Repudiation
Repudiation
A party commits the breach of repudiation when, by words or conduct, and without lawful
excuse, manifests an unequivocal intention no longer to be bound by the contract or by any
obligation forming part of the contract
This includes a denial of the existence of the contract, a refusal to perform or to accept
performance and the notification of inability to perform
The test is whether the party accused of repudiation has acted in such a manner as to lead
a reasonable person to believe that they do not intend to fulfil or completely fulfil their
part of the contract
If a party misunderstands the true content, meaning or effect of a contract, and in good
faith disputes their obligations under the contract, their conduct will constitute a
repudiation of the agreement if it satisfies the test above
Repudiation can be considered to be an anticipatory breach as it may occur before the time
stipulated for performance
The breach is anticipatory as it also anticipates or predicts some form of another breach
A party who gives notice in advance of the due date that they will not make or accept
the stipulated performance, or that performance will be late, defective or incomplete,
thereby gives notice that they will commit some form of a breach such as mora
debitoris
Repudiation may also occur on or after the due date for performance, in which case it will
often merely reinforce one of the other forms of breach
This is because having initially elected to uphold the contract and thereby having
afforded the repudiator an opportunity to repent, the innocent party may subsequently
cancel if the repudiator persists in their refusal to be bound by the contract
Repudiation 1
For the repentance principle to apply, it is sufficient that the innocent party
reasonably perceives that the defaulting party will not remedy its breach despite
having been given the opportunity to do so, no further act of repudiation is required
If that breach were to materialise and it would merit rescission of the contract, the
innocent party may forthwith rescind on account of the repudiation
Where the contract prescribes a procedure to be followed before the contract may be
rescinded for breach, the innocent party is not obligated to follow this procedure before
cancelling when the breach takes the form of repudiation
The guilty party cannot have it both ways; having repudiated the contract, they may not
seek refuge in one of its terms
When the innocent party has the right to rescind and elects to exercise it by accepting the
repudiation, the contract comes to an end upon the communication of this decision to the
other party and the usual consequences of recession ensue
Affirmation of the contract (rejection of the repudiation)
The innocent party is not obligated to accept the repudiation, if they prefer, they may ignore
or reject it and hold and other party to the agreement
Repudiation 2
If the repudiation is rejected, the innocent party does not have an immediate claim for specific
performance or damages
The innocent party’s own duty to perform is suspended for the duration of the repudiation,
provided that the innocent party makes the repudiating party aware that they are at all times
willing and able to perform should the latter chance their mind
This would not count in cases where the repudiation occurs prior to the due date for
performance as to accelerate such date would be to make a new contract for the parties
Repudiation 3