Testing Methods For Fertilizers 2020
Testing Methods For Fertilizers 2020
Contents
- viii -
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1. General Rule
1.1 Common Items
(1) Applicable range
The Testing Methods for Fertilizers stipulate the official method of analysis of fertilizers and fertilizer
materials. The type of samples in the tests is shown in the summary of respective test items.
Reference: The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Hereinafter referred to as MAFF)
Public Notices which adopt the “Testing Methods for Fertilizers” are shown below.
1) MAFF Public Notice: Prescribing for the quality labeling standards of special fertilizers, MAFF
Public Notice No. 1163 of August 31, 2000, MAFF Public Notice No. 397 (2020) of February 28,
2020, as amended.
2) MAFF Public Notice: Prescribing for the particulars detailed in the assurance label regarding the
type of raw material as well as material, name and an amount of usage of normal fertilizers,
pursuant to Article 11-2 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2 of Regulation for Enforcement of Fertilizer
Regulation Act, MAFF Public Notice No. 700 of March 16, 1984, MAFF Public Notice No. 399
(2020) of February 28, 2020, as amended.
3) MAFF Public Notice: Prescribing for the official specification of normal fertilizers pursuant to
Fertilizer Regulation Act, MAFF Public Notice No. 284 of February 28, 1986, MAFF Public
Notice No. 401 (2020) of February 28, 2020, as amended.
4) MAFF Public Notice: Prescribing for the major components whose contents are detailed in the
assurance label of normal fertilizers listed in Fertilizer Regulation Act Article 4 Paragraph 1 Clause
3, pursuant to Fertilizer Regulation Act Article 17 Paragraph 1 Clause 3, MAFF Public Notice No.
96 of January 27, 2000, MAFF Public Notice No. 402 (2020) of February 28, 2020, as amended.
1
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2.2) General matters and terms that cite Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS)
a) General notices: General matters common to analysis are according to JIS K 0050.
b) Definition: The definitions of major terms used in the Testing Methods for Fertilizers are
according to JIS K 0211, JIS K 0214, JIS K 0215, JIS Z 8101-1, JIS Z 8101-2 or JIS Z 8101-3.
c) Laboratory sample: A sample transferred to a laboratory. Laboratory sample as specified in
JIS K 0211.
d) Test sample: A sample obtained from a laboratory sample after pretreatment such as grinding.
Test sample as specified in JIS K 0211.
e) Analytical sample: A sample measured from a laboratory sample or a test sample and to be
used in one test. Test sample or analytical sample as specified in JIS K 0211.
f) Sample: A sample in the testing methods indicates c) a laboratory sample, d) a test sample or
e) an analytical sample.
g) Rounding numbers: Methods of rounding the numbers are according to JIS Z 8401.
h) Absorptiometric analysis: General rules for absorptiometric analysis are according to JIS K
0115.
i) Atomic absorption spectrometry: Atomic absorption spectrometry includes flame atomic
absorption spectrometry, electrically heated atomic absorption spectrometry (hereinafter
referred to as “electrically heated atomic absorption spectrometry”) and other atomic absorption
spectrometry. General matters common to these are according to JIS K 0121.
j) Gas chromatography: General matters common to gas chromatography are according to JIS
K 0114.
k) Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: General matters common to Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry are according to JIS K 0123.
l) Electrical conductivity measuring method: General matters common to electrical
conductivity measuring methods are according to JIS K 0130.
m) Test sieving: General matters common to test sieving are according to JIS Z 8815.
n) High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: General matters common to High-Performance
Liquid Chromatography are according to JIS K 0124.
o) High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry: General matters
common to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/ Mass spectrometry are according to
JIS K 0136.
p) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry: General matters common to ICP Optical Emission
Spectrometry are according to JIS K 0116.
q) ICP Mass Spectrometry: General matters common to ICP Mass Spectrometry are according
to JIS K 0133.
r) Ion Chromatography: General matters common to Ion Chromatography are according to JIS
K 0127.
(2.3) Description methods, procedures and terms in testing methods for fertilizers.
a) Reagent name: Unless otherwise specified, conform to the names by the chemical
nomenclature established by the Chemical Society of Japan [in accordance with the
International Union of Pure and Applicable Chemistry (IUPAC) nomenclature of inorganic
chemistry and nomenclature of organic chemistry] and the names of JIS reagents.
b) Organic matters: Fertilizers such as Organic fertilizers, sludge fertilizers and compost and
fertilizer materials. However, organic compounds such as urea and urea compounds are
excluded.
c) Actual article: A laboratory sample in original state.
d) Drying matter: The matter which remains after drying the actual article.
e) Notes, comments, figures, tables and formulae: Serial numbers for each test item should be
2
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) When the dilution factor is large, accuracy should be secured by procedures such as
repeating the dilution procedure.
(2) Set according to the specification and operation method of the measurement instrument
used. There is no need to include the minimum and the maximum values of the
3
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Water
a) Water: Water used in the Testing Methods for Fertilizers herein is water of A2 specified in JIS
K 0557 or water that is confirmed not to affect a quantitation value. However, when otherwise
specified in respective test items, use the specified water.
(4) Reagents
a) Reagents: When the reagent is JIS-specified, use one of highest quality among those marked
with the JIS symbol; when none of the reagent is marked with the JIS symbol, use one of quality
that will not cause a problem in the test. Use reference materials for volumetric analysis
specified in JIS K 8005 for the standardization of titration solutions. Note that ethanol (95)
specified in JIS K 8102 to prepare indicators, etc. can be replaced with ethanol (99.5) specified
in JIS K 8101 and ethanol-water (19+1) prepared with water.
b) Reference materials: The preparation of standard solutions or standardization of titration
solutions using reference materials 1) - 2) below other than materials specified in respective
testing items is possible.
1) Reference materials provided by National Metrology Institute: Reference materials
traceable to International System of Unit (SI) provided by National Metrology Institute (NMI:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology NMIJ, NIST, BAM, etc.)
which signed CIPM MRA (Global Mutual Recognition Arrangement based on the Meter
Convention)
2) Reference materials for volumetric analysis: Reference materials for volumetric analysis
specified in JIS K 8005.
c) Standard Solutions: In the cases of specifying in the comment in respective testing items, the
preparation of standard solutions for a calibration curve using the solution which is traceable to
the National Metrology of 1) - 3) below other than specified in respective testing items is
possible. However, use standard solutions which do not cause a problem in the test with the
kinds and concentration of chemical compounds or added acid used. In addition, in (2.1) a)
Main components or major components, calculate main components or major components
using conversion factors specified in the comment of respective items.
1) Standard Solutions provided by National Metrology Institute: Standard solutions traceable
to International System of Unit provided by National Metrology Institute (NMI: National
Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology NMIJ, NIST, BAM, etc.) which signed
CIPM MRA.
2) JCSS (Japan Calibration Service System) Standard Solutions: Standard solutions prepared
by JCSS (Japan Calibration Service System) the registered provider for Chemical Analysis,
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, ICP or Ion Chromatography traceable to specific reference
materials based on Measurement Act Article 134. In addition, it is recommended to use standard
solutions which indicate the uncertainty of concentration and factors.
3) Standard Solutions traceable to National Metrology: Standard Solutions traceable to
National Metrology (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology NMIJ,
NIST, BAM reference materials, etc. traceable to International System of Unit) provided by
National Metrology Institutes which signed CIPM MRA, but at the same time they are standard
solutions for Chemical Analysis, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, ICP or Ion Chromatography
prepared by the providers who obtained the certification of ISO Guide 34(JIS Q 0034 :
General requirements for the competence of reference material producers). In addition, it is
recommended to use standard solutions which indicate the uncertainty of concentration and
factors.
4
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
6
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) Refer to the separate sheet: “Target of trueness and criteria of precision in respective
concentration levels” or “the reproducibility of respective testing methods” in order to
determine if there is mutual agreement.
7
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2. Handling of samples
2.1 Sampling
Refer to the “Sampling Method of Fertilizers (2020)”.
References
1) Incorporated Administrative Agency Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center:
Sampling Method of Fertilizers (2020)
2) JIS M 8100: Particulate materials - General rules for methods of sampling (1992)
3) JIS K 0060: Sampling method of industrial wastes (1992)
4) JIS Z 8816: Particulate materials − General requirements for methods of sampling (2001)
5) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p. 12 - 17, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
8
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Refrigerator: A refrigerator that can be adjusted to 1 ºC - 8 ºC.
b) Storage container for a sample: A storage container for a sample should be clean, strong and
completely sealed airtight. In particular, in case it contains sludge for raw materials, the
container should be made of non-degradable, non-absorbable material. Additionally, it should
be airtight, water-proof, vapor-proof and non-corrosive.
9
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
10
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2.3.1 Pre-drying
(1) Summary
This procedure is applicable to fertilizers whose laboratory sample is moist and hard to grind. The
symbol of the procedure is 2.3.1-2017 or PD.-1.
Conduct pre-drying using a drying apparatus, and measure the loss on drying in this procedure. In
addition, calculate a conversion factor (actual article), if necessary, to convert the component content
obtained in respective tests to the component content in a laboratory sample (actual article).
(2) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to the pre-drying temperature at
± 2 ºC.
b) Sample drying dish: Measure the mass to the order of 0.1g in advance. Additionally, use
materials of a quality that do not affect the measurement of test components.
Note (1) Examples of drying temperature and drying time: About 70 hours at 40 ºC, no less than
5 hours at 65 ºC.
(2) An example of time to leave at rest: About 20 minutes
Comment 1 When calculating major components in a laboratory sample (actual article) such as
compost and sludge fertilizers, etc. where the test sample is prepared conducting pre-
drying, convert component contents in the analytical sample obtained in respective
tests by the following formula.
References
1) Mariko AIZAWA, Yuji SHIRAI, Yasushi SUGIMURA, Yuichi TAKAHASHI, Jun OKI,
Yukio FUKUCHI and Norio HIKICHI: Evaluation of Pre-drying Procedure to Prepare
Test Samples from Sludge Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 122 - 128
(2008)
11
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4) Flow sheet for pre-drying The flow sheet for the pre-drying of a moist laboratory sample is
shown below.
12
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Apparatus
a) Scoop for increment reduction: A scoop for increment reduction specified in the “Sampling
Method of Fertilizers (2020)”.
b) Riffle sampler: A riffle sampler specified in the “Sampling Method of Fertilizers (2020)”.
References
1) Incorporated Administrative Agency Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center:
Sampling Method of Fertilizers (2020)
2) JIS M 8100: Particulate materials - General rules for methods of sampling (1992)
3) JIS K 0060: Sampling method of industrial wastes (1992)
4) JIS Z 8816: Particulate materials − General requirements for methods of sampling (2001)
13
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2.3.3 Grinding
(1) Summary
This procedure is applicable to fertilizers. The symbol of the procedure is 2.3.3-2017 or GRD.-1.
In order to prepare a homogeneous test sample, grind a laboratory sample with an adequate grinder
until it completely passes through the designated granularity.
(2) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Grinder: Use a grinder (3) of a type and suitability for the granularity and the physical
characteristics (1) of a laboratory sample. In addition, the grinder apparatus which come into
contact with a laboratory sample should be made of materials (2) which do not affect the
analytical value.
b) Primary grinder: A grinder (3) that can primarily grind a large lump.
c) Cutter machine: A cutter that can cut long stems, etc.
d) Sieve: A sieve for the test specified in JIS Z 8801-1 or JIS Z 8801-2 or equivalents.
Note (1) The physical characteristics of a laboratory sample are defined by their solidity,
toughness, specific gravity and adhesiveness.
(2) (Ex.) Do not use stainless steel apparatus when preparing a test sample for chromium or
nickel.
(3) A centrifuging type grinder, a cutting mill, a vibration mill type grinder, etc.
(4) A blender with an attachable blade, etc.
Comment 1 If the sampling amount of an analytical sample is less than 1 g, use a test sample which
will completely pass through 500 µm aperture sieve. In addition, in case a test sample
which suits the aforementioned condition cannot be obtained due to a deliquescent
laboratory sample, etc., make one by crushing a test sample with a mortar and pestle,
which completely passes through 1 mm aperture sieve.
(3.2) Fused phosphate fertilizer, silicate slag fertilizer, etc.: Conduct as specified in 6.4 of JIS M
8100 and as shown below.
a) Grind a laboratory sample with a vibration mill type grinder.
b) Transfer the ground laboratory sample to a sieve of 212 µm apertures.
c) Incline the sieve about 20 degrees, supporting it with one hand or a bent arm, and tap the sieve
frame with the other hand at the rate of about 120 times per minute. During the procedure, place
the sieve in a horizontal position at the rate of 4 times per minute, rotate it 90 degrees and tap
the sieve frame firmly one or two times.
d) When fine powder attaches to the back side of a sieve screen, remove it gently from the back
side to make minus sieve.
e) Regarding the plus sieve of a sample, make them pass through by repeating the procedure in a)
- d).
f) Combine and mix the sample passed to make the test sample.
14
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 Conduct the procedures in (3.2) to obtain observed value of citric acid-soluble main
components in a stable manner. For examples of applicable laboratory samples, fused
matters such as fused phosphate and silicate slag fertilizer, fertilizers made from fused
materials and calcined phosphate fertilizer, etc. are listed.
Comment 3 The procedures in b) - d) are the procedures in 6.1.3 (1.4) of JIS Z 8815.
References
1) JIS Z 8801-1: Test sieves - Part 1: Test sieves of metal wire cloth (2019)
2) JIS Z 8801-2: Test sieves - Part 2: Test sieves of metal wire cloth (2020)
3) JIS M 8100: Particulate materials - General rules for methods of sampling (1992)
15
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3. General tests
3.1 Moisture or moisture content
3.1.a Loss on drying method with drying apparatus
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type A (Def-M)
and its symbol is 3.1.a-2017 or Mois.a-1.
Use drying apparatus under conditions suitable for the kind of fertilizers to be measured to heat
analytical samples to measure loss on drying and obtain moisture in an analytical sample or the
moisture content of a quality labeling standard of a special fertilizer (herein after referred to as
“moisture”). Additionally, calculate a conversion factor (drying matter) to convert component content
obtained by respective tests to component content in a drying matter as necessary.
This testing method corresponds to loss on heating in the Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(1992).
(2) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Drying apparatus: Drying apparatus that can be adjusted to the test temperature ± 2 ºC.
b) Ground-in stoppered weighing bottles (1): Low-form weighing bottles, 50 mm × 30 mm,
specified in JIS R 3503. Dry by heating in advance in a drying apparatus at 75 ºC - 130 ºC,
stand to cool in a desiccator, and measure the mass to the order of 1 mg.
Note (1) Aluminum weighing dishes described in the Handbook of the Feed Analysis Standards
-2009- can also be used.
Note (2) Heat simultaneously the slightly moved or removed stopper of the ground-in stoppered
weighing bottle.
Comment 1 When pre-drying a laboratory sample such as compost and sludge fertilizers to
prepare a test sample, calculate the moisture of the laboratory sample (actual article)
by the following formula:
16
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
B: Loss on drying (% (mass fraction)) of the laboratory sample (actual article) by the
pre-drying procedure
C: Loss on drying (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample by moisture measurement
Comment 2 When calculating harmful content in a drying matter of sludge fertilizers, etc.,
convert component content in a test sample obtained from respective tests by the
following formula.
Comment 3 Use drying conditions in Table 1 for fertilizers of the types shown below:
Comment 4 For samples containing volatile matters, subtract the volatile matter content by the
following a) and b) from loss on drying to obtain moisture.
a) Fertilizers containing guano or diammonium hydrogen phosphate, etc.: Determine
total nitrogen in the test sample, and in the analytical sample after the drying
procedure; convert the difference between the quantitation values into ammonia (NH3)
to make the volatile matter content.
b) Potassium hydrogen carbonate: Determine carbon dioxide in the test sample, and in
the analytical sample after the drying procedure; the difference between the
quantitation values is the volatile matter content.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p. 20 - 23, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Society for the Study of Feed Analysis Standards: Methods of Analysis of Feeds and
17
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4) Flow sheet for moisture: The flow sheet for moisture in fertilizers is shown below:
18
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) There is a method to calibrate with calibration weights or a method to calibrate
automatically with built-in weights.
Note (2) The setup of the drying program and the determination parameter for the end of heating
(constant weight) is according to the specification and the operation method of the
moisture analyzer used.
Comment 1 When pre-drying is conducted, calculate the moisture of the laboratory sample (actual
article) by the following formula:
B: Loss on drying (% (mass fraction)) of the laboratory sample (actual article) by the
pre-drying procedure
C: Loss on drying (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample by moisture measurement
19
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 When calculating harmful content in a drying matter of sludge fertilizers, etc.,
convert component content in a test sample obtained from respective tests by the
following formula.
Comment 3 Table 1 shows the results of the comparison of the measurement values by loss on
drying method with drying apparatus and the measurement values by loss on drying
method with a moisture analyzer using organic fertilizers, compost and sludge
fertilizers in order to evaluate trueness.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 2.
20
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Takeshi UCHIYAMA and Chiyo SAKASEGAWA: Validation of a Heating Method Using
a Moisture Analyzer for Moisture Content in Sludge Fertilizer. Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 1- 5 (2008)
2) Takeshi UCHIYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Moisture Content in Sludge
Fertilizer by a Heating Method Using Moisture Analyzer: A Collaborative Study.
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 6 - 11 (2008)
3) Satono AKIMOTO and Sakiko TAKAHASHI: Validation of a Heating Method Using a
Moisture Analyzer for Moisture Content in Sludge Fertilizer. Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 1 - 5 (2009)
(4) Flow sheet for moisture: The flow sheet for moisture in sludge fertilizers, compost, and
organic fertilizers, etc. is shown below:
21
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Electric furnace: Electric furnace that can be adjusted to 550ºC ± 5 ºC.
b) Crucible: After heating a porcelain crucible for chemical analysis specified in JIS R 1301 with
an electric furnace at 550 ºC ± 5 ºC, stand to cool in a desiccator in advance and measure the
mass to the order of 1 mg.
Note (1) Example of carbonizing and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature
from room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for
about 1 hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(4) Flow sheet for ash content: The flow sheet for ash content in fertilizers is shown below:
22
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3.3 pH
3.3.a Glass electrode method
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type A (Def-M)
and its symbol is 3.3.a-2017 or pH.a-1.
Measure the pH of fertilizers with a pH meter using a glass electrode.
Comment 1 Respective pH standard solutions stored for long time should not be used since the pH
value may change during storage period. In particular, note that borate pH standard
solution and carbonate pH standard solution easily absorb carbon dioxide in the air, so
that the pH values deteriorate.
The pH standard solution that was used once or left exposed to the air should not be
used.
Comment 2 Conduct the calibration of a pH meter as indicated in JIS Z 8802. Actual calibration
operation is according to the operation procedure of the pH meter used for
measurement.
When the pH of a sample solution is no more than 7, use neutral phosphate pH standard
solution and oxalate pH standard solution, or phthalate pH standard solution. When it
exceeds 7, use neutral phosphate pH standard solution and borate pH standard solution,
or carbonate pH standard solution.
Note (1) In the case of a moist laboratory sample, it is recommended to use a sample that is not
pre-dried.
(2) If the sample solution becomes hard to measure because of gelling due to the influence
of flocculants in sludge fertilizer, etc., increase the volume of water to be added.
23
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as 3.4.a (4.1). Additionally, the sample
solution prepared in 4.2.4.a (4.1) can be used instead of the sample solution prepared
by (4.1.2).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS Z 8802 and as shown below. Actual
calibration operation is according to the operation procedure of the pH meter used for
measurement.
a) Wash the read station of a calibrated pH meter repeatedly no less than 3 times with water and
wipe out with clean and soft paper, etc.
b) Put a sample solution into a beaker (3), dip the read station in the solution and measure the pH
value.
Note (3) It is necessary to put sufficient volume of sample solution to keep a measurement value
stable.
Comment 4 If a pH meter has a temperature correction dial or a digital switching, measure the pH
value after adjusting the graduation of the pH meter with the temperature of a sample.
References
1) JIS Z 8802: Methods for determination of pH of aqueous solutions (2011)
(5) Flow sheet for pH value: The flow sheet for pH value in fertilizers is shown below.
Predetermined volume
Ground-in stopper flask.
of analytical sample
← Water 5 -10 times or 100 times the volume
Stirring
Measurement pH meter
24
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) Store potassium chloride standard solution in a polyethylene or borosilicate glass bottle
and seal the bottle.
(2) The volume that is recommended for an instrument or a cell used.
Comment 1 Potassium chloride standard solution used once or left in the air should not be used.
Comment 2 Check the indicated value as shown in 6.2 in JIS K 0130 as necessary. Actual procedure
to check is according to the operation procedure of the electrical conductivity meter
used for measurement.
Note (3) In the case of a moist laboratory sample, it is recommended to use a sample that is not
pre-dried.
(4) If the sample solution becomes hard to measure because it is gelled by the influence of
flocculants in sludge fertilizer, etc., increase the volume of water added. However, this
fact should be expressed in the test result.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0130 and as shown below.
Actual measurement operation is according to the operation procedure of the electrical
conductivity meter used for measurement.
a) Wash the read station of an electrical conductivity meter repeatedly no less than 3 times with
water.
b) Put a sample solution into a beaker (5), dip the read station and measure electrical conductivity.
25
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) It is necessary to put sufficient volume of sample solution to keep a measurement value
stable.
References
1) JIS K 0130:General rules for electrical conductivity measuring method (2008)
(5) Flow sheet for electrical conductivity: The flow sheet for electrical conductivity is showed
below.
26
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3.5 Granularity
3.5.a Dry-type sieving testing method
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type A (Def-M)
and its symbol is 3.5.a-2017 or P-size.a-1.
Measure the particle diameter distribution of solid fertilizers with a dry-type sieving analysis.
(3) Dry-type sieving analysis procedure: Conduct sieving analysis corresponding to the aperture
size of a sieve used as indicated in JIS Z 8815 and as shown below.
(3.1) More than 1mm and no more than 4mm
a) Stack a large aperture sieve on an acceptor so that the large sieve is on top.
b) Measure a laboratory sample to the order of 0.1g and put it in the sieve at the top section.
c) After putting a stopper on it, hold the stacked sieves with both hands, and vibrate (1) them back
and forth along a unidirectional and horizontal plane at about 60 times per minute with about
70 mm amplitude.
d) Put respective plus and minus sieves in a weighing dish (2).
Note (1) Conduct more circular motion at the rate of about 3 revolutions per minute as necessary.
(2) Turning over the back side of a sieve, remove the clogged particles from the sieve screen
with a clogging removal brush and combine them with the plus sieve.
Note (3) When fine powder attaches to the back side of a sieve screen, remove them gently from
the back side with a clogging removal brush and combine them with the minus sieve
Mass percentage of plus sieve or minus sieve (%) (R) = (A/T) × 100
References
1) JIS Z 8815: Test sieving - General requirements (1994).
2) JIS K 0069: testing methods for sieving of chemical products (1992).
(5) Flow sheet for granularity: The flow sheet of granularity of solid fertilizers is shown below.
Laboratory sample
Measure the mass to the order of 0.1g
or Test sample
Dry-type sieving
Mass measurement of
respective plus sieve Measure the mass to the order of 0.1g
and minus sieve
28
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Drying apparatus: Drying apparatus that can be adjusted to the test temperature ± 2 ºC.
b) Soxhlet extractor: An inter-changeable Soxhlet extractor, cooling apparatus and weighing
bottles (Example: JIS R 3503, attached figure 71)
c) Water bath A water bath that can be adjusted to about 60 ºC
d) Weighing bottle: A flat bottle flask connectable to a Soxhlet extractor. After heating with a
drying apparatus at 100 ºC - 105 ºC in advance, stand to cool in a desiccator and measure the
mass to the order of 1mg.
e) Cylindrical filter paper: A cylindrical filter paper made of cellulose. Example: 22 mm external
diameter, 20 mm internal diameter, 90 mm total length (1).
29
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) The amount of diethyl ether depends on the volume of a weighing bottle.
(4) Adjust the temperature for diethyl ether to circulate 16 - 20 times per hour. (Target
temperature is about 60 ºC)
(5) Remove the cylindrical filter paper from the Soxhlet extractor. In the case of a cock
attached Soxhlet extractor, open the cock and recover it.
(6) It is dangerous if diethyl ether resides in a weighing bottle when the bottle is put in a
drying apparatus.
(7) Wipe the outside of a weighing bottle since there is a risk of garbage or stain sticking to
it.
References
1) Japan Oil Chemist ‘Society: Standard Method for the Analysis of Fats, Oils and Related
Materials (2003), 1.5 Oil content p. 1 - 2, Incorporated Foundation Japan Oil Chemist
‘Society, Tokyo (2009)
2) Feed Analysis Standard Task Force: Feed Analysis Method/Handbook -2009 - I, p. 37 -
39, Incorporated Administrative Agency, Food and Agriculture Materials Inspection
Center, Saitama (2009)
(5) Flow sheet for oil content: The flow sheet for oil content in organic fertilizers is shown below:
2 g- 5 g
Weigh to the order of 1mg to a cylindrical filter paper
analytical sample
Soxhlet extractor
Weighing bottle
30
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100
mL of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and
titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution
31
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide
solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or,
calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Catalyst (5): Mix potassium sulfate specified in JIS K 8962 and copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate
(6)
specified in JIS K 8983 in the ratio of 9 to 1.
f) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium
hydroxide specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
32
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Steam distillation apparatus
b) Digestion flask: Kjeldahl flask
c) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (10) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (11), add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (10) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (11),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Put a predetermined amount of the digestion solution in a 300-mL distillation flask, add a proper
amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (12), and immediately connect this
distillation flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (10) 5 mL - 20 mL
(11) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
33
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(12) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue color will appear.
Note (13) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 6 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
Comment 7 The nitrogen content in the analytical sample can be measured by using an automatic
nitrogen analyzer (Kjeldahl digestion method) instead of the test procedure in (4). The
setup of the program and the parameter of the analyzer as well as vessels etc. are
34
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
according to the specification and the operation method of the automatic nitrogen
analyzer used. However, conduct in advance a comparative test with the test procedure
in (4) using fertilizers containing no nitrate nitrogen, to confirm that there is no
difference in the quantitation value of total nitrogen.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 98.5 % - 100.6 %
and 97.1%-99.2 % as total nitrogen (T-N) respectively.
The results of the collaborative study (limited to reported values with the Kjeldahl
method) to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed by using a
three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.02 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p. 27 - 31, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Feed Analysis Standard Task Force: Feed Analysis Method/Handbook -2009 - I, p. 28 -
33, Incorporated Administrative Agency, Food and Agriculture Materials Inspection
Center, Saitama (2009)
3) Takashi KUBOTA, Tomoko OSHIDA, Kozue YANAI, Yuzuru INOUE, Seiji MATSUI,
Takaharu MATSUMOTO, Eiichi ISHIKURO and Akemi YASUI: Improvement of the
Conditions for the Determination of Total Nitrogen in Fish Meal in Kjeldahl Method and
Its Comparison with Dumas Method, Bunsekikagaku, 60, p. 67 - 74 (2011)
4) Kimie KATO, Masaki CHIDA and Erina WATANABE: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Total Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by Kjeldahl
method, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 5, p. 156 - 166 (2012)
35
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total nitrogen: The flow sheet for total nitrogen in fertilizers is shown below:
36
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Measurement: Conduct measurement as shown below. However, confirm in advance using
an analytical sample that there is no difference from the measured value of total nitrogen
obtained according to 4.1.1.a, 4.1.1.c, 4.1.1.d or 4.1.1.e.
a) Measurement conditions for the total nitrogen analyzer by the combustion method: Set up
the measurement conditions for the total nitrogen analyzer considering the following:
Combustion temperature: No less than 870 ºC
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Turn on the total nitrogen analyzer by the combustion method (1), and adjust so that stable
indicated values can be obtained.
2) Weigh a predetermined amount of the standard for calibration curves (2) to the order of 0.1 mg
into a combustion vessel.
3) Insert the combustion vessel into the total nitrogen analyzer by the combustion method, and
read the indicated value.
4) Conduct the procedure in 3) for another combustion vessel for a blank test, and read the
indicated value.
5) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the nitrogen content and the indicated value of the
standard for calibration curves and the blank test for calibration curves.
c) Sample measurement
1) Weigh a predetermined amount of an analytical sample (3) to the order of 0.1 mg into a
combustion vessel.
2) Insert the combustion vessel containing the analytical sample to the total nitrogen analyzer by
the combustion method, and read the indicated value.
3) Obtain the nitrogen content from the calibration curve, and calculate total nitrogen in the
analytical sample.
Note (1) The setup of the program and the parameter of the analyzer are according to the
specification and the operation method of the total nitrogen analyzer by the combustion
method used.
(2) Standard for calibration curves: DL-Aspartic acid (purity no less than 99 % (mass
fraction)), EDTA (purity no less than 99 % (mass fraction)), hippuric acid (purity no less
than 98 % (mass fraction)) or other reagents having equivalent purity recommended by
the total nitrogen analyzer by the combustion method used.
37
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) The sampling amount of an analytical sample is as shown in Table 1. In addition, set the
sampling amount of an analytical sample upon consideration of the estimated content of
total nitrogen in the test sample and the measurement range of the total nitrogen analyzer
by the combustion method.
Comment 1 Sample an analytical sample from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding (3.1) by
grinding with a mill until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture or
from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding Comment 1.
Comment 2 Compound fertilizers, designated blended fertilizers and nitrolime may have high
contents of phosphoric acid (P2O5), alkali metals (Na, K), alkaline earth metals (Ca,
Mg), etc., causing contamination of packing or damage in quartz parts, etc. To avoid
their influences, it is recommended to add tungsten oxide (elemental analysis reagent
or heat-treated reagent) to completely cover the analytical sample.
Comment 3 When a sample with a low content of organic compounds, such as compound fertilizers
and designated blended fertilizers etc., and thus with low combustion efficiency is
measured, it is recommended to add sucrose to the analytical sample so that the carbon
content will be comparable to the standard for calibration curves. Additionally, confirm
in advance that sucrose to be used has a nitrogen content that does not affect the
measured value of total nitrogen of the analytical sample.
Comment 4 Table 2, in order to evaluate trueness, shows the results of the comparison of
measurement values by the Combustion method and the Kjeldahl method with sludge
fertilizers, organic fertilizers, and inorganic fertilizers, etc.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 3.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers for home gardening, and 0.05 % (mass fraction) for
the other fertilizers.
38
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
39
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Mariko AIZAWA, Yasushi SUGIMURA, Yuichi TAKAHASHI, Jun OKI, Yukio
FUKUCHI, Yuji SHIRAI and Norio HIKICHI: Validation of a Combustion Method for
Determination of Total Nitrogen Content in Sludge Fertilizer. Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 12 - 17, (2008)
2) Mariko AIZAWA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Total Nitrogen content in Sludge
Fertilizer by a Combustion Method: A Collaborative Study. Research Report of Fertilizer
Vol. 1, p. 18 - 24, (2008)
3) Mariko AIZAWA and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Combustion Method for
Determination of Total Nitrogen Content in Organic Fertilizer. Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 6 - 11, (2009)
4) Mariko AIZAWA and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Combustion Method for
Determination of Total Nitrogen Content in Inorganic Fertilizer. Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 1 - 10, (2010)
5) Mariko AIZAWA, Yuko SEKINE and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Total Nitrogen
Content in Fertilizer by a Combustion Method: A Collaborative Study. Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 11 - 18, (2010)
6) Kazumi UCHIYAMA and Yoshio MAEBASHI: Effective Analysis of Organic Trace
Element, p. 99, Mimizuku-sha, Tokyo (2008)
(4) Flow sheet for total nitrogen: The flow sheet for total nitrogen in fertilizers is shown below:
40
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: Chromatograms of the standard for calibration curves and an analytical sample are
shown below:
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100 mL
of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and titrate
with a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution becomes
gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or, calculate the
factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
42
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Hydrochloric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8180 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
f) Tin (II) chloride dihydrate: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8136 or a reagent
of mercury analysis grade or equivalent quality.
g) Devarda’s alloy: A reagent of nitrogen analysis grade specified in JIS K 8653 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
h) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium hydroxide
specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
i) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
j) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
k) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
m) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
n) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Steam distillation apparatus
b) Digestion flask: Kjeldahl flask
c) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
43
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) In the case of direct distillation, a 500-mL Kjeldahl flask connectable to a steam
distillation apparatus is preferable.
(6) If the bubbles foam strongly and excessively, suspend heating for a little while.
(7) When the entire sample solution volume is used in measurement, it is not necessary to
precisely adjust.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (8) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor, (9) add a few drops of
methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (8) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (9),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Put a predetermined amount of the digestion solution in a 300-mL distillation flask, add a proper
amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (10), and connect this distillation flask
to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (8) 5 mL - 20 mL
(9) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(10) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue color will appear.
V10: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2 : Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
V11: Constant volume (mL) of the digestion solution in (4.1) g)
V12: Aliquot volume (mL) of the digestion solution subjected to distillation in (4.2)
b)
W3: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (11) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 3 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.31- 33, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
45
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total nitrogen: The flow sheet for total nitrogen in fertilizers is shown below:
46
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100 mL
of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and
titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution
becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide
solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or,
calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
47
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Reduced iron: Nitrogen content is no more than 0.005 % (mass fraction)
f) Catalyst (5): Mix potassium sulfate specified in JIS K 8962 and copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate
(6)
specified in JIS K 8983 in the ratio of 9 to 1.
g) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium hydroxide
specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
h) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
i) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
k) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
l) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
m) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
48
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (7) A sudden reaction generates heat, and unreacted nitric acid vaporizes or digests to make
nitrogen oxide etc. through which process losses occur easily. Careful and efficient
operation should be taken
(8) Until a sudden reaction is settled.
(9) If the bubbles foam strongly and excessively, suspend heating for a little while.
(10) When the solution has finished changing color, heat further for no less than 2 hours.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (11) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (12), add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (11) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (12),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Put a predetermined amount of the digestion solution in a 300-mL distillation flask, add a proper
amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (13), and connect this distillation flask
to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (11) 5 mL - 20 mL
(12) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(13) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue or reddish-brown
49
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (14) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 3 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
50
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total nitrogen: The flow sheet for total nitrogen in fertilizers is shown below:
51
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
52
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
A-N: Ammoniacal nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample (1) obtained
by 4.1.2
N-N: Nitrate nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample (1) obtained by
4.1.3
Note (1) A-N and N-N use raw data without rounding numerical value
53
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or,
calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
e) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
f) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium hydroxide
specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) d) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Steam distillation apparatus
b) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
55
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 5 g when there is less nitrogen content
in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 3 When it is a fertilizer which contains ammonium urate, humus acid ammonium or
nitrate nitrogen, etc., or when it is not a fertilizer in which phosphate, ammonium and
magnesium coexist, conduct the procedure in (4.1.1.1) a) - c) in 4.2.4.a, the procedure
in (4.1.1.2) a) - c) in 4.2.4.a or the procedure in (4.1.2) a) - c) in 4.2.4.a and put a
predetermined amount of suspension (the equivalents of 20 mg - 100 mg as N) in a
300-mL - 500-mL distillation flask to make a sample solution.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (6) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (7), add a few drops of
methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (6) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (7),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Add (9) no less than 2 g of magnesium oxide (8) to the distillation flask, and connect this
distillation flask to a steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (6) 5 mL - 20 mL
(7) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(8) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity.
(9) Add a small amount of silicone oil as necessary.
Comment 4 When the sample does not contain organic matters or urea, a proper amount of
sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (8) can be added instead of magnesium
oxide.
= (B × V6 - V7) × C1 × f1 × (1.4007/W2)
V8: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2 : Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
W3: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (10) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 5 If it is hard to confirm the endpoint due to the carbon dioxide resulting from carbonate
in the extract when magnesium oxide is used, it is recommended to boil the extract
for 1-2 minute(s) after distilling and cool, and then titrate.
Comment 6 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) d) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As
a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 21 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) were 102.2 % - 100.8 % and 102.5 % as
ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study (limited to reported values with Distillation method) to determine
a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting
analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the calculation results of reproducibility,
intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.1 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.01 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
57
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.36- 37, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masaki CHIDA and Erina WATANABE: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Ammonia Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by
Distillation Method, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 130 - 138 (2013)
3) Erika HIRATA, Hideo SOETA, Hidemi YOSHIMURA and Keiji YAGI: Performance
Evaluation of Determination Method for Nitrogen in Fertilizer: Harmonized
Collaborative Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 84 – 93 (2019)
58
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for ammoniacal nitrogen: The flow sheet for ammoniacal nitrogen in fertilizers is
shown below.
59
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Potassium chloride solution (1 mol/L) (1): Dissolve 75 g of potassium chloride specified in JIS
K 8121 in water to make 1000 mL.
c) Aluminum chloride solution (1 mol/L) (1): Dissolve 240 g of aluminum chloride (III)
hexahydrate specified in JIS K 8114 in water to make 1000 mL.
d) Potassium hydroxide solution (170 g/L) (1): Dissolve 170 g of potassium hydroxide in water
to make 1000 mL.
e) Formaldehyde solution: Add one volume of water to one volume of the 36 % (mass fraction)
- 38 % (mass fraction) formaldehyde specified in JIS K 8872.
f) Hydrochloric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8180 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, and add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
60
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 Thymol blue can be dissolved if it is sodium salt. The thymol blue specified in JIS K
8643 is slightly hard to dissolve in ethanol and hard to dissolve in water. Therefore,
add about 2.15 mL of sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 mol/L) per 0.1 g of thymol blue
to neutralize, and then prepare the thymol blue solution (1 g/100 mL) through the same
procedure as (2) i).
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) Add 3 mL of aluminum chloride per 0.04 g of P or 0.1 g of P2O5 in the sample solution.
(3) Form precipitate of aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate to separate the
phosphate.
Comment 4 In the procedure of (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an
analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 5 When it is not a fertilizer in which phosphate, ammonium and magnesium coexist,
about 400 mL of potassium chloride solution (1 mol/L) can be used instead of about
300 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+20) in the procedure of (4.1.2) b).
Comment 6 In the case of the compound fertilizers containing bentonite, after shaking to mix using
about 300 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+20) or about 400 mL of potassium chloride
61
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
solution (1 mol/L) according to Comment 5 in (4.1.2) b), add water to the marked line,
filter with Type 3 filter paper and transfer 50 ml - 100 mL to a 250-mL volumetric
flask, and then conduct the procedure in (4.1.2) c) - e).
VS: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration in (4.2) e)
VB: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration of the blank test in (4.2) f)
C: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V4: Constant volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.1.1) c) or (4.1.2) d)
V5: Aliquot volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Comment 7 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization and (4.2) e) - f) can be conducted
by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the determination
parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according to the
specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 21 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) were 100.4 % - 101.0 % and 100.1 % as
ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) respectively.
The results of the collaborative study (limited to reported values by Formaldehyde
method) to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed by using a
three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.03 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.02 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
62
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.39- 42, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masaki CHIDA and Erina WATANABE: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Ammonia Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by
Formaldehyde Method, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 139 - 147 (2013)
(5) Flow sheet for ammoniacal nitrogen: The flow sheet for ammoniacal nitrogen in fertilizers is
shown below.
63
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
64
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100 mL
of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and
titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution
65
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide
solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or,
calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium hydroxide
specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
f) Devarda’s alloy: A reagent of nitrogen analysis grade specified in JIS K 8653 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, and add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Steam distillation apparatus
66
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
Note (5) Conduct the procedure in Comment 3 when there is much nitrogen content in the
fertilizers such as simple salt fertilizers.
Comment 3 In the case of nitrate fertilizer, etc. containing much nitrogen content, weigh 2 g - 5g
of an analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, put it into a 250- mL volumetric flask,
dissolve it in water, and further add water up to the marked line. Put predetermined
volume of suspension (the equivalents of 20 mg -100 mg as N) into a 300- mL - 500-
mL distillation flask.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (6) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (7), add a few drops of
methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (6) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (7),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Add (10) no less than 3 mg of devarda’s alloy and adequate volume of sodium hydroxide (200
g/L - 500 g/L) (8) (9) and connect this distillation flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (6) 5 mL - 20 mL
(7) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(8) Sudden reaction makes bubbles foam drastically and the bubbles overflow from a
distillation flask. Therefore, it is required to add an alkali solution gradually and mix
quietly.
(9) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity.
(10) Add a small amount of silicone oil as necessary.
Note (11) The nitrogen content (N-N+A-N) and ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) use raw data without
rounding the numerical value.
(12) When no ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) is contained, the nitrogen content (N-N+A-N)
calculated in (4.3) b) is regarded as nitrate nitrogen (N-N).
V10: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2 : Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
W3: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (13) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 4 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.49- 50, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
68
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen: The flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen in fertilizers is shown below.
69
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100 mL
of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and
titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution
becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide
70
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (1). Or,
calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
=V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1 : Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium hydroxide
specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
f) Reduced iron: Nitrogen content is no more than 0.005 % (mass fraction)
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified in
JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, and add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified in
JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Note (5) Conduct the procedure in Comment 3 when there is much nitrogen content in the
fertilizers such as simple salt fertilizers.
(6) Sudden reaction generates heat, and unreacted nitric acid vaporizes or digests to make
nitrogen oxide etc. through which process losses occur easily. Careful and efficient
operation should be taken
(7) Until a sudden reaction is settled.
Comment 3 In the case of nitrate fertilizer, etc. containing much nitrogen content, weigh 2 g - 5g
of an analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, put it into a 250- mL volumetric flask,
dissolve it in water, and further add water up to the marked line. Put predetermined
volume of suspension (the equivalents of 20 mg - 100 mg as N) into a 300-mL - 500-
mL distillation flask.
(4.2) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are according
to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (8) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (9), add a few drops of
methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam distillation
apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (8) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an acceptor (9),
add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect this acceptor
to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Add adequate volume of sodium hydroxide (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (10) and connect this distillation
flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (8) 5 mL - 20 mL
(9) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL beaker
with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be immersed in
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(10) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity.
b) Calculate nitrogen content (N-N+A-N) in the analytical sample by the following formula:
c) Subtract the ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) separately obtained in 4.1.2 from the obtained nitrogen
content (N-N+A-N) to calculate nitrate nitrogen (N-N) (11) (12).
Note (11) The nitrogen content (N-N+A-N) and ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) use raw data
without rounding the numerical value.
(12) When no ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) is contained, the nitrogen content (N-N+A-N)
calculated in (4.3) b) is regarded as nitrate nitrogen (N-N).
(4.3.2) When a boric acid solution (40 g/L) is used in (4.2) a):
a) Titrate the distillate with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid until the color of the solution becomes light
red (13).
b) Calculate nitrogen content (N-N+A-N) in the analytical sample by the following formula:
c) Subtract the ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N) separately obtained in 4.1.2 from the obtained nitrogen
content (N-N+A-N) to calculate nitrate nitrogen (N-N) (11) (12).
V10: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration
C2 : Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2 : Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
W3: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (13) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 4 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.3)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.48- 49, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
73
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen: The flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen in fertilizers is shown
below.
74
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the nitrate standard solution in (2), a nitrate standard solution for a
calibration curve can be prepared using nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N 0.1 mg/mL or 1
mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
c) Add about 1 g of calcium hydroxide and about 1 mg of basic magnesium carbonate and shake
to mix at 30 - 40 revolutions /min for about 10 minutes.
d) Add water up to the marked line.
e) Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution (3).
Note (3) As soon as the sample solution is prepared, conduct the procedure in (4.2) a).
Comment 2 If the filtrate of (4.1) e) is colored, add no more than 0.5 g of active carbon and filter
with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 410 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 10 mL of nitrate standard solution (N-N 0.01 mg/mL) in small evaporating dishes
(4)
step-by-step.
2) Conduct the same procedure as (4.2) b) - g) to make the nitrate standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation.
3) Put 40 mL of water in a 100-mL volumetric flask, and shake to mix while gently adding 2 mL
of phenol sulfuric acid. Let it stand to cool and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) f) - g) to
make the blank test solution for calibration curve.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength 410 nm of the nitrate standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation as the
control.
5) Prepare the calibration curve of concentration of the nitrate nitrogen and absorbance of the
nitrate standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) g), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4).
2) Obtain the nitrate nitrogen (N-N) content from the calibration curve and calculate nitrate
76
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 16 % (mass fraction) and 1 %
(mass fraction) - 3% (mass fraction) were 103.4 % and 101.1 % - 100.9 % as nitrate
nitrogen (N-N) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.002 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.52- 55, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of Calibration
curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Kimie KATO, Masaki CHIDA and Erina WATANABE: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Nitrate Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by Phenol
Sulfuric Acid Method, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 148 - 155 (2013)
4) Erika HIRATA, Hideo SOETA, Hidemi YOSHIMURA and Keiji YAGI: Performance
Evaluation of Determination Method for Nitrogen in Fertilizer: Harmonized
Collaborative Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 84 – 93 (2019)
77
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen: The flow sheet for nitrate nitrogen in fertilizers is shown
below.
78
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
79
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate the total phosphoric acid (T-P2O5) in an analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (2.2914).
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.3) h) for the
measurement of cadmium, nickel, chromium or lead, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid in (2) should be a reagent of harmful metal analysis grade, microanalysis grade or
equivalents.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Spectrophotometer: A spectrophotometer specified in JIS K 0115
b) Electric furnace: An electric furnace that can be adjusted to 550 ºC ± 5 ºC.
c) Hot plate or sand bath: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Adjust the amounts of gas and silica sand of a sand bath so that the sand bath temperature can
be set to 250 ºC.
d) Digestion flask: Kjeldahl flask
Note (8) When the solution has finished changing color, heat further for no less than 2 hours.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) in 4.2.1.b. Also, the
procedures in (4.1.1) a) - f) are the same as in (4.1) in 4.1.1.a.
Note (9) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 4 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 5 The procedures in (4.1.2) are the same as the procedures in (4.1.1) of 4.3.1.a, (4.1) of
4.3.1.b, (4.1.1) of 4.5.1.a, (4.1.1) of 4.6.1.a, (4.1.1) of 4.9.1.a, (4.1.1) of 4.10.1.a and
(4.1) of 8.4.a.
Note (10) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(11) The watch glass can be removed.
(12) When exsiccating it, phosphoric acid may not dissolve completely and the
concentration may become a low value in the procedure in g).
(13) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 6 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.3) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 7 The procedures in (4.1.3) are the same as in (4.1.2) of 4.3.1.a, (4.1.2) of 4.5.1.a, (4.1.2)
of 4.6.1.a, (4.1.2) of 4.9.1.a and (4.1.2) of 4.10.1.a. And also, the same as (4.1) in
4.9.1.b, (4.1) in 4.10.1.b, (4.1) a) - h) in 5.3.a, (4.1) a) - h) in 5.3.b, (4.1) a) - h) in
5.4.a, (4.1) a) - h) in 5.4.b, (4.1) a) - h) in 5.5.a, (4.1) a) - h) in 5.5.d, (4.1) a) - h) in
5.6.a and (4.1) a) - h) in 5.6.b.
d) Add 20 mL of coloring reagent solution, and further add water up to the marked line, and then
leave at rest for about 30 minutes.
Note (14) It is not necessary to add a phenolphthalein solution (1 g/100 mL) when determination
can be done by the color change of copper ion (light blue → blue-purple).
(15) Without the addition of water, precipitate may be produced when a coloring reagent
solution is added.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add a proper amount of water (15), and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) d) to make the P2O5
0.5 mg/100 mL - 6 mg/100 mL phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (16).
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) d), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (16).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate total
phosphoric acid (T-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (16) Measure within 6 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution in the procedure in
(4.2) d).
Comment 8 After the procedure in (4.2) a), it is also possible to measure citrate-soluble phosphoric
acid at the same time by adding 4 mL of nitrate acid (1+1) and 2 mL of Petermans
citrate solution and by conducting the procedures from (4.2) d) to (4.3) in 4.2.2.a
(using b reagent solution in the Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers (1992)).
Further after the procedure in (4.2) a), it is also possible to measure citric acid-soluble
phosphoric acid at the same time by adding 4 mL of nitrate acid (1+1) and 17 mL of
citrate solution and by conducting the procedures from (4.2) d) to (4.3) in 4.2.3.a
(using b reagent solution in the Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers (1992)).
Comment 9 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % - 20 % (mass fraction) and
1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 99.4 % - 100.2 % and 101.0 % - 105.7 %
as total phosphoric acid (T-P2O5) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed
82
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
83
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.108- 114, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of Calibration
curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Kimie KATO, Masayuki YOSHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Systematization of
Determination Methods of Major Components in Sludge Fertilizer, Compost and Organic
Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3 p. 107 - 116 (2010)
4) Yoshiyuki SUNAGA, Yasushi SUGIMURA, Ichiro YOSHIDA and Hidenori KONISHI:
Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for Phosphorus Content
in Fertilizer by Ammonium Vanadomolybdate Absorption Photometry, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 167 - 179 (2012)
5) Toshio HIRABARA, Shin ABE, and Masahiro ECHI: Performance Evaluation of
Determination Method for Phosphoric Acid in fertilizer: Harmonized Collaborative
Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 94 – 108 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet for total phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for total phosphoric acid in fertilizers is
shown below:
84
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
85
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
86
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 60 ºC - 65 ºC.
b) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 220 ºC ± 5 ºC.
c) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 220 ºC ± 5 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
d) Digestion flask: Kjeldahl flask
Note (4) When the solution has finished changing color, heat further for no less than 2 hours.
Comment 1 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.1.a. In addition,
the sample solution prepared in (4.1.2) in 4.2.1.a and (4.1.3) in 4.2.1.a can also be used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.98- 106, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
88
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for total phosphoric acid in fertilizers is
shown below:
89
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 The coloring reagent solution in d) can also be prepared by the following method.
Dissolve 2.24 g of ammonium vanadate (V) (3) specified in JIS K 8747 in water, add
300 mL of nitric acid, and add water to make 1000 mL. Separately, add 100 g of
90
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.2.2.b.
Comment 4 When the determination is affected by the coloring of the sample solution of d) and h),
put the predetermined volume (8) of the sample solution (1) and the sample solution (2)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask, add a few drops of hydrochloric acid (1+1) to acidify,
then add no more than 0.1 g of active carbon. After leaving at rest for a little while,
add water up to the marked line and filter with Type 3 filter paper. The filtrate is to be
the mixture solution for the sample solution of (4.2) a). Additionally, as phosphorus
contained in active carbon has the possibility to elute and affects the determination
value, a blank test is required.
Comment 5 The volumetric flask used in the procedure in a) should be distinguished as a flask to
be used for phosphate coloring operation and should not be used for other purposes.
Note (8) The transferred volume of the sample solution (1) and the sample solution (2) should be
equivalent.
(9) When the solution is muddled by adding nitric acid (1+1), conduct centrifugation with
about 1700 × g centrifugal force (12) for about five minutes after the procedure in e).
(10) When it does not contain nonorthophosphoric acid, the boiling operation is not
necessary.
(11) Without the addition of water, precipitate may be produced when a coloring reagent
solution is added.
(12) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add 2 mL of Petermans citrate solution, 4 mL of nitric acid (1+1) and a proper amount of water
(11)
, and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) e) to make the P2O5 0.5 mg/100 mL - 6 mg/100
mL phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (13).
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) e), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (13).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate citrate
soluble phosphoric acid (S-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (13) Measure within 2 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 99.4 % - 100.6 %
and 98.6 % - 103.0 % as citrate-soluble phosphoric acid (S-P2O5) respectively.
92
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed
by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the calculation
results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.08 %
(mass fraction).
93
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.108- 114, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of Calibration
curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Akira SHIMIZU and Shin ABE: Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing
Method for Citrate-Soluble Phosphorus Content by Ammonium Vanadomolybdate
Absorption Photometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 180 - 189 (2012)
4) Toshio HIRABARA, Shin ABE, and Masahiro ECHI: Performance Evaluation of
Determination Method for Phosphoric Acid in fertilizer: Harmonized Collaborative
Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 94 – 108 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet for citrate soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for citrate soluble phosphoric
acid in fertilizers is shown below:
94
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
95
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 65 °C ± 2 °C and 60 ºC - 65 ºC.
b) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 220 °C ± 5 ºC.
c) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 220 ºC ± 5 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
e) Transfer the non-dissolved matter on the filter paper together with the filter paper to another
250- mL volumetric flask (2), and add 100 mL of Petermans citrate solution and stopple. Then
shake to mix until the filter paper breaks down completely.
f) Heat the volumetric flask in e) in water bath at 65 ºC ± 2 ºC for 1 hour while shaking to mix
every 15 minutes.
g) After immediate cooling is complete, add water up to the marked line
h) Filter with Type 6 filter paper to make a sample solution (2).
Comment 1 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.2.2.a.
Note (3) The transferred volume of the sample solution (1) and the sample solution (2) should be
equivalent.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.98- 106, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
97
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citrate soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for citrate soluble phosphoric
acid in fertilizers is shown below:
98
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
99
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 The coloring reagent solution in c) can also be prepared by the following method.
Dissolve 2.24 g of ammonium vanadate (V) (3) specified in JIS K 8747 in water, add
300 mL of nitric acid, and add water to make 1000 mL. Separately, add 100 g of
hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate (4) specified in JIS K 8905 while
dissolving in water, and further add water to make 1000 mL. In the case of usage, mix
equal volumes of the two solutions.
Comment 2 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) in an analytical sample
100
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) of 4.2.3.b, (4.1) of
4.2.3.c, (4.1.1) of 4.2.3.d, (4.1.1) of 4.3.2.a, (4.1) of 4.3.2.b, (4.1) of 4.3.2.c, (4.1.1) of
4.3.2.d, (4.1.1) of 4.5.3.a, (4.1.1) of 4.5.3.b, (4.1.1) of 4.6.3.a, (4.1.1) of 4.6.3.b,
(4.1.1) of 4.7.2.a, (4.1.1) of 4.7.2.b, (4.1.1) of 4.8.1.a and (4.1.1) of 4.8.1.b.
Note (7) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.3.b, (4.1.2) of
4.2.3.d, (4.1.2) of 4.3.2.a, (4.1.2) of 4.3.2.d, (4.1.2) of 4.5.3.a, (4.1.2) of 4.5.3.b,
(4.1.2) of 4.6.3.a, (4.1.2) of 4.6.3.b, (4.1.2) of 4.7.2.a, (4.1.2) of 4.7.2.b, (4.1.2) of
4.8.1.a and (4.1.2) of 4.8.1.b.
Comment 5 For a by-product phosphate fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and
(4.1.2) d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an
analytical sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an
101
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
analytical sample”.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Comment 7 When the determination is affected by the coloring of the sample solution of (4.1.1) d)
and (4.1.2) d), transfer the predetermined volume of the sample solution to a 100-mL
volumetric flask, add a few drops of hydrochloric acid (1+1) to acidify, then add no
more than 0.1 g of active carbon. After leaving at rest for a little while, add water up
to the marked line and filter with Type 3 filter paper. The filtrate is prepared as the
sample solution of (4.2) a). Additionally, as phosphorus contained in active carbon has
the possibility to elute and affects the determination value, a blank test is required.
Comment 8 The volumetric flask used in the procedure in a) should be distinguished as a flask to
be used for phosphate coloring operation and should not be used for other purposes.
Note (8) When the solution is muddled by adding nitric acid (1+1), conduct centrifugation with
about 1700 × g centrifugal force (11) for about five minutes after the procedure in e).
(9) When it does not contain nonorthophosphoric acid, the boiling operation is not
necessary.
(10) Without the addition of water, precipitate may be produced when a coloring reagent
solution is added.
(11) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add 17 mL of a citric acid solution, then add 4 mL of nitric acid (1+1), further add a proper
amount of water (10) and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) e) to make the P2O5 0.5 mg/100
mL - 6 mg/100 mL phosphoric acid standard solution for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (12).
102
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) e), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (12).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-
soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (12) Measure within 2 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution.
Comment 9 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 96.6 % - 103.4 %
and 102.0 % - 103.8 % as citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed
by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the calculation
results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.03 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.01 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
103
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.108- 114, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of Calibration
curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Yoshiyuki SUNAGA, Yasushi SUGIMURA, Ichiro YOSHIDA and Hidenori KONISHI:
Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for Phosphorus Content
in Fertilizer by Ammonium Vanadomolybdate Absorption Photometry, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 167 - 179 (2012)
4) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients in
the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 11,
p. 1 – 13 (2018)
5) Toshio HIRABARA, Shin ABE, and Masahiro ECHI: Performance Evaluation of
Determination Method for Phosphoric Acid in fertilizer: Harmonized Collaborative
Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 94 – 108 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble
phosphoric acid in fertilizers is shown below:
1 g analytical sample Weigh to the order of 1 mg to a 250-mL volumetric flask
← 150 mL of citric acid solution [about 30 ºC]
Shaking to mix Constant-temperature rotary shaker (30 - 40 revolutions/min)
30 ºC ± 1 ºC, for 1 hour
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1-1 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers
(Extraction procedure (4.1.1))
104
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1-2 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers
(Extraction procedure (4.1.2))
Sample solution
Cooling
← A proper amount of water
← 20 mL of coloring reagent solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
Leaving at rest For about 30 minutes
105
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 The coloring reagent solution in d) can also be prepared by the following method.
Dissolve 2.24 g of ammonium vanadate (V) (3) specified in JIS K 8747 in water, add
300 mL of nitric acid, and add water to make 1000 mL. Separately, add 100 g of
hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate (4) specified in JIS K 8905 while
dissolving in water, and further add water to make 1000 mL. In the case of usage, mix
equal volumes of the two solutions.
Comment 2 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
106
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) in an analytical sample
by multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (2.2914).
Note (6) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (7) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 For a by-product phosphate fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and
(4.1.2) d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an
analytical sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an
analytical sample”.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
107
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (8) A watch glass should not be uncovered when bubbles form while heating because they
may splash.
(9) It is recommended to transfer 2 mL of water to a 100-mL - 200-mL tall beaker in advance
and confirm the volume.
(10) The volume of the solution after transferring should be up to about 50 mL.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add 17 mL of a citric acid solution, then add 4 mL of nitric acid (1+1), further add a proper
amount of water (11). Conduct the same procedure as (4.2) f) to make the P2O5 0.5 mg/100 mL
- 6 mg/100 mL phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (12).
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) f), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (12).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-
soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (11) If water is not added, precipitate may form when adding the coloring reagent solution.
(12) Measure within 2 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution in the procedure in
(4.2) f).
Comment 7 Additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using solid fertilizers (10
samples) containing the equivalents of 1.03 % (mass fraction) - 51.04 % (mass
108
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
fraction) as citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid. As a result, the mean recovery rate was
99 % - 100 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a solid preparation sample
to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows
the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and their
analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.05 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Toshiaki HIROI, Masayuki YAMANISHI Determination Method for Citric Acid-Soluble
Phosphorus in Solid Fertilizer Containing Phosphonate (Phosphite) using
Spectrophotometer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 43 - 58 (2016)
109
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid containing phosphorus acid, etc.: The
flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers containing phosphorus acid, etc.is
shown below:
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
110
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Sample solution
Standing to cool
111
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
b) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 60 ºC - 65 ºC.
c) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 220 ºC ± 5 ºC.
d) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 220 ºC ± 5 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.98- 106, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
113
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble
phosphoric acid in fertilizers is shown below:
Sample solution
Figure 1 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers (Extraction procedure)
114
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid (C-P2O5) in an analytical sample
by multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (2.2914).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
b) Extractor: Constant-temperature rotary shaker or reciprocating water bath shaker as described
below.
ba) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
bb) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker: that can be adjusted to
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40 mm.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 For a by-product phosphate fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and
(4.1.2) d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an
analytical sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an
analytical sample”.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 178.287 nm
116
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry is available for the simultaneous measurement of
multiple elements for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid, citric acid-soluble potassium,
citric acid-soluble magnesia, citric acid-soluble manganese, citric acid-soluble boron
and citric acid-soluble lime. In this case, put a pre-determined amount of phosphoric
acid standard solution (P 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), potassium standard solution (K 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), magnesium standard solution (Mg 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL),
manganese standard solution (Mn 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) and boron standard solution
(B 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology in a volumetric flask to
mix, add hydrochloric acid (1+5) to make an acid concentration of 0.5 mol/L and
further add water up to the marked line to prepare a primary mixed standard solution.
Put a pre-determined volume of primary mixed standard solution in volumetric flasks
step-by-step, add hydrochloric acid (1+23) up to the marked line to prepare mixed
standard solutions for calibration curve preparation within the concentration range in
Table 1 and measure at the analytical line wavelength shown in the Table 1. In this
case, multiply the respective concentrations of mixed standard solutions for calibration
curve preparation or measurement values obtained in (4.2) by the conversion factors
in Table 1 to calculate respective main components in an analytical sample.
Note that when preparing mixed standard solutions, avoid using standard solutions
made of compounds (potassium dihydrogenphosphate, etc.) which contain anything
other than a target component (phosphoric acid, etc.) or prepare separately the standard
solution for a calibration curve of a component (potassium, etc.) which affects
measurement.
In addition, when preserving mixed standard solutions for calibration curve
preparation, use a container, which can be sealed tightly, made of material such as
PTFE that does not elute boron easily.
117
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:1.74 % (mass fraction) - 49.04 % (mass
fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of
Ammonium vanadomolybdate absorptiometric analysis was conducted to evaluate
trueness using processed phosphorus fertilizers (2 samples), compound fertilizers (12
samples), home garden-use compound fertilizers (1 sample), mixed compost
compound fertilizers (2 samples), mixed phosphate fertilizers (2 samples), designated
blended fertilizers (4samples), blended fertilizers (5 samples), byproduct compound
fertilizers (1 sample), byproduct phosphorus fertilizers (2 samples), organic compound
fertilizers (1 sample) and fused phosphate fertilizers (1 sample). As a result, a
regression equation was y=−0.0027+1.001x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was
1.000. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample.
As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive level of 0.260 % (mass fraction) -
49.99 % (mass fraction) was 96.3 % - 100.8 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and
blended fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance.
Table 2 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal Ingredients
118
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble
phosphoric acid in fertilizers is shown below:
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1-2 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers
(Extraction procedure (4.1.2))
119
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
120
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) in an analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (2.2914).
aa) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
ab) vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
b) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
c) Spectrophotometer: A spectrophotometer specified in JIS K 0115
Comment 2 In the procedure of (4.1.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical sample
to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) of 4.1.2.b, (4.1.1.1)
of 4.2.4.b, (4.1) of 4.2.4.c, (4.1.1.1) of 4.2.4.d, (4.1.2.1) of 4.3.3.a, (4.1.2) of 4.3.3.b,
(4.1.2) of 4.3.3.c, (4.1.2.1) of 4.3.3.d, (4.1.1.1) of 4.7.3.a, (4.1.1.1) of 4.7.3.b, (4.1.1)
of 4.9.2.a, (4.1.1) of 4.10.2.a, (4.1.1) of 4.13.1.a and (4.1.1) of 4.14.1.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1.2) is the same as the procedures in (4.1.1.2) of 4.2.4.b, (4.1.1.2)
of 4.2.4.d, (4.1.2.2) of 4.3.3.a, (4.1.2.2) of 4.3.3.d, (4.1.1.2) of 4.7.3.a and (4.1.1.2) of
4.7.3.b.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.b, (4.1.2) of
4.2.4.d, (4.1.3) of 4.3.3.a, (4.1.3) of 4.3.3.d, (4.1.2) of 4.5.3.a, (4.1) of 4.5.3.b, (4.1.2)
of 4.5.4.a, (4.1.2) of 4.6.4.a, (4.1.2) of 4.6.4.b, (4.1.2) of 4.7.3.a, (4.1.2) of 4.7.3.b,
(4.1.2) of 4.8.2.a, (4.1.2) of 4.8.2.b, (4.1.2) of 4.9.2.a, (4.1) of 4.9.2.b, (4.1.2) of
4.10.2.a, (4.1) of 4.10.2.b, (4.1.2) of 4.13.1.a, (4.1) of 4.13.1.b, (4.1.2) of 4.14.1.a,
(4.1) of 4.14.1.b, (4.1) of 4.15.1.a and (4.1) of 4.15.1.b.
Comment 6 When the determination is affected by the coloring of the sample solution of (4.1.1.1)
122
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
d), (4.1.1.2) d) and (4.1.2) d), put the predetermined volume of the sample solution in
a 100-mL volumetric flask, add a few drops of hydrochloric acid (1+1) to acidify, then
add no more than 0.1 g of active carbon. After leaving at rest for a little while, add
water up to the marked line and filter with Type 3 filter paper. The filtrate is prepared
as the sample solution of (4.2) a). Additionally, as phosphorus contained in active
carbon has the possibility to elute and affects the determination value, a blank test is
required.
Comment 7 The volumetric flask used in the procedure in a) should be distinguished as a flask to
be used for phosphate coloring operation and should not be used for other purposes.
Note (6) When the solution is muddled by adding nitric acid (1+1), conduct centrifugation with
about 1700 × g centrifugal force (9) for about five minutes after the procedure in e).
(7) When it does not contain nonorthophosphoric acid, the procedure in b) is not necessary.
(8) Without the addition of water, precipitate may be produced when a coloring reagent
solution is added.
(9) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add a proper amount of water (8), and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) e) to make the P2O5
0.5 mg/100 mL - 6 mg/100 mL phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (10).
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
123
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) e), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (10).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate water-
soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (10) Measure within 6 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution in the procedure in
(4.2) e).
Comment 8 After the procedure in (4.2) a), it is also possible to measure citrate soluble phosphoric
acid at the same time by adding 2 mL of Petermans citrate solution and by conducting
the procedures from (4.2) c) to (4.3) in 4.2.2.a (using b reagent solution in the Official
Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers (1992)).
Further after the procedure in (4.2) a), it is also possible to measure citric acid-soluble
phosphoric acid at the same time by adding 17 mL of citrate solution and by conducting
the procedures from (4.2) c) to (4.3) in 4.2.3.a (using b reagent solution in the Official
Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers (1992)).
Comment 9 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 100.5 % - 101.2 %
and 99.0 % - 101.7 % as water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) respectively.
The comparison of the measurement value of extraction (yi:0.292 % (mass fraction) -
40.40 % (mass fraction )) by a vertical reciprocating shaker and the measurement value
of extract by a rotary shaker (xi) was conducted using fertilizers (12 samples). As a
result, a regression equation was y=−0.041+0.999x, and its correlation coefficient (r)
was 1.000. The comparison of the measurement value of simple extraction (yi:1.92 %
(mass fraction) - 12.21 % (mass fraction )) and the measurement value of extract by a
rotary shaker (xi) was conducted using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a
regression equation was y=0.005+1.005x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers,
designated blended fertilizer and fluid compound fertilizer (2 samples) to evaluate
precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1-1 and 1-2 show the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Table 2 shows results
and analysis results from a collaborative study for test method validation.
In addition, the results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference
material fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance.
Table 3 shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.03 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.004 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
124
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
125
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.108- 114, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of Calibration
curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Yoshiyuki SUNAGA, Yasushi SUGIMURA, Ichiro YOSHIDA and Hidenori KONISHI:
Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Method for Citrate-Soluble
Phosphorus Content by Ammonium Vanadomolybdate Absorption Photometry, Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 167 - 179 (2012)
4) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
5) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Extraction Method for the Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
the Solid Fertilizer using a General-purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer,
Vol. 10, p. 1 - 8 (2017)
6) Toshio HIRABARA, Shin ABE, and Masahiro ECHI: Performance Evaluation of
Determination Method for Phosphoric Acid in fertilizer: Harmonized Collaborative
Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 94 – 108 (2019)
126
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble phosphoric acid: The flow sheet for water-soluble
phosphoric acid: in fertilizers is shown below:
127
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
128
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) in an analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (2.2914).
Comment 2 In the procedure of (4.1.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical sample
to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
solution (1+1) until the color of the solution becomes light red-purple.
f) Add nitric acid (1+10) until the light red-purple color of the solution disappears to make it
slightly acidic.
g) Add 20 mL of coloring reagent solution, and further add water up to the marked line, and then
leave at rest for about 30 minutes.
Note (6) It is recommended to transfer about 2 mL of water to a 100-mL - 200-mL tall beaker in
advance and confirm the volume.
(7) Care should be taken not to exsiccate it. When it exsiccates, the determined value
becomes lower than usual in some cases.
(8) The volume of the solution after transferring should be up to about 50 mL.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 420 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 12 mL of phosphoric acid standard solution (P2O5 0.5 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Add a proper amount of water (9), and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) g) to make the P2O5
0.5 mg/100 mL - 6 mg/100 mL phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 420 nm of the phosphoric acid standard solutions for
the calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve
preparation as the control (10).
5) Prepare the calibration curve of the phosphoric acid concentration and absorbance of the
phosphoric acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the solution in (4.2) g), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 4) (10).
2) Obtain the phosphoric acid (P2O5) content from the calibration curve, and calculate water-
soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) in the analytical sample.
Note (9) If water is not added, precipitate may form when adding the coloring reagent solution.
(10) Measure within 6 hours after adding the coloring reagent solution in the procedure in
(4.2) g).
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a fluid preparation sample.
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 30 % (mass fraction) - 50 %
(mass fraction), 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 % (mass fraction), 4 % (mass fraction) and
0.2 % (mass fraction) were 101.1 % - 101.8 %, 101.1 % - 101.5 %, 100.8 % and
102.5 % as water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) respectively. In the case of using
a solid preparation sample, the average rate of recovery at the content level of 30 %
(mass fraction) - 59 % (mass fraction), 12 % (mass fraction) - 21 % (mass fraction)
and 1 % (mass fraction) - 9 % (mass fraction) are 99.5 % - 100.4 %, 99.3 % - 100.3 %,
and 96.9 % - 100.4% respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a solid preparation sample
131
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
132
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiaki HIROI, Masakazu SAIKI and Kimie KATO: Development and Validation of
Spectrophotometry for Determination of Water-Soluble Phosphoric acid in Liquid Mixed
Fertilizer Containing Phosphonic acid, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 1 P. 25 - 33
(2008)
2) Toshiaki HIROI, Masakazu SAIKI and Kimie KATO: Determination of Water-Soluble
Phosphoric Acid in Liquid Mixed Fertilizer Containing Phosphonic Acid by
Spectrophotometry: A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 1 p. 34 -
40 (2008)
3) Fumihiro ABE, Noriyuki SASAKI and Toshio HIRABARA: Determination of Water-
Soluble Phosphorus in Solid Fertilizer Containing Phosphonic Acid by
Spectrophotometry, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 10 - 16 (2015)
4) Masayuki YAMANISHI, Toshiaki HIROI and Fumika TAKATSU Determination Method
for Citric Acid-Soluble and Water-Soluble Phosphorus in Solid Fertilizer Containing
Phosphonic Acid or Phosphonate (Phosphite) using Spectrophotometer: A Collaborative
Study, Vol. 9, p. 59 - 68 (2016)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble phosphoric acid containing phosphorus acid, etc.: The flow
sheet for water-soluble phosphoric acid in fertilizers containing phosphorus acid, etc.is shown
below:
133
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
134
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
135
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30
- 40 revolutions/min.
b) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 60 ºC - 65 ºC.
c) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 220 ºC ± 5 ºC.
d) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 220 ºC ± 5 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
Comment 1 In the procedure in a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5 g of an analytical sample to the
order of 1 mg, and put it into a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) of 4.2.4.a.
d) Immediately, add 50mL of quimosiac solution, heat for about 15 minutes while sometimes
mixing in a water bath at 60 ºC - 65 ºC to produce the precipitate of quinolinium
phosphomolybdate.
e) After standing to cool down to room temperature while sometimes mixing, filter under reduced
pressure with a crucible type glass filter, wash the tall beaker 3 times with water and transfer
the whole precipitate into a crucible type glass filter, and further wash 7 - 8 times with water.
f) Transfer the precipitate together with the crucible type glass filter into a drying apparatus and
heat at 220 ºC ± 5 ºC for about 30 minutes.
g) As soon as heating is complete, move it into a desiccator and let it stand to cool.
h) After standing to cool, remove the crucible type glass filter from the desiccator and measure the
mass to the order of 1 mg.
i) Calculate water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) by the following formula.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.98- 114, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble phosphoric acid The flow sheet for water-soluble phosphoric
acid: in fertilizers is shown below:
137
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
138
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the phosphoric acid standard solution in (2), a phosphoric acid standard
solution for a calibration curve can be prepared using a phosphoric acid standard
solution (P 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case,
calculate water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5) in an analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (P) of a phosphoric acid standard solution for a
calibration curve or a measured value obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor
(2.2914).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A rotary shaker or a vertical reciprocating shaker as described below.
aa) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30 -
139
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
40 revolutions/min.
ab) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
b) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Comment 3 In the procedure of (4.1.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical
sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less phosphoric acid
content in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 6 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 178.287 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the phosphoric acid standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
140
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry is available for the simultaneous measurement of
multiple elements for water-soluble phosphoric acid, water-soluble potassium, water-
soluble magnesia, water-soluble manganese, water-soluble boron, water-soluble
calcium, water-soluble iron, water-soluble cobalt, water-soluble copper, water-soluble
zinc and water-soluble molybdenum in fluid fertilizers. In this case, put a pre-
determined amount of phosphoric acid standard solution (P 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL),
potassium standard solution (K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), magnesium standard solution
(Mg 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), manganese standard solution (Mn 1 mg/mL or 10
mg/mL) and boron standard solution (B 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National
Metrology in a volumetric flask to mix, add hydrochloric acid (1+5) to make an acid
concentration of 0.5 mol/L and further add water up to the marked line to prepare a
primary mixed standard solution (1). Transfer a pre-determined volume of primary
mixed standard solution (1) to volumetric flasks step-by-step, add hydrochloric acid
(1+23) up to the marked line to prepare mixed standard solutions for calibration curve
preparation (1) within the concentration range in Table 1-1 and measure at the
analytical line wavelength shown in the table. Multiply the respective concentrations
of mixed standard solutions for calibration curve preparation or measurement values
obtained in (4.2) by the conversion factors in Table 1-1 to calculate respective main
components in an analytical sample.
In addition, put a pre-determined amount of calcium standard solution (Ca 1 mg/mL),
iron standard solution (Fe 1 mg/mL), cobalt standard solution (Co 1 mg/mL), copper
standard solution (Cu 1 mg/mL), zinc standard solution (Zn 1 mg/mL) and
molybdenum standard solution (Mo 1 mg/mL) in a volumetric flask to mix, add
hydrochloric acid (1+5) to make an acid concentration of 0.5 mol/L and further add
water up to the marked line to prepare a primary mixed standard solution (2). Put a
pre-determined volume of primary mixed standard solution (2) in volumetric flasks
step-by-step, add hydrochloric acid (1+23) up to the marked line to prepare mixed
standard solutions for calibration curve preparation (2) within the concentration range
in Table 1-2 and measure at the analytical line wavelength shown in the Table.
Note that when preparing mixed standard solutions, avoid using standard solutions
made of compounds (potassium dihydrogenphosphate etc.) which contain anything
other than a target component (phosphoric acid, etc.) or prepare separately the standard
solution for calibration curve of a component (potassium, etc.) which affects
measurement.
In addition, when preserving mixed standard solutions for calibration curve
preparation, use a container, which can be sealed tightly, made of material such as
PTFE that does not elute boron easily.
141
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.390 % (mass fraction) - 29.5 % (mass
fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of
Ammonium vanadomolybdate absorptiometric analysis was conducted to evaluate
trueness using powdery test fertilizers (26 samples). As a result, a regression equation
was y=−0.115+0.977x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.998. Similarly the
comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.179 % (mass fraction) - 10.88 % (mass
fraction )) and the measurement value (xi) was conducted using fluid fertilizers (12
samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0. 022+1.008x, and its correlation
coefficient (r) was 0.999. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using
preparation fertilizers (5 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive
level of 1.64 % (mass fraction) - 52.15 % (mass fraction) was 99.8 % - 103.0 %.
Additive recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand)
and a home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery
rates at the additive level of 10 % (mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) were 98.1 %
and 101.9 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a home garden-use
compound fertilizer (solid), a blended fertilizer, a fluid compound fertilizer and a home
garden-use compound fertilizer (fluid) to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-
way analysis of variance. Table 2-1 and 2-2 show the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
142
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
study for test method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.04 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.02 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
143
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal Ingredients
(W-P2O5, W-K2O, W-MgO, W-MnO and W-B2O3) in Liquid Fertilizer using Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research Report of
Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 1 - 9 (2015)
2) Norio FUNAKI: Simultaneous Determination of Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES),
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 28 – 51 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble phosphoric acid of the fluid mixed fertilizers is
shown below:
144
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
145
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.3 Potassium
4.3.1 Total potassium
4.3.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry or flame photometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers containing organic matters. This testing method is
classified as Type B and its symbol is 4.3.1.a-2017 or T-K.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration-hydrochloric acid boiling or aqua regia digestion to
convert the total potassium into potassium ion, add an interference suppressor solution, and then spray
in an acetylene-air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with potassium at a wavelength of 766.5
nm or 769.9 nm to quantify the total potassium. Or, determine the intensity of the emission line at a
wavelength of 766.5 nm or 769.9 nm produced in flame to obtain the total potassium (T-K2O) in an
analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 7.
Comment 1 Instead of the potassium standard solution in (2), a potassium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a potassium standard solution
(K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate total
potassium (T-K2O) in the analytical sample by multiplying the concentration (K) of a
potassium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a measurement value
(K) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.2046).
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.2) h) for the
measurement of cadmium, nickel, chromium or lead, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid in (2) should be a reagent of harmful metal analysis grade, microanalysis grade or
equivalents.
below:
aa) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in JIS
K 0121.
1) Light source: A potassium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
ab) Flame photometer:
1) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
b) Electric furnace: An electric furnace that can be adjusted to 550 ºC ± 5 ºC.
c) Hot plate or sand bath: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Adjust the amounts of gas and silica sand of a sand bath so that the sand bath temperature can
be set to 250 ºC.
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.1.a.
tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer to a 100-mL volumetric flask with water, add water up to the
marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric flask
is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be added.
Comment 5 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 6 The procedures in (4.1.2) are the same as in (4.1.3) in 4.2.1.a. and (4.1) a) - h) in 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer or flame photometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or the flame photometer:
Set up the measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or the flame
photometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 766.5 nm or 769.9 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 766.5 nm or 769.9 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the potassium concentration and the indicated
value of the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.5 mg - 5 mg as K2O)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (2), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the potassium content from the calibration curve, and calculate total potassium (T-K2O)
in the analytical sample.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 97.8 % - 100.1 %
and 100.9 % - 103.1 % as total potassium acid (T-K2O) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed
by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the calculation
results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.08 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.03 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
148
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.132- 138, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masayuki YOSHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Systematization of
Determination Methods of Major Components in Sludge Fertilizer, Compost and Organic
Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3 p. 107 - 116 (2010)
3) Yasuharu KIMURA and Hisanori ARAYA Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Methods for Potassium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 190 - 200 (2012)
4) Hisanori ARAYA and Kimie KATO: Performance Evaluation of Determination Methods
for Potassium in Fertilizer - Harmonized Collaborative Validation - Research Report of
Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 109 – 122 (2019)
149
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total potassium: The flow sheet for total potassium in fertilizers is shown
below:
150
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
151
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Electric furnace: An electric furnace that can be adjusted to 550 ºC ± 5 ºC.
b) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 120 ºC ± 2 ºC.
c) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 120 ºC ± 2 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
d) Hot plate or sand bath: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Adjust the amounts of gas and silica sand of a sand bath so that the sand bath temperature can
be set to 250 ºC.
152
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (2) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 1 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.1.a. In addition,
the sample solution prepared in (4.1.3) in 4.2.1.a can also be used.
153
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) About 3 ml of tetraphenylborate solution per 10 mg of K2O is required to form the
precipitate of potassium tetraphenylborate
Comment 2 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 25 % (mass fraction) - 30 %
(mass fraction) and 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 % (mass fraction) were 99.5 % - 100.8 %
and 99.5 % - 100.6 % as total potassium acid (T-K2O) respectively.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.3 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.122- 128, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Aiko YANO and Hideo SOETA: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Nitrate Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by Phenol
Sulfuric Acid Method, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 201 - 211 (2012)
(5) Flow sheet for total potassium: The flow sheet for total potassium in fertilizers is shown
below:
154
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
155
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the potassium standard solution in (2), a potassium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a potassium standard solution
(K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
citric acid-soluble potassium (C-K2O) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (K) of a potassium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or
a measurement value (K) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.2046).
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40 mm
b) Analytical instrument: An atomic absorption spectrometer or a flame photometer as shown
below:
ba) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in JIS
K 0121.
1) Light source: A potassium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
bb) Flame photometer:
1) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
Note (3) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (4) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 4 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer or the flame photometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or the flame photometer:
Set up the measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or the flame
photometer considering the following:
157
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 100.2 % - 101.7 %
and 100.4 % - 101.8 % as citric acid-soluble potassium (C-K2O) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.05 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.06 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.136- 138, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Yasuharu KIMURA and Hisanori ARAYA Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Methods for Potassium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 190 - 200 (2012)
158
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium
in fertilizers is shown below:
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1-1 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in fertilizers (Extract procedure 4.1.1)
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1-2 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in fertilizers (Extract procedure 4.1.2)
159
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Sample solution
Aliquot
100-mL volumetric flask
(predetermined amount)
← About 10 mL interference suppressor solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
Measurement Atomic absorption spectrometer or flame photometer
Figure 2 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in fertilizers (Measurement procedure)
160
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
b) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 120 ºC ± 2 ºC.
c) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 120 ºC ± 2 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Note (2) About 3 ml of tetraphenylborate solution per 10 mg of K2O is required to form the
precipitate of potassium tetraphenylborate
Comment 3 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 25 % (mass fraction) - 30 %
(mass fraction) and 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 % (mass fraction) were 98.6 % - 100.6 %
and 100.6 % - 100.7 % as citric acid-soluble potassium (C-K2O) respectively.
162
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.6 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.122- 128, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Aiko YANO and Hideo SOETA: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Method for Nitrate Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by Phenol
Sulfuric Acid Method, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 201 - 211 (2012)
(5) Flow sheet for the testing method: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in
fertilizers is shown below:
163
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
164
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) If the solution temperature is no more than 20 ºC, the reaction does not advance in some
cases. Therefore, it is recommended to heat the solution up to about 30 ºC.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.128- 132, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
165
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium
in fertilizers is shown below:
Standing to cool
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Figure 1 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in fertilizers (Extraction procedure)
Sample solution
Figure 2 Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium in fertilizers (Measurement procedure)
166
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the potassium standard solution in (2), a potassium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a potassium standard solution
(K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
citric acid-soluble potassium (C-K2O) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (K) of a potassium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or
a measurement value (K) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.2046).
Comment 2 There are two modes to observe emission from an ICP-OES, a horizontal observation
mode and an axial observation mode. The axial observation mode does not apply to
potassium since interference is serious.
Comment 3 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
b) Extractor: A constant-temperature rotary shaker or a reciprocating water bath shaker as
described below.
ba) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
bb) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker that can be adjusted to
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40 mm.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 766.491 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the potassium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at a wavelength of 766.491 nm.
168
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the potassium concentration and the indicated
value of the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Transfer a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.2 mg - 16 mg
as K2O) to a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the potassium content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-soluble
potassium (C-K2O) in the analytical sample.
Comment 7 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.3.d Comment 7.
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:3.57 % (mass fraction) - 34.24 % (mass
fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of
Flame atomic absorption spectrometry analysis was conducted to evaluate trueness
using compound fertilizers (9 samples), mixed compost compound fertilizers (2
samples), designated blended fertilizers (1sample), blended fertilizers (4 samples), and
byproduct compound fertilizers (1 sample). As a result, a regression equation was y=
−0.0058+1.0027x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. In addition, additive
recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample. As a result, the mean
recovery rate at the additive level of 0.329 % (mass fraction) - 63.18 % (mass fraction)
was 98.0 % - 100.3 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and
blended fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.09 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients in
the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 11,
p. 1 – 13 (2018)
2) Shingo MATSUO: Simultaneous Determination of Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
(C-P2O5, C-K2O, C-MgO, C-MnO and C-B2O3) in Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled
169
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble potassium
in fertilizers is shown below:
170
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the potassium standard solution in (2), a potassium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a potassium standard solution
(K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
water-soluble potassium (W-K2O) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (K) of a potassium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or
a measurement value (K) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.2046).
ba) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in JIS
K 0121.
1) Light source: A potassium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
bb) Flame photometer:
1) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
c) Hot plate : A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Comment 2 In the procedure in a), a 250-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 300-mL tall
beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an extraction
flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover with a watch
glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric
flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedures in (4.1.1) in 4.3.3.b, (4.1.1) in
4.3.3.c, (4.1.1) in 4.8.2.a and (4.1.2) in 4.8.2.a.
Comment 4 In the procedure of (4.1.2.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical sample
to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 6 The procedure in (4.1.2.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
172
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 The procedure in (4.1.3) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer or flame photometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or flame photometer: Set
up the measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer or flame photometer
considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 766.5 nm or 769.9 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 766.5 nm or 769.9 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the potassium concentration and the indicated
value of the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.5 mg - 5 mg as K2O)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (2), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the potassium content from the calibration curve, and calculate water soluble potassium
(W-K2O) in the analytical sample.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 %
(mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass fraction) were 97.9 % - 100.2 %
and 97.3 % - 100.6 % as water soluble potassium (W–K2O) respectively. The
comparison of the measurement value of extraction (yi :2.69 % (mass fraction) -
26.64 % (mass fraction )) by a vertical reciprocating shaker and the measurement value
of extract by a rotary shaker (xi) was conducted to evaluate trueness of the extraction
of solid fertilizers using fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=0.022+1.001x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 1.000. The comparison of the
measurement value of extraction (yi:2.69 % (mass fraction) - 26.64 % (mass fraction ))
by a vertical reciprocating shaker and the measurement value of extract by a rotary
shaker (xi) was conducted to evaluate trueness of the extraction of fluid fertilizers using
fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y = 0.022+1.001x, and
its correlation coefficient (r) was 1.000.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers,
designated blended fertilizer and fluid compound fertilizer (2 samples) to evaluate
precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1-1 and 1-2 show the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Results from a
collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
173
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
174
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.136- 138, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Yasuharu KIMURA and Hisanori ARAYA Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Methods for Potassium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 190 - 200 (2012)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
4) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Extraction Method for the Water-soluble Principal
Ingredients in the Solid Fertilizer using a General-purpose Equipment , Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 1 - 8 (2017)
5) Hisanori ARAYA and Kimie KATO: Performance Evaluation of Determination
Methods for Potassium in Fertilizer - Harmonized Collaborative Validation -
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 109 – 122 (2019)
175
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for water-soluble potassium in
fertilizers is shown below:
176
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
177
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30
- 40 revolutions/min.
b) Drying apparatus: A drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 120 ºC ± 2 ºC.
c) Crucible type glass filter: A crucible type glass filter 1G4 specified in JIS R 3503. Let it stand
to cool in a desiccator after heating at 120 ºC ± 2 ºC in advance and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
d) Hot plate : A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
a) Weigh 2.5 g of an analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 300-mL tall beaker.
b) Add about 200 mL of water, and cover with a watch glass and heat on a hot plate to boil for
about 15 minutes.
c) After immediate cooling is complete, transfer it to a 250- mL volumetric flask with water.
d) Add water up to the marked line.
e) Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
Comment 1 In the procedure in a), a 250-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 300-mL tall
beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an extraction
flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover with a watch
glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric
flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.3.3.a.
Comment 3 In the procedure in a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5 g of an analytical sample to the
order of 1 mg, and put it into a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) About 3 ml of tetraphenylborate solution per 10 mg of K2O is required to form the
precipitate of potassium tetraphenylborate
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 30 % (mass fraction) - 50 %
(mass fraction) and 10 % (mass fraction) - 20 % (mass fraction) were 100.2 % -
100.8 % and 99.3 % - 102.2 % as water soluble potassium (W-K2O) respectively.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.7 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.122- 128, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Aiko YANO and Hideo SOETA: Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Method for Nitrate Nitrogen Content in Fertilizer by Phenol Sulfuric Acid
Method, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 201 - 211 (2012)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for water-soluble potassium in
fertilizers is shown below:
180
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
181
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 In the procedure in a), a 250-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 300-mL tall
beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an extraction
flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover with a watch
glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric
182
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 In the procedure in a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5 g of an analytical sample to the
order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) If the solution temperature is no more than 20 ºC, the reaction does not advance in some
cases. Therefore, it is recommended to heat the solution up to about 30 ºC.
183
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.128- 132, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for water-soluble potassium in
fertilizers is shown below:
184
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
185
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the potassium standard solution in (2), a potassium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a potassium standard solution
(K 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
water-soluble potassium (W-K2O) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (K) of a potassium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or
a measurement value (K) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.2046).
Comment 2 There are two modes to observe emission from an ICP-OES, a horizontal observation
mode and an axial observation mode. The axial observation mode does not apply to
potassium since interference is serious.
Comment 3 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A rotary shaker or a vertical reciprocating shaker as described below.
aa) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
ab) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
186
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
ac) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
b) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Comment 4 In the procedure in a), a 250-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 300-mL tall
beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an extraction
flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover with a watch
glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric
flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.3.3.a.
(4.1.2) Powdery test sample (Solid compound fertilizers not containing magnesia potassium sulfate)
(4.1.2.1) Rotary shaker
a) Weigh 5 g of an analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 500-mL volumetric flask.
b) Add about 400 mL of water, and shake to mix at 30-40 revolutions/min for about 30 minutes.
c) Add water up to the marked line.
d) Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
Comment 6 In the procedure of (4.1.2.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical sample
to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 7 The procedure in (4.1.2.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 8 The procedure in (4.1.2.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less potassium
content in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 9 The procedure in (4.1.3) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement according to JIS K 0116 and as shown below. Specific
measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical Emission
Spectrometry used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 766.491 nm or 769.896 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the potassium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the potassium concentration and the indicated
value of the potassium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.2 mg - 16 mg as K2O)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the potassium content from the calibration curve, and calculate water soluble potassium
(W-K2O) in the analytical sample.
Note (3) 769.896 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 766.491 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 10 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 11 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:3.30 % (mass fraction) - 35.22 % (mass
fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of
Ammonium vanadomolybdate absorptiometric analysis was conducted to evaluate
trueness using powdery test fertilizers (25 samples). As a result, a regression equation
was y=−0.233+1.008x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.997. Similarly the
comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.641 % (mass fraction) - 7.23 % (mass
fraction )) and the measurement value (xi) was conducted using fluid fertilizers (12
samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0.021+0.969x, and its correlation
coefficient (r) was 0.999. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using
preparation fertilizers (7 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive
level of 1.09 % (mass fraction) - 63.18 % (mass fraction) was 98.4 % - 102.4 %.
Additionally, additive recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound
fertilizer (1 brand) and a home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result,
the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 5 % (mass fraction) and 0.4 % (mass
fraction) were 102.3 % and 104.0 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using potassium sulfate,
188
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
189
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal
Ingredients (W-P2O5, W-K2O, W-MgO, W-MnO and W-B2O3) in Liquid Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 1 - 9 (2015)
2) Norio FUNAKI: Simultaneous Determination of Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES),
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 28 – 51 (2019)
190
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble potassium: The flow sheet for water-soluble potassium in the
fluid fertilizers is shown below:
191
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
192
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A constant-temperature rotary shaker or a reciprocating water bath shaker as
described below.
aa) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
ab) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker that can be adjusted to
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, and reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40
mm.
b) Hot plate: A hot plate or a water bath, etc. which can raise the liquid temperature up to 80 ºC.
c) Beaker made of polymer: A beaker made of polyethylene, etc. of a quality of material which
prevents silicic acid from eluting in the measurement procedure in (4.2).
d) Filter made of polymer: A Gooch crucible made of polymer (compatible filter diameter: 25
mm) or a funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter: 21
mm) A Gooch crucible made of polyethylene, etc. of a quality of material which prevents silicic
acid from eluting in the measurement procedure in (4.2).
Comment 2 A funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter:
21 mm) is sold under the name Polyethylene Kiriyama Funnel PSB-21.
Note (3) Since processed slag phosphoric acid fertilizers and mixed phosphoric acid fertilizers,
etc. stick to the bottom of a volumetric flask easily, shake to mix the volumetric flask
gently and disperse an analytical sample into the hydrochloric acid (1+23).
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.4.1.d.
b) Add about 150 mL of hydrochloric acid heated up to about 30 ºC (3), and shake to mix by
reciprocating horizontally at 160 times/min with amplitude of 25 mm - 40 mm (30 ºC ± 1 ºC)
for 1 hour.
c) After immediate cooling is complete, add water up to the marked line.
d) Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
Note (4) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Acid and base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) (% (mass fraction)) in an analytical sample
= V4 × C × f × (V5/V6) × (15.021/W2) × (100/1000)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
C: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V5: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1) c)
V6: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 25 % (mass fraction) - 40 %
(mass fraction) and 10 % (mass fraction) were 98.4 % - 100.5 % and 101.0 % as acid-
soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) respectively.
The comparison of the measurement value of extraction (yi:13.24 % (mass fraction)
- 37.08 % (mass fraction)) by a reciprocating water bath shaker and the measurement
value of extract by a constant-temperature rotary shaker (xi) was conducted to evaluate
trueness using fertilizers (25 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y
=−0.250+0.987x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. In addition, the results
of the repeatability tests on different days using silicate slag fertilizers and mixed
phosphorus fertilizer to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation
and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.3 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.144- 146, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Yasushi MIYASHITA Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Method for
Soluble Silicic Acid in Fertilizer by Potassium Fluoride Method, Research Report of
196
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5) Flow sheet for acid-soluble silicic acid: The flow sheet for acid and base-soluble silicic acid
in fertilizers is shown below:
197
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
198
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
g) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.10 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
h) Phenolphthalein solution (1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 1 g of phenolphthalein specified in JIS K
8799 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Water bath: A water bath that can be adjusted to 65 ºC ± 2 ºC.
b) Hot plate, etc.: A hot plate or a water bath, etc. which can raise the liquid temperature up to 80
ºC.
c) Volumetric flask and beaker made of polymer: A flask and a beaker that are made of
polyethylene, etc. of a quality of material which prevents silicic acid from eluting in the extract
procedure in (4.1) and in the measurement procedure in (4.2).
d) Filter made of polymer: A Gooch crucible made of polymer (compatible filter diameter: 25
mm) or a funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter: 21
mm) A Gooch crucible made of polyethylene, etc. of a quality of material which prevents silicic
acid from eluting in the measurement procedure in (4.2).
Comment 2 A funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter:
21 mm) is sold under the name Polyethylene Kiriyama Funnel PSB-21.
0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution becomes light
red.
f) Calculate base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) by the following formula.
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
C: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V5: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1) c)
V6: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Comment 3 Table 1 shows results and analysis results from a collaborative study for testing method
validation.
References
1) Takeshi HASHIMOTO, Akira SHIMIZU and Kaori OKADA: Validation of a Method
of Potassium Fluoride for Determination of Sodium Hydroxide-Soluble Silicic Acid in
Silica Gel Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3, p. 19 - 24 (2010)
2) Akira SHIMIZU, Shin ABE and Jun ITO: Determination of Solubility Silicic Acid in
Silica gel Fertilizer and Silica gel-including Fertilizer by Potassium Fluoride Method: A
Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 5, p. 31 - 40 (2012)
201
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5) Flow sheet for acid and base-soluble silicic acid: The flow sheet for acid and base-soluble
silicic acid in silica gel fertilizers, etc. is shown below:
202
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 A funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter:
21 mm) is sold under the name Polyethylene Kiriyama Funnel PSB-21.
and wash the container 3 times with a potassium chloride solution, then transfer the whole
precipitate into the filter, and further wash 6 - 7 times with a small amount of potassium chloride
solution (6).
d) Transfer the precipitate on the filter together with the filter paper into a 300-mL tall beaker with
water, and further add water to make about 200 mL and heat it and raise the liquid temperature
up to 70 ºC - 80 ºC on a hot plate, etc.
e) Add a few drops of phenolphthalein solution (1 g/100 mL) as an indicator and titrate with the
0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the solution becomes light
red.
f) Calculate acid and base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) by the following formula.
Acid and base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) (% (mass fraction)) in an analytical sample
= V4 × C × f × (V5/V6) × (15.021/W2) × (100/1000)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
C: Estimated concentration (mol/L) of sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 mol/L - 0.2
mol/L)
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V5: Constant volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.1) c)
V6: Aliquot volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (3) The transferred volume of the sample solution (1) and the sample solution (2) should be
equivalent.
(4) To be no more than 10 ºC
(5) Filter paper pulp can be stuffed to restrain precipitate from outflowing.
(6) Until the filtrate becomes neutral.
Comment 3 Table 1 shows results and analysis results from a collaborative study for testing method
validation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.6 %
(mass fraction).
205
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Akira SHIMIZU, Jun ITO and Shin ABE: Method Validation of Potassium Fluoride
Method for Determination of Acid-Soluble and Base-Soluble Silicic Acid in Fertilizer
containing Silica gel, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 1 - 8 (2011)
2) Akira SHIMIZU: Method Validation of Potassium Fluoride Method for Determination
of Acid-Soluble and Base-Soluble Silicic Acid in Fertilizer containing Silica Gel,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 1 - 8 (2013)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI and Akira SHIMIZU: Determination of Soluble Silicic Acid in
Fertilizers Containing Silica Gel Fertilizer by Potassium Fluoride Method: A
Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 7, p. 36 - 42 (2014)
206
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for acid and base-soluble silicic acid: The flow sheet for acid and base-soluble
silicic acid in fertilizers including silica gel fertilizers is shown below:
207
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
208
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Reagents
a) Hydrochloric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8180 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
b) Perchloric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8223 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
b) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
c) Electric furnace: An electric furnace that can be adjusted to 1000 ºC - 1100 ºC.
d) Crucible: After heating a chemical analysis porcelain crucible specified in JIS R 1301 in an
electric funnel at 1000 ºC - 1100 ºC, let it stand to cool in a desiccator and measure the mass to
the order of 1 mg.
Comment 1 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) of 4.4.1.a.
l) After standing to cool, remove the crucible from the desiccator and measure the mass to the
order of 1 mg.
m) Calculate acid and base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) by the following formula.
Acid and base-soluble silicic acid (S-SiO2) (% (mass fraction)) in an analytical sample
= A × (V1/V2)/W × 100
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.143- 144, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
5) Flow sheet for acid and base-soluble silicic acid: The flow sheet for acid and base-soluble
silicic acid in fertilizers is shown below:
210
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
211
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a 0.1
mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 A funnel for reduced pressure filtering made of polymer (compatible filter diameter:
21 mm) is sold under the name Polyethylene Kiriyama Funnel PSB-21.
Comment 3 In the procedure of (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5 g of an
analytical sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it into a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
C: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V5: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1) c)
V6: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Comment 5 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization and (4.2) e) Titration can be
conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 30 % (mass fraction) and 12 %
(mass fraction) - 20% (mass fraction) were 100.7 % and 99.5 % - 100.5 as water-
soluble silicic acid (W-SiO2) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a liquid potassium silicate
fertilizer by extraction with a rotary shaker or simple manual extraction to evaluate
precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results
from a collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are shown in
Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction).
214
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.144- 146, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Method for
Water-Soluble Silicic Acid in Fertilizer by Potassium Fluoride Method, Research Report
of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 174 - 181 (2015)
3) Toshiharu YAGI and Kenta SAKUMA: Extraction Method for the Silicic Acid in the
Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p.
1 – 9 (2019)
215
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5) Flow sheet for water-soluble silicic acid: The flow sheet for water-soluble silicic acid in
fertilizers is shown below:
216
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution (Ca
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate total
lime (T-CaO) in the analytical sample by multiplying the concentration (Ca) of the
calcium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a measurement value
(Ca) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.3992).
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.2) h) for the
measurement of cadmium, nickel, chromium or lead, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid in (2) should be a reagent of harmful metal analysis grade, microanalysis grade or
equivalents.
Note (5) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.1.a.
Note (6) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
218
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 6 The procedures in (4.1.2) are the same as in (4.1.3) in 4.2.1.a. and (4.1) a) - h) in 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 422.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 422.7 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.5 mg - 5 mg as CaO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate total lime (T-CaO) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 15 % (mass fraction) and 1 %
(mass fraction) were 101.8 % and 97.9% as total lime (T-CaO) respectively. In order
to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and
its analysis are shown in Table 1.
In addition, the results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference
material fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance.
Table 2 shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.05 %
(mass fraction).
219
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.156- 158, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masayuki YOSHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Systematization of
Determination Methods of Major Components in Sludge Fertilizer, Compost and Organic
Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3 p. 107 – 116 (2010)
3) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Methods for Calcium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 183 - 192 (2013)
220
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total lime: The flow sheet for total lime in fertilizers is shown below:
221
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
222
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) 29 g of lanthanum oxide (atomic absorption analysis grade or equivalents) can also be
used.
(2) This is an example of preparation; prepare an amount as appropriate.
(3) Add an interference suppressor solution that is 1/10 volume of the volume to be
prepared.
(4) For storage, use a sealable container made of materials which are not likely to dissolve
calcium, such as borosilicate glass-1 specified in JIS R 3503 or Teflon.
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution (Ca
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate acid-
soluble lime (S-CaO) in the analytical sample by multiplying the concentration (Ca)
of the calcium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a measurement
value (Ca) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.3992).
Note (5) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 422.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 422.7 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.5 mg - 5 mg as CaO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate acid-soluble lime (S-CaO)
in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 20 % (mass fraction) and 1 %
224
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(mass fraction) were 100.9 % and 101.1% as acid-soluble lime (S-CaO) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.05 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.167- 169, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Methods for Calcium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 183 - 192 (2013)
(5) Flow sheet for acid-soluble lime: The flow sheet for acid-soluble lime in fertilizers is shown
below:
225
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
226
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution
(CaO 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
citric acid-soluble lime (C-CaO) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (Ca) of the calcium standard solution for calibration curve preparation
or a measurement value (Ca) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.3992).
30 °C±1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, and reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40
mm
b) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in JIS K
0121.
1) Light source: A calcium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
Note (5) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (6) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 4 For a calcareous fertilizer, etc., if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and (4.1.2)
d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an analytical
sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an analytical
sample”.
Comment 5 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, check non-dissolved matters status after the
procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 422.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
228
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Spray the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 422.7 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 0.7 mg as CaO
and no more than the equivalents of 6mL of citric acid solution) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add the solution to make a citric acid solution equivalent to 6 mL.
3) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
4) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
5) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-soluble lime (C-
CaO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 30 % (mass fraction), 1 % - 15 %
(mass fraction) and 0.2 % (mass fraction) were 99 %, 101 % - 98 % and 96 % as citric
acid-soluble lime (C-CaO) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using calcium carbonate and
designated blended fertilizer (1 brand) to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-
way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate
precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance Characteristics
of Testing Methods for Calcium Content in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 183 – 192 (2013)
229
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble lime: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble lime in fertilizers
is shown below:
230
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution (1
mg/ mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate citric
acid-soluble lime (C-CaO) in the analytical sample by multiplying the concentration
(Ca) of the calcium standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a
measurement value (Ca) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (1.3992).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A constant-temperature rotary shaker or a reciprocating water bath shaker as
described below.
aa) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate a
250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at 30 -
231
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
40 revolutions/min.
ab) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker that can be adjusted to
30 °C±1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface using
a shaking rack, and reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm - 40
mm
b) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the citric
acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 For a calcareous fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and (4.1.2) d)
is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an analytical
sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an analytical
sample”.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, check non-dissolved matters status after the
procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 393.366 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the calcium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
232
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at a wavelength of 393.366 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 14 µg - 1.4 mg as CaO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-soluble lime (C-
CaO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 7 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.3.d Comment 7.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 30 % (mass fraction), 1 % - 15 %
(mass fraction) and 0.2 % (mass fraction) were 98 %, 103 % - 101 % and 104 % as
citric acid-soluble lime (C-CaO) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using calcium carbonate and
designated blended fertilizer (1 brand) to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-
way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate
precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.3 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
2) Shingo MATSUO: Simultaneous Determination of Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
(C-P2O5, C-K2O, C-MgO, C-MnO and C-B2O3) in Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 14 – 28 (2018)
233
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for the testing method: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble lime in fertilizers is
shown below:
234
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution (Ca
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution (CaO 5
µg/mL - 50 µg/mL) for the calibration curve preparation prepared in (2) in 4.5.1.a can
be used. In this case, calculate water-soluble calcium (W-Ca) in the analytical sample
by multiplying the concentration (CaO) of a calcium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (CaO) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (0.7147).
Note (5) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the analytical
sample is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble calcium.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 422.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 422.7 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.5 mg - 5 mg as Ca) in
a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate water-soluble calcium (W-
Ca) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rate at the content level of 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 % (mass
fraction) was 98.1 % - 101.1% as water-soluble calcium (W-Ca) respectively.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.07 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.04 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
References
236
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble calcium: The flow sheet for water-soluble calcium in fertilizers
is shown below:
237
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the calcium standard solution in (2), a calcium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a calcium standard solution (Ca
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0115
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the analytical
sample is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble calcium.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 393.366 nm or 317.933 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the calcium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the calcium concentration and the indicated value
of the calcium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Ca)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the calcium content from the calibration curve, and calculate water-soluble calcium (W-
Ca) in the analytical sample.
Note (3) 317.933 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 393.366 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES. In
that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi :0.095 % (mass fraction) - 10.93 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of flame atomic absorbance spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using
fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=0.005+0.978x,
and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. Additionally, additive recovery testing
was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a home garden-use
compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level
of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 105.9 % and 106.4 %
respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound fertilizer
and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were analyzed by the
one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate
precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test
method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.0005 %
(mass fraction).
239
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
240
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble calcium of the fluid fertilizers is shown below:
Sample solution
241
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.5.5 Alkalinity
4.5.5.a Ethylenediamine tetraacetate method
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers that guarantee alkalinity. This testing method is
classified as Type E and its symbol is 4.5.4.a-2017 or AL.a-1.
Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to an analytical sample, boil to extract, and mask with 2,2’,2”-
nitrilotriethanol and a potassium cyanide solution, add a 0.01 mol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate
standard solution, and conduct a chelatometric titration with a 0.01 mol/L magnesium standard
solution to obtain alkalinity (AL). Or after masking, conduct a chelatometric titration with an
ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution to obtain alkalinity (AL) in an analytical sample.
242
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
h) 0.01 mol/L magnesium standard solution: Put 0.24 g of magnesium specified in JIS K 8875
into a 1000-mL beaker, add about 10 mL of hydrochloric acid to dissolve, add a proper amount
of water, and while adding a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL) as an indicator, neutralize with
an ammonia solution (1+3) until the color of the solution becomes yellow, and then add water
to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put 25 mL of 0.01 mol/L magnesium standard solution in a 200-mL - 300-
mL Erlenmeyer flask, add about 15 mL of water and about 5 mL of ammonium chloride buffer
solution, and while adding an Eriochrome Black T solution as an indicator, titrate with 0.01
mol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution until the color of the solution becomes
blue. Calculate the factor of a 0.01 mol/L magnesium standard solution by the following
formula.
Note (1) The reagent corresponds to triethanolamine in the Official Methods of Analysis of
Fertilizers (1992).
(2) This is an example of preparation; prepare an amount as appropriate.
Comment 1 Instead of a 0.01 mol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution in (2) g), a 0.1
mol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dihydrogen disodium solution conforming to
ISO/IEC 17025 can be used.
Note (3) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
(4) Conduct the procedure in Comment 5 when there is much manganese content in the
fertilizers.
Comment 2 In the case of a by-product magnesia fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution of d)
is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “2 g of an analytical
sample” in the procedure in a) with “1 g - 1.5 g of an analytical sample”.
Comment 3 In the procedure in a), a 500-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 500-mL tall
beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an extraction
flask and should not be used for the other purposes. In addition, “cover with a watch
glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”, and “transfer it to a 250-mL - 500 mL
volumetric flask with water” in the procedure in c) is skipped.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.5.2.a.
Comment 5 Put a predetermined volume of filtrate in (4.1) e) in a 200-mL tall beaker, add a drop
of methyl red solution as an indicator and add ammonia water (28 % (mass fraction))
specified in JIS K 8085 drop by drop until the color of the solution changes light
yellowish red from purplish red. Add 20 mL of ammonium peroxodisulfate aqueous
solution (20 g/100mL) to boil (5). Immediately transfer it to a 100-mL - 200-mL
volumetric flask with water. After immediate cooling is complete, add water up to the
marked line. Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement as shown below. Two examples of titration are shown as
follows.
(4.2.1) Measurement (A): Titration with a magnesium standard solution (0.01 mol/L)
a) Put a predetermined volume (the equivalents of 5 mg - 20 mg as CaO + MgO) of sample solution
in a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask.
b) Add a proper amount of water, add a drop of methyl red solution as an indicator and add sodium
hydroxide solution (5 g/100 mL) drop by drop to neutralize until the color of the solution
becomes yellow.
c) Add 0.1 g of ascorbic acid, 1 ml - 10 mL of 2,2’,2”-nitrilotriethanol−water (1+3) and 1 mL - 10
mL of potassium cyanide solution (6).
d) Add a predetermined volume of 0.01 mol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution (7).
e) Add 20 mL of ammonium chloride solution or 2-aminoethanol solution.
f) Add several drops of Eriochrome Black T solution, and titrate with a 0.01 mol/L magnesium
standard solution until the color of the solution becomes red.
g) Calculate the alkalinity (AL) content in an analytical sample by the following formula.
Note (6) If manganese is present, replace “1 mL - 10 mL of potassium cyanide solution” with “1g
- 5g of potassium cyanide”.
(7) Add excess volume since 1.8 mL of ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution (0.01
mol/L) is required for 1 mg of CaO.
(4.2.2) Measurement (B): Titration with an ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution (0.01
mol/L)
a) Put a predetermined volume (the equivalents of 5 mg - 20 mg as CaO + MgO) of sample solution
in a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask.
b) Add a proper amount of water and 5 mL of citric acid solution (8), add a drop of methyl red
solution as an indicator and add sodium hydroxide solution (5 g/100 mL) drop by drop to
neutralize until the color of the solution becomes yellow.
c) Add 0.1 g of ascorbic acid, 1 ml - 10 mL of 2,2’,2”-nitrilotriethanol−water (1+3) and 1 mL - 10
mL of potassium cyanide solution (6).
d) Add 20 mL of ammonium chloride solution or 2-aminoethanol solution.
e) Add several drops of an Eriochrome Black T solution, and immediately titrate with a 0.01 mol/L
ethylenediamine tetraacetate standard solution until the color of the solution becomes blue-
green.
f) Calculate the alkalinity (AL) content in an analytical sample by the following formula.
Note (8) When the sample solution does not contain phosphate, silicate, etc., it is not necessary
to add citric acid.
245
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 Care should be fully taken in the case of using potassium cyanide and its solution in
accordance with the Safety Data Sheet (SDS). In addition, observe laws and ordinances
concerned such as the Poisonous and Deleterious Substance Control Law.
Criteria of the abolition in the Poisonous and Deleterious Substance Control Law (for
reference): Add a sodium hydroxide solution to make it alkalinity more than pH 11,
and further add an oxidizer (sodium hypochlorite, bleaching powder) solution to
conduct oxidative degradation processes. After dissolving CN ingredient, neutralize
with sulfuric acid, and discard it after diluting it with a large amount of water. Take
enough time to dissolve the CN ingredient with alkalinity.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.162- 164, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for alkalinity: The flow sheet for alkalinity in fertilizers is shown below:
246
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
247
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) S-CaO and S-MgO use raw data without rounding numerical value
248
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.6 Magnesia
4.6.1 Total magnesia
4.6.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
The testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 4.6.1.a-2018 or T-Mg.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and hydrochloric acid or nitric acid−hydrochloric
acid (1+3), add an interference suppressor solution, and then spray in an acetylene−air flame, and
measure the atomic absorption with magnesium at a wavelength of 285.2 nm to quantify total
magnesia (T-MgO) in an analytical sample.
In addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 7.
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate total magnesia (T-MgO) in the analytical sample by multiplying
the concentration (Mg) of the magnesium standard solution for calibration curve
preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor
(1.6583).
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.2) h) for the
249
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.1.a.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (7) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water, add water
up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
Note (5) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for
about 1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(6) The watch glass can be removed.
(7) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 5 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
Comment 6 The procedures in (4.1.2) are the same as in (4.1.3) in 4.2.1.a. and (4.1) a) - h) in
5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 285.2 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 285.2 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MgO)
(8)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the magnesium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the total magnesia
(T-MgO) in the analytical sample.
Note (8) If there is a possibility that the concentration of total magnesia in the sample solution
exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, put a predetermined amount of
the sample solution into a 100-mL volumetric flask and dilute by adding water up to
the marked line to make 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MgO.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 5 % (mass fraction), 1 % (mass
fraction) and 0.2 % (mass fraction) were 102.4 %, 101.7 % and 103.0 % as total
magnesia (T-MgO) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using swine manure compost,
251
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
composted sludge fertilizer and poultry manure ash (1 sample for each) to evaluate
precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results
from a collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are shown in
Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.2 % (mass
fraction).
References
1) Erika HIRATA,Hideo SOETA,Hidemi YOSHIMURA,Keiji YAGI: Determination of
Total Magnesium in Compost and Sludge Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
- Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 11, p. 29 - 38 (2018)
252
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total magnesia: The flow sheet for total magnesia in fertilizers is shown
below:
253
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
254
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate acid-soluble magnesia (S-MgO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mg) of a magnesium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.6583).
Note (4) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 285.2 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 285.2 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MgO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the magnesium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the acid-soluble
magnesia (S-MgO) in the analytical sample.
256
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 15 % (mass fraction) and 1 %
(mass fraction) were 101.7 % and 99.5% as acid-soluble magnesia (S-MgO)
respectively. In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test
method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.05 % (mass fraction) for fluid fertilizers.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.167- 169, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Methods for Magnesia Content in Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 193 - 202 (2013)
(5) Flow sheet for acid-soluble magnesia: The flow sheet for acid-soluble magnesia in fertilizers
is shown below:
257
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
258
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble magnesia (C-MgO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mg) of a magnesium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.6583).
aa) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate
a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at
30 - 40 revolutions/min.
ab) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker that can be adjusted to
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface
using a shaking rack, and reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25
mm - 40 mm.
b) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in JIS
K 0121.
1) Light source: A magnesium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
Note (4) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the
citric acid solution.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (5) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the vibration.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 4 For a by-product magnesia fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) and
(4.1.2) d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of an
analytical sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an
analytical sample”.
Comment 5 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Comment 6 In some silicate slag fertilizers, the variation of measurement value of citric
acid-soluble magnesia (C-MgO) may be observed according to the time variation of
heating state after adding a citric acid solution. Therefore, in the case of silicate slag
fertilizers, it is necessary to conduct the procedures of (4.1.1) c) - d) and (4.1.2) c) -
260
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
d) as quickly as possible after confirming the time of shaking to mix in the procedure
in (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Comment 7 In the case of a fertilizer containing Kieserite (magnesia sulfate fertilizers), wash the
non-dissolved matters with water obtained while preparing the sample solution of
water-soluble magnesia in (4.1) in 4.6.4.a to put it in a 250 mL volumetric flask, and
then prepare a sample solution by the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - d) and (4.1.2) b) - d).
Mix the magnesia obtained in (4.2) regarding this sample solution with the
water-soluble magnesia in 4.6.4.a regarding the said fertilizers to make citric
acid-soluble magnesia.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 285.2 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 285.2 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MgO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the magnesium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the citric acid-soluble
magnesia (C-MgO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As
a result, the mean recovery rate at the content level of 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 %
(mass fraction) was 98.9 % - 100.3 % as citric acid-soluble magnesia (C-MgO).
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. The results of the collaborative study
to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were analyzed by using a
three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the calculation results of
reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.06 %
(mass fraction) for solid fertilizers.
261
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.167- 169, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Methods for Magnesia Content in Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 193 - 202 (2013)
3) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Effect of Time during Extraction
Operation on Measurements of Citric Acid-Soluble Magnesium in Silicate Slag
Fertilizer Vol. 7, p. 145 - 156 (2014)
4) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 1 – 13 (2018)
262
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble magnesia: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble magnesia
in fertilizers is shown below:
263
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble magnesia (C-MgO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mg) of a magnesium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.6583).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the
citric acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 For a by-product magnesia fertilizer, if the pH of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d)
and (4.1.2) d) is neutral or basic, prepare a sample solution anew by replacing “1 g of
an analytical sample” in the procedures in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.2) a) with “0.5 g of an
analytical sample”.
Comment 6 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, check the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Comment 7 In some silicate slag fertilizers, the variation of measurement value of citric
acid-soluble magnesia (C-MgO) may be observed according to the time variation of
heating state after adding a citric acid solution. Therefore, in the case of silicate slag
fertilizers, it is necessary to conduct the procedures of (4.1.1) c) - d) and (4.1.2) c) -
d) as quickly as possible after confirming the time of shaking to mix in the procedure
265
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 279.553 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at a wavelength of 279.553 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the
blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.02 mg - 1.6 mg as
MgO) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the magnesium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the citric acid-soluble
magnesia (C-MgO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 9 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.3.d Comment 7.
Comment 10 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:1.59 % (mass fraction) - 15.06 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using processed phosphorus fertilizers (2 samples), compound fertilizers (11
samples), silicate slag fertilizer (1 sample), mixed compost compound fertilizer (1
sample), mixed phosphorus fertilizers (2 samples), designated blended fertilizer (1
sample), blended fertilizers (5 samples), byproduct compound fertilizer (1 sample),
organic compound fertilizer (1 sample), and fused phosphate fertilizer (1 sample). As
a result, a regression equation was y=0.0271+1.0124x, and its correlation coefficient
(r) was 0.999. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using a
preparation sample. As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive level of
0.232 % (mass fraction) - 18.81 % (mass fraction) was 94.9 % - 102.7 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and
blended fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.03 %
266
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 1 – 13 (2018)
2) Shingo MATSUO: Simultaneous Determination of Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
(C-P2O5, C-K2O, C-MgO, C-MnO and C-B2O3) in Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 14 – 28 (2018)
267
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble magnesia: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble magnesia
in fertilizers is shown below:
268
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate water-soluble magnesia (W-MgO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mg) of a magnesium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.6583).
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in
JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: A magnesium hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
269
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.6.4.b.
Comment 3 In the procedure in a), a 500-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 500-mL
tall beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an
extraction flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover
with a watch glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a
500-mL volumetric flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Note (5) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less magnesia
content in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 285.2 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 285.2 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MgO)
270
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 1 % (mass fraction) - 5 %
(mass fraction) were 100.4 % - 100.9 % as water-soluble magnesia (W-MgO)
respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.07 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.167- 169, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Souichi IGARASHI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Verification of Performance
Characteristics of Testing Methods for Magnesia Content in Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry: Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 193 - 202 (2013)
271
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble magnesia: The flow sheet for water-soluble magnesia in
fertilizers is shown below:
272
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the magnesium standard solution in (2), a magnesium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a magnesium standard
solution (Mg 1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate water-soluble magnesia (W-MgO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mg) of a magnesium standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mg) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.6583).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
273
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
b) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Note (2) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.6.4.a.
Comment 4 In the procedure in a), a 500-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 500-mL
tall beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an
extraction flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover
with a watch glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a
500-mL volumetric flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Note (3) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less magnesia
content in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 279.553 nm or 280.270 nm (4)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the magnesium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the magnesium concentration and the indicated
value of the magnesium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.02 mg - 1.6 mg as
MgO) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
274
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the magnesium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble
magnesia (W-MgO) in the analytical sample.
Note (4) 280.270 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 279.553 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
275
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
276
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal
Ingredients (W-P2O5, W-K2O, W-MgO, W-MnO and W-B2O3) in Liquid Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 1 - 9 (2015)
2) Norio FUNAKI: Simultaneous Determination of Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES),
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 28 – 51 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble magnesia in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
277
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.7 Manganese
4.7.1 Acid-soluble manganese
4.7.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This test method is applicable to fertilizers containing manganese carbonate fertilizers. This testing
method is classified as Type D and its symbol is 4.7.1.a-2017 or S-Mn.a-1.
Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to an analytical sample, boil to extract and add an interference
suppressor solution, and then spray into an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption
with manganese at a wavelength of 279.5 nm to obtain the hydrochloric acid (1+23) soluble
manganese (acid-soluble manganese (S-MnO)) in an analytical sample. In addition, the
performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 4.
Comment 1 Instead of the manganese standard solution in (2), a manganese standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a manganese standard
solution (Mn 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate acid-soluble manganese (S-MnO) in the analytical sample by
multiplying the concentration (Mn) of a manganese standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mn) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.2912).
JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: A manganese hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
b) Hot plate : A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Note (4) Be aware that an analytical sample should not solidify in the bottom of a beaker.
Comment 2 In the procedure in a), a 500-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a 500-mL
tall beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an
extraction flask and should not be used for the other purposes. In addition, “cover
with a watch glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”, and “transfer it to a 250-mL
- 500 mL volumetric flask with water” in the procedure in c) is skipped.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.5.2.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 279.5 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the manganese standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 279.5 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the manganese concentration and the indicated
value of the manganese standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MnO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the manganese content from the calibration curve, and calculate the acid-soluble
manganese (S-MnO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 5 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 %
279
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.176- 177, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Natuki TOYODOME, Tokiya SUZUKI and Hideo SOETA: Verification of
Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for Manganese Content in Fertilizer by
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 203 - 212
(2013)
(5) Flow sheet for acid-soluble manganese: The flow sheet for acid-soluble manganese in
fertilizers is shown below:
Cooling Immediately
Sample solution
Sample solution
Aliquot
100-mL volumetric flask
(predetermined amount)
← About 10 mL of interference suppressor solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
Measurement Atomic absorption spectrometer (279.5 nm)
280
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the manganese standard solution in (2), a manganese standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a manganese standard
solution (Mn 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate citric acid-soluble manganese (C-MnO) in the analytical sample
by a multiplying the concentration (Mn) of manganese standard solution for
calibration curve preparation or a measurement value (Mn) obtained in (4.2) by a
conversion factor (1.2912).
described below.
aa) Constant-temperature rotary shaker: A constant-temperature rotary shaker that can rotate
a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up in a thermostat adjustable to 30 ºC ± 1 ºC, upside down at
30 - 40 revolutions/min.
ab) Reciprocating water bath shaker: A reciprocating water bath shaker: that can be adjusted to
30 °C ± 1 °C and shake a 250-mL volumetric flask, set up vertically on the water surface
using a shaking rack, reciprocate horizontally at 160 times/ minute with amplitude of 25 mm -
40 mm.
b) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in
JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: A manganese hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
Note (4) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the
citric acid solution.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (5) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 4 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
282
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 5 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 %
(mass fraction) were 101.9 % and 100.5 % as citric acid-soluble manganese
(C-MnO) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and their analysis are shown in Table 1.
Additionally, the results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference
material fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance.
Table 2 shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.006 %
(mass fraction).
283
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.176- 177, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Natuki TOYODOME, Tokiya SUZUKI and Hideo SOETA: Verification of
Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for Manganese Content in Fertilizer by
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 203 - 212
(2013)
3) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 1 – 13 (2018)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble manganese: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble
manganese in fertilizers is shown below:
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
284
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Sample solution
Aliquot
100-mL volumetric flask
(predetermined amount)
← About 10 mL of interference suppressor solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
Measurement Atomic absorption spectrometer (279.5 nm)
285
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the manganese standard solution in (2), a manganese standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a manganese standard
solution (Mn 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case,
calculate citric acid-soluble manganese (C-MnO) in the analytical sample by a
multiplying the concentration (Mn) of manganese standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mn) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.2912).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the
citric acid solution.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 257.610 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
287
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Spray the manganese standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at a wavelength of 257.610 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the manganese concentration and the indicated
value of the manganese standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 0.8 mg as
MnO) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the manganese content from the calibration curve, and calculate the citric acid-soluble
manganese (C-MnO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.3.d Comment 7.
Comment 7 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.089 % (mass fraction) - 1.88 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of Flame atomic absorption spectrometry analysis was conducted to evaluate
trueness using compound fertilizers (7 samples), mixed phosphorus fertilizers (2
samples), solid compound fertilizers (2 samples), blended fertilizers (4 samples) and
organic blended fertilizer (1 sample). As a result, a regression equation was
y=0.0015+0.9988x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. In addition, additive
recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample. As a result, the mean
recovery rate at the additive level of 0.595 % (mass fraction) - 28.94 % (mass
fraction) was 98.5 % - 105.5 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and
blended fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 1 – 13 (2018)
288
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble manganese: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble
manganese in fertilizers is shown below:
289
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the manganese standard solution in (2), a manganese standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a manganese standard
solution (Mn 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In
this case, calculate water-soluble manganese (W-MnO) in the analytical sample by a
multiplying the concentration (Mn) of manganese standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mn) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.2912).
ab) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter for a flack to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute
(amplitude of 40 mm).
b) Flame atomic absorption spectrometer: An atomic absorption spectrometer specified in
JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: A manganese hollow cathode lamp
2) Gas: Gas for heating by flame
(i) Fuel gas: acetylene
(ii) Auxiliary gas: Air sufficiently free of dust and moisture.
Comment 2 In the procedure of (4.1.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical
sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 279.5 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
291
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Spray the manganese standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at
a wavelength of 279.5 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the manganese concentration and the indicated
value of the manganese standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as MnO)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the manganese content from the calibration curve, and water-soluble manganese
(W-MnO) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As
a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 6 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 %
(mass fraction) were 101.2 % and 101.1 % as water-soluble manganese (W-MnO)
respectively.
The comparison of the measurement value of extraction (yi:0.0330 % (mass fraction)
- 6.18 % (mass fraction )) by a vertical reciprocating shaker and the measurement
value of extract with a rotary shaker (xi) was conducted to evaluate trueness of the
extraction of solid fertilizers using fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression
equation was y=−0.009+1.011x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 1.000. The
comparison of the measurement value of simple extraction (yi:0.0590 % (mass
fraction) - 1.27 % (mass fraction )) and the measurement value of extract (xi) by a
rotary shaker was conducted to evaluate trueness of the extraction of fluid fertilizers
using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=-0.001+1.006x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 1.000. The results of the
repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and mixed
microelement fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1-1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability. The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid
compound fertilizer and a liquid microelement compound fertilizer to evaluate the
extract precision of fluid fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1-2 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative study for testing method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.004 %
(mass fraction).
292
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
293
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.176- 177, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Natuki TOYODOME, Tokiya SUZUKI and Hideo SOETA: Verification of
Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for Manganese Content in Fertilizer by
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 203 - 212
(2013)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
4) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Extraction Method for the Water-soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Solid Fertilizer using a General-purpose Equipment , Research Report of
Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 1 - 8 (2017)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble manganese: The flow sheet for water-soluble manganese in
fertilizers is shown below:
294
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
295
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the manganese standard solution in (2), a manganese standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a manganese standard
solution (Mn 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case,
calculate water-soluble manganese (W-MnO) in the analytical sample by a
multiplying the concentration (Mn) of manganese standard solution for calibration
curve preparation or a measurement value (Mn) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion
factor (1.2912).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A rotary shaker or a vertical reciprocating shaker as described below.
aa) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30 -
296
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
40 revolutions/min.
ab) A vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of 40
mm).
b) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS
K 0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Comment 3 In the procedure of (4.1.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.5g of an analytical
sample to the order of 1 mg, and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less manganese
content in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 6 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 257.610 nm or 260.569 nm (3)
297
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) 260.569 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 257.610 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 7 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible for fluid fertilizers
with the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.0145 % (mass fraction) - 0.260 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using powdery test fertilizers (14 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=−0.0035+0.972x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.997. The comparison of
the measurement value (yi:0.027 % (mass fraction) - 1.49 % (mass fraction )) and
the measurement value (xi) was conducted using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a
result, a regression equation was y=−0.0013+1.025x, and its correlation coefficient
(r) was 0.999. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using
preparation fertilizers (6 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the
additive level of 0.0907 % (mass fraction) - 41.97 % (mass fraction) was 96.9 % -
101.0 %. Additive recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer
(1 brand) and a home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a liquid
microelement compound fertilizer (1 bland). As a result, the mean recovery rates at
the additive level of 0.15 % (mass fraction) - 0.2 % and 0.005 % (mass fraction)
were 96.3 % - 96.5 % and 107.0 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a home garden-use
compound fertilize (solid), a blended fertilizer, a fluid compound fertilizer and a
home garden-use compound fertilize (fluid) to evaluate precision were analyzed by
the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1-1 and 1-2 show the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2
Note that the minimum limits of quantification of this testing method are about
0.005 % (mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.0002 % (mass fraction) for fluid
fertilizers.
298
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
299
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal
Ingredients (W-P2O5, W-K2O, W-MgO, W-MnO and W-B2O3) in Liquid Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 1 - 9 (2015)
2) Norio FUNAKI: Simultaneous Determination of Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES),
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 28 – 51 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble manganese in fertilizers is shown below:
300
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
301
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.8 Boron
4.8.1 Citric acid-soluble boron
4.8.1.a Azomethine-H method
(1) Summary
The test method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 4.8.1.a-2019 or C-B.a-3. Extract by adding a citric acid solution to an analytical sample,
mask co-existing copper, iron and other salts with ethylenediamine tetraacetate and measure the
absorbance with azomethine-H borate formed by the reaction with azomethine-H and correct the
absorbance originated in coloring of a sample solution to obtain citric acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3)
in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment
7.
Comment 1 Instead of the boron standard solution in (2), a boron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a boron standard solution (B 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate citric
acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (B) of a boron standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a
measurement value (B) obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (3.2199).
Note (2) Shake to mix the volumetric flask gently and disperse an analytical sample into the
citric acid solution.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 4 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
Note (4) When the solution is muddled, conduct centrifugation with about 1700 × g centrifugal
force (5) for about five minutes after the procedure in e) or filtrate with Type 3 filter
paper.
(5) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
303
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 If formaldehyde processed urea, a large quantity of aluminum, copper, iron zinc,
organic matters, etc. coexists to affect quantification, put a predetermined amount
of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 0.8 mg as B2O3, no more than 10
mL of the solution) in a 100-mL separatory funnel, add 10 mL of hydrochloric acid
(1+3), add water to about 20 mL and add 20 mL of 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol –
4-methyl-2-pentanone (1+9) to shake to mix with a shaking apparatus for about 1
minute. After allowing to stand still, remove the lower layer (aqueous phase) and
add 20 mL of sodium hydroxide (20 g/L) to shake to mix with a shaking apparatus
for about 1 minute. After allowing to stand still, transfer the lower layer (aqueous
phase) to a 100-mL volumetric flask, add a few drops of phenolphthalein solution
(1 g/100mL) to neutralize with hydrochloric acid (1+3) until the color of the
solution becomes achromatic, and conduct the procedure in (4.2) b).
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 415 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 8 mL of boron standard solution (B2O3 0.1 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step.
2) Put 1 mL - 10 mL of boron standard solution (B2O3 0.01 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step.
3) Add 15 mL of citric acid solution and conduct the same procedure as (4.2) c) - e) to make the
B2O3 0.01 mg/100 mL - 0.8 mg/100 mL boron standard solution for the calibration curve
preparation.
4) Conduct the same procedures as 3) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
5) Further, put 15 mL of citric acid solution in another 100-mL volumetric flask and conduct the
same procedures as 4.2) c) and e) to make a test solution for control.
6) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 415 nm of the blank test solution for the calibration
curve preparation and the boron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation using
the test solution for control as the control.
7) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the boron concentration and the absorbance of
the boron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the sample solution for measurement in (4.2) e) and the sample solution for
correction in (4.2) f), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 6).
2) Obtain the boron (B2O3) content from the calibration curve using the absorbance obtained by
subtracting the absorbance of a sample solution for correction from the absorbance of a
sample solution for measurement and calculate citric acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 6 If it is known in advance, according to the results of quality control analysis, that
coloring of a sample solution does not affect the analysis of citric acid-soluble boron
in an analytical sample, there is no need to prepare the sample solution for correction
((4.2) f)).
In that case, read 4.3) c) 2) as “Obtain the boron (B2O3) content from the calibration
304
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
curve using the absorbance of a sample solution for measurement and calculate citric
acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in the analytical sample”.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted using preparation sample to evaluate trueness. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 1.02 % (mass fraction) - 5.11 %
(mass fraction) and 0.20 % (mass fraction) as citric acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3)
were 99 %, 97 % - 99 % and 106 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a borate fertilizer and a
compound fertilizer (1 brand for each) to evaluate precision were analyzed by
one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate
precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative study for testing
method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
305
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.184- 187, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of
Calibration curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Akira SHIMIZU: Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for
Boron Content by Azomethine H Absorption Photometry, Research Report of Fertilizer
Vol. 6, p. 174 -182 (2013)
4) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
in the Fertilizer using a General-Purpose Equipment, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
11, p. 1 – 13 (2018)
5) Masayuki YAMANISHI: Improved Determination Method of Boron (B2O3) in Fertilizer,
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 22, p. 10 - 27 (2019)
306
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble boron: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble boron in
fertilizers is shown below:
Cooling Immediately
← Water (up to the marked line)
Filtration Type 3 filter paper
Sample solution
Sample solution
307
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Boron
standard solution
Aliquot
100-mL volumetric flask
(predetermined amount)
← 15 mLof citric acid solution
← 25 mL of ethylenediamine tetraacetate
← 10 mL of ammonium acetate
← 10 mL of azomethine-H solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
308
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
100-mL
volumetric flask
← 15 mL of citric acid solution
← 25 mL of ethylenediamine tetraacetate
(Sample solution
for control)
← 10 mL of ammonium acetate
(Blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation)
← 10 mL of azomethine-H solution
← Water (up to the marked line)
Leaving at rest For about 2 hours
a) Reference table 1-1 shows the absorbance (example) of a standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation and a blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation using a test
solution for control as the control.
In addition, calibration curves are shown in Reference diagram 1 and regression coefficients
of the regression equations are in Reference table 1-2.
b) Reference table 2 shows the sampling amount of an analytical sample, the constant volume of
extract, the transferred amount of extract and the constant volume of the sample solution for
measurement as well as the absorbance (example) of the sample solution for measurement and
the sample solution for correction using a test solution for control as the control.
c) Obtain the boron (B2O3) content in the sample solution for measurement by formula (1) (Refer
to Reference diagram 1) and calculate citric acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in the analytical
sample by formula (2)”.
C1: Boron (B2O3) content in 100 mL of a sample solution for measurement (mg)
As: Absorbance of a sample solution for measurement in (4.2) e) using a test solution
for control ((4.3 b) 5)) as the control
309
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Ab: Absorbance of a sample solution for correction in (4.2) f) using a test solution for
control ((4. 3) b) 5)) as the control
Ac: Corrected absorbance
a: Intercept of a regression equation of a calibration curve
b: Inclination of a regression equation of a calibration curve
C2: Citric acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in an analytical sample (% (mass fraction))
V1: Constant volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.1.1) c) or (4.1.2) c)
V2: Aliquot volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.2) a)
W: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
0.120 0.800
y = 0.025+0.900x y = 0.025+0.900x
0.100
0.600
0.080 Ac(1)=As(1)-Ab(1)
Absorbance (ABS)
Absorbance (ABS)
Ac(2)=As(2)-Ab(2)
0.060 0.400
0.040
0.200
C1(1) C1(2)
0.020
0.000 0.000
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Boron concentration (B2O3 mg/100 mL )
310
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1)
Reference table 1-2 Regression equation
of a calibration curve (example) of citric acid-soluble boron
Regression coefficient (y =a +bx )
a b
Low concentration range 0.025 0.900
High concentration range 0.025 0.900
1) Regression equation calculated by the least squares method
Reference table 2 Measurement (example) of sample solution and calculation of citric acid-soluble boron
Unit Blended fertilizer (1) Compound fertilizer (2) Borate fertilizer
Sampling amount of analytical sample (W ) g 1 1 1
Predetermined volume of extract (V 1 ) mL 250 250 250
1)
Transferred amount of extract (V 2 ) mL 25 10 0.25
Predetermined volume of sampling solution,
1) mL 100 100 100
etc. for measurement(V 3 )
Absorbance of sampling solution
ABS 0.055 0.170 0.400
for measurement (A s )
Absorbance of sampling solution
ABS 0.005 0.020 0.000
for correction(A b )
Corrected absorbance (A c=A s -A b ) ABS 0.050 0.150 0.400
Boron concentration in sampling solution
2) mg/100 mL 0.028 0.139 0.417
for measurement (C 1)
Citrate-soluble boron content
3) % 0.03 0.35 41.7
in analytical sample (C 2 )
1) 2 steps dilutionis is applied to borate fertilizers. Ex: (5 mL→50 mL) (2.5 mL→100 mL)
2) Calculate C 1 by substituting the regression coefficient (interception (a ) and gradient (b )) in Table 1-2 for formula (1).
3) Calculate C 2 by substituting C 1, W, V 1 and V 2 for formula 2.
311
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the boron standard solution in (2), a boron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a boron standard solution (B 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate citric
acid-soluble boron (C-B2O3) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (B) of a boron standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a
measurement value (B) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (3.2199).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
Note (3) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.2.3.a.
Note (4) Use a 250-mL flat-bottom volumetric flask to stabilize the shaking.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.3.a.
Comment 5 The determination may be affected if an analytical sample cakes on the bottom of a
250-mL volumetric flask. Therefore, confirm the status of the non-dissolved matters
after the procedures of (4.1.1) b) and (4.1.2) b).
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 249.773 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
313
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Spray the boron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at a wavelength of 249.773 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the boron concentration and the indicated value
of the boron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.02 mg - 1.6 mg as
B2O3) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the boron (B2O3) content from the calibration curve, and calculate citric acid-soluble
boron (C-B2O3) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 Wash the sample injector of an ICP-OES sufficiently with water because boron easily
causes the memory effect.
Comment 7 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.3.d Comment 7.
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.073 % (mass fraction) - 0.51 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of Flame atomic absorption spectrometry analysis was conducted to evaluate
trueness using compound fertilizers (7 samples), mixed phosphorus fertilizers (1
sample), solid compound fertilizers (2 samples), blended fertilizers (3 samples) and
organic compound fertilizer (1 sample). As a result, a regression equation was
y=−0.0408+1.0456x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.992. In addition,
additive recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample. As a result, the
mean recovery rate at the additive level of 0.601 % (mass fraction) - 35.51 % (mass
fraction) was 97.0 % - 102.0 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compound fertilizers and
blended fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Extraction Method for the Citrate-Soluble Principal Ingredients
314
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for citric acid-soluble boron: The flow sheet for citric acid-soluble boron in
fertilizers is shown below:
315
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the boron standard solution in (2), a boron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a boron standard solution (B
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (B) of a boron standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a
measurement value (B) obtained in (4.3) by a conversion factor (3.2199).
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 1 g when there is a high amount of
boric acid content in the fertilizers such as a borate fertilizer and boric acid fertilizer.
Comment 2 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a) and (4.1.1) b), a 250-mL volumetric flask can be used
instead of a 300-mL tall beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be
distinguished as an extraction flask and should not be used for the other purposes.
Additionally, “cover with a watch glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip
“transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.3.3.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (4) When the solution is muddled, conduct centrifugation with about 1700 × g centrifugal
force (5) for about five minutes after the procedure in e) or filtrate with Type 3 filter
paper.
(5) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 If formaldehyde processed urea, a large quantity of aluminum, copper, iron zinc,
organic matters, etc. coexists to affect quantification, put a predetermined amount
of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 0.8 mg as B2O3, no more than
10 mL of the solution) in a 100-mL separatory funnel, add 10 mL of hydrochloric
acid (1+3), add water to about 20 mL and add 20 mL of 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol–
4-methyl-2-pentanone (1+9) to shake to mix with a shaking apparatus for about 1
minute. After allowing to stand still, remove the lower layer (aqueous phase) and
add 20 mL of a sodium hydroxide solution (20 g/L) to shake to mix with a shaking
apparatus for about 1 minute. After allowing to stand still, transfer the lower layer
(aqueous phase) to a 100-mL volumetric flask, add a few drops of phenolphthalein
solution (1 g/100mL) to neutralize with hydrochloric acid (1+3) until the color of
the solution becomes achromatic, and conduct the procedure in (4.2) b).
Comment 6 Water-soluble boron can be measured simultaneously with citric acid-soluble boron
by adding 15 mL of citric acid solution before the procedure in (4.2) b).
317
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 415 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 8 mL of boron standard solution (B2O3 0.1 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step.
2) Put 1 mL - 10 mL of boron standard solution (B2O3 0.01 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step.
3) Conduct the same procedures as (4.2) b) - d) to make B2O3 0.01 mg/100 mL - 0.8 mg/100 mL
of the boron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
4) Conduct the same procedures as 3) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
5) Further, conduct the same procedures as 4.2 b) and d) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to
make the test solution for control.
6) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 415 nm of the blank test solution for the calibration
curve preparation and the boron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation using
the test solution for control as the control.
7) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the boron concentration and absorbance of the
boron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Regarding the sample solution for measurement in (4.2) d) and the sample solution for
correction in (4.2) e), measure absorbance by the same procedure as b) 6).
2) Obtain the boron (B2O3) content from the calibration curve using the absorbance obtained by
subtracting the absorbance of a sample solution for correction from the absorbance of a
sample solution for measurement and calculate water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 7 Water-soluble boron can be measured simultaneously with citric acid-soluble boron
by adding 15 mL of citric acid solution before the procedure in (4.2) b), (4.3) b) 3),
(4.3) b) 4) and (4.3) b) 5).
Comment 8 If it is known in advance, according to the results of quality control analysis, that
coloring of a sample solution does not affect the analysis of citric acid-soluble
boron in an analytical sample, there is no need to prepare the sample solution for
correction ((4.2) e)). In that case, read 4.3) c) 2) as “Obtain the boron (B2O3)
content from the calibration curve using the absorbance of a sample solution for
measurement and calculate water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in the analytical
sample”.
Comment 9 Recovery testing was conducted using a powdery preparation sample to evaluate
trueness. As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10.22 % (mass
fraction) - 5.11 % (mass fraction) and 0.20 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble
boron (W-B2O3) were 99 %, 101 % - 103 %, and 102 %.
Recovery testing was conducted using a fluid preparation sample to evaluate
trueness. As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 5 % (mass
fraction), 0.1 % (mass fraction) and 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble boron
(W-B2O3) were 102 %, 99 %, and 93 %.
318
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a borate fertilizer, a
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer and a fluid
compound fertilizer (one brand for each) to evaluate precision were analyzed by
one-way analysis of variance. Table 1-1 and 1-2 show the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2
Note that the minimum limits of quantification of this testing method are about
0.01 % (mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.003 % (mass fraction) for fluid
fertilizers.
319
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.184- 187, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Sakiko TAKAHASHI and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of a Color metric
Method for Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Boron: Evaluation of
Calibration curve, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 137 - 144 (2009)
3) Akira SHIMIZU: Verification of Performance Characteristics of Testing Methods for
Boron Content by Azomethine H Absorption Photometry, Research Report of Fertilizer
Vol. 6, p. 174 -182 (2013)
4) Masayuki YAMANISHI: Improved Determination Method of Boron ( B2O3 ) in
Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 22, p. 10 - 27 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble boron: The flow sheet for water-soluble boron in fertilizers is
shown below:
320
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
321
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
a) Reference table 1-1 shows the absorbance (example) of a standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation and a blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation using a test
solution for control as the control.
In addition, calibration curves are shown in Reference diagram 1 and regression coefficients of
the regression equations are in Reference table 1-2.
b) Reference table 2 shows the sampling amount of an analytical sample, the constant volume of
extract, the transferred amount of extract and the constant volume of the sample solution for
measurement as well as the absorbance (example) of the sample solution for measurement and
the sample solution for correction using a test solution for control as the control.
c) Obtain the boron (B2O3) content in the sample solution for measurement by formula (1) (Refer
to Reference diagram 1) and calculate water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in the analytical sample
by formula (2)”.
322
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
As: Absorbance of a sample solution for measurement in (4.2) d) using a test solution for
control ((4.3 b) 5)) as the control
Ab: Absorbance of a sample solution for correction in (4.2) e) using a test solution for
control ((4. 3) b) 5)) as the control
Ac: Corrected absorbance
a: Intercept of a regression equation of a calibration curve
b: Inclination of a regression equation of a calibration curve
C2: Water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in an analytical sample (% (mass fraction))
V1: Constant volume (mL) of the sample solution in (4.1.1) d) or (4.1.2) c)
V2: Aliquot (mL) of the sample solution in (4.2) a)
W: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
323
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
0.150 1.000
y = 0.025+1.050x
y = 0.025+1.050x
0.120 0.800
Ac(1)=As(1)-Ab(1)
Absorbance(ABS)
Absorbance (ABS)
0.060 0.400
0.000 0.000
0.00 0.02 0.04
0.06 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Boron concentration(B2O3 mg/100 mL ) Boron concentration (B2O3 mg/100 mL )
1) Low concentration range 2) High concentration range
(B2O3 0 mg/100 mL - 0.10 mg/100 mL) (B2O3 0 mg/100 mL - 0.80 mg/100 mL)
324
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the boron standard solution in (2), a boron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a boron standard solution (B 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology. In this case, calculate
water-soluble boron (W-B2O3) in the analytical sample by multiplying the
concentration (B) of a boron standard solution for calibration curve preparation or a
measurement value (B) obtained in (4.2) by a conversion factor (3.2199).
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5% (volume fraction) in purity
325
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Hot plate:
A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
Note (3) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 1 g when there is a high amount of
boric acid content in the fertilizers such as a borate fertilizer and boric acid fertilizer.
Comment 3 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), 250-mL volumetric flask can be used instead of a
300-mL tall beaker. However, the volumetric flask used should be distinguished as an
extraction flask and should not be used for the other purposes. Additionally, “cover with a
watch glass” in b) is replaced by “place a funnel”. Skip “transfer it to a 250-mL volumetric
flask with water” in the procedure in c).
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1) in 4.3.3.a.
Note (4) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when there is less boron content
in the fertilizers such as a home garden-use fertilizer.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 249.773 nm or 249.678 nm (5)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the boron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the boron concentration and the indicated value
of the boron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
326
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.02 mg - 1.6 mg as
B2O3) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the boron content from the calibration curve, and calculate water-soluble boron
(W-B2O3) in the analytical sample.
Note (5) 249.678 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 249.773 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 6 Wash the sample injector of an ICP-OES sufficiently with water because boron easily
causes the memory effect.
Comment 7 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible for fluid fertilizers
with the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry. In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.0165 % (mass fraction) - 0.590 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of Azomethine-H method was conducted to evaluate trueness using solid
fertilizers (21 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=0.0002+0.993x, and
its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.998. The comparison of the measurement value
(yi:0.013 % (mass fraction) - 0.530 % (mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission
Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of Azomethine-H method was
conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a
regression equation was y=−0.0041+0.986x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was
0.999. In addition, additive recovery testing was conducted using preparation
fertilizers (6 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive level of
0.0912 % (mass fraction) - 56.30 % (mass fraction) was 97.4 % - 101.2 %. Additive
recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a
home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a liquid microelement compound
fertilizer (1 bland). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of
0.15 % (mass fraction) - 0.2 % and 0.01 % (mass fraction) were 95.5 % - 99.4 % and
96.5 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a home garden-use
compound fertilize (solid), a blended fertilizer, a fluid compound fertilizer and a fluid
home garden-use compound fertilize to evaluate precision were analyzed by the
one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate
precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative study
implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limits of quantification of this testing method are about
0.005 % (mass fraction) for solid fertilizers, and 0.0005 % (mass fraction) for fluid
fertilizers.
327
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
328
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble Principal
Ingredients (W-P2O5, W-K2O, W-MgO, W-MnO and W-B2O3) in Liquid Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 8, p. 1 - 9 (2015)
2) Norio FUNAKI: Simultaneous Determination of Water-soluble Principal Ingredients in
Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES),
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 28 – 51 (2019)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble boron in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
329
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.9 Zinc
4.9.1 Total zinc
4.9.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type C and its
symbol is 4.9.1.a-2017 or T-Zn.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid-hydrochloric acid (1+3), and then
spray in an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with zinc at a wavelength of
213.9 nm to quantify the total zinc (T-Zn). In addition, the performance of this testing method is
shown in Comment 8.
Comment 1 Instead of the zinc standard solution in (2), a zinc standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a zinc standard solution (Zn 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.2) h) for the
measurement of cadmium, nickel, chromium or lead, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid in (2) should be a reagent of harmful metal analysis grade, microanalysis grade
or equivalents.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
330
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising from room temperature
to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1 hour and further
raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.1.a.
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising from room temperature
to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1 hour and further
raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 5 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
331
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The procedure in (4.1.2) can also be used to make a sample solution in (4.1.3) in
4.2.1.a and (4.1) a) - h) in 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 213.9 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 213.9 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the zinc concentration and the indicated value of
the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution (7) to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Obtain the zinc content from the calibration curve, and calculate the total zinc (T-Zn) in the
analytical sample.
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the zinc concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with
hydrochloric acid (1+23).
Comment 7 The zinc concentration in the analytical sample can also be corrected by subjecting
the blank test solution to the same procedures as in c) 1) to obtain the zinc content in
the blank test solution.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As
a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 1.2 % (mass fraction) and 90
mg/kg were 99.5 % and 97.8 % as the total zinc (T-Zn) respectively.
The results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference material
fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 1
shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 5 mg/kg
for solid fertilizers.
332
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.193- 194, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masayuki YOSHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Systematization of
Determination Methods of Major Components in Sludge Fertilizer, Compost and
Organic Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3 p. 107 - 116 (2010)
3) Shin ABE and Yoshiyuki SUNAGA: Verification of Performance Characteristics of
Testing Methods for Zinc in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 156 -164 (2013)
(5) Flow sheet for total zinc: The flow sheet for total zinc in fertilizers is shown below:
333
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
334
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the zinc standard solution in (2), a zinc standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a zinc standard solution (Zn 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
Note (2) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(3) The watch glass can be removed.
(4) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Standard Addition Method) according to JIS K 0116
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 206.191 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2mL and 4 mL of zinc standard solution (25 μg/mL) to volumetric flasks of 1) above,
then add hydrochloric acid (1+23) up to the marked line to make a sample solution of
Standard Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
206.191 nm.
5) Transfer 5 mL of blank test solution to a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same
procedures as in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained
from the respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added zinc concentration and the corrected
indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and the sample solution
without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the zinc content from the intercept of the calibration curve to calculate the total zinc
(T-Zn) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 The total zinc (T-Zn) in the analytical sample can also be corrected by subjecting the
blank test solution to the same procedures as in b) 1) - b) 4) and b) 6) - b) 7) to
obtain the zinc content in the blank test solution.
336
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP‐OES.
In this case, put a pre-determined amount of copper standard solution (Cu 0.1 mg/mL,
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), zinc standard solution (Zn 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10
mg/mL), cadmium standard solution (Cd 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), nickel
standard solution (Ni 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), chromium standard
solution (Cr 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) and lead standard solution (Pb 0.1
mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) in a volumetric flask to mix, add hydrochloric acid
(1+5) to make acid concentration 0.5 mol/L and further add water up to the marked
line to prepare a primary mixed standard solution. Transfer a pre-determined amount
of primary mixed standard solution to a volumetric flask, add hydrochloric acid
(1+23) up to the marked line to prepare a mixed standard solution for addition within
the concentration range in Table 1. The measurement wavelengths of respective
elements are according to Table 1.
In addition, the additive amount of mixed standard solution for addition and the
additive concentrations of respective elements in a sample solution are shown in the
Table below.
Comment 7 The comparison of the measurement value (xi:65.0 mg/kg - 3310 mg/kg) of ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (yi) of Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers
(49 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−47.6+1.080x and its
correlation coefficient (r) was 0.995. Triplicates measurement for each one sample of
sewage sludge fertilizer, human waste sludge fertilizer, industrial sludge fertilizer,
mixed sludge fertilizer, calcined sludge fertilizers and composted sludge fertilizer
was conducted. As a result, a repeatability obtained was 0.1 % - 2.3 % as a relative
standard deviation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 8
mg/kg.
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
337
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total zinc: The flow sheet for total zinc in fertilizers is shown below:
5.00 g
200-mL - 300-mL tall beaker.
analytical sample
Sample solution
Sample solution
338
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the zinc standard solution in (2), a zinc standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation can be prepared by using a zinc standard solution (Zn 1 mg/mL or
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
Comment 2 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.50 g of the analytical
339
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 213.9 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 213.9 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the zinc concentration and the indicated value of
the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 mg - 0.5 mg as
Zn) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the zinc content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble zinc
(W-Zn) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample
(solid). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass
fraction), 2 % (mass fraction) and 0.01 % (mass fraction) were 101.6 %, 101.9 % and
98.9 % as water-soluble zinc (W-Zn) respectively. In addition, recovery testing was
conducted using a preparation sample (fluid). As a result, the mean recovery rates at
the content level of 1 % (mass fraction), 0.05 % (mass fraction) and 20 mg/kg were
99.6 %, 100.4 % and 100.6 % as water-soluble zinc respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a liquid microelement compound fertilizer to evaluate the extract
precision of fluid fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 10
mg/kg (solid fertilizers) and 0.9 mg/kg (fluid fertilizers).
340
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.192- 194, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Shin ABE and Yoshiyuki SUNAGA: Verification of Performance Characteristics of
Testing Methods for Zinc in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 156 -164 (2013)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble zinc: The flow sheet for water-soluble zinc in fertilizers is
shown below:
341
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
342
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the zinc standard solution in (2), a zinc standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation can be prepared by using a zinc standard solution (Zn 10 mg/mL)
traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and a spectrometer
type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the equipment used
differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the calibration curve
suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for the calibration
curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
343
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble zinc.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 213.856 nm or 206.200 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at an
analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the zinc concentration and the indicated value of
the zinc standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Zn)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the zinc content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble zinc
(W-Zn) in the analytical sample.
Note (3) 206.200 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 213.856 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.0109 % (mass fraction) - 0.0827 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of flame atomic absorbance spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=
−0.0007+0.984x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.998. Additionally, additive
recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a
home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates
at the additive level of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 91.6 %
and 95.9 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were
analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results
of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for 3333testing method validation and its analysis are shown in
Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
344
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
345
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble zinc: The flow sheet for water-soluble zinc in fluid fertilizers is
shown below:
346
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.10 Copper
4.10.1 Total copper
4.10.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type C and its
symbol is 4.10.1.a-2017 or T-Cu.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid−hydrochloric acid (1+3), and then
spray in an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with copper at a wavelength of
324.8 nm to obtain the total copper (T-Cu) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of
this testing method is shown in Comment 8.
Comment 1 Instead of the copper standard solution in (2), a copper standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a copper standard solution
(Cu 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 When using a sample solution obtained in the procedure in (4.1.2) h) for the
measurement of cadmium, nickel, chromium or lead, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric
acid in (2) should be a reagent of harmful metal analysis grade, microanalysis grade
or equivalents.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
347
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising from room temperature
to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1 hour and further
raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.1.a.
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising from room temperature
to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1 hour and further
raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 5 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1.2) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not
348
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 324.8 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the copper standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 324.8 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the copper concentration and the indicated value
of the copper standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution (7) to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Obtain the copper content from the calibration curve, and calculate the total copper (T-Cu) in
the analytical sample.
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the copper concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with
hydrochloric acid (1+23).
Comment 7 The copper concentration in the analytical sample can also be corrected by subjecting
the blank test solution to the same procedures as in c) 1) to obtain the copper content
in the blank test solution.
Comment 8 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As
a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 0.15 % (mass fraction) and
0.03 % (mass fraction) were 100.4 % and 99.6 % as total copper (T-Cu) respectively.
The results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference material
fertilizer were analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 1
shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 4 mg/kg.
349
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.254- 255, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Kimie KATO, Masayuki YOSHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Systematization of
Determination Methods of Major Components in Sludge Fertilizer, Compost and
Organic Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3 p. 107 - 116 (2010)
3) Shin ABE and Yoshiyuki SUNAGA: Verification of Performance Characteristics of
Testing Methods for Copper in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 165 - 173 (2013)
(5) Flow sheet for total copper: The flow sheet for total copper in fertilizers is shown below:
350
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
351
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the copper standard solution in (2), a copper standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a copper standard solution
(Cu 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (4) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water, add water
up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
i) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - h) using another tall beaker to prepare a blank
test solution.
Note (2) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(3) The watch glass can be removed.
(4) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 324.754 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2mL and 4 mL of copper standard solution (25 μg/mL) to volumetric flasks of 1) above,
then add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line to make a sample solution of Standard
Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
324.754 nm.
5) Transfer 5 mL of blank test solution to a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same
procedures as in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained
from the respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added copper concentration and the corrected
indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and the sample solution
without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the copper content from the intercept of the calibration curve to calculate the total
copper (T-Cu) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 The copper concentration in the analytical sample can also be corrected by subjecting
the blank test solution to the same procedures as in b) 1) - b) 4) and b) 6) - b) 7) to
obtain the copper content in the blank test solution.
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
353
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
354
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total copper: The flow sheet for total copper in fertilizers is shown below:
5.00 g
200-mL - 300-mL tall beaker.
analytical sample
Sample solution
Sample solution
355
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the copper standard solution in (2), a copper standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a copper standard solution
(Cu 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
356
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.50 g of the analytical
sample and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 324.8 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the copper standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 324.8 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the copper concentration and the indicated value
of the copper standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 mg - 0.5 mg as
Cu) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the copper content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble copper
(W-Cu).
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample
(solid). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass
fraction), 1 % (mass fraction) and 0.03 % (mass fraction) were 100.7 %, 99.4 % and
102.6 % as water-soluble copper (W-Cu) respectively. In addition, recovery testing
was conducted using a preparation sample (fluid). As a result, the mean recovery
rates at the content level of 1 % (mass fraction), 0.05 % (mass fraction) and 20
mg/kg were 98.8 %, 99.3 % and 101.4 % as water-soluble copper respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a liquid microelement compound fertilizer to evaluate the extract
precision of fluid fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 10
mg/kg (solid fertilizers) and 3 mg/kg (fluid fertilizers).
357
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.254- 255, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Shin ABE and Yoshiyuki SUNAGA: Verification of Performance Characteristics of
Testing Methods for Copper in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 165 - 173 (2013)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble copper: The flow sheet for water-soluble copper in fertilizers
is shown below:
358
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
359
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the copper standard solution in (2), a copper standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a copper standard solution
(Cu 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble copper.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 327.396 nm, 224.700 nm or 324.754 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the copper standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the copper concentration and the indicated value
of the copper standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Cu)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the copper content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble copper
(W-Cu).
Note (3) 224.700 nm or 324.754 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission
obtained is different from the one of 327.396 nm, it is necessary to understand the
suitable concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution
for the calibration curve in advance.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.00982 % (mass fraction) - 0.0819 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of flame atomic absorbance spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=−0.0006+0.966x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. Additionally,
additive recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand)
and a home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery
rates at the additive level of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were
93.5 % and 95.3 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were
analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results
of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
361
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0005 % (mass fraction).
362
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble copper: The flow sheet for water-soluble copper in fluid
fertilizers is shown below:
363
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
b) Sample digestion flask (3): A 100-mL borosilicate glass volumetric flask 100 mL (180 mm
total height, 13 mm mouth diameter)
Note (3) Distinguish the volumetric flask used in digestion as a sample digestion flask and do
not use it for any other purposes.
Comment 1 Sample an analytical sample from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding (3.1) by
grinding with a mill until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture or
from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding Comment 1.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
a) Put 20 mL of the sample solution in a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask.
b) Add a 0.2 mol/L ammonium iron (II) sulfate solution drop-by-drop until the brown color of
dichromate ion almost disappears from the sample solution.
c) Add about a 0.25 mL of N-phenylanthranilic acid solution (6), and titrate with a 0.2 mol/L
ammonium iron (II) sulfate solution until the color of the solution changes from dark
red-purple to blue-green.
d) Put 20 mL of the blank test solution in a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask, and conduct the
procedures in b) - c) to titrate.
e) Calculate the organic carbon (O-C) in the analytical sample by the following formula:
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.2 mol/L ammonium iron (II) sulfate solution needed for
the titration of the blank test solution
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.2 mol/L ammonium iron (II) sulfate solution needed for
the titration of the sample solution
C: Set concentration (0.2 mol/L) of 0.2 mol/L ammonium iron (II) sulfate
solution
f: Factor of 0.2 mol/L ammonium iron (II) sulfate solution
V6: Constant volume (100 mL) of the sample solution and the blank test solution
365
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
in (4.1) d)
V7: Aliquot volume (20 mL) of the sample solution and the blank test solution
subjected to titration in (4.2) a) and (4.2) d)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (6) About 5 drops with a 1-mL - 2-mL Komagome pipette. Add the same volume to the
sample solution and the blank test solution.
Comment 2 The results of the collaborative study to determine a certified reference material
fertilizer were analyzed using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 1
shows the calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and
repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 1.5 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yuji SHIRAI, Yuko SEKINE, and Toshiaki HIROI: Validation of Determination Method
for Organic Form Carbon in Sludge Fertilizer and Compost, Research Report of Fertilizer,
Vol. 3, p. 117 - 122 (2010)
366
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for organic carbon: The flow sheet for organic carbon in sludge fertilizers and
compost, etc. is shown below:
367
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Sea sand (particle diameter 425 µm - 850 µm) is commercially sold by FUJIFILM
Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd. and YONEYAMA YAKUHIN KOGYO Co., Ltd.
Note (1) The setup of the program and the parameters of the analyzer are according to the
specification and the operation method of the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the
combustion method used.
(4) Test procedures: Conduct measurement as shown below. However, confirm that there is no
difference from the measured value of organic carbon obtained in advance according to
4.11.1.a by using an analytical sample.
Note (2) The additive amount of hydrochloric acid (1+3) is merely a target. It is enough to make
368
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
the whole analytical sample come into contact with hydrochloric acid. Let it stand for a
short time in the case of producing bubbles.
(3) In some cases, it is not necessary to add water due to the capacity of a container.
(4) Shake calmly the container for combustion to make the analytical sample come into
complete contact with hydrochloric acid.
(5) Remove hydrochloric acid completely
Comment 2 Sample an analytical sample from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding (3.1) by
grinding with a mill until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture or
from a test sample prepared in 2.3.3 Grinding Comment 1.
Comment 3 When it is confirmed that, for example, the volatilization of hydrogen chloride is not
detected by using a test paper, etc. and hydrochloric is completely removed in the
procedure d), the procedure e) can be skipped.
(4.2) Measurement: Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of a
total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the combustion method.
a) Measurement conditions for the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the combustion
method: Set up the measurement conditions for the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer
considering the following:
Combustion temperature: No less than 870 ºC
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Turn on the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the combustion method (1), and adjust so
that stable indicated values can be obtained.
2) Weigh a predetermined amount of the standard for calibration curves (6) to the order of 0.1 mg
into a combustion vessel.
3) Insert the combustion vessel into the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the combustion
method, and read the indicated value.
4) Conduct the procedure in 3) for another combustion vessel for a blank test, and read the
indicated value.
5) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the carbon content and the indicated value of the
standard for calibration curves and the blank test for calibration curves.
c) Sample measurement
1) Insert the combustion vessel containing the sample for measurement to the total nitrogen-total
carbon analyzer by the combustion method, and read the indicated value.
2) Obtain the carbon content from the calibration curve, and calculate organic carbon in the
analytical sample.
Note (6) Standard for calibration curves: DL-Aspartic acid (purity no less than 99 % (mass
fraction)), EDTA (purity no less than 99 % (mass fraction)), hippuric acid (purity no less
than 98 % (mass fraction)) or other reagents having equivalent purity recommended by
the total nitrogen-total carbon analyzer by the combustion method used.
Comment 4 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.21 % (mass fraction) - 45.40 %
(mass fraction)) of Combustion method and the measurement value (xi) of
Dichromate oxidation was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers and
compost (total 25 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=0.004+1.009x
and its correlation coefficient (r) were 0.999.
Results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are
shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.05 %
369
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(mass fraction).
References
1) Aiko YANO, Satono AKIMOTO, and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Organic Carbon
in Sludge Fertilizer and Compost by Hydrochloric Acid-Treated Combustion Method,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 9 - 19 (2013)
2) Aiko YANO and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Organic Carbon in Sludge Fertilizer
and Compost by Hydrochloric Acid-Treated Combustion Method: A Collaborative
Study, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 7, p. 22 - 27 (2014)
(5) Flow sheet for organic carbon: The flow sheet for organic carbon in sludge fertilizers and
compos is shown below:
370
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: Chromatograms of the standard for calibration curves and an analytical sample are
shown below:
371
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
O-C: Organic carbon (% (mass fraction)) (1) in the analytical sample obtained in
4.11.1
T-N: Total nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) (1) in the analytical sample obtained in
4.1.1
Note (1) O-C and T-N use raw data without rounding numerical value
372
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.12 Sulfur
4.12.1 Total sulfur content
4.12.1.a Potassium permanganate analysis
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers mainly containing ferrous sulfate (iron (II) sulfate)
(FeSO4)) among sulfur and its compound. This testing method is classified as Type D and its
symbol is 4.12.1.a-2017 or T-S.a-1.
Dissolve an analytical sample in water and diluted sulfuric acid, add phosphoric acid and then titrate
ferrous sulfate (iron (II) sulfate) (FeSO4)) by oxidation-reduction with a potassium permanganate
solution to obtain the total sulfate (T-SO3). In addition, the performance of this testing method is
shown in Comment 1.
Note (1) The endpoint is reached when the color of solution keeps as it is for 30 seconds after
coloring
a) Weigh 0.5 g - 1 g of an analytical sample to the order of 0.1 mg, and put it in a 200-mL tall
beaker.
b) Add about 50 mL of water and about 15 mL of sulfuric acid (1+5) and shake with a magnetic
stirrer to dissolve.
c) Immediately add about 1 mL of phosphate, and then titrate with a 0.02 mol/L potassium
permanganate solution until the color of the solution becomes light red (2).
d) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - c) using another 200-mL tall beaker to titrate
(2)
.
e) Calculate the total sulfur content (T-SO3) in an analytical sample by the following formula.
Comment 1 Recovery testing was conducted using a reagent (ferrous sulfate heptahydrate); as a
result, the mean recovery rate was 29.1 % (mass fraction) as total sulfate content
(T-SO3). The recovery rate to a theoretical value was 101.0 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.04 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yasushi SUGIMURA and Shinjiro IZUKA: Method validation of Redox Titration for
Determination of Sulfur content (as sulfur trioxide) in Fertilizers of Ferrous sulfate and
its mixture materials, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3, 25 - 29 (2010).
2) JIS K 8978: Iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate (Reagent) (2008)
(5) Flow sheet for total sulfur content: The flow sheet for total sulfur content in fertilizers
mainly containing ferrous sulfate is shown below.
374
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
b) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 80 ºC - 90 ºC.
c) Crucible: After heating porcelain crucible or platinum crucible in an electric furnace at 800
ºC in advance, let it stand to cool in a desiccator and measure the mass to the order of 0.1 mg.
d) Drying apparatus: Drying apparatus that can be adjusted to 110 ºC - 120 ºC.
e) Electric furnace: An electric furnace that can be kept at 800 ºC ± 5 ºC.
Note (2) Omit extraction if fluid fertilizers are made from only sulfuric acid and all materials
are dissolved
(3) Until sulfur content is dissolved. About 5 minutes when raw materials, etc. are not
dissolved.
375
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) Weigh 1g - 5g of an analytical sample to the order of 0.1 mg if the fluid fertilizers of
the analytical sample are made from only sulfuric acid and all materials are dissolved.
(6) It can be suspended after the procedures end.
(7) A pH meter can be used for neutralization.
(8) Omit the procedures in c) if fluid fertilizers are made from only sulfuric acid and all
materials are dissolved.
(9) Heated up to 70 ºC - 80 ºC in a water bath in advance.
(10) Add drop-by-drop.
(11) Until precipitate settles.
(12) Add a barium chloride solution slightly excessively to reduce the solubility of barium
sulfate.
(13) Wash the precipitate until a white turbidity is no longer formed when about 5 mL of
376
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
nitric acid (1+2) and about 1 mL of silver nitrate solution (2 g/100 mL) are added to
about 20 mL of washing.
(14) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 800 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(15) To prevent a crucible from chipping, it is recommended to let it stand to cool gently in
an electric furnace until the temperature of an electric furnace falls to no more than
200 ºC.
(16) Time to let it stand to cool in a desiccator should be constant. In the case of a porcelain
crucible, it is about 45 - 60 minutes.
Comment 1 Testing was conducted using sulfur simple substance fertilizers containing no
materials (2 samples); as a result, the quantitative value of the total sulfur content
(T-SO3) was 99.9 % - 100.1 % to a theoretical value.
Results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are
shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.4 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) JIS K 8088: Sulfur (Regent) (2010)
2) JIS K 8217: Iron ores - Methods for determination of sulfur content (1994)
3) Edited by KANTO CHEMICAL CO., INC.: Technique on Chemical Analysis of Regent
- Practical Basic Technique and Knowledge, p. 112 - 120 (2009)
4) Yasushi SUGIMURA Validation of Gravimetric Analysis for Determination of Sulfur
Content (as Sulfur Trioxide) in Sulfur and its Compounds as Fertilizers, Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, P. 9 - 15 (2011)
5) Shin ABE, Chika SUZUKI and Yuji SHIRAI: Testing Method of the Total Amount of
Sulfur Content (as Sulfur Trioxide): A Collaborative Study, Research Report of
Fertilizer, Vol. 7, p. 28 - 35 (2014)
377
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total sulfur content: The flow sheet for total sulfur content in fertilizers
mainly containing sulfur and sulfuric acid is shown below.
378
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
379
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Hot plate: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
b) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 30 ºC ± 2 °C and 80 ºC - 90 ºC.
c) Magnetic stirrer:
d) Spectrophotometer: A spectrophotometer specified in JIS K 0115
c) After standing to cool, transfer to a 250-mL volumetric flask with water and add water up to
the marked line.
d) Filter with Type 3 filter paper (4) to make an extract.
Note (2) Omit extraction if fluid fertilizers are made from only sulfuric acid and all materials
are dissolved
(3) Until sulfur content is dissolved. About 5 minutes when raw materials, etc. are not
dissolved.
(4) Omit the procedures in d) when all materials are dissolved.
Note (5) Weigh 1g - 5g of an analytical sample to the order of 0.1 mg if the fluid fertilizers of
the analytical sample are made from only sulfuric acid and all materials are dissolved.
(6) It can be suspended after the procedures end.
(7) A pH meter can be used for neutralization.
(8) Omit the procedures in c) if fluid fertilizers are made from only sulfuric acid and all
materials are dissolved.
(4.4) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 450 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 50 mL of sulfate standard solution (SO3 0.02 mg/mL - 0.1 mg/mL) in a 100-mL
Erlenmeyer flask with screw cap and conduct the procedure (4.3) b) - f) to make an SO3 1
mg/65 mL - 5 mg/65 mL sulfate standard solution for the calibration curve preparation.
381
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2) Put 50 mL of water in another 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask with screw cap and conduct the same
procedures as 1) to make a blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Measure absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm of the sulfuric acid standard solutions for the
calibration curve preparation using the blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation
as the control (8) (9).
4) Prepare the calibration curve of the sulfuric acid concentration and absorbance of the sulfuric
acid standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) For the sample solution, conduct procedures similarly as in b) 3) to measure absorbance.
2) For the blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) to measure absorbance, and
correct the absorbance obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the sulfate (SO3) content from the calibration curve, and calculate the total sulfur
content (T-SO3) in the analytical sample.
Note (8) Measure right after stirring because barium sulfate easily precipitates.
(9) A spectrophotometer with automatic sample introducing device is preferable.
Comment 1 The range of calibration curve with linearity is SO3 1 mg/65 mL - 5 mg/65 mL and
the curve does not pass through the origin.
Comment 2 Testing was conducted using sulfur simple substance fertilizers containing no
materials (2 samples); as a result, the quantitative value of the total sulfur content
(T-SO3) was 98.4 % - 99.4 % to a theoretical value.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 1 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) JIS K 8001: General rule for test methods of reagents (2009)
2) JIS K 8088: Sulfur (Regent) (2010)
3) JAPAN Sewage Works Association: Sewage Sludge Analysis -2007-, p. 132 - 134 Tokyo
(2007)
4) Edited by KANTO CHEMICAL CO., INC.: Technique on Chemical Analysis of Regent -
Practical Basic Technique and Knowledge, p. 131 - 135 (2009)
5) Yasushi SUGIMURA: Method Validation of Turbidimetry for Determination of Sulfur
Content (as Sulfur Trioxide) in Fertilizers of Sulfur, Sulfuric acid and Its Mixture,
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 6, p. 20 - 26 (2013)
382
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for total sulfur content: The flow sheet for total sulfur content in fertilizers
mainly containing sulfur and sulfuric acid is shown below.
383
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
384
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.13 Iron
4.13.1 Water-soluble iron
4.13.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This test method is applicable to fertilizers that indicate iron content as a response modifier. This
testing method is classified as Type D and its symbol is 4.13.1.a-2017 or W-Fe.a-1.
Extract by adding water to an analytical sample, spray in an acetylene−air flame and measure the
atomic absorption with iron at a wavelength of 248.3 nm to obtain water-soluble iron (W-Fe) in an
analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 5.
Comment 1 Instead of the iron standard solution in (2), an iron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using an iron standard solution (Fe
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
385
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.50 g of the analytical
sample and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 248.3 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the iron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 248.3 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the iron concentration and the indicated value of
the iron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 mg - 0.5 mg as
Fe) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the iron content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble iron
(W-Fe) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample
(solid). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 10 % (mass
fraction), 5 % (mass fraction) and 0.05 % (mass fraction) were 101.1 %, 102.8 % and
107.0 % as water-soluble iron (W-Fe) respectively. In addition, recovery testing was
conducted using a preparation sample (fluid). As a result, the mean recovery rates at
the content level of 1 % (mass fraction), 0.1 % (mass fraction) and 0.01 % (mass
fraction) were 103.6 %, 105.7 % and 105.1 % as a water-soluble iron (W-Fe)
respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a liquid microelement compound fertilizer to evaluate the extract
precision of fluid fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 40
mg/kg (solid fertilizers) and 4 mg/kg (fluid fertilizers).
386
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.252, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Shinei TAKAHASHI, Chika SUZUKI and Noriyuki SASAKI: Verification of
Performance Characteristics of Testing Method for Iron in Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 7, p. 131 - 137 (2014)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble iron: The flow sheet for water-soluble iron in fertilizers is
shown below:
387
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
388
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the iron standard solution in (2), an iron standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using an iron standard solution (Fe
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116.
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble iron.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 259.940 nm or 238.204 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the iron standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at an analytical line wavelength.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the iron concentration and the indicated value of
the iron standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Fe)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the iron content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble iron
(W-Fe) in the analytical sample.
Note (3) 238.204 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 259.940 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 4.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.0191 % (mass fraction) - 0.517 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of flame atomic absorbance spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=0.001+0.968x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.999. Additionally, additive
recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a
home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates
at the additive level of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 96.5 %
and 93.9 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were
analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results
of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2.
390
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0005 % (mass fraction).
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
391
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble iron in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
392
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.14 Molybdenum
4.14.1 Water-soluble molybdenum
4.14.1.a Sodium thiocyanate absorptiometric analysis
(1) Summary
This test method is applicable to fertilizers that indicate molybdenum content as a response modifier.
This testing method is classified as Type D and its symbol is 4.14.1.a-2017 or W-Mo.a-1.
Extract by adding water to an analytical sample, add sulfuric acid (1+1) and perchloric acid, further
add a sodium thiocyanate solution and a tin (II) chloride solution, and measure the absorbance with
thiocyanate complex formed by the reaction of reduced molybdenum (V) with thiocyanate ion to
obtain water-soluble molybdenum (W-Mo) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of
this testing method is shown in Comment 6.
Comment 1 Instead of the molybdenum standard solution in (2), a molybdenum standard solution
for the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a molybdenum
standard solution (Mo 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National
Metrology.
393
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.50 g of the analytical
sample and put it in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 4 When the sample solution in d) contains organic matters that affect the determination,
put a predetermined amount of the sample solution to a 100-mL tall beaker, add a
small amount of sulfuric acid and nitric acid to heat and digest the organic matters
until white smoke of sulfuric acid evolves. After standing to cool, transfer the
solution to a 100-mL volumetric flask with water and add water up to the marked
line to filter. The filtrate is prepared as the sample solution of (4.2) a).
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.4.a.
Note (3) When the solution becomes muddy, centrifuge after the procedure in c). However, if it
is presumed that copper (I) thiocyanate caused the muddying, centrifuge after leaving
at rest for 1 hour.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 460 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 30 mL of molybdenum standard solution (Mo 0.01 mg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric
flasks step-by-step.
2) Conduct the same procedure as (4.2) b) - c) to make a 0.01 mg/100 mL - 0.3 mg/100 mL
molybdenum standard solution for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 100-mL volumetric flask to make a blank test
394
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using a preparation sample. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the content level of 2.5 % (mass fraction) and
0.1 % (mass fraction) were 100.2 % and 100.8 % as water-soluble molybdenum
(W-Mo) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a liquid microelement compound fertilizer to evaluate the extract
precision of fluid fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 60
mg/kg (solid fertilizers) and 6 mg/kg (fluid fertilizers).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.281- 283, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Keiji YAGI, Natuki TOYODOME, Tokiya SUZUKI and Hideo SOETA: Verification of
Performance Characteristics of Testing Method for Water-soluble Molybdenum Content
in Fertilizer by Sodium Thiocyanate Absorptiometric Analysis, Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 7, p. 138 - 144 (2014)
3) Shinji KAWAGUCHI: Simple Extraction Method for Water-Soluble Components in
Liquid Compound Fertilizers, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 10 - 20 (2016)
395
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for water-soluble molybdenum: The flow sheet for water-soluble molybdenum
in fertilizers is shown below:
396
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the molybdenum standard solution in (2), a molybdenum standard solution
for the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a molybdenum
standard solution (Mo 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble molybdenum.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 202.030 nm or 277.540 nm (3)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the molybdenum standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read
the indicated value at a wavelength of 202.030 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the molybdenum concentration and the indicated
value of the molybdenum standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Mo)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the molybdenum content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble
molybdenum (W- Mo).
Note (3) 277.540 nm can also be used. However, since the intensity of emission obtained is
different from the one of 202.030 nm, it is necessary to understand the suitable
concentration range of the calibration curve and prepare a standard solution for the
calibration curve in advance.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi : 0.00342 % (mass fraction) -
0.20374 % (mass fraction)) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the
measurement value (xi) of the Sodium thiocyanate absorptiometric analysis was
conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a
regression equation was y=0.0004+0.982x and its correlation coefficient (r) was
0.999. Additionally, additive recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound
fertilizer (1 brand) and a home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result,
the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 %
(mass fraction) were 95.4 % and 97.6 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were
analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results
of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
398
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0005 % (mass fraction).
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
399
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble molybdenum in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
400
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
4.15 Cobalt
4.15.1 Water-soluble cobalt
4.15.1.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fluid compound fertilizers, liquid microelement compound
fertilizers and the fluid fertilizers of home garden-use compound fertilizers. This testing method is
classified as Type E and its symbol is 4.15.1.a-2017 or W-Co.a-1.
Extract by adding water to an analytical sample, spray in an acetylene−air flame and measure the
atomic absorption with cobalt at a wavelength of 240.7 nm to obtain water-soluble cobalt (W-Co) in
an analytical sample.
Comment 1 Instead of the cobalt standard solution in (2), a cobalt standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a cobalt standard solution (Co
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (2) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
Note (3) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble cobalt.
401
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 240.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the cobalt standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 240.7 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the cobalt concentration and the indicated value
of the cobalt standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Co)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the cobalt content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble cobalt
(W-Co) in the analytical sample.
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble cobalt in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
402
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the cobalt standard solution in (2), a cobalt standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a cobalt standard solution (Co
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: An optical emission spectrometer specified in JIS K
0116
1) Gas: Argon gas specified in JIS K 1105 of no less than 99.5 % (volume fraction) in purity
Note (2) The sampling amount of the analytical sample is 10 g when the content in the sample
is less than 0.01 % (mass fraction) as water-soluble cobalt.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 4.2.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 228.616 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the cobalt standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the indicated
value at a wavelength of 228.616 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the cobalt concentration and the indicated value
of the cobalt standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as Co)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5), and add water up to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the cobalt content from the calibration curve, and calculate the water-soluble cobalt
(W-Co) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.2.4.d Comment 7.
Comment 5 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.00105 % (mass fraction) - 0.0213 %
(mass fraction )) of ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value
(xi) of flame atomic absorbance spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness
using fluid fertilizers (12 samples). As a result, a regression equation was
y=0.0001+0.927x, and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.996. Additionally, additive
recovery testing was conducted using a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a
home garden-use compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates
at the additive level of 0.01 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 94.6 %
and 98.4 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a fluid compound
fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were
analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results
of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a collaborative
study implemented for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0005 % (mass fraction).
404
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Simultaneous Determination Method for Effect-Development
Promoting Agent (Ca, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn and Mo) in Liquid Compound Fertilizer using
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES), Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 9, p. 1 - 9 (2016)
405
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet: The flow sheet for water-soluble cobalt in fluid fertilizers is shown below:
406
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5. Harmful components
5.1 Mercury
5.1.a Cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
The test method is applicable to fertilizers excluding fluid sludge fertilizers. This testing method is
classified as Type B and its symbol is 5.1.a-2017 or Hg.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with nitric acid- perchloric acid, and then reduce mercury (II) in the
solution with tin (II) chloride. Aerate this solution, and measure the atomic absorption for generated
mercury vapor at a wavelength of 253.7 nm to obtain mercury (Hg) in an analytical sample. In
addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 3.
Note (1) Use a reagent with low mercury content, such as for mercury analysis or for harmful
metal analysis.
(2) Use as an anti-forming agent.
(3) This is an example of preparation; prepare an amount as appropriate.
(4) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 4 months after preparation.
(5) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 1 months after preparation.
Comment 1 Instead of the mercury standard solution in (2), a mercury standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a mercury standard solution
(Hg 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Mercury atomic absorption spectrometer: Mercury atomic absorption spectrometer using
a method for producing the atomic vapor by reduction specified in JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: Low-pressure mercury lamp
b) Hot plate or sand bath: A hot plate whose surface temperature can be adjusted up to 250 ºC.
407
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Adjust the amounts of gas and silica sand of a sand bath so that the sand bath temperature can
be set to 180 °C - 200 °C.
c) Sample digestion flask (6): A 100-mL borosilicate glass volumetric flask 100 mL (180 mm
total height, 13 mm mouth diameter)
Note (6) Distinguish the volumetric flask used in digestion as a sample digestion flask and do
not use it for any other purposes.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry specified
in JIS K 0121. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
atomic absorption spectrometer used. An example of measurement using a mercury atomic
absorption spectrometer is shown below:
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 253.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 1 mL - 20 mL of mercury standard solution (Hg 0.1 µg/mL) in 100-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step, and add water up to the marked line. Put 5 mL of these solutions in respective
reduction vessels, add 1 drop of tri-n-butyl phosphate (9), to make mercury standard solutions
for the calibration curve preparation.
2) Put 5 mL of water in another reduction vessel, and add 1 drop of tri-n-butyl phosphate (9), to
make the blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Connect the reduction vessel to the mercury atomic absorption spectrometer, and introduce
sulfuric acid (1+1) and a tin (II) chloride solution, and circulate air.
4) Read the indicated value at a wavelength of 253.7 nm.
5) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the mercury content (µg) and the indicated value
of the mercury standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of a sample solution in respective reduction vessels, add 1 drop of tri-n-butyl
phosphate (9), and conduct similarly as in b) 3) - 4) to read the indicated value.
2) Put 5 mL of the blank test solution in a reduction vessel, add 1 drop of tri-n-butyl phosphate
(9)
, and conduct similarly as in b) 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated
value obtained for the sample solution.
408
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3) Obtain the mercury content (µg) from the calibration curve, and calculate mercury (Hg) in the
analytical sample.
Note (9) It is not required to add tri-n-butyl phosphate if not needed.
Comment 2 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), mercury (Hg) can be corrected by
obtaining the mercury content in the blank test.
Comment 3 Recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using an industrial sludge
fertilizer (1 sample), composted sludge (3 samples) and a human waste sludge
fertilizer (1 sample). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level
of 2 mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg were 98.7 % - 101.6 % and 100.7 % - 105.4 % as
mercury (Hg) respectively. In addition, recovery testing was conducted using
soybean meal, rape seed meal, compound fertilizers (2 samples) and blended
fertilizers. As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 40
mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg were 98.5 % - 101.5 % and 100.4 % - 103.3 % as mercury
(Hg) respectively.
In order to evaluate precision, results from a collaborative study for test method
validation and its analysis are shown in Table 1. In addition, the results of the
collaborative study to determine a certified reference material fertilizer were
analyzed by using a three-level nesting analysis of variance. Table 2 shows the
calculation results of reproducibility, intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.01
mg/kg.
409
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Fumihiro ABE, Takeshi HASHIMOTO and Yasushi SUGIMURA: Determination of
mercury in sludge fertilizer - Improved decomposition method -, Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 60 - 66 (2008)
2) Fumihiro ABE, Takeshi HASHIMOTO and Norio HIKICHI: Determination of mercury
in sludge fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results -, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p.
67 - 73 (2008)
3) Akira SHIMIZU, Kaori OKADA, Takeshi HASHIMOTO, Yasuto IDE and Toshiaki
HIROI: Determination of Mercury in Fertilizer- Expanding the scope of application of
improved method -, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 12 - 17 (2009)
(5) Flow sheet for mercury: The flow sheet for mercury in fertilizers is shown below:
410
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) Use a reagent with low mercury content, such as for mercury analysis or for harmful
metal analysis.
(2) This is an example of preparation; prepare an amount as appropriate.
(3) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 4 months after preparation.
(4) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 1 month after preparation.
Comment 1 Instead of the mercury standard solution in (2), a mercury standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a mercury standard solution
(Hg 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Mercury atomic absorption spectrometer : A mercury atomic absorption spectrometer
using a method for producing the atomic vapor by reduction specified in JIS K 0121.
1) Light source: Low-pressure mercury lamp
b) Pressure vessel decomposing device: A device which pressurizes the inside of a vessel by
putting acid, etc. to heat in the airtight vessel, and decomposes a sample by the interaction of
heating, pressurizing and acid. The following requirements should be met.
1) The main part of a decomposing device: In the case of the microwave heating method, a
device should be able to produce a high-frequency wave using a frequency which is permitted
411
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5 g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(6) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(7) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - c).
(8) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(9) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.2.c, (4.1) of 5.3.c,
(4.1) of 5.4.c, (4.1) of 5.5.e and (4.1) of 5.6.c.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry specified
in JIS K 0121. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
atomic absorption spectrometer used. An example of the measurement using the mercury
atomic absorption spectrometer is shown below:
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 253.7 nm
412
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of a sample solution in respective reduction vessels, and conduct similarly as in b)
3) - 4) to read the indicated value.
2) Put 5 mL of the blank test solution in a reduction vessel and conduct similarly as in b) 3) - 4)
to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the mercury content (µg) from the calibration curve, and calculate mercury (Hg) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), mercury (Hg) can be corrected by obtaining
the mercury content in the blank test.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples), and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 0.2 mg/kg - 0.4
mg/kg, 0.01 mg/kg - 0.09 mg/kg and 0.7µg /kg - 7µg /kg were 100.0 % - 109.1 %,
99.0 % - 114.6 % and 100.4 % - 113.4 % as mercury (Hg) in an actual article
respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2
µg/kg.
413
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for mercury: The flow sheet for mercury in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown
below:
414
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.2 Arsenic
5.2.a Hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 5.2.a-2017 or As.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with nitric acid-sulfuric acid-perchloric acid, and then generate arsenic
hydride by the addition of sodium tetrahydroborate in the acidic condition with hydrochloric acid,
introduce it with argon gas to a heated absorption cell, and measure the atomic absorption with
arsenic at a wavelength of 193.7 nm to obtain arsenic (As) in an analytical sample. In addition, the
performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 7.
Note (1) The concentrations of a potassium iodide solution and a sodium tetrahydroborate
solution vary depending on the instrument used.
(2) This is an example of preparation; prepare an amount as appropriate.
(3) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 6 months after preparation.
(4) Store in a refrigerator, and do not use after 1 month after preparation.
Comment 1 Instead of the arsenic standard solution in (2), an arsenic standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using an arsenic standard solution
(As 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (5) For cell heating, there are a method of electric heating and a method of flame heating.
Note (6) Carbonization (degradation) of organic matters by sulfuric acid begins by heating
when nitric acid no longer remains. In this state, As5+ may be reduced to As3+ and
evaporate; therefore, stop heating immediately after the end of the generation of
nitroxide (yellow-brown smoke).
(7) Oxidation of organic matters by perchloric acid progresses extremely rapidly and
explosively. For that reason, add perchloric acid after fully degrading organic matters
with nitric acid to avoid danger.
(8) When the white smoke of perchloric acid is generated, if the solution is colored such
as black-brown or brown, stop heating immediately, and after standing to cool, add
nitric acid, and heat again to degrade remaining organic matters.
(9) The watch glass can be removed.
(10) The generation of arsenic hydride is inhibited by the presence of nitric acid; therefore,
remove nitric acid by sufficiently generating the white smoke of sulfuric acid.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as in (4.1) in 5.2.b and 5.5.c. However, the
sampling amount of the analytical sample in (4.1) a) in 5.5.c is 1.00 g.
416
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 When the analytical sample solidifies in the procedure in (4.1) b), moisten the
analytical sample with a small amount of water as necessary in advance.
Comment 4 It is not necessary to conduct the procedure in (4.1) b) “leave at rest overnight” in the
case of fertilizers not containing organic matters.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used. Two examples of measurement procedures with a continuous
hydride generator are shown below.
(4.2.1) Measurement (A): Leaving at rest after adding a potassium iodide solution.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 193.7 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 2.5 mL - 10 mL of arsenic standard solution (As 0.1 µg/mL) in 50-mL volumetric flasks
step-by-step.
2) Add 5 mL of hydrochloric acid and 5 mL of potassium iodide solution, leave at rest for about
15 minutes, and then add water up to the marked line, to make 5 ng/mL -20 ng/mL arsenic
standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
3) Conduct the same procedures as 2) for another 50-mL volumetric flask to make a blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
4) While letting argon flow, introduce the arsenic standard solution for the calibration curve
preparation for each step and the blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation
respectively, further introduce hydrochloric acid (1+1) and a sodium tetrahydroborate solution
to the hydride generator to generate arsenic hydride.
5) Separate arsenic hydride and liquid waste, and then introduce the gas containing arsenic
hydride to a heated absorption cell, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of 193.7 nm.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the arsenic concentration and the indicated value
of the arsenic standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask, and conduct
procedures similarly as in b) 2) and b) 4) - 5) to read the indicated value.
2) Put a predetermined amount of the blank test solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask, and
conduct procedures similarly as in b) 2) and b) 4) - 5) to read the indicated value, and correct
the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the arsenic content from the calibration curve, and calculate arsenic (As) in the
analytical sample.
further introduce a potassium iodide solution, hydrochloric acid (1+1) and a sodium
tetrahydroborate solution to the hydride generator to generate arsenic hydride.
3) Separate arsenic hydride and liquid waste, and then introduce the gas containing arsenic
hydride to a heated absorption cell, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of 193.7 nm.
4) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the arsenic concentration and the indicated value
of the arsenic standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask, and conduct
procedures similarly as in b) 2) - 3) to read the indicated value.
2) Put a predetermined amount of the blank test solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask, add water
up to the marked line, and conduct similarly as in b) 2) - 3) to read the indicated value, and
correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the arsenic content from the calibration curve, and calculate arsenic (As) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 5 The coexistence of iron, nickel, and cobalt at over 5, 10, 80 folds amount of arsenic,
respectively, inhibits the generation of arsenic hydride. However, the inhibition of
arsenic hydride generation even in the coexistence of iron at 1000 folds amount can
be removed by adding or introducing a potassium iodide solution.
Comment 6 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), the arsenic (As) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the arsenic content in the blank test solution.
Comment 7 Recovery testing was conducted using industrial sludge fertilizer, composted sludge
fertilizer (3 samples) and human waste sludge fertilizer; as a result, the recovery rates
at the concentration level of 50 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg were 94.6 % - 100.6 % and
99.9 % - 103.3 % as arsenic (As), respectively. Also, recovery testing was conducted
using processed slug phosphorus fertilizer, soybean meal, rape seed meal, compound
fertilizer and magnesia-potassium-sulfate fertilizer; as a result, the recovery rates at
the concentration level of 50 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg were 98.5 % - 109.8 % and 103.5 %
- 108.6 %, respectively.
Results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its analysis are
shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.1 mg/kg.
418
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Naoki ASAO, Yukie ISHIDA, Shinjiro IZUKA and Masakazu SAIKI: Determination of
Arsenic in Sludge Fertilizer - Improved Decomposition Method - Research Report of
Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 74 - 81 (2008)
2) Naoki ASAO, Shinjiro IZUKA and Norio HIKICHI: Determination of Arsenic in
Sludge Fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p.
82 - 89 (2008)
3) Yasushi SUGIMURA, Naoki ASAO and Shinjiro IZUKA: Determination of Arsenic in
Fertilizer- Expanding the scope of application of improved method -, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 18 - 24 (2009)
419
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for arsenic: The flow sheet for arsenic in fertilizers is shown below:
1.00 g - 2.00 g
200-mL - 300-mL tall beaker
analytical sample
← A small amount of water to moisten analytical sample
(if needed).
← About 10 mL nitric acid
← About 5 mL sulfuric acid
Leaving at rest Cover with a watch glass
overnight
Sample solution
420
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the arsenic standard solution in (2), an arsenic standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using an arsenic standard solution
(As 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (3) Carbonization (degradation) of organic matters by sulfuric acid begins by heating
when nitric acid no longer remains. In this state, As+5 may be reduced to As+3 and
evaporate; therefore, stop heating immediately after the end of the generation of
nitroxide (yellow-brown smoke).
(4) Oxidation of organic matters by perchloric acid progresses extremely rapidly and
explosively. For that reason, add perchloric acid after fully degrading organic matters
with nitric acid to avoid danger.
(5) When the white smoke of perchloric acid is generated, if the solution is colored such
as black-brown or brown, stop heating immediately, and after standing to cool, add
nitric acid, and heat again to degrade remaining organic matters.
(6) The watch glass can be removed.
(7) The generation of arsenic hydride is inhibited by the presence of nitric acid; therefore,
remove nitric acid by sufficiently generating the white smoke of sulfuric acid.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.2.a.
Comment 3 When the analytical sample solidifies in the procedure in (4.1) b), moisten the
analytical sample with a small amount of water as necessary in advance.
Comment 4 It is not necessary to conduct the procedure in (4.1) b) “leave at rest overnight” in
the case of fertilizers not containing organic matters.
d) Add about 2 mL of potassium iodide solution, shake and leave at rest for a few minutes.
e) Add about 1 mL of tin (II) chloride solution, shake and leave at rest for about 10 minutes (8).
f) Connect arsenic hydride generation bottle, glass tube lightly stuffed with lead acetate glass
wool in advance and 5 mL of silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution (9), and quickly put 2.5g
of zinc into an arsenic hydride generation bottle.
g) Leave at rest at room temperature (15ºC - 25ºC) for about 45 minutes, and allow generated
arsenic hydride to absorb into the silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution and color.
h) Put a predetermined amount of blank test solution into the arsenic hydride generation bottle,
conduct procedures similarly as in b) - g) to allow generated arsenic hydride to absorb into the
silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution and color.
Note (8) When a large amount of iron is contained, add 1 g of ascorbic acid and 2mL of tin (II)
chloride solution and shake to mix to leave at rest for about 10 minutes instead of the
procedure in e).
(9) Apply a small amount of silicone grease, etc. to the connecting parts of an arsenic
hydride generation bottle, glass tube and arsenic hydride absorption tube to maintain
their airtightness.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used.
a) Measurement conditions of the spectrophotometer: Set up the measurement conditions of
the spectrophotometer considering the following.
Detection wavelength: 510 nm or 519 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Put 2.5 mL - 20 mL of arsenic standard solution (1 µg/mL) in arsenic hydride generation
bottles step-by-step.
2) Conduct procedures similarly as in (4.2) b) - g) and allow them to react.
3) For another arsenic hydride generation bottle, the silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution
prepared similarly as in the procedure in 2) is used as the blank test solution for the calibration
curve preparation.
4) Measure the absorbance at a wavelength 510 nm of the silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution
of the arsenic standard solution for the calibration curve preparation using the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation as the control.
5) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the arsenic concentration and the indicated value
of the arsenic standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) For the silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution of (4.2) g), conduct procedures similarly as in
b) 4) to measure absorbance.
2) For the silver diethyl dithiocarbamate solution of (4.2) h), conduct procedures similarly as in
b) 4) to measure absorbance, and correct the absorbance obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the arsenic content from the calibration curve, and calculate arsenic (As) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 5 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), the arsenic (As) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the arsenic content in the blank test solution.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
423
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for arsenic: The flow sheet for arsenic in fertilizers is shown below:
1.00 g -2.00 g
200-mL - 300-mL tall beaker
analytical sample
← A small amount of water to moisten analytical sample (if needed).
← About 10 mL nitric acid, about 5 mL sulfuric acid
Leaving at rest Cover with a watch glass
overnight
Sample solution
424
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
425
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the arsenic standard solution in (2), an arsenic standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using an arsenic standard solution
(As 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
426
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(7) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(8) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - d).
(9) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(10) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
427
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.1.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0113
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Arsenic: monitor ion (m/z): 75
Rhodium: monitor ion (m/z): 103
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray arsenic standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into the inductively coupled plasma, and read the ratio of
the respective ion count number for the monitor ion of an element subjected to measurement
and an internal standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 µg - 5 µg as As)
in a 50-mL volumetric flask (9).
2) Add 5mL of internal standard solution (5) and add nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line.
3) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count numbers.
4) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 3) to correct the ratio of the ion
count numbers obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the arsenic content from the calibration curve, and calculate arsenic (As) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 4), the arsenic (As) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the arsenic content in the blank test solution.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples) and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 1 mg/kg - 9 mg/kg,
0.1 mg/kg - 0.9 mg/kg and 0.02 mg /kg - 0.04 mg /kg were 85.0 % - 105.9 %, 90.6 %
- 108.5 % and 95 % as arsenic (As) in an actual article respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.。
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 3 µg /kg.
428
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
this case, transfer a pre-determined amount of cadmium standard solution (Cd 0.1
mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), lead standard solution (Pb 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or
10 mg/mL), nickel standard solution (Ni 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL),
chromium standard solution (Cr 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) and arsenic
standard solution (As 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National
Metrology to a volumetric flask to mix, dilute with nitric acid (1+19) to prepare a
mixed standard solution (Cd 0.5 µg/mL, Pb 5 µg/mL, Ni 5 µg/mL, Cr 5 µg/mL, As 5
µg/mL) (1)(2)(3). Put 0.02 mL - 2 mL of mixed standard solutions in 100-mL
volumetric flasks (9) step-by-step, add 10 mL of rhodium standard solution (Rh 0.1
µg/mL) and rhenium standard solution (Re 0.1 µg/mL) (5) respectively as internal
standard and add nitric acid (1+19) up to the marked line to prepare mixed standard
solutions for calibration curve preparation (1)(2)(3) within the concentration range in
Table 2. Conduct procedures similarly as (4.2) b) - c) under the measurement
conditions in Table 2 and calculate the respective element concentrations in the
analytical samples.
Comment 6 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. Select a
measurement mass number considering the extent of interference. However, a mass
number cannot be changed in the measurement of arsenic. A magnetic sector
429
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for arsenic: The flow sheet for arsenic in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown below:
430
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.3 Cadmium
5.3.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 5.3.a-2017 or Cd.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid-hydrochloric acid (1+3), spray into an
acetylene-air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with cadmium at a wavelength of 228.8 nm
to obtain cadmium (Cd) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method
is shown in Comment 5.
Comment 1 Instead of the cadmium standard solution in (2), a cadmium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a cadmium standard solution
(Cd 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (3) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
431
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 2 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 4.9.1.b, (4.1) of
4.10.1.b, (4.1) of 5.3.b, (4.1) of 5.4.a, (4.1) of 5.4.b, (4.1) of 5.5.a, (4.1) of 5.5.d,
(4.1) of 5.6.a and (4.1) of 5.6.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 228.8 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the cadmium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 228.8 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the cadmium concentration and the indicated
value of the cadmium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution (7) to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value,
and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the cadmium content from the calibration curve, and calculate cadmium (Cd) in the
432
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
analytical sample.
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the cadmium concentration in the sample solution will
exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount
with hydrochloric acid (1+23).
Comment 4 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), the cadmium (Cd) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the cadmium content in the blank test solution.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using industrial sludge fertilizer and composted
sludge fertilizer (5 samples); as a result, the recovery rates at the concentration level
of 5 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg were 97.5 % - 99.2 % and 96.7 % - 99.7 %, respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.1 mg/kg.
References
1) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA, Manabu MATSUZAKI and Tadao AMANO: Determination
of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Improved
Decomposition Method - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 41 - 49 (2008)
2) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA and Manabu MATSUZAKI: Determination of Cadmium,
Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results - Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 50 - 59 (2008)
3) Hisanori ARAYA and Yoshimi TAKEBA: Validation of atomic absorption spectrometry
for determination of cadmium, lead, nickel and chromium in calcined sludge fertilizer -
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 30 - 42 (2010)
433
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for cadmium: The flow sheet for cadmium in fertilizers is shown below:
434
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the cadmium standard solution in (2), a cadmium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a cadmium standard solution
(Cd 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
f) Slightly move the watch glass (4), and continue heating on the hot plate or sand bath to
concentrate until nearly exsiccated.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (5) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer the solution to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water,
add water up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
i) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - h) using another tall beaker to prepare a blank
test solution.
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(4) The watch glass can be removed.
(5) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Standard Addition Method) according to JIS K 0116
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 228.802 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2mL and 4 mL of cadmium standard solution (0.25 μg/mL) to volumetric flasks of 1)
above, and further add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line to make a sample solution
of Standard Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
228.802 nm.
5) Put 5 mL of blank test solution in a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same procedures as
in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained from the
respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added cadmium concentration and the
corrected indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and sample
solution without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the cadmium content from the intercept of the calibration curve to calculate cadmium
(Cd) in the analytical sample
Comment 5 Instead of the correction method in c) 5), the cadmium (Cd) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the cadmium content in the blank test solution.
436
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.9.1.b Comment 6.
Comment 7 The comparison of the measurement value (xi:0.003 mg/kg - 3.32 mg/kg) of ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (yi) of Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers
(49 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0.03+1.009x and its
correlation coefficient (r) was 0.996. Triplicates measurement for each one sample of
sewage sludge fertilizer, human waste sludge fertilizer, industrial sludge fertilizer,
mixed sludge fertilizer, calcined sludge fertilizers and composted sludge fertilizer
was conducted. As a result, a repeatability obtained was 0.8 % - 4.1 % as a relative
standard deviation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is 0.2 mg/kg.
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
437
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for cadmium: The flow sheet for cadmium in fertilizers is shown below:
438
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the cadmium standard solution in (2), a cadmium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a cadmium standard solution
439
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5 g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(7) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(8) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - d).
(9) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(10) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
440
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
force.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.1.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0113
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Cadmium: monitor ion (m/z): 111, 114
Rhodium: monitor ion (m/z): 103
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray cadmium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into the inductively coupled plasma, and read the ratio of
the respective ion count numbers for the monitor ion of an element subjected to measurement
and an internal standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.005 µg - 0.5 µg as
Cd) in a 50-mL volumetric flask (9).
2) Add 5mL of internal standard solution (5) and add nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line.
3) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count numbers.
4) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 3) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the cadmium content from the calibration curve, and calculate cadmium (Cd) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 4), the cadmium (Cd) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the cadmium content in the blank test solution.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples), and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 0.1 mg/kg - 0.9
mg/kg, 0.01 mg/kg - 0.09 mg/kg and 2 µg /kg - 4 µg /kg were 89.4 % - 108.5 %,
91.0 % - 112.0 % and 96.3 % - 108.5 % as cadmium (Cd) in an actual article
respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 2 µg /kg.
441
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
that case, see 5.2.c Comment 5.
Comment 6 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. Select a
measurement mass number considering the extent of interference. However, a mass
number cannot be changed in the measurement of arsenic. A magnetic sector
double-focusing mass spectrometer or a collision reaction cell specified in JIS K
0133 can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
442
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for cadmium: The flow sheet for cadmium in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown
below:
443
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the rhodium standard solution in (2), a rhodium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a rhodium standard solution
(Rh 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Instead of the cadmium standard solution in (2), a cadmium standard solution for the
444
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (150 ºC) → 20 min (150 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(5) When organic matters, for example colored precipitate, etc., still remain, add 2 mL of
nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrogen peroxide and repeat the procedures in (4.1) c) – d).
(6) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedures in (4.1) of 5.4.d, (4.1) of 5.5.f
and (4.1) of 5.6.d.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0133
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Cadmium: monitor ion (m/z): 111
Rhodium: monitor ion (m/z): 103
Collision cell: KED (Kinetic Energy Discrimination) mode
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray cadmium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation together with rhodium standard solution (Rh 50 ng/ mL)
into the inductively coupled plasma (8), and read the ratio of the respective ion count numbers
for the mass/charge number of an element subjected to measurement and an internal standard
element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask (6), add 5mL of water and add
nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line (9).
2) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
3) For the blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 2) to correct the ratio of the
ion count number obtained for the sample solution.
4) Obtain the cadmium content from the calibration curve, and calculate cadmium (Cd) in the
analytical sample.
Note (8) Simultaneously introduce internal standard solution 1/10 of the volume of the standard
solution for the calibration curve preparation or the blank test solution for the
calibration curve preparation.
(9) If there is a possibility that the cadmium concentration in the sample solution will
exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount
with nitric acid (1+19).
Comment 6 When a sample solution or a standard solution for the calibration curve preparation
and an internal standard solution are not simultaneously introduced in the
measurement of the ICP-MS, when preparing respective solutions in the procedures
in c) 1) and c) 3), add a rhodium standard solution (Rh 50 ng / mL) 1/10 of the
volume of the respective solutions.
446
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 Instead of the correction method in c) 3), the cadmium (Cd) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the cadmium content in the blank test solution.
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:0.09 mg/kg – 5.52 mg/kg) of ICP
Mass Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers (20
samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0.0084+0.98x and its correlation
coefficient (r) was 0.999.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 0.5 mg/kg.
Comment 9 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
this case, mix a pre-determined amount of cadmium standard solution (Cd 0.1
mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL), nickel standard solution (Ni 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL
or 10 mg/mL), chromium standard solution (Cr 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL)
and lead standard solution (Pb 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to
National Metrology and dilute with nitric acid (1+19) to prepare a mixed standard
solution (Cd 0.1 µg/mL, Ni 1 µg/mL, Cr 1 µg/mL, Pb 0.2 µg/mL) (1)(2)(3). Put 0.1 mL
-10 mL of mixed standard solutions in volumetric flasks step-by-step, add nitric acid
(1+19) up to the marked line to prepare mixed standard solutions for calibration
curve preparation within the concentration range (1)(2)(3) in Table 2. Mix a
pre-determined amount of rhodium standard solution (Rh 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10
mg/mL), scandium standard solution (Sc 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) and
thallium standard solution (Tl 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) as internal
standard solutions and dilute with nitric acid (1+19) to prepare a mixed internal
standard solution (Rh 5 µg/mL, Sc 10 µg/mL, Tl 1 µg/mL) (1)(2)(3). Put 1 mL of mixed
internal standard solution in a volumetric flask, add nitric acid (1+19) up to the
marked line to prepare a mixed internal standard solution for calibration curve
preparation within the concentration range (1)(2)(3) in Table 2. Conduct procedures
similarly as (4.2) b) – c) under the measurement conditions in Table 2 and calculate
the respective element concentrations in the analytical samples.
Note that the concentration of a standard solution and an internal standard solution
can be changed as appropriate according to Comment 4.
447
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 10 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. A magnetic
sector double-focusing mass spectrometer or a reaction cell specified in JIS K 0133
an be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Satoko SAKAIDA, Mayu OSHIMA, Keisuke AOYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI1:
Determination of Harmful Components in Fertilizers using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 52 –
68 (2019)
448
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for cadmium: The flow sheet for cadmium in solid sludge fertilizers is shown
below:
449
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.4 Nickel
5.4.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 5.4.a-2017 or Ni.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid−hydrochloric acid (1+3), spray into
an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with nickel at a wavelength of 232.0 nm
to obtain nickel (Ni) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is
shown in Comment 5.
Comment 1 Instead of the nickel standard solution in (2), a nickel standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a nickel standard solution (Ni
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (3) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 2 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 232.0 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the nickel standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 232.0 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the nickel concentration and the indicated value
of the nickel standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution (7) to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value,
and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the nickel content from the calibration curve, and calculate nickel (Ni) in the analytical
sample.
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the nickel concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with
hydrochloric acid (1+23).
451
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), the nickel (Ni) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the nickel content in the blank test solution.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using industrial sludge fertilizer and composted
sludge fertilizer (5 samples); as a result, the recovery rates at the concentration level
of 300 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg were 98.5 % - 100.3 % and 97.1 % - 99.9 %,
respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 1 mg/kg.
References
1) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA, Manabu MATSUZAKI and Tadao AMANO: Determination
of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Improved
Decomposition Method - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 41 - 49 (2008)
2) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA and Manabu MATSUZAKI: Determination of Cadmium,
Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results - Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 50 - 59 (2008)
3) Hisanori ARAYA and Yoshimi TAKEBA: Validation of atomic absorption spectrometry
for determination of cadmium, lead, nickel and chromium in calcined sludge fertilizer -
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 30 - 42 (2010)
452
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nickel: The flow sheet for nickel in fertilizers is shown below:
453
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the nickel standard solution in (2), a nickel standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a nickel standard solution (Ni
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
f) Slightly move the watch glass (4), and continue heating on the hot plate or sand bath to
concentrate until nearly exsiccated.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (5) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer the solution to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water,
add water up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
i) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - h) using another tall beaker to prepare a blank
test solution.
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(4) The watch glass can be removed.
(5) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.4.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Standard Addition Method) according to JIS K 0116
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 231.604 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2 mL and 4 mL (2.5 μg/mL) of nickel standard solution to volumetric flasks of 1) above,
then add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line to make a sample solution of Standard
Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
231.604 nm.
5) Put 5 mL of blank test solution in a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same procedures as
in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained from the
respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added nickel concentration and the corrected
indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and the sample solution
without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the nickel content from the intercept of the calibration curve to calculate nickel (Ni)
concentration in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Instead of the correction method in c) 5), the nickel (Ni) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the nickel content in the blank test solution.
455
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP‐OES.
In that case, see 4.9.1.b Comment 6.
Comment 7 The comparison of the measurement value (xi:8.4 mg/kg - 129 mg/kg) of ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (yi) of Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers
(49 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0.96+1.010x and its
correlation coefficient (r) was 0.995. Triplicates measurement for each one sample of
sewage sludge fertilizer, human waste sludge fertilizer, industrial sludge fertilizer,
mixed sludge fertilizer, calcined sludge fertilizers and composted sludge fertilizer
was conducted. As a result, a repeatability obtained was1.0 % - 2.6 % as a relative
standard deviation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 8
mg/kg.
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
456
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nickel: The flow sheet for nickel in fertilizers is shown below:
457
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the nickel standard solution in (2), a nickel standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a nickel standard solution (Ni
1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
458
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5 g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(7) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(8) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - d).
(9) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(10) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
459
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.1.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0113
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Nickel: monitor ion (m/z): 60, 58
Rhodium: monitor ion (m/z): 103
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray nickel standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation into the inductively coupled plasma, and read the ratio of the
respective ion count numbers for the monitor ion of an element subjected to measurement and
an internal standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 µg - 5 µg as Ni) in
a 50-mL volumetric flask (9).
2) Add 5mL of internal standard solution (5) and add nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line.
3) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
4) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 3) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the nickel content from the calibration curve, and calculate nickel (Ni) in the analytical
sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 4), the nickel (Ni) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the nickel content in the blank test solution.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples) and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 10 mg/kg - 60
mg/kg, 1 mg/kg - 9 mg/kg and 0.1 mg /kg - 0.9 mg /kg were 89.6 % - 99.2 %, 91.5 %
- 114.7 % and 96.1 - 103.7 % as nickel (Ni) in an actual article respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 6 µg /kg.
460
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP‐MS. In
that case, see 5.2.c Comment 5.
Comment 6 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. Select a
measurement mass number considering the extent of interference. However, a mass
number cannot be changed in the measurement of arsenic. A magnetic sector
double-focusing mass spectrometer or a collision reaction cell specified in JIS K
0133 can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
461
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nickel: The flow sheet for nickel in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown below:
462
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the rhodium standard solution in (2), a rhodium standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a rhodium standard solution
(Rh 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Instead of the nickel standard solution in (2), a nickel standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a nickel standard solution (Ni
463
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
464
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (150 ºC) → 10 min (150 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(5) When organic matters, for example colored precipitate, etc., still remain, add 2 mL of
nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrogen peroxide and repeat the procedures in (4.1) c) – d).
(6) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedures in (4.1) of 5.3.d.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0133
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Nickel: mass/ charge number (m/z): 60
Rhodium: mass/ charge number (m/z): 103
Collision cell: KED (Kinetic Energy Discrimination) mode
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray nickel standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation together with rhodium standard solution (Rh 50 ng/ mL) into
the inductively coupled plasma (8), and read the ratio of the respective ion count numbers for
the mass/charge number of an element subjected to measurement and an internal standard
element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask (6), add 5mL of water and add
nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line (9).
2) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
3) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 2) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
4) Obtain the nickel content from the calibration curve, and calculate nickel (Ni) in the analytical
sample.
Note (8) Simultaneously introduce internal standard solution 1/10 of the volume of the standard
solution for the calibration curve preparation or the blank test solution for the
calibration curve preparation.
(9) If there is a possibility that the nickel concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with nitric
acid (1+19).
Comment 6 When a sample solution or a standard solution for the calibration curve preparation
and an internal standard solution are not simultaneously introduced in the
measurement of the ICP-MS, when preparing respective solutions in the procedures
in c) -1) and c) 3), add rhodium standard solution (Rh 50 ng/mL) 1/10 of the volume
of the solution.
Comment 7 Instead of the correction method in c) 3), the nickel (Ni) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the nickel content in the blank test solution.
465
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:3.67 mg/kg - 305 mg/kg) of ICP Mass
Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry was conducted using sludge fertilizers (19 samples). As a result, a
regression equation was y=3.48+0.97x and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.998.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of sludge
fertilizers were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 5 mg/kg.
Comment 9 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
that case, see 5.3.d Comment 9.
Comment 10 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. A magnetic
sector double-focusing mass spectrometer or a reaction cell specified in JIS K 0133
can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Satoko SAKAIDA, Mayu OSHIMA, Keisuke AOYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI:
Determination of Harmful Components in Fertilizers using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 52 –
68 (2019)
466
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for nickel: The flow sheet for nickel in solid sludge fertilizers is shown below:
467
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.5 Chromium
5.5.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (Fertilizers containing organic matters)
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers containing organic matters. This testing method is
classified as Type B and its symbol is 5.5.a-2017 or Cr.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid−hydrochloric acid (1+3), spray into
an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with chromium at a wavelength of 357.9
nm or 359.3 nm to obtain chromium (Cr) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of
this testing method is shown in Comment 5.
Comment 1 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
solution (Cr 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (4) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
468
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (5) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(6) The watch glass can be removed.
(7) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 357.9 nm or 359.3 nm (8)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the chromium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame (9), and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 357.9 nm or 359.3 nm (8).
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the chromium concentration and the indicated
value of the chromium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 25 mL of the sample solution (10) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to
the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in 1) - 2) and b) 1) to read the
indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
469
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5) Obtain the chromium content from the calibration curve, and calculate chromium (Cr) in the
analytical sample.
Note (8) When background correction is conducted by the Zeeman method, 359.3 nm is
recommended as the analytical line wavelength.
(9) Use low-fuel acetylene−air flame. Acetylene−nitrous oxide flame can also be used.
(10) If there is a possibility that the chromium concentration in the sample solution will
exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, decrease the amount to be
transferred.
References
1) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA, Manabu MATSUZAKI and Tadao AMANO: Determination
of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Improved
Decomposition Method - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 41 - 49 (2008)
2) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA and Manabu MATSUZAKI: Determination of Cadmium,
Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results - Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 50 - 59 (2008)
3) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA, Chie INOUE: Validation of determination methods for
chromium in sludge fertilizer - Evaluation of measurement procedure, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 2, p. 130 - 136 (2009)
470
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in fertilizers containing organic
matters is shown below:
471
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.5.b Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (Fertilizers mainly containing fused matters, slag,
etc.)
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers mainly containing fused matters, slag, etc. This
testing method is classified as Type B and its symbol is 5.5.b-2017 or Cr.b-1.
Add ammonium sulfate to prevent the bumping of an analytical sample, pretreat the analytical
sample with nitric acid−sulfuric acid−perchloric acid, and then spray into an acetylene−air flame.
Measure the atomic absorption with chromium at a wavelength of 357.9 nm or 359.3 nm to obtain
chromium (Cr) in an analytical sample. The performance of this testing method is shown in
Comment 4.
In addition, fertilizers containing no organic matters can also be measured by the method of 5.5.c.
However, this method should be used for fertilizers that bump when heating. (Fertilizers made of
fused matters, slag, etc. may bump in many cases).
Comment 1 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
solution (Cr 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (4) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
Note (5) Sudden temperature rise may cause bumping. Therefore, increase the temperature
gradually.
(6) If there is no possibility of bumping, the watch glass can be removed.
(7) Exsiccating it may cause the chromium to become insoluble. Therefore, care should be
taken not to concentrate too much.
(8) Heating at high temperature may cause bumping. Therefore, it is recommended to
increase the temperature gradually from about 170 °C to the temperature at which it
boils slightly.
(9) If much nitric acid remains, care should be taken because bumping can occur easily
when heating temperature rises.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
473
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (10) When background correction is conducted by the Zeeman method, 359.3 nm is
recommended as the analytical line wavelength.
(11) Acetylene−nitrous oxide flame can also be used.
(12) If there is a possibility that the concentration of chromium in the sample solution
exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, put no more than 10 mL of the
sample solution in a 100-mL volumetric flask and add about 10 mL of interference
suppressor solution and about 67 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+17), and add water up to
the marked line.
474
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiaki HIROI, Fumika TAKATSU: Evaluation of Digest Method for Determination of
Chromium in Inorganic Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 10, p. 9 - 28 (2017)
2) Toshio HIRABARA, Toshiaki HIROI, Tomomi ISIKAWA: Evaluation of Digest
Method for Determination of Chromium in Inorganic Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry: A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 11, p. 39 - 46
(2018)
475
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in fertilizers mainly containing
fused matters and slag is shown below:
476
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.5.c Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (Fertilizers not containing organic matters)
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers not containing organic matters (including calcined
sludge fertilizer). This testing method is classified as Type B and its symbol is 5.5.c-2017 or Cr.c-1.
In addition, for fertilizers mainly made of fused matters, slag, etc., care should be taken because
they may bump while heating. 5.5.b applies to fertilizers that may bump.
Pretreat an analytical sample with nitric acid−sulfuric acid−perchloric acid, and then spray into an
acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with chromium at a wavelength of 357.9
nm or 359.3 nm to obtain chromium (Cr) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of
this testing method is shown in Comment 8.
Comment 1 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
solution (Cr 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (4) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.2.a.
Comment 3 When the analytical sample solidifies in the procedure in (4.1) b), moisten the
analytical sample with a small amount of water as necessary in advance.
Comment 4 It is not necessary to conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) “leave at rest overnight”
because the range subjected to analysis does not contain organic matters.
Comment 5 In some cases, about 10 minutes heating in procedure in (4.1) g) is required.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
478
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 357.9 nm or 359.3 nm (10)
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the chromium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a low-fuel acetylene−air flame (11), and read
the indicated value at a wavelength of 357.9 nm or 359.3 nm (10).
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the chromium concentration and the indicated
value of the chromium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank
test solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 25 mL of the sample solution (12) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add about 10 mL of interference suppressor solution (3), and add hydrochloric acid (1+17) to
the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in 1) - 2) and b) 1) to read the
indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the chromium content from the calibration curve, and calculate chromium (Cr) in the
analytical sample.
Note (10) When background correction is conducted by the Zeeman method, 359.3 nm is
recommended as the analytical line wavelength.
(11) Acetylene−nitrous oxide flame can also be used.
(12) If there is a possibility that the concentration of chromium in the sample solution
exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, put no more than 10 mL of the
sample solution in a 100-mL volumetric flask and add about 10 mL of interference
suppressor solution and about 67 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+17), and add water up to
the marked line.
479
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Hisanori ARAYA, Yoshimi TAKEBA and Toshiaki HIROI: Evaluation of Digest
Method for Determination of Chromium in Calcined Sludge Fertilizer by Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 4, p. 23 - 29 (2011)
2) Takeshi UCHIYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI: Evaluation of Digest Method for Determination
of Chromium in Calcined Sludge Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry: A
Collaborative Study. Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 5, p. 41 - 47 (2012)
480
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in calcined sludge fertilizer and
fertilizers not containing organic matters is shown below: However, fertilizers that may bump
are excluded from the scope of application.
481
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
482
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
solution (Cr 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
f) Slightly move the watch glass (4), and continue heating on the hot plate or sand bath to
concentrate until nearly exsiccated.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (5) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer the solution to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water,
add water up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
i) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - h) using another tall beaker to prepare a blank
test solution.
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(4) The watch glass can be removed.
(5) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Standard Addition Method) according to JIS K 0116
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 205.552 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2mL and 4 mL of chromium standard solution (2.5 μg/mL) to volumetric flasks of 1)
above, then add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line to make a sample solution of
Standard Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
205.552 nm.
5) Put 5 mL of blank test solution in a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same procedures as
in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained from the
respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added chromium concentration and the
corrected indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and the sample
solution without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the chromium content from the intercept of the calibration curve to calculate
chromium (Cr) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 Instead of the correction method in b) 5), the chromium (Cr) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the chromium content in the blank test solution.
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.9.1.b Comment 6.
484
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The comparison of the measurement value (xi:12.9 mg/kg - 193 mg/kg) of ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (yi) of Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers
(49 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=1.74+0.971x and its
correlation coefficient (r) was 0.991. Triplicates measurement for each one sample of
sewage sludge fertilizer, human waste sludge fertilizer, industrial sludge fertilizer,
mixed sludge fertilizer and composted sludge fertilizer was conducted. As a result, a
repeatability obtained was 0.9 % - 2.5 % as a relative standard deviation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is 4 mg/kg.
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in fertilizers is shown below:
485
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
486
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
487
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5 g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(7) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(8) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - d).
(9) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(10) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
488
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
force.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.1.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0113
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Chromium: monitor ion (m/z):52, 53, 50
Rhodium: monitor ion (m/z): 103
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray chromium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation into the inductively coupled plasma, and read the ratio of
the respective ion count numbers for the monitor ion of an element subjected to measurement
and an internal standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 µg - 5 µg as Cr) in
a 50-mL volumetric flask (9).
2) Add 5mL of internal standard solution (5) and add nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line.
3) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
4) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 3) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the chromium content from the calibration curve, and calculate chromium (Cr) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 4), the chromium (Cr) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the chromium content in the blank test solution.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples) and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the concentration level of 10 mg/kg - 90
mg/kg, 1 mg/kg - 9 mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg - 0.4 mg/kg were 92.4 % - 108.8 %, 94.3 %
- 115.4 % and 105.8 - 106.8 % as chromium (Cr) in an actual article respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 1 µg /kg.
489
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP‐MS. In
that case, see 5.2.c Comment 5.
Comment 6 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. Select a
measurement mass number considering the extent of interference. A magnetic sector
double-focusing mass spectrometer or a collision reaction cell specified in JIS K
0133 can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
490
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown
below:
491
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the scandium standard solution in (2), a scandium standard solution can be
prepared by using a scandium standard solution (Sc 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL)
traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Instead of the chromium standard solution in (2), a chromium standard solution for
the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chromium standard
492
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
493
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (150 ºC) → 10 min (150 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(5) When organic matters, for example colored precipitate, etc., still remain, add 2 mL of
nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrogen peroxide and repeat the procedures in (4.1) c) – d).
(6) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedures in (4.1) of 5.3.d.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0133
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Chromium: mass/ charge number (m/z): 52
Scandium: mass/ charge number (m/z): 45
Collision cell: KED (Kinetic Energy Discrimination) mode
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray chromium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test solution
for the calibration curve preparation together with scandium standard solution (Sc 100 ng/
mL) into the inductively coupling plasma (8), and read the ratio of respective ion count
numbers for the mass/charge number of an element subjected to measurement and an internal
standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask (6), add 5mL of water and add
nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line (9).
2) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
3) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 2) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
4) Obtain the chromium content from the calibration curve, and calculate chromium (Cr) in the
analytical sample.
Note (8) Simultaneously introduce internal standard solution 1/10 of the volume of the standard
solution for the calibration curve preparation or the blank test solution for the
calibration curve preparation.
(9) If there is a possibility that the chromium concentration in the sample solution will
exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount
with nitric acid (1+19).
Comment 6 When a sample solution or a standard solution for the calibration curve preparation
and an internal standard solution are not simultaneously introduced in the
measurement of ICP-MS, when preparing respective solutions in the procedures in c)
-1) and c) 3), add scandium standard solution (Sc 100 ng /mL) 1/10 of the volume of
the solution.
Comment 7 Instead of the correction method in c) 3), the chromium (Cr) in the analytical sample
can also be corrected by obtaining the chromium content in the blank test solution.
494
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:4.43 mg/kg – 504 mg/kg) of ICP
Mass Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers (17
samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=3.34+0.98x and its correlation
coefficient (r) was 0.999.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using fertilizers were analyzed
by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 5 mg/kg.
Comment 9 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
that case, see 5.3.d Comment 9.
Comment 10 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. A magnetic
sector double-focusing mass spectrometer or a reaction cell specified in JIS K 0133
can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Satoko SAKAIDA, Mayu OSHIMA, Keisuke AOYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI:
Determination of Harmful Components in Fertilizers using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 52 –
68 (2019)
495
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for chromium: The flow sheet for chromium in solid sludge fertilizers is
shown below:
496
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.6 Lead
5.6.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type B and its
symbol is 5.6.a-2017 or Pb.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and nitric acid−hydrochloric acid (1+3), spray into
an acetylene−air flame, and measure the atomic absorption with lead at a wavelength of 217.0 nm
or 283.3 nm to obtain the lead (Pb) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this
testing method is shown in Comment 5.
Comment 1 Instead of the lead standard solution in (2), a lead standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation can be prepared by using a lead standard solution (Pb 1 mg/mL or
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Note (3) There are the continuous source method, the Zeeman method, the non-resonance
spectrum method, and the self-reversal method, etc.
497
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250°C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about 1
hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(5) The watch glass can be removed.
(6) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 2 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 3 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 217.0 nm or 283.3 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the lead standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 217.0 nm or 283.3 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the lead concentration and the indicated value of
the lead standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test solution for
the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution (7) to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value,
and correct the indicated value obtained for the sample solution.
3) Obtain the lead content from the calibration curve, and calculate lead (Pb) in the analytical
sample.
498
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the lead concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with
hydrochloric acid (1+23).
Comment 4 Instead of the correction method in c) 2), the lead (Pb) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the lead content in the blank test solution.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using industrial sludge fertilizer and composted
sludge fertilizer (5 samples); as a result, the recovery rates at the concentration level
of 100 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg were 99.1 % - 100.6 % and 97.5 % - 99.6 %,
respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 1 mg/kg.
References
1) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA, Manabu MATSUZAKI and Tadao AMANO: Determination
of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Improved
Decomposition Method - Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 41 - 49 (2008)
2) Yoshinari SAKAKIBARA and Manabu MATSUZAKI: Determination of Cadmium,
Lead, Nickel and Chromium in Sludge Fertilizer - Collaborative Test Results - Research
Report of Fertilizer Vol. 1, p. 50 - 59 (2008)
3) Hisanori ARAYA and Yoshimi TAKEBA: Validation of atomic absorption spectrometry
for determination of cadmium, lead, nickel and chromium in calcined sludge fertilizer -
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 30 - 42 (2010)
499
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for lead: The flow sheet for lead in fertilizers is shown below:
5.00 g
200-mL - 300-mL tall beaker.
analytical sample
Sample solution
500
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the lead standard solution in (2), a lead standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a lead standard solution (Pb 1
mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
f) Slightly move the watch glass (4), and continue heating on the hot plate or sand bath to
concentrate until nearly exsiccated.
g) After standing to cool, add 25 mL - 50 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) (5) to the digest, cover
the tall beaker with the watch glass, and heat quietly to dissolve.
h) After standing to cool, transfer the solution to a 100-mL - 200 mL volumetric flask with water,
add water up to the marked line, and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
i) As a blank test, conduct the procedures in b) - h) using another tall beaker to prepare a blank
test solution.
Note (3) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 450 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
(4) The watch glass can be removed.
(5) Add hydrochloric acid (1+5) so that the hydrochloric acid concentration of the sample
solution will be hydrochloric acid (1+23). For example, when a 100-mL volumetric
flask is used in the procedure in h), about 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+5) should be
added.
Comment 3 Do not conduct the procedures in (4.1) b) - c) in the case of fertilizers not containing
organic matters.
Comment 4 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.3.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Standard Addition Method) according to JIS K 0116
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 220.351 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation and sample measurement
1) Put 5mL of sample solution in three 10-mL volumetric flasks respectively.
2) Add 2 mL and 4 mL of lead standard solution (0.25 μg/mL) to volumetric flasks of 1) above,
then add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line to make a sample solution of Standard
Addition Method.
3) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line of the remaining volumetric flask of 1)
above to make a sample solution without a standard solution.
4) Spray the sample solution of Standard Addition Method and the sample solution without a
standard solution into the induction plasma, and read the indicated value at a wavelength of
220.351 nm.
5) Put 5 mL of blank test solution in a 10-mL volumetric flask, conduct the same procedures as
in 3) - 4) to read the indicated value, and correct the indicated value obtained from the
respective sample solutions.
6) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the added lead concentration and the corrected
indicated value of the sample solution for Standard Addition Method and the sample solution
without a standard solution.
7) Obtain the lead content from the intercept of the calibration curve, and calculate lead (Pb) in
the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Instead of the correction method in c) 5), the lead (Pb) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the lead content in the blank test solution.
502
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 6 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-OES.
In that case, see 4.9.1.b Comment 6.
Comment 7 The comparison of the measurement value (xi:1.1 mg/kg - 69.0 mg/kg) of ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometry and the measurement value (yi) of Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry was conducted to evaluate trueness using sludge fertilizers
(49 samples). As a result, a regression equation was y=−0.31+1.045x and its
correlation coefficient (r) was 0.993. Triplicates measurement for each one sample of
sewage sludge fertilizer, human waste sludge fertilizer, industrial sludge fertilizer,
mixed sludge fertilizer, calcined sludge fertilizers and composted sludge fertilizer
was conducted. As a result, a repeatability obtained was 0.9 % - 3.3 % as a relative
standard deviation.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 5
mg/kg.
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Tomoe INOUE, Megumi TABUCHI and Tetuya NOMURA:
Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Lead, Nickel, Chromium, Copper and Zinc
in Sludge Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 30 - 35 (2011)
503
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for lead: The flow sheet for lead in fertilizers is shown below:
504
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the lead standard solution in (2), a lead standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation can be prepared by using a lead standard solution (Pb 1 mg/mL or
10 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
505
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (6) The maximum limit of solid content, which is converted from moisture content, in the
sampling volume 20.0 g of an analytical sample is about 0.5 g. If solid content is likely
to exceed the limit, reduce sampling volume as necessary.
(7) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (240 ºC) → 20 min (240 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(8) When organic matters still remain, for example the digestion solution is colored,
repeat the procedures in (4.1) b) - d).
(9) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(10) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
506
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) of 5.1.b.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0113
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Lead: monitor ion (m/z):208, 206, 207
Rhenium: monitor ion (m/z): 187
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the lead standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into the inductively coupled plasma, and read
the ratio of the respective ion count numbers for the monitor ion of an element subjected to
measurement and an internal standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.05 µg - 5 µg as Pb)
in a 50-mL volumetric flask (9).
2) Add 5mL of internal standard solution (5) and add nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line.
3) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
4) For the blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 3) to correct the ratio of the
ion count number obtained for the sample solution.
5) Obtain the lead content from the calibration curve, and calculate lead (Pb) in the analytical
sample.
Comment 3 Instead of the correction method in c) 4), the lead (Pb) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the lead content in the blank test solution.
Comment 4 Triplicates additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using fluid
industrial sludge fertilizers (2 samples) and composted sludge fertilizers (6 samples).
As a result, the mean recovery rates at the lead concentration level of 10 mg/kg - 20
mg/kg, 1 mg/kg - 5 mg/kg, 0.2 mg /kg - 0.7 mg /kg and 0.04 mg/kg – 0.07 mg/kg
were 91.2 % - 103.1 %, 85.0 % - 113.9 %, 93.2 - 108.1 % and 106.1 % - 109.8 % as
lead (Pb) in an actual article respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using two kinds of fluid sludge
fertilizers to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 4 µg /kg.
507
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 5 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
that case, see 5.2.c Comment 5.
Comment 6 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. Select a
measurement mass number considering the extent of interference. However, a mass
number cannot be changed in the measurement of arsenic. A magnetic sector
double-focusing mass spectrometer or a collision reaction cell specified in JIS K
0133 can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI: Determination of Heavy Metals in Fluid Sludge Fertilizers by ICP-MS
and CV-AAS, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 26 - 37 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for lead: The flow sheet for lead in fluid sludge fertilizers is shown below:
508
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
509
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Instead of the thallium standard solution in (2), a thallium standard solution can be
prepared by using a thallium standard solution (Tl 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL) traceable
to National Metrology.
Comment 2 Instead of the lead standard solution in (2), a lead standard solution for the calibration
curve preparation can be prepared by using a lead standard solution (Pb 1 mg/mL or
510
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
511
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) Condition examples for a microwave decomposing device: 0 min (room temperature)
→ 10min (150 ºC) → 10 min (150 ºC) → 40 min (room temperature), initial output
1400 W
(5) When organic matters, for example colored precipitate, etc., still remain, add 2 mL of
nitric acid and 1 mL of hydrogen peroxide and repeat the procedures in (4.1) c) – d).
(6) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 16.5-cm of radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedures in (4.1) of 5.3.d.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct measurement (Internal Standard Method) according to JIS K 0133
and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method
of the ICP Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the ICP Mass Spectrometer considering the following:
Lead: mass/ charge number (m/z): 208
Thallium: mass/ charge number (m/z): 205
Collision cell: KED (Kinetic Energy Discrimination) mode
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the lead standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation together with thallium standard solution (Tl 10
ng/ mL) into the inductively coupling plasma (8), and read the ratio of respective ion count
numbers for the mass/charge number of an element subjected to measurement and an internal
standard element.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the ratio of the ion count
number of an element subjected to measurement.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put 5 mL of the sample solution in a 50-mL volumetric flask (6), add 5mL of water and add
nitric acid (1+19) to the marked line (9).
2) Conduct procedures similarly as in b) 1) to read the ratio of the ion count number.
3) For blank test solution, conduct procedures similarly as in 1) - 2) to correct the ratio of the ion
count number obtained for the sample solution.
4) Obtain the lead content from the calibration curve, and calculate lead (Pb) in the analytical
sample.
Note (8) Simultaneously introduce an internal standard solution 1/10 of the volume of the
standard solution for the calibration curve preparation or the blank test solution for the
calibration curve preparation.
(9) If there is a possibility that the lead concentration in the sample solution will exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount with nitric
acid (1+19).
Comment 6 When the sample solution or the standard solution for the calibration curve
preparation and the internal standard solution are not simultaneously introduced in
the measurement of ICP-MS, when preparing respective solutions in the procedures
in c) 1) and c) 3), add the thallium standard solution (Tl 10 ng /mL) 1/10 of the
volume of the solution.
Comment 7 Instead of the correction method in c) 3), the lead (Pb) in the analytical sample can
also be corrected by obtaining the lead content in the blank test solution.
512
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 The comparison of the measurement value (yi:2.00 mg/kg – 101 mg/kg) of ICP
Mass Spectrometry and the measurement value (xi) of Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry was conducted using sludge fertilizers (17 samples). As a result, a
regression equation was y=−0.73+0.98x and its correlation coefficient (r) was 0.998.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using fertilizers were analyzed
by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this test method is about 1 mg/kg.
Comment 9 The simultaneous measurement of multiple elements is possible with the ICP-MS. In
that case, see 5.3.d Comment 9.
Comment 10 The presence and the extent of interference to the measurement mass number of an
element subjected to measurement and an internal standard element can be estimated
by qualitative analysis using an ICP-MS in advance to quantitation. A magnetic
sector double-focusing mass spectrometer or a reaction cell specified in JIS K 0133
can be used as a method to reduce spectrum interference.
References
1) Satoko SAKAIDA, Mayu OSHIMA, Keisuke AOYAMA and Yuji SHIRAI:
Determination of Harmful Components in Fertilizers using Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS), Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 12, p. 52 –
68 (2019)
513
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for lead: The flow sheet for lead in solid sludge fertilizers is shown below:
514
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Ion Chromatograph or High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An ion
chromatograph specified in JIS K 0127 or a high-performance liquid chromatograph specified
in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 4-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless-steel column tube filled with
hydrophilic methacrylate-gel, to which 5-μm particle diameter class 4 ammonium group
chemically bonds (3).
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 55 ºC - 60 ºC.
515
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (3) A column is commercially sold under the name Shodex IC NI-424, etc.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0127 or JIS K 0124 and as
shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
Ion Chromatograph or the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Ion Chromatograph or High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph: An example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the
measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A hydrophilic methacrylate-gel column (4-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 5-μm
particle diameter) to which quaternary ammonium group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 58 °C
3) Eluent: Prepared by the procedures in (2) g)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 20 µL
6) Detection unit: An electric conductivity detector
Comment 1 In the measurement of a sample solution, there is a possibility that the recovery rate
becomes lower than actual due to the influence of matrix if the concentration is calculated with
the peak height. Therefore, prepare a calibration curve using the peak area.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 20 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the sulfamic acid content from the calibration curve by the peak area to calculate the
sulfamic acid (amidosulfuric acid) in the analytical sample.
Comment 2 Calculate the concentration by the peak area similarly as the calibration curve
preparation to prevent the influence of matrix.
Comment 3 Note that it takes time to stabilize the baseline due to the usage of the ion-pairing
reagent in the elute. It is recommended to take about 120 minutes for stabilization
time before starting measurement.
Comment 4 It is possible for the simultaneous measurement of sulfamic acid and ammonium
thiocyanate in this testing method. In that case, mix a predetermined amount of
516
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
sulfamic acid standard solution (1000 mg/L) and ammonium thiocyanate standard
solution (1000 mg/L), dilute with water to prepare a mixture standard solution (10
mg/L) (1) and use it instead of a sulfamic acid standard solution (10 mg/L) in (2) i).
After that, conduct the same procedure in (4.2) b) to calculate the respective
concentrations of materials subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing of ammonium sulfate (3 brands) was conducted. As a result, the
mean recovery rates at additive level of 0.25 % (mass fraction) and 0.075 % (mass
fraction) were 94.4 % - 103.5 % and 94.4 % - 100.8 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.04 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Toshiaki HIROI and Yuji SHIRAI: Simultaneous Determination of Sulfamic Acid and
Ammonium Thiocyanate in Ammonium Sulfate by Non-suppressed Ion
Chromatography, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 5, p. 1 - 23 (2012)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for sulfamic acid in ammonium sulfate is
shown below:
Sample solution
517
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: Examples of the IC chromatograms of sulfamic acid and thiocyanic acid of the
standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and sample solution
(ammonium sulfate) are shown below.
(A) Mixture standard solution (the equivalents of 60 ng (3 mg/L, 20 μL) as sulfamic acid
and ammonium thiocyanate, respectively)
(B) Sample solution (the equivalents of 0.25 % (mass fraction) (2500 μg/g) as sulfamic
acid and ammonium thiocyanate added in ammonium sulfate, respectively)
IC measurement conditions
Column: Shodex IC NI-424 (4.6-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 5μm-particle
diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of measurement conditions in (4.2) a)
518
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/ Mass Spectrometer: A high-performance
liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer specified in JIS K 0136 that satisfies the following
requirements.
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
(ii) Column: A 2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter 100-mm - 150 mm long stainless-steel column
tube filled with silica gel to which 5-μm crosslink-type diol chemically bonds or
polyhydroxymethacrylate. This should comply with the specification of a Mass
Spectrometer.
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Ion detection method: Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) method
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
519
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
× g.
Note (2) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1.1) c) and d), it is allowed to filter with Type 3 filter
paper and the filtrate can be the extract.
Note (3) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(4) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 4 Instead of the procedures in (4.2) b) and c), it is allowed to filter with a membrane
filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5 µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the
filtrate can be the sample solution.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0136 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
520
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 1 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the sulfamic acid content from the calibration curve to calculate the sulfamic acid
(amidosulfuric acid) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using samples that sulfamic acid equivalent to 1/5 -
4 times of permissible content are added to ammonium sulfate fertilizer (1 brand),
by-product nitrogen fertilizer (1 brand), by-product compound fertilizer (1 brand),
compound fertilizer (1 brand) and fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the
mean recovery rates at the additive level of 0.1 % (mass fraction), 0.025 % (mass
fraction) and 0.005 % (mass fraction) were 97.6 % - 104.2 %, 95.2 % - 107.0 % and
96.4 % - 111.2 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using ammonium sulfate
fertilizer, by-product nitrogen fertilizer and compound fertilizer to evaluate precision
were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation
results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Table 2 shows results and analysis results from a collaborative study for testing
method validation. Note that sufficient reproducibility by sulfamic acid concentration
0.0116 % (mass fraction) was not obtainable. But sufficient reproducibility was
obtained in the scope of sulfamic acid concentration 0.0386 % (mass fraction) -
0.401 % (mass fraction).
521
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Kohei ITO, Mariko FUJITA, Yoshimi HASHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination
of Sulfamic Acid in Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS),
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 38 - 49 (2015)
2) Tomoharu NOZAKI Determination of Sulfamic Acid in Fertilizers using Liquid
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (LC-MS): A Collaborative Study, Research Report
of Fertilizer Vol. 9, p. 69 - 76 (2016)
3) Kenji KOZUKA, Kohei ITO, Nobuhito NAKAMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination
of Sulfamic Acid in Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS):
A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 11, p. 47 – 53 (2018)
522
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for sulfamic acid in fertilizers is shown
below:
523
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the chromatogram of sulfamic acid for the calibration curve
preparation is shown below.
Sulfamic acid
Sulfamic acid
524
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Ion Chromatograph or High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An ion
chromatograph specified in JIS K 0127 or a high-performance liquid chromatograph specified
in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 4-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
hydrophilic methacrylate-gel, to which 5-μm particle diameter class 4 ammonium group
chemically bonds (4).
525
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (4) A column is commercially sold under the name Shodex IC NI-424, etc.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0127 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the Ion
Chromatograph or the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Ion Chromatograph or the High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph: An example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the
measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A hydrophilic methacrylate-gel column (4-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 5-μm
particle diameter) to which quaternary ammonium group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 58 °C
3) Eluent: Prepared by the procedures in (2) g)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 20 µL
6) Detection unit: An electric conductivity detector
Comment 1 In the measurement of a sample solution, there is a possibility that the recovery rate
becomes lower than actual due to the influence of matrix if the concentration is
calculated with a peak height. Therefore, prepare a calibration curve using a peak
area.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 20 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the ammonium thiocyanate content from the calibration curve by the peak area to
calculate ammonium thiocyanate (sulfurized cyanide) in the analytical sample.
Comment 2 Calculate the concentration by the peak area similarly as the calibration curve
preparation to prevent the influence of matrix.
Comment 3 Note that it takes time to stabilize the baseline due to the usage of the ion-pairing
reagent in the elute. It is recommended to take about 120 minutes for stabilization
526
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiaki HIROI and Yuji SHIRAI: Simultaneous Determination of Sulfamic Acid and
Ammonium Thiocyanate in Ammonium Sulfate by Non-suppressed Ion
Chromatography, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 5, p. 1 - 23 (2012)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for ammonium thiocyanate in ammonium
sulfate is shown below:
527
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: Examples of the IC chromatogram of sulfamic acid and thiocyanic acid of the
standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and sample solution (ammonium sulfate)
are shown below.
(A) Mixture standard solution (the equivalents of 60 ng (3 mg/L, 20 μL) as sulfamic acid
and ammonium thiocyanate, respectively)
(B) Sample solution (the equivalents of 0.25 % (mass fraction) (2500 μg/g) as sulfamic
acid and ammonium thiocyanate added in ammonium sulfate, respectively)
IC measurement conditions
Column: Shodex IC NI-424 (4.6-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 5-μm particle
diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
528
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 4-mm to 6-mm inner diameter 150-mm to 250-mm long stainless steel column
tube filled with poly vinyl alcohol or silica gel (2) , to which 5-μm particle diameter amino
group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 210
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
× g.
529
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
e) pH test paper: A pH test paper infilled with indicator and dried, which can measure the
value from pH 1 to pH 11 and a color change chart with the pH interval value 1 is attached.
Note (2) Remaining silanol group of silica gel affects the measurement of ion in some cases.
Therefore, use a column which does not affect the measurement of sodium thiocyanate
by treating the silanol group. As an example of the treatment, silica gel is to be entirely
covered with the uniform membrane of silicone polymer.
Comment 1 A column is sold under the names Asahipak NH2P-50 4E, CAPCELL PAK NH2
UG80, etc.
Comment 2 pH test paper is sold under the name UNIV Test Paper, etc.
Note (3) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Note (4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of procedures in (4.2) b) and e) - f), it is allowed to filter with a membrane
filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the
filtrate can be the sample solution.
530
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A vinyl alcohol polymer column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm
long, 5-µm particle diameter) to which amino group chemically bonds or a silica gel column
(4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm particle diameter) to which
amino group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 1.79 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, 0.78 g of sodium
dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate and 14.04 g of sodium perchlorate monohydrate in water to
make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made
of hydrophilic PTFE.
4) Flow rate: 0.9 mL/min - 1.0 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 10 µL
6) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 210 nm
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the ammonium thiocyanate content from the calibration curve by the peak area to
calculate ammonium thiocyanate (sulfurized cyanide) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of nitrous acid and
ammonium thiocyanate (sulfurized cyanide). In this case, mix a predetermined
amount of nitrous acid standard solution (1 mg/mL) and ammonium thiocyanate
standard solution (1 mg/mL), dilute with water to prepare a mixture standard solution
(100 μg/mL) (1) and use it instead of (2) g) ammonium thiocyanate standard solution
(100 μg/mL). After that, conduct the same procedure in (4.3) b) to calculate the
respective concentrations of materials subjected to measurement in the analytical
sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using samples that ammonium thiocyanate
equivalent to 1/5 - 5 times of permissible content are added to an ammonium sulfate
fertilizer (1 brand), a coating nitrogen fertilizer (1 brand), a blended fertilizer (2
brands), a compound fertilizer (1 brand) and a fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand). As
a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 0.025 % (mass fraction),
0.01 % (mass fraction), 0.005 % (mass fraction) and 0.0025 % (mass fraction) were
95.4 % - 100.5 %, 94.7 % - 103.8 %, 83.8 % - 109.0 % and 87.2 % - 103.3 %
respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are in Table 1. Ammonium thiocyanate had sufficient reproducibility in the
531
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Kohei ITO, Yasuharu KIMURA, Masanori HASEGAWA and Yuji SHIRAI:
Simultaneous Determination of Nitrous Acid and Thiocyanate in Fertilizer by
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Japanese Journal of Soil Science
and Plant Nutrition, Vol. 87 (2), p.120 - 124 (2016)
2) Masanori HASEGAWA and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Nitrous Acid and
Ammonium Thiocyanate in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC): A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 70 - 78 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for ammonium thiocyanate in fertilizers is
shown below:
532
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
533
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
←1
2
↓
Retention time
(A) Mixture standard solution
(The equivalents of 100 ng (10 µg/mL, 10 μL) as nitrous acid and ammonium thiocyanate,
respectively)
1→
2
↓
Retention time
534
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: a high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter 150-mm - 250-mm long stainless steel column tube
filled with poly vinyl alcohol or silica gel (2), to which 5-μm particle diameter amino group
chemically bonds.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 210
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
e) pH test paper: A pH test paper infilled with indicator and dried, which can measure the
535
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
value from pH 1 - pH 11 and a color change chart with the pH interval value 1 is attached.
Note (2) Remaining silanol group of silica gel affects the measurement of ion in some cases.
Therefore, use a column which does not affect the measurement of nitrous acid by
treating the silanol group. As an example of the treatment, silica gel is to be entirely
covered with the uniform membrane of silicone polymer.
Comment 1 A column is sold under the names Asahipak NH2P-50 4E, CAPCELL PAK NH2
UG80, etc.
Comment 2 pH test paper is sold under the name UNIV Test Paper, etc.
Note (3) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Note (4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of procedures in (4.2) b) and e) - f), it is allowed to filter with a membrane
filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the
filtrate can be the sample solution.
536
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A vinyl alcohol polymer column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm
long, 5-µm particle diameter) to which amino group chemically bonds or a silica gel column
(4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm particle diameter) to which
amino group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 1.79 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, 0.78 g of sodium
dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate and 14.04 g of sodium perchlorate monohydrate in water to
make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made
of hydrophilic PTFE.
4) Flow rate: 0.9 mL/min - 1.0 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 10 µL
6) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 210 nm
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the nitrous acid content by the peak area using the calibration curve to calculate the
concentration of nitrous acid in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of nitrous acid and
ammonium thiocyanate (sulfurized cyanide). In this case, mix a predetermined
amount of nitrous acid standard solution (1 mg/mL) and ammonium thiocyanate
standard solution (1 mg/mL), dilute with water to prepare a mixture standard solution
(100 μg/mL) (1) and use it instead of (2) g) nitrous acid standard solution (100
μg/mL). After that, conduct the same procedure in (4.3) b) to calculate the respective
concentrations of materials subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using samples that nitrous acid equivalent to 1/5 - 5
times of permissible content are added to ammonium sulfate fertilizer (1 brand),
coating nitrogen fertilizer (1 brand), blended fertilizer (2brands), compound fertilizer
(1 brand) and fluid compound fertilizer (1 brand). As a result, the mean recovery
rates at the additive level of 0.1 % (mass fraction), 0.04 % (mass fraction), 0.02 %
(mass fraction) and 0.01 % (mass fraction) were 99.0 % - 100.8 %, 100.4 % -
102.0 %, 103.1 % - 106.6 % and 101.2 % - 105.9 % respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1. Nitrous acid had sufficient reproducibility in the range
from 0.0255 % (mass fraction) to 0.291 %. (mass fraction).
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0003 % (mass fraction).
537
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Kohei ITO, Yasuharu KIMURA, Masanori HASEGAWA and Yuji SHIRAI:
Simultaneous Determination of Nitrous Acid and Thiocyanate in Fertilizer by
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Japanese Journal of Soil Science
and Plant Nutrition, Vol. 87 (2), p.120 - 124 (2016)
2) Masanori HASEGAWA and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Nitrous Acid and
Ammonium Thiocyanate in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC): A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 8, p. 70 - 78 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for nitrous acid in fertilizers is shown below:
538
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
539
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
←1
2
↓
Retention time
1→
2
↓
Retention time
540
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Biuret is sold by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.
and Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 7.5-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
weak acid ion-exchange resin.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 190
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
541
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
× g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under the production name Asahipak ES-502C 7C, etc.
Note (4) If there is a possibility that the biuret nitrogen (B-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of supernatant with water.
(5) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(6) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Note (7) If there is a possibility that the biuret nitrogen (B-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of precisely adjusted solution with water.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A weak acid ion-exchange resin column (4.00-mm - 7.5-mm inner diameter,
100-mm - 150-mm long, 5-µm – 10-µm particle diameter)
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 3.92 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.12 g of phosphoric acid
542
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
in water to make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than
0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE.
4) Flow rate: 0.6 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 10 µL
6) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 190 nm
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the biuret nitrogen (B-N) content from the peak height using the calibration curve to
calculate the biuret nitrogen (B-N) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of biuret nitrogen (B-N),
dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N), urea nitrogen (U-N), guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) and
a guanylurea nitrogen standard solution (GU-N). In this case, mix a predetermined
amount of biuret nitrogen (B-N 1 mg/mL), a urea nitrogen standard solution (U-N 2
mg/mL), a dicyandiamide nitrogen standard solution (Dd-N 2 mg/mL), a guanidine
nitrogen standard solution (Gd-N 2 mg/mL) and a guanylurea nitrogen standard
solution (GU-N 2 mg/mL), dilute with water to prepare a mixture standard solution
(200 μg/mL) (1) and use it instead of (2) e) a biuret nitrogen standard solution (B-N
200 μg/mL). After that, conduct the same procedure in (4.2) b) to calculate the
respective concentrations of materials subjected to measurement in the analytical
sample.
Comment 6 Additive recovery testing was conducted using one brand of an acetaldehyde
condensed urea fertilizer, a compound fertilizer, a blended fertilizer, a fluid
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer respectively. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 0.2 % (mass fraction) and
0.1 % (mass fraction) and 0.02 % (mass fraction) were 87.0 % - 95.1 %, 90.6 % -
101.1 % and 91.2 % - 105 5 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a blended fertilizer, a
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision
were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation
results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a
collaborative study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
543
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 Note that nitrolime has ingredients which affect the measurement of biuret nitrogen
(B-N).
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Yasuharu KIMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Urea Nitrogen,
Biuret Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea
Nitrogen in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A
Single-Laboratory Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 72 - 85 (2017)
2) Norio FUNAKI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Urea Nitrogen, Biuret
Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea Nitrogen in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 86 - 100 (2017)
544
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for biuret nitrogen in fertilizers is shown
below:
545
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the chromatogram of the standard solution of biuret nitrogen for the
calibration curve preparation is shown below.
Reference diagram: HPLC chromatogram of the mixture standard solutions for the calibration
curve preparation (10 mg/L for each)
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen (3) Dicyandiamide nitrogen
(4) Guanidine nitrogen (5) Guanylurea nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: Asahipak ES-502C 7C (7.5-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 9-μm
particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions
in (4.2) a)
546
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
5.11 Titanium
5.11.a ICP Optical Emission Spectrometry (1)
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type D and its
symbol is 5.11.a-2017 or Ti.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with nitric acid - sulfuric acid - perchloric acid, introduce it to an ICP
Optical Emission Spectrometer (“ICP-OES”) and measure the emission with titanium at a
wavelength of 334.941 nm to obtain the titanium (Ti) in an analytical sample. In addition, the
performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 3.
Comment 1 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
Note (2) Oxidation of organic matters by perchloric acid progresses extremely rapidly and
explosively. For that reason, add perchloric acid after fully degrading organic matters
with nitric acid to avoid danger.
(3) When the white smoke of perchloric acid is generated, if the solution is colored such
as black-brown or brown, stop heating immediately, and after standing to cool, add
nitric acid, and heat again to degrade remaining organic matters.
(4) The watch glass can be removed.
Comment 2 When the analytical sample solidifies in the procedure in (4.1) b), moisten the
analytical sample with a small amount of water as necessary in advance.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 334.941 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the titanium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at a wavelength of 334.941 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the titanium concentration and the indicated
value of the titanium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.01 mg - 2 mg as
titanium) in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add 25 mL of hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the titanium content from the calibration curve, and calculate titanium (Ti) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 3 Additive recovery testing was conducted using an autoclaved lightweight concrete
548
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Determination of Titanium in Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled
Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) , Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
10, p. 29 - 40 (2017)
549
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for titanium in fertilizers is shown below:
550
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Since the indicated value at an arbitrary wavelength of an ICP-OES varies depending
on the observation mode (horizontal and axial mode) of emission and the
spectrometer type, the concentration range of the calibration curve suitable for the
equipment used differs. Therefore, it is recommended the concentration range of the
calibration curve suitable to the equipment used and a standard solution prepared for
the calibration curve should be understood in advance.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0116 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the ICP Optical
Emission Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer: Set up the
measurement conditions for the ICP Optical Emission Spectrometer considering the
following:
Analytical line wavelength: 334.941 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the titanium standard solution for the calibration curve preparation and blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into inductively coupled plasma, and read the
indicated value at a wavelength of 334.941 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the titanium concentration and the indicated
value of the titanium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
2) Obtain the titanium content from the calibration curve, and calculate titanium (Ti) in the
analytical sample.
Comment 2 Additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using silicate slag
fertilizers (2 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive level of
0.1 % (mass fraction) - 0.2 % (mass fraction) was 95.1 % - 98.2 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using silicate slag fertilizers (2
samples) to evaluate precision were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.02 %
(mass fraction).
552
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Keisuke AOYAMA: Determination of Titanium in Fertilizer using Inductively Coupled
Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) , Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol.
10, p. 29 - 40 (2017)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for titanium in fertilizers is shown below:
553
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries: The Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers 1992, p.78 - 79,
Japan Fertilizers Analysis Association, Tokyo (1992)
2) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p. 196 - 197, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
554
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Hibar LiChrosorb NH2, Inertsil
NH2, Unison UK-Amino, Mightysil NH2, Shim-pack CLC-NH2, Shodex NH-5A,
Unisil Q NH2, etc.
Note (3) Add methanol immediately as the determined value becomes higher than usual if it is
left in air.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) c) - e), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which amino or amino propyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Acetonitrile - methanol (6+1)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 215 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Inject 10 µL of respective dicyandiamide standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation to the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, record a chromatogram at a
wavelength 215 nm, and obtain a peak area or height.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height at a
wavelength 215 nm of the respective dicyandiamide standard solutions for the calibration
curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
556
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
2) Obtain dicyandiamide (Dd) content from the calibration curve to calculate the concentration
of dicyandiamide (Dd) in the analytical sample.
3) Calculate the dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N) by the following formula.
Comment 4 Recovery testing was conducted using nitrolime (3 samples) and a blended fertilizer
containing nitrolime (2 samples), as a result, the recovery rates of dicyandiamide at
the concentration level of 6 % (mass fraction) and 0.6 % (mass fraction) were 94.9 %
- 105.1 % and 95.6 % - 103.5 % respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Masakazu SAIKI and Miyuki ASAO: Validation of High-Performance Liquid
Chromatography for Determination of Dicyandiamide in Nitrolime, Research Report of
Fertilizers, Vol. 2, p. 25 - 31 (2009)
2) Masakazu SAIKI and Masayuki YOSHIMOTO: Determination of Dicyandiamide in
Nitrolime by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizers, Vol. 2, p. 32 - 37 (2009)
557
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for dicyandiamide nitrogen: The flow sheet for dicyandiamide nitrogen in
nitrolime and fertilizers containing nitrolime is shown below:
0.11 0.11
Dd 8.541
Dd 8.458
0.10 0.10
0.09 0.09
0.08 0.08
0.07 0.07
0.06 0.06
AU
AU
0.05 0.05
0.04 0.04
0.03 0.03
0.02 0.02
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
min min
1) Dicyandiamide standard solution (the equivalents of 100 ng (10 µg/ mL, 10 µL) of
dicyandiamide)
2) Sample solution (nitrolime)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 7.5-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
weak acid ion-exchange resin.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 190
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
559
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
× g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under the production name Asahipak ES-502C 7C, etc.
Note (3) If there is a possibility that the dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N) concentration in the
sample solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of supernatant with water.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Note (6) If there is a possibility that the dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N) concentration in the
sample solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of precisely adjusted solution with water.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A weak acid ion-exchange resin column (4.0-mm - 7.5-mm inner diameter,
100-mm - 150-mm long, 5-µm – 10-µm particle diameter)
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 3.92 g of potassium dihydrogenphosphate and 0.12 g of phosphoric acid
in water to make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than
0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE.
560
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N) content from the peak height using the calibration
curve to calculate the dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of biuret nitrogen (B-N),
urea nitrogen (U-N), dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N), guanidine urea (Gd-N) and
guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N). In that case, see 5.10.a Comment 5.
Comment 6 Additive recovery testing was conducted using one brand of an acetaldehyde
condensed urea fertilizer, a compound fertilizer, a blended fertilizer, a fluid
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer respectively. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 3 % (mass fraction) and 1.5 %
(mass fraction) and 0.3 % (mass fraction) were 96.3 % - 96.3 %, 94.5 % - 99.7 % and
88.9 % - 100.6 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a blended fertilizer, a
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision
were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation
results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a
collaborative study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
561
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Yasuharu KIMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Urea Nitrogen,
Biuret Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea
Nitrogen in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A
Single-Laboratory Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 72 - 85 (2017)
2) Norio FUNAKI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Urea Nitrogen, Biuret
Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea Nitrogen in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 86 - 100 (2017)
562
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for dicyandiamide nitrogen in fertilizers is
shown below:
563
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the chromatogram of the standard solution for calibration curve
preparation of dicyandiamide nitrogen is shown below.
Reference diagram HPLC chromatogram of the mixture standard solutions (10 mg/L for
each) for calibration curve preparation
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen (3) Dicyandiamide nitrogen
(4) Guanidine nitrogen (5) Guanylurea nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: Asahipak ES-502C 7C (7.5-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 9-μm
particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
564
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
6.2 Chlorine
6.2.a Ion Chromatography
(1) Summary
The testing method is applicable to potassium sulfate, potassium bicarbonate, magnesium potassium
sulfate, fish cakes powder, fish cakes and compost. This testing method is classified as Type D and
its symbol is 6.2.a-2017 or Cl.a-1.
Add water to an analytical sample to extract chloride ions, introduce them to an Ion Chromatograph
(IC) to isolate it with an ion exchange column, and then measure with an electric conductivity
detector to obtain chlorine (Cl) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing
method is shown in Comment 3.
Comment 1 Instead of the chloride ion standard solution in (2), a chloride ion standard solution
for the calibration curve preparation can be prepared by using a chloride ion standard
solution (Cl- 0.1 mg/mL) traceable to National Metrology.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Magnetic stirrer:
b) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 1700 × g.
c) Ion Chromatograph: An ion chromatograph specified in JIS K 0127 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) Column: In case of a suppressor method, a 4-mm inner diameter 250-mm long 5-μm particle
565
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
diameter column tube filled with poly vinyl alcohol porous particles, to which quaternary
ammonium group chemically bonds (4).
In case of non-suppressor method, a 4.6-mm inner diameter 100-mm long column tube filled
with hydrophilic polymethacrylate-gel, to which quaternary ammonium group chemically
bonds (5).
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 40 ºC.
3) Suppressor: Cation exchange membrane or resin should be used.
4) Detection unit: An electric conductivity detector
d) Membrane filters: Pore size is no more than 0.45 μm, made of hydrophilic PTFE
Note (4) A column is commercially sold under the name Shodex IC SI-52 4E, etc.
(5) A column is commercially sold under the name Shodex IC NI-424, etc.
Note (6) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(7) In case of exceeding the calibration curve, dilute by a factor of more than 20.
Comment 2 Instead of the procedures in (4. 1) c) and d), it is allowed to filter with Type 3 filter
paper and the filtrate can be the extract.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0127 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the Ion
Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Ion Chromatograph: An example of measurement
conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 20 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the chloride ion concentration from the calibration curve by the peak area to calculate
the chlorine (Cl) in the analytical sample.
Comment 3 Additive recovery testing was conducted with a suppressor method using samples
that 1.8 % (mass fraction) – 33.4 % (mass fraction) of sodium chloride as chlorine is
added to potassium sulfate, magnesia potassium sulfate, potassium bicarbonate, cow
dung compost and fish cakes powder. As a result, the mean recovery rates at the
chlorine additive level of 33.4 % (mass fraction), 10 % (mass fraction) - 13.4 %
(mass fraction) and 1.8 % (mass fraction) - 9.1 % (mass fraction) were 100.8 %,
98.6 % - 101.1 % and 96.2 % - 103.2 % respectively. With a non-suppressor method,
they are 100.2 %, 96.4 % - 97.2 % and 93.3 % - 101.4 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using potassium sulfate,
magnesia potassium sulfate, potassium bicarbonate, cow dung compost and fish
cakes powder to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance.
Table 1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.1 %
(mass fraction).
567
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Satoko SAKAIDA, Mariko FUJITA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Chloride in
Fertilizers by Ion Chromatography (IC), Research Report of Fertilizers, Vol. 8, p. 50 -
60 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for chlorine in fertilizers is shown below:
568
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Cl- Cl-
Cl- Cl-
(C) Chromatogram of fish cakes powder (D) Chromatogram of fish cakes powder
(Suppressor method) (Non-suppressor method)
569
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Magnetic stirrer:
b) pH test paper: A pH test paper infiltrated with indicator and dried, which can measure the
value from pH 1 to pH 11 and a color change chart with the pH interval value 1 is attached.
Comment 1 pH test paper is sold under the name UNIV Test Paper, etc.
flask.
b) Add 100 mL of water and stir it by using a magnetic stirrer for about 10 minutes.
c) Filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample solution.
V4: Volume (mL) of the 0.1 mol/L silver nitrate solution required for titration
C: Set concentration (0.1 mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L silver nitrate solution
f: Factor of 0.1 mol/L silver nitrate solution
V5: Liquid volume of water (100 mL) subjected to extraction in (4.1) b).
V6: Aliquot volume (25 mL) of the sample solution subjected to titration in (4.2)
a).
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.199- 201, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
571
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for chlorine in potassium sulfate, etc. is
shown below:
572
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Standardization: Transfer a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid to a 200-mL
- 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution,
and titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the
solution becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium
hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula
(1).
Or, calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
e) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
f) Urease: A reagent which completely digests 0.25 g of urea by 0.5 g of urease.
g) Sodium hydroxide solution (5 g/L) (1): Dissolve 5 g of sodium hydroxide specified in JIS K
8576 in water to make 1000 mL.
h) Hydrochloric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8180 or a reagent of
equivalent quality.
i) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified
in JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
j) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
k) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
m) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified
in JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
n) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a
0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
574
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) d) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 3 Refined products of urease made from sword beans are commercially sold. The
degree of activation may degrade even if stored in a refrigerator. Therefore, it is
recommended to test similarly and confirm activation by using urea specified in JIS
K 8731 in advance.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Extractor: A rotary shaker or a magnetic stirrer as described below
aa) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 500-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30 -
40 revolutions/min.
ab) Magnetic stirrer:
b) Steam distillation apparatus
c) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or a round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
d) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 40 ºC - 45 ºC.
Comment 4 In the procedure in (4.1.1) a), it is also allowed to weigh 2.50 g of the analytical
sample and transfer to a 250-mL volumetric flask.
Comment 5 The procedure in (4.1.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.1.1) in 4.2.4.a.
Comment 6 The procedure in (4.1.2) is the same as the procedure in (4.1) in 6.3.c.
(4.3) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are
according to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (11) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (12), add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam
distillation apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (11) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an
acceptor (12), add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect
this acceptor to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Add 2 g - 3 g of magnesium oxide to a distillation flask containing the sample solution (13),
and connect this distillation flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
f) Subject the undigested test solution to the same procedure as in a) - e) to obtain the distillate
from the undigested test solution.
g) Subject the blank test solution to the same procedure as in a) - e) to obtain the distillate from
the blank test solution.
Note (11) 5 mL - 20 mL
(12) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL
beaker with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be
immersed in 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(13) Add a small amount of silicone oil as necessary.
Comment 7 Immediately conduct the procedure in (4.3) b) not to emit ammonia gas in a vessel.
V6: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid transferred to the acceptor in (4.3) a)
V7: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration in (4.4.1) a)
V8: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration in (4.4.1) b)
V9: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration in (4.4.1) c)
C1: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
f1: Factor of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
V10: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1.1) c) or additive volume (mL) of
water in (4.1.2) b)
V11: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract subjected to hydrolysis in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample in (4.1.1) a) or (4.1.2) a)
V12: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration in (4.4.2) a)
V13: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration in (4.4.2) b)
V14: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration in (4.4.2) c)
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2 : Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
V10: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1.1) c) or additive volume (mL) of
water in (4.1.2) b)
V11: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract subjected to hydrolysis in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample in (4.1.1) a) or (4.1.2) a)
Note (14) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 8 If it is hard to confirm the endpoint due to the carbon dioxide resulting from
carbonate in the extract when magnesium oxide is used, it is recommended to boil
the extract for 1-2 minute(s) after distilling and cool, and then titrate.
Comment 9 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) d) Standardization and (4.4)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
Comment 10 An example of the additive volume and titter of urease is shown below.
If the urea content can be estimated, calculate the volume of urea in the aliquot
volume of the extract in (4.2) a) by the following formula.
If the urea content cannot be estimated, subtract ammoniacal nitrogen and nitrate
nitrogen from the total nitrogen of the permissible content or the display component
content of the urea nitrogen in a urea compound to obtain nitrogen content. The obtained
nitrogen content is calculated as around the maximum content of urea nitrogen (U-N). In
this case, calculate the volume of urea in the transferred volume of the extract in (4.1.1) or
(4.2) a) after the procedures in (4.1.1) by the following formula.
D2: Estimated urea nitrogen (U-N) content (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical
sample
V10: Constant volume (mL) of the extract in (4.1.1) c) or (4.1.2) c)
V11: Aliquot volume (mL) of the extract subjected to hydrolysis in (4.2) a)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample in (4.1.1) a) or (4.1.2) a)
The specification of urease shows that “No more than 0.5 g of urease completely digests
0.25 g of urea”. Therefore about 2 mg of urease is required to digest 1 mg of urea.
Assuming that the estimated urea content or the calculated urea content in the transferred
volume of the extract is about 43 mg (about 20 mg as urea nitrogen), about 86 mg of
urease is required. When adding 0.2 g of urease (potency 130 unit - 150 unit), the extract
containing the equivalents of 10 mg - 100 mg as urea nitrogen (U-N) can be hydrolyzed.
In addition, when about 20 mg aliquot is taken as urea nitrogen, the differences between
the titer of the distillate from the sample solution ((4.4.1) a) or (4.4.2) a)) and the titer of
the distillate from the undigested test solution ((4.4.1) b) or (4.4.2) b)) are estimated as
follows: About 14 mL, when a 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution is used as a titrant,
about 7 mL, when 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide is used as a titrant and about 3 mL, when
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid is used as a titrant.
Comment 11 Additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using samples
prepared by adding urea to sulfur, a compound fertilizer, isobutyraldehyde condensed
urea, a compound fertilizer containing formaldehyde processed urea (one sample for
each). As a result, the mean recovery rate at the additive level of 1.58 % (mass
fraction) - 39.96 % (mass fraction) was 98.7 % to 103.7 %
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using urea and a compound
fertilizer containing UF (one sample for each), to evaluate precision were analyzed
by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability.
The minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.4 % (mass
fraction).
578
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.56- 59, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Toshifumi FUJITA, Kimie KATO, Toyokazu NIIMI, Yasuharu KIMURA, Kohei ITO
and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination Method for Urea Nitrogen in Fertilizer by Urease,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 195 - 207 (2017)
(5) Flow sheet for urea nitrogen testing method: The flow sheets for urea nitrogen test method
in fertilizers are shown below:
579
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
580
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 7.5-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
weak acid ion-exchange resin.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 190
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
× g.
Comment 1 A column is sold under the production name Asahipak ES-502C 7C, etc.
a) Weigh 1.00 g of an analytical sample, and put it into a 200 mL-ground-in stopper Erlenmeyer
flask.
b) Add 100 mL of water and stir it by using a magnetic stirrer for about 10 minutes.
c) After allowing to stand still, put a supernatant solution (2) in a 1.5-mL ground-in stopper
centrifugal precipitate tube (3).
d) Centrifuge it at 8000 × g - 10000 × g centrifugal force for about five minutes (4) and use the
supernatant as a sample solution.
Note (2) If there is a possibility that the urea nitrogen (U-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of supernatant with water.
(3) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(4) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Note (5) If there is a possibility that the urea nitrogen (U-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of precisely adjusted solution with water.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A weak acid ion-exchange resin column (4.0-mm - 7.5-mm inner diameter,
100-mm - 150-mm long, 5-µm – 10-µm particle diameter)
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 3.92 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.12 g of phosphoric acid
in water to make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than
0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE.
4) Flow rate: 0.6 mL/min
5) Injection volume: 10 µL
6) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 190 nm
Comment 3 The eluent can be prepared as follows. Dissolve 19.6 g of potassium dihydrogen
phosphate and 0.584 g of phosphoric acid with water to make 500 mL and store in a
582
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the urea nitrogen (U-N) content from the peak height using the calibration curve to
calculate the urea nitrogen (U-N) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of biuret nitrogen (B-N),
urea nitrogen (U-N), dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N), guanidine urea (Gd-N) and
guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N). In that case, see 5.10.a Comment 5.
When Asahipak ES-502C 7C is used as a column for HPLC to analyze urea nitrogen
(U-N) in a compound fertilizer containing formaldehyde processed urea (UF), the
peak of the urea nitrogen (U-N) and the peak of the impurity components originating
from UF are not separated, so that urea nitrogen (U-N) cannot be measured. In this
case, the peak of the urea nitrogen (U-N) and the peak of the impurity components
originating from UF are separated by using PRP-X200 as a column for HPLC instead
to be able to analyze the urea nitrogen(U-N) in the compound fertilizer containing
UF. However, when the PRP-X200 column is used as a column for HPLC, the
simultaneous measurement of urea nitrogen (U-N) and biuret nitrogen (B-N), etc. is
impossible.
Comment 5 Additive recovery testing was conducted using one brand of an acetaldehyde
condensed urea fertilizer, a compound fertilizer, a blended fertilizer, a fluid
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer respectively. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 6 % (mass fraction) and 3 %
(mass fraction) and 0.6 % (mass fraction) were 98.3 % - 102.9 %, 98.9 % - 105.2 %
and 92.3 % - 99.9 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a blended fertilizer, a
compound fertilizer and a home garden-use compound fertilizer to evaluate precision
were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation
results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results from a
collaborative study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in Table
2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.03 %
(mass fraction).
583
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Yasuharu KIMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Urea Nitrogen,
Biuret Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea
Nitrogen in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A
Single-Laboratory Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 72 - 85 (2017)
2) Norio FUNAKI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Urea Nitrogen, Biuret
Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea Nitrogen in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 86 - 100 (2017)
584
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: An example of the flow sheet for urea nitrogen in fertilizers
is shown below:
585
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: The chromatograms of the standard solution for calibration curve preparation of urea
nitrogen are shown below.
Reference diagram 1 HPLC chromatogram of the mixture standard solutions (10 mg/L for
each) for calibration curve preparation
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen (3) Dicyandiamide nitrogen
(4) Guanidine nitrogen (5) Guanylurea nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: Asahipak ES-502C 7C (7.5-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 9-μm
particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
Reference diagram 2 HPLC chromatogram of the urea nitrogen standard solutions (20 mg/L)
and a formaldehyde processed urea fertilizer for calibration curve
preparation
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: PRP-X200 (4.1-mm inner diameter, 150-mm long, 10-µm particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
586
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Spectrophotometer: A spectrophotometer specified in JIS K 0115
b) Magnetic stirrer:
Comment 1 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) of 6.3.a.
Comment 2 When the determination is affected by the coloring of the sample solution of (4.1) c),
add about 0.5 g of active carbon and filter with Type 3 filter paper to make a sample
solution from which the coloring disappears.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0115 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
spectrophotometer used for the measurement.
587
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 Additive recovery testing was conducted using a compound fertilizer, crustacea
grade fertilizer powdery and a preparation sample. As a result, the mean recovery
rates at the additive level of 20 % (mass fraction), 10 % (mass fraction) and 3 %
(mass fraction) were 100.0 % - 102.4 %, 100.5 % - 102.0 % and 98.0 % - 103.3 % as
urea nitrogen (U-N) respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using urea, a designated
blended fertilizer and a compound fertilizer to evaluate precision were analyzed by
the one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction).
588
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.60- 62, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
2) Shinei TAKAHASHI: Determination of urea nitrogen in Fertilizer by Spectrometry,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 11, p. 54 – 62 (2018)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for urea nitrogen in fertilizers is shown
below:
589
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Guanidine sulfate is commercially sold by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd.,
Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 7.5-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
weak acid ion-exchange resin.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 190
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
590
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
× g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under the production name Asahipak ES-502C 7C, etc.
Note (3) If there is a possibility that the guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of supernatant with water.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Note (6) If there is a possibility that the guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of precisely adjusted solution with water.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A weak acid ion-exchange resin column (4.0-mm - 7.5-mm inner diameter,
100-mm - 150-mm long, 5-µm – 10-µm particle diameter)
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 3.92 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.12 g of phosphoric acid
in water to make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than 0.5
591
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1).
2) Obtain the guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) content from the peak height using the calibration curve
to calculate the guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of biuret nitrogen (B-N),
urea nitrogen (U-N), dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N), guanidine nitrogen (Gd-N) and
guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N). In that case, see 5.10.a Comment 5.
Comment 6 Additive recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample for a guanylurea
fertilizer (one brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of
3.71 % (mass fraction), 1.85 % (mass fraction) and 0.371 % (mass fraction) were
91.2 %, 94.0 % and 100.0 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a guanylurea fertilizer to
evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results
from a collaborative study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in
Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.02 %
(mass fraction).
592
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Yasuharu KIMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Urea Nitrogen,
Biuret Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea
Nitrogen in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A
Single-Laboratory Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 72 - 85 (2017)
2) Norio FUNAKI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Urea Nitrogen, Biuret
Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea Nitrogen in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 86 - 100 (2017)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: An example of the flow sheet for guanidine nitrogen in
fertilizers is shown below:
593
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: The chromatogram of the standard solution for calibration curve preparation of
guanidine nitrogen is shown below.
Reference diagram HPLC chromatogram of the mixture standard solutions (10 mg/L for
each)
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen (3) Dicyandiamide nitrogen
(4) Guanidine nitrogen (5) Guanylurea nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: Asahipak ES-502C 7C (7.5-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 9-μm
particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
594
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100
mL of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL -
300-mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution,
and titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the
solution becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium
595
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula
(1). Or, calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
=V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium
hydroxide specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
f) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified
in JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
g) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
h) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
j) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified
in JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
k) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
l) Phosphate solution: Dissolve 3.63 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate specified in JIS K
9007 and 5.68 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate specified in JIS K 9020 in 1000 mL of
water (5). When it is used, adjust the liquid temperature at about 25 ºC (cold buffer solution).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a
0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
596
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Rotary shaker: A rotary shaker that can rotate a 250-mL volumetric flask upside down at 30
- 40 revolutions/min.
b) Steam distillation apparatus
c) Digestion flask: A Kjeldahl flask which can be connected to a steam distillation apparatus.
Comment 3 Crush a laboratory sample with a mortar or a pestle, etc. until it completely passes
through an 850 µm aperture sieve.
Comment 4 If there is no possibility for an analytical sample to hydrolyze, it is allowed to use
water instead of a phosphoric acid solution.
Comment 5 The temperature of a solution in the procedure in (4.1) b) - d) should be no more
than 26 ºC.
(4.3) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are
according to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (8) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor, (9) add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam
distillation apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (8) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an
acceptor, (9) add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect
this acceptor to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Add a proper amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (10), and immediately
connect this digestion flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
597
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (8) 5 mL - 20 mL
(9) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL
beaker with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be
immersed in 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(10) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue color will appear.
Cold buffer solution soluble nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= (B × V6-V7) × C1 × f1 × (V8/V9) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
= (B × V6-V7) × C1 × f1 × (V8/V9) × (1.4007/W2)
Cold buffer solution soluble nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= V10 × C2 × 2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
= V10 × C2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (2.8014/W2)
Note (11) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 6 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.4)
598
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.67- 68, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for cold buffer solution soluble nitrogen testing method: The flow sheets for
cold buffer solution soluble nitrogen testing method in formaldehyde processed urea
fertilizers are shown below:
599
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
600
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100
mL of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
601
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL -
300-mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution,
and titrate with a 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the
solution becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium
hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula
(1). Or, calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of
0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Catalyst (5): Mix potassium sulfate specified in JIS K 8962 and copper (II) sulfate
pentahydrate (6) specified in JIS K 8983 in the ratio of 9 to 1.
f) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium
hydroxide specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified
in JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified
in JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
m) Heat phosphate solution: Dissolve 3.63 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate specified in
JIS K 9007 and 5.68 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate specified in JIS K 9020 in 1000 mL
of water (7). When it is used, heat until it reaches boiling point (heat buffer solution).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a
0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Water bath: A water bath which can boil water.
b) Steam distillation apparatus
c) Digestion flask: A Kjeldahl flask which can be connected to a steam distillation apparatus.
d) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
Comment 3 Crush a laboratory sample with a mortar or a pestle, etc. until it completely passes
through an 850 µm aperture sieve.
Note (9) When the solution has finished changing color, heat further for no less than 2 hours.
(10) When the entire sample solution volume is used in measurement, it is not necessary to
transfer it to a volumetric flask.
(4.3) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are
according to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (11) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (12), add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam
distillation apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (11) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an
603
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
acceptor (12), add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect
this acceptor to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Put a predetermined amount of the digestion solution in a 300-mL distillation flask, add a
proper amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (13), and immediately connect
this distillation flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (11) 5 mL - 20 mL
(12) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL
beaker with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be
immersed in 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(13) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue color will appear.
Heat buffer solution soluble nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= (B × V6 - V7) × C1 × f1 × (V8/V9) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
= (B × V6 - V7) × C1 × f1 × (V8/V9) × (1.4007/W2)
Note (14) The total nitrogen (T-N) and the nitrogen which is insoluble in a heat buffer solution
use raw data without rounding numerical value.
formula:
c) Subtract the nitrogen which is insoluble in a heat buffer solution from the separately obtained
total nitrogen (T-N) according to the method in 4.1.1 to calculate the nitrogen which is soluble
in a heat buffer solution
Heat buffer solution soluble nitrogen (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= V10 × C2 × 2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
= V10 × C2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (2.8014/W2)
V10: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid needed for titration
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
f2: Factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
V11: Constant volume (mL) of the digestion solution in (4.2) f)
V12: Aliquot volume (mL) of the digestion solution subjected to distillation in (4.3)
b)
W2: Mass (g) of the analytical sample
Note (15) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 4 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.4)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.68- 69, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for heat buffer solution soluble nitrogen testing method: The flow sheets for
heat buffer solution soluble nitrogen testing method in methylolurea polymerization fertilizers
are shown below:
605
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
606
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Sulfuric acid: A JIS Guaranteed Reagent specified in JIS K 8951 or a reagent of equivalent
quality.
c) 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid (1) (2): Add about 14 mL of sulfuric acid to a beaker containing 100
607
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
mL of water in advance, stir well, and add water to make 1000 mL.
Standardization: Put a predetermined amount (3) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in a 200-mL -
300-mL Erlenmeyer flask, add a few drops of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution,
and titrate with a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution until the color of the
solution becomes gray-green (4). Calculate the volume of a 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium
hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula
(1)
. Or, calculate the factor of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid by the following formula (2):
Volume (B) of 0.1 mol/L -0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution equivalent to 1 mL of 0.25
mol/L sulfuric acid
= V4/V5 ………. (1)
V4: Volume (mL) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution needed for
titration
V5: Volume (mL) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid subjected to standardization
C1: Set concentration (mol/L) of 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
C2: Set concentration (0.25 mol/L) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
d) Boric acid solution (40 g/L): Dissolve 40 g of boric acid specified in JIS K 8863 in water to
make 1000 mL.
e) Catalyst (5): Mix potassium sulfate specified in JIS K 8962 and copper (II) sulfate
pentahydrate (6) specified in JIS K 8983 in the ratio of 9 to 1.
f) Sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (1): Dissolve 100 g - 250 g of sodium
hydroxide specified in JIS K 8576 in water to make 500 mL.
g) Bromothymol blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of bromothymol blue specified
in JIS K 8842 in 20 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102, add water to make 100 mL.
h) Methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl red specified in JIS K 8896 in
100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
i) Methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.1 g of methylene blue specified in JIS K
8897 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
j) Methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution: To 2 volumes of methyl red solution (0.1
g/100 mL), add 1 volume of methylene blue solution (0.1 g/100 mL).
k) Bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL): Dissolve 0.5 g of bromocresol green specified
in JIS K 8840 in 100 mL of ethanol (95) specified in JIS K 8102.
l) Methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution: To a methyl red solution (0.1 g/100 mL),
add equal volume of bromocresol green solution (0.5 g/100 mL).
m) Heat phosphate solution: Dissolve 1.43 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate specified in
JIS K 9007 and 9.10 g of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate specified in JIS K 9020 in 1000
mL of water (7). When it is used, heat until it reaches boiling point (heat buffer solution).
Comment 1 A 0.1 mol/L - 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution in (2) a) can be replaced with a
0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution or a 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
Comment 2 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in (2) c) can be replaced with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid
conforming to ISO/IEC 17025.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Water bath: A water bath which can boil water.
b) Steam distillation apparatus
c) Digestion flask: A Kjeldahl flask which can be connected to a steam distillation apparatus.
d) Distillation flask: A Kjeldahl flask or round bottom flask that can be connected to a steam
distillation apparatus.
Comment 3 Crush a laboratory sample with a mortar or a pestle, etc. until it completely passes
through an 850 µm aperture sieve.
Note (9) If it takes 4 minutes or more for filtrating, conduct extracting anew according to
Comment 4.
Comment 4 After conducting the procedures in (4.1.2) a) - c), add 1 g of diatomaceous earth to
stir and conduct the procedure in (4.1.2) d).
609
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (10) When the solution has finished changing color, heat further for no less than 2 hours.
(11) When the entire sample solution volume is used in measurement, it is not necessary to
transfer it to a volumetric flask.
(4.3) Distillation: Conduct distillation as shown below. Specific distillation procedures are
according to the operation method of the steam distillation apparatus used in measurement.
a) Put a predetermined amount (12) of 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid in an acceptor (13), add a few drops
of methyl red−methylene blue mixture solution, and connect this acceptor to a steam
distillation apparatus. Or, put a predetermined amount (12) of boric acid solution (40 g/L) in an
acceptor (13), add a few drops of methyl red−bromocresol green mixture solution, and connect
this acceptor to a steam distillation apparatus.
b) Put a predetermined amount of the digestion solution in a 300-mL distillation flask, add a
proper amount of sodium hydroxide solution (200 g/L - 500 g/L) (14), and immediately connect
this distillation flask to the steam distillation apparatus.
c) Send steam to the distillation flask to heat the solution in the distillation flask, and distill at a
distillation rate of 5 mL/min - 7 mL/min.
d) Stop distilling when the distillate has reached 120 mL - 160 mL.
e) Wash the part of the steam distillation apparatus that came in contact with the solution in the
acceptor with a small amount of water, and pool the washing with the distillate.
Note (12) 5 mL - 20 mL
(13) As an acceptor, use a 200-mL - 300-mL Erlenmeyer flask or a 200-mL - 300-mL
beaker with which the distillate outlet of the steam distillation apparatus can be
immersed in 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid or a boric acid solution (40 g/L).
(14) An amount sufficient to make the solution strong alkalinity. A blue color will appear.
Cold water insoluble nitrogen (N1) or the nitrogen which is insoluble in a heat buffer
solution (N2) (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= (B × V6 - V7) × C1 × f1 × (V8/V9) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
610
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (15) Cold water insoluble nitrogen (N1) or the nitrogen which is insoluble in a heat buffer
solution (N2) uses raw data without rounding numerical value.
Cold water insoluble nitrogen (N1) or the nitrogen which is insoluble in a heat buffer
solution (N2) (% (mass fraction)) in the analytical sample
= V10 × C2 × 2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (14.007/W2) × (100/1000)
=V10 × C2 × f2 × (V11/V12) × (2.8014/W2) ・・・・・ (3)
Note (16) The endpoint is reached when the color changes from green to light red.
Comment 5 The titration procedures in (2) a) Standardization, (2) c) Standardization and (4.4)
can be conducted by an automatic titrator. The setup of the titration program, the
determination parameter for the endpoint and vessels such as acceptors are according
611
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
to the specification and the operation method of the automatic titrator used.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.68- 69, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(5) Flow sheet for the activity coefficient of nitrogen testing method: The flow sheets for the
activity coefficient of nitrogen testing method in formaldehyde processed urea fertilizers are
shown below:
612
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
613
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Incubator: An incubator whose temperature is 30 ºC ± 1 ºC.
b) Total nitrogen: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in 4.1.1 when
determining total nitrogen.
c) Ammoniacal nitrogen: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in 4.1.2 when
determining ammoniacal nitrogen.
d) Nitrate nitrogen: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in 4.1.3 when
determining nitrate nitrogen.
e) Water-soluble phosphoric acid: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in
4.2.4 when determining water-soluble phosphoric acid.
f) Water-soluble potassium: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in 4.3.3
when determining water-soluble potassium.
g) Water-soluble magnesia: Apparatus and instruments corresponding to clauses in 4.6.4 when
determining water-soluble magnesia.
614
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) Since no grinding is conducted and inhomogeneous laboratory samples are used, it is
desirable to heighten the reliability of determined values by conducting tests using 3 -
5 laboratory samples.
(2) Since an initial elution flow is estimated to be higher than usual if the laboratory
sample vibrates in water, water should be added gently. Do not shake to mix the
sample solution until the filtering in c) is completed.
(3) Filter most of the solution so that non-dissolved matter remains in the Erlenmeyer
flask.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurements of the initial elution flow of a target component as
specified in respective clauses in a) - f). In addition, specific measurement procedure for each
component is carried out according to a corresponding clause.
a) Total nitrogen: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and quantitate the total
nitrogen according to the respective clauses in 4.1.1 to make initial elution flow.
b) Ammoniacal nitrogen: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and quantitate
ammoniacal nitrogen according to respective clauses in 4.1.2 to make the initial elution flow.
c) Nitrate nitrogen: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and quantitate nitrate
nitrogen according to respective clauses in 4.1.3 to make the initial elution flow.
d) Water-soluble phosphoric acid: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and
quantitate water-soluble phosphoric acid according to respective clauses in 4.2.4 to make the
initial elution flow.
e) Water-soluble potassium: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and quantitate
water-soluble potassium according to respective clauses in 4.3.3 to make the initial elution
flow.
f) Water-soluble magnesia: Get a predetermined amount of sample solution and quantitate
water-soluble magnesia according to respective clauses in 4.6.4 to make the initial elution
flow.
Note (4) Determine total nitrogen (T-N), ammoniacal nitrogen (A-N), nitrate nitrogen (N-N),
water-soluble phosphoric acid (W-P2O5), water-soluble potassium (W-K2O) or
water-soluble magnesia (W-MgO) in 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.2.4, 4.3.3 or 4.6.4 using test
samples prepared in 2.3 Preparation of test samples.
(5) The initial elution flow and corresponding component content use raw data without
rounding numerical value.
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.288- 290, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
615
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(6) Initial elution rate testing method: The flow sheet for initial elution rate testing method in
coated fertilizers is shown below:
616
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (1) Aluminum weighing dishes described in the Handbook of the Feed Analysis Standards
-2009- can also be used.
(2) A rotary shaker that can rotate a 100-mL ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube
upside down at 30 - 40 revolutions/min may also be used.
(5) Stir with a glass rod, wash non-dissolved matter which may have adhered to the glass
rod with water and add wash to a centrifugal precipitate tube.
Note (6) Heat at the temperature to enable the procedure in (4.2.2) b).
References
1) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.316- 317, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
(6) Humic acid testing method: The flow sheet for humic acid testing method is shown below:
619
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
620
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Shaking apparatus
b) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 1700 × g.
c) Ion Chromatograph: An ion chromatograph specified in JIS K 0127 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) Column: A no less than 4-mm inner diameter 7.5-mm long 3.5-μm particle diameter column
tube filled with porous particles, to which quaternary ammonium group or quaternary
alkanolamine class chemically bonds (2).
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 25 ºC - 40 ºC.
3) Suppressor: Cation exchange membrane or resin should be used.
621
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (2) A column is commercially sold under the name Shodex IC SI-90 4E, etc.
Note (3) The vessel should be made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect the measurement.
(4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(5) In case of exceeding the calibration curve, dilute by a factor of more than 100.
(6) Confirm in advance that the sample solution is within the PH range applicable to the
column.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement by using suppressor method as indicated in JIS K
0127 and as shown below. Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation
method of the ion chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Ion Chromatograph: An example of measurement
conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A polyvinyl alcohol porous particles column (4-mm inner diameter 250-mm long
9-μm particle diameter) to which quaternary ammonium group chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 25 °C
3) Eluent: Carbonate buffer solution
4) Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An electric conductivity detector
Note (7) When the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height of
respective solutions for the calibration curve preparation forms a curved line, it should
be described by a quadratic function.
622
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 20 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1).
2) Obtain a sulfate ion concentration from the calibration curve by the peak area or peak height
to calculate the sulfate ion (SO42-) in the analytical sample (8).
Note (8) As for potassium humic acid fertilizers and fertilizers containing potassium humic acid,
their peak form sometimes changes. Therefore, it should be calculated by a peak
height.
Comment 1 Additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using preparation
fertilizers (6 samples). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of
73 % (mass fraction), 40 % (mass fraction), 20 % (mass fraction), 10 % (mass
fraction), 5 % (mass fraction) and 1 % (mass fraction) were 98.7 %, 98.2 %, 97.5 %,
100.5 %, 94.9 % and 103.5 % as sulfate ion respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using triple superphosphate of
lime, magnesia fertilizers, compound fertilizers, designated blended fertilizer and
gypsum to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table
1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.2 %
(mass fraction).
623
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for the testing method: The flow sheet for sulfate ion in fertilizers is shown
below:
624
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
625
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
6.10.2 Sulfate
This method is according to 5.29.2 Sulfate analysis in “The Official Methods of Analysis of
Fertilizers 1992”.
References
1) National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries: The Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers 1992, p.145 -
147, Japan Fertilizers Analysis Association, Tokyo (1992)
2) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.285- 286, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
626
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries: The Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers 1992, p.121 -
123, Japan Fertilizers Analysis Association, Tokyo (1992)
2) Masayoshi KOSHINO: Second Revision of The Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers
(Details), p.259- 261, Yokendo, Tokyo (1988)
627
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
7. Nitrification inhibitor
7.1 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine (AM)
7.1.a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers containing 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine
(AM). This testing method is classified as Type C and its symbol is 7.1.a-2017 or AM.a-1.
Add methanol − water (1+1) to an analytical sample to extract
2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine, introduce it into a High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(HPLC), isolate with an octadecyl silylation silica gel column, and measure at a wavelength 295 nm
to obtain 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine (AM) in an analytical sample. In addition, the
performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 6.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 295
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
e) Acidic alumina cartridge column: Link a 10-mL cylinder to a column (3) that is filled with
500 mg - 1 g of acidic alumina, put 3 mL of methanol and let it flow down.
Note (3) A cartridge with a 3-mL - 6-mL column filled with 500 mg - 1 g of silica gel can be
used.
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Inertsil ODS, Mightysil RP-18,
L-column ODS, Shim-pack VP-ODS, Silica C18M 4D, Puresil C18, COSMOSIL
5C18-MS-II, etc.
Comment 3 An acidic alumina cartridge is commercially sold under production names such as
Bond Elut AL-A, Sep-Pak Alumina-A and Supelclean LC-Alumina-A.
Note (4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(5) If there is a possibility that the 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine in the sample
solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined
amount of extract with methanol water (1+1).
Note (6) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 4 Instead of the procedures in (4.2) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
629
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
sample solution.
Comment 5 The test is possible by the following procedures in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
The procedures in (4.1) c) - d) and (4.2) a) - b) are omitted and “Put the effluent” in
(4.2) c) is replaced with the “After allowing to stand still, put the supernatant” to
operate.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC) used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Methanol - water (4+6)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 295 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Inject 10 µL of respective 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine standard solutions for the
calibration curve preparation to the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, record a
chromatogram at a wavelength 295 nm and obtain a peak area or height.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height at a
wavelength 295 nm of the respective 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine standard
solutions for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine content from the calibration curve to calculate
2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine (AM) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted using compound fertilizer (1 sample) and blended
fertilizer (2 samples), as a result, the mean recovery rates of
2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine at the concentration level of 1.0 % (mass
fraction), 0.4 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 99.1 % - 100.5 %,
99.3 % - 101.6 % and 100.2 % - 100.7 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yuji SHIRAI: The volumetric analysis of 2-amino-4-chloro-6-methylpyrimidine in
fertilizers with High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, Validation Report of
Fertilizers (in Japanese), 44 (3), p. 26 - 41(1991)
630
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
631
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
10000 × g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Inertsil ODS, Mightysil RP-18,
L-column ODS, Shim-pack VP-ODS, Silica C18M 4D, Puresil C18 and COSMOSIL
5C18-MS-II.
Note (3) If there is a possibility that the 1-amidino-2-thiourea concentration in the sample
solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined
amount of supernatant with water.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC) is
shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 45 °C
3) Eluent: Dissolve 0.94 g of sodium 1-hexasulfonic acid in 1000 mL of methanol water (2+8),
adjust to pH 3.15 with acetic acid and filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no
more than 0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE (1).
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 262 nm
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the 1-amidino-2-thiourea content from the calibration curve to calculate
1-amidino-2-thiourea (ASU) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 Recovery testing with triplicates measurement was conducted using compound
fertilizer (2 samples), as a result, the mean recovery rates of 1-amidino-2-thiourea at
the concentration level of 1.0 % (mass fraction), 0.5 % (mass fraction) and 0.25 %
(mass fraction) were 99.0 % - 104.3 %, 97.7 % - 100.7 % and 99.7 % - 101.3 %.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Kazunori CHIBA: Analysis method of 1-amidino-2-thiourea (ASU) of Nitrification
inhibitor in fertilizers with High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, Validation Report
of Fertilizers (in Japanese), 43 (4), p. 15 - 22 (1990)
2) Shigehiro KAI and Erina WATABE: Determination of 1-Amidino-2-thiourea as a
Nitrification Inhibitor in Compound Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid
Chromatography: A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizers, Vol. 6, p. 36 -
42 (2013)
634
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for 1-amidino-2-thiourea: The flow sheet for 1-amidino-2-thiourea in fertilizers
is shown below:
635
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Hibar LiChrosorb NH2, Inertsil
NH2, Unison UK-Amino, Mightysil NH2, Shim-pack CLC-NH2, Shodex NH-5A,
Unisil Q NH2, etc.
Note (4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which amino or amino propyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Acetonitrile - methanol (9+1)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 220 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Inject 10 µL of respective 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation to the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, record a chromatogram at a
wavelength 220 nm and obtain a peak area or height.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height at a
wavelength 220 nm of the 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole standard solutions for the respective
calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
637
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 Recovery testing was conducted using compound fertilizer (2 samples), as a result,
the mean recovery rates of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole hydrochloride at the concentration
level of 0.5 % (mass fraction), 0.3 % (mass fraction) and 0.2 % (mass fraction) were
100.2 % - 104.9 %, 100.8 % - 103.0 % and 100.7 % - 104.2 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Koichi SAKAGAMI: Analysis methods of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole hydrochloride with
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, Validation Report of Fertilizers (in
Japanese), 40 (4), p.9 - 16 (1987)
(5) Flow sheet for 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole hydrochloride (ATC): An example of the flow sheet
for 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole hydrochloride in fertilizers is shown below:
638
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A column is sold under production names such as Inertsil ODS, Mightysil RP-18,
L-column ODS, Shim-pack VP-ODS, Silica C18M 4D, Puresil C18 and COSMOSIL
5C18-MS-II.
Note (2) If there is a possibility that the N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid concentration in
the sample solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of the outflow solution with methanol.
(3) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(4) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 2 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Methanol - water (5) (55 + 45)
4) Flow rate: 0.8 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 246 nm
Note (5) Adjust the water used to pH 3 with phosphoric acid in advance.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid content from the calibration curve to
calculate N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid (DCS) in the analytical sample.
Comment 3 Recovery testing was conducted using compound fertilizer (2 samples) and blended
fertilizer (1 sample), as a result, the mean recovery rates of N-2,5-dichlorophenyl
succinamic acid at the concentration level of 0.4 % (mass fraction), 0.2 % (mass
fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were 100.9 % - 101.4 %, 100.8 % - 101.4 % and
101.2 % - 103.4 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Akira KUBO: Analysis methods of N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid (DCS) of
Nitrification suppression materials in fertilizers with High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph, Validation Report of Fertilizers (in Japanese), 44 (4), p.25 - 36 (1991).
(5) Flow sheet for N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid (DCS): The flow sheet for
N-2,5-dichlorophenyl succinamic acid (DCS) in fertilizers is shown below:
641
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
642
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
b) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
e) Silica gel cartridge column: Link a 10-mL cylinder to the column (3) filled with 500 mg - 1
g of silica gel, add 3 mL of methanol to let it flow down.
Note (3) A cartridge with a 3-mL - 6-mL column filled with 500 mg – 1 g of silica gel can be
used.
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Hibar LiChrosorb NH2, Inertsil
NH2, Unison UK-Amino, Mightysil NH2, Shim-pack CLC-NH2, Shodex NH-5A and
Unisil Q NH2.
Comment 3 A silica gel cartridge column is commercially sold under production names such as
Sep-Pak Plus Silica, InertSep Si.
Note (4) Mix well until the whole sample comes in contact with water.
(5) About 5 g - 10 g.
(6) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(7) If there is a possibility that the concentration of dicyandiamide in the sample solution
exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount of
the extract with methanol.
Note (8) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(9) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
644
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 Instead of the procedures in (4.2) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which amino or amino propyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Acetonitrile - methanol (6+1)
4) Flow rate: 0.5 mL/min - 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 215 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Inject 10 µL of respective dicyandiamide standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation to the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, record a chromatogram at a
wavelength 215 nm, and obtain a peak area or height.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height at a
wavelength 215 nm of the respective dicyandiamide standard solutions for the calibration
curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain dicyandiamide content from the calibration curve to calculate dicyandiamide (Dd) in
the analytical sample.
Comment 5 Recovery testing was conducted using inorganic compound fertilizer (2 samples) and
organic compound fertilizer (3 samples), as a result, the mean recovery rates at the
concentration level of 2 % (mass fraction) and 0.2% (mass fraction) were 101.2 % -
102.6 % and 98.4 % - 100.6 %.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.01 %
(mass fraction).
645
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masakazu SAIKI: Development of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for
Determination of Dicyandiamide as a Nitrification Inhibitor in Fertilizer. Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 3, p. 43 - 50 (2010)
2) Masakazu SAIKI: Determination of Dicyandiamide as a Nitrification Inhibitor in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study, Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 16 - 22 (2011)
646
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for dicyandiamide: The flow sheet for dicyandiamide in fertilizers is shown.
647
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: Examples of the HPLC chromatogram of dicyandiamide standard solution for the
calibration curve preparation and sample solution (compound fertilizer) are shown
below.
0.20 0.20
0.18 0.18
8.607 Dd
0.16 0.16
0.12 0.12
AU
AU
0.10 0.10
0.08 0.08
0.06 0.06
0.04 0.04
0.02 0.02
0.00 0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
min min
1) Dicyandiamide standard solution (the equivalents of 100 ng (10 µg/ mL, 10 µL) of
dicyandiamide)
2) Sample solution (compound fertilizer)
648
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 2-sulfanilamide thiazole is sold under the production name sulfathiazole by Tokyo
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., and Kanto
Chemical Co., Inc.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
e) Acidic alumina cartridge column: Link a 10-mL cylinder to a column (3) that is filled with
500 mg - 1 g of acidic alumina, put 3 mL of methanol and let it flow down.
Note (3) A cartridge with a 3-mL - 6-mL column filled with 500 mg – 1 g of silica gel can be
used.
Comment 2 A column is sold under production names such as Inertsil ODS, Mightysil RP-18,
L-column ODS, Shim-pack VP-ODS, Silica C18M 4D, Puresil C18 and COSMOSIL
5C18-MS-II.
Comment 3 An acidic alumina cartridge is commercially sold under production names such as
Bond Elut AL-A, Sep-Pak Alumina-A and Supelclean LC-Alumina-A.
Note (4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(5) If there is a possibility that the 2-sulfanilamide thiazole concentration in the sample
solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined
amount of the extract with methanol.
Note (6) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(7) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 4 Instead of the procedures in (4.2) c) - d), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(aperture diameter: no more than 0.5-µm) made of PTFE and the filtrate can be the
sample solution.
Comment 5 The test is possible by the following procedures in the case of fertilizers not
containing organic matters.
The procedures in (4.1) c) - d) and (4.2) a) - b) are omitted and “Put the effluent” in
650
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.2) c) is replaced with the “After allowing to stand still, put the supernatant” to
operate.
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An example
of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is shown below.
Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 30 °C - 40 °C
3) Eluent: Methanol−water (2+8)
4) Flow rate: 1 mL/min
5) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector, a measurement wavelength: 285 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Inject 10 µL of respective 2-sulfanilamide thiazole standard solutions for the calibration curve
preparation to the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, record a chromatogram at a
wavelength 285 nm and obtain a peak area or height.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the concentration and the peak area or height at a
wavelength 285 nm of the respective 2-sulfanilamide thiazole standard solutions for the
calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the 2-sulfanilamide thiazole content from the calibration curve to calculate
2-sulfanilamide thiazole (ST) in the analytical sample.
Comment 6 Recovery testing was conducted using compound fertilizer (1 sample) and blended
fertilizer (2 sample), as a result, the mean recovery rates of 2-sulfanilamide thiazole
at the concentration level of 1.0 % (mass fraction), 0.4 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 %
(mass fraction) were 101.2 % - 102.1 %, 99.6 % - 101.7 % and 99.4 % - 101.0 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.005 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Yuji SHIRAI: The volumetric analysis of 2-sulfanilamide thiazole in fertilizers with
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, Validation Report of Fertilizers (in Japanese),
44 (1), p. 10 - 20 (1991)
651
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for 2-sulfanilamide thiazole (ST): The flow sheet for 2-sulfanilamide thiazole in
fertilizers is shown below:
652
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
8. Others
8.1 Melamine and its degradation products
8.1.a Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers. This testing method is classified as Type D and its
symbol is 8.1.a-2017 or Mel.a-1.
Extract melamine and its derivative substances (hereinafter referred to as “melamine derivations”)
in organic matters and fertilizers containing organic matters with diethylamine−water−acetonitrile
(1+4+5) and derivatize with BSTFA−TMCS (99+1) and then measure with a Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometer to obtain melamine deviations in an analytical sample. In addition, the
performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 8.
Comment 1 The structural formula of melamine and its degradation products is shown in the
figure 1. During the production process of melamine, a by-product that replaces
“-NH2” of R1 - R3 with “-OH” is formed in some cases.
R1 R1 R2 R3 MW
Melamine NH2 NH2 NH2 126.12
N N Ammeline OH NH2 NH2 127.10
Ammelide OH OH NH2 128.09
R2 N R3 Cyanuric acid OH OH OH 129.07
Note (1) After it is opened once, add a proper amount of sodium sulfate (anhydrous) and seal
tightly to store.
(2) A mixed derivatization reagent is commercially sold under the name BSTFA−TMCS
(99+1).
(3) The respective standard reagents of melamine, ammeline, ammelide and cyanuric acid
653
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 A capillary column is commercially sold under the names such as DB-5ms, Rtx-5ms,
HP-5ms, SLB-5ms, BPX-5, CP-Sil 8CB low Bleed/MS and TC -5HT for GC/MS.
Note (4) Confirm that the tube is made of polypropylene, etc. to not affect testing results.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 5 Grind until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture to prepare the
test sample.
Comment 6 Weigh 0.5 g of an analytical sample, extract with 200 mL of
diethylamine−water−acetonitrile (1+4+5). If it is diluted 50 times in the procedure in
d), the quantitative range of melamine derivations in the analytical sample is 0.2 %
654
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.3) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0123 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the Gas
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer: An example of
measurement conditions for the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer is shown below. Set
up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Gas Chromatograph
(i) Sample injection method: split less injection method (1min)
(ii) Temperature of sample injector: 280 °C
(ii) Capillary column: A capillary column (0.25-mm - 0.32-mm inner diameter, 30-m long,
0.25 µm layer thickness) made of fused silica. 5 % phenyl 95 % methyl polysiloxane
chemically bonds to the inner surface of the capillary column.
(iv) Temperature of column bath: 100 °C (1 min) → (15 °C /min) → 320 °C (3 min)
(v) Temperature of GC/MS coupling portion: 250 °C
(vi) Carrier gas: helium, flow rate: 1.5 mL/min
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electron-Impact ionization (EI) method
(ii) Ionization voltage: 70 V
(iii) Temperature of ion source: 230 °C
(iv) Ion detection method: Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) method
(v) Measurement of ion: Shown in table 1
655
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (9) Confirm that the ratio against the peak area ratio or height ratio of the standard
solution is within the range of about ± 30 %. In addition, the peak area ratio or height
ratio depends on the concentration.
656
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 Recovery testing of melamine derivations was conducted using soybean meal, fish
meal, fish waste processed fertilizer, mixed organic fertilizer, blended fertilizer and
compound fertilizer, as a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 10 %
(mass fraction) and 0.2 % (mass fraction) were 92.1 % - 102.9 % and 90.3 % -
102.2 %.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of melamine derivations of the test
method is about 0.01 % (mass fraction).
References
1) Yuji SHIRAI, Jun OKI: Validation of Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for
Determination of Melamine and Its Degradation Products in Fertilizers, Research
Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 1, p. 114 - 121 (2008)
657
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for melamine derivations: The flow sheet for melamine derivations in fertilizers
is shown below.
658
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) of GC/MS of the mixture
standard solution for calibration curve preparation of melamine derivations is
shown below.
↓a ↓b ↓c ↓d
659
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
8.1.b
660
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 The standard reagent of melamine, ammeline, ammelide and cyanuric acid are sold
by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd. and Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and
Hayashi Pure Chemical Industries., Ltd.
Comment 2 A column is sold under the production name TSKgel Amide-80, etc. A column that
has been confirmed to be able to completely separate melamine, ammeline,
ammelide and cyanuric acid should be used.
Note (4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(5) If there is a possibility that the concentration of melamine derivations in the sample
solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curb, the amount of a
supernatant solution to be transferred should be1 mL - 2.5 mL.
(6) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(7) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) f) - g), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(pore size: no more than 0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the filtrate can be
the sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is
662
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 Recovery testing was conducted using 3 brands of nitrolime, 1 brand of compound
fertilizer containing nitrolime, 2 brands of compound fertilizers not containing
nitrolime, 1 brand of ammonium sulfate and 1 brand of urea, as a result, the recovery
rates of melamine derivations at the concentration level of 4 % (mass fraction) and
0.1 % (mass fraction) were 90.5 % - 106.3 % and 92.2 % - 107.0 %.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of the test method is about 0.02 %
(mass fraction) for melamine and cyanuric acid and about 0.01 % (mass fraction) for
ammeline and ammelide. In the case of ammelide and cyanuric acid, the sufficient
reproducibility was observed in the range of 0.188 % (mass fraction) - 1.10 % (mass
fraction) and 0.105 % (mass fraction) - 1.15 % (mass fraction) respectively.
663
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Etsuko BANDO and Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of High-Performance Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) for Determination of Melamine and Its Related Substances in
Fertilizer, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 6, p. 27 - 35 (2013)
2) Etsuko BANDO and Sigehiro KAI: Determination of Melamine and Its Related
Substances in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A
Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 7, p. 10 - 21 (2014)
664
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for melamine derivations: The flow sheet for melamine derivations in fertilizers
is shown below.
665
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the HPLC chromatogram of the mixture standard solution for
calibration curve preparation of melamine derivations is shown below.
666
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 A standard reagent of melamine is sold by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd.,
Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Hayashi Pure Chemical Industries., Ltd.
nm.
b) Ultrasonic generator: An ultrasonic washer can be used.
c) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
d) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
Comment 2 Column is sold under the production name TSKgel Amide-80, etc. A column which
has actually isolated melamine, ammeline, ammelide and cyanuric acid should be
used.
Note (4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(5) If there is a possibility that the concentration of melamine derivations in the sample
solution exceeds the maximum limit of the calibration curb, the aliquot volume to be
taken of a supernatant solution should be 1 mL - 2.5 mL.
(6) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(7) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 3 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) f) - g), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(pore size: no more than 0.5 µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the filtrate can be
the sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph is
shown below. Set up the measurement conditions considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4-mm - 6-mm inner diameter, 150-mm - 250-mm long, 5-µm
particle diameter column) to which carbamoyl chemically bonds.
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C ± 1 °C
3) Eluent: Acetonitrile - phosphate buffer solution (82+18)
668
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 4 Additive recovery testing was conducted to evaluate trueness using rape seed meal,
soybean meal, compound fertilizer containing lime nitrogen and organic matter,
compound fertilizer containing organic matter and blended fertilizer containing
organic matter (1 brand for each). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive
level of 2 % (mass fraction), 0.4 % (mass fraction) and 0.1 % (mass fraction) were
94.6 % - 99.8 %, 92.4 % - 98.5 % and 93.1 % - 98.4 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using soybean meal and
compound fertilizer containing organic matter, to evaluate precision were analyzed
by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.02 %
(mass fraction).
References
1) Etsuko FUNAMIZU: Determination Method for Melamine in Organic Fertilizer and
Fertilizer Containing Organic Matter using High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(HPLC), Research Report of Fertilizers, Vol. 9, p. 33 - 42 (2016)
669
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for melamine derivations: The flow sheet for melamine derivations in fertilizers
is shown below.
Reference: An example of the HPLC chromatogram of the standard solution for calibration curve
preparation of melamine is shown below.
←melamin
670
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Structural formulas of clopyralid, aminopyralid and picloram are as shown in Figure
1.
671
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
weighing dishes and measure the mass to the order of 0.1 mg. Dissolve with a small amount
of acetonitrile, transfer to 100-mL volumetric flasks and add the solvent up to the marked line.
k) Mixture standard solution (100 ng/mL) (1): Dilute a predetermined amount of respective
agrichemical standard solutions (0.1 mg/mL) with formic acid (1+1000) to prepare mixture
standard solution (100 ng/mL).
l) Mixture standard solution for calibration curve preparation (5 ng/mL - 50 ng/mL) (1): In
the case of usage, put 2.5 mL - 25 mL of mixture standard solution (100 ng/mL) in 50 mL
volumetric flasks step-by-step, and add formic acid (1+1000) up to the marked line.
m) Mixture standard solution for calibration curve preparation (0.5 ng/mL - 5 ng/mL) (1): In
the case of usage, put 2.5 mL - 25 mL of mixture standard solution (10 ng/mL) in 50 mL
volumetric flasks step-by-step, and add formic acid (1+1000) up to the marked line.
Comment 2 Standard reagents of clopyralid, aminopyralid and picloram are sold by FUJIFILM
Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Hayashi Pure
Chemical Industries., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer : A high-performance
liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometer specified in JIS K 0136 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
(ii) Column: A 2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter 50-mm - 150-mm long 1.6-µm - 2.2-µm
particle diameter stainless steel column tube filled with silica gel to which octadecyl
chemically bonds. The specification is according to the mass spectrometer specification.
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Ion detection method: Selected Reaction Monitoring
b) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
c) Manifold
d) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at about 1700 × g.
e) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
f) Concentrator: An evaporator that can adjust to 40 ºC ± 2 ºC.
g) Copolymer cartridge column: A divinylbenzene-N-vinylpyrrolidone copolymer mini
column (200 mg)
Comment 3 Column is sold under the production name ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18, etc.
Comment 4 A copolymer cartridge is sold under the production names such as Oasis HLB 6cc
(200 mg) and Oasis PRiME HLB Plus Short Cartridge (225 mg).
b) Add 1 mL of sodium hydroxide solution (40 g/L) and 99 mL of methanol (3), and shake to mix
by reciprocating vertically at 300 times/min (amplitude of 40 mm) for about 30 minutes.
c) After allowing to stand still, put a supernatant solution in a 50-mL ground-in stopper
centrifugal precipitate tube.
d) Centrifuge it at about 1700 × g centrifugal force for about five minutes (4) and use the
supernatant as an extract.
Note (3) It is also allowed to add 100 mL of sodium hydroxide solution (40 g/L) − methanol
[1+99]
(4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 5 Grind until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture to prepare the
test sample.
Note (5) Use a pressure reducing device in the procedure in (4.2) and (4.3) as appropriate.
(6) When pretreating many analytical samples, a free-standing type vessel that can contain
a solution with a liquid volume of 20 mL may be used. In this case, instead of
procedure d), put an effluent into a round-bottle flask, wash the vessel 2 times with 2.5
mL of methanol and add washing to the previous effluent.
(7) When using Oasis HLB 6cc (200 mg), add 5 mL of the extract 2 times.
Note (8) If there is a possibility that the clopyralid, aminopyralid and picloram concentration in
the sample solution exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of effluent with formic acid (1 +1000).
(9) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(10) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
(4.4) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0136 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Tandem Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) The measurement conditions of the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Tandem
Mass spectrometer: An example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance
Liquid Chromatograph/Tandem Mass Spectrometer is shown below. Set up the measurement
conditions considering it:
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column: A silica gel column (2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter, 50-mm - 150-mm long,
1.6-µm - 2.2-µm particle diameter column) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
(ii) Flow rate: 0.2 mL/min - 0.5 mL/min
(iii) Eluent: A: Formic acid (1+1000) B: Methanol:
(iv) Gradient: 0 min (5 %B) → 5 min (60 %B) → 6 min (95 %B) → 7 min (5 %B)
(v) Temperature of column bath: 40 °C
(vi) Injection volume: 5 µL
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Mode: Positive
(iii) Capillary voltage: 1.0 kV
(iv) Ion source temperature: 120 °C
(v) Desolvation temperature: 400 °C
(vi) Cone voltage: Shown in table 1
(vii) Collision energy: Shown in table 1
(viii) Monitor ion: Shown in table 1
674
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 5 µL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 2) - 3) (11).
2) Obtain the content of material subjected to measurement from the calibration curve to
calculate the concentration of the material subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
Note (11) Confirm that the ratio against the peak area ratio or height ratio of the standard
solution is within the range of about ± 30 %. In addition, the peak area ratio or height
ratio depends on the concentration.
Comment 6 Additive recovery testing of clopyralid, aminopyralid and picloram was conducted
using cow dung compost (2 kinds), composted sludge fertilizers containing cow dung
(2 kinds) and composted sludge fertilizers containing swine manure (1 kind), as a
result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 1000 µg/kg, 400 µg/kg and 40
µg/kg were 78.1 % - 90.0 %, 81.0 % - 117.6 % and 71.2 % - 101.3 % respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for testing method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limits of quantification of clopyralid, aminopyralid and
picloram of the test method are about 10 µg/kg respectively.
675
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI, Yuko SEKINE, Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Clopyralid in
Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS),
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 3, p. 51 - 59 (2010)
2) Hisanori ARAYA, Toshiharu YAGI, Yoshimi HASHIMOTO and Yuji SHIRAI:
Determination of Clopyralid, Aminopyralid and Picloram in Compost and Composted
Sludge Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS),
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 7, p. 1 - 9 (2014)
3) Kenji KOZUKA, Mayu OSHIMA, Yoshimi HASHIMOTO, Naoko TAMARU, and Yuji
SHIRAI: Determination of Clopyralid, Aminopyralid and Picloram in Compost and
Composted Sludge Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
(LC-MS/MS): A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 10, p. 61 - 71
(2017)
676
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for clopyralid and its derivative substances: The flow sheet for clopyralid and
its derivative substances in compost and composted sludge fertilizer is shown below:
677
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Peak No.
1
Intensity / arb.units
0 5
Retention Time / min
678
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 A standard reagent of clopyralid is sold by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd.,
Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Hayashi Pure Chemical Industries., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/ Mass Spectrometer: A high-performance
liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometer specified in JIS K 0136 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
(ii) Column: A 2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter 50-mm - 150-mm long 1.6-µm - 2.2-µm
particle diameter stainless steel column tube filled with silica gel to which octadecyl
chemically bonds. The specification is according to the mass spectrometer specification.
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Ion detection method: Selected Reaction Monitoring
b) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
c) Manifold
d) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 700 × g - 2000 × g.
e) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
f) Concentrator: An evaporator that can adjust to 40 ºC ± 2 ºC.
g) Copolymer cartridge column: A divinylbenzene-N-vinylpyrrolidone copolymer mini column
(200 mg or 335 mg)
h) Filter: A funnel for filtering under reduced pressure (compatible filter diameter: 60 mm)
i) Glass fiber filter paper: A filter paper made of glass fiber (filter diameter: 60 mm) that can
keep particle diameter 0.8 µm.
j) Test tube mixer: Vortex mixer
680
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 Column is sold under the production name ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18, etc.
Comment 4 A copolymer cartridge is sold under the production names such as Oasis HLB 6cc
(225 mg) and Oasis PRiME HLB Plus Short Cartridge (225 mg).
Comment 5 A funnel for filtering under reduced pressure is sold under the production name
KIRIYAMA Funnel SB-60, KIRIYAMA Funnel SU-60, etc.
Comment 6 A glass fiber filter is sold under the production name Glass filter paper GFP-60, etc.
Note (3) A vessel used for an extract procedure should be made of glass or polypropylene and it
can be used with a shaker and a centrifugal separator.
(4) A 100-mL - 200-mL ground-in stopper or screw cap Erlenmeyer flask can also be
used. In this case, however, suspension should be transferred to a ground-in stopper or
screw cap centrifugal precipitate tube before the procedure c) and e).
(5) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
(6) An Erlenmeyer flask can also be used. In this case, however, filtrate should be
transferred to a 100-mL volumetric flask before the procedure h).
Comment 5 Grind until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture to prepare the
test sample.
Note (7) Use a pressure reducing device in the procedure in (4.2) and (4.3) as appropriate.
(8) When making a pretreatment of many analytical samples, a free-standing type vessel
that can contain a solution with a liquid volume of 20 mL may be used. In this case,
681
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
instead of procedure d), put an effluent into a round-bottle flask, wash the vessel 2
times with 2.5 mL of methanol and add washing to the previous effluent.
(9) When using Oasis HLB 6cc (200 mg), add 5 mL of the extract 2 times.
Note (10) The part under 2 mL from the bottom forms a cone shape.
Note (11) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 2000 rpm of revolutions makes about 740 × g centrifugal
force. Confirm the permissible range of centrifugal force of a 10-mL cone shaped
bottle centrifugal precipitate tube with a screw cap used.
(12) When using a Pasteur pipet, use the same Pasteur pipet through a series of procedures
in c) - d).
682
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(4.5) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0136 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) The measurement conditions of the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass
spectrometer: An example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column: A silica gel column (2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter, 50-mm - 150-mm long,
1.6-µm - 2.2-µm particle diameter column) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
(ii) Flow rate: 0.2 mL/min - 0.5 mL/min
(iii) Eluent: A: Formic acid (1+1000) B: Methanol:
(iv) Gradient: 0 min (5 %B) → 5 min (60 %B) → 6 min (95 %B) → 7 min (5 %B)
(v) Temperature of column bath: 40 °C
(vi) Injection volume: 5 µL
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Mode: Positive
(iii) Capillary voltage: 1.0 kV
(iv) Ion source temperature: 120 °C
(v) Desolvation temperature: 400 °C
(vi) Cone voltage: 20 V
(vii) Collision energy: 20 eV for determination, 30 eV for validation
(viii)Monitor ion: Precursor ion m/z 192
Product ion m/z 146 for determination, m/z 110 for validation
683
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 5 µL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 2) - 3) (18).
2) Obtain the clopyralid content from the calibration curve to calculate clopyralid in the
analytical sample.
Note (18) Confirm that the ratio against the peak area ratio or height ratio of the standard
solution is within the range of about ± 30 %. In addition, the peak area ratio or height
ratio may depend on the concentration.
Comment 8 Additive recovery testing of clopyralid was conducted using cow dung compost (1
kinds), as a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 50 µg/kg, 10 µg/kg
and 2 µg/kg were 78.9 %, 78.3 % and 71.5 % respectively. In addition, additive
recovery testing of clopyralid was conducted using swine manure compost, poultry
manure compost and composted sludge fertilizer (1 sample for each), as a result, the
mean recovery rates at the additive level of 200µg/kg, 2 µg/kg and 80µg/kg were
88.6 %, 81.2 % and 94.2 % respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for testing method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 1.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of clopyralid of this test method is
about 2 µg/kg.
684
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) National Research and Development Agency: Institute for Agro-Environmental
Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization: High-sensitive analysis
for clopyralid in cow dung compost (Reference method)
< http://www.naro.affrc.go.jp/publicity_report/pub2016_or_later/pamphlet/tech-pamph/078229.html>
2) Kohei ITO, Kenji KOZUKA, Keisuke AOYAMA, Yuji SHIRAI: Validation of
Microanalysis Determination of Clopyralid in Compost and Composted Sludge
Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS),
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 11, p. 63 – 74 (2018)
3) Kohei ITO, Kenji KOZUKA, Satono AKIMOTO, Satoko SAKAIDA, Mayu OSHIMA,
Nobuhito NAKAMURA, Yuji SHIRAI: Microanalysis Determination of Clopyralid in
Compost and Composted Sludge Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass
Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): A Collaborative Study, Research Report of Fertilizer Vol.
11, p. 75 – 85 (2018)
(5) Flow sheet for clopyralid: The flow sheet for clopyralid in compost is shown below:
685
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
686
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
687
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Retention
688
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 A standard reagent of clopyralid is sold by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd.,
Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Hayashi Pure Chemical Industries., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer : A high-performance
liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometer specified in JIS K 0136 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
(ii) Column: A 2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter 50-mm - 150-mm long 1.6-µm - 2.2-µm
particle diameter stainless steel column tube filled with silica gel to which octadecyl
chemically bonds. The specification is according to the mass spectrometer specification.
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Ion detection method: Selected Reaction Monitoring
b) Vertical reciprocating shaker: A vertical reciprocating shaker that can shake a 250-mL
volumetric flask using an adapter to reciprocate vertically at 300 times/ minute (amplitude of
40 mm).
c) Manifold
d) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 700 × g - 2000 × g.
e) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g -
10000 × g.
f) Concentrator: An evaporator that can adjust to 40 ºC ± 2 ºC.
g) Copolymer cartridge column: A cartridge column whose syringe barrel (12 mL) is filled
with a divinylbenzene-N-vinylpyrrolidone copolymer (500 mg).
h) Zirconia coated silica gel cartridge column: A cartridge column whose syringe barrel (6
mL) is filled with silica gel (500 mg) coated by zirconia group.
Comment 3 A column is sold under the production name ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18, etc.
Comment 4 A copolymer cartridge is sold under the production names Oasis HLB 12cc (500 mg),
etc.
Comment 5 A zirconia coated silica gel cartridge column is commercially sold under production
names HybrideSPEⓇ-Phospholipid (500 mg), etc.
Note (3) A vessel used for an extract procedure should be made of glass or polypropylene and it
can be used with a shaker and a centrifugal separator.
(4) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g centrifugal
force.
Comment 6 Grind until it completely passes through a sieve of 500 µm aperture to prepare the
test sample.
Comment 7 In the procedure in (4.2), if there is a possibility that the solution cannot pass a
cartridge column due to clogging, conduct the following procedures.
In the procedure (4.2) c), transfer the solution after adding 3 mL of hydrochloric
acid (1 +11) to a 10-mL ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube, centrifuge at
about 740 × g for about 5 minutes (7) and put the supernatant in a cartridge column.
After that, continue the procedures. In addition, add the “washing” in the procedure
in (4.2) d) to the previous ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube, shake to mix
using a test tube mixer (vortex mixer), centrifuge at about 740 × g for about 5
minutes (7) and put the supernatant to a cartridge column. After that, continue the
procedures.
Note (5) Use a pressure reducing device in the procedure in (4.2) and (4.3) as appropriate.
(6) The same Pasteur pipet, etc. should be used in a series of procedures.
(7) 16.5-cm of rotor radius and 2000 rpm of revolutions makes about 740 × g centrifugal
force. The permissible range of centrifugal force of a 10-mL ground-in stopper
centrifugal precipitate tube used to be confirmed.
691
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (8) When making a pretreatment of the multicomponent of an analytical sample, a 10-mL
test tube may be used. In this case, before the procedure in e), put the eluate into a
50-mL round-bottle flask, wash the previous test tube 2 times with 2.5 mL of
acetonitrile and add the washing to the previous eluate.
(9) Prepare at the time of usage. Using the solution that has passed one day after the
preparation affects the measurement results.
(10) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(11) 7.2-cm – 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
(12) If there is a possibility that the clopyralid concentration in the sample solution exceed
the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount of the
sample solution with formic acid (1 +1000).
Comment 8 Instead of the procedures in (4.3) f) - g), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(pore size: no more than 0.5 µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the filtrate can be
the sample solution.
(4.4) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0136 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the High-Performance
Liquid Chromatograph/ Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) The measurement conditions of the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass
spectrometer: An example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column: A silica gel column (2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter, 50-mm - 150-mm long,
1.6-µm - 2.2-µm particle diameter column) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
(ii) Flow rate: 0.2 mL/min - 0.5 mL/min
(iii) Eluent: A: Formic acid (1+1000) B: Methanol:
(iv) Gradient: 0 min (5 %B) → 5 min (60 %B) → 6 min (95 %B) → 7 min (5 %B)
(v) Temperature of column bath: 40 °C
692
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 5 µL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1) - 2) (14).
2) Obtain the content of material subjected to measurement from the calibration curve to
calculate the concentration of the material subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
Note (13) According to the sensitivity of an instrument, ion for determination may be regarded
as ion for validation and vice versa.
(14) Confirm that the ratio against the peak area ratio or height ratio of the standard
solution is within the range of about ± 30 %. In addition, the peak area ratio or height
ratio depends on the concentration.
Comment 9 The comparison of the measurement value (yi : 1.5 µg/kg – 88.5 µg/kg) of
microanalysis for clopyralid (2) and the measurement value (xi) of microanalysis for
clopyralid (1) was conducted to evaluate trueness using cow dung compost (5
samples), horse dung compost (2 samples), swine manure compost (4 samples),
poultry manure compost (4 samples) and composted sludge fertilizer (5 samples). As
a result, a regression equation was y=−0.43+1.005x and its correlation coefficient (r)
was 0.996.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using compost and composted
sludge fertilizers were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of clopyralid of this test method is
about 2 µg/kg.
693
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Nobuhito NAKAMURA, Kenji KOZUKA and Yuji SHIRAI: Improvement of
Microanalysis Determination of Clopyralid in Compost and Composted Sludge
Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS),
Research Report of Fertilizer Vol. 12, p. 69 – 83 (2019)
694
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for clopyralid: The flow sheet for clopyralid in compost and composted sludge
fertilizer is shown below:
695
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
696
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fluid home garden-use compound fertilizer and fluid compound
fertilizer. This testing method is classified as Type B and its symbol is 8.3.1.a-2017 or AG-C-1.a-1.
Dissolve respective agricultural chemicals in fertilizers with acetonitrile and water, and extract.
Refine by using 2 kinds of cleanup cartridge, and then measure with a High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph/Tandem Mass Spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) to obtain compounds subjected to
analysis in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in
Comment 3.
µg/mL) to a 100-mL volumetric flask and add methanol up to the marked line.
p) Mixture standard solution for calibration curve preparation (50 ng/mL - 500 ng/mL): In
the case of usage, put 2.5 mL - 25 mL of mixture standard solution (1000 ng/ mL) in 50-mL
volumetric flasks step-by-step, and add methanol up to the marked line.
q) Mixture standard solution for calibration curve preparation (5 ng/mL - 50 ng/mL): In
the case of usage, put 2.5 mL - 25 mL of mixture standard solution (100 ng/ mL) in 50-mL
volumetric flasks step-by-step, and add methanol up to the marked line.
(4) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer : A high-performance
liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometer specified in JIS K 0136 that satisfies the
following requirements.
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
(ii) Column: A 2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter 50-mm - 150-mm long 1.6-µm - 3.0-µm
particle diameter stainless steel column tube filled with silica gel to which octadecyl
chemically bonds. The specification is according to the mass spectrometer specification
(3)
.
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Ion detection method: Selected Reaction Monitoring
b) Ultrasonic generator: An ultrasonic washer can be used.
c) Concentrator: An evaporator whose temperature can be adjusted up to 40 ºC.
d) Porous diatomaceous earth cartridge column: A column that is filled with the porous
diatomaceous earth (capacity: 5 mL) (4)
e) Graphite carbon-NH2 laminate cartridge column: A 6-mL cylinder on which 500 mg of
graphite carbon and 500 mg of aminopropyl silylation silica gel is laminated (5).
Note (3) The column is sold under the names ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18, etc.
(4) The column is sold under the names Chem Elut (5 mL), etc.
(5) The column is sold under the names Envi-carb/LC-NH2 (500 mg/500 mg, 6 mL), etc.
Note (6) After measuring the specific gravity of sample, calculate the concentration of materials
subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
(7) Note that the volume of the solution may expand as a result of ultra-sonication. It is
698
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 2 The specific gravity (density) can be calculated by placing a 10-mL volumetric flask
on an electric balance, aligning the scale to zero, putting 5.00 mL of the analytical
sample in the volumetric flask and reading the weighing value.
Note (8) Confirm the solution to elute before conducting the testing.
(9) There is a possibility for agricultural chemicals to vaporize if it is exsiccated
excessively.
(5.4) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0136 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer used in measurement.
a) The measurement conditions of the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass
spectrometer: An example of measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph
(i) Column: A silica gel column (2-mm - 3-mm inner diameter, 50-mm - 150-mm long,
1.6-µm - 3.0-µm particle diameter column) to which octadecyl chemically bonds.
(ii) Flow rate: 0.2 mL/min - 0.5 mL/min
699
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(iii) Eluent: A: Ammonium formate solution (0.1 mmol/L) − formic acid solution (0.1 v/v%)
[1+1]
B: Acetonitrile formate solution (0.1 v/v%)
(iv) Gradient: 0 min (50 %B) → 15 min (95 %B) → 20 min (98 %B) → 30 min (50 %B)
(v) Temperature of column bath: 40 °C
(vi) Injection volume: 5 µL
2) Mass Spectrometer
(i) Ionization method: Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) method
(ii) Mode: Positive
(iii) Capillary voltage: 3.0 kV
(iv) Ion source temperature: 120 °C
(v) Desolvation temperature: 400 °C
(vi) Cone voltage: Shown in Table 1
(vii) Collision energy: Shown in Table 1
(viii)Monitor ion: Shown in Table 1
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 5 µL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 2) - 3) (12).
2) Obtain the content of materials subjected to measurement from the calibration curve of the
peak area or height to calculate materials subjected to measurement in the analytical sample.
Note (12) Confirm that the ratio against the peak area ratio or height ratio of the standard
solution is within the range of about ± 30 %. In addition, the peak area ratio or height
ratio depends on the concentration.
700
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5.5) Calculation
Calculate the respective concentration of agricultural chemicals in the analytical sample by the
following formula. in the analytical sample by the following formula:
= (A × B × 10) /C
Comment 3 Recovery testing was conducted using fluid home garden-use compound fertilizer (3
kinds) and fluid compound fertilizer (2 kinds), as a result, the mean recovery rates at
the additive level of 4000 µg/kg and 400 µg/kg (However, 4000 µg/kg and 400 µg/kg
of pyrethrin contain total of pyrethrin I/II) were 77.0 % - 104.5 % and 85.6 % -
107.9 % respectively.
Additionally, results from a collaborative study for test method validation and its
analysis are shown in Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification for respective agrichemicals of the test
method is about 10 µg/kg.
701
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Toshiharu YAGI, Masayuki YAMANISHI, Yuji SHIRAI: Simultaneous Determination
of Agricultural chemicals in Fluid Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass
Spectrometry, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 4, p. 36 - 48 (2011)
2) Toshiharu YAGI, Masayuki YAMANISHI, Yuji SHIRAI and Masato SHIBATA:
Simultaneous Determination of Six Kind of Agricultural Chemicals in Fluid Fertilizer
by Liquid Chromatograph-Tandem Mass Spectrometer (LC-MS/MS): A Collaborative
Study, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 5, p. 48 - 59 (2012)
702
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(6) Flow sheet for simultaneous analysis of 6 kinds of agrichemicals: The flow sheet for
simultaneous analysis of 6 kinds of agrichemicals in fertilizer is shown below.
703
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Peak No.
1
4
Intensity / arb.units
6
0
7
0 Retention Time / min 20 0 Retention Time / min 20
704
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(2) Summary
This testing method is applicable to compost and straw, raw materials of compost. This testing
method is classified as Type D and its symbol is 8.3.2.a-2017 or AG-C-2.a-1.
Extract respective agricultural chemicals in fertilizers or raw materials with acetonitrile and water,
refine by using a porous diatomaceous earth column, a gel permeation chromatograph and a
synthetic magnesium silicate cartridge column, and then measure with an electron capture detector
equipped gas chromatograph to obtain compounds subjected to analysis in an analytical sample. In
addition, the performance of this testing method is shown in Comment 7.
(4) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) Gas Chromatograph (GC): GC specified in JIS K 0114 that satisfies the following
requirements.
1) Sample injector: An injector that enables split less system.
2) Capillary column: A capillary column (0.25-mm inner diameter and 30-m long) made of
fused silica. 14 % cyanopropylphenyl -86 % dimethyl polysiloxane chemically bonds to the
inner surface of a capillary column with 0.25 µm thickness.
3) Detection unit: Electron capture detector (ECD)
b) Gel Permeation Chromatograph (GPC): Preparative liquid chromatograph specified in JIS
K 0135 that satisfies the following requirements. No detector is required.
1) Sample injector: A sample injector that can inject 5 mL of sample solution.
2) Column: A 20-mm inner diameter 300-mm long stainless-steel column tube filled with
styrendivynylbenzene copolymer system hard gel
3) Guard column: A 20-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled
with styrendivynylbenzene copolymer system hard gel
4) Fraction collector: A fraction collector that can set up a fraction to which agrichemical
components elute.
c) Shaking apparatus
d) Concentrator: An evaporator whose temperature can be adjusted up to 40 ºC.
e) Filter: A funnel for filtering under reduced pressure (compatible filter diameter: 60 mm)
f) Porous diatomaceous earth cartridge column: A column that is filled with the porous
diatomaceous earth (capacity: 20 mL).
g) Synthetic magnesium silicate cartridge column: A cartridge column that is filled with 910
mg of synthetic magnesium silicate.
h) Membrane filters: Made of PTFE (pore size is no more than 0.5 μm)
Comment 2 Column for GC is sold under the production name DB-1701, Rtx-1701, SPB-1701,
etc. A column which has actually isolated compounds subjected to analysis should be
used.
Comment 3 GPC is an aliquot liquid chromatograph that collects a fraction of a material
subjected to measurement sieved and isolated by packing materials of the column for
GPC according to the size of the molecule of the material. A column for GPC is sold
under the production name Shodex CLNpak EV-2000 AC, etc. In addition, a guard
column for GPC is sold under the production name Shodex CLNpak EV-G AC, etc.
Comment 4 A funnel for filtering under educed pressure is sold under the production name
KIRIYAMA Funnel SB-60, KIRIYAMA Funnel SU-60, etc.
Comment 5 A porous diatomaceous earth cartridge is commercially sold under production name
Chem Elut (20 mL), etc.
Comment 6 Synthetic magnesium silicate is commercially sold under the production names such
as Sep-Pak Florisil Plus Long Cartridge (910 mg).
706
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 7 A membrane filter is sold under the production name HLC-DISK 25 Solvent system
(pore size: 0.45 µm), DISMIC 25JP050, Millex FH (diameter: 25 mm, pore size:
0.45 µm), etc.
c) After concentrating the eluate under reduced pressure in a water bath of no more than 40 ºC
until most of the eluate exsiccates, send a nitrogen gas to exsiccate the eluate (3), and add 2 mL
of hexane to dissolve the residue.
Note (4) If there is a possibility that the concentration of respective agricultural chemicals in
the sample solution exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of the sample solution with 2,2,4-trimethylpentane−acetone
(4+1).
(5.5) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0114 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the Gas
Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) The measurement conditions of the Gas Chromatograph: An example of measurement
conditions for the Gas Chromatograph is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Sample injection method: split less injection method (1min)
2) Temperature of sample injector: 250 °C
3) Capillary column: A capillary column (0.25-mm inner diameter, 30-m long, 0.25 µm layer
thickness) made of fused silica. 14 % cyanopropylphenyl−86 % dimethyl polysiloxane
chemically bonds to the inner surface of the capillary column with 0.25 µm thickness.
4) Column bath temperature: 60 °C (1 min) → (20 °C/min) → 180 °C→ (2 °C/min) →
260 °C→ (5 °C/min) → 275 °C (1 min)
5) Carrier gas: helium, Flow rate: 1.5 mL/min
6) Addition gas: Nitrogen, Flow rate: 60 mL/min
7) Detection unit: Electron capture detector (ECD)
8) Detector temperature: 280 °C
c) Sample measurement
708
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Tomoharu NOZAKI: Determination of Organic Chloride Pesticides in Composts using
Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD), Research Report of
Fertilizers, Vol. 10, p. 41 - 60 (2017)
709
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(6) Flow sheet for simultaneous analysis of chloride pesticides: The flow sheet for
simultaneous analysis of chloride pesticides in fertilizer is shown below.
710
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
711
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
8.4 Sodium
8.4.a Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
(1) Summary
This testing method is applicable to fertilizers containing organic matters. This testing method is
classified as Type D and its symbol is 8.4.a-2017 or Na.a-1.
Pretreat an analytical sample with incineration and hydrochloric acid, spray into an acetylene−air
flame, and measure the atomic absorption with sodium at a wavelength of 589.0 nm or 589.6 nm to
obtain sodium (Na) in an analytical sample. In addition, the performance of this testing method is
shown in Comment 3.
Comment 1 Instead of the sodium standard solution in (2) b), a sodium standard solution (Na 0.1
mg/mL 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry traceable to
National Metrology can also be used.
Note (4) Example of charring and incineration procedure: After raising the temperature from
room temperature to about 250 °C in 30 minutes to 1 hour, continue heating for about
1 hour and further raise to 550 °C in 1 to 2 hours.
Comment 2 The procedure in (4.1) is the same as the procedure in (4.1.2) in 4.2.1.a.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0121 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the Atomic
absorption spectrometer used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the Atomic absorption spectrometer: Set up the measurement
conditions for the Atomic absorption spectrometer considering the following:
Analytical line wavelength: 589.0 nm or 589.6 nm
b) Calibration curve preparation
1) Spray the sodium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation into a flame, and read the indicated value at a
wavelength of 589.0 nm or 589.6 nm.
2) Prepare a curve for the relationship between the sodium concentration and the indicated value
of the sodium standard solutions for the calibration curve preparation and the blank test
solution for the calibration curve preparation.
c) Sample measurement
1) Put a predetermined amount of the sample solution (the equivalents of 0.1 mg - 1 mg as Na) (5)
in a 100-mL volumetric flask.
2) Add hydrochloric acid (1+23) to the marked line.
3) Subject to the same procedure as in b) 1) to read the indicated value.
4) Obtain the sodium content from the calibration curve, and calculate the sodium (Na) in the
analytical sample.
Note (5) Sample a predetermined amount of sample solution according to the device model in
Note (2).
Comment 3 Additive recovery testing with triplicates measurement was conducted using fish
caked powder, fish waste processed fertilizers, rape seed meal and its powder,
composted sludge fertilizers and compost, as a result, the mean recovery rate at the
additive concentration of sodium in the range of 1 % (mass fraction) - 10 % (mass
fraction) was 97.0 % - 103 %.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using fish caked powder
(sample to which sodium chloride is added) and compost to evaluate precision were
analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the calculation results of
713
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Kimie KATO, Masaki CHIDA and Toshifumi FUJITA: Method Validation for
Determination of Sodium in Fertilizer by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry , Research
Report of Fertilizers, Vol. 8, p. 61 - 69 (2015)
(5) Flow sheet for sodium testing method: The flow sheet for sodium testing method in
fertilizers is shown below:
Sample solution
714
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Sample solution
Aliquot
100-mL volumetric flask, water
(predetermined amount)
←Hydrochloric acid (1+23) (up to the marked line)
Measurement Atomic absorption spectrometer
(589.0 nm or 589.6 nm)
715
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 1 Guanylurea sulfate is commercially sold by Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. and Tokyo
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 7.5-mm inner diameter 100-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
weak acid ion-exchange resin.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45ºC.
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 190
nm.
b) Magnetic stirrer:
c) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
716
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
× g.
Comment 2 A column is sold under the production name Asahipak ES-502C 7C, etc.
Note (3) If there is a possibility that the guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N) concentration in the
sample solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of supernatant with water.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement.
(5) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Note (6) If there is a possibility that the guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N) concentration in the sample
solution will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a
predetermined amount of precisely adjusted solution with water.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of a
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC) used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for a High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC): An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A weak acid ion-exchange resin column (4.0-mm - 7.5-mm inner diameter,
100-mm - 150-mm long, 5-µm – 10-µm particle diameter)
2) Column bath temperature: 40 °C
3) Eluent (1): Dissolve 3.92 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.12 g of phosphoric acid
in water to make 1000 mL. Filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than
717
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N) content from the peak height using the calibration
curve to calculate guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N) in the analytical sample.
Comment 5 This testing method enables the simultaneous measurement of biuret nitrogen (B-N),
urea nitrogen (U-N), dicyandiamide nitrogen (Dd-N), guanidine urea (Gd-N) and
guanylurea nitrogen (GU-N). In that case, see 5.10.a Comment 5.
Comment 6 Additive recovery testing was conducted using a preparation sample for a guanylurea
fertilizer (one brand). As a result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of
36.7 % (mass fraction), 35.2 % (mass fraction) and 33.4 % (mass fraction) were
103.8 %, 104.6 % and 105.6 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using a guanylurea fertilizer to
evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table 1 shows the
calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability. Additionally, results
from a collaborative study for testing method validation and its analysis are shown in
Table 2.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about 0.006 %
(mass fraction).
718
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Masahiro ECHI, Yasuharu KIMURA and Yuji SHIRAI: Determination of Urea Nitrogen,
Biuret Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea
Nitrogen in Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: A
Single-Laboratory Validation, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 72 - 85 (2017)
2) Norio FUNAKI and Yasuharu KIMURA: Determination of Urea Nitrogen, Biuret
Nitrogen, Dicyandiamide Nitrogen, Guanidine Nitrogen and Guanyl urea Nitrogen in
Fertilizer by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): A Collaborative Study,
Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 10, p. 86 - 100 (2017)
719
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for guanylurea nitrogen in fertilizers is shown
below:
720
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Reference: An example of the chromatogram of the standard solution for calibration curve
preparation of guanylurea nitrogen is shown below.
Peak name
(1) Urea nitrogen (2) Biuret nitrogen (3) Dicyandiamide nitrogen
(4) Guanidine nitrogen (5) Guanylurea nitrogen
Measurement conditions for HPLC
Column: Asahipak ES-502C 7C (7.5-mm inner diameter, 100-mm long, 9-μm
particle diameter)
Other conditions are according to the example of HPLC measurement conditions in
(4.2) a)
721
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(3) Apparatus and instruments: Apparatus and instruments are shown below.
a) High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: A high-performance liquid chromatograph
specified in JIS K 0124 that satisfies the following requirements.
1) Column: A 4.6-mm inner diameter 250-mm long stainless steel column tube filled with
silica gel, to which octadecyl, ion-exchange group for strong acidity and strong basic
anion-exchange group of a 3-µm particle diameter chemically bond.
2) Column bath: A column bath whose temperature can be adjusted to 30 ºC - 45 ºC.
722
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3) Detection unit: An absorptiometric detector that can measure at a wavelength around 290
nm.
b) Water bath: Water bath that can be adjusted to 60 ºC ± 2 ºC.
c) Magnetic stirrer
d) Centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 1700 × g.
e) High speed centrifugal separator: A centrifugal separator that can work at 8000 × g - 10000
× g.
Comment 1 A column is sold under the production name Scherzo SS-C18, etc.
Note (2) Use a silicone stopper instead of a glass stopper as the solution is heated.
(3) Steam easily expels silicon stoppers, so while lightly holding down the stopper from
the top with your finger, shake it so that the water drops on the inside of the flask
come down as much as possible. In addition, conduct this procedure before and after
the heating procedure.
(4) The ground-in stopper centrifugal precipitate tube should be made of polypropylene,
etc. to not affect the measurement
(5) 7.2 cm - 18.9-cm of rotor radius and 3000 rpm of revolutions makes about 1700 × g
centrifugal force.
(6) If there is a possibility that the uric acid (U-acid) concentration in the sample solution
will exceed the maximum limit of the calibration curve, dilute a predetermined amount
of supernatant with phosphate solution.
(7) 7.2-cm - 8.9-cm of rotor radius and 10000 rpm of revolutions makes about 8100 × g -
10000 × g centrifugal force.
Comment 2 Instead of the procedures in (4.1) e), it is allowed to filter with a membrane filter
(pore size: no more than 0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE and the filtrate can be
the sample solution.
(4.2) Measurement: Conduct the measurement as indicated in JIS K 0124 and as shown below.
Specific measurement procedures are according to the operation method of the
High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph used in measurement.
a) Measurement conditions for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph: An
example of measurement conditions is shown below. Set up the measurement conditions
considering it:
1) Column: A silica gel column (4.6-mm inner diameter, 250-mm long, 3-μm particle diameter),
to which octadecyl, ion-exchange group for strong acidity and strong basic anion-exchange
723
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 3 Eluent can be prepared as follows. Dissolve 15.4 g of ammonium acetate with water
to make 1000 mL and store in a refrigerator. At the time of usage, dilute a
predetermined volume of the solution by a factor of 10 to mix with methanol of
volume ratio 1/9 and filter with a membrane filter (aperture diameter: no more than
0.5-µm) made of hydrophilic PTFE.
c) Sample measurement
1) Subject 10 μL of the sample solution to the same procedure as in b) 1)
2) Obtain the uric acid (U-A) content from the peak area or height using the calibration curve to
calculate the uric acid (U-A) in the analytical sample.
Comment 4 In addition to uric acid, allantoin and allantoic acid can be measured simultaneously
by this measurement method (when using a Scherzo SS-C18 column). Note that the
detection wavelength of allantoin and allantoic acid is 210 nm.
Comment 5 Additive recovery testing was conducted using one brand of a compound fertilizer, a
composted sludge fertilizer, a mixed compost compound fertilizer and compost. As a
result, the mean recovery rates at the additive level of 0.1 % (mass fraction), 0.01 %
(mass fraction) and 0.005 % (mass fraction) were 92.4 % - 101.8 %, 85.3 % -
105.0 % and 92.5 % - 114.1 % respectively.
The results of the repeatability tests on different days using one brand of a compound
fertilizer, a composted sludge fertilizer, a mixed compost compound fertilizer and
compost to evaluate precision were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Table
1 shows the calculation results of intermediate precision and repeatability.
Note that the minimum limit of quantification of this testing method is about
0.0008 % (mass fraction).
724
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
References
1) Norio FUNAKI: Determination of Uric Acid in Fertilizer by High Performance Liquid
Chromatography, Research Report of Fertilizer, Vol. 11, p. 86 – 105 (2018)
725
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(5) Flow sheet for testing method: The flow sheet for uric acid in fertilizers is shown below:
Reference: An example of the chromatogram of the standard solution for calibration curve
preparation of uric acid is shown below.
Reference diagram: HPLC chromatogram of the uric acid standard solution for
calibration curve preparation (50 µg/mL)
726
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
(1) Purposes
This article explains the procedure to validate characteristics of testing methods which will be listed
in the Testing Methods of Fertilizers. In addition, when testing institutes conduct a test which is
not included in the Testing Methods of Fertilizers, a procedure to evaluate the validity of the test
method should conform to a method stipulated in this article.
Additionally, this article targets chemical testing methods. However, this article is not applicable to
the extraction method of the content of effective figures (acid-, citric acid- and water-soluble) in a
powdery sample or a solidified fertilizer.
Comment 1 The contents of effective figures (acid-, citric acid- and water-soluble) are stipulated
in a notification of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. In addition,
the change of measurement conditions such as an extraction temperature may affect
an observed value in some cases. Therefore, no changes will be implemented in the
extraction method of the contents of effective figures in a powdery fertilizer and a
solidified fertilizer for the present and the application of this article is limited to the
change of a measurement method (including refining of extract, etc.).
Note (1) In reality, the certified value of a certified reference material, the chemical
composition of a compound, the added content of a reference material, etc. and others.
(2) Reagents, etc. containing a target matrix can be used in the case that there is no
distribution fertilizer used as a blank sample for a recovery test and the confirmation
of the minimum limit of quantification, etc.
(3) Mix a component subjected to analysis with a mortar, etc. to sufficient uniformity
(4) In the case of adding a standard solution, vaporize the solvent sufficiently conducting
measures such as letting it stand for one night.
(5) A fertilizer containing components subjected to analysis whose formation or form
changed due to a chemical or physical process (a granulation process, etc.).
the simultaneous measurement of multi components, confirm that adjacent peaks are sufficiently
separated (6).
Note (6) Resolution (R) should be 1.0 or more at minimum though 1.5 or more is preferable.
Comment 2 Resolution (R) is used as a separation indicator of peaks. If Resolution (R) is 1.5 or
more, the adjacent two peaks are sufficiently separated and they do not affect a
measurement, whether a peak height or peak area is used. If Resolution (R) is 1.0 or
more, there is no problem if peak height is used for a measurement even if the
adjacent two peaks overlap to some extent.
Resolution (R) can be obtained using a peak width by the formula (1a). In addition, if
the peak is a normal distribution, it can be obtained using a peak width at half height
by the formula (1b). With the data processing device of a chromatograph, the formula
(1b) is often used to obtain Resolution (R).
𝑡 −𝑡
Resolution (𝑅) = ・・・(1a)
1
(𝑊 + 𝑊 )
2×
1.18 × (𝑡 − 𝑡 )
Resolution (𝑅) = ・・・(1b)
𝑊 ,
+𝑊 ,
Note (7) A test method such as Molecular absorption spectrometry, Atomic absorption
spectrometry or Titration analysis which does not isolate with a measurement
instrument.
(8) Absorbance, titer, etc.
729
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
calculation of a regression equation by the least square method. Moreover make the plot of residuals
(12)
in respective levels.
Note (9) The blank test solution for the calibration curve preparation can be included.
(10) In order to avoid nonlinear confusion due to the variation of sensitivity, etc., conduct
measurements randomly for each replicate determination.
(11) Absorbance, fluorescence intensity, peak height, peak area, etc.
(12) The difference between a signal obtained by measurement and a signal estimated using
a regression equation.
Comment 3 It is recommended that the 95% confidence interval of an intercept (a) includes the
origin (0).
Comment 4 Though it is usable if the coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.99 or more, it is
recommended that the coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.999 or more for a precise
analysis. If it is less than 0.99, use the equation of a higher order or study the
conversion of a numerical value.
Comment 5 The mean of residuals is 0 and the residuals indicate a random pattern.
Comment 6 A warning limit is given using the formula (2) which is obtained from a collaborative
study for the characterization of a certified reference material.
𝑠 𝑠
= 𝜇 ± 2 × (𝑠 −𝑠 )+ =𝜇±2× 𝑠 + ・・・(2)
𝑛 𝑛
µ: Certified value
𝑠 : Reproducibility standard deviation in a collaborative study
𝑠: Repeatability standard deviation in a collaborative study (14)
n: The number of analytical samples to repeatability test
𝑠 : Pure between-laboratory standard deviation in a collaborative study
730
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Note (13) The evaluation procedure of the difference between a measurement result and a
certified value (characteristic value) is shown in Reference 1 Procedure to compare
an observed value and a certified value.
(14) It may be expressed as within-laboratory standard deviation (𝑠 ) in some cases.
a) In case 12 or more samples are available: Conduct respective tests of 12 or more test
samples composed of addition samples, natural contamination samples or distribution samples
according to a new test method and a standard test method, create the correlation chart of
observed values with two methods for each sample and calculate the inclination (b) and the
intercept (a) of a regression line, and a correlation coefficient (r). Further confirm a prediction
interval.
However, in case that the width between the minimum and the maximum observed value is
small, conduct the paired samples t-test to confirm that a significant difference is not
observed.
Comment 7 It is recommended that the 95% confidence interval of an inclination (b) includes 1,
the 95% confidence interval of an intercept (a) includes the origin (0) and the
correlation coefficient (r) is no less than 0.99.
b) In case fewer samples are available: With regard to 3 or more test samples of different
concentration, conduct respective repeatability addition tests using 4 analytical samples
according to the new test method and a standard test method, confirm the homoscedasticity of
the results of 2 groups and conduct a t-test for each concentration to confirm that significant
difference is not observed under the two-sided significant level of 5%.
(3.4.3) In case neither certified reference material nor other validated test methods are usable
For 3 or more test samples of different concentration, conduct respective repeatability tests using
3 analytical samples and evaluate by obtaining the recovery using the mean of the observed values.
The criteria of the trueness are shown in Separate sheet: The target of trueness and the criteria
of precision in respective concentration levels.
Note (15) In case the number of laboratories which have required facility/instruments is limited,
731
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Comment 8 In case permissible content and equivalent level is 1.0 mg/kg or more, the Minimum
Limit of Quantification (LOQ) of harmful components and restricted components,
etc. should be no more than 1/5 of the permissible content and equivalent level. In
case permissible content and equivalent level is no more than 1.0 mg/kg, the
Minimum Limit of Quantification (LOQ) should be no more than 2/5 of the
permissible content. Moreover, it is recommended that the Minimum Limit of
Quantification of main components/major components and material components
should be no more than 1/5 of minimum volume to be contained and the minimum
content of a distribution fertilizer. In addition, in case the Minimum Limit of
Quantification exceeds 1/5 of these minimum volumes, conduct the above-mentioned
repeatability test, confirm the Minimum Limit of Quantification and state clearly the
fact in the applicable range of a test method.
Comment 9 There are some methods to estimate Minimum Limit of Quantification. The methods
differ depending on whether they are based on an instrument analysis or not and
depending on instruments used. A method different from the methods shown in
(3.6.1) to (3.6.3) is allowed. However, the definition of a method and Minimum
Limit of Quantification by the method should be clearly stated.
732
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
10 × 𝑠
Estimated value of Minimum Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = ・・・(4)
𝑏
Comment 10 There are some methods to estimate Minimum Limit of Detection. The methods
differ depending on whether they are based on an instrument analysis or not and
depending on instruments used. A method different from the methods shown in
(3.7.1) to (3.7.3) is allowed. However, the definition of a method and Minimum
Limit of Detection by the method should be clearly stated.
Note (20) In case of a repeatability test using 7 analytical samples, the value is 1.94. In case of
using 10 analytical samples, the value is 1.83.
733
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
In case a calibration curve is linear, estimate Minimum Limit of Detection (LOD) in an analytical
sample by the formula (6) using the standard deviation of the residuals of a calibration curve or
estimated signals in concentration 0 and the inclination (b) of a calibration curve.
(3.8.1) Common variation factors: Typical variation factors common to various kinds of test
methods are as follows.
a) Extraction time, extraction temperature
b) Stability of a test solution in respective steps
c) Reagent’s grade
References
1) JIS K 0211: Technical terms for analytical chemistry (General part) (2013)
2) JIS K 0214: Technical terms for analytical chemistry (Chromatography part) (2013)
734
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
3) JIS Q 0035: Reference materials−General and statistical principles for certification (2008)
4) JIS Z 8101-2: Statistics−Vocabulary and symbols−Part 2: Statistical quality control terms
(1999)
5) JIS Z 8402-1: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results -
Part 1: General principles and definitions (1999)
6) ALINORM 09/32/23 Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Prorgamme: Repot of the Thirtieth
Session of the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling, Codex
Alimentarius Commission Thirty-second Session (2009)
7) ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and
Methodology Q2(R1), International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) (2005)
8) AOAC Official Methods of Analysis Appendix K: Guidelines for Dietary Supplements
and Botanicals, AOAC INTERNATIONAL (2012)
9) JIS K 0114: General rules for gas chromatography (2012)
10) JIS K 0124: General rules for high performance liquid chromatography (2011)
11) The notification by the Director of Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical
and Food Safety Bureau, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: “Guideline on
Bioanalytical Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Development”, July 11, 2013,
Yaku-shoku-Sinsa-Hatsu-0711 No.1 (2013)
12) Thompson, M., Ellison, S.L.R, Wood, R., : Harmonized guidelines for
single-laboratoryvalidation of methods of analysis, Pure & Appl. Chem. 74 (5), 835-855
(2002)
13) CLSI EP9 A2 Ed. 2, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples,
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2002)
14) Linsinger, T.,: Comparison of a measurement result with the certified value, European
Reference Materials' application note 1, European Commission - Joint Research Centre
Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) (2010)
15) Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme: Procedural manual Twenty-second edition,
Codex Almentarius Commission (2013)
16) AOAC Official Methods of Analysis Appendix K: Guidelines for Dietary Supplements
and Botanicals, AOAC INTERNATIONAL (2005)
17) Horwitz , W.: Protocol for the Design , Conduct and Interpretation of
Method-Performance Studies,Pure & Appl. Chem.,67 (2), 331 - 343 (1995)
735
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Obtain the total mean (m) of the replication test results and the certified value (μ), and the
absolute value (𝛥 ) of the difference of the two values by the formula (R1.1). Next, obtain the
standard uncertainty (𝑢 ) of the certified value of a certified reference material by the formula
(R1.2), and obtain the standard uncertainty (𝑢 ) of the total mean by the formula (R1.3). Calculate
the combined standard uncertainty (𝑢 (∆ ) ) of 𝛥 by the formula (R1.4) using the obtained 𝑢
and 𝑢 . Further, calculate an expanded uncertainty (𝑈∆ ) by the formula (R1.5) using the
coverage factor (𝑘 = 2).
Compare 𝛥 and 𝑈∆ to confirm that the criterion (the formula (R1.6)) is satisfied, that is,
𝛥 is no more than 𝑈∆ .
The absolute value (𝛥 ) of the difference of the total mean of repeatability test results
and a certified value= |𝑚 − 𝜇| ・・・(R1.1)
𝑈 %
The standard uncertainty (𝑢 ) of the certified value = ・・・(R1.2)
𝑘
The standard uncertainty of the measurement of a total mean (𝑢 )
𝑠
= ・・・(R1.3)
√𝑛
= 2×𝑢 (∆ ) ・・・(R1.5)
Criterion 𝛥 ≦ 𝑈∆ ・・・(R1.6)
736
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
𝜇: True value
𝑁 0, 𝜎( ) :
737
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
𝑠
Repeatability relative standard deviation (𝑅𝑆𝐷 , %) = × 100 ・・・ (R2.9)
𝑚
𝑠
Reproducibility relative standard deviation (𝑅𝑆𝐷 , %) = × 100 ・・・ (R2.10)
𝑚
Note (1) In case 𝑉 < 𝑉 , assume 𝑉 = 𝑉 (that is, the pure between-laboratory variance
(𝑠 )= 0 in the formula (R2.5)) and let the formula (R2.6) form 𝑠 = 𝑠 .
(2) The rounding of a numerical value is not executed in the middle of the calculation.
(3) The mean and the standard deviation are expressed rounding to the digit of the
observed value. The relative standard deviation is expressed rounding to the first
decimal place.
(3) Calculation procedure of intermediate precision and repeatability by the replicate test
results on different days
(3.1) Estimation of a true value and a variance
In an actual statistical analysis, a true value (μ), a true test day variance (σ(T)2) and a true
repeatability variance (σr2) are unknown. Therefore, they are replaced with estimated values
obtained from the repeatability test results on different days and are expressed as a mean (m), test
days variance (s(T)2) and a repeatability variance (sr2) respectively.
739
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Conduct one-way analysis of variance for the replicate test results on different days to obtain the
unbiased variance (V) of respective variation factors in Table 3.
740
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
𝑠
Repeatability relative standard deviation (𝑅𝑆𝐷 , %) = × 100 ・・・ (R2.16)
𝑚
𝑠
Internediate relative standard deviation 𝑅𝑆𝐷 ( ) , % = × 100 ・・・ (R2.17)
𝑚
Note (4) In case 𝑉 < 𝑉 assume 𝑉 = 𝑉 (that is, the test days variance (𝑠( ) ) in the
formula (R2.12) = 0) and let the formula (R2.13) form 𝑠 ( ) = 𝑠 .
(4) Examples of the calculation of intermediate precision and repeatability by the replicate
test results on different days.
An example of repeatability test results on different days of citric acid-soluble phosphoric acid
using sample 1 and sample 2 containing phosphite is shown in Table 4. Conduct one-way analysis
of variance for the test results of respective samples to obtain the unbiased variance (V) of
respective variation factors (Table 5).
Examples of the calculation of intermediate precision and repeatability for the sample 1 and
sample 2 using the formula (R2.11) to the formula (R2.17) are shown in Table 6-1 and 6-2. In
addition, the results of respective standard deviation are expressed rounding to the digit of the
observed value and the results of the respective relative standard deviations are expressed rounding
to the first decimal place.
741
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
742
Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Separate sheet: The target of trueness and the criteria of precision in respective concentration
levels
The target of trueness (recovery rate) and the criteria of precision in respective concentration
levels to evaluate Chromatography (1) and test methods other than Chromatography are shown in
Table 1 and Table 2. The target of trueness is generally within the recovery rate of Table 1. As for
precision, the permissible level may exceed respective relative standard deviations in Table 2 by a
factor of 2.0.
743
Explanation of Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
“The Official Methods of the Analysis of Fertilizers” stipulated by the National Institute for
Agro-Environmental Sciences (currently the National Agriculture and Food Research
Organization) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (herein after referred to as
MAFF) is adopted for the MAFF Public Notices (Prescribing for the official specifications for
normal fertilizers pursuant to the Fertilizer Regulation Act, etc.) which prescribes the quality or
the labeling method of fertilizers, and contributes to maintaining the quality of and securing the
safety of fertilizers. On February 28, 2020, according to the amendment of these MAFF Public
Notices, “Testing Methods for fertilizers” were adopted as the official methods of analysis for
effective components, harmful components, etc., as stipulated by the Incorporated Administrative
Agency: Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (herein after referred to as “FAMIC”)
“Testing Methods for Fertilizers” collected simple testing methods using new analytical
instruments and the performance results of testing methods for new ingredients and fertilizers.
The contents were edited and made public by FAMIC based on the views of experts and MAFF
officers in the technical committee for fertilizers, etc. established at FAMIC.
In the course of editing the “Testing Methods for Fertilizes”, attention was paid to the
following amendment points to make the description easier to understand: Reagents and
instruments used should be clarified by specifying JIS standards, etc., certified standard solutions
and titrant have been revised for ease of use and operation flow sheets for respective testing
methods have been appended in order for analysts to work easily. In addition, a testing method
type specified by the validation level (Citrate-soluble phosphoric acid 4.2.3.a: Ex. Type B) and
its symbol indicating the amendment year or revision history (Citrate-soluble phosphoric acid
4.2.3.a: Ex. 4.2.3.a-2018 or C-P.a-2) were described in the “Summary”. Also, as for the testing
methods whose validation was conducted, the results of trueness and precision were listed in the
“Comments”.
In the “Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)”, as a result of the investigation and research
issues by FAMIC, (1) testing methods which were studied anew in FY2019 were added and (2)
the classification of the testing methods carried out in collaborative studies and whose validation
was confirmed by multiple laboratories were revised as Type B. In addition, (3) descriptions of
sampling methods and testing operation pointed out by the technical committee for fertilizers,
etc. were revised.
Explanation-1
Explanation of Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
In addition, information, such as consistency and revised contents between “Testing Methods
for Fertilizers (2020)’ and “Official Methods of Analysis of Fertilizers (1992)”, was put together
in the “Performance evaluation of the Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020) and comparison
Explanation-2
Explanation of Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Explanation-3
Explanation of Testing Methods for Fertilizers (2020)
Explanation-4