Crafting a thesis on the intricate themes surrounding death in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is no easy feat.

This timeless tragedy delves deep into the complexities of mortality, the afterlife, and the existential
questions that plague the human condition. As students embark on the journey of dissecting Hamlet's
musings on life and death, they often find themselves grappling with profound philosophical
concepts and deciphering layers of symbolism.

The process of formulating a thesis statement that encapsulates the essence of Hamlet's exploration of
death requires thorough analysis, critical thinking, and a deep understanding of the text. It demands
the ability to navigate through Shakespeare's intricate language, unravel the motivations of the
characters, and decipher the underlying messages woven into the narrative.

Furthermore, crafting a thesis that not only reflects the depth of Hamlet's contemplation on death but
also presents a unique perspective or argument adds another layer of complexity to the task. It
necessitates originality, creativity, and scholarly rigor to produce a thesis statement that stands out
amidst the vast body of existing literature on the subject.

For students facing the daunting challenge of writing a thesis on Hamlet's treatment of death,
seeking expert assistance can make all the difference. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers specialized
academic support tailored to the needs of students grappling with Shakespearean texts. With a team
of experienced writers well-versed in literary analysis and research, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ provides
invaluable guidance and resources to help students craft compelling and insightful theses on Hamlet's
exploration of death.

By leveraging the expertise and assistance available at ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, students can navigate
through the complexities of Hamlet's thematic exploration with confidence. Whether it's refining a
thesis statement, conducting in-depth research, or polishing the final draft, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
empowers students to excel in their academic endeavors and produce scholarly work that is both
insightful and impactful.

In the challenging endeavor of dissecting Hamlet's treatment of death, let ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ be

your trusted ally. Order now and unlock the support you need to conquer the complexities of crafting
a thesis statement on this timeless literary masterpiece.
He thinks of “the dread of something after death” and the “undiscover’d country” from where “no
travelers returns” and he shrinks from it. They were finally translated into English and published in
the 20th century. During the Elizabethan era, the general believe that the King had sovereign power
and divine right was extensive. Under the law, the only possible verdict is cold-blooded murder, 20
although the audience can plainly see that the killing of Claudius was nothing of the kind. According
to Raluca Galita, such imagery ranges from anything as small as stage instructions to as obvious as
the Ghost of King Hamlet. His philosophizing can be a way for him to avoid thinking about or
acknowledging something more important: his urge to take revenge against Claudius. Many modern
editions define “straight” merely as “straightaway,” “immediately,” or the like. Quite similarly, when
Laertes wishes to avenge his father, many scholars suggest that Hamlet is innocent because his act of
murder was unintentional, while others suggest Hamlets ignorance justifies Laertes’ vengeance.
Explore the concept of revenge in Shakespeare's Hamlet. By focusing solely on the imagery of death
rather than the many complications death causes within the play, the author successfully focuses the
reader's attention on imagery and death as an overarching symbol rather than just an action. Share to
Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. Even then, she might have to go to court to get her
dower. Less than one month after King Hamlet’s death, Prince Hamlet mourns the loss of his father
as any typical person would do. Because the intent to kill a person is necessary for murder, a man
who intends to kill a rat but accidentally kills a person instead is not guilty of murder. 15. Polonius
both question Ophelia (sister and daughter, respectively) about her relationship with Hamlet. Ophelia.
He became a prolific independent Shakespearean scholar, combining his interests in Shakespeare and
the law. Kornstein notes that the law may benefit society as a way of channeling the passion of
revenge, which might otherwise go unchecked. According to Merris, Memento Mori is the idea that
the fear of death manifests itself in characters and symbolism, imagery, diction allow this idea of
death to take enlarge and become prominent in the characters daily lives. Hamlet retires to the
audience, where Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, and Polonius have gathered, along with many. Either
way, it becomes clear that Memento Mori is a very distinguished idea common in literature of the
time and thus it is very likely that Shakespeare tactfully chose to deeply integrate this theme in his
own works. Stated simply, medieval law focused on the legal status of the victim; the more modern
view focused on the state of mind of the accused killer. I can't keep my eyes off of him because his
character is all over the place. In fact, the whole play consists of a “series of murders” and suicide,
and ends with the major characters death. It now returns to that locale, where the two overarching
themes of death and property reach their symbolic climaxes. This therefore emphasizes the
prevalence of death in Hamlet’s thought process and how it degrades his well being. If you want a
unique paper, order it from our professional writers. She states, Do not forever with thy vail lids,
seek for thy noble father in the dust. Elleen explains how Horatio's role was to keep secret and to be
the most knowledgeable person to help in certain situations such as in Hamlet's trouble by seeing his
dead father's ghost. As Yoshino says, “Perfect justice requires not just a life for a life, but a soul for
a soul.” 70. Since the video relates the play, its diction, and its stage directions so closely to the exact
words and directions in the book, it does an excellent job of accomplishing its goal.
After all, to kill an anointed King, even in an act of revenge, was considered as a serious offence.
Claudius offers him a drink from the poisoned cup, but Hamlet refuses. Through the speech itself,
Hamlet introduces death as a way to ease pain and alleviate the stresses in life. Many modern
editions define “straight” merely as “straightaway,” “immediately,” or the like. And now I’ll do’t.
And so he goes to heaven.” (iii, iii, 77-78). This clarifies that if Hamlet could have killed Claudius
while he was confessing to God. Here to remember means to maintain and to restore it. Overall, the
two themes that stuck out to me the most were the madness and insanity theme and the religion
theme. The author uses strong textual analysis to support her claims along with research on the stories
of Pyrrhus and Gorgonzola embedded within Hamlet. Hamlet could have argued that killing a traitor
is not treason. Within his famous soliloquy in Act 3, scene 1, Hamlet presents the morality of
choosing to end one’s own life. But in the grave-digging scene, Hamlet reminds himself that death
diminishes all vanities in man, for it is the ultimate end of every man. Since the video relates the
play, its diction, and its stage directions so closely to the exact words and directions in the book, it
does an excellent job of accomplishing its goal. He and Hamlet then quarrel over who loved Ophelia
more, and Gertrude mentions her regret that Hamlet and Ophelia could have been married. Pettit
suggests that he was familiar with Law French, the corrupted form of Norman French that was the
primary language of the English legal system. 57. Laertes, also dying, confesses the whole plot to
Hamlet, who finally attacks Claudius, stabbing him with the. Green argues that extensive ambiguity
leads characters to obsessively and compulsively watch and analyze other character’s which leads to
many misconceptions and eventually the mass catastrophe in the end. For in this instance, the
collection of ambiguities among characters lead them to hysteric assumptions and interpretations that
in the end lead them to take aggressive action, resulting in the mass murder at the end of the play.
Either way, it becomes clear that Memento Mori is a very distinguished idea common in literature of
the time and thus it is very likely that Shakespeare tactfully chose to deeply integrate this theme in
his own works. When Claudius came to watch the play, he stormed out in rage. Instead of Hamlet
taking immediate action to take revenge, his indecisiveness leads Hamlet to waste his opportunity to
get revenge. The author further proves his claim by accessing other works that include the theme of
Memento Mori that were written prior to or during Shakespeare's time. Perhaps he even sent a few of
his hired Switzer guards to “safeguard” Hamlet’s lands and collect the feudal rents, on behalf of his
queen-to-be and her son, of course. As I continue to watch this play, I will be interested to see
whether or not Hamlet is able to overcome his madness and if he will successfully get revenge
against his uncle. (To be or not to be scene). That despite its appeal, an element of entering the
unknown with no way to return still remains. In the course of their interview, Polonius hides behind
a tapestry; at one point, he. Is it possible that Leicester poisoned the 16th Earl of Oxford for his
lands? “’A poisons him i’ th’ garden for his estate” (3.3.248), as Hamlet says during the Mousetrap
performance. Which is why this talks about how he is embarrassed about Denmark because he seems
many drunk people on the streets and making horrible decision. Claudius? Doesn’t Hamlet’s claim,
which arose when his father died, precede Claudius’ claim, which arose later, when he married
Gertrude. This is because in the Elizabethan era, ghosts were believed to be either heavenly or
satanic. Hamlet’s loyalty caused him to do anything to hear the truth from !laudius.
Here, again, the enforcement of this duty was the widow’s only resource, as the title to all the land
of which her husband died seized vested in the heir, both at law and in equity.”). But how can he be
said to be punished alive when the punishment comes after his death. As her dower lands had not yet
been carved out of the estate, she had a potential possessory right to any part of those lands.
Understanding the law of suicide is crucial to understanding the controversy regarding Ophelia’s
burial rites. “Her death was doubtful” (5.1.182), 3 as the priest tells Laertes, by which he means it is
questionable whether Ophelia’s death was an accident or a suicide. When Fortinbras’ uncle quashes
that scheme, the young prince apparently settles on some worthless land in Poland as a substitute
target. His father’s lands should have vested in him on his father’s death, and Hamlet would have
had the duty of assigning a third of the lands to Gertrude as her dower. 32 But in Shakespeare’s
time, successful legal actions over property usually involved interference with possession, based on
the legal maxim, “Possession is nine-tenths of the law.” 33 Since Hamlet was in Wittenberg when his
father died, he was not in a position to take possession of his lands right away. Dyer’s reports were
copied by hand and passed around in legal circles, but it is difficult to imagine how they might have
come into the hands of a sometime actor from Stratford. For through such intense and angry diction,
Hamlet makes it obvious that pondering death has emotionally degraded him. Horatio mourns his
friend's death, and he hears the army of Fortinbras entering. The main set up in the book Hamlet,
shows us that friendship is needed but, keep your friends close and enemies closer. 4, Love, while
highly viewed in society, many tend to literally kill to be with someone. But none of them is so much
concerned with the subject as in Hamlet. Holding the skull of Yorick, the court jester who entertained
him as a child, Hamlet ponders the brevity and futility of the human condition and the inevitability
of death. Either way, it becomes clear that Memento Mori is a very distinguished idea common in
literature of the time and thus it is very likely that Shakespeare tactfully chose to deeply integrate
this theme in his own works. We have no reason to believe that Brincknell was acting on such
motives. The two prepare to fight, and Claudius claims that he will order a celebratory feast if
Hamlet wins. In reference to Ophelia’s death, the author highlights the issue it causes, as it causes
disruption and a quarrelling brawl between Hamlet and Laertes. This makes Hamlet depressed and
regretting in his failure to express his love for her. I know that there were many others being it was a
Shakespeare play, but those two gave me the most feelings and insight to understanding the play. I
am going to explore the reasons why Hamlet delays his father’s death. Hamlet’s loyalty caused him
to do anything to hear the truth from !laudius. When Claudius came to watch the play, he stormed
out in rage. I believe my current interpretation is more in line with English custom and law. There was
the obvious one brewing between Denmark and Norway, the battle Hamlet had with himself and
with his father's murderer, and his uncle even had a battle with society in order to keep is fatal sins a
secret. No other play of Shakespeare is so much obsessed with the subject as is Hamlet. They explain
that the ghost represents not only death, but also represents a disruption of social order in Denmark.
Something is amiss in Denmark -- for two successive nights, the midnight guard has witnessed the
appearance of the. Hamlet discusses the no matter what a person did during their life, even if they
were absolutely amazing, in the end, they always go back to where they came from. Claudius
summons two of Hamlet's school friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, in order to discover the
meaning. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know not how oft. When King Hamlet died, it
would have taken some time for a messenger to get the news to Hamlet; then Hamlet would have
had to make the trek to Elsinore.
Does Laertes father’s death truly justify him killing Hamlet. The net benefits of exacting revenge
seldom outweigh the costs of time and effort spent on it, not to mention the increased chance that the
friends and family of the object of one’s revenge will retaliate against the revenger. Hamlet did not
have any attestation that the ghost was essentially telling the truth, and he has to verify it some how
that the ghost was authentic. Shakespeare satirizes the lawyers’ arguments and the court’s reasoning
in the first gravedigger’s further explanation: “If the man go to this water and drown himself, it is,
will he, nill he, he goes, mark you that. In fact, the whole play consists of a “series of murders” and
suicide, and ends with the major characters death. These circumstances give added meaning to
Hamlet’s fulminations about “the law’s delay” (3.1.72) in the “To be, or not to be” soliloquy
(3.1.56ff.). Death is a collection in Hamlet that germinates in Hamlet’s mind after seeing his father’s
ghost, show much growth in his soliloquy, and then continues to evolve into a massive, terrible veil
over the Kingdom of Denmark throughout in the play. How do they reflect the major developments
of plot, conflict, and resolution. Claudius assures Laertes that it will look like an accident. Burton
argues that Claudius has skillfully manipulated the law so that Claudius, not Hamlet, is benefiting
from Hamlet’s inheritance and that Claudius’ machinations threaten to delay Hamlet’s inheritance
indefinitely. Compare and contrast the different roles of elders and children and how the younger
generation manages and reacts to their different situations. Which is why she tells Hamlet that it
would be better if he moved past his father’s death and no longer hold onto him. At one point
Hamlet wants to believe that the ghost was actual. Hamlet takes the poisoned sword and hurts
Claudius. This shows the extend of how humans could go beyond the boundaries to accomplish
something they truly desire. Does Hamlet in fact go crazy, or is he just playing a part. The action you
just performed triggered the security solution. Although this is a revenge play, Hamlet continually
delays acting, out of a sense of duty of avenging his father’s murder. She states, Do not forever with
thy vail lids, seek for thy noble father in the dust. If Hamlet had killed King Claudius at the starting
of the play, the King would have been considered a martyr. External events in the play do not
contribute to Hamlet’s delay, but are rather used to Hamlet’s advantage as excuses to further delay
of avenging his father’s murder. In the vocabulary of these actions, a fine (“final concord”) ended a
lawsuit in which the defendant defaulted by prearrangement; it was “final” because it concluded the
rights of all interested persons, and not just the parties to the action. It is relevant today because, we
hear about many suicides happening today due to bullying and such, which is why understand how
Hamlet is feeling about his situation. Understanding the law of suicide is crucial to understanding the
controversy regarding Ophelia’s burial rites. “Her death was doubtful” (5.1.182), 3 as the priest tells
Laertes, by which he means it is questionable whether Ophelia’s death was an accident or a suicide.
Manslaughter was a sudden killing driven by “the heat of the blood kindled by ire,” as Coke said. 13
Manslaughter was punished by imprisonment for up to a year and branding of the thumb. Yorick’s
jaws that made the courteous roared with laughter are shapeless now. Ecclesiastical law, but the duty
of personal honour prevalent in Elizabethan times prohibited revenge. While speaking to the skull,
Hamlet wonders if the skull of Alexander the Great looks similar after decay. Act Two finds us some
indefinite time in the future. Hamlet finds evidence that Claudius murdered his father, but
procrastinates, waiting for the right opportunity.
For what is ownership of land but ownership of the dirt to which we all return. Hamlet discusses the
no matter what a person did during their life, even if they were absolutely amazing, in the end, they
always go back to where they came from. This is clearly shown when the ghost of King Hamlet
appears to Hamlet and tells him Claudius murdered him. Hamlet, knowing someone is behind the
curtain eavesdropping, shows his impulsiveness leading him to thinking it is Claudius and murders
Polonius. Just then, Fortinbras arrives at the court, accompanying some English ambassadors who
bring word of the death of. The moment King Hamlet died, Gertrude had a claim to his still-
undivided estate through dower, just as Hamlet had a claim through inheritance. Here hung those
lips that I have kissed I know not how oft. But this would overestimate the logic and predictability
of the legal system: seemingly clear rules were often sidestepped through legal fictions. For reasons
that are not entirely clear today, the lands emerged from the legal maneuverings as no longer
entailed, but as held by the 16th Earl of Oxford in trust. However, his biggest failure was the failure
in himself, when. In the book Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet acts crazy to make everyone
think he is insane because of his father's death. Osric praises Laertes for being the epitome of a
gentleman, and he tells Hamlet that Claudius bets that in a fencing match between Laertes and
Hamlet, Hamlet would win. Polonius both question Ophelia (sister and daughter, respectively) about
her relationship with Hamlet. Ophelia. Suspected suicides were often buried at the fringes of the
churchyard. Because he has not forfeited the law’s protection, he is still the king’s lawful subject.
The main set up in the book Hamlet, shows us that friendship is needed but, keep your friends close
and enemies closer. 4, Love, while highly viewed in society, many tend to literally kill to be with
someone. For through such intense and angry diction, Hamlet makes it obvious that pondering death
has emotionally degraded him. I am going to explore the reasons why Hamlet delays his father’s
death. By the time of Coke’s writing in the 1600s, juries who found that the defendant had killed in
self-defense could simply acquit, and pardon from the king was no longer necessary. In this part of
the play it is quite obvious that the play had a gruesome, violent death and the sexual aspect of the
play was clearly introduced when Claudius married Hamlet’s mother Gertrude. With all the
immediate royalty of Denmark dead, Fortinbras asserts his right to the. The unlawful intent
transferred to the unintended victim. If you want a unique paper, order it from our professional
writers. Perhaps Shakespeare is borrowing from their idea of manifested death or perhaps his idea
grows in its own. Green uses a close reading of Hamlet, research on the history of England, and
research on Shakespeare as a writer to develop his claim. We see many links from person to person by
many roles to accomplish something by revenge itself and we also see that in ourselves to by either
the best we can in a certain situation, which is why Cameron was truly astonished to see many
emotions play a role to get the reader get the attention of what the character is truly going through.
Horatio is responsible for telling the story of how all of the royal deaths occurred, and he seems
determined to make sure that everyone knows. From this murder the catastrophe of the play steams.
It initiates the second cycle of revenge for a murdered father, that of Leartes for Polonius. The
question being - does death drive one to insanity and irrationality or does the latter drive one to
death. Or is he just profoundly disturbed, emotionally overwhelmed by circumstance and fate.
In order to determine if Claudius is truly guilty, Hamlet produces a play in which the. It attracts the
audience, also; the audience would feel sympathy for the position Hamlet is in. This illustrate that his
a religious person, he is constantly allusion to religion and Christian values of Christianity and purity.
Hunt makes his claims through a close reading and analysis of Hamlet along with outside research on
the story of Pyrrhus and Priam. Watkin points out that the play employs three of the four types of
poisoning that Coke lists in his Third Institute: gustu, by taste, as with the poisoned wine; contactu,
by touching, as with the poisoned sword used on Hamlet, Laertes, and Claudius; and suppostu, as
with a suppository or the like, in this case, the poison that Claudius pours in his brother’s ear before
the action of the play begins. 19 Coke declared poisoning to be the most detestable kind of murder.
Here, again, the enforcement of this duty was the widow’s only resource, as the title to all the land
of which her husband died seized vested in the heir, both at law and in equity.”). I enjoy how
Horatio is the only character left standing at the end of the play. If you want a unique paper, order it
from our professional writers. Instead of Hamlet taking immediate action to take revenge, his
indecisiveness leads Hamlet to waste his opportunity to get revenge. Elleen explains how Horatio's
role was to keep secret and to be the most knowledgeable person to help in certain situations such as
in Hamlet's trouble by seeing his dead father's ghost. One will soon enough have all the real estate
one will ever need. At one point Hamlet wants to believe that the ghost was actual. Upon knowing
someone is behind the curtain, which Hamlet believes to be Claudius, stabs Polonius dues to his
impulsiveness. When Hamlet tells her that Claudius killed her husband, she probably sees that
Claudius has used her and that her life is in danger. A quick peek behind the arras would have
immediately cured him of that notion. But this would overestimate the logic and predictability of the
legal system: seemingly clear rules were often sidestepped through legal fictions. Hamlet poses his
desire to damn Claudius as a matter of fairness: his own father was killed without having cleansed
his soul by praying or. He believed in the doctrine of Catholism, Catholics believed murder and
revenge is to be erroneous, because of religious belief Hamlet delays the murder. Laertes soon returns
to Denmark with a mob in tow, demanding an. His interpretation of ambiguity as the root of
Hamlet’s final tragedy supports our interpretation of Hamlet as a bad collection. What conditions,
both personal and public, make this metaphor a defining point of Hamlet’s world and how do those
conditions contribute to the tragedy. We have no reason to believe that Brincknell was acting on such
motives. At this point the ghost tells Hamlet that he has been given the role of the person who will
take the revenge of his father. I am going to explore the reasons why Hamlet delays his father’s
death. As seen in the book hamlet, we see that the King's brother killed the King to get with the
Queen Gertrude. As her dower lands had not yet been carved out of the estate, she had a potential
possessory right to any part of those lands. It i s very clear Hamlet pr ocrastinates; hi s only goal in li
fe is to kill Claudius and take revenge, but yet again he does not for no apparent reason. The author
further proves his claim by accessing other works that include the theme of Memento Mori that were
written prior to or during Shakespeare's time. The inheritor could not sell or give away his estate; on
his death it had to go to his lineal descendants. I have chosen to watch this film because after
vaguely researching about the play, I found that it includes many Shakespearean themes we have
discussed in class.