainty in geopolitics stems from the dynamic nature of global power. Fresh
partnerships emerge, regional power structures change, and new international players feel
their presence, reshaping the geopolitical landscape. Originating in the post-war era, NATO
faces the challenge of adapting to a world where geopolitical risks stem from the constantly
shifting dynamics of global diplomacy (Saputra & Mahaputra, 2020). To truly grasp this
issue, it is essential to analyse historical patterns and emerging forces thoroughly.

2. Disparities in Defense Capabilities and Resource Commitments

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 15

The problem with how resources is shared within NATO comes from differences in how
much each country can defend itself and how much money it can spend on defence. These
differences happen because different countries have their plans, different ideas about the
dangers, and different histories. To understand everything, we need to know a lot about what
happened in the past, the current dangers to safety, and how rich the countries are (Novak et
al., 2020). To make sure that resources are shared fairly, we all need to think about why some
people have more resources than others.

3. Evolution of Hybrid Threats

There is a direct correlation between the revolutionary character of modern warfare and the
need to adjust to hybrid threats. According to Rehman et al. (2019), the nature of battles has
changed due to the rapid development of technology, including cyber capabilities and
information warfare. It is essential to delve into the goals of hybrid threats, such as state-
sponsored cyberattacks and unconventional warfare, to pinpoint where they originate.
Understanding the evolution of military doctrines and technical advancements is crucial for
developing adaptive strategies.

A comprehensive strategy considering historical, geopolitical, and technical factors is

required to understand these underlying reasons (Akparep et al., 2019). Suppose NATO wants
to be more resilient and agile in the face of a constantly shifting global security scene. In that
case, it must address the fundamental issues that are leading to significant problems.

4.3 Relating Issues to Leadership Concepts

To successfully navigate complex geopolitical landscapes and foster unity within the alliance,
NATO needs strong leadership. This involves carefully analysing the challenges the alliance
encounters from a leadership perspective.

4.3.1 Transformational Leadership in Geopolitical Shifts

Strong leadership in NATO is very important because the world is changing.

Transformational leaders are important when the world changes quickly. They encourage
countries to change and do well even when things are unsure.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 16

 Charismatic Visionary Leadership: Transformative leaders in NATO need to be able

to convey a compelling vision with charm. According to Hajiali et al. (2022), leaders
have the power to bring member states together by communicating a common vision.
Energising and inspiring NATO members to face global changes head-on, charismatic
leadership is a key component.
 Inspiring Adaptability and Innovation: Changes in geopolitics need novel
approaches and flexible plans of action. Leaders with transformational skills inspire
NATO member states to welcome change and find innovative solutions to new
problems by creating an environment that is open to new ideas and methods. Leaders
can support their teams by offering motivation, which can help them develop a growth
mindset and adjust to evolving geopolitical circumstances (Syakur et al., 2020).
 Building Trust and Collaboration: When the world's political landscape is
unpredictable, trust becomes paramount. Trust among NATO members is a top
priority for transformational leaders, who work to foster it via open dialogue and
group decision-making. Leaders can make the alliance more resilient and respond
more unitedly to geopolitical crises if they create an atmosphere of trust (Jaroliya &
Gyanchandani, 2021). Under transformational leadership, collaboration is paramount,
as leaders enable member states to use their distinct assets in pursuit of common
objectives.
 Empowering and Developing Leadership Across Levels: Transformational leaders at
every level of NATO recognize the importance of leadership. Important people
working together can make positive changes when leaders give power to individuals
at different levels (Purwanto, 2019). Making sure that everyone in the alliance can
respond well to world events means developing strong leaders in the group. The
NATO leadership team has become better because leaders have been working to help
develop and support future leaders.
 Adapting Communication Strategies: In geopolitics, effective communication is
crucial. Adapting their approaches, transformational leaders effectively communicate
in various political and cultural settings. By changing its approach, the alliance can
ensure that its messages are relatable, engaging, and clear. Leaders can enhance
communication and boost NATO's effectiveness by promoting open dialogue and
fostering mutual understanding.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 17

4.3.2 Distributive Leadership for Resource Allocation:

Efficient resource allocation within NATO is greatly aided by distributive leadership in the
dynamic geopolitical threat environment. Different stakeholders are given a voice in
distributing resources via a decentralised decision-making process, emphasising
responsiveness and flexibility.

 Decentralized Decision-Making

Centralizing decision-making powers within the NATO structure may not fully utilize the
knowledge and experience of NATO member states. Therefore, the role of the member states
can be decentralized. Delegating the weight and responsibility to other countries typically
involves providing them with an opportunity to air their opinions and proposals, thereby
giving way to more detailed and comprehension-demanding decisions about budget and
resource allocation. Emphasis of inner strengths will unite member countries necessitating the
collective initiative of the alliance that in this way will be stronger in countering new issues.

 Optimizing Specialized Expertise

The councils of NATO are the tile which NATON members present combined skills and
knowledge. To realize a distributive leadership, aim of making everyone on the team to add
maximum value to it, using resources science has provided is a strategy used. Consequently,
NATO, as an institution, receives higher support from the public and elites (Boukis et al.,
2020).

 Enhancing Flexibility and Responsiveness

They should be sufficiently astute and fast moving to adapt smoothly to these changing
political geographies. Improving the setup, getting rid of the bureaucratic problems, and
using the distributive leadership could lead to quick responses of the NATO. As an
emphasized by the likes of Milhem et al. (2019), this statement depicts the flexibility with
which the Alliance is capable to reallocate its assets to accommodate new political crises of
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 18

the future. NATO must give importance to the current changes in global politics and the
adaptability to remain in touch with these changes, has to be quicker in adopting.

 Building Collaborative Resource Strategies

The member states act in concert at a distributive level to establish rules for the distribution
of technical and financial resources. Consulting all the parties that are involved in making the
decisions is a critical thing if the result is to be the distribution of the scarce resources in the
way that is in line with the agreed objectives (Azizaha et al., 2020). Either working
individually to address certain external threats or jointly would enhance the solidarity
between NATO member-states and every participant will feel obliged and committed.

 Ensuring Transparency and Accountability

Fair distribution of the resources is the first presupposition in distributive leadership where
the issues are solved based on transparency and accountability and the objectives are the
goals. Being able to see where the money is going helps countries trust each other (Sunarsi et
al., 2020). Transparent accountability rules help NATO to look more credible and make sure
resources are distributed fairly.

4.3.3 Adaptive Leadership in Hybrid Threat Environments

Adaptive leadership is crucial in dealing with hybrid threats within the framework of NATO's
changing challenges. Leadership in the face of hybrid threats—those that use both traditional
and nontraditional tactics—calls for flexibility, resiliency, and vision (Stone & Patterson,
2023).

Leaders must remain adaptable as hybrid threats can manifest in unexpected and constantly
evolving forms. Ibrahim and Daniel (2019) suggest that adaptive leadership within NATO
involves continuously reassessing strategies and approaches to stay ahead of evolving
challenges. Being able to think quickly and make decisions decisively are crucial qualities for
effective leadership, along with the skill to outsmart opponents with creative strategies.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 19

The leadership of NATO must be resilient in the face of uncertainty brought forth by hybrid
threats. Members of the alliance who are adept at adapting must show that they can handle
uncertainty well, as the nature of the dangers they confront is ever-changing. This strength
ensures that NATO will fulfil its commitment to safeguard the world, regardless of the
unusual or intricate threats it may face (Nurani et al., 2021).

Being an effective leader involves more than just reacting to immediate threats; it involves
anticipating future challenges and addressing them in advance. Anticipating potential hybrid
threats is crucial for NATO leaders to proactively mitigate risks and enhance preparedness
(Suprapti et al., 2020). By strategically planning, NATO is more equipped to address hybrid
threats.

Due to the overlap between military and civilian sectors, leaders must integrate civil-military
collaboration to address hybrid concerns. Adaptive leadership requires relationships with
NGOs, intelligence agencies, and others (Kanat-Maymon et al., 2020). Leveraging military
and civilian resources provides a complete hybrid threat response.

NATO promotes an environment where individuals are always learning and developing new
ideas. To do this, it relies on leaders who can change course in the face of adversity. To
maintain a competitive edge, executives should foster an atmosphere that welcomes and
embraces innovative approaches (Decuypere & Schaufeli, 2020). The alliance's ability to
remain resilient in the face of evolving challenges depends on its willingness to consider and
implement novel approaches.

5. Leadership Styles and Concepts

5.1 Overview of Leadership Approaches

To shape organisational strategy, foster collaboration, and achieve group goals, effective
leadership tactics are crucial. The case study highlights the importance of various leadership
styles within NATO's leadership landscape, emphasising their significance for the alliance's
success.

 Transformational Leadership
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 20

NATO leaders inspire members to a single vision, displaying transformational leadership.

Leaders must express a common purpose to inspire country pride and dedication (Fang et al.,
2019). In the case study, leaders connect various interests, promote teamwork, and develop a
NATO-based identity. To manage the ever-changing geopolitical context, leaders emphasise
learning, innovation, and the future. Transformational leadership helps NATO mobilise
resources, create collective capabilities, and confront emerging security challenges,
strengthening its effectiveness and unity (Torlak & Kuzey, 2019).

 Distributive Leadership

Distributive leadership requires sharing duties and allowing diverse levels of the organisation
decision-making ability, as seen in NATO. Distributive leadership is key in the coalition. It
guarantees that each member nation contributes enough to NATO's aims (Cho et al., 2019).
This optimises resource utilisation. The principle of voluntarism facilitates a more native
development than countries simply following orders and exercises. The quoted statement
reveals wheree NATO partners assume leadership and responsibility to make sure that their
allies interests and contributions are not neglected. Involving groups into the work shared
among them to distribute and work together creates the team spirit and gives rights to the
group members. The last expectation of an alliance is that it would help to bond the members
and give it high-powered conflict-solving arms to deal with hard political issues.

 Adaptive Leadership

NATO's adaptive leadership is indispensable: it's a way to ensure response efficiency against
diversified opponents' actions. With the aim at enhancing the flexibility and resilience of the
organization for the confrontation with uncertainty and swift change, the theory of Henkel et
al. (2019) highlights the significance of flexible leadership. As the head of a NATO, one is
expected to learn something new every day, make a quick choice regarding matters of utmost
importance and adjust to new challenges. Leaders should therefore try to see what the future
might be, to promote nation-based creativity and to allow people to adapt (Walls, 2019). In
NATO today, what exemplifies leaders to different degrees is that varying degrees of
openness and disquiet with standard norms and techniques exist.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 21

5.2 Identification of Leadership Styles in the Case

To demonstrate how the entity tackles issues, the study case discusses the deployment of
different leadership efforts inside NATO framework. Somi et al. (2018) stated that among the
types of leadership, transformational leadership is recognized as one of the most critical. In
this tactic, leaders try to mobilize their followers for a uniform objective wherein they toil
individually.

Furthermore, the case demonstrates how the alliance's responsibilities and decision-making
were divided, an example of distributive leadership. Because NATO operations involve many
different countries with different abilities and opinions, it is essential for the leadership style
to be decentralized (Bhaduri, 2019).

NATO's approach to handling hybrid threat settings also demonstrates adaptable leadership.
Influential leaders possess adaptability, quick learning skills, and the ability to handle
complicated geopolitical changes. With its adaptive leadership strategy, the alliance can
effectively navigate the dynamic landscape of international security by addressing new
threats, fostering resilience, and sustaining its effectiveness (Zheng et al., 2019).

Even though these forms of leadership are every day, situational leadership develops when
alliance leaders modify their strategies according to unique circumstances. According to Guhr
et al. (2019), NATO can effectively handle the wide range of difficulties it faces in its
operational terrain by using a variety of leadership styles. Recognizing different leadership
styles reveals how NATO handles its ever-changing environment, demonstrating a
sophisticated and multi-dimensional approach to leadership that supports the alliance's goals
and purpose.

5.3 Evaluation of Leadership Methods Used

Assessment of leadership techniques used inside NATO's operational framework shows a
fluid and situationally dependent strategy. The complex and multi-faceted difficulties faced
by the alliance are tackled via the strategic deployment of various leadership techniques by its
member states.

One effective strategy is the use of transformative leadership. Impressive articulation of

NATO's ability to foster partnerships among member states, highlighting the organization's
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 22

dedication to promoting collaboration and unity. Emphasizing the importance of unity within
the alliance and the determination of its members to reach their objectives, transformational
leadership aligns with NATO's mission (Northouse, 2021). This approach effectively unites
member nations to address intricate security issues.

One such approach that NATO operations highlight is distributive leadership. Managing the
alliance's different competencies and viewpoints relies heavily on the distribution of tasks and
decision-making power (Budur & Demir, 2019). NATO guarantees a more participatory and
thorough decision-making process by spreading leadership among different states and
stakeholders. An alliance must be able to adapt and respond quickly to changing security
threats, and this strategy helps with both.

NATO places excellent emphasis on adaptive leadership when addressing hybrid threat
scenarios. The alliance's ability to address new threats demonstrates its proactive approach
and forward-thinking mindset swiftly and effectively. Katsaros et al. (2020) suggest that
NATO's adaptive leadership practices enable the organization to adjust its strategy quickly,
enhancing its resilience to evolving geopolitical landscapes.

Additionally, NATO's strategy uses situational leadership, which stresses the importance of
adapting leadership approaches to unique situations. Alliance leaders understand the many
challenges they face by deftly adapting their approaches depending on the situation. With a
pragmatic and context-dependent leadership style, NATO's situational awareness allows it to
handle specific difficulties successfully.

Understanding the constraints of various leadership approaches is crucial. Emphasizing

teamwork through transformational leadership can encounter obstacles when balancing
national agendas and interests. It is essential to consider different perspectives in distributive
leadership to promote cohesion and avoid division (Cummings et al., 2021).

An example of a sophisticated and adaptable approach is the evaluation of leadership styles

inside NATO. Global security's complex and dynamic nature necessitates a range of
leadership styles, which the alliance deploys. A nuanced leadership strategy is devised
through a thorough examination of various methods, ensuring NATO's capacity to safeguard
collective security while recognizing the pros and cons of its diverse membership.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 23

6. Critical Thinking Evaluation

6.1 Assessment of the Suitability of Leadership Approaches

NATO's revolutionary leadership fits its purpose. The alliance requires a unifier to create
cohesiveness among member states with varied geopolitical objectives. Novitasari et al.
(2020) characterize transformational leadership as suitable for NATO's purpose of inspiring
leadership and a unified vision to advance collective defence. Promoting a common purpose
and devotion among member nations increases the alliance's ability to confront external
issues.

NATO successfully managed member nations' capabilities, proving distributive leadership

works. Distributive leadership delegates decision-making authority, allowing NATO to use its
members' unique skills and assets. This strategy fosters collaboration by incorporating
alliance members' perspectives and talents (Li et al., 2021). Distributive leadership's
adaptability benefits a broad group of member states with distinct security contributions.

NATO's commitment to transitioning leadership demonstrates its adeptness in addressing

complex issues such as hybrid threats. Being flexible in leadership is crucial for NATO to
address emerging security challenges. The group excels in adjusting its strategies,
anticipating future challenges, and generating fresh concepts by remaining flexible to global
shifts.

6.2 Correct Application of Leadership Concepts

 Transformational Leadership in Geopolitical Shifts

Considering recent geopolitical developments, NATO has relied heavily on transformational

leadership. The alliance understands that member states must be inspired to adapt and work
via a visionary strategy to keep up with the dynamic nature of global politics. A compelling
vision of collective defence and shared values is articulated by transformational leaders inside
NATO, creating a feeling of togetherness and purpose among disparate members.

Amid changing geopolitical landscapes, transformative leadership is crucial in guiding NATO

towards strength and unity. Leaders stress the significance of agility, innovation, and
proactive adaptation to emerging challenges (Weintraub & McKee, 2019). Transformational
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 24

leaders establish a collective vision beyond current issues, fostering a united sense of purpose
that bolsters the alliance's determination amid geopolitical uncertainties.

In addition, transformational leadership motivates member nations to welcome change and

actively achieve the alliance's goals. Leaders foster a culture of ongoing improvement by
advocating for strategic innovations and encouraging collaborative solutions (Iraizoz-Iraizoz
et al., 2023). Emphasising transformational leadership helps NATO stay responsive to the
changing geopolitical landscape, positioning itself as a dynamic and forward-thinking
alliance ready to tackle new challenges with collective strength and resilience.

 Distributive Leadership for Resource Allocation

Leadership in the essence of distribution provides one of the core functions of NATO which
is dealing with the intricate process of resource allocation. One of the most crucial functions
of NATO - as an international organisation - is to ensure that its state members get a kick out
of their disposable military budgets. By means of a diffusion leadership structure, everyone
rights on the personal of association stakeholders can effectively be involved in decision-
making over the distributions of resources.

The application of both resource allocation and human resource is a major leadership
responsibility. Underwing leadership of NATO, member states can accommodate on their
relevant capacities and strategic objectives. This leadership champions cooperative decision-
making approach (Naqshbandi et al., 2019). When member states end up being able to feel
responsible and involve with the collective decisions, then cooperation is improved.

Through a collective effort of the participating nations, with the diverse strengths of each
being fully used, distributive leadership facilitates optimal resource utilization. Through
leadership, an effort to create the systems of resource allocation that recognizes the abilities
and contributions of the whole team must be guided, with an emphasis on continuous
communication (Tran, 2021). NATO's resources can be employed as efficiently as possible by
garnering efforts together. Alliance resource optimization, and fairness, and teamwork for the
jointes are all become all be very effective under the dieser leadership style.

 Adaptive Leadership in Hybrid Threat Environments

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 25

The role of very adaptive leadership cannot be underestimated when one must deal with the
type of threat hybrids that the Partnership faces today. It is that dynamic leadership must be
put into effect to execute the goals of preventing the changing security issues regarding the
current time of complex, and unexpected threats.

Hyebered threat occurs when the mix of traditional and non-traditional methods are used,
such as economic, diplomatic, and information warfare. Being short-sighted and versatile is
the potent weapon of this approach that helps to deal with cunning and unpredictable
situations (Purwanto et al., 2021).

The real time of the leader becomes a vital asset in hybrid threat situations when a high level
of situational awareness and coping with uncertainty are required. They skillfully know how
to cope with the same old danger, but they are also the shift to a new kind of danger positions
them in tackling it (Benmira & Agboola, 2021). Those nations can increase the level of
efficiency of NATO by their excellency in foresight, rapid reaction to hybrid enemies
attacking in several areas, mentioned before.

Apart from leaders focus on continuous production of education programs is called for to
keep the club members engaged in the struggle. However, fighting off hybrid threats needs to
be a combined effort of people, knowledge sharing and, lastly, fast response is the key. NATO
may have the potential to develop adaptive flexibility by making investments in resilience,
response to emerging threats and hybrid warfare. In the light of adaptive leadership, this will
be brought about by NATO states (Manzoor et al., 2019). The coalition should acquire an
agility and adaptability to build on the challenges that may emerge because of shifting
security environment to put into practice this leadership approach.

6.3 Adequacy of Leadership Strategies

It is paramount to assessing if various approaches can bring the alliance through a multitude
of geopolitical developments and hybrids threats is that which makes vertification of the
efficacy of the alliance's leadership initiatives What the decision-making strategies of highest-
ranking officials will be in the light of the eminent and changing challenges forms the
purpose of this research.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 26

6.3.1 Strategic Alignment with Objectives

The other major point that we should consider is how the strategies are aligned with the
policymaking priorities of NATO. To a wider view to look unto how NATO's leadership has
gone bout the full getting of its overarching objectives. The same study by Adams et al.
(2020) highlights the significance of CEOs (Chief Executive Officers) establishing a strategy
that supports the organization's long run goals and vision. As the security affinity is the main
motive for all common expeditions, it becomes the reason behind every single mission. In
face of altered global political picture and new challenges, the decision makers of the NATO
ought to realize the future role of the organization's functioning and then should shape
policies in line with shifts. To ensure NATO leadership leads successfully, one must be aware
of the dynamic functions of international peace and security.

6.3.2 Adaptability and Flexibility

The flexibility of NATO leadership to adjust to new situations is also critical. Businesses can
only deal with problems if they adjust to shifting geopolitical circumstances, say Archanjo de
Souza et al. (2020). Leadership is a dynamic process that requires constant adaptation to new
situations.

Given the dynamic nature of geopolitical situations and hybrid threats, NATO leadership
policies must be flexible enough to adjust to new realities. Leadership's ability to swiftly
modify operational plans, resource distribution, and alliance priorities is examined (Sharma et
al., 2019). Leadership methods help NATO retain its global prominence and stability by
adapting to unanticipated obstacles and grasping new opportunities.

6.3.3 Collaboration and Inclusivity

Collaboration and inclusion are vital to analysing NATO leadership techniques. The alliance's
international nature requires cooperation among member governments. Leaders must create a
diverse environment to make educated geopolitical judgements (Huertas-Valdivia et al.,
2019). Performance indicators should encompass leadership efforts in fostering intercultural
collaboration and inclusiveness. Researching initiatives that promote collaboration among
member nations in exchanging data, making decisions, and solving issues collectively is
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 27

necessary. It is essential for plans to steer clear of power imbalances and make the most of
each team member's strengths to achieve group security objectives.

When faced with geopolitical challenges, NATO functions more effectively when its
members collaborate. Emphasising inclusiveness and collaboration, a leadership strategy is
demonstrated through diplomatic coordination, combined military drills, and information-
sharing protocols (Berraies & Zine El Abidine, 2019). Maintaining NATO's collaborative
strength amid geopolitical uncertainty relies on leadership's ability to navigate cultural
nuances, foster transparent dialogue, and cultivate a sense of collective responsibility towards
common objectives.

6.3.4 Risk Mitigation

Leadership techniques must be evaluated based on how well they reduce risks. Effective
strategies consider possible hazards and come up with proactive ways to deal with or lessen
their impact via the use of risk assessment tools. Addressing both traditional and non-
traditional threats, like cyber warfare or hybrid tactics, is essential.

Table 2: Risk Mitigation

Risk Mitigation Strategy

Lack of Information Establish robust intelligence-sharing mechanisms

among NATO members.
Divergent National Interests Conduct regular diplomatic dialogues to align interests
and priorities.
Inadequate Communication Implement a secure and efficient communication
system within the alliance.
Resource Allocation Challenges Develop a transparent framework for equitable
distribution of resources.
Geopolitical Tensions Establish crisis response protocols and diplomatic
conflict resolution mechanisms.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 28

7. What-if Analysis

7.1 Scenarios and Implications

 Scenario 1: Unforeseen Geopolitical Shift

Picture a dramatic shift in the global power equation that threatens long-standing
relationships. Unforeseen changes in the economy, political turmoil, or new technologies can
give rise to this made-up situation. A rapid revaluation of current diplomatic measures would
be necessary due to the varied ramifications (Khan et al., 2020). A more transactional
approach to building new alliances or strengthening current relationships may be necessary
for leaders to swiftly traverse the changed terrain.

 Scenario 2: Cybersecurity Threat to Intelligence Sharing

Imagine a situation where a complex cybersecurity threat puts the security of intelligence-
sharing networks at risk. It is possible that this issue arises from cyberattacks sponsored by
states or from non-state actors taking advantage of vulnerabilities. The consequences are
significant, as compromised information security can affect collaborative initiatives (Gemeda
& Lee, 2020). Leaders need to quickly implement flexible cybersecurity measures and
communicate openly. This scenario requires prompt and synchronised action, possibly
requiring a directive leadership approach to facilitate fast decision-making.

 Scenario 3: Escalation of Hybrid Threats

Imagine more and more tricky attacks that mix different tactics, like spreading false
information and using money to force people to do things. This situation requires leaders to
adapt to new challenges instead of using old methods. The effects go beyond just the military,
and involve diplomacy, technology, and working together with others to gather information
(Kelly & Hearld, 2020). Leaders need to plan to deal with tricky threats. They might need to
use different leadership styles to allocate resources and respond to changes effectively.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 29

7.2 Consideration of Alternate Leadership Approaches

When dealing with the unpredictable world of international affairs, leaders need to be ready
to adopt different leadership strategies to tackle changing obstacles. How practical these
approaches are can vary based on the specific scenario.

 Alternate Approach 1: Collaborative Leadership in Multilateral Diplomacy

Imagine momentarily that several countries are entangled in a complicated diplomatic matter.
A collaborative leadership style that prioritises honest dialogue and reaching a consensus may
work well in these situations (Saleem et al., 2020). No paramount challenges are faced when
the aforementioned methodology is adopted as it stimulates a feeling of collective
accountability and respects the pluralistic aspects of the population. Under that leadership
paradigm, leaders put a great emphasis on diplomatic dialogue especially coalition building.
Thus, they indulge in more intense conversations and negotiations as a way of searching for a
long-term solution that is suitable for all.

 Alternate Approach 2: Transactional Leadership for Crisis Management

When the needed response is rapid and the same for everyone, then a transactional style of
leadership can be acceptable. The incentives are on who is the boss, who holds the power,
and who stands out as a fast problem solver. More emphasis is often placed on how leaders
retain control, providing proper solutions to a crisis for immediate use and making swift
decisions instead of deliberating on them by transactional leaders (Syakur et al., 2020). On
the one hand, this plan might be inaccurate, but it may keep you alive when emergency would
arise.

 Alternate Approach 3: Transformational Leadership for Long-Term Strategy

Problems that call for reexamination of all institutional workings or alignments of long-term
planning need a leading style of management. It consists in uniting around a common cause,
promoting innovation through work activities, and getting down to the problem instead of
putting it off (Donkor et al., 2021). Another facet of the leadership crisis spurred by
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 30

unanticipated global affairs is the potential for team members of talented leaders to react from
accepting change to adapting to new possibilities.

7.3 Analysis of Potential Outcomes

In fairness, it is essential to understand how different leadership configurations affect the
world order today and make projections about future global linkages. Pandemic and in the
process of these events, individuals’ perceptions are impacted in different ways through
different perspectives.

 Outcome 1: Collaborative Leadership and Diplomatic Stability

Interaction that puts emphasis on both leaders' and followers' involvement can consolidate the
regime. The countries can establish good working relationships through alliances and
coalition. 2 Geopolitical health, interregional cooperation, and alliances will encourage the
advancement of a world free of the burden of infectious disease (Decuypere & Schaufeli,
2020). As for a norm of diplomacy, an atmosphere without anyone disagrees because long-
term influences do it in such a manner that people communicate in prior to confront each
other.

 Outcome 2: Transactional Leadership and Crisis Resolution

Situations requiring pragmatic and dynamic measures to secure prompt and efficient
outcomes, transactional administrators assume the position of responsibility. Through
immediate actions to disaster and logistics (allocation of resources) one can mitigate the
effects of catastrophes. Transaction-based methods may be efficient for short-term (Purwanto
et al., 2020), but for a sustainable future, cooperation and consensus building might be more
important. Moreover, this may upset partnerships or a durable responsibility amongst the
international communities which could increase the likelihood of conflicts. You can also read
free daily updates and enjoy our community forum at

 Outcome 3: Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Resilience

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 31

Leadership ability will show its flexibility and resilience and innovation is also a sure thing at
hinding time of the crisis. One of the differentiators of innovate countries is their
performance during global volatilities. Forming the best local communities which have
creative and intelligent members that can to solve complex problems and adapt to new threats
will determine where the future of cyber security is heading (Kalkan, Cicek & Bozkurt,
2020).

Synthesis of Outcomes and Future Implications

A comprehensive examination shows that the outcomes are not mutually exclusive but may
coexist to varying degrees depending on the situation and the leadership style used. Different
leadership styles, including transformative, transactional, and collaborative, impact the
geopolitical environment (Baptiste, 2019). Consequently, a balanced and progressive strategy
that incorporates elements of all three may provide the most thorough and long-lasting
answers.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Well beyond geopolitics these results will have far-
reaching consequences. They determine the diplomatic norms, international order, and the
ways of settling crises, for instance. Leaders now must be very flexible concerning the
complicated challenges of international affairs and they need a diverse set of leadership skills
too which is a fact of Guterresa et al. (2020).

Studying different results can help us see how leadership styles and global politics affect each
other. Knowing about these possible results helps good leaders to purposefully use different
methods to deal with the challenges of a constantly changing world.

8. Pros and Cons Analysis

8.1 Positive Aspects of Current Approaches

The current leadership strategies employed in the geopolitical scenario exhibit commendable
strengths, contributing to the effectiveness of international engagements.

 Positive Aspect 1: Swift Decision-Making

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 32

An advantage in dealing with geopolitical issues is the ability to make quick decisions, which
is characteristic of transactional leadership. Leaders who use transactional techniques are
great at making quick and effective judgements when things are changing a lot. This
effectiveness is especially important in times of crisis, when leaders must quickly distribute
resources, handle pressing issues, and manage complicated situations with grace and speed
(Stone & Patterson, 2023). Being able to react quickly to new threats shows that you have the
kind of leadership that can protect your country's interests and keep the peace in a world
where everything is always changing.

 Positive Aspect 2: Collaborative Diplomacy for Global Stability

Collaborative diplomacy promotes international stability. Transformational and participatory

leaders develop connections and collaborations. These leaders foster collaboration and
understanding to achieve common objectives and address global issues (Rehman et al., 2019).
This collaborative diplomacy promotes diplomatic connections and improves geopolitical
problem-solving. The ability to build coalitions, advance peace, and establish guidelines for
coordinated activities enhances global stability and security.

 Positive Aspect 3: Adaptive Resilience and Innovation

The current leadership strategies are highly effective in fostering adaptive resilience and
innovation. Individuals who embrace adaptive leadership strategies cultivate an
organisational environment that values flexibility, growth, and creativity. During times of
unpredictability or shifts in global politics, it's crucial to possess adaptive resilience to
effectively tackle obstacles. Fostering a culture that embraces change can inspire teams to
think outside the box, adapt rapidly to new circumstances, and uncover creative solutions to
evolving challenges (Pishgooie et al., 2019). Expressed in a reflective way, this element not
only boosts the organization's ability to withstand unexpected challenges but also readies it to
take advantage of opportunities for growth and improvement in a rapidly changing
geopolitical landscape.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 33

8.2 Drawbacks of Current Leadership Strategies

While present leadership tactics offer advantages, it is crucial to acknowledge their inherent
limitations and pinpoint areas for improvement.

 Drawback 1: Transactional Leadership and Long-Term Diplomatic Relations

Current leadership strategies have certain drawbacks, including the potential of overusing
transactional leadership styles, which may undermine international relations. Transactional
leadership, which emphasises duties, rewards, and punishments, may improve the short term
but hinder long-term collaboration, according to Bhaduri (2019). Transactional approaches
may be self-serving and inhibit the formation of durable coalitions in global diplomacy,
where trust-building and long-term relationships are crucial. To build strategic relationships
over time, balance transactional, transformational, and relational strategies rather than
prioritising short-term gains.

 Drawback 2: Collaborative Leadership and Decision-Making Efficiency

Although it may affect the effectiveness of decision-making processes, collaborative

leadership promotes inclusion and varied viewpoints. When working together in collaborative
environments, it may take more time to reach an agreement due to the involvement of various
stakeholders, unlike in autocratic or directive settings. Extensive consultation and consensus-
building processes may sometimes hinder quick decision-making, particularly in urgent or
time-sensitive scenarios. It may present challenges in situations that demand quick and
decisive actions (Saputra & Mahaputra, 2020). It is essential to find a balance between
collaborative decision-making and timely execution to maintain the efficiency of leadership
strategies while promoting inclusivity.

 Drawback 3: Transformational Leadership and Resistance to Change

Transformational leadership may inspire beneficial change, but those used to the status quo
may reject it. Those content with the current quo may resist innovation and adaptability.
Transformational leadership may cause strategy implementation problems due to employee or
stakeholder resistance (Ohunakin et al., 2019). Transformational leadership requires
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 34

managing and overcoming this opposition. Effective communication, education on change

advantages, and a supportive atmosphere may lessen this negative and ease the adjustment.

9. Recommendations
1. Enhance Collaborative Intelligence Sharing

Improving information sharing via collaboration calls for strengthening the current Five Eyes
partnership and reaching out to additional key allies for assistance. When countries set up a
solid system for sharing information, they may pool their knowledge and get a better picture
of global problems (Novitasari et al., 2020).

2. Invest in Adaptive Leadership Training

Adaptive leadership training is worth the money if you want to build a strong and flexible
leadership team. For this plan to work, it needs to teach future leaders how to be quick on
their feet and smart when there are multiple threats. Governments may offer specialised
training courses for their leaders to help them handle tough scenarios. Leaders will find it
simpler to adjust to global changes. According to Rehman et al. (2019), this investment
fosters creative leadership, preparing individuals for new possibilities and dangers.

3. Promote Inclusive Decision-Making

Prompting decision-making that considers different viewpoints is crucial for having

successful leaders. Involving a wide range of stakeholders, each with their own set of
experiences and viewpoints, makes decisions that are more reflective of society. Decisions
are improved and support from varied demographics is increased by this technique, according
to Boukis et al. (2020). The democratic fabric is strengthened, and the community's different
needs and aspirations are met as decision-making becomes more inclusive.

4. Strategic Alignment of Military Operations

Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 35

Strategically coordinating military operations ensures they support geopolitical goals.

Aligning military strategies with political and diplomatic aims may improve a nation's
defences. Saputra and Mahaputra (2020) say this strategy enhance military operations by
minimising fragmentation and enhancing national security. The military can react to acute
threats and accomplish long-term security and stability goals when well-coordinated.

5. Cultivate Cultural Understanding in Leadership

Understanding different geopolitical environments requires leaders to cultivate cultural

awareness. International collaboration and diplomatic relationships are enhanced when
leaders demonstrate an appreciation for diverse cultural viewpoints. Highlighting the
significance of cultural competence training in leadership promotes mutual understanding,
aids in resolving conflicts, and helps individuals handle challenges with grace and
consideration (Baptiste, 2019). By adopting this method, leaders can enhance their ability to
make thoughtful decisions and cultivate strong connections through a comprehensive grasp of
different cultural contexts, thereby reducing the likelihood of misinterpretations. Individuals
with a deep understanding of different cultures are crucial in advancing worldwide peace and
teamwork through creating an inclusive and harmonious environment.

10. Future Action Points

10.1 Formulation of Specific Measures

It's critically important to get hold of steps that solve existing problems and at the same time
develop a comprehensive strategy that will enable the whole process. Initially, the incoming
parties require working on establishing an ordered and effective cooperation as well as
information exchange system. The advantage of it lies in coalitions' prompt response,
increase of understanding, and use of communication channels which are elaborated and
therefore more secure to encode and disclose any facts as accurate as they can be.

Education of the future leaders in the face of evolving geopolitical contexts will require
restructuring of the training programs and better leadership curricula. This situation appears
to be temporary, however, it necessitates the craftiness, adaptability, and mobility. On top of
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 36

that customizing training for multilateral challenges more mature decision-making in unclear
situation is realized.

10.2 Benefits Associated with Proposed Plan

Several advantages are associated with this proposed approach. We must prioritise improving
collaboration in intelligence-sharing if we are to effectively handle emerging geopolitical
challenges.

1. Strengthened Global Security: Given the increasing geopolitical risks, this data will
help us improve our communication of information. To provide a coordinated and
effective response, it is essential that security policies prioritise the promotion of
quick and open information sharing.

2. Cultivation of Adaptive Leadership: People are more likely to succeed and adopt a
growth mindset after enrolling in adaptive leadership training programmes. Leaders
can react more quickly and navigate complex geopolitical situations with this
flexibility.

11. Conclusion
To conclude, this project takes a close look at the provided case study, using many strategies
to overcome challenges and provide recommendations for moving forward. Beginning with a
thorough review of the case's background, we moved on to investigate the geopolitical shifts,
difficulties, and assignment goal. With a SWOT analysis, the investigation ended. This
investigation, which considered both internal and external variables, uncovered the most
important aspects of the problem.

The environment study delved into a multifaceted terrain, exploring economic, social,
technical, political, and operational aspects. Knowing where problems come from and using
management methods to fix them is crucial. Studying how the leader leads can show essential
ways they do things in the case study. To determine if leadership techniques were sufficient,
the critical thinking evaluation looked at how well they were suited and used. From a future-
looking vantage point, a prospective "what-if" study explored possible situations and
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 37

different ways to lead. The pros and cons analysis provided a fair assessment of the current
approaches, which balanced the benefits with the negatives.

The five recommendations for the finishing section of the research project are adaptive
leadership training, integrated decision-making, operation strategic alignment, collaborative
intelligence sharing, and leadership cultural cultivation. Executing the action mentioned
above is expected to deliver a more efficient and effective way of managing the case study
hurdles and, after that, lead to a society where peace and security are attainable.
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 38

References
Abasilim, U. D., Gberevbie, D. E., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2019). Leadership styles and
employees’ commitment: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Sage Open, 9(3),
2158244019866287.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244019866287

Adams, B. G., Meyers, M. C., & Sekaja, L. (2020). Positive leadership: Relationships with
employee inclusion, discrimination, and well‐being. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1145-
1173. https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/apps.12230

Akparep, J. Y., Jengre, E., & Mogre, A. A. (2019). The influence of leadership style on
organizational performance at TumaKavi Development Association, Tamale, Northern
Region of Ghana. http://www.udsspace.uds.edu.gh/handle/123456789/2580

Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M., & Haridy, S. (2021). The relationship between leadership
styles and organisational innovation: A systematic literature review and narrative
synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 338-370.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339/full/html

Alrowwad, A. A., Abualoush, S. H., & Masa'deh, R. E. (2020). Innovation and intellectual
capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional
leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management
Development, 39(2), 196-222.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0062/full/html

Archanjo de Souza, D. S. D. O., Pedro Salgado, A. M., Marins, F. A. S., & Muniz, J. (2020).
The influence of leaders’ characteristics on the relationship between leadership and
knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(4), 462-
473. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14778238.2020.1730716

Asgari, A., Mezginejad, S., & Taherpour, F. (2020). The role of leadership styles in
organizational citizenship behavior through the mediation of perceived organizational
support and job satisfaction. Innovar, 30(75), 87-98.
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0121-
50512020000100087&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 39

Atasoy, R. (2020). The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles, School
Culture and Organizational Change. International Journal of Progressive
Education, 16(5), 256-274. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1273161

Azizaha, Y. N., Rijalb, M. K., Rumainurc, U. N. R., Pranajayae, S. A., Ngiuf, Z., Mufidg,
A., ... & Maui, D. H. (2020). Transformational or transactional leadership style:
Which affects work satisfaction and performance of Islamic university lecturers
during COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 577-588.
https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/87355955/transformational-or-transactional-
leadership-style-which-affects-work-satisfaction-and-performance-of-islamic-
university-libre.pdf?1654965788=&response-content-disposition=inline
%3B+filename
%3DTransformational_or_transactional_leader.pdf&Expires=1709189436&Signature
=Sbk-icecgnPGGjPrz5G44ZJWteb3EWgbjf1rmVnvTm9PI-
XrKTlxrBWkRtU2vohY1137Sc55uwUXxXYucezbG9-
HBkODUF89S8yM0ijLwEiozBZvoE4cx5GqQApKodpZL3NOCQflmEN7bU9F0Zv
PP3eVKGMOyBIcexvTFwQwZ~WnOh~0rHp~oEkTnbsSy6cyWkpWRpCQ3RJ1P~
eQSgxGG5En1c~UzpmAbxu0eavQCMCxNEsmTuAl-
4sAl8CGoCjNkLOo3Jtl3jEebOVJ1ruEibzf0VF0qTrr3Rrx1eKlID2DVss3RN~z26r5-
SwzVGntq8ws9xFmrZGJH01oOdJYMA__&Key-Pair-
Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Baptiste, M. (2019). No Teacher Left Behind: The Impact of Principal Leadership Styles on
Teacher Job Satisfaction and Student Success. Journal of International education and
leadership, 9(1), n1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=eJ1212519

Benmira, S., & Agboola, M. (2021). Evolution of leadership theory. BMJ Leader, leader-
2020. https://bmjleader.bmj.com/content/leader/early/2021/01/08/leader-2020-
000296.full.pdf

Berraies, S., & Zine El Abidine, S. (2019). Do leadership styles promote ambidextrous
innovation? Case of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 23(5), 836-859.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0566/full/html
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 40

Bhaduri, R. M. (2019). Leveraging culture and leadership in crisis management. European

Journal of Training and Development, 43(5/6), 554-569.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJTD-10-2018-0109/full/html

Boukis, A., Koritos, C., Daunt, K. L., & Papastathopoulos, A. (2020). Effects of customer
incivility on frontline employees and the moderating role of supervisor leadership
style. Tourism Management, 77, 103997.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517719301955

Budur, T., & Demir, A. (2019). Leadership effects on employee perception about CSR in
Kurdistan Region of Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational
Studies, 5(4), 184-192. https://eprints.tiu.edu.iq/18/

Busari, A. H., Khan, S. N., Abdullah, S. M., & Mughal, Y. H. (2019). Transformational
leadership style, followership, and factors of employees’ reactions towards
organizational change. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(2), 181-209.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JABS-03-2018-0083/full/

Cho, Y., Shin, M., Billing, T. K., & Bhagat, R. S. (2019). Transformational leadership,
transactional leadership, and affective organizational commitment: a closer look at
their relationships in two distinct national contexts. Asian Business &
Management, 18, 187-210. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-019-
00059-1

Cummings, G. G., Lee, S., Tate, K., Penconek, T., Micaroni, S. P., Paananen, T., & Chatterjee,
G. E. (2021). The essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and
educational interventions influencing nursing leadership. International journal of
nursing studies, 115, 103842.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748920303333

Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring
explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1),
69-95. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2397002219892197

Donkor, F., Dongmei, Z., & Sekyere, I. (2021). The mediating effects of organizational
commitment on leadership styles and employee performance in SOEs in Ghana: A
structural equation modeling analysis. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211008894.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440211008894
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 41

Fang, Y. C., Chen, J. Y., Wang, M. J., & Chen, C. Y. (2019). The impact of inclusive
leadership on employees’ innovative behaviors: the mediation of psychological
capital. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1803.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01803/full

Fries, A., Kammerlander, N., & Leitterstorf, M. (2021). Leadership styles and leadership
behaviors in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Family Business
Strategy, 12(1), 100374.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877858520301017

Gemeda, H. K., & Lee, J. (2020). Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among
information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national
study. Heliyon, 6(4). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(20)30544-2.pdf

Guhr, N., Lebek, B., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). The impact of leadership on employees'
intended information security behaviour: An examination of the full ‐range leadership
theory. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 340-362.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/isj.12202\

Guterresa, L. F. D. C., Armanu, A., & Rofiaty, R. (2020). The role of work motivation as a
mediator on the influence of education-training and leadership style on employee
performance. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1497-1504.
http://m.growingscience.com/beta/msl/3617-the-role-of-work-motivation-as-a-
mediator-on-the-influence-of-education-training-and-leadership-style-on-employee-
performance.html

Hajiali, I., Kessi, A. M. F., Budiandriani, B., Prihatin, E., & Sufri, M. M. (2022).
Determination of work motivation, leadership style, employee competence on job
satisfaction and employee performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource
Management, 2(1), 57-69. https://goldenratio.id/index.php/grhrm/article/view/160

Hansen, J. A., & Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2019). Managing employee innovative behaviour through
transformational and transactional leadership styles. Public Management
Review, 21(6), 918-944.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14719037.2018.1544272

Harvard Business Review. (n.d.). Hearts and Minds: Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of
Wrangling NATO. Harvard Business Review Store:
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 42

https://case.hks.harvard.edu/hearts-and-minds-admiral-jim-stavridis-on-the-art-of-
wrangling-nato/

Henkel, T. G., Marion Jr, J. W., & Bourdeau, D. T. (2019). Project manager leadership
behavior: Task-oriented versus relationship-oriented. Journal of Leadership
Education, 18(2), 1. https://commons.erau.edu/publication/1270/

Huertas-Valdivia, I., Gallego-Burín, A. R., & Lloréns-Montes, F. J. (2019). Effects of

different leadership styles on hospitality workers. Tourism management, 71, 402-420.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261517718302620

Ibrahim, A. U., & Daniel, C. O. (2019). Impact of leadership on organisational

performance. International Journal of Business, Management and Social
Research, 6(2), 367-374. https://www.journalbinet.com/ijbmsr-060219-39.html

Iraizoz-Iraizoz, A., García-García, R., Navarrete-Muro, A., Blasco-Zafra, A., Rodríguez-

Beperet, A., & Vázquez-Calatayud, M. (2023). Nurses’ clinical leadership in the
intensive care unit: A scoping review. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 75,
103368. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339722001719

Jaroliya, D., & Gyanchandani, R. (2021). Transformational leadership style: a boost or

hindrance to team performance in IT sector. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of
Management, 19(1), 87-105.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/XJM-10-2020-0167/full/html/
1000

Kalkan, Ü., Altınay Aksal, F., Altınay Gazi, Z., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The
relationship between school administrators’ leadership styles, school culture, and
organizational image. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020902081.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244020902081

Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., & Roth, G. (2020). Work motivations as antecedents and
outcomes of leadership: Integrating self-determination theory and the full range
leadership theory. European Management Journal, 38(4), 555-564.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263237320300207

Katsaros, K. K., Tsirikas, A. N., & Kosta, G. C. (2020). The impact of leadership on firm
financial performance: the mediating role of employees' readiness to
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 43

change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 333-347.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0088/full/html

Kelly, R. J., & Hearld, L. R. (2020). Burnout and leadership style in behavioral health care: A
literature review. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 47(4), 581-
600. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11414-019-09679-z

Kelly, S., & MacDonald, P. (2019). A look at leadership styles and workplace solidarity
communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 432-448.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2329488416664176

Khan, M. A., Ismail, F. B., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The interplay of leadership
styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational
citizenship behavior. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019898264.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2158244019898264

Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance
feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work
engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development
International, 22(3), 257-282.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13678868.2018.1530170

Li, P., Sun, J. M., Taris, T. W., Xing, L., & Peeters, M. C. (2021). Country differences in the
relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. The
Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101458.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1048984320300850

Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Nurunnabi, M., Subhan, Q. A., Shah, S. I. A., & Fallatah, S. (2019). The
impact of transformational leadership on job performance and CSR as mediator in
SMEs. Sustainability, 11(2), 436. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/436

Mi, L., Gan, X., Xu, T., Long, R., Qiao, L., & Zhu, H. (2019). A new perspective to promote
organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: The role of transformational
leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118002.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619328720

Milhem, M., Muda, H., & Ahmed, K. (2019). The effect of perceived transformational
leadership style on employee engagement: The mediating effect of leader’s emotional
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 44

intelligence. Foundations of Management, 11(1), 33-42.

https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/fman-2019-0003

Mwesigwa, R., Tusiime, I., & Ssekiziyivu, B. (2020). Leadership styles, job satisfaction and
organizational commitment among academic staff in public universities. Journal of
Management development, 39(2), 253-268.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMD-02-2018-0055/full/

Naqshbandi, M. M., Tabche, I., & Choudhary, N. (2019). Managing open innovation: The
roles of empowering leadership and employee involvement climate. Management
Decision, 57(3), 703-723. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MD-
07-2017-0660/full/html

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.

https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=6qYLEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&dq=leadership+styles&ots=Q
Q5modUbbo&sig=ghPrN1f9aNhDRtWMFegzYpqnBus

Novak, A., Breznik, K., & Natek, S. (2020). How leaders can initiate knowledge management
in organizations: Role of leadership style in building knowledge
infrastructure. Human Systems Management, 39(1), 37-50.
https://content.iospress.com/articles/human-systems-management/hsm190596

Novitasari, D., Siswanto, E., Purwanto, A., & Fahmi, K. (2020). Authentic leadership and
innovation: what is the role of psychological capital?. International Journal of Social
and Management Studies, 1(1), 1-21.
https://www.ijosmas.org/index.php/ijosmas/article/view/1

Nurani, D. W., SAMDIN, S., NASRUL, N., & SUKOTJO, E. (2021). The effect of leadership
style on organizational commitment and employee performance: An empirical study
from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(12), 141-
151. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202133452482051.page

Ohunakin, F., Adeniji, A. A., Oludayo, O. A., Osibanjo, A. O., & Oduyoye, O. O. (2019).
Employees’ retention in Nigeria’s hospitality industry: The role of transformational
leadership style and job satisfaction. Journal of human resources in hospitality &
tourism, 18(4), 441-470.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15332845.2019.1626795
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 45

Pishgooie, A. H., Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh, F., Falcó‐Pegueroles, A., & Lotfi, Z. (2019).

Correlation between nursing managers’ leadership styles and nurses' job stress and
anticipated turnover. Journal of nursing management, 27(3), 527-534.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jonm.12707

Purwanto, A. (2019). Influence of transformational and transactional leadership style toward

food safety management system ISO 22000: 2018 performance of food industry in
Pati Central Java. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 7, 180-185.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3984807

Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Hartuti, H., Setiana, Y. N., & Fahmi, K. (2021). Effect of
psychological capital and authentic leadership on innovation work
behavior. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(1), 1-13.
https://www.ijosmas.org/index.php/ijosmas/article/view/4

Purwanto, A., Bernarto, I., Asbari, M., Wijayanti, L. M., & Hyun, C. C. (2020). Effect of
transformational and transactional leadership style on public health centre
performance. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 2(1).
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Masduki-Asbari/publication/339800591_EFFEC
T_OF_TRANSFORMATIONAL_AND_TRANSACTIONAL_LEADERSHIP_STYL
E_ON_PUBLIC_HEALTH_CENTRE_PERFORMANCE/links/
5f0fbdbd45851512999e50e6/EFFECT-OF-TRANSFORMATIONAL-AND-
TRANSACTIONAL-LEADERSHIP-STYLE-ON-PUBLIC-HEALTH-CENTRE-
PERFORMANCE.pdf

Rabiul, M. K., & Yean, T. F. (2021). Leadership styles, motivating language, and work
engagement: An empirical investigation of the hotel industry. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, 92, 102712.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278431920302644

Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2019). Mediating effect of innovative culture
and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational
performance in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1),
1-24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40497-019-0159-1
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 46

Saleem, A., Aslam, S., Yin, H. B., & Rao, C. (2020). Principal leadership styles and teacher
job performance: Viewpoint of middle management. Sustainability, 12(8), 3390.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3390

Saputra, F., & Mahaputra, M. R. (2022). Effect of job satisfaction, employee loyalty and
employee commitment on leadership style (human resource literature study). Dinasti
International Journal of Management Science, 3(4), 762-772.
https://dinastipub.org/DIJMS/article/view/1324

Sharma, A., Agrawal, R., & Khandelwal, U. (2019). Developing ethical leadership for
business organizations: A conceptual model of its antecedents and
consequences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(6), 712-734.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LODJ-10-2018-0367/full/html

Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Leadership styles and skills developed through game-
based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94, 360-366.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318300572

Specchia, M. L., Cozzolino, M. R., Carini, E., Di Pilla, A., Galletti, C., Ricciardi, W., &
Damiani, G. (2021). Leadership styles and nurses’ job satisfaction. Results of a
systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public
health, 18(4), 1552. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1552

Stone, A. G., & Patterson, K. (2023). The history of leadership focus. Springer Books, 689-
715. https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-01323-2_38.html

Sunarsi, D., Rohaeni, N., Wulansari, R., Andriani, J., Muslimat, A., Rialmi, Z., ... & Fahlevi,
M. (2020). Effect of e-leadership style, organizational commitment and service
quality towards indonesian school performance. Syst. Rev. Pharm, 11, 472-481.
https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/93891362/effect-of-eleadership-style-
organizational-commitment-and-service-quality-towards-indonesian-school-
performance-libre.pdf?1667917964=&response-content-disposition=inline
%3B+filename
%3DEffect_of_e_Leadership_Style_Organizatio.pdf&Expires=1709189446&Signatur
e=FOTtfTN-J97xHDAG~e6XbkX-
OUBMlYR~yuivIvtQeE7alNYBsmlkEC7AqCADRZiKJ3uVpbOdMmKgdZTVOty3l
dh8e2IxYbUWgp7ajqqbzsdMNLcXe7mxXBcR0jq~9na~6R-
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 47

D1BGk7jSAu9JpyQ3fjkUzJGODB9l7qnV19tum0Jaqg8YdXMblPOjrU7LCSW0pfQ
X0hdeHKrQSYEBQKWSGJ~7zfQDG8p7xj-xm-
qESprkVceIbgD9i9AcroVGS4xiFjbtv9sVzEuSiRajO6V4HbWyGcgVqD5vRMcaZYt
X1TnwZRTGB86IsA0VyN6f~hsG9xPjmcS7Gc6QjVcCfSoqLsQ__&Key-Pair-
Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Suprapti, S., Asbari, M., Cahyono, Y., Mufid, A., & Khasanah, N. E. (2020). Leadership style,
organizational culture and innovative behavior on public health center performance
during Pandemic Covid-19. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management
Research, 1(2), 76-88. https://jiemar.org/index.php/jiemar/article/view/42

Syakur, A., Susilo, T. A. B., Wike, W., & Ahmadi, R. (2020). Sustainability of
communication, organizational culture, cooperation, trust and leadership style for
lecturer commitments in higher education. Budapest International Research and
Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1325-1335.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sustainability-of-Communication%2C-
Organizational-and-Syakur-Susilo/60f981fbb4de0cbec129ec308418c2e3de990c35?
p2df

Torlak, N. G., & Kuzey, C. (2019). Leadership, job satisfaction and performance links in
private education institutes of Pakistan. International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, 68(2), 276-295.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0182/full/html

Tran, Q. H. (2021). Organisational culture, leadership behaviour and job satisfaction in the
Vietnam context. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 136-154.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOA-10-2019-1919/full/html

Walls, E. (2019). The value of situational leadership. Community practitioner: the journal of
the Community Practitioners'& Health Visitors' Association, 92(2), 31-33.
https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/38415

Weintraub, P., & McKee, M. (2019). Leadership for innovation in healthcare: an

exploration. International journal of health policy and management, 8(3), 138.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462199/

Zheng, J., Wu, G., Xie, H., & Li, H. (2019). Leadership, organizational culture, and
innovative behavior in construction projects: The perspective of behavior-value
Admiral Jim Stavridis on the Art of Wrangling NATO 48

congruence. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(4), 888-918.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0068/full/html