Cost & Schedule Monitoring and Control
Cost & Schedule Monitoring and Control
Construction
Management
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1
Cost &
Schedule
Monitoring
and Control
2
25/12/2023
Earned Value (EV) also defined as the Budgeted Cost of Worked Performed (BCWP) helps to
compute Performance Indices of a Project (Cost and Schedule Performance Indexes)
A ratio less than one indicates excess A ratio of less than one indicates the project
spending, and greater than one indicates is lagging. In contrast, greater than one
better utilization of money. indicates more work done in the scheduled
time.
4
25/12/2023
BCWS - Budget Cost of Work Schedule = (% of Planned Work to be Performed x Budget Cost)
BCWP - Budget Cost of Work Performed = (% of Work Performed x Budget)
ACWP - Actual Cost of Work Performed = (Actual Cost of Work Performed as per Accounting
Records)
CPI = (BCWP / ACWP) ; CPI = ( EV/AC) SPI = (BCWP / BCWS) ; SPI = ( EV/PV )
6
25/12/2023
Project Budget
Deadline
Actual Cost of Work
Performed (ACWP)
Budget Cost of Work
COST
Schedule (BCWS)
PV
Cost Variance AC
EV Schedule Variance
TIME
CASE STUDY
Given the Project data below and the Planned S-Curve, what is the status of the Project if Activities 1.1
and 1.2 are 100% complete at the end of 3rd month with Activity 1.3 actual cost incurred amounting to
190,500.00?
Duration % Work
Item No. Site Budget Rel. Wt. M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Actual Cost
(mos.) Completed
86.76% 100.00%
WP1
73.53%
Start
61.37%
Activity 1.1 1 130,000 15.29% 130,000 100.00% 125,000
Activity 1.2 2 185,000 21.76% 38.33%
92,500 92,500 100.00% 180,000
Activity 1.3 3 310,000 36.47% 103,333.33 103,333.33 103,333.33 60.00% 190,500
15.29%
Activity 1.4 2 225,000 26.47% 112,500 112,500
0.00%
End
Total 850,000 100.00%
Duration M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6
Monthly Cost - 130,000 195,833 195,833 103,333 112,500 112,500
% Monthly 0.00% 15.29% 23.04% 23.04% 12.16% 13.24% 13.24%
Cumulative Cost - 130,000 325,833 521,667 625,000 737,500 850,000
% Cumulative 0.00% 15.29% 38.33% 61.37% 73.53% 86.76% 100.00%
8
25/12/2023
CASE STUDY
WP1
Start
Activity 1.1 130,000 1 100% 100% 125,000
Activity 1.2 185,000 2 100% 100% 180,000
Activity 1.3 310,000 3 60% 190,500
Activity 1.4 225,000 2
End
TOTAL 850,000
CASE STUDY
SV = BCWP - BCWS = EV - PV
BCWP = % work completed x budget
Activity 1.1: SV = 130,000-130,000 = 0.00
Activity 1.1: BCWP = 100% x 130,000 = 130,000
Activity 1.2: SV = 185,000-185,000 = 0.00
Activity 1.2: BCWP = 100% x 185,000 = 185,000
Activity 1.3: CV = 186,000-206,667 = - 20,667
Activity 1.3: BCWP = 60% x 310,000 = 186,000
10
25/12/2023
CASE STUDY
WP1
Start
Activity 1.1 130,000 1 100% 130,000 100% 130,000 125,000 5,000 0.00
Activity 1.2 185,000 2 100% 185,000 100% 185,000 180,000 5,000 0.00
Activity 1.3 310,000 3 66.67% 206,667 60% 186,000 190,500 (4,500) (20,667)
Activity 1.4 225,000 2
End
TOTAL 850,000 521,667 501,000 495,500 5,500 (20,667)
11
CASE STUDY
12
25/12/2023
WP1
Start
Activity 1.1 130,000 1
Activity 1.2 185,000 2 100% 130,000 100% 130,000 125,000 5,000 0.00 1.04 1.00
Activity 1.3 310,000 3 100% 185,000 100% 185,000 180,000 5,000 0.00 1.03 1.00
Activity 1.4 225,000 2 66.67% 206,667 60% 186,000 190,500 (4,500) (20,667) 0.98 0.90
End
TOTAL 850,000 521,667 501,000 495,500 5,500 (20,667) 1.01 0.96
Cost and Schedule Performance Index: CPI > 1 and SPI <1.0
The Project is WITHIN BUDGET and the Work Performed is BEHIND Schedule
13
14
25/12/2023
3. Imagine that the project you are handling is starting to fall behind schedule or exceed the project’s budget.
What actions would you take?
o Conduct a thorough analysis to identify the root cause of the delays or budget overruns.
o Communicate with the team and stakeholders to discuss possible solutions and implement corrective
actions immediately.
o All of the above
15
16
25/12/2023
PDM Network
17