Module No.: July 2, 2021 Module 4: Linear Programming: Transportation Method
Module No.: July 2, 2021 Module 4: Linear Programming: Transportation Method
Ø Optimum Solution
2
Initial Basic Feasible Solution
Lesson No. Ø Transportation Problem
Ø Method
3
Ø MODI Ø SSM Min. Problem
Ø SSM
Ø SSM Steps
Transportation Model
- a special procedure of linear programming for finding the minimum cost
for distributing homogeneous units of product from several points of
supply (origin) to a number of points of demand (destinations)
- it answers the question: what are the cheapest routes to send a certain
number of products from a certain number of suppliers to a certain
number of destinations?
It was first presented by F.L. Hitchcock in 1941 in the study entitled: The Distribution of
a Product from Several Sources to Numerous Localities.
Terms
Stepping Stone Method Ø was developed by A. Charnes in 1953
Modified Distribution
Method
Destination
Origin
Unused Cells
Used Cells
Terms
Stepping Stone Method
Destination
Origin
Unused Cells
Used Cells
Terms
Stepping Stone Method
Modified Distribution
Method
Origin
Unused Cells
Used Cells
Terms
Stepping Stone Method
Modified Distribution
Method
Destination
Unused Cells
Used Cells
Terms
Stepping Stone Method
Modified Distribution
Method
Destination
Origin
Used Cells
Terms
Stepping Stone Method
Modified Distribution
Method
Destination
Origin
Unused Cells
Ø are routes where there is quantity shipped between a source and a destination.
Used Cells
Northwest Corner Rule Ø It provides that the allocation of shipment from the plants to the
(NCR) warehouses begins in cell (1,1) in the northwest (upper left-hand corner) of
the table.
Minimum Entry Method
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
Northwest Corner Rule Ø It provides that the first allocation begins in the cell with the smallest
(NCR) available cost in the cost matrix.
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
Vogel’s Approximation
Method (VAM)
After an assignment is made using the three methods, the next step is to check
whether or not the solution can be improved. We have to examine each unused cell to
determine whether or not moving a shipment into one of them reduces the delivery
cost and then repeating this procedure until the lowest possible cost solution is
obtained.
Use the current solution and operations (a) and (b) below to evaluate the
marginal cost over each of the unused or vacant cells.
a. Set U1 = 0.
b. Find the row indices U2….Un and column indices V1 …..Vn such that
Step 1 Cij = Ui + Vj for every used cell.
c. Let Eij = Cij – Ui – Vj for every unused cell; Eij is the marginal cost of
introducing Cell I, j into the solution.
Step 3
Look for the used or occupied cell.
Use Ui + Vj Always set U1 = 0.
U1 + V1 = 9
U1 + V2 = 11
U2 + V2 = 5
U2 + V3 = 10
U3 + V3 = 9
Formula:
Net contribution to Cost = (Cost of vacant cells) minus (Cost Factor of Supply)
minus (Cost Factor of demand)
(-6)
a) Trace a closed path using the most direct route from the selected unused cell
through at least three cells used in the solution and then back to the original unused
cell.
b) Use plus and minus signs alternately at each cell of the closed path, starting with a
plus sign at the unused cell to be evaluated.
1. Based on the test for improvement in solution above, Cell (1,3) has the most negative entry (-
9), so we put a (+) sign on that cell; then (-) (+) and (-) in the cells closest to Cell (1,3). It is
important to note that the signs should be alternately put. Always start with (+) sign and
ends in (-) sign.
2. Cells (1,2), (2,2) and (2,3) are the closest cells with its path identified by the dash lines in this
table.
3. Notice that two cells (1,2) and (2,3) have negative signs. Compare the two values and choose
the one with the least value.
4. Between the two negatives we have (-10) and (-30), we have to choose(-10) the lesser value,
that means 10 units must be transferred from W2 to W3 then deduct 10 units from P2 to W3.
Since we have the new table, then just repeat the process until no negative entry in the change in
cost has been reached.
1) There is still negative entry (-4) in the change in cost corresponds to Cell (2,1), so we need to
determine the close path.
2) The close path is from cell (2,1) to cell (2,3) then up to cell ((1,3) to cell (1,1) back to cell (2,1).
3) Next, we indicate (+) sign in Cell (2,1), (-) sign in Cell (2,3) (+) sign in Cell (1,3) and (-) sign in
Cell (1,1) No sign assigned to Cell (2,2) since this cell is not a corner point.
4) Choose the least value with the (-) sign, between 100 and 20 we have to choose 20. This
means we transfer 20 units to cell (2,1), then deduct 20 units to cell (1,1), then prepare
another table and repeat again the process.
Remember that the corner of the close path should always be a used cell. If the corner of the
path is a vacant cell, look for another path.
20
Changes in cost are all positive, therefore table 3 is an optimal table wherein an optimal solution
can be taken. Therefore, decision has to be made.
The general process is to look for available 3 occupied cell, rectangular in position to
the point of destination.
Use the initial feasible solution to create a unique stepping-stone path for
Step 1 each unused cell.
Use these paths to calculate the change in cost (or marginal cost ) of
Step 2 introducing each unused cell into the solution.
Using the stepping-stone path, determine the maximum number of items that
Step 4 can be allocated to the route selected in step 2 and adjust the allocation
appropriately.
Problem
Problem
Problem
U1 = 0
U2 = 500
U3 = -700
1000 V1 1200
V2 1000 700 = 1200
700 1,000 500
U1 = 0
U2 = -300
U3 = -700
1200
V2 1500 1200 -700 + V1
V2 -300 V1 = 1500
V3 = 1100 V2 300
-700 + V3 = 1100 U3 + 1000 = 300
V3 = 1800 U3 = -700