Module 3 Colonial Architecture
Module 3 Colonial Architecture
Colonial Architecture 1:
Introduction to Colonialism and its impact on built form in different
regions
Emergence of New Typologies
Colonial style in India under Portuguese - Goa - Goan Houses, The
Basilica of Bom Jesus.
Dutch - Malabar Coast Kochi - Mattancherry Palace/Dutch Palace
Colonial Architecture 2:
French - Pondicherry – characteristics of buildings in French Colony
English - Calcutta (The Victoria Memorial), Mumbai (Chattrapathi
Shivaji Terminus/Victoria terminus) and Delhi (Rashtrapathi Bhavan/
Old Viceroy’s House)
• Every age conceived the architecture according to its needs. At
every stage it responded to the prevailing attitudes. Whatever they
were, as each age presented architecture that was the
characteristic of its people, their faiths and ideals, their stage of
civilization projecting their beliefs and at the same time
accommodating various external influences, the stupas, temples,
palaces, forts, mosques, minars and the mausoleums which were
built in great numbers in different epochs of ancient and medieval
history of India served the purpose of those times. Yet period of
emperors like Shahjahan and Akbar etc. witnessed magnificence in
art and architecture made contributions to Indian architecture.
• As the Mughal Empire disintegrated in the early 18th century, and
then as the Maratha Empire became weakened after the third battle
of Panipat, many relatively weak and unstable Indian states which
emerged were increasingly open to manipulation by the Europeans,
through dependent Indian rulers.
• After the glorious Mughal Architecture, India saw the development of
the Indo-European Architectural heritage, which was the
amalgamation of the styles of the European countries, like Portugal
(Portuguese), Holland (Dutch), France (French) and finally
culminating in the colonial occupation by the British.
• The European constructed, forts, churches, town hall, clock towers,
market complexes, and gateway etc.
• The Architecture of the Imperial Portuguese marked by Churches
and Cathedral reflecting the post-Renaissance European
architecture. There are examples of old mansions, remains of
fortifications and defences, dating mainly from 18th century A.D.
• The Portuguese architecture was very much influenced by
contemporary developments in Europe at that time. The Churches of
Goa are also the fusion of Renaissance Principles and aesthetics to
suit local colonial tastes, monetary resources and raw materials.
• The advent of the British and the French and eventually the
supremacy of the British over the French led to the establishment of
many cantonment cities and barrack architecture by the British to
enable them to keep a control over princely states. Unlike its
predecessors, the British architecture was need oriented. It was no
longer ornamental and its place was taken by simplicity but in shear
size and height it inspired awe. Thus, the political stability of the British
period encouraged a building boom.
• The buildings built by the British were not as elegant and grand as
that of the Mughals, but were civic and utilitarian buildings and
commemorative (memorial of an event or a person) structures.
• Indo-European Architecture in India during British period closely
followed the developments in their home country but also sought
inspiration from existing architecture in India for great legitimacy.
• Though, the evolution and development of British Indo-European
Architecture in India can be studied from the cities of Calcutta,
Madras, Bombay, New Delhi etc.
• The contributions made by the British led to the creation of a
composite architectural style imbibing European, Indian and Mughal
elements and was also called the colonial architecture.
• One of the most significant legacies of British rule in India is the
colonial Architecture from the two centuries anteceding the struggle
for independence. These imposing buildings including Palaces,
mansions, clubhouses, and government official buildings,
represented a hybrid of western and eastern sensibilities as their
architect sought to plant the flag of British dominance in a foreign
culture.
• If we see the new princely cities like Jaipur, Bikaner and Mysore, they
are also influenced by Indo-European architecture. The towns were
patterned along British example has Clock towers, railway stations,
public official buildings, assembly halls and public hospitals etc.
• Near the end of the 15th century, Portuguese sailor Vasco da Gama
became the first European to re-establish direct trade links with India
since Roman times by being the first to arrive by circumnavigating
Africa (c. 1497–1499). Having arrived in Calicut, which by then was
one of the major trading ports of the eastern world.
• The Dutch Republic, England, France, and Denmark-Norway all
established trading posts in India in the early 17th century.
COLONIALISM - WHAT IT MEANS ?
•Practice of domination.
The Historical Context
1. PORTUGESE ERA
2. DUTCH ERA
3. FRENCH ERA
4. INDO - SARCENIC
Architetcure of the
Colonialism in India Colonizer
• Portuguese Pre 1857
(1502–1961) – Functional
– Trade French – Pondicherry
• Dutch requirements
Dutch – Coromandel,
(1605 to 1825)
Post 1857 Malabar
• New behavioural
Urban Inserts - New logic to building :
pattern
Nai Sadak • Military engineers
— MES • Colonial life style of
Town Halls and
the rich
clock tower
• PWD 1862
Hill Stations - • New typologies
• Building laws 1855
Masoorie – Clubs
Shimla • ASI
Cantonments (Archaeological – Gymkhana
Survey of India) – Hotels
Urban Extensions -
1861 — by Sir
Civil Lines – Parks and
Alexander
Cunningham Gardens
– Bungalows
The first successful voyage to India was by Vasco da Gama in 1498, when
after sailing around the Cape of Good Hope he arrived in Calicut, Kerala
• The colonial era in India began in 1502, when the Portuguese Empire
established the first European trading centre at Kollam, Kerala.
• In 1510 the city of Goa was conquered, which had been controlled
by Muslims. The policy of marrying Portuguese soldiers and sailors
with local Indian girls, the consequence of which was a great
miscegenation in Goa, so their descendants came to be called
“Eurasians” who now come under name of Anglo- Indians.
• Goa was their prized possession and the seat of Portugal's viceroy.
• Portugal's northern province included settlements at Daman, Diu,
Chaul, Baçaim(vasai), Salsette, and Mumbai. The rest of the northern
province, with the exception of Daman and Diu, was lost to the
Maratha Empire in the early 18th century.
• In 1661 Portugal was at war with Spain and needed assistance from
England, leading to the marriage of Princess Catherine of Portugal to
Charles II of England, who imposed a dowry that included the insular
and less inhabited areas of southern Bombay while the Portuguese
managed to retain all the mainland territory north of Bandra up to
Thana and Bassein. This was the beginning of the English presence in
India.
UNDER PORTUGESE ERA
︎ Goa - prized possession
︎ Miscegenation
︎ Promote Catholicism - motive
PORTUGESE – GOAN HOUSES
Portuguese – catholic houses faced the street with unique large ornamental
windows opening onto verandahs.
interior of Goan Portuguese houses: elaborate patterns created with tiles
imported from Europe & false ceiling - installed of wood.
walls - painted with bright colours contrasting to the earthy coloured
furniture.
- mud or laterite stone and coloured with vegetable & natural dyes.
Gateposts and compound walls – craved with great detail.
Covered porches and verandas – designed for socializing.
Therefore buildings of Goa – constructed with local laterite stones set in lime
mortar, walls plastered with same mortar & tile roof made to rest on wooden
trusses.
PORTUGESE – GOAN HOUSES
unique large ornamental windows
opening onto verandahs.
Ionic, Doric,
Corinthian
orders
• The Zamorin and many small Princes in the region looked to them for
driving away the cruel Portuguese and in a pitched battle in
January 1663 the combined forces of the Dutch and the Zamorin
defeated the Portuguese at Cochin.
• Thus ended the hundred and sixty five years of Portuguese relation
with Kerala.
• Administrative reforms were introduced as the ‘Mixed colony system’,
prohibition of Sati practice, introduction of European methods in
administration and the introduction of a fresh coinage and the efficient
judicial system.
• Thus during the sixteenth century the Portuguese dominated the sea- borne
trade and on the western sea-board there were not merely trading stations
but also fortified naval bases, in which they exercised sovereign powers. The
Mughals had no sea power; even Akbar had to get authorization from the
Portuguese to send his ships to the Red Sea.
The Dutch
• The arrival of the Dutch in India in 1602 turned the tide against the
Portuguese. It was pepper that drew the Dutch East India Company
to Kerala.
• In March of that year the Netherlands formed the Dutch East India
Company with the aim of establishing commercial relations with
India. It was very clear that “the policy of the Dutch was more strictly
commercial than that of the Portuguese. Like the latter they realized
that factories, i.e. trade depots, had to be defended by forts, but
their objective was to gain a command of trade and not territorial
dominion, political power or religious conversion.
DUTCH ERA
• 1741 witnessed severe rivalry between the French and the British.
Britain ruled India for over three hundred years, their legacy still remains
through building and infrastructure that populate their former colonies.
The major cities colonized during this period were :
• Madras
• Calcutta
• Bombay
• Delhi
• Agra
• Bankipore(Patna)
• Karachi
• Nagpur
• Bhopal and
• Hyderabad
The Victoria Memorial, Calcutta
Indo-Sarsenic revival style
Architect William Emerson
• While Lutyens was designing the Government House, Herbert Baker was
working on the design of the Secretariat buildings. These buildings, two
identical blocks facing each other across King’s Way, were to house
important ministries of the government. It was essential, therefore, that they form
a composite whole with Government House, the entire (so to say) ‘supreme
power’ looming imposingly on Raisina Hill. The blocks are made of buff and red
sandstone, with the red sandstone forming a broad ‘base’ for the outer walls.
• As Lutyens did in Rashtrapati Bhavan, in
the Secretariat too Baker used a
combination of European and indigenous
architectural elements. The semi-circular
arches, the Corinthian columns, and the
baroque dome are unmistakably western;
the carved elephants and lotuses, red
sandstone jalis, chhajjas, and the chhatris
on the terraces are just as obviously Indian.
• In a nod to Mughal architecture, Baker designed the main
entrances of both blocks to resemble a traditional Mughal
gateway. If you’ve seen the tomb of Humayun (near Nizamuddin,
in Delhi), you’ll note the same details here: a small arched
doorway, set into a much larger (also arched) gateway. As in
Humayun’s Tomb, here too circular medallions decorate the inner
corners of the archway, and a small, ornate balcony projects
above the inner door.
• The North and South Blocks sit on a plinth about 30 ft
above the ground and are connected by an
underground passage (still in use). Between them, the
four-storied Secretariat buildings have about 4,000
rooms, several inner fountain courts, and miles of
corridors. Both blocks have original paintings decorating
some walls and ceilings. The North Block, for example,
boasts of allegorical depictions of justice, war, and peace;
the South Block has paintings of Indian cities and emblems
of older kingdoms.
India Gate:
• The names of 90,000 men who died during these conflicts are
inscribed on the uprights of the arch. (Over the decades since its
construction, this has come to be a memorial for Indian soldiers in other
wars as well, including the Indo-Pakistan war of 1971 and the Kargil
war of 1999.This is in addition to the names of soldiers awarded the
Param Vir Chakra, India’s highest military decoration).
• The relatively plain façade and clean lines
of India Gate lie in sharp contrast to the
more ornate appearance of the Secretariat
buildings or Rashtrapati Bhavan. Like
these buildings, though, India Gate is also
composed mainly of buff sandstone. At the
top of the arch are inscribed the letters
INDIA, with MCMXIV on the left and
MCMXIX on the right—the Roman
numerals indicating the beginning and the
end, 1914 and 1919, of the First World War.
Between the narrower sides of the columns
are two large sandstone pine cones,
symbolizing eternal life. Topping the arch is
a shallow dome with a bowl to be filled with
burning oil on anniversaries to
commemorate martyrs. A similar structure
was installed under the arch, where oil was
ceremonially burnt on the anniversary of
the memorial’s inauguration. While oil is
rarely lit in the bowl above the arch, the
bowl below the arch was replaced, in
1970, with an ‘eternal flame’, burning
constantly in memory of India’s dead
soldiers. This is in the form of a plain
square shrine of black marble, atop a
stepped platform of red stone. From the
centre of the black shrine rises an
upturned bayonet supporting a helmet, a
symbol of the unknown soldier. On each of
the corners of the red stone platform is a
constantly-alight flame. The shrine is
known as the Amar Jawan Jyoti (literally,
‘Flame of the Immortal Warrior’).The words
‘AmarJawan’ is also inscribed in gold on all
four sides of the shrine.
• Just beyond India Gate
is a domed, tall-
columned canopy,
standing in the middle of
a large pool of water and
built to commemorate
King George V. Lutyens
drew his inspiration for
this from an ornate
pavilion at
Mahabalipuram. It
originally housed a white
marble statue of George
V, shifted to Coronation
Park in 1968. Since then,
there have been
suggestions to install
other statues—including
Mahatma Gandhi’s—
under the canopy. These
have been dismissed as
being contrary to the
nature of the canopy and
the central vista.
Islamic architecture had been called Saracenic architecture in Europe
until the 19th century, hence came the strange name of Indo-
Saracenic style.
And yet Indians accepted it in a sympathetic way as what British
architects
represented Indian nationalism, and it was diffused throughout the
country. The background of that was the progress of the research of
ancient buildings since the foundation of the Archaeological Survey of
India on the one hand, and the first elucidation of the architectural
tradition of India by the publication of the History of Indian and Eastern
Architecture (1876) written by James Fergusson on the other hand.
The precursors of this style were Charles Mant (1840-81), who designed
the New Palace of Kolhapur (1881) and William Emerson (1843-1924),
who designed Muir College (1886) in Allahabad.
The reason of that Islamic architecture was selected as the Indian
tradition was that Mughal architecture based on arches and domes
was considered more compatible with European architecture than
Hindu temples based on the post and beam structure. In spite of that,
Robert Fellows Chisholm (1840-1915) mastered Indian traditional
architecture other than Islamic, and made a compromise between
that and Western architecture. It is best represented by the Napier
Museum (1880) in Trivandrum absorbing south Indian tradition of
wooden architecture.
There are many late colonial buildings in the city, such as the Anglican
Cathedral (1935) designed by H.A.N. Medd. The ornament less Garrison
Church of St Martin (1930) designed by Arthur Gordon Shoosmith, a
disciple of Lutyens, is the first work of modernism in India. Currently,
Delhi is a metropolis with a population of 14 million, comprising eight
historical cities from the first Lal Cot (Qutb district) and spreading to the
greater urbanized area. Important facilities for arts include the National
Museum and the Indira Gandhi National Center for the Arts in New
Delhi.
“Public buildings: Major Architectural Features and their Utilitarian and
Symbolic Significance,” deals with the public buildings constructed
during the colonial period. By public buildings we mean those buildings
that were open and accessible to the general public. According to
their nature, these buildings were classified into the following different
categories: (a) Churches/Chapel (b) Circuit House (c) Hospitals (d)
Schools/Colleges (e) Bridges (f) Post Office (g) Library/Stadium/Club
(h) Police Station (i) Commercial Place (j) War Memorial/Canopy. The
public buildings show a remarkable amalgamation of British
architecture with the indigenous style/elements. This was partly owing
to the fact that several architects, masons and workers involved in the
construction of these buildings were Indians.
“Residential Bungalows: Architecture as a Resource of Power”, is
devoted to the discussion of the Bungalows constructed under the
British rule. Bungalows were residential complexes in which resided the
high officials of the British Raj. These buildings provide us with an insight
into the British Indian architectural pattern, and help us see the process
of cultural diffusion during the colonial period. The Bungalows reflected,
and their architecture sustained both class and racial difference. The
bungalows spatially separated the whites from the blacks, but, more
significantly, also the higher class whites from the lower class whites. The
pattern of the residential building construction give one an idea of the
class status, its residents occupied. It also signified how architecture
reflected differences based on class and race.
“Official Building” deals with those buildings of colonial period, which
were built to serve as sites of administration. Like several other buildings
of the colonial period, the official buildings were based the design of
Lutyens and Baker. These two architects were well versed in the neo-
classical style that was the brainchild of Renaissance. They were
responsible for the construction of many important buildings in Delhi,
after the capital was shifted from Calcutta to Delhi. Among the most
magnificent official buildings of that era was the Viceroy House
(Rashtrapati Bhawan). Lutyens designed it, and it served both official
and residential purposes. The building was divided into different parts in
accordance with their utilitarian value but to secure an aesthetic touch,
were enclosed by some of the indigenous, particularly Mughal, features
in the buildings were the presence of chajja, jalis, etc. The official
buildings of the British era are, indeed, magnificent examples of the
amalgamation of Anglo-Indian styles. They are also remarkable in
combining utilitarian needs with aesthetic appreciation.
The study of the colonial architecture demonstrates the immense
changes that were introduced by the British in India, in the building
construction activities. At the same time, it has shown to us certain
structural continuities and the influence of Mughal and other
indigenous architectural technique over the British architecture in India.
Colonial architecture was a symbolic index of imperial power, and was
intended to strike awe and terror in the minds of the subject Indians. To
achieve that objective, the scale of its grandeur was matched by a
deep and sustained invocation of Mughal architecture. Colonial
architecture was not entirely “colonial”, after all!