Assignment 1 Literature Theories
Assignment 1 Literature Theories
LEVEL: 2:2
examine the merits and demerits and finally to evaluate the artistic worth, is the function of
criticism. Thus, literary criticism is the study, discussion, evaluation, and interpretation of
literature.
Beckson and Ganz (1989) Literary criticism is the evaluation of literary works. This includes its
classification by genre, structure, and judgement of value Literary criticism asks what literature is,
what it does, and what it is worth. (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Literary criticism helps readers like
you and me interpret the literature we read. Each literary theory provides us with a different way of
looking at a given literary work, which can ultimately reveal important aspects about it.
Literary criticism helps us to understand what is important about a literary text for example its
structure its context, social, economic and historical how the text manipulates the reader. It also
helps us to understand the relationship between authors, readers and literary texts. Moreover
Ransom (1988) postulates that it refers to description, analysis, interpretation and evaluation of
literary texts. The function of Literary criticism is to examine the merits and demerits or defects of
Another important factor to note is that the view of criticism is directly related to the critic’s own
intellectual philosophy or outlook of life. It is determined by the likes and prejudices of the critic
or himself and this is equally shaped by the socio political sensiblities of the critic’s enviroment as
Literary criticism is the practical application of literary theory to a literary text. In literature, critic
theories are used in literary criticism. These include Marxism, Post Coloniality, historicism, new
historicism, feminism, mythology, and semiotics which are themselves in one way or another, the
product of criticism, and by that right, shade a different, but not necessarily wrong light on a text.
Whereas theory could be general or abstract, literary criticism is its application of literary theory.
interpretation, analysis and evaluation of a literary text more often than not, through the use of
theories. Theories are meant to interpret and evaluate works of literature with the mind of
Some of the theories we come across include the philosophical, feminist, archetypal, reader
response criticism and formalism or new criticism to mention but a few. The moral philosophical
approach is useful for works that present an obvious moral philosophy, useful when considering
the themes doesn’t view literature merely as art isolated from all moral implications. The approach
recognizes that literature can affect readers and that the message is important its disadvantage is
that it is judgemental.
Formalism or New Criticism notes that analysis can’t be performed without much research
emphasizes the value instead of the context of literature virtually all critical approaches must begin
here. It is an disadvantage because a text is seen in isolation ignores the context cannot account for
allusions. The other approach psycho-analytical approach can be useful in undderstanding works
in which characters obviously have psychological issues knowing about a writer’s pschological
make up can give us insight into his work. A disadvantage of this approach is that it can turn into a
psychological case study sometimes attempts to diagnose long dead authors sees sex as everything
The Feminist approach addresses the problem of under representation seeks to provide more
realistic potrayals of women within the text examines the power struggle between the sexes an
analysis into a political battlefield for the sexes. The archetypal approach provides a universalitic
approach and identifies a reason why certain Literature may survive the test of time works well
with works that are highly symbolic eg the Bible it’s disadvantage is that it may ignore the art of
literature. Reader response criticism recognizes that different people view works differently and
that interpretations change overtime on the downside it makes an interpretation too subjective.
REFERENCE LIST
Culled J.D.(1981) The pursuit of signs New York Cornell University Press
Minnesota Press
Ransom J.C. (1988) The New Criticism (Folcroft, Pa Folcroft Library Editions 1971)