MATH 1023/24 Lecture Notes Chapter 1 - Sequences: 1 - Limit of Convergent Sequences
MATH 1023/24 Lecture Notes Chapter 1 - Sequences: 1 - Limit of Convergent Sequences
Chapter 1 - Sequences
𝑥1 + 𝑥 2 + … + 𝑥 𝑛
→ 𝐴.
𝑛
𝑥1 + … + 𝑥 𝑛 𝜖 𝜖 𝜖2 𝜖2
∈ (𝜖 + (1 − ) (𝐴 − 𝜖), 𝜖 + (1 − ) (𝐴 + 𝜖)) = (𝐴 − 𝜖 + , 𝐴 + 𝜖 − ) .
𝑛 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴
1
Proposition 1.3. The limit of a sequence is unique, and limits preserves the
four arithmetic operations (in particular, addition and multiplication).
Proof. For the readers to complete.
Example 1.3.1. We first present a simple but powerful result in proving results
related to polynomials or in which binomial theorem is involved:
𝑛𝑘 (𝑘 + 1)!𝑛𝑘 (𝑘 + 1)! 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑛 = = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅⋯⋅ → 0.
(𝑘+1 ) 𝑛 ⋅ (𝑛 − 1) ⋅ ⋯ ⋅ (𝑛 − 𝑘) 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛−1 𝑛−𝑘
𝑥1 + 𝑥 2 + … + 𝑥 𝑛
→ 𝐿 ∈ (−∞, +∞).
𝑛
𝑥𝑛+1 𝑆 𝑛 𝑆
= 𝑛+1 − ⋅ 𝑛 → 𝐿 − 1 ⋅ 𝐿 = 0.
𝑛+1 𝑛+1 𝑛+1 𝑛
∞ ∞
𝑘−1 𝑛 𝑛−1 1
(1 − 𝑥) ∏ (1 + 𝑥2 ) = lim (1 − 𝑥2 ) = 1 ⟹ ∏ (1 + 𝑥2 )= .
𝑘=1
𝑛→∞
𝑛=1
1−𝑥
Example 1.3.4. Suppose lim𝑛→∞ (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥𝑛−1 ) = 𝐴 ≠ 𝑘𝜋. Suppose that sin 𝑥𝑛 →
𝐿. Using the rotation matrix by the angle of 𝑥𝑛 −𝑥𝑛−1 (or equivalently trigonom-
etry identities), we get the following identities
′
sin 𝑥𝑛+1 = sin (𝑥𝑛+1 − 𝑥𝑛 ) cos 𝑥𝑛 +cos (𝑥𝑛+1 − 𝑥𝑛 ) sin 𝑥𝑛 . → 𝐿 = sin 𝐴⋅𝐿 +cos 𝐴⋅𝐿.
′
sin 𝑥𝑛−1 = sin 𝑥𝑛 cos (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥𝑛−1 )−cos 𝑥𝑛 sin (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥𝑛−1 ) . → 𝐿 = 𝐿⋅cos 𝐴−𝐿 ⋅sin 𝐴.
′ ′2
Since sin 𝑥𝑛 → 𝐿, we have cos 𝑥𝑛 → 𝐿 such that 𝐿2 + 𝐿 = 1. Substituting
the limits into the above identities, we get (by assuming the continuity of sine
and cosine functions)
′
𝐿 (1 − cos 𝐴) = 0; 𝐿 ⋅ sin 𝐴 = 0.
2
′
Since sin 𝐴 ≠ 0, then 1 − cos 𝐴 ≠ 0 and hence 𝐿 = 𝐿 = 0, which is impossible.
Therefore, sin 𝑥𝑛 must diverge whenever 𝐴 ≠ 𝑘𝜋.
Example 1.3.5. Suppose
1
𝑥𝑛+1 = 1 + , 𝑥 = 1.
1 + 𝑥𝑛 1
If the sequence {𝑥𝑛 } converges to a real number 𝐿, then 𝐿 > 0, and hence
1 √
𝐿=1+ ⟹ 𝐿 = 2.
1+𝐿
√
Let 𝜆𝑛 = ∣𝑥𝑛 − 2∣. Then
𝜆𝑛+1 √ 1
= ( 2 − 1) ⋅ .
𝜆𝑛 𝑥𝑛 + 1
√
We can then use induction to show that 𝑥2𝑛−1 < 𝑥2𝑛+1 < 2 < 𝑥2𝑛 < 𝑥2𝑛−2 .
This step is a standard but crucial step. This result implies 1 ≤ 𝑥𝑛 ≤ 32 , which
gives
√ 𝑛
2−1
𝜆𝑛 ≤ 2 ⋅ ( ) → 0.
2
√
Therefore, 𝑥𝑛 → 2, and we also estimated the speed of its convergence.
Proposition 1.4. Suppose 𝑎𝑛 ≤ 𝑏𝑛 ≤ 𝑐𝑛 for sufficiently large 𝑛, and 𝑎𝑛 , 𝑐𝑛 → 𝐴.
Then for sufficiently large 𝑛,
𝐴 − 𝜖 ≤ 𝑎𝑛 ≤ 𝑏𝑛 ≤ 𝑐𝑛 ≤ 𝐴 + 𝜖.
Therefore 𝑏𝑛 → 𝐴. The key is to use various techniques and tricks to find and
construct the binding convergent sequences {𝑎𝑛 } , {𝑐𝑛 }.
Example 1.4.1. Note that
Therefore, we have
1! + 2! + … + 𝑛! 2(𝑛 − 1)! + 𝑛! 2
1< < = + 1.
𝑛! 𝑛! 𝑛
(1!+2!+…+𝑛!)
By squeeze theorem, we get 𝑛! → 1.
3
Example 1.4.2. Suppose 𝑝(𝑛) is a polynomial of 𝑛 and 0 < 𝑎 < 1. Using the
result 1.3.1, we can show that 𝑝(𝑛)𝑎𝑛 → 0. Suppose 𝑎−1 = 1 + 𝐴, 𝐴 > 0, and
|𝑝(𝑛)| < 𝑛𝑘 for some large enough integer 𝑘. Note that
𝑛 𝑛𝑘
(1 + 𝐴)𝑛 > ( )𝐴𝑘+1 ⟹ 0 ≤ |𝑝(𝑛)| 𝑎𝑛 < 𝐴−(𝑘+1) ⋅ 𝑛 → 0.
𝑘+1 (𝑘+1)
4
𝑍𝛼 = {𝑛𝛼 − [𝑛𝛼] ∶ 𝑛 ∈ ℤ} .
Here, we also try to find a maximum distance as in 1.8, using pigeonhole prin-
ciple. Let 𝑚 be a positive integer. Then, there must exist distinct 𝑖 < 𝑗 ∈
{1, 2, … , 𝑚 + 1} such that, for some 𝑘 ∈ {1, 2, … , 𝑚}, we have
𝑘−1 𝑘
≤ 𝑖𝛼 − [𝑖𝛼], 𝑗𝛼 − [𝑗𝛼] < .
𝑚 𝑚
This implies that any two elements from the subset of 𝑍𝛼 , 𝑍𝛼𝑚 =
{𝑛 ((𝑗 − 𝑖)𝛼 − [(𝑗 − 𝑖)𝛼]) ∶ 𝑛 ∈ ℤ}, are less than 𝑚−1 apart in distance.
Suppose 0 ≤ 𝑐 < 𝑑 < 1, then we build a corresponding 𝑍𝛼𝑚 using a suitable,
large enough 𝑚 such that 𝑚−1 < |𝑑 − 𝑐|. Then, there exists 𝛽 ∈ 𝑍𝛼𝑚 ⊂ 𝑍𝛼 such
that 𝛽 ∈ (𝑐, 𝑑). This shows the density of 𝑍𝛼 in [0, 1).
Example 1.9.1. Consider the sequence {sin(𝑛)}. We claim that 𝐿𝐼𝑀 {sin(𝑛)} =
[−1, 1].
This directly follows from the above example. To see why, draw a unit circle
𝜔. Observe that it is sufficient (by using the continuity of sine function) to
show that for any radius vector v pointing from the origin 𝑂 to a point on 𝜔,
there is a sequence of radius vectors corresponding to the sequence {sin(𝑛)}
𝑛
that approaches it. In rigorous language, the set { 2𝜋 𝑚𝑜𝑑 1} is dense in [0, 1)
(number of cycles), which is given by 1.8.
2
(2𝑛)!! 1
𝑎𝑛 = [ ] ⋅ .
(2𝑛 − 1)!! 2𝑛 + 1
Therefore, the sequence converges. This is the sequence in the Wallis formula.
Example 2.1.3. Suppose
5
𝑚
1
𝑆𝑚 = ∑ 𝑝
, 𝑝 > 1.
𝑛=1
𝑛
1 1 1 1
𝑆2𝑚 −1 ≤ 1 + 𝑝
⋅ 2 + 𝑝 ⋅ 4 + ⋯ + (𝑚−1)𝑝 ⋅ 2𝑚−1 = 1 + 𝑟 + 𝑟2 + … + 𝑟𝑚−1 < .
2 4 2 1−𝑟
1 𝑛
𝑒𝑛 = (1 + ) .
𝑛
𝑛+1
1 𝑛 𝑛 (1 + 𝑛1 ) + 1 1 𝑛+1
𝑒𝑛 = 1 ⋅ (1 + ) < [ ] = (1 + ) = 𝑒𝑛+1 .
𝑛 𝑛+1 𝑛+1
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑛 1 𝑛! 𝑛(𝑛 − 1) ⋯ (𝑛 − 𝑗 + 1)
𝑒𝑛 = ∑ ( ) 𝑗 = ∑ 𝑗
= 2 + ∑ .
𝑗=0
𝑗 𝑛 𝑗=0
(𝑛 − 𝑗)!𝑗!𝑛 𝑗=2
𝑗!𝑛𝑗
Note that
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑛(𝑛 − 1) ⋯ (𝑛 − 𝑗 + 1) 1 1 𝑗−1 1 1
∑ = ∑ (1 − ) ⋯ (1 − ) < ∑ < ∑ < 1.
𝑗=2
𝑗!𝑛𝑗 𝑗=2
𝑗! 𝑛 𝑛 𝑗=2
𝑗! 𝑗=2
𝑗(𝑗 − 1)
1 𝑛
𝑒 ≔ lim 𝑒𝑛 = lim (1 + ) .
𝑛→∞ 𝑛→∞ 𝑛
6
To see this, we only need to see that both {𝑥2𝑛 } and {𝑥2𝑛−1 } follow the same
difference equation,√and hence they have the same limit. Therefore, the sequence
{𝑥𝑛 } converges to 2.
Example 2.1.6. Suppose 𝑎1 > 𝑏1 > 0, and
2𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑛
𝑎𝑛+1 = ,𝑏 = √𝑎𝑛+1 𝑏𝑛 .
𝑎𝑛 + 𝑏𝑛 𝑛+1
Using induction, it is easy to see that 𝑏1 < 𝑏2 < 𝑎2 < 𝑎1 ⟹ 𝑏𝑛 < 𝑏𝑛+1 <
𝑎𝑛+1 < 𝑎𝑛 . Suppose 𝑎𝑛 → 𝐴, 𝑏𝑛 → 𝐵, then
2𝐴𝐵
𝐴= , 𝐴𝐵 ≠ 0 ⟹ 𝐴 = 𝐵.
𝐴+𝐵
∞
1 1 1
𝑒=∑ = 1 + 1 + + + ….
𝑛=0
𝑛! 2! 3!
First, using theorem 2.1, the series on RHS converges. Now we prove the equal-
ity.
We notice that the terms are kind of familiar to us, as they appear in our
derivation of the upper bound for 𝑒 in 2.1.4. To show the above proposition,
use that
1 𝑛 𝑚
1 1 𝑘−1 1 𝑚 𝑚
1 1 𝑘−1
(1 + ) > 2+∑ (1 − ) ⋯ (1 − ), (1 + ) < 2+∑ (1 − ) ⋯ (1 − ).
𝑛 𝑘=2
𝑘! 𝑛 𝑛 𝑚 𝑘=2
𝑘! 𝑛 𝑛
Using proposition 1.5, by pushing 𝑛 → ∞, the first inequality shows that for
𝑚 1
any given 𝑚, 𝑒 ≥ ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! . By letting 𝑚 → ∞ and apply 1.5 again, we get
∞ 1
𝑒 ≥ ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! .
1𝑚
The second inequality shows, by pushing 𝑛 → ∞, that 𝑒𝑚 ≤ ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! , which is
∞ 1
now independent of 𝑛. By letting 𝑚 → ∞, we get 𝑒 ≤ ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! . Therefore, we
∞ 1
get 𝑒 = ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! .
We may also want to bound the error term. In fact, we have
Proposition 2.3. For any 𝑚,
7
𝑚
1 1 1
<𝑒−∑ < .
(𝑚 + 1)! 𝑘=0
𝑘! 𝑚!𝑚
𝑚 1 ∞ 1
Proof. Just directly compute 𝑒 − ∑𝑘=0 𝑘! = ∑𝑘=𝑚+1 𝑘! and see
𝑛 𝑛−𝑚−1
1 1 1 𝑚+1 1
∑ < ∑ 𝑗
< × = .
𝑘=𝑚+1
𝑘! 𝑗=0
(𝑚 + 1)!(𝑚 + 1) (𝑚 + 1)! 𝑚 𝑚!𝑚
1 1 𝜃 𝑚
𝑒 − (1 + 1 + +…+ )= 𝑚 , < 𝜃𝑚 < 1.
2! 𝑚! 𝑚!𝑚 𝑚 + 1
1
We can get a much better estimation by adding the term 𝑚!𝑚 to our estimation.
To show this, we would need the following identity
1 1 1 1 1
1+1+ +…+ + =3− −⋯− .
2! 𝑚! 𝑚!𝑚 2! ⋅ 1 ⋅ 2 𝑚!(𝑚 − 1)𝑚
1 1 1 1 1 1
− = , − = .
𝑚!(𝑚 − 1) 𝑚!𝑚 𝑚!(𝑚 − 1)𝑚 𝑚!(𝑚 − 1) (𝑚 − 1)!(𝑚 − 1) 𝑚!
This shows
∞
1
𝑒=3−∑ .
𝑘=2
𝑘!(𝑘 − 1)𝑘
Hence
∞
1 1 1 1
∣𝑒 − (1 + 1 + +…+ + )∣ = ∑ .
2! 𝑚! 𝑚!𝑚 𝑘=𝑚+1
𝑘!(𝑘 − 1)𝑘
𝑛 𝑛
1 1 1 1 1 2
∑ < − ∑ < − = .
𝑘=𝑚+1
𝑘!(𝑘 − 1)𝑘 (𝑚 + 1)!𝑚 𝑘=𝑚+1 (𝑘 + 1)! (𝑚 + 1)!𝑚 (𝑚 + 2)! (𝑚 + 2)!𝑚
8
Proposition 2.4. 𝑒 is irrational.
𝑝
Proof. If not, then 𝑒 = 𝑞 for some coprime (positive) integers 𝑝, 𝑞 where 𝑞 ≠ 1.
Then
𝑝 1 1
= (1 + 1 + + … + ) + 𝜖𝑞 .
𝑞 2! 𝑞!
Therefore, by multiplying on both sides 𝑞!, we get 𝑞!𝜖𝑞 must be an integer (since
it is the difference between two integers). However,
1 1
0 < 𝜖𝑞 < ⟹ 0 < 𝑞!𝜖𝑞 < < 1.
𝑞!𝑞 𝑞
This means 𝑞!𝜖𝑞 can never be an integer, contradictory to our assumption that
𝑒 is rational. The above technique is often used in proving similar arguments in
similar situations.
Selected exercises for Section 1 & 2
Exercise 1. Show that
2𝑛 1 𝑥∈ℚ
lim { lim [cos(𝜋𝑚!𝑥)] } = { .
𝑚→∞ 𝑛→∞ 0 𝑥 ∈ ℚ𝑐
2𝑛
We call the function 𝐷(𝑥) = lim𝑚→∞ {lim𝑛→∞ [cos(𝜋𝑚!𝑥)] } Dirichlet’s func-
tion.
𝑥𝑛
Exercise 2. (a) Suppose lim𝑛→∞ (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥𝑛−1 ) = 𝑑. Show that 𝑛 → 𝑑.
𝑥 √
(b) Suppose 𝑥𝑛 > 0 and lim𝑛→∞ 𝑥𝑛+1 = 𝐿. Show that lim𝑛→∞ 𝑛 𝑥
𝑛 = 𝐿.
𝑛
𝑐𝑛
(c) Suppose 𝑎𝑛 → 𝛼, 𝑏𝑛 → 𝛽, 𝑐𝑛 = 𝑎0 𝑏𝑛 + … + 𝑎𝑛 𝑏0 . Show that 𝑛 → 𝛼𝛽.
Exercise 3. (a) Prove the following generalization of 1.2. Suppose 𝑎𝑛 → +∞
and is strictly increasing, and
𝑏𝑛 − 𝑏𝑛−1
lim = 𝐿 ∈ [−∞, +∞].
𝑛→∞ 𝑎𝑛 − 𝑎𝑛−1
Then
𝑏𝑛
lim = 𝐿.
𝑛→∞ 𝑎𝑛
(b) Compute
9
1 𝑛 𝑛
lim ∑ ln ( ).
𝑛→∞ 𝑛2 𝑘
𝑘=0
Exercise 5. Let
1 𝑛+1
𝑏𝑛 = (1 + ) .
𝑛
1 1 1
< ln (1 + ) < .
𝑛+1 𝑛 𝑛
(c) By using 𝑏𝑛 and 𝑒𝑛 and showing that they have the same limit, one can
give an alternative proof to the existence of 𝑒. Use a similar technique to show
𝑐𝑛 = 𝐻𝑛 − ln 𝑛 converges.
(d) Show that
𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
< ln (1 + ) < .
𝑛+𝑘 𝑛 𝑛
1 1 1 (−1)𝑛−1
𝑢𝑛 = 1 − + − +…+ .
2 3 4 𝑛
(b) Show that 𝑢2𝑛 = 𝑎𝑛 , where 𝑎𝑛 = 𝐻2𝑛 − 𝐻𝑛 . Hence find the limit of {𝑢𝑛 }.
10
Exercise 8. (*) (a) Show that
1 1 𝑛 𝑒
< 𝑒 − (1 + ) < .
2𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
(b) Show that there exists 𝐵 > 0 independent of 𝑛 such that, for sufficiently
large 𝑛,
1 1
∣𝑛2 (ln (1 + ) − )∣ ≤ 𝐵.
𝑛 𝑛
In other words,
1 1 1
ln (1 + ) = + 𝑂( 2).
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑏
𝑎𝑒 + = 𝑐.
𝑒
1 1 𝑛
Exercise 10. (a) Compute lim𝑛→∞ (1 + 𝑛 + 𝑛2 ) .
𝑛
(b) Show that lim𝑛→∞ √
𝑛
𝑛!
= 𝑒 using exercise 1(a). Then show again using
exercise 1(b).
1
(c) Use (b) or exercise 2(a), compute lim𝑛→∞ (𝑛!) 𝑛2 .
(d) Compute
1 2 𝑛
lim (1 + 2
) (1 + 2 ) … (1 + 2 ).
𝑛→∞ 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑛
1
lim ∏ (1 + ).
𝑛→∞
𝑘=1
𝑎𝑘
𝐾𝑛+1
lim = 𝑒.
𝑛→∞ 𝐾𝑛
11
𝑒𝐻 𝑛
Hint: Use 𝑛 → 𝑒𝛾 .
(g) It is known that lim𝑛→∞ 𝑛 sin 𝑛𝜋 = 𝜋. Use this and 2.3 to show that
Exercise 11. Let 𝑃 (𝑥) and 𝑄(𝑥) be two non-constant polynomials of the same
degree and assume that 𝑃 (0)𝑄(0) ≠ 0. Suppose {𝑎𝑛 } , {𝑏𝑛 } are sequences of
positive numbers such that
𝑎𝑛+1 𝑃 ( 𝑎𝑏𝑛 ) 𝑏
lim = 𝐿, 𝑎𝑛+1 = 𝑛
, 𝑏𝑛+1 = 𝑛 .
𝑛→∞ 𝑎𝑛 𝑄 ( 𝑎𝑏𝑛 ) 𝑎𝑛
𝑛
Show that 𝐿 = 1.
Exercise 12. (*) To compute the exact limit of is often much more complicated
as it may involve finding the closed form for the sequences using various tricks
and techniques.
Consider the sequences {𝑎𝑛 } , {𝑏𝑛 } in 2.1.6. In this exercise, we find a closed
form of the two sequences using trigonometric substitution.
𝑏𝑛
Let 𝑐𝑛 = 𝑏𝑛+1 .
2
(a) Show that 𝑐𝑛 = 2𝑐𝑛+1 − 1.
(b) Let 𝜃 = arccos ( 𝑎𝑏1 ). Note that 𝜃 = 2 arccos (√ 𝑎12𝑎+𝑏1 ). Show that 𝑐𝑛 =
1 1
cos ( 2𝜃𝑛 ).
√
(c) Use lim𝑛→∞ 𝑛 sin 𝑛𝜋 = 𝜋 to show that 𝑎𝑛 , 𝑏𝑛 → 𝜋 when 𝑎1 = 2 3, 𝑏1 = 3.
3 - Iteration
In this section, we consider sequences of the form 𝑎𝑛+1 = 𝑓(𝑎𝑛 ), where 𝑓 ∶ 𝐼 → ℝ
is a function that is independent of 𝑛.
The following proposition summarizes the relation between monotonicity of 𝑓
and the sequence.
Proposition 3.1. Suppose {𝑥𝑛 } ∶ 𝑥𝑛+1 = 𝑓 (𝑥𝑛 ), and 𝑓 is monotone on 𝐼. If
𝑥𝑛 ∈ 𝐼, ∀𝑛, then
(1) when 𝑓 is monotone increasing, {𝑥𝑛 } is monotone, and
(2) when 𝑓 is monotone decreasing, {𝑥2𝑛 } , {𝑥2𝑛−1 } are monotone sequences with
opposite monotonicity.
12
Proof. We only show (1) since 𝑓 ∘ 𝑓 in (2) is monotone increasing. While (1) is
trivial using mathematical induction: if 𝑥1 ≤ 𝑓 (𝑥1 ) = 𝑥2 , then 𝑥3 = 𝑓 (𝑥2 ) ≤
𝑓 (𝑥1 ) = 𝑥2 .
Example 3.2. Let 𝐴 > 0, 𝑥1 > 0, and
1 𝐴
𝑥𝑛+1 = (𝑥𝑛 + ).
2 𝑥𝑛
√
By induction, 𝑥𝑛 > 𝐴. Then
√ 2
√ 1 𝐴 √ 1 (𝑥𝑛 − 𝐴) 1 √
𝑥𝑛+1 − 𝐴 = (𝑥𝑛 + − 2 𝐴) = ⋅ ≤ (𝑥𝑛 − 𝐴) .
2 𝑥𝑛 2 𝑥𝑛 2
√
This shows 𝑥𝑛 → 𝐴 and gives us an estimate on its speed. Moreover,
√ 2
√ 1 (𝑥𝑛 − 𝐴) 1 √ 2
𝑥𝑛+1 − 𝐴= ⋅ ≤ √ ⋅ (𝑥𝑛 − 𝐴) .
2 𝑥𝑛 2 𝐴
𝑥𝑛 (𝑥2𝑛 + 3𝐴)
𝑥𝑛+1 = .
3𝑥2𝑛 + 𝐴
√
Show that it indeed estimates 𝐴 and estimate the speed of its convergence.
2
Exercise 2. Suppose 𝑦0 ≥ 2, 𝑦𝑛 = 𝑦𝑛−1 − 2. Let
1 1 1
𝑆𝑛 = + +…+ .
𝑦0 𝑦0 𝑦1 𝑦0 𝑦1 ⋯ 𝑦 𝑛
Show that
𝑦0 − √𝑦02 − 4
lim 𝑆𝑛 = .
𝑛→∞ 2
Hint: let 𝑦0 = 𝑎 + 𝑎−1 for some 𝑎, and use repeatedly the following telescoping
trick for product
13
1 𝑎2𝑁 − 𝑎−2𝑁
𝑎𝑁 + 𝑁
= 𝑁 .
𝑎 𝑎 − 𝑎−𝑁
14